ML20080G231
| ML20080G231 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 02/06/1984 |
| From: | Eddleman W EDDLEMAN, W., JOINT INTERVENORS - SHEARON HARRIS |
| To: | Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20080G234 | List: |
| References | |
| 82-468-01-OL, 82-468-1-OL, ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8402130314 | |
| Download: ML20080G231 (4) | |
Text
.
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
,6 g bguary 196b.
NUCLEAR BEGULATORY COMMISSION rJ U
- - Sk 00CXEil:4 ^ d" BRANCH BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING E0AED Glenn O. Bright Dr. Janes H. Carpenter James L.- Kelley, Chairman In the Matter of CAROLINA POWER AND LIGHT CO, et al.
)
~
(Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant,
)
Units 1 and-2)
)
ASLEP Nc3 82-h68-01
)
CL Joint Intervenors ' Response to Soard order served Jan. 30 (Ruling on Summary Disposition on Joint Contention II etc)
Joint ~Intervenors believe that this extensive order shows a detailed examination of the issues raised in Joint' Contention II by the Board, and we ar,e appreciative of that effort.
We do intend to,nresent Drs. Johnson and Sternglass as witnesses if they are still available.
Dr. Sternglass indicates he will be out of the country, lecturing in Europe, from about May 10, 196k until early June.
WebelieveDr.Sternglassisthebestpossiblewitnesstodefend his own work, just as Dr. Gofman is the best witness to present his own work (cf. 1-27-84 order at 19) and respectfully seek the Board's and parties ' cooperation to schedule a health effects hearing where he can appear, understanding the Board 's caution about voir dire.
We believe Dr, We presume in allowing Dr. Sternglass t,o croear, Join.pearid [dGV Cr 3bNC Johnson can also aq II(d) is alive.
We see no point in contesting the Board's rulings on Jof tt II's various.agec ts; it would waste the Board's. tir.e and ours.
We do reque,st clarification of the status of Joint II(d).
8402130314 840206 PDR ADOCK 05000400 0
- We do also intend to make our case -by cross-exanination of witnesses.(cf. Boar.1 Order of 1-27-Sh at 6).
On this point we respectfully request the Board's guidance: -the Board has,
1 we believe, alluded in the past to croza-examination by non-experts re health effects as possibly being non productive.
We therefore ask whether we will be required to emylcy health
- effects experts in order to conduct caross-examination on Joint Contention II.
If -so, we would appreciate being so advised at your earliest convenience.
Finally, the served conies of the Board's 1-27-8E Order omit nage 51; however, the nessage appears clear fren the continuation on uage $2: received and unders'tood.
'We expect to: begin. discovery of our own on Joint Contentions I and VII within 2 weeks; Applicants have already served a first round of discovery on us.
JOINT INTERV52?O95 Kudzu Alliance, CEANGE, Conservation Council of North Carolina and Wells Eddleman, by Wells Eddlenan
i Rie e
cyc j*j' UNITED STATES e,
/
J' D
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
(
A
('
i5 3
,E REGION ll DW
[
101 MARIETTA STREET. N.W.
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30303 UTM I
\\,,,,, /
/
JAN 2 61984
^ ~
d, Mr. Wells Eddleman 718-A Iredell Street Durham, NC 27701
Dear Mr. Eddleman:
SUBJECT:
RII-83-A-OO66 This letter is in response to your letter of July 19, 1983, to Mr. Charles
- 8arth, In your letter you said that your review of weld data reports onCour.s at the Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant revealed possible problemr. with pipe hangers four specific hangers.
We have reviewed these four specific hanger packages and the following infor-mation is provided per your request:
1.
Plumbing and drainage system seismic hanger No. A-1-216-1-PD-H-441 was inspected on April 14, 1982, and four welds were rejected. Records indi-cate that these welds were reinspected and April 13, 1983.
accepted to drawing revisior 3 on 2.
Plumbing and drainage system hanger No. A-1-216-1-PD-H-456 was cited as missing welds.
Welds were reinspected and accepted to drawing revision 1 on January 6, 1983.
3.
Service water system hanger No. A-3-216-1-SW-H-473 is stated in a report dated January 20, 1983, to have been welded by an unqualified welder (stencil E-58) and to have burn through.
The burn through was on a tack weld on shim plates. This item has not received the final inspection nor has it been accepted.
A review of records irdicates that the above welder was quali-fled to the applicable procedure (1A4) on October 28, 1982, per the require-ments of ASME Section IX, Article III, paragraph OW-302.2, 1980 Edition, 1982 Summer Addenda.
The subject welds in question are tack welds (fillet type, non-load bearing) for which the welder was also qualified.
4.
Service water system hanger No. A-3-216-1-SW-H-531 notes welds were rejected because a number of welds are differeret from the type shown on the drawing. All drawings have gone through a weld symbol review subsequent to the 1980-1981 reinspecticn.
The above welds were reinspected to drawing revision 6 and accepted on March 30, 1983.
Should you have additional questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me collect at (404) 221-4193.
If you should call and I am not available, please ask to speak to my associate or, if you prefer, leave a message so that I can return your call.
Should you want to write to me, my mailing address is RII/IA', PO Box 2203, Atlanta, GA 30301.
t l
/
W. Eddleman January 26, 1984 We appreciate your bringing your concerns to our attention and should we be able to provide you with additional assistance, please do not hesitate to contact me.
Sincerely, c-Bruno Uryc, Jr.
/
Investigation / Allegation Coordinator lW.. -~
A_
'l m
T!RM90 Dockat <o-hoo 1-31 8h SHEAu.0!! HA9 BIS WITCLEAR PO FD PLWT' Ton Baxter Shaw, Pittman Potts & Trowbridge Attorney f or Annlicants Carolina Power & Light et al.
Dear Ton 3axter,
Cron USN'C 9egion II.
Today I veceived the enclosed letter to this case.
It does not indicate that it has been served on the parties I recall that one of your interrogatories asks ne if I know of a I believe iten specific defective unrenaired nine hange" at Harris.
3 of the enclosed letter fron Bruno Urvo, Jr. (DII 93-A-0066) 1-P6 814 by certified mail to me, is informatien resnonsive to that Therefore I an today sending a cony of the letter interrogatory.
Other to you and a cony of it and of this letter to Judge Kelley.
l i n th e next filing I parties will be served with a cony of thir
$ 2,v b cat.
{ () h i h 5 H arv
- k8*
"*O--
N p, w. & M..%
,Q b8.9 84b M Y
\\ 8 *),'
1-mm ( E
_