ML20080M950

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Provides Current Status & Projected Completion Date of Continuing Penetration Seal Program & Proposed Schedule for Specific Cable Rerouting,Per App R to 10CFR50
ML20080M950
Person / Time
Site: Peach Bottom  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 02/10/1984
From: Boyer V
PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC
To: Eisenhut D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
NUDOCS 8402220034
Download: ML20080M950 (4)


Text

. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY 2301 MARKET STREET P.O. BOX 8699 PHILADELPHIA. PA.19101 V. S. BOYER February 10, 1984

""je7ll,"1l,"'

Docket Nos. 50-277 50-278 Mr. Darroll G. Eisenhut Division of Licensing U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555

SUBJECT:

Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station Penetration Seal Upgrade Program

REFERENCES:

1) Letter from J. W. Gallagher to D. G. Eisenhut dated October 14, 1981
2) Letter from V. S. Boyer to D. G. Eisenhut, dated September 16, 1983
3) Letter from V. S. Boyer to D. G. Eisenhut, dated December 2, 1983 i

Dear Mr. Eisenhut,

Philadelphia Electric Company, in Reference 1, proposed to upgrade the electrical and mechanical penetration seals in those barriers separating redundant safe shutdown components to meet the design criteria identified in 10CFR50, Appendix R, Sections IIIG and IIIM.

We requested, in a second letter, Reference 3 pursuant to 10CFR50.12, an extension in the date for completion of the rerouting of safe shutdown cabling.

This letter will provide:

(1) the current status and projected completion date of the continuing penetration seal pro-gram and; (2) the proposed schedule extension for specific cable rerouting.

t i

8402220034 840210 PDR ADOCK 05000277

)

F pm i

000 t

{.

. I Penetration Seal Upgrade Program A.

Status As of February 5, 1984, 4160 penetration seals have been upgraded.

It is estimated that a total of 6300 electri-cal and mechanical seals will require upgrading.

The survey of safe shutdown barriers is 95% complete.

Seals have been installed at an average rate of (25) per day, projecting a completion total of 4600 by March 1, 1984.

The following table lists a more detailed breakdown of the completed installation work per unit:

Completed Seals Location (2/5/84)

Unit 2 1272 Unit 3 2136 Common 752 Total 4160 Work has been concentrated in Unit 3 and common in an-ticipation of the Unit 2 refueling outage in the Spring of 1984.

Analysis has shown that only 340 seals are ex-clusively associated with Unit 2.

These seals will be upgraded last.

An additional 225 seals require a Unit 2 outage due to access restrictions resulting from high radiation or high voltage.

The balance of the remaining work is scattered throughout the plant in safe shutdown barriers.

Completed areas to date include all emergency switchgear and battery rooms.

B.

The following discussion describes circumstances which contributed toward delays in program completion:

1)

In reference 2, we reported that the Philadelphia Local of Asbestos Workers was on strike, limiting the availability of workers from surrounding union halls.

The work force during the strike fluctuated from (47) in late May 1983 to (74) during the middle of September, 1983.

When a settlement was reached in September, 1983, (120) asbestos workers were employed on two shifts; the maxi-mum number of craft which could be supported by station personnel.

A significant loss in seal installation production occurred during l

these four months that the strike was in progres3

, As part of our ef forts to mitigate this pro-duction problem and as reported in reference 2, an extensive testing program was undertaken to qualify existing coaling materials.

Results of these tests and our implementation program have been submitted.

2)

During this same time period, a large portion of our work force was diverted from the cche-duled seal work toward correcting initial con-struction deficiencies found in several emergency switchgear and battery rooms.

Corrective action and resulting surveia in other areas severely restricted penetration seal installation production during a period when additional manpower was not available.

These immediate corrective actions are well documented and the subject of an Enforcement Conference held at the NRC Region I Office in King of Prussia on August 11, 1983.

3)

Our Alternative Shutdown Proposal was submit-ted on September 16, 1983 for NRC review.

Approval was received on January 26, 1984.

Reference 1 stated " Completion of the upgrade effort will be consistent with the schedule for implementing the alternative shutdown modifications (March 1, 1984) ".

Although this SER approval has not directly affected the upgrade program, it could be considered a fac-tor in completion of our survey of safe shut-down barriers which identified all electrical and mechanical seals requiring upgrade.

We hereby request, pursuant to 10CFR50.12, an exemption from the March 1, 1984 completion date as stated below:

a)

For all No. 3 Unit penetration seals, an extension to June 1, 1984; b)

For all No. 2 Unit penetration seals, an extension to June 1, 1984 or to the end of the Unit 2 Refueling Outage, which ever is latest.

II Cable Re-Routing Programs Under No. 3 Unit, attachment E to reference 3, we committed to having ten cables rerouted by 3/15/84 (with any necessary encapsulation complete also).

Rerouting these cables will require approximately (5) days of system inoperability

l !

(blocking) for one cable (HPCI) and (9) days of system inop-erability (blocking) for the remaining 9 cables (Core Spray).

PEco feels that it would not be prudent to block either of these ECCS systems while the unit is at power.

Therefore, we hereby request, pursuant to 10CFR50.12, an exemption to our present completion schedule such that the above reroutes will not be required to be completed until the next Unit 3 forced outage commencing after 2/29/84 of sufficient duration to do this work in series (due to licensing requirements the HPCI and Core Spray Systems cannot be blocked simultaneously).

We are confident'that this letter documents the continued ef-forts being made at Peach Bottom to meet our commitments, and sufficiently. states the need for the requested exemptions to the previously referenced schedules.

Should you have any questions or require additional informa-tion, please do not hesitate to contact us.

Very truly yours, bfb V8 W GMM/ cam /gmm71 Copy to:

A.

R. Blough, Site Inspector W. T. Ullrich Peach Bottom E. C. Kistner V. S. Doyer G. N. DeCowsky S. L. Daltroff W. M. Alden/W. C. Bitely J. S.'Kemper J. G. Weisheit E. J. Bradley G. M. Morley M. J. Cooney R. S. Fleischmann, II R.

H. Moore J. W. Gallagher g

.., i.

_ _ _ _. _ _. _. _. _ _. _, _ _ _ _