ML20081J629

Mgt Plan for Extended Const Delay of WPPSS-1

ML20081J629
Person / Time
Site:	Columbia, Washington Public Power Supply System
Issue date:	06/29/1982
From:	WASHINGTON PUBLIC POWER SUPPLY SYSTEM
To:
Shared Package
ML20081J608	List: ML20081J629
References
FOIA-83-515 GO1-82-0421, GO1-82-421, PROC-820629, NUDOCS 8311090057
Download: ML20081J629 (76)

Text

._ .. ~_ . ._ - . . . - .

s '.. .re .

l 4

MANAGEENT PLAN

' FOR 1

EXTENDED CONSTRUCTION DELAY OF WNP-1 JUNE 29, 1982 i 8311090057 830920 -

PDR FOIA PDR BELL 83-515 _

e e

JUNE 29,1982  !

4 ,

' MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR EXTENDED CONSTRUCTION DELAY OF WNP-1 1.0 OVERVIEW l.1 INTRODUCTION This Management Plan is a description of ,the general policy and guidelines to be followed in bringing the WNP-1 Project'to an extended construction delay status. The Supply System will use this, plan as the basis for all management direction with respect to efforts on Project 1. The extended construction delay plan is to be executed within limited funding constraints while preserv-ing the assets of the Project of a period of up to 5 years.

1.2 BOARD ACTIONS DIRECTING THE DELAY Because of the problems in financing the construction of Units 1, 2 and 3; BPA load forecasts; and BPA projected rate increases, the Supply System Board of Directors accepted the BPA recommendation to delay construction of WNP-1 for a period of up to 5 years. The reconnended action, on April 19, 1982, was to place WNP-1 in a minimum cost status while preserving the assets and maintain-ing licensability for a period of up to 5 years beginning May 1,1982. The Supply System Board of Directors mandated implementation of those recommenda-tions on April 29, 1982, in Resolution No.1221 (see Appendix A).

Subsequently the Board requested the Supply System staff to analyze alterna-tive delay concepts and provide appropriate reconnendations. On May 28, 1982, the Staff recommended, and the Board approved, a concept wherein a gradual restart program would be authorized beginning in January,1983. The concept also provided for alternative ramp-up options to be reviewed in October,1984, and a decision made at that time relative to the magnitude of the overall con-struction delay, i.e. two years, or five years, or some intermediate delay period. -

('

5, SQ6 -1160 1

l L

e a .

JUNE 29, 1982

. . . . . .- .2 -

CONTENTS J

1.0 OVERVIEW l i

2.0 FINANCIAL 3 3.0 LICENSE MAINTENANCE 6 4.0 ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS 10 5.0 QUALITY CONSIDERATIONS 13 6.0 DOCUMENTATION AND RECORDS  : . . 2 ~~ z .

, 15 7.0 COMMERCIAL ACTIONS ,

18 8.0 PROGRAMMATIC ACTIONS __ 22 9.0 REQUIRED ACTIONS 23 10.0 MANAGEMENT OF THE EXTENDED CONSTRUCTION DELAY 26 APPENDIX A - BOARD OF DIRECTORS' RESOLUTION No. 1221 AND EXECUTIVE BOARD RESOLUTION No. 71 APPENDIX B - COMPOSITE PANNING CURVE APPENDIX C - WNP-1 FINANCIAL PLAN .

APPENDIX D - PLANNED AC110NS kP*, I* g MM

+

l

. e JUNE 29, 1982 l 1.3 CHANGES TO THE PLAN Changes to this plan will require approval of the Director of Projects.

1.4 FUNDAMENTAL PRINCIPLES GOVERNING WNP-1 EXTENDED CONSTRUCTION DELAY 1.4.1 Initiation Initiation of the delay concept commenced promptly after the Board actions described above. Further implementation of the delay will be in accordance with manning levels approved by the Board-(see Appeitdix B for, composite man-ning curve) and other guidance provided by the Board and the Managing Director.

1.4.2 Plan Objectives The primary objectives to be achieved during extended construction delay are e providing of efficient January 1, 1983, ramp-up capability e preserving plant assets by performing necessary preventive maintenance on plant equipment e conducting activities necessary to preserve the Construction Permit and the ability to obtain an Operating License e maintaining sufficient and accurate documentation on all quality, safety, and code-related materials and installations j e maintaining insurance coverage.

I 1.5 MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES The management of the extended construction delay will be conducted by line management. In managing the delay, maximum utilization will be made of exist-ing procedures, systems and reports.

- , , , _ _ , - .,-_,_-r , , % -, , ya

l

. 1 e e JUNE 29, 1982 2.0 FINANCIAL 2.1 GENERAL Funding of the WNP-1 construction delay will be limited to $282 million, plus reinvestment income, for the period May 1, 1982 through September 30, 1983.

Funding source (s) after September 30, 1983 will be determined at a later date. Table 1 sunnarizes the estimated cash requirements.

2.2 , BUDGET AND CASH FLOW REQUIREMENTS : ""*~

• For specific initial criteria applicable-to the WNP-11983 budgets and related cash flow requiremen'ts, refer to the general criteria promulgated in the "1983 Financial Planning Process, Addendum 1," dated June 3,1983, issued by R. L.

Ferguson (Appendix C). The 1983 Financial Plan (Budget) and related cash i flows will be submitted for action by the Board of Directors in September, 1982.

2.3 REQUIRED ACTION .

A list of specific required actions is given in Section 9.2 and in Appendix D.

i I

3 p - - - - - - , , , , - - - - . ~ -

i . e JUNE 29, 1982 l FINANCIAL BASELINE

($ in Milliens) 1 Beginning Ba?ance (Cash on Hand 5/1/82). $ 282 Revenues Reinvestment Income $ 17.9 Total Revenues 299.9 Cash Requirements

}

Estimate for Period 5/82-9/83 (as of 5/24/82) . 299.9 Ending Balance (Cash on Hand 10/1/83) $ J e

9 4

G

. - - . .  ? - -

e e .

JUNE 29, 1982 EXTENDED CONSTRUCTION DELAY CASH FLOW PLAN

~

, ($ = 000's) ,

5/82 $ 42,080 6/82  : . .: ~ ~

. 40,385 s 7/82 ,

24,950 8/82 ..- 18,345 . . -

9/82 15,833 4 10/82 26,532 11/82 17,412 12/82 20,191 1/83 g 8,666 2/83 9,714 3/83 . 9,652  ;

4/83 10,429 5/83 9,406 6/83 9,988

-7/83 10,133 I 8/83 11,045

. 9/83 15,139 TOTAL $ 299,900 5

. e JUNE 29, 1982 3.0 LICENSE W.INTENANCE -

. .- ,.2 .

3.1 DESCRIPTION

OF LICENSES  !

3.1.1 License Requirements The Supply Systm currently po,ssesses an NRC construction permit for W -1.

NRC regulations do not require that any phase of construction of a total pro-ject be completed on a specific schedule. The only require.nent relating to construction schedule is that construct' ion be completed by the latest comple-tion date specified in the construction permit.. The latest cospletion date may be extended by the NRC for " good cause". (42 USC, 2235; 10CFR50.55) 3.2 License Extensions It has been coninon for NRC licensees to seek construction permit amendments to extend latest completion dates. Such amendments are usually granted rou-tinely. " Good cause" for such amendments can be demonstrated by factors beyond the licensee's control such as labor difficulties, changing regulatory requirements, and adverse economic conditions.

3.1.3 WNP-1 License Status A request to extend the latest completion date on the WNP-1 permit to June 1, 1986, was submitted to the NRC on July 21, 1981. Under NRC Regulations, the ,

construction permit will' remain in effect_ pending NRC action on the request (100CFR2.109). The latest completion date specified in the WNP-1 permit is January 1, 1982. Recently the Coalition for Safe Power petitioned the NRC to l convene a hearing on the requested CP extension for WNP-1. The Supply System's and the NRC's legal staffs both filed replies which oppose the peti-tion. The NRC has not yet formally responded to the petition.

l l

6 i

• h -pWv Ye P

JUNE 29, 1982

.. .3.1.4 WNP-1 License Extension.

While the NRC Staff has the authority to require licensees to "show cause" why permits should not be modified, suspended or revoked in view of significant new information (see 10CFF2.202), the issuance of a "show cause" order solely because construction on WNP-1 is interrupted is considered to be unlikely, particularly in view of the state of conpletion of the projects and the like-lihood of eventual resumption of construction and project completion. Based on precedents where other utilities have deferred construction (e.g., Duke Power deferral of Cherokee Units 1, 2 ann [, it is expected that the NRC Staff will view the information regarding a deferral of construction on WNP-1 primarily as it relates to their own. resource needs and review priorities.

The NRC Staff has informed us that they will probably not take any action on the construction permit extension request until resumption of construction on WNP-1.

3.1.5 NRC Overview of Delay The NRC Inspection and Enforcement staff will have a direct interest in the plans for, and activities associated with, preservation of the facility records and hardware. It will be important to consider their concerns when formulating our plans for deferral of WNP-1 construction and to keep them closely informed of our activities.

In a June 16, 1982, NRC response to a Coalition for Safe Power petition to withdraw the construction permits for WNP-4/5 on the basis of their termina-tion, the NRC stated that the termination does not itself pose any hazard to public health and safety. The petition was therefore denied. We would expect the staff to take the same position with regard to the slowdown of WNP-1.

l t

~

7

l

, e JUNE 29, 1982 l . 3.1.6 Site. Certification. Agreement l As a requirement of State law (RCW 80.50.), partles desiring to construct

! energy facilities in excess of 250 MWE must meet the application and certifi-

, cation requirements of the Washingtc:n Energy Fa ility Site Evaluation Council

! (EFSEC). The Supply System has secured the requisite Site Certification

! Agreements for WNP-2, WNP-1/4 and WNP-3/5.

Early in 1982, the Supply System briefed EFSEC on the various stages of the

! termination process for WNP-4.and 5. On"5' arch '11, 1982, the Supply System requested EFSEC to defer any actions that wculd impact the Site Certification Agreements for WNP-4 ar.d 5, as a facility with a license was definitely more marketable than one without. On April 12, 1982, EFSEC took formal action to concur with the request, and will postpone any consideration of Agreement

amendments until June, 1983.

j .

On May 20th the Supply System submitted a similar request to EFSEC for WNP-1.

On June 14, 1982, EFSEC agreed "to continue to treat WNP-1 as a licensed

facility and to take no action which would in any way ~ diminish or jeopardize the current Site Certification Agreement for WNP-1."

3.2 ACTION PLAN FOR PRESERVING T!!E WNP-1 CONSTRUCTION PERMIT AND LICENSABILITY 3.2.1 Notifications

NRC management was informally kept informed of the events leading up-_to the i

deferral of WNP-1 by several phone calls between April 19, 1982 (the date of the BPA Administrator's recomendation) and April 29, when the Board voted to accept the BPA recommendation.

I 8-t

- , - - - . - - - - - v- - - --w--

. r

. JUNE 29, 1982

. . Formal notification of both:the NRC Staff (Bethesda) and Inspection and Enforcement (Region V) of the Supply System action regarding deferral of WNP-1 construction was accomplished by an April 30, 1982 letter to the Director, NRR, with copy distribution to the Director of Insp!ction and Enforcement, Region V. No other formal submittals are considered necessary at this time to maintain the WNP-1 construction permit or to satisfy normal practices of keep-ing the NRC informed of significant activities.

The EFSEC was notified of the construction interruption by a letter dated

~

May 14, 1982. '

3.2.2 Licensing Applications -

The operating license application for WNP-1 was tendered on November 25, 1981 for the acceptance review. Do:keting by the NRC is expected in June or July, 1982.

It is expected that the NRC Staff will begin the review of portions of the Final Safety Analysis Report submitted with the operat'ing license application even though the project is delayed.

There is no filing fee for the operating license application; thus, this action represented no additional cost to WNP-1.

l l

3.2.3 Cu'rrent Issues Review As part of our ongoing licensing efforts, we should continue to identify and resolve, where feasible, issues such as those which may be raised by the pro-visions of 10CFR50.55(e),10CFR21 and IE Bulletins.

3.3 REQUIRED ACTION A list of specific required actions is given in Section 9.2 and in Appendix 0.

9

. - - . . - ._ . .- . _ . - - . - . - . _ = --. . . . . . . .

, e .

JUNE 29, 1982

~ ~ ~~

4. 0' ENGINEERING' CONSIDERATIONS 4.1 TECHNICAL REQUIREMENTS FOR WNP-1 PRESERVATION 4

1 j Engineering guidance on activities to be conducted for the preservation of the i

assets in WNP-1 follows. Final determinations are to be made by the Program '

Director. Engineering planning and considerations for entering an extended #

construction delay range from complete preservation and completion of all necessary functions, to simply walking;off and leaving the work as is. The degree of preservation work is primarily a function of economics at the time of implementation. As a minimum, safety, code or quality requirements will in

themselves demand a certain level' of preservation activity. Using economics as a basis, three classes of equipment / materials / structures can be defined.

t e those which will be preserved at all costs e those which will receive minimal attention and are assumed at a risk to be suitable for service later .

I e those which are simply left as is I

The equipment / structure / materials that are encompassed by each of these classes can only be determined by an item by item evaluation by technically knowledgeable persons, with final decisions made by the Program Director responsible for managing the extended construction delay withir a defined funding level.

4.2 EQUIPMENT TO BE PRESERVED AT ALL COSTS l For that equipment / material / structures required to be preserved, the following i

considerations must be evaluated:

l .

o 3

10

.- .,y- -. . .p.,+ 3.m. .ew..! . .- y yy - ,, .e,. .h,.,.-e ,. , , - - , , , , , , , f , . , . , .,y , w c, ,a, .

O JUNE 29, 1982 e Pfeservationand'$to'ragewillbeinaccordancewithmanufacturer's recommendations, applicable design requirements and ANSI N45.2.2.

e Complete surveillance and record keeping functions must be maintained throughout the delay period. The condition of the equipment must periedically be verified and all protective measures maintained intact.

e Records including drawings, purchasing / manufacturing documents, code data reports, or partial code. data reports, qualification documenta-tion, construction deficiency reports and any other applicable docu-ments must be completed to the extent possible and must be properly filed with the responsible' party.

e Construction drawing revisions, completed engineering directives and an accurate status record of work completed must be identified and filed with the responsible party.

4.3 MINIMUM ATTENTION WITH RISK ,

For equipment / material / structures determined to require minimum attention, the following considerations must be evaluated:

e Preservation and storage will be in accordance with manufacturer's

. reconnendations, applicable design requirements, and/or ANSI N45.2.2.

However, these requirements may be modified based on the degree of acceptable economic risk for a particular piece of equipment.

I

e Minimal surveillance will be established to assure protective measures remain adequate, i.e., heater operable, covers intact, etc.

i 11

, e JUNE 29,1982 e Records, including drawings, purchasing / manufacturing documents, code data reports or partial code data reports, qualification documentation

~' '

and "anf other applidbl'edocuments will be completed to the extent pos-sible and filed with the responsible party.

e Construction drawings, revisions and completed engineering directives will be identified and filed with the responsible party when practical.

4.4 LEFT AS IS Those items identified as more costly to. maintain for the delay period than to

~

replace will receive no attention. Those 1tems that cannot be used elsewhere and have a specified shelf-life of insufficient leilgth to warrant preserva-tion, will receive no attention. Alternatively, items in this category might be excessed or sold as scrap.

e Exposed rebar and structural steel should be left as is with sand-blasting prior to usage, if required.

4.5 ECONOMIC CONSIDERATION .

Preservation of certain specialty, nonsafety-related items will be given close consideration. Examples of high-dollar specialty items are the turbine and generator.

~ 4.6 REQUIRED ACTION The Program Director shall define the layup requirements for all equipment /

structures / materials to be preserved given the economic considerations dis-cussed in his plan. These items are to be identified by June 30, 1982, so that specific connercial direction may be given to appropriate construction contractors and equipment vendors.

Nonconformances relating to hardware, structures, and documentation will be dispositioned, and closed out when practical. (If nonconformaces can be closed out at the contractors expense, they should be closed out.) As a mini-mum, unresolved nonconformances should be recorded and their status noted for future action.

12 l

l

. s JUNE 29, 1982

. . . . . _ _5.0. QUALITY CONSIDERATIONS Planning for the WNP-1 extended construction delay addresses Quality Assurance program considerations that are necessary to preserve licenses and permits and to protect plant equipment and facilities to insure a resumption of construc-tion after the delay.

5.1 REGULATORY REQUIkEMENTS e nv. _

The regulatory requirements that will be met to preserve the assets at Project 1 are outlined in the following subsections.

5.1.1 _ Quality Assurance Program The applicable ' portions of the Design and Construction Quality Assurance Pro-gram will continue to be implemented to cover the extended construction delay.

5.1.2 Preservatinn and Storage Requirements -

I As discussed in Section 4, Engineering Considerations, equipment received and in storage shall be maintained in accordance with manufacturer's recommenda-tions and/or applicable design requirements and standards, or approved alter-natives.

Implementation of the preventive maintenance program shall be verified by Quality Assurance through site surveillances/ audits.

5.1.3 Procedures / Instructions Applicable existing procedures will continue to be implemented to assure that the quality of materials, components and structures, including partially com-pleted structures, is adequately preserved during the period of suspended I

construction.

13

JUNE 29, 1982 5.1.4 Records Documentation for work completed, including maintenance and qualification records, will be reviewed, accepted, maintained, and stored in a record stor-age facility to which the Supply System has assured access.

The status of construction tests and inspections performed prior to suspension of work will also be documented, reviewed and stored in a records facility accessible to the Supply System. " ~ ' ~ -

5.1.5 ASME Code Work -

The ASME Manual will continue to be in effect.

5.2 REQUIRED ACTION The WNP-1 Program Director is responsible for developing any additional imple-mentation plans which do not currently exist, to meet these requirements.

These plans are to be defined, documented and a copy provided to Corporate Quality Assurance.

l 14 l

s

• JUNE 29, 1982

~ ' ~

' 6.d DdCUMENTATION AND RECORDS .

This section describes the requirements for records and documents needed to preserve the assets of WNP-1. Records / documentation are a necessary part of the total construction effort. Proper documentation must be accomplished at minimum cost.

5.1 PRESENT STATUS OF DOCUMENTATION - WNP-1

. a. -

The current status of records for WNP-1 is as follows:

e Engineering / Design records'are in UE&C and/or contractor custody.

e QA Class I construction records are in Bechtel and/or contractor custody.

e ASME Division 2 construction records are in UE&C and/or contractor custody.

e Quality Class II and G construction records are in Supply System,

, Bechtel and/or contractor custody.

e QA Class I equipment vendor records are in Supply System, Bechtel

,and/or prepurchased equipment contractor custody.

j e Class II and G equipment vendor records are in Supply System, Bechtel or prepurchased equipment contractor custody.

e Supply System contractors / consultants records are in Supply System l custody (fuel racks, security system, operational spare parts, simula-tor,etc.).

e Supply System-generated ' records are in Supply System custody.

.,. 15

JUNE 29, 1982

~ ~

6.2 RIC6RDS REQUIREME$TS' In order ~ to preserve the assets of the project, records must be retained as described in the following subsections.

6.2.1 Architect / Engineer and Construction Manager The AE and/or CM shall retain all quality records currently in his custody.

Custody of quality records for terminated contractors will be retained by the CM and/or AE. .

6.2.2 Supply System The Supply System shall retain all quality records currently in its custody, and obtain custody of those that are not, for those contracts administered within the Supply System (e.g., fuel racks, security system, etc.).

6.2.3 Contractors .

Contractors will submit their records to the AE or CM as indicated in para-graph 6.2.1 above or as otherwise determined by the Program Director. Custody of quality records for suspended contractors will be retained by the contrac-tor. The Supply System will verify the adequacy of those records by audit /

survei.11 ance.

6.3 RECORDS GENERATED DURING CONSTRUCTION DELAY Records generated during the extended construction delay shall be retained as follows:

o Preventive maintenance records shall be retained by the Supply System.

9 16 i

. .- . _ ._ . . _ _ - . = - . . . - .

JUNE 29, 1982

! 6 Records for equipment received during the construction delay shall be retained by the CM organization.

6.4 REQUIRED ACTION A list of specific actions required is given in Section 9 and Appendix C.

_ j ost =.

M i

e 1

i e

I i

1 f

17

9 a

s JUNE 29,1982

. . .;7.0 COMMERCIAL ACTIONS 7.1 GENERAL The guidance and requirements specified in this section are necessary to ensure proper overall planning, support budget formulation and facilitate cash flow forecasting and control. It is emphasized that the Program Director will implement immediately those contractual actions that reduce the continuing commitment of funds to a minimum, with consideration being given to restart i impact. Priority shall be given to the laihbst dollar impacts. -

7.2 SPECIFIC ACTIONS ,

7.2.1 Prepurchased Equipment The decision to suspend or terminate prepurchased contracts will be made on a case by case basis, based upon (a) whether such suspension or termination will result in greater near-term costs than continuance of work, and (b) the abil-ity to reprocure to support restart. -

The Program Director shall review all contracts and develop an initial plan for resolving each contract by August 1,1982. Data shall reflect the follow-ing.

e Listing of contracts based on estimate of potential costs. Innediate evaluations are to be conducted on large dollar-value exposure con-tracts.

e Intended Action -

a. Suspension of WNP-1 work

b. Termination of WNP-1 work

c. Partial suspension of WNP-1 work

d. Continue work to completion 18

g- In JUNE 29, 1982 o Consideration of disposing of equipment, material:on hand or raw mate-rials in vendors' shops. Such disposal must recognize existing bond covenants; additional guidance on this will be provided.

The Program Director shall prepare individual contract negotiation plans as required to support the commercial action plan. Based on these negotiation plans, the projected cost / cash flow should be reviewed and adjusted. An over-all negotiation schedule should also be prepared, based on the priorities established above, by August 1,1982. Negotiations should begin in accordance with this schedule. Upon completion.of. individual negotiations, the cost / cash flow projections will be adjusted, if necessary. Necessary contractual docu-ments should be executed in accordance with established commercial procedures.

7.2.2 Construction The action plans for construction contracts are similar to those for prepur-chased equipment.

7.2.3 Headquarters Contracting Activities .

Service and prepurchase contracts that support, or are funded by WNP-1, and are managed by Headquarters will be given the same scrutiny and reports pro-vided thereon as in the case of prepurchase contracts. This will be accom-plished by the Chief Financial Officer / Treasurer who will coordinate actions with the.others for whom the contracting services are being provided.

7.3 NUCLEAR FUEL The nuclear fuel contracts are under the technical control of the Technical Director. The following actions are to be taken.

7.3.1 NSSS/ Fuel Initial core fuel is included in Contract 2 with B&W. A new extended date for l delivery of initial core fuel will be negotiated in upcoming meetings with B&W j and included in the resulting modification to this contract.

! 19

i A

.. s JUNE 29, 1982 7.3.2 Western Nuclear On November 29, 1981, the Supply System filed a lawsuit in US District Court, Western District of Washington, against Western Nuclear Inc. The Supply Sys-tem advised Western Nuclear that the contract to supply uranium concentrates is not enforceable, and that the Supply System would not accept further deliv-eries or make further payments under the contract. On February 22, 1982, the Court granted Western Nuclear's motion for summary judgement, finding the con-tract to be enforceable and ordering thB* Supply Sytem to pay damages. A trial to determine damages is schedule to begin on November 13, 1982. The Court's decision does not affect the Supply System claims under Federal Anti-Trust laws.

7.3.3 Department of Energy Separative work is currently scheduled to be delivered to the Supply System for WNP-1 in FY 84, FY 85 and FY 86, in addition to an existing inventory of separative work. The Supply System's initiatives to sell these services to other utilities are to be continued.

7.3.4 Kerr-McGee UF4 Conversion Contract This contract involves conversion of UF4 supplied by Gardinier to UF6-Termination of the Gardinier contract has reduced the amount of conversion needed'under this contract to only a very small quantity. Contract closecut is expected to be completed by September,1982.

7.3.5 Kerr-McGee U38 0 Conversion Contract This contract involves conversion of a fixed quantity of U308 for WNP-1 through 1986. It is expected that no conversion services for WNP-1 will be required over this period. Elimination of this comitment will be pursued.

I .

f 20

, .r -

1*

v =. l l

JUNE 29, 1982 l ,

7.3.6 Reporting Responsibilities l

The Technical Director will continue close coordination of actions with the l Director of Projects, and will advise the Program Director of any changes to plans and will provide reports as required.

7.4 REQUIRED ACTION i

Specific required actions are given in Section 9 and Appendix C.

9 h

e e

l ,

s' ,

./ y f'

V

, y e'k n

f

.r '

. . 21

" (

• ,c. / 4_ . .

, **- , / -

.L*. 4 _ ~

g* .

JUNE 29, 1982 8.0 PROGRAMMATIC ACTIONS The Supply System is comitted to becoming an efficient organization designed to build three nuclear plants as opposed to five. This will require a number of programatic actions including streamlining organizations and improving the overall manual-to-nonmanual ratios on the projects. The Program Directors are to pursue such actions with respect to architect engineers, the construction managers and the construction contraE$o~r's) 'These types of management initia-tives must be implemented to minimize the impact of the extended construction delay. In the same sense, all nongen'erating facilities and other activities conducted by the Supply System not directly supporting construction should be examined to determine if there are new and better ways of doing business, and thereby effecting economies with respect to personnel and costs overall. The foregoing is to be accomplished by appropriate directors within the framework of the existing Supply System organi:ation.

G f

i 4

er* 4 ese - .. . , ,

22 ,

I l

l

JUNE 29,1982 9.0 REQUIRED ACTIONS 9.1 ACTIONS TAKEN TO DATE The following actions have already been initiated and will be continued as necessary to inplement the construction delay. The Program Director has:

e Initiated reductions in manual /non-manual workforce.

s -- ,

o Initiated actions to reduce construction ' activities to an absolute minimum.

e Provided initial guidance on comercial actions. Supplemental direc-tion will be provided on a continuing basis as required.

e Developed necessary budget guidance for the FY 83 budget and the FY 83 addendum.

e Initiated necessary early planning activities for the extended con-struction delay.

9.2 PLANNED ACTIONS An "actilon item" system has been established wherein important actions are identified, responsible individuals assigned, completion dates established and management follow-up acconplished (see Appendix D).

A selected list of key actions has been extracted and are highlighted in' Table 3. The due dates and responsible individual (s) are also indicated.

7.. . . . . .

23

i JUNE 29, 1982 i

TABLE 3 SELECTED WNP-1 REQUIRED ACTIONS Required Report Item Responsibility Date CONSTRUCTION-RELATED ITEMS (INCLUDES SECURITY AND SAFETY)

Implement a lay-up plan for all designated FC Hood 7/1/82 equipment, material, and structures / systems ,

on site. Assure development of NSSS and Turbine-Generator lay-up requirements.~' - - ,

Prepare and implement a site Property Manage - FC Hood 7/12/82 ment program .-

ENGINEERING ACTIONS Review all contractor engineerng efforts, and FC Hood 5/31/82 rampdown effort as appropriate Define technical layup requirements CB Organ 6/30/82 LICENSING ACTIONS -

Develop action plan to enhance licensability AG Hosler 5/30/82 of plant OPERATIONS / TEST & STARTUP ACTIONS Prepare and implement PM/CM program RF Mazurkiewicz 5/31/82 CONTROLLER AND COST-RELATED ACTIONS Prepare FY 83 budget as baseline budget DR Cseh 8/20/82 l Project cash flow projections through 9/30/83 DR Cseh 6/23/82 Provide recommendations for shutdown or con- DR Cseh 6/30/82 tinued use of ADP systems at site l Establish cost sharing guidelines for use at DR Cseh 4/30/82 tha site as required (e.g., on change orders) i e o er* 4 ene em o . . ,

24

=

.. =

JUNE 29, 1982 TABLE 3 (Continued)

SELECTED WNP-1 REQUIRED ACTIONS .

Required Report Item Responsibility Date QUALITY ASSURANCE Status open NRC inspection and 50.55e items to CR Edwards 9/30/82 facilitate restart ,a~+. ,

Conduct assessments of do:umentation, compila- ' CR Edwards 9/15/82 tion and statusing COMMERCIAL ACTIONS Conduct review of all prepurchased contracts JA 0'Donnell 6/30/82 and provide plan of action for each (e.g.,

suspension,' termination or other action)

Establish schedule for closeout, termination JA 0'Donnell 6/30/82 or suspension of all construction and Supply System contracts .

DOCUMENTATION ACTIONS Review, approve and implement Bechtel's, FC Hood 6/30/82 UE&C's, QA's and SS documentation plans CF Organ CM Michael PROPERTY CONTROL / FACILITIES ACTIONS Prepare and implement vehicle, trailer, office RF Mazurkiewicz 6/30/82 equipment and utilities consolidation / disposal t

plan GENERAL ACTIONS Identify more efficient " ways of doing busi- C8 Organ (UE&C) 7/15/82 ness" at WNP-1 and provide schedule for FC Hood-(Bechtel) evaluating and implementing, when appropriate, such improvements l . . ,.. _ . . . . ..

25 ,

l

e *

. JUNE 29,1982 1

10.0 MANAGEMENT OF THE EXTENDED CONSTRUCTION DELAY

, The principles for management of the construction delay are presented in Sec-tion 1.5 and will be based on implementation by line management.

10.1 LINE MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITIES Management of the extended construction dejay is the direct responsibility of

~

the line managers of the Supply System.' Each Director will be ' responsible for accomplishing those activities within h1s area of ' responsibility on the defined schedule and within budget., The integrity of the overall financial baseline defined in Section 2.0 must be maintained and is the collective responsibility of every director.

10.2 PROGRAM RESPONSIBILITIES The Program is to provide assistance to line management in developing and

~

implementing actions and is to provide a consolidated performance evaluation.

The Program Director will continue to report to the Director of Projects on all matters related to the extended construction delay. The functions of the Program will be as follows:

e dpvelop and publish a consolidated Monthly Performance Report e analyze impact of external influences on the ability to perform aoainst the defined baseline e identify any requirements or additional initiatives for executing the delay e assist the Director of Projects in review of program actions against the plan

.e - . . . . . . .

26

c .

JUNE 29, 1982 e assist l'ine management where and when necessary in the implementation of the extended construction delay 1

e review the experience of other nuclear utilties in extended delays on their plants e review Supply System performance on accomplishing required tasks e review total expenditures versus' baseline and funds availability to identify possible variance trends or overruns e identify and analyze potential areas for further savings e update this plan as necessary.

10.3 REPORTING GUIDELINES The following reports / input are required on a monthly basis:

e Financial (responsibility of D.R. Cseh) cash flow twelve-month rolling projection extended through September 1983, and accompanying variance explanation on a current month basis as well as a total to go cash projection through September 1983 27

JUNE 29, 1982 e Construction (responsibility of F. C. Hood, based on monthly reports to be provided by the Construction Manager) e Documentation to include information on Inspection

- Vaulting Packaging e Contract Closecuts

" ~ " ' '

e Efficiency Improvements '.

e Revised Level O Project Schedule -

e Quality Assurance e Quality Control _

e Safety e Manpower o HQ Activities - Performance Related e Property Management e Cash Flow e Contractor Engineering -

e Construction Acceptance Statusing e Engineering (responsibility of C. B. Organ, based on monthly reports to be provided by the A/E) e CPR e Variance e 9/90 Program e Licensing & TMI Schedule e Level 0 Schedule to Completion e 6 Month Look Ahead e Prepurchased Equipment j e Efficiency Improvements  ;

e Contract Closeout e Cash Flow e Manpower. -

c~ - - - --

e HQ Activities - Performance Related 28

r $

s .

JUNE 29, 1982 e Business (responsYbil'ity of J. A. O'Donnell) status of contract closeout / deferral actions by contract (with con-currence of F. C. Hood and C. B. Organ) status of contract commercial actions relating to steps taken to obtain an equitable settlement between the Supply System and con-tractors on all open issues (with concurrence of F. C. Hood and C. B. Organ). ,

_ 4 -4 ; -, .,

o Quality Assurance (responsibility of C. R. Edwards) continue present reporting to Program Director and Director, QA, with modifications to show status of delay activities.

9 3

I i

^

s k

29 i .

r-

. l r s .

JUNE 29, 1982

. .. .. _ . ..a . .

I i

u .s ~ ~ . ,

t.

,~

APPENDIX A BOARD OF DIRECTORS' RESOLUTION NO. 1221 AND a

i EXECUTIVE ~ BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 71.

i i

e 4

6 d

f i

1 e

f e

. p e

i s

4 i ,

- - m. -- - - F* ++.eet-e, .v.,i .-- , -e w t- , a- -n+g,e .,-M.-- m -s e w '-g

\ . - --

O e .. .. ...

M t

, t

. . 4

~

U .

I 3; APPENDIX A ;

2 It BOARD OF DI*ICTORS *

. . - .2 3; FISOLUTIO11 NO. 1221 d' A ST.5OLUTION DIFICTING A TI'!ANCI'.1G A*;D  !

CONET3UC'-*0N P30G. A*1 FOR PROJECTO 1, 5-. 2 A'JD 3 AND AN CmNDED CONET?.UC"' ION OCLAY FOF. PSCJE.CT 1 S j:

I 7 '; On April 19, 1932, the Bonnaville ecuar Adninistrator 3 .' rece rended to the Scard and staf f of the Supply System thst: ,

1. The construe:1on cf Projects 2 and 3 precaed at 9 3'l l

10;i full pa:e to r.sintain or improve the c::1 sting

( l I

s 11 !. construction scnedules for these projects,

'2! 2. The cens: uction completion scheluie of Pro]e::

i

~31 1 be delsyod fc 4..s , period of au :c five ye:rs; id 'i and . l

4

' 5 3 ,. 1. The 3 card instruct the s sff of the Surpiy Syste1 0

15 j t: prepare a budee: and financinc plan censistant 171 lith thesc rccomenca ricts.

?

';n2 Ai::iniserstor 's ree:mmen.iction does not prcvide for 13: t 5

1 I

~ 9 ", 2 '-ond s:le der o roject i at this tae.

i 0 ".?. On April 23, 1902, t.*e Adninistrator notified the P:ecu-  !

. . '.! p

• • ! e tive Scar by letter that he would not soprove a financing ,

. 3 it

p ia.1 inconsis. ant with that prc<Jram.

.1

• '+'

4

'"he Msnacin<3 Direc cr. at the recuent cf the Executive

\- ,

+; . Eoard, prepared and precented siternativas te the Adninictrator's:

- =p r j reco:nendstion to the Finance co'umittee of the xc:ucive Eccrd

['

6 ':i and to the Denneville cower Administration.

• 7t on Acril 29, 1932. the Ad-unistrator nota *ied the Execu-

l

'3 .?

} te Essed by letter that ne r,uld not sperove snf of the

• j, _litz..:tre:r p:tsencef :: :

• in..7 ; ne- -1:.. er te n ! resolution. .

J a! w .;ca v.s ancone:::e v. with tM cr.:: ,s

• rece Ps.cs: en.

s s "1 *1 I'

. 4

\ 32 d

'8 lj 5 I .

i

,m_._ , , . _ - , ,

i 1.,

y. ,

1 1

.i

/

l

,- 1 i

- i i

The Bond Resolutions for thu Projects require the So ply System to comolete conctruction of the Projects at the earliest

{ . - .2 3, practical time, subject to the Project Agreements.

Il 4 1

?ursuant to the Projcet Agreccents, the Administrater i .

5, has a right of approval of bond resolutions for the Projects, t

si snd his exercise of that right is net subject to review by a l

7; pre;ect consultant.

8! The 'tanaging Director has reported that without a bond i

g sale for Pro]ect 1, the Supply "ystem will have insufficient to: funds to pay project commitments and that no otner source of I  !

it; funds is available and an immediate extended construction de- -

12i lay is necessary te preserve the assets of Project 1, and 33 .l The ?.:cocutive 3 card .9.gp, , recommended that the Eoard of I

4 /cirectors concur in ?.esolution Mo. 71 of the Oxecutive 3 card 15 directing the Managing Diiector to take actions consistent t il 16)! with the Administrator's reccmmendation: NO:i, TU"REFO RE ,

17 IT IS RESOLVID that the Board of Directors cencurs in tai the action of the Executive Board contained in Executive

'l 19, Ecard Resolution No. 71. .

20 ADOPTED by the Bourd of Directors of Mashington Public 21; Power Eucply System this 29th day of April, 1982.

i 3

l President 24,

• i*A**OCT: '

25 6

//d 27 "

29 !.

'l

[N_ /

A?? MOW.D AS TO FOPfi

\

Sec: nary j M:D LSOALITYt 79 '

Q A, '_

3 - ,

h '

=c q t, -

e 31 :' ( Ccunse*

2t Il E ___

i-

- ~- .

p3 . , ,- .

l

.l

.I .

4..

t

• I 1 t

APPENDIX A - .-

3 ll

• 3 21 ":CCUTIV2 BOARD

. . . . .. a '

3! REIO!," TION 230. 71 I

4' A .W CLUTIC'! DI?SCTI'1C A FINANCING A'ID C0"ST?UC IO'! P.".CGiW4 F0't DETEC'S 1, 2 AND 3 .VD 5.'I F.STC'!D00 CO'15TRUCTION

. DELAY FOR PACCL*.~' 1 Oh 4

7a on Arril 19, 1332, the Bonneville Power Administrater

t. '

S *j reco==enced to the 3carf and Staf f of the Supply Syste"t that:

9 ,g -

1. The cen=truction of Projects 2 and 3 proceed- 8 1

r 10I at fall pace te e.aintain or improve the existin? l 11: c:nstruction zencdulce for these projectr,  ;

4 -

T 12 2. The etnstructica cenpletion 2:nedule of ?ro3ect  ;

1 .

10 4-

• ** ' ay ed de;; 2 jeriod of up..to five years; idi and ,

4 15:1 2. The Ses:d.in~5truct t'he sr.aff of the Supply System l

.F i "Sh to pre are a audqct 2nd fint.ncing plan consistent

• / .

17 *l with thesc rccer:rsencatiens. j

• 8 h The Administrator's recccmndatien does not provide for i a  ;

?Si :l a tend sale for 5 o3ect 1 a t thf s .imc. ,

+

~~

- Cn April 23, l?30, the Administr: tor actified the E::ecu-i 01 4 tive .Esard by let.or thar. he wocid not spyr:ve a financing  :

.1- . .

22 '; ;ian inconsistent with that prcoram.  ;

a  ;

23 i The . Managing Director, at the recuest of-the 2.xecutive t k 24' Board, prepered and presented alternativec to the Administrator's;

.1.-

' 25 4 cccor:sendation to the Finance Cir:::.ittee of the Oxecutive Scard - f' s

l

~5" } t i and to the Sonnevi11e Power Al'ministrstion.  !

~ ~7 5 On April 29, 1932, the Ad.inistrator nocified the Ixecc-I 1 .

' 23' tavc 2carf by' letter that ha Net:1'1 not anyrcyc any ot the j 23 0 alternatives presentad or a financing tAlan or bced resolution f

• ' which was inconsistent with the original recomendatien.

j r~

r 31: 1.

[-

( 3:j

f i

1 I 5 l 9 y

l  :

1-

\

t i .s

~

- - - w

,> J .*..<.. . .* - , - . 3 . . ,

t

/s o

1 The Bond Resolutions for thc Projects require the Supply 2 System to complete construction of the Projects at the earliest practical tima.2 subject to the Project Agreements.

3 ,

di Pursuant to the Project Agreements,,the Administratot 5 has a right of approval of bo'nd resolutions for the Projects, 6 and his exercise of that right is not subject to review by a 71 project consultant.

I 81 The Managing Director has reported that without a bcnd 93 sale for Prcject 1, the Supply Systam will have insufficient 10! funds to pay project commitments and that no other source of I

i 11 funds is available and an immediate extended construction de-

s.  !

, 12{ lay is necessary to pre:erve the assets of ?ro)cc: 1; ::0M, i

13t ;nI nyong, '

.a,a4 + -

14 r IT IS *?. SOLVED that the ::anaging Director is directed i -

15 and authorited to implement an immediate e:ttended constructicn 16! .d'elay of ?roject 1 censistent with the Administratcr's recc= men-17j ,*dation and good business practice, and to prepare and submit

.F 18' amended budgets and a financing plan for the Projects for 19 review and approval by the Esecutive Board and the Doard of i

203 Directors, and i

21: IT IS FUATOCR RESOLTID that the 2xecutivo Board recc= mends 22! to the Board of Directors that the Board of Directors cincur

'3: in this acticn by passing a resolution in a form substantially

(- ' 4l similar to this Resolution No. 71.

I 25i ADOPTED by the C::tcutive Board of Nashington Public Power l IS Sepply System this 29th dsy of April, 1982.

27'

' 25r ^da'%5A.-

t Chairman 29 !

'ATTOCTi APPROVED AS To ropM

- 30 ! " '

g GALITY: ,

31; * * ,- .

_r--

• 32; l & , a_

l s Secretary Coun'sel i , .

I Il .

JUNE 29, 1982

._ ,q, ra s * , ,

4 e

APPENDIX B

- COMPOSITE MANNING CURVE 9

e e

6

', WNP-1 EXTENDED CONSTRUCTION DELAY PLAN COMPOSITE PERSONNEL CHART 1982 1983 1984 1985 1986 ;

vtan l l MAJOR EVENTS J A C^"#

lJ Fh

^ M j J

^ S N D J F y A M j J A kIh M [k N J F y

A M{J J A S NlD . Ffy,#fM,3 I

gfNfD

~

8000 T" g -. -

h I __ _. __.

m l .

D . .

seco __-- 62,Q k- __-

e  % _._ _ _. _. _._ _ _ _. .. _ _. - -

d, ,h I. k.. g o

I I seco 1 ,

I -

[ lil I PLANNED l ,j l j ' '

j l l:--.. -.

mo l __y y_  ;

~~'

-'T

-- ~ ~ " ' ~ ' - ~ ~

- ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ - ---

!l ACTUAL- i N_ I l _ -_ _ __.___ _._. __ .__ _ ..- _ ... .. . i_ __. - - ._. _ _ _

y _ 39do . . ____ __.__ d._ __. }.

I j l t

, y __

j _ _ .___ - ._.._ __ __

I

/ s-

s

/- __ _.._ _. . -_._.- -.. - .

} _ __ . - _ . .

y ...

l ,

L ,

i

/ , _

_1925 h, k. #,

b _- _ _ _

! I3 A-..-

I l s  !

" pr .,

l AS OF 8/1 s/82 N_% g . .. . . ._ -. _. _ . _ __ .__ . _ -__ - ;_,_

l y __4_._

g _ _ ._ ._ _ _ _ .

g I i 800

( _ _ _ .. _ _ ._ _ _ _ _ -._- _ ._._ .. _ - _ _ . --_ .-- -_

I o

, .i -

e s .

JUNE 29, 1982

.,fNt'* p 9

APPENDIX C WNP-1 FINANCIAL PLAN O

f l

1 I

O 9

.Y

1 .

APPENDIX C ,

1NTER0FFICE .MEM0R ANDUM D ou :

. O EDC WNF.1/4 WASKINGTON PUBLIC FOWER SUFFLY SYSTEM O sDe WNr.2

-- - -. .- ,.2 . 3 --, gyp.sjs l

l 0 Aaminrue Department Mgrs.

i Date: June 3, 1982 Division Mgrs.

RLF/ File /LB To:

1 From:' n. L. Fer on, Managing Director 1

sub).et: 1983 FINANCIAL PLANNING PROCESS, ADDENDUM 1 Refersace: IOM, March 9,1982, R. L. Ferguson to Directors, "1983 Financial Planning Process"-

Since the issuance of my reference merNorandum, a series of events have occurred

. which led to the Executive Board's directive of April 29, 1982 to implement an

. insnediate extended construction delay of WNP-1 and to prepare amended budgets for the Projects consistent with the directive.

We must now adjust our 1983 Financial Planning Process to reflect this new direction. The specific targets for this amended planning process are as

follows

o Project milestone dates are as follows: .

Fuel Coninercial Load Operation WNP-1 12/90 6/91 WNP-2 9/83 2/84 WNP-3 12/85 6/86 l

. e Budget planning for WNP-3 should be done so as to not preclude Fuel Load as early as June 1985.

l e The extended construction delay of WNP-1, with its attendant reduction in monthly cash flow, meets the intent of the previous planning target of reducing the total combined (WNP-1, 2 and 3) monthly cash flow by up to 15 percent.

I e A total Supply System staffing level of 1,740 and its associated cost is to be the planning base for future Supply System Resources. Any changes of the planning base for future Supply System Resources can only be authorized by the Corporate Resource Allocation Team.

Further clarification of this direction is provided in the attached document entitled " General Criteria,1983 Financial Planning Process - Addendum 1 June 3,1982".

i RLF/lbc Attachment we.i.: m

i, ,

s .

GENERAL CRITERIA 1983 FINANCIAL PLANNING PROCESS ADDENDUM 1, JUNE 3,1982 l l

I. INTRODUCTION / PURPOSE Due to the Executive Board's directive of April 29, 1982 to implement an immediate extended construction delay of WNP-1 and to prepare amended budgets for the projects consistent with the directive, an addendum to the 1983 financial planning / budget criteria is required.

II. SCOPE Substantial changes to all major budget line items for WNP-1 will be required as a result of the Board's action. It is expected that changes to certain major budget line items for WNP-2 and 3 will also be required due to implementation of the May 1982 Supply System reduction in force.

4 III. REVISED 1983 FINANCIAL PLANNING TARGETS A. Project milestone dates are as follows:

Fuel Commercial Load Operation WNP-1 12/90 6/91 (See Se~ction VI for related assumptions.)

WNP-2 9/83 2/84 (Unchanged.)

WNP-3 12/85 6/86 (. Reflects 6 months earlier completion.)

Note: Budget planning for WNP-3, particularly Supply System operations staffing, should be done so as to not preclude Fuel Load as early as 6/85.

B ., The extended construction delay of WNP-1, with its attendant reduction in monthly cash flow, meets the intent of the previous planning target of reducing the total combined (WNP-1, 2 and 3) monthly cash flow by up to 15%.

C. A total Supply System staffing level 'of 1,740 (see Attachment 1) and its associated cost is to be the planning base for future Supply System Resources. Any change of this planning base can only be authorized by the Corporate Resource Allocation Team.

Outside consultants, job shoppers or temporary hires will not be used to circumvent the intent of this planning target.

IV. GUIDELINES /SPECIAL CONSIDERATIONS A. Data developed in the 1983 Financial Planning Process will be used as the basis for preparing revised estimates / budgets.

l -

. - . . _ . ~ _

I . t GENERAL CRITERIA

'1983 FINANCIAL PLANNING PROCESS -

ADDENDUM 1, JUNE 3, 1982 Page 2 .

s . .. . ._ .2 .

B. For WNP-1:

1. Estimate to completion from May 1,1982 through Comercial Operation is to be prepared reflecting a 5-year slippage

, in the current official Comercial Operation date of June 1986. The revised Commercial Operation date would be

! June 1991. This estimate is to be prepared consistent with assumptions provided in Section VI of this document.

, 2. Detailed cash requirements from May 1, 1982 through September 30, 1983 must be prepared in the femat provided in Attachment.2n m s i

e For Each Prepurchased Equipment Contract i

e For Each Construction Contract e For Each Major Owner Furnished Equipment /

Material Contract or Purchase Order e For Each Nuclear Fuel Contract e Architect-Engineer Services e Construction Management Service,s e Supply System Resources (A&G)

3. Cash requirements after September 1983 are to be identified by major budget line item, monthly through June 1984 and quarterly thereafter. -

4. The total cash disbursement reouired for WNP-1 from

. May 1, 1982 through September 30, 1983 is limited to the cash balance in the project construction fund as of May 1,

~

1982 (approximately 5282 million) plus the reinvestment income thereon.

5. A preliminary estimate of cash disbursements required from May 1, 1982 through September 30, 1983 was prepared in i

March 1982. A summary of this estimate is shown on Attach-ment 3. This estimate has been used by BPA in their fiscal planning. Therefore, any variance to this preliminary l

estimate must be adequately explained.

C. Cost of all comon equipment and facilities for WNP-1 and 2 will continue to be shared equally between these two projects.

l GENERAL CRITERIA

, 1983 FfNANCIAL PLANNING PROCESS .

ADDENDUM 1, JUNE 3,1982 Page 3 .

1 1

j D. Preliminary inputs' for the Supply System Resource Budget are to be i revised consistent with:

o May 1982 Reduction-in-Force Plan l i e Revised 1983 Financial Planning Targets (Section III) e WNP-1 Extended Construction Delay Estimate Assumptions /

Guidelines (Section VI)

More detailed budget instructions for Supply System Resources are provided in Attachment 4.

..vw : ,

E. Cost and cash flow forecasts are to be updated to reflect cumulative actuals through tiay 28, 1982.

~

. V. INTERIli BUDGET REQUIREMENTS A. To allow adequate time for incorporating budget changes due to the WNP-1 extended construction delay, final Executive Board action on the budget has been deferred from June 25, 1982 until September 24, 1982.

B. Historically, the budget has been updated annually with an effective

. date of July 1. This year, with final Board action being delayed, it will be necessary to prepare an interim budget for this 3-month period. Guidelines for this interim budget are as follows:

1. The basic intent is to state as simply as possible the

. monthly financial requirements for the construction projects for the period of July 1,1982 through September 30, 1982.

2. Formal document will be prepared and mailed out on June 4, 1982 with Board action scheduled for June 10, 1982.

3. Content of the formal document will include as a minimum:

o Cost by major budget line item.

e Major planned accomplishments, e.g., completion percentage, important milestones.

e Cash flow including income and disbursements.

1 .

i

.__ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . , , , , _ _ _ _ _ , . . _ . -_.s ...

.- - . - - = .-

. GENERAL CRITERIA

' 1983 FINANCIAL PLANNING PROCESS .

ADDENDUM 1. JUNE 3, 1982 Page 4

. . . ,.2 .

4. Final format will be established by Corporate Budgets.

5. The interim budget for Supply System Resources will be prepared by the Corporate Budget office. Specific input will not be required from each organization.

VI. EXTENDED CONSTRUCTION DELAY ESTIMATE ASSUMPTIONS / GUIDELINES, WNP-1 A. Construction deferral actions began on May 1,1982.

} B. Estimate to be based upon a= 5-year delay in project completion with an early manpower buildup, slow constrettion pace and option for earlier completion. -

e Fuel Load 12/90 (or Earlier--as Early as 12/87) o Commercial Operation 6/91 (or Earlier--as Early as 6/88)

Note: Although the estimate is to be . based upon this 5-year delay plan, budget planning should be done so as to i not preclude earlier completion.

C. Restart assumptions and guidelines are generally defined as follows:

e Build-up professional / craft manpower at a gradual rate until October 1984. Begin restaffing

January 1983 for Architect-Engineer, Construction Manager and Supply System Resources March'1983 for Contractor Nonmanual f

July 1983 for Manual e Evaluate option of earlier completion in third quarter of 1984 (could accelerate manpower with Fuel Load as early as December 1987).

D. Project scope remains as presently defined; no major regulatory impacts.

! E. Conduct preventive maintenance of critical' equipment; conduct i minimum activities necessary to preserve licenses, N-stamp and construction permit; maintain sufficient and accurate documenta-tion of all quality safety and code-related materials / equipment; maintain Class II and G documentation to support extended construc-tion delay and operational requirements; maintain connercial/

administrative documentation to support conmitments and corporate

! requirements. .

^

l

, a

l s . GENERAL CRITERIA '

l 1983 FINANCIAL PLANNING PROCESS l ADDENDUM 1 JUNE 3, 1982 Page 5

, F. Estimate to be based upon initial results of 1983 Financial Planning / Budgeting Process.

G. Shutdown and preservation of asset activities are to be conducted with absolute minimum cash flow.

e Shutdown all construction over 3-month period. Craft manpower turndown as rapid as possible.

e Ceiling of $25 million for completing certain construction work to optimize restart and/or complete to logical stopping point. ,

"" m -

e Nonmanual manpower turndown to minimum requirements by January 1983. .-

H. Most prepurchased equipment contracts will be completed in order to preserve design specifications and license basis. For contracts not in this category and not 75%> complete:

e Acquire all documentation.

e Assure adequate material supply on site to optimize restart.

e Terminate contract. .

I. Expected results of estimating effort.

e Revised estimate at completion by major budget line item including Supply System resources, e Related cash flow by month through September 1983 and quarterly thereafter.

e Separate identification of deferral cost impacts. -

Ramp-down/ Demobilization (Including Documentation Effort)

- Ramp sp/Remobilization Contract Termination / Suspension Penalties Preservation of Assets Inflation 1

l d

l 1 l

' , GENERAL CRITERIA

' 1983 FINANCIAL PLANNING PROCESS ADDENDUM 1, JUNE 3,1982 Page 6 .

VII. COMPLETION SCHEDULE Issue Addendum to General Criteria 6/3 Complete Interim Budget

- Managing Director's Review 6/4 Mailout 6/4

- Board Action 6/10 Managers Submit Revised Resource (A&G; Budget Input 6/25 Complete Construction, Supply Sy. stem. Resource and 7/9 Nuclear Fuel Estimates and Preliminary Cost / Cash '

Flows .

WNP-1 Deferral WNP-2 and 3 Full Production WHP-4/5 Tennination Corporate Resource Allocation Team Final Review 7/19-21 Managing Director's Interim Review 7/26-27 Complete Final Estimates, Cost Flows and Cash Flows 7/30

- Complete Financing Plan; Interest, Financing & 8/6 Reserves Managing Director's Final Review 8/9-10 Issue Draft of Formal' Budget Documents 8/20 Conduct Formal Reviews (Finance Committee, Owners, 8/30-9/10 Participants and BPA)

Board Action 9/24 l

. ATTACHMENT 1 s .

SUPPLY SYSTEM STAFFING. LEVEL Planning Target l Organization Actual 5/82 Following RIF Managing Director 8 5 Legal 11 9 Internal Audit 18 12 Administrative Audit 5 2

' a ~ .. ,

WNP-4/5 Tertnination 8 6 Director Projects ,.. 3 4 Public Affairs 54 32 Quality Assurance 81 66 Safety / Security 391 318 Administration 230 124 Technology 166 ,

150 Power Generation 592 520 WNP-2 147 135 Chief Financial Office 262 180 WNP-1 120 60 WNP-3 116 114 TOTAL 2 ,21 2 1,737 SAY 1,740 l

4

ATTACHMENT 2 WNP-l.

• Pagn 1 of 3 EXTENDED CONSTRUCTION DELAY BASELINE BUDGET AND CASH FLOW FORECAST

> Sheet of Date: -- .

Revision:

Contract No.: Contractor:

Contract

Description:

May 1982 Through Sept.1983 Total

, Activities

, A M4 'e Baseline Scope

. Work Invoiced

. Work Not Invoiced -

, . In Process Work

,. Old Claims

. Other l

Total Baseline Delay Scope

. Maintenance

. Demobilization '

. Suspension

. Termination .

. Document Closeout l Total Delay TOTAL SCOPE Assumptions:

Budget Approval Sign-offs Contract Budget Accountability

Date:

l Date:

!! Program Director:

-1 1

I l

l.

ATTACHMENT 2 Paga 2 of 3 DEFINITIONS BASELINE SCOPE (FY-1982 BASELINE BUDGET) l

1. Work Invoiced '

Includes all cost for work comoleted and invoiced including but not limited to direct manual labor cost, support or distributable manual labor cost, labor special cost, nonmanual labor cost, material cost, construction, equipment usage cost, overhead cost, escalation, sales taxes, etc. for any work, services, equipment or material (that is included in the FY-1982 Baseline Budget scope) that has been invoiced for payment by the Supply System.

2. Work Not Invoiced

_ .e nn .

Includes all cost for work completed or future work, as' defined above in " work invoiced", for services, equipment or material (that is included in the FY-1982 Baseline. Budget scope) that has been or will be performed in the future and that has not been invoiced for payment by the Supply System (i.e., final demobilization of completed contracts).

3. In-Process Work Includes all cost for work performed (or allowed to be performed by primarily material and equipment suppliers) on prefabricated items not yet finished and/or shipped as of a specified date (product still in the fabricator's shop).

4. Old Claims The projected cost settlement of all contractor identified claims and potential claims which have not yet been submitted by contractors (but are included in the FY-1982 Baseline Budget scope) exclusive of any claims relating to the construction slowdown and/or the subsequent extended construction delay.

5. Other l

Includes the cost of other outstanding financial liabilities (i.e.,

contract realignments, adjustment payments).

EXTENDED CONSTRUCTION DELAY SC0FE (NOT INCLUDED IN FY-1982 BASELINE BUDGET)

1. Maintenance Includes all cost for work associated with securing the in-place

commodities, placing material and equipment into storage, monitoring and securing the facilities, maintenance and preservation of materials, equipment, facilities, documentation and warranties (that are exclusive of the FY-1982 Baseline Budget) solely related to the construction l c. slowdown and/or the subsequent extended construction delay.

DEFINITIONS (Cont'd) ATTACHMENT 2 ~

i '

Pagg 3 of 3

2. Demobilization Includes all cost for work operations associated with moving off the job site upon notification of termination or suspension including dismantling and removal from site of construction equipment, facilities, personnel and restoration of the site as required. Demobilization is i defined here as the " Interrupt Demobilization" and not the " Bid Demob-ilization" (that is included in the FY-1982 Baseline Budget). Remob-ilization is to be considered after June 30, 1983.

l

3. Susoension of Contract The projected cost settlement of all contractor identified claims and potential claims resulting from the suspension of work associated with

~

the extended construction delaf (if' any). Cost shall include as a minimum all considerations (if any) for nonrecoverable overhead cost, extended overhead cost and other potential clained cost (not included in the FY-1982 Baseline Budget)' solely as a result of the construction

. slowdown and/or the subsequent extended construction delay.

~

4. Termination of Contract Includes all projected cost settlements as defined above in " suspension" for contractor identified claims and potential claims resulting from the

" termination of contract" associated with the extended construction delay (if any). Termination cost shall also include as a minimum all considera-tions (if any) for cancellation charges and/or restocking charges for existing orders and other potential claim cost (not included in the FY-1982 Baseline Budget) which are solely as a result of the construction slow-down and/or the subsequent extended construction delay.

5. Document closecut Includes all costs for making ready sufficient and accurate documentation for all classes (I, II and G) of work necessary to preserve' the plant's license, design and completed work.

. s l

l.

1

)

t

)

k o m J

f

% . _p a

' " ~

/ ...

ATTACHMENT 3 i '

Paga 1 of 2

,/ -

. . ~ .

. .. . ._ ..; . . WNP-1  !

l CASH REQUIREMENTS 5/82 - 9/83

($ in Millions) e ~

Prepurchased Equipment /ttaterial $ 24.3 Architect-Engineer 16.1 ConstructionContractsII) 159.3

~~ ' ' ' " " "' '

• Owners (2)

' 22.1 Subtotal -'

. $221.8 Fuel 5 12.9 TOTAL $234.7 Notes:

(1) Includes Construction Management.

(2) Includes Administrative & General and Ow'ner Furnished Equipment / Material . -

f 1

~

ATTACIMENT 3

~~

Page 2 ef 2 -

llNP-1 .

CASH FLOW ,'

5/82 - 9/83 -

($ in Millions)

'Prepurchased Architect-Eculpment/ Material Engineer Construction (j) Ownere.gg.' Fuel 1 Total

)

5/82 $ l.8 54.7 $ 36.5 $ 3.6 $ .1 $ 46.7 6/82 1.5 3.0 18.7 2.0 12.6 37.8 7/82 1.5 1.5 13.5 1.1 -

17.6 8/82 1.4 1.1 11.4 1.1 -

15.0 9/82 1.3 1.0 6.5 1.1 -  :

9.9

. 10/82 1.3 .4 6.5 1.1 -

9.3 11/82 1.2 .4 6.5 1.1 - -

9.2 12/82 1.2 .4 6.0 1.1 .2 8.9 1.1 15.4 1/83 1.2 .4 12.7 -

2/83 1.1 .4 11.7 1.1 -

14.3 3/83 1.1 .4 6.7 ,

1.1 -

9.3 4/83 1.1 .4 6.6 .a 1.1 -

9.2 5/83 1.4 .4 5.6  ! 1.1 -

8.5 5.6 -' 1.1- 9.0' 6/83 1.9 .4 -

7/83 2.3 .4 1.6 -

1.1 - 5.4 '

8/83 1.5 .4 1.6 1.1 4.6 9/83 1. 5_ .4 1.6 1.1 -

.4.6 TOTAL $ g6J ' $159.3 $22.1 $12.9 $234.7 Notes: 1 TITTnciudes Construction asnagement. .

(2). Includes Administrative & General and owner Furnished Equipment / Material. (

l l

1 l

l m_ _ _ ,.m . ...- _

. ATTACHMENT 4

, f RESOURCE BUDGET fNSTRUCTIONS ,

The Resource Budget will be modified to reflect the revised criteria relating to WNP-1 and the reduction in force. The general process remains as before,

. but some. spacial instructions wi'i assist in submitting data.

o Planning for WNP-1 will be extended through planned concercial operation. To assist Corporate Budgets in preparation of the estimate-at-complet'9n, it is necessary to budget for direct cost to WHP-1 (WBS Codes lxxxxx) through FY-92. Corporate Programs and the remaining Projects only need to budget through FY-88. Revised input forms will be available from the budget coordinators.

e The Owner's Controlled (Account 3xx), HGP and Corporate Resource data files have been merged into one file labeled as the "83" file. Future reports will reflect all Resource Budget data.

e Organization Overhead is applied *&t'the Director level.. Percentages are calculated at each level for infonnational purposes. Data to be coded to the Overhead WBS (X00000) is labor and other cost providing general organizational support. - This includes:

Directors and their secretaries.

Division Managers and their secretaries.

General office supplies, materials and equipment.

General staff development, but not classes or training specific to a work function.

Interview and relocation.

Department Managers and their secretaries can be coded to the Overhead WBS or a Direct WBS code depending on work functions. .

e Corporate Programs (WBS 8xxxxx) are of a generic nature and support the Company in general. Taeks relating to Projects are to be coded directly to each affected Project on a shared basis. No Project direct work is to be coded as a Corporate Program.

e Work Definition fonns are to be updated and consnunicated te the referenced contacts reflecting the revised scope of work and labor uni ts. The ecst data can be entered after the budget is processed.

e Organtration codes used in budgeting reflect those to be in effect as of July 1982.

e- Gudget contacts for organizations are as folicws:

W1P-1 -

Gary Oldright WNP-2 -

Gary Oldright WNP-3 -

Gary Oldright Technology -

Craig Walton Genaration -

Craig Walton Chief Financial Office -

Gaylon Gallup Safety and Security -

Craig Walton Quality Assurance -

Gaylon Gallup Auditing -

Gaylon Gallup Legal -

Gaylon Gallup -

Administration -

Gaylon Gallup All Others -

Gary Oldright 1

--__---_-__________--___---___---________------__------_U

I i

JUNE 29, 1982

- . .2 .

4ne , .

=

4 APPENDIX D PLANNED ACTIONS 8

1 l

I

._z _ _ _ _ _

leeP-1 DELAY PLAN , For 6/25/82 Meeting -

PERSONNEL ACTIONS Orininal Current- ".-

Item flesponsibility Requi, red Date Forecast Date Remarks Status

• 1. Provide resource loaded manpower plan to Each Senior Staff 4/21/.82(noon) Manpower plans approved by Complete '

Program Ofrector member

" - - Program Director. 4/29/82

- 2. 'Isplement approved mer plans Each Senior Staff Continuing Open -

member 3 i

s. 3. Place maximum nweer 97 is;P-1 Supply Sys- RW Poot Continuing All personnel transfers must Complete tem pe'rsonnel in assignments within cther be approved by Acting PD Supply System organizadors '

• 4. Cocrdinate RIF ert!ons alth Coroorate RF Lewis 4/30/82 5/21/82 Earlier " completion date" of Complete personnel staff ad obtain Corporate RIF 4/30/82 has been extended; ,

j policy < Corporate RIF policy not fully developed at that time.

-} 5.. Provide list of employees requiring place- All managers 4/30/82 Complete l

t ment to the Program Director , ,

i

3 V

') .

j 4 i d

• j

• 1

].

s

'l

.o J

• Itequires Program Director approva!

y .

A

! CONSTRUCTION-RELATED ITD15 (INCLUDES SECURITY AND SAFETY) ,6/25/82 -

Original Current g Responsibility Required Date Forecast Date Remarks Status -

o 1. Iglement a lay-up plan for all designa- FC Hood 6/30/82 (intti- 7/01/82 e UEEC contact is Taylor. BPC Open ted equipment, meterial and structures / ate implementa- contact is Horn.

systems on site. Assure developnent of tion) e This plan to implement layup

- RS5$ and Turbine-Generator lay-vo re- requirements developed by .

quirements. CBOrganinassignedactiog item under " Engineering Actions."

o 2. Propere security plan for site FC Hood 5/31/82 e close all gates except Complete one near Operations.

- e input from Vorhels due i 6/1/82. L 1 e Plan to be revisited on

p basis of restart.

• 3. Pnpert safety program for site (to in. FC Hood 5/31/82 6/09/82 ' Complete as of 6/11/82. ,

clude fire protection plan) Documentation needed  ?

L for final closeout.

f '

,' 4. Prepare and iglement ststus verifica. FC Hood 5/31/82

~

6/11/82 e Bechtel contact is' Horn. Coglete. Documenta-tion program s Verification is required tion needed for final for terminated contracts. closecut.

o Define project control system requirements (e.g..

} Rr15-2 evaluation) d 5. Prepare and iglenent a plan to clean up RF Lewis site (exclusive of perinanent plant struc-5/31/82 6/21/82 e Bechtel contact is Horn. Closed as a Construc-tion Action Item. Re-

]; Tilley working this for tures and laydown areas) , Supply System. assigned to Operations.

.[ 5. Prepare and iglement plan for cIcanup FC Hood 5/31/82 e 8echtel contact is Horn. Actions are complete.

J of permanent plant structures and lay- Documentation of formal closeout is required.

y doim areas fl. ' I* Receln and review Sechtel reco inenda. FC Hood 4/23/82 6/30/82 e Initial input received and Open 8 tions on all constructica contracts previously closed. Now being reopened so that WNP-4 ac-O. 8 :; *

^ tions can be incorporated.

N

~

6/25/82 CONSTRUCTION-RELATED ITEMS (INCLUDES SECURITY AND SAFETY) - Continued Original Current -

, Item Responsibility Required Date Forecast Date Remark s Status 0 8. Identify all construction work in be com. FC Hood 4/30/J2., o UESC contact is Iverson. Coglete jl pleted . Bechtel contact is Horn.

Included in Bechtel slow.

j down plan.

8a. Develop overall plan for Struct'eral Inte- CB Organ 6/15/82 Open f grity Test 7

8b. Assure implementation of plan for Struc- FC Hood TBD e Test tentatively scheduled Open tural Integrity Test for 12/6/82.

9. Implement system layuu pin FC Hood 5/15/82 Continuing e UE&C contact is Edmondson. Closed. See Item I in Bechtel contact is Horn. ' this section.

e plan to be implemented to be that developed by CB Organ under Item 7 of 1 " Engineering items." ,

3 Y 9a. Confirm to Bechtei which, if sny NSSS FC Hood 6/11/82 I e Reference document is a N CNCR's. MWO's. etc. which have been dis-

• Closed ~ Needs d ~ 5 3.page " Status on.NSSS" tation for form ose positioned by UE&C require implementin9 closeout actions at this tim report prepared by Bechtel out*

as of 5/13/82.

e At the rampdown meeting on 4' 6/9/82. FC Hood advised that at present. none of .

the dispositioned documents

• referred to required igle. i i

mentation at this time. He

']'

, will advise if and when any of them do require Igle-1 mentation.

3 10. Close out all open as of 4/30/82 corres- FC Hood 5/31/82 continuing e List compiled and being Open pondence to Bechtel worked.

g a 11. Identify and make arrangements for retaln- FC Hood Continuing e 8PC contact is Horn.Bechtel Action is coglete.

4 ing contractor non-enanual personnel needed performing this function. Documentation for 3j for documentation assembly, and other key with FCH overview. fonnal cicsecut is activities requi red.

(12. Prepare construction restart program FC Hood 6/01/82 6/30/82 recomendations

,6/25/82 -

C0hSTRUCTION-RELATED ITEMS (INCLUDES SECURITY AND SAFETY) - Continued Original Current 13 Responsibility Required Date Forecast Date Rema rks Status (13. Establish EFSEC interface plan during FC Hood 5/15/42 *~ 6/30/82 e RW Root met with EFSEC.

delay period ,

e Interim report submitted.

Final report required.

I

14. Conselldate, verify, and provide Inven- FC He d 9/30/82 TBD e At the 5/26/82 meeting, the tory of all Owner and contractor pur- understanding was reached chased equipwnt and material to be that Bechtel would provide Installed in plant and all other Owrer to the APD-C recomendations and contractor purchased tools, equip- regarding allocations between meet and material. Include all allo- WNP-1 and WNP-4 on costs of.

cation between WNP-1 and WNP-4. Dollar material and construct W r Ilottation on small tools te be $250 equipment.

j or dollar amount stated la existing e As part of its inventory pro-

'! contractor procedures. cess. Bechtel is to identify 4 locations of various materials by use of floor plans of vari-t ous butiding elevations. For 1 g small tools. Bechtel will use .'

j . statistical sampling technique '

with a 901 confidence level.

j, e FC Hood conducted e ting with 1 Bechtel on this issue on 6/14/82.

i Bechtel to provide action sum-mary to him by 6/30/82.

} *

15. %te autosuIted property management sys- FC Hood 10/31/82 '

) tee to reflect status of all components i installed or to be installed j ,

j' N Npere and implement Property Management FC hood 7/07/82 e Program to be consistent j Was for site with discussions at Program Director's Review with D0P j

t on 6/22/82.

Y e Coordination with RF Mazurkiewicz II* h1ve issue of Bechtel's materials man- FC Hood 6/30/82 a9 mat role, and roles cf Local 77 and of traft1 in materials management.

, _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ - _ _ - . . _ . - _ _ _ . . _ . . .. _ _ . .- .- .. . - . _ . . . . .~. _ _ . . . . .

5 CONSTRUCTION-RELATED ITEMS (INCLUDES SECURITY AND SAFETY) - Continued ,

6/25/82 .

Original Current Item Responsibility Required Date Forecast Date Remarks Status ~

18. Develop and tuplement as acceptable con- FC Hood 7/12/82 struction scheduling system restart ..

1,

~

I

-(-  !

. ,h

~

q z

.t g

a,

, t 4

a

=$ . .

".unj s 3

if

'.j -

i 9

+ -

C'i

(.

\ ,

1- .

6/25/82 ENGINEERING ACTIONS ,

Original Current g R_esponsibility Required Date Forecast Date Remarks Status

• 1. Ileview all contractor engineering efforts. FC Hood 5/31/02*

• 6/09/82 e UESC contact is Iverson. Complete. Documentation and raspdown effort as appropriate '

~

Bechtel contact is Horn. for final closeout is

,in approval cycle.

• 2. Prepare and implement design verification C3 Organ 5/31/82 6/30/82 e UEEC contact is Iverson. I FiJFee e Continue with AP5. Verif-ication of installed loads required.

e Criteria for monitoring of building settlements and -

well water levels contained' in UEWP-82-258 dated 5/20/82.

I

• 3. Preilde reconuendaticrs on HSP and SCI-4 C8 Organ 5/15/82 e Reconinendations in draf t Complete j panels form 5/14/82.

l' 4. Close out all open (as of 4/30/82) corres- CH llichael 5/31/82 Ongoing e Closeout plan is in place.

pondence to UE&C ,

t Followup to close out indi-

'g vidual items is continuing. .

as

.* 5. Prepare engineering restart program recom- CB Organ 6/15/82 '

S . sendations

• 6. P CB Organ 5/15/82 e Se Ro 1 sub t Complete ngineering rampdown and delay .

k tions & Objectives." dated ,

i 5/12/82. .

-r j Es. Obtain from UE&C the raspdown p.dnning C8 Organ 6/30/82 documents required by RW Root letter of -

, 5/12 (see item 6 above) 7.-

Define technical layup requirements CB Organ 5/15/82 6/30/82 O. Establish plan for maintenance audits CB Organ Continuing 7/15/82

.i on struttures and systems to insure requirements are not being m

4s i

ENGINEERING ACTIONS , 6/25/82 ,

Original Current .

Item Responsibility Required Date Forecast Date Remarks Status 1 9. Establish comprehensive procedure for CB Organ 5/3'f/82 ~ 6/18/82 e This action not required Closed j hand 11ng of design drawings on hold. . in light of current restart

] and for boaing up design infonnation planning.

j (including backup data)

- 10. Provide engineering schedule'during CB Organ 6/30/82 e First cut on schedule to be

[ construction delay accomplished by 6/1/82

] 10a. Issue level 1 engineering schedules C8 Organ 7/01/82 1  :

s 11. Previde conclusions and recommendations C8 Organ 6/15/82 e Coordination with FC Hood 6

regarding (a) present capability of DCS e See Bechtel Action Item 839.

to satisfy its basic charter (i.e., pro-y' vide design baseline). (b) additional capability of providing a'l design rela-ted info needed to close out contracts (e.g., feasibility of adding historical ',

t i data), and (c) necessity for DCS to con-tain historical data to satisfy quality

')j .

8 y]) a or design verification requirements. y s .

q .

M m

o

.?1 .

l h

.d

6/25/82 ,

LICENSING ACTIONS (INCLUDES ASME.RELATED ACTIONS)

Original Current .,.

g Responsibility, Required Date. forecastDate Remarks Status

1. Resolve three ASME Div. 2 code cases CB Organ / 6/30/82 UE&C contact is Martin.

CR Edwards ' .. Action by ASME Consnittee is

2. Contact NRC regarding docketing of FSAR RW Root 4/23/82 . Conglete

• 3. Orwisp and implement action plan identi- AG Hosler 5/30/82 UE8C contact is Valentenyt. I Complete fring all requirements to insure licensa- .

bility of plant

• 4. Dewlep and implement plan to accomplish C8 Organ 5/15/32 UESC contact is Martin. Conglete all actions required to maintain an Bechtel contact is Fallon.

,(

N-certificate 4a. Orwisp revised N-Certificate plan based CB Organ 6/11/82

• Plan rewritten and 4

submitted for approval.

I on mtart guidelines i

5. Preport and submit drift suspension plan RW Root 6/24/82 Plan completed. Trans-j 5/31/82-for miew .,

mittal letter to NRC 4 g

in concurrence cycle, e

-) 4 s

)

i

• +

4 .

I i

i t

i I;

o

6/25/82 '

OPERATIONS / TEST & STARTUP ACTIONS Original Current '.

Responsibility Required Date Forecast Date Remarks Status Ites RF Mazurkiewicz 7/31/6;L.,

• 1. Prepare restart package in Operations ..

and T&SU area RF Mazurkiewicz 5/31/82 e Bechtel contact 's VanFleet.

• 2. Prepare and iglement H1/CM Program Define PM requiremrnts by I appropriate areas, to in-clude civil, mechanical, electrical, NSSS, turbine. I River Water House, tegor-ary utilities, connunica-tions.  :

I o PM/CM program is in olace '

under Bechtel supervision.

t Supply System to assume PM/

CM responsibility effective 7/1/82 for WNP-1. PSP 16.1 has been approved.

.+

\ 8 Prepare and iglement facilities main- RF Mazurkiewicz 5/15/82 6/30/82 e UE&C contact is Cole.Bechtel

• 3.

• contact is Horn.

tenance program during ragdown period e Implementation to require approximately 6 months.

e Consideration being given to employing Marthwest as 2 contractor.

• e This function assigned to

• RF Mazurkiewicz effective 6/7/82.

w':: f/!5/.2a e Item moved to Property

2. i.- -._.,.,a__,

n?x '::= cf ::;;':!'.!:r Of.

-- .. . a.,e m i " '.. Control / Facilities section.

Prepare long range facilities mainte. RF Mazurkiewicz 10/01/82 e Tilley to work this for RFM

• 4.

t nance program

.i '

lj i

6/25/82 '

CONTROLLER AND COST-RELATED ACTIONS Original Current '

Itee Responsiblitty Required Date Forecast Date Remarks Status

1. Verify cost allocation between WP-1 and DR Cseh 6/30/82 In accordance o Completion date contingent WMP-4 from inventory as provided by FC with contract upon schedule established Hood under Action item 14, page 4 closeout sche- for 8echtel's providing in-

• dule ventory input.

1 e 2. Prepare FY83 budget as baseline budget DR Cseh 6/30/82 0 3. Project cash flow projections through DR Cseh 5/31/82 6/09/82 e Cash flow projections pre. Coglete 9/30/83 pared and disseminated at "Rampdown" meeting on 6/23/82.

o 4. Establish plan for shutdown of approprl- CR Cseh 5/07/82 L Complete ate ADP systems used at site

5. Provide recomendatfors for shutdown or DR Cseh 9/05/82 6/33/82 e Completion dats moved for .

continued use of all ADP systems used at ward to minimize ADP costs.

site , e Recomendations being routed

.. for concurrences as of 6/24/82, f prior to forwarding for P.D. a final approval. y

6. Establish cost sharfrg guidelines for use DR Cseh 4/30/82 Complete ,

at the site as required (e.g., on change orders)

• 7. Prepare CIS restart program recomenda- DR Cseh 7/15/82 2 tions

8. Establish and iglement plan to cut off RF HazurH ewicz 5/10/8' e Work orders in pipeline Cornp!ete costs for cperational spares

• were cancelled.

o 9. Formaltre plan for WNP-1 and WNP-2 cost DR Cseh 5/10/82 5/31/82 e Ferguson letter of 6/3/82 Cornplete sharing prescribes criteria- we will continue to share costs equally with WNP-2.

9a. Formalf2e and igle ent revised cost shar- DR Cseh 7/15/82 ing agreement for HNP-1 and WNP-4 e Major effort required 1y Bechtel to adjust contracts in accordance with Mod I and !1od 2 of Cost Shar-Ing Guidelines.

r .

I 6/25/82 -

CONTROLLER AND COST-RELATED ACTIONS - Continued Original Current e l Responsibility Re_ quired Da_te_ Forecast Date Remarks Status Item Complete

10. Terminate WMP-4 non-manual charges.to RW Root 5/1b82~ '

WNP-1 DR Cseh 6/30/82 h 10a. Make necessary adjustments to charges previously made e Plans developed by 5/14/82. Complete

11. Establish and laplement a plan to cut All affected 5/10/82 Some job shoppers still on off all job shoppers chargenble to WNP-1 Senior Staff board as of 5/14/82.

members CBOrgan(UE&C) 6/01/82 6/09/82 e Subcontractors / consultants Closed. See item 11b lla. Identify. and justify. any existing job retained by UESC are: sal . below. .

shoppers, consultants or service contrac- FC Hood (Bechtel neutron shielding; modeling l

tors that are still chargeable to WNP-1 and all contrac- for sump; Superstrut lab tors) tests, lab test of structu-ral mesh rs .'.

i i .7 JA 0'Donnell '6/18/82 'f e Coordination will be effec- 8 lib. Review all su't-contracts awarded by con- '

ted with FC Hood.

, ' struction contractors and provide report.

with justification, on any that are not closed out. .

JA 0'Donnp11 6/25/82 e This action required to 11c. Ides.tify. and prepare justification for respond to RL Ferguson memo 3 all job shoppers, censultants and service contractors needed on site after July 8 of June 8.1982. .

j 1982

• 12. Establish and laplement plan to cut off All affected 5/10/82

• Complete all service contracts (e.g. with Olym- Senior Staff plcEngineering, geologists.etc.) uesbers

$13. Take action to cut off costs asfociated RF Mazarkiewicz 5/10/82 Complete with Power Generation-In Service Inspec-tion Par Tool e14. Review the question of shuttins off simu- RF Mazurkiewicz 5/10/82 Couplete lator costs. and make recommendtfon j

~

6/25/82 CONTROLLER AND COST -RELATED ACTIONS - Continued Original Current

• g Pe_sponsibility Required Date. Forecast Date Remarks Status

15. Send formal meno to Jerry Read request- DR C$eh 5/07/82- - Coglete ing a detailed listing of Owner's Con- -

struction Cormitments .

• 16. Take action to cut off all possible costs DR Cseh 5/10/82 6/30/82 e Action complete based on I Complete. Documentation on all appropriate Owner's Construction Ferguson ION regarding our needed for formal close activities, e.g.. ASHE sub-station, sew- sharing costs with WNP-2, out.

age lagoon, rifle range, DOE charges, plus work order system now "near site" power service, construction in place (see Action Item power 18below). ,

i

17. Prepare meno to Corporate regarding their DR Cseh 5/04/82 Coglete -

• submittal of work orders, for Program Director approval, covering all Corporate direct and indirect charges to WNP-1

18. Set up work order system to control all DR Cseh 5/10/82

• s Coglete charges applicable to WNP-1 .

^s .'!.

. Y

~

b s

4

6/25/82 ~-

QA ACTIONS Original Current Item Responsiblitty Required Date Forecast Date Remarks Status

1. Notify NRC of slowdown decistops and RW Root 4/23/82 e Semi-complete plans

• e Copy of suspension plan yet to be pro-vided to NRC week

ending 06/25/82. -

2. Close out 50.55(e)'s.10CFR 21's open CR Edwards TBD e UEAC contact is Haren.

Items and CAk's Bechtel contact is Gate-wood.

.2aA Status open NRC inspection and 50.55(e) CR Edwards 9/30/82 e Plan is to close out all items to facilitate restart. of these actions that we  :

can, status the rest, and b i then advise NRC.

3. Perforu surveillances of Bechtel's and CR Edwards Ongoing UESC's QA Records review and status acti-vities to ensure adequacy and acceptabi- ,

11ty for Quality Class 1. II & G Augmen- '

't ted contractors for WT-1/4 .

I'

4. Conduct audits of Bechtel. UESC and Supply CR Edwards Ongoing , o Plan is for audits to be y  ;

. System at appropriate fregisency to compty conducted by Corporate with PSAR. QAR and ASNC "N" Certificata QA requirements

• 5. . Closecut of NRC SALP iters CR Edwards 5/17/82 e Was completed as of Program o Complete Director's forwarding of our " Analysis of SALP"

• memo to RB Glasscock on ,

6/2/82.

6. Closeout of Audit and Non-audit QtRs CR Edwards 11/31/82 e 25-30 QFRs to be closed.

7. Closeout of Surveillance Reports CR Edwards 11/31/82 e Bechtel working these.

8. Develop and implement a Supply System CR Edwards 6/1/82 6/25/82 e Depending on final decisions Receiving Inspection Program; also pro-

• regarding Bechtel role, this gram for storage and handling of equip- action item may go away.

ment and material

QA ACTIONS - Continued ,

E.'25/82 ,

Original Current Ites Responsibility Required Date Forecast Date Remarks Status 9 Perform qualtftcation surveys of site CR Edwards 5/17/82 e Surveys applicable to JAJ Complete centractors as necessary, to qualify ".- and JCI. Surveys completed

.! them as ASE meterial suppiters - - 5/14/82. Write-ups to follow promptly. , ,

I 10. Perform receiving inspection for equip- CR Edwards Ongoing aDependingonfinaldectslobs

sent and material received from site regarding 6echtel role,this centractors and prepurchased contractors action item may go away.

11. Conduct assessment of documentatica CR Edwards 9/15/82 campilation and statusing.

s k  !

3  :

4 i

S .'.

'} t o

-). .

I .

s t *

j 3-1 -

1 l

e

6/25/82

• COPNERCIAL ACTIONS ..

Original Current Forecast Date Status **

item Responsibility R_equired Date Remarks

• 1. Review and take appropriate action on all J. A. O'Donnell 5/31/82 e UE8C contact is Cole. Bech- e Actions cogleted.

rentals / leases and ronsultant contracts ' -- tel contact is VanFleet. Officially documented closecut remains.

• 2. Review and take appropriate action on all J. A. O'Donnell 5/31/82 6/30/82 e UE&C contact is Phare.

insurance applicable to site Bechtel contact is Shaw. I e DeLuca tasked to Jevelop schedule for resolution of

• 3. Frovide guidance relative to warrantics J. A. O'Donnell 6/30/82 'eUNYcon$actisIollins, e Complete on all appilcable items at site Bechtel contact is Shaw.

i,

• 4. Conduct review of all yrepurchased cor.- J. A. O'Donnell 6/30/82 e UE&C contact is Collins. e Action cog leted.

tracts and provide plein of action for Bechtel contact is Shaw. Officially documented each (e.g., suspension, termination or closeout remains other action) 4a. Establish schedule for closecut, temina- J. A. O'Donnell 6/16/82 eS as tion or suspension of all construction ani. e nd WNP-4 /

. Supply System contracts contracts simultaneously. Y'

• 5.' Arrange a meeting with B&W to negotiate J. A. O'Donnell ASAP e B&W will arrive 5/26/82. Coglete out of the B&W contrset as euch of the Reg. f.89 slowed down.

" schedule acceleration" fuhds as possible .

Sa. Complete negotiations with B&W based upon J. A. O'Donnell 6/30/82 ',

decisions made at meeting with B&W referred t to in Item 5 above.

6. Prepare plan for closecut of expediting MC Carrigan 4/30/82 e UESC contact is Taylor. Coglete function

• 7. Review and provide recommendations on J. A. O'Connell 5/15/82 6/15/82 e Comunications with UE&C UESC and Bechtel contracts and Bechtel are underway.

• 8. Prepare commercial restart resgram recom- J. A. O'Donnell 7/1/82 mendations

l 6/25/82 *-

DOCUMENTATION ACTIONS Original Current g Responsibility Required Date Forecast Date Remarks Status

• 1. Define all documentation requirements CB Organ 5/15/.82 6/18/82 e Bechtel contact is FC Hood

• • ~ Harding. UESC contact is *1cCaleb.

Otlitchael (has coordination e Supply System plan prepared.

responsibility) Out for concurrence by FCHI and C80, which was accomplished 6/18/82.

.e 2. Review, approve and implement Bechtel's FC Hood 5/31/82 6/30/82 e Bechtel contact is Harding. e Complete. Documentation; docimentation plan CH: Michael needed for final

( closeout.

• 3. Review, approve and laplement Ur&C's CB Grgan 5/31/82 6/18/82 e UE&C contact is McCaleh documentation plan CH Hichael

• 4. Review, approve and implement a site CR Edwards 5/31/82 , Closed. No separate .

quality documentation program .

i site QA documentation E

'l program is required. '

5

• • 3. Prepare and implement Supply System's 01 Michael 5/31/82 6/11/82 e Complete 5/14/82 .except

. documentation plan for review and approval by

. Program Director

• 6. Prepare documentatton restert program Of flichael 6/30/82 T recommendations ,-

i 9

- L

, ~

6/25/82 ~

PROPERTY CONTROL / FACILITIES ACTIONS Original Current Item Responsibility Required Date_ Forecast Date Remarks Status

• 1. Prepare and iglement plae for property 7/01/82 e Bechtel contact is VanFleet Closed out. Super-FC Hood (Bechtel) 5/31/"82 seded by item 13a under i'

control, to includa warehousing plan "., o Preparation of this plan will be influenced by imple- " Construction-related mentation of DR Cseh's plah items".

for reconciling W P-1 and 3 WP-4 equipment (see item

1. page 8).

• 2. Prepare and laplement veh'cle consolida- -p5 Mazurkiewicz 5/31/82 6/30/82 e UE&C contact is Cole.Bechtel tion / disposal plan contact is VanFleet, e implementation will require '

approximately 3 sonths.

e Function assigned to Opera, '

tions 6/7/82.

i .

e Consideration to be given to WP-4 interests.

o Implementation will require

-

• 3. . Prepare and implement trailer consolida- RF Mazurkiewicz 5/31/82 - 6/30/82 tion / disposal plan approximately 3 months.

l 1 i e Function assigned to Opera- .,

'f tions 6/7/82. q

• e Consideration to be given to WP-4 interests.

• 4. Prepare and implement ofuce equipment RF Hazurkiewicz 5/31/82 6/30/82 e UE&C contact is Cole.Bechtel i- - utilization / disposal pla.1 contact is VanFleet.

e Iglementation will require

,: approximately 3 months.

e Function assigned to Opera- (

tions 6/7/82.

e Consideration to be given to WP-4 interests. *

• 5. Prepare and laplement utilities consoll- RF Mazurkiewicz 5/31/82 6/30/82 e Bechtel contact is Horn.

dation/ reduction plan (to include commu- '

e Iglementation will be on-nications) going.

- e Function assigned to Opera-tions 6/7/82.

e Consideration to be given to WP-4 interests.

6/25/82 ,

PROPERTY CONTROL / FACILITIES ACTIONS Original Current item itesponsibility Required Date Forecast Date Remarks Status

6. Prepare and implement a plan to clean up RF V,azurkiewicz 5/31/82'- 6/21/82 e Bechtel contact is Horn, site (exclusive of permanent plant struc- Tilley working this for tures and laydown arcE) Supply System. 1

7. Resolve issue of acquisitics of AWSH tem- JA 0'Donnell 6/15/82 e Coordination with Bob Shaw porary and non-temporary . facilities of Bechtel 6,

. V S

' 't

- ,'  ?

a e

6/25/82 CENERAL ACTIONS . g Original Current .' -

Item Rasponsibility Required Date, forecast Data Remarks Statut

• Visit made to TVA on 5/5 and Complete

1. Arrange for onsite visit from repmsenta- RW Root ASAP tive of a plant which has been shut down . . .

5/6 by Carrigan, Hood and and then restarted under conditions simi- . Porter.

lar to those at WNP-1 , ,

Closed. Restart

• 2. Couplete preparation of Restart Manual NC Carrigan -10/31/32 i manual not required under present Extended Con-struction Delay Concept.

3. Advise Glasscock of site organirational RW Root As rer.uired changes prior to their implementation

4. Close out in an approoriate manner all All Senior 5/30/82 ,.

Items open as of 5/1/82 with Corporate Staff rembers ,

( L staff members and outside ager.cles g  ? I 6 .

5'. ' Provide conclusions and retoerendations FC Hood 6/15/82 .

ein-house meeting held 6/3/82.Added Closed. See Item 11 action is to provide by 6/15/82 under " Engineering regarding (a) present capatility of DCS to satisfy its basic charter (i.e., pro. . recommendations on DCS hardware to Actions" vide design baseline) ard (L) edditional be utilized during the Extended capability of providing all rks19n rela- - Construction Delay. ,

ted info needed to closa out contracts  ;

(e.g., feasibl11ty of adding historical

• data).

O A -- - _ . _ _- ___

1. //

h 6)

Washington Public Power Supply System P.O. Box 968 3000 GeorgeWashingtonWay Richland, Washington 99352 (509)372-5000 July 8, 1982 G01-82-0421 i

..<m-., ,

~

United States Nuclear Regulatory Coninission -

Region V .-

1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 -

Walnut Creek, California 94596.

Attention: 9. H. Engelken

Subject:

NUCLEAR PROJECT NO. 1 CONSTRUCTION DELAY MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR WNP-1 Attached for your information is the Washington Public Power Supply System Construction Delay Management Plan for WNP-1. Please call me should you have any questions on this matter. -

D. .' zur g' Acting Program Director, WNP-1 (821)

RWR/by Attachment cc: CR Bryant, BPA (399)

l l

1 In a f w-l 1

03 ![l Nd [l bl bbk l;

I so. up are p '

, ... . GQ In A

s'. .e J

MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR EXTENDED CONSTRUCTION DELAY OF WNP-1 JUNE 29, 1982 5.1

__ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _