ML20080S795
| ML20080S795 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 02/23/1984 |
| From: | CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| To: | STONE & WEBSTER, INC. |
| References | |
| CSC-7364, NUDOCS 8402290256 | |
| Download: ML20080S795 (9) | |
Text
.
CONSUMERS POWER COMPANT MIDI.AND ENEEGY CENTER hb Transmittal No CSC-7364 5D-386 Date: February 23, 1984 To:
Stone & Webster P O Box 1963 Midland, MI 48640 ARINCIPAL STAFF vRA d aqjDPRP Attached Is, Partial Response To p/RA
" '7J ECA I545F Complete Response To itC DRMA p3 '/
?A0 QCS (li;,
X For Your Information SGA NL
/P Z
ENF ;
lFi le Mo i
Other
==
Description:==
Closed QAR #RT-00019 which was used by MPQAD to track CIO NIR #006.
d 1
M /
ignature:\\
J5KipplerscNRCIRegion*IIIJw/a1 cc JJHarrison, NRC Region III w/a RJCook, NRC Site w/a RAWells, MPQAD w/a BHPeck, MEC w/a NIReichel, FEC w/a DDJohnson, }EC w/a 8402290256 840223 PDR ADOCK 05000
_f_ E_8/
li s
l j 1
l--
4 DISTRIBUTION FOR QAR #RT 00019 ACTION:
INFO:
.JABauer WRBird.
JEBrunner RBCameron JWCook GREagle GFEvert BTFoote Dehorn "C*DDJohnson- (2) r- - 1 Wws2cu JPKnight BWMarguglio/DJones JMeilstrup ERMouser GEParker JERussell RCSember DATaggart CMThompson (ALAB-2) j DMTurnbull i
RAWells
- FILE 16.0 l
l-ir, I
- 0ne copy to go to S&W
- 0riginal l
M10284-0001A-QL10 l
I 6.
QAR NO:
' MIDLAND PROJECT RT-00019 quat.m ASSURANCE DEPARTMENT QU ALITY ACTION REOUEST 7.
DATE ISSUED:
8 REY:
12/29/83 0
1.
REQUIREMENT:
9-PAGE 1 0F 3 FPG-2.000 Rev 5 identifies requirements for maintaining 10 ASME RELATED construction training records. ORIGINAL "s
0" 2.
DEFICIENCY:
Stone and Webster NIR #006 identified numerous deficiencies in construction training records.
- 11. POTENTIAONSS(e)
YES NO 3.
QAR ORIGINATED BY:
4.
DISCIPLINE / DIVISION /SECTION 5.
RESPONSE DCE DATE 12,. REPORTED TO MPQA I DMTurnbull QSD 1/6/84 MANAGER DATE
- 13. ACTION ITEM NO:
- 15. ITEM PRIGRITY:
- 17. S/U CODE:
- 19. ACTION ORGANIZATION l 20 QAR REVIEWED BY:
SO4122 3
PGM00 Bechtel Construction /[
{
- 14. DISCIPLINE:
- 16. TREND CODE:
- 18. RESB CODE:
Training Coordinator
~
~ DATE:
21.
g e7[Lj N/A DNT BC PCO FEST C
- 22. CAUSE:
23 PROPOSED CORRECTIVE ACTION:
pgggg 70 2.s ser. *a.1 TM25 LU C R C D O.0fECl *
(GVlb)On"I ll,FfG 2 Ct>C Lon OlGAAIUCfCYCt.C)
FIC In67EacTWns In FPG 2,000 00 Co rn-CL v9RL'I JrTCll'lES: 0 ICeQJoCFD InFeethn ne n '
PLG rin6 C L.RSS /% TTan onnc e rcS 7~drs B C in 7"ERinenG CFCb CDs. 2.) PSSIDVE' (neTh 0 D tF RsRDinG Ohec+5 CbKEECTin6 TEnonsnC. CEChlCDS. h D& fin ED I LLEG I be Le TV. s0 30PEEUgSCCS h Ade. b.e o n DiccC7EU ~rb use cultecnr e.cnounc roeeb GinCc The UIF._ col LAJR3 IS30Gbs DTCne Ann LL)Gh3Tl 2 n nUC AU D T7"CD Th 2CC A DDo nCT
&chdPS b F-72nin s n S CGCC E DS. \\ Cont) 24 RESPONSIBLE ORGANIZATION / PERSON:
- 25. PROPOSED COMPLETION DATE
//, 7/ s.f "Th e s 13 /* Ee-TECTED 3/Gn DFF dAIT FC C
.JRLK. ffEIL,STECP ConsTEUCn co 11CA rnon a ggy,7 yy p pg m I-se - UI
~26 DISPOSITION C NCU RENCE:
.I S
Y l
Y QAR REVIEWER DATE PQAE (ASME DNLY) - #
DATE
- 27. DISPOSTION ACTION TAKEN:
1 R&t/ *1 TTs F FC, 2-000 rin3 2EEn 1%CED / 7~
C L E"ACL Y.0PECI FIE S ;
}
il CEGul C ED s GFDCinanon on TEHin/% GratDS-2.)
PtslTIG fnETM6D DF Obtesic711L TEntnin& CECA CDb.
M DEFIntnen D F :;~LLEGIDiLITY O
S u 9 Et*_L W,t'.S atx;E Ct-Cf) D I Et%7ED TD USE~ CCER6AT CED/DC /~C E.nb.
3 tlXE ILin L. L h e.
L.u R3 ISS O CD. 6 Tb nG' -4 LGE B5 TE'E. H AUG ALblTED z.hst C EC CC.Dh ElThER 6y gfgi*jhf. ~ '6C. F1 C'nE liUADEJ D %. ' AUD s T. ALLEGG.CD.5 H alt.
.".,cs 41,10.
- >t u., '
- 28. METHOD OF DISPOSITION VERIFICATION
- 29. QARCLO$EDBY R2 viewed FPG 2.000, Rev 7 in controlled manual in DCC.
Its content was approved by MPQAD on 2/8/84.
A-M N MI
'MPdAD g g p { DATE jg7 W /$ ] W h L/v7 f
PFQCE (ASME ONLY)
DATE.
ACCEPTABLE UNACCEPTABLE O SUPERCEDING QAR r
~
~
-adat. m AssuaAncE DEPARTMENT QU ALiTY ACTlON REQUEST isTE:
tLo:
~
1-11-a4 CONTINU ATION SHEET PAGE 2 op 4 i
BLOCK 23 CONTINUED:
either by sampline or a one hunaraa na ve en*
maa 4
- n,1
<m groups have been accepted.
Ccoles of interim reennneen nr.
=**=ehea fser,s. sep l
i 2..
/
M-4/1B (Rev 0)
Ifagn troTIg STONE AND WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORPORATION QCf.
15.01 NONCONFORMANCE IDENTIFICATION REPORT
- ttachment 4.1 R2 vision 2
~
PAGE 1 0F 2
{
DATE OF NONCONFORMANCE:
~
NIR NUMBER 006 OCTOBER 27, 1983
-IDENTIFICATION / LOCATION OF ITEMS:
BECHTEL DOCUVENT CONTROL CENTER DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORMANCE:
~
During the review of 2054 non-manual Construction Training Records, three areas of discrepancies were observed which were not in compliance with the requirements of FPG-2.000_Rev. 5. " Training of Construction Personnel." (The following Temns 1
were evaluated #5, 6, 8, 9,12,13,16,17,19, 20, 25, 26, (27/28), 29, 30,31, 32/33), BHO Team Staff.
(See attached for descriptions of Discrepancies)
/>A M i e nn.h PROGRAM MGR
[ % c, g :P
~
h_
IllTlATOR g
DATE c:rklwc 2B /993 DATE Sd /f8 l.
CORRECTIVE ACTION BY:
IDENTIFY ORGANIZATION TAKING CORRECTIVE ACTION 1
e-l VERIFICATION SAT UNSAT NEW NIR#
CONCURRENCE INITIATOR PROGRAM MGR DATE DATE MTE h
REMARKS
....--_,<.,m.--.---_---...---y,,-r,~.,
,.,_....-,_,-,--.-,-----m-,m.,--,
,-,*-nr
NIR 005 Page 4 of y 4
4
- 1) _ Course Rosters Attachment D to FPG-2.000 exhibited one or more of the following discrepancies.
a f'
, BLOCK NO.
ENTRY REOUIRED ENTRY RECORDED 1
CCP DWG. No. FIG. No.
2 (a) Name of lesson Either a', b or c missing (b) Procedures (c) Revision 6
Location of Session 10 (a) Signature Bechtel (b) Print Last Name Either a or b missing 5
Instructor Name Instructor Depar>_nt In addition many entries
/
were left blank
' 2) Reading' Records Attachment C to FPG-2.000 exhibited one or more of the following discrepancies:
Reading Record
- 1) The department and or assignment lines are illegible or incomplete.
- 2) Assigned reading performed on October 11, igS3 and September 29, 1983 were not documented on Reading Form Attachment C, Rev. 5.
l'
- 3) Team Records and TSR (Training Status Report) show training completed Document Control Files showed no record of training.
For example:
NAME TEAM #
TRAINING REQUIREMENT DISCREPANCY Kranzfelder Management FPD-2.000 Code 2 No Record in File J. Hull 32/33 M-204 Code 5 No Record in File In addition to these violations, inconsistency was noted in 4 arecs:
(1) Modification to records, some lined through, signed and dated and others simply lined through. (2) Some entries on course register are completed using' pencil while most are in ink.
(3) Difficulty is experienced in de-termining the accuracy of records where attendance at a course carries credit for several others.' (4) Some entries carried the revision number to procedures and some omitted the revision. (5) Proper " Course Roster Form as lict:d in Procedure FPG-2.000 were not utilized. (6) Some courses on Rosters contafn information not identical to matrix listing.
It is recommended that.the disposition to this NIR include a co=aittment te verify training records of each individual prior to status assessment assignment.
94
Bechtel Power Corporation P=st Office Box 2167 Midland. Michigan 48640 December 9, 1983 4
Consumers Power Company P.O. Box.1963 Midland, MI 48640 Attention:
D.L. Quamme Job 7220 Midland P oject CONSTRUCTION REIVEW OF STONE &
WEBSTER'S NIRS 006 & 007 BCCC 8804 S##
"## "** M M '4 2'8 har Mr. Wamme-Reference :
CPCo Ltr. D.L. Quamme to G. A. Hierzer dated December 7,1983 Serial No. CSC-7069 Outlined below is Construction's complete response and proposed. corrective
- acticn for the subject NIRs..
1.
The discrepancies listed for the cl' ass attendance roster are 'acknow-ledged.
The use of the class attendance rosters was effective on September 28,11983 Each roster since that date will be reviewed and corrected in conformance with Attachment D to FPG-2.000.
2'.
(Reading Records)
A.
Illegibility occurs when~the preparers run copies from. poor masters instead of obtaining copies from the Training Departmenc.
B.
As noted on Attachment C, the format may vary as long as all information is included.
C.
.There is only one official training record and that is stipulated in paragraph 9 of FPG-2.000.
The Team Record and the Team Ststus Report. (TSR) are informal management tools and are not official records.
The TSR-is being replaced by the Training Exception Report. Printout (TERP).
Addressing the two specifics listed.
- Krantzfelder - Completed FPD-2.000 at Level 5 on 8/18/83 Paragraph 6.3, FPG-2.000 applies.
' Hull - Spec. M-204 appears on the - latest TERP (attached ).
1his means he has not received.the required training.
J
.y--
w.
.e---
p-yy
,,,,,-w--,.
---c.
e-, -,,,,, - - -.. -. -,.,,,-,.,,-,,y.-v
-+very-.-,,,,-.,
.--m-
4.1 D.t. ce==>
Bechtel Power Corporation Bccc 8804 Peg 2 2 3
(Inconsistencies )
A, FPG-2.000 is being revised to stipulate that all corrections will be a line out in ink.
The corrector will initial and date.-
B.
All entries will be made in ink.
C.
Review specified in para.1 above will include the listing of all applicable documents on the class attendance rosters.
D.
See para. 1 above.
E.
The Course Roster form is now furnished to the instructor with his copy of the Trrining Schedule to assure that the proper form is used.
4.
The referenced letter stated that our original response regarding the Training Records Group review of a 10% random sample of the training files is unacceptable.
We concur that a 10% sample is inadequate and regret the choice of words.
In fact over 100%
verification takes place.
When training records indicate an in-i-
dividual is 100% complete a verification of the record takes place.
This may occur long before the individual is assigned to status assessment.
In addition, the supervisor is provided with an exception report showing. the training requirements outstanding.
Discrepancies between records which may be maintained by the super-visor and the Training Records Group are reconciled on a continuous basis using this management tool.
Requirements, therefore, are documented in the exception report.
An additional 1007 verification of records is made prior to an individual actual.y being assigned to status assessment by the Training Records Group.
This occurs when the supervisor presents a-listing of individuals to be assigned.
I L
If you have any questions regarding the above, please contact E.H.
Pillsbury at Ext. 7507.
Very ruly yours, l's..n
- 0. A.- Hier r N
y Site Phna kW 20
-GAH/ MAD /BtF/lec Written Response Requested:
No
Attachment:
S&W NIRs (Nonconformance Identification Report) Nos.
l 006 & 007 CC:
N. Reichel f
?/ ;.a.
(.c.:.s..,
-....u g,z, y-osan n. ausmma
~.
(}Di!I{}0!i[
Sue blenager meu 4 he<<
..s.
=
M.diand Project: Po Sea 1963. M4end. MI 48840. (517) 6318650 Q[ b.. E C E I V E December 7, 1983 DEC 71953
. <.:s;.1.
l-O'.'lf.Q CQ,Q?,
Mr G A Hierzer t.e.- m M h,,t)
,Q Bechtel Power Corporation r
P O Box 2167 Midland, MI 48640 MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER GWO 7020 S&W NIR's 006 AND 007 File Bl.1.7, 0655 UFI:
53*50*04, 99*08 Serial:
CSC-7069 Your response to S&W NIR's 006 and 007 is unacceptable regarding the Training
, Records Group reviewing a 107. random sample of the training files to verify the file,s of personnel who have completed all requirements for status assessment.
A 100% review of these training files mus.t be. conducted and results documented.
This should be done on a priority basis according to the sequence in which teams vill begin status assessment.
' ~
[W
\\
DLQ/DDJ/ kip cc:
BHPeck, MEC NIReichel, MEC G
9 eW8 S
e S
- - -.., -,.