Text

Performance Indicators,May 1991
	ML20081L741
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	05/31/1991
From:	; OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20081L738	List: ML20081L732; ML20081L741;
References
	NUDOCS 9107080046
	Download: ML20081L741 (95)
	v • d • e

_ _.

i f

FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS MAY 1991 s

/

~..

Prepared by:

Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group TAR 728820368886 R

PDR

i 1

0%il s) wes%a w wn, abb,...

d envens a>isden, wnd sowndjud anwnl...

g d w a, ? %, cwm

%ng, carnanibnenl...

f d w a, u>ay, s) ?!>...d w dang, ikjob f

qu lk fad 6, wg 6.

Ji w owna-diiudd, rud ik mdi s) ateund, pown,awussumff,a>sau6 an, a auul ik ub, wnd $%hein, p

ael-/,_ % lu quw ej passin,, rudjud On, dang, i6 9Vibny.

Jaans).6%ns i

es l

OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT Prepared By:

Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group May 1991

ABSTRAdT PURPOSE The " Performance indicators Program" is intended to provide selected Fort Calhoun plant perfor-mance information to OPPD's personnel responsible for optimizing unit performance. The information is presented in a way that provides ready identification of trends arx! a means to track progress toward reaching corporate Doals. The information can be used Ior assessing and rnonitoring Fort Calhoun's plant performance, with errphasis on safety and reliability. Some performance indicators show company goals or industry intormation. This information can be used for comparison or as a means of promoting pride and rnotivation.

SCOPE The conditions, goals, and projections reflected within this report are current as of the end of the month being reported, unless otherwise stated, in order for the Pertormance Indicator Program to be effective, the following guidelines were followed while implementing the program:

1) Select data which most effectively monitors Fort Calhoun's performance in key areas.

2) Include established corporate goals and industry information for comparison.

3) Develop formal definitions for each performance parameter. This wi!i ensure consistency in future reports and allow comparison with industry averages where appropriate.

Comments and input are encouraged to ensure that this program is tailored to address the areas which are most meaningful to the people using the report. Please refer comments to the Test and Performance l

Group. To !ncrease personnel awareness of Fort Calhoun Station's plant performance, it is suggested that this report be distributed throughout your respective departments.

REFERENCES INPO Good Practices OA 102, " Performance Monitoring - Management Information" INPO Report Dated November 1984," Nuclear Power Plant Operational Data" NUMARC B7-00,"Guldelines and Technical Bases for NUMARC Initiatives Addressing Station Blackout at Light Water Reactors", Revision 1, Appendix D, *EDG Reliability Program", dated April 6,1990.

Table of Contents l

I i

J INDUSTRY KEY PARAMETERS pa UPPEA g2gQ Q2ED

[dQE An nas acum4 usinormi FORCED OUTAGE RATE......................~...........~....-.........

0.25%... 2.4%..11.9%..-.11.9%

~.2 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRrrlCAL..

0.

....0..

0 0..... 3 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS -(INPO DEFINITION)......... 0._

0.....

0_.

_0 4

GROSS HEAT RATE.....

.................................... 9.935. 10.250- 10.4 77..10.424..... 6 EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR......~

82.5%.... 69%.... 98 8%.. 91.6% m 7 FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR =

........ ~......~.... -... 0.04._

1.4... - 0 913.... 0.817 m

.8 PERSONNEL RADIATON EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE).............

........~.166

....75.

23.4..--. 4 19.1_... 9 VOLUME OF LOW. LEVEL SOUD RADIOACTIVE WASTE.....

........... 3.072.. 4.500 -

19.8..

.33.6...10 DISABLING INJURY FREQUENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE)... 0%...... 0.31%...

0.91%... 0.56%.,.11 OPERATIONS STATION NET GENERATON.

.1 FORCED OUTAGE RATE........

-2 4....

UNPLANNED AUTOMATlO REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL................................... 3 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATONS -(INPO DEFINITION)..................

........................4 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATONS -(NRC DEFINITON)..........,......

-- 5 GRO S S HE AT RATE................

........................... -..... 6 o

EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR....

.......7 FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR.

.............................................8.

DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT..........._..

.........................12 EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS......

...... 13 OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET

....~.............. _.....14

- DOCUMENT REVIEW...._.........

................._.........-..................15 MAINTENANCE EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABILITY...........~ _.......

...................16 DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (25 DEMANDS)........

~..17 AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE).....-..............18 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON. OUTAGE)..........

....... 19 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON. OUTAGE).....

.. 20 RATO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MANTENANCE (NON. OUTAGE)

.......--..............21 1

.g-

JMIE NANCE (cont'd)..........

........................... P.AE PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE....

22 NUMBER OF OUT-OF. SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS....

.. 23 MAINTE N AN CE OVERTIM E.................................

.. 24 PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)..

.... 25 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE MAINTENANCE)......

... 26 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE)......

. 27

............... ~

(PRESSURE EOUIPMENT)

. 28

...... ~

(GENERAL MAINTENANCE)...........

....... 29 (MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE)..

....... 3 0 (INSTRUMENTATON 3 CONTROL)=

... 31 NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS.......

. 32 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEMS (NPRDS) REPORTABLE FAILUREL

. 33 MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS..

34 CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE.....

... 35 CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLO'3! CAL PROTECTION PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE) -

.9 VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE..................

.10

........... ~..............

SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY..

=36

.. ~....

PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT..

.. 37 AUXILIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATON LIMITS.

..... 3 8 IN LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-OF. SERVICE.........=

.... 39 HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED..........

40

=

I MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATON EXPOSURE

.41 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATONS..........

.......................................42 r

l DECONTAMINATED AUXILLARY BUILDING.......

..... 43 1

RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM......e

.44 NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS......

45 GASEOUS RADOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT..............-

.. 4 6 LOUlO RADOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT....

....... 47 SECURITY LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY)................

.48 SECURITY INCIDENT BREAKDOWN..

.... 4 9 SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES...... -,..

.. 50 li

1 1

t MATERIALS AND OUTSIDE SERVICES AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS (NON. OUTAGE) =

. 51 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE.

. 52 SPARE PARTS ISSUED

.52 INVENTORY ACCURACY

.. 53 STOCKOUT RATE...

53 EXPEDITED PURCHASES....

. 54 INVOICE BREAKDOWN.,

,. 55 MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING..

. 55 DESIGN ENGINEERING OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS...

. 56 TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING).

. 57 OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUESTS (EAR's)..

.. 58 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS..

.59 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE BREAKDOWN....

. 60 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY DISABUNG INJURY FREQUENCY RATE

.11 RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FREQUENCY RATE,....... _

. 61 HUMAN RESOURCES NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LER'S.

-. 62 STAFFING LEVEL...

.. 63 PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE

. 63 EA!NING AND 00 AllFICATION SRO AND RO LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATO :

.64 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS.

. 65 HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS.

.66 TOTAL INSTRUCTON HOURS...

. 67 TLT.it HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING.......

.... 6 8 REFUEL ING OUTAGE MWO OVERALL STATUS (CYCLE 13 REFUELING OUTAGE)....

. 69 PROGRES3 OF CYCLE 13 OUTAGE MODIFICATON PLANNING--

. 70 OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (CYCLE 13 REFUELING OUTAGE).

. 71 OUALITY ASSURANCE VOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS

.. 72 lii j

1

i QUALITY ASSURANCE (CONT'D)

CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NOVs (TWELVE-MONTH RUNNING TOTAL).......................

73 OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS

.............,74 OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTlON REPORTS

..............75-CAR's ISSUED vs SIGNIFICANT CAR's vs NRC VIOLATIONS ISSUED vs LER's REPORTED..

...... 76 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS......................

....... 77 SAFETY ENH ANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX

....................,.............. 83 REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST....................

_..............................................85

SUMMARY

SECTION AD VE RS E TRE ND RE PORT......

.......... 86 INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTION R5 PORT.......

.................. 86 P

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT IMPROVEMENTSCHANGES.........~............................... 86 1

IV i

.,,,,-n,-...,n,-,,-,-

,. n v

.-,,,,,,-v,

E Net Generation (10,000 Mw hours) 50 -

40-35.1 31.27 20 26.89 17.26 26.94

[;"- i 0

h * --

i Jun90 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 STATION NET GENERATION This indicator shows the net generation of the Fort Cal 6un Station for the reporting month.

During the month of May 1991, a net tota' of 256,830 MWH was generated by the Fort Calhoun Station. This low net generation reflects the fact that the Fort Calhoun Station was operated at planned reduced power forthe entire month of May 1991.

Data Source: Station Generation Report Adverse Trend: None l

l 1

l-i 1

Forced Outage Rate

--C>-

Fort Calhoun Goal (2.4%)

--C}-

Industry Upper 10 Percentile (0.25%)

12%-

GOOD 9,7 9%-

V 6%-

3%-

C O

O O

1.4 0

/

I U

U 0%

I n

U

'88 '89 '90 May90 Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 FORCED OUTAGE RATE The forced outage rate was reported as 11.9% for the last twelve months.

To achieve the Fort Calhoun Station (FCS) forced outage rate goal of 2.4%, the plant cannot be forced off line more than 19 hours2.199074e-4 days 0.00528 hours 3.141534e-5 weeks 7.2295e-6 months for the remainder of 1991, Note: If no forced outages occur, the 12 month average Forced Outage Rate will remain constant at 11.9% until August when h will decrease due to the August 1990 forced outage being deleted fmm the 12 month interval.

Data Source: NERC GAD Forms Adverse Trend: None 2

3-

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal

-C)- Industry Upper 10 Percentile 3

FCS Reactor Scrams 2-a 1-C O

O O

,0 C,O,O,O,O,O,O,m,O,O,C,O i

'87'88'89'90 Jun90 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL There were no unplanned automatic reactor scrams in May 1991. The last unplanned automatic reactor scram occurrea on July 2,1986.

The 1991 goal for unplanned automatic reactor scrams while critical has been set at zero.

The industry upper ten percentile value is zero scrams per unit on an annual basis. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper ten percentile of nuclear power plants in this area.

Data Source: Plant Licensee Event Reports (LER)

Adverse Trend: None 3

3-3 Safety System Actuations

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal O-Industry Upper 10 Percentile 2-Gooo y

1 1-1

2 0 0 0

M i D r-C O iWiN i

i i

'88 '89 '90 Jun90 Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS -(INPO DEFINITION)

There were no unplanned safety system actuations during the month of May 1991.

The 1991 goal for the number of unplanned safoty system actuations is zero.

The industry upper ten percentile value for the number of unplanned safety system actuations per year is zero. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper ten percentile of nuclear power plants for this indicator.

Data Source: Plant Ucensee Event Reports (LER)

Adverse Trend: None 4

- 12 Month Running Total SSA 10-

-1000 4

Critical Hours C

Safety System Actuations (SSA)

-900 0~

-800 7

-700

+

6-

-600 b

!4

-500 4-

-400 4

y,g

-300 2-

-200 1

W

-100 h

- /

~

0 0

-0

,,ii

'88'89'90 JJASONDJ FMAMJJASONDJ FMAM UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS -(NRC DEFINITION)

This indicator shows the number of unplanned safety system actuations (SSA's) which include the High and Low Pressure Safety injection Systems, the Safety injection Tanks and the Emergency Diesel Generators. The NRC classification of SSA's in-cludes actuations when major equipment is operated and when the logic systems for these safety systems ara challenged.

The last event of this type occurred in Novembe-1990 when the Diesel Generators DG-1 and DG 2 experienced anticipatory starts when the turbine was tripped due to a forced shutdown of the plant. This forced shutdown was due to an Instrument Air Sys-tem line failure in the Turbine Building.

The majority of SSA's displayed above were related to 1990 Refueling Outage activities and are currently being reviewed under the Safety System Actuation Reduction Pro-gram. The goal of the Program is to reduce the number of SSA's at Fort Calhoun.

Data Source: Plar.! Licensee Event Reports (LER)

Adverse Trend: None 5

l

3 3

Monthly Gross Heat Rate 13-

--A-- Year-to-Date Gross Heat Rate

--e--

Fort Calhoun 1991 Year End Goal 2

-D-Industry Upper 10 Percentile 12-c h

GOOD o

8 11e V

10520 y/

a y-e o

o e

o

////

M 10-O C

O O

O D

/

.zz.

.a,

,g

'88

'89

'90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 GROSS HEAT RATE The Gross Heat Rate Indicator goal has been changed. This goal was changed due to the rescheduling of the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage which resulted in a reduction in operating power to save fuel.

This indicator shows the Gross Heat Rate (GHR) for the reporting month, the previous 1991 rnonths, the year-tr-date value, and the year end GHR for the previous 3 years.

The gross heat rate for the Fort Calhoun Station was reported as 10,477 BTU /KWH during the month of May.

The year-to-date gross heat rate was reported as 10,323 BTU /KWH.

The above year-end Fort Calhoun goal (10,250 BTU /KWH) is the theoretical best gross heat rate that can be achievod by the Fort Cahoun Station during 1991.

The gross heat rate industry upper ten percentile value is 9,935 BTU /KWH.

Data Source: Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trends: None 6

l

O MonttWy EAF Year-to-Date EAF

-o-Fort Calhoun Year-to-Date Goal

--O-Industry Upper 10 Percentile 100% -

,:s O

04 O

O O

D 80%-

o o

o o--c o

56.6 60%-

1 40 % -

l 20%-

8 4

4 80 %

'88

'89

'90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF), year-to-date EAF for 1991, ana the EAF for the previous 3 years.

The EAF was reported as 98.78% for the month of May. The EAF was not effected by -

the 70% power reduction during February, since the reduction was under management control and for reasons of economy (fuel savings).

The year-to-date EAF was reported as 81.28%.

The EAF Fort Calhoun goal is 60% for 1991.

The EAF industry upper ten percentile value is 82.5%.

Data Source: Dietz/Parra (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trends: None 7

1

- - Fuel Reliabikty indicator

--O--

Fort Calhoun Goal (1.4)

{

C Industry Upper 10 Percentile (.04) h_

Industry Median (2)

^

g 4-E GOOD 2.4 y

1,2-v

^

O

, =

,/,0 0

0 0

C O

O O

O j

'88 '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul. Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 l

FUEL REUABILITY INDICATOR l

[

The Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) was reported as.913 nanocuries/ gram for the month l

of May. This INPO indicator uses an industry normalized letdown purification rate. The FRI value using the plant's actua! letdown purification rate was reported as 1,42 nanocuries/ gram.

The Cycle 13 fuel performance continues without an observed fuel failure. The high FRI value is indicative of previous fuel failures. The last dotected fuel failure was during ;

Cycle 10.

The 1991 fue! reliability goal has been set at 1.4 nanocuries/ gram.

The fuel reliability indicator industry upper ten percentile value is 0.04 nanocu-ies/ gram.-

Data Source: Holthaus/Guliani Adverse Trend: None s

+

8'

l Personnel CumulatNe Radiation Exposure (Man Rem)

-O-Fort Calhoun Annual Goal (75 Man Rem)

-O-Industry Upper 10 Percontile (166 Man Rem) 300-GOOD l 272 276 i

j200-Y 93.

100-4

~

C O

O O

O l i. 0-

'88 '89 '90 PERSONNEL RADIATON EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)

During May 1991,4.31 man rem was recorded by TLD's worn by personnel while work-ing at the Fort Calhoun Station. The year to-date exposure is 23.448 man rem, The Fort Calhoun goal for personne! radiation exposure (cumulative) during 1991 is 75 l

man rem, The personnel radiation exposure industry upper ten percentile is 166 man rem per unit r

per year,

[

Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 54 i

r 2

9

- ~. _ ~ _. _ _ _, _ _. _ -. _.. _ _ _ _. _ _ -

3 Radioactive Oil Sent For Processing (in gallons)

D Dry Active Waste Sent For Processeg (in cubic feet) 6000-

[

4000-2000-7 1

N 0-i i

i i

i Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 Cumulative Radioactive Waste Buried

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal For Waste Buried (4500) 619s

-O-Industry Upper 10 Percentile Waste Duried (3072) g 7500 -

w 3 gg 4310 O

Radioactive Waste Buried (in cubic feet) 6000 -

E N 4500-O O

O 0

O O

f',l 3000-D O

O O

D----O j('g gm>

1500-um, o

'89

'90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 Year end Total VOLUME OF LOW. LEVEL SOLID FIADIOACTIVE WASTE The upper graph sW e the volume of radioactive oil and dry radioactive waste sent for processing. The lower graph shows the volume of monthly, cumulative annual total, and year end total of radioactive waste buried the previous 2 years.

The monthly and cumulative volumes of radioactive waste which were buried during the months of January, February, and March 1991 have been revised. These revisions are due to the delay involved in the shipping for processing, the processing, and the burying of radioactive waste.

Cumulative volume of radioactive oil shipped off site for processing (gallons) 4.330.0 Cumulative amount of solid radwasted shipped off site for processing (cubic feet) 7,778.0 Volume of solid radioactive waste which was buried during the month (cubic feet) 19.8 Cumulative volume of soiid radioactive waste buried (cubic feet) 437.0 Amount of solid radioactive waste in temporary storage (cubic foot) 0.0 The Fort Calhoun goal for the volume of solid radioactive waste which has been buried is 4,500 cubic feet.

The industry upper ten percentile value is 3,072 cubic feet per unit per year. The Fort Calhoun Station was in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plants for this indicator in 1986,1987, and 1988.

Data Source: Patterson/Breuer (Manager / Source) SEP 54 Adverse Trsrd: None 10

B 1991 Disabling Irqury Frequercy Rate

--M-1990 Disabling tr$ury Frequency Rate

- 5 Year Average Disabling injury Frequency Rate 1d'

--O-Fort Calhoun Goal

--+-- Industry Upper 10 Percentile 1.2 -

GOOD 1-V O.8 -

0.6 -

0.4 -

C O--

--C O

O O

O 0.2 -

M X

0

'm m

m m

m Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec DISABLING INJURY FREQUENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE)

This indicator shows the reporting month disabling injury 4lIness rate in column form.

The 1990 disabling injury 411 ness frequency rate and the 5 year average of the corre-sponding monthly disabling injuryAliness frequency rate are also shown.

There were no (0) lost time accidents reported at the Fort Calhoun Station in May. The total number of lost time accidents that have been reported during 1991 is one (1).

The 1991 disabling injuryAllness frequency rate goal was set at 0.31%.

The industry upper ten percentile disabling injuryAllness frequency rate is 0%.

yant Year End Rate 1988 1.6 1989 0.4 1990 0.5 Data Source: Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: The high rate for lost time accident rate is due to histoplasmosis, a work related illness.

SEP 25 & 26 11

j E

ThermalOutput l

--O-Fort Calhoun Unmet 1495 MW Goal Tech Spec 1500 MW Umit i

1500-i 1200-I l

900-i 600-300-i

(

1 3

5 7

9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT i

The above thermal output graph displays the daily operating power level during May 1

1991, the 1500 thermal megawatt average technical specification limit, and the 1495 thermal megawatt Fort Oalhoun goal that was not met.

Plant power level was reduced to 70% in February for fuel conservation in support of the extension of power operations for Cycle 13. This power reduction will continue until the summer months when 100% power will be resumed. Reduced power operations i

I will be resumed in the fall.

a Data Source: Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source) 1 Adverse Trend: None I

l i

i 12 l

i

_.__._._--,.--_.,.~w...m.,-..~

2-A Equipment Fotood Outage Rate 1.6 -

1.4 -

1.2 -

GOOD y

0.8 -

0.6 -

0.53 10.2-0.4-O.13 I

O h O

I I

'88

'89 90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS There were no equipment forced outages reported during the month of May 1991.

i The last equipment forced outage occurred in January 1991 and was due to the Decem-ber CEDM housing leak which carried outage time into January.

Data Source: Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Adverse Trend: None 13 I

l

. - - -... - _ - - -. - _.~_.

4 Operations 1991 Budget ($ Million) 1991 Cumulathe Total ($ Million) 80-1991 Revised Budget 60 -

40-20-i 0

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

~

- Maintenance 1991 Budget ($ Million) 20-1991 Cumulative Total ($ Million) 15-1991 Revised Budget 10-5-

1

=

2

-e

~

0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET The Operations and Maintenance Budget Indicator shows the budget year to-date as well as the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance for the Fort Calhoun Station.

The December Bar Graph represents the revised year-end budget due t' buoget revi-o sions primarily reflecting the refueling postponement for Cycle 13.

The budget year to-date for Operations was 26.5 million dollars for May while the actual cumulative expenditures through May totaled 22.4 million dollars.

The budget year to-date for Maintenance was 6.7 million dollars for May while the actual cumulative expenditures through May totaled 2.7 million dollars.

Data Source: Gleason/ Parent (Manager / Source)

Adve'se Trends: None 4

14 1

1500-Documents Scheduled for Review 4

Documents Reviewed 1200-Overdue Documents 900-600-f l

300-s

+

I

_a 0

Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 DOCUMENT REVIEW This indicator shows the number of completed, scheduled, and overdue (greater than 6 months past the scheduled due date) biennial reviews for the reporting month. These document reviews are periormed in house and include Special Procedures, the Site Security Plan, Maintenance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance Procedures, and the Operating Manual.

l During May there were 63 document reviews completed while 17 document reviews l

were scheduled. At the end of May, there were 28 document reviews overdue. The overdue document reviews at the end of May consisted primarily of Operations docu-ments.

During the month of April there were 51 new or renamed documents reviewed. These new or renamed documents will need to be reviewed again in 1993.

Data Source: Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 46 15

Number of Failures /20 Demands

-M-Trigger Values for 20 Demands O

Number of Failures /50 Domands l

Triggor Valdes for 50 Demands E

Number of Failures /100 Demands Trigger Values for 100 Demt ds 8-

~LD

~

G 6-y l

l l

i 4

4 4

4 3

3 3

y y

y 2

22 22 22 2

2 2

22 f

f f

I O

y 0

0 0

4 i

i i

I 4

i i

i I

4 I

Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dr Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABILITY This bar graph shows three monthly indicators pertaining to the number of failures that were reported during the last 20,50, and 100 emergency diesel generator demands at the Fort Calhoun Station. Also shown are trigger values which correspond to a high level of confidence that a unit's diesel generators have obtained a reliability of greater than or equal to 95% when the failure values are below the corresponding trigger val-ues. These trigger values are the Fort Calhoun 1991 goal.

The demands counted for this indicator include the respective number of starts and the respective number of load runs for both Diesel Generators combined. The number of start demands includes ail valid and inadvertent starts, including all start-only demands I

and all start demands that are followed by load run demands, whether by automatic or manualinitiation. Load run demands must follow successful starts and meet at least one of the following criteria: a load run that is a result of a realload signal, a load run test expected to carry the plant's load and duration as stated in the test specifications, and a special test in which a diesel generator was expected to be operated for a mini-mum of one hour and to be loaded with at least 50% of design load (see exceptions and other demand criteria in the Definition Section).

Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 16

DG 1 Failurev25 Demands O

DG 2 FailurerJ25 Demands 5-

- Failure Trigger Value for 25 Demands 4.5-4-

i 3.5 -

3-2.5 -

2-1.5 -

1-0.5 -

0 00 00 00 00 00 00 0

Nov90 Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (25 DEMANDS)

This indicator shows the number of failures experienced by each emergency diesel generator during the last 25 start demands and the last 25 load run demands. A trigger value of 4 failures within the last 25 demands is also shown. This trigger value of 4 failures within 25 demands is the Fort Calhoun goal for 1991.

It must be emphasized that in accordance with NUMARC criteria, certain actions will take place in the event that any one emergency diesel generator experiences 4 or more failures within the last 25 demands on the unit. These actions are described in the Definition Section. A Standing Order has been drafted for the Fort Calhoun Station to institutionalize and formally approve / adopt the required NUMARC actions.

l Diesel Generator DG-1 has not experienced any failures during the last 25 demands on the unit.

l Diesel Generator DG 2 has not experienced any failures during the last 25 demands on the unit.

Data Source: Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 17

O March 1991 Outstandino Mwo's 400-O April 1991 Outstanding MWO's E May1991 Outstanding MWO's i

300-200-Tllr

!$h 100-h:;

b$

,+

I I

' "~ 'i A

0 i.'

4 I

I L

0 3 Months 3-6 Months 6-9 Months 912 Months

>12 Months AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the age of corrective non outaDe maintenance work ordors (MWO's) remaining open at the end of the reportirig month.-

Data Source: Patterson/Schm!tz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 18

400-350-3 March 1991 O April 1991 g May 1991 300-250-l 200-l 150-100-O M

E i

i Total Open MWOs Open MWOs>3 TotalOpen Safety Open Safety Open High Priority months old Related MWOs Related MWOs >

MWOs 3 Months Old MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the total number of corrective non-outage MWO's remaining open at the end of the reporting month, along with a breakdown by several key categories.

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 l

19 l

Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Morths Old 80%-

--E)-

Industry Upper Quartile 70%-

GOOD V

GO%-

50%-

C C

C D

40%-

30%-

20 %

Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON-OUTAGE)

J This indicator shows the percentage of open corrective non-outage maintenancs work orders that were greater than three months old at the end of the reporting month.

The percentage of open corrective non outage maintenance work orders that were greater than three months old at the end of May was reported as 39.2%.

1 The industry upper quartile value for corrective maintenance backlog greater than 3 months old is 45.8%. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper j

quartile of nuclear power plants in this area.

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (LManager/ Source)

Adverse Trend: None 20

i Ratio of Preventko to Total Maintenance 90*/. -

-G-Industry Upper Quartile (57.7%)

h Fort Cathoun Goal (60%)

--o--

80%-

GOOD 70%-

i 60%-

g 4

AxA Af A 14 A

A A

A g

m m

40%-

Y F

30%-

20%

Jun91 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE (NON-OUTAGE)

The ratio of preventive to total maintenance indicator shows the ratio of completed non-outage preventive maintenance to total completed non outage maintenance.

The ratio of preventive to total maintenance was 57.9% in May.

The Fort Cathoun goalis to have a ratio of preventive to total maintenance greater than 60%. The low values for the months of January through April 1991 are due to the low number of PM activities scheduled to be completed during these months.

I The industry upper quartile value for the ratio of preventive to total maintenance is 57.7 %

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverste Tiend: None 21

.. ~., - _

4%-

- Preve.?No Maintenance items Overdue

--O-Industry Upper Quartile

--O-Fort Calhoun Goal 3%-

GOOD 2%-

V i

4 1

C O

O O

=C C

0 0

D 1%-

l b

l 0%

Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan.

Feb Mar Apr May91 1

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE i

The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in the administration and execution i

of preventive maintenance programs. A small percentage of preventive maintenance i

items overdue indicates a station commitment to the preventive maintenance program l

and an ability to plan, schedule, and perform preventive maintenance tasks as pro-grams require.

During May 1991,1202 PM ltems were completed. All PM's were completed within the allowable grace period.

The Fort Calhoun goalis to have less than 1.2% preventive maintenance items over-i due. The industry upper quartile for preventive maintenance items overdue is 1.2%

The Fort Calhoun Staiton is currently performing in the industry upper quartile for this indicator.

Data Source: Patterson/Lindon (Manager / Source) l Adverse Trend: None SEP 41 4

1 22

Number of C. R. Instruments Repairable On-Line 50-O Total controi noom iretruments out or. service

-C}- Industry Upper Quartile For Total Out of Service Instrumerts rt a un Goat Fodotal WSede Instmmems 40-l 30-

~

20-a c

p 10-I h

d o

a o

o o

g g Tf

,M, 0

Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 NUMBER OF OUT OF SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS This indicator shows the number of out-of service control room instruments, the number of instruments repairable during plant operations (on line), the industry upper quartile for this indicator, and the Fort Calhoun goal.

There was a total of 26 out of servica control room instruments at the end of April. A plant outage is required to repair 12 of these 26 control room instruments.

The Fort Calhoun goalis to have less than 16 out of service control room instruments.

The industry upper quartile value for the number of out of service control room instru-ments is 7.

Data Source: Patterson/ Adams (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None

)

23

80%-

- Maintenance Overtime 70%-

-H--

12 Month Average GOOD l

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal 60%-

V 50%-

i 1

40%~

i 30%-

O O

20%-

b o

-x X

10%~

0%

Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 l

i MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The Maintenance Overtime Indicator monitors the ability to perform the desired mainte-l nance activities with the allotted resources. Excessive overtime indicates insufficient resource allocation and can lead to errors due to fatigue, i

The percent of overtime hourt, with respect to normal hours was reported as 5.5%

j during the month of May 1991. The 12 month average percentage of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 8.7%.

The Fort Calhoun goal for the percent of maintenance overtime hours worked has been set at 25% for non outage months and 50% for outage months.

2 Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 4

24

_._;m--,.._.

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -. _ _ _ ~

15 -

D Open IR's Related to the Use of Procedures (Maintenance)

E Closed IR's Related to the Use of Procedures (Maintenance)

O Procedural.Noncornpliance IR's (Maintanance) i 10-5-

1 1

2 2

2 32

-2 11 30 0 000 000 30 00 0

00 00 00 000 000 0

- i i

e i

i i

i e

i i

i Jun90 Jul Au0 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the number of identified Maintenance incidents Reports (IR's) that cre related to the use of procedures, the number of closed IR's that are related to the use of procedures (includes IR's that were caused by procedural noncompliance), and the number of closed IR's that were caused by procedural noncompliance, it should be noted that the second and third columns will lag behind the first column until the IR's are closed. This reporting method is due to the process in which IR's receive their cause category codes. IR's receive their causa category codes when they are closed.

Data Source: Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 & 44 l

l i

25

-..-.-.u..:

E Open MWO's

O

Fon Calhoun Goal 600-C

^

434 430 423 0

0 0

0 400-361 348 293 302 289 287 "oo-Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the number of conactive non outage Maintenance Work Orders (MWOs) that were open at the end of the reporting month.

The goal for this indicator is to have less than 450 corrective non outage maintenan:o work orders remaining open.

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 26

.=

. ~ - -. -...

i Conpleted Scheduled AdMties (EM)

-e-Fort Calhoun Goal 100% -

4 80%-

C O

O O

0 y

60 %

3/2 3/9 'J/16 3/23 3/30 4/6 4/13 4/20 4/27 5/4 5/11 5/18 5/25 5/31 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Electrical Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWR's, MWO's, STs, PMO's, calibra-tions, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

Reproting Month Completed Scheduled Activities Week 1 95%

Week 2 03 %

Week 3 84 %

Week 4 79 %

Week 5 91 %

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 27

- Completed Scheduled ActMtles (PE)

--O-Fort Calhoun Goal 100% -

/

4 80%- C O

O O

O 60%-

40%

T2 3/9 3/16 3/23 3/30 4/6 4/13 4/20 4/27 5/4 5/11 5/18 5/25 5/31 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (PRESSURE EQUIPMENT)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerriing Pressure Equipment Maintenance Maintenance activities include MWR's, MWO's, STs, PMO's, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

Reporting Month Completed Scheduled Activities Week 1 85%

Week 2 78%

Week 3 95%

Week 4 73 %

Week 5 92%

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 28

4 4

- Completed Scheduled Activkles (GM) i

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal 100 % -

60% ~

C C

60%-

40%

3/2 3/9 3'16 3/23 3/30 4/6 4/13 4/20 4/27 5/4 5/11 5/18 5/25 5/31 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (GENERAL MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activites as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activites concerning' General Main-tenance. Maintenance activities include MWR's, MWO's, ST's, PMO's, calibrations, and miscellanceous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

Reporting Month Completed Scheduled Activities Week 1 85%

Week 2 79 %

Week 3 86 %

Week 4 75%

Week 5 100%

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source) l Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 29 u.

I Completed Scheduled MMties (MM)

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal 100% -

80%-

C O

O O

O 60%-

40 %

3/2 3/9 3/16 3/23 3/30 4/6 4/13 4/20 4/27 5/4 5/11 5/18 5/25 5/31 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the pecont of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Mechanical Maintenance. Maintenance a@ities include MWR's, MWO's, STs, PMO's, calibra-tions, and miscellaneous maintenance activites.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

Reporting Month Completed Scheduled Activities Week 1 96 %

Week 2 86 %

Week 3 92%

Week 4 89 %

Week 5 88 %

Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 30

-... ~. -

- Conpleted Scheduled AcMies (10)

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal 100% -

80%- C O

O O

C O

O O

s 60%-

I 40%

3/2 3/9 3/16 3/23 3/30 4/6 4/13 4/20 4/27 5/4 5/11 5/18 5/25 5/31 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Instrumenta-tion & Control. Maintenance activities include MWR's, MWO's, ST's, PMO's, calibra-tions, and miscellaneous maintenance activities, The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

Reporting Month Completed Scheduled Activities Week 1 77 %

Week 2 93%

Week 3 93%

Week 4 84 %

Week 5 97 %

l Data Source: Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 L

31

3 1,

@ Number of Missed ST's Resulting in LER s 0

0 0

.0 0

0 0

i i

i e

i i

'89

'90 Jur.30 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS This indicator shows the number of missed Surveillance Tests (ST's) that result in Licensee Event Reports (LER's) during the reporting rnonth. The graph on the left shows the yearly totals for the indicated years.

During the month of May 1991, there were no missed ST's that resulted in LER's.

Data Source: Plant Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 60 & 61 32

20-E TotalNPRDS Cornponent Failures

@ Confirmed NPRDS Component Failures 10-7 '/

5' 55 55 55

/

5' 4

1 0

0 0

Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec san Feb Mar Apr May91 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIACILITY CATA SYSTEMS (NPRDS)

REPORTABLE Fall.'sRES This indicator shows the total number of NPRD".i component failures and the number of confirmed NPRDS component failures. The total number of NPRDS component failures is based upon the number of failure reports sent to INPO. The number of confirmed NPRDS component failures is based upon the number of failure reports that have been eccepted by INPO. The difference between these two figures is the number of failure reports still under review by INPO.

During May 1991, there were no (0) confirmed NPRDS component failures.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 33 l

15-Components With More Than One Failure Components With More That. Two Failures 10-GOOD y

S-0 Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS The Maintenance Effectiveness indicator was developed following guidelines set forth by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Opera-tional Data (NRC/AEOD). The NRC/AEOD is currently developing and verifying a maintenance effectiveness indicator using the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPRDS) component failures.

This indicator shows the number of NPRDS components with more than one failure during the last twelve months and the number of NPRDS components with more than two failures during the last twelve months. The number of NPRDS components with more than two failures in a twelve month period should indicate the effectiveness of plant maintenance.

During the last 12 reporting months there were 4 NPRDS components with more than 1 failure. None (0) of the 4 had more than two failures, Data Source: Jaworsb Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 34

20-

- Check Vake Failure Rate per Million Comp. Hours

--6--

Industry Check Vane Fallure Rate per Mi!Ilon Comp. Hours 15-

--O-Fort Ca!houn 1991 Goal (2.00E-6) 10 10-GOOD V

5-

.N L

Q p

u u

u a

nu 0

'89 '90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 Check Valve Failures CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE This indicator shows the Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate, the Fort Calhoun goal and the industry check valve failure rate. This rate is based upon failures during the previous 18 months. The check valve failures at Fort Calhoun Station, for the previous two years, are shown on the left.

The data for the industry check valve failure rate is three months behind the reporting month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the data.

l For February 1991, the Fort Calhoun Station reported an actual check valve failure rate of 6.54E-7 while the industry reported an actual failure rate of 2.71E-6. At the end of May, the Fort Calhoun Station reported a calculated check valve failure rate of 1.96E-6.

The Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is a failure rate of 2.00E-6.

Data Source: Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 43 i

.35 l

i

Seoordary System CPI l

Seoordary System CPI Limit GOOD

-O--

Fort Calhoun Goal (.45)

Y

--6--

Irdustry Upper Quartile 1-l l

l l

j 0.38 ou).5-e x

i 4

A

,0 Marit0 Jun Jul - Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 200-175-146.1 Hours Chemistry is Outside OG Guidelines 150-GOOD 125-100-y 75-50-25 -

May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep 'Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY The top graph, Secondary System Chemistry Performance index (CPI), is calculatsd using the following three parameters: cation conductivity in steam generator blowdown, sodium in steam generator blowdown, and condensate pump diccharge dissolved oxygen. The bottom graph shows the total hours of 13 parameters exceeding the Owners Group (OG) guidelines during power operation.

The Fort Calhoun goal for the CPI is 0.45. The CPI was reported as 0.373 for the month of April. The industry upper quartile value for this indicator was 0.16 for August 1989 through Dec.1989. The CPI industry.value then changed to 0.24 for 1990.

The number of hours outside the OG guidelines was reported as 2.16 hours1.851852e-4 days 0.00444 hours 2.645503e-5 weeks 6.088e-6 months for the reporting month.

The above two chemistry indicators are one month behind the reoorting period due to-t l

the time needed for data collection and evaluation of the station chemistry data.

Data sourco: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 36

10%-

8%-

w Primary System Chemistry Out of Limit

--O-Fort Calhoun Goal 6%-

GOOD V

4%-

b l9 1.8

/

7~

2%-

C O

O O

,'k"0%

3 n

m o

'89 90 May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT The Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Out of Umit indicator tracks the primary system chemistry performance by monitoring six key chemistry parameters.

100% equates to all six parameters being out of limit for the month. This lhdicator is one month behind the reporting month.

The Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 2%.

l l

The Primary System Chemistry Porcent of Hours Out of Limit was reported as.53% for the month of April.

The high percentage of hours out of limit for the primary system during June and July was due to startup after the 1990 Refueling Outage and various power fluctuations which occurred during June and July. A plant shutdown and startup in September and a plant outage in November / December resulted in a higher percentage of hours out of limit.

Data Source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)

A;dverse Trend: None 37

10-9

-H - Hours Auxiliary System Chemistry Out Of Limit 8-7-

6-Y 5-4-

3-2-

1-0

,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,;,p 89 90 May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 AUXILIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LfMITS 4

The Auxiliary System Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits indicator tracks the monthly hours thct the Component Cooling Water (CCW) system is outside the station chemistry limit. The above chemistry indicator is one month behind the reporting period due to the time needed for data col'oction and evaluation of the chemistry data for the station.

The auxiliary system chemistry hours outside station limits was reported as O for the month of April.

The industry upper quartile value for auxiliary systems chemistry hours cutside station limits is 2.6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months . The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper quartile of all nuclear power plants for this indicator.

Data Source: Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None

12-Numberof instruments Outof Service

-O.-

Fort Calhoun Goal 10-8-

7 7

--C O

O O--

6-L 5

5 0

d' Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan -Feb-Mar Apr May91 IN-LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-OF-SERVICE This indicator shows the total number of in-line chemistry system instruments that are out-of-service at the end of the reporting month. The chemistry systems involved in this indicator include the Secondary System and the Post Accident Sampling System (PASS).

At the end of May there was a total of 6 in-line chemistry instruments that were out-of-service. Of these 6 instruments,4 were from the Secondary System and 2 were from PASS.

The Fort Calhoun goal for the number of in-line chemistry _ system instruments that are out-of-service has been set at 6. Six out-of-service chemistry instruments make up 10%

of all the chemistry instruments which are counted for this indicator.

Data Fource: Patterson/Renaud (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 39

.i

4 s

TotalWaste Produoed (Kilograms)

Federal & State MontNy Limit (Kg)

I 1000-800-600-400-4 5.$

200-144.5 89.8 70.4 O

Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 3

HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED

)

This indicator shows the total amount of hazardous waste produced by Fort Calhoun each month. This hazardous waste consists of non-halogenated hazardous waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste produced.

During the month of May,0.0 kilograms of non-halogenated hazardous waste was produced,15.0 kilogre.ms of halogenated hazardous waste was produced, and 0.0 3

l kilograms of other hazardous waste was produced.

i Date Source: Patterson/Henning (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None f

l l

i i

i l

40-

-- +

5000-OPPD 4500 mrem /yr. Limit 4000-O Highest Exposure for the Morith (mrem)

$ Highest Exposure for the Quarter (mrem)

~

E Highest Exposure for the Year (mrem) 2000-1000-847 0

May91 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE During May 1991, an individual accumulated 336 mrem which was the highest indi-vidual exposure for the month.

The maximum individual exposure to date for the first quarter of 1991 has been 546 mrem.

The maximum individual exposure reported to date for 1991 has been 847 mrem.

The OPPD limit for the maximum yearly individual radiation exposure is 4,500 mrem /

year.

Date Source: Patterson/ Williams (ManageaSource)

Adverse Trend: None 41

250-237 E

MontNy PersonnelContaminations GOOD Cumulative Personnel Contaminations 200-y

--O-Fort Calhoun Annual Goal (90)

- O-Industry Upper Quartile (129) 157 150-c c

c a--c a

=

a a--c c

100-C C

C C

50-6 3

3 o

i i

'89 90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct No/ Dec91 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS This indicator shows the number of skin and clething contaminations for the reporting month. A total of 28 cumulative contaminations have occurred during 1991.

l There was a total of 237 skin and clothing contaminations in 1990.

c The 1991 goal for skin and clothing is 90 contaminations.

The industry upper quartile value for total skin and clothing contaminations is 129 per unit annually.

Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 & 54 42

100% -

- Decontaminated Auxiliary Building

--O-Fort Calhoun Goal 90%-

C W

O O

^

f 80%-

A 70%-

GOOD 60%-

50 %

Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 DECONTAMINATED AUXILIARY BUILDING This graph shows the percentage of the auxiliary building which is decontaminated (clean) based on the total square footage, a Fort Calhoun goal of 85% decontaminated auxiliary building (non-outage months) and a goal of 75% decontaminated auxiliary building (outage months).

As of the end of the reporting month,87.3% of the total square footage of the auxiliary building was decontaminated. An increase in the percentage of the auxiliary bui_lding which is decontaminated is expected after the auxiliary buidling painting is completed.

Date Source: Patterson/Gundal(Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 54 l

43 i

i

. ~. - - -

10-8-

@ Number of identified PRWP's i

6-4-

2-1 1

1 1

1-1 0-Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov. Dec

-Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM The Radiological Work Practices Progam Indicator shows the numoer of Poor Radio-logical Work Practices (PRWP's) which were identified during the reportin'g month.

The number of PRWP's which are identified each month should indirectly provide a means to qualitatively assess supervisor accountability for their workers' radiological performance.

During the month of May 1991, two (2) PRWPs were identified.-

Data Source: Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source) l Adverse Trend:- None SEP 52 l

44-

.. u

Y 75 -

S TotalNumberof HotSpots O Number of Additional Hot Spots identified-5 5

5 5

5 4

4 3

3 3

50 -

i s

25-1 i

0 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May - Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS This indicator shows the total number of hot spots which have been identified to exist in the Fort Calhoun Station and have been documented through the use of a hot spot identification sheet. A hot spot is defined as a small localized source of high radiation.

A hot spot occurs when the contact dose rate of an item or piece of equipment is at least 5 times the General Area dose rate and the item or piece of equipment's dose rate is equal to or greater than 100 mRcm/hoor.

Date Sourca: PattersonN/illiams (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trends: None l

i l

45

_~

E Monthly Radioactive' Gas Discharged (Curies)-

800-Cumulative Radioactive Gas Discharged (Curies) 785

--C)-

Cumulative AnnualGoal(Curies) 600-GOOD V

400-C O

O O

200-0

, - - ~,

'88

'89 Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct. Nov Dec90 GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT.

The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for Janu-ary 1990 through December 1990. A total of 465.3 curies have been released to the environment from January through December of 1990. -The Fort Calhoun Station goal ~

was 360 curies for this indicator.

The high value of gaseous radioactive waste that was released to the environment _

during the month of February 1990 was due to a containment purge associated with the 1990 Refueling Outage.

The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every,

six months.

Date Source: Franco /Krist (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 46

Monthly Radioactive Uquid DischarDed Curnulative Radioactive Liquid Discharged 300-

+ Cunulabve AnnualGoal 228 231 228 C

O O

O E200-m

.g lGOODI a

100- 0 V

g, 0

i i

'87 '88 '89 Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 E 40000-R 35000-

$30000-g 25000-m 20000-3 15000-

@ 10000-4654 3410 3510 3250 3280 4170 3

5000- 3198,2834

.E F7#/a,tw/rA, 185 g g g y e, g 2070 r.06 497 0

p Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 LlOUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for the months of January 1990 through December 1990. The liquid radioactive waste that was discharged to the environment from all sources totaled 175.5 curies from January through December 1990. The Fort Calhoun Station goal for 1990 is 256 curies.

The bottom graph shows the volume of liquid radioactive waste that has been released form the radioactive waste monitor tanks and steam generators. The volume of liquid radioactive waste discharged to the environment from the radioactive waste monitor tanks and the steam generators totaled 20.7 million gallons from January through De-cember 1990. The liquid radioactive waste that was released to the environment in-cludes liquid released form the steam generators due to the fact that radioisotopes were detected in the steam generator blowdown. The liquid rat 1 active waste being riis-charged to the environment is calculated every six months.

i Data Source: France /krist (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 47 1

30-

_ Loggable/ Reportable inciderts (Does not GOOD Include System Failures) rf 20-y 15-10-4

^

5-

~

^

O Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 -

120-Securty System Failures l GOOD l 80-V 40-O Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 LOGG ABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY).

The Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Security) Indicator is depicted in two separate graphs. The first chart depicts the total number of loggable/ reportable incidents con-ceming Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV's); Security Badges; Security Key Control; and Access Control and Authorization which occurred during the reporting month. The -

bottom graph shows the total number of loggable/ reportable. incidents concoming secu -

j rity system failures which occurred during the reporting month.'

During the month of May 1991, there were 59 loggable/ reportable incidents identified.

This is a 30% decrease in the number of loggable/ reportable incidents from the previous reporting period and is the lowest reporting month to date. It also should be noted that of the 58 loggable security system failures reported thN month,33 were environmental failures which is also a significant decrease over previous reporting periods'. Security:

Services continues to pursue the CCTV environmental problems which account for l_

approximately 75%-85% of the logg'able incidents each month.

Data Source: Sefick/Woemer(Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 p

48

E Security Report / Log incidents February 1991 16-O Security Roport/ Log incidents March 1991 E Security Report / Log incidents April 1991 Q Security Report / Log incidents May 1991 12-GOOD Totalincidents Jan'91 6

Y F6b-91 0

Mar '91 2

B --

Apr 91 3

May 91 1

4-E 2

1 0

0 0

4 0

0 0

0 l??%Il I

4 4

1 LDV's Badges Key Control Access Control SECURITY INCIDENT BREAKDOWN This indicator now shows the number of incidents concerning the following items for the reporting month: Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV's) Security Badges; Access Control and Authorization; and Security Key Control.

Data Source: Sefick/Woerner(Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 49

50-O ErwironmentalFailures E - System Failures 40-GOOD 30-V 20-10-9 8

6 3

0-0, 0

0 0

0 Alarms CCTV Computer Search Equip.

Doors Card Readers SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES This indicator shows the number of incidents conceming the following items for the reporting month: Alarm System Failures, CCTV failures. Security Computer Failures, Search Equipment Failures, Door Hardware Failures, and Card Reader Failures. Alarm systems and CCTV failures will now be divided into two categories: environmental failures and system failures.

Number of incidents:

Apr11 May11 System Faltures Env Fail Fouin. Fall.

Env. Fall.

Fouin. Fall Alarm Systems 17 17 6

9 CCTV 34 7

27 3

Computer n/a 0

0 1

Search Equipment n/a 1-0 4

Door Hardware n/a 8

0 8

Card Reader n/a 0

0 0

4 Total 51

'33 33 25 Data Source: Sefick/Woerner(Manager / Source) j Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 50

-I i

- Amount of Work On Hold Awa>Jng Parts 9%-

--O-Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal 8%-

GOOD 7%-

y 6%-

6%

5%-

4%

N 4%

4%

-4.f 4%-

4.

4%

W.

g-3%-

'I*

2%-

1%-

0%

Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb. Mar Apr May91 AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS (NON-OUTAGE)

This procurement indicator displays the amount of open, non-outage, maintenance items that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total amount of open, non-outage, mainte-nance items, expressed as a percentage.

There was a total of 783 open, non-outage, maintenance items with 18 of these items on hold awaiting parts at the end of the reporting month.

The 1991 Fort Calhoun Goal for this indicator is 3.5% of the total number of open non-outage maintenance items awaiting parts.

Data Source: Willrett/ CHAMPS (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None l-51

~

- Spare Parts inventory Value ($ Million) 12-9-

6 Jun90 Jul Aug Sep

- Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar

. Apr May91 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE

'e spare parts inventory value at the Fort Calhoun Station at the end of May was

.: ported as $12,750,269.

Data Source: Steele/Huliska (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 500-Spare Parts issued ($ Thousands) 400-300-0 Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91

- SPARE PARTS ISSUED =

The value of the spare parts issued during May totaled $302,332.

Data Source: Steele/ Miser (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 52

. ~ - -.. -

Invernory Accuracy Fort Calhoun Goal (98%)

' O * *

/

x 95%-

90%

Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr Ma>91 INVENTORY ACCURACY This indicator shows the accuracy of the actual parts count for the warehouse compared to the counts contained in the MMIS computer system for the reporting month.

During May,622 different line items were counted in the warehouse. Of the 622 line items counted,9 items needed count adjustments. The inventory accuracy for the month of May was reported as 99%. The Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 98%.

Data Source: Willrett/McCormick (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None

{

~ % of Pick Tickets Generated With Parts Not Available 5'/ -

Fort Calhoun Goal 4%-

3%-

2%-

1%-

0%

Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar-Apr May91 STOCKOUT RATE This indicator shows the percentage of the number of Pick Tickets generated with no parts available during the reporting month.

During May, a total of 1115 Pick Tickets were generated. Of the 1115 Pick Tickets generated,69 Pick Tickets were generated with no parts available.

The Fort Calhoun 1991 Goalis 0%.

Data Source: Willrett/McCormick(Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 53 2

2%-

^

- % of Total Purchases that are Expedited

-O-Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal (0.5%)

1%-

C O

O O

O 0%

Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 EXPEDITED PURCHASES This indicator shows the percentage of expedited purchases compared to the tetal number of purchase orders generated during the reporting month.

During May, there was a total of 342 purchase orders generated. Of the 342 purchase orders generated, there was one (1) expedited purchase.

The Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator 0.5%

Date Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None i

N l

100-80-60-40-31 20-9

/

9 VMwsWXwM'MI J

.A WMWx%9M'M'd 9

i a

i Service inv6ces COE Invoices Miscellaneous INVOICE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows the number of service invoices, COE invoices, and miscellaneous invoices for the month of May 1991.

Date Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None Percentage of Material Requests for issues 100% -

with the Request Date the same as the Need Date 80%-

+

4

+_

60%-

40%-

- 20%-

f 0%

l May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING This indicator shows the percent of material requests (MR's) for issues with their re-quest date the same as their need date compared to the total number of MR's for issues for the reporting month.

During the month of May, a total of 1115 MR's were received by the warehouse. Of the 1115 total MR's received by the warehouse,544 MR's were for issues with their request i

date the same as their need date.

l Data Source: Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 55

.- -. - -.. ~. - -.... _ -

600 -

Total Modihcation Packages Open 500-425 425 I,I.200 400-337 300-

'88

'69

'90 Jun90 Jul Aug sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS.

This indicator shows the total number of outstanding modifications (excluding outstand-ing modifications which are proposed to be cancelled).

Catecorv Racortina Month Form FC-1133 Backlog /in Progress 16 Mod. Requests Being Reviewed 96 Design F.ngr. Backlog /in Progress 105 Construction Backlog /In Progress 30 Desion Enar. Undate Backloatin Procress 82 Total 309 As of the end of May,16 additional modification requests have been issued this year and 17 modification requests have been cancelled. The Nuclear Projects Review Com-mittee (NPRC) has completed 54 backlog modification request reviews this year. The -

Nuclear Projects Committee (NPC) has completed 68 backlog modification request reviews this year.

Data Source: Jaworskirrurner (Manager / Source)

Scofield/Lounsbery (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 56

100 -

- TotalTemporaryModifications

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal 60-40-20-g 9

0 Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 10-

@ March 1991 O April 1991 E May 1991 8

8-7 7

6-5 5

O 3

0-3 Months 3-6 Months 6-9 Months 912 Months

> 12 Months TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING)

The top graph shows the total number of temporary modifications (TM's) installed in the Fort Calhoun Station and the Fort Calhoun goal. The bottom graph shows the age of all installed TM's in the plant for the respective month.

At the end of May, there was a total of 28 TM's installed in the Fort Calhoun Station. As l

of the end of the reporting month,10 of the 28 installed TM's require an outage for.

removal. The current Foit Calhoun goal for the total number of installed TM's is less l

than 15.

l Data Source: Jaworski/ Turner (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 & 71 1

57

- TotalNunber of Open EAR's 200-150-100-50-0 Ju!90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91. Feb Mar Apr May Jun 50-O DEN 0-3 months O SE 0-3 months Q DEN 3 6 months D SE 3-6 months 30-Q DEN >6 months O SE >6 months

~

15 12 M

10

~

10-8 m

5 5

-5 g

4 Q 5 4 5

6 3r-EF10 0 '_.

M

- 7 4 0 55h. ' ' IT410 0 0 0

o l

Priority 1 -

Priority 2 Priority 3 Priority 4 OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUESTS (EAR's)

The top graph shows the total number of open EAR's at the end of the reporting month.

-The bottom graph shows the EAR's by Design Engineering Nuclear or System Engi-neering responsibility and their age m months at the end of the reporting month.

The decrease in open EAR's at the end of May resulted from a review of the backlog.

This review found many had been closed or cancelled which were incorrectly updated in l

AMRTS and counted as open.

There was a total of 109 open EAR's at the end of May. Of the 109 total open EAR's,78 were Design Engineering Nuclear's responsibility and 31 were System Engineering's responsibility.

Data Source: JaworskiNan Osdel(Manager / Source) SEP 62 Adverse Trend: None 58

. -.=_. -.... -. _ -... -. -.

ECN's Badiogged in DEN

{

00-ECN's Opened During the Month ECN's Completed During the Month l

150-100-

+

50-

+

V:

+

0 Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan.

Feb Mar Apr May91 t

ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS This indicator shows the number of Engineering Change Notices (ECN's)' awaiting -

completion by DEN, the number of ECN's opened during the reporting month, and the number of ECN's completed by DEN during the reporting month.

At the end of May 'i991, there was a total of 178 DEN backlogged open ECN's. There were 34 ECN's opened, and 13 ECN's completed during the month.

Although the number of open ECN's is currently high, activities are in progress to re-duce the backlog of open ECN's. It is expected that in several months the number of open ECN's will begir. to decrease.

Data Source: Phelps/Pulverenti(Manager / Source)

. Adverse Trend: None l )

l l

E DocumentChan0es O substitute Repiao. ment item 350-O FacilityChanges 332 3 No Type Assignment 300-256 250-208 200-us 150-M 100-E*i-73 58 h

M 50-1

w *

.m_r NI 8

9 10 7

4 5-4 o

O 0

Total Open ECN's Opened ECN's Completed ECN's Tota! ECN's Reevd ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE BREAKDOWN This indicator breaks down the number of Engineering Change Notices (ECN's) that remain open awaiting completion by Design Engineering Nuclear (DEN), the number of ECN's that were opened, and the number of ECN's that were completed by DEN during the reporting month. The total number of ECN's received by DEN since the initiation of the ECN process in 1989 is also shown.

Data Source: Phelps/Pulverenti(Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 a

(

1991 Recordable injury Frequency Rate 5-4.7 1990 Recordable injury Frequency Rate 4.5 -

5 Year Average Recordable Injury Frequency Rate 4-OD 3.5 -

3-2.73 V

2.5 -

2.4 2.25 1.5I

+

1.5 -

/

t l

s

/

0.5-

/

j i

i i

i e

i i

i Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dee RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FREQUENCY RATE This indicator shows the 1991 monthly,1990 monthly, and the FCS 5 year monthly average of the recordable injury / illness cases frequency rates.

A recordable injury / illness case is reported if Nuclear Operations Division personnel are injured on the job and require corrective medical treatment beyond first aid. The record-able cases frequency rate is computed on a year-to-date basis.

There was one (1) recordable injury / illness case reported during the month of May.

There has been a total of 5 recordable injury / illness cases so far in 1991.

Year Recordable Cases Year-End Rate 1988 11 2.6 1989 11 2.2 1990 1

2.1 Data Source: Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: Based on the 5 year average recordable injury / illness frequency rate, an adverse trend is indicated.

SEP 15,25 & 26 61

50-46 Licensee Event Repons

~

O Personnel Errors Reponed in LERs 40-O Cumulative Licensee Event Reports a

Cumulative Personnel Errors Reported in LERs 31 29 30-20-10-A A

i i

i 60 38

'89 90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec NUMBER OF PERSONNiL ERRORS REPORTED IN LER'S This indicator shows the number of Licensee Event Reports (LER's) with event dates during the reporting month, the LER's attributed to personnel errors, and the cumulative total of both. The year-end totals for the three previous years are also shown.

le May 1991, there were 2 LER's reported. None (0) of these LER's was attributable to personnel error.

There have been 11 LER's reported so far in 1991 and 4 of these LER's have been attr;butable to pesonnel error.

Data Source: Therkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 15

600-558 g

O Actuaiomsionstarring D

n tamng 400-198 204 55 52 I

N" 0- -

i Nuclear Operations Production Engineering Nuclear Services STAFFING LEVEL The authorized actual staffing levels are shown for the three Nuclear Divisions.

Data Source: Sorenson/ Burke (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 24 Nuclear Operations Division Turnover Rate Production Engineering Division Turnover Rate 10-8-

Nuclear Services Division Turnover Rate.

4

. e....

9 O

J90 F90- M90 A90 M90 J90 J90 A90 S90 090 N90 D90 J91 F91 M91 A91 M91 PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE The tumover rates for the three Divisions are calculated using only resignations from OPPD.

Division Turnover Rate NOD 4.9%

PED 6.6%

NSD 1.8%

Currently, the OPPD corporate turnover rate is being reported as approximately 4.0%.

This OPPD corporate tumover rate is based on the turnover rate over the last four years.

Data Source: Sorenson/ Burke (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 63 l

SRO Exam Pass Ratio (if Exams Administered)

RO Exam Pass Ratio (if Exams Administered)

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal 100% -

C O

O C

80%-

60% -

40% -

20% -

0%

NRC Generic Fund NRC Site Specific NRC Requal OPPD Requal SRO AND RO LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO SRO License Examination Pass Ratio l

The Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) Ucense Examination Pass Ratio indicator shows l

the number of NRC administered Generic Fundamentals Exams (GFE's), the number of NRC administered Site Specific Exams, the number of NRC administered license requalification exams, and the number of OPPD administered license requalification exams.

RO License Examination Pass Ratio The Reactor Operator (RO) License Examination Pass Ratio indicator shows the num-ber of NRC administered Generic Funcamentals Exams (GFE's), the number of NRC administered Site Spacific Exams, the number of NRC administered license requalification exams, and the number of OPPD administered license requalification exams.

The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 100% pass ratio.

No tests were administered during the reporting month.

Data Source: Gasper / Herman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 64

l

@ SRO Exams Administered i

O sRO Exams Peased 3 RO Exams Administered 50-Q RO Exams Passed 45-

$l 30 -

]

25 -

20-

}

7 j

]

f

.)

15 -

h

)

j j

10-g E-

{

j

.i

j i

i i

j

'j i

s 1

0 i

Jun90 Jul Au0 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS This indicator shows the number of Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) and Reactor Opera-S tor (RO) quizzes and exams taken and passed each month. These internally adminis-tered quizzes and exams are used to plot the SRO and RO candidates' monthly progress.

During the month of May 1991, no writtesi exams were administered because On-The-Job Trahiing and Simulator Training was conducted.

Data Source: Gasper / Herman (Maneger/ Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 65

(

O Hotlinesinitiated

@ Hotlines Closed 35-

@ Hotlines Overdue < 4 Weeks O Hotlines Overdue > 4 Weeks 25-

~

20-

]

1

~

15-

~

10-O t

l l

I l

J.

l

~

~'

l 7

j j

y t

~

0 F

T' M

i i

Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Od Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS This indicator shows the number of Hotline Training Memos that were initiated, returned for close out, overdue less than four weeks, and overdue greater than four weeks for the reporting month.

May 1991 initiated Hotlines 8

Closed Hotlines 7

Hotlines Overdue < 4 wks.

3 Hotlines Overdue > 4 wks 0

Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 4

66

O Other Training (1000 Hrs.)

E General Ernployee Training (1000 hrs.)

D Technical Support (1000 Hrs.)

6-3 Chornistry and Radiation Protection (1000 Hrs.)

O Maintenance (1000 Hrs)

E Operations (1000 Hrs.)

4-0

-I i

i-i i

i i

i-i i

i-1 May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Om Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS This indicator displays the training instruction hours administered to the listed depart-ments for the reporting month.

This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time required for data collection and processing.

DEPARTMENT M AR '91 AF E Operations 187 61 Maintenance 1313 712 i

Chernistry and Radiation Protection 1776 823 Technical Support 1004 523 General Employee Training 822 422 Other 39 43 Total 5141 2584 Data Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: Nono 67 c

S 4

O oth>r Training (2000 Hrs.)

@ General Ernployee Training (1000 hm.)

Q Technbal Support (1000 Hrs.)

E Chemistry and Radiatbn Protectbn (1000 Hrs.)

30-O uni.,tenarx,e (1000 Hrs.)

25 -

@ Operatbns (1000 Hrs.)

20-15-mn 10-lllll h h

M E

=

s

=

i i

May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING This indicator shows the total number of student hours for Operations, Maintenance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, General Employe's Training, and Other training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station.

This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time needed to collect and evaluate the data.

DEPARTMENT MAR' APR '91 Operations 524 166 Maintenance 4579 1400 Chemistry and Radiatbn Protectbn 5543 2129 Technical Support 4694 2124 General Employee Tralning 2905 1633 Other 112 182 Total 18357 7634 1

P*a Source: Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source)

Aaverse Trend: None 68 l

TotalOutage MWO's 800-

-e MWO's Ready to Work

-O-Outage MWR Backlog 600 -

400-200-C U

0 Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 MWO OVERALL STATUS (CYCLE 13 REFUELING OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the total number of Maintenance Work Orders (MWO's) that have

>een written over the past reporting periods for completion during the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage and the number of MWO's that are ready for work (the parts for these MWO's are staged, the procedures are approved, and the paperwork is ready for field use.) Also included is the number of outage Maintenance Work Requests (MWR's) which have been identified for the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage, but have not yet been converted to MWO's. Any MWO's written after the start of the outage will be reflected in the indicator labeled Emergent MWO's. Approximately 3000 maintenance orders were completed during each of the previous two refueling ousages.

Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes available, Data Source: Patterson/Dunham (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 69 l.

_________m_.____________

l Total Outage Modtfications

--b-Mods With Planning Dowment Approved

--O--

Mods With Final Design Approved

--6--

Mods With Construction Package Approved 30-W 20-A 10-Ao g

0 v

Aug90 ;,ep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 PROGRESS OF CYCLE 13 OUTAGE MODIFICATION PLANNING Th!s indicator shows the number of modifications approved for planning (to determine feasibility) or for completion during the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage (RFO). Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes available.

The current schedule for completion of the modification phases of the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage is as follows.

Outage Scopo Freeze

Oct.1,1990 Planning Documents Approved

Feb 22,1991 Final Designs Approved

Apr 24,1991 Construction Packages Approved

Jun 15,1991 Schedule Incorporated

Jul 26,1991 Material On Site

Jul 26,1991 Construction Started Feb 15,1992 Construction Complete Mar 30,1992 Accepted by SAC Apr 10,1992

Indicates milestones which have not been changed as a result of the new Jan 92 refueling outage start date. A forced outage after Nov 91 could result in an early start date for the Cycle 13 RFO.

Data Source: Patterson/Dunham (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 70 g

- Totaloutage Projects Pro}eds with Preiminary Schedules

Submitted 50-

- Projects with Detailed Schedules Subnitted 40-i 30-(

_ w l-g

-l2 20-10-0 Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Ma*

Apr May Jun Jut 91 OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (CYCLE 13 REFUELING OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the status of the projects which affect the scope of the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage.

The projects that Jo not yet have preliminary schedules are Uquid Effluent Releases and Radiography.

Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes available.

The schedule for the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage projects is as follows:

All Projects identified and Outage Scope Frozen Oct 1,1990 All Projects Schedulod in Detail Jun 28,1991 Procedures Ready Oct 26,1991 Parts Staged Nov 16,1991 l

Data Source: Patterson/Dunham (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 71

- Viola 60ns per 1000 Inspection Hours 12-

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal 9-O O

O O

O GOOD 6-V 3.7 I/

0~

f 2.3

[

'89 '89 '90 May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator displays the number of NRC violations cited in inspection reports per 1000 NRC inspection hours. This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved with collecting and processing the data.

The violations per 1000 inspection hours indicator was reported as 0.92 for the month of e

April 1991.

The Fort Calhoun Goalis 1.6 violations per 1000 hours0.0116 days 0.278 hours 0.00165 weeks 3.805e-4 months of inspection for 1991.

There was a total of 7,672 inspection hours in 1990 which resulted in 20 violations.

Data Source: Therkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 72

O Number of Vblatbns During the Last 12 Months E Number of NCV's During the Last 12 Morths 50-E E

28 22

~

20 21 21 21 20

]%

16

~

E 15 1

i. lyi I i i i h 12 12 gg 33 May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCV's (TWELVE-MONTH RUNNING TOTAL)

The Cumulative Violations and Non-Cited Violations (NCV's) indicator shows the cumu-lative number of violations and the cumulative number of NOV's for the last twelve months.

This indicator is one month behind the reponing month due to the time involved with collecting and processing the data for this indicator.

Data Source: Therkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 73 l

E Outstarding CAR's That Are Modification Related Outstarding CAR's > Six Months Old Total Outstarding CAR's 150-100-

~

50-

'~'~'Ei'

' ~ ~ * ' '

~ ' ' ' ' ' ' ' ~ ' ' ' ~ ' " -

0-Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS This indicator shows the total number of outstanding Corrective Action Reports (CAR's),

the number of outstanding CAR's that are greater than six months old, and the number of outstanding CAR's that are modificction related.

As of the end of May 1991, there were 126 outstanding CAR's,54 CAR's that are greater than six months old, and 6 CAR's that are modification related.

Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None t

4 J

74

20-15-

-O-NOD Overdue CAR's 10-

- NOD CAR's With Extencions Granted I4 m

n 0

m w

w w

Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 30-

--O-PED Overdue CAR's 25 -

20-

--h-PED CAR's With Extensions Granted 15-10-g_

n g

W 3

Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 6-5-

-D-Other Overdue CAR's

~

--6--

Other CAR's With Extensions Granted 3-2-

U-1 U" 1 Jun90 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May91 OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS This indicator shows the number of overdue CAR's and the number of CAR's which received extensions broken down by organization.

Overdue CAR's March 91 April 91 May 91 NOD 0

0 0

PED 1

1 1

~

Others 0

0 0

Total 1

1 1

Extended CAR's March 91 Apnl91 May91 NOD 1

8 2

PED 2

4 Otners 0

1 1

Total 10 11 7

Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)

Adverso Trend: None 75

1990 SALP Funct.

Area CAR's Sl0nti. CAR's NRC Vbla.

LER's A) Plant Operat6ons 62 0

2 10 B) Radiolog, 28 2

0 0

Controls C) Maint/Survell 180 8

6 4

D) Emergercy 7

0 3

0 Preparedness E) Security 26 0

5 3

F) Engr / Tect1 172 5

3 12 Suppori G) Safety Assess; 29 0

0 0

Qual. Vert!,

H) Othei 1

0 0

0 Tota 505 15 19 29 1991 SALP Funct.

Area CAR's Signif. CAR's NRC Viola.

LER's A) Plant Opstations 11 1

0 (1)*

B) Radolog, 7

0 0

0 Controls C) Maint/Survell.

45(11) 0 0

3 D) Ernergency 15(12) 0 0

0 Preparedness E) Security 1

0 1

1 F) Engr / Tech 41(8) 1 0

5(1)*

Suppor1 G) Safety Assess >

14(4) 0 0

1 Qual. Vert!,

H) Other 0

0 0

0 Total 134(35) 2 1

11(2)

Note: () indicate value for the reporting month.

LER 91-06 has been recategorized from a plant operations LER to Engr / Tech Suppon LER by Sts lan Licensing since last month.

CARS ISSUED vs SIGNIF, CARS vs NRC VIOLATIONS ISSUED vs LERs REPORTED The above matrix shows the number of Corrective Action Reports (CARS) issued by the Nuclear Services Division (NSD) vs the numbar of Significant CARS issued by NSD vs the number of violations issued by the NRC for the Fort Calhoun Station in 1990 and 1991. Included in this table is the number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) identified by the Station each year. The number of NRC violations reported is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved in collecting and processing the violations.

There were 0 violations due to personnel errors during the month previous to the report-ing month.

O Data Source: Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)

Therkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 15,20,21 76

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINmONS AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAIN 1T. NANCE WORK OR.

uled for revow, and the number of document reviews DERS that are overdue for the reporting month. A document This indcator trads the total number of outstanding cor-review is considered overdue if the review is not com-rectrve non outrige Maintenance Work Orders at the Fort plete within 6 months of the assigned due date. This indi-Calhoun Staton versus 1: sit age in months.

cator trads performance for SEP #46.

AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAl11HG FARTS EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT REUABIL.

This indicator is defined as the percentage of open, on-ITY outage, maintenance work orders that arsi on hold await.

This indicator shows the number of failures that were ing parts, to the total number of open, non cutage, main-reported during the last 20,50, and 100 emergency die-tsnance work orders.

solgenerator demands at the Fort Calhoun Staton. Also shown are ingger values which correlate to o hth level AUX 1UARY SYSTEMS CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE of contdence that a unit's dieselgenerators have ob-STATION LIMITS tained a reliability of greater than or equal to 95% when The cumulative hours that the Component Cookng Water the demand f ailures are less than the trigger values.

system 1s outside tho staton chemistry limit. The hours

1) Number of Start Demands: All valid and inadvertent are accumulated from the first sample exceeding the hmit start demands, including all start only demands and all until additonal samphng shows the parameter to be back start demands that are followed by bad-run demands, within kmits, whether by automatic or manualinitiation. A sts 1 only demand is a demand in which the emergency generator CARS ISSUED vs SIGNIFICANT CARS va NRC VIOLA. is started, but no attempt is made to load the generator.

TlOllS vs LERs REPORTED

2) Number of Start Fallures: Any failure within the emer.

Provides a comparison of CARS issued, NRC violatons, gency generator system that prevents the generator from and LERs reported, achieving epocified frequency and vohage is classified as a valid start failure. Thl includes any condition identifed CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE in the course of maintenance inspections (whh the emer.

The Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate and the indus-gency generator in standby made) that definholy would try check valve f ailure rate (tailures per 1 millon mmpo.

have resulted in a start f ailure if a demand had occurred, nont hours). The data for the Industry Iailure rate is three

3) Number of Load Run Demands: For a valid bad-run months behind the PI Report reporting month. This indi-demand to be counted the bad run attempt must meet cator tracks performance for SEP #43.

one or more of the following ersteria:

A)A load 4an of any duration that results from a real auto-CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER matic or manualinitiation.

THAN 3 MONTHS OLD B)A load run test to s&*isfy the plan!'s load and duration The percentage of total outstanding corrective mainte-as stated in each test's specifcations, nance hems, not requiring an outage, that are greater C)Other special tests in which the emergency generator than three months old at the end of the period reported, is expected to be operated for at least one hour while loaded with at least 50% of its design load CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS & HON-CITED VIOLA-

4) Number of Load Run FailuresA load run failure should T10NS(12 MONTH RUNNING TOTAL) be counted for any reason in which the emergency gen-The cumulative number of violatons and Non-Cited Vio-erator does not pid up load and run as predcted. Fail-latons for the last 12 months.

ures are munted during any valid load 4un demands.

5)ExceptonsUnsuccessful attempts to start or load-run DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT should not be counted as vald demands or failures when This indicator shows the daily core therrr31 output as they can be attributed to any of the following:

measured from mmputer point XC105 (in thermal mega-A)Spurous tdps that would be bypassed in the event of watts). The 1500 MW Tech Spec limit, and the unmet an emergency.

portion of the 1495 MW FCS daily goal for the reporting B)Malfuncton of equipment that is tot required during an monte are also shown.

emergency.

C)lntentional termination of a test because of abnormal DICABLING INJURY FREQUENCY RATE (LOST T1ME condnions that wouki not have resulted in major diesel ACCIDENT RATE) generatoi damage or repair.

This indicator is defined as the number of acx:idents for D) Malfunctions or operating errors which would have not all utihty personnel permanently assigned to the station, prevented the emergency generatcr from being restarted involving days away from work per 200,000 man-hours and brought to load within a few. minutes.

worked (100 man years). This does not include contrac-E)A failure to start because a portion of the starting sys-tor personnel. This indicator tracks personnel perior-tem was disabled for test purpose, it followed by a suc-mance for SEP #26.

cessful start with the starting system in its normal align-m ent.

DOCUMENT REVIEW (BIENNIAL)

Each emergency generator failure that results in the gen-Th Document Review indcator shows the number of orator being declared inoperable should be counted as documents reviewed, the number of documents sched-one demand arsd one failure. Exploratory insts during 77

I PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINmONS (con't) correctko maintenance and the successful test that fol-present on the surface of fuel elements from the manu-bws repair to verify operability should not be counted as facturing process. Steady state is defined as continuous demands or f ailures when the EDG has not beer de-operations above 85 percent power for at least seven clared operable again.

days.This INPO indcator uses an industry normaltzed letdown purtication rate. The FRI has also been calcu.

ENGINEERING CdANGE NOTICE (ECN) BREAK.

Lated using FCS's actual letdown purifcation rate. These DOWN calculations revealed that the use of the plant's actual This indicator breaks down the number of Engineering rate would result in an approximate 45% increase in FRI l

Change Notices (ECN's) that rema% open awalting data.

completion by Design Engineering Hudear (DEN), the number of ECN's that were opened, and the number of GASEOUS RADIDACTIVE WASTE BEING DIS-ECN's that were completed by DEN during the reporting CHA40?D TO THE ENVIRONMENT month. The total number of ECN's receked by DEN This indicator displays the total number of Curies of all since the inhiation of the ECN process in 1989 are also gaseous tedioacdve nuchdes released from FCS.

shown. This indcator tracks performance for SEP #62.

GROSS HEIAT RATE ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) STATUS Gross heat rate is defined as the ratio of totalthermal The number of ECN's that were opened, completed, and energy in Brtish Thermal Unks (BTU) produced by the open backlog F.CN's awating completon by DEN, for the reactor to the total gross electrical energy produced by reporting month. This indcator tracks performance for the generator in kilowatt hours (KWH).

SEP #B2.

HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITI-The totalamosnt (in Kilograms)of non-halogenated haz.

CAL HOURS ardous S aste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other Equipment forced outages per 1000 cruical hours is the hazardous waste produced by FCS each month, inverse of the mean time between forced outages caused by equipment f ailures. The mean time is equal to HOTUNE TRAINING MEMOS the number of hours the reactor is ethicalin a penod The number of Hotline Training Memos (HTM) thst are (1000 hours0.0116 days 0.278 hours 0.00165 weeks 3.805e-4 months ) divided by the number of forced outages initiated, closed, and overdue less or greater than 4 caused by equipment talk,res in that period.

weeks for the indicated mcrth. A HTM is a training docu-ment sont out for immediate review. The HTM should be EQUIVALENT AVAILABluTY FACTOR reviewed and eigned wRhin 5 days of receipt of the HTM.

This indcator is defined as the ratio of gross avaltable generaton to gross maximum generation, expressed as HOURS CKEMISTRY is OUTSIDE OWNERS GROUP a percentage. Available generation is the energy that can GUIDEUNES be produced if the unh is operated at the maximum Total hours for 13 secondary side chemistry parameters power level permitted by equipment and regulatory limi-exceeding guidelines during power cneration. Power tatiens. Maximum generation is the energy that can be operation is defined as greater than 30% power, The 13 produced by a una in a grven period if opers'ad continu-parameters tracked are steam generator pH, cation con-ously at maximum capachy.

ducthrhy, boron sllca, chloride, sulf ate, sodium, f eed wa-ter pH, dissolved orygen, hydrazine, iron, copper, and EXPEDITED PURCHASES condensate pump discharge dissolved orygen.

The percentage of expedited purchases which occurred during the reporting month compared to the total number D&UNE CHE14STRY INGTRUMENTS OUT OF SER-of purchase orders generated.

VICE Tc,tal number of in-line chemistry instruments that are FORCED OUTAGE RATE out of service in the Secondary Syst6m and the Post This indcator is defined as the percentage of time that Accident Sampling System (PASS).

the unit was unavailaNe due to forced events compared to the time planned for edoctrical generation. Forced INVENTORY ACCURACY events are fa!!ures or other unplanned conditions that The percentage of line hems that are counted each require removing the tmit from service before the end of month by the warehouse which need count adjustments.

the next weeks.d. Forced events include startup f ailures and events inRiated while the unit is in reserve shutdown INVOICE BREAKDOWN (i.e., the unt is avall-ble but not in service).

The number of invoices that are on hold due to shelf lif e, COE, and miscellaneous reasons.

FUEL REUABluTYINDICATOR This indicator is defi ied as the steady-state primary cool. UCENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS ant 1-131 activity, corrected for the tramp uranium contri-This indicator shows the number of SRO and/or RO quiz.

bution and normalized to a common purification zes and exams that are administered and passed each rate. Tramp uranium is f uel which has been deposited on rnonth. The Ucense Candidate Exams Indicator tracks reactor core internals from previous dwiective f uel or is Training performance for SEP #68.

78

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (con't)

LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BE3NG DISCHARGED the reporting month. A hot spot is a smalllocahred TO THE ENVIRONMENT source of radiaton. A not spot occurs when the contact This.ndcator displays the votume of hquid radoactive dose rate of an item is at least 5 times the General Area waste released from the radcactive waste monnor tanks, dose rate and the item's dose rate is equal to or greater to include releases through the plant bbwoown if rado-than 100 mrem / hour.

active nuchdes we deteued in the blowdown system.

The cunes from all releases from FCS te the Missouri NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIADILITY DATA River are also shown.

SYSTEM (NPRDS) FAILURE REPORTS SUBMITTED The data plotted is the total number of NPRDS compo.

LOGGADLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY) nont f ailures (confirmed and possible) and the number of The total number of secunty incidents for the reporting confirmed NPRDS component f ailures. The total number -

month depicted in two graphs. This indcator trads secu-of NPRDS mmponent failures are based on the number nty performance for bEP#58.

of f ailure reports that have been sent to the institute of Nuclear Power Operatons (INPO). Confirmed NPRDS MAINTENANCE EFFEC 11VENESS component f ailures are based t.pon f ailure reports that The number of Nuclear Plant Reliabihty Data System have been accepted by INPO. Possible NPRDS compo.

(NPRDS) components with more than 1 f ailure and the nont failures are based upon f ailure reports that are still number of NPRDS components with more than 2 failures under review by INPO.NPRDS is a utikty industry urers dunng the last 12 months, group program which has been outiined by INPO and implemented at FCS.

MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER DACKLOG The number of corrective non outage maintenance work NUMBER OF OUT OF SERVICE CONTROL ROOM orders that remain open at the end of the reporting INSTRUMENTS month. This indicator was added to the Pi Report to A control room instrument that cannot perform its design trend open corrective non outage maintenance work or-functon is considered as out-of service. A control room ders as stated in SEP #36.

Instrument which has had a Maintenance Work Order (MWO) wrnten for it and has not been repaired by the MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN end of the reporting period is considered out-o' servce This indcator is e b'eakdown of corrective ron outage and will be counted. The duraton of the out of. service maintenance work orders by several categories that re-conditon is not considered. Computer CRTs are not con-main open at the end of the reporting month. This indca-sidered as control room instruments.

tor tracks maintenance performana for SEP #36.

NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPotlTED IN M*stN1ENANCE OVERTIME LER'S The % of overtime hours compared to normal hours for The number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

_.a maintenance. This includes OPPD personnel as well as to personnel error on the original LER submittai. This contract personnel.

indcator trends personnel performance for SES #15.

MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING NUMBER OF MISSED SURELLANCE TESTS RE-The percent of material requests (MR's) for issues with SUL1 G IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS their request date the same as their need date compared The number of Surveillance Tests (ST's)that result in to the total number of MR's.

Licensee Event Reports (LER's) during the reporting month. This indcator tracks missed ST's for SEPs #60 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE and #61.

The total maximum amount of radiaton ocerved by an indrvidual person working at FCS on a monthly, quarterly, OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET and annual basis.

The year to-date budget mmpared to the actaal expen-ditures for Operatons and Maintenance departmonts.

MWO OVER ALL STATUS (CYCLE 13 REFUEUNG OUTAGE)

OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTtON REPORTS The total number of Maintenance Work Orders (MWO's)

This indcator displays the total number of outstanding that have been wntten for completion during the Cycle 13 Corrective Action Reports (CAR's), the number of CAR's Refuehng Octage. MWO's which are wreten after the that are older than six months and the riumber of modrii-start of the Refuehng Outage will be labeled Emergent caton related CAR's.

MWO's. Also shown is the number of MWR's whbh have been identified for the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage, but OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE RE-have not yet been converted to MWO's. This indcator OUESTS (EAR's) tracks performme for SEP #31.

The total number of open EAR's and the number of cpen EAR's broken down by their age in months. This indica.

NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS tor tracks performance for SEP #62.

The number of radiological hot spots which have been identified and documented to exist at FCS at the end of 79

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Con't)

OUTUTANDING MODIFICAT)ONS PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULA.

The number of Modifcaton Requests (MR'S)in any TiVE) state between the issuance of a Modicaton Number CollectNo radiaton exposure 6s the total ertomat whole.

and the mmpleton of the drawing update.

body dose received by all on stle personnel (enduding t) Form FC 1133 Backbg/in ProgressThe Form FC 1133 contractors and visitors) during a time period, as men-has not been plant approved.

sured by the thermoluminescent dosimeter ;TLD). Col.

2)Modifcaton Requests Being ReviewedThis category lective radiation exposure is reported in units of man-includes:

rom. This indicator tracks radobgic.I work periormance A )Modication Requests thrt are not yet reviewed for SEP #54.

B.)ledicaton Requests being reviewed by the Nuclear Projeds Review Commttee (NPRC)

PERSONNEL TURNOVER RAll!

C.)ModNcaton Requests being rev6ewed by the Nuclear The ratio of the number of turnovers to average empby-Projects Committee (NPC) ment. A tumover is a vacancy created by voluntary resig.

These ModRestbn Pequests may be reviewed several naton from the company. Retirement, death, termination, times before they are approved for accomplishment or transfers within the company, and part time employees cancelled. Some of these Modifcation Requests are re-are not considered in tumover, turned to Engineering for more informaton, some ap.

proved for evaluation, some approved for study, and FREVENTIVE MAINTENANCEITEMS L /ERDUE some approved for planning. Once planning is completed This indicator is defined as the % of preventrve mainte-and the scope of the work is clearty defened, these Modi-nance hems in the month that were not completed by the featon Requests may be approved for accomplishment schedoled date plus a grace period equal to 25 percent with a year assigned for constructon or they may be can-of the scheduled interva!. This indcator tracks preventNo celled. Allof these different phases require review, maintenance activities for SEP #41.

3) Des n 5 Engineering Backlogrin ProgressNuclear Pian-e ning.ias sosigned a year in which construction will be PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY % OF HOURS OUT completed and design work may be in progress.

OF UMIT

4) Construction Backbg/in ProgressThe Construction The % of hours out of limit are for six primary chemistry Package has been issued o construction has begun but parameters drvided by the total number of hours possible the modifcaton has not been accepted by the System for the month. The key parameters used a e: Uthium, Acceptance Committee (SAC).

Chloride, Hydrogen. Dissoved Oxygen Fluoride, and

5) Design Engineering Update Backlogtln ProgressPED Suspended Solids. EPRilimbs are used.

has receNed the Modifcaton Completon Report but the drawings have not oeen updated.

PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS The above merh..u outstanding modifcatons do not (MAINTENANCE) a r,;W..iivancations which are proposnd for cancella-The number of identified incidents concorr.ing mainte-ton.

nance procedural problems, the number of closed IR's related to the use of pron edures (includes the number of OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (CYCLE 13 closed IR's caused by procedural noncompliance), and REFUELING OUTAGE) the number of closed procedural noncompliance IR's.

The number of projeds which affect the scope of the This indicator trends persont el performance for SEP #15 Cycle 13 Refueling Outage and the number of projeds and #41, for which detailed scheduler have been submhted. This indcator tracks performance for SEP #31.

PROGRESS OF CYCLE 13 OUTAGE PODIFICATION P;.ANNING OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION The number of modifcations approved for planning (to REPORTS determine feasbility) for completion during the Cycle 13 The number of overdue Cor octive Acton Reports Refueling Outage. This inacator tracks performance for (CAR's) and the number of CAR'r. which received exten.

SEP #31.

sions broken down by organization for the last 6 months.

RADIOLOGICAL WORK PR ACTICES PROGRAM PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTE.

The number of identified poor radiological work practices NANCE ACTIVITIES (PRWP) for the reporting month. This indicator tracks The % of the number of completed maintenance actrvi-radiological work performance for SEP #52.

ties as compared to the number of scheduled mainte.

nance activities each week. This % is shown for each RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE maintenance craft. Maintenance activities includa The ratio of preventive maintenance (including surveil-MWRt MWO's, ST's. PMO's, calibratons, and other lance testing and calibraton procedures) to the sem of miscel.aneous activities. These indcators track Mainte-non-outaga corredive maintenance and preventive main-nance performance for SEP #33.

tenance completed over the reporting period. The ratio.

a expressed as a percentage, is calculated based on man-hours. 'this indicator tracks preventivs ma'ntenanco ac.

tivities for SEP #41, 80

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (con't)

RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FREQUENCY RATE periorrnance as a resun of environmenthl conditons (i.e.,

(RECORDABLE INJURY RATE) rain, snow, frost. fog, sunspots, shade).

The number d injuries requiring more than normal first

5) Security Computer Failures Failure of the muttL cid per 200,000 man hours worked. This indcator trends plexer, central processing untt, and other computer hard-personnel pork rmance for SEP #15 and #26.

ware and software. This category does not indude soft-ware problems caused by operator error in using the SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE software.

INDEX

6) Search Equipment Failures. Failures of x ray, metal, The Chemistry Performance Index (CPI)is a calculaton or explosive detectors and other equipment used to based on the concentration of key impurtties in the sec-search for mntraband. This also includes incidents ondary side of the plant. Tl.ese key impurities are the where the search equipment is found defective or did not most likely cause of deterioraton of the steam genera-function prope ty during testing.

tors. The chemistry parameters are reported only for the

7) Door Hardware Failures. Failure of the door alarm period of time greates than 30 percent power, and door hardware such as datches, electric strikes, doorknobs, locks, etc.

SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE

8) Card Reader Failures. Incidents caused by mechani-IriDEX (CONTINUED) ca! breakdown of card readers, but not improper use of The CPlis calculated using the fotbwing equaton. CPI-the card readers. (See Access Cor, trol and

((KCO.8) + (Nv20) + (0,/10)) / 3Where tha following are Authorization)This indcator tracks security performance monthly averages of;Ka - average bbwdown caton for SEP #58, twt.innryNa - average bbwdown sodium concentratonO, - average condensate pump discharge SPARE PARTS ISSUED dissolved oxygen concentraton The dollar value of the spare parts issued for FCS during the reporting perod.

SECURITY INCIDElHS BREAKDOWN The number of Secunty bggable/re;ortable incidents is SHO a RO 06ERATOR LICENSE EXAMINATION broken down into the fotbwing categories:

PASS RATIO

1) Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDVs)lncidents related The SRO & RO Iconte examinaten pass rato for NRC to the use of LDVs, e.g., keys left in the vehicle, loss of administered Genene Fundamsntals Exams (GFE's),

keys, or failure to retum keys.

NRC administered She Specific Exams, NRC adminis-

2) Security Badgestncider.ts associated with improper tered leense requalifcation exams, and OPPD adminis-use and handling of securny badges, incidents include tered license requalifcaten exams. This indcator tracks securtry badge, that are bst, taken out of the protected Training performance for SEP #68.

area, out of control on site, or inadvertently destroyed or broken.

STAFFING LEVEL

3) Access Controland AuthorizatonAdministrative and The actual staffing level and the athorized staffing level procedural errors associated with the use of the card-for the Nudear Operatons Divis,r.,n, the Production EngL accese system such as tallgating,incorred security neering Division, and the Nuclea' Services Division, badge issued, and improper osmrt procedures. This also includes incidents that were caused by incorrect a:: cess STATION NET GENERATION authorization information antered into the securny sys-The not generation (sum) produced by the FCS during tem camputer, the reporting rnonth.

4) Securny Key Controllncidents involving Secunty key control, e.g., bst Securny keys, Security keys removed STOCKOUT RATE from site, or f ailure to return Secunty keys. This type of The total number of Pck Tckets that were generated event does not reflect incidents concerning LDV dunng the reporting month and the total numbu of Pck keys.This indicator tracks securhy performance for SEP Tckets that were generated during the reporting month

58.

with no parts available expressed as a percentage.

SECllRITY SYSTEM FAILURES TEMPORARY MODINCATIONS incidents involving alarm system f ailures, CCTV f ailures, The number of tempora *chanical and elocuical con-securny computer f ailures, search equipment f ailures, figuratons to the piart 5 y stems, door hardware f ailures, and card reader f ailures. These

1) Temporary configuratons are defined as electrical system f ailures are further categorized as folbws:

jumpers, electrical blocks, mechanical jumpers, or me-

1) Alarm System Failure Detecton system events in-chanical bbcks which are installed in the plant operating volving f alse/ nuisance alarms and mechanical f ailures, systems and are not shown on the latest revision of the

2) Alarm System Environmental Failures Degrac'ations P&lD, schematic, connection, wiring, or flow diagrams.

to dutocton system performance as a result of environ-2 pumpers and blocks which are installed for Surveil-montal conditons (i.e., rain, snow, frost).

lance Tests, Maintenanc.e Procedures, Cahbration Pro-3)CCTV Failures Mechanicalfailures to all CCTV hard-cedures, Special Procedures, or Operating Procedures ware components.

are rot considered as temporary modifications unless the 4)CCTV Environmental Failures Degradations to CCTV jumper or bbck remains in place after the test of proce.

81 1

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DEFINITIONS (Con 4) dure is complete. Jumpers and bb&s installed in tes' or ersted (ECCS only), and rna)or equbment in the system lab instruments are not considered as temporary modb-is actuatoc. Unplanned means that the system aduation

catons, was not part of a planned test or evolution. The ECCS

3) Scaffolding is not considered a temporary rnodttcaton, actuatons to be counted are actuatons of the high pres.

Jumpers and bbeks which are installed and for which sure injedon system, the bw pressure injection system, EEAR's have been submitted will be considered as tem-or the safety injection tanka.

porary modWestons untilfinal resolution of the EEAR and the jumper or bbek is removed or is permanenty UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS(NRC recorded on the drawings.This indcator tradss temporary DEFINITION) modWcations for SEP's #G2 & #71.

The number of safety system actuatons which include (2n!x) the High Pressure Saf ety injection System, the TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS Low Pressure Saf ety injeden System, the Safety injec-The total number cod departmont breakdown of training tion Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators. The

'nstruction hours administered by the Training Center, NRC classifcatien of safety system actuations includes actuations when major equipment is operated And when TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAININGThe total the bgle systems for the atove safety systems are chal-number of student hours of trmining for Operatons, Main-lenged.

tenance, Chemistry /Hadiation Protection Technical Sup-port, General Empbyee Training, and Other training con-VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPENTION HOURS duced for FCS.

This indicator is defined as the number of violations sited in NRC inspecton reports for FCS per 1000 NRC inspec-TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHINO CONTAMINATIONS t on hours. The volations are reported in the year that Reportable skin and cbthmg contaminatons above the in*pecton was actually performed and not based on background levels greater than 5000 dpm/100 cm when the inspection report is receNed. The hours re-squared. This indcator trends personnsi performance for ported for each inspection report are used as the inspec-SEP#15.

tion hours.

UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WHILE CRITICAL WASTE This indcator is defined as the number of unplanned au-This indicator is defined as the volume of bw-level solid tomatic scrams (reactor protection system logic actua-radoactive waste actually shipped for burial. This indca-tons) that occur while the reador is critcal. The indcator tot also shows the volume of bw-level radcactive waste is further defined as fotbws:

which is in temporary storage, the amount of radcactNo

1) Unplanned means that the scram was not part of a oil that has been shipped off-site for processing, and the p!snned test or evoluton.

volume of solid dry actNo waste which has been shipped

2) Scram means the automatic shutdown of the reactor off-the for proces*ing.Lew !svel solid radcactive waste by a rapid inserton of all control rods that is caused by consists of dry actrve w=ete. tb@:, resi,,s, and evapo-actuaton of the reactor protection system. The scram rator bottoms generated as a result of nucier.r power signal may have resutted from exceeding a setpoint or plant operaton and maintenance. Dry actNo waste in-m6/ have been spurous.

cludes contaminated rags, cleaning materials, dispos.

3) Automate means that the initial signal that caused ac-able protective clothing, plastic containers, and any other tuation of the reactor protecton system bgic was pro-material to be disposed of at a bw4evel radioactNo vided from one of the sensors monitoring plant param-waste disposal site, except resin, sludge, or evaporator eters and condklons, rather than the maneal scram bottoms. Low level ref ers to all radcactive waste that is swttches (or pushbuttons) in the main control room, not spent f uel or a by-product of spent f uel

4) Critical means that during the steady state condition of processing.This indcator tracks radological work perfor-the reactor prior to the scram, the etiective multipication mance for SEP #54.

f actor (k,,) was equal to one.

UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS.

(INPO DEFINITION)

This indicator is defined as the sum of the folbwing safety system actuations:

1)The number of unplanned Emergency Core Cooling System (ECCS) actuations that result from reaching an ECCS actuation setpoint or from a spurious /inadvertem ECCS signal 2)The number of unplanned emergency AC power sys-tem actuations tnat result from a bss of power to a safe-guards bus.An unplanned safety system actuation oc-cuts when an actuaton setpoint for a safety system is reached or when a spurious or inadvertent signal is gen-82

SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM INDEX The purpose of the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Performance Indicators Index is to list perfor.

mance Indicators related to SEP llems with parameters that can be trended.

SEP Reference Number 15.

. Pane increase HPES and IR Accountability "Ihrough Use of Pertormance indicators Piocedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenanoe)................................................................... 25 Total Skin and Clot hing Conta minatiore...................................................................................... 4 2 R ecordable injury Cas es Frequency Rate................................................................................. 61 Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LE R's...................................................................... 62 CAR's issued vs Significant CAR's issued vs NRC Violations issue:) vs LER's Reported............ 76 SEP Reference Number 20 Quality Audits and Surveltlance Programs are Evaluated, Improved in Depth and Strengthened CAR's issued vs Significant CAR's issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LER's Reported............ 76 SEP Reference Number 21 Develop and Conduct Safety System Functionalinspections CAR's issued vs S6gnificant CAR's issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LER's Reported.......... 76 SEP Reference Number 24 Complete Staff Studies Staffing Level

..........................................................................................................................63 SEP Reference Number 25 Training Program for Managers and Supervisors implemented Dis abt ing inju ry F reque ncy R at e................................................................................................. 1 1 R ecordable injury Cases Frequ ency Rat e.................................................................................. 61 SEP Reference h' umber 28 Evaluate and implement Station Standards for Sale Work Practice Requirements Disabling inju ry F requ e ncy R at e.............................................................................................. 1 1 R eco rdable injury Cases Freoo ency Rate.................................................................................. 61 SEP Reference Number 31 Develop Out30e and Maintenance Planning Manual and Conduct Proj6ct Management Tralnin MWO Overall Status (Cycle 13 Refueling Outage).................................................................... g

.. 69 Progress of Cycle 13 Outage Modification Planning...................................................................... 70 Overall Project Status (Cycle 13 Ref ueling Outage).................................................................... 71 SEP Reference Number 33 Develop On-Line Maintenance and Modification Schedule Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities

( Electrical M alnt enanc e)........................................................................................................... 2 7

( Pre s su re Equipme nt)................................................................................................................ 28

( Gen eral M a int e na nee)........................................................................................................... 29

( M echa nical M alnie na nee).................................................................................................... 3 0 (Instrumentation & Controber 68 SEP Reference Number 38 Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog Maintene ce Work Ordor(MWO) Backlog (Corrective Non-butage Maintenance).................... 26 Maintenance Work Order (MWO) Breakdown (Corrective Non-Outage Maintenance)...................19 SEP Reference Number 41 Develop and implement a Preventive Maintenance Schedule Ratio of Preve ntIve to Total M alnt ena nee............................................................................ 21 83

~

e Preventive M alntenance itoms Overdue.....................................................................-.............. 22 U@

SEP Rafarance Number 43 Implement the Check Valve Test Program C heck Valve F allute Rate......................................................................................................... 35 SEP Reference Number 44 Compliance WRh and Use of Procedures Procedures Noncompilance incidents (Malntenance).................................................................. 25 SEP Reference Number 48 Design 4 Procedures Control and Admint;trative Program Docu me nt H e view....................................................................................................................... 15 SEP Reference Number 52 Establish Supervisory Accountability for Workers Radiological Practices RadiologicalWork Practices Program SEP Reference Number 54 Complete implem6ntation of Radiological Enhancement Program Personnel Radiation Expo sure (Cu mulative)............................................................................... 9 Volume of Low-Level Solid Radioactive Waste............................................................................ 10 Total Skin and Clot hing C onta minations...................................................................................... 42 Decont aminated Auxillary Building........................................................................................... 43 SEP Reference Number EB Revise Physical Security Training and Procedure Program Logg able/R epo rtable incide nts (Se rou rity)................................................................................... 48 S ecu rtt y incide nt Bre akdown................................................................................................. 4 9 Securn y System Fallures.............................................................................................................. 50 SEP Referece Number 80 Improve Cur $ols Over Surveillance Test Program Number of Missed Serveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports................................. 32 SEP Reference Number 81 Modify Computer Program to Correctly Schedule Surveillance Tests Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Aesulting h Licensee Event Reports................................. 32 SEP Reference Number 82 Establish interim System Engineers Te mpo ra ry Modif icat io ns........................................................................................................... 5 7 Outstanding Engineering Assistance Requests (EAR's)................................................................ 58 E ngineering C ha nge Notice S tstus.............................................................................................. 59 Engine e ring C ha nge N otice B re akdown........................................................................................ 60 SEP Reference Number 68 Assess Root Cause of Poor Operator Training and Establish Means to Monitor Operator Training S RO / RO Lice nse Examination Pa ss Rat 6o...................................................,........................... 64 Lice n se C andidate Ex a r"s............................................................................................................ 65 SEP Reference Number 71 Improve Controls over Temporary Modifications Te mpo rary M od it icat io ns........................................................................................................... 57 B4

REMRT DISTRIBUTION UST J. C. Adams R. H. Guy A. W. Richard R. L. Andrews R. M. Hawkins D. G. Ried G. L Anglehart M. C. Hendrickson G. K. Samide W. R. Bateman R. R. Henning T.J.Sandene K. L. Belek K. R. Henry B. A. Schtnidt A. D. Bilau J. B. Herman S. T. Schmitz B. H. Blome G. J. Hill F. C. Scofield C. N. Bloyd K. C. Holthaus L. G. Sealock J.P.Bobba M. A. Howman H. J. Sefick C. E. Boughter L G. Huliska D.K.Sentel M. A. Breuer C. J. Husk P.

Sepcenko C. J. Brunnert K. C. Hyde J. W. Shannon M. W. Butt R. L Jaworal R. W. Short C. A.Carison R. A.Johansen J. R. Shuck J. W. Chase W. C. Jones C. F. Simmons G. R. Chatfield J. D. Kecy E.L.Skaggs A. G. Christensen J. D. Keppler J. L. Skiles A. J. Clark D. D. Kloock F. K. Smith O. J. Clayton J. C. Knight R. L Sorenson R. P. Clemens D. M. Kobunski K. E. Steele J. L. Connolley G. J. Krause W.

Steele G. M. Cook L. J. Kripal H. F. Sterba M. R. Core J. G. Krist G. A. Teeple S. R. Crites J. B. l(uhr M. A.Tesar D. W. Dale L. T. Kusek T. G. Therkildsen R. C. DeMeulmeester L E. Labs J. W. Tills R. D. DeYoung M. P. Lazar D. R. Trausch D. C. Dietz R. C. Learch P. R. Tumer D. E. Dirrim S.E. Lee J. M. Uhland K.S. Dowdy R. E. Lewis C.F.Vanecek J. A. Drabota Fs C.Liebentritt G. L Van Osdel T. R. Dukarski C. J. Linden J. M. Waszak -

P. R. Dunham B. R. Livingston W. O. Weber R. G. Eurich J. M. Lotshult G. R. Williams H. J. Faulhaber J. H. MacKinnon S. J. Willrett M. A. Ferdig G. D. Mamoran W. C. Woemer V. H. Frahm J. W. Marcil F. F. France N. L Martice M. T. Frans D. J. Matthews H. K. Fraser T. J. Mcivor J. F. W. Friedrichsen K. S. McCormi&

S. K. Gambhlr R. F. Mohaffey J. K. Gasper R. A. Miser W. G. Gates K. J. Morris M. O. Gautier D. C. Mueller S. W. Gebers R. J. Mueller J. M. Glantz W. L Neal J. T. Gleason J.B.Newhouse L V. Goldberg M. W. Nichols D. J. Golden C. W. Norris D. C. Gorence J. T. O'Connor R. E. Gray W. W. Orr M. J. Guinn L. L. Parent K.

Guliani T. L. Patterson E. R. Gundal R. L. Phelps A. L Gurtis T. M. Reisdorft 85

ADVERSE TREND REPORT INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTION REPORT A Performance indicator which has data reprssenting three (3) consecutNo months of declarbg performance mnstnutes an adverse trend. The Adverse Trend Report This secton lists the indcators which show inadequacies explains the conditons under which certain indcators are as corr. pared to the OPPD goal and indcators which showing adverse trends. Irecators with datt, showing an show inadequacies as compared to the industry upper apparent adverse trend which is D21 considered adverse, Quartile. The indcators will be compared to the industry will have an explanation which defines why an adverse upper quartile as relevant to that indcator, trend does not exist.

Disabhno In!ury Frocuency Rate flott Time Aeident Batjuf PrevenWe to Totat Maintenance Balg)

(Page 21)

(Page 11)

The ratio of preventNo to total maintenance was reported This indcator has been defined by the Manager of the below the Fort Calhoun goal of 60%. This rato de-Safety Department (E. Skaggs) as exhibiting an adverse creased in December and January due to the high num-trend. The high rate for this indcator can be attribu'.ed to ber of hours in which maintenance was involved in cor-the occurrence of histoplasmosis, a work related l!! ness, rective maintenance viotations per 1000 manhours of inspection.

Reenrdable Iniou Cases Frecuency Rdo (Page 61)

Number of Out of Service Control Room Instruments This indicator has been defined by the Manager of the (page 23)

Safety Department as drhibiting an adverse trend based The total number of out of-service control room instru-on the 5 year remrdable injury frequency rate, ments for the reporting month (26)is above the Fort Calhoun goal of 15.

End of Adverse Trend Report.

Temocrary Mod 0estions (Page 67)

The total number of temporary modifications for the ts-porting month (28) is above the Fort Calhoun goal of 15.

The number of temporary modifcations 6 9 months old and >12 months old have increased for three consecu-live months.

End of Management Attent' n Report.

e PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT IMPROVE.

MENTWCHANGES Disab!ina Inlurv Frecuency Rste

{Page 11}

SEP 25 has been added as a reference.

Outstandina Enoineerino Assistance Recuests (EAR's)

(Page 59)

EAR's are now identified by their age in months and the responsible organization, i.e. Design Engineenng Nuclear or Systems Engineering.

Enoineerine Chance Notice Breakdown (Page 60)

The category *No Type Assignment" was added.

Recordable Iniurv Cases Frecuency Rate (Page 61)

SEP 25 has been added as a reference.

End of Indcator improvement / Changes Report.

86 4

FORT CALHOUN STATION OPERATING CYCLES AND REFUELING OlfTAGE DATES Event Date RanDe Production (MWH)

Cumulative (MWH)

Cycle 1 09/26/73 02/01/75 3,299,639 3,299,639 1st Refueling 02/01n5 05/09/75 Cycle 2 05/09/75 10/01/76 3,853,322 7,152,961 2nd Refueling 10/0196 12/13/76 Cycle 3 12/13/76 09/30/77 2,805,927 9,958,888 3rd Refueling 09/30/77 12/09/77 Cycle 4 12/09/77 10/1498 3,026,832 12,985,720 4th Refueling 10/1498 e2/24/78 Cycle 5 12/2498 01/18/80 3,882,734 16,868,454 5th Refueling 01/18/80 06/11/80 Cycle 6 06/11/80 09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 6th Refueling 09/18/81 12/21/81 Cycle 7 12/21/81 12/06/82 3,561,86o 24,330,034 7th Refueling 12/06/82 04/07/83 Cycle 8 04/07/83 - 03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 8th Refueling 03/03/84 07/12/84 Cycle 9 07/12/84 09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893 9th Refueling 09/28/85 01/16/86 Cycle 10 01/16/86 03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 10tn Refueling 03/07/87 06/08/E7 Cycle 11 06/08/87 09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 11th Refueling 09/27/88 01/31/89 Cycle 12 01/31/89 02/17/90 3,817,954 45,589,459 12th Refueling 02/17/90 05/29/90 Cycle 13#

05/29/90 02/01/92

Planned Dates 13th Refueling #

02/01/92 05/01/92 Cycle 14#

05/01/92 09/18/93 14th Refueling 09/18/93-11/13/93 Cycle 15#

11/13/93 - 03/11/95 15th Refueling #

03/11/95 05/06/95 FORT CALHOUN STATION CURRENT PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS

RECORDS

First Sustained Reaction August 5,1973 (5:47 p.m.)

First Electricity Supplied to the System August 25,1973 Commercial Operation (180,000 KWH)

September 26,1973 Achieved Full Power (100%)

May 4,1974 Longest Run (477 days)

June 8,1987 Sept. 27,1988 Highest Monthly Net Generation (364,468,800 KWH)

October 1987 Most Productive Fuel Cycle (4,936,859 MWH)(Cycle 11)

June 8,1987 Sept. 27,1988

_ _ _ _ _ __ _-_-

ML20081L741

Text

SUMMARY

O

Navigation menu

Search