ML20079K064
| ML20079K064 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 01/16/1984 |
| From: | Quamme D CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| To: | Baranow S STONE & WEBSTER, INC. |
| References | |
| CSM-0719, CSM-719, NUDOCS 8401240501 | |
| Download: ML20079K064 (10) | |
Text
.
o Consumers i
J Power o~ ' o--a-Site Manager Midlend Project P
- m. alNo f pgL STAFP I
Midland Project PO Box 1963. M41and. MI 48640 (517) 631-865o
' [k January 16, 1984 NHA
Mr S W Baranow L}g T
Stone & Webster vg g-P O Box 1963 li to Midland, MI 48640 W
MIDLAND ENERGY CENTER FCR/FCN STOP WORK ORDERS File: Bl.1.7, 0460.3 UFI: 99*08, 73*
Ser~21: CSM-0719 As presented during our discussion on January 16, 1984, this letter transmits the actions which have or will be taken to address the concerns identified in MPQAD Management Corrective Action Request / Report (MCARR) DAT-1 and Stone
& Webster Construction Implementation Overview Item Number 043.
The specific outline of short-term and long-term corrective actions is given in Attachment 1.
Included in this attachment is the discussion on document control actions to be taken in relation to lifting the FCR/FCN Stop Work Orders.
The resolution and document control process for soils are being provided in Attachments 2 and 3.
Specifically, as we discussed on January 16, 1984, Soils will work to documents processed through Document Control Stations 8, 10, 13, 24 and 64.
The approach toward document distribution for Status Assessment and Quality Verification Program activities, however, has been re-evaluated to provide direct control of distribution from the Field Document Control Center (Station 59). As outlined in Attachment 4, Work Prints and Installation Status Assessment Prints will be processed and controlled. Bechtel Field Procedure FPD-1.000, FPD-3.000 and FPC-7.500 have been revised to address this process. These procedures have been approved on January 16, 1984.
Installation Status Assessment will only utilize " Status Assessment Prints (SAPS)", and Quality Verification will only utiliz"e " Work Prints".
Other packaged construction activities where specific documents are utilized and controlled, such as. Construction Work Plans (CWPs), will also only utilize work prints.
All Status Assessment Prints and Work Prints will be identified as such on the document.
As we discussed, we will continue to release on a discipline-by-discipline basis.
We will continue to coordinate this effort with you through Norm Reichel.
If you have any further questions regarding this subject, please do not hesitate to contaqt me directly.
/
t
/ [84 I \\
L, 8401240501 840116 PDR ADOCK 05000329 A
/
,M DLQ/9AT/pp
't&% g
P 33 2 CSM-0719 January, 16,.1984-CC: JJHarrison, NRC Region-III
~
RJCook, NRC Site JGKeppler, NRC Region III RAWells, MEC NIReichel,'MEC BHPeck, MEC DDJohnson, MEC JKMeisenheimer, MEC DATaggart, MEC e
s 9
9 e
e 4
4 9
6 O
6 4
e O
/
p
,v-
.e.,
r---~w
- -, --,-<r-
---r-
-~s v
,-ww---
=
Page 1 of 3 1
FE-AI-J-586 QA-AI-S-04146 CPCo-MCAR/R-DAT-1 Detailed below is Construction's complete response to the subject MCAR/R.
ROOT CAUSE Lack of full implementation to established procedures at certain station locations.
The magnitude of the revised documents being distributed to the stations has impacted document control compliance following the issue of the Stop hbrk Order.
In order to support actions necessary to correct deficiencies associated with SWO FSW 33-41, several interim registers are being utilized for document control.
We regard this as inadequate for long term document control.
CORRECTIVE ACTION'TAKEN SHORT TERM Improvements In Administrative Coordination During The Sb0 Registers and distribution deficiencies noted by MPQAD and/or Stone and lebster have been corrected.
We will continue to release documentation for audit by discipline groups.
As noted in the MCARR, the magnitude of document distribution associated with the stop work along with our accelerated movement to automated registers has impacted compliance with established procedures. To reduce non-compliances the following actions have been taken or are planned:
1.-
Increasing oral and written communications between document control and recipient organizations.. Daily sessions began December 5,1983 and have included status updates, explanation of documents, procedures and process changes associated with the stop work.
Status handouts and other written materials are distributed in the meeti ngs.
2.
Tra'ining sessions for field employees including Bechtel', SMO, MPQAD, and subcontractors who are updating / auditing sticks were held on January 6,1983. These sessions provided a review of drawing, specification, FSK, one time deviation, vendor, and change paper registers being used on the jobsite, and in addition, the R)DL (Fiel.d Document Distribution -List).
T/N 54944
- Page 1 of 3 i
---s-
=
.. ~
Page 2 of' 3 6
3.
Adding additional supervisory personnel to the document control center to improve the interface with recipient organizations and improve monitoring of the work.
- 4. -Increasing levels of register verification due to the accelerated schedule of converting from primarily manual to automated document control register systems.
This effort began in early December,1983.
5.
Drawing and revision registers will continue to be distributed to document distribution locations for use as a master reference.
6.
Bechtel management, and WQAD have revi.ewed and reduced the number of distribution points on site, and the amount of distribution to each location.
Both types of reductions will significantly reduce
' the volume to be reproduced and distributed by FDCC, (Field Document Control Conter).
Document Control Actions Associated With Lifting S10 33-41 Field procedures FPD 1.000 and FPD 3.000 are being revised to incorporate changes in the status assessment print and workprint process. The procedures address the comparison of the registers with any workprint or status assessment print to be used in the field.
All workprints and status assess-ment prints will be distributed from the FDCC (Station 59) and be verified against the Composite Register Following release of FSO by MPQAD, distribution to existing stick locatforis will proceed in accordance with procedures. All distribution will originate from the FDCC, utilizing latest Composite Register as reference.
Actions taken or planned include:
1.
Completing the composite registers for drawings, specifications, vendor prints, FSK's and associated change paper incorporating the results indicated on the resolution sheets.
2.
Revise FPD 1.000 and FPD 3.000 and instruct document control and field engineering in the new procedures.
LONG TERM A detailed plan, including forecast completion dates will be submitted by February 10,1983.
A majority of the long tem corrective actions were either in -the planning or implementation phase prior to issuing of SWO FSW 33-41. These corrective actions were based on internal Bechtel decisions or decisions associated with the implementation of the Master Document Control Center on site.
(This is a joint Consumers Power /Bechtel activity initiated in mid 1983).
Specific corrective action items that will be undertaken by Bechtel and Consumers Power include:
T/N 54944 Page 2 of 3
,_s_..
y
_..,__.-.__,,__,,,,y
, _, _ _ _.,. _,,.. _,,., _,. ~ _...,
m.__,.._.,.
-,__m,,
--,-c
-~_.. _ _
s.
Page 3 or 3 l
1.
Evaluating further the number of distribution points actually required on the jobsite, eliminating distribution points where possible.
2.
Assigning functional responsibility for the updating of all document distribution locations, regardless of re:ipient organization, to document control. This will include procedures, training, distribution, updates and routine auditing.
i 3.
Completing implementation of a single data base creating a shared, interactive document control register for the project on System 38.
This register will serve as a single source of information on document status throughout the project.
In addition, the current combination of automated and manual systems, utilizing differing formats and terminology will be reduced to one data base with consistent updating and processing requirements, formats and terwinology.
4.
Improving the accuracy and usefulness of the FDDL (Field Document Distribution List) through regular review by recipient. organizations of distribution requirements, followed by regular distribution of the FDD L.
The FDDL will also be converted to System 38 from the current automated and manual format.
l 5.
Reviewing document control procedures for interface problems, omissions and/or inconsistencies.
l i
t T/N 54944 l
Page 3 of 3
_-_,,.,.,,--.w.
,.-_.--..,,..,,,,,,.,.,,-aw,_,,n,_..nn-,
,,n.,y
,__,,,.,._,..,._.,.,_,.,w--
?
k g
o l
a g
L f
S 3
q f
G t
s n
e d
e f
p A
m j
/
A h
y t
S c
e a
W V
K t
f t
O A
r a
C y
R ge A
O s
D y
t lf r
5 g
- A W
~g g
C f
f y
A P
o S
I c
A e
/
D L
S 3rh s
Y d
A D
E t
3
/v L
nt 6
1 f
d tf I
eY n$
g, f a
C p
A A a
O a
T f i
r r p
- /
P
^s c te 1
t h
i f
A A :
l i
f 0
6 t S
s e
1 A h N f H
pR
(,
V o
i s
s u
s f
U E
s t
I 4
H $
D nH s
l i
s T
s S A o oT i
C Q
D i l
l i
F t
h s
t-D R c o e
nis A
A f
n A
o D S6 n
S D
Z A A
> N rY C
b O
S L.
N <
A z
f T
t gw P
i F
p $
f L
t t
0 p s
/d A
h A tM C o h
o A
/
o T
M R R
K tD u4 U
L 1
4 C
6 A
1 L
f s
P M
O
)
u R
T 8 s Eo o 3
s W' P nuir#
N Mo r
fWse*
O S
io f Do m#
C l t YFa#
r t
fSA c?
RY D
l M
N t
Q N
A l
S I
C G
C E
C x4$%
S L-9.
A C i D
- s. 6 E
s e
4, i
l rE l
oa S v 3, L
s ',
E o
i K ct Q ~ o 8, R
M c i
\\
- i i ll
',iI
a A
t' S
t t ie Y
\\.
$.ll d *,
M j
n s
a 9
9 j
t J o{
7}: 'I t
t i
- o g8$
8 d }.
0 e
tJ l
J O
9
- s..
t g
i h
- f,k II i<i s
i
.. :s if
., # 4 af J J t(
=s
!j I
8, )I
(
as s
f l
g3 44 3
i iif l,i '*.
5 l
<l J g 9
0g l Ea i 1
2.13
"; 4 4V 1 3 I
17
?
f a
' i s
m i
a s
i i f I
II l!!
1 l' t
.v..s-
=
.,,i c-x I' 8 j,.
2
}
IJ Ji e
> -- 4F--Mp 2[
3.;
g' g.I.!
,3 5ja g.
<AI I;Ij ss$j g-
!' *t i j I I< d :{ ' j '
- 3 c. !
I s ij oE il l t
1: ;le s
a, A>.
g g 3 7 s ; j *; $
os 0<;e(c0*
it il ].
l* f f I f 5 1
rl s i r:
atp J-
-1 :l 3, e
- 3-;
a A.;
c T
E O
1
h J'
e
,9 8
4
,O t=s k
- i s
a j
$ f 5
9 1
J U 5 i
e s i; r e1 E
D*
e y
5 il e
a 2
<u
"(M)k s
d i k
g
~
e i
w )<-
I
.I y
r g
~ Z tj
, f-1 s
?
J
~
.I,
$. :C a' i
e' o J
J a
$ $2 e :
O dQ o e J
e.
y* {*
0a d
n S
g
C '.
0 i
P s
?
i b $,
$ {:!.
s t
! b.:
- i. i 1 a-
~
I k e, e
a
~
aa a
s y.
U Qa J
j a
O
?
w w,id s-o ha J.s t s f e<-
-e w
o
,F h*$?
9
.Wo t
z.
$Y
!i<
j b<U$n
!:l,, J
=
F 1
' " A d' h * *" 2
<P y
~
of g
n db 0
2 5
h H
i l
+
,