ML20080D920
| ML20080D920 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 08/18/1983 |
| From: | Leonard H CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| To: | Baranow S STONE & WEBSTER, INC. |
| References | |
| 23517, NUDOCS 8308300642 | |
| Download: ML20080D920 (4) | |
Text
6 -:
4 CORSum8IS Pa mcmat _srare Power an
<*me t
- ^
scs%d3 Company 3/RA oAo Q
DPRP sto
{
A SC f
Midland Project: Po Box 1963, Midland. MI 4B640 + (517) 6318650 TEM 5F
[
f.
I August 18, 1983 S
L nFILE//rZ -
n uo Mr Stanley Baranow Stone & Webster Construction Co Midland Nuclear Cogeneration Plant PO Box 1963 Midland, MI 48640 MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER - SEHIAL: 23517 FILE: 24.2
References:
1.
MLCurlan'd letter to RAWells, dated August 8, 1983, Serial 25172 2.
RAWells letter to JWCook, dated August 8,1983, Serial 23677 3
RAWells letter to DBM111er, dated August 9, 1983,
Subject:
Midland Energy Center Project - Material Traceability Review CCP Zone 6 Please find attached copies of the three memos referenced above which deal with material traceability.
Should you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or Brien Palmer.
s
$U/
~
HPLeonard, General QA Superintendent Plant Assurance Division Midland Project Quality Assurance Department HPL/BMP/ckb cc:, JHarrison,;USNRC DBMiller, Midland BMPalmer, Midland DATaggart, Midland i
RAWells, Midland i
l i
8308300642 830818
\\(
i PDR ADOCK 05000329 A
PDR AUG 2 51983
=
y SY s To MWells FaoM
.,MLCurland DATc August 8, 1983 Power Company
.SueJccT MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER PROJECT -
PROGRAMMATIC REVIEW OF MATERIAL TRACEABILITY BY MPQAD connespomocuec FILE 24.0 SERIAL 25172 cc MPQAD has completed a review of the procedures and systems in use at the Midland Plant,for identification and control of material and components in response to a Zone 6 action item of the Construction Completion Program. An evaluation was made of the adequacy of these procedures and systems to fulfill and adhere to regulatory, code and standard requirements regarding material identification and control.
The review consisted of:
a search of require-ment documents, procedures, specifications and instructions; personnel contact; and observations of stockrooms, storage areas and field installations.
Inves-tigations concentrated on. pipe hangers and supports, structural materials, piping, and weld filler _m gerial.
Based on this review, my staff and I have concluded that the systems in use for material identification and control do provide for compliance,with ASME Code requirements of identification through fabrication, and for 10CFR50 Appendix B requirements of preventing the use of incorrect material. Although the requirements are met, the degree of compliance is considered minimal. The report prepared by my staff does recommend some actions which it is believed
~
will provide a more positive control for future activities and will lessen project vulnerability to subsequent difficulty in responding to questions of material acceptabili,ty.
However, it is my judgement that the present program and the verification of material identification imposed by appropriate PQCIs complies with the commitments for this project.
It is my conclusion that although certain improvements will be recommended, as~noted above, there should be no constraint or holds placed on the inspection process at this time.
MLC/pab i
e
~
..es i
i To JWCook, P-26-336B FaoM RAWells, Midland Consumers DAvc August 8, 1983 Power Sussc cT MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER PROJECT -
CCP PROGRAMMATIC REVIEWS MATERIAL TRACEABILITY
$',*,"$,ococe FILE 24.0 SERIAL 23677 cc WRBird, P-14-418A DBMiller, Midland MLCurland, Midland BMPalmer, Midland HPLeonard, Midland As part of our Construction Completion Program, MPOAD was assigned the responsibility to conduct certain programmatic reviews as a prerequisite to initiation of Phase 2 of the CCP.
The purpose of this memo is to address the review conducted on material identification and control.
This study has been completed under the direction of M L Curland, Principal Quality Advisor for -
MPQAD.
The fundamental conclusion of the study is that the systems in use for material identification and control do provide for compliance with ASME Code requirements of identification through fabr'ication, and for 10CFR50 Appendix B requirements of preventing the use of incorrect material.
. conclusions and recommendations contained in the MPQAD The detailed findings, report vill be presented to the CCP Management Review group and selected staff in the very near future.
It is the position of MPQAD that our material identi-fication and control systems are acceptable, although certAin reconenendations may be made for future improvements. Additionally, since materia 1 identifica-tion and control verification is required where necessary.through appropriate PQCIs, it is concluded that the program for material identification and control requirements and verification is acceptable for inspection purposes: Although some improvements will be recommended to the overall program, these are not considered a constraint to our inspection process.. The'cngoing lirger rein-spection effort and reinspections under the QVP will meet progrimmitic materiai
~
identification and control requirements.
This position is based upon a collective review of the final draft report by my staff and upon the recommendation of M L Curland, attached.
l RAW /pab 4
i e
e e
p
,s' l
To DBhiller
. g rnos RAWen CODSumetS DArc August 3
Power company SusJccT MIDLAND ENERCY CENTER PROJECT -
MATERIAL TRACEABILITY REVIEW
' CCP ZONE 6 g,yg.,,g CoaatsPowotact CC The attached mecos indicate that MPQAD.hao compieted its review of.miteridi, traceability as required by, Zone 6 of the CCP.
As. indicated in the Attiched,'
the programs presently in place are, acceptable, although,some recommend 4tions for improvements for future use will be made.
The. details of the study ind conclusions vill be. presented to the CCP management i;roup for informition in the near future.
I consider this CCP assignment ciosed.
~
~
jln CONSUMERS POWER COMPANY ECE;VEg AUG 1 o1953 HP LEONARD 4
4 3I l