Text

Reactor Containment Bldg Integrated Leak Rate Test
	ML20082H138
Person / Time
Site:	05000000, Quad Cities
Issue date:	12/17/1982
From:	; COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20082H066	List: IR 05000255/1981026; IR 05000315/1978014; IR 05000316/1977021; IR 05000316/1977031; ML20082H069; ML20082H073; ML20082H085; ML20082H087; ML20082H116; ML20082H123; ML20082H132; ML20082H138; ML20082H143; ML20082H148; ML20082H156; ML20082H163; ML20082H172; ML20082H189;
References
	FOIA-83-384 NUDOCS 8312010035
	Download: ML20082H138 (84)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:. /d f'. j REACTOR CONTAINMENT BUILDING INTEGRATED IZAK RATE TEST =- '1 QUAD-CITIES NUCIZAR P9WER STATION ~ UNIT ONE DECDiBER 16-17, 1982 $DRha$0UU83G825 GOGOLB3-364 pyg JUN 15 gen go-1s t

e' .s e TABLE.0F CONTENTS PAGE TABLE AND FIGURES INDEX...................... 3 INTRODUCTION................. *.......... 4 ~ A. T_EST PREPARATION _S A.1 Type A Test Procedures................ .5 A.2 Type A Test Instrumentation.... .5 .

A.2.a.

Temperature. .9 A.2.b. Pressure.. .9 A.2. c.. Vapor Pres st4s............ .9 A.2.d. Flow.- ................".10 A.3 Type A Test Measurements..... .10 l A.4 Type A Test Pressurization ;............... 11 B. TEST METHOD r B.1 Basic Technique. .13 B.2SuplementalVerificationTest. .14 B.3 Instrument Error Analysis................. 14 C. SEQLT.NCE OF EVENTS C.1 Test Preparation Chronology.......... .16 C.2 Test Preparation and Stabilization Chronology... .16 C.3 Measured Leak Rate Phase Chronology............ 17 \\ l C.4 Induced Leakage Phase Chronology............. 18 l C.5 Depressurizatica Phase Chronology. .18 l D. TYPE A TEST DATA 1 D.1 Measured Leak Rate Phase Data. 19 D.2 Induced Leakage Phase Data. 19 ................ p %q )

O' = g TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED) PAGE E. TEST CALCUIATIONS....................... 32 F. TYPE A TEST RESULTS F.1 Measured I,eak Rate Test Results. .33 F.2 Induced Leakage Test Results......... 6 .33 F.3 Leak Rate Compensation for Non-Vented Penetrations. .34 F.4 Pre-Operational Results vs. Test Results......... 34 APPENDIX A TYPE B AND C TESTS... .36 APPENDIX B

SUMMARY

OF AS FOUND LEAK RATES... .46 APPENDIX'C COMPUTATIONALPRodDURES...... .48 APPENDIX D INSTRUMENT ERROR ANALYSIS..... .57 APPENDIX E BN-TOP-1, REV. 1 ERRATA....... .63 g APPENDIX F TYPE A TEST RESULTS USING MASS-PLOT. .67 METHOD (ANS/ ANSI 56.8) i APPENDIX G BLOCK DIAGRAM OF COMPUTER............ 70 PROGPJuf TO PERFORM CALCULATIONS BASED ON BN-TOP-1, REV. 1 4 2- - - - - ~ - - _. -... - -

J o TABLES AND FIGURES INDEX ( PAGE TABLE 1 Instrument Specifications............... 6 TABI.E 2 Sensor Physical Locations............... 7 TABLE 3 Measured Leak Rate Phase Test Results...... 20 i TABLE 4 Induced Leakage Phase Test Results.....'..... 21 i TABLE A-1 Type B and C Test Results...............37 FIGURE 1 Idealized View of Drywell and Torus.......... 8 Used to Calculate Free Air Volumes FIGURE 2 Measurement System Schematic Arrangement. 12 FIGURE 3 Measure Lenk Rate Phase - Graph of Calculated..... 22 Leak Rate and Upper Confidence Limit i l FIGURE 4 Measured Leak Rate Phase - Graph of Total....... 23 Time Measured I.eak Rate and Regression Line FIGURE 5 Measured Leak Rate Phase - Graph of.......... 24 Dry Air Pressure FIGURE 6 Measured I.eak Rate Phase - Graph of.......... 25 Volume Weighted Average Containment Vapor Pressure FIGURE 7 Measured Leak Kate Phase - Graph of Volume. 26 Weighted Average Containment Temperature FIGURE 8 Induced Leakage Phase - Graph of Calculated...... 27 Leak Rate and Upper Confidence Limit FIGURE 9 Induced Leakage P.hase'- Graph of Total Time. 28 Measured Leak Rate and Regression Line FIGURE 10 Induced Leakage Phase - Graph of Volume. 29 Weighted Average Containment Temperature FIGURE 11 Induced Leakage Phase - Graph of Volume. 33 i Weighted Average Containment Vapor Pressure FIGURE 12 Induced Leakage Phase - Graph of........... 31 Dry Air Pressure FIGURE 13 Statistically Averaged Leak Rate and Upper...... 35 Confidence Limit (ANS/ ANSI 56.8 Method). e 0 ,--.n,_.n.. ,-,,n_..an_.,-,, ,m, _,n,,,,,-_,,,-,_g, .-,,,,,,.,----,,,n..--,-,_

p INTRODUCTION This report presents the test method and results of the Integrated Primary Containment I.eak Rate Test (IPCLRT) successfully performed on December 16-17, 1982 at Quad-Cities Nuclear Power Station, Unit Ose. The test was performed in accordance with 10 CFR 50, Appendix J, and the Quad-Cities Unit One Technical Specifications. For the first time at Quad-CitCos a short duration test (less than 24 hours) was conducted using the general test method outlined in BN-TOP-1, Revision 1 (Bechtel Corporation Topical Report) dated November 1, 1972. Using the above test method, the total primary containment integrated leak rate, adjusted to include penetrations not tested during the IPCLRT, was calculated to be 0.524 wt Uday at a test pressure greater than 48 PSIG. The calculated leak rate was within the 0.750 wt Uday acceptance criteria (75% of I ). The associated upper 95% confidence limit was 0.731 we Uday. g Excluding non-testable penetrations, the supplemental induced leakage test result was calculated to be 1.326 wt U day. This value should compare with the sum of the measured leak rate phase result (0.453 wt U day) and the induced leak of 8 SCIM (0.980 wt U day). The calculated leak rate of 1.326 wt U day lies within the allowable tolerance band of 1.433 wt Uday z 0.250 wt Uday. ? p e - - - - ~,,,,..,.

6 e. SECTION A - TEST PREPARATIONS A.1 Type A Test Procedure' The IPCI.RT was performed in accordance with Quad-Cities Procedure QTS 150-6, Rev.1, including checklists QTS 150-51 through S13 and subsections T2, T3, 76, 78, 79, and T10. Approved Temporsry Procedure 1748 was written for the proper operation of the IPCI.RT air compressor and the method for pressurizing the containment volume. Temporary Procedure 1757 slightly modified the instrument location of four test instruments without changing subvolume locations. Temporary Procedure 1756 modified the pre-test valve line-up to reflect valves that had been remeved (with lines capped) since the last IPCI.RT and valves that were not locked in their position and needed no locks. Temporary Procedure 1758 modified the post test valve line-up to bring it in agreement with the start up preparations for the Unit that were in progrese following the IPCI.RT. These procedures were written to comply with 10 CFR 50, Appendix J, ANS/ ANSI N45.5-1972, Quad-Cities Unit One Technical Specifications, and to reflect the Commission's approval of a short duration test using the BN-TOP-1, Rev.1 Topical report as a general test method. ~ A.2 Type A Test Instrumentation Table One shows the specifications for the instrumentation utilized in the IPCI.RT. Table Two lists the physical locations of the temperature and humidity sensors within the primary containment. Figure 1 is an idealized view of the drywell and suppression chamber used to calculate the primary containment free air subvolumes. Plant personnel performed all test instrumentation calibrations using NBS traceable standards. e e l l = ~ , - -_, -- _ vsxn ~.,.,_--,-------,,,,n -,--- ------,, ~- n ,n-- - - - - - -, ~ - - - -

. TABLE ONE INSTRUMENT SPECIFICATIONS INSTRUNENT MANUFACTURER HODEL NO. SERIAL NO. HANGE A_CfURACY REPEATABILITY Precision ~ Pressure Cases (2) Volumetrics 846,847 0-100 PSIA 1.015 PSI 1.001 PSI 44209 to Burns

44238 j

RTD's (30) En8ineerin8 SPIAl-54-3A inclusive 50-200*F 1.5'T 1.1*F 5835.1, a Volumetrics 2,3,6,7, Dewcells (8) (Foxboro) 8,9,10 '9-+140*F 11.0*F 1.5'F Pall Trinity Thermocouple Micro 14-7-2H 0-600*F 12.0*F t.1*F Fischer Flowineter & Porter 83 8209A9118 RIB 0-8.44 scfm 1.084-scfm Level Indicator LI l-263-100A Yarway SCR/M 967-25377 +60"H O 2 f t 9 f ,4 $ is

I 7 TABLE TWO SENSOR PHYSICAL LOCATIONS t RTD NUMBER SERIAL NUMBER SUBVOLUME ELEVATION AZIMITTH 1 44209 1 670'0" 180* 2 44210 1 670'0" 0* 3 44211 2 657'0" 20* 4 44212 2 657'0" 200* 5 44213 3 634'0" 70* 6 44214 3 634'0" 265* 7 44215 4.(Annular Ring). 643'0" 45' 8 44216 4 615'0" 225' 9 44217 5 620'0" 10 44218 5 620'0" 100* L1 44219 5 620'0" 220* 12 44220 6 608'0" 335* 13 44221 6 608'0" 130* 14 44222 6 608'0" 220* 15 44223 5 608'0" 310* 16 44224 7 598'0" 70* 17. 44225 7 598'0" 160* 18 44226 7 598'0" 200* 19 44227 7 598'0" 340* 20 44228 8 587'0" 10' 21 44230 22 44232 8 587'0" 1000 ~ 8 587'0" 190* 23 44233 8 587'0" 280* 24 44234 9(CRD Space) 586'0" 0* 25 44235 10(Torus) 578'0" 0* 26 44236 10(Torus) 578'0" 120' I 27 44237 10(Torus) 578'0" 60* 28 .44238 10(Torus) 578'0" 180* 29 44229 10(Torus) 578'0" 240' 30 44231 10(Torus) 578'0" 300* Thermocouple (inlet to 11(Rx Vessel) clean-up HI) DEWCELL NO SERIAL NUMBER SUBVOLUME ELEVATION AZIMITTH 2 1 5835-3 2 657'0" 160* 2 5835-1

5 620'0" 340' l

3 5835-6 7 598'0" 70* 4 5835-8 7 598'0" 25 0 ' l 5 5935-10. 9 586'0" 0* i 6 5835-9 10 578'0" 0* 7 5835-7 10 578'0" 120' 8 5835-2 10 578'0" 240* Thermocouple . Vessel 11 Saturated l l p

3 FIGURE 1 1 Ideelisse View of Dr,.aall ad Tve vs Used to Calculate Free Yelumes '] ~ 37'r' I-34'8" M 641'3a f h s,7.s.. /(" ug / i -,.I / /. / / 652'8" 9f f///jM" ,'/ [ ' ' ~ ' ' ' ' 'I 'r, -;l 4'. e ,g. / 635'It" Volume / ~ ,q 1,/ ue e- ,/.

)

/ gg; /. s. a r 8%) f^/l-s \\' l / / \\. / sws-l // i (Grotingi l 'f =Er l ',.) ..._l 502'10" e i 7 ..._.,j l s If ssyr j/ 8 (sneln) j/ ^% /^ l W /////

" l 3oey.

J, gg. y. Floor) p. 6 ,/ .~ P e .g. 1 ,,.--------e--- ,-v------me-.

w---w

=w-+w

~ ~ - - -

'w'-'

) i i 9 e i A.2.a. Temperature { h location of the 30 platinum RTD's was chosen to avoid conflict with local temperature variations and thermal influence froe metal structures. i i h RfD's were manufactured by Burns Engineering Inc. and are Model SP 1Al-5%-3A. Each RTD and its associated bridge network was calibrated to yield an output of approximately 0-100 mV over a temperature range of 50-150*F. Each RTL was calibrated by comparing the bridge output to the true temperature as indicated by the temperature standard. Three temperatures were used for the calibration. Two calibration constants (a slope ar.d intercept of the regression line) were computad for each RTD by performing a least squares fit of the RTD bridge output to the reference star.dard's indicated.true temperature. N temperature stridard used for all calibrations was a Volumetries RTD Model VMC 701-B used with a Dewcell/RTD Calibrator Model 07731. N s*=nd=ed was calibrated by Volumetrics on November 11, 1982 to standards traceable to the NBS. N plant process computer scanned the output of each RTD-bridge network and converted the output to engineering units using the calibration constants. A.2.b. Pressure Two precision quarta bourdon tube, absolute pressure gauges were utilized to measure total containment pressure. Each gauge had a local digital readout l 3 and a Einary Coded Lecimal (BCD) output to the process computer. Primary containment pressure was sensed by the pressure gauges in parallel through a 3/8" tygon tube connection to a special one inch pipe penetration to the cone =4 - t. l Each precision pressure gauge was calibrated from 50-70 PSIA in 5 PSI l increments using a third precision pressure saute (Volumetrics Model 07726) that had been sent to volumetzscs for calibration. h pressure standard was calibrated on October 22, 1982 using NBS traceable reference standards. \\ h digital readout of the instruments were in " counts" or arbitrary units. Calibration constants -(a slepe and intercept of a regression line) were encored into the computer program to convert " counts" into true atmospheric pressure as read by the third, reference gauge. No mechanical calibration of the gauges was performed to bring their digital displays into agreement with true pressure. r A.2.c. Vapor Pressure - N eight lithium chloride deweells were physically situated.in the contain-ment based on the results of the last four IPCIRT's performed at Quad-Cities and remained unchanged from the last IPCLRT performed for Unit one in February, 1979. h deweells used were supplied by Volumetrics and manufactured by Foxboro. . -. - - -... ~. - -

p. The calibration constants (the slope and intercept of"a regression line) for each deweell were computed. relating the 0-150 mV output of the sensor i

conditioning card to the actual dewpoint indicated by a reference standard.

A three point calibration was performed for each dewcell. The reference standard was a chilled mirror deweell standard, Volumetries Model VHC 305, used with the Deweell/RTD Calibrator Model 07731. The reference standard was calibrated by Volumetrics on October 22, 1982 using NBS traceable standards. A.2.d. Flow A rotameter flowmeter, Fischer-Forter serial number 8209A9118RIA, was used for the flow measurement during the induced leakage phase of the IPCLRT. The flowmoter was calibrated on October 20, 1982 by Fischer-Porter to within 21% of full scale (.8-8.44 SCFM) using NBS traceable standards. Plant personnel continuously monitored the flow during the induced leakage phase and corrected any minor deviations from the induced flow rate of 8 SCFM by adjusting a 3/6" needle valve on the flowmeter inlet. A.3 Type A Test Measurement The IPCLRT was performed utilizing a direct interface with the station process computer. This system consists of a hard-wired installation of temperature, dewpoint, and pressure inputs for the IPCLRT to the procu s computer. The interface allows the process computer to sesa, calculate, and print results with minimal manual input. The process computer output gave measured and calculated leak rate data using the dry air mass method given in ANS/ ANSI 56.8-1981. This output was used for comparison purposes only. Data sets giving instrument outputs were automatically transferred to a Prime 750 computer where the containment data was used to compute the lesk rates and confidence limits based on BN-TOP-1, Rev. 1. A Rastek color terminal-I was used to aid in monitoring the containment environspectal configuration and instrument stability. The BN-TOP-1, Rev. I calculations were also displayed in summary form showing the results and trends as each additional data set was ( received. Key parameters such as containment volume weighted dry air pressure ~ and temperature and calculated leak rates with upper confidence limits were plotted and displayed on the computer terminal. During the IPCLRT p. mat personnel plotted a number of subvolume, containment, and calculated parameters in order to quickly identify any problems that might develop during the test such as a failed sensor or unusual leak rate data that might indicate excessive leakage. Figure 2 shows a schematic diagram of the IPCLRT dat's acquisition system. l i l.

A.4 Type A Test Pressurization I A 3000 SCMf, 600 hp, 4 kV electric oil-free air compressor was used to pressurize the primary containment. An identical compressor was available in standby during the IPCI.RT. The compressors were physically located on a single, enclosed truck trailer located outside the Reactor Building. %e compressed air was piped using flexible metal hose to the Reactor Buii f, through an existing four inch fire header penetration, and piped to a temporary 2 spool piece that, when installed, allowed the pressurization of the drywell through the "A" containment spray header. The inboard, containment spray isolation valve, H0-1-1001-26A was open during pressurization. Once the containment was pressurized, the MO 1-1001-26A valve was closed and the spool piece was removed and replaced with a blind flange. T s db 9 4 l ) 4 1 e I I = \\ ~

MEAUSREMENT SYSTEM SCHEMATIC ARRAt4GEMENT RTD 3/C LOCAL Jut 1CTIO;I (4) BOXES (8) RTD m 3/C. w (26) (26) POWER SUPPLY 80X (1) DEWCELL UC 3/C (3) (8) h Il0V' DRYWELL TERMIflAL X BOX FLOWMETER .+ x PRESSURE SE!!Sl!!G X~ TU8il3G ~ ~ 40/C 40/C l lPCLRT (3) (3) .jlNSTRUMENTCONSOLE .p DRYWELL PERSONNEL INTERLOCK BULKl!EAD RTD & DEWCELL S'lGNAL 40/C (2) CONDITIONING CARDS PROCESS 32/C (2) COMPUTER MASS PRESSURE GAUGES PLOT METii0D G 110V PRIME 8l1-TOP-1 COMPUTER f4ETHOD FIGURE 2 -- ~ ~ ~,., - - - -. - - w-~ - ~ - - - - -

1 .p. SECTION B - TEST METHOD ( Basic Technione B.1 The absolute Tte absolute method of leak rate determination was used. defined method uses the ideal gas laws to calculate the measured leak rate, as in ANS/ ANSI N45.4-1972. include subvolume weighted containment temperature for pressure, total air pressure, and a total containment volume correction .j reactor water level. As required by the Commission in order to perform a short duration test (measured leak rate phase of 12-24 hours), the measured leak rate was s A least cally analyzed using the principles outlined in BN-TOP-1, Rev.1. h t rt of squares regression line for measured leak rate versus time since t e s a The calculated the test is calculated after each new data set is scanned.is the leak rate on the reg leak rate at a point in time, t, g the time t.g The use of a regression line in the BN-TOP-1, Rev. I report is differentThe latter 56.3-1981 standard. from the way it is used in the ANS/ANSIuses the slope of the regressio f time ,.'l to derive a statistically averaged leak rate. i f calculates a regression line for the measured leak late, which is funct the change in dry air mass. h dry air mass always see a negative slope for the regression line, because t e For the regression is decrean.'s over time due to leakage from the containment. i you presume that the leakage from the containment is constant over t me. Since it is impossible t; instantaaeously and perfect h test. on the scatter in the measured leak rate values obtained d d after a few early in the test will scatter much more'than the values compute hours of testing. The computer printouts titled " Leak Rate Based on Total Time Calcu in that the attached to the BN-TOP-1, Rev. I topical report are misleading sion column titled " Calculated Leak Rate" actually has printe ~ ) The calculated sets received up until the last time listed on the printout. ilable leak rate as a function of time (t ) can only be calculated from data avan 1. t in leak rate may be decreasing over time, despite a substantial positive slop up until that point in time, t. Extrapola*. ion of the regression line is the last computed regression line. 3 terminate a short duration not required by the RN-TOP-1, Rev. I criteria tak rate be decreasing over What is reccHrad is that the calculated d t'o 24 hours. time or that an.ra tasing calculated leak rate be extrapolate test. The distinet Tot.. +en the regression line values and the calculated leak c . ( time is made in Section 6.4 of BN-TOP-1, Rev.1.i ted out in the l rate as a,2:cten*e v., as a function of time, are correct y pr ncomputer printouts in A Calculated i.at m " Trends Based on Total Time Calculations BN-TOP-1, Rev. 1. ~ --~ W s. ~.... .m

Associated with each calculated leak rate is a statistically derived upper confidence limit. Just as the calculated leak rate in BN-70P-1, Rev. I and the statistically averaged leak rate in the ANS/ ANSI standard are not the same (and do not ev tions are grea,en yield nearly equal values), the upper confidence limit calcula-tly different. In the BN-TOP-1, Rev. I topical report the upper confidence limit is defined a.s the calenlated leak rate plus the product of the two sided 97.5% T-distribution value (as opposed to the one-sided 95% T-distribution used in the ANS/ ANSI standard) and the standard deviation of the measured leak rate data about the computed regression line (which has no relationship to the vdue computed in the ANS/ ANSI standard). l l There are two important conclusions that can be derived from data analyzed using the BK-TOP-1, Rev. I method:

1) the upper confidence limit for the same j

measured leak rate data can be substantially greater than the value calculated using the ANS/ ANSI method, and 2)the upper confidence limit does not converge to the calculated leak rate nearly as quickly as usually observed in the latter method as the number of data sets becomes large. With this in mind, l the upper confidence limit can become the critical parameter for concluding a short duration test, even when the measured leak rate seems to be well under ( the maximum allowable leak rate. A graphical comparison of the two methods l can be made by referring to Figure 3 for thellN-TOP-1, Rev. I calculated leak rate and upper con'fidence limit and to Figure 13 for the statistically averaged leak rate and upper confidence limit based on ANS/ ANSI 56.8-1981. B.2 Supplemental Verification Test The supplemental verification est superimposes a known lea.z of approximately the same magnitude as I,A (8.16 SCDf or 1 wt %/ day as defined in the Technical Specifications). The degree of detectability of the combined leak rate (contain-ment calculated leak rate plus the superimposed, induced leak rate) provides a basis for resolving any ancertainty associated with the measured leak rate phase of the test. The allowed error band is 125% of L

A There are no references to the use of upper confidence limits to evaluate the acceptablility of the induced leakage phase of the IPCLRT in the ANS/ ANSI standards or in BN-TOP-1, Rev. 1.

B.3 Instrument E rcr Analysis An instrument error analysis was performed prior to the test in accordance with BN-TOP-1, Rev. 1 Section 4.5. The instrument system error was calculated in two parts. The first was to determine the system acctracy uncertainty. The second and more important calculation (since the leak rate is impacted most by changes in the containment parameters) was performed to determine the systes repeatability uncertainty. The results were 0.0890 wt %/ day sad 0.0175 wt %/ day for a 12-hour test, respectively. These values are inversely proportional to the test duration. After pressurizing the containment and at various stages of the test two RTD's and one deweell failed giving unreasonable indications. The two RTD's were deleted from the subvolume average temperature calculations from the point where they deviated from their past pattern and the values indicated by l other RTD's in the same subvolume. The deweell, though somewhat erratic in its output, was included in the measured leak rate phase until it failed completely 11 hours into the test. 14 .-__,___,.,m_ m--

~ o Removing 'the three instruments that failed during the test gives a system accuracy uncertainty of.0911 wt %/ day and a system repeatability uncertainty of.0184 wt %/ day for s 12 hour test.. l The instrumentation uncertainty is used only to illustrate the system's ability to measure the required parameters to calculate the primary containment leak rate. The mathematical derivation of the above values can be found in Appendix D. The instrumentation uncertaicty is always pres 2nt in the data and is incorporated in the 95% upper confidence limit. l It is extremely important during a short duration test to quickly identify a failed sensor and in real time back the spurious data out of the calculated volume weighted containment temperature and vapor pressure. Failure to do so can cause the upper confidence limit value to place a short duration test in jeopardy. e i ~ w -~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -

g3 l

O l SECTION C - SEQUENCE OF EVENTS t C.1 Test Preparation Chronology The pretest preparation phase and containment inspection was completed on December 16, 1982 with no apparent structural deterioration being observed. Major preliminary steps included:

1) Completion of all Type B and C tests, component repairs, and retests except for the main steam line drain valve NO 1-220-1.

The IPCLRT was conducted,'with Commission approval, with this valve closed. The HD 1-220-2 valve, in line with the above valve, minimized leakage through this flow path during the IPCLRT.

2) Blocking open three pairs of drywell to suppression chamber vacuum

breakers.

3) Installation of all IPClRT test equipment in the suppression chamber.

4) Completion of all repairs and installations in the drywell.

5) Venting of the reactor vessel to the drywell by opening the manual head vent line to the drywell equipment drain sump.

6) Completion of the IPCLRT data acquisition system including computer programs, instrument console, locating instruments in the drywell, and l

associated wiring.

7) Re-established water level in the suppression chamber following a s'eismic piping change to the level instrument sensing lines.

8) ' Completion of th'e pre-test valve line-up.

C.2 Test Pressurization and Stabilization Chronolony DATE TIME EVENT 12-16-82 0315 Began pressurizing containment. 0400 Compressor tripped due to nitrogen leak on auxiliary oil pump emergency air supply. 0430 Compressor back on-line., 0450 Failed RTD 18. Reading 20'T different than the other three RTD's in the same subvolume. Removed it from scan. 0545 Found two leaks on r cently installed suppression pool level instrure.4t lines. Flange bolts only l finger tight. Ear.h leak estimated at 150 scfh at containment pressure of 40 PSIA. Repairs completed.. .w.......- ... _. _ ~.., _ _. _, _ _..,. _. _ _.,

i e l DATE TIME EVENT l~ 0545 Minor leaks on oxygen analyzer rack isolation valves. Packing leaks estimated at total of 2 scfh. Tightened packing. 0700 Minor valve packing leak on AO 1-8804 (Drywell Air Sample Return) estimated at 1.2 scfh. Tightened packing. 0830 Containment is pressurized to 65 PSIA. 0900 Inspected drywell head flange using soap bubble , solution. No leaks, i 1008 Minor leaks observed in TIP room. Packing leaks on isolation valves. Total approximate 4 acfh. Reduced to minute value after tightening packings. l 1045 A0 1-8801C had small packing leaks (4 scfh). i Repaired. 1130 Torus water temperature is 58*F. Containment will probably be cooling off during the test due to the above. Containment temperature dropping at 0.33'F/hr. 1330 Containment temperature dropping in the last hour at a rate of 0.55'F/hr. l C.3 Measured I.eak Rate Phase Chronology l .DATE TIME EVENT i 12-16-82 1330 ' Containment temperature stable to much less than l'F/hr. 1342 Started Measured I,eak Rate Phase with RTD 18 removed from the instrument scan. 1805 Observed erratic readings from Dew Cell #1. Dew point temperature changed 22*F in 10 minutes. On the next scan it went back to an intermediate value. Instrument continued to act erratic, but was not removed from the scan. l 12-17-82 0112 Dew Cell #1 for subvolumes 1 and 2 failed. Computer i rejected input automatically for giving an unreason-able output. Program assigns partial pressure of water vapor from the nearest deweell to subvolumes 1 and 2. Measured leak rate dropped 0.065 wt %/ day and stayed steady when Dew Cell #1 was removed from the scan. G

DATE TIME EVENT 0142 Terminated measured leak rate phase at 12 hour point. Calculated leak rate was 0.4532 wt %/ day and docteasing over time. The average measured leak rate over the last 5' hours was 0.3768 wt %/ day.

The upper con ~fidence limit was 0.660 wt %/ day. All other BN-TOP-1, Rev. I criteria for terminating the test were satisfied. C.4 Induced I.eakane Phase Chronolo n 12-17-82 0155 Valved in the flowmeter at 8 SCFM (95% scale reading). Radiation Protection is collecting a sample. 0223 Radiation Protection Department completed sample analysis. 0302 One hour stabilization is complete.' Re-initialized program for new base data set. 0325 Fail'ed.RTD #23. Changed output by approximately 25'T in one data set. Unreasonable tamperature (. compared to all other temperatures in the drywell. Three other RTD's in that subvolume. Re-initialized base data set with RTD #23 removed from scan. s. 0332 Scan coepleted for ba0e data set for the Induced Phase. ~ 0412 Dewcell #1 reappeared in the scan. Failed Deveell

1 because its sudden reappearance in the scan shows erratic unreliable output. Will remove the sensor data manually from computer for the three data sets it re-appeared.

0435 Process computer down. No scans. 0515 Computer back up. Desinning scan without Deweell #1. 0911 Data set lost due to inadvertant manual deletion in j program. 0937 Terminated the Induced Phase. Data indicated I successful test. C.5 Depressurization Phase Chronolo n DATE TI!E EVENT 12-17-82 0950 Began containment depressurization as required by procedures for venting through the Reactor Building Ventilation System.

DATE TIME EVENT ( 12-17-82 1800 Containment depressurized. 1830 Technical Staff personnel entered drywell. No apparent structural damage and instruments are still in place. ~ 2030 Made initial entry to suppression chamber. No apparent damage and all instruments still in place. 2350 Checked sump levels.in Drywell. No' change from before the test. Sumps were not pumped during the test. SECTION D - TYPE A TEST DAT1. D.1 Measured I,eak Rate Phase Data ~ ~ A summary of the computed data using the BN-TOP-1, Rev. I test method for t a short duration test can be found in Table 3. Graphic resulta of the test are found in Figures 3-7. For comparison purposes only, the statistically averaged leak rate and upper. confidence limit using the ANS/ ANSI 56.8-1981 standard are graphed in Figure 13. A summary of the computed data using the ANS/ ANSI standard is found in Appe:2diz F. D.2 Induced Leakane Phase Data A summary of the computed data for the Induced I,eakage Phase of the IPCLRT is found in Table 4. The calculated lesk rate and upper confidence limit using the BN-TOP-1, Rev. I method are shown in Figure 8. The measured leak rate and last computed regression line are shown in Figure 9. Containment conditions during the Induced Ieakage Phase are presented graphically in Figures 10-12. e e 9 8 4 9 O ? e 8. 6

N ###

j, y g. ,.n.-~, n,,,.,,,-n,-n-,,-_---,-,n,,,-,. ,,,-,_---n--n,_

l I 1 MEASURED LEAK RATE TEST RCSi;LTS I s 71*t 7tMe Pots 1wat Ltas Raft caLe Ltas ea7C 93: c04rictqct 28 13 71 83.84 63.9e3 3.83000+00 0.83400+00 3 403".03 8 003O+00 29 13 08 03.44 63.97S

.65760-01 4.03083 88 0.0000+co 0 2003+00 38 14.CS 83 82 63 973

.11760*00 8 03003 00 0 0000 00 c.002:+0e ^;.-.--

.7-

.-.; ^. .;;;;^ ^ ."T^^ ^ 32 14 34 83.76 63.966

.64340-41

. 6927D*01 . 1450+01 0 1312+01 33 14.S$ 83.73 63.999 4 5192Dael 8.57353 42 =.1200*L1 S.1220*81 ^;..

.7 ;

.7 ;;; ^

0..;;;; ;^ .7--^

^ ;.- T; ;^

35 14 88 83.69 63.958 e.17093*80 0.13290*88 a.4363*00 0 7823+88 36 15.05 83.67 63.947 8.19963*80 8 16823+48 . 23 90 +S 8 8.5753+0D ^7..;. ^..;- ^; ^. ;;.^ ^^ ..;^ ;; :."';; ;; ^ 30 15.38 83.61 63.938 0 1641G*00 8 22830+88 .9940=01 8.5003*00 ( 39 15 59 83.59 63.930 8 25630*00 3.2S723*48 8.3170a01 8 483O+30

; ;.7;

^. ;

^ ;;. ;^ ^ ^^;^^ ;^ ^.. - ^ ^ ' 99-twe+*0 44- ^ 41 15.88 83 54 63.922 8 29243*00 8 32290*05 0.1580*00 0 4893+49 42 16 85 83.54 S3.91 6 8.32223*e8 8.34960+88 8 2830*e0 0 4963+00 0.;-^;; ^^ ^." _;^ ;^ 0.^;T^ ^; :.";;^ ;" ^^ ^ 44 16 38 83.51 63.999 8 34180*80 8 41283*98 0 2930*00 8.5322+03 45 16.95 83.49-63.900 0.40180+88 8 43740*00 0.3250*00 8 5S03+00 ...T.

^.^^^

^.;;^T^^^ ^ -;^;- ^^ 0.;;;; ^^ ^?--

^

47 16 88 83 44 63 898 3.32090+48 8 44633+44 8.2993+08 8 5970+0C 48 17.89 93.48 63.897 8.31210*e0 8.44490+48 0.2780*e8 8 6123*00 l .7.;. ^^ - ^. - ^ ^ -- ^^ ^ - ---^ ^ ^ ?'; ^ ^^ ^..;^^ ;^ ^ j S8 17 38 83.42 63.894 0.31320*00 0.44513*88 8 2640 08 846263*00 S1 17 35 83 49 63.447 0.29800+00 4 44630*t0 0 2500*t 8 8.6313+00 -9P-tT..

^..-

^ ;;7^^ :- ^ ^; ; ^^ ^.: ;^ ;^ :..;;- ^^ 53 17.48 93.37 63.862 4.47280*40 0 46200+00 8.277D*40 0.64 73 +0 0 54 18 8s 83.38 63.464 0.40013*C3 0 47003+08 8.2890 80 0 6510+08 ..7 ^ ^ -- ^; ^. 7;;^ ;^ ^ ^ 7; ^^ ^.."?- ^; l 56 18 38 83.36 63+462 0 48840*e8 8 48350+48 8 3050 00 8 6623+88 8 44930*08 0.313O+00 3 4660 00 S7 18.S5 83.34 63.857 8.4L963+48^^ ^.i-7; ^^ ^ ;;^ - ^^ ^ ;T- ^^

^. -

.;^^

^.;; ;- 59 18 40 93 32 43+8S3 0+38780+08 8 49610*48 8.3190*48 8.673O+00 68 19 05 ' S3 38 63.449 8.39170+40 0 49760*08 3.3190+08 8.6760*e8 ...;^ .;^.^ :- .;7T^ :. 62 19.38 83 29 63.843 0.395S0+00 0.50123*80 9 3213*K0 3.6813+03 63 19.35 43.27 63.439 8.39713+00 0 50233 00 0+3213+03 0.6833+e0 .;.7.

..i

.;..;- ^^ ;...-- ; 65 19.88 83.24 63.827 8.42590 40 8.S$693*48 8 3263+46 0.6443 00 8

46 20.3S 83.24 63.829 0.40390*03 0.50770+08 8.3263+08 0.6900+08

^ ^ ^.-..

^.....

^ ;^^^ - ^ ;^;^ ^^ ^^ 48 28.30 83 22 63.823 8.39860*49 8.50790*08 8 3240*03 8.4920+e: 69 20.55 83 22 63.820 0.40070+00 0.50790+48 8.3234 08 0.693O+08

..;T: .-..i-.^; ^.- 7;.^.

.;;;;- ^^ ^ ;T:^ - ^^ 71 20.88 S3.18 63.813 0.39733+08 4 5373O+03 0 3200+0C 8 6943+0C 72 21 05 83 17 63.410 0.39490+00 8.50640*e8 8.3183+00 3 6950 88 ^^

.. ; 4 ;; ;..^ ^..

^ ^;7^ - ^ ;^^..~ ^ ^; ;;.;; 74 21.38 83 14 63.834 8.38750+49 8 50+40*08 8.3140+48 8 6953+08 75 21.55 83 14 63.881 8.34973+48 8.50310+4e 8 3120+00 0.6950*e0 T; ;;.. ^.;;.;- ^^ ^ ; : ;; 77 21 48 33 12 63.796 8.38670+80 0.90090+03 3 3083*08 8 6943+00 79 22.85 83.12. 63.792 8.39530*06 8.30000*48 0.30?D*00 0 6933+88 l

...... ^.. - ; a*9-=

^ SS 22.38 83.10 63.786 8.39!30*08 8+497tO*ee 0.383O+09 8 4920 00 l 81 22.35 83 88 43.782 0.39100*48 9.49640+48 0 3810+60 8.6910+00 l

..;^;..

.;^ ;.; 03 22.88 83.86 63.777 8.39000*48 0.49413+40 0.2990+00 0 6983+et to 23.8S 83.06 63.774 8.38830*te 0 49280*48 0 2973*08 8 6890+00 ^ ^ ^ ^...;^ ^^ ..;;-^.. 8 6860+00 86 23.38 93 83 63.778 0.34020+08 8.48940+08 0 2920+98 87 23.35 33 04 .63 767 C.34710*40 0 44810+88 0 2910*OS 8 6850*e8 08 23.71 93 82 63.765 8.37640*e8 0.40610+48 0 2890 08 8 6440+48 ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ 64w4' "

.;^^^; ^^ " ^^: "; 0^
"?"-0;

".";; ^0 98 24.89 83.82 63 768 8.38110+00 0.44290+00 0 20$O+48 8 6810+48 91 24.21 83.88 63.758 8.37540+08 0 40110+48 8 2830 00 9.6790+08 --99-44ste- -8;.;"

" ?O; - - -4.47436*48--8,47944*00 - - 8,2864*48 4 6780+48-~

93 24.58 82 98 63 751 8.37900

t e 0.47790+88 8+2790+88 8 6760+88*

iP 24.71 82 99 63 759 8.37540*04 0 47620*00 0 2700+08 0 6750*40 ".;"""0:"" "."?^^^ ^" _^^^; "O ^ ^; ;^.^^ 00.77

.?^.

8.37960+00 0 47350*00 8 2750 00 8 6720*00 96 25.85 92.96 63.742 97 25.21 82.95 63.76e 4.31890 00 e.4683O+4C g.2670*ee 0.66 90 + 8 8 -96 995 76- ^ ^. " ^

. 79h -4.3067D*0 0 S.46464*44

". ;; 45 +44 -4 6664*44 - 99 25.55 92.*3 63.757 0.30510+48 0.45800+88 0 253O+08 8 663O+80 100 25.71 82 93 63 755 8.30600+00 0 45320+48 8 2460+49 8 6680+48 7;;

"it ^^^; 0-

" ^ ;; ^ ^ -* S+4,464 ;" ""

TABLE 3

a 1

---a _-._---_-------n--,_, w_,_. -,,-n

INDUCED LEAKAGE PHASE TEST RESULTS a ( I m... l l e TIMC 7ERP PRESSURE' LEAK RA7C CALC LCAK AA7C 953 CONFIDCMCC 0 3.55 82.79 63.68* 0.00000+00 0.00000+00 0.0000 00 0.0000+00 1 3.71 82 78 63 679 4.75980*00 0 00000+00 0.0000*00 0 0000*00 2 3.49 82.y7 63673 9 39739+93 9 09900+90 g.!!90+99 0 9999+99 4 4 21 82.75 63.657-0.12010+01 0 13120+41 0.5770*00 0.2050+01 5 4 34 02 75 63.656 0.12690+01 0.13480+41 0.8070+00 0.1890+01 e ;.-^

^.7^

e;.e ^ .;;7";::"

.0^^^;:0-0."T^^ -::

0.;;^; 7 5 33 82.75 63 610 0 14130 01 0.13290+81 9 181D*01 8.2050+01 4 5.50 42 77 63.603 0 14620*01 0 15230*01 0 1090*01 0 1950*01 .e7 ^;.7^ 0; :.;^;;; ^; 0..

^

18 5.43 82 70 63 592 0 12910+01 0 14300 01 0.1010 01 0 1850 01 11 6 00 82 71 63 584 0 13310+01 0 14220*01 0.1030+01 0 1820 01

^ ;.;7

^^.7^

. 7^

0..;^.; ^^ ^.";^;;;^^

0. ;; ^. ; 0.

^. ; 770 ; 13 6 33 82 68 63.571 0 13040+01 0 14050+01 0 1040.a1 8 177D*st 14 6.50 82.69 63.564 8.13290*01 0 14030 01 0.1060+wl 0 1750+01 ^; ..;7 ^;.;^ 00."-^ 0.;;";;:^; .;--^^ -0;

.;070::"

.17"" ^; 16 6.83 82.67 63.552 0 12980+01_ 0 13920 01 0.1070 01 0.1720*01 17 7.00 02 67 63 544 0 13300*01 0.13920*01 0.1080 01 0.1700+01

^

7.;7 ^;."^

.;;^

0."; ;;:^; 0.;;;;::" O.."

^^

19 7.33 92 45 63 532 0.12960+01 0.13830 01 8 1090+01 8.1680+01 20 7..*0 82.66

63. 52_5 0 13140*01

0. 13410+01

0. 1090*01.. 8 1670+01 22 7.43 82 63 63.514 0 12780+01 0 13640+01 0 1090+01 0 1650+01 23 8.80 82.63 63 506 0 12920+01 0 1363O+01 0 10 90 + 01 0 1640+01

^;

."7
.;^

-^;

.'^;;; -

0.;;^^; ^^ ^ ;^^;- "

0. ;" ;; : " -

25 8 33 82 62 634495 0.12820 01 0 13520+01 0.1090*01 0 1620+01 26 8 50 82 62 63E489 8.12810+01 0 13480+01 0.1090*01 0 1610+01 ^7 ^ ;7 ^^ ;^ ^.'^;^;- ^; ^. ; ; ^. " ; - -^

0. ;;-- ^ ^ ^..":: :^^

28 8.83 82.60 63.477 0.12700+01 0.13400+01 0.1090*01 0 1590+01 29 9.00 42 60 63 471 0 12650+01 0 13350+01 0 1090 01 0.1500*01 e^.-- e;.; 7 ^.'^;; :0^ ^.;;;^;-;; ^.;^^^ ; ". 0.; ::::: 31 9.50 02 59 63 453 0.12600*01 0 13260 01 0 1080+01 0 1570+01 MCAN LCA4 R47E OF LAST 20 POIN7530 12920 01 G e TABLE 4 8 ._,,..._..n_,,.,. .._,,,,.--,,nr.,.m,._ ,_,.-m,-.,-.--,,

l [. 1 E CALCOLATED LEAK RATE f +1 J er H l 'l o.is l l A,ss% verta connoEncs Q.. o a N n z, CALCULATES LEAR RATE N s a 4 3 wE i, e n.. 'l - g A =< j c. e \\.j fl ~ u.o .J 4 p. ( " s, ? 8 i-1 l e, l o.oo . ', co 2'.00 f.co 4'.00 loo 6' co i' oo s'..>o s'. co s b. t,o ).00' sh.co Illit. IN finilRS HEASURED LEAK RATE PHASE - GRAPil 0F CALCULATED LEAK. RATE AND UPPER CONFIDENCE LlHIT t

.I n 3 CONTAINMENT MEASURED LEAK RATE il 1-0 E a i n t: ' ( j1 >.J 6 l sd-1 n l Q. HEAsuptp LEAR AATE m s,. - \\ i e n C i N c .c 1-Y 5 E t tentsgeog tsus A Mi[ ~ i 1 wu 4 ij I Y' 13 f-I I I.co s'.co a'.co s'. co 4'.00 .'. 00 d oo t'.co u'.oo 9' oc sb.00 l's.co shoo o TIHf. IN HOURS e HEASURED LEAK RATE PHASE - GRAPH OF TOTAL TlHE. 4 HEASURED LEAK RATE AND REGRESS 10ll Lil4E i O l g

l t .E AVERAGE CONTAINMENT DRY' AIR PRESSURE c. &j. 'g y i- , p n-I g u) Ch-n G E a-4- y g g e rn g. E* 8di E2- 'E l-c. t .I i i,, O' ? J{ I. g 4

b.co l'. co 2'.00 i'. co 4'.00 C.oo s'. co i'. co s'.oo e'. oo io.oo d.00 ilt.oo ilHE IN 1100RS MEASURED LEAK RATE PilASE -

GRAPil 0F DRY AIR PRESSURE w M

AVERAGE CONTAINMENT VAPOR PRES,SURE n 4-g 5-W t o 1 V I., h ~ t 3 m 4 E it. T A z! i g" m a E WQ u w l o Se. t : ,9 ee 1 is t V i ii 2 5.00 s'. oo (.co t oo 4'. o0 .'. 0a 6'. 0a r'.oo e'..so s'. oo s n'.oo

).00 sh.co i

Illit. IN l100RS l HEASURED LEAK RATE PflASE - GRAPH OF VOLUME WElGliTED AVERAGE'C0tiTAlllHEl4T VAPOR PRESSURE t . :L

t ,i, g) v ':1 ~ AVER AGE ' CON T AI NI1EN T TEMPERATURI-y V-e 1 l 8 i 1 ,1 e

nl 0-P u ')

1 ok na* W a m A h5 V l. i 5 r g! s

s 1

M* 1; L N i g ) '? l ,k l 2-2 5.00-s'.oo i.oo i.oo 4'.00 ,' oo e,'. co t'.co n'.<w 9'.00 ab.co s's.co s'a.co fl i TINE IN HOURS I -'l ,1 NEASURED LEAK RATE PilASE - GRAPil 0F VOLUME a WElGHTED AVERAGE CollTAlllHEllT TEMPERATURE d i t 'l

CALCULATED 1.EAK RATE ~ .{. INDUCED PllASE i s ~~. coenresnect at g-w = z., ~. .i. m: O3 s-

W 88 cattia.avge Leas marg
88j -

1 i -sc - I y 1 4.oo .c...

e...,,

e...,

c.,,

e...,

I 1 811 1N 180H111; i lNDUCED LEAKAGE PilASE - GRAPil 0F CALCULATED LEAK RATE AND UPPER C0liFIDEl4CE LlHIT =

see, CONTAINMENT ME ASURED 1.F AK RATE INDUCED PHASE s.cs s

? >+ .c. 7 assasunts tsaa mars areassseoes Luseh _ n n a = = .c.. A .~ ~ 'I / V s.ses M. i w r n'S. : ' v i 1 i .i j ) '5). ou o'. ',o s '..u, s '.,o f'.F" [.,o s' on i,.,o ,go i I 181! IN 1801111:: ] lilDUCED LEAL

AGE PilASE - GRAPil 0F TOTAL TlHE HEASURED LEAK RATE A!40 REGRESS 10ll LillE I

'l i

AVERAGE UONIAINMENI IFMPERATURE I N DtJC EI) I'llASE i e l ~

s. ;*

r,a t a i.r _73 g;3 E ~ W'! si.

N o., '

e as

n.s*

I' E,' la. N \\

/

X 2 I U 'is.co o'.,o s'. ars. s. :,o . c. .*u.

un

,-,o r t-s.s J 8. *.o uns , ai 6 uts I Ilit iN ll:lilli:. e lilDUCED LEAKAGE PitASE - GRAPil 0F VOLuftE WEIGitTED AVERAGE C0;lTAlllHENT TEttPERATURE l l l

AVERAGE. CONTAINMENT VAPOR PRESSURF ~ i i INDUCED PilASE 1 l b a. 1 1 sa m u. ci sa c jo 8l. O. m i l* *

u..

a.e O

i..

i;';< .9

8 fe e,-

4 i 1 6. 1 00-- -...--..c....,..._.,....f._... /~,,, ,g,---

;,,f
g, o..o i. io i..o I lil' lN llutlH: ;

lilDUCED LEAL; AGE PilASE - GRAPH OF VOLUHE WElGilIED AVERAGE C0;lTA1:lHElli VAPOR PRESSURE 1 i l

\\ AVE R AGF UfiN T A I NMI:N I' Dis' Y AIR PREUCURE [.. I N D U C l.D PIIA Sl': sj

/

6-i 2 s= 9 u l ] ."o . s' 3 g D E,..*.. ilie .'- e

se '_

res tr... N i l I p -r =. b.00

u. ',o s.o.

s.Lo .? :.', .. :.0 3 00

l. *.o 4 c.ts 4.,n

?.. u3

'.,0 h.00 I litt iN 110tlRS i

INDUCED LEAKAGE PilASE - GRAPH OF DRY AIR PRESSURE t

s . 9 SECTION E - TEST CAI.CULATIONS Calculations for the IPCLRT using the BN-TOP-1, Rev. I test method are ( found in Quad-Cities procedures QTS 150-T3 and 79. A reproduction of these procedures can be found in Appendix C. In the course of preparing for the IPCIJtT a number of errors were identified in the published version of BN-TOP-1, Rev. 1. These errors were editorial in nature and no attempt was made by Station personnel to deviate from the intended procedure outlined in the BN-TOP-1, Rev. I topical report. These errors are identified in Appendix E. A block diagram of the computer program to perform the calculations based on the BN-TOP-1, Rev. I test method can be found in Appendix G. G l e e h ( t S 9 e 4 I i 9 32- -ww--, s--,-- w w- -v--w- -w-- @*4-'*u""W t'N"f8NI"FN'-M'"""" ' ' " " ' " '~'

. SECTION F - TYPE A TEST RESULTS F.1. Measured Leak Rate Test Results ( Based upon the data obtained during the short duration test, the following results were determined: (LA = 1.0 wt %/ day)

1) Calculated leak rate at 12 hours equals 0.453 wt %/ day and declining steadily over time (<0.750 wt 1/ day).

2) Upper confidence limit equals 0.660 wt %/ day and declining

(<0.750 wt %/ day).

3) Mean of the meas'ured leak rates for the last 5 hours (30 data sets) equals 0.377 wt %/ day (<0.750 wt %/ day).

4) Data sets were accumulated at approximately 10 minute time intervals and no intervals exceeded I hour.

I l

5) There were 73 data sets accumulated in 12 hours.

l

6) The minimum test duration of 12 hours was successfully accomplished 1

(> 12 hours). F.2 Induced Leakaze Test Results A leak rate of 8.0 scfm (0.980 wt %/ day) was induced on the primary containment for this phase of the test. The leak rates during this phase of the test were as follows. Total Time Calculated Leak Rate 0.453 0.453 (Measured Leak Rate Phase) i i Induced Leak (8.0 sefa) 0.980 0.980 Allowed Error Band + 0.250 - 0.250 1.683 1.183 Total Time calculated Leak Rate 1.326 wt %/ day (Induced Leak Rate Phase) 9 R _

i F.3 Leak Rate Compensation For Non-Vented Penetrations The IPCLRT was performed with the following penetrations not drained and g vented as requirci by 10 CFR 50, Appendix J. The "as left" leak rates for each of these penetrations, as determined by Type C testing, is alsc listed: PENETRATION FUNCTION SCFH VI %/ DAY X-9A "A" Feedwater Line 2.22 0.0045 X-95 "B" Feedwater Line 23.9 0.0488 X-12 RHR Supply 7.79 0.0159 X-14 Rx Water Clean-Up Supply 0.9 0.0018 X-41 Primary System Sample 0.0 0.0 TOTAL 34.81 0.0711 This yields the following adjusted leak rates: Calculated Leak Rate (BN-TCP-1, Rev. 1) .524 wt %/ day ypper Confidence Limit (BN-TOP-1, Rev.1) .731 wt %/ day For the purpcses of comparison, using the ANS/ ANSI method the following are the adjusted leak rates: Statistically Averaged Leak Rate .376 wt %/ day Upper Confidence Limit (ANS/ ANSI 56.8) .465 we %/ day It is understood that the leak rates associated with the ANS/ ANSI calculations can on1 be reported if a 24 hour test is performed. F.4 Pre-Operational Results vs. Test Results Past IPCLRT reports have compared the results of those tests with the pre-operational IPCLRT, performed April 20-21, 1971. The last IPCLRT on Unit One conducted February 19-22, 1979 yielded a statistically averaged leak rate (ANS/ ANSI method) of 0.3175 wt %/ day after correcting for non-tested penetrations. The present test, if the same method of data analysis were used, except for the test duration, gave a leak rate of 0.376 wt %/ day. The difference between the results are within each tests uncertainty limits. The reported leak rate using the BN-TOP-1 Rev. I method of calculating a leak rate for a short duration test will show a significant increase.over past IPCLRT results. The increase is due almost entirely to the difference in method of computation, rather than an increase in containment leakage.

J ( i i CALCULATED LEAR RATE (MASS PLOT METHCD) i lh. -h I -f- -.41 ( l g . a.h ! k j ,l 1 4 j ..l . -g- ;' h$- r ?..h h,, q q ,.4 { .}. 3 ...I .r -a a l p s - g._p.; _...,. ,;,5 7, %.y i 7... ; ;; geg 7 e = {. TTg .-i.

.L u.

5, 3 3 i e.he.M -l[

f- [A

/i. N4ggdygg @[Mk . {..p.,. .9 g --% l,, . p. 'l ,,j .._+q p p.q..; p p.; p , ;*, y i- _f,.f N,_ 3p +4_++._,. .f..- l h; j -. y,..E. f j_.. }. q-4,. j. .J. ' hh hhim f' h ^[ l' f 'f [ h h f- -l -I }-;-..h f

j. hIy 1

-h-I i +H 1 4./ ~ '

.,' i:- 3

.i M' + + -thMFi t i s -- i t F- . t-4 . '. '+ - -+- -Wr;

.; rl L i-H' b b

?! ++Ht i 4HIH + + 4 t r {. [..{.. [. 'f -' l t "t' pi ..j. p g t j . g,. 4 f _y,

+

m./ m 4 a w

mes+.r om e

i .+. : 1 .y.-h.-, - l, {. ' .f 1* l ,~ f 't' "l {' f [ g.,p q. J. g., .g..q .) g.,, 4 g.* y , t h-{F 1 T J -+--H F- + H F+-4 H i I I ' l *- -.i P i " s -i -; !/ OMW-4tr -h - t. _; 1 i _ i + 4-th -I l FH f i l "l ' l 1 I H l -PI ' l e. [' - [ !{' '{ *{ "{t-l- I "l

f:

't ...{. j ] j.. {.-. {. g _ t. f.. {,l l l 9_, 1 L l. !/!

l. 'I9-M GS.

!~

i..

l~ - l : FPf- '.. l, t j +-l l t -i l F l4 l,-l l. I t i ! F' i' i 5_ q 1 ,.r., ,,,,.. ; i u ], . 2 , f,.,I,.T. wl i.. .-I,m. 6 i e _.-6,. t 1 T. l t I } I l 4 v.; I i i T. ~ ' ''""b " h b h b f~?'l b h'" l'f l ! i (" h l " **" <t ~ +-t1./! i i :t i+ w . :? At

.i t: :h l. i; h*F

.. t t-- i-IF-; H h I ! I i i l i l ii-tc +-H l F t c t; 'i 1 t =. L .l Jr. ? l- +FF + +H l 4 I i FFl-l ! I l l'I I l +-Alll _' T

.F+-F

=! t' ~ ~ih *% H t--H HI i !- I : F FH 2 1 '/.l. h -1 :; % t ' !.. + 1 T H- -! +- -!lal-1.! i i ! ! 1 - l "i - F M '. 1 til ~, i ti 1 P--+

+ + ++ H 2l

l i-l l !

4 , m,4. r o 1 r on i .i i 1 1 i. r -i o, "T". t ,;,;;,. p.; {

g _ g f",

i l ? a a 3 s e e e io n sa new newsre j l l l FIGURE 13 v.--

APPENDIX A TYPE B AND C TESTS Presented herein are the results of local leak rate tests conducted on all penetrations, double-gasketed seals, and isolation valves since the previous IPCLRT in February, 1979. All valves with leakage in excess of the individual valve leakage limit were restored to an acceptable leak tightness prior to the resumption of power operation with the exception of the Main Steam Line Drain Valve, MO l-220-1. Technical Specification change to T.S. 3.7.A.2.a.2. was approved by the Commission to allow operation without first repairing this valve. Total leakage for double gasketed seals and total leakage for all other penetrations and isolation valves following repairs r.atisfied the Technical Specification limits. These results are listed in Table A-1. I O e e. =,e . pg

TABLE A-1 TYPE B AND C TEST RESULTS VALVE (S) OR MEASURED LEAK RATE (SCFH) ( PENETRATION TEST VOLUME AS FOUND DATE AS LEFT DATE AO 203-1A Main Steam Line 10,37 09-06-82 10.37 09-06-8; Isolation Valves *** 4.48 09-01-80 4.61 11-05-8C. A0 203-2A 10.37 09-06-82 10.37 09-06-8;- 140.56 09-01-80 4.61 11-05-8C. A0 203-1B 19.58 09-06-82 3.46 12-13-8:, 23.77 09-01-80 5.76 11-20-8C A0 203-2B 19.58 09-06-82 3.46 12-13-8;~ 27.65 09-01-80 5.76 11-20-8C A0 203-1C 43.78 09-06-82 5.76 12-13-8; 1.73 09-01-80 1.73 11-26-8C A0 203-2C 43.78 09-06-82 5.76 12-13-8; 1.73 09-01-80 1.73 11-26-8C A0 203-1D 8.06 09-06-82 8.06 09-06-8; 14.97 09-01-80 0.0 11-26-8C A0 203-2D 8.06 09-06-82 8.06 09-06-8; 226.97 09-01-80 0.0 11.26-8( MO 220 Main Steam Line Drains UD/5.01 09-06-82

- /5.01 MO 220-2 96.71/5.97 09-01-80 13.05/5.97 11-25-8C A0 220-44 Primary Sample 0.0 09-30-82

0.0 09-30-8

A0 220-45 0.0 11-24-80 0.0 11-24-8( l CV 220-58A Feedwater Inlet UD* 10-08-82 8.06 11-16-8; Loop "A" Inboard 0.90 09-19-80 0.90 09-19-8( CV 220-62A Feedwater Inlet 194.6 10-08-82 2.22 11-16-8; Loop "A" Outboard UD* 09-19-80 6.66 10-29-8( CV 220-58B Feedwater Inlet UD* 09-08-82 24.64 12-03-8; Loop "B" Inboard 5.39 09-05-80 5.39 09-05-8( CV 220-62B Feedwater Inlet 104.5 09-08-82 23.9 12-08-8; Loop "B" Outboard UD* 09-06-80 17.76 10-14-8( Unable to determine the leakage due to an inability to pressurize the volume wit! compressed air. Technical Specification change to start-up and run with MO 1-220-1 valve unrepai:

- - Test Pressure for MSIV's is 25 PSIG. Where the A and B valves in a steam line have identical-leakages, the valves were tested as a single volume.

The value is a maximum leak rate through the valve assuming that the other valve leaked 0.0 SCFH.

I i TABLE A-1 TYPE B AND C TESI RESULTS VALVE (S) OR MEASURED LEAK RATE (SCFH) PENETRATION TEST VOLI:ME AS FOUND DATE AS LEFT DATE NO 1001-20 RERS to Radwaste 0.0 12-11-82 0.0 12-11 NO 1001-21 0.0 10-08-80 0.0 10-05-80' MO 1001-23A RHRS Containment Spray - 18.24 10-10-82 18.24 10-10-82 HD 1001-26A System I 4.16 09-30-80 4.16 09-30-30 MO 1001-29A RHRS Return Loop "A" 12.06 10-17-82 12.06 10-17-82 1.51 09-30-63 1.51 09-30-80 NO 1001-34A RERS Suppression Chamber-60.48 10-24-82 4.54 12-01-82 MO 1001-36A Spray - System I 0.76 09-30-80 0.76 09-30-80 NO 1001-37A MO 1001-23B RERS Containment Spray - 1.13 10-25-82 1.13 10-25-82 MO 1001-26B System II 0.0 09-30-80 0.0 09-30-80 MO 1001-29B RHRS Return Loop "B" 0.0 10-25-82 0.0 10-25-82 6.18 09-30-80 6.18 09-30-80 MO 1001-34B RHRS Suppression MO 1001-36B Chamber Spray 4.91 10-24-82 4.91 10-24-82 MO 1001-37B System II 8.42 09-29-80 8.42 09-29-80 MO 1001-47 RHRS Shutdown 15.58 10-04-82 15.58 10-04-82 MO 1001-50 Cooling Suction 0.0 10-01-80 0.0 10-01-80 MO 1001-60 RHRS Head Spray 0.19 10-24-82 0.19 10-24-82 MO 1001-63 0.76 10-01-80 0.76 10-01-80 NO 1201-2 Clean-Up System 14.87 09-30-82 1.80 12-08-82 MO 1201-5 Suction 11.50 10-31-80. 11.50 10-31-80 MO 1301-16 RCIC Steam Supply 0.38 09-06-82 0.38 09-06-82 MO 1301-17 0.48 08-31-80 0.48 08-31-80 CV 1301-40 RCIC Condensate Drain 2.50 09-09-82 2.50 09-09-82 1.90 08-31-80 1.90 08-31-80 CV 1301-41 RCIC Turbine Exhaust i 1584.0 09-07-82 0.84 12-11-82 4 1.20 08-31-80 1.20 08-31-80 A0 1601-21 Drywell and Suppression 258.0 09-09-82 0.0 12-04-82 A0 1601-22 Chamber Pur8e 435.21 09-03-80 2.10 11-18-80 A0 1601-55 A0 1601-56 A0 1601-20A Suppression Chamber 17.58 10-17-82 0.0 10-27-82 CV 1601-31A Vent Lines #1 11.37 09-04-80 11.37 09-04-80 _. ~,.

TABLE A-1 TYPE B AND C TEST RESULTS VALVE (S) OR MEASURED LEAK RATE (SCFH) PENETRATION TEST VOLUME AS FOUND DATE AS LEFT DATE A0 1601-20B Suppression Chamber 0.015 09-09-82 0.015 09-09-81 CV 1601-31B Vent Lines #2 5.02 09-04-80 5.02 09-04-8C. AD 1601-57 Drywell and Suppression 1.90 10-20-82 1.90 10-20-82 AO 1601-58 Chamber Supply Air 2.50 09-03-80 2.50 09-03-8C A0 3601-59 Purge l AD 1601-23 Drywell and Suppression 9.00 13-17-82 9.00 10-17-82 A0 1601-24 Chamber Exhaust 125.98 09-03-80 18.0 11-02-80 AO 1601-60 A0 1601-61 A0 1601-62 A0 1601-63 A0 2001-3 Drywell Floor Drain 1.10 10-20-82 1.10 10-20-82 A0 2001-4 Susp Discharge 1.30 09-23-80 1.30 09-23-80 AO 2001-15 Dryvell Equipment 0.90 10-20-82 0.90 10-20-82 AO 2001-16 Drain Sump Discharge 9.50 09-23-80 9.50 09-23-80 MO 2301-4 HPCI Steam Supply 3.46 09-06-82 3.46 09-06-82 to 2301-5 10.37 08-31-80 10.37 08-31-80 C7 2301-34 HPCI Condensate Drain 0.0 09-09-82 0.0 09-09-82 4.50 08-31-80 4.50 08-31-80 l l CV 2301-45 HPCI Steam Exhaust UD* 09-07-82 0.80 12-07-82 4.02 08-31-80 4.02 08-31-80 i A0 4720 Drywell Pneumatic 13.0 09-27-82 13.50 10-22-82 i Suction 0.0 09-03-80 0.0 09-03-80 AO 4721 Drywell Pneumatic 14.0 09-27-82 14.0 10-22-82 Suction 0.0 09-03-80 0.0 09-03-80 A0 8801A 0xygen Analyzer Suction 0.0 09-13-82 0.0 09-13-82 0.2 09-09-80 0.2 09-09-80 A0 8802A 0xygen Analyzer Suction 0.2 09-13-82 0.20 09-13-82 0.6 09-09-80 0.6 09-09-80 AO 8801B Oxygen Analyzer Suction 4.20 09-13-82 4.20-09-13-82 O.2 09-09-80 0.2 09-09-80 AO 8802B 0xygen Analyzer Suction 0.0 09-13-82 0.0 09-13-82 0.3 09-09-80 0.3 09-09-80 t l,

0 TABLE A-1 TYPE B AND C TEST RESULTS VALVE (S) OR MEASURED LEAK RATE (SC7H) PENETRATION TEST VOLUME AS TOUND DATE AS LEFT DATE A0 8801C 0xygen Analyzer Suction 4.20 09-13-82 4.20 09-15-82: 0.0 09-09-80 0.0 09-09-8C- \\ ' l 'AO 8802C 0xygen Analyzer Suction 3.90 09-13-82 3.90 09-13 l 0.0 09-09-80 0.0 09-09-8C AO 8801D Ozygen Analyzer Suction 0.20 09-13-82 0.20 09-15-82 0.40 09-09-80 0.40 09-09-8C AO 8802D 0xygen Analyzer Suction 0.20 09-13-82 0.20 09-13-82 1.10 09-09-80 1.10 09-09-8C i AO 8803 0xygen Analyzer Return 8.00 09-17-82 8.00 09-17'-82 7.50 09-18-80 7.50 09-18-8C A0 8804 0xygen Analyzer Return 2.70 09-i7-82 2.70 09-17-82 1.80 09-18-80 1.80 09-18-8C 733-1 Automatic TIP Ball Valve 4.50 09-21-82 0.30 11-23-82 0.0 09-15-80 0.0 09-15-8C 733-2 Automatic TIP Ball Valve 0.20 09-21-82 1.70 11-23-82 0.20 09-15-80 0.20 09-15-8C 733-3 Automatic TIP Ball Valve 0.0 09-21-82 3.30 11-23-82 0.0 09-15-80 0.0 09-15-8C 733-4 Automatic TIP Ball Valve 1.0 09-21-82 7.30 11-23-82 0.0 09-15-80 0.0 09-15-8C 733-5 Automatic TIP Ball Valve 0.0 09-21-82 3.10 11-23-82 0.1 09-15-80 0.1 09-15-8C 700-743 TIP Purge Check Valve 11.70 09-21-82 5.0 11-23-82 6.0 09-15-80 6.0 09-15-8C SO 2499-1A CAM - Drywell 0.0 09-16-82 0.0 09-16-8; SO 2499-2A 0.0 09-19-80 0.0 09-19-8C SG 2499-3A CAM - Suppression Chamber 0.0 09-16-82 0.0 09-16-82 SO 2499-4A 0.0/2.5 09-19-80 0.0/2.5 09-19-8C SO 2499-1B CAM - Drywell 0.0 09-16-82 0.0 09-16-8; SO 2499-2B 0.6 09-19-80 0.6 09-19-8C SO 2499-3B CAM - Suppression 0.0 09-16-82 0.0 09-16-8; SO 2499-4B Chamber 7.0 09-19-80 7.0 09-19-8C 40- ,7- -~-- y_,,. _.. - -,. p _,-a y-

TABLE A-1 TYPE B AND C TEST RESULTS VALVE (S) OR I MEASURED LEAK RATE (SCFH) PENETRATION TEST VOL1ME AS FOUND DATE AS LEFT DATE FCV 2599-1A ACAD Isolation 2.40 09-15-82

2.40 09-15-82 6.00 09-19-80 6.00 09-19-80 FVC 2499-1B ACAD Isolation 0.0 09-15-82 0.0 09-15-82 6.00 09-19-80 6.00 09-19-80 A0 2599-2A ACAD to Drywell 0.0 09-17-82 0.0 09-17-82 CV 2599-23A 0.0 09-19-80 0.0 09-19-80 A0 2599-3A ACAD to Suppression 0.0 09-16-82 0.0 09-16-82 CV 2599-24A Chamber 0.0 09-19-80 0.0 09-19-80 A0 2599-2B ACAD to Drywell 0.0/1.2*

09-17-82 0.0/1.2* 09-17-82 CV 2599-23B 0.3 09-19-80 0.3 09-19-80 A0 2599-3B ACAD to Suppression 0.0 09-16-82 0.0 09-16-82 CV 2599-24B Chamber 1.20 09-19-80 1.20 09-19-80 A0 2599-4A ACAD Drywell Bleed to 0.0 09-15-82 0.0 09-15-82 FCV 2599-5A SBGTS 2.5/0.0* 09-19-80 2.5/0.0* 09-19-80 A0 2599-4B ACAD Drywell 2.1/0.0* 09-15-82 2.1/0.0* 09-15-82 FCV 2599-5B Bleed to SBGTS 1.1/1.8* 09-19.P*. 1,1/1,8* Q9-19-80 X-1 Drywell Equipment Hatch 0.0 09-06-82 0.0 12-16-82 0.0 12-17-80 0.0 12-17-80 X-2 Drywell Personnel 0.0 11-26-82 0.0 11-26-82 Airlock 0.0 12-19-80 0.0 12-19-80 X-4 Drywell Head Access 0.0 09-06-82 0.0 09-06-82 Hatch 0.0 09-18-80 0.0 09-18-80 X-6 CRD Removal Hatch 0.0 09-06-82 0.0 12-16-82 0.0 12-02-80 0.0 12-02-80 X-35A TIP Flux Mon. Flange 0.0 09-20-82 0.0 09-20-82 0.0 09-15-80 0.0 09-15-80 X-35B 0.0 09-20-82 0.0 09-20-82 0.0 09-15-80 0.0 09-15-80 Valves tested separately. Individual valve leak rates shown.

TABLE A-1 TYPE B AND C TEST RESULTS i VALVE (S) OR MEASURED LEAX RATE (SCFH) PENETRATION TEST VOLUME AS FOUND DATE AS LEFT DATE X-35C 0.0 09-20-82 0.0 09-20-82 0.0 09-15-50 0.0 09-15-80 X-35D 0.0 09-20-82 0.0 09-20 0.0 09-15-80 0.0 09-15-80 X-35E 0.0 09-20-82 0.0 09-20-82 0.0 09-15-80 0.0 09-15-80 X-35F 0.0 09-20-82 0.0 09-20-82; 0.0 09-15-80 0.0 09-15-80 1-35G 0.0 09-20-82 0.0 09-20-82 0.0 09-15-80 0.0 09-15-80 X-200A Suppression Chamber 0.0 09-06-82 0.0 12-14-82 Access Hatch 0.0 12-19-80 0.0 12-19-80 X-2005 0.0 09-06-82 0.0 12-20-82 0.0 12-19-80 0.0 12-19-80 Drywell Drywell Head UD* 09-06-82 0.0 12-15-82 Head Flange 0.0 12-17-80 0.0 12-17-8C SL-? Shear Lug Inspec. tion 0.0 09-21-82 0.0 09-21-82 Hatches 0.0 09-12-80 0.0 09-12-8C SL-2 1.50 09-21-82 1.50 09-21-82 0.0 09-12-80 0.0 09-12-8C SL-3 0.50 09-21-82 0.50 09-21-81 0.0 09-12-80 0.0 09-12-3C SL-4 0.0 09-21-82 0.0 09-21-8; 0.0 09-12-80 0.0 09-12-8C SL-5 0.0 09-21-82

0.0 09-21-8

0.0, 09-12-80 0.0 09-12-8C SL-6 0.0 09-21-82 0.0 09-21-82 l 0.0 09-12-80 0.0 09-12-8C SL-7 0.0 09-21-82

0.0 09-21-8

0.0 09-12-80 0.0 09-12-8C 1 t Unable to determine the leakage, because the flowmeter test rig has a 30 SCFH flow capacity. Leakage exceeded 30 SCFH.. _..

TABLE A-1 TYPE B AND C TEST RESULTS VALVE (S) OR MEASURED LEAK RATE (SCFH) PENETRATION TEST VOLLHE AS FOUND DATE AS LEFT DATE SL-8 5.50 09-21-82 5.50 09-21-8 ' 0.0 09-12-80 0.0 09-12-8( X-7A Primary Stena 0.0 09-10-82 0.0 09-10-E! 0.0 09-11-80 0.0 09-11-8( X-78 0.7 09-10-82 0.7 09-10-8; 0.9 09-11-80 0.9 09-11-8(; X-7C 0.0 09-10-82 0.0 09-10-8:' O.0 09-11-80

0.0 09-11-8(

X-7D 0.0 09-10-82 0.0 09-10-8:: 0.0 09-11-80 0.0 09-11-8(' X-8 Primary Steas 0.0 09-10-82 0.0 09-10-8; Drain Line 0.0 09-11-80 0.0 09-11-8( X-9A Reactor Feedwater 0.0 09-10-82 0.0 09-10-8; 0.0 09-11-80 0.0 09-11-8C X-98 0.0 09-10-82 0.0 09-10-8; 0.0 09-11-80 0.0 09-11-8( X-10 Steam to RCIC 0.0 09-10-82 0.0 09-10-8; 0.0 09-11-80 0.0 09-11-8( X-11 EPCI to Steam Supply 0.0 09-10-82 0.0 09-10,8: 0.0 09-11-80 0.0 09-11-8C X-12 RERS Supply 0.0 09-10-82 0.0 09-10-8; 4.3 09-11-80 4.3 09-11-8( j X-13A RERS Return 0.0 09-10-82 0.0 09-10-8; O.0 09-11-80 0.0 09-11-8( l X-138 0.0 09-10-82 0.0 09-10-8; 0.0 09-11-80 0.0 09-11-8C X-14 Cleanup Supply 0.30 09-10-82 0.60 12-10-8; 0.0 09-11-80 0.0 09-11-8C X-23 Cooling Water 0.0 09-10-82 0.0 09-10-8; 0.5 09-11-80 0.5 09-11-8( X-24 Cooling Water Return 0.0 09-10-82 0.0 09-10-8; 0.0 09-11-80 0.0 09-11-8( -,

TABLE A-1 TYPE B AND C TEST RESULTS VALVE (S) OR MEASURED LEAK RATE (SCFH) PENETRATION TEST VOLUME AS FOUND DATE AS LEFT DATE Z-25 Vent From Drywell 0.0 09-10-82 0.0 09-10-82 0.6 09-11-80 0.6 09-11-80 X-26 Vent to Drywell 0.0 09-10-82

0.0 09-10-82

0.3 09-11-80 0.3 09-11 X-36. CRD Rydraulic 0.0 09-10-82 0.0 09-10-82 System Return 0.05 09-11-80 0.05 09-11-80 X-47 Standby Liquid 0.0 09-10-82 0.0 09-10-82 Control 0.0 09-11-80 0.0 09-11-80 X-17 Reactor Vessel 0.0 09-10-82 0.0 09-10-82 Head Spray 0.0 09-11-80 0.0 09-11-80 X-16A Core Spray Inlet 0.0 09-10-82 0.0 09-10-82 8.0 09-11-80 8.0 09-11-80 X-16B Core Spray Inlet 5.10 09-10-82 4.7 10-04-82 0.0 09-11-80 0.0 09-11-80 X-100A CRD Position 0.0 09-29-82 0.0 09-29-G2 Indication 0.0 09-15-80 0.0 09-15-80 X-100B Pouer 0.0 09-29-82 0.0 09-29-82 0.0 09-15-80 0.0 09-15-80 X-100C Neutron Monitor 0.0 09-28-82 0.0 09-28-82 0.0 09-11-80 0.0 09-11-80 X-100D Neutron Monitor 0.0 09-28-82 0.0 09-28-82 0.0 09-10-80 0.0 09-10-80 X-100E Neutron Monitor 0.0 09-28-82 0.0 09-28-82 0.0 09-10-80 0.0 09-10-80 X-100F CRD Position Indication 0.0 09-29-82 0.0 09-29-82 0.0 09-03-80 0.0 09-03-80 X-100G Power 0.0 09-29-82 0.0 09-29-82 0.0 09-03-80 0.0 09-03-8C X-101A CRD Position Indication 0.0 09-28-82 0.0 09-28-82 0.0 09-11-80 0.0 09-11-80 X-101B CRD Position Indication 0.0 09-28-82 0.0 09-28-82 0.0 09-11-80 0.0 09-11-8C ~. _ _, _ _ . ~-..

? TABLE A-1 TYPE B.aRD C TEST RESULTS g VALVE (S) OR MEASURED LEAF RATE (SCFH) PENETRATION TEST VOLUME AS FOUND DATE AS LEFT DATE X-101D Recirc Fump Power 0.0 09-29-82 0.0 09-29-82 0.0 09-03-80 0.0 09-03-80 X-102A Rectre Pump Power 0.0 09-28-82 0.0 09-28-82 0.0 09-11-80 0.0 09-11-80 X-103 Thermocouple 0.0 09-28-82 0.0 09-22 02 0.0 09-11-80 0.0 09-11-80 X-104B CRD Position Indication 0.0 09-29-82 0.0 09-29-82 0.0 09-15-80 0.0 09-15-80 X-104C Recire Pump Power 0.0 09-28-82 0.0 09-28-82 0.0 09-11-80 0.0 09-11-80 X-104F Power 0.0 09-29-82 0.0 09-20-32 0.0 09-03-80 0.0 09-03-80 X-105A Power 0.0 09-29-82 0.0 09-29-82 0.0 09-15-80 0.0 09-15-80 X-105B Power Drive Modules 0.0 09-28-82 0.0 09-28-82 0.0 09-10-80 0.0 09-10-80 X-105C CRD Position Indication 0.0 09-28-82 0.0 09-28-8'2 0.0 09-10-80 0.0 09-10-80 X-105D Recire Pump Power 0.0 09-29-82 0.0 09-29-82 0.0 09-03-80 0.0 09-03-80 X-107A Neutron Monitor 0.0 09-28-82 0.0 09-28-82 1.0 09-10-80 1.0 09-10-80 X-227A ACAD/ CAM 0.0 10-04-82 0.0 10-04-82 0.0 09-18-80 0.0 09-18-80 X-227B ACAD/ CAM 0.35 10-04-82 0.35 10-04-82 C.0 09-18-80 0.0 09-18-80 -,---,-,,.,----,--,,,-,-,,-,-,-._.,w_y_97 y,-.-w.--- --.9-yw g-. ,---,r-,,-,.y.,.,y-y. -,y y p,-

, APPENDIX B AS FOUND LEAK RATES I The as found leak rate for the primary containment isolation valves, excluding the osin steam isolation valves and leakages identified during the IPCLRT, was not determined due to excessive leakage in the "A" feedwater line. The total leak rates prior to and after the outage are summarized as follows: AS FOUND AS LEFT TECHNICAL LEAK RATE LEAK RATE SPECIFICATION ITEM (SCFH) (SCTH) LIMIT (SCFN) Isolation Valves U.D.* 119.91 293.75 Testable Penetrations 6.45 6.35 Double Gasketed Seals U.D.** 7.50 Main Steam Isolation Valves (tested at 25 psig) A0 203-1A 10.37 10.37 11.5 A0 203-2A 10.37 10.37 11.5 A0 203-1B 19.58 3.46 11.5 A0 203-23 19.58 3.46 11.5 A0 203-1C 43.78 5.76 11.5 A0 203-2C 43.78 5.76 11.5 f A0 203-1D 8.06 8.06 11.5 A0 203-2D 8.06 8.06 11.5 Total through leakage for MSIV's 8 25 psig 40.90 13.83 Total adjusted through leakage for MSIV's e 48 psig 70.75 23.92 l Total through leakage l 9 48 psig U.D. 157.68 Complete details of these local leak rate test results are contained in LER/RO-82-26/03L. The total as found leakage for isolation valves was 2143.76 SCFH plus an unknown value for the "A" feedwater line. The total as found leakage for double gasketed seals was 7.5 SCFH plus an unknown value for the drywell head seal., ,,,,,,w ,_,,.y, ,--,_n_--.,-,,,,--,__,,w.,,., -, -, -.,,..,, -

Based on the above, the total as found leak rate of the primary containment was greater than the Technical Specification criteria of I wt%/ day. g If only the leakage paths tested during the IPCLRT, plus an adjustment for all penetrations not tested during the IPCLRT, are considered, then the containment leak rate is calculated to be 0.524 wt%/ day and falls within the Technical Specification acceptance criteria of 0.750 wt%/ day. i l 1 I -

e e l t APPEVDIX C COMPUTATIONAL PROCEDURE i e I i ' 48-

QT3 150-T3 Revision 7 CALCUI.ATIONS PERFORMED FOR IPCLRT DATA October 1982 ID/8B Data collected from pressure sensors, dew cells and RTD's located in the containment are processed using the following calculations. If the test ts concluded with a test period of < 24 hours, additional calculations given in QT3 150-T9 will be required. A. Average Subwolume Temperature and Dewpoint. Ty= Z(all RTD's in the ith subvolume)

T (1)

Number of AID's in jta subvolume D.P.) = Z(all dew cells in jth subvolume)

?

(2) Number of dew cells in j th subvolume where Ty = average temperature of the j tn subvolume D.P.) = average dewpoint of the j th subvo!ume 5. Average Primary Containment Temperature and Dewpoint. T= (VF ) * (T ) *7 (3) (VTp*(D.P.))*7 D.P. = (1. ) where T = average containment tamperature D.P. = ave se containment dewpoint VF) = volume fraction of the jth subvolume NVOL = number of subvolumes If T) is undefined then Ty=Tpg for 1 1 j $ (NVOL - 2) T) = T),g for j = NVOL - i T3 = e-in - e f-3 = xvot FOR REFEEiCi! CX!.Y l If D.P.) is undefined D.P.3 = D.P.p g for 1 1 j i (NVOL - 2) D.P.) = D.P.),3 for j = NVOL - 1 D.P.) = estimate for j = NVOL -

C. .Calculatica of Dry Air Pressura. D.P.( K) = 273.16 + D.P.(*T) - 32 1.8 i X = 647.27 - D.P.(*K) 3 EXPCN = I * (T + Z * % + C * % ) (D.P.("I))*(1 + D

X)

P* = (218.167) * (14.696) ( ) e(EXPON

In(10))

P = I(all absolute pressure causes) (3) -P hsu) Number of absolute pressure gauges v where I = 3.2437814 Z = 5.86826 x 10'3 ~ C = 1.1702379 x 10 ~3 D = 3.1878462 x 10 P, a volume weighted containment vapor pressure P = containment dry air absolute pressure C, D, I, T, Z, and EXPON are dewpos.nt to vapor pressure esavers:.cn constants and coefficients. D. Containment Dry Air Mass. W = (28.97) * (144) * (P) * (228737 - 25 * (T.r7F.I. - 35 )) (6) 1545.33 * (T + 459.69) where V = containment dry air mass I.ZYEI. a reactor water level CAD DCl$D ).ld Will8If l OI.'i V 289506 = primary containment volume i UR RL" J-a i NCTZ This volume is the summation of the subvolumes calculated in QTS 150-T2. These subvolumes were calculated using QTS 150-T8. Since -Je measured leak rate is a difference is air masses, this number is just as e=nservative as using the FSAR number. l

E. Utocured Lenk Rato. ' L,(TOTAL) = (W - W )

2400 g

g (7) t

W g

g ( L,(PODIT) = (W(,g - W )

2400 g

.g7 (8) (Si

S.1)
W.1 t

i where W a containment dry air mass at t = 0 g i t a time from start of test at ich data set g t,g a time from start of test at (i-1).th data set g W = dry air assa at ich data set W a dry air mass at (1-1)th data set g,g [ L,(TOTAI)= measured leakage from the start of test to :,th data set L,(PODIT)= measured leakage between the last tse data sets' F. Statistical Leak Race and Confidence Limit. LDIEAR LEAST SQUARES FITTDIG THE IPC1RT DATA The method of "Lasst Squares" is a scastst:, cal procacure for findtag.se best fitting regression line for a set of measured data. The centerton for the best fitting line to a set of data points is taat use sum of the squares of the deviations of the observed points from the itse must be a sinimum. When this criterion is set, a uncque best fitting line is obta:,sec based on all of the data points in the IIRT. The value of the leak rate based on the regression is called the statistically average leak rate. Since it is assumed that the leak rate is constant during the testing period, a plot of the seasured centainment dry air mass versus time would ideally yield a straight line with a negative slope (assuming a non-zero leak rata). Obviously, sampling techniquas and test conditions are not perfect and consequently the measured values will devtate from the ideal straight line situation.- Based on this statistical process, the calculated leak rate is obtained from the equation: W = At + B j fh hffhk h l where W = contained dry air mass at time l t -,_.-w...-,,-,-._-,,.--.--,,..,,_____,_-,.-_.-.,.,,.___,,.mv- ,y- - _, _ _,

R =-esiculated dry air mass et time e o 0 A sleulated leak rata t= ast duration j ' '( FOR RE:ERE4CE Dhi. s,O ( 'A D y Air Mass (1hs) 4 ( Test Duration (hrs) The values for the Least Squares fit constanta A and I are 3.iven by: A = (N

I(t ) * (W ) - In
IW } = I(t - E) * (W - 0) g g

g g g i .'N "' Z(t,) - (It ) } I(t - {)2 L ~ g = (I(t )2, ggy()), gggg ), gy ); 3 = IW -A*In g g N

Z(t )2, ggg()2 N

g where t a the average time for all data seta U = the average air mass for all data sets The second formulas are used in the process computer program to reduce round-off-error. By definition, leakage out of the containment is considered positive leakage; therefore, the statistically average leak rate is given by: t = (-A) * (2t.00) ) (9) l STATISTICAL t!NNANf223 In order to calculata the 95% confidence limits of the statistically ( average leak rata, the standard deviation of the least squares slope and the student's TDistribution function are used as follows. 1 N

Z(W )2 - (IW )

g g 2% 8={

(

(N-2) N

2(t )2 - (In )2) - A }

g g When gerforming these calculations on the process computer, Z(W ) and g (IV ) become so large that they overflow. To avoid this probles.iW. is ,subhtitutedforW. AW is the difference between W and W g g

g.. _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _. _ _ _, _ _ _ _ _ _.. _ _ _ _ _.. _ _ _ _

h singlo sided T-Distribution with 2 dngrecs of fresdca is approximated by the following formula from NBS Handbook 91: T.E. = 1.646698 + 1.455393,1.975971 (N-2) (N-2)' i N upper confidence limit (UCL) is given by UCL = L, + e * (TE)

2400

(,,g g g. g y) (10) B l e o e I O 9 4 E e S FOR REfiRENCE UN 53-

t' QTS 150-T9 Revtston 1 CALCULATIONS PEV. ORMED TOR IPCIRT octoeer 1982 ID/40 DATA TOR TIST DURATION LISS THAN 24 HOURS Data collected from pressure sensors, dew cells, and RC's located in the containment are processed using the following equations. Some data needs to be analyzed using equations in QTS 130-T3 prior to using these equations. Those equations are referenced by equation number. The petaary reference for these calenlations is the Topical Report 3N-TCP-1 Revision 1. A. MEASURED LZAK RAE (Total Tima) From 3N-TCP-1 Rev. 1, Section 4.3 tae following equation as given for tse measured leak rate using the total c:me procedure: [ T I g

2600
l1.o'i 'o )

i M 'i where Mg = asasured leak rate ts wetgat ". ;er day for ce

ata point assussag r1, R, and '.' are constant ts see deal ~as Law equations; t a time since the begina =g of the test parreca :s tae ;

data point in hours; T,, Tg si sean, volume weighted contat::me= temperature ac :te 1;beginning of the test and at tse data point ; is *R -(Reference EQ. 3 in QTS 150-T3 and convert tm *R ('T

459.69 = '3) ).

Y,, I a calculated dry air pressure in PSIA at :se bests =ts: g of the test and at the data point t (Reference EQ. 5 La QT3 150-T3). Using the following relationship derived in ANSI N45.4-1972 Appendiz 3 stven below: T* I W Wi= i 1 () "o T 7, g where W, W a dry air mass of the contaissent at the beguning of the test g and data point i, respectively. I L a u.p: tpnmg nui y i mno auw e.J.. -

l QT3 150-T9 Rens on 1 And substituting in the calculation'of the contaissent dry air mass taat corrects for a change in reactor water level given in QTS 150-T3 IQ. 6 gives the following expression for the e' suced leakage: Z 25 M -35)b T, Fg i

2600 *{

l T g N __= 25 ( +, - 35))j) (3) tg g g P, (288 T.rs i ' where LE,, tg a reactor water level in inches (marrow range GIMACS) at the l g beginning of the test and the data point 1. respecu rely. 5. CALCOLATID LIAE RATE. The method of Lasat Squares ta a statistical procedure for f:nding the "best fit" straight line, :ommonly call _ed tse cegress:en lue, for a set of esasured data such that the sus of the squares of the teviattens if esca sessured data point from the stra gn: hae as nn =ued. To deterstne the esiculated leak (L,; este at :=e :

ne : gress u s hae I

is deterstand using cae :nessured leik rate tata fr:m*:ne start af us test to time t The calculated lean rate :s ::e po st :n :nas.me at g l time tg. l Lg=Ag*Sg g s-> t l where t a time in hours since the beg -a as of me test :o ne ; g l data potas; nit 3 (I E ) (I M ) g g g g i* a I (t )' - (In )' g g 2 (221 ) (Ing ). (g () (gg(3,) g A l i* aIt* - (Ic )' g g ftY f.*fh*? N.H Y I*I g.g west u a e number of data sets to time t g C. G u ss,CI L2.m UCL aLg+3*a (5) g LC aL +3*a (6) th Ware, L a calculated leak rata for the i data point (Refersace IQ. c); g E a value of the T - distributica for the 95% confidence limit and (= -2) degrees of freedom; i = 1.95994 + 2.37* 6,2.32:5 D (n-1) (n-2)* A a a number of data points including the i data point; -

QTS ;50-T9 Ravisten 1 e a standard deviation of the measured leak rate from ce regressto:t i:.ne cale.tlated using the first a data points; t' [Y*a*[I(t (t - I)2 g g

3) - 1 (It )2)2j a

a Zw1 j =1 Zu E=d a [I(3 - N, ) 2)I g s= i 9 ( (a - 2) / N) M A

R g

g

t)

M a measured leak rata (total t:.me) at ce j " data potst. y t

99..D.u."M..u..uc m..i.i Y. !

yr c 9 ' i

e e de v ? e APPLVDIX D INSTRUMLVI EEKOR ANALYSIS O WSP 6 . i l

QTS 150-T10 Reviston 1 ( IPCutT SAMPIZ ERROR ANALYSIS October 1982 TOR SEDRT Dt:RATICN TZ5T ID/85 A. ACCURACT ERROR ANALTSIS For Topical Report EN-TOP-1 the seasured total time leak rate (M) in weight pertest per day is computed using the Absolute Method by the formula: I 2t.00 t N M (*. / DAT) a 7

1-(1) 3 1 where: J a total (volume weighted) contatament dry a r pressure,PSIAi g

at the start of the test; Iy *a total (volume wetgated) conta nment ar. 2:. pressure .75*A, st data point N af ter -@ start of the.ast; I a test duratica from the start of the test to :tata potst X in hours; f 7 = contaissent volume weighted camperature in *R at the start 1 of the test; g a containment volume weighted camperature is "R at tse data point N. The following assumptions are ande: A A 7 = F * ' ""*** ' 18 *** '*8' d'7 'i' P*" ^* *********** r (PSIA) during the test; A A T a +5 aT where T is the averste volume weighted pr: mary canta:. ament air g / temperature ('R) during the test; ~ Pg=Py where P is the total containment atmospheric pressure (PSIA); y aP libert P is the partial pressure of water vapor in the primarf g 7 containment. i -Ipr) er : pru.a.e y e u n si U T.Til,bf. IJ N:.;.' l 1 ~

l QTS 150-T10 a Revision 1 Taking the partial derivative in terms of pressure and temperature of equation (: and substituting in the above assumptions yields the following equation found in Section 4.5 of BN-TOP-1 Rev. 1: (

g=2 f *2( ): +2(

) (2) F T where e, = the error in the total pressure measurement system, ( (*g)2,(*p )2 ) %; e, a 2

pT = (instrument accuracy error) / J no.

f :nst. in measurtag total containment pressure;

py = (instrument accuracy error) / J no. of :nst. :: measur:.ng vapor partial pressure; (instrument accurac7 error) / J no. of nst.

e. =

,n seasur:.ng containment temperature; t

3

the error in the sensured leak race; e

i FOR EEREDE DiaY .. - tion of th. tes. Subwolume #11, the free air space above the water in the reactor vessel, is treated separately from the rest of the containment volume. The reason for the separate treatment is that neither the air temperature or the partial pressure of water vapor is sessured direct.ly. The temperature of the air space is assumed to be the tamperature of the reactor l water, se asseured in the shutdown cooling or clean-up domineralizar piping before the heat l azchangers. The partial pressure of water vapor. l is computed assuming saturation conditions at the temperature of the water. Volume weighting the errors for the two volumes (Subvolume 911 and Subvolumes #1-10) is the method used. i l !

QT5 150-710 R::vssion 1 5. EQUI?".ENT SPECITICAT!ONS l FI.C'- 4 3 !*.ROCC'J71.E I.msbla r RD (*?) PPG (PSIA) CIk m ('?) ( SCP.) (") Range 50-200 0-100 140 0 - 8.44 Accuracy 2.30 2.013 21

.083 22.0 Repeat =

ability 2.10 2.001 2.30

.32

.10 C.

CLhrurATION 07 CISTRCSNT ACCURACT C CIRTAnr T 1. Computing " e. " 6 Volume Traction for Volume 411 =.322 6 Volume Traction for Volumes =1-10 = .9-2e t i to *.02276

1 )

eT= (.977:4* 430 ,1 7= .1347'3 i e 2. Computing * *p.

pT *
di~

l l

p7 = 2.0106 PSIA i

3. Computing " *py" At a dewpoint of 80*T (assumed), an accuracy of : 1*T corresponds to 2.017 PSIA.

py = 2 !.97724
E +.02276 * @ )

4r 41 'p,= 2.0064 PSIA j aan p nesm: no-IONndpbf.CEu:EU.ed,1,j! 4. Computing

e, "

e, a 2 ( (.0104)8 + (.0064)2 )% ,e, a 2.0123 PSIA

I QTS 15.-T1. Revision 1 5. Com9uting total instrument accuracy uncertaincy " e A" 3 T

2 * ( '0125 )2 + 2 * [ 351.7 )

A= 2400 'I3'7 b 2 63.. A assumint P = 63. PS u A l T = 551.7*R Therefere, for a 12 hour test, A = 2.o89a?. / DAT a 3 D. CO.".PCATICN oF UfS 41.7.C T RE?uTA3II.I-"i timTA:n 1. Computing " e., E e=2 4 37 ~ g a 2.013.*R Computing " *p7 2. e,7

2. 01 42 l

,g. =.o or nu 3. Computing " *py" ,,. 2 c.,mr. m.. w. 21 > [ 41 ,,. 2.oon nu 4. C,ums J FDR HEFERENCE 0 e e,. c c 2. c.o.u r p r e, a 2.. 33 PSu ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ' l t 61-

QTS 150-710 Revision 1 5. Ccapucing the total instrument repeatability uncertainty -

(2(

): +2(j3 )) 0 g Therefore, for a 12 sour test, e

*.0175.% / DAT g

l E. cchrumo TOTAL N.w E.W CN7ADITT 3*22*[(h8+(eh8}b 8 g = 2 2 * ( (.0890)8 + (.0173)2 Jh e g a *.182 weight *. / DAY for a 12 hour test. e 1 1 l l l e O + i FOR REFEE!EE RilY l 4 l l

APPENDIX E BN-TOP-1, REV. 1 ERRATA I The Commission has approved short duration testing for the IPCLRT provided the Station uses the general test method outlined in the BN-TOP-1, Rev. I topical report. The primary difference between that method and the ones previously used is in the statistical analysis of the measured leak rate data. Without making any judgments concerning the validity of this test method, certain errors in the editing of the mathematical expressions were discovered. The intent here is not to change the test method, but rather to clarify the method in a mathematically precise manner that allows its implementation. The errors are listed below. l l EQUATION 3A. SECTION 6.2 Reads: Lg=A+Btg Should Read: Lg=Ag+Eg g t Reason: The calculated leak rate (L ) at time t is computed using the regression line c natants A,g Thesummationsikaskn(computedusing B equations 6 and 7). equation 6 are n defined as I = I, where n is the number of data sets up until r l i=1 l time t The regression line constants change each time a l newdaka. set is received. The calculated leak rate is not a linear function of time. PARAGRAPH FOLLOWING EQ. 3A, SECTION 6.2 Reads: The deviation of the measured leak rate (M) from the calculated leak rate (L) is shown graphically on Figure A.1 in Appendix A and is expressed as: Deviation = M -L g g l Should Read: The deviation of the measured leak rate (M ) from the regression line (N ) is shown graphically on Figure A 1 in Appendix A and it, I expresshdas: Deviation = M -N g g where Ng=A + B,

tg, p

l A,B = Regression line constants computed from all data E E Jets available from the start of the test to the last data set at time t, p t = time from the start of the test to the ith data set. g I !

s Reason: The calculated leak rate as a function of time during the test is based on a regression line. The regression line constants, A and B, are g g changing as each additional data set is received. Equation 3A is used later in the test to compute the upper confidence limit as a function of time. For the purpose of this calculation, it is the deviation from the last computed regression line at time t, that is.important. EQUATION 4. SECTION 6.2 Reads: SEQ = I (M - L )2 Should Read: SSQ = I (M - N )2 g Reason: Same As Above EQUATION 5. SECTION 5.2 Reads: SSQ = I [ M (A + Bt )]2 g (A, + B

t )h Should Read:

SSQ = I ( M g p g l Reason: Same As Above EQUATION ABOVE EQUATION 6, SECTION 6.2 Reads: B = (Ei i )(d ) ~ ~ 1(t - t)3 g II*i 33 )(d ~ Should Read: Bg= i 1(t - t)3 g I Reason: Regression line constant B changes over time (as functionoft)aseachkdditionaldataset e is received. BIr of "t" left out of denominator. Summation signs omitted. EQUATION 6, SECTION 6.2 Reads: B = " I *i di (I *i) (I d ) ~ i I n It 3 - (I t )3 g g i d ~( *i) (I d ) g = " I *i Should Read: B i i n It 3 (I t )3 g g Reason: Same As Above 64-

O EQUATION 7, SECTION 6.2 Reads: A=5-Bt i ShoulJ Read: Ag=5-B t g Reason: Same As Above EQUATION 10, SECTION 6.2 Reads: A=( i) ( *i ) ~ (I *i) (I tg gM) aIt 3 (I t )3 g g g=( i) ( *i ) * (I *i) II *i d) Should Read: A i nit 3 - (I t )3 g Reason: Same As Above EQUATION 13. SECTION 6.3 2 ,2 [1 + 1 + (*p * ] Reads: c 3 (t - t)2 g [g + 1, (t 5)* ) Should Read: at32 p 1 (t - T)2 g where t = time from the start of the test of the last data P set for which the standard deviation of the measured leak rates (M ) from the regression line (N ) is 1 g being computed; g* time from the start of the test of the i* data t set; n = number of data sets to time tp; a I = I ; and i=1 T= It g. Reason: Appears to be error in editing of the report. Report does a poor job of defining variables..

EQUATION 14, SECTION 6.3 s[l+1+IE ~") Reads: a= p ] (t - t)3 g s [ 1 + 1 + (*p ~ ) i Should Read: a= ) t)2 I (t g Reason: Same As Above EQUATION 15, SECTION 6.3 Reads: Confidence Limit = L 2 T Should Read: Confidence Limits = L 2 T x a where L = calculated leak rate at time t T= T distribution value based on n, the number of data sets received up until time tp; a= standard deviation of measured leak rate values (M ) about the regression line based on data from g the start of the test until time t P Reason: Same As Above EQUATION 16, SECTION 6.3 Reads: UCL = L + T Should Read: UCL = L + T

a Reason:

Same As Above EQUATION 17, SECTION 6.3 Reads: LCL = L - T Should Read: LCL = L - T

a Reason:

Same As Above 1 n .,n------: e-----,--'v- ~ ~ - ~ - - - - - - - -

APPEN0lX F TYPE A TEST RESULTS USING MASS - PLOT HETHOD i HEASURED LEAK RATE PilASE i rass ala Cll lL S 16M i t i et 1% 12/tF/N2 i eseeSHHMANT DF Hela Sil5 I liepu 73 es se ] It%T CInt* ea ts IE MP MFa stlet e C AL C. M ASS lt HV 6 le MkAS. Li&E he tE Ca tc. LE AN isP PE N lie n. I IH L IF 8 g a5 S Is e PN ES S, e / D6 V N 6T E 95 8 CO PF empest 5 (PSR 6) Iet at l'ai 84 g feey tI ni f p.8 e 13842844 ts/ tare? 03.08 8.9t S44e g 4 9E 8% 63,964 4

p. 9 56 64 5A eE e 5 AJ,9 68

. e,06 95. e. 06 95 e e.1 7 g 18 92844 sppgApe2 3 3. e4 1 !? 9.31 1 48 2844 92f34/s2 83.e2 a.9ts47elveE as e.9tS659947E e5 63,954 -0,e79e..eee5 ....e798 .e.e524 1 I A.S e 14812844 sp/ tar 2 e3.70 e.93%669734E e5 s.9tS66tle4E e5 63,952 0, e4 74 0.0851 . e. es t i .#.s e6 7 e I a.4 7 14827844 sp/ tape 2 83,76 S. 9t S4 74 74 5F 85 8.135 66 t t e7 F e a 63,9 58 .e. e5 54 -e. s7 ee . e. e517 .e.S Je ? e.h 1 1 483/ 44 12 /1 Afb 2 S J,73 e.91544319%E ei 8.915 64 76 4e E e5 63,9 44 e, e5 33

e. 4e s3 g, s7 54 8.3 21 8 8

l 1.n e 14842844 is/ tar 2 8 3. 71 8.98542714PE 85 s.915673844E e5 43,944 e,se65

0. 25 24 a.3773 s.3652 e

0.9 %5 84454E e5 S.915 64 3 7 es E e5 63.9 M e,16 47

c. 63 37 e.14 93 e.744 1 3.1 7 3 4852844 12 /t Ap F2 e 3. 60 t

a.9 56ei?e6E e5 63,9 32 e,34 6e e.egse q gena e.7 47 7 t.51 158 2844 g3/ tar ? 83.67 s.93%585499E e5 e 1 l 1.5 e 15812844 s> pt ap e? 8 3.65 e.98 54 41e75F 45 0.9tS69tF5eE e4 61,927 0,2e 32

s. 66 99

a. 2e 49 e.7 al 1 923 0,1652 -e.1 62 e.2t e5 0.7706 7

43,914 e.9 S697443E e5 j 1.67 15872844 tsflaps? 83,61

e. 919555 e7 9E 49 t

1.h 1 15832844 sp/t Ar 2 0 3, 54 4.9354>$e43E e5 e.9 85 7s t 3 79 E e5 63, e 26 35

8. 24 62

e. 25 75 e.138 5 e

2.CJ 15842844 jsptAre? .eJ,50 e.9t S425tS4E e5 e.9tS7144?4E e5 61,914 e,3ese e,7973 a.2954 e.367e 2.s 7 15852844 ts/ tar ? 03,55 c.9154ts343F e5 a.9tS7t F3tFE e5 61,936 0,2961 0.1543 a.Jtet e.3548 e i l ?.33 168 2844 gsf1ApF2 e3,54 0.98517te93E e5 e.*t572397eE es 63,981 0,3238.e.6835

a. 3411 e.4843 j'

2.5 e 14812844 sp/14pe? 83,52 8.915786430E e5 s.9tS71932eE e5 63,e93 e,3938 8.3444 a.38 4 8.447? . 915742565E e5 63,89e 0,3848 a.2e35 e.484: e.4664 i 2.67 16822844 92/14pe2 es,58 e.935273406E e5 8 2. . i.83284 t,,iA,32 83,49 8.9 52,924tE e5 9 5749,i.E e5 6,8 04 8.39 06 8.6963 a.425, 8.4842 I 1.as e 14842844 giftgre2 e3,47 e.9tS274te9E 85 s.9 tS 749e 75E e5 63,805 s.34e7.e.4443

a. 42.14 a.4 761 1.37 36857844 ts f t 4) e?

0 3, 45 8.945?7e965E e5 a.9 tS 74 55 te t e5 ol.0 83 e 33 55.e.1381 g, 4141 s.4622 l.31 1 78 2844 spflaps? 03,45 S. 9152 6193 4E G S s.91574seteE AS 63,881 0,3136 0.2365

a. se tt 0;4493

.l.'> p t 7817844 sp/1Ar ? 83.43

8. 9197 87 35 7E e 5 8.stS741316E e5 63,8 75 0.33 91

p. ag e2

a. 4617 a.444e e

1. A 7 17872844 sp /t Ar e?

53.42 8.915?t867 ef e 5 e.935PJete1E e5 63,8 75 0, 31 63 - 0. 16 23

a. 39 67 a.4 J 8 4

3.s t t 18.17 8 44 gs /t ap e2 - e 3,39

c. 9192 ?e 9e 7E e 5 e.9 35 73 35 6? E e5 63,4 73 e,3e e3

e. e5 22

e. se as e.4 22 3 i

4. st e 1784?844 gS/ tare? S t.4e e.9tSt%9444E 85 S.915 732416E e5 63.867 8.3281 0.9683 a.3s44 e.4173 i 4.s 7 3 7857844 tapt Ar ? e 3. 37

e. 93 49e9676E e5 8.9tS746954k e5 8*3 e 47 0,4728

3. 94 66

8. 43 se e.4 541 e

4.11 148 7844 jsst4pe? 01.37 a.*l4991794E 85 0.9157513e6E e5 61.e53 e,4083.t.4113 a.42t? s.46e2 1 4. S ee 1 4832844 t>ptare? 8.l.37 8.789971 777E 85 a.*157549ttE e5 43,053 e.4ste 0.4tF4 a.4277 e.4645 4.67 3e872844 tsptspe? 03,36 e.914et197ef SS e 9tS75e%94E e5 61,447 0,4e 79 e 5957 g,4142 a.4sst 4.41 3 8837844 spitapF2 8 3. 14 a.58 49 8 7 3 8 4F e5 e.985761646F e5 43,8 42 8.4ee3

a. 42 e5 8.8391 e.4,7 8 2

L

4 I APPOIDlX F (cont'd) HEASURED LEAK RATE PilASE (cont'd) I i 5.us se842844 ts/ tare? 81.34 a.9144*e459E e5 8.985764747E e5 A3 e40 e,414e e.5779 e,44 g4 e 4754 j 5.s 7 s at s? t 4 4 s 7 fl Ap e7 e J. 32

s. 9: 4P 9A ir es es e,9 85 76 4 t :71: m 63, A 34

e. 3s 75.e, 4e ie

4. 44 17 e.4 72 7

's. i t let 7s44 1,flaper 83.3e e.vt4assages e5 0,9 5764467E e5 A3,833 e,3939 e,5932

e. 44 99 e.4 712

. %.5 m 89817844 i7 sl ai s? 4 3.te e.9:4ssengat e5 a 9 TSP 6%Ae6E m e t,s ie e,4e st a, 76 45

g. 44 57

a.4 714 l

5.t r a vt 2? t 44 37 stain? 8 3, 29 e.984sessaar e5 a. a l'3 76 %A 7? E e5 61.e 2e e, J9 64

e. ne et 4, 44 5g e,4698 5.a t 39812844 isjl er r e 3,27

8. 93 47 74 9e ns-8 5 e

l5 7655 6 t E as 63,3 24 s,39 7a

4. 44 52 e, 44 55 e,4 &c 4 e

6.n n 1984?t44 1 ppg A} e2 e3.27

s. 93 47 4184 6F 95 a.93576%A47F e5 61.e Pe

0. 4e s3

a. 40 90 e, 44 5 p e.4472 6.37 19:52844 3 7 pt Af82 eJ,24

4. 98 tA Ae ?4 5E e 5 e.9857684eak 45 A3,812

c. 4250

1. 33 68 a.4491 a.4 7e e 6.41 7et 7844 t?/lA/87 e3,24 c.93444735st-e5 a 915 7655 37E e5 43,eg3 0,4e26.e.4263 a.449g 0.4686 6.5 ss 7 m 81;* t 4 4 17ptAph?

e3,24 4.8844439e7F e5 m.915 76 7e 49t 45 65,083 e,4025 e.3999 4.4444 a.4672 4 ] 6.47 23:27844 gSftspp? 83,27 e.984444365E e5 8.vi5767e6sf e5 63,e37 e,3994 e.2793 e,44 74 e,4654 4.81 74839844 ts /t sp h? W3.22 a.9t ig g4 A5 tt e 5 e.9 tS 7A64 9eE as 41,0e5 e,4e le 0.4647 g,444e e,4 63 8 l 7.Se 74842344 jppl4pe2 83.71 8.114593379F 85 a.91576%A?aE e5 63,tet e,44e3 e J7e3 e,44g3 e,te21 l Q 7.17 70852844 s9/lA/f7 e l. le

e. 98 45 75 74 6F e5 a.9857643ASE e5 43,797 e 3966

a. 24 22

a. 44 45 e.c oe s 03 7.11 718 7844 ts/lApF?

83,17 m.91 H %274ef e> n.'a t5 767 7 4% E s 61,794 e,3935 0.2599 4.44s4 e,4576 ( 7.'i s 21:1.8844 32 pt as W7 8 3,16 S. 98 4g lF 3 8 4F e 5 n. A l5 7A nn 7s k A% A1,791

8. J9 94

8. 45 92

a. 44 sg e.4 54 8 *

) 7.67 73 >?t44 jpptAre2 e l.14 a.*is t%4 ao pt as 3.9 85 75 845 4E n5 45,789 e,Jeet.e. s t F9 g 43M e,4533 n e.915 4 77 A2 F n$ 61,786 s 39 ee e 4777 e,43 7g a ;45e 9 , F.e 3 218 32 84 4 17 pl eie7 83.14 a.93449 W ar a 4.ge 71142344 ts/ tap 42 el,14 8.98444536)F e5 s.9 35 7'i44 77E e5 63,782 e.39st e.7773 g,43$7 e.4495 2 44 17/tApB7 e 3,12 e.98 445F ee 7F e% 0.915 75 4r,87 k e5 A3,7 As

e. 3e eg.e.19 65

a. 43 44 9.4 69 8

4 j 4.3 8 7819 l 't.11 ??8 7844 t>plA/57 9 4.12 W.*14Ae58.t t 85 s.915753184E e9 51,777 W,3945 e.se59 a.esst 4,4453 A 1 9 58 27887844 37/34pP2 5 3, ls e.9844milFgE e5 a.91575 tin 9E e5 44,773 a.34s76 e e419 e,43 :4 e,4433 8.A7 ??t?7844 37/16p8? Al.le e.98415A597E e5 m.9stS754/59F e5 63,774 e 3947

a. 7315 a.43gt a.4417 st.p t ?2891144 es ps ApM7 e 3, se e.984119IAlf 5% e.91574e s7f e5 43,747 e, Je Pe e.27 5

e. 47 9e e.4 4e l s

4 + 1

9. se g 72347844 h/3ApS?

Al.SS e.984ttie43s5 og p.9tSF475tRE e5 69,745 3,3917 e.3ee5 g,8779 a,4385 e 5 9.1 7 3?tS?t44 sp/gApM7 A3,86 8.9845eePe f 45 a,985745n3%F e5 41,762 0,Jee7 e,27 1 e,4744 e,4 34 a l 9.lt ?lt 7844 sopt4pA7 93,06 e.914743 37F 35 p.915 74 39 7'IE si 63,759 e 3867 p.2767 e,4?44 e,4349 l 9.5 se 7 38 es t4 4 spp3Ap02 e 3,05

e. 98 47 Fe 59 as: e5 e.91574laa3E 49 61,7 5e e, 34.44 e 19 76 se, 42.ist e.4 32 9 i

9.67 ' 3 t '*7 8 44 39stspF7 es3.e3 a.91475: 72nr e4 e.985759%476 mi 61,754

e. 3e 19 e.29 72 a.473s e,4 3e 9 9.9 % 7 18 17 14 4 spitAph2 S t. e4 0.9847e7A940 e'8 a.91573974ek e5 61,751 s,34 47

e. 7e ?3

4. 4p e-a 3.4295 I

lp.pn 1384?t44 s7ptAp5? 93.e? 8.984719547F e5 e.9 85 7 55PFE e5 63,75s e,3776 0.2723 3,48 71 e,4 2 7.4 l lh.I 7 7.1857844 t?/t Ap e2 e 3. e2

8. 98 el 89 92 7f e4 e.'815 7. 35 3 4 E e5 63,747 e,33 3 3 e,59 39 4.4lA3 e.4 255 sn.tl et *i544 31/87,67 M t.e?

8. 914l 55 R'8 7E #5 8.985798994E e5 41,745 e,3815 e.4es2 e,43 to a.4234 i n. % 's et17844 sSig7pe?

A t.es

9. 914t S44!4E e5 e.*l5729a46E e5 63,742 0.3759 e.pl63 e,4877 e 47tm in.A7 es37844 37pl7pS7 el.08 4.994371R47E e5 a.915726etFE e5 61,719 e,3775 e.4ees e,4:e3 e 42em 14.as t e 37844 i?/l7pS2

2.9A

e. 914194 349F e5 p.915724593E 85 63,735 e.37e9 e,44 74 e,4ete e 43e5 j

11.9 g 314'844 g>p37pF7 N2.9e e.984a9AA74E as e wl5 7225 A1E e5 61,734 e,3749

e. nl ee

e. es as e.414 7 11.1 7 nt 57 84 4 s2/37pe?

A 2, 97 a.98to4444FE 09 4.91572e753E e5, 43,7 3e e,3784 a,6e 72

4. 4e an e.4352 i

S t. t.t it 7844 ti/37pF7 e2.96 4.98 4pple73E e5 0.915 73 94 4pE e5 41,727 e.37e6 e.3949 g.4e54 e.4139 i i t.% st t a l? t4 4 s7/3 Ff82 82,94

a. 98 43ne9 tMF e5 p.9 85 7e 98 57E e5 43,745 e,3e9e.4.3784 g, 39 eat e,4 09 3 li. A s

$ 8 7/ 84 a s,il s,e7 a 2,94 e.9: 4?9e Asst a5 a.9 85 49 95 es t e5 65,744

e. 3e 5A a.ezet e.397g a.4ees i

li.n = 3: 17 84 - iwii7per si,93

e. vs 47 eg 49 9F e5 e 9 35 6e 97 t9 F e5 43,7 41 e,3e 3e e.1754 e, Je 54 e,3 9e e 17.014 184/844 37p37pe?

A?,93 a.98 4745293E e5 8.'8156enP5PE #5 43,74e 0.3447 e.3455 e.3796 e,3 93 7 1

.t APPEHDIX F (cont'd) 1YPE A TLST RESULTS l USillG l LASS - PLOT llETil0D lil>UCED LEAK PI:ASE i i l t sys alt c ll lF S si;4 tl l e426 12/17 fM 2 ... 5UM*l AH f Ill II AI A $8-IS e4 111880 112 ea se I t '. I Ct.sicl' DAlc If MP MF a%HH6 p CAIC', NASS eHV AIR laka%, LkAK NAIk Cat C, g l Alt ges'PF 86 p e 94, I INI gl I etAS S IsN

PNtSS,

& / IsA V 4 Af D. 952 C0er j g 6aoist $ II*SI A) I CI AG. - P 0l t.I t /0 4r llHIT l' e.n o 3: v :44. p,i 7, e? n z, 79..,i is.6 4n es 63,6 6. l 0.I i 58 4? 84 4 sp ft 7fAJ d 2, 7e N. '88 54 53 44 7E e 5 6.5.6 61 0,el33 e,el13 81,

t 3:5?t44 gpfg7pe?

4 2, 76 m,91.1.16m in st 4 % e.9835t:5?oli n's 6.4,6 % 1, se u 3,3401

1. e'lisi 1.7982 4.% se 48 7844 tyf3 Ff47 e ?, 77 a 91 17 63 %# tg eS e.9 83 52 23 es E n5 65,4 47

1. 24 51 1, 60 43

8. ?9 p%

1.6722 l.#9 5819:57 t?fl yf M? 0 2, 7') 8.9t?S455 5F e4 0,91351 1518% k 8')

3,'295 1, 412e 3, 4617

3. 44 34 3,5322 1

3.*,4 St /9 85 7 syf 3 7fh? 8 2, 76

e. 98 24 ?? 24 tE e 5 m,4 83 53 66 68t F e5 61,507 1, 45 77 t, 94 97 s,47 ii 3.5 39 a

?.s J St 19 :S7 iz f t PfR? 0 2, 78

4. 98 ?4 t 6 5t er e 5 0.9 3 3 52 78 27 E e*>

65,543 1,7m M3 - a,6918e 3, es si 3,513? 2.79 5: 49 IS 7 *pft7,87 4 2, 7e e.93?19?Sg6E e5 0.913 52 ?? S6t e5 65,5 77 1, 29 af 3, 32 57 1,37pg n,4 60 7 l 9.45 5359 57 gpfgyfe? 0 2, 78 8.98??66t 77F e4 e,98352n545E e5 65,569 t. J/ 7e 1,2160 s,16 e 3,442# I 2,6 62 9857 gyfg 7f e? e 2, Fe e,9s?g99374F e5 e,91353706F e4 65,563 1,3154-I. e5 ',3 s,34 s4 t,4?s? i 556 t Jett 3,7331 3,3374 3,4037 2.79 6:39857 gpfg7pe? 07.68' n,9821274766 25 a.913515esst a5 65,540 3 65, 1, 32 65 3,6977 g, 33 4, 3,3973 7,95 68?9857 gp fg 7f e? 82,69 e,9 ?e g 4 97 6f s's e,4135 46e7I te*> 3.t / 6: 19 :5 7 gpfgpfe? 82,6h

e. 43 39 4? na s,F eS e,9 3 3 Si l?.tl k e5 A1,5 4?

t, 3163

3. 3.le2 3,13 e 1,3 e? 2 1

3,' 9 6: 49857 iz f t Pf e? e 2, 67 e.vt346 46aE si A,9135:n2156 n% hl 5 36 1,79 as7 e,96 99 g, 37 6: 3,3 7e 4 I 1,4 % 6859857 9pft 7fh? 0 2. f.7

e. 98 316s al 6E s's A,9335t n88 76 a')

63,520

1. 32 79 1, 94 83

t. 37 74 8.1672

.l. 6 ? 18 9857 spft 7f48 7 e ?,66 e,93 3 7 e7 99 46 nS e.913 Se '96 3 6 4 n$ 01,523

1. 38 5e te,ellt 3, 37's5 3.5591 3,89 78 393S7 g of t PfR7 e2,65

m. 913 61188 70 45 at,93154%73dk as 63,5 7 3,;'961 t, 3107 3.33 66 1,5S06 1

+ p.933 eSappe-as as,5 te 3, 31 31 3, 6', el g,33 ig 3,3 63 5 4 1.95 7829857 s y f t 7f e? s?,66 a.91353 74tE 45 3 4.l? 78 19:57 jsig7pe? ef,64 a.vt:19astet AS e.*el3Se 49?E #5 63,5a4 1,2NS? a.67tB t.3448 1.4379 4.? a 7849857 tsf3 7f e? s2,63 e,93 34 :sn9 tF e% e.9 3 3 49 7 s test F HS 65,498 3,28 35 3,3947 s 3e t5 3.130 s 7 e *3F s% 0,93 3 49 5 t Seel-n% 61,49 3,?914 3.542's e. ?9 4s t..a p4 p 4,45 f t%9 85 7 g of t Pf8? e2,63 n 93g13 s e 4. f. '8 'l l 93S7 sp e3 7pil? 22,62 es. 9 3 3 p Pn **S og. g5 p.*: 3 3 49:3g ss ti el5 h t,4 46 t 2669 18, 61 3'> t,79 s t 1,4164 4.19 N: 19 357 g?pl 7f 8? 82,62

p. 9 3 3 3 **i %M g,g sh S.9 314e f?.*%l 18 %

( 1,4 79 3,2791

1. 69 2*>

g. 28 44 1,.19188 4.'85 At #91*> 7 g7 f t Pf e/ 8 2, 62 H. 91 g n 'en ? F tg It '. se.9 3 3 48%l.4 / f it's 64,4 Fj 3, 21:33 3,.5482 3, ?R 44 3.196*8 S.l> M t 19 S 7 gpflyfR? et,6? e,913 p g% gg pl IIS st. s g 3 4A t% n.'l AS hl,467 3,2d?9 3, llit' l. ?s a44 3.te?9 5. * *s H : 4*a * *> 7 g 3 fg 7p is? a z, t,g p,.sl n'a%g %p pg n '. 'se,'8 il 4fo g/ 4 7 F n's t.$,4 63 1, Ps. 9's s;. 96 03 s, 77 ei t t. 897 6 5.4% H I S*8 8 % # g>ftyph? N?,fe es. **I n't

4 44 4l SS l','. t t 4 7 71 14 6-esS 86,456 3,2s te 3.,818' t t.?##8 l '. / 97 8-

,4 44 3, 2*s et7 3,'I s ll

8. 76 'st 9.886 84 4. 7 '8 9:l'835 7 31 pg 7p h/

el;*,

9 n 93 esi t t t e.e4 :5 et e 1.14 7 "* '*** 1 is';

S. '# 5 9 3.**8 3 '* 7 sy f t 7,97 N/,S9

p. *81 si% 4 s te og n '. u.

g.4 46 9 8.t'. I a.S e*,4 in 3, *si g 6

3. 1654 s. 26 to 8. J H? 3

e ( APPENDIX G BLOCK DIAGRAM OF COMPUTER PROGRAM TO PERFORM CALCULATIONS BASED ON BN-TOP-1, REV. 1 t e S e

PROGRAM BNTQP ir SET UP FILES USED BY PROGRAM \\ AND READ IN OLD DATA Y s, SELECT ONE: l M: MANUAL DATA ENTRY A: AUTO DATA ENTRY l E: ENTER CAI.18 RAT 10N CONSTANTS l D: DELETE DATA l 8: CHANGE BASE DATA SET C: CRT DUMP OF OUTPUT l l L: LlHE PRINTER DUMP OF OUTPUT l P: PLOT DATA l 5: START DATA MOVER H: HALT DATA MOVER q: quli // NN A D C' P H L M E B L S Q l I __ a- --v <w -,w ,v,u -w ,,v,- m-,,ww w,- m -rw --"+---,--,------w a--- -s

M A L u ENTER DATA FOR TIME, RTD READ DATA FOR TIME, RTD, ~ DEWCELL PRESSURE AND DEWCELL, PRESSURE, AND REACTCP REACT 0d VATER LEVEL WATER LEVEL FROM FILE 4 PERFORM REASONABLE LIMIT VALIDATION A' v CALCULATE CONTAINMENT AVERAGE TEMPERATURE, VAPOR PRESSURE, AND PRESSURE 4 PERFORM LEAK RATE AND LEAST SQUARE FIT CALCULATIONS 4 OUTPUT RESULTS OF DATA SET { Y D B ENTER START AND FINISH ENTER NEW BASE DATA DATA SET NUMBERS SET NUMBER 4 l DELETE DATA SETS AND PACK REMAINING SETS S RECALCULATE LEAK RATE l RESULTS FOR ALL DATA SETS i Y i

E Q u u ENTER SLOPE, INTERCEPT, AND CLOSE ALL OPEN FILES CHANNEL NUMBER FOR ALL SENSOF S v EXIT OUTPUT THE CALIBRATION DATA BNTOP 4 ALLOW BAD INPUT TO BE FIXED Y (? l. tr s/ SELECT ONE: SELECT ONE: B: BNTOP OUTPUT B: BNTOP OUTPUT C: CONTAlHMENT CONFIGURATIOrl C: CONTAINMENT CONFIGURATION D: LAST DATA SET D: LAST DATA SET l s / f GET PROPER OUTPUT FILE GET PROPER OUTPUT FILE 4 h LIST FILE ON CRT SCREEH SPOOL FILE TO THE LINE PRINTER ONE PAGE AT A TIME k 'Y' if.

~ '. ? P PUT GRAPH AXIS ON SCREEP: i' 4 SELECT ONE: T: CONTAINMENT AVERAGE TEMPERATURE P: DRY AIR PRESSURE I L: LEAK RATE DATA ,P SCALE AXIS FOR TEMPER-SCALE AXIS FOR PRESSURE SCALE AXIS FOR MAXI-ATURE MUM VALVE 4 4 4 PLOT UPPER CONF LIMIT, PLOT TEMPERATURE VS. PLOT PRESSURE VS. TIME LOWER CONF LIMIT, TIME MEASURED. & CALCULATED " "j _' y v WAIT FOR WAIT FOR WAIT FOR RETURN RETURN RETURN l l P P P I ~ S H s sp LOG IN PROGRAM TO TRANSFER LOG OUT PROGRAM TO TRANSFEP DATA FROM PROCESS COMPUTER DATA FROM PROCESS COMPUTER Y Y I l . (final) l =.m. l

~ l. -~.m. ~~.e-. - RESULTS OF INTEGRATED LEAKAGE RATE TESTING _ I i i 1/ Allowable Leakage 5easuredTotalPene-1 Allowable Leakage [de'y trati n & Is lation Comments 0,75L, = 0.19 Qo 0.75 L = %3ril p t Valve Leakage M(,(bk I'; Tested 8 P, gg Co uted from Test c.&. rm vol.T' ki.e. "*"l""***""* 'a 'c

i. u s c W

.Kb . Tt P =t t a e em Pre-Opera-gg[y [ tion Type a f [ [/ A to Pa . = Pre-Opera-tion Type 'A to P g Periodic Test No.1 i e:. I I Periodic Tsst'Uo. 2 ~ s Periodic

Test No. 3 I

Periodic Test No. 4 i ;

.s

,.. en v.3 of Aopendix J to 10 CFR 50. .s-i

- 12 THP 4030 STP 202 A

E.5 SUPPLEMENTAL TEST DATA SHEET #3 Sheet 1 of 1 i Rev. 2 - 5/16/78 ICE CONDENSER PRESSURES AND ATNOSPHERIC PRESSURE / DATE TIME RUN # PI-l PI -2 PATM INITIAL 1 9 6 O l l l DATA REVI WED BY / na ,..__..-.n- ,s,._,,%f, ,9_.g,,,, _ _ __g,m.

- 12 THP 4030 STP.202 Shtet 1 of 1 E.5 SUPPLEMENTAL TEST DATA SHEET #4 Rev. 2 - 5/16/78 TITEKEEPER'.S RECORD AND AMBIENT TEMPERATURE EXACT TIME OF AMBIENT DATE DATA COLLECTION RUN #

TEMPERATURE INITIAL I -( e. mm DATA REVIEWED BY / r

- 12 THP 4030 STP.202 Sheet 1 of 1 Rev. 2 - 5/16/78 I

E.5 SUPPLEMENTAL TEST DATA SHEET #5 ' ~ DATE TIME RUN & FLOWMETER ' READING PRESSURE INITIAL f e 9 DATA REVIEWED BY /

1

- 12 THP 4030 STP.202 APPENDIX F TEST

SUMMARY

Pressurization Start (date, time) Finish (date, time) Final Pressure (psia) Stabilization Start (date, time) Finish (date, time) ~ Weighted Weighted Avg. AT Avg. AT Hour 1 Hour 2 Hour 3 Hour 4 -Upper Lower Ice Highest Highest Ind. aT Ind. aT Upper Lower Ice ILRT Start (date, time) Run # Finish (date, time) Run # Lam, Leak Rate (wt%/ day) (%La)

Lam /95%, 95% Upper Confidence Limit (wt%/ day)

(%La) Type C Penalty Leakage (wt%/ day)

- Total Type A Leakage (wt%/ day)
Applicable to Unit 2 only
- Calculate according to 5.3.2 for unit under test Page 1 of 2 Rev. 2 - 5/16/78

, +.,,_-

7,

- 12 TliP 4030 STP.202 6

APPENDIX F, Cont'd. Supplemental Test Start (date, time) Run # Finish (date, time) Run # Lc Supplemental Test Leak Rate (wt%/ day) % Lg La Imposed Leak Rate (wt%/ day) % La Depressurization Start (date, time) Finish (date, time) Initial Pressure (psia) 1 \\ r DATE REVIEWED BY / l ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA MET / COMMENTS: 1 l l l I l i Page 2 of 2 Rev. 2 - 5/16/78

- 12 THP 4030 STP.202 j

Sheet 1 of 3 APPENDIX 0.1 s TYPE C LEAKAGE PENALTY FORM t Type C Leakage Penalty for Undrained Systems: ISOLATION LEAKAGE DESCRIPTION CPN# VALVES (secm) RCOT to RCOT pps 40 DCR-205 DCR-206 Q}' RC~ System accumulator fill lines 68 ICM-265 0,o Refueling water line to Refueling Cavity 36 SF-151 g C Z, $' 3 SF-153 i Cont. Sump Line to Waste Hold up Tanks ~ 41 DCR-600 O.O DCR-601 'NESW to and from Containment (see tabu-12630 4 lation on 0.1 sheet 2 and 3 ~ i .RCP Seal Water Lines 11 CS-442-1 12 CS-442-2 43 CS-442-3 O.O 14 CS-442-4 CVCS letdown and excess letdown lines 34 QCR-300 37 QCM-250 & 350 ld Q %u Samples Lines from Accumulators 81 ICR-5 n ICR-6 V'g Sample Lines from Pressurizer 66 NC&109 & 110 O,g 3 NCR 107 3108 CVCS Charging Line 35 CS-321 0,O Glycol lines to and from ice condenser 86 VCR-10 & -11 AHU's , 56 VCR-20 & -21 0C f Total Type C Leakage = 13200.4 Penalty (sccm) Expressed in ". La = 0. 2 La = 110,220.74 La = Total Type C Leakage Pecalty : La 0

"12 THP 4030 STP.202 ~ Sheet 2 of 3 NESW Systam Leakage CPN# Isolation Leakage Valves (SCCM) CLV #1 17 WCR-901 21 WCR-902 bk.b 17 NSW-415-1 21 WCR-903 g3p'3 4 18 WCR-905 22 WCR-907 /M9, O M CLV #2 18 NSW-415-2 l 22 WCR-906 /[ g*g 19 WCR-909 23 WCR-910 $b{*b l-* CLV #3 - 19 NSW-415-3 23 WCR-911 2 G O '.,

C 20 WCR-913 24 WCR-914 3 0 9.C

.j.n. CLV #4 i I 20 NSW-415-4 24 WCR-915 0.0 .i 26 .WCR-921 26 WCR-923 994./ CUV #1 26 NSW-419-1 26 WCR-922 2/ 8 8. '". 27 WCR-925 27 WCR-927 bN, O CUV #2 27 NSW-419-2 27 WCR-926 bO 85 WCR-C'9 85 WCR-931 O.O CUV #3 85 MSW-419-3 85 WCR-930 O. D \\ Rev. 3 4/2/80

~

- 12 THP 4030 STP.202 Sheet 3 of 3 1

Isolation Leakage [ NESW System Leakage CPN # Valves (SCCM) { I r 84 WCR-933 gg*q CUV #4 M ER-935 i 64 NSW-419-4 i 84 WCR-934 O,O 26 WCR-945 75,O 26 NSW-244-1 RCP #1 Motor Air Coolers l 26 WCR-951 26 WCR-955 39,9 27 WCR-946 27 NSW-244-2 6.O RCP #2 Motor Air Coolers 27 WCR-952 27 WCR-956 00 85 WCR-947 85 NSW-244-3 30,6 RCP #3 Motor Air Coolers 85 WCR-953 g'g 85 WCR-957 ( 84 WCR-948 84 NSW-244-2 0,0 RCP #4 Motor Air Coolers 84 WCR-954 84 WCR-958 OO 73 NSW-417-4 73 WCR-962 O,O l E. Inst. Room Vent i 73 WCR-961 73 WCR-963 0,o 73 NSW-417-3 73 WCR-966 OO W. Inst. Room Vent 73 WCR-965 73 WCR-967 O,O l Total NESW System Type C Leakage = k Rev. 3 4/2/80 ,,c ,.w., _,,-..y. y,--,..,,,.,9 ,y-.,_.g,.,_- ,.._.,.,++------.---,.,,.,,,,w + - _.. - - _., - -. - - - -}}

ML20082H138

Contents

Text

SUMMARY

0.0 09-30-8

0.0 09-21-8

0.0 09-21-8

0.0 09-11-8(

0.0 09-10-82

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

ML20082H138

Text

SUMMARY

0.0 09-30-8

0.0 09-21-8

0.0 09-21-8

0.0 09-11-8(

0.0 09-10-82

SUMMARY

Navigation menu

Search