ML20080G592
| ML20080G592 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 02/01/1984 |
| From: | CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| To: | STONE & WEBSTER, INC. |
| References | |
| CSC-7269, NUDOCS 8402130459 | |
| Download: ML20080G592 (5) | |
Text
,_
q-CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY MID1.AND ENERGY CENTER g
3M Transmittal No:
CSC-7269 Date February 1, 1984 To: -Stone & Webster P O Box 1963 Midland, MI 48640 Attached Is:
Partial Response To T
m HCIPAL STAF C yRP V S.h X
Complete Response To i t A' l
f/dA
{\\/j" 33A For Your Information
. <"o Tc3 d Y3 Other h
.,s_L gp-Ei10 l
==
Description:==
Tracked Information Item 050.
O
- Signaturer
- JGKeppler, NRC Region. III w/a -
ec:
JJHarrison, NRC Region III w/a RJCook, NRC Site w/a RAWells, MPQAD w/a BHPeck, MEC w/a NIReichel, MEC w/a DDJohnson, MEC w/a FEB 8 1984 8402130459 840201 PDRADOCK05000g Q)g
/
~
Sheet 1 of 2
f5f"*'"lH%D POINT NMER.
STONE & WEBSTER CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION O TRACKED ACTION ITEM
~
- OVERVIEW, O TRACKED INFORMATION ITEM N/Bl4NB #vClEAR fidNT J.0. NO. /f 509 O TRACKED RECOMMENDATION ITEM REFERENCE (S)
O UNTRACKEDITEM CPC'o Memo. CSC-7119 of 12/23/83 (cooy attachod)
O HOLD POINT NOTIFICATIOll CONDITION DETAILS The following documents discuss Q and/or Q-interface CWP's/ items:
- 1) FPG-7.300, Rev. 3 " Construction Work Plans (CWP)"
- 2) 'MPQAD Procedure T-3, Rev. 1 "Ccntrol, Release and Handling of Construction Work Plans (CWP) and Quality Work Packages (QWP)"
- 3) CPCo " Ground Rules for Construction Work", dated June 2, 1983 In discussing the above with CPCo personnel, the following was noted:
- 1) Q-interface wor!: may or may not require inspection.
2)- The inspection /non-inspection guideline in use presently by the TQR's/MPQAD QCE's is a handwritten list.
X YEs wo..s,1 O NO ATTACHMENTS
/
SEE SHEET 2 0F 2
/
/
IN! IA APPROVED /DATE D ATE RESPONSE REQ'D.
INIT TE 2-6-84 i
a) )) l/$0/ $f m
/~ys-p y
/
RESPONSE.
A) CPCo attached letter CsC-7229 dated January 31, 1984 is Consumers Power Company's complete response to Item #050.
B) The above referenced memo CsC-7119 dated December 23, 1983 is not a issue in Item #050.
l b YES NO. s)
NO ATTACHMENTS EST. CORRECTIVE ACTION RESPONDENT TITLE DATE COMPLETION DATE RESPONSE ACCEPTED DATE RESPONSE VERIFIED / CLOSED DATE ad G
Item Number 050 CONDITION DETAILS (continued)
Sheet 2 of 2
- 3) There is no specification /PQCI/ Procedure which establishes which Q-interface items receive or do not receive inspections. Thus, there is no desig~n/ engineering consideration being given to
~
the present-inspection /non-inspection guidelines.
Please advise CIO of the resolution of this condition where there is no fonnal direction for which Q-interface items do or do not require inspection.
NOTE: The subject above was addressed prior to utilization of this reporting form. - As such,-this--information item -is being -- - -- - - -
Issued as a tracking mechanism.
G O
o O
e 9
_- ~,
o
w i CODSUm0fS 4
L-(
)
h{f[
Des.1 t Quemme
(
Campany-
%','TL, Midfand Project: PO Boa 1963, Midland. M14864o. (517) 6318650 January 31, 1984 Mr G A Hierzer Bechtel Power Corporation
'P O Box 2167 Midland,.MI 48640 MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER CWO 7020 Q-INTERFACE CWP POLICY STATEMENT File: 0456, 0655, Bl.l.7 UIF: 99*08; 53*50*04, 12*50 Serial: CSC-7229 Recen'tly Stone & Webster had a concern about what inspections were necessary for Q-Interface CWPs.
This was a result. from a Stone & Webster representative having discussions with various Field Engineers and Team Quality Reps on the Teams.
The result of these discussions indicated that there was some confusion among thes s Team members.as to what was the purpose of a Q-Interface CWP, what work was required to be inspected and also where to find these requirenents.
It was. agreed by Consumers ' Site Management and Stone & Webster that a po1 icy
~
statement should be distributed to the Teams. The attached policy statement should be distributed to all System / Area Teams for their immediate notification.
Team Supervisors and ' Lead TQR should ensure that all Team members receive a copy and that the Field Engineers and Team Quality Reps fully understand all aspects of Q-Interface CWPs.
If any questions still re=ain, the Team should contact their CPCo Construction Engineer for further clarification. This action should be completed by February 8, 1984.
Furthermore, this policy statement should be incorporated in MPQAD Procedure T-3 and FPG-7.300 as an attachment.
This will ensure that any personnel requiring training in either of these procedures in the future will be i:.structed as to the purpose of Q-Interface and how to determine what inspections are necessary.
The attached policy statement's development was coordinated with Bechtel an.d MPQAD.
,Y 4
DLQ/DLH/ kip Jh cc:
RAWells, MPQAD
_BHPeck, MEC DDJohnson, MEC NIReichel, MEC JChristy, MPQAD JReins'ch, BPCo
P
[O D
l~,
\\
To Bechtel System / Area Team Members From P o Sit D anag ent
\\c
~ Date n 7anuary 27, 1984~
Subject Q-13TERFACE CWP POLICY STATEMEFT Q-Interface is a word coined by Consumers Power Site Management.
Its purpose is to ensure that any work which comes in contact with a Q Commodity or renders a Q Commodity inaccessible, is ultimately controlled by Consumers
-Site-Management.
Q-Interf ace CWPs in an area will be discontinued at cocnence-ment of Phase II of the CCP.
The reason CPCo requires control of these Q-Interface CRPs is two-fold:
(1) to ensure that the installation of a commodity will not conceal Q items that need verification inspection and (2) to ensure that the work activities being done does not, violate Phast I, controls set up by CPCo & the NRC.
These centrols are being inccrporated into Section 7 of FPG-7.300 Rev 4, and are delineated in the CCP Confirmatory Order.
(These controls were formally referred to as the
" Ground Rules".)
Actual work that is performed 'in the field is Q or Non-Q.
CWPs are marked as Q-Interf ace only asc a managemenistool to ensure that the above requirements are met.
Some Non-Q work' performed by a Q-Interface CWP may have programmatic QC hold points which are addressed in the PQCI.
The Field Engineer will fill out a CWP in accordance with FPG-7.300 and take the determination of which block (Non-Q, Q-Interface or Q) to check based on drawings and specifications in which he. is working with.
Hold points are assigned based on the applicable specifications and the PQCI.
This is des-cribed in Section 4.5.3 of the Construction Completion Program.
The Team Quality Representative receives the Q-Interface or Q CWP following the initial preparation and reviews the hold points ensuring the requirecents of the PQCI are met, per FPG-7.300 and MPQAD Procedure T-3.
The TQR shall sign the CWP until all quality planning is complete.
not Once all the above items are completed per applicable specifications and procedures the Q or Q-Interface CWP is forwarded to CPCo Site Management Office
~
for review and sign-off.
L