ML20082J725
| ML20082J725 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Oyster Creek |
| Issue date: | 08/21/1991 |
| From: | J. J. Barton GENERAL PUBLIC UTILITIES CORP. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| C321-91-2226, NUDOCS 9108280242 | |
| Download: ML20082J725 (3) | |
Text
~*
,s GPU Nuclear Corporation 5..
Nuclear
=sure Forked Arver, New Jersey 087310388 609 971-4000 Wrder's D-rect Dial Nurnter C321-91-2226 August 21, 1991 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn:
Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
Subject:
Oyster Creek Nuclear Generation Station Docket 50-219 Response to inspection Report 91-08 Emergency Operating Procedures
Dear Sir:
The purpose of this letter is to respond as requested to the deficiencies noted by the subject report dated June 10, 1991.
GPU Nuclear is pleased that the NRC has recognized our past efforts and commitment to resolve these issues, and understands your concerns as stated in the report. Attachment I addresses our status of the deficiencies remaining.
Should you require further information, please contact Brenda DeMerchant, OC Licensing Engineer at 609-971-4642.
Vety Trt y urs y g/ ~.
h 6fc Qohn J. D rton ice Pr; ident and Director Oyster reek JJB\\BDEM:jc Attachment cc:
Administrator, Region 1 Senior NRC Resident inspector Oyster Creek NRC Project Manager 9109280242 910S21 ADOCK0500ty'9 j
DR
[
\\ \\
GPU Nuclear Corporation is a subsdary of Geno'a! Pubhc Utiht40s Corporation
(C321-91-2226)
Subsequent to the E0P inspection conducted the week of April 15, 1991, several items which were identified in the Inspection Report 91-08 as being deficient have been addressed and resolved. These items include:
Procedure EMG-3200.03 " Level Restoration" flowchart has been revised to separately list CR0 as an injection system in step LR-5.
Procedure EMG-3200,11 " Secondary Containment Control" flowchart has been revised to correct discrepancies regarding concurrent performance of stops SC/T-3 and 4, SC/R-2 and 3, and SC/L-2 and 3.
The borax and boric acid required to implement procudure 2000 0PS-3024.28 " Standby Liquid Control System - Diagnostic and Restoration Actions" are now stocked in the warehouse.
Revisions to lesson plan 0623.2610/845.0.0030, "SBE0P Flowcharts" have been completed.
Procedures EMG-3200.04 " Emergency RPV Depressurization" and EMG 3200.09 "Lovel/ Power Control" have been revised to correct the wording problems noted.
The concerns regarding plant labelling have been noted and a revision to Procedure 109 " Plant Labelling" has been made to state that "while the labelling project is in progress, some labelling may not comply with all requirements, particularly specialty label requirements (e.g., E0P valve labels may not have fluorescent orange background.)"
The following items will be addressed during the current operating cycle.
i i
Other procedures identified as being deficient including l
EMG-3200.02 " Primary Containment Control", E0P support procedure 312.1 " Bypassing Isolation Interlocks and Automatic Scran during Emergency Conditions" and 2000-0PS-3024.28 will be revised as appropriate.
i i
A formal validation and verification (V&V) will be conducted for I
all E0P flowcharts and support procedures directly referenced in the E0Ps. The V&V is scheduled to begin during the fourth quarter i
of 1991 and will be completed after arrival and certification of J
the site specific simulator, i
i Regarding the E0P training issues noted in section 1, the site j
specific job analysis (task listing) for the !on licensed operator position is now conplete.
The analysis of individual l
tasks continues.
j I
i i
l u
C321 91-2226 Page 2 Development of the On The Job (0JT) training program for the non -
licensed operator is ongoing and will be finalized by the fourth quarter, 1991.
Draft writers guides 2000 S10 1218.03, 2000-STD-1218.04, and E0P administrative procedure 107.4, are in the process of being rewritten to address self identified and inspection related concerns.
flowcharts and text E0P's will be validated against the applicable writers guide after revisions to the writers guide have been completed.
Concerns regarding discrepancies between the Plant Specific Technical Guidelines (PSTG's) and the E0P's will be resolved by the revision to the PSTG's now in progress.
In order to address the concern that equipment operators are not fully aware of their specific responsibilities during emergency operations, discussions of the equipment operator responsibilities during amergency operations will be conducted with each shift.
Operations upper management will stress the importance and function of the equipment operator responsibilities during the weekly plant status update meeting.
I 6
f l
I i
i
-