ML20079N227
| ML20079N227 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Robinson  |
| Issue date: | 01/26/1984 |
| From: | Trowbridge G CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO., SHAW, PITTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE |
| To: | Ruoff J PALMETTO ALLIANCE |
| References | |
| 83-484-03-LA, 83-484-3-LA, ISSUANCES-OLA, NUDOCS 8401300139 | |
| Download: ML20079N227 (5) | |
Text
a k
(
SHAW, PITTMAN. PoTTs & TROWBRIDGE A..arna.sM'* Or ortst'ON.L eO*"O
, IONS Q
teco be sThEET, N. W.
USbhb wASM,NG70N. O. C. 20036
(==>====
- o......g.
.......e s_~. ~o, <.. e ns;;'.: n.... g 2Et",2gy,*e....
.....eo~
w::: 4,~.
st
=n";;w:::n
- = "a.n;m:::.n.
n = e "::
- "Ah's,*.."?,;*a"/c' t'"!!?.**ru'.Y:E"et
= = =..
- n.. '.".sm,,
e;te,'......:
aces =oseser=++o ti?"#fE,'
"p"ff SE d"J ;t; ""o*a4" O?!M.","'!Al?!'
?!?"t*6"ny17 "" "'
"8:!"? 1: 'a!,"."Ec.
!!,'*?,' '; ";.u, P.j[R A NC.f, i3 til? " " c 12"v2? / C A.7,*f."e'e*
1"7J"."a#'i+;*: e G4
-r.
,oo hiW' *MY2 "" "'
"* ?'3,[]".'s?i,*,*.*6'! *
- aon.am an
?* ??, h*e* "' "!,*,,",;'
':,".*::g;;g,,
e "E,"*"*
s?;" %*."I',Ne? *'
3TE:no"n?:.",.O
- n"t'?',"?it"$"c'""
t*"l'.hu'.t"$'"W,"""'e't
".!Ei.'.". laid'.'L E Nc' " "*
". =.s.?
i.t.'t."Ji';f!./.h.
ML*"".! o '.s ff,;'.
c m,
r oo lME"hid?bg*". * *...c.
Ei',"tat".n.:lfhi' "
"'**'(*"'*"****)
."?,"'? fiu';,t',
itif.*f"'."."J.,...
c
- c w.o c. o 8E N oOL No CM EL.
.iG E
. J".*d'."?.Yi"- ll *. e
'" "'! " Off""'*"
- ^ * ' ' ~ * " ' * ' ' * '
h.i."*."Ic* *."",......
1 J 'o". '.?ht'"'"
s f'.;L':2"
- fi;i.*u"e'
- i':' *a"12 :'"**
1"a':".o'o** 3.ts.",,,
- ??*a?." :"'.'".u-..
i'."!!! 3"."?'."Oc.
?!"L.'s** ",lM "
""c."I"o t 't.tt lllllll?ll a 2'#,?..e.
d T';",'.'il"f"Jhf.5.e.
"?" ":."A?"4T"
- ** "*"*""d"
'"ct"^*. leo"28"'" d" fA*"..';'!:'""'"
!;17/a iv"fc'J'!". "'
'8""'!#,.*f,O','? -.
- lli". io"Jc""f"'
."!,fra".? ",..'.21.5"&" n January 26, 1984
..e,......evo..L 822-1026 Dr. John C.
Ruoff c/o Palmetto Alliance 2135-1/2 Devine Street Columbia, South Carolina 29205 Re: Carolina Power & Light Co.
Robinson Unit 2 Docket No. 50-261-OLA ASLBP No. 83-484-03LA
Dear Dr. Ruoff:
I am enclosing a list of questions and document requests prepared by CP&L in order to understand the assumptions and cal-culations embodied in ESRG's January 20, 1983, cost comparison of the retirement vs. steam generator replacement alternative for Robinson 2.
A number of the questions ask for copies of the workpapers and data or the computer inputs and outputs used in developing the ESRG projections.
These documents would in our view prove from ESRG's standpoint the simplest, and from CPSL's standpoint the most informative, means of complying with CP&L's information requests.
Recognizing that time is short, we have asterisked those questions and document requests to which we most urgently need a response.
We request that an immediate answer to these items be sent by express mail to CP&L (attention Mr.
B. Mitchell Williams) with the balance to follcw as soon as possible.
8401300139 840126 PDR ADOCK 05000261 0
PDR qO@-
[
bs S
r SHAw, PITTMAN, PoTTs & TROWZRIDGE 8
a sammteswee or Ntsesoma6 Compoc hows Dr. John C.
Ruoff January 26, 1984 Page Two When we have received answers we may need to ask more follow-up questions and for this reason I have asked that ESRG be prepared to meet with us next week at their offices in Boston if this proves necessary.
CP&L is prepared to reimburse ESRG for the reasonable costs of reproducing the documents requested.
A copy of this letter and its enclosure have been sent by Federal Express to Dr. Raskin at ESRG.
Sincerely, SHAW, P TTMAN, POTTS & TROWBRIDGE y) m44 korgeF Trowbrid cc: Dr. Paul D.
Raskin Service List
(
4
}
ESRG Data' Request
- l.
Provide the GNP Deflators or other specific cost deflators used in the study for the years 1979, 1980, 1981, 1982, and 1983, the source of the deflators used, and the application in the study.
2.
Provide copies of the items referred to in the following specific numbered references on pages 116, 117, 118, and 119 of the study:
Reference Item Nos.
3, 13, 14, 17, 18, 39, 42 and 44.
Where specific pages of a document are referenced, only the. referenced pages need be provided.
Where personal communication is referenced, provide copies of all letters, memorandums or other written communication; in the case of verbal communications, provide copies of notes, transcripts, or other written documentation of the communication.
3.
Provide a complete description and'a copy of all input and output of the " Computer-based Costing Model" for all applica-tions of the model in the study (page 11).
4.
Provide the " financial model...used to simulate these revenue flows" (page 13) including all computer programs and documen-tation, a complete description of the study, and copies of all input and output data used for each application of this model in the study.
- 5.
Provide copies of all workpapers and data used to develop each column in Table 2.1 (page 17).
6.
Provide copies of all workpapers and data used to calculate the " average 2.8d per kW saved" cost of " incremental conser-vation investments" (page 20).
What conservation programs are assumed in Baseline load forecast?
What further conservation programs or efforta are targeted in sensitivity analyses?
7.
What is the basis for the assumption that an additional 300 MW
" load reduction" by the end of the study period is achievable (page 20) ?
8.
What is the assumed "real escalation rate" in O&M costs (page 21)?
9.
Provide a copy of the U. S. Department of Energy publication from which the " ten-year average industrywide capacity factor of 57 percent" was derived (page 24).
10.
Provide a description of the methodology and copies of the workpapers in the " detailed analysis" performed to divide out-ages into " refueling and NRC" and " maintenance and repair" categories (page 25).
R
I'l, f
1 11.
Provide all workpapers and data used to develop the "four percent NRC outage rate" (page 25).
12.
Provide all workpapers and data used to derive the " improve-ment factor" " derived from industrywide data compiled by the NRC" (page 34).
13.
Provide all data and studies relied on to develop or determine the " improvement factor" previously referred to in question 12.
14.
Provide all workpapers and data used to " modify upward" the capacity factor regression results (page 26).
15.
Provide the workpapers and data used to derive the NRC-mandated outage " weighted average...for the years 1975 to 1981" (page 26).
16.
Provide copies of the computer printouts of the regression equation from the actual computer runs used to develop Table 3.3 (page 33).
- 17.
Was the re3t asion equation in Table 3.3 estimated using ordinary least squares?
- 18.
Was the regression equation in Table 3.3 estimated using gen-eralized least squares?
19.
Provide copies of all workpapers and data used to derive Table 3.4 (page 35).
- 20.
Provide all workpapers and data used to derive Table 3.6, in-cluding, but not limited to, a detailed description of the derivation of each column (page 38).
21.
Provide copies of the regression analysis results used to de-rive Table 4.3 (page 43).
22.
Provide the computer printouts from the actual computer runs used to estimate the regression equation in Table 4.5 (page 47).
23.
Provide copies of all workpapers and data used to derive Table 4.7 (page 51).
24.
Provide a copy of all workpapers and data used to derive Table 5.2 (page 55).
- 25.
Provide all workpapers used to calibrate the net capital addi-tions model to the experience at the Robinson Plant (page 61).
26.
Provide copies of all workpapers and data used to develop the "56 percent" "overall adjustment factor" (page 61).
27.
Provide a copy of all workpapers and data used to derive the "17.37 percent" fixed charge rate" (page 61).
2 n.
['
1
- 28.
Provide copies of all workpapers and data used to derive Table 5.6 (page 62).
29.
Provide copies of all workpapers and data used to " adjust the cost of financing nuclear fuel inventories" to reflect the lower level of generation and hence, nuclear fuel expense" (page 63).
30.
Provide copies of all calculations and data used to derive the
$12.7 million nuclear fuel inventory " write-off" (page 64).
31.
Provide copies of all workpapers and data used to derive Table 6.1 (page 65).
- 32.
Provide copies of all workpapers and data used to develop Table 6.4 (page 75).
- 33.
Provide copies of all workpapers and data used to derive Table 6.6 (page 87).
34.
What tax assumptions were used in developing Table 6.6 (page 87) ?
35.
Provide a complete description of the " utility financial model
... employed to simulate the flow of required revenues" associated with the steam generator investment (page 89).
36.
Provide copies of all input and output from the " Utility finan-cial model" used in the study (page 89).
37.
Provide copies of all workpapers and data used to derive Table 6.7 (page 90).
38.
Provide copies of all workpapers and data used to derive the
$83 million savings due to steam generator write-off (page 91).
39.
Provide copies of all workpapers and data used to derive the
$38 million " net benefit to retirement" (page 92).
- 40.
Provide copies of all workpapers and data used to derive Table 7.2 (page 103).
41.
Provide a complete description and copies of all input and output of the financial model used "to simulate CP&L characteristics and practices" (page 10).
42.
What capital structure and cost of capital were used to develop capital-related revenue requirements?
43.
Provide a list, by name, of all computer software packages em-ployed in the study, or used to develop input for the study, and the location and owner of the computer on which the software packages reside.
3 i
a