ML20080S010

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Facility Organization Chart & Modifying Definition of Shift Technical Advisor Function. Safety Evaluation Encl
ML20080S010
Person / Time
Site: Saint Lucie  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 10/12/1983
From:
FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML17214A507 List:
References
NUDOCS 8310180211
Download: ML20080S010 (6)


Text

v_

t i

nm OO m-o

.a Om OO no x-c

.E.1.,

O Gm 4

l

.M 8U g

g.Ag,.ve4C.

,8-

._ mgI!,mi'%

c 0 n

.mm

.a e-o 23 G m C.Au.T H

I I

I I

A n.=.1,

,9,,, ',';

A.

..A I

I I

I any.'

a*=It"

, m.in C..m

... Y

=a';g m nia' 2C m

-ACm j

UPt.O.N.OA. ELE.CT.4C.L.IBAlleTEI.A.L

.EC811MCA

.tr..vt.08

.uPg.vt.0.

V' A. it.AeIC CE

.upg.vt.0.

.nsPt.v1 0.

.tfr..vt.G.

Pt hl.0.

j i

n i

j m...

1

,,oc,u. a.

u..

4.

aa=

  • u =

..C, C

m C.A..

m m

C.A..

C.A..

g,,,

io C.

1 d

1

.NIEF 18Astlf. 41ect RO ASST.

EL. 1 4CIAN PC.E.AN l.tl.Uttt.T

.kAC.llel.T gg APP.CT attAll.

ELE IfC Collt.0L APP.NANIC.

E flCgg A.PECIAll.f.0.L

.9 C08F IIE L Pt.CE.

opt.E.i t.

E.T8 C

T j

APP.E.IBCE.

,,gtpggg ATO.

1 vesLets..a.

mu.

l Fisure,s.3 2 r,essity org.niscion - st. smie Plant,' unit t l

7. _ _. _ _

\\.

.M Cn

.H T1

=..g,,,,.

T ig % T., y

=

~_;

=C.ui N

I I

I I

r.,. gg';

l o

.n o.

l 4

g I

I I

i

.L.n CA.L.

a y..'

a*=ya u

in

n..m

,;,;a

==nal'

.n a

m...

==>

.A. C.W L.

.sas.CT..A C ma.s..a.L.

blEC.I I.CA F..V1

.UP..V4 0.

.gpg syg.eg

.ur..VI

.ur..VI

.ur..Vt9 ut. vs 0a t

C i

n i

n..

=tu. a.

'=aa aaa

?

g,,,

,u m

m.

Lu.==9

.L. 1.ICIA.

P. MAIL M

APP.C.T.C.IA..M.AC tim.IC.

.L.

.f 1..T.UM..T F"Jaga

,go; 0L C0lli.

fC.

CA

.II. CO ff L minit!;.

=

I ls-

- u...

  • Figue. 8.2-2 Uni, oegents.tlen S Lucie be Unit 2 i

I t

Table 6.'2-1 MINIMUM SHIFT CREW COMPOSITIONE WITH THE OTHER UNIT IN MODES 5 OR 6 OR DE-FUELED POSITION NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS REQUIRED TO FILL POSITION MODES 1, 2, 3, & 4 MODES 5 & 6 SS (SRO)

' la ga SRO 1

None

  • 4 M

2 1

M 2

8 STA 1c None I

WITH THE OTHER UNIT IN MODES 1, 2, 3, OR 4 POSITION ~

IR5GER CF INDIVIDUALS REQUIRED TO FILL POSITION ICOES 1, 2, 3, & 4 McES 5 & 6 SS (SRO) 1 la 8

SR0

^

1 None 20 2

1 AD 2

1 STA-la,c go,,.

l

$$ - Shift Supervisor RG - Licensed Reactor Operator SRO - Licensed Senior Reactor Operator AD ' Auxiliary Operator STA - Shift Technical Advisor Does not inclinto the licensed Senior Reactor Operator er Senior Reactor Operator Limited to Fuel Handling, supervising CORE ALTERATIONS after the initial fuel loading.

Shift crew composition any be less than the minimus requirments for a period of time not to exceed 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> in order to accommodate unexpected absence of on duty shift crew memoers provided immediate antion is taken

, to restore the shift crew composition to within,tne minimum requirements of Tatie 6.2-1.

g Individual may fill the same position on tne other unit.

y One of the two required indiviauals may fill tne same position on tne other unit.

c/

If any of the reouired SR0s on shift meet the STA requirements for both units, that SRO nay-fill the STA position.

ST. LUCIE - UMIT 1 6-4 Amendment No.

. _= --

Table 6.2-1 MINIMUM SHIFT CREW COMPOSITION TWO UNITS WITH TWO SEPARATE CONTROL ROOMS WITH* UNIT 1 IN MODE 5 OR 6 OR DEFUELED POSITION NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS REQUIRED TO FILL POSITION

, MODE 1, 2, 3, or 4 MODE 5 or 6 8

a SS (SR0) 1 l

SR0 1

None M

2 Q

AD 2

2 STA Ic None WITH UNIT 1 IN MODE 1, 2, 3 OR 4 POSITION NUMBER OF INDIVIDUALS REQUIRED TO FILL POSITION 4

MODE 1, 2, 3, or 4 MODE 5 or 6 8

8 SS (SRO) 1 1

SM 1

km R0 2

1 A0 2*' C 1

~

STA 1

None SS Shift Supervisor with a Senior Reactor Operator's License on Unit 2 SR0 Individual with a Senior Reactor Operator's License on Unit 2 l

R0 Individual with a Reactor Operator's License on Unit 2 A0 Auxiliary Operator STA Shift Technical Advisor Except for the Shift Supervisor, the Shift Crew Composition may be one less than the minimum requirements of Table 6.2-1 for a period of time not to exceed 2 hours2.314815e-5 days <br />5.555556e-4 hours <br />3.306878e-6 weeks <br />7.61e-7 months <br /> in order to accommodate unexpected absence of on-duty shift crew members provided immediate action is taken to restore the Shift Craw Composition to within the minimum requirements of Table 6.2-1.

This prevision does not permit any shift crew position to be unmanned upon shift change due to an oncoming shift crewman being late or absent.

During any absence of the Shift Supervisor from the Control Room while the unit is in MODE 1, 2, 3 or 4, an individual (other than the Shift Technical Advi.sor) with a valid SR0 license shall be designated to assume the Control Room command function.

During any absence of the Shift Supervisor from the Control Room while the unit is in MODE 5 or 6, an individual with a valid SRO c: R0 license shall be designated to assume the Control Room command function.

_a/ Individual may fill the same position on Unit 1 j!/ One of the two required individuals may fill the same position on Unit 1.

c/ If any of the requirtd SR0s on shift meet the STA requirements for both

$7, h Qs.t g d 0 may fill the STA pgs tion.

-.-_-._.-_-----,--l--.___..-.

.. ~

~

ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS 6.2.3 INDEPENDElfT SAFETY ENGINEERING GROUP (ISEG)

FUNCTION 6.2.3.1 The ISEG shall function to examine plant operating charac'teristics, NRC issuances, industry advisories, Licensee Event Reports and other sources of plant design and operating experience information, including plants of similar design, which may indicate areas for improving plent safety.

f COMPOSITION

~

6.2.3.2 The ISEG shall be composed of five dedicated, full-time rambers with varied backgrounds and disciplines related to nuclear power plants.

No more than i

two members shall be assigned from any one department.

Three o; more of the members shall be engineers with a bachelor's degree in engineering or a related i

science, with at least 2 years of professional level experience in the nuclear field. Any nondegreed ISEG members will either be licensed as a Reactor Operator j

or Senior Reactor Operator, or will have been previously licensed as a Reactor Operator or Senior Reactor Operator within the last year at the St. Lucie Plant i

site; or they will meet the qualifications of a department naad as specified in, l

Specification 6.3.1 of the St. Lucie Unit 2 Technical Specifications.

The qualifications of each nondegreed candidate for the ISEG shall be approved by the Assistant Chief Engineer - Power Plant Engineering, prior to joining the group.

RESPONSIBILITIES 6.2.3.3 The ISEG shall be responsible for maintaining surveillance of selected plant activities to provide independent verification

  • that these activities are performed correctly and that. human errors are reduced as much as practical.

The ISEG shall make detailed recommendations for revised procedures, equipment modifications, maintenance activities, operations activities, or other means of improving plant safety to the Assistant Chief Engineer-Power Plant Engineering.

AUTHORITY 6.2.3.4 The ISEG is an onsite independent technical review group that reports offsite to the Assistant Chief Engineer-Power Plant Engineering. The ISEG shall have the authority necessary to perform the functions and responsibilities as delineated above.

M@@S 6.2.3.5 Records of activities performed by the ISEG shall be prepared, main-tained and a report of the activities forwarded each calendar month to the Assistant Chief Engineer-Power Plant Engineering.

6.2.4 SHIFT TECHNICAL ADVISOR The Shift Technical Advisor function is toeprovide en shif t advisory

~

technical dbpport in the areas of thermal hydraulics rreactor engineering, and plant analysis with regard to the safe operation of the unit.

63 UNIT STAFF QUALIFICATIONS 4

6.3.1 Each member of the unit staff shall meet or exceed the minimum qualifica-tions of ANSI /ANS-3.1-1978 as endorsed by Regulatory Guide 1.8, September 1975 (reissued May 1977), except for the (1) Health Physics Supervisor who shall meet "Not responsible for sign-off function.

ST. LUCIE - UNIT 2 6-6

SAFETY EVALUATION The changes to Table 6.2-1 of Unit 1 and Unit 2 Tecnnical Specifications are an expected evolution of the STA concept, as evidenced by statements in both NUREG 0660 and NUREG 0737 and by FPL's response to item I. A.1.1. of NUREG 0737 (L-81-4, 1/2/81 ), and not a change in the intent of the Tecnnical Speci fications. The Draft Commission Policy St,;ement on Engineering Expertise on Shift as published in the Federal Register July 25, 1983, alloas licensees to combine the Senior Reactor Operator and Shift Technical Advisor f unctions.

As noted abvoe, the NRC has always stated that the separate STA was an interim concept with a desired goa1 of upgrading one or more on-shift SR0s to meet the STA requirements.

This has also been a goal at the St. Lucie site.

We are now in a position to implement this concept in the fairly near future.

In fact, the only itens preventing full implementation are the present Technical Speci fications.

Note that the Unit 1 and Unit 2 Technical Specification requirements for STA training and education (which are also described in the FSAR and NUREG 0843 - SER for Unit 2) are not being modified and continue to apply to the STA or SRO-STA so the on-shift technical expertise is not adversely affected by the proposed change.

We do wish to retain the option of using separate STAS to allow maximum flexibility in both shift manning and handling possible personnel retention problens.

The related change to Figure 6.2-2 essentially involves a title change for an existing position in the operations (on-shift) organization.

The old Watch Engineer title which was for the SRO " shift forenan" is being changed to Assistant (Nuclear) Plant Supervisor, who also must be an SRO.

Tnis position will now became supervisory / management in nature more so than the old Waten Engineer / Shift Foreman position. The Unit 2 Shift Supervisor title is changed to Nuclear Plant Supervitcr to be consistent witn the Unit 1 specification, and the title actually used at the plant.

For the above reasons the propored changes do not involve an utreviewed safety questions per 10 CFR 50.59 nor do they involve a significant hozard per 10 CFR 50.91 (a) (1).

I' i

s.,.

..