ML20080P616

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Application to Amend License DPR-57,changing Tech Specs to Allow Increased Flexibility in Core Design for Core Reconstitution Schedule for Nov 1983 Replacement of Damaged Fuel
ML20080P616
Person / Time
Site: Hatch Southern Nuclear icon.png
Issue date: 09/29/1983
From: Head G
GEORGIA POWER CO.
To: Stolz J
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20080P618 List:
References
NED-83-483, TAC-52448, NUDOCS 8310070279
Download: ML20080P616 (3)


Text

,

GNaaPoweGccOcey g -$ 333 b 7 0T!A/f*1p A 4 ifjd b y ' j .) 30308 Ti;qnw : uipt %'5 l+9 MWngAom ,

W: Ow a 4545 A ' .mia Ge a 30 162 G. F. Head s o, , . ...n <

h " G"

  • NED-83-483 September 29, 1983 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention: Mr. John F. Stolz, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 4 Division of Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 NRC DOCKET 50-321 OPERATING LICENSE OPR-57 EDWIN I. HATCH NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1

- REQUEST FOR CHANGES TO PLANT HATCH UNIT 1 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Gentlemen:

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90, Georgia Power Company (GPC) hereby requests a revision to Plant Hatch Unit 1 Technical Specifications (Appendix A to Operating License DPR-57). The effects of the revision are threefold: 1) provides Maximum Average Planar Linear Heat Generation Rate (MAPLHGR)hlimits

! for ilodal' exposures greater than 30 Gwd/t; 2) provides MAPLHGR limits for additional fuel types; and 3) provides Minimum Critical Power Ratio (MCPR)-

operating limits for 8x8R and P8x8R fuel. These proposed revisions will allow increased flexibility in core design for the core reconstitution which is scheduled for November 1983 to replace damaged fuel.

In addition to providing MAPLHGR limits at nodal exposures greater than 30 Gwd/t for current Hatch 1 fuel, the revision also provides the MAPLHGR limits for all fuel types available in the futil storage pool for use in the Hatch I core for which we have data available beyond 30 Gwd/t. The MAPLHGR limits for additional fuel types are defined in Reference 1 and in Attachment 1 to this letter (Errata and Addendum sheets will be transmitted following their receipt from General Electric). We have reviewed the results given in these references and conclude that these MAPLHGR limits are conservative for l

operation of these fuel types in Hatch 1. We have also reviewed the peak clad temperatures of the proposed fuel types and have cencluded that the results conform to the criteria specified in References 2, 3, 4, and 10 CFR 50 Appendix K (Section II.l.b). Therefore, the ECCS results justify operation of J

the proposed fuel types to exposures greater than 30 Gwd/t.

l \

goi i 1 t

8310070279 830929 PDR ADOCK 05000321 PDR g Q gGlf. $O I

GeorgiaPower A Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention: Mr. John F. Stolz, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 4 September 29, 1983 Page Two The third change of the revision provides new MCPR operating limits for 8x8R and P8x8R fuel. We have chosen these limits to provide conservative values for general core designs. We will, of course, verify that these limits bound the results of all transient analyses (including ODYN Option A where applicable) during our licensing review of each new core design. We will submit a Technical Specification change if the results require it.

The proposed revision to the Technical Specifications adds MAPLHGR limits for Standard General Electric (GE) fuel types and revises certain operating limits based on analyses using GE standard methodology. Consequently, the existing margins of safety are maintained. Because margins of safety are maintained and no change in operating modes is proposed, there is no increase in the probability or consequences of accidents or malfunctions of equipment important to safety previously analyzed, nor is the possibility created for a new accident or malfunction not previously considered. The Plant Review Board and Safety Review Board have reviewed and approved the proposed changes and have concluded that they do not constitute an unreviewed safety question.

We have determined this request to be a Class III amendment. Attachment 2 consists of a determination of amendment class. A check for $4,000.00 is enclosed. Atta-hment 3 contains instructions for incorporation of the proposed changes with copies of the affected pages. Attachment 4 contains the determination that these changes do not represent a sigr,1ficant hazard as required by 10 CFR 50.91.

GeorgiaPower d Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attention: Mr. John F. Stolz, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 4 September 29, 1983 Page Three

> G. F. Head states that he is Senior Vice President of Georgia Power Company and is authorized to execute this oath on behalf of Georgia Power Company, and that to the best of his knowledge and belief the facts set forth in this letter are true.

GEORGIA POWER COMPANY By: [ S, /bW G. F. Head SworrrTo an scribed before me this 29th day of September,1983.

-r ,

L/

"/7 ~ Ndtaryjbl OLT/mb "' *'"'S""*"

N.yCommissionExpiresJuf f

26,INJ Enclosure xc: H. C. Nix, Jr.

Senior Resident Inspector J. P. O'Reilly, (PEC-Region II)

J. L. Ledbetter (DNR) i l

t f

1

- s._ . - . - -m-,y . -m-,- -

c. . - .