ML20080P626

Organization Charts WCNOC-20A,Rev 15,Feb 1993

ML20080P626
Person / Time
Site:	Wolf Creek
Issue date:	02/12/1993
From:	WOLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORP.
To:
Shared Package
ML20080P484	List: ML20080P626
References
FOIA-94-383 WCNOC-20A, NUDOCS 9503080062
Download: ML20080P626 (34)

Text

,,

i.

FOIC CHAPTER 6 HNDT 2

~

EXAMPLE ORGANIZATION CHARTS p-aa

, ; 3 7,,,, _ e PATTERS94-383 PDR

E

~

y I

--===m,g wses1 lil!

f

~g Al'l bnl$h I

eg!

-lll? hIlhhk

/,

v1

_,i U

lii ill @ @ _ii[i[!il_

l O

5 111 !

~

N t

e 9,1 t

m!E!!!]lil,l 5

-lilI. 11!

1 Ls

,li lhI'!J fl i

~

_-[]ippjifggg 5

tij i'

1 g

- j,-

W o

a o

I Z

4 x

-c r

h o

i f

i i

eik in*g* iii n i

rCa

..J:

LL n

s,..

t 9

4 f

!coC24p'%,

8rf'02 1,

sW e

b ORGANIZATION CHARTS

%CNOC-20A I

REV.

15 FEBRUARY 1993 I

i l

PRESIDENT & CEO APPROVAL f

DATE 2-'2-s 0 0 4 s / 4 5/

t b

MIE OulI!K lerTrJa ag!RATDG CIRPOUtrICM wwr CBGhMIZNTIG( ODRP DME REVISIG6 15 JANDRRY 1993 CBGANIZATIONAL ELEMENT QURE REVISION l

NAME NLMBER

. MMBER Corporate A

14 6

f Human Resources Al 2

Accounting / Controller B

10 i

Purchasing & Material Services B

10 I

Nuclear Assurance C

'11 Quality Assurance C1 2

Quality Control C2 2

i Regulatory Services C3 2

Document Services C4 2

Ccuputer Services C5 2

)

7tchnical Services C6 1

1 Engineerfag D

11 NPE/ Wichita D1 1

Nuclear Analysis D2 1

Equipent Engineering D3 1

Systen Engineering D4 1

NPE Support DS 1

Nuclear Operations E

11 Pr=4n4%

El 10 Maintenance & Mad.

E2 2

1%chnical Support E3 2

Operations E4 2

Plant Support ES 2

l 4

4 4

WOLF CREEK

' NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION ORGANIZATION CHART A REVISION 14 DATE 2/93 e o wiTNERS PHESMNT S CHEF EXECtfTrVE OFFGR I

I I

l I

I

~

l M A GAFOSO F T RN00ES /

C E PARRY R C NAGAN /

O L MAVNARD /

W 8 WOOD 01 ECYN VICE PRESOENT VICE PRESMNy GEldRAL COUN5Ett CONTROL L ERP VCE PREsaDENT E

NUCLEAR ASSURANCE PLANT OPERATDMS SECRETARY TRE ASURE R E*sGeEERNG E W SCNMOTZER G P RATNSUN A M EDWAROS R S SENEDCT J O wEERS G O SURCNART MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER PLWICHASNG S NUCLEAR ANALYSS DOCindENT SERvtCES QuallfY CONTROL OPERAftONS HUMAN RESOURCES MATERfAL. SERvCE S (ACitNGl W M LeeSAY C W FowtER R R SMITH K J MOLES MANAGER MANAGER M S LARSON W G EALES,JR g

NR

~

M W AND CORPORATE MANAGER MANAGER WW REGLA ATORT SERvtCES

$MANCIAL CONTROLS NPEMMCHIA ASSURANCE MODFt ATIONS NN C A SWART 2EIORUSER J M PIPPM y

' R MANAGER M J RLUG C M SPROUT MANAGER

~~

NTEGRATED MANAGER MANAGER TECl#ECAL ER SERMS GENERAL ACCOUNTNG SYSTEM ENGINEER #G SERvtCES

. Pt. ANT SCHEDULNG 9 T EN W S WM M E DMGLER R D Ft ANNIGAN MANAGER MANAGER NUCLEAR

"*""GE"

~~

1 EN NT

~

NPE SUPPORT SAFETY ENGNEERING T F DEDDENSJR M G watgAMS N W HOAOLEy MANAGER MANAGER J L STORES MANAGER OUTAGE nApst SUPPORT MANAGER EQUIPMENT SITE SERytCES ggg,ggggg 9

m

-e

,y

+-

n-A

-+ a c-uai--

.m

r. -.-..m.

i LF CREEK W6) NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORA ORGANIZATION CHART A1

~

• REVISION 2 DATE 2/93 G D. BURCHART MANAGER HUMAN RESOURCES I

I S.L BOYCE J A. CHERRY J. A CALLEWAERT SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR ACCESS EMPLOYMENT &

BENEFITS SCREENING & EEO COMPENSATION e

2

-w e

-e e.

s e,..

e m

+ - - - - - - - ---

4

.e--.

, _. _ _.. < -im_m_

l W8LF CREEK

' NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION ORGANIZATION CHART B REVISION 10 DATE 2/93 M.A GAYOSO CONTROLLER /

TREASURER I

I M S LARSON M J KLUG E W SCHMOTZER MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER FINANCIAL GENERAL PURCHASING &

CONTROLS ACCOUNTING MATERIAL SERVICES R. J BRICKELL W G. BALL SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR PURCHASING &

FINANCIAL REPORTING CONTRACTS A. F. STULL R D. STUMP SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SITE ACCOUNTING WAREHOUSE J D PALMER R A.OLSON SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR DATA CONTROL EXPEDITING W.W. ADAMS C. L. CANTRELL SUPERVISOR SUPERMSOR MATERIAL FISCAL PLANNING CONT ROL B J VICKERY D P SKAHAN SWERMSOR SUPERVISOR PROCUREMENT COST ANALYSIS SYSTEMS

i

+

1 LF CREEK W4pNUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION ORGANIZATION CHART C REVISION 11 DATE 2/93 R.C.HAGAN VICE PRESIDENT NUCLEAR ASSURANCE R D FLANNIGAN R. S. BENEDICT W. M. LINDSAY K. J MOLES A M. EDWARDS R D. GtLGER c a swAnmma MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER NUCLEAR SAFETY OUALITY OUALITY REGULATORY DOCUMENT COMPUTER TECHNICAL ENGINEERING CONTROL ASSURANCE SERVICES SERVICES SE RVICES SERVICES e

- ~--

c

~

-~ --

W8LF CREEK

' NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION ORGANIZATION CHART C1 REVISION 2 DATE 2/93 W.M LINDSAY MANAGER QUALITY ASSURANCE I

I I

I E.M PETERSONil S F. HATCH T.M DAMASHEK J. E. FLETCHER SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR AUDITS QUALITY SYSTEMS

, SURVElttANCE SUPPLIER QUALITY

.---.w-

-y

--t---

+-

-+ee e

-w

+ea w

-w-

+

+ - - - -

W6LF CREEK

' NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION ORGANIZATION CHART C2 REVISION 2 DATE 2/93 R.S BENEDICT MANAGER QUAllTYCONTROL I

I I

I I

T. B. DOUGAN K M. HARVEY J F. HALL C.E DE-LONG SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR MATERIAL QUALITY QC ELECTRICAL OC MECHANICAL QUALITY PLANT SUPPORT INSPECTION INSPECTION SUPPORT e

's

,wr-e,--

~

LF CREEK W4) NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORA ORGANIZATION CHART C3 REVISION 2 DATE 2/93 K J. MOLES MANAGER REGULATORY SERVICES

8. S. LOVELESS T. L RILEY S. G. WDEEN SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR R'

EtMRONMENTAL REGULATORY L ENSM MANAGEMENT COMPtlANCE

i W4pLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION ORGANIZATION CHART C4 REVISION 2 DATE 2/93 A. M. EDWARDS MANAGER

' DOCUMENT SERVICES I

1 I

I I

D. E. MC-DANIEL D. J. RASMUSSON N K ECCLES C. J MORGAN I

SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR RECORDS DOCUMENT RECORDS DOCUMENT MANAGEMENT SERVICES MANAGEMENT CONTROL o

e 6

m

'.e LF CREEK W4pUCLEAROPERATING CORPORATION N

ORGANIZATION CHART C5 REVISION 2 DATE 2/93 R. D. GILGER MANAGER COMPUTER SERVICES W. B. SMITH JR.

D C. HERHOLD SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR INFO SYSTEMS INFO SYSTEMS (ADMIN SUPPORT)

(PLANT SUPPORT)

S. L HULL D. K GOURLEY JR.

SUPERMSOR SUPERMSOR COMPUTER INFO SYSTEMS OPERATIONS (SITE)

R. G. THOMASON J. R.WESBROOKS i

SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SYSTEM SPECIAL COMPUTER SOFTWARE PROJECTS

1. R. ERvlN l

SUPERVISOR l

COMMUNICATIONS l

.. ~..--

i 4

W$1LF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION t

ORGANIZATION CHART C6 REVISION 1 DATE 2/93 C A 9ArARYZftORUDER MANAGER TECHNICAL SERVICES I

I I

I M A.SCHREleER K M THRALL SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR EMERGENCY RADIOLOGICAL PLANNING SERVICES (ACTING) s

W8LF CREEK

' NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION ORGANIZATION CHART D REVISION 11 DATE 2/93 F. T. RHODES VICE PRESIDENT ENGINEERING I

I I

I I

I G. P. RATHOUN T. J. GARR"T N. W. HOADLEY C. M. SPROUT M E. DINGLER J. L STOKES W. G. EALES JR' MANAGER MANAGm MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER NUCLEAR ANALYSIS NUCLEAR EQUtPMENT SYSTEM NPE S TE NPENVICHITA (ACTING)

ANALYSIS ENGINEERING ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVtCE S

i WOLF CREEK

' NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION ORGANIZATION CHART D1 REVISION 1 DATE 2/93 W.G EALES,JR MANAGER NPENVICHITA I

I W.L SELBE L M SOLORIO K. 5. PARTHASARATHY MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER FLUID SYSTEMS ELECTRICAL FACILITIESENG &

ENGINEERING SYSTEMS ENG-AN AL YStS S L. BEAL LB.ASHURST P.K GUPTA SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR DESIGN ENGINEER ENGINEER E J.PRATHER C. R. MORRIS G L MASKRID SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER A.PRAKASH SUPERVISOR ENGINEER

6 k

se WQLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION ORGANIZATION CHART D2 REVISION 1 DATE 2/93 G. P. RATHBUN MANAGER NUCLEAR ANALYSIS (ACTING) l I

I l

G.J NEISES M D HALL J.N HSEU E. W. JACKSON J E. SAMMIS SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER FUEL CONTRACT i

1

i l

t l

WQLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION ORGANIZATION CHART D3 REVISION 1 DATE 2/93 N.W.HOADLEY MANAGER EQUIPMENT ENGINEERING l

1 I

l T. J. GRAF D L ALUSON D G LONG f

SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER (ELECT / CONTROLS)

(SPCN)

(MECHANICAUCML)

..,,m s

b t

i i

l W4) NUCLEAR OPERATING CORP LF CREEK ORGANIZATION CHART D4 REVISION 1 DATE 2/93 i

C. M. SPROUT MANAGER SYSTEM ENGINEERING I

l l

L D. RATZLAFF S. E. HEDGES K. DERAKHSHANDEGAN M R.BARBEE L W.HCLLOWAY SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER ENGINEER (MOV)

(AUXtLIARY)

(NSSS)

(ELECTRICAL)

(BOP) m m

-m.

1 W$LF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION ORGANIZATION CHART DS l

. REV'SION 1 DATE 2/93 M. E. DINGLER MANAGER NPE SUPPORT l

l l

l J. D. STAMM l

MANAGER PLANT DEStGN ENGINEERING M D. STUART E. L ASBURY J.A.ZELL C. S. ADAMS SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR ESTIMATING ENGINEER ENGINEER DESIGN SUPPORT l

A. S. SERHAL

~

SUPERVISOR ENGINEER

~

V. J. MAC-TAGGART SUPERVISOR i

ENGINEER T. P. HOOD SUPERVISOR ENGINEER I

4 m

m

.m

=

y

.m.

-...wv.

1 Wi$LF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION ORGANIZATION CHART E REVISION 11 DATE 2/93 O. L MAYNARD VICE PRESIDENT PLANT OPERATIONS R.W. HOLLOWAY ASSISTANT TO VICE PRESIDENT PLANT OPERATIONS C. W. FOWLER W.8 NORTON J. D. WEEKS M, G. WILLIAMS B. T. MC-KINNEY

^

MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER MANAGER

^

MAINTENANCE &

TECHNICAL OPERATIONS PLANT SUPPORT TRAINING MODIFICATIONS SUPPORT PLANT SCHEDULING T. F. DEDDENS JR.

MANAGER OUTAGE

i W$LF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATitKi CORPORATION ORGANIZATION CHART E1 REVISION 10 DATE 2/93 I

B. T. MC-10NNEY MANAGER TRANNG I

I D. L. F EHR K D. HUGHES D K PARKS MANAGER SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR OPERATIONS TRAN NG CORPORATE TRAINING DEVELOPMENT TRANNG I

I OPEN E. D. MOSES H. L. STUB 8Y SUPERV!SOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR OPERATOR SIMUL'. TOR TECHNICAL TRANNG MAINTENANCE TRAINING i

l l

l I

4 l

W4pLF CREEK NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION ORGANIZATION CHART E2 REVISION 2 DATE 2/93 C W FOWLER MANAGER MAINTENANCE &

MODIFICATlONS I

I I

I I

A 8 CLASON D. JACOBS C. E. RICH JR B B.

TH SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR NA CF MAINTENANCE MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL "I

ENGINEERING MAINTENANCE MAINTENANCE V. J. CANALES R. J. SETTER T. H. SCHLESENER D M GILLESPIE SUPERVISOR MAINTENANCE SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR MECHANICAL ELECTREAL MODIFICATIONS B L.BERGSTR W P.W.CLARKSON D. B. TICE C. L JONES SUPERVISOR W

ENA" SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR CONTRACTOR MECHANICAL ELECTRICAL COORDINATOR 3

ES D. D. FORBECK J. L MC-BRIDE

~

MECHANICAL

~

SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR BUILDING MAINT. SUPPORT SERVICES K 8 CLAIR D M. WILLIAMS SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR

~

MAINTENANCE

~

MAINTENANCE PtANNING PLANNING w

w

4

?

1

..)

LF CREEK W4) NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPOR ORGANIZATION CHART E3 REVISION 2 DATE 2/93 W 9 NORrON MANAGER TECteaCAL SUPPORT I

I I

I I

I i s uGRRat R t Sass P O ADAM R L WM D E GERRELTS MANAGER SUPERyeSOR SUPERv!SOR NR RESUL,TS MANAGER RADIADON REACTOR CHEuSTRY 2C ENGNEERNG I

I I

i W COAYES R F ROvwE A M E SReetAAAN R S ROSNSON C L PALMER O^

I SUPERvtSOR L F SRESHEARS SUPERvtSOR SLFERytSCR SUPERvtSOR CHEMISTRY

~

DEALTH PHYSICr$1 SUPERvtSOR SUPERvtSOR I&C t&C I&C ENGREER 3C Smf PL ANNNG COMPT /TER MAINTEMANCE (SECONDARY)

L E SUMNER S A HENRY G J PENDERGRASS SUPERvtSOR R a nauuope SUPERvtSORi&C SUPERvtSOR CHEh4STRY tfALTH PHYSICIST SUPERvtSOR A W STEINER adET ENGNEER LASORATORY (PRSAARY AND RADWASTE)

A S PaanER M M COVEY M A SLOW SUPERytSORI S C

~

SUPERvtSOR HEALTH P9tYSICIST

~

MRN OELOEWE CHEleSTRy I

SHOPLAS ACftvtTESI CM MEOENCIT T A CDPEEY P A ILESLER SUPE RvtSOR H P SLFERytSOR H P SUPERvtSOR I& C (RADuvaSTE)

(SUPPORT)

E C mm L M nNE R A vvtSOOM SUPERVISOft H P SUPERVISOR HP SUPERvtSOR f & C 4ALARAI IOPERAT M t

l e

.. m m

U e

4 t

1 WL4LF CREEK

' NUCLEAR OPERATING COflPORATION 1

ORGANIZATION CHART E4 REVISION 2 DATE 2/93 J. D WEEKS MANAGER OPERATIONS l

l l

l l

l l

l D G NAROR D G. MOSEBEY D J. NEUFELD S.M WALGREN R W MILLER D. P. WILT SE C. R. YOUN!E SUPERVISOR SHIFT SHFT SHIFT SHIFT SHIFT P RATl NS OPERATIONS SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR ppgRT J D FREEMAN R L SCHMIDT D. L DEES R. L SCHNEIDER S D. AUSTIN SUPERVISOR SUPERVISING SHIFT SHIFT SHIFT RADWASTE OPERATOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR I

J. L BLACKWELL L L PARMENTER SPECIALIST SUPERVISING FIRE PROTECTION OPERATOR R.M HUBBARD R. P. EVENSON SUPERVISING SUPERVISING OPERATOR OPERATOR P M. MARTIN E. J. TAYLOR SHIFT SUPERVISOR SUPERVISING (ADMINISTRATIVE)

OPERATOR R E.KOPECKY S. D. GIFFORD SUPERVISING SUPERVISING OPERATOR OPERATOR J E. GitMORE SUPERylSING OPERATOR M J STEINERT R. S. FERGUSON SUPERVISING SUPERVISING OPERATOR OPERATOR

e 1

W8LF CREEK

' NUCLEAR OPERATING CORPORATION ORGANIZATION CHART ES REVISION 2 DATE 2/93 M.G WILLIAMS MANAGER PLANT SUPPORT l

J.W JOHNSON MANAGER SECURITY D. N DULLUM M. E. STEWNSM SUPERVISOR A

I TRATM PLANT TRENDING S ENSOR

& EVALUATION D. L ERBE C. D RICE M. R. MC-KINNEY M C.LUTZE SUPERVISOR SUPERVISOR LIEUTENANT SECURITY INVESTIGATOR

(

'^

"}

OP R TIONS T IN JG e

4e e

v w

e

~e-

=-

-,1

3g<,

.i "'

l

~I~_-

-- lll}

-)W !

-ll!! h I)

- lill iII

,h x

_s "m

_ii' Fi

-11 ! llli 11illi! $ h=

i y @ _l1 !Il Ll pl lll l

l t-Flid silI!!

z O

111 !

i

-If i

d' k I'.!@2Iii Il i

u p )- gl, 1

(t 1

q1; R[I !!1!B U lill 1

?%

<vi[W

+

?c x

[S/ "f!

^

N,kf G-101-

Rev.'0993 l

JCourse

Lesson Titles' Chapter'7 LInspection Planning l

Author: Paul'Narbut-1.

Introduce Self:.Name/ Region / job / background

.2.

Provide some' background explaining the.simportance ofithe course. :A few suggestions are:

The nature and_ depth of inspections have changed over~the two decades that'we have had NRC inspections.

One thing

,that.hasn't changed is'the fact that inspectors who prepare well. inspect better.and have'more importantLfindings.

'l Provide an example from your personnel: experience'where good 7

planning was an important factor in a successful inspection or, discuss a particularly good inspector you know and link I

his/her-success-to planning.

3.

' Explain that you will review the main points-of_the chapter using view graphs.

Explain that the use.of view' graphs is necessary but will be limited to one_ hour and then you will be presenting real life examples and exercises.

4.

Go to the view graphs.

Present.VG-1 through VG-14 4

After VG-15, Risk based inspection: guides (RIGS), show'a trancparency copy of some RIG cover pages, e.g. NUREG/CR-5832 and NUREG/CR-5766

'Present VG-16 through VG-28

...........YOU SHOULD BE AT A ONE_ HOUR BREAK POINT HERE..........

5.

Present the " generic inspection planner", the " generic team inspection planner", and "the typical inspection planner" from the chapter text examples 7-1,.7-2, and 7-3.

Either make transparency copies from the text or use VG-29,

-30, and -31.

These examples from the chanter test are not. excellent l

examples of good inspection plans in that they are general in nature and don't structure the' inspection as do the examples in the exercise.

The new inspectors generally want examples of "how to do it",

and "what a good plan looks like" along with "what planning to do".

Show view graphs made from IP 87100, Appendix B, pages B-1, B-2, and B-3.

This is an example of a materials inspection plan / field notes.

7-1 i

h g

o-t.

Show VG-32,: the " detailed' inspection plan.for, Perry."

This

)

is in the text as the example of.-a detailed plan.; This lesson plan includes additiona14detailedLplans whichlwere actual inspection-plans' developed in. Region V.

Use these actual plans, or any other good actual examples you'may i

have, in your exercises with the students.

j I

6.

EXERCISE: DEVELOP AN' INSPECTION PLAN.WITH THE STUDENTS 1

'Do.a technical; type.first, the.TI for service water, and j

limit the exercise to the operations portion.

Pass out TI'2515/115 Rev 1 pgs 1,3,4.. Also display view

)

L graphs of the same pages.

Go'over the two key sections:

Objectives and Requirements. Highlight the action words to

)

bring out the actions required by the inspector. (e.g..

" Perform - system walkdown")

Have the students:

collectively review what the operations inspector is supposed to do.

Give them a few minutes.

]

Note that the operations inspector has a pretty tall order j

to fill.

1 Ask the students to guess how mich time would be~ required for this operations inspection.

Discuss how many people'and i

how much time.

(Answer: one inspector, two weeks)

)

Ask the students:

1 What preparation would you do?

(List answers on the

.i blackboard)

Some of the right answers are:

.j read the generic letter and the' response read other sites' inspection reports on this service water team inspection i

read the FSAR and the site's systems training manual i

talk to team leader, resident, section head i

read some procedures arrange and schedule activities Ask the students what inspection activities they would plan.

1 1

(Go down TI items one at a time) l Make a list of the responses on the blackboard again

'I When interest wanes, pass out the plan that was actually used " OPERATIONS AGENDA-P. NARBUT" and here it is:

i 5

7-2

8.,a 1

~,

s. '

j OPERATIONS ADGENA-P. NARBUT'

_j

-1 I

2/2/93, 0800.: Perform detail system walkdown with a licensed plant operator.

This includes piping, electrical, and instrumentation. (8 hrs).

.i

.2/3/93, 0800:

WPPSS to provide indepth briefing on procedures,_

l (operating, abnormal,EOP's, alarm response) (2 hrs) 2/3/93 1100:

Provide detail briefing of operator training for i

SWS, include. training plan, discussion of mods, i

training manual updates. (2 hrs)

I 2/3/93 -1400:

Review operating logs with a. control room supervisor.

l 2/4/93. 0800:

Review valve lineup program with~ Ops Manager.

i Specifically how often is VLU verified, how many j

verificators, throttled valve, locked valves, post-maintenance alignment,etc. (2 hrs) 2/4/93 1100:

Review pond level controls, M/U methods, options.

l (2 hrs) l 2/5/93 0800:

Walk through selected procedures with ops, verify e

performability (4 hrs )

J l

i l

l 4

1 i

1 l

l 7-3

3s s

-j L

The virtues:ofLthe plan are that the major areas of-the TI are covered and the licensee personnel can be~ scheduled-

. ahead of time:to be available for the reviews.

It-in. time efficient.

Note to the students'that the aboveLplan did not cover two:

full-weeks.; Elicit their thoughts on why this is a wise

' thing to'do.

(Answer: to allow time to develop findings)

The results of the plan were productive'and identified-meaningfull issues.

See inspection' report 50-397/93-201 for the results.

7. EXERCISE 2:

Develop another. inspection plan

.Second example-IP 35702, QA Effectiveness

a. Pass out copies of 35702 (assume one individuallis performing the inspection)..On a view graph copy, highlight the ojectives and requirements..This helps the students focus on the obvious (to you and me), "what should be done".

b. Again discuss and-list-the possible preparations

c. Again discuss and list inspection ideas to' accomplish this IP 8.

Pass out the actual inspection plan used.

Here it is:

I

?

I I

i i

I 7-4 1i

~.. -..

,?*

INSPECTION PLAN Revision 6/19/93 Site:

Palo Verde Dates:

June 7-11, 21-25. 1993 Inspector:

P. Narbut Inspection Objectives:

1.

Partially perform Inspection Procedure 35702. INSPECTION OF QUALITY VERIFICATION FUNCTION.

I will utilize the areas of service water and Steam Generator tube inspection as the sample activities to assess the effectiveness of the licensee's OA organization.

2.

Interface with the two Russian Inspector groups observing our activities during the two weeks.

DETAIL rLAN FIRST WEEK 6/7 1300 Arrive at site, meet with Russian Team A. discuss weeks plans 1400 Entrance interview followed by a meeting with the licensee, to review SP and ECW system design and operation.

Review licensee actions taken for Generic Letter 89-13.

Review system problems with the system engineer.

1500 Meet with 0A.

Review all OA and OC overview activities for SP and ESW (and GL 89-13) and SG tube inspection.

Review OA audit results. CAR's and significant surveillance findings for these areas.

Sample about two years worth of effort.

6/8 0800 Commence a detailed walkdown of Unit 1 spray pond and Essential Cooling Water system with the system engineer.

i 1300 Review a one year (1992) sample of the following for ESW and SG tube problems. determine if problems appear to have been effectively dealt with.

PRB minutes

)

LER's i

NCR's CAR's Operability determinations e

Completed Maintenance Work Requests 6/9 0800 Continue record review and identify several (three or four) existing important problems.

For these problems, assess and draw 7-5

e

{ [.

f

. j

~

n-I conclusions on why the OA. organizations were not effective'in-

-identifying the issues or their precursors or root causes.

i

' Examine whether quality verification activities were:

l 3

P1anned adequately-Provided qualified ' people a

Conducted in depth examinations o

e Provided effective corrective action i

e Reported findings effectively to proper levels of-l

'~

. management I

Monitored for change after corrective. action.

t This will be accomplished by interviewing the OA personnel

)

involved, reviewing the records _of the verification' activities.

3 and examining personnel qualifications.

j 6/10 0800 Continue-6/11 1100 1st Week Exit

-l SECOND WEEK l

r j

6/21 1300 Arrive at site, meet with Russian Team B. discuss weeks plans and results from the first week

- j 1400 Perform walk down.of Spray Pond and Essential Service Water. system.

and emphasize areas of interest from first weeks activities for.

. l the Russians.

j 6/22 0800 Continue inspection. C. Myers and M. Payne added to-the I

inspection. Mike to look at Surveillance test problems. Mike is also to follow up a OA audit finding on SP flow set point change s

which operator's were not aware of. Chris to look at NDE and MOV j

problems and 0AM's verification of IN 91-67 for SG tube plugging i

(and the 0A footprints).

Paul-to complete the deviation-background details on GL 89-13 commitments and look at EW Hx tube alugging. What caused the cracking.-is OA driving a root cause.

Examine selected QC reports coating repair. Hx welding repair., and 1

tube plugging.

6/23 0800 Continue inspection l

)

6/24 0800 Continue inspection i

6/25 0800 Exit interview j

i i

l 7-6 i

--