ML20082L137
| ML20082L137 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 07/31/1991 |
| From: | OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20082L136 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9109030251 | |
| Download: ML20082L137 (97) | |
Text
- - - .
FORT CALHOUN STATIOl\
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS JULY 1991 gm _
F*Ng {E , .
1 __
llllM f
/
Prepared by:
Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group I
9 hwd of wice%a w wn, audink,...
d twsk wisdorn, wnd sowndjudynenl...
d w a, ybk,, cwawdoing, corrnandanenl...
d w a, way, of QL,...d w dobng, ikjob gal lh ,bl 6, wyuj, 6. Jl w twns-diuxM, el ik wdL q udeund, p w wim,, a w a w n, f e w e a - d n ws an, wnd iG pa wnd $%hnin, asc_ p % tu,,u w y peuin,, uljud bn, dn&ng, ik ?qu LUay.
Jaana. ).6%ner
OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT Prepared By:
Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group i
July 1991
e ABSTRACT PURPOSE The
- Performance Indicators Program"is intended to provido selected Fort Calhoun plant perfor-mance information to OPPD's personnel responsible for optimizing unit performance. The information is presented in a way that provides ready identification of trends and a means to track progress toward reaching corporate goals. The information can be used for assessing and monitoring Fort Calhoun's plant performance, with emphasis on safety and reliability. Some performance indicators show company goals or industry information. This information can be used for comparison or as a means of promoting pride and motivation.
SCOPE The conditions, goals, and projections reflected within this report are current as of the end of the month being reported, unless otherwise stated.
In order for the Performance indicator Program to be effective, the following guidelines were followed while implementing the program:
- 1) Select data which most effectively monitors Fort Calhoun's performance in key areas.
- 2) include established corporate goals and industry information for comparison.
l- 3) Develop formal definitions for each performance parameter. This will ensure consistency in l 'i.ure reports and allow comparison with industry averages where appropriate.
Comments and input are encouraged to ensure that this program is tailored to address the areas which are most meaningful to the people using the report. Please refer comments to the Test and Performance Group. To increase personnel awareness of Fort Calhoun Station's plant performance, it is suggested that this report be distributed throughout your respective departments.
REFERENCES i INPO Good practices OA-102, " Performance Monitoring - Management information" iNPO Report Dated November 1984," Nuclear Power Plant Operational Data" NUMARC 87-00," Guidelines and Technical Bases for NUMARC Initiatives Addressing Station Blackout at Light Water Reactors", Revision 1, Appendix D,"EDG Reliability Program" dated April 6,1990.
I L
l l
Table of Contents INDUSTRY KEY PARAMETERS EAGE WNffTRY UPPER p,ffQ, QgQ g M TH!S LORH LAST LORH FORCED OUTAGE RATE .. . 0 25% .. .. 2 4% .. .11.9% .. .119% .. ,2 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL . . o .. .. .o . . . .0... .. o .. .3 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS - (INPO DEFINITION) .. ...o .. .. o _. .0- ...o . .4 GROSS HEAT RATE... . . . . . . . . . . . . 9.935 .. 10.250... ~.10.444 . .10.555.. .6 EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR.. . 82 5% .. .69% . 92 25% . . 94 B% . 7 FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR- o 04 . .1 4 . .1 89 .. ...o 576,. .8 PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE).. I f4 . . .. 75 .. .. 34 . .29i _ 9 VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOllD RADIOACTIVE WASTE . , 3.072 . . . 4.500.. .517 6.. . 5176 .10 DlSABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE .. ~0-. .. o 31.. . 0 32 .. .. c.39.. .11 OPERATIONS STATION NET GENERATON . .1 FORCED OUTAGE RATE . .2 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL.. .3 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS -(INPO DEFINITION). .4 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACT'JATIONS - (NRC DEFINITION) . .5 GROSS HEAT RATE. . . .6 EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR.. . . . . .7 FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR . . . . .8 DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT . .12 EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS . .13 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET.. .14 DOCUMENT REVIEW.. .15 MAINTENANCE EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABILITY . .16 DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (25 DEMANDS) . .17 AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON. OUTAGE) . .18 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NONOUTAGE) . .19 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON-OUTAGE).. . 20 RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE (NO'lOUTAGE) . . 21 i
l.
\ .
MAINTENANCE (cont'd) E6Df.
PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE . . . 22 NUMBER OF OUT OF-SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS. . . .. .. 23 MAINTEN ANCE OVERTIME .. .. . 24 PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLlANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE) . . 25 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVE NON-OU1 AGE MAINTENANC,E). . . 26 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE) . . 27 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (PRESSURE EQUIPMENT).. . 28 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (GENERAL MAINTEN ANCE) . . 29 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE) . . 30 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (INSTRUMENTATON & CONTROL) . . 31 NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS . . 32 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DAT A SYSTEMS (NPRDS) REPORTABLE FAILURES.. . . . 33 MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS .. . . . 34 CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE . . . . . . 35 CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION PERSONNEL RADIATON EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE).. . .9 VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOL!D RADIOACTIVE WASTE . . .10 SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY . . 36 PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT . . 37 AUXILIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATON LIMITS . .. .- . . 3 8 IN LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT OF. SERVICE , . . . .39 u HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED . . . .. . .40 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATON EXPOSURE.. . . . 41 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATONS ... . , .. . .. . 42 DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA . ... . 43 RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM.. . 44 NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS . . ,
.45 GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT. . 46 LOUID RADOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT.. . 47 SECURITY LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY) . .48 SECURITY INCIDENT BREAKDOWN . .49 SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES . . 50 il l
MATERIALS AND OUTSIDE SERVICES EACE AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAIT!NG PARTS (NON OUTAGE) . . 51 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE . . . 52 SPARE PARTS ISSUED _.. . 52 INVENTORY ACCURACY.. . . . , . 53 STOCKOUT RATE . . 53 EXPEDITED PURCHASES . . 54 INVOICE BREAKDOWN.. . . 55 MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING . . . 55 DESIGN ENGINEERING OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS .. . . 56 TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING) . . 57 OUTSTANDING ENLilNEERING ASSISTANCE REQUESTS (E ARs) . . 58 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS . . 59 ENUllNEERING CHANGE NOTICE BREAKDOWN . . 60 INDUSTRI AL S AFETY DIS ABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE. . .11 RECORDABLE INJURY /lLLNESS CASES FREQUENCY RATE . . . _ . , . 61 HUMAN RESO'JRCES NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LERs . . 62 STAFFING LEVEL.. . . . 63 PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE . . .
. 63 TRAINING AND 00'LIFICATION SRO AND RO LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO . ,. 64 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS . . 65 HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS . . 66 TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS .. . 67 TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING . . 68 Bffj)ELING OUTAGE MWO OVERALL STA'US (CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE).. . 69 PROGRESS OF CYCLE 14 OUTAGE MODIFICATION PLANNING., . 70 OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE) . . 71 QUALITY ASSURANCE VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS . . 72 iii j i
O QUAllTY ASSURANCE (cont'd) EAGE COMPARISON OF VIOLATONS AMONG REGION IV PLANTS . . 73 CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCVs (TWELVE. MONTH RUNNING TOTAL) . . 74 OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS . . . . 75 OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS . . 76 CARS ISSUED vs. SIGNIF. CARS vs NRC VIOLATIONS ISSUED vs LERs REPORTED . . 77 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS . .
?;;
SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM IWDEX . . 85 REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST , _ . . 87 SUMM ARY SECTION ADVERSE TREND REPORT . . , . 88 INDICATORS NEED!NG INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTON REPORT . . . . . 88 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT IMPROVEMENTS / CHANGES . . 88
- Net Generation (10,000 Mw hours) 50-
]
'40-34.61 a;r::
31.27 MW
.kT s 30- 28.03 w,
Ws .~ 27.9 L' +
26.89 27.26 SM 26.94 - C, y% @@ M.. 25.68 ysy $4 INV- iy 2
,g 24.76 # g .. 24.23 137 g W Q=?i qs w QQ:i a
9: 4 E.!M ! ,.
, p g .93 ,, Q(:.
ns f:E -
e%:-,
'_ , i38 ?? % g
- 3 XT gf,' '
q, ' t: y ;-hjp 20- g> .s < Ois? ~
h W 4s 44 p" Sc "G
, 3> 4Y m .s k ~; '
i% @t gy cyg
& QR. wr
< tu py
~ 'fy 16.36 gg W^f'A gg 4 f** ,g'w -
N@' y we Gr.
V:w @fqph n$
h+d:
T py%e GwG M S e Uyey j$pd ~u Q
Wx@n4%
s QQjk-: hp: . u , <
f %s 2 y. W??
%f Qf*
[9:bl um p aA 10- ay %a m%w 6 M;;&
%my ,
Mh['L p
)13%s, Wa y
4.pwy iY
!Q:(d!
4:e x If}i . u bh s~ . s .
}+ ki g% a MwY:
gqfy:
yy RfM 4:w gs
$$s.+.
.a
$ mc yfs , p.x ,s p s .-Qy%) su g
a
- gw.- y
- + pu gt QM MDp M#' epm
- @ 12 w y%. "* Q'i %p$p[n s
Q)E. $$dW W$y :# i "ht?y!p A fni,a s
- A ;wh
- a .
-w ug et 2 y.
p s Pt e -N. pgw+ -a
.i ' ' M, !,1, p,
.kJNp 243d og
,dy$$
e.a sp de a
MA y@M
_ 3 y y -
MKi .%,f:$ YY ,p A it" Id [ kw.:.hsl NMI %,%$l; MS (wjvdh ((1 0 4 b 4 khh 1 4 hif 4
i' s;fkk d
i h
i h( i
^bkh I
5 4
Nkk b i l Aug90 Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Ju!91 STATION NET GENERATION This indicator shows the net generation of the Fort Calhoun Station for the reporting month.
During the month of July 1991, a net total of 346,100 MWH was generated by the Fort Calhoun Station.
Data Source: Station Generation Report Adverse Trend: None i
I 1
- Forced Outage Rate
-O- Fort Calhoun Goal (2.4%)
15%- >
-O- Industry Upper 10 Percentile (0.25%)
12%-
9.7 - GOOD 9%-
V 6%-
3%-
2: 1.4 -C O- -O O O O O O O O O O O
i i i 8
I I I I
'88 '89 '90.- 0%Aug90 Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb ~ Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 i
! FORCED OUTAGE RATE The forced outage rate was reported as 11.9% for the 'ast twelve months.
To achieve the Fort Calhoun Station forced outage rate goal of 2.4%, the plant cannot L be forced off-line more than 19 hours2.199074e-4 days <br />0.00528 hours <br />3.141534e-5 weeks <br />7.2295e-6 months <br /> for the remainder of _1991 l
l- Note:If no forced outages occur, the 12 month average Forced Outage Rate will remain t constant at.11.9% until August when it will decrease due to the August 1990 forced L outaga being deleted from the 12 month interval.
1.
L Data Source: NERC_ GAD Forms -
i Adverse Trend: None l
2 L -
'3- -
--O- Fort Calhoun Goal.
l
-O- Industry Upper 10 Percentile
2-l o ,
i 1- C O O O n !
, ', , , io O,O,O,O,O',m ,O,O,O,O,O,O,
'87'88'89 '90 Aug90 Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan .Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jut 91 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL i
l There were no unplanned automatic reactor scrams in July 1991. The last unplanned L automatic reactor scram occurred on July 2,1986.
The 1991 goal for unplanned automatic reactor scrams while critical has been set at
.zero.
The industry upper ten percentile value is zero scrams per unit on an annual basis. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper ten percentile of nuclear power plants in this area.
i l- Data Source: Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs) l LAdverse Trend: None 3
1 _.
3-M Safety Systern Actuations
-O- Fort Calhoun Goal
-O- Industry Upper 10 Percentile 2- GOOD V
1 --
0 0 ri i i 0--C i D r-C i C i D r-G i D r-D r-D r-G i O i D,
'88 '89 '90 Aug90 Sept Oct Nc! Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUAT ONS -(INPO DEFINITION)
There were no unplanned safety system actuations during the month of July 1991.
The 199j goal for the number of unplanned safety system actuations is zerc.
The industry upper ten percentile value for the number of unplanned safety system actuations per yearis zero. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper ten percentile of nuclear power plants for this indicator.
Data Source: Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)
Adverse Trend: None 4
4 12 Month Running Total SSA 10- -1000
-e- Critical Hours B Safety System Actuations (SSA) -900 8- -800 7
3 .
-700 2 6- g -600 0 5 e <o 3-
) h j -500 E" e
$ fi E j j m 4- -400 g
? o s is -300
% e E
& ym ff ? 2- 7 3 m -200 w I > ; -
f f 5 4 j
y j
-100 fj 0 $ /j q ?
i i ,io vv -0
'88'89'90 ASO14DJFMAMJJASONDJFMAMJJ UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS -(NRC DEFINITION)
This indicator shows the number of unplanned safety system actuations (SSAs) which include the High and Low Pressure Safety injection Systems, the Safety injection Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators. The NRC classification of SSAs in-cludes actuations when major equipment is ooerated and when the logic systems for these safety systems are challerged.
The last event of this type occurred in June 1991 when there were two anticipatory signal starts for DG-2. The first start occurred after a control relay was bumped causing a momentary loss of power to safety bus 1 A4. DG-2 started a second time when a breaker trip occurred during DG-1 breaker synchronization. DG-2 was not requi. d to provide power to the safety bus in either of these situations.
The majority of SSAs displayed above were related to 1990 Refueling Outage activities and are currently being reviewed under the Safety System Actuation Reduction Pro-gram. The goal of the Program is to reduce the number of SSAs at Fort Calhoun.
Data Source: Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)
Adverse Trend: None 5
E Monthly Gross Heat Rate
--h- Year to-Date Gross Heat Rate 13- O Fort Calhouri 1991 Year End Goal
-O- Industry Upper 10 Percentile D
g12-8 GOOD S
11-v :
i 10270 10520 10304
~
2 O O O O .O l_ g gg j --C O O O D I
l.li10-
'88 I
'89 I-
'90 I
n 4
4
. ;i.
q 4
g i ! 4 4 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 4 4 1 4 i
- GROSS HEAT RATE The Gross Heat Rate Indicator goal has been changed. This goal was changed due to the rescheduling of the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage which resulted in a reduction in operating power to save fuel.
This indicator shows the Gross Heat Rate (GHR) for the reporting month, the previous t 1991 months, the year-to-date value, and the year-end GHR for the previous 3 years.
The gross heat rate for the Fort Calhoun Station was reported as 10,444 BTU /KWH
-during the month of July.
l The year-to-date gross heat rate was reported as 10,380 BTU /KWH.
The above year end Fort Calhoun goal (10,250 BTU /KWH) is the theoretical best gross heat rate that can be achieved by the Fort Cahoun Station during 1991.
The gross heat rate industry upper ten percentile value is 9,935 BTU /KWH.
, Data Source: Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source)
Aoverre Trends: None 6
i
9 O Monthly EAF Year to-Date EAF
-O- Fort Calhoun Goal
-O- Industry Upper 10 Percentile 100% - -
F D-O-O-O-O-C O O O O 80%-
f 66 : O -
O- O-O-O-O O
~
I 60%-
l GOOD
, 40%-
20%-
~
i i i 10% ; , , , , , , , , , , , ,
'88 '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF), year-to-date EAF for 1991, and the EAF for the previous 3 years.
The EAF was reported as 92.25% for the month of July. The EAF was not effected by the 70% power reduction during February, since the reduction was under management controi and for reasons of economy (fuel savings).
The year-to-date EAF was reported as 90.82%.
The EAF Fort Calhoun goalis 69% for 1991.
The EAF industry upper ten percentile value is 82.5%.
Data Source: Dietz/Parra (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trends: None 7
~
Fuel Reliability Indicator
-G- Fort Calhoun Goal (1.4)
O Industry Upper 10 Percentile (.04) co a industry Median (2)
O 4-be
(
C GOOD 2.4 j V
2- A ^ ^ ^ ^ > > > > > > >
1.5 - 1.5
~
1,,,0 q n n n v
n v
n v
n v
n v
n v
n v
n v O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S O O O O
'88 '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) was reported as 1.89 nanocuries/ gram for the month of July. This INPO indicator uses an industry normalized letdown purification rate. The FRI value using the plant's actual letdown purification rate was reported as 2.85 nanocuries/ gram.
The FRiincreased in July because the 1-131 concentration was higher due to the plant i increasing to 100% powerin the latter half of June.
The Cycle 13 fuel performance continues without an observed fuel failure. The high FRI value is indicative of previous fuel failures. The last detected fuel failure was during Cycle 10.
i The 1991 fuel reliability goal has been set at 1.4 nanocuries/ gram.
The fuel reliability indicator industry upper ten percentile value is 0.04 nanocuries/ gram.
I Data Source: Holthaus/Guliani l l l Adverse Trend: None l 8
Personnel Cumulative Radiation Exposure (Man-Rem)
O Fort Calhoun Ar.nual Goal (75 Man-Rem)
--G- Industry Upper 10 Percentile (166 Man-Rem) 300-272 276
- i 200- V 4
93.4 ; 100-C O O O O O O O O O O O l
g-- , --,---,0
'88 '89 '90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)
During July 1991,4.906 man rem was recorded by TLD's worn by personnel while working at the Fort Calhoun Station. The year-to-date exposure is 34.079 man-rem.
The Fort Calhoun goal for personnel radiation exposure (cumulative) during 1991 is 75 man rem.
The personnel radiation exposure industry upper ten percentile is 166 man-rem per unit per year.
Data Sourr.e: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 54 I
i 9
I
E Cumulative Radioactive Oil Sent For Prowssing (in gallons)
O Cumulative Dry Active Waste sent For Processing (in cubic feet) 6000-4000- g 2000- -
' 0 , , , , , , , , , , ,
l Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 '
- Cumulative Radioactive Waste Buried
--O- Fort Calhoun Goal For Waste Buried (4500) 6195 -{-}- Industry Upper 10 Percentile Waste Buried (3072) 7e .7500-(d 431o 6000- Q Radioactive Waste Buried This Month (in cubic feet)
] .
4500- C O O W---C O O C O O O O 3000- C O O di O O O O O O O O O 1500-
, , ., o
'89 '90 Jan91 Feb - Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug sep Oct Nov Dec91 Year-end Total-VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE The upper graph shows the volume of radioactive oil and dry radioactive waste sent for
_ processing. The lower graph shows the volume of rnonthly, cumulative annual total, and year-end total of radioactive waste buried the previous 2 years.
The monthly and cumulative volumes of radioactive waste which were buried during the months of January, February, and March 1991 have been revised. These revisions are due to the delay involved in the shipping for processing, the processing, and the burying of radioactive waste.
Cumulative volume of radioactive oil shipped off-site for processing (Fldns) 4,330.0 Cumulative amount of solid radwasted shipped off-site for processing (cubic feet) 7,778.0 Volume of solid radioactive waste which was buried during the month (cubic feet) 0.0 Cumulative volume of solid radioactive waste buried (cubic feet) SC.6 Amount of solid radioactive waste in temporary storage (cubic feet) 0.0
~ The Fort Calhoun goal for the volume of solid radioactive waste which has been buried is 4,500 cubic feet.
The industry upper ten percentile value is 3,072 cubic feet per unit per year. The Fort Calhoun _ Station was in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plants for this indicator in
{ 1986,1987, and 1988.
l l Data Source: Patterson/Breuer (Manager / Source) SEP 54 Adverse Trend: None 10
1 4
@ 1991 Disabling injury / illness Frequency Rate X 1990 Disabling injury /lliness Frequency Rate
--f- 5 Year Average Disabling injury / Illness Frequency Rate 1.4 --
-O- Fort Calhoun Goal
- Industry Upper 10 Percentil 1.2 - GOOD 1- V 0.8 -
0.6 - 0.56 0.3r b b O.4 - : N 0.32
--C C C C C C C .- ,-..
T
~
0.2 - ; - X "
L
} ! .
0 0, ,0, - .
0 L i L i ^ i T 'T' T' i i i i i i
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec DISABLING INJURY /lLLNESS FREQUENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE)
This indicator shows the reporting month disabling injury / illness rate in column form.
The 1990 disabling injury / illness frequency rate and the 5 year average of the corre-spcnding monthly disabling injury / illness frequency rate are also shown.
There were no (0) lost time accidents reported at the Fort Calhoun Station in July. The total number of lost time accidents that have been reported during 199? is one (1).
The 1991 disabling injury / illness frequency rate goal was set at 0.31.
The industry upper ten percentile disabling injury / illness frequency rate is 0.
y3at Year-End Rate 1988 1.6 1989 0.4 1990 0.5 Data Source: Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 25 & 26 11
- E -ThermalOutput
--O- Fort Calhoun 1495 MW Goal
- Tech Spec 1500 MW Limit 1500 r; y . . .; , , - - -. ,,. ,, - ~; ~:,-- .i..-
,,,p g,wj,pm f - - - 9
.y g y n~-
..e
. , : s: 3y
'^
,, j 11 L . ' e i # ,/ :' 'E - 7 O
'.?.' '_' . ;. ; 7, ;_; R.;0':,R.*Y~Q%
2
. ~,.f x.yy;, x. yg .
cww l
1200 , -
,; , ..q. ..
.. (- ,l .'99- 4pd
, E .iig. aES'Mi
'~
900 T '., f i - -
9.g.e;qw
+
^
- ~ '
..' L
?'.' : ;. . s .- . -
J ; . [}W;;w wl,.%.f26 600 s .' . : s : S; o . 5 7 ;
,: ..+ ' . g+,,' f,g, g;;
' }; .. .
j';}; < -
.... ;.. _..u; - .
- x. . ' .
.,7
. - ,w.w.i ,,
L; :
k..
. , f .
.c- ,, . ,
,y.. ' ~ . y ;~ % , * . +..,,e. A-- 1. ! '. :
300 F M ' r '^& ~
y
^
w
- ~ ~
9 :1 ' WG
. c; ; : .
.L , y
- g,a;.3 ;; yc ;; yp;_ ; ' ;g;.y y
- p;' & MyjMum:;.g:;y@.;4.f. _7,; Y iW.
g k0nsw 4 am s.As%wMMMc wAnhc dDMK .
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT 1
- The above thermal output graph displays the daily operating power level during July
( .1991, the 1500 thermal megawatt average technical specification limit, and the 1495 l thermal megawatt Fort Calhoun goal.
, Plant power level was reduced to 70% in February for fuel conservation in support of the extension of power operations for Cycle 13. This power reduction continued until the latter half of June when 100% power was resumed.- Reduced power operations will be resumed in the fall.
r F .
Data Source: Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source) 2 Adverse Trend: None s
k 4
12 1
i
2-Equipment Forced Outage Rate 1.8 -
1.6 -
1.4 -
1.2 - GOOD
'~ v 0.8 -
0.6 -
0.53 0.4 -
0.13 02-i O
i h i i
O
'88 '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS There were no equipment forced outages reported during the month of July 1991.
The last equipment forced outage occurred in Jariuary 1991 and was due to the Decem-ber CEDM housing leak which carried outage time into January.
Data Source: Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)
Adverse Trend: None 13
. . . . .- - - . . . - . . ~ . .. -._. - - . - . _ - . _
. J l
- Operations 1991 Budget ($ Million) -I I
--+-- -'
1991 Curnulative Total ($ Million) 80- 1991 Revised Dudget 60-40-20-0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec
~
Maintenance 1991 Budget ($ Million) 20- :
1991 Cumulative Total ($ Million) 15- @ 1991 Revised Budget
'10-5- _A r 2 -
Jan Feb Mar Apr ' May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET The Operations and Maintenance Budget Indicator shows the budget year-to-date as well as the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance for the Fort Calhoun Station.
The December Bar Graph represents the revised year-end budget due to budget revi-sions primarily reflecting the refueling postponement for Cycle 13. The revised year-
~
end budget for Operations was 60.4 million dollars. The revised year-end budget for Maintenance was 12.7 million dollars.
The budget year-to-date for Operations was 37.9 million dollars for July while the actual cumulative expenditures through July totaled 34.2 million dollars.
The budget year-to-date for Maintenance was 9.4 million dollars for July while the actual cumulative expenditures through July totaled 4.2 million dollars.
Data Source: Gleason/ Parent (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trends: None l
14
1500-
- Documents Scheduled for Review l Documents Reviewed 1200-
--V - Overdue Documents 900-Goo-300-
- ? r ' NNm Y o
' '- =' '
Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 DOCUMENT REVIEW This indicator shows the number of completed, scheduled, and overdue (greater than 6 months past the scheduled due date) biennial reviews for the reporting month. These document reviews are performed in-house and include Special Procedures, the Site Security Plan, Maintenance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance Procedures, and the Operating Manual.
During July there were 107 document reviews completed while 40 document reviews were scheduled. At the end of July, there was one (1) document review overdue.
During the month of July there were 87 new or renamed documents reviewed. These new or renamed documents will need to be reviewed again in 1993.
Data Source: Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 46 l
15 l
@ Number of Failures /20 Demands X Trigger Values for 20 Demands a
O Number of Failures /50 Demands Trigger Values for 50 Demands O Number of Failures /100 Demands O Trigger Values for 100 Demands 8- O O O O O O O O O O O O GOOD 6- y l l l l ,
4 4 4 4 4 4- - - - - -
W X ! X i X X X X X X X X X :
22 22 22 22 2 2 2 2 2 22 22 '
2- -
7-7- y .
- t ,
d , 3 11
- f M
f$
,f .
e ,
~
g(f 4 $ ! r fd O O O 0 0 '
,- ',O , , ,
O O .
Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABILITY This bar graph shows three monthly indicators pertaining to the number of failures that were reported during the last 20,50, and 100 emergency diesel generator demands at the Fort Calhoun Station. Also shown are trigger values which correspond to a high level of confidence that a unit's diesel generators have obtained a reliability of greater -
than or equal to 95% when the failure values are below the corresponding trigger val-ues. These trigger values are the Fort Calhoun 1991 goal.
The demands counted for this indicator include the respective number of starts and the respective number of load-runs for both Diesel Generators combined. The number of start demands includes all valid and inadvertent starts, including all start-only demands and all start demands that are followed by load-run demands, whether by automatic or manualinitiation. Load-run demands must follow successful starts and meet at least one of the following criteria: a load-run that is a result of a real load signal, a load-run test expected to carry the plant's load and duration as stated in the test specifications, and a special test in which a diesel generator was expected to be operated for a mini-
+
mum of one hour and to be loaded with at least 50% of design load (see exceptions and other demand criteria in the Definition Section).
Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 16
)
1
@ DG 1 Failures /25 Demands O Dc 2 raitures/25 Demands 5- Failure Trigger Value for 25 Demands 4.5 -
4-3.5 -
3-2.5 -
2 2-1.5 - !
1 1- '
0.5 - :
- . 0 00 00 00 00 00 00 00 0 i i i i i i i i i i i i Nov90 Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (25 DEMANDS)
This indicator shows the number of failures experienced by each emergency diesel generator during the last 25 start demands and the last 25 load-run demands. A trigger value of 4 failures within the last 25 demands is also shown. This trigger value of 4 failures within 25 demands is the Fort Calhoun goal for 1991, it must be emphasized that in accordance with NUMARC criteria, certain actions will take place in the event that any one emergency diesel generator experiences 4 or more failures within the last 25 demands on the unit. These actions are described in the Definition Section. A Standing Order has been drafted for the Fort Calhoun Station to institutionalize and formally approve / adopt the required NUMARC actlons.
Diesel Generator DG-1 has not experienced any failures during the last 25 demands on the unit.
Diesel Generator DG-2 has experienced one failure during the last 25 demands on the unit.
Data Source: Jaworski/Fonning (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 17
~
May1991 Outstanding MWO's June 1991 Outstanding MWO's
' July.1991 Outstanding MWO's-300-II8 100- !
%y-g ik '
k w 0
- I I' " I ~ f a 1 i 4 4 1 3 Months 3-6 Months 6-9 Months 9-12 Months >12 Months AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE) l This indicator shows the age of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders -
L (MWO's) remaining open at the end of the reporting month.
Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None i
I-l.
18 i
i
_ m- _ .m. --- - -, ,
400-350- E May 1991 O June "91 O July 1991 300- y/
M
- // .
i i
250- 'pf
~,/,
./
200- y'/.
,//, .- !
'// ;
150- '//.
- //. ,
w 100- (( kfN ((
M $4
'// . %*i S: hs;
//,ti c //,
a4
~
hf:
//n k hh: 2dh
//, -
hh'
//, ;p
, hE ,,
</, _,
0-- b -
'$' # l i i i 6 i TotalOpen MWOs Open MWOs>3 Total Open Safety Open Safety Open High Priority months old Related MWOs Related MWOs > MWOs 3 Months Old MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE)
This indicator shows the total number of corrective non-outage MWOs remaining open at the end of the reporting month, along with a breakdown by several key categories.
Data Cource: Patterson/Schmic (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 19
- Corrective Maintenance Dacklog > 3 Months Old
- ~ "
Industry Upper Quartile 70%- GOOD V ,
60%-
50%-
C " " "
D 40W 30%-
20W -
Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON-OUTAGE) ;
This indicator shows the percentage of open corrective non outage maintenance work orders that were greater than three months old at the end of the reporting month. l The percentage of open corrective non outage maintenance work orders that were greater than three months old at the end of July was reported as 33.5%.
The industry upper quartile value for corrective maintenance backlog greater than 3 months old is 45.8%. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper quartile of nuclear power plants in this area.
Data Source: Petterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None
- 20
- Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance
-G- Industry Upper Quartile (57.7%)
A 80%- amoun Goal (MY.)
GOOD 70%-
- ~
6\ 6 &6 ^ ~
6'6'6 6) 6 50%-
40%-
30%-
20 %
Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE (NON OUTAGE) 1 The ratio of preventive to total maintenance indicator shows the ratio of completed non-outage preventive maintenance to total completed non-outage maintenance.
The ratio of preventive to total maintenance was 59.2% in July.
The Fort Calhoun goalis to have a ratio of preventive to total maintenance greater than 60%. The low values for the months of January through April 1991 are due to the low number of PM activities scheduled to be completed during these months.
The industry upper quartile value for the ratio of preventive to total maintenance is 57.7 %
Data Source: Patterson/Schm:tz (Manager / Source) -
Adverste Trend: None 21
-. i . . . - . - - . . . - . - - - - . . - . . - - - - . - . . - - , . . . . - , -
4%- - Proventive Maintenance items Overdue
-O- Industry Upper Quartile
-O-- Fort Calhoun Goal 3%-
GOOD 2%~
V I
O O O O O O O O O O O O 1%-
1 0%
Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in the administration and execution of preventive maintenance programs. A small percentage of preventive maintenance items overdue indicates a station commitment to the preventive maintenance program and an ability to plan, schedule, and perform preventive maintenance tasks as pro-grams require.
During July 1991,1060 PM ltems were completed. All PM's
- vere completed within the allowable grace period.
The Fort Calhoun goalis to have less than 1.2% preventive maintenance items over-due. The industry upper quartile for preventive maintenance items overdue is 1.2%.
The Fort Calhoun Staiton is currently performing in the industry upper quartile for this l Indicator.
1 Data Source: Patterson/Unden (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 41 22
l O Number of C. R. instruments Repairablo On Lino 50- O Total Control Room Instruments Out of Service
--o- Industry Upper Quartile For Total Out of Se:vico Instruments 40-
-O- Fort Calhoun Goal For Total Out of Servico Instruments 30- _
=
20- vgp w w$
$_: M $$ W h,i s
p -
g&
9xe 9 9 -
o-g -
g M ?% M w w
.$ g h fp g g 10- ,/ ,3 o- -
o--o d -
o OT-n a 0 - - #[fj- O 0- , , , , ,
i Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 NUMBER OF OUT-OF SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS This indicator shows the number of out of service control room instruments, the number of instruments repairable during plant operations (on-line), the industry upper quartile for this indicator, and the Fort Calhoun goal.
There was a total of 33 out of-service control room instruments at the end of July. A plant outage is required to repair 9 of these 33 control room instruments.
The Fod Calhoun goalis to have less than 15 out of-service control room instruments.
The industry upper quartile value for the number of out of-service control room instru-ments is 7.
Data Source: Patterson/ Adams (Mariager/ Source)
Adverse Trend: None 23
e 80%-
Maintenance Overtirne 70% - -M- 12 Month Average GOOD
--O- Fort Calhoun Goal 60% -
V 50% -
40% -
30% -
C C C C C C C C C C C C 20% - m u 10% - N --
, ,_, v s
nf "
0%
Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The Maintenance Overtime Indicator monitors the ability to perform the desired mainte-nance activities with the allotted resources. Excessive overtime indicates insufficient resource allocation and can lead to errors due to fatigue.
The percent of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 4.1%
during the month of July 1991. The 12 month average percentage of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 8.9%.
The Fort Calhoun goal for the percentage of maintenance overtime ht"Jrs worked has been set at 25% for non outage months and 50% for outage months.
Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 24
4 15-O Open IR's Related to the Use of Procedures (Maintenance)
D Closed IR's Related to the Use of Procedures (Maintenance)
O Procedural Noncompliance IR's (Maintenance) 10-5-
4 i 3
3 3 -
2 2 '
, 2 .
2 3
s 111 1 , , 1 y., - -, -,
000 000'O i 0 ;
/ 0 0
': ' / 0 000 000 000 000 0-Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 l PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)
This indicator shows the number of op'en Maintenance incidents Reports (irs) that are related to the use'of procedures, the number of closed irs that are related to tho use of procedures, and the number of open and closed irs that received procedural noncom-pliance cause codes, t
i~
Data Source: Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 & 44 l
l t
l 25 ;
1
. -,,.._. . _ _ . . - - - . . . _ _ _ _ _ . - . ~ ___ - . . _ . - . , _ - . _ . _ _ _ _ _ . , . . . . - . . . - . , -
d 4
800- 1 l3 Open MWO's Mb= Fort Calhoun Goal l
I 600-
.. m ,
l s m - m m .
423 406
" ~ ~ " " O 400-361 348 N 293 302 289 287 nlI I I IIIIIII Aug90 Sep 3 I Oct . Nov I
Dec I
Jan MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE MAINTENANCE)
I Feb i
Mar 1
Apr 4
May i
Jun
)
Jul91 i
This indicator shows the number of corrective non outage Maintenance Work Orders (MWOs) that were open at the end of the reporting month.
The goal for this indicator is to have less than 450 corrective non-outage maintenance i work orders remaining open.
Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 26 -
_ _ . . - _ _ _ . . . . _ _ _ . . . . . . _ . . _ . , t .. . _ . __ . - _ _ _ _,_ . _ _ , _ _ . _ _ . , . , _ _
[
. I i
Completod Schedulod Activities (EM) f
?
--G- Fort Calhoun Goal ;
)
l
' 100% -
{
l 80%-
\- #
^ ^ ^ -^ ^ ^- ^ ^
l l
O - - v^ v y v v v v v v v' O I
00%-
5/4 5/11 5/18 5/25 5/31 G/7 G/14 G/21 0/28 7/5 7/12 7/19 7/26 !
PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE) {
I This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenanco activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenanco activities concerning Electrical !
Maintenance. Maintenanco ectivities includo MWns, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, ,
and miscellaneous maintenance activities, j The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%. l Roporting Month Completed Scheduled Activities :
Wook 1 82 % l Wook 2 84 %
Wook 3 81 % [
Weok 4 91 % ;
Data Sourco: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager /Sourco)
Adverso Trond: None SEP 33 !
i i
27 p L
I t
t
- Completed Scheduled ActMties (PE) ,
-O-- Fort Colhoun Goal 1
- 100% -
i 80%- O -
0-- -
~ O 60%-
40%
5/4 5/11 5/18 5/25 5/31 6/7 6/14 6/21 6/28 7/5 7/12 7/19 7/26 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (PRESSURE EQUIPMENT) 1 This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Pressure ,
Equipment Maintenance. Main +enance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.
The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%. !
Reporting Month Completed Scheduled Activities Week 1 88% <
Week 2 78%
Week 3 79%
Week 4 90 %
Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 l i
- - 28 i
a .. . - - _ , . . .-
_, ,_, :-.__.-, . . . . . , . _ . , ~ , , , , . , _ - . . . . - . - _ , . . , - . . ~ . . . . . - - - ~ ,
, ,.--,r - . . , ., -
e-l Completed Scheduled Activities (GM) ,
-O- Fort Calhoun Goal 100 % - f l
i 80%- O O--C O O O .
i i
i 00%-
I 40% -
i 5/4 5/11 5/18 5/25 5/31 6/7 6/14 6/21 6/28 7/5 7/12 7/19 7/20 !
PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES l (GENERAL MAINTENANCE) [
This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the numbor of scheduled maintenance activities concerning General Main-tenance. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities. ,
f The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80% {
Reporting Month Completed Scheduled Activities l Week 1 60% !
Week 2 67 % !
Week 3 73 % }
Week 4 65% !
t Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) i l
Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 !
?
t 20 l
, _ _ _ _ . . . . . . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ . . _ - . - . - . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ - _ . ~ ..- .___- ._ _ . . _ _ _ - _ .
i l
)
Completed Scheduled ActMtles (MM) l 1
-O- Fort Calhoun Goal !
100% -
80%- C O O O O O O O O 60%-
l l
l 40% -
5/4 5/11 5/18 5/25 5/31 W7 6/14 6/21 U28 7/5 7/12 7/19 7/26 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE)
This indicator shows the pecent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Mechanical Maintenance. Maintenance activ;tles include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.
The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%
Reporting Month Completed Scheduled Activities Week 1 89 %
Week 2 95%
Week 3 93%
Week 4 85 %
Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)
Adverso Trend: None SEP 33 30
Completed Scheduled Activities (IC) !
-O- Fort Calhoun Goal 100% -
l I
80%- 0 O O O O----C O O O O O !
60%- i I
i 40%
}
5/4 5/11 5/18 5/25 5/31 6/7 6/14 G/21 6/28 7/5 7/12 7/19 7/26 '
PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES !
(INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL) {
i This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as i compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning instrumenta- i tion & Control. Maintenance activities include MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibrations, [
and miscellaneous maintenance activities. -)
i The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%. l y
Reporting Month Completed Scheduled Activities !
Week 1 94 % I Week 2 88 % !
Week 3 85% l Week 4 89 % 1 i
Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) !
Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 j f
I 31 I i
l 3
3-
@ Number of Missed STs Resulting in LERs 2-1-
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 , , , , , , , , , , , ,
'89 90 Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS This indicator shows the number of missed Surveillance Tests (STs) that result in Lic-ensee Event Reports (LERs) during the reporting month. The graph on the left shows the yearly totals for the indicated years, During the month of July 1991, there were no missed STs that resulted in LERs.
Data Source: Plant Licenseo Event Reports (LERs)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 60 & 61 32
20-E TotalNPRDS Component Failures O Confirmed NPRDS Component Failures 10-77 l
S5 :
4 4 j 33 3 3 j 22 1 l 0 00 00 0 i i i i i i i i i i i Augs0 Sept O::t Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Ju!91 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEMS (NPRDS)
REPORTABLE FAILURES l
This indicator shows the total number of NPRDS component failures and the number of confirmed NPRDS component failures. The total number of NPRDS component failures is based upon the number of failure reports sent to INPO. The number of confirmed NPRDS component failures is based upon the number of failure reports that have been accepted by INPO. The difference between those two figures is the number of failure reports still under review by INPO.
During July 1991, there were no (0) confirmed NPRDS component failures.
Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 33
1 15- : Components With More Than Ono Failuro
-X-- Components With Moro Than Two Failures 10-GOOD V
5- -
X X "
x
v, x
~
0 n x %--
Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS The Maintenance Effectiveness Indicator was developed following guidelines set forth by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Opera-tional Data (NRC/AEOD). The NRC/AEOD is currently developing and verifying a maintenance effectiveness indicator using the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPRDS) component failures.
This indicator shows the number of NPRDS components with more than one failure during the last twelve months and the number of NPRDS components with more than two failures during the last twelve months. The number of NPRDS components with more than two failures in a twelve month period should indicate the effectiveness of plant maintenance.
During the last 12 reporting months there were 5 NPRDS components with more than 1 failure. 2 of the 5 had more than two failures. The tag numbers of these components are CH 1 A & CH-18.
Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 34
20-Check Valve Failure Rate per Million Comp. Hours
-A-~ Industry Check Valve Failure Rate per Million Cornp. Hours 15-
--O- Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal (2.00E-6) 10 3 10-f$ GOOD y
g V 5-
^
1 O I 1 N I O
'89 90 Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 Check Valvo Failures CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE This indicator shows the Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate, the Fort Calhoun goal -
and the industry check valve failure rate. This rate is based upon failures during the previous 18 months. The check valve failures at Fort Calhoun Station, for the previous ,
two yects, are shown on the left.
The data for the industry check valve failure rate is three months behind the reporting month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the data.
For April 1991, the Fort Calhoun Station reported an actual check valve failure rate of 1.96 E-6 while the industry reported an actual failure rate of 2.62E-6. At the end of July, the Fort Calhoun Station reported a calculated check valve failure rate of zero (0). The >
Fort Calhoun goal for this indicatoris a failure rate of 2.00E 6. >
Data Sourcet Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)-
4 Adverse Trond: None SEP 43 35
r ~
9 Secondary system CPI Secondary system CPI Limit ,
-O- Fort Calhoun Goal (.45) 1.5 - V .
--6-- Industry Upper Ovartile 1- l l l l l l l l l l l l o.se o.34 0.5 - x p n i i i 0 i i i i i i i i e i e i i M W Jul90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun91
)
200 - )
175 - --H-- Hours Chemistry is O~ G GuW Unos 146.1
~ ' 50 ~
125- GOOD l 100 - y
- ' 75-50-25-O ;; ;,
,; ;( :s
'90 Jul90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY The top graph, Secondary System Chemistry Performance Index (CPI), is calculated using the following thl 9e parameters: cation conductivity in steam generator blowdown, sodium in steam generator blowdown, and condensate pump dischar0e dissolved oxygen. The bottom graph shows the total hours of 13 parameters excaeding the Owners Group (OG) guidelines during power operation.
The Fort Calhoun goal for the CPI is 0.45. The CPI was reported as 0.603 for the l month of June. The industry upper quartile value for this indicator was 0.16 for August 1983 through Dec.1989. The CPIindustry value then changed to 0.24 for 1990.
l The number of hours outside the OG guidelines was reported as 4.39 hours4.513889e-4 days <br />0.0108 hours <br />6.448413e-5 weeks <br />1.48395e-5 months <br /> for the l month of June.
l The above two chemistry indicators are one month behind the reporting month due to l the time needed for data collection and evaluation of the station chemistry data.
i Data source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 36
4
- 10% -
l M Primary System Chemistry Out of Limit 8%-
~
i 6%-
GOOD V
4%-
19 1.8 g = 2%- C O O O O O
~
- 1
.., , oof
'89 '90 Jul90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT The Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Out of Limit indicator tracks the primary system chemistry performance by monitoring six key chemistry parameters.
100% equates to all six parameters being out of limit for the month. This indicator is one month behind the reporting month.
The Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 2%.
The Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit was reported as 1.05% for the month of June.
The high percentage of hours out of limit for the primary system during July 1990 was due to startup after the 1990 Refueling Outage and various power fluctuations which occurred during June and July. A plant shutdown and startup in September and a plant outage in November / December resulted in a higher percentage of hours out of limit.
Data Source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 37
d 10-9- Hours Auxiliary System Chemistry Out Of Limit
- r- Industry Upper Quartile 8-7-
6-5-
4-3-
A A A A A A A A A A 2-1-
0- 0 o ;; , ;> , ;> i ;> , ), , ;> , ; > , ;> , ;> , ), ,n , ,
'.gg'.90 Jul90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 .
AUXILIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS The Auxillary System Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits indicator tracks the monthly hours that the Component Cooling Water (CCW) system is outside the station chemistry limit. The above chemistry indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time needed for data collection and evaluation of the chemistry data for the station.
The auxiliary system chemistry hours outside station limits was reported as 8.42 hours4.861111e-4 days <br />0.0117 hours <br />6.944444e-5 weeks <br />1.5981e-5 months <br /> for the month of June.
The industry upper quartile value for auxiliary systems chemistry hours outside station limits is 2.6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />.
Data Source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None r
38
, 8 Number of instruments Out-of Servico 8 -O- Fort Calhoun Goal B-
- 7 7 7
,N ,
6- [
--h-- ---C O O O b --O--- k S- ,
- -- l 4- f
~
ya '
y/4)
- : i1 -, 3 3 ?i 3 1 3- L. i 3 .
2- !' -
/
Hlj-hl-llllLII,i O
i Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Ju!91 IN LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-OF-SERVICE This indicator shows the total number of in-line chemistry system instruments that are out-of service at the end of the reporting month. The chemistry systems involved in this indicator include the Seccndary System and the Post Accident Sampling System (PASS).
At the end of July there was a total of 6 in line chemistry instruments that were out-of-service. Of these 6 instruments,4 were from the Secondary System and 2 were from PASS.
The Fort Calhoun goal for the number of in line chemistry system instruments that are out of service has been set at 6. Six out of service chemistry instruments make up 10%
of all the chemistry instruments that are counted for this indicator.
Data Source: Patterson/Renaud (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 39
@ Total Waste Produced (Kilograms)
- Federal 8 Stato Monthly Limit (Kg) 1000-800-600 -
400 -
' 200 -
144.5 89 8 /; 70.4 0= -
1 I I i l i i i i i i I Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jut 91 HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED This indicator shows the total amount of hazardous waste produced by Fort Calhoun each month. This hazardous waste consists of non halogenated hazardous waste, j halogenated hazardous wasto, and other hazardous waste produced.
During the rnonth of July,0.0 kilograms of non halogenated hazardous waste was produced,15.0 kilograms of halogenated hazardous wasto was produced, and 0.0 kilograms of other hazardous waste was produced.
Date Source: Patterson/Henning (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None i
40
, _ _ . . , _ _ - _ . . _ - - .-. _ _._-.__~ _- -- - - - - - - - - - --- --
5000 -
OPPD 4500 mrem /yr. Limit 4000-O Highest Exposure for the Month (mrem)
@ Highest Exposure for the Ouarter (mrem)
~
E Highest Exposure for the Year (mrem) 2000-1000- 929 0 i July 1991 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE During July 19' . an individual accumulated 326 mrem which was the highest indi-vidual exposura for the month.
The maximum individual exposure to date for the second quarter of 1991 has been 326 mrem.
The maximum individual exposure reported to date for 1991 has been 929 mrem.
The OPPD limit for the maximum yearly individual radiation exposure is 4,500 mrem /
year. -
Date Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 41
1 237 250-O Monthly Personnel Contaminations GOOD Cumulative Personnel Contaminations 200-y -O- Fort Calhoun Annual Goal (90)
-{'}- Industry Upper Quartile (129) 157 L 150-0 0 0 0 0 C O O O O O O 100-C O O O O O O O O O O O 50-9 7 6 3 3 4 3
- ,0 ,m ,", , , , , , , , , ,
'89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS This indicator shows the number of skin and clothing contaminations for the reporting month. A total of 35 contaminations have occurred during 1991.
There was a total of 237 skin and clothing contaminations in 1990.
The 1991 goal for skin and clothing contaminations is 90.
The industry upper quartile value for total skin and clothing contaminations is 129 per unit annually.
Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 & 54 42
- \
l 100% - - Decontaminated Auxiliary Building' Radiation Controlled Area I l
1
-O- Fort Calhoun Goal 90%-
/
n ^
w o c% 0 0 o o o 80%-
A 70%-
GOOD i
60%- q 50%
Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED AREA This indicator (formerly titled " Decontaminated Auxiliary Building") was revised in June 1991 to include the new Radwaste building and the areas of the C/RP. building that will ,
be considered Radiologically Controlled. The graph shows the percentage of the RCA that is decontaminated (clean) based on the total square footage, a Fort Calhoun goal of 85% decontaminated auxiliary building (non-outage months) and a goal of 75%
decontaminated auxiliary building (outage months). >
At the end of the reporting month,89.9% of the total square footage of the RCA was decontaminated.
Date Source: Patterson/Gundal(Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP54 43
- _ - _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ - . .. . - ~ . . . - . _ ~ - . ~ . - - - - . . _ . . . . . . . _ . - . . -
4 10-8 [9 Number of Identified PRWPs 6-4-
2-1 1 1 1 1 /.
O i i i i i i i e i i i i Aug90 Sep. Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM L The Radiological Work Practices Progam Indicator shows the number of Poor Radio-logical Work Practices (PRWPs) which were identified during the reporting month.
The number of PRWPs which are identified each month should indirectly provide a means to qualitatively assess supervisor accountability for their workers' radiological performance.
During the month of July 1991, four (4) PRWPs were identified.
Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source) l l Adverse Trend: None SEP52-
'l l
\
44 l
t t
L
, e l Total Number of Hot Spots 75' Number of Additional Hot Spots identified
-s- Fort Calhoun Goal f 54 54 54 55 53 53 53 [
r I I I #
h h 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 O O O O -O
~
9/ ;
?: ; :g j 25- ! :i 1 M i' $ j 3
fg h fM fy I* I
- l I
f xx :
d ff
- l !
0 i i i i i i i i i i i i Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 ,
NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS This indicator shows the total number of hot spots which have been identified to exist in the Fort Calhoun Station and have been documented through the use of a hot spot identification sheet. A hot spot is defined as a smalllocalized source of high radiation. !
A hot spot occurs wheri the contact dose rate of an item or piece of equipment is at !
least 5 times the Gene.t. Area dose rate and the item or piece of equipment's dose rate is equal to or greater than 100 mrem / hour. :
I The Fort Calhoun goal for this indicatoris 40.
Date Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source) ,
Adverse Trends: None I
45 !
I
. i 1
@ Monthly Radioactive Gas Discharged (Curies) !
800- - Cumulative Radioactive Gas Discharged (Curles)
-O- Cumulative AnnualGoal(Curies) ,
600~
GOOD 465 V
400-C O O O O O O O O O O O 164 200- <
l i
I I I i l I l 4 I i i 3
'89 90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec91 GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT.
The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged'to the environment is shown for Janu- r cry 1,1991 through June 30,1991. A total ot 42.2 curies have been released to the environment during this time. The Fort Calhoun Station cumulative annual goal for 1991 is 360 curies for this indicator.
The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months.
l
- Date Source: Franco /Krist (Manager / Source)
AdverseTrend: None 46
O Monthly Radioactive Liquid Discharged Cumulative Radkactive Liquid Discharged
-O-- Curnulative Annual Goal 231228 e o o o o o e o o o o o
- 175 200-GOOD
- b d 100- d ca r,. . 1M __ --
,7 ( 4.8-8.3*""2[ _
84 i i i , , , . , i i i
, i , , 4 88 '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Gept Oct Nov Dec91 h40000-g 35000-c) 30000-g 25000-m 20000-1000
$ 5000- "2370 ,2910'3800 33so 3750 301c 0
NEA i i i i i i i f i a i Jan91 Feb Mar npr May Jun i i Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec91 LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for of Janu-ary 1,1991 through June 30,1991. The liquid radioactive waste that was discharged to the environment from all sources totaled 70.3 curies during this time. The Fort Calhoun Station cumulative annual goal for 1991 is 256 curies.
The bottom graph shows the volume of liquid radioactive waste that has been released from the radioactive waste monitor tanks and steam generators. The volume of liquid radioactive waste discharged to the environment from the radioactive waste monitor tanks and the steam generators totaled 19.2 million gallons from January through June 1991. The liquid radioactive waste that was released to the environment includes liquid released from the steam generators due to the fact that radioisotopes were detected in the steam generator blowdown. The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months.
Data Source: Franco /Krist (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 47
l l 30-25- -
Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Does not GOOD Include System Failures) 20-y 15-10-
^
0 '
Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 120- l GOOD l - Security System Failures V
80-40-0 Aug90 Sep Oct Ncv Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 LOGG ABLE! REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY)
The Loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Security) Indicator is depicted in two separate graphs. The first chart depicts the total number of loggable/ reportable incidents con-ceming Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDVs); Security Badges; Security Key Control; and Access Control and Authorization which occurred during the reporting month. The bottom graph shows the total number of loggable/ reportable incidents concerning secu-rity system failures which occurreo during the reporting month.
During the month of July 1991, there were 65 loggabh/ reportable incidents identified.
System failures accounted for 63 (97%) of the loggable/ reportable incidents, and 42 (67%) of these were environmental failures. CCTV environmental failures (36) ac-counted for the majority of the system failures for the month. New cameras are currently being installed which should result in a decrease in CCTV environmental failures. The 2 loggable security incidenis involved tailgating and improper escort procedures.
Data Source: Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 c:
E Security Report / Log Incidents April 1991 16- O Security Report / Log 't idents May 1991 Q Security Report / Log incidents June 1991 C Security Report / Log Incidents July 1991 12- GOOD Month Totalincidents Jan'91 6 y
Feb'91 0 Mar '91 2 8- Apr '91 3 May '91 1 Jun'91 1 Jul'91 2 4-3 2
1 1 O
0 0 0 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 M.' O O LDVs Badges Key Control Access Control SECURITY INCIDENT BREAKDOWN This indicator now shows the number of incidents concerning the following items for the reportir.g month: Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDVs) Security Badges; Access Con-trol and Authorization; od Security Key Control.
Data Source: Sefick/Woerner(Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 49
i 50-O Environmental Failures D System Failures 40-36 GOOD 30-Y 20-10 10- .
6 [5Y 5
%; 4 0 0 1 0 b 0 0 O 4 I I i I i Alarms CCTV Computer Search Equip. Doors Card Readers SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES This indicator shows the number of incidents concerning the following items for the reporting month: Alarm l'ystem Failures, CCTV failures, Security Computer Failures, Search Equipment Failures, Door Hardware Failures, and Card Reader Failures. Alarm systems and CCTV failures are now divided into two categories: environmental failures and system failures.
Number of Incidents: June '91 July '91 System Failures Env. Fall. Eauio. Fail. Env. Fail. Eaulo. Fail Alarm Systems 15 7 6 10 CCTV 34 6 36 1 Computer n/a 2 0 4 Search Equipment n/a 2 0 5 Door Hardware n/a 4' O 1 Card Reader n'a 0 0 0 Total 49 21 42 21 Data Source: Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 I
50
Amount of Work On Hold Awalting Parts 9%- --O- Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal 8%- GOOD 7%-
6%-
5%-
4%- /.
o O O
^
o 3%-
2%-
1%-
0%
Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS (NON-OUTAGE)
T'ie procurement indicator displays 1% oercentage of open, non-outage maintenance items that are on hold awaiting parth m the total amount of open, non-outage mainte-nance items.
There was a total of 757 open, non outage maintenance items with 17 of these items on hold awaiting parts at the end of the reporting month.
The 1991 Fort Calhoun Goal for this indicator is 3.5% of the total cJmber of open, non-outage maintenance items awaiting parts.
Data Source: Willrett/ CHAMPS (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 51
15-
- Spare Parts Inventory Value ($ Million) 12-i s g_ #
6 Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE The spare parts inventory value at the Fort Calhoun Station at the end of July was reported as $13,247,922.
Data Source: Steele/Huliska (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 500-400- -
Spare Parts issued ($ Thousands) 300-200-100- #
/-
0--
Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 SPARE PARTS ISSUED The value of the spare parts issued during July totaled $361,320.
Data Source: Steele/ Miser (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 52
Inventory Accuracy
-O- Fort Calhoun Goal (98%)
/ 0% gc o 95%-
90%
Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Ju!91 INVENTORY ACCURACY This indicator shows the accuracy of the actual parts count for the warehouse compared to the counts contained in the MMIS computer system for the reportirig month.
- During July,1176 different line items were counted in the warehouse. Of the 1176 line items counted,6 items needed count adjustments. The inventory accuracy for the month of July was reported as 100% The Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 98%
Data Source: Willrett/McCormick (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None
% of Pick Tickets Generated With Parts Not Available -
%:: -O- Fort Calhoun Goal N
,p 3%-
2%-
1%-
0% O O O v O O O-Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 STOCKOUT RATE This indicator shows the percentage of the number of Pick Tickets generated with no parts available during the reporting month.
During July, a total of 1178 Pick Tickets were generated. Of the 1178 Pick Tickets generated,59 Pick Tickets (5%) were generated with no parts available.
The Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal for this indicator is 0%.
Data Source: Willrett/McCormick(Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 53
2%-
% of Total Purchases that are Expedited
--O- Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal (0.5%)
1%-
C O O O O O O 0% i Aug90 Sep Oct Nov- Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 EXPEDITED PURCHASES This indicator shows the percentage of expedited purchases compared to the total number of purchase orders generated during the reporting month.
During July, there was a total of 317 purchase orders generated. Of the 317 purchase orders generated, there were no (0) expedited purchases.
The Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator 0.5%.
Date Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 54
100-80-GO -
40-21 20- --- ---- -
14 0 I i i Service invoices COE invoices Miscellaneous INVOICE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows the number of service invoices, COE invoices, and miscellaneous invoices for the month of July 1991. I Date Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None Percentage of Material Requests for issues with !
~ he Request t Date the same as the Need Date 100 % -
80%-
60%-
X 40%-
20%-
(
0%
Ju!90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING This indicator shows the percentage of material requests (MRs) for issues with their request date the sama as their need date compared to the total number of MRs for issues for the reporting month.
During the month of July, a total of 1178 MRs were received by the warehouse. Of the 1178 total MRs received by the warehsuse,410 MRs were for issues with their request date the same as their need date.
Data Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 55
i 600 -
- Total Modification Packages Open 500-425 42s i
400-337
^
f/ 300-
'88 '89 '90 Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS This indicator shows the total number of outstanding modifications (excluding outstand-ing modifications which are proposed to be cancelled).
Cateaorv Recortina Month Form FC-1103 Backlog /In Progress 16
!)od. Hequests Being Reviewed 97 Design Engr. Backlog /In Progress 99 Construction Backlog /In Progress 29 Desion Encr. Uodate Backloc'in Procress 45 Total 286 As of the end of July,25 additional modification requests have been issued this year and 17 modification requests have been cancelled. The Nuclear Projects Review Com-mittee (NPRC) has completed 78 backlog modification request reviews this year. The Nuclear Projects Committee (NPC) has completed 86 backlog modification request reviews this year.
Data Source: Jaworski/ Turner (Manager / Source)
Scofield/Lounsbery (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 56 -
~
Total Temporary Modifications
-O- Fort Calhoun Goal 60-40-
~
U-- --U U O O -- O O O O O O O O
Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Ju!91 0 10
.10- @ May 1991 O June 1991 E July 1991 0
i i i 6 1 0-3 Months 3-6 Months 6-9 Months 9-12 Months > 12 Months
-TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING)
The top graph shows the total number of temporary modifications (TMs) installed in the Fort Calhoun Station and the Fort Calhoun goal. The bottom graph shows the age of all installed TMs in the plant for the respective month.
At the end of July, there was a total of 26 TMs installed in the Fort Calhoun Station.15 of the 26 installed TMs require an outage for removal. The current Fort Calhoun goal for the total number of installed TMs is less than 15.
Data Source: Jaworski/ Turner (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: Temporary modifications six to nine months old continue to increase due to the need for outage conditions to remove them. Currently,15 temporary modifi-cations require an outage for removal.
SEP 62 & 71 57
1 l - Total Nurnber oi Open EARS 200-50-0 Sep90 Oct Nov Doc Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 60 - @ DEN 0-3 months O sE 0-3 months 50- O DEN 3-6 months @ SE 3-6 months 40- O DEN >6 months O sE >6 months 30-
~
20- 16 12 9 9 10 7 001 00 2 l 0 0 1 1 6 00 i i i i Priority 1 Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUESTS (EARS)
The top graph shows the total number of open EARS at the end of the reponing month.
The bottom graph shows the EARS by Design Engineering Nuclear or System Engineer-ing responsibility and their age in months at the end of the reporting month.
There was a total of 107 open EARS at the end of July. Of the 107 total open EARS,89 were Design Engineering Nuclear's responsibility and 18 were System Engineering's responsibility.
Data Source: JaworskiNan Osdel(Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP62 58 I
-C}- ECNs Backlogged in DEN l ECNs Opened During the Month 200- O ECNs Completed During the Month 4
150-100-00~
b y - .
0 Aug90 Sep Oc1 Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS This indicator shows the number of Engineering Change Notices (ECNs) swaiting completion by DEN, the number of ECNs opened during the reporting month, and the number of ECNs completed by DEN during the reporting month.
At the end of July 1991, there was a total of 198 DEN backlogged open ECNs. There were 41 ECNs opened, and 51 ECNs completed during the month.
Although th6 number of open ECNs is currently high, activities are in progress to reduce the backlog of open ECNs. It is expected that in several months the number of open ECNs will begin to decrease.
Data Source: Phelps/Pulverenti (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 59
i j O DEN - Enginscring not compi:to System Engineering - Engineering complete, MWO not written Q Maintenance - MWO scheduled, but not complete 47 44 50- ~
40- 29 f 27 30- M M@$43 16 - ---- --
5 2 0 %r ejj 2 -d If ?
O - 3 months 3 6 months > 6 months ECN FACILITY CHANGES OPEN O DEN - Engineering not complete System Engineering - Engineering complete, MWO not written
- Maintenance - MWO scheduled, but work not complete 90 81 63 60- ,; - = ,
30- 20 25 0 ,
O - 3 months 3 - 6 months > 6 months ECN SUBSTITUTE REPLACEMENT PARTS OPEN O DEN - Engineering not complete System Engineering - Walkdown or confirmation not complete 20- 13 14 3h 8 W*iM'dTIf 4#
10- gggggggggj 2 gjgggggggj ggjpglj O - 3 months 3 6 months > 6 months ECN DOCUMENT CHANGES OPEN ENGINEERiflG CHANGE NOTICE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows a break down of the number of Engineering Change Notices (ECNs) that are assigned to Design Engineering Nuclear (DEN), System Engineering, and MF,intenance for the reporting month. The graphs provide data c n ECN Facility Changes Open, ECN Substitute Replacement Parts Open, and ECN Document Changes Open.
Data Source: Phelps/Pulverenti (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 1 60 l
~ _ _ _ - - - - _ _ - -
i l .
5- @ 1991 Recordable injury / Illness Frequency Rate 1990 Recordable injury / Illness Frequency Rate
--6-- 5 Year Average Recordable injury /ll! ness Frequency Rate 4- : <
3.5 -
3- . .
y 2.5 - L i
d 2.25 2.27 2.25
~
a- %
1.5 - / ;
j A s
l /
1- .
0.5 - [
-i 0
-i i ----, i ,--^i i i i ; i Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec RECORDABLE !NJURY/lLLNESS CASES FREQUENCY RATE This indicator shows the 1991 monthly,1990 monthly, and the Fort Calhoun Station 5 year monthly average of the recordable injury / illness cases frequency rates.
A recordable injury / illness case is reported if Nuclear Operations Division personnel are injured on the job and require corrective medical treatment beyond first aid. The record-able cases frequency rate is computed on a year to-date basis.
There was one (1) recordable injury / illness case reported during the month of July.
There has been a total of 7 recordable injury / illness cases so far in 1991.
Year Recordable _ Cases Year-End Rate 1988 11 2.6 1989 11 2.2 1930 1 2.1 t
Data Source: Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: Based on the 5 year average recordable injury / illness frequency rate, an adverse trend is indicated. SEP 15,25 & 26 61 4
,dj l
l 50-l l -
46 @ Licensee Event Reports O Personnel Errors Reported in LERs
~
-4:)-- Cumula9ve Licensee Event Raports a Cumulative Personnel Errors Reported in LERs 26 3 30-20-12 9
! 10-i A I :o " b" "
i0 i i i i i i i i i i i i
'88 '89 '90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LERS This indicator shows the number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) with event dates during the reporting month, the LERs attributed to personnel errors, and the cumulative total of both. The year end totals for the three previous years are also shown.
In July 1991, there was one (1) LER reported. This LER was not attributable to person-nel error.
There have been 15 LERs reported so far in 1991 and 7 of these LERs have been attributable to personnel error.
Data Source: Therkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 62 !
600 - 558 533 -
0 Actuai civision Starring 400- gg O Authonzed Division Staffing 1.g -
~~
200 204 200 - ~ g
- I; 55 52
I I I 0 i 4 l Nuclear Operations Production Engineering Nuclear Services STAFFING LEVEL The authorized actual staffing levels are shown for the three Nuclear Divisions.
Data Source: Sorenson/ Burke (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 24
-C}- Nuclear Operations Division Turnover Rate
-&- Production Engineering Division Turnover Rate 10% -
-O-- Nuclear Services Division Turnover Rate 8%-
2*< -
C O O-C O-o-C O O O-M90 A90 M90 J90 J90 A90 S90 090 N90 D90 J91 F91 M91 A91 M91 J91 J91 PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE The turnover rates for the three Divisions are calculated using only resignations from OPPD.
Division Turnover Rate NOD 4.5%
PED 6.0%
NSD 3.6%
Currently, the OPPD corporate turnover rate is being reported as approximately 4.0%.
This OPPD corporate turnover rate is based on the turnover rate over the last four years.
Data Source Sorenson/ Burke (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None ;
C3
-C}- SRO Exam Pass Ratio (l; Exams Administered)
- RO Exam Pass Ratio (If Exams Administered)
-O- Fort Calhoun Goal 100% - C O O O 80%-
60%-
40% -
20% -
0%
NRC Generic Fund NRC Site Specific NRC Requal OPPD Requal SRO AND RO LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO This indicator is currently being revised by the Fort Calhoun Training Department to more accurately reflect SRO and RO license examination procedures.
SRO License Examination Pass Ratio The Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) License Examination Pass Ratio Indicator shows the number of NRC administered Generic Fundamentals Exams (GFEs), the number of NRC administered Site Specific Exams, the number of NRC administered license requalification exams, and the number of OPPD administered license requalification exams.
RO License Examination Pass Ratio The Reactor Operator (RO) License Examination Pass Ratio Indicator shows the num-ber of NRC administered Generic Fundamentals Exams (GFEs),the number of NRC administered Site Specific Exams, the number of NRC administered license requalification exams, and the number of OPPD administered license requalification exams.
The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 100% pass ratio.
Data Source: Gasper / Herman (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 68
@ SRO Exams Administered O SRO Exams eassed E RO Exams Administcred 50-
@ RO Exams Passed 45-40-35- ,
30-
]-
25- ) $ f
- > 9 20- "
7 <
- ]3 q j 7- 7-(
) 's j p i
15- ) I j j } j s j j pi 10-
- ~
__ f f, j i! I t Ik l I'f 2 i
f'ff;
![
! ! l ! !*
' "- - r$
r d
! l- ! !
II I!
h O 6 i i i i i i i i 6 6 i Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS This indicator shows the numoer of Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) and Reactor Opera-tor (RO) quizzes and exams taken and passed each month. These internally adminis-tered quizzes and exams are used to plot the SRO and RO candidates' monthly progress.
During the month of July 1991, twenty (20) SRO exams were administered and eigh-teen (18) of these exams were passed. In addition, fifteen RO exams were administered and all of these exams were passed.
Data Source: Gasper / Herman (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 65
. Hotlines Initiated 4 Hotlines Closed 35- @ Hotlines Overdue < 4 Weeks
. O Hotiines Overdue > 4 weeks 25-20- [
15- -
10- ,,, , ,
}
_I T __ .
5- -
( -
~ ~
0
' fl 7 i i i i i i i i i i i i ,
Aug90 Sep- Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS This indicator shows the number of Hotline Training Memos that were initiated, returned for close out, overdue less than four weeks, and overdue greater than four weeks for the reporting month.
-July 1991 Initiated Hotlines 6 Closed Hotlines 2 g Hotlines Overdue < 4 wks. 4
( Hotlines Overdue > 4 wks 3 Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source)
AdverseTrend: None t
66 i
O Other Training (1000 Hrs.)
O General Employee Training (1000 hrs.)
O Technical Support (1000 Hrs.)
O Chemistry and Radiation Protection (1000 Hrs.)
6-O Maintenance (1000 Hrs.)
5 Operations (1000 Hrs.)
==
~~
Z is - - -
n
- N p m
M i sg - -
n -
7(9.
2- h_=
M @A /4 .-_.
E sti M p W
, 3 jgj; 31 _
2 d jjj 0- ; ; -; 7 7 ;- E- i , i i i May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS This indicator displays the training instruction hours administered to the listed depart-ments for the reporting month. Due to a programming problem,information for the months of May and June was unavailable at the time of this report's publication.
This indicator is normally one month behind the reporting month due to the time re-quired for data collection and processing.
DEPARTMENT M AR '91 APR'91 Operations 187 61 Maintenance 1313 712 Chemistry and Radiation Protection 1776 823 Technical Support 1004 523 General Employee Training 822 422 Other 39 43 Total 5141 2584 Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 67
~ - - -. . -
O Other Training (1000 Hrs.)
@ General Employee Training (1000 hrs.)
@ Technical Support (1000 Hrs.)
E Chemistry and Radiation Protection (1000 Hrs.)
30-O Maintenance (1000 Hrs.)
25- @ Operations (1000 Hrs.)
20-15- - =
.... y -
g $.
10- e ..., sjg ,,,,, 17/x Wx: 75 5-o r = , ,
=
=
=,= =,=,= , , =, ,
m May90 Jun: Jul .Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING This indicator shows the total number of student hours for Operations, Maintenanca, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, General Employee Training, .
and Other training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station. Due to a programming prob-lem,information for the nionths of May and June was not available at the time of this.
L report's publication.
1 This indicator is normally one month behind the reporting month due to the time needed
= to collect and evaluate the data.
i DEPARTMENT MAR' APR '91 Operations _ 524 166 L Maintenance 4579 1400 l Chemistry and Radiation Protection 5543 2129 Technical Support - 4694 2124 Gcneral Employee Training 2905 1633 Other 112 182 Total 18357 7634 Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source) l Adverse Trend: None L sa
Total Outage MWO's 800 -
1
- MWO's Ready to Work
-O-- Outage MWR Backlog 600 -
400-200 -
-g 0
Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 MWO OVERALL STATUS (CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE)
This indicator shows the total number of Maintenance Work Orders (MWOs) that have been written over the past reporting periods for completion during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage and the number of MWOs that are ready for work (the parts for these MWOs are staged, the procedures are approved, and the paperwork is ready for field use.) Also included is the number of outage Maintenance Work Requests (MWRs) which have been identified for the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage, but have not yet been converted to MWOs. Any MWOs written after the start of the outage will be reflected in the indicator labeled Emergent MWOs. Approximately 3000 maintenance orders were completed during each of the previous two refueling outages.
Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes available.
Data Source: Patterson/Dunham (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 69 I
Total Outage Modifications Mods With Planning Document Approved
-O- Mods With Final Design Approved O Mods With Construction Package Approved 30-20-10-0 Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 PROGRESS OF CYCLE 14 OUTAGE MODIFICATION PLANNING This indicator shows the number of modifications approved for planning (to determine feasibility) or for completion during the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage (RFO). Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes available.
The current schedule for completion of the modification phases of the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage is as follows:
Outage Scope Freeze
- Oct.1,1990 Planning Documents Approved
- Feb 22,1991 Final Designs Approved
- Apr 24,1991 Construction Packages Approved
- Jun 15,1991 Schedule incorporated
- Jul 26,1991 Material On Site
- Jul 26,1991 Construction Started Feb 15,1992 Construction Complete Mar 30,1992 Accepted by SAC Apr 10,1992
- Indicates milestones which have not been changed as a result of the new January 1992 refueling outage start date. A forced outage after November 1991 could result in an early start date for the Cycle 14 RFO.
Data Source: Patterson/Dunham (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 I
70
Total Outage Projects Projects with Preliminary Schedules
- Submitted
~
-D- Projects with Detailed Schedules Submitted 40-30-
__N 20-10-
/
0 Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (CYCLE 14 REFUELING OUTAGE)
This indicator shows the status of the projects which affect the scope of the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage.
The projects that do not yet have preliminary schedules are Liquid Effluent Releases and Radiography.
Additional data points will be added to this indicator as informa* ion becomes available.
The schedule for the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage projects is as follows:
All Projects identified and Outage Scope Frozen Oct 1,1990 All Projects Scheduled in Detail Jun 28,1991 Procedures Ready Oct 26,1991 Parts Staged Nov 16,1991 Data Source: Patterson/Dunham (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 71
Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours 12-
-O-- Fort Calhoun Goal 9-C C C C C GOOD 6-V 3.7 2.63- w N
i
~~~~
i 1~
'88 '89 '90 i ~O i i i Jul90 Aug Sep i
Oct
, i Nov Dec Jan i
6 0
Feb Mar y0 m
o Apr May Jun91 VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator displays the number of NRC violations cited in inspection reports per 1000 NRC inspection hours. This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved with collecting and processing the data.
The violations per 1000 inspection hours indicator was reported as 0.56 for the twelve months from July 30,1990 thru June 30,1991.
The Fori Calhoun Goal is 1.6 violations per 1000 inspection hours for 1991.
Data Source: Therkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 72
5--
V o ations per 1000 Inspection Hours (12 month Period) g Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours (1991 Only) g 4-E 8
5
& 3- 2.89
~
.E 2.29 h
" 2.05 M k~ 1.76 0
d$ l E ss 1.52 Y N '
2 ?? Y $ $
g?s f>
51- 0.88 0.9 1.05 gy 1.15 4 gx .
of 0.82 Lis $$ D(: 0.81 (R Rt N:k 0.56 N D: D$I R.[ (Df{
X 0.37
$ L$$
$kLl [klky kk %Q- % ,.
Ws uma kk$.
sx s.x cxx e.# sv sxx so sys y 0 N' i i S "e '" i i
i i
N i
N
i Fort Cooper River Bend Commanche Wolf Creek Arkansas South Texas Waterford Calhoun Peak One COMPARISON OF VIOLATIONS AMONG REGION IV PLANTS This indicator provides a comparison of violations per 1000 inspection hours among Region IV nuclear power plants. The data is compiled for a twelve month period from July 1,1990 to June 30,1991 and for 1.s calendar year 1991 only.
The Fort Calhoun goal for 1991 is 1.6 violations per 1000 inspection hours.
Data Source: Therkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 73
4 75 . =i Nurnber of Violations During the Last 12 Months -
@ Number of NCVs During the Last 12 Months 50-34 34 28 27 25-21 21 20 18 M$ 16 -
16
- 14 14 15 12 12 i$f
- k! , m 11 33 Pi 4 4.< R 3e 9 N $ N !N !$t % !$ = 7 7 7 M:} }ff -
$jfg$ Ed CE g M #l 7 5 4
, 8 i M i L ei
%R .
W k{
i li&
B - a$
. i Ju!90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun91 CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCVs (TWELVE-MONTH RUNNING TOTAL)
The Cumulative Violations and Non-Cited Violations (NCVs) indicator shows the cumu-lative number of violations and the cumulative number of NCVs for the last twelve months.
This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved with collecting and processing the data for this indicator.
Data Source: Therkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 74 i
@ Outstanding CARS That Are Modification Related
-O- Outstanding CARS > Six Months Old T tal Outstanding CARS 20b 150-100-50- C N O
V ##'* '
AugGO Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS This indicator shows the total number of outstanding Corrective Action Reports (CARS),
the number of outstanding CARS that are greatar than six months old, and the number of outstanding CARS that are modification related.
As of the end of July 1991, there were 113 outstanding CARS,52 CARS that were greater than six months old, and 5 CARS that were modification related.
Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None 75
20-15- --C}- NOD Overdue CARS 10- - NOD r A ns With Extensions Granted S-A 0 m' w O F .. 'Y L O w 'T F Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jt n Jul91
~
-O- PED Overdue CARS 2S-20- --6-- PED CARS With Extensions Granted g-r" " m m- # ..
' N p Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Ju!91 6-5- --C- Other Overdue CARS
~
3-
--a- Other CARS With Extensions Granted 2-i i Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS This indicator shows the number of overdue CARS and the number of CARS which received extensions broken down by organization.
Overdue CARS Overdue CA'As May 91 June 91 July 91 NOD 0 0 0 PED 1 1 0 Others 0 0 1 Total 1 1 1
' ' ~ ~
Extended CARS Ex1anded CARS May 91 June 91__ July 91 NOD 2 1 3 PED 4
- 9 12 Others 1 O 1 i Total 7 10 16 Data Soitree: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: PED CARS with extensions granted have increased for three consecutive montns.
76
l .
191>0 SALP Furet.
Area CARS Sigalf. CARS NRC Vbla. LERs
~
A) Plant Operatiod 62 0 2 10 B) Radiolog. 28 2 0 0 Controls C) Maint/Survel . 100 8 6 4 D) Ernorgency 7 0 3 0 Preparedness E) Security 26 0 5 3 F) Engr / Tech 172 5 3 12 Suppori G) Safety Assess > 29 0 0 0 Oual. Veril.
H) Other 1 0 0 0 Total 505 15 19 29 1991 SALP Funct.
Area CARS Sionit. CARS NRC Viola. LERs A) Plant Operations 19 (3) 1 1 3 (2)
B) Radiolog. 7 0 2 (2) O Controls C) Maint/Survell 52 (3) 0 0 3 (1)
D) Emergency 15 0 0 0 Preparedness E) Security 4 (2) 0 1 1 F) Engr / Tech 59 (9) 2 (1) 0 7 (2)
Suppor1 G) Safety Assess) 17 (3) 0 0 1 Qual. Verit.
H) Othei 0 0 0 0 Tota' 173(20) 3 (1) 4 (2) 15(5)
Note: ( ) indicate value for the reporting month.
CARS ISSUED vs SIGNIFICANT CARS vs NRC VIOLATIONS ISSUED vs LERs REPORTED The above matrix shows the number of Corrective Action Reports (CARS) issued by the Nuclear Services Division (NSD) vs the number of Significant CARS issued by NSD vs the number of violations issued by the NRC for the Fort Calhoun Station in 1990 c ^
1991. Included in this table is the number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) identit:ed by the Station each year. The number of NRC violations reported is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the violations.
Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)
Therkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)
Adverse Trend: None SEP 15,20, . i 77
PERFORMANCE I?IDICATOR DEFilllTIOilS AGE OF OUT9TANDING MAINTEN Af4CE WC AK OR- based on the total square footage This indcator tracks DERS perictmance for SEP # 54.
This indicator tracks the total number of outstanding cor-rective non-outage Maintenance Work Orders at the Fort DISABLING INJURY FREQUENCY HATE (LOST TIME Calhoun Staten versus their age m months. ACCIDENT RATE)
This indicator is defined as the number of accidents for AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS all utikty personnel permanently assigned to the stston, This indicator is defined as the percentage of open, non- involving days away from work per 200,000 man hours outage, maintenance work oroers that are on hold awan- worked (100 man yeart,). This does not include contrac-ing parts, to the total number of open, non-outage, main- tor personnel. This indicator tracks porsonnel perf or.
tenance work orders. mance for SEP #25 & 26.
AUXILIARY SYSTEMS CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE DOCUMENT REVIEW (DIENNIAL)
STATION LIMITS The Document Review indicator shows the number of The cumulative hours that the Component Coobng Watet documents reviewed, the number of documents sched-system is outside the staten chemistry limit. The hours uted for review, and the number of document reviews are accumulated from the first sample exceeding the limit that are ovetous for the reporting month. A document until additonal samphng shows the parameter to be back review is considered overdue tf the review is not com-within limits. plete within 6 months of the assigned due date. This indi-cator tracks performance for SEP 846 CARS ISSUED vs SIGNIFICANT CARS vs NRC VIOLA.
llONS vs LERs REPORTED EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIADll.
Provides a comparison of CARS issued, NRC violations. ITY and LERs reported. This indicator tracks periormance for This indicator shows the number of f ailures that were SEP #15,20, & 21. reported dunng the last 20,50, and 100 emergency die-sel generator cs mands at the Fort Calhoun Staton. Also CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE shown are trigger values which correlate to a high level Compares the Fort Calhoun check valve f ailure rate to of Con 4dence that a unft's dieselgenerators have ob-the industry chock valve f ailure rate (f ailures per 1 milhon tained a rehabihty of greater than or equal to 95% when component hours). The data for the industry f ailure rate the demand f ailures 6 S less than the trigger values.
is three nionths behind the Pl'rteport reporting month. 1) Number of Start Demands: All vahd and inadvartent This indicator tracks performance for SEP #43. start demands, including all start only demands and all start demands that are followed by load run demands, COMPARISON OF VIOLATIONS AMONG REGION IV whether by automatic or manualinitiation. A start only PLANTS demand is a demand in which the emergency generator Pr':mdes data on violations per 1000 inspection hours for is started, but no attempt is made to load the generator.
Region IV nuclear power plants. 2) Number of Start FaMures: Any f ailure within the emer.
gency generator system that prevents the generator from CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE DACKLOG GREATER achievmg specified frequency and voltage is classihed at THAN 3 MONTHS OLD a vahd start f ailure. This includes any condton identiher, The percentage of total outstanding corrective mainte- in the course of maintenance inspectons (with the eme.-
nance items, not requiring an outage, that are greater gency generator in standby mode) that definitelv would than three months old at the end of the period reported. have resulted in a start failure if a demand had occurred.
- 3) Number of Load Run Demands: For a vahd load-run CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS & NON CITED VIOLA- domand to be counted the load run attempt must meet TlONS (12 MONTH RUNNING TOTAL) one or more of the following criteria:
The cumulative number of vo:ations and Non-Cited Vo- A)A load run of any duration that resutts from a real auto-lations for the last 12 months matic or manual imtiation.
B)A load run test to satisfy the plant's los 'nd duration DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT as stated in each test's specibcatons.
This indicator shows the daily core thermal output as C)Other specialtests in which the emergency generator measured from computer point XC105 (in thermat mega- is expected to be operated for at least one hour while watts). The 1500 MW Tech Spec limit, and the unmet loaded 'vith at least 50% of its design load.
porton of the 1495 MW FCS daily goal for the reporting 4) Number of Load Run Failures: A load run f ailure month are also shown. should be counted for any reason in which the emer-gency generator does not pick up load and run as pre-DECONTAMINATED RADIATION CONTROLLED dicted. Failures are counted during any valid load-run AREA demands.
The percentage of the Radiaton Controlled Area, which 5)Exceptons: Unsuccessful attempts to start or load run includes the auxihary building, the radwaste building, and should not be counted as vahd demands or f ailures when areas of the CEP building, which is decontaminated they can be attnbutEl to any of the icilowing:
78
PERFORMANCE lt4DICATOR DEFilllTIOtJS (Cont'd)
A)Spurous tnps that would be bypassed in the event of an emergency. FORCED OUTAGE RATE B)Malf unction of equipment that is not required dunng an This indcator is defined as the percentage of time that emergency, the unit was unavailable due to forced events compared C)lntentionaltermination of a test because of abnormal to the time planned for electreal generaton. Forced conditons that would not have resulted in major diesel events are f ailures or other unplanned conditons that generator damage or repair, require removing the unit from service before the end of D)Malfuactions or operating errors which would have not the next weekend. Forced events include startup failures revented the emergency generator from being restarted and events initiated whi:a the unft is in reserve shutdown and brought to load wfthin a f ew minutes. (i s., the unit is available but not in servce).
E)A f ailure to start because a porton of the starting sys-tem was disabled for test purpose, if followed by a suc- FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR cessful start with the starting system in its normal abgn. This indcator is defined as the steady state primary cool-mont. ant 1131 activity, corrected for the tramp uranium contri.
Each emergency generator f ailure that results in the gen- buten and normahzed to a common purification orator being declared inoperable should be countad as rate. Tramp uranium it f uel whch has been depc*.ited on one demand and one failure. Exploratory tests dunng reactor core internals f rom previous defective fuel or is corrective maintenance and the succest,fultest that 101- present on the surf ace of fuel (lements from the manu-lows repair to venty operab.hty should rmt be counted as f acturing process. Steady state is defined as continuous demands or f ailures when the EDG has not been de- operations above 85 percent power for at least sevan clared operable again. days.This INPO indcator uses an industry normahzed letdown purifcation rate. The FRI has also been calcu-ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) DREAK- lated using FCS's actualletdown punfication rate. These DOWN calculatons revealed that the use of the plant's actual This indicator breaks down the number of Endneering rate would result in an approximate 45% increase in FRI Change Notices (ECNs) that are assigned to Da sign data Engineering Nuclear (DEN), System Engineering, and Maintenance. The graphs provide data on ECN Facihty GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE DEING DIS-Changes open, ECN Substitute Replacement Parts CHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT open, and ECN Document Changes open. This indicator This ind.cator displays the total number of Curies of a!!
tracks periormance for SEP #S2. gaseous radioactive nuchdes released from FCS.
ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) STATUS GROSS HEAT RATE The number of ECNs that were opened ECNs that were Gross hsat rate is defined as the ratio of totalthermal completed, and open bacAlog ECNs awaiting completion energy in Britisn Thermal Uarts (BTU) produced by the by DEN for the reporting month. This indicator tracks per- reactor to the total gross electrical energy produced by formance for SEP #62, the ponerato, in kitcwatt hours (KWH).
EOUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRIT 1 HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED CAL HOURS The total amount (in Kilograms) of non halogenated haz.
Equipment forced outages per 1000 critcal hours is the ardous waste, halog 9nated hazardous waste, and other inverse of the mean time between forced outages hazardous waste produced by FCS sach month.
caused by equipment f ailures. The mean time is equal to the number of hours the reactor is criticalin a perod HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS (1000 hours0.0116 days <br />0.278 hours <br />0.00165 weeks <br />3.805e-4 months <br />) divided by the number of forced outages The number of Hothne Training Memos (HTM) that are caused by equipment f ailures in that period. initiated, closed, and overdue less or greater than 4 weeks for the indicated rnonth. A HTM is a tiaining docu-EOUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR ment sent out for immediate review. The HTM should be This indicator is defined as the ratio of gross available reviewed and signed within 5 days of receipt of the HTM.
generation to gross maximum generaton, expressed es a percentage. Available generaton is the energy that can HOURS CHEMISTRY IS OUTSIDE OWNERS GROUP be produced if the Unit is operated at the maximum GUIDELINES power level permittod by equipment and regulatory limi- Total hours for 13 sacondary side chemistry parameters tations. Maximum generaton is the energy that can be exceeding guidehnes during power operaton. Power produced by a unit in a given period if operated continu- operation is defined as greater than 30% power. The 13 ously at maximum capacity, parameters tracked are steam generator pH, cation con-ductivity, boron silica, chloride, sulf ate, sodium, f eed wa-EXPEDITED PURCHASES ter pH, dissolved crygen, hydrazine, iron, copper, and The percentage of expedited purchases which oxurred condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen.
during the reporting month compared to the total number of purchase orders generated.
79
4 PERFORMAf4CE It4DICATOR DEFit41TIOt4S (Cont'd) their request date the same as their need date compared it4 LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT OF SER- to the total number of MRs.
VICE Total number of in-hne chemistry instruments that are MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIADON EXPOSURE out ci-service in the Secondary System and the Post The total maximum amount of radiaton received by an Accident Sampling System (PASS) individual person working at FCS on a monthly, quarterly, and annual basis.
' INVENTORY ACCURACY The percentage of line items that are counted each MWO OVERALL STATUS (CYCLE 13 REFUELING month by the warehouse which need count etustments. OUTAGE)
The total number of Maintenance Work Orriers (MWOs)
INVOICE BREAKDOWN that have been wntten for completon dunng the Cycle 14 The number of invoices that are on hold due to shelf Mc, Ref uehng Outage. MWOs whch are written aher the start COE, and miscellaneous reasons. of the Refuehng Outage will be labeled Emergent MWOs.
Also shown is the number of MWRs whch have been LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS identif.ed for the Cycle 14 Refueling Outage, but have This indicator shows the nurnber of SRO and/or RO quiz- not yet been converted to fAWOs, This indicator tracks zes and exams that are administered and passed each performance for SEP #31.
month. This indcator tracks training periormance for SEP 868. NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS The number of radiologeal hot spots which have been LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCH ARGED ident:fied and documented to exist at FCS at the end of TO THE ENVIRONMENT the reporting month. A hot spot is a small locahzed This indicator displays the volume of hquid radenctive source of radiation. A hot spot occurs when the mntact waste released from the radioactive waste monitt,t tanks. dose rate of an nom is at least 5 times the General Area to include releases through the plant blowdown if radio- dose rate and the item's dose rate is equal to e' greater a@ve nuchdes are detected in thw blowdown system, than 100 mrem / hour.
The curies from all releases from FCS to the Mesouri River are also shown. HUMBER OF bdCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEM (NPRDS) FAILURE REPORTS SUBMITTED LOGG ABLE/REPORTAB LE INCIDENTS (SECURITY) The data plotted is the total number of NPRDS compo-The total number of security incidents for the reporting nont f ailures (confirmed and potsible) and the number of month depicted in two graphs. This indicator tracks secu- confirmed NPhDS component f ailures. The total number rity pertormance for SEP#58. of NPRDS component failures are based on the number of failure reports that have been sent to the Institute of MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS Nuclear Power Operations (INPO). Confirmed NPRDS The r. umber of Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System component f ailures are based upon f ailure reports that (NPRDS) components with inore than 1 failure nd the have been accepted by INPO. Possible NPRDS compo.
number of NPRDS components with more than 2 failures nont f ailures are baced upon f ailure reports that are still duriag the last 12 months. Under review by INPO. NPRDS is a utikty industry users group program which has been outlined by INPO and MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER B ACKLOG implemented at FCS.
The number of corrective non outage maintenance work orders that remain open at the end of the reporting NUMBER OF OUT OF SERVICE CONTROL ROOM month. This indicator was added to the Pl Report to INSTRUMENTS trend open corrective non-outage maintenance work or- A control room instrument that cannot periorm its design dets as stated in SEP #36. function is considered as out of service. A control room instrument which has had a Maintenance Work Order MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (MWO) wrrtten for it and has not been repaired by the This indicator is a breakdown of mrrective non-outage end of the reporting pared is considered out of-service maintenance work orders by several categories that re- and will be courited. The duration of the out-of service main open at the end of the reporting month. This indca- conditon is not considered. Computer CRTs are not con-tot tracks maintenance performance for SEP #36. sidered as control room instruments.
MAINTENANCE OVERTIME NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN The % of overtime hours compared to normal hours for LERS maintenance. This includes OPPD personnel as well as The number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) attributed contract personnel. to po sonnel error on the original LER submittat This indcator trends personnel performance for SEP #15.
MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING The percent of mat:J requests (MRs) for issues with 80
w PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Cont'd) include modifcations whch are proposed for cancella-NUMBER OF MISSED SURVElLLANCE TESTS RE. tion.
SULT1ND IN UCENSEE EVENT REPORTS The number of Surveillance Tests (3Ts) that result in OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (CYCLE 14 Licensee Event Reports (LER$) during the reporting REFUELING OUTAGE) month. This indicator tracks missed STs for SEP #60 & The number of projects which affect the scope of the
- 61. Cycle 14 Refueling Outage and the number of projects for which detailed schedules have been sutamtted. This l OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET indcator tracks performance for SEP #31.
The year to date budget compared to the actual expen-ditures for Operations and Maintenance departments. OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACT1CN R'! PORTS OUTSTANDING CORRECT 1VE ACTION REPORTS The number of overdue Corrective Action Reports This indicator displays the totai number of outstanding (C ARs) and the number of CARS which received exten-Correctrve Action Reports (CARS), the number of CARS sions broken down by organization for the last 6 months.
that are older than six months and the number of modtfi.
caton related CARS. PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTE-NANCE ACTIVITIES 1 OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE RE. The */. of the number of completed maintenance activi- I OUESTS (EARS) ties as compared to the number of scheduled mainte.
The total number of open EARS and the number of open nance activities cach week, This % is shown for each EARS broken down by their age in months. This indcator maintenance craft. Maintenance activities include tracks performance for SEP #62. MWRs, MWOs, STs, PMOs, calibratons, and other mis-cellaneous activities. These indicators track Maintenance OUTSTAND; 9 MODIFICATIONS performance for SEP #33. i The number of Modifcation Requests (MRs)in any state l betweOn the issuance of a Modifcaton Number and the PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULA.
completion of the drawing update. TiVE)
- 1) Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress. This number Collective radiaton exposure is the total external whole- l reperesents modtfcation requests that have not been body dose received by all on-srle personnel (including plant approved during the reporting month, contractors and visitors)during a time period, as mea- I 2)Modifcation Requests Being Reviewed. This category sured by the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD). Col.
includes: lective radiation exposure is reported in units of man-A.) Modification Requests that are not yet reviewed, rem. This indicator tracks radological work performance B.)Modifcaton Requests being reviewed by the Nuclear for SEP #54.
Projects Review Committee (NPRC).
C.) Modification Requests being reviewed by the Nuclear PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE Projects Committee (NPC) The ratio of the numter of turnovers to average employ.
These Modification Requests may be reviewed several ment. A turnover is a vacancy created by voluntary resig-times before they are approved for accomphshment or nation from the company. Retirement, death, terminaton, cancelled. Some of these Modification Requests are re. transfers within the company, and part time employees turned to Engineering for more information, some ap. are not considered in turnover.
proved for evaluation, some approved for study, and some approved for planning. Once planning is completed PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE and the scope of the work is clearly defined, these Modi- This indcator is defined as the % of preventive mainte-ficaton Requests may be approved for accomplishment nance items in the month that were not completed by the with a year assigned for constructon of they may be can. scheduled dato plus a grace period equal to 25 % of the celled. All of these different phases require review, scheduled interval. This indicator tracks preventive main-3)Desgn Enginesring Backlog 1n Progress. Nuclear tenance activities for SEP #41.
Planning has assigned a year in which construction will be completed and design work may be in progress. PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY % OF HOURS OUT
- 4) Construction Backlogin Progress. The Construction OF LIMIT Package has been issued or c**nstruction has begun but The % of hours out of limit are for six primary chemistry the modification has not been accepted by the System parameters divided by the total number of hours possible Acceptance Committce (SAC). for the month. The key parameters used are: Lithium, 5)Desgn Engineering Update Backlog 1n Progress. PED Chloride. Hydrogen, Dissolved Oxygen, Fluoride, and has received the Modifcation Completon Report but the drawings have not been updated.
The above mentoned outstanding modifcations do not 81
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Cont'd)
Suspended Solids. EPRI limits are used.
- 1) Licensee Des;gnated Vehicles (LDVs)- Incidents re-PROCEDUR AL HONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS lated to the use of LDVs. e g., keys left in the vehicle, (MAINTENANCE) loss of keys. or f ailure to retum keys.
The number of identified incidents concerning mainte- 2) Securny Badges incidents associated with improper nance procedural problems, the number of closed IRS use aad handhng of security badges. Incidents include related to the use of procedures (includes the number of securtry badges that are bst, taken out of the protected closed irs caused by procedural nor. compliance), and area, out of control on the, or inadvertently destroyed or the number of closed procedural noncomphance irs. broken.
This indcator trends personnel performance for SEP #15 3) Access Control and Authonzaton Administrative and
& 44. procedural errors associated with the use of the card, access system such as tailgating, incorrect securrty PROGRESS OF CYCLE 14 OUTAGE MODIFICATION badge issued, and improper escort procedures. This also PLANNING includes inciden's that were caused h, incorrect access The number of modifications approved for planning (to authorization information eatorerl into the securny sys-determine feasibilay) for completion dunng the Cycle 14 tem computer.
Refueling Outage. This indcator tracks periormance for 4) Securrty Key Control Incidents invelving Security key SE P #31. control, e g., bst Securny keys, Security keys removed from sne, or f ailure to return Security keys. This type of RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGR AM event does not reflect incidents concerning LDV The number of identified poor radiological work practicos keys.This indcatt,r tracks secunty performance for SEP (PRWP) for the reporting month. This indicator tracks #58.
radiolog cal work performance for SEP #52.
SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAlHTENANCE incidents involving alarm system f ailures, CCTV f ailures, The ratio of preventive maintenance (including surveil- securny computer f allures, search equipment f ailures, lance testing and calibration procedures) to the sum of door hardware failures, and card reader failures. These non-outage corrective maintenance and preventive main- b, tem f ailures are further categorized as follows:
tenance uompleted over the reporting period. The ratio, 1) Alarm Systerr Failure - Detecton system events in-expressed as a percentage,is calculated based on man- volving f alselnt,.sance alarms and mechanical f ailures.
hours. This indicator tracks preventive maintenance ac- 2) Alarm System Environmental Failures Degradations livities for SEP 841. to detecton system performance as a rcsult of environ-mental conditons (i.e., rain, snow, frost).
RECORDABLE .NJURY CASES FREQUENFY 4ATF. 3 COW FrJimen Metru.Ifri'wm,to M!CCTV hard-(RECORDABLE INJURY RATE) ware components.
The number of injuries requiring more than normal first 4)CCTV Environmental Failures Degradations to CCTV aid per 260,000 man hours worked. This indieetor trends performance as a result of environmental conddons (i.e.,
personnel performance for SEP #15,25 & 26. rain, snow, frost, f og, sunspots, shade),
- 5) Security Computer Failures Failure of the muttil SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE plexer, central processing unit. and other computer hard-INDEX ware and software. This ategory does not include soft-The Chemistry Performance Index (CPI)is a calculation ware problems caused by operator error in us ng the based on the concentration of key impurities in the sec- soft ware.
Ondary side of the plant. These key impurities are the 6) Search Equipment Failures Failures of x ray, metal, most likely cause of deterioraton of ths steam genera- or explosiv9 detectors and other equipment used to tors. The chemistry parameters are reported only for the search for contraband. This also includes incidents period of time greater than 30 percent power. where the search equpment is found defective or did not function properly dunng testing.
SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE 7) Door Hardware Failures Failure of the door alarm INDEX (CONTINUED) _
and door hardwarc auch as latches, electric strikes, The CPIis calculated using the follewing equaton: CPI - doorknobs, bcks, etc.
((Kat.8) + (Na'20) ~ 4,/10)) / 3 where the following are B) Card Reader Failures Incidents causad by machani-monthly avera0es cf: Ka average bbwdown cation cal breakdown of card readers, but not improper use of conductivity, Na = average blowdown sodium concen- the card readers. (See Access Control and traton, O, - average condensate pump discharge dis- Authorization)This indcator tracks security periormance solved orygon concentraton. for SEP #58.
SECURITY INCIDENTS BREAKDOWN SPARE PARTS ISSUED The number of Secunty bggabletroportabte incidents is The dollar value of the spare pa'ts issued for FCS during broken down into the following categories:
82
O PERFORM ANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (cont'd)
SRO & RO OPERATOR LICENSE EXAMINATION TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS PASS RATIO Reportable s. kin and cothing contaminations above The SRO & RO Icense eraminaton pass rato for NRC background levels greater than 5000 opm/100 cm administered Generic Fundamentals Exams (GFEs), squared. This indcator trends personnel periormance for NRC administered Site Specific Exams, NRC adminis- SEP #15 & 54.
tored license requalifestion exams, and OPPD adminis-tered license requahfcation exams. This indcator trackr UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS Training periormance for SEP #08. WHILE CRl11 CAL This indicator is defined as the number of unplanned au-STAFFING LEVEL tomate serams (reactor protecton syr, tem logic actua-The actual staffing level and the authonzod staffing level tions) that occur while the reactor is critcal. TI,o indicator for the Nuclear Operations Divison, the Producion EngL is f urther defined as follows:
neering Divison, and the Nuclear Services Division. This 1)Unplanncd means that the scrcm was not pac. of a indicator tracks performance for SEP #24. planned test or evolution.
- 2) Scram rneans the automatic shutdown of the reactor STATION NET GENERATION by a rapid insertion of all control rods that is caused by The not generation (sum) produced by the FCS during actuaton of the reactor protecton system. The scram the reporting month, signal may have resulted f rom exceeding a setpoint or may have been sputous.
STOCKOUT RATE 3) Automate means that the initial signal that caused ac-The total number of Pck Tckets that were generated tuaton of the reactor protecten system logic was pro.
dunng the reporting month and the total numt, of Pck veded from one of the sensors monitonng plant param-Tickets that were generated during the reporting month eters and vonditons, rather than the manual scram with no parts available expressed as a percentage. switches (or pushbuttons) in the main control room.
4)Cntcal means that dur ng the steady state condition of TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS the reactor prior to the scram, the effec'ive multiplication The number of temporary mechanical and electrcal con- f actor (k,) was equal to one.
figurations to the plant's systems.
- 1) Temporary configurations are defined as electrical UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS.
Jumpers, electrical blocks, mechanical jumpers, or me- (INPO DErtN1110N) chanical blocks which are installed in the plant operating This indicator is defined as tne sum of the following systems and are not shown on the latest revision ot the safety system actuctions:
PalD, schematic, connecton, wiring, or flow diagrams. 1)The number of unplanned Emergency Core Cooling 2Wumpers and blocks whch are installed for Surveil- System (ECCS) actuations that result from reaching an lance Tests, Maintenance Procedures, Calibration Pro- ECCS actuaton setpoint or f rom a spurious / inadvertent cedures, Special Procedures, or Operating Procedures ECCS signal.
are not considered as temporcry modific:,tions unless the 2)The number of unplanned emergency AC power sys-jumper or block remains in place after the test or proco- tem actuations that result from a loss of power to a safe-dure is complete. Jumpers and blocks installed in test or guards bus. An unplanned safety system actuaton oc-lab instruments are not considered as temporary modifi- curs when an actuaton setpoint for a saf ety system is catons, rear.hed or when a spurous or inadvertent signal is gen-
- 3) Scaffolding is not considered a temporary mod:ficaton. erated (ECCS only), ano major equipment in the system Jumpers and blocks whch are instatied and for which is actuated. UnplanncJ means that the system actua'on EEARs have been submitted will be considered as tem- was not part of a planned test or evolution. The ECCS parary modifcatons until final resoluton of the EEAR actuatons to be counted are actuatons of the high pres-and the jumper or block is removed or is parmanently sure injecten system, the low presture injection systsm, recorded on the drawings.Tiiis indicator tracks temporary or the safety injecten tanks.
modif catens for SEP #62 & 71.
UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS(NRC TOTAL INSTRllCT10N HOURS DEFINITION)
The total number and department breakdown of training The number of safety system actuatons which include instructon hours administered by the Traimng Center. (ak) the High Pressure Saf ety injection System, the Low Pressure Safety injection System, the Saf ety injec-TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING ton Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators. The Tae total number of student hours of training for Opera- NRC classifcation of safety system actuatons includes tions, Maintenance, Chemistry / Radiation Protection, actuations when major equipment is operated d when Technical Support, General Employee Training, and the logic systems for the above safety systems are chal-Other training conducted for FCS. lenged.
83
\
\
~..
t PEP.FORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Cont'd)
VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator is defined as the number of volations sited in NRC inspecton reports for FCS per 1000 NRC inspecton hours. The volatons are reported in the year that the inspection was actually performed and not based on when the inspecton report is received. The hours reported for each inspecton report are used as the inspecton hours.
VOLUME OF LOW. LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE This indicator is defined as the volume of low level solid radioactive waste tdua!!y shipped for burial. This indicator also shows the volume of low-level radcactive waste which is in temporary sarage, the amount of radcactive oil that has been shipped off site for processing, and the volume of soled dry radioactrve waste which has coon shipped off-site for pr::::.44. Lc.v level solid radcactive waste consists of dry active waste, sludges, resins, and evaporator bottoms generated as a resutt of nuclear power plant operation and maintenance. Dry radioactive waste includes contaminated rags, cleaning m terials, disposable protective clothing, plastic containers, and any other material to be disposed of at a low-levwl radioactive waste disposal site, except resin, s',idge, or evaporator bottoms. Low-level re-fort to all radioactive waste that is not spent f uel or a by product of spent fuel prreessing. This indicator tracks radio-logical work performance for SEP #54.
G 84
SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX 1
The purpose of the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Performance Indicators index is to list perior, mance indicators related to SEP ltems with parameters that can be trended.
SEP Reference Number 15 imgq Increase HPES and IR Accountability Through Use of Periormance ind cators Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance) . . .. . .25 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations . . . . .42 Recordable injury Cases Frequency Rate . .... . . . . . . . . . . . 61 Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs . . . . . . . . 62 CARS issued vs Significant CARS issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LERs Reported . . . . . . . 77 SEP Reference Number 20 Ouality Audits and Surveillance Programs are Evaluated, improved in Depth and Strengthened CARS issued vs Significant C ARs issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LERs Reported . . 77 SEP Reference Number 21 Develop and Conduct Saf ety System Functional inspections CARS issued vs Signhicant CAPS issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LERs Reported . . 77 SEP Reference Number 24 Complete Statt Studies Staffing level .. . . . . . . . . .. . 63 SEP Reference Number 25 Training Program for Managers and Supervisors implemented Disabling injury Frequency Rate . . . . . .. .. . . . . .11 Recordable injury Cases Frequency Rate . . . . . .. .. . . 61 SEP Relftence Number 26 Evaluate and Implement Station Standards for Safe Work Practice Requirements Disabling injury Frequency Rate . . . . . . . . .. . . . .11 Recordable injury Cases Frequency Rate . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. 61 SEP Reference Number 31 Develop Outage and Maintenance Planning Manual and Conduct Project Management Training MWO Overall Status (Cycle 13 Refueling Outage) . .. . . . . . . . . . . .. 69 Progress of Cycle 13 Outage Mcdification Planning .. . .. .. . . . .70 Overall Project Status (Cycle 13 Refueling Outage) . . . . .. 71 SEP Reference Number 33 Develop On Line Maintenanc? and Modification Schedule Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (Electrical Mainten&nce) . .. . .. . . 27 (Pressure Equipment) . .. . . . .. .28 (General Maintenance). .. . . 29 (Mechanical Maintenance) . .. . . . . ,, . . . . 30 (instrumentation & Control) 68 SEP Reference Number 36 Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog Maintenance Work Order (MWO) Backlog (CorrectWe Non-Outage Maintenance) . . . 26 Maintenance Work Order (MWO) Breakdown (Corrective Non-Outage Maintenance). .19 SEP Reference Number 41 Develop and Imptement a Preventive Maintenance Schedule Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance . . 21 85
- d i .
Pieventive M intenance itoms Overdue . ... ... .. .. . .. . . 22 Procedural Noncompliance incidents . . . . . . 25 Sfff, terence Number 43 Implement the Check Valve Test Program Check Valve Failure Rate. . .. .. . . . 33 SEP Reference Number 44 Compliance With and Use of Procedures Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance) . .. ._ . ... . . . .25 SEP Reference Number 48 Design a Procedures Control and Administrative Program Document Review . . . .. .. . . . . .15 Sf.P Reference Number 52 Establish Supervisory Accountability for Workers Radiological Practices Radiological Work Practices Program. . . 44 SEP Reference Number 54 Complete implementation of Radeiogical Enhancem n' program Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative) .. . . . . .9 Volume of Low-Level Solid Radioactive Waste. . . . .10 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations . ... .. .. 42 Decontaminated Radiation Controlled Area.. . . . . .. 43 SEP Reference Number 58 Revise Physica; Security Training and Procedure Program Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Security) .... .... ... . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. 48 Secunty incident Breakdown. ... . . .. .. . . . . . . . . . 49 Security System Fallures ..... . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . ... . . . . 50 SEP Reference Number 60 Improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports. ..32 SEP Reference Number 61 Modify Computer Program to Correctly Schedule Surveillance Tests Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports.. . . .32 SIEHeterence Number 62 Establish Interim System Engineers Temporary Modifications . . . . . . . .. . . . . . ... 57 Outstanding Engineering Assistance Requests (EARS) . . .. .. . . . 58 Engineering Change Notico Status . . . . . ... ... .. .. . . . . . . 59 Engineering Change Notice Breakdown . . .. . .. . 60 SEP Reference Number 68 Assess Root Cause of Poor Operator Training and Ectablish Means to Monitor Operator Training SRO / RO License Examination Pass Ratio.. . . . . 64 License Candidate Exams. . . . . . . . . 65 SEP Reference Number 71 Improve Controls over Temporary Modifications Tomporary Modifications . . 57 86
O REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST J. C. Adams K. R. Her.ry L G. Sealock R. L. Andrews J. B. Herman H. J. Solick G. L. Anglehart G. J. liill D. K. Sentel W. R. Bateman K. C. Holthaus J. W. Shannon K. L. Belek M. A. Howman R. W. Short A. D. Bl!au L. G. Huliska C. F. Simmons B. H. Biome C. J. Husk E.L.Skaggs C. N. Bloyd R. L. Jaworski J. L. Skiles J.P.Dobba R. A.Johansen F. K. Smith C. E. Boughter W. C. Jones R. L. Sorenson M. A. Breuer J. D. Kecy K. E. Steele C J. Brunnert J. D. Keppler W. Steele M. W. Butt D. D. Kloock H. F. Sterba C. A. Carlson J. C. Knight G. A. Teeple J. W. Chase D. M. Kobunski M. A. Tesar G. R. Chatfield G. J. Krause T. G. Therkildsen A. G. Christensen L J. Kripal J. W. Tills A J. Clark J. G. Krist O. R. Trausch O. J. Clayton J. B. Kuhr P. R. Turner R. P. Clemens L.T.Kusek J. M. Uhland J. L. Connolle/ L.E. Labs C.F.Vanecek G. M. Cook M. P. Lazar J. M. Waszak M. R. Core R. C. Learch W. O. Weber S. R. Crites S.E. Lee G. R. Williams D. W. Dale R. E. Lewis S. J. Willrett P. C. DeMeulmeester R. C. Lieb .itritt W. C. Woemer R. D. DeYoung C. J. Linden D. C. Dietz B. R. Livingston J. A. Drahota J. H. MacKinnon T. R. Dukarski G. D. Mamoran P. R. Dunham J. W. Ma*cil R. G. Eurich N. L. Martice H. J. Faulhaber D. J. Matthews M. A. Ferdig T. J. Mcivor V. H. Frahm K. S. McCormick F. F. Franco R. F. Mehafiey M. T. Frans K. J. Morris H. K. Fraser D. C. Mueller J. F. W. Friedrichsen R. J. Mueller S. K. Gambhlr W.L.Neal J. K. Gasper J. B. Newhouse W. G. Gates M. W. Nichols M. O. Gautier C. W. Norris S. W. Gebers J. T. O'Connor J. M. Glantz W. W. Orr J. T. Gleason L. L. Parent L. V. Goldberg T. L. Patterson D. J. Golden R. L. Phelps D C. Gorence T. M. Reisdorff R. E. Gray A. W. Richard M. J. Guinn D. G. Ried E. R. Gundal G. K. Samide R. H. Guy T.J.Sandene R. M. Hawkins B. A. Schmidt M. C. Hendrickson S. T. Schmitz }
R. R. Henning F. C. Scofield 87
l .
e ADVERSE TREND REPORT A Pedorraar.co Indcate, wr.ich has data representing Number of Out of Service Contro! Room Instruments three (3) consecutive months of de uning performaace (Page 23) constitutes an adverse trend. The Adverse Trond Report The total number of out.of servce control room instru-explains the cendrtons under which certain indcators are ments for the reporting month (33) .s above the Fort showing adverse trends. Indcators with data showing an Calhoun goal of 15.
apparent adverse trend which is c21considefed adverse, See3nderv System Chemistry will have an explanaton whch dehnes why an adverse trend does nor exist. (Page 36)
The Seonndary System Chamistry Performarre index Iemocrary Modrheatens for the reporting month (0.603) is above the Fort Calhoun (Page 57) goalof 0.45.
This indicator is exhiblting an adverse trend due to a continuing increase in the number of temporary modrfi. Auxi0ary Syste.n (CCW) Chemistry Hours Outside Sta catons six to nine montns old. These modifcations con- l'on timits tinue to increase in number due to the need for outage (Page 38) conditons to remove the items. Currently fifteen tempo. The Auxiliary System Chemistry Hours Outside Station rary modifcatons require an outage for removal. Limits indicator value of 8.42 hours4.861111e-4 days <br />0.0117 hours <br />6.944444e-5 weeks <br />1.5981e-5 months <br /> for the month of July is above the industry upper quartile value of 2.6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />.
R cordable Iniurv'IFness Cases Frecuency Rate (Page 61) Number of Hot Scots This indicator has been dsfined by the Manager of the (Page 45)
Safety Department as exhibrting an adverse trend based The number of Hot Spots ior the reporting month (55) on the 5 year recordable injury / illness frequency rate. exceeds tne Fort Calhoun goal of 40.
Overdua and Extended Correct!ve Action Reoorts Stdout Rate (Page 76) (Page 53)
An adverse trend is indicated because PED CARS with The percentage of pick t ekets generated with no parts er1ensions granted have increased for three consecutive available has been above the Fort Calhoun goal of 0%
months, smco May 1991. ,
End of Adverse Trend Report. End of Management Attenton Report.
INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT MANAGEMENT ATTENTION REPORT IMPROVEMENTS / CHANGES This section hsts the indicators which show inadequacies Disabhna Miurv/lFness Fre22nCY Rate as compared to the OPPD goal and indcators which (Page 11) y show inad&quacies as compared to the industry upper The 1991 f.gures for this indcator have been revised due quartile. The indicators will be compared to the industry to a re-evaluation of records by the safety department.
upper quartile as relevant to that indcator.
Number of Hot Scgig Gross Heat Flaig (Page 45)
(Page 6) The Fort Calhoun goal of forty (40) has Non added to The gross heat rate has been above the Fort Calhoun this 'r.dicator, year end goal since March 1991.
Encineenno Chance Notice B cakdown Fuel Rehabibtv Indicator (Page 60)
(Page 8) The graph for this indcator has been revised to more The fuel reliability indicator for July 1991 was above the effectively represent the flow of work.
Fort Calhoun Goal due to the plant's increasing power to 100% in the latter hatt of June which resulted in a higher Comca'ison o' Vio8ations Amono Recion IV Plants 1-131 concentration. (Page 73)
The Fort Calhoun goal of 1.6 violations per 1000 inspec-D:sab!ino Iniurv'lbess Frecuency Rate tion hours has been added to this indcator.
(Page 11)
The Disabling injury /lliness Frequency Rate for the re. Cvde 13 ReNe4no Outace references have been porting month (0.32) is above th. Fort Calhoun goal of changed to Cycle 14 for clarifcation.
0.31.
End of Indcator Improvement / Changes Report.
88
l .
FORT CALHOUN STATION OPERATING CYCLES AND REFUELING OUTAGE DATES Event Date Range Production (MWH) Cumulative (MWH)
Cycle 1 09/26D3 - 02/01D5 3,799,639 J,299,639 1st Refueling 02/019 5- 05/09/75
- Cycle 2 05/09D5 - 10/0106 3,853,322 7,152,961
.nd Refwling 10/0196 12/1396 *
- i Cycle 3 12/i396-09/3097 2,805,927 9,958,888 3rd Refueling 09/30D7 - 12/0907 *
- Cycle 4 12/09/77 10/14D8 3,026,832 12,985,720 4th Refueling 10/1498 12/24D8 *
- Cycle 5 12/24/78 01/18/80 3,882,734 16,868,454 5th Refueling 01/18/80 - 06/11/80 *
- Cycle 6 06/11/80 09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 6th Refueling 09/18/81 12/21/81 * '
Cycle 7 12/21 A1 12/0u/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 7th Refueling *
- 12/06/82 - 04/07/83 Cycle 8 04/07/83 - 03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736.405 8th Refueling 03/03/84 07/12/84 *
- Cycle 9 07/12/B4 - 09/28/85 4,741,188 32,477,893 9th Refueling 09/28/85 - C1/16/86 *
- Cycle 10 01/16/86 03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 10th Refueling 03/07/87 06/08/87 *
- Cycle 11 06/08/87 - 09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 lith Refueling 09/27/88 01/31/89 *
- Cycl,.,12 01/31/89 02/17/90 3,817,954 45,589,459 12th Rcfue;ing 02/17/90 05/29/90 *
- Cy:le 13# 05/29/90 02/01/92 # Planned Dates
- 13th Refueling # 02/01/92 05/01/92
- Cycle 14# 05/01/92 09/18/93
- 14th Refueling 09/18/93 11/13/93 *
- Cycle 15# 11/13/93 03/11/95 *
- 15th Refueling # 03/11/95- 05/06/95 *
- FORT CALHOUN STATION CURRENT PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS " RECORDS" First Sustained Reaction August 5,1973 (5:47 p.m.)
First Electricity Supplied to the System August 25,1973 Commercial Operation (180,000 KWH) September 26,1973 Achieved Full Power (100%) May 4,1974 Longest Run (477 days) June 8,1987 Sept. 27,1988 Highest Monthly Net Generation (364,468,800 KWH) October 1987 Most Productive Fuel C <cle (4,S36,859 MWH)(Cycle 11) June 8,1987 Sept. 27,1988