ML20079G674
ML20079G674 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Point Beach |
Issue date: | 09/28/1982 |
From: | Pandey S FRANKLIN INSTITUTE |
To: | Le N, Shemanski P NRC |
Shared Package | |
ML20079G671 | List: |
References | |
CON-NRC-03-79-118, CON-NRC-3-79-118 IEB-79-01B, IEB-79-1B, TER-C5257-506, NUDOCS 8210040095 | |
Download: ML20079G674 (519) | |
Text
. .- - -
o l
l Pl:asa 5:nd Copy of XA to PDR l
l TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT l REVIEW OF LICENSEES' RESOLUTION OF OUTSTANDING ISSUES FROM NRC EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SAFETY EVALUATION REPORTS (F-11 and B-60)
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY
! POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1
( .
[ NRC DOCKET NO. 50-266 FRC PROJECT C5257 NRC TAC NO. 42498 FRC ASSIGNMENT 13 NRC CONTRACT NO. NRC43-79-118 FRC TASK 506 k
Preparedby Franklin Research Center 20th and Race Streets Philadelphia,PA 19103 FRC Group Leader: S. Pandey Prepared for Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 -
Lead NRC Engineer: N. B. La P. Shenanski September 28, 1982 l
.j Thia roport was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States 4 Govemment. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, or any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for any third party's use, or the results of such use, of any Information, appa-retus, product or process disclosed in tble report, or represents that its use by such third
'] ,
phety would not infringe privately owned rights.
i l
l !
l k
l :
1 1
,t t
al
~~
.1 . 00. Franklin Research Center q A Division of The Franklin Institute The Bene ne mn Frenten Parkwsy PMe Pe.19I03(2IS)448 t000 8210040095 820928
- ^o Ca s 28 ' Please Send Copy of XA to PDR z :_ : :_
TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT ,
REVIEW OF LICENSEES' RESOLUTION OF OUTSTANDING ISSUES FROM NRC EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SAFETY EVALUATION REPORTS (F-11 and B-60)
WISCONSIN ELECTRIC POWER COMPANY POINT BEACH NUCLEAR PLANT UNIT 1 NRC DOCKET NO. 50-266 FRC PROJECT C5257 NRC TAC NO. 42498 FRC ASSIGNMENT 13 NRC CONTRACT NO. NRC-03-79-118 FRC TASK 506 Prepared by Franklin Research Center 20th and Race Streets Philac'alphia, PA 19103 FRC Group Leader: S. Pandey l
Prepared for Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Lead NRC Eng1neer: N. B. Le P. Shemanski September 28, 1982 This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, or any of their .
I employees, makes any warranty, expressed or impiled, or assumes any legal liability or l
responsibility for any third party's use, or the results of such use, of any information, appa-ratus, product or process disclosed in this report, or represents that its use by such third party would not infringe privately owned rights.
Reviewed by: Approved by:
, , AYe Group Leader c b*v7
/
/5YY% '
Prjo ect Man ger l '
SV/] A . m r*
Departmerf f Direcfr 1 al %
.00. Franklin Research Center A DMsion of The Franklin institute The Bengan Frankan Parkway. Phde.. Pe 19103(21S)448 1000 l
- -,-_ -w .~e- m m wmer en - --,~~ ~. w.-- ~, .
- - - = - -
--~~-_
TER-C5257-506 CONTENTS S1ction Title a Page,
-1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ,1-1 .
1.1 Purpose of the Evaluation . . . . . . . . 1-1 1.2 Scope of the Evaluation . . . . . . . . . .1-1 1.3 Generic Issue Background. . . . . . . . . 1-2 1.4 Specific Issue Background . .- . . . . . . 1-10 2 NRC CRITERIA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION . . . . . 2-1 2.1 Criteria Provided by the NRC. . . . . . . . 2 2.2 Staff Positions and Supplemental Criteria . . . . 2-1 2.2.1 Requirements and Applicable Criteria . . . . 2-1 2.2.2 Application of Requirements and Criteria to TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Equipment . . . 2-3 2.2.3 Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review . . . . . . . . . . . 2-4 2.2.4 Clarification of Qualification Requirements . . 2-5 2.2.5 Additional Clarification of Qualification Requirements . .- . . . . . . . . 2-8 '
3 METHOI' OLOGY USED FOR THE EVALUATION . . . . . . . 3-1
! 3.1 Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1 3.2 Methodology . . . . .- . . . . . . . 3-2 3.3 NBC Qualification Categories and Definitions. . . . 3-8 3.4 Implementation Guide for Fulfilling NRC Criteria. . . 3-12 4 TECHNICAL EVALUATION . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 4.1 Introduction. . . ". . . . . . . . . 4-1 4.2 Sumary of the Evaluation . . . . . . . . 4-2 4.3 Methodology Used by the License = . . . . . . 4-12 4.3.1 Completeness of Safety-Related Equipment List. . 4-12
, 4.3.2 Containment Spray System . . . . . . . 4-14 l 4.3.3 Environmental Service Conditions . . . . . 4-15 l 4.3.4 Chemical Spray . . . . . . . . . 4-19
- 4.3.5 Submergence . . . . . . . . . . 4-19 l 4.3.6 Aging and Qualified Life . . . . . . . 4-20 i 4.4 Equipment Environmental Qualification Evaluation. . . 4-23 i , .
l 0006ranklin Research Center A Chuen of The Fransen enemans Y j+f--hir z ft, K, l :.-- & 4 k ;. Lw ,J '. s . e; s- .~ s, Q ._ " . ,,
n,,-f,, , 37,\ ;.J.f .mq.sms.%.g Di&, q
I
. TER-C5257-506 l CONTENTS (Cont.)
t
.- l Title Page !
Section
. . . . . . . . 5-1 ,
5- CONCLUSIONS . . . . . ,
. . . . . . . . . 6-1 6 REFERENCES . .
APPENDIX A - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE CONDITIONS APPENDIX B - LISTING OF SAFETY-RELATED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT APPENDIX C - PLANT SAFETY-RELATED SYSTEMS AND DISPLAY INSTRUMENTATION APPENDIX D - REVIEW OF LICENSEE'S RESPONSE TO NRC EEQ SER CONCERNING JUSTIFICATION FOR INTERIM OPERATION APPENDIX E - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFOLMATION nklin Resea
- Aonamen.#m snremrch Center
i i
1 TER-C5257-506 )
i I
l l
i FOREWORD l l
This Technical Evaluation Report was prepared by Franklin Reseatch Center I under a contract with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comunission (Office of Nuclear
~
Reactor Regulation, Division of Operating Reactors) for technical assistance in support of NRC operating reactor licensing actions. The technical cvaluation was conducted in accordance with criteria established by the NRC.
4 9
e 4
9 s
A Chemen of The Frermen Insmans
'" ~ ' A3 un,cs c7 _ '%s;.QM'I f w.FAE5.6 <
a- Ms [ ,."J G n ce:UPE Ed % = U~~'aiUR 2.'4 E' 3 L 'i+E' 'S -
e TER-C5257-506 IDENTIFICATION OF PROPRIETARY INFOL% TION Soma of the information in this technical evaluation report was obtained from manufacturers' proprietary test reports. All proprietary test reports I cre identified as such in Section 6, References, of this report. Checksheets 1
l in Section 4 containing proprietary information have been replaced with a checksheet page stating that the proprietary information has been reswed.
s vii 000t] Frenidin Research Center A Cheman of The Frenedtn insensee Tarta.- _ . . m+, -
- .M*' "*i v .,- --- - . OV7^*i"S'Mwe : T"F*'S**'~*U"P"-***-.
TER-C5257-506 1
, 1. INTRODUCTION i
1.1 PURPOSE OF THE EVALUATION The- purpose of this r,eport is to: -
I l
o evaluate licensees' resolutions of outstanding issues related to '
safety-related electr'ical equipment environmental qualification (EEQ) discussed in the Nuclear Regulatory Comeission (NRC) Safety Evaluation Reports (SERs) in accordance with NRC criteria. The objective is to identify all cases. where a licensee's response has not resolved the significant qualification issues.
o evaluate licensees' qualification documentation of safety-related electrical equipment located in harsh environments in accordance with criteria established by the NRC and to identify .(1)' equipment for which qualification documentation is adequate, i.e., substantiates that the equipment is capable of performing its specified design basis safety function when it is exposed to a harsh environment' and (2) equipment for which qualification documentation is deficient, i.e.,
does not give reasonable assurance that the equipment is capable of performing its specified safety function.
o evaluate licensees' qualification documentation of safety-related electrical equipment located in harsh environments required for TMI Lessons Learned Implementation. The objective is to evaluate qualification documentation of equipment within the scope of IE Bulletin 79-013, Supplement 3 (item 2) [40],* in accordance with criteria established by the NRC in a manner identical to the evaluation of all other safety-related electrical equipment.
1.2 SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION The scope of this report is limited to the evaluation of environmental qualification of <_lectrical equipment that must function to mitigate the consequences of a loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) or high energy line break (HELB) and whose environment is adversely affected by that event.
i l *For References, see Section 6. Note that reference numbers are not presented I
in sequential order.
i M
_nidin Rese_ arch. _ Center
, _ . ,..e---. -,
4 :. w ~D*? u $4n'u,:U2 M B.1;.1s-G~;had;.-
. r s-
.p- -. ~ -- -s A ya: .l a.: e . - wD. &L--~< _-
TER-C525 7-506 !
i With respect to TMI Action Plan Implementation, the scope of this report 'l 1
is limited to those sections of NUREG-0737 [3] applicable to equipment having I an installation implementation date of January 1,1981. Where applicable, a review is to be performed on installed equipment with implementation dates after January 1,1981 if adequately identified by the Licensee.
i The NBC has determined that. the evaluation of environmental qualification of equipment items (1) located in plant areas whose environment is not adversely affected by the design basis event (DBE) (e.g., equipment located in
" mild" environments) or (2) required to achieve and maintain cold shutdown, is not to be included within the scope of this report. However, where the Licensee has identified these equipment items in the EEQ submittals to the NRC, these items have been listed in NRC evaluation Categuy III.b in this:
re port (see Section 3 of this report for definition of NRC evaluation categories).
Qualification aspects not included within the, scope of this evaluation are: '
o seismic and dynamic qualification o equipment protection against natural phenomena o equipment operational service conditions (e.g., vibration, voltage, and frequency deviations) o equipment located where it is subjected to the outdoor environment o equipment protection against fire hazards o equipasnt protection against missiles o equipment located in plant areas whose environment is not adversely affected by the design basis event o equipment required to achieve and maintain cold shutoown.
1.3 GENERIC ISSUE BACKGROUND >
Safety-related electrical equipment must be capable of performing design safety functions under all normal, abnormal, and accident conditions. The purpose of equipment qualification is to provide tangible evidence that equipment will operate on demand and to verify design performance, thereby establishing assurance that the potential for common-mode failure is minimized.
1-2 nklin Research Center A Comanen of The Fremen muumme
.s. .S E-CC &,. -H '.~.wise 4 i,,4 ti. ,,%. di L. . . .s- ..% d 23! . . - - -
~- -
TER-C525 7-506 Of particular concern is the assurance that equipment will remain operable during and following exposure to the harsh environmental conditions (i.e., temperature, pressure, humidity [ steam], chemical sprays, radiation, tnd submergence) imposed as a result of a' design basis accident. These harsh- -
cnvironments are generally defined by the limiting conditions resulting from -
the complete spectrum of postulated break sizes, break locations, and single
~
failures consequent to a BOCA, main steam line break (MSLB) inside the reactor containment, or a HELB outside the reactor containment (such as a main steam or feedwater line break). In addition, depending on specific plant design I
features, other postulated HELB locations may be associated with:
o the chemical and volume control system (CVCS) letdown line o the steam supply piping to the auxiliary feedwater ( AFW) pump turbine the reactor core isolation cooling (RCIC) pump turbine the high pressure core injection (HPCI) pump turbine '
i -
the isolation condenser o steam generator blowdown.
1 The NRC criteria for reviewing the safety of nuclear power generating stations include the requirement that the qualification of safety-related l electrical equipment be substantiated by auditable do'cumentation of the program that establishes the ability of the equipment to function as specified in the station design. This report is restricted to a technical evaluation of the equipment's ability to function in harsh environments resulting from DBEs.
Qualification criteria applied during the licensing of the older nuclear power plants have been modified over the years, and specific industry standards concerning qualification have been revised as the design of recetor systems has changed and as regulatory and operating experience has accumulated. Examples of such standards are IEEE Standards 279-71, 323-74, 383-74, 317-76, 334-80, 381-77, 382-80, 535-79, 627-80, 649-80, and 650-79.
NRC NUREG documents 0413 and 0588 have been devtloped to address this topic.
In particular, NUREG-0588 (published for comment in December 1979 and reissued as Revision 1 in July 1981) formally presented the NRC staff positions regarding selected areas of environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment in the resolution of General Technical Activity A-24, 1-3 A ,
Ubu Franklin Research Center A Dhnson of The Fransen Insumme m , w. .yv~~--~~-.
- e'...L-uu?.;n r O 9 .. ka
- p % :
- 'wwe-y
= = . -
M KsWy y yh..l5.dJ h. C N -
'.C .M 2 1 . ..
=: u, . .eu:
~
TER-C5257-506
" Qualification of Class IE Safety Related Equipment." The positions documented therein are applicable to plants that are or will be in the construction permit or operating license review process.
Although qualification standards and regulatory requirements have undergone considerabia development, all of the currently operating nuclear power plants are required to comply with 10CFR50, Appendix A, General Design Criteria for Nuclear P'ower Plants,Section I, Criterion 4. This criterion states in part that " structures, systems and components important to safety shall be designed to accommodate the effects of and to be compatible with the environmental conditions associated with normal operation, maintenance, .
testing and postulated accidents, including loss-of-coolant accidents."
Qualificacion requirements are also embodied in (1) 10CFR50 Appendix A, Ceneral Design Criteria 1, 2, and 23 and (2) 10CFR50 Appendix B, Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants, Criteria III, " Design Control," and II, " Test Control." These requirements are applicable to safety-related equipment located outside as well as inside containment.
The NRC staff has evaluated the licensees' equipment qualification programs by reviewing the qualification documentation of selected safety-related equipment as part of t'he operatin's license review for each plant. The NRC staff has also used a variety of methods to assure that these general rt,quirements are met for electrical safety-related equipment. In the oldest I
plancs, qualification was baaed on the fact that electrical' components were of high industrial quality. After 1971, qualification was judged on the basis of IEEE Std 323-71; however, no regulatory guide was issued adopting this
, standard. For plants whose SERs were issued after July 1, 1974, the Comission issued Regulatory Guide 1.89, which in most respects adopted the meat recent standard, IEEE Std 323-74.
In November 1977, the Union of Concerned Scientists petitioned the NRC Cosmaissioners to upgrade current standards for the environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment in operating plants. Subsequently, the NRC staff instituted the Systematic Evaluation Program (SEP) to determine the degree to which the older operating nuclear power plants deviated from current nklin Research Center A Dhamen af The Franseninsenwe l
.c.';}:. , 'y - ,33[L. .. s u.m , s.-uscWDQr ... _ .. t-
- s. , i' .=
[- r:m
TER-C5237-506 m
licensing criteria. The subject of electrical equipment environmental
- qualification (SEP Topic III-12) was selected for accelerated evaluation as part of this program. Seismic qualification of equipment was to be addressed as a separate SEP topi,c. In December 1977, the NRC issued a generic letter to all SEP plant licensees requesting that they initiate reviews to determine the cdequacy of existing equipment qualification documentation.
Preliminary NRC review of licensee responses led to the preparation of NUREG-0458, an interim NRC assessment of the environmental qualification of electrical equipment. This document concluded that "no significant safety deficiencies requiring immediate remedial actions were identified." However, .
it was recommended that additional effort should be devoted to examining the installation and environmental qualification documentation of specific electrical equipment in all operating reactors.
On May 31, 1978, the NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement issued IE Circular 78-08, " Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment at Nuclear Power Plants," which required all licensees of operating plants (except those included in the SEP) to examine their installed safety-related electrical equipment and ensure appropriate qualification documentation for equipment function under postulated accident conditions.
Subsequently, on February 8, 1979, the NRC Office of Inspection and Enforce-cent issued IE Bulletin 79-01, which was intended to raise the threshold of IE Circular 78-08 to the level of Bulletin, i.e'., action requiring a licensee re s pons e'. This Bulletin required a complete re-review of the envirommental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment as described in IE Circular 78-08.
The review of the licensees' responses indicated certain deficiencies within l the scope of equipment addressed, definition of harsh environments, and adequacy
! of support documentation. It became apparent that generic criteria were needed for evaluating the electrical equipment environmental qualification for both SEP and non-SEP operating plants. Therefore, during the second half of 1979, the Division of Operating Reactors (DOR) of the NRC issued internally a document i entitled " Guidelines for Evaluating Environmental Qualification of Class IE Electrical Equipment in Operat'.ng Reactors" (38]. (The document is hereafter nklin Research Center A Chamen of The Fransen 4= sense
. cc.m ,e - . _ .
.--,p, _&-- ,, . , r p;.,
S ?O_wh : ' aw $ u'W-h'.'.i LYAiZiCEEC5 Abs ] b '
N.6 . . ~ . O t(5,'E W % R e "sh A ?W -
TER-C5257-506
>r referred to as the " DOR Guidelines.") The document was prepared as a screening
~
standard for reviewing all operating plants, including SEP plants. It was originally . intended that the licensees evaluate their qualification documentation in accordance with the DOR Guidelines. However, initial NRC review of this documentation, which was compiled to support licensee submittals, revealed the-need for obtaining independent evaluations and for accelerating the qualifi-cation review program.*
i In October 1979, the NBC awarded Franklin llesearch Center a contract to provida assistance in the " Review and Evaluation of Licensing Actions for Opercting Gesctors;" which included an assignment for review of equipment environmental qualification documentation under SEP Topic III-12. The assign-ment was to review equipment environmental qualification documentation t.nd to present the results in the form of a Technical Evaluation Report for the 11 oldest plants (included in the SEP review). The plants included within the assignment were the Palisades, Oyster Creek, Ginna, Haddam Neck, Yankee Rowe, Lacrosse, and Big Rock Point plants and Zion Station Units 1 and 2, Indian Point Units 2 and 3, Millstone Unit 1, Dresden Unit 2, and San Onofre Unit - 1.
(This assignment was completed in April 1981.)
On January 14, 1980, the NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement issued the DOR G'aidelines and IE Bulletin 79-013, which expanded the scope of IE
- Bulletin 19-01; and requested additional information on environmental qualifica-tion of safety-related electrical equipment at operating facilities, excluding the 11 facilities undergoing the SEP review. This Bulletin cited the DOR Guidelines as the criteria to be used in evaluating the adequacy of the safety-related electrical equipment qualification. The scope of the review was expanded to include HELBs (inside and outside containment) in addition to i
equipment aging and submergence. The NRC advised the licensees that the ;
I criteria contained in the DOR Guidelines would be used in its review of licensee submittals; NUREG-0588 would be used as a guide in caus where the DOR Guidelines do not provide sufficient detail.
In early February 1980, the NRC decided that Indian Point Units 2 and 3
, and Zion Station Units 1 and 2 should be included within SEP To"pic III-12 for the purpose of equipment environmental qualification review.
1-6 i
- _ranidin Resea_rch._
_ . Center i
~ C'" T '_T %_ _ _ . . -ww.u. m. . Q.w :.w. w a s umw.aa . ~_:--,.a := c a :..: _ _
_ . . ._ _ _ . _ - l
TER-CS257-506 On February 21, 1980, the'NRC and representatives of the SEP Plant Owners-Group held an open meeting at NRC headquarters to. discuss an accelerated review '
program in accordance with the DOR Guidelines. Representatives of the Indian-Point Units and Zion Station also attended this meeting. he NRC formally -
issued to all licensees represented at the meeting the DOR Guidelines document which included a second document, " Guidelines for Identification of That ,
Safety Equipment of SIP Operating Rasctors for Which Environmental Qualifica-tion Is To Be Addressed" [38], together with the request that the licensees raview their plant systems and provide additioul equipment environmental ' -
qualification information to the NBC on an accelerated schedule.
e For non-SEP plants, the NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement formed a tesk force including a principal reviewer in each region and a task leader from headquarters. The regional members were assigned responsibility for the cachnical review of the licensees' responses to IE Bulletin 79-013, and the task leader was assigned responsibility for the overall coordination of the raview effort with NRC staff to, assure overall consistency. . De regional reviewers held meetings with the licensees in their respective regions, which resulted in staff positions being issued in a supplement to IE Bulletin 79-013 2
dated February 29, 1980.
In April 1980, the NRC organizational structure was modified and the Equipment Qualification Branch was formed within the new Division of Engi-ntering. Responsibility for reviewing the status of equipment qualification for all plants was assigned to this branch.
On May 23,-1980, the NBC issued Memorandum and Order CLI-80-21 [41],
specifying that licensees and applicants must meet the requirements set for*h -
in the DOR Guidelines and NUREG-0588 regarding environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment in order to satisfy 10CFR50, Appendix A, Grneral Design Criteria,Section I, Criterion 4. This Order also established l that the SERs on this subject, to be prepared by the NBC staff, must be issued on February 1, 1981 and that all subsequent actions to be taken by licensees to achieve full compliance with the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588 must be l ,
l completed no later than June 30, 1982. The Memorandum and Order established
- the DOR Guidelines and NUREG-0588 as acceptable interpretations of ,the General I
ranklin Research Center A Chuen of The Fremen buenme
.m : .m .,m.,
' 1y lt~CC M /.--4 -- 5%J MLL'.EJJM . vf n L M..
l a.a.hd s er: 1 ' Ovit* :n s. : n O i 4 T 6 ice uX.^..u dh..W ' . ~ . . _ _
TER-C525 7-506 Design Criteria for an interim period. Rulemaking was proposed for the purpose of establishing a permanent interpretation of the General Design Criteria.
The staff held regional meetings with the licensees and interested parties during the week of July 13, 1980.' The staff issued a second supplement to IE Bulletin 79-013, a response to significant questions raised during the public meetings, and two Orders. The. order dated May 30, 1980 required the licensees to comply with the previously issued Consnission Memorandum and Order of May 27,1980 (CLI-80-21). - The above orders required the licensees to complete the tasks identified in IE Bulletin 79-01B no later '
than November 1,1980 to allow the staff to comply with the February 1,1981 date imposed by the Commission order. The responses to the questions were issued on February 29, 1980; and the secon'd and third supplements to'IE-Bulletin 79-OlB, highlighting the staff positions affecting the licensees' responses, were issued on September 29 and October 24, 1980, respectively.
In October 1980, EG&G Idaho, Inc., awarded Franklin Research Center a contract to provide assistance in the equipment environmental qualification review for 13 of the plants whose licensees responded to IE Bulletin 79-01B.
The assignment was to evaluate the licensees' equipment environmental qualifi-cation submittals and to present the results in the form of a Technical <
Evaluation Report for each plant. The objective of this Technical Evaluation Report was to review the licensees' submittals to determine if. safety-related electrical equipment was reviewed for environmental qualification in accordance with the DOR Guidelines and NUREG-0588 as required by IE Bulletin 79-013. The NRC was to perform an audit of the qualification documentation references as part of its Safety Evaluation Program.- If discrepancies were found, the audie was to be extended. The plants included within this assignment were Nine Mile Point Unit 1, Millstone Unit 2, Salem Unit 1, Browns i
Ferry Units 1, 2, and 3, Brunswick Units 1 and 2, Hatch Units 1 and 2, Dresden -
Unit 3, and Quad Cities Units 1 and 2. (This assignment was completed in June.
1981.) .
In mid-1981, the NRC issued SERs on environmental qualification of _
safety-related electrical equipment to licensees of all operating plants. W 1-8 rank!!n Research Center 5 A Denman of The Fransen insumme 05 U5 _ ._
a.m. :W Wh.* > . s -,Y. 55 fi =~ % 9 LM ' U? ' ' ;
_ . . _ " _ ~ %W _ _ '
TER-C5257-506 -
Where additional qualification information was required, the licensees were directed to respond to the NRC within 90 days of receipt of the SER.
In May 1981, under the licensing action assistance contract, NE authorized Franklin Research Center to proceed with the review and evaluation of the environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment located in harsh environne,nts, required for TMI Lessons Learned Implementation ,
on 71 operating plants.
, In July 1981, the NE conducted extensive meetings with the nuclear industry to. address concerns and questions regarding qualification of safety-related equipment. In addition, the NBC provided licensees with detailed information with respect to the format and expected content of the licensees' 90-day responses to the NE SERs. Draft outlines of the following proposed programs were also presented to the industry: environmental qualification of equipment located in " mild" environments, seismic and dynamic qualification,.
and environmental qualification of mechanical equipment.
On September 23,.1981,- the NE Cossaissioners considered a petition (SECY-81-486) to extend th a deadline for actions to be taken by licensees to achieve environmental qualification of all safety-related equipment. On September 30, 1981, the NE Commissioners extended this deadline to the second refueling outage after March 31, 1982.
In October 1981, the NE authorized Franklin Research Center to include within the scope of the existing EEQ assignment (TMI Lesecas Learned Implementation Equipment) the evaluation of licensees' resolutions of out-standing issues related to equipment environmental qualification discussed in the NRC SERs in accordance with NE cr'iteria. The assignment was to review the qualification documentation and to present the results in the form of a Tcchnical Evaluation Report for 71 operating plants. (This report was devel-t oped within the scope of this assignment.)
On January 7,1982, the NRC Comunissioners approved the issuance of the
[ proposed r'ile, " Environmental Qualification of Electric Equipment for Nuclear
^ Power Plants," for public conenent. The proposed rule was ' published in the I'N As N Federal Register (Volume 47, No. 13) dated January 20, 1982.
l m' 1
t
'7 ranidin Research Center vn 4 A Lanmen af The Premen Meanne
\
l, '. ~
! VEmpx.1.. m _._auepAm +. eis2 ns.gid:OEEFh '.sd m a *
.c u2T~ ._
-,w .
- . - - . -. , l _
. TER-C5257-506 In February 1982, Proposed Revision 1 to Regulatory Guide 1.89,
" Environmental Qualification of Electric Equipment for Nuclear Power Plants,"
was issued for public comment. This regulatory guide was issued to (1) reflect current NE . positions on equipment qualification and (2) provide guidelines for meeting the NRC Commissioners proposed rule on equipment qualification.
The final rule, " Environmental Qualification of Electric Equipment for Nuclear Power Plants," was subsequently issued on April 16, 1982 by the NBC (to be published in the Federal Register) to clarify and strengthen the criteria for environmental qualification of electrical equipment. The final rule is to be incorporated into 10CFR50 as Section 50.49, " Environmental Qualification of Electric Equipment for Nuclear Power Plants." The significant features of the rule are:
o Raqualification of electrical equipment in accordance with the rule will not be required for equipment qualified or being qualified in accordance with the DOR Guidelines and IE Bulletin 79-013 or NUREG-0588, provided the qualification program commenced within 90 days after the effective date of the rule.
o The requirement to qualify equipment needed to complete one path of achieving and maintaining a cold shutdown condition has been deleted.
o A new section has been added, covering the qualification of equipment located in mild environments.
o The Commission deadline for actions to be taken by licensees to achieve environmental qualification of all safety-related equipment is extended to the second refueling outage after March 31, 1982.
On April 20, 1982, the NRC staff issued Generic Letter No. 82-09 (50] to all licensees, presenting the NRC's position and clarification of certain aspects of the environmental qualification requirements.
1.4 SPECIFIC ISSUE BACKCROUND On May 31, 1978, the NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement issued IE Circular 78-08, " Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment at Nuclear Power Plants," which required all licensees of operating plants to examine their installed safety-related electrical equipment and 1-10 0000a on Franklin
.m. n . . .Resear.ch
, C. enter
_ . . . - ~~
TER-C5257-506 ansure appropriate qualification documentation for equipment function under postulated accident conditions. Subsequently, on February 8,1979, the NRC l Office of Inspection and Enforcement issued IE Bulletin 79-01, which was intended to raise the threshold of IE Circular 78-08 to the level of Bulletin, i.e. , action requiring a licensee response. This Bulletin required a complete ro-review of the environnental qualification of safety-related electrical cquipment as described in IE Circular 78-08.
On January 14, 1980, the NBC Office of Inspection and Enforcement issued ,.
the DOR Guidelines and IE Bulletin 79-013, which expanded the scope of IE Bulletin 79-01 and requested additional' information on environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment at operating facilities. .
{ This Bulletin cited the DOR Guidelines as the criteria to be used in evaluating the adequacy of the safety-related electrical equipment qualification.
The NRC staff held regional meetings with the licensees and interested parties during the week of July 13, 1980. The staff issued a second supplement to IE Bulletin 79-013, a response to significant questions raised during the public meetings, and two Orders. The Order dated May 30, 1980 raquired the licensees to comply with the previously issued Commission M:morandum and Order of May 27,1980 (CLI-80-21). The above orders required the licensees to complete the tasks identified in IE Bulletin 79-01B no later than November 1,1980 to allow the staff to comply with the February 1,1981 date imposed by the Commission Order. The responses to the questions were issued on February 29, 1980; and the second and third supplements to IE Bulletin 79-013, highlighting the staff positions affe: ting the licensees' responses, were issued on September 29 and October 24, 1980, re spectively.
i The NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement performed (1) a preliminary evaluation of the Licensee's response, documented in a technical evaluation report (TER) and (2) an onsite verification inspection (April 21, 1980 for Units 1 and 2 and October 10, 1980 for Unit 1) of selected safety-related electrical equipment. Components of the residual heat removal (RRR) and component cooling water (CCW) systems of Unic 1 were inspected, and components of safety injection systems of Units 1 and 2 were inspected. The inspection at both units verified proper installation of equipment, overall interface -
dL Franklin Research Center A Ohemen of The Fromen ineamme
~~~**.,.w.'. . s . ;- . , - - - . ,. ,, -- ?" .10'" .S . ,Tr*'
r.'. %s ;;?OU.kCi *
- L'A .C $ %:iut % Y: %45 n4 :IM - ' . A a t LA.: w.. "! Mis M'a vG*J d = + ~.. 2LL
.f,
. %' r.- ',
TER-C5257-506 integrity, and manufacturer's nameplate data. The manufacturer's name and model number from the nameplate data were compared to information given in the Component Evaluation Work Sheets (CES) of the Licensee's report. The site inspections are documented in letters dated April 24, 1980 from F. J.
Jablonski (Region III) to V. D. Thomas (IE) and October 21, 1980 from D. W.
Hayes (Region III) to E. L. Jordan (IE). Deficiencies outlinsd in th6se letters included a lack of plant equipment identification numbers and namplace data that did not correspond to the CES. Additionally, pump and valve motors of the safety injection and containment spray systems of both Units 1 and 2 are located in the same room without sufficient separation. The staff believes that this arrangement is not consistent with the separation criteria; therefore, the Licensee should address this situation.
On April 18, 1980 [1], Wisconsin Electric provided the NRC with an equipment environmental qualification submittal in response to IE Bulletin 79-013 for the Point Beach Plant.
On October 30, 1980 [2], Wisconsin Electric submitted to the NRC further equipment environmental qualification information in response to IE Bulletin 79-015.
The NRC issued a Safety Evaluation Report (SER) to Wisconsin Electric on May 21, 1981 (5]. .
Requests for information [51, 52, 53] were transmitted to the NRC by FRC to obtain qualification documentation referenced by the Licensee in its submittals, TMI Action Plan information, and correlations to NUREG-0737 [3].
By letters dated September 11 [6] and October 8, 1981 (7], Wisconsin Electric transmitted'to the NRC a response to the SER.
On January 29 [9] and February 22, 1982 (43], Wisconsin Electric provided responses to the FRC requests for additional information.
1-12 Uf J Franklin Research Center A 00mmen of The Fransen enemano
~
~ '
,. ; * , 4 u,L.26 : ...a.. GJ3e . W u Ju -s ~ s ;L .?' %' '
TER-C525 7-506
- 2. NRC CRITERIA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION 2.1 CRITERIA PROVIDED BY THE NRC The screening . guidelines used to evaluate the electrical equipment anvironmental qualification program were:
o DOR Guidelines, " Guidelines for Evaluating Environmental Qualification of Class lE Electrical Equipment in Operating Reactors," November 1979
[38]
o NUREG-0538; Revision 1, " Interim Staff Position on Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment," July 1981 [42].
Other appropriate references used in the review of the licensecs' electrical equipment environmental qualification submittals are:
o IE Bulletin 79-01B, " Environmental Qualification of Class lE Equipment," January 14, 1980; Supplement No.1, February 29, 1980; Supplement No. 2, September 29, 1980; and Supplement No. 3, October 24, 1980 [48, 49, 39, 40]
o NUREG-0737, " Clarification of TMI Action Plan Requirements," November 1980 [3]. This document is applicable for the selection of equipment for the evaluation of the environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment located in harsh environments required for TMI Lessons Learned Implementation. The scope of the review is limited to equipment associated with specific sections of NUREG-0737 which have an installation implementation date of January 1,1981.
l Where applicable, a review is to be performed on installed equipment
! with implementation dates after January 1,1981 if adequately l identified by the licensee.
l l
2.2 STAF" POSITIONS AND SUPPLEMENTAL CRITERIA The NRC identified the following staff positions and supplemental criteria to be used in conjunction with the referenced screening guidelines.
2.2.1 Requirements and Applicable Criteria Items 3 and 17 of Supplement 2 to IE Bulletin 796013 [39] describe the application of the DOR Guidelines and NUREG-0588 to operating reactors (ors),
2-1
_nklin Rese_ arch._ . Center m mr~ - .- - - - -
- h. .m b& 't ke 4 _.
46d I w h* *' = = - '
.* N *O 'b
+ *=+ -- * *A = 4 ' ' " " "' # *
.c, ..
3 TER-C5257-506 near term operating license applicants (NTOLs), and construction permit applicants (cps). The qualification requirements and applicable criteria are stated as follows:
(Question 3]
" Define the requirements and applicable criteria for ors, NTOLs, and OLa. ~ Specifically address the NTOLs whose CP SER is prior to July 1974 and after July 1974. Can a CP whose SER is prior to 1974 use the DOR guidelines?"
[NBC Answer to Question 3]
" Table 1 describes 'the application of each document. All operating ~
reactors as of May 23, 1980, will be evaluated against the . DOR guidelines. In cases where the DOR guidelines do cot provide sufficient detail, but NUREG-0588 Category II does, NUREG-0588 will be used.
TABLE 1 REQUIREENTS ors OLs cps CP SER CP SER DOR GUIDELINES *efore 7/1/74 After 7/1/74 USE NUREG-0588 NUREG-0588 NUREG-0588 NUREG-0588 AS NECESSARY (CAT. II) (CAT. I) (CAT. I) or NEW RULE WHEN IN EFFECT l'
REPLACEMENT COMPONENTS USE NUREG-0588 (CAT. I)
All plants licensed after May 23, 1980, shall conform to NUREG-0588. In accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.89, all such operating licenses for i facilities whose construction permit SER is dated July 1, 1974 or later, ,
'are to be reviewed against IEEE Std. 323-1974. Thus, for these licensees,
~
the operating license applicant is to qualify equipment to the Category I column in NUREG-0588. For operating licenses issued after May 23, 1980, whose construction permit SER is dated before July 1,1974, the operating license applicant is to qualify equipment to at least Category II column of NUREG-0588; unless the licensee made commaitment in the construction )
permit record to use the 1974 standard, or unless the operating licensee l j application record indicates that the 1974 standard is to be used, in i l
such cases Column I of NUREG-0588 is to be used.
While there are differences between the Category II column of NUREG-0588 and the DOR guidelines, the differences are in details and in the 2-2 .
_Idin Rese_ arch _ Center
'-- . . 7.r.- J Te__.;**s m -- s . SSn?- T ,_ .-w*., .- -- e - 5 -- - -
- - - , . - -.o -, - . , . . -. , -- .-- , . , _ _ . . - - - , , . .,-
TER-C5257-506 optional part of the documents. The minimum requirements set forth by these documents are general and compatible. Thus, the minimum standards ,
set by either of the two documents are equally applicable to ors and l NTOLs." l i
[Quescica 17] ~
" Define the requirements for ' replacement parts. ' Are they the same for
' spare' parts? Clearly discuss the alternatives for existing inventories of parts / components.
- If equipment is ordered to meet IEEE Std. 323-1974 -
standard but lead time exceeds June 1982, can we use IEEE Std. 323-1971 qualified components in the interim?"
[NRC Answer to Question 17]
"The requirements for ' replacement' and ' spare' parts are the same for the purposes of complying with the Cosmaission order and memorandum.
After May 1980, all parts used to replace presently installed parts shall be qualified to Category I of NUREG-0588 'unless there are sound reasons to the contrary.' Nonavailability and/or the fact that the part to be used as a replacement is a spare part purchased prior to May 23, 1980, and is in stock are among the factors to.be considered in weighing whether there are ' sound reasons to the contrary. ' All replacement parts
- shall as a mininum conform to the requirements described in the answer to question 3. Justification for deviation from Category I of NUREG-0588 shall be documented by the licensee and records shall be available for audit, upon request by the NRC."
2.2.2 Application of Requirements and Criteria to TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Equipment The NRC requested an evaluation of the environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment located in har.sh environments required for TMI Lessons Learned Implementation in accordance with criteria established by the NRC in a manner identical to the evaluation of all other safety-related electrical equipment. Additionally, Item 21 of Supplement 2 to IE Bulletin 79-01B [39] states:
"IMI Lessons Learned instrumentation will be considered in the February 1, 1981 SER. This equipment is subject to the same requirements as other safety-related electrical equipment. The guidance and requirements of NUREG-0588 referenced daughter standards, and Reg Guides will be used by the staff in assessing the adequacy of the qualification information."
Item 2 of Supplement 3 to IE Bulletin 79-013 [40] states:
"IEB 79-013 required a 90 day response which was due in mid-April 1980.
Supplement 1 (Feb.1980) informed licensees that equipment which was 2-3 -
Os -
0000 Franidin Research Center A Demusen of The Frennen insumme
,r, P,.
T w--
r~""~~--****~*'*'A***
. . . . . .. ,s T.2Jsi:1 M M Ei & C ab L2.hwa n n!m - s d:LAS& W
.~.-~ %~~~
+ - . - . - .
o -- . .
,= ,
TER-C5257-506 o g
4
' planned' to be installed as a result of lessons learned need not be 7 addressed in that response. Some of this equipment has sin'ce'been '
installed. Npplement #2 (Q.5, Q.21) identified that the staff position was that equipment which is installed should be treated in a manner q similar to all other safety-related electrical equipment and be addressed in the November 1, 1980 submittal. This position represents no change in g g
staff position regarding the scope of the review. However, since the staff position on this issue was unclear the following will apply: j Qualification *information for installed TMI Action Plan equipment' h
a.
ause be submitted by February 1,1981. [
t 3
- b. Qualification information for future TMI Action Plan equipment (ref.
NUREG-0737, when issued), which requires NRC pre-implementation review, must be submitted with the pre-implementatic,n review data.
~
- c. Qualification information for TMI Action Plan equipment currently under NRC review should be submitted as soon as possible.
- d. Qualification information for TMI Action Plan equipment not yet i
installed which does not require pre-implementation review should be submitted to NRC for review by the implementation date." .
2.2.3 Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review Supplement 2 of IE Bulletin 79-013 (39} permits deferment of the review of environmental qualification for all safety-related equipment items located in plant areas where the equipment is not exposed to the direct effects of a high energy line break (HELB)' or to nuclear radiation emanating from circula-l tion of fluids containing radioactive substances. Supplement 3 of IE Bulletin 79-01B [401 permits deferment of the review of environmental qualification for all equipment required to achieve and maintain the plant in a cold shutdown condition. Supplements 2 and 3 of 79-013 originally permitted deferment until after February 1,1981 of the qualification review of equipment located in a mild environment or required to achieve and maintain the plant in a cold shutdown condition. Since the issuance of Supplements 2 and 3, the NRC has determined that the review of environmental qualification for this equipment is not within the scope of the present review program.
2-4 nidin Resestch Center A Dhamun of The Fragen tReghet
TER-C5257-506 2... Clarification of Qualification Requirements 2.2.4.1 Service Conditions Inside Containment for a Loss-of-Coolant Accident I (DOR Guidelines Section 4.1)
For pressurized water reactors (PWRs), the DOR Guidelines state that the .j contairaent temperature and pressure conditions as a function of time should be based on the most recent NBC-approved service conditions specified in the Final Safety Analysis Report (FSAR) or other licensee documentation. . In the specific case of pressure-suppression type containments, . the following mininman high temperature conditions may be used: (1) boiling water reactor (BWR) drywells - 340*F for 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and (1) PWR ice condenser lower compartments -
340*F for 3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br />. As stated in Supplement 2 to IE Bulletin 79-013 [39],
"these values are a screening device, per the Guidelines, and can be used in lieu of a plant-specific profile, provided that expected pressure and humidity conditions as a function of time are accounted for."
Service conditions should bound those expected for coolant and steam line breaks inside containment with due consideration given to analytical uncertainties. The steam line break condition should include superheated l
conditions, the peak temperature, and subsequent temperature / pressure profiles as functions of time. If containment spray is to be used, the impact of the spray on required equipment should be assessed.
1 The adequacy of a plant-specific profile depends on the assumptions and design considerations at the time the profiles were developed. The DOR-Guidelines and NUREG-0588 provide guidance and considerations required to determine if the calculated plant-specific temperature / pressure profiles encompass the loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) and HELB accidents inside containment.
2.2.4.2 Submergenc e i (DOR Guidelines Section 4.1, Subitem 3; and Section 4.3.2, subitem 3)
Equipment submergence (inside or outside containment) should be addressed where the possibility exists that submergence of equipment may result from HELBs or other postulated occurrences. Supplement 2 to IE Bulletin 79-013 (39] provides the following additional criterion: If the equipment satisfies nklin Research Center A Ohemen of The Fransen hasame
-. -- _ ....w.,,-. .._ . __ _~.m-.,, , m
$% b' *$
- fae, . aper.l'& . he.,. ..%
- 1 ? 'f.Cb
- s. l e s . . _ . . _ .h ,. Rg* s
'~ & ,lh3)e_ '
E' < , _ ; ? $ ,* . W ,.o . t'm'.* *.
. _ - . - _ . ~ , . _ - - - _ . .. . . ,. .,. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _ __- _
TER-C5257-506 the guidance and other requirements of the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588 for the LOCA and HELB accidents, and the licensee demonatrates that its failure will not adversely affect any safety-related function or' mislead the operator after submergence, the equipment can be considered exempt from the submergence portion of the qualification requirements.
2.2.4.3 Sinalated Service Conditions and Test Duration (DOE Guidelines Section 5.2.1)
The Guidelines require that the test chamber environment envelop the required service conditions for a time equal to the period from the initiation of the accident until the service conditions return to normal. Supplement 2 to IE Bulletin 79-018 [39] provides the following additional criterion:
i
" Equipment designed to perform its safety-related function within a short time into an event must be qualified for a period of at least I hour in excess of the time assumed in the accident analysis.' The staff has indicated that time is the most significant factor in terms of the margins required to provide an acceptable confidence level that a safety-related function will be completed. The 1-hour qualification requirement is based on the acceptance of a type test for a single unit and the spectrum of accidents (small and large breaks) bounded by the single test."
I 2.2.4.4 Test Sequence (DOR Guidelines Section 5.2.3)
Supplement 2 to IE Bulletin 79-018 [39] provides the following additional criteria:
" Sequential testing requirements are specified in NUREG-0588 and the DOR .
Guidelines. Licensees must follow the test requirements of the applicable document.
- 1. If the test has been completed without aging in sequence, l justification for such a deviation must be submitted.
- 2. If testing of a given component has been scheduled but not initiated, the test sequence / program should he modified to include aging.
1
- 3. Test programs in progress should be evaluated regarding the ability to comply by incorporating aging in the proper sequence. These programs would then fall in the first or second category."
2-6 .
ranidin Research Center A 0heen af The henten kunnae
. ,, fM 5 - A e .,. .., ,, .iP - .- , "* *-:* ' -
_ . - - - . . , - , - , - - _ - . - . _ _ . . ,_._a *
+
0 TER-C525 7-506 2.2.4.5 Radiation (DOR Guidelines Sections 4.1.2, 4.2.2, and 4.3.2, Subitem 2) fupplement 2 to IE Bulletin 79-OlB [39] provides the following additional )
criteria:
"Both the DOR Guidelines and NUREG-0588 are similar in that they provide l the methods for determining the radiation source term when considering LOCA events inside containment (100% noble gases /50% iodine /1% -
particulates). These methods consider the. radiation source term resulting from an event which completely depressurizes the primary system and releases the source term inventory to the containment.
NUREG-0578 provides the radiation. source term to be used for determining the qualification doses for equipment in close proximity to recirculating fluid systems inside and outside of containment as a result of LOCA.
This methoa considers a LOCA event in which the primary system may not depressurize and the source term inventory remains in the coolant. .
NUREG-0588 also provides the radiation source term to be used for qualifying equipment following non-LOCA events both inside and outside eontainment (10% noble gases /10% iodine /0% particulates).
When developing radiation source terms for equipment qualification, the licensee must ensure consideration is given to those events which provide the most bounding conditions. The following table summarizes these considerations:
Outside Containment NUREG-0578 NUREG-0588 (100/50/1 (10/10/0 in RCS) [*]
- in RCS) l Inside Containment Larger of I
l NUREG-0588 NUREG-0588 (100/50/1 (10/ 10/0 in containment) in RCS) or NUREG-0578 .
(100/50/1 in RCS)
- The numbers in parentheses represent % noble gases /% iodine /% particulates.
RCS means reaccor coolant system.
2-7 -
nklin Research Center A Chaman af The Fremen insensee
)
I *,4 M d
- e,, "$ k# . I E.
- % = kN# E # *E -"/ " "' "-" " '
~
s TER-CS257-506 a
Gaumna equivalents may be used when consideration of the concibutions of i beta exposure has been included in accordance with the guidance given in the DOR Guidelines and NUREG-0588. Cobalt 60 is one acceptable gn====
radiation source for environmental qualification of safety-related equipment. Cesium 137 may also be used." =
2.2.5 Additional Clarification of Qual'ification Requirements 6 j
The NBC has worked with a number of licensees, at their requests, to On k provide further clarification on environmental qualification requirements.
g January 20, 1982, the NRC issued Generic Letter No. 82-09 [50] presenting staff positions on certain aspects of the qualification requirements. Generic Letter No. 82-09 states:
"1. Operator Display Instrumentation Q. Given the interrelated activities associated with display instrumentation (e.g. , NUREG-0700, NUREG-0799, proposed Regulatory Guide 1.97 and Equipment Qualification efforts), what display instrumentation referenced in emergency operating procedures must be identified in licensee submittal to the NRC7 A. All display instrumentation referenced in the emergency procedures need not be identified. The NBC requires that licensees need only identify and have available qualification documentation on those operator display instruments which are safety-related (see Question 2). If licensees have previously supplied a listing of all display instrumentation referenced in emergency procedures, licensees may identify (such as by the use of an *) which of those instruments are safety-related. The staff will defer review of the basis have for this safety-related classification until other NRC activitiesl been implemented. When these other activities are implemented, additional instruments presently not requiring qualification may l require upgrading to a safety-related status and/or may require qualification. Licensees will be required at that time to qualify this instrumentation in accordance with the following criteria:
o For new or upgraded instrumentation with a required operation date prior to the equipment qualification deadline, qualification must be accomplished by the equipment qualification deadline.
1Such activities include preparation of new emergency procedures (NUREG-0799), control room design reviews (NUREG-0700), and upgrading of accident monitoring instrumentation (Reg. Guide 1.97 and NUREG-0737).
2-8 .
renidin Research Center A Chamen of The Fransen trussume y -
. a-m c.
- =a . ,
- - -n&_-- . _ 2a -- _
TER-C5257-506 o For new or upgraded instrumentation with a required operation date after the equipment qualification deadline, qualification must be accomplished prior to equipment operation and plant acceptance.
- 2. Safety-Related Equipment Q. For Equipment Qualification purposes, what constitutes all-safety-related electrical equipment?
A. The Commission, *in CLI-80-21, required the environmental
- qualification of only safety-related electrical . equipment.
Identification of the safety-related equipment installed at specific plants can be obtained from FSARa, Technical Specifications and other docketed correspondence setting forth NRC requirements or licensee commitments. Identification of safety-related equipment e installed in harsh environments at specific plants must be supplied by the licensee. The necessity for upgrading nonsafety-related system to safety-related status will be the subject of other NRC reviews.
- 3. Replacement Parts Q. Please clarify the NRC requirements on replacement parts.
A. In CLI-80-21, the Commission stated that unless there were sound reasons to the contrary, replacement equipment should be qualified to the standards set forth in Category I of NUREG-0588. The Commission's position was designed to promote the policy of i upgrading the environmental qualification and reliability of installed safety-related electrical equipment. To meet this overall goal, licensees must institute internal policy practices consistent with the Commission's statement.
l Situations may arise in which upgrading to NUREG-0588, Category I of I replacement equipment qualified to NUREG-0588, Category II or the DOR Guidelines will not be compatible with overall station safety and performance goals. Lice,nsees must review such situations on a case-by-case basis and determine that ' sound reasons to the contrary' do, in fact, exist which warrant the use of replacement equipment (not necessarily in-kind) qualified to the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588, category II. For equipment located in a harsh environment, lic ens ee * ' procedures must provide for documentation and substantiation of such determinations.
2-9 nidin Research Center "m *V! #
j, +e, *4 N [i
. j' eP l e,. vi. 2'
- s* E* $.*Su.'s s
- s_ 4_ - ' - . S-- ~-
- - * ?--%* ?-e 5 J ~ "' ** *Y** * * ~
=
TER-C5257-506 Conditions which reflect sound reasons why qualification standards for replacement of equipment in a harsh environment need not be upgraded to NUREG-0588, Category I include the following:
- 1. The licensee has replacement equipment in stock that meets the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588, category II, and . procurement actions regarding such replacement equipment had commenced prior to May 23, 1980.
~
- 2. Replacement equipment qualified to the NUREG-0588, Category I standards does not exist.
- 3. Replacement equipment. qualified to the NUREG-0588, Category I standards is not available to meet installation and operation schedules. . Equipment qualified to the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588, Category II may be used for an interim period until Category I equipment is obtained and an outage of sufficient duration is available for replacement. Justification for use of the non-Category I qualified replacement equipment beyond this ,
interim period must be submitted to the NRC for approval prior to the end of the interim period and _ in sufficient time for reasonable NRG , review.
- 4. Raplacement equipment qualified to NUREG-0588, Category I standards would require significant plant modifications to accommodate its use.
- 5. Operating performance and reliability data for the Category I equipment indicates poor overall equipment performance. For example, mean time to failure is significantly shorter for the Category I replacement equipment.
- 6. The use of replacement equipment qualified to NUREG-0588, '
- Category I standards has a significant probability of creating human factor problems that will negatively affect plant safety and performance, e.g., (1) knowledge, skills and ability of existing plant staff require significant upgrading to operate or maintain the specific Category I replacement equipment; (2) the use of equipment qualified to Category I standards ' creates a one-of-a-kind application; or (3) maintenance, surveillance or calibration activities are unnecessarily complex.
- 5. Submersence Outside containment Q. For equipment qualification purposes, what are the staff requirements-concerning submergence of equipment outside containment?
l 2-10 . ,
4bu Franidin Researth Center )
A Commen of The Fransen buemme ,
b 5 5 4 4 9 e b 'eNf
"*"#** ~N" '
TER-C525 7-506 l A. The Staff requires that the licensee submit documentation on the qualification of safety-related equipment that could be submerged due to a high energy line break outside containment.
- 6. Radiation Q. Is the staff screening value of 4 x 107 rada applicable to all operating reactors?
A. No. This screening value is applicable only to PWRs with dry type containments. However, for PWRs with dry type containments, the licensee may choose to use plant specific analysis instead of the screening value. For plants with other containment types, the licenses must use plant specific analysis. j Acceptable to the Staff for equipment qualification purposes are i
, radiation values developed as part of the plant licensing process provided that they are based on the TID 14844 source terms and are conservatively performed. In order to assure that the methodologies are appropriate, the Staff requests two component specific sample calculations (one for inside and one for outside containment), and a brief written description of each of the methodologies used, their
, application and associated conservatisms. Such sample calculations and a statement by the licensee that the values of radiation exposure of components so derived are appropriate for environmental qualification of equipment will satisfy the Staff's concern on the
, ' Radiation Specification Value' used during the qualification reviews.
i
- 7. Containment Service Conditions
! Q. Must the Staff value (identified in the SERs) of TSAT for PWRs and TSAT + 20*F for BWRs be used as the maxianas in-containment temperature for the purpose of equipment qualification?
A. No. The Staff will accept the use of these values. However, an acceptable alternative to the NRC staff's temperature criterion used for the service conditions must base that service condition on the FSAR analysis or other NBC approved analysis, provided that the specific analysis, or a summary of that analysis, together with reference to the previous NBC acceptance of the analysis is submitted by the licensee. In addition, some of the information in the associated safety evaluation may require clarification.
- 8. _One Hour Minimum Operating Time Q. The Staff has previously indicated that certaiu exceptiens to the one-hour mininnam operating time rule are permitted. Can further clarification be provided?
2-11 -
renidin Research Center A Otumen of The Fransen insumane h h i h Wy-s esa Jh .i:._,O.a . s .;w , :
>< n &< ; .c L. __. . ? .:0
. :.% u- ki " E dr& L _.
.m TER-C5257-506 3dim; With regard to plants subject to the qualification requirements of M
- d f
A.
the DOR Guidelines or Category II of NUREG-0588, for those pieces o @
equipment tested prior to May 23, 1980, the test data and analysis j
- may be used to qualify the The equipment to the required operating time one hour margin requirement need not [Q]
js plus an appropriate margin.However, subsequent failures should be shown not to be applied. f be detrimental to plant safety.
)
The one hour time margin rule is not applicable to equipment whose -
safety function is performed prior to significant changes in the environment at.the equipment location.
[J i t.%
ap 4
- 9. Q C Q.
Itast a qualified life be developed for all safety-related electrical .
equipment located in harsh environments?
A. Section 7 of the DOR Guidelines and Section 4.2, Category II of NUBEG-0588, do not require a qualified life to be established forA all safety-related electrical equipment located in harsh environments. 323-1974, qualified life, in accordance with the provisions in IEEEincluding replacem is required for equipment,
' Category I of NUREG-0588 that is located in a harsh environment.
An acceptable method for addressing in-service degradation is through .
a preventive maintanance/ surveillance program with equipment and J component refurbishment and/or replacement based on known i susceptibility to aging degradation, the results of inspections, orThese ele manufacturers recousandations.
an understanding on a device specific basis of the nature and extent of the increased stress levels encountered during Design Basis Accidents and resultant degradation (if any) which may occ used to establish replacement and refurbishment schedules if the component's design and materials application are sufficiently simple and the necessary data are available to allow a meaningful. applica-tion.
In plants subject to the qualification requirements that of haseither been the DOR Guidelines or NURgG-0588 Category II, for equipment identified as being susceptible to significant degradation due to /
thermal end radiation aging, the schedule for inspection of and or replacement of the susceptible components in that equipment imast be incorporated into the preventive maintenance and surveillance prograss, and that information should be Forincorporated intothe other equipment, the'"
system i
component evaluation worksheets (SCEWS). aging column i 0
e 2-12 ranklin Research Center A Chumanof The Fransen bushee
,i =&; - - ,- r
- _. ??VW7n ,
hm .c ,
TER-C5257-506 l
.h
- t j
- 3. NETHODOLOGY USED FOR THE EVALUATION
3.1 INTRODUCTION
As discussed in Section 1.3 of this report, the NRC issued Safety , l Evaluation Reports (SERs) on environmental qualification of safety-related equipment to licensees of all operating plants in mid-1981.
The SERs identified various equipment qualifiestion deficiencies as i
~
indicated below-
. l LEGEND: DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY R -
Radiation M - Margin T -
Temperature I - HELB Evaluation Outside QT -
Qualification Time Containment Not Completed RT -
Required Time QM - Qualification Method P -
Pressure RPN - Equipment Reloca' tion or Replacement, H -
Humidity Adequate Schedule Not Provided CS -
Chemical Spray EXN - Exempted Equipment Justification A -
Material Aging Evaluation, Inadequate Replacement Schedule, On' going SEN - Separate Effects Qualification Equipment Surveillance Justification Inadequate S_- Submergence QI - Qualification Information Being (R) - Licensee has committed Developed to replace equipment EPS - Equipment Relocation or Replacement Schedule Provided The SERs directed licensees to "either provide documentation of the missing qualification information which demonstraces that safety-related equipment meets the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-058S requirements or connit to a corrective cceion (re-qualification, replacement (etc.]) to establish qualification by June 30, 1982." Licensees were required to respond to the NRC within 90 days of receipt of the SER.
As stated in Section 1.1, the purpose of this report is (1) to evaluate licensees' resolutions of outstanding issues related to safety-related electrical equipment environmental qualification (EEQ) discussed in the NRC's SERs in accordance with NRC criteria, and (2) to evaluate licensees' ,
qualification documentation of safety-related electrical equipment, including n
3-1 ,
U !! Franidin Research Center A Opsammen of The Fransen ineuause mwe~ >~ y . _
.e. .; _ _, . . . . . ,m
,-[,ld' . Q
_ hy '4); (D -f Q,.?p' d g* y*Q ,4g }4r,h..t$y,; ] , , -
,p,+ *,((
- k e e ,*[. *
- y 1 if " [ i ( [ ,,'[ g *,, .i,e., y.Q[; [ g;,Q 7, Q *,
c TER-C5257-506 ,
3 TMI Lessons Learned Implementation equipment, located in harsh environments in .
accordance with criteria established by the NRC (see Section 2 of this report). The methodology used to evaluate (1) the Licensee's response to the NRC SER and (2) the equipment environmental qualification is presented herein. E t
3.2 METHODOLOGY The Licensee, Wisconsin Electric Power Comp sny, p.rovided a responsa to f the SER and additional qualif'ication information in its submittals [6,7,9,43]
to the NRC for the Point Beach Nuclear Plane Unit 1.
The following bases provided by the NRC were used to determine the relative completeness of the Licensee's submittals:
o Determine whether the Licensee provided specific responses to the SER Concerns.
o Determine whether the Licensee proposed corrective actions and a schedule for completion of .che actions.
o Determine whether the Licensee addressed the NBC's concern for margin with respect to the containment environmental conditions.
o Determine whether the Licensee revised the environmental parameters.
o Determine whether the Licensee's System Component Evaluation Work Sheets (SCEWS) were updated to correct deficiencies and add supplemental information.
o Determine whether the Licensee provided justifications for interim j
' operation for all unqualified equipmedt.
o Determine whether the Licensee addressed aging and incorporated the results into the equipment maintenance program. .
The extensive list of safety-related electrical equipment
- in various I
I locations of the plant identified by the Licensee was analyzed, and all l
l l
tdentical equipment located within plant areas that are exposed to the same
!- environmental service conditions was grouped together and designated an
- In this report,
~
the term " safety-related electrical equipment" refers to the equipment defined by the two NRC Guidelines referenced in Section 2.1.
3-2 ranidin Research Center A Oleman of The Franneninsamme i
l -~ ~"
. . ;. Y.% - i -
- %.s ,
R
,Q N 1 , c. , : =v Q.;-. : ...
- w. e~ .. ,._._n.
-TER-c5257-506
" equipment item." In this report, the term " equipment item" refers to a specific type of electrical equipment, designated by manufacturer and model, which is representative of all identical equipment in a plant area exposed to the same environmental service conditions (e.g., Flow Transmitter, Fischer &
Porter, Model 1052496, located within containment). This analysis resulted in a reduced listing of equipment (equipment items) that formed the. basis for the review.
Appendix A contains the environmental service conditions for each location. Appendix 5 contains the tabulation of the equipment items, locations, function, plant identification numbers, required operating time, ,
and applicable qualification documentation references. Appendix C lists the plant systems identified by the Licensee and the NRC as being essential to s a fe ty.
Each item in the list of safety-related electrical equipment items was reviewed in relation to:
o the Licensee's response to the SER concerns o technical information received from the Licensee as a result of requests for additional information (Appendix E) o technical data derived from the Licensee's submittal
- o NRC DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588 Revision 1 criteria o the Licensee's definition of harsh service environments (Appendix A) o documentation cited by the Licensee as evidence of qualification o applicable and available qualification documentation associated with l the overall equipment environmental qualification program o the Licensee's analysis and/or justification of qualification o Licensee-proposed corrective action for qualification deficiencies o the Licensee's equipment /part replacement schedules j o the Licensee's technical arguments concerning the adequacy of
- equipment, based on system operational considerations o the Licensee's rationale concerning exemption of equipment from qualification.
A 3-3 l !!!lbrankun Research Center A Denman of The Franseninsensee
. O 2 % M M.y? A . -x O si M if,J;.J. u i %'4 M 2 d *.-4AD; Ms N N h s Ji h m i k. *C C . ;?.i.E * v-
< d'2 .I
+
.o _ -
0 TER-CS257-506 w Nl *..y.
Topics not within the scope of the evaluation are:
3*E 7%
o completeness of the Licensee's listing of safety-related equipment o acceptability of Licensee-provided environmental service conditions. W f
The NBC requested an evaluation of the environmental qualification for of g.
safety-related electrical equipment located in harsh environments required The objective is to evaluate qualification IMI Lessons Learned Im'plementation. ,G]
documentation of equipment within the scope of IE Bulletin 79-013, Supplement %
3 3 (item 2), in accordance with criteria established by the NRC (see Section 2 P of this report) in a manner identical to the evaluation of all other safety- 'I The scope of this review is limited to TMI related electrical equipment. have Action Plan equipment associated with those sections o' NUREG-0737 i e which an equipment installation implementation date of January 1,1982 (sect ons ar Where applicable, a review was to be performed on identified below).
installed equipment with implementation dates after January 1,1981 if adequately identified by the licensee. .
II.B.3 (ALL/1-1-81) Post-Accident Sampling Capability of Reactor Coolant -.,
and Containment II.D.3 (ALL/1-1-81) Direct Indication of Relief and Safety Valve Position II.E.1.2 (PWR/1-1-81) Auxiliary Feedwater System Automatic Initiation and Flow Indication II.E.3.1 (PWR/1-1-81) Emergency Power Supply for Pressurizer Heaters (Safety-Grade Interfaces)
II.E.4.1 (ALL/7-1/81)* Dedicated Hydrogen Penetrations II.E.4.2 (ALL/1-1-81) Containment Isolation Dependability II.F.2 (PWR/1-1-81) Instrumentation for Detection of Inadequate Core Cooling II.G.1 (PWR/l-1-81) Emergency Power for Pressurizar Equipment (Safety-Grade Interfaces)
II.K.2.10 (PWR/B&W/7-1-81) Safety-Grade Anticipatory Reactor Trip II.K.3.9 (PWR/w/1-1-81) PID Controller Modification (If Hardware Change Involved) 3-4 rarddin Research Center A Ognuman af The Fm Insomme
-.-m
, - , - ,,** _,4 7 7 7 g- ,
-v-- . . _g - - & .
TER-C5257-506 II.K.3.12 (PWR/W/1-1-81) Anticipatory Reactor Trip upon Turbine Trip I
II.K.3.13 (PWR/GE/7-1-81) Separation of HPCI and RCIC Initiation Signals l
II.K.3.15 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Prevention of Spurious Isolatica of HPCI and
! RCIC Syatems i
II.K.3.19 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Interlock on Racirculation Pump Loop II.K.3.21 (BWR/GE/7-1-18) Restart of Core Spray and LPCI Systems (If Hardware Changed Out) l II.K.3.27 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Provide Common Reference Level for Vessel Level Instrumentation (If Hardware Changed Out)
Licensees whose plants were included within the NRC Systematic Evaluation Program received a Technical Evaluation Report (TER) in addition to the SER. _
The TER was based on a review of equipment environmental qualification documentation associated with the Licensee's EEQ submittals. The qualification j deficiencies identified in the SER were derived from the TER. Flants included
- within this program wer's the Palisades, Oyster Creek, Ginna, Haddam Neck, I
Yankee Rowe, Lacrosse, and Big Rock Point plants and Zion Station Units 1 and 2, Indian Point Units 2 and 3, Millstone Unit 1, Dresden Unit 2, and San Onofre Unit 1. For these plants, the evaluation presented herein is based on (1) the result of the initial TER, (2) the Licensee's response to the NRC SER and the TER, and (3) the Licensee's updated EEQ submittal (s).
TERs were also developed for the following plants: Nine Mile Point Unit 1, Millstone Unic 2, Sales tinit 1, Browns Ferry Units 1, 2, and 3, Brunswick Units 1 and 2, Hatch Units 1 and 2, Dresden Unit 3, and Quad Cities Units 1 cud 2. The objective of those TERs was to review the Licensee's submittals to determine if safety-related electrical equipment was reviewed for environmental qualification by the Licens'e in e accordance with the DOR Guidelines and NUREG-0588 as required by IE Bulletin 79-013. For these 13 plants and all other plants, excluding the 14 plants associated with the Systematic Evaluation .
Program, the evaluation presented h'erein is based solely on (1) the Licensee's response to the NRC SER and (2) the Licensee's revised EEQ submittal (s).
This technical evaluation was conducted to identify (1) whether the Licensee provided an adequate response to the SER concerns (and TER concerns, nklin Research Center A Deussen of The hensen husame I:r M* C -JW;.WEy.YE% Caw gjC:..Q _ C27C u_., w % GEOD4 . 8 d h .. " '_
e TER-C5257-506 l
where applicable), (2) major deficiencies within the equipment qualificacian program, and (3) whether the Licensee proposed adequate corrective actions to resolve qualification deficiencies and provided a schedule for completion of the corrective actions. The TER was written primarily to address deviations from the NRC criteria and requirements. Technical data or test results that i satisfy the qualification esitaria are not discussed herein.
The evaluation presentsd in Section 4 of this report includes completed equipment environmental qualification review checksheets (partially handwritten) which compile both the technical information necessary to conduct the review and the results of the evaluation. Parameters listed on these checksheets were derived from the appropriste NRC screening criteria. The evaluation of each equipment item includes several checksheet pages. Only those checksheet pages necessary to complete the evaluation for each equipment item are included in this report. A complete listing of the checksheet pages is shown on the bottom of Checksheet la, reproduced here as Figure 3-1.
The checksheets contain the following information:
o Equipment item information (see Figure 3-1), for example:
Solenoid Valve Located in Turbine Building ( Area #7)
Automatic Evitch Co.-(ASCO) Model LB8300361U Actuates Feedwater Control Valves (V-4269, V-4270)
Licensee Reference 839 Required Operating Time: Short term (SI signsi)
TER Checksheet No.1 Reference 59, Section 4.5.2.6 Licensee Submittal: Page 9 [62]; Table 3, Page 1 (1]; SCEW L o Qualification deficiencies identified in the SER (see Figure 3-1) o Licensee's response to the SEE o Licensee's statements and rationale for qualification o Licensee's corrective action and replacement schedule o Evaluation of qualification including identification of all deficiencies o Evaluation of system considerations presentai by the Licensee as a rationale for excluding equipment from qualification.
The results of the evaluation are sunmaarized on Checksheet 2 (Equipment I Environmental Qualification Summary Form) for each equipment item. Checksheet 3-6
- UJ U Franidin Resea.rch Aomamenerneri. en m Center ,
.e q .y t,iv.G. 1. cF "% m .. #(( e._ _. . . _ N <
V , J ..M_,
r.. ,
>4 ; , .5 .
- - - - . -- ,_ - _ _ _ _~ _ _
IER-C5257-506 NRC Contract No. NRC 03 75-118 s Pe08 M Fre,Mn Reeeeech Center PRC Project No.CS257 4 Om e8 The Pream h MIC Ase60nment No.13 la 20m and Rene Sessa Phde.. Pa.19:03 m2 e46 tone PRCTask No.
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUPICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _
i
, Epsipment Item No.1 l Selenoid Valves Located in hrbine Building (Ares #7)
Anstomatic Switch Co. (ASCD) Model LB8300561U
, Astustes Feeduster Control valves (V-4269, V-4270)
- Liseasee Reference 1617 Required Operating Time 'Short tezu (SI signal)
TER Geeksheet No. 1 Reference 59, Section 4.5.2.6 I
Licensee submittal: Page 9 [62]; Table 3. Page 1 [1]; FRC SCEV 1 Omm'" ION FOR OSICN IDElrTIFIED BY TEE NSC SER = CIBCLED ITEM (5) ONLY3 (See Sectica 3 of tais TER for Legend)
R, T, gr, W, F E, CB, A, S. (R), N, I, 98, RPN, EIN, SEN, QI, RFS, Mone, Not stated, Not applicable LISTDQ OF AFFLICABLE Ch*BE3'!58 Cggggg Checksheet Page No, 4
Squipment Item la Summary of Licensee Desponses to the NBC SIR lb Squipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to WK SIR 34, 3be 3c, 3d System Consideration Daview 44, 4b, es, 44, 4e, 4f squipment Environmental Qualification aeview Se, 5b, Sc, 5d, Se, 5f, Sg, 5he Si, Sj Installed mI Lessons Learned Implementation 6a, 6b .
Equipment Summary
- 4Latenance ano Deplacement Senedule Summary 7a, 7b, 7c Figure 3-1. Sample Checksheet Page la
" Equipment Item" .
3-7 b) Franklin Research Center A oma or The Fremen m
%ri)l..w+:;i,# %d::. $ aw,4 ,. ,' ,15. n Q.[ , ,f, j{, '}, ; .. _ ,, ,, ;_ __ , ,
. = ., _
i TER-C5257-506 2 specifically identifies any qualification deficiencies determined by the
< evaluation and identifies the NRC qualification category to which the equipment item was assigned. A sample Checksheet 2 is presented in Figure 3-2.
All information was reviewed for conformance to the NRC criteria referenced in Section 2 of this report. As requested by the NRC, all appli-cable and available qualification documentation associated with the overall Equipment. Environmental Qualification (EEQ) program was used' by the reviewers, whether referenced by the Licensee or not.
Upon completion of the review for each equipment ites, an overall evaluation of the component and a specific conclusion with respect to its qualification was developed. Based on the evaluation, each equipment item was ,
assigned to one of the generic qualification categories provided by the NRC.
l The NRC category descriptions are presented in Section 3.3 of this report.
3.3 NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORIES AND DEFINITIONS o NRC Category I.a EQUIPMENT THAT SATISFIES ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DOR GUIDELINES OR NUREG-0588, OR HAS ACCEPTABLE DEVIATIONS FROM THE DOR /NUREG CRITERIA This category includes equipment items which are fully acceptable on the basis that all applicable criteria defined in the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588 are (1) aatisfied and the equipment has been found to be ,
qualified or (2) sufficient information has been presented to determine ~
that deviations from the criteria are acceptable or insignificant.
o NRC Category I.b EQUIPMENT FOR WHICH DEVIATIONS FROM THE DOR GUIDELINES OR NUREG-0588 ARE JUDGED CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTABLE PROVIDED THAT SPECIFIC MODIFICATIONS ARE MADE This category includes equipment items that do not satisfy one or more of the applicable criteria defined in the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588; however, the Licensee has stated that specific modifications will be made on or before a designated date. This equipment is considered by NRC to be conditionally acceptable provided that the specific modifications are made by the Licensee. When the modifications are completed as proposed, the Licensee states that the equipment will satisfy all applicable NRC requirements. Examples of specific modifications are (1) replacement of 1 unqualified equipment with qualified equipment, (2) equipment hardware 3-8 .
4Ob0ll Franidin Research Center ~
A Quenen af The Prween insomme a
h 7 kwh eg O be --t t/ *w.AM a
' *
- h& 1 e- 1 % w 't =* 1+- b -m.
l TER-C5257-506
&llM Frenian eteemarch Ceneer NRC Centreet No.NRC 43 FD 118 ~
peg 8 PRCPro6est No.C3257 A Ch=== es The pensee 6meme PRC Assignment No.13 2 mm and Asse Somon Phan Pm IMOS GIS 46tese PRCTask No.
EQUIPMENT ENVilW3NMENTAL QUAURCATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _
E NIM elT BWVIEDitEEFFAL QUALIFI GTION StBetARY FORM DESIWhTICH:
NB: BE20ZREMErr5 I = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adaquete Adequate similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Estan11aned ,
Aging Degradation Evaluated adequately
- Qualified Life or aspLasement amat= Estaalisted (If asquired)
Program Establiehed to Identify Aging Degradation criteria Regarding Aging Simulacion Satisfied (If Sequired)
Criteria Sogarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Pear. Temperature Adequate o Peak Freneurs Adequate r
o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adectuate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied criteria negarding submergence Satisfied Criteria negarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Bogardiaq Test Failures or Severe Ancealtee (If Any) Satisfied Criteria negarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria negarding Instrumeat Accuracy satisfied Test Duration Margia (1 boer + Function Time) Satisfied criteria negarding Margias satisfied (MURAG4548, Cat. Il DESIGMATION:
NBC QUALIFIGTICII CATEGORY X = GTEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.h Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Iht Established II.h Equipment Not Qualified II.d Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or neplacement Schedule Justified III.4 Equipment Buespt Fros Qualification III.a Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Mot Nede Available 1
l Figure 3-2. Sample Checksheet Page 2 "Fquipment Environmental Qualification Summary Form" 3-9 rarddin Research l awthe m e.. Center -
._. . ~ . -, - , . _ _ _ .. ,. ,
4,
~
% I #
$ g #s ')( h d 4] _[ ,, ,-_ ,,,8 g (,. ,f [,_ 4 f....e C4 4 *,5 b' $ 5 so I . te . .p.
l i
i TER-C5257-506 4
I modification, (3) equipment' relocation above submergcnce level, (4) '
relocation or shielding of equipment from radiation source, (5) vecifica- ,
4 tion of qualificaciou by additional testing, (6) equipment relocation to a mild environment, and (7) qualification testing of equipment in progress.
o NRC Category II.a EQUIPMENT FOR WHICH QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION IS INSUFFICIENT TO ESTABLISH THAT THE EQUIPMNT IS OR IS NOT QUALIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE' DOR GUIDELINES OR NUREG-C588 The qualification of equipment items in this category, in accordance with the requirements of-the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588, is significantly
- deficient or inconclusive based upon review of (1) the documentation provided by the Licensee or (2) applicable and available qualification documentation associated with the overall equipment environmental qualification program. The qualification documentation indicates signifi-cant deficiencies, which can be categorized as follows: (1) appropriate documentation reflecting qualification h~s anot been cited and made available for review by the Licensee and there is no knowledge of applicable dccu--
mentation; (2) the Licensee is awaiting qualification from the equipment .
vendor; or (3) the qualification documentation indicates significant /!
deficiencies; however, where testing was conducted, no reported failures or severe anomalies were observed which wonid unquestionably affect the ability of the equipment' to perform its design basis safety function (s).
- l
. o NBC Category II.h EQUIPENT THAT IS UNQUALIFIED This category includes equipment items whose qualification documenta- -
tion has been judged to be seriously deficient based upon review-of, (1)- the documentation provided by the Licensee, or (2) applicable and available qualification documentation associated with the overall equipment n environmental qualification program. The qualification documentation indicates ser'.ous deficiencies reported during testing; for n ample, severe -
anomalies or failure of the test specimen, which could affect the ability '
of the equipment to perform its safety function. NRC has requested 1 imediate written notification when an equipment item is pladed in this "
I category during the course of the review. l o NBC Category II.c l EQUIPMENT THAT SATISFIES ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DOR GUIDELINES
- OR NUREG-0588 WITH THE EXCEPTION OF QUALIFIED LIFE e i ')
This category includes equipment items that are acceptable on the basis that all applicable criteria defined in the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588 l 7
are satisfied with the exception of the qualified life criterion. The Licensee (1) has not evaluated qualified life or replacement schedule, (2) has not adequately evaluated qualified life or replacement scheduls, or (3) has not adequately intepreted qualified life in terms of calendar time.
[ Note: The component replacement schedule discussed in Section 7.0 of the 3-10 -
Nuu Franidin Research Center
- A Ohemen of The Frumen buense m, .n - -.- sd**?"JfiW.% u . *% M -.
s e c L-- -
- R'7'_!W-vW. . _ .. . s - __ ._
- - ~ , _ _ ,- . . _ _ _ - _ - _ - - - _ _ _ _ , . _ , _ _ _ _
,-_u_. ~
- ~ - - . - , ., -
a TER-C5257-506 DOR Guidelines is, in effect, a qualified life. It is not essential to use the term " qualified life," but the replacement schedule must be justified.}
o NRC Category III.a EQUIPMENT THAT IS EXEMPT FROM QUALIFICATION Thi.s category includes equipment items that are exempt from ,
qualification on the basis that (1) the equipment does not provide a safety function (i.s., should not have been included in the equipment list submitted by the Licensee), or (2) the specific safety-related function of -
the equipment can be accomplished by some other designated equipment that is fully qualified and satisfies 'the single failure criterion. In
- addition, any failure of.the exempt equiveent must not mislead the operator
, or degrade the ability of qualified equipment to perform its required safety-related function. - ,
o NRC Category III.h . _ .. ,
i EQUIPMENT NOT IN THE SCOPE OF THE QUALIFICATION REVIEW - - -
. This category includhs equipment items _addra'ssed by the Licensee in the
- equipeent environmental qualificccion submittals which are (1) required to achiese and maintain the plcat'in a cold shutdown condition or (2) located
- in a mild environment. Supplement 2 of IE Bu'lletin 79-01B permits
~
l deferment of the review of environmental qualification .for all safety-related equipment items located in plant areas where the equipment is not exposed to the dirset effects of a high enaEgy line-break (BELB) or to nuclear radiation emanating from circulation of fluids containing radioac'cive substances. Supplement 3 of IE. Bulletin 79-01B permits
, deferment of the ruiew of environmental qualification for all equipment required to achieve and maintain the plant in a cdid shutdown condition.
Supplements 2 and 3 of IE Bulletin 79-01B ~ originally permitted determent l .until after February 1 1981 of che qualification review of equipment located. in a' mild environment or rejuired to achiave and maintain the plant in 2 cold shutciown condition. Since the issur.nce'.of Supplements 2 and 3,
~
'the NRC has determined that the review of environmental qualification for this equipment is not within the scope of this report, o NRC Category IV . ,
EQUIPMENT FOR WHICH QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION EAS NOT BEEN MADE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW This category includes equipment items for which qualification documentation in accordance with the requirements of the COR Guidelines or NUREG-0588 has been cited by the Licensee as evidence of qualifica-l -tion; however, this documentation has :.ot been made available for review.
~ Therefore, a conclusion cannot be reached with respect to qualification of ~
cnis equipment.
3-11 -
nidin Research Center A OMaan of The Prerudn buseme e ., ~ m-~. w we- . w.-p l' S O 'g
.e t 4 ' i' g-M 6 p.)1 g-((M Aw W, .h [ .A A e k 1 *5 4d *N i N N ' * * - ' MM ** -
? -
s TER-C5257-506 -
~
ap5 22 3.4 IMPLEN!NTATION GUIDE FOR FULFILLING NRC CRITERIA i -
. -4.*
us Q
The NRC has requested that a detailed implementation guide for fulfilling Ibfif-NRC criteria be prepared as part of this assignment. The implementation guide will present a fully detailed discussion of the principal qualification I The primary emphasis-criteria presented in the DOR Guidelines and NUREG-0588.
will be to clarify technical points, . eliminate possible misconceptions, and . +
~%
clearly provide definitive guidance to enable licensees to understand and t-resolve, in an expeditious manner, qualification deficiencies identified as a '
-result of this TER. The implementation guide (TER-C5257-532) has been ,.h The implementation guide is either appended ~
prepared and issued to the NRC. '
to this TER or will be forwarded to the Licensee by the NRC under a separate ,x ir letter. The Licensee is encouraged to review that document. 6 ncs.
4
.T V
- s e
i g L' g n' + p W ":
- e ,
a s
9 a
5*
4 ..
4 s
4 s . ..
s , (54; t
v
?
b 3-12
~
s idin . s
_ran_ _Resea_rch._Cen.ter
( t ';
x...:nm :, a -
M*' "N ~ - =: ; ,3_ ;
- -m-w _ , _ , - r wr-*::v. ..
- c. ; - .
s -Ils x .
\ 'l y r -
j q >
~'
'[ TER-C5257-506 A .-
l ?
3 ., 7. g 4 4. , TECHNICAL EVALUATION
(
4.1^ INTRODUCTION .-
3
* The technical eva o iiow presented in this section represents the -
x w .. ,
equipment environmental osalification (EEQ) assessment for each equipment item s
listed in Appendix B in accorciance with the methodology. presented in Section 3
\ , 3 of this report. The evalu2 cions were conducted to identify any major deficiencies within the Licensde's equipment qualification program and to
,. determine whether the Licensee (1)j provided an adequate response to the SER concerns, (2) proposed adequate corrective actions to resolve qualification s ,
deficiencies, and (3) frovided 'a ; schedule for completion of the corrective 3
cctions. '
s.
- ,g 'n (g The evsMations.'are based'en the available qualification documentation
'i provided ty ' AM ' Licensee', complemented in several cases by other relevant s .. '
technical information. N Thr/tu'orqualificationdeficiencieschachavebeen identified and 'tL{C results oil the evaluation are shown in the' Equipment 3
Environmental Qualification Summary Forms (Tables 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, and 4-4) s presented in Section 4.2P '
/
Observations concerning clie Licensee's qualification methodology 4
presented in response to the NRC SER are presented in Section 4.3.
Technical evaluations of the environmental qualification of the equipment
\ items are presented in Section 4.4.
I I i .
b 4
I
$ ranidin Resestch Center A Comuman of The hensen m -
- g - . ,37 ,
.7 _
. g ,
.. - , ._. . - - - _________x
TER-C5257-506 4.2
SUMMARY
OF THE EVALUATION The following tabulations represent a summary of the results of the equipment environmental qualification evaluation conducted in accordance with the methodology presented in Section 3.
Table 4-1 summarizes the number of equipment items assigned to each NRC qualification category' as a result of the evaluation.
Table 4-2 summarizes the number of equipment items found to have a specific qualification deficiency.
Table 4-3 summarizes the number of equipment items for which the Licensee has proposed a specific corrective action to resolve a qualification deficiency.
Table 4-4 consists of Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms for the equipment items, identifying (1) compliance with the qualification requirements de fined in Section 2, (2) the resultant NRC qualification category, and (3) the Licensee-proposed corrective action.
A Demmen of The Fransen insomme
'~CJ./ 7 Ty* ,y,. ; , , _ , - , ;.. . .. q $ . ,'~ ~ 7.I-7 , , ., , , , . .-s. . . .; i .,. . . , ,. ", A'.lu.. . 2 2 . - :.1 . i >. " TCM ___.__.
TER-c5257-506 TABLE 4-1 NUMBER OF EQUIPMENT ITEMS IN EACH QUALIFICATION CATEGORY
~ NUMBER OF NRC CATEGORY EQUIPMENT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION ITEMS cocessmassanzassssssssazzzsessassassmassanzamazassamassazzasssssssuamr.zzazzz2 ==
I.A EQUIPMENT QUALIFIED---------------------------------------- 5
[ EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 33, 35, 36, 40, 41, 43 J I . 8- EQUIPMENT QUALIFIC ATION PENDING MODIFICATION--------------- 37 C EQUIPMENT ITEM NOCS).: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 0, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 31, 32, 34, 37, 38, 39, 46, 47, 48, 49, 57, 58, 59, 60 )
II.A EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION NOT ESTABLISHED-------------------- 18 C EQUIPMENT ITEM NOCS) : 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, -
42, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 61, 62,.63, 65 1 II.B EQUIPMENT NOT QUALIFIED-----------~~~~~~------------------- 3 II.C EQUIPMENT SATISFIES ALL REQUIREMENTS EXCEPT QUALIFIED LIFE OR REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE JUSTIFIED----------- 3 C EQUIPMENT ITEM NOCS).: 30, 64, 66 1 l .
( III.A EQUIPM EN T EXEMPT FROM QUALIFICATION.----------------------- 1 l C EQUIPMENT ITEM NOCS).: 45 1 III.B EQUIPMENT NOT IN THE SCDPE OF THE REVIEW------------------- 3 C EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 44, 67, 68 ]
IV DOCUMENTATION NOT MADE AVAILABLE--------------------------- 0 TOTAL 68 233Gazzas sEssEss2ssass3sammasssass=ssssssazzz223sss3sE==X==E===2333222:23333E=3 l
o l
A 4-3 Ubranklin Research Center A Dhemen of The Franadin inseame T~ T WK$? I
'& .;- e w;&E15;- .2 >Y ? E~'- ' "--
TER-C5257-506 TABLE 4-2 QUALIFICATION DEFICIENCY
SUMMARY
NUMBER OF DEFI*IENT EQUIPMENT NRC REQUIREMENT ITEMS cssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssazzassssssammmassassssassaammassass== sass ==ss==
- 1. DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE OF QUALIFICATION ADEQUATE------------- 40 C EQUIPMENT ITEM 30(5).: 2, 3, 4, 5, 9, 15, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 29, 30, 31,32, 34, 37, 38, 39, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 54, 55, 56, 57, 59, 61, 62, 63, 65 1
- 2. ADEQUATE SIMILARITY BETWEEN EQUIPMENT AND T EST S P EC IM EN EST A B LI S H ED --------------------------------- 24
( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 42, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56, 58, 60, 61, 62, 63, 65 )
- 3. AGING DEGR AD ATION EVALU ATED ADEQUATELY-------------------- 30
( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 1, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 16, 17, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 32, 50, 5't, 52, 54,-55, 56, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66 1
- 4. QUALIFIED LIFE OR REPLACEMENT 3CHEDULE ESTABLISHED (IF REQUIRED)--------------------------------- 16
[ EQUIPMENT ITEM NQ(5). 1, 24, 25, 20, 27,.28, 32, 53, 54, 56, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66 )
- 5. PROGRAM ESTABLISHED 70 IDENTIFT AGING DEGRADATION--------- 8
[ EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S) .: 24, 27, 50, 51, 52, 54, 55, 56 3 ,
l 6. CRITERIA REGARDING AGING SIMULATION i 1
(IF REQUIRED)---------------------------------------- 7
( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(3).: 28, 50, 51, 52, 54, 55, 56, 56 1
- 7. CRITERIA REGARDING TEMPERATURE / PRESSURE EXPOSURE:
A. - PEAK ~ TEMPERATURE ADEQUATE----------------------- 7 f
( EQUIPMENT ITEM NOCS).: 50, 51, 52, 53, 54., 55, 56 1
- 8. - P EAK P RESSUR E AD EQ U ATE =====--------------------- O assssassazzsszzassazzzassssamaassmazzassassssssssssssssssazassazzzsazzz=sas=ss==
l i
nk!!n Research Center A Chemen of The Frereen meanne
,. w,,,, ,,,e w -
w = * *musee - em **w - *= +* * - * * * * * * * = +
% g a g s .,i 4 h M @ 4 m b E P
r l l
TER-C5257-506 Table 4-2 (Cont. ) ;
QUALIFICATION DEFICIENCY
SUMMARY
NUMBCR OF DEFI*IENT EQUIPMENT
. NRC REQUIREMENT ITEMS
ssunzzassassasssssssssssssssazzasasssssammassammassazzzz=ssazzazzmazzazz=ssazz
C. - DURATION ADEQUATE------------------------------- 0 D. - REQUIRED PROFILE ENVELOPED ADEQUATELY----------- 0 E. - STEAM EXPOSURE (IF REQUIRED) ADEQUATE----------- 0
- 8. CRITERIA.REGARDING SPRAY SATISFIED------------------------ 0
- 9. CRITERIA REGARDING SUBMERGENCE SATI5FIED------------------ 0
- 10. CRITERI A. REGARDING RADI ATION S ATISFIED-----------~~~~----- 14 C EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(5).: 10, 11, 13, 14, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 50, 51, 52, 54, 55 I
- 11. CRITERI A REGARDING TEST SEQUENCE 5 ATISFIED---------------- 4 C EQUIPMENT ITEM NOCS).* 10, 11, 13, 14 1
- 12. CRITERIA REGARDING TEST FAILURES OR SEVERE ANOMALIES (IF ANY) SATI5FIED------------------------------------ 0
- 13. CRITERIA REGARDING FUNCTIONAL TESTING 5AII5FIED-======--== 1
( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(5).: 32 1
- 14. CRITERIA REGARDING INSTRUMENT ACCURACY SATI5FIED---------- 1
( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S). 32 )
- 15. TEST DURATION MARGIN (1 HOUR + FUNCTION TIME) SATISFIED--- 3
- 16. CRITERIA REGARDING MARGINS SATI5FIED (NUREG=0588, CAT. 1)- O sanazzazasassazzamazasassazzsazzasssassazzassassas=sassasss= man ===sszz==ssazz===
-w A 4-5 UNU Franklin Research Center 4 m n w n. rrensen m
- Ni *?Ys . M77 e 8'OW
- i. '@ OE T7" %' N2 7 - ' a'
~
2-' i ^ *- * '
-~
TER.-C5257-506 l
TABLE 4-3 LICENSEE CORRECTIVE ACTION
SUMMARY
NUMBER OF CDRRECTIVE ACTION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ITEMS aussssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssssss32susssssss35 sass 33333332s3333
- 1. EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT WITH QUALIFIED EQUIPMENT----------------- 33 C EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(3). 1, 2, 3 ,- 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16 ', 17, 18, ,
19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 37, 38, 39, 47, 48, 49, 57, -
58, 59, 60 1
- 2. EQUIPMENT MODIFICATION ==--------------------------------------- 1
( EQUIPMENT ITEM NOCS). 13 3
- 3. EQUIPMENT RELOCATION ABOVE SUBMERGENCE LEVEL--~~~-------------- 0
- 4. RELOCATE OR SHIELD EQUIPMENT FRO'M RADIATION SOURCE------------- 0 j
- 5. VERIFY QUALIFICATION SY ADDITIONAL TESTING / ANALYSIS------------ 1 C EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(3). 34 1
- 6. EQUIPMENT RELOCATION TO A MILD ENVIRONMENT-------~~------------ 1-C EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S). 46 ]
i 7. QUALIFICATION TESTING OF EQUIPMENT IN PROGRESS----------------- 3
{
} 8. OT'HER ('FOR DETAILED DESCRIPTION SEE SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT ITEMS)== 2 l ( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: ,31, 32 1 SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION OF CDRRECTIVE ACTION (S) HAS BEEN PROVIDED (SEE SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT ITEM FOR COMPLETION DATE)-------- 32 C EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(3). li 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8e 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 31, 32, 38, 48, 49, 57, 58, 59, 60 1 233333333333s3333333333333333s3sEs3332s3333333333333333=33=33==3===333=33==33==3
, 4-6 .
_nklin Resea_rch._
_ . Center l
- , - . - .mm . . . -
,. .w. in.rn . . . . ...a=*. .'-~~- -~
d 4
i <;
Table 4-4 i
c]
}
4 gg; tou Pntaf ruvanomarmfat ouattr Carlos surnant roan gg> ..................................................
D 'n .............................................................
1 g IQ $ raC sostratu? Item numeras
[,c ..................................... ..... . ...........
s5- 'seelseersnesseesteessees ............l .oo f s .ees s .eee l e t.e l.e t t l.e t .a s e t s i e g e s e t s :
I
.d 210 a maC REonIncarnis Desicuations I . Der:CareCT: 8 : a 8 : : a e a e a :
-J I ---------------. ----------------------.------ a e e a 8 I e s i e a o q, t 1. poCa.EnTED cviormCs or Quatsr:Cafsom aDEomats-------------...---- 8I : I I I iIi 8 a a a iI :
l 2. secouaTc sin LantTT nETucts coulPnts? aan I : e : : a h E TEsf sPrC nca cafastssmso--------------- --------- J-------------a 8 8
- iIeI 3
I 8
I I 3
E: IeI 3
it (1 8 3. ACING DECnaDaftog ETALUaTED a>EouaTrLT=-----------.. == --.===8 I I 8 8 8 8III8II IEIEIIIE8I $ 8 .
43 3 4. 00abtrIED LIFE On mEPLACEMENT sCNEDULE I I i j u tj gp 8
8 i
ESTAPL3sptp (tr mEDU3arD)--.------===---.--==------------.--
- s. PanceaR EStaNLisNEO 70 IDEpT3rf aclNG DEcGaDaflot--.==-. .==--===4
-- l I Il 3
8 8 i
l 8
8 t
4 3
8 3
3 8
1 3
8 3
3 8
3 3
8 8
3 8
3 8
3 8
3 8
8 8
8 3
8 8
8 8
j u a 6 Ca:Trass accapotec acaus sinutafsom saftsrarD tir agossatD) ....I 3 3 I a 3 3 e 3 :
cf I T. Ca: Testa escanninc Temerantuar/Parssent EEPespass 1 8 3 3 i e 3 3 3 3 3 8 i 3 3
- 1 8 a. . Pgan 7tnetaatung aptomatt-----------------------...---.8 i i 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 l l
.' 8 a. - Ptas PaEssumE aDE05 ATE ==--**=====---=--.-=--.-=--..--==8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 l l 3 8 8 8 8 8 s C. = DumaTIon a06004TE---------. .--**=--=..-...=-=-=====-el ! 8 3 3 $ $ 3 l l l l 3 3 8 8 I p. - mEcolato PaprILE EnvEtocco aDasseTELT-------...---..- g 3 3 3 : 3 I l 3 8 3 3 E. - strag esPospec g r agostates notesaTE------------------I t~ ;.
8 8 8 3 3 3 3 3 4 8 8 3 3 8 8 l 8 e. Ca:Trata arcampinc sPaat saftstgrD- .---..--....--.---. --....= 3 l : 4 3 3 8 8 8 8 8 3 e i [ t e. CalTEala arcnanluc spontaccurg sattsrate.---.... ..--- -------.8 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 I r i to. CuttinIn arGanDI#c maDIATIoM saffsrIED-*--*-*-****============- -l l 8 l 8 8 8 8 8 ,8 I IIi 158I i 8
, ue ** I 18. CutTEsta arcampInc ftsf agostpCe saftsrttD.....-----. ----------I 3 I g 3 I 3 3- t 3I3I3 I I .3 I 3 3 8 82. Cn Trata arGauDtus TEsf ra LUPts om arvest amena63Es 8
3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
'd i -lin I (tr amT) sartarstD- ----- ----.------.-------... ------------I I I i a
- sl A 8 83. Cn TEnna etcanotus rumCTIonah Tgsflus sattsrtrD--.---- .-----..=1 i 14. CRITEaIn arGamalmG thstabhENT ACCU 8aCT 3473sr350-....-- =--======5 3 3 3 3 j
3 3
3 3
3 3
3 8
3 3
3 3
3 3
4 3
4 8 8 1 4 8
l l 3 $ l l l l l l { $ $ 3
? I 35. Tgst punaTrow nancsu at move + rueCTIo# Ting) 3413erIED---*==--==t t 8 j 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 4
s 36
.... Cn...............................
Trata PEGannInc sanctus s4T.ista.te tuvasc.oses, CAT.
... .................. 13.-......I....I...3....:....:.......3...3. ..3...3...3...3...3 . .......:....
i i naC OUaLir:CATsop caTEconf (pestcmafsnes I . CATEconf3 8 I I I I 8 I I i I ------ --....--.-----.--- --.-------.-----.--....-- : 8 8 : :
8 8 i ,a i 8 8 8
3 8
8 I
t-1 I.a EcusPnt>T neattrito--..--.......--..----... .------ . .--.3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 l 3 3 3 1.s coulPrrNT ocaL3r CaTsom PemDans noDartCattou----------------=3 2 EIE 8E 8IIE8IIIiIII4I8IIE: IIE1
+ g 3 II.a EQUIPPrw? OUnLir5CATID4 DOT EsfanLIsMED-------=====--===--*--I 8 8 I I I 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 I II.B toufPvFLT NOT 0gaLarIED-*=----===----=*====.-=======--=======8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 l l 8 8 8 8 8 o 8 II.C r0HIParhT 84TIsrIEs ALL mEcuterntNTs EECEPT I I 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 3 3 8 8 8 8 1
, I cuaLIr:Lp L1rg un mEPLactmEET scutDULE JusT3rIED---======*--=8 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 3 3 4
! 7J l III.a rouleurgf EarnPT raon cuaLtrICATIpu--------------------..----I i 8 3 3 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 I i 3 3
- ] I III.B EuGIP?EkT NOT IN THE SCDPE Dr TNC RETIEW--=====.==--===-==*-=8 1 3 8 8 l l l l l l 8 8 8 8 8
- ) 8. .IT.......DHCtfMENTarton l n07 papE avaltasLE-- --===------------. ...--.3...8...3...........3...3.......3...3...4...3...3...3.......3 3 8 3 ps
............................................................o. 8 l }. 8 CusaECTIVE acilHN APECIFIED (DEsIGMaTIDus X . action SPEC 3rIED) 4 I I i 8 3 4 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 (k I ------ ---------------=- - ------------------------.---------- t t 8 3 8 8 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4- l >3
' 1 8. EQUIPMENT aEPLACEMEd? MITH QUaLIr!ED EGUIPmEKT-=------------=---*! I II II IE IE II IIIE4I 8I8IIE3I II 4I I Ln
- I 2. EcuIPME=T monsrtCatton=----------------..------------.--.-..-----I I 3 3 8II -4
{.';' t 3. roulPMEh? mLI.oCaffnu anovE fpr suumEncrpCE LLytL-----....--------I I 4. mELpCatt no ANIELD EQUIPMENT raoh paDIATIOM s00 ACE ======--*- ----I I
1 8 8 8
1.
I I
I 3
t I
3 6
I 3
3 3
3 3
3 3
8 3
3 8
8 8 8 I
3 j,
8 C3 i l' s 3 I 8 I g 8 8 8 3 3 e cn 65.EQUIPMEHT tratrT unaLar: Carson 70 ei aDDittomaL Trs.TinciamatisIs-------------.3 .
1 I aELOCATIOW a MILD ENVIaOh ENT-----=-===.-======--*==8 8 3 .'l 8 8 8 I $ 1 8 8 8 8 8 l l ( l T. OUALIrgCATsus TEsTIkG or EQUIPRENT In Pm0cpEss===-====.--===-----t i I 8 8 8 3 3 8 3 8 8 8 8 8 8 8. OTHEn (- Str APFClrtC EQUIPPENT ITEM Ir CNICErD- )--=-==---===-8 8 8 4 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 3 l l 8 8 8 8 8 8 i I .8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 scutput r np Cuart.ETsup or ComaECTIVE ACTION (s) Nas aEEN PaOVIDED-*-1 I 1I i1 8I l X $E II 4I II $I f,
.I. . . . . ....e.............................................................,........................................8.I..............8.I II II l E 8
.e ei. 4 i i
! t i
- q p.
4~ *I 41 .
i ,
i ,
a
i k
Table 4-4 (Cant. )
[ ,;; toulentrT EDvinoenENTAL GuAL3rtCAT3Da sumnApf ruan t ggg ..................................................
.1) n ., .............................................................
5 I rpC EOWIPNENT NURSEPS
'h ...............................5754 ....... ... ..............
8 g E g5 ......' ................................................................. 8 416 4 8118 8 8 9 8 8 8 9 8 8 24 8834
$ ppC mE0ulat.Ehis
...... . 8.......
83 3 8 0..... 3 3 8.03... 4 3.0.3 ... 5 8 436. .....8 0 318 . ...s.430 9.......
0 39 8 0 34 8 gDU (pts 3GNATIONs X . DEFICIENCT) 1 I a ! .8 g 8 --...... ... -. =,. -.-..--....-.=.-..-.. . g 8
g 8
i 8 g g 3
g g 8
g g 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
- I a. DocumEmTEo EvinE=CE or os4bir3CAfso# ADEnv4TE-=.....- .....
i 8 8 8 8 8
" =4 8 8a8aaaaXII 3siI IIII4II ia8I a
, 8 2. ADEGUATE SINILAktTT #ETWEED EONIPMENT ANO l l l I I l i l TLsf SPFCIPEr ESTASLI5NES *==*****===--.*******--*= **===-=--**=.I13 8I l I- l l
4 8 l
8 8 8 i i i 4,
4 8 8 8 8 4 8 8 8 3. AGguG DECWADATIO4 EVALNATES ADEDWATELYa==========================8 I & I I i
, ' 8 4. OuALIrIED Lire ca mEPLACEpfMT SCHEDULE 1 8 8 8 8I tE45 8I IEI IIi
$ $ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 i 1 5 8 ESTASI.15Nr0 #IF DE4WlptD)==-=-- *--===-=--=======-==-====****====8 g 8 5. ruD4kan r&TapLISH&D 70 ISENTItf AGlWG DEGDADAT3DNa-***===-===-===l 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8IIE8383iEI I I 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8I I I IEI 8 8 8 3 6. Cp!TERIA pfGAND14G AGIDG SIROLATIDW SATISFIED (3r DEeglass)-. ==l 8 8 8 8 3 3 8 8 3 5 8 33 8 8 4 6
8 7. CpITLMIA prGAppl.G TEMPEp4TUDE/PatssuaC Ear 0 Supe 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 I S.
I 4.
- PE A K TE 4PER A TWW E ADEDU A TE=----*.*====--===~~~~~~~=-==== 4 8 8 5 5 1 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 A. = PEAR PREssu6t ADE00 ATE =-*--=====*--**--=====-==*-==--*=4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 C. = puaATInN A0005 ATE---*-*==*-**-**-*-=*=-**-**==-~=***--*8 8 8 8 8 8 i ! l I l 8 8 8 8 8 8
P. *- STrA BLoe.fkED PSDFILE ENTELOPED 8 I I 4 4 I I PED) 4DE09ADE09ATELT=--*.==-==**======4 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 E. FIPOSpWE (If SE051 ATE =.*==========-====8 8 I l 8 8 8 8 8 l 8 8. CalftNIA prG4kD19G 3PDAT SATIsrIED.-===*--+-*.***=-==========-=*=1 i I 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 I 9. CalTENIA ptGA$ DING $USMENGrNCE 84TIsrIrD.====-----======
8 8 I I I i l 8 4 I l l I
-======$ 8 4 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 30. CRITEaIA REGARDING RAPIATION 5ATIsrtED==========. ==-============8 8 8 8 8 I I I II8IIE83338 8 8 33 8 18. CNITEgga prG4 APING TEST SE99FNCE 84TISrlED==*******====**********! $ $ 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 e i 23. CpITEaIA SEGaanguG TEsf r&gLeaEs Da agvEnt AmopatlEs ! I i I I
- o. 8 (tr Aaft sAftsrIED.------------== ---====------.- ======.8 8 8 1
8 2
8 3 4 8 3 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 83. CaITEas4 arGAan NG rupCTIceAL testing sAftsrsED-= . ....*..==-..! I i i 8 8 8 8 8
$ 14. CNITENIA SEGnantnG IhafagNENT ACCua&CT 34Tl8FirD.=-=======- =*..I 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 I I i 8 i i ! $ $ 8 8 15. TEsf punAftoN .Apste il poca , ruuCTsps T!nE) SAfterIE*=*.--- .-l i I 8 8 8 3 3 3 8
I 8
8 8
3 8
3 8
8 8
8 8
I
- 16. CptT g).....
.i .........ENI.A DEGAnnigG xapGINs SAT srsto SNepEG.-esse, CAT.
- J
! mse onALIr!CATIuN CATEG08T (Dr88G#4T50ma E = CATEGoat)
.I....I....l...8...8...4...4...4...8...8...8...8...8...8 . ..8...8 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 3 8 8 8 8 3 $ 8 3 3 5 ------ =- ===---=-------- -------===-----=---=...---- i I.A Equ3PmEu? ouettritp--------.----.. ---- ...-...-...==...
8 4 8 a l I $ $ $ 3 4 $ 8
-) 8
! I l l 8 8 8 8 8 8 3.u Enutrnraf ouALarICAflue PEpDawG PootrtCAftou....... ---.-.-l a : aIa8a$a33334s8 8 8 4 $ 8 8 8 I II.A E0ul PHEu? OU ALIFIC ATIDW Nuf EST A8LISHED---==- *=========-..= 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 I 8 II.S EqulPothT buf 0pALIFIED---== -======-----*=--.. -==========.8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8I IIIIIEIEI3 1 8
- 8. I l 5 l 8 5 3 8 8 8 1 3 8 8 II.C ECHIP"raf SATIArIES ALL REGUIREhthTS EECEPT I 8 OuALIrtEn LIrg on DEPLACEpEht sCNEDutE JUSTIFIED...... -....-l
$ $ 1 8 8 8 8 8 3 8~!
$ $ $- 8 8 s 8 III.A EQUIPMrp? FIEMPT in0M GUALIFICATIDM-====-*====----==---======4 8 I I I I $ 8 8 8 3 8 8 8 351 4 8 'l I i 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 III.D LONIPmEaf NOT In THE SCOPE OF THE REVIEW =-==-----==-====----=3 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 3 8 IV 4 4 3 8 8 8 8
......... Doc.uaE9T4ftom auf nape AVAILAnLE----- 8 8 8 8 I pc T=....=- -.------.--...$...(DESIGNATIONI I CookErftvE 407804 SPECIFIED
.....................................................................8..s....8...8...8...8...3...8...8...8...8 E
........ I ACTION SPEtIFIED) 8 8 I i 8 8 8 I 3 ...... .--. ---.----..-=-- --..--.---.-..- .. ----........- g g g g 4 3 8 8 8 i
8 I
8 8 (k
9 I l . Enu t Par uf StPL ACrhtst alTH 00 Ab tr Irb gou P=LaT==.-----.-....--.=-4 a ai3 i 8 3 g g 3 g 8 i I ,,
'A I 2. tuulentwT ponsrICAflou..--------=-----=---== --....---*..--=
aIxis3Xia8 8 a 8 a l I $- La
.-=$ 1 3 3 3 3 8 8 8 8 8 8 I I 8 8 =4 4 3. runIPnrpt mEs.oCATIou AppTE THE spenteGENCE LEVEL =============-===8 8 8 8 8 3 3 [ $ 8 3 $ 3 4 4. as LuCATE om sNILLD EdulF4ENT rpon R ADInf f 04 SOURCE----=----===..-l $ $ 3 5, 3
4 3 8 3 8 1 1 1 3 3 8 3 3 8 i C3
- 5. VLairf OHALIr! Cation BT ADDITIONAL TESTINC/ANALV3fs====-------...I $ 1 8 8 3 3 3 4 8 8 8 8 8 3 gm 8 6. routP*trNT DEI.nCAT103 TO A MII.D ENvip0NMENT-======-== --=-=====-. I i !
3 I T. CHALIr8CATIO1 TESTI4G pr IONIPPENT Is FWnGaES$=--==-=-.-=....-===8 3 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 1 3 l 8 8 .
8 8 8 8 I e. OTHER 1.- SLE SPECIFIC EQUIPPENT ITEN Ir CNECErp- )-**==========$ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 3 l 1 1 8 8 8 3 3 8 i 8 8 8 8 ) I 4 i I 8 : I $ 8 8 3 3 8 8 I I SONEDuLe rup Consa.ETion s.r CookrCTIvE ACT Dals) Has DEEN Panflorp=-= 43 8 8
.......................................................................8 3......8.x...8.x 4.a
... ...4.a l .E-l.'.s.8....I....i.
.... .. .i...............8 3 8 8 n
4
_ i
M
- i d.. Table 4-4 (cout. ) i
,1 -
q L; rQUIPPa>T EDVIson.rmtat cuaLIrtraTBom su.na>T FO8m 3 $56 *
...s.a............................................
y i ea L] 3 .q ...................s...................s...s.................
11 8 rac 20#8PPEuf ITra me.orps 8 8
.....s..............m........ ..............................
2E le38te33te33 Ste 433443344410458 g ji ................s.m.............................................. .....m...............t03Ste368037t ens te 39te44t.ettle
..e..... ............. ...........
O g ag i Wac WLuWIDE*r4Ts (pssI6maTION: 3 . DEFICIEdCT) 8 8 1 3 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 1 3 I 3 ae I -------.-- -.--- ..---- .--- ...-------.-.-- I i 1 8 8 3 I : 8 3 3 8 3 4 5 3 8 3. DocternTro Evletecc or ouaLIFIcatsos anEeuafg.. .. . .- .-...I 3 3 1 338 8 8I 33II I 3- t 8 i L. R I 2. aLewuaTE sinILARITT DETWEEW E9e PetRT a## 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 I m n I TEsf sPECINEW rafaALIsmEB-.---- ... .-....---. ---- --- -- --.3 3 3 8 8 4 4 8 8 8 8 8E I i 1 8
- r 8 3 act.c DECnapattug EvaknaTre a>EDueTELT- ---*----
-t -
---I Is8 8 8 3 I i 1 I 8 8 8 8 8 I s h (1 4 4. ocaLIrgte Lirt ce ptPLacraget scagpptg I I 3 3 3 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 8 .
c 3 8 E.Ta.Lis.ra rir 26 t.r,I---. .-----------.. --- ---. -- .- : 8 8 : : 8 I I I : - : I :
I 5. PenGenn ESTasLisure to spraTIFT SGlac DECassaTIum -=-....---. 3 3 3 3 3. 8 S I 6. castEnga arcampInG ass >c sameLaTIce sattstite (Ir Stoutest)- ---t i 8 3 8 8 3 3 I
3 4 3 3 4 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 3* I 8 8 8 8
T. ceITrata pEcomotsG.TEmptmafwer/PoEssuer garossess I I 3 3 3 3 8 : 3 8 3 3 3 8 l 3 a. . PLak ten EnafweE &#tesaft.------..-----..-----. --...I I I 8 I I I I 8 8 8 8 8 8 8- 3 I s. . PEsa Petssume aesweafg---.. --- .--- --..I 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 8 3 3 3 3 8 8 8 c. . Pue sT Ion aetawaTE-. ----. ~ -.-*---~~.-. I 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 3
- I p. . PEnutaEa Poor Ls gavsLeres seseeaTELT..----- ---. . I I I 8 3 I i 1 8 8 8 8 8 8 I I I r. . stram esrosens (tr asestate) assesats.--.--- .. 3 8 I t t 3 i 8 I 3 8 I a .
I e. cas trat a secampIns spear saTIstIED-- .-..----. .- - ---..=8 8 I I I I $ 8 1 1 8 8 8 8-t. 8
% i 9. CalTEnga mEcanotes sesngnctect saTIsrtED-.-------... -.-. .I l 8 8 8 8 I I. I i 8 8 8 8 8 8 I; 8 30. cutTEnla arcaseses anotaTIce sat 3ertEs--- -. -..-- ..--l 4 3 3 3 8 8 8 3 I I I I I 8' s 8 18. ca:TEnla arcaanges Test scentser sattsrast---- -- .--- - ----I 8 3 I i 3 8 3 3 3 3- t I e
.} } if y,
I 82, cmITEsta pecanesPG Test rathmers se styres amen & Lits a sir arv3 saftsrgic-- .----...--.-- --.-- .. 3 I
e e
i I
8 t
8 3
4 3
3 8
8 8
3 8
3 8
8 8
3 8
3 8
3 3 I l 3
- }*(]4 3 33 cnITEssa arcansing tweefinmat TESTIps seTIsrate--. .---
1 14, calTEpla SEGampInc gasTatatWT ACCDeacT saTIsrIED-*-- -
.---g
.-.--g ia3 i I I 3
I
't I
8 I
3 8 I
3 8
3 3 8
8 8
8 8
8 8 8 8
8
. r. ' 8 15. TEsf pesafton 44ects is posa e reDCTIDW Tint) 34TIstlED---.. *--8 8 8 8 8 I I l t i I I I I l 8 8 86 13.-----*-1 -4
.... CatTEnla arcampInc napsses
................... ... . saTIsrage
.......... t.esesG-eles,
.. ........cat. .. .
8
.4...........8...8...8...8...8...8. 8...8...8 .8. .. .I .. . .I (L'
t 3 mac osaLIFIcattom caTEconf catstcoaTIoss s . Cafreoeft t
g i
8 e
8 8 g I s i I 8
g 4
3 8
l 3
g 8
g 8
g 8
g 8
3 8
g j
i s.a rassentat seatst Ep ------ -.----.----.. -.. -- --.---.8 8 33 3 : x3mi i IE EI IE3 8 8 ;
, 8 I.L EculPutav egaLIractTIGe PEDDskG Muttr3 CATION . - ..--l 3828 EI 8 8EIEIE8 8 8 8 8 8 1 II.a rueIParNT OgattricaTBom not Esfattisage--..-- --- - ..---l l l 3 8 8 8 8 8 4 3 8II I 8 8 i
'j i 83.s Lowl yntu? not meattrito . - ....-. . .a-.-- . ---.8 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 g 3 3 3 8 8 g i II.c* EnulPPC2T sat 3sttES ALL RF0WipEREnts L3CrPT 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 I I I l ts I DesLIFIkn LIFE pe stPLACENENT sCREneLE JUSTIFIES =. - .--..! I 4 8 8 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 3 8 8 8
!? 8 III.a ff*WIPhE17 --- .------....] I l 8 1 I 83 8 III.4 EpulPPFn? .F8FMPT07 In TWEpscope eo# SwaLIr pr TBE tcot tos...----- 8 3 3 8 8 8 8 8 REvaEW--.-...- . ! I 8II
, ----I 8 8 8 8 8 4 4 8 8 i H t 13 pocuernfa asaltasLE------.----...---.-- M
- 5. ...................T. inn mot Aast
. ........ ......................................... .--.3...3...3...8...8...8...8...8...8...3....I....l...3...3...3...3 ps cpearcTIvc acitum sPecartre 3 ...-.-----....---. -- ..--
(DEsis.aTIoss a . action srscarttet t
--..--..------.--...----...... . 3 i
g I
g s
3 8
3 8 8 I
8 l
8 8
8 g
8 g
8 1
8 g
8 a
8 3
8
[
g ,3
- I t. EaulPafwT DEPLacrnent uttu omattrisp ressenEnf. --.-------. --g 3 a 1 8 338a8a3 3 4 8 8 8 8 ha i,. t 2. E6ulPLEst montracaT3na ------ --- --- .-- .---- ------ ..--.8 *t- 8 I I I 8 3 3 3 3 l' I i 1 La 3 ..-------------s I 4 8 8 8 8 8 I I I I I 8 8 8
'd
- p 3. DELucaTL
- 4. FooIPr.r>T ne acLocattua amo.usENT sd ELo equip TusFRom se6*EnGEncE*LEfth paplaflom seWScE .----... . : I I 3 8 8 8 8 8 I 8 8 8 8 8 [n i 5. VERIrf ovaLiricaTInk 37 a>DivipaaL TrsT3 sc/AnaLTsts-----.--------a t 1 4I 4 8 8 8 8 3 3 3 3 8 8 8 C3 gj i 6. toutPPEnf mEtocatgon to a FILO ruvasonntuf..--.----.--.-----....-g i t 3 8 : 3 3 I 8 3 ! 3 cp
, i T. OHaLIFICaTION fpsfip4 pr EGWIPPkNT 84 PhpCmLs&-.....-. ------g { $ 3 3 3 $ 3 $ .I l l 8 8 8
}g . I 8. nTurn t-- sEE ,sPEctric Eoeltstaf ITrp Ir curtsta--.)-------------I I 1x3 3 8 4 8 8 8 3 3 3 8 8 8 8
(. I I I 8 8 i I 8 8 8 8 8 8 3 8 8 8 8 scurtnLE rps runPsLitou or cpearcTIVE acTapets) was baEm Pros I 3a3
,. .......................................s......................... tate.. 3.s t....... ......3.. ........................3...8...3...3...3 ........
i 1 4 4
<i t 9 s.
- 4, ,
.' I .
1
t
- 1
'i*
';1 Table 4-4 (Cont. )
.s
, ;J , EcutPatut tuvinomersTat ocabspicattuu sunnans romm c=a ...s........................................e.....
i si c=2 V 3 .g .............................................................
g g rac rougratet ITEu nun #Ess 4
, 3 .....................................m.......................
(( 384(384780408049885et05884538053885448S54e34 as ==========.================..==========.==============.====.========================================================1037865036598e648 ================
s ao 3 mac mEomancersTs spratcsaTIoss a . PErtetrucT3 8 8 Km : .------. ~.--. ..-.- --.-- --..-.-----.--.
8 g g g 8
g 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 3 3 3 3 3 8 g g g g I
l'I s, pocurretro EvanEnce or cuaLIFIcarson aprovaTE.-------..
- 2. automaTL statLastTs sETwsts Eas3Patut ano
---.-s I 8I Ik 88 83 8III 8 8IiE iI IIi 43 8 8 t;R; 8
I s
TEsf sPresaEs estanLis*Lo---.----------------.-----.
- 3. acanc otcesotrios ev4 Lea 1Es aoEouaTLLT..---.--. -.---. .-- -...
.. a 4 a I 3
4 t 8 8 4: 8 5 $
$ s 3
a8 s
', 8 8 8 83 Is83 3 8I43)El l l
() 3 4. ovaLirarp Lart on ptPLacrnENT scucDULL I I 8 8 I i 8 8 8 8 ~ l' 8 8 8 8
8 8
I a 3 Estantisrro tsr pEassacol-.- ---- -- .--. ---.--------. .....-8 8 *l i I 4 8 8I4I i 838 8 8 8 8 q[ s s. Puosaaw rstambtsute to Istafarf assdc DEcanoattow ..------...--3 8 1I a at tI B38a4 4 t t t I m csITEpsa pEcaang.c asses sinutaftom satisr3En (Ir prostate).----.3 1 3 3 8a3 83 II33Ia3 i 3 3 3 8 7. crgfrata arcamplac TrnPreafwer/Perssuet taPossets : I
,' I a. . Pean TrePEmatunt ADEtwaTE.--. --------- ---=---.-. .-t 3
8 8 3
1 8 3 3 3 118a8I II iE8I IR8 3 3, 8 3 3 I
3 8
3 3 1 1 4 -
3 m. - Ptah retssung aDEosaTE. -..---------- - .. ---. 8 3 3 3 3
3 3 3 3 3 3 1 3 3 3 3 a c. - oJ#afina a0EcuaTE*..--------..-*.* --- **==.-==.4 4 8 8 8 8 4 4 4 8 8 4 8 8 4 8
. I a. - arnutbro pourILE Euvrtorro antesattLT- .. .--...---g 4 3 4 8 8 1 3 3 3 4 4 3 3 8 3 8 r. - sTram EzrosseE gir aroegern) aprovaTE= - .-- --.. I I 8 I i 8 4 I I I I a i i I 3 s. castrare arcannInc SPaaf sartsrtro- ---------- ... -.. ..--g 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 9. retirata mEgaangs4 susntecancE satisr3rp---- --.- . i t t I 8 24. csITrust arcamaguc saatafzom sattsrIE0=---.=.---.
...-=.---t i t L 4 4 8 8 l l B I
..-===--== I 8 8 8 85838II II838 8 8 8 *
- s. I 33. ch Trgia Prcamaguc Trst SEouthcc sattsrato .---.- --.....---g I B 4 8 8 8 8 8 4 4 l' 3 I 8
I 8
I I 3 82. castrust arcanalmG Test taltests on stetas anoma53t. 3 3 3 3 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
- i gir ant) sariar Es---- ---....---.----- ----.--.-.--.-.--- i 1 8 8 C3 3 8 3 3 3 8 3 .t 3 3 3 8 8 8 a 8 3 3. ceITEm n pEcanonnG rubCTED#ab TEsTI4s saTIsrtED*.*-*-.=.----==. ! 4 ( l 4 $ $ $ $ $
I se. cs Trata arcampInc lusfuenENT accunacT saftsr Ep . --..---.-..=3 3 g 3 8 i s l I 3 3 3 3 3 3 8 35. fts? oupaTsh4 Pancia (3 houn e rumcTION Tint) saTIstIED-* l l 8 36. cpITrata arcampING nas48ms saTIsrito (NuSEG-950s, Cat. 15-. -=
8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 l 8 8 8 8
'l
, ..e..........................................................
I pac osahtricaffun caTEcoat
.-l...4...8...8...8.......8...8...8...8...8.8...8...8...8...8 (DEstcoatsoas I . caTEcoaT)
- j g ...... -.-----.--.- - --- . . .-.---.--.--.-------
8 g
8 i g 8 4 g
8 3
8 g
8 g
8 8
8 g g 8 8 g
8 g g 8 I g
B g
3 g ,
q t s.a enuerpruf nuattr En-------.---. ---------.--...-------......t 1 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
. < t 3.s runIPnsat suaLgricATsus PEnospc poetr3catsom....-..- -....-s 33 3aia I I II.a EQUIPrE37 ouaLiricaTIo# But tsfaSLIsNED---.. ..---...==...---I 3 3 3 33888IIIi 8
t 8 8 9R 43 l E II 3III III I I l l 8 II.s moutPns%T mut ouattr Ep..--..------- -.-.--.-..-..---.--...-4 g g g 8 B B g 3 3 g I g g 3 8 II.c EcutParat saftsrlEs ALL mEconschEDTS EscEPT 4 I 8 8 8 8 8 I I 4 4 4 8 8 8 8 8 onaLIFILn s.srE P4 mLPLacentar scWEDULE JusfirstD----- --- -.. 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 -8 3 8 8 8 8 8 III.a EQulPAr.If E3EAPT r804 esaLIFICaffoN-===*--- .-----.-*=.... I I $ 5 5 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 l 4 8 8 8 I d--..--.-----
- 3,II.s E4uf P>Est not INnOT pocumEnfaison THE sCDPE Maor pr TNC aETIE -..--..- 8 aVAILanLE---.....-==..-===.---.--..--.
4 3 8 8 8 8 3 $ $ 8 8 8 8 l t H
.......................................................................3...3...3...3...8...........4...3...3...4....g...............8 8 3 3 4 4 M pd I commEcTavE actio= seccartro (DEsssmaTanas a action sPEctrIEnt s t : : :
I --..-- ----.-.--------.--- --------------------------- . ---. 3 I 8 3
8 0
8 t
I I 4
4 's I 3
8 1 3
)(
La w I l . EuulP. Emf DErbacEnEN T WITH uuaLIFIED EQulPRa'NT- =-.-----*-*---*--l 45 8I $3 8 t 2. toutPrrJT nangrgeavann-------- --------..---..--...--.- .-----..=3 8 8 8 8 8 8 iI $I$3$I $ b3 I I I l l La
- )'
8 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 i 8 s. Ecstratar PELocavans AhuVE INL suhMEscENCE LEVEL-**--=*= -=---*-=1 l I t I 4. as,LoraTE na su scla routPathf t ous santaf sum sounct--..--------..-g 3 4
8 8 8 i 8
a 8
3 8
3 3
8 8
1 4
3 3
5 3
1 3
]f on 8 5. VestrT 4uaLarscaran4 av apoITIokab TraflNc/adaLYSis--===.-*===.--I 8 8 8 8 8 8 I I 8 8 8 8 I i 1 C)
- t 6. Ecuir E.7 mELocarsar To a nILo Eustankarmf.-------------..-----..t E 8 I I I i 4 3 1 8 3 3 3 8 ch 8
8 1. ouaLIrtcaTION TESTlas nV tou!PnENT 54 PROchias.. ......-*-------=t & ( 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 $ $ $ $ $
- 1 e. OTHfa (-- sEr arFCIFIC CoulPalNT { TEM fr CHEfEro- )-.----..-. --7 l 3 1 $ $ 8 8 3 $ $ j $ $ t t l 8 8 8 4 8 I i 1. I I 8 8 8 8 8 8 1
.I scuEsuLE rna ro*PLE7344 HT cup 9rCTIVE ACTIuM(s) Has SEEN PSDTICED=..! 8I 48 8 8Xl X l l, ...............................................................................................8...8...8...8.......8..I..$.I...........
$ 8 8 i
i i e
I'
1 1
oj .
j Table 4-4 (cont. )
t I EOulPmENT EpytagentmTAL euALIIICAftom summAp1 800m
- c,
==
- ,,, ..s..................................,.. . .......s.......
g i rne Ese:Patet :Tsa mens 3 .......................... ... .......aas..................s..s i sest 2c g:y ............................................................................leestessles4tassiesenestgesel ......................... .. ..... ... ...............a J 1 NBC mEeulagnENTA (DESIGN 4TIONe I . der CIEDCTI 8 I I I I B 8 3 I
, 23D 3 --.---...--..--- .-.--..-----.---.---..------- : : i 8 8 :
, f I 1. poCurra t ED Ev gnEuCE OF GN ALIFICATIDs ADE09 ATE ====---*===-===..*** t I $I i I8 I $ 8 8 8 8 j g l'E i 2. ApronATE SI.48LAalTT DETWEEN Estarnts? Aue 3 4 3 8 8 8 8 3 3 8 4
- gnOr 4 TLsf SPrCIME4 EsTA4LIsNEO.=*-~~ -----=---------==..--=.* ===--==8 I 8I II t iI$ $ 8 8 i 7 i 3. AGIMG DEce AD A TIup EV Abu4TES ADE094TELI--**=-...-*== -==*====**--I I $ I II $I$I II1 l 8 8 (1 8 4. OHALIr!ED LIRE 04 aEPLACEMENT sCNEDeLE 8 8 8 3 4 3 3 4 3 , I c.. g EsTAeLisuEo (Ir mEuesaten.------..--- .-- ------------- ---- I : aas: aaI I a i la e i S. FaDGWAN ESTheLisNED TO IDEhTIrf Actuc DEGaADATIOm==-===.-~.----*=4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8
' 6. CpITagIA accanossc AcInc sameLATaos sATIsrIEo (Ir stoesaten.-----I it 8 s I I a s 4 . I 11 4 1. Cm:Tause arcAnolse TEnPEa4TenE/Patssent EIPosvas a i 3 3 4 3 4 a i A. - PEAN TEnPEn&Tuat AeEs#Afr--------...-- .- ..------I 3 8 8 I l 3 : :
+ 8 a. - PEA -
--I 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 3 3
% 8 C. - Du.K4TIDs P#Ess#SE ADEow4TEADE09 --.ATE--===-------.**===-
..-..----. ----.8 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 8 3 9. - pEcutere PoprILE EnvELotto ADEse4TELT- --- 3 4 3 4 3 4 8 3 8 3
[]f v '
I 8
- r. - sTE44 EIPGsDaC (Ir RE0 WIRED) ASEOGATE.-**=
- e. Ca:TEmI A aEc4 mat ec aPs Ar sAf tsrIrp------ . --.
- I
-.-...---.-3 4
8 8
3 8
3 8
3 8
8 8
8 8
3 8
3 8
3 8 9. CBITreI A prchansac scantactsCE s&TtsrIEp ----.--- .-----g .3 3 3 3 3 3 3 8 3 8 to. CatfrmIA mEcAantes a4pIATIpe 34T srsEp---- --- -- ----t 3 3 3 3 3 4 3
- i. 8 33. CaITrata arcAmossc Test sEcoEpCE sATIsr3ED - ---==--- ---- I I 3 8 8 8 8 8
' * ** 3 :. CpITrnIA prcAnoluc TEST PAILeats on sevEat AmonALIEs 3 I I a 8
3 3 i 8 1
3 yL 8 ter AmT) sATIsrIEP--------------------------.----------. --=4 4 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 1
. ;. p. 3 83. CottratA mEchantec rueCTsom&L TEsTInc satssrlto------------------I : 3 I e : I 3 ,
t 34. CnITEaIA mEcAnpInc lustaunEnf ACCuaAct sAftstIEp... .-----------8 6 8 8 8 4 8 8 I h 3 3 5. Test posATIOm nAncIm a s woen e repCTIon tant) sAfssrIEo- ....I 3 : I 3 3 3 3 8 86 Ca: TENIA pecAnoguc nAccles SAT!srIED CAT. 33= --- -8
..8.e..e..........3...4...4 .3...........................8 8 1 i; .... ....s..s...............................tasaEG-esse...s......g........ ..........
8 j2 1 DAc OUALIrlCATION CATEG0af (DEstcuatinus I . CATEcogg) 3 g g g l
,jen i ------==--------------..-- -.-----------------.-------
3 i
3 8
3 I I I I t 3
8 8
i 8 2
I.A routenEnf ou4Larsto-----.. ...--------- ..--.--. ---.--.s 3 I t 3 : 3 3
. C 3 a.m roulPutar ouALIrtC4fton PLactuc poogrtC4Tspa----.---- ------; I 4 8 8 8 I I I
! i 3 8 II.A EQUIPnrHT OHALIFICATION DOT EsTLLLisNED--==-=.***.==*---==.-=8 I 8 4I8 8I I $ 1 4 i hc 13.5 EeulPargT me? 9pAbtrIEP=-----==.------.=== ----=------= ----=4 8 I l 4 8 8 8 I i
'. bt i II.C EQutPMEWT s4TIsrIEs ALL SE60lpEnENTs EECEPT
- I I 8 1 4 4 8 I '8 8 OUALIr!ED LIFE Da mEPLACEMrh? sCNEDULE JWsfir!ED-=======..===4 8 f 8II 8I $ 8 8 8 31 : III.A EQUIPMEkT EIEmPT ra04 OWALIFICATION=. .-------.-- .--**-----I I I i l 8 8 8 8
/j l !!!.P E0MIP9r1T NOT In TME SCOPE OF ThE ptVIEW- ..--.-----====.-=--8 8 l 1 3 1 4EII I 3 g 8 IV l 3 3 3 8 l 3 M.
..........POCUME N T 4 f t04 NOT M ADE AV A I L AaLE---------.---.--.----.- -. 8 .. 8 .........s..................
...................ss.......s.....................s..e......... .................s........ W I,
t CunarCTIVE ACTIQ 1 sPECIFIED (DEstcmATIONg I . ACTISg sPECIrlED? g 8 8 l t l 8 8 3 >0 t .----........---...-------- ---------.... -..-=.--.. .----.- - t i 8 , , a i 3 3 ,3 gg il 8 3. IngIPAE.T aEPLACEMENT WITN 08ALIrIED EeylPmENT ---==-.- --**====.8 8 3 I I I -3 I 3 3 pa l t 2. ELUIP9E47 unalrICATIGM ----------------.---------.- .-.. -..--.8 g 3 3 3 3 3 8 3 3 (n
[j t s
- 3. EhulPMEET aELOCAfl0N AEbvE THE subMEacEWCE LEVEL--*----*.--=-.---t
- a. DELDCATE He SHILLO EQUIPMENT re0M e40! ATION 30WacE*- -==-----*-=-3 l
I 8
i 8
8
{
4 t
3 t
8
'{
8 8
'J I
y, $ t
- 5. VEstrT GUALIrtrA13GM ET ADDITIDeAL TESTinc/Am4LTsts-*==*---*.-===8 8 8 I I i 8 8 8 8 C3 tq 6. r0UIPMENT aEI.ncATjoM 70 4 MILO ENVIpouarqT-----.--.-.-----.------g l l l 3 8 3 cm
[p I 1. OUALIFICATIO4 TLSTIIC Or EQHIPMENT IN Pa0caEas==-=..-=-=--=- - .=l t i ! ' pf 8 i $ $ 8 8 I e. OTNFS (.- sEE APECIrIC EGUIPMENT ITEM Ir CHrC5EO- )-.-=.==..=-==8 i ! t 8 l l I l {
> l i 8 I i 8 8 I t 8 3
[], I scota uLe rue ConrLErInn er (name:CTsvL ACTIo=Ist nAs PEEm reov1Doo.--I I 3- I s a
............s......................................................................s................ .............s s..........s...
N. I I. 1. O I 4 i V ' I' [ ' f , i !
s . TER-C5257-506 4.3 METHODOLOGY USED BY THE LICENSEE I This section includes observations concerning the Licensee's i qualification methodology presented in the response [6] to the NRC SER. . 4.3.1 Completeness of Safety-Related Equipment List Section 3.1 of clie NEC SER [5] identified the following concern:
" Display instru-1entation which provides information for the reactor l operators to aid them in the safe handling of the plant was not -
specifically identified by the licensee. A complete list of all display i instrumentation mentioned in the LOCA and HELB emergency procedures must be provided. Equipment qualification information in the forts of sususary
- l. sheets should be provided for all components of the display instrumenta-tion exposed to harsh environments. Instrumentation which is not
- considered to be safety related but which is mentioned in the emergency procedure should appear on the list. For these instruments, (1) justification should be provided for not considering the instrument
- safety related and (2) assurance should be provided that its subeequent failure will not mislead the operator or adversely affect the mitigation-i of the consequences of the accident. The environmental qualification of j post-accident sempling and monitoring and radiation monitoring equipment is closely related to the review of the TMI Lessons-Learned modifications i and will be performed in conjunction with that review.
The licensee identified 234 items of equipment which were assessed by the staff. Because Units 1 and 2 are nearly identical, the review can be performed as one. Where necessary, differences in the units will be noted for clarity." In, response to this concern, the Licensee stated (6]:
" Completeness of Safety-Related Equipment:
l The _NRC Staff requested a listing of all systems both inside and outside 1 potentially liarsh environments required to ' achieve or support: (1) i emergency reactor shutdown, (2) containment isolation, (3) reactor core ! cooling, (4) containment heat removal, (5) core residual heat removal, 1 and (6) prevention of vignificant release of radioactive material to the environment.' Based &3 a detailed review of the PBNP FFDSAR, Technical Specifications, and En.argency Operating Procedures, the following table lists all the systems that are required to perform those functions at Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2 in the event of a postulated Loss-of-Coolant Accident (LOCA) or High Energy Line Break (HELB)
- accident. The corresponding nomenclature identified by the DOR ,
j Guidelines, Appendix A, Typical Equipment / Functions Needed for Mitigation ] of a LOCA or MSLB Accident are also shown (see Appendix C of this TER for further details]. , i 4-12 ! du Franklin Research Center , A Osamen of The hensen humane
. it y**r:=:*;. tem... _ , . - - -- -m. . ,,. v-.*~.,. - . - - - . - - _ _ - . . , . - - ~ _ _ _ . , - - - , . _ . . . _ . - . ' .. - - . _ - _ - _ . - _-- -- . . _ ~- , . - - ,
.- . . - ._. ._ ,. - - .. .=
TER-C5257-506 l Only those systems required for mitigation of a LOCA or HELB accident l based on the PBNP Final Facility Description and Safety Analysis Report f (FFDSAR). Technical Specifications, and Emergency Operating Procedures and whose components are potentially exposed to a harsh e'nvironment from those accidents were listed in our responses to IE Bulletin 79-01B. The environmental qualification of components required for Post-Accident Sampling and Monitoring, Radiation Monitoring (including containment), and Safety-Related Display Instrumentation are being addressed as part of evaluations and modifications being undertaken to meet the intent of the ~
- TMI Action Plan (NUREC-0737). These evaluations and modifications will follow the schedule committed to in our numerous responses to the Staff related to the THI Lessons Learned. The Heating, Ventilating and Air conditioning (HVAC) systems for the control' room and areas containing safety equipment are not located in potentially harsh environn'ents and were, enerefore., not identified in our systems list. Venting is used as the containment combustible gas control system at Point Beach Nuclear
! Plant. This addresses all of the typical systems listed in Appendix A to the DOR Guidelines. ' Tha staf f also requested us te provide 'a complete list of instrumen-cation !sentioned in the LOCA and HELB emergency precedures.' The i following is a list of that instrumentation by PBNP cag number and function with justification provided for not environmentally qualifying the instruments which are not safety-related (see Appendix C of this IER , for further details). Only those instruments that are required for mitigation of design-basis LOCA and HELB accidents per the PBNP FFDSAR, accident analyses, Technical Specifications, and Emergency Operating Procedures and are potentially exposed to harsh environments from those accidents are considered within the scope of IE Bulletin 79-015. Those instruments in the above list l which were listed without comments were included in the master list of equipme'nt under the plant system to which they belong. In addition, the RCS Loop RTDs and Core-Exit Thermocouples were included in the updated master list and component evaluation worksheets which were submitted to the NRC Staf f on January 30, 1981 in response to IE Bulletin 79-OlB, Supplement No. 3. Our detailed evaluation of the remaining instruments in the above list leads to the conclusion that their failure will not affect the performance of any safety system or mislead the operator in such a manner as to adversely affect LOCA or HELB accident mitigation. i i Wisconsin Electric is actively pursuing the evaluation and upgrading of additional instruments in response to the TMI Action Plan (i.e., NUREG-0737), NUREG-0696, and Regulatory Guide 1.97. The schedule for this effort, however, is consistent with Wisconsin Electric's conunitments related to the above documents which were previously provided to the Staff." It is concluded that the Licensee has provide'd a satisfactory response to the NRC concern. nklin Research C A on n e n. n. men w. enter .
,", WM p e egge ,y f,'f *,Q#*9**f% M M y . - -
99 mgg
'lf\,gsd*,
e , Qg ,, ,,- _ tt
- W v JV w V ' a ..p.. ,
' f 3.g, z; g ;_ 'j _
- 4 ,
I +
- ---- _2 __
B i 1 TER-C5257-506 : 4.3.2 _ Containment Spray System Section 3.2 of the NRC SER (5] identified the following concern:
"On this basis, the staff has assumed, unless ocherwise noted, that the analysis for developing the environmental envelopes for Point Beach Units 1 and 2, relative to the temperature, pressure, and the containment spray csustics, has been performed in accordance with the requirements stated above. The staff, has reviewed the Component Evaluation Work Sheets to ensure that the qualification data envelope the specifications established by the licensee. During this review, the staff assumed that for plants designed and equipped with an automatic containment spray system which satisfies ths sir.gle-failure criterion, the main-steam-line-break (MSLB) environmental conditions are enveloped by the large-brask-LOCA environ'sental conditions. The staff assumed, and l requires the licensee to vertfy, that the containment spray system is not subject to a disabling single-compontnt failure and therefore satisfies the requirements of Sectica 4.2.1 of the DOR Guidelines. 'quipment tubmergence has also been addressed where the possibility l exiscs that flooding of equipment may result from EEL 3s."
i In response to this concern, the Licensee st& ten (6): i
" Service Conditions:
In its review of the service conditions inside containment, the Staff ' assumed that the Main Steam Line Break (MSLB) conditions are enveloped by l the large-break LOCA conditions. The Staff required us to verify the assumption that PBNP is equipped with an automatic containment spray system which satisfies the single-failure criterion. The PBNP FFDSAR, Section 6.4, containment Spray System, subsection 6.4.3, Design Evaluation, states 'A single failure analysis has been made on all active components of t,he system to show that the failure of any single active component will not prevent fulfilling the design function.- This analysis is summarized in Table 6.4-4. ' This statement and an additional design review verify that the Containment Spray System is initiated automatically l and satisfies the single failure criterion of 10 CFR 50, Appendix A. Therefore, the Containment Spray Systems at Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, satisfy the requirements ;f Section 4.2.1 of the DOR Guidelines." It is concluded that the Licensee has provided a satisfactory response to l the NRC concern. i l l i l 4-14 1 ~ 001 Frankun Research Center A Osammen d The Penneen enssame V'*. . ,- .5 ..n. . #1**2 . ,.;. _.__,W?~.,-;_,._,-- :, y- m. . - - - _ _
- - _.J7"'W .+ _--
TER-C5257-506 4.3.3 Environmental Service Conditions 4.3.3.1 Temperature, Pressure, and Humidity Conditions Inside Containment Section.3.3 of the NRC SER [5] identified the following concern: 7 "Me licensee has provided the results of accident analyses as follows: Max Temp (*F) Max Press (psig) Basidity (%) - LOCA 278 53 not provided MSLB not provided not'provided not provided > The staff has concluded that the minimum temperature profile for - equipment qualification purposes should include ~a margin to account fer higher-than-average temperatures in the upper regions of the containment that can exist due to stratification, especially following a pcstulated MSLB ,. Use of the stea.u saturation temperature corresponding to the total building pressure (pertial pressure of eteam plus partial pressure of air) versus time will provide an acceptable margin for either a postulated
- LOCA or MSL3, whichever is controlling as to potential adverse environnental effects on equipment. -
The licensee's specified temperature (service condition) of 278*F does not satisfy the above requirement. A saturation temperature corresponding to the peak profile (301*F peak temperature at 53 peig) should be used l instead. The licensee should update his equipment susa.ary. tables to reflect this change. If there is any equipment that does not meet the staff position, the licensee must provide either justification that the equipment will perform its intended function under the specified conditions or propose correceive action. The licensee has provided service condition pressure and temperature profiles for the containment and an assortment of components. _ The staff assumed that the containment service condition profiles in the licensee's October 30, 1980 submittsi are for a LOCA. However, for this review, the licensee should specify the relative humidity associated with each i profile and provide service condition profiles - including pressure, , temperature, and humidity - for all areas subject to a potential HELB. In addition, room numbers or other applicable designation should be used to specify the area to which profile applies." The Licensee responded to the NRC concern as follows [6]:
" Temperature, Pressure and Humidity Conditions Inside Containment:
The NRC Staff has now concluded, contrary to the requirements of the DOR Guidelines, ~ Section 4.2.1, that the containment temperature profile for equipment qualification purposes should include an additional ' margin to account for higher-than-average temperatures in the upper regions of the _nidin Rese_ar.ch._
. . Center TRE??C, , i.J [c .._z. -
- C 5((Q<. _a_ .s.,. . 2 0' ._x s & .5 & '&2;k;i3G p 3
=- - .. w ,. TER-C5257-506 l i ~
containment that can exist due to stratification, especially following a l postulated MSLB. Use of the steam saturation temperature corresponding ! to the total building pressure (partial pressure of steam plus partial - l pressure of air) versus time will provide an acceptable margin for either a postulated LOCA or MSLB... '- The DOR Guidelines, Section 4.2.1, states that ' equipment qualified .for LOCA environment is considered qualified , for a MSLB accident environment in plants with automatic spray systems l not subject to disabling single component' failures.' The Commission's Memorandum and Order CLI-80-21, dated May 23,'1980, and the Staff's order for Modification'of License, dated October 24, 1980, Concerning Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment at Point Beach Nuclear Plant, Units 1 and 2, both endorse the use of the DOR Guidelines or NUREG4588, as appropriate,' for establishing the adequacy of environmental qualification. It is Wiscorsin Electric's position that I the use of the con.:ainmene temperature profile cal:ulated for a l. design-basis, large-break LOCA, which has been previously approved by the ; NRO Staff, is accepf.able for equipment qualification inside containment. l Therefore, the required temperature profile refert.nced in the component i evaluation worksheets for equipment located inside containment remains valid and will not be changed. 1 From a technical standpoir,t, the use of the saturation temperature corresponding to total building pressure versus time is overly conservative except in two. cases. The first case is where equipment is located extremely high in containment and stricification effects following a MSLB may cause temporary superheated conditions until the containment spray system starts at a maximum of one minute following the initiation of the accident. In this case, the thermal lag.of the safety-related equipment would prevent the critical internal temperatures from exceeding the equilibrium temperatures reached during qualification to the conservatively-calculated LOCA temperature profile. Since a typical MSLB containment temperature profile (see NUREG-4458, Figure 1) for a Westinghouse PWR obows a temperature reduction to 240'F or less almost i immediately after spray initiation, the op,lifi:ation to the LOCA temperature profile provides adequate at surance of safety from an ! equipment qualification standpoint. I The second case is where equipment is located in the direct vicinity of a high-energy line with no physical barrier such as a wall or floor in ( between and, therefore, could experience higher temperatures than l calculated during a postulated accident. The superheated st'eam escaping from the break in this case may not six with and/or be cooled by the containment air or surfaces before it reaches the safety-related equipment. A detailed review of equipment locations inside containment with respect to elevation and to vicinity of high-energy lines was conducted. The only safety-related equipment which falls into either of the above two cases is the solenoid valves and limit switches associated with the containment purge supply and exhaust valves,1 & 2-HV3213 and 3245. Those components are being replaced with components qualified to - well above the maximum saturation temperature. t 4-16 - l 000 Franidin Research Center l AChemenaf The Preseen humas . I I m.mw . m ~f _ _ - 3.--
.m .m-- .~. , =~.
TER-C5257-506 l In the interim, continued operation is justified in spite of the higher temperature profile by the fact that purge supply and exhaust valves and their redundant backups outside containment are administratively
' red-tagged' closed unless the plant is in a cold shutdown condition.
Therefore, failure of these components could not. adversely affect LOCA or HELB accident mitigation. - The Staff has also requested.that the relative humidity associated with
, each service condition (i.e., temperature and pressure) profile may be .
i provided. As stated on the component evaluation worksheet, a relative humidity of 100% was assumed as the worst case. Temperature and pressure are the only parameters related to steam and moisture which are significant in qualification of; equipment to LOCA or HELB accidents. In fact, the DOR Guidelines do not even mention humidity as a parameter to ( be considered in qualification except for equipesnt in confined spaess in
- areas where fluids are recirculated from inside containment to ac: orap ish long-carm core cooling following a LOCA (See DOR Cuidelinen, Section 4.3.2). Therefore, the ide.ntification of 100% telative huuidity on the component evaluation worksheets is considered sufficient and the service condition profiles do not need to be changed."
It appears that the Licensae has not resolved the NRC ' concern. Since the Licensee is responsibic for identifying tho environments, the parameters identified by the Licensee have been used in the evaluatiour contained in this Technical Evaluation Report. These parameters are reproduced in Appendix A. I 4.3.3.2 Temperature, Pressure, and Basidity Conditions Cutside Containment Section 3.4 of the NRC SER [5] identified the following concern: i l
"The licensee should provide service condition profiles for all areas I outside containment subject to a potential HELB, as stated in Section 3.3 of this report."
i In response to this concern, the Licensee stated [6]:
"The Staff also requated that a pressurs, temperature, and humidity profile be provided ' for all areas subject to a potential HELB. ' In addition, room numbers or other applicable designation should be used to specify the area to which each profile applies. Temperatore and pressure profiles were developed and submitted for all safety-related components potentially exposed to a HELB' accident environment outside containment.
The profiles were identifed by component rather than room number because the profile is different for every location within the room. The pressure profile is a function of distance from the high-energy line due to expansion of the steam jet as a function of distance from any potential break location. There is no need to provide profiles for all l areas. Humidity profiles are not required by the DOR Guidelines, as i ! 4-17 4000U Franidin Research Center A Chemen of The Frannen insumme h &~. i} , .C yG5.Y?' %. . ).Lfpa i(( _ Lu . L ., s. El. S $ 5 5 5 .5 %.i s ..; .2s $ ..-. .
- - - - a . TER-C5257-506 discussed in the above paragraph. Therefore . our previous submittal is considered sufficient in this regard and _ no changes to existing profiles or additional profiles are provided."
It is concluded that the Licensee has provided a satisfactory response to the NRC concern. a 4.3.3.3' Nuclear Radia* tion Dose (Inside and Outside Containment) Section 3.8 of the NRC SER [5] stated the following: ,
"The licensee has provided values for the radiation levels postulated to exist following a LOCA. The application and methodology employed to determine these values were presented to the licensee as part of the NRC staff criteria contained in the DOR Guidelines, in NUREG-0588, and in the . guidance provided in IE5-79-015, Supplement 2. Thereforu, for this review, the staff has assumed that, unless otherwise noted, the values provided have been decernined in accordance with the preveribed
~ l criteria. The staff review determined that the values to which equipment
,- was qualified enveloped the requirements identified by the licensee.
The value required by the licensee inside containment is an integrated dose of 5.8 x 107 rada. This value envelopes the DOR Guideline requirements and is therefore acceptable. A required value outside containment of 6.51 x 106 rade has been used by the licensee to specify limiting radiation levels in the vicinity of the safety injection system in the auxiliary building. This value appears te consider the radiation levels influenced by the source term methodology associated with recirculation fluid lines and is therefore acceptable." , In response, the Licensee stated [6]:
" Radiation (Inside and Outside Containment)
The NBC Staff has found the required radiation doses used for equipment qualification inside and outside containment to be acceptable. Therefore, no further response is provided. The methodology employed in dose and dose rate calculations is maintained in our central equipment qualification file and is available at our general offices for NRC audit." It is concluded that the Licenses has provided a sat'isfactory response to the NRC concern. 4-18 - d Fracidin Research Center A Chaman of The Fransen humane i e,~~, / ,wg ~ E J3,,g g ;,T,6,? .',, h h gg e m ,,
~
n , .
,s ,, "_" i _
, TER-C5257-506 4.3.4 Chemical Spray Section 3.6 of the NRC SER [5] identified the following concern: "The licensee's values for chemical sprays, as specified on the CES, are B 50 -NaOH solution: pH 7.9-10.0. For this review, the exact 3 4 chemical concentration of boric acid and sodium hydroxide used in qualification testing should be discussed. Therefore, the effects of chemical spray will be considered unresolved. The staff will review the .
Licensee's response when it is submitted and discuss the resolution in a supplemental. report." In response to this concern, the Licensee stated [6]:
" Chemical Soray:
The Staff has requested the exact chemical ccacentration of boric acid and sodium hydroxide used in qualification testing and a further discussion of the effects of chemical spray. This information will be provided with the updated component evaluation wo:ksheets." It is concluded that the Licenste has provided a satisfactory response to the NRC concern. 4.3.5 Subme rgenes Section 3.5 of the NRC EER [5] identified the following concern:
"The maximum submergence levels have been established and assessed by the licensee. Unless otherwise noted, the staff assumed for this review that the methodology employed by the licensee is in accordance with the appropriate criteria as established by Commission Memorandum and Order CLI-80-21.
i The licensee's value for maximum submergence is 14 ft 10 'in. The i licensee has identified three solenoid valves and three limit switches as - l having the potential for becoming submerged af ter a postulated event. ! The licensee stated that this equipment will perform its safety function before becoming submerged. In this case, the licenses should provide an assessment of the failure modes associated with the submergence of these components. The licensee should also provide assurance that their subsequent failure will not adversely affect any other safety functions or mislead the operator. Additionally, the licensee should discuss operating time, across the spectrum of events, in relation to the time of submergence. If the results of the licensee's assessment are acceptable, then these components may be exempt from the submergence parameter of qualification. l l Anwin aesearch conie, A Osmusen of The hensen busesne I
~ ..;; M&~;W O. .w x.%5;bg,$hga h ;iiMgmfh~;&KQT . _ w_. 2._,. .'~ LTCXY ' ~
TER-C3257-506 It is not clear from the information submitted that submergence of safety-related electrical equipment outside of containment was addressed. He licensee should address this area more specifically in the 90-day response and upgrade the CES as appropriate." In response to this concern, the License.e stated [6]:
"Submersence he Staff has rehested additional information concerning the submergence of several components identified as having the potential for submergence.
It was .siso requested that potantisi submergence of safety-related electrical equipment outsids containment can he addressed. The information requested wi.11 be provided with the upJared component ' evaluation worksheets." It is concluded that the !.icenace has provided a satisfactory response to i the NRC conce.rn. 4.3.6 Aging and Qualified Life Se'ction 3.7 of the NEC SER [5] identified the following concern:
"Re DOR Guidelines, section 7, does not rsquire a qualified life to be established for all safety related electrical equipment, however the following actions are required:
- 1. Detailed comparison of existing equipment to the materials identified in Appendix C of the DOR guidelines. De first supplement to IEB-79-01B requires the Licensees to utilize the table and identify any additional materials as a result of their effort.
- 2. Establish an ongoing program to review surveillance and maintenance records to identify potential age related degradations.
- 3. Establish component maintenance an.d replacement schedules which include considerations of aging characteristics of the installed components.
he licensee identified a number of equipment items for which a specified qualified life was established (for example, 7 years, 10 years, or 40 years). In its assessment of these submittals, the staff did not review the adequacy of the methodology nor the basis used to arrive at these values; the staff has assumed that the established values are based on state-of-the-art technology and are acceptable. ranklin Research Center A Ohemen of The Frereen busame
%= . . . r ,. c . _ c p ,. t. e u *" ; .g,. _ , ; a,, . _ - . , - C% . a . , . .N v - c ws.
l 1
. TER-C5257-506 -
For this review, however, the staff requires that the licenses submit ; supplemental information to verify and identify the degree of conformance l co the above requirements. . The response should-include all the equipment l identified as required to maintain functional operability in harsh environments. The staff will review the licensee's response when it is submitted and discuss its evaluation in a supplemental report." In response to this conc'ern, the Licensee stated [6]:
"Q:
The NRC Staff has requested additional information ::c verify tbs degres of complianert with the aging requirements of the DOR Guidalines for j safety-re.le::ed electrical equipset.t potentially exposed to harsh accident environments. The requirements include the following actices:
- 1. Existing equipment must be analysed to identify any ' materials which are known to be susceptible to significant degradatio., due to themal .
and radiation aging.' If the device contains such material, a . qualified life 'ausst be established on a case-by-case basis;'
- 2. Establish preventative maintenance, surveillance, and/or replacement. 2 schedules which take into a: count the specific aging characteristics of the installed equipment; and '
- 3. Establish an ongoing program to review surveillance and maintenance records to assure that equipment exhibiting age-related' degradation is maintained and/or replaced as necessary.
1 The first requirement to evaluate equipment for potential degradation due. to thermal and radiation aging has been met by two methods. For equipment which was pre-aged prior to design-basis event testing, the pre-aging program was evaluated and compared to the plant-specific application to establish an expected minimum life including margin. For equipment which was not pre-aged during environmental qualification tests, the organic materials (i.e., those other than metals or ceramics) were identifed and evaluated for potential ~ degradation due to thermal or i radiation aging in order to establish an expected minimum life including ! margin. Appendix C to the DOR Guidelines as well as other references were used in these evaluations. Examples of both methods of establishing an expected life are shown in the notes for the updated component evaluation worksheets. , i The second and third aging requirements from the DOR Guidelines concern maintenance, replacement, and surveillance programs. These programs already exist at Point Beach Nuclear Plant for the purpose of ensuring' that safety-related equipment will be able to perform its design function throughout its installed lifetime. These programs and supporting i A 4-21 branidin Research Center A Ohenen of The Museen heemme m<se wt -.=. .- me mm _ m e-r_.m m . ,- ,a m m ,.w ...
TER-C5257-506 administrative procedures, however, are being re-evaluated and will be upgraded,-if necessary, before the environmental qualification deadline (presently June 30, 1982) to comply with the intent of the DOR Guidelines. Existence of these programs will be documented in Wisconsin Electric's central equipment qualification file by the deadline and will be available for audit by the NRC Staff." It is concluded that the Licensee has provided a satisfactory response to the NEC concern. 4 a D D G e
~ ~ . - .
TER-C525 7-506 4.4 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION EVALUATION The evaluation presented in this section of the report includes, for each equipment item, completed equipment environmental qualification review checksheets (partially handwritten) which present both the technical information necessary to conduct the review and the results of the evaluation. g a e 5 e nidin Research Center A Chemen of The Fransen kumus
' *** *T'W$V. ','W c : :,r :, m ::r .= u , y,.*;Z3 M' ;~ ** .. .. _ 'y7.Z7- _ .; _c . ~;gg q-- y~~ ,_ ~.ww y . - -. - t. - _ . . _ . _ _ _ _
31 1' , I
.. ... .... .... .u........... j gr , I see:Passt sessaoensetat osatiracargos c ._ seestessi Issa cascusesst sepsa l reses esacu 3 g .I p. - ^ ----------. . u....
1
....e ,
gk roc
- e$n 2"g so cor enset
......r........ .. .......
paye ac
. .r. tu.ss.e . .. ..... - poes.t ... senese..................... -.seca.tsee--
a rossames teamannesse ' rossono
- esses esastraat settesse, star, c'e*
' % s.syst taassnittaa saates sta sesstraat gestoste, s&st sa'e*, se saavou ;
- r a rtne teamsnittse , ses pas staat sestesse, stas, s'e*, out a es.ow teams = ttaa eneros 333 nesstgaat esitesse, sosv. c'e* out j 4
s tavss, svaren nasestnes, ages e
,, a rs.us teamanettaa reasono staess coevagassut, tuses.saat esstesse, stav,sase'.s*,
v es'e*,, ce 2 4 1 rs.uw vsaasnittse rossono essen aests.name ents.eams, stav. c'e*, out i e resssoas inassantese rossono
- attes 39sts,samt setteams, Ptse, ese'e*, e .
o resssent teamenettse esatos , sta aes 6 aat eens. esse, stse, s'e*, eer ! l ge rareseas taassmattaa roseono estsa contaammast, s&ss. 6s'e* i
- tsste. tramanattaa tensose- slams e 3 Levas, taapanettse rosoooo ;staag contagensas, asastiaat settesse,stav. as'.s*,
se v es'e*, so I 33 rarssues vasessistsa rossono - stise costaamaser, saas. 6s'e* - ' , as tsves,taassaartse rossoso , ellag .
- costassasset, saas, as'e*
I as rLaw vannonittee reneoso ', ele Costassasst, stav. es's* i as pse.ssoas vaansmittsa - rossono ansatsaar nestates, sosv as'e*, se i 37 s,sess. taamsmittsa rossose h. essensiten tuantessess, esse,stav.It'e*,come ; e as sotsuate watos seco ..'p<c see349e tesassant esitosse, stav,.e's., s.oe . N as son.ssono watvs asce c.,r .tesentstg costasmasov, as.sv. ee'e* . .
- ao sotspots, vates asco , . . . estest contagesset, stsu, see'e*
as sos.anoso vatus asco , . ' . esenescas costassasst, as.sv. 6s'e* 22 sotsposo vater asco costaneesar, stas, st'e* 23 sots.ose vates .asco q% 'bassatel4 seestes . costasansas, stas se'e* 24 gasctasc motos , yesvansasses . sessa, ctase e tussettastle up nesstraat seas. eses, ss.se, s'e*, sat as attcranc moton wastameaness n voor, reams easts, c& ass a res ausst aat eestesse, ss.se, c'e*, com as is.actose noroe hastassaouse ,4,, amor, teams setes; class e tre asses.nast se nsese, ssse at ss.tetste udson wastamsweess se'e'. a roep, raams testa, tasaustases nesit aat simestetas,es*,se,, .c'e*, con-se ts.scranc motos mastnessouss aser, tsaus seems, c& ass a ses costatsmast, stas, 8* ase es*e* as sos.crescat casts ortscs messasseossa maanses so, gescyt; contagnaast, stav as'e* 3e ano rossono . sesse336v assatasar 3 susanocourts contaos, racesets cose, assesse scaragons.sostesse, s, stav se'e*, stry,sesses es'e* os ; 32 Ptu possposet (1ssa CGuta:Wiisms, stas. 3s'4* 33 taansoucsn. cir rssman contacts ,F ses aussa.saar aesteams, stav. as'e* , 34 siorc,a content castra as sectascat canstaarrog wastaussosas ' vers v . ausstgaat easteams, rosv. s'e*, out i cauess-utses ess.ese cassessa virs contasancer, acous stav. 46'e* s
. as tosctascas, cans,s arties marcasm escuras, ses arsses contasonset, aeovs stav. is*e* tg
,j 33 svernacas, casts, T .sanocours.s postoa smaatagse esps mostaae 1, tasanocowes.s satssa contaannser, sosv. 4m'e* ps ! , se Es.Levnicas, casss, sustampany socsosstos rasswats, ass 6ss3 costasonsst, stav. as'e* I l se nEctascas. cass.s, contest nons caos.s . 6ee e insses see eerstes costasma i S to stectascas, caos.s. sostamaser pos postmasi, tusstre estupse ra anages see outsass contasmat n 4: oso.tossts asses,atre elas. osoessiosorasas sat posse caos, (etages contaienter noctuscas. cants', rouca on as is.tevascas, cans.s tastaenant . osomets osotasemposessas reistse satts. assier es. eersecs contagensus -4 43 ss.act> cas, cans.s, contpos. ' scants 44 sitctescat comascros sosper seas, refra contoos, cess,s a:Lus,tyrs savt smeses ame odisses contasasser d, contassaiset, as.sv. 4s'e* c3 45 si.e:ctaic nsatta esstancmouss 'ess. so, sesa7es sise 4 containment, s&se. es'e' m j (a Ju8CtInu pos NNattafra 33tsjsg) CoGra 5Name, sssv. as*8* 4 47 as.rctascas cunerctus tpsono ss.scienc asras contagement, suv. as*e* to a vsrs :::as, tuswas pas.s cousasuname, ts.sv. ee se to su.ctascas ar st seffet't co:inscrue E i s'e st:18cMouss es)3s913G, odG, Do, 6e85ess os cohtashasht, stre e6*S* ' b I
- - i
TER-C5257-506 8 .
! .*.* * & 33 ! ?..*. S '. ". 3 .....o .53. ?.. . 5. ?. ?. ?. ?. ?. ?.?.*.*. ,5 . t g ..
2t .. 2.. - Ig3, ,3;. 33..
;. .3.5.,.34. .-8. g 5. .
3S3*C.". U Sa: F . . .15.
..E C. :. :. :..... ......... C...;. 2 . . . . .. . a.....,.t.. . .a .- . . .- . .- .-. 8. a .- - ....--en.
a .
. ..5.8 8.858...
8 . ..
.uuuuvo.u uu ...a .s .. . .. . -.a.
1 3 ".".*. ".!. ! 233388. . 1 2 3...
.. a. .=
u.3. 3. .. M. u u.
- ... t 7."****
.S.id2R . t... ... .. - .. .. .u .
jjg[ . j ,,.s. 8 -Ei.!=illi!!!!i!!!
- . . .i.t . ~
S t .- .
~
1
. . . 2... .. .2 .. . .... *og it- .3 t t*** .g g..-.
444 aa
.. == ===..
- 3. g ... .-
l I 8I53583-3-- !
.3000.R00.....88888888 ..
t --- --
...Wuu.u-.-..... .g&... 3. ..33.... -------4....dddded44 u......
2 - t.
. Co. .........u u. u . . v. u. u. .. .>..>>.9 . ....J. p.e.e..e e. ..
u u u v. . .J J J .J J J J
....W mma.a.D.a.m k.----.......C .....w.m C
u d uuuuuuu 4 4. m a NNMMMMMM C.CGCCGO C .* u a. . C A. . S . .- s .- > > > > b - > >. a a 3 a & J . -- -- Q C aaaaaaa. 4..u v.a.F'4
..g ... .-. .............
p. t l nklin Resear A Chus.n .i Th. n wwFran.ch
.m. C. enter m., - ,s, ,, .,.*. ,,. .. .s.. . u.t -.~.m..n .. .. , ,,. ..a. ~;.m. .s.. .. r s.,_-..~.-,_?:-
v ~:~a .
- - . . - . ~.r . . . ~ -:<, .- ~~~~~ --a ~.~+~
s ~.~ 3:- n
#m NRC Centrtet No. NRC-03-79-118 P go bob Franklin Reserrch Centir FRC Prcject No. C5257 A Orvision of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 80(s EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 1 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN THE AUZILIARY BUILDING, ELEV. 8' FOIBORO MODEL 611GM REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 YEAR TER CHECKSHEET NO. 1 ,
, LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 639, 567 1 UNCTION (PLAJT ID): TRAN5MITS SAFETY I!UECTION PUNP DISCHARGE LINE PRESSURE - (1-PT922,23) LICENSEE SUBMITIAL [7]: SCEW(S): 1-14 l ) l DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITE24(S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, h S, (R), M, I, QM, h EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable 1 LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la Sumary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 25, ?c, M- ! System Consideration Review 42 'b,
- ';, 40, 4., s Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 5:, 55, Se, ;J, :., 5f,
! Si, 55, Ei, Sj Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 52, Sb Equipment Sununary ' Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary ?;, 7L, 7; - g 1 7
,k k hi,- ' **e ,
F' _ h) ' 1 $9 '** g E g- .. ,, . *' t
piMU Frtnktn Rssench Cent r NRC Contract Ns. NRC 03-79-118 FRC Project HD. C5257 P gt j A Divmon of The Frankhn Inuirute FRC Assignment No.13 lb. l . a,th n,d Race scre,es Pmda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-10m FRC Task No. So 6 /c d 7 l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQOIPMENT ITEM NO. /
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC S/.R - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: [ Tne Licensee (has/;... .~i.) provided a respcase to the SER concerns. [ The' Licensee (has/'- ut) specifically stated that the equipment 44
-geaM " ' :. 2/e. will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.
' ~ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no
- outatanding qualification deficiancias. l
)( The Licensee (ha:A : _ t) proposed a ccerective action for this equipment ' itas whose qualification hcs not been fully established.
1 Justification for interim operation (has/M- *) been providad by the Licensee for this equipment item. i Corrective action specified by the Licensee: X Equipment replacement with quitlified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item i
- that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.
1 The Licensee (bas />- ..e provided a schedule for the proposed 1 corrective acti . (Schedule f e accomplishing the corrective action h> /9 -
.)
l The Licensee stacos that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
)
DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) 1 I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficien'cy J ~; I.b ModificationT III.a Exempt '
II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualif,ied IV Documentation Not Available e e
. . . .. N?w. g,# 4..#.. w ., # m a u .c, . .,. S *.b . -. '{J{ _.
y._-{L_ 7-p
\
s.
-s A g . . ~
4 . NRC Contract N . NRC-03-74118 ') ? ~ h ' Md Fr:nklin Rese:rch Center FRC Project Ns. C5257 \ .' P;gc' , ' . A D6 vision d N Frankhn Insniute FRC Assignment No.1) ; 20th and Race Streets. Phde.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 lM FRC Task No. 80/o /fd7 s EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. / pj u;. EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
PN'g} \' ~ i
;\ l DECIGNATION:
t NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY , Documented Evidence of Qua11fication Adequate
- Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established '
Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately
%. O Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) % '
Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation , l' . Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) \ s Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: - o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate 3 \ ' g, o Duration Adequate \ , o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately n o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate ' ( - 4 Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied
.y l Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied - - '
g i Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied __ Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied
' '- %~
Criteria Regarding Test Failures or' Severe Anomalies '
\ \ *
(If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied s, I ${' N Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied , Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied ( , criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) g- , 3 __s , ,,
, , / +
n -- en . DESIGNATION: . NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified s _,. , I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X l I II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established -- II.b Equipment Not Qualified - II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life , or Replacement Schedule Justified , x III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipsent Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review , IV Documentation Not Made Available ' s ( YMA M em % a ' m T . w_. a e/y p. w . f,<-e-4/ eL ss pa-w "p M- A p ,.m; . . :.,. ,---,. ,.. w. , _ ...-,.
. w , ,..~. ,.. n . _ ,-. ,. ,. , , - . = . _
. . _ . - - = _ . . _ . _ _ - . _ . . . . . ~ . - .
' gA NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Pag 3 bdd Frtnkbn Resear:1 Center 4 0 A civ.on ol m rranwin Insnruse FRC Assignment No.13 3a J0th and Race So.eu. Tus.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. Ed 67sfd / h \
.D?., I ECUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. / . 3 Y V ! \ LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER f
D
; G. These transmitters are being rootsced with new Foxbore N-E10 Series transmitprs which are presently' qualified to IEI! 323-U71 including N I 2.2 x 10 Rads gamma radiation and IEEE 344-1971. A Utility Transmitter "i'- Qualification Grous has been formed to cualify these transmitters to '\ IEEE 323-1974 and IEEE 3a4-1975. The final qualification is scaecuted s to be completed by tne environmental qualification deadline. It is our intention that the replacements be. completed by June 30, 1982. The transmitters wnica are located inside containment or outside containment in the vicinity of high energy lines are all Foxboro transmitters which have been tasted for those ca,.iditions. In sost cases, the transmitters - are being rsplaced because of a lack of traceability on tae matarials i which :r' events us from analyting tne aging enaracteristics. The Foxcore p ., l transmitters'will, in our oginion, perfom their safety function in the .i' j , extrweTi unlikely event of a 1.0CA or HEl.3 accident. The other trans-
- y' sitters outside containment (Santon's) will have perfomed tneir safety
. function prior to being exposed to a severe environment from that 3
accident. It is unlikely tnat the transmittars have degraded in their N N a'acroximately 10 years of operation since we have seen no evicence of i su:n degradation. Therefore, the continued safe operation of tae plant,
\ is assured until the ,transmittars are replaced.
t l I
) %gm } , \ \
3% s ., s u s- . s ,
.(
1 ,_ _ s e q z s
. \ ~l I . \ N w< ,
gb s . 1
?
L-__ _-,- - -.==-- . _- - 3- 3 33----~-
A NRC Centract No. NRC-03-79-118
.O Franklin Rese:rch Cent:r Pag 3 FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A om .on of The FrananInsorute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 44d.1000 FRC Task No. 50le EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2 LEVEL TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN THE AUEILIARY BUILDING, ELEV. 26', SPRAY ADDITIVE TAME AREA BARTON MODEL 332 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 DAY ,
TER CHECKSHIET NO. 2 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED - FUNCTION (PLANT ID): ISASURES SPRAY ADDITIVE TANKS LIQUID LEVEL (1-LT931) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL (7]: SCEW(S): I-19 1, DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY1 (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, QV, Rf,'P, H, CS, S, (R) , M, I, QM, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable l LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Cummary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 25, 2;, 20 System Consideration Review 'r. '5 'c, 'd. ^^ 'f Equipment Environmental Qualification Review "., %, R, 54,
, C., "f, ;;, 5h, Ei, W Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation S , 15 Equipnient Sununary Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary 7 , L, 7; i .-m-g.., g .;-.,q.,,.. q .,=, , , , _ , , , , , .gy g.3_ , ;,,
g.,.,,.,. q . 7 m,, . --- , . f, ggg. . . ~ .
h NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79118 i MTJ Frcnklin Rsse:rch Center FRC Project N2. CS257 Pag 2 ; 4 ow on or The Frankhn ininewe FRC Assignment No.13 [O7 lb sih and Rue Sweis Phde, Pa. 191031215) 44810m FRCTask No. fC6 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. =2. SUt(MARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: jTne Licensee (has/tr' :t) provided a response to the SER concerns.
% The Licensee (has/ bee-not) specifically stated that the equipment io r'ifi":f -*r will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.
_ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. 1 The Licensee (hasAnes net) proposed a corrective action for this equipment ites whose qualification has not been fully established. 1 Justification for interim operation (has/':: :: ) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment ites. k Corrective action specified by the Licensee: X Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification i Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source _ Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item . that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. 1 The Licensee (has/':: 3 provided a schedule for the proposed corrective ion. (Schedule foy accomplishing the corrective i action d A /97 L .) y ,
,, , The Licensee Rates that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NBC OUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM CNLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency U.o Modificationf III.a Exempt
'II.a qualification Not Establisbed III.b Not in Scope II,b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available I
# 3 NRC Contract NO. NRC 03 79-118 dkr:nidin R:se rch Center FRC Project N3. CS257 Pag 3 A Div.s.on of The Frankiin Insneute FRC Assignment No.13 2 2osh and Race Seems. Phde.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. *To6/r#7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. A.
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM l DESIGNATION:
- NBC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY .
Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate V '
^ -l Adequate similarity Between Equipment and Test Spec,imen Established
- Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)
Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) - Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied ' Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding. Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification 1 II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review l IV Documentation Not Made Available 4 e
- ,-- ~ n m .: q q,,yg g 7 g , 7 , m.f py , . ,_ . .q ,
_ _ . ..__ ,. . . - . . . . ._._e __ _ _ . . . . . A NRC Contract Ns. NRC 03-70118 brankhn Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Page A D6vwon of The Frankan inmaute FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20th and Race Serees. Ptub.. Pe 19103(215)44a. ooo Fr;C Task No. E 4 /f87 1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAIJFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. d. LICENSEE RESPONSE 'to NRC SER G. These transmitters are being replaced with new Foxsoro N-~.'J3 Series . transmit g*ars wnica are presently qualified to IEEE 323-1971 including 2.2 x 10 Rads gamma radiation and IEEE 344-1371. A Utility Transmitter Qualification Grous has been famed to qualify tasse transmitters to IEEE 323-1974 and IEEE 344-1975. The final qualification is scheduled to be coagleted by tae environmental qualification coadline. It is our intention taat the replacements be casoleted by June 30, 1982. The transmittars wnica are located inside containment or outsica containment
- . . - - ~
fn the vicinity of high energy Ifnes are all Foxboro transmitters which have been tasted for those conditions. In most cases, the transmitters are being replaced because of a lack of traceasility on the saterials whica prevents us from analyzing the aging caaracteristics. The Foxboro transmitters will, in our opinion, perfor's taeft safety function in tae extremely unlikely event of a LCCA or HELS accident. The otner trans-sittars outside containment (Barton's) will have perfor' sed taoic safety function prior to being exoosed to a severe environment from tr.at accicant. It is unlikely that the transmittars nave cegraced in tasir approximately 10 years of operation since we have seen no evicence of such cegrada* ion. Therefore, the cotitinued safe operaticn of tae plant is assured until the .transmittars are replaced. e 0 e e
~-e...--- = + = . - -' =-s=m= - wh--
- M ==== ,.-.e.. === mm .-%- mm. m
#g NRC Contrr_ct No. NRC-03-79-118 MJ Frankhn Res4treh Center FRC PrIject No. C5257 P g3 A Dews.on of The Frankhn lastitute FRC Aasignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 60 (a EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.1 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 3 FLOW TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN THE AUXILIARY BUILDING, ELE 7. 8', OUTSIDE LOWER PIPEWAY #2 BARTON MODEL 295 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 YEAR ,
TER CHECKSHEET NO. 3 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED
- FUNCTION (PLANT ID): MEASURES REACTOR VESSEL SAFETY IICECTION LINE FLUID FLO4 (1-FT928) '
LICENSEE SUBMITTAL (7} : SCEW(S): I-17 DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED SIT 11M(S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, Qr, RT, P, H, CS, h S, (R)e M, I, @t , EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No. ! Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sununary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 25, 2 , ?f l System Consideration Review in, Ib, !:, id. 't. 4f Equipment. Environmental Qualification Review Se, 55, 52, Ed, 5 , 55,
;;, ;;., %, j l
Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6., GL j Equipment Summary Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary 7., 7L, 7w - l w mnrwan::x- . a . ::= s.. .. e=wm n :=_ _ y :== . . . _ . .== .x.-
. - - . - , . , - - - . ~-- -. -. .. - .
~ ~ -~ . _J' _t __. ~ 1_ . . . . . . _. _ 5 1... _ J- - - - - -
4 NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 Pago j du Franklin Rese:rch Ccnter FRC Project No. C5257 A Owen of ne Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20:n and Race Sesets. PMs.. Pe 19103 (215) 448 10 @ FRC Task No. O8A/T07 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAOFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 3
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: 1 Tne Licensee (haa f r ::tl provided a response to the SER concerns. g The Licensee (has/h,;; ...J specifically stated that the equipmentA
---'ie ' - 0 will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.
_ The ' Licenses has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification de'ficiencies. 4 The Licensee (hasf- 20t) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. 1 Justification for interia operation (has/h;; ed been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. gCorrective action specified by the Licensee: 1 Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source l _ Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) ! Equipment relocat. ion to a mild environment _ Qualification testing of equipment in progress , Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. g The Licensee (has/ hee-not4 provided a senedule for the proposed correctivA. action. (Schedule for accomplishing -the corrective action (l -3 T2 /M7 .) g - > l The Licende6 states that, the equipment item does not require qualification l and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BAS $D ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED IIEN ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
{ I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency
)1.D Modification 7 III.a Exempt 11.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope '
j II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Avail'able l l l l m
I h NRC Contract No. NRC-03 79118 Jilbr:nk!!n Rrsetrch Crnier FRC Project No. C5257 Pag 3 A Dwe.on of The Franh Insneute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Sweets. Phde.. Pa.19103 (215) 4481000 FRC Task No. ToA/ A EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAIJF1 CATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. d EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: l NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY - Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate , Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies . (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0568, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification 1 II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.o Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exeispt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available f
. - . . . . ,.a ,-,.3.,..,, , ... - - , - . , . , , . ,7
A, NRC Contract N . NRC-03 79-118
!!!j$J Fr:nklin f14setrch Centa FRC Project No.C5257 Paga A Dimn d The Frank!!n Insatute FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20th and Race Sweets. Phde . Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. 46 6 /fd7 ,
1 l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. d I.ICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER G. These transmitters are being regiaced with new Foxtero N-E10 Series - transmi t*5ars wnica are presently qualified to IEEE 323-1971 including 2.2 x 10 Rads gamma radiation and IEEE 344-1971. A utility Transmitter Qualification Grous has been fomed to qualify these transmitters to IEEE 323-1974 and IEEE 344-1975. The final cualification is scheduled to be completed by tae environmental qualffication deadline. It is our intention that the replacements be casoleted by June 30, 1982. The transmitters watch are located inside containment or outside containment^ in the vicinity of hih energy lines :re all Foxboro transmitters dich have been testad for those conditions. In most cases, the transmitters are being replaced because of a lack of traceatility on tne satorials - which prevents us from analyzing tne aging enaracteristics. The Foxcore transmitters will, in our opinion, perform their safety function in tae extremely unlikely event of a LCCA or HE!.3 accident. The other trans-sitters outside containment (Barton's) will nave performed taoir safety function prior to being exposed to a severe environment from that accident. It is unlikely that the transmittars have degraded in their approximately 10 years of operation since we have seen no evidence of such cegracation. Therefore, the continued safe operation of the plant is assured until the .transmittars are reolaced. I l l
..:?a Y Tn..- G ail u I"sm .x ~ . x L .; i ...h,. . ; L _ ;_Q '-Thz , _ _\ _. ; _, ,s -?7;i ,;.., _.--- v-t _
l NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 ! A'nklin LUCCTr'a Res2 arch Center FRC Proj:ct No. C5257 Prga A Ommon of The Franan lasntuts FRC Assignmsnt No.13 lc 1 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 60(o ! EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4 FLOW TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN THE AUXILIARY BUILDING, ELEV. 8' , OUTSIDE LOWER PIPEWAY #1 BARTON MODEL 333 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 YEAR . TER CHECKSHEET NO. 4 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED ' FUNCTION (PLANT ID): MEASURES SAFETY INJECTION PUMP DISCHARGE. LINES FLUID FLOW (1-FT924,925) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL (7): SCEW(S): I-15 DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITDi(S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, QT, RT, P,H,CS,@S, (R) , M, I, QM EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la Sununary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb
- l. Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a,-E, L , ;d System Consideration Review t;, 15, !;, if, fr, If Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 52, 55, Er, 52, 5:, 5f, 5,5 Sh, Ci, j Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 52, 55.
Equipment Summary Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary A , L, 7; -
~~
k
.g ,
3 (,m
.i ~
4ULW Franklin R:seirch Centcr NRC Crntract NO. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Pago A Divtson of The Frankhn Instaute FRC Task Assignrnent No.1)TcT7 lb 1'th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC No. T46/ EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Y
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: I Tne Licensee (hasA:: ;;;, provided a response to the SER concerns. 4 The Licensee (has/M: ;;d :pecifically stated that the equipment +e--
'- " irl .J/ar wi11 function whea exposed to the applicable DBE environmental servi'ce conditions. '
The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. 1 The Licensee (hasp- n:O proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. 1 Justification for interim operation (hash-- -^" 3een provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. NCorrective action specified by the Licensee M Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source _ Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has p'rovided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. D e Licensee (has/h.. uwd provided a schedule for the proposed corrective acti . (Schedul at accomplishing the corrective action M C4., .) The Licensee at that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) l t
I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency ! _ FI.b Modificatior) III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available
"[ e * *'
A NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 00h) Franklin Rrserrch Cent:r FRC Project N3. C5257 Paga A Dwoon of The Frarun Insthie FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. So d /0/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4/ EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SID(MARY FORM l DESIGNATION: NRC REOUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qua'lification Mequate Y , Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established \ Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Ltfe or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Tast Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: NRC' QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified . I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification Y II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exeinpt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available %D -*7*e ** *?f 9'- 94801W14 29T* * '* dy *%d;*7
, y . , $"*"% .M.- ** * * * * * ._w*'9'** #] * *T * '" ? } V"_],*]' **,
_ Q*{
NRC Contract N3. NRC-03 79-118 6,!$U Fr:nklin R: search Canter FRC Project N2. C5257 P ge l A DMmon elThe Frankhr Inanure 3a 20th and Race Seests. Phde.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC FRCAssignment No.14 ~d'7 Task No. 6od/3 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Y i LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER l l f l G. These transmitters are being replaced witn new Foxnero N-E10 Series transmit *gers wnica are presently qualified to IEEE 323-1971 including . 2.2 x 10 Rads gassa radiation and IEEE 3a4-1971. A utility Transmitter . Qualification Group has seen formed to qualify these transmitters to l IEEE 323-1974 and IEEE 344-1375. The final qualification is seneculed to be completed by the environmental qualification deadline. It is our intention that the reolacements te casoleted my June 30, IS82. The transmitters wnten are located inside containment or outsico contaipment in the vicinity of high energy lines are all Foxboro transmitters wnica have been tasted for those conditions. In most cases, the transmitters are being replaced because of a lacx of tracean111ty on tae .catorials ; wnten prevents us from analyzing tne aging enaracteristics. The Foxcoro , transeitters will, in our opinion, perform their safety function in the extremely unlikely event of a LCCA or HEL3 accident. The otner trans-sitters outside containment (Sarton's) will nave performed tasir safety function prior to being exposed to a severe environment from that ; accident. It is unlikely taat the transeittars have degraded in taoir
-approximately 10 years of operation since we have seen no evidence of ;
suca degradation. Therefore, the continued safe operation of tne plant is assured until the . transmitters are roolaced. i I l e e
. . . _ . . . ~ ~ ' ' ' - - _ '~~
- Z'~ ...___T .. ~T ' 7.' T _ __,_~_~~ _ . . _ .
;'~'..___-'~J'_.~ .C'
b
~
h NRC C:ntr:ct No. NRC-03-79-118 P g3
.U.J Franklin Research Centsr FRC Prgject No. CO257 A Dms.on of The Frankhn Instaure FRC Assignment No.13 ,
Ia 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44810m FRC Task No. 606 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.1 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 5 LEVEL SWITCH LOCATED IN CONTADDIENT, ELEY.19' MAGNETROL MODEL A153 1 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 YEAR TER CHECESHEET No. 5 LICENSEE PEFERENCE(S): Nor CITED FUNCTION fPLANT ID): MEAS'URES LIQUID LEVEL IN CONTAIIGENT SUMP B (1-LC942A&B,' ~ 943A&B) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL [7): SCEW(S): 1-20 DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED IT!!M(S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R,T,QT,RT,P,H,CS,hS, (R) , M, I, QM, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la Sumary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sumary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, L, L, J System Consideration Review 0;, it, 0;, 02, k, Of Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 0;, L, R, 00, L, Of, Sii, Sh, Si, Sj-Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation i;, 55 - Equipment Sumary Maintenance anc Replacement S::hedule Summary 7;, ?b, ~: g.- : -nmn : - . .. m yr-- w . . - .- z._ g: _ .:_. ,- :. :-;.n.. m .. a _ u . :::: .
~
r
- " . , , . ._J, , _..
A NRC Contract No. NRC-03 79-118 lj3bNnklin Rsseuch Canta FRC Pr: Ject N3. C5257 P203 A Dimon of The Frankhn insutute i FRC Assignment No.13 ib 20th and Race Streets. Phde.. Pa 19103 (2151 448 1000 FRCTask No. 78 G /Td 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. J
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY-CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: . k Tne Licensee (has.H- M- provided a response to the SER concerns. d The Licensee -(has/h: 2 ..;G - specifically stated that the equipment-ts -
;_ clifi:f r will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.
The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstandiq qualification deficiencies. N The Licensee (has/heem) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. X Justification for interim operation (has/h ; ;.;G been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. l kCorrectiveactionspecifiedbytheLicensee - Y Equipment replace'eent with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) _ Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provideM other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim cperation. 4 The Licensee (nas/ hee-not-) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule fgr accomplishing the corrective action / FU N / f/ L. e As gr 4-- - . ) V The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency 11.c Modizicationl . III.a Exempt II.a qualification Not Established III'.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available
.m-,......#----.- man m mmew N - .u. , , ,y , - - , . ---m. -m .._ _ - ,.- >--p,y -.w.._,.-m,, w . syyy .,.,p- mq_ .,,.m w- gg.i.,y p,:.
l l
#m NRC Contract N . NRC-03 79118 CUUU Fr:nklin R serren Centar FRC Project No. CS257 P 03 A ow.on of The Frankhn Instause FRC Asc'inment No.13 e ~ 2 20sh and Race Serests. Phde Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 806/507 ,
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. # EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY . Documented Evidence of Qua'lification Mequate 4 , Mequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established ' Aging Degradation Evaluated Mequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule. Established (If Required) / Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Mequate o Peak Pressure Mequate o Duration Mequate . o Required Profile Enveloped Mequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Mequate criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Bagarding Tast Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisiied j Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied ; Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Functio t Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification 1 II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exeinpt From Qualification III.u Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available 9
'** *-*****$**"**9)*' *A - - , 8h wwsup**ter . 9 y a, ==., =*em+, r-' .a ==. . 'eg g s. op - . -f... ,.
-c- . .
v -a - - - - - - __ - _ . . . . _ _ - ~ . _ _ . _ . . . _._.____- _. .. ._ . . . . Ag NRC Contract Ns. NRC-03-79-118 Pig 3
#cd Franklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 .
A civison of The Frankhn Institute F"RC Assignment No.19 3a 20th and Race Sweets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTaskNo. D0/fd7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. # LICENSEE 1ESPONSE '20 NRC SER C. These levil switees have been known to survive worse environments and" therefore were not required to be qualified before the plant was built (qualification Referenca 18., p.1-2). The construction of these float-type level seitches is extremely simple and rugged. There are four enannels per containment sumo waien are located in of fferent quadrants of the containment. After a review of their design, the
~Ievel switenes were judged to be aale to survive and perform their ' safety functica in t.1e sxtremely unitkely event of a LOCA. Several back-up sans exist for deteretning Containment Sumo 8 level (e.g.,
RW5T water level). Therefore, continued safe operation of the p.lant is assured. Since taese level sensors lack the documentation required by the " DOR Guidelines" (Enclosure a to I! Sulleti., 79-013), they will be i replaced with level sensors qualified to Category I of NUREG-0588 in ' accordance wita our sent1ule for modifications to meet the intent of NUREG-0737. . l l l
)
I [ e r,.., me. w,-w-m.v
1 i
#A NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 l $J Franklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Paga j I
A Division of The FrankLn Instate FRC Assignment No.13 lc ' 20th and Race Streers. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 4481M FRC Task No. 606 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. ,fa l EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 6 FLOW TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN THE AUXILIARY BUILDING, ELEV. 46' , COMPONENT COOLING HEAT EXCHANGER AREA FOXBORO MODEL 613 DM REQUIREE OPERATING TIME: 1 YEAR , TER CHECKSHEET NO. 6 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 63'9, 567 - FUNCTION (PLANT ID): TRANSMITS FLUID FLOW MEASUREMENT IN COMPONENT COOLING HEAT EXCHANGER OUTLET LINE (1-FT619) LICENSEZ SUBMITTAL [7]: SCEW(S): II-20 DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY' (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, h S, (R) , M, I, QM, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable l LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHH'KSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Nge No. Equipment Item la Sumnary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 4L, L, ;d System Consideration Review 4, OL, 4c, 'f,
. !;, if- ' Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 52, 55, 5:, 5f, !;, Sf, b , ~L, 31, ;; -
Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 0, O Equipment Summary l Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Sunnary 7., iu, iv m;,.~..;- -.ge. ;. ,
. , n n ,.,_-..,,,.z. ,.m .__ _ g g ,. _ , , ,, m g _ , , , , _ . _ , , _ .
e . NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 4'bJFranklin Raurch Centir
- FRC Prrlect N2.C5257 Paga A Division of The Franklin Insnture FRC Asalgnment No.1 Ib 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. To fa J' #7 ,
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAIJFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. la.
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: i V Tne Licensee (has.'- -" provided a response to the SER concerns. 1The Licensee (has/W) specifically stated that the equipment 4.s gliL; --- f we will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. ' The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. 1 The Licensee (has/':: . . , 4 proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. X Justification for interim operation (has/h: 2 rt) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. 1 Corrective action specified by the Licensee:
.,, 3, Equipment replacament with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)
Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. 1 The Licensee (nas/.... owv.i provided a schedule for the proposed
- corrective ac n. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action Aa j > (f 2 .)
The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC OUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
I.a Qualified- II.c Qualified Life Deficiency II.o Modification I III.a Exempt
'II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope l
II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available { .
,!W" I--
I h gg Y- b Dm
- v 8-
,.N - , - ,9 , _, . -
- - . . ~ . . . -. . _ --
A NRC Contract Ns. NRC-03 79-118 UNr:nklin R:sench Center FRC Project N2. C5257 Pag 3 A Devmon of The Frankhn insatues FRC Assignment No.13/ 2 3kh and Race Seeses. Phde.. Pe. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTaskNo. So 6/5M EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY . Documented Evidence of Qualification Mequate , Mequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established 1 Aging Degradation Evaluated Mequately
'T Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)
Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Requ' ired) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Mequate o Peak Pressure Mequate o Duration Mequate o Required Profile Enveloped Mequataly o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied 4 Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied , Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied .- Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified l I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification 1 i II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified , II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available e a , S f fg ~ ~ ~ ~ , ,
_ . . . . ._ _~ . ~.
.. ~ . 1 , _._._ . . Z . _
A, NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79118 ! FRC Project No. C5257 Pag 3 0000 Franielin Research Center A D6vemon of The Franun inmause FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20m and Race Sesses. Phse.. Pa. 19103 (215) ee81000 - FRC Task No. To6/(4'7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. ./s. ! LICEldSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER
- 0. The modifications specified in Qualification Reference 98 for Foxnoro transmitters have not been made to these transmitters. A review of the seal design for the Foxaore units and a review of the environmental qualification tests of the Foxtore units, lead to the conclusion that
- these transmittars would perfors their short-term safety trip function.
Therefore, the continued safe operation of the plant is assured. G. These transmitters are teing roolaced wita new Foxacro N-i10 fortes transmitjers wnien are presently qualified to IEEE 323-1971 inclucing 2.2 x 10 Rads gamma radiation and IEEE 344-1971. A utility Transmittar Qualification Grous nas been formed to qualify taese transmitters to IEEE 323-197a and IEEE 344-1975. The final qualification is senecuted to be completed my tne environmental cualification deadline.' It is our intention that tne reolacements te comoleted y June 30, 1982. The transmitters wnica are located inside containment or outsica containment in the vicinity of hign energy lines are all Foxcoro transmitters wnica have been testad for those conditions. In most cases, the transmitters are being reslaced because of a lacz of traceaallity on the saterials wnich prevents us from analyting the aging enaracteristics. The Foxcore transmitters will, in our opinion, perform tneir safety function in tne extremely unlikely event of a t.acA or HE!.3 accident. The other trans-sitters outside containment (Sarton's) will have performed their safety function prior to being exposed to a severe environment from that
, accident. It is unlikely that the transmitters have degraded in tasir -approximately 10 years of operation sines we have seen no evidence of such degradation. Therefore, the continued safe operation of the plant is assured until the . transmitters are replaced. . . - ~ , % - _ ,
gs NRC C ntr:ct No. NRC-03-79-118 i .. 5nWin Research Center FRC PrJject N3. C5257 Pago A ommon of The Frankhn Institure FRC Assignment No.13 5 2nh and Race Streets Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 1 2 FRC Task No. Sdd - EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. fr._
! Checksheets f-/ have been removed due to the proprietary nature of information contained therein.
'I 4 .i
-=
e OOM8MD W - -- r-m--..- - - - - , , . .c, ., , _ ,
A NRC C:ntract No. NRC-03-79-118 dlaEnklin Resench Centu FRC Pr:lect No. C52R Prg3 A Div on of The Franun Insnrute FRC Assignment No.13 lc Dh and Race Sweets. Phila.. Pa. 19103(215) 4
- 1000 FRC Task No. 80(o ECUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. '7 1
1 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7 . FLOW TEANSMITTER LOCATED IN TE AURILIARY BUILDING, ELEY. 8' , OUTSIDE LOWER FIPEWAY #2 F0EBORO MODEL 613DM , l REQUIMD OPERATING TDE: 1 YEAR TER CEECEEHET NO. 7 LICENSEE IIFEEENCICS): "639, 567
- FUNCTION (PIANT ID): TRANSMITS FLUID FLOW HEASUREMENT IN RER HEAT EXCHANGER OUTLET LINE (1-FT626)
LICENSEE SUBMITTAL (7}: SCER(S): II-18 s DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRC
- ED ITDL(S) ONLY:
(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, QT, HT, P, H, CS, h S, (R), M, I , f,M , EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECESHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NBC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NBC SER 3a, L, b, % ! System Consideration Review tr. ti, !;, if, %, Of Equipment Environmental Qualification Review :, 55, 56, 52, Se, !!,
!; , O ' . , ! '. , Oj l
Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation f, Si Equipment Summary - Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7 , 7L, 7-S7 ;*?4Rv,1 J A2x7Fs&T4. u,w. w.-N
~ . . . 25 *r ~5 m s ._. m c N :"".'E ,:n.,. i . . . ._d'rZ- .
. -- . _ -. .. - -~_- _. . . .
4 NRC Ccntract No. NRC-03-79-118 Pago
'200 Franklin Rasmch Centsr FRC Prrject No. C5257 owis.on or ne Frenkhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 j lb 20th and Race Streets. Phde.. Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. Ib d /fc/"I -
t EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7 SUXMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:
, ! 1 Tne Licensee (has/h;; .6) provided a response to the SER concerns. . } ' i 1 The Licensee (has/ h ) specifically stated that the equipment-ee-- '/or will function when exposed to the applicanle DBE
{ -"-'i'M' environmental service conditions. i , .j The Licensee has presented informt. tion which shows there are no i outstanding qualification deficiencies. 1 The Licensee (has/h:: c.;u proposed a corrective action for this equipment i item whose qualification has not been fully established. 1 Justification for interim operation (has/M ::) been provided by the Licens'ee for tnis equipment item. NCorrective action specified by the Licensee: J Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress . Other ( ) i The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim i operation.
; A The Licensee (has/Mr ::t) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective a n. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective
, I action 3d' /#f1- .) f [] l The Licensee stTtes that the equipment item does not require qualification
; and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
i DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW l - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) i I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency n.o Modification) III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in. Scope
} II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available i < )
I A
* *1 , a p + , ( e y 8 E, . 4 m -- - . - - - , , _. , - - . _ . . . _ ._
As NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 Pago 2.U Frenklin Rrserrch Center FRC Project No.C5257 A Divmon od The Franidn insneure FRC Assignment No.1 2 20th and Race Sweets. Phde.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTaskNo. So6 f87 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SLMMARY FORM 4 DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X =' DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of' Qualification Mequate Mequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established .k' *, Aging Degradation Evaluated Mequately
~ '
V Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Mequate o Peak Pressure Mequate o Duration Mequate o Required Profile Enveloped Mequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Mequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied - Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding hinctional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-OS88, Cat. I)- , DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification .X. II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.o Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified' III.a Equipment Exeispt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation !bt Made Available [
. - ~ - -
r n.=.. . .. - ..,w. .m, w _
.-.:,.,.. ; ,.m. .
& NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 Paga Uk'J Frcnklin RzseIrch Cant r FRC Pr:: lect No.C52$7 A D6vmon ot h Frankun insuture FRC Assignment No.14 3a 20th and Race Sweets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. J~d 6/U7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER i
i - i 0. The zodifications specified in Qualification Reference 98 for Foxtoro j transmitters have rtet been made to these transmitters. A review of the
. seal design for the Foxboro units and a review of the environmental -
t qualification tests of the Foxcore units, lead to the conclusion tnat t taese transmittars would perform their snort-ters safety trip function. , i Therefore, the continued safe operation of the plant is assured. G. These transmitters are being replaced wita new Fox: ore N-!!D Series
- transaitjarswnicaarepresentlyqualifiedtoIEEE 323-1971 inclucing 2.2 x 10 Aads gamma radiation and IIII 344-197' A Utility Transmittar Qualification Grous has been formed to cualify tasse transmittars to IIII 323-1974 and IEEZ 344-1975. The final cualification is seneduled to te completed my tne envircemental qualification deacline.' It is our intention that tne raclacements te completed ty .'une 30, '_382. The transmittars wnica are located insice :entainment or outsice :entainment in the vicinity of high energy lines are all Foxtore transmitters .nica have been tastad for those conditions. In most cases, the transmitters are teing replaced because of a lack of traceamility on tne materials wnica prevents us free analyzing tne aging characteristics. The Foxcore transmitters will, in our opinion, perform their safety function in tae extremely unlikely event of a LCCA or HE!.3 accident. The otner trans-sitters outside contafement (Barton's) will have performed their safety function prior to being exposed to a severe environment from that accident. It is unlikely that the transmittars have degraded in taoir aporoximately 10 years of operation since we have seen no avidence of such degradation. Therefore, the continued safe operation of tne plant is assured until the , transmitters are replaced.
I l p 9 i i r 1 1 h -~ . -?~. .,~m.,
~ q; .,
q,~.~g, Q ,, g 3-[; . ., ~7l 2Q ,,;-3;Q'y?X ; ; k.%7 : :L
# NRC C:ntrrct No. NRC-03-79-118
- d. Franklin Research Cent:r FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 Pago A on,ision of The Frandn instetute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 i215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. Solo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Y EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 8 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER LOCATED IU TEE AUXILIARY BUILDING, ELEV.19' , OUTSIDE RHR PUMP CUBICLES FOXBORO MCDEL 611GX REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 YEtJL TER CHECKSHEET NO. 8 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S) 09 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): TRANSMIT 3 RHR PUMP DISCHARGE PRESSURE MEASUREMENT (1-PT628, 629)
LICENSEE SUBMITTAL'[7]: SCEW(S): II-17 DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITE24(S) CNLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, h S, (R), M, I, QM, h EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, L, 3u, 3d System Consideration Review 52 !b, !;, 02, Os, 4f - Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Se, SL, 2 , d , 5 ; .- I f ,- Sii, L, 31, Sj Installed TMI Lessonn Learned Implementation h, !b Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary ?; , 7 b , 7;
,e .- ~ . - . . ! \
y , , NRC COntr ct No. NRC-03-79-08 ' p_ LGFranklin Ressarch Center FRC Pr; ject No. C5257
. Pag 3 A D.wsion of ns Frankhn Insututs FRC Assignment No.13 'l s f D,N 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-t000 FRC Task No. (C6 /f"07 'n ,~.\
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITESI NO.1 ' ,
? '
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE' APPLICABLE: 1 Tne Licensee (has/br :t' provided a response to the SER concerns. 1The Licensee (has/h) apecifically stated that the equipment is , ( qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE j environmental service conditions. 1 _. The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. 1 The Licensee (has/h;; ..GT.) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. d Justification for interim operation (has/h: 2 net) been provided by the Licensee for tnis equipment item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee: , ,
, .,,K, Equ i pment, replacement with qualified equipment 4
Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (tes. ting / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. , 1 The Licensee (nas/he; .H.i provided a schedule for the proposed I correctiveacgon. c, (Schedule / 3 A / f[2 for accomplishing the corrective action 4^ .)
/
The Licensee Kates that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. l DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW ,
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) *f l I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency III.a Exempt N. ' "
l ,,p . o .%:lification ]
~II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope -
! . II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available ! I '
\ .
t s N 3 l .
. .. . .----r~ '^$"l - r s e es +. %*
r* .* 3 J '\'" i ;tl ?'% % './l ,'L : . Y : 'd i.. .. .s-.A .a, . " n..l.w ' . +-A 1 .
3 Ar!j0ht! Fr:nMn Research Centrr NRC Contract N 2. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 3 i
,j ' FRC Project N5. C5257 l A Dmmon of The Franidin Incture 2 LhandRaceScaets.Phda Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTask FRC Assignment No. No.13[fd7 tog i -
i EQUIPMENT ENVlaONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 8 x N i i EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM 'g. ,
+
DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documen'ted. Evidence of Qualification Adequate j A'i N Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established 1
- Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately 1 ' Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) s Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation . ' Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) l . Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures l 'o Peak Temperature Adequate
- o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiatio'n Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Cri,teria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied 4 Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: l NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGCRY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.o Equipment Not Qualified l II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exeispt From Qualification III.c Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available l l l
& ok s + n # = ' .
y ,. .
. R X"* " "~"' n :' r- - v~~ v' ym - .._- -g -f , - . . - - , - - _, a
A g NRC Contract Ns. N RC-03 79-118 f!h Franklin Rsse:rch Canter FRC Project No. C5257 Paga A oms.on ei ne Frank!!n institute FRC Assignment No.1p 3a 20 h and a.c. se.eas. Phde.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. f06 / 70 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER
- 0. The sodifications specified in Qualification Reference 98 for Foxeoro transmitters have not been made to these transmittars. A review of the seal design for the Fostore units and a review of tne environmental qualification tests of tae Foxboro units, lead to the conclusion tnat
' these transmittars would perform their snort-term safety trip function. -
Therefore, the continued safe operation of the plant is assured. I G. These transmitters are being roolaced wita new Foxcore N-E10 Series transmit ers wnica are presently cualified to IEEE 323-1971 including 2.2 x 103Rads gamma radiation and Iggg 344-1971. A utility Transmitter Qualification Group has seen formed to qualify these transmit *ars to IEi! 323-1974 and IEEE 344-1975. The final cualification is, screculed is our to se comoteted intention by thecements that the reo14 envirenmental qualification se ccmoleted my Juneceadline. 30, 1 E ., . ,he i transmitters whica are located inside containment or outsica containment in the vicinity of high energy lines are all Foxboro transmitters wnica nave been tested for taose conditions. In most cases, tne transmittars are being replaced because of a lacx of traceasility on the materials l .nien prevents us from analyzing the aging enaracteristics. .The Foxcore l transmitters will, in our coinion, perform their safety fune:1on in tne extremely unlikely event of a LCCA or HE!.S accident. The other trans-l mitters outside containment (Barton's) will have performed their safety function prior to being exposed to a severs environment from that accident. It is unitkely that the transmitters nave degraded in tasir
. aggroximately 10 years of operation since we have seen no evicence of such degradation. Therefore, the continued safe cperation of the plant
- is assured until the . transmitters are replaced.
l I i 1 , i b
* ~
_ - , ~ ?f , , j , j. . [._ . , - , ,
~ . v ~~ ~
.y A NRC C:ntrtet No. NRC-03-79-118 $5nkhn R: search Centrr FRC PrtJIct No. C5237 Pcg3 A Dmion of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Fa 19103(215) 443-1000 FRC Task No. 506 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF IQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 9 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 9 .
PRESSURE TRANSMITTER LCCATED IN ThE AUXILIARY BUILDING BARTON MODEL 332 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 YEAR TER CHECKSHEET NO. 9 LICENSEZ REFERENCE (S): Nor CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): . GAGES PRESSURE MEASUREMENT IN CONTAINMENT (1-PT945 THROUCH 1-PT950) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL (7): SCEW(S): IV-3, -5, -7 DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, ' QU, RT, P, H, CS, S, (R), M, I, QM , EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la Sununary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, OL, ; , 0; System Consideration Review 4e, 45, 40, 40, ,, 4Z Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 0;, 55, Se, Od, Se, 32r 5, ,5h, Ei, Oj Installed TMI Lessons Learned IIn~plementation , 0L Equipment Sununary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7e, 7b, 7;- . m -_ , c- .,, , . .~ e n . - y. * -- - - -
-w -.
A - NRC Csntr ct No. NRC-03-79-118 E!: Franklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 P ga A Diwsion of The Franon Insmute lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila. Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC AsaignmInt FRCTask No. CONo.1}fc 6/ 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: ! l 1 g Tne Licensee (has/_;; .~., provided a response to the SER concerns. - ! i j KThe Licensee (has/ hee-eet) specifically stated that the equipment-6s.- ,
;_r M **-4 =d h will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. ~
The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. I The Licensee (has/h;; .m) proposed a corrective action for this. equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. g Justification for interim operation (has/h;; . 4 been provided by the Licensee for this equipment-item. ( Corrective action specified by the Licensee:
- g Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)
Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualificatior; testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim , , operation. l , l 1 The Licensee (nas/h ; .~4 provided a schedule for the proposed-
! corrective acti (Schedule.for accomplishing the corrective I
action _?d /@rd .) The Licensee stat that the equipment item does not require qualification i and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW I
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
I.a Qualified _ II.c Qualified Life' Deficiency dI.b Modification J III.a Exempt
, II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope 1 i II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available ~
I i l . 1
% ~ pTT*e.9:15.7,F:.s .~ . . TT ~' ' F'L p:2.-lC' . a .. I s = .. - .- . _ _ - . ._ L
A. ~ NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 P:qa
!!ddlFr:nk!!n R seach Center FRC Project No. C5257 A Divmon olh FranWininsatute 2 20th and Race Streets. Phaa.. Pa. 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC FRC AssignmentTask No. SoNo. 6fJo J3 ,"7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. ?
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Y' Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluared Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) __ Program Established to Identify Agi'ng Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o -Peak Temperature Adequate - o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy. Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification 1 II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available O YM ?4 D I#Yg3 @M D Fm**-[ a}$ 7 *** -- - - ,*4&TQ T- ,
+
ey_ - - gregga < s e * * -= *
- ce psy= =cem e
, . _ __ _ 9 __ _ _ . _ _ . __ - _ _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ . . _ .
4 NRC C:ntract No. NRC-03 79-118 Pcga i."JWJ Frenklin Rxseirch Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A huon of The Fralbkhn Institute 3o l 20th and Race Streets. Phaa.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC FRC Task Assignment Nor. 6D6 No.13[S~d 7 i l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 9 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER i G. These transmitters are being replaced with new Foxtoro N-E10 Series
, transmitjars wnich are presently qualified to IEEE 323-1371 including
- 2.2 x 10 Rads gamma radiation and IEEE 344-1571. A utility Transmitter Qualification Grous has been formed to qualify taese transmitters to i
1 IEEE 323-1974 and IEEE 344-1375. The final qualification is schaculed to be concleted by tne environmental qualification deadline.' It is our intention that the replacements be completed by June 30, 1982. The transmitters wnich are located inside containment or outsice containment i in the vicinity of high energy lines are all Foxcore transmitters which I have been tested for those conditions. In most cases, the transmitters
! are being replaced because of a lack of tracancility on :ne matarials l
wnich prevents us frca analyzing the aging enaractaristics. The Foxcoro l transmitters will, in our ooinion, perform tneir safety function in :ne 1 extremely unlikely event of a t.CCA or HE!.3 accident. The other trans-sittars outside containment (Barton's) will have perfor aed tasir safety funetton prior to being exposed to a severe environment from that ac:1 cent. It is unlikely taat the transmitters nave cegraced in their amoreximataly 10 years of oceration since we have seen no evicence of suca cegracation. Therefore, the continuec safe c;eration of the plant is assureo until the. transmitters are replacec. l a i j 1, I I t I l
- ( M i .. .w. t _5i. L
A. NRC Contr:ct No. NRC-03-79-118 SEnklin Research Center FRC Prcject No. C5257 Ptga A oms.on of The Franan Insntuie FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103(2:5) 448-101)0 FRC Task No. 80(o EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF 50UIPMENT ITEM NO. /0 4 EQUIP W T ITEM NO. 10 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT, ELEV. 66' FOXBORO MODEL 611GM REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 30 MINUTES r TER CHECKSHEET NO. 10 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 639 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): . GAGES PRESSURE MEASUREMENT (1-PT429, 430, 431, 449) SERVICE: PRESSURIZER-NARROW RANGE LICENSEE SUBMITTAL [7]: SCEW(S): IV-2 DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD((S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, QT, RT,P,H,CS,hS, (R) , M, I, QM, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No. I Equipment Item la l l Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, OL, ;o, la System Consideration Review !;, 15, t;, id, i;, if Equipment Environmental Qualification Review h, 55, 5:, ~d, ~ , Sf, 59,5h,~,1, & Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 0;, 55 Equipment Summary l Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7;, 75, ? ;- - I
;-hQ~ y * ' yrw y som, *= kee ? T *_ ,? ~ -* - _ . .-_ , p *y =~ rum e
- em ~
t=e~,*;hrh. ' _ - _ - ;& * {
-_.,r3se , __ - - - _ . . .____-. _ _ _ .-- - , _
4 NRC C3ntr"ct No. NRC-03 79-118 Pzg3 MU Franklin Resench Csnru FRC Project N3. C5257 A DMsen of The Frankan Insnrute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. fo & /ro 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /o
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: l g Tne Licensee . (has/h;; ~3) provided a response to the SER concerns. - I
, QThe Licensee (has/t;; ;;C specifically stated that the equipment La ,
i queMets+-end/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no
, outstanding qualification deficiencies. * ! [ The Licensee (has/N; .-e) proposed a corrective action for this equipment j item whose qualification has not been fully established.
t d Justification for interim operation (has/h .; ;;t) been provided by the Licensee for tnis equipment-ites. j . (CorrectiveactionspecifiedbytheLicensee: Q Equipment replacement with qualifiaid equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level i Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source
~ ~
Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress i Other ( )
. The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.
j The Licensee (nas/h- .mi) provided a schedule for the proposed
' corrective actQn. (Schedule fo accomplishing the corrective i
action h3d - i 8 .) The Licensee states veat the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. i DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
! - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) . I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency }
j
]I.o _
Modification] I A.a qualification Not Established III.a I:xempt III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available r
' 4 er -
- t. -t,e*e ._ - - - mt' te- M i= *1 *, =+=
_ "-- ~ ?". ' ' *
- M*""'**"-- -
*d***"'*"
. . c.
A NRC Contract N . NRC-03-79-118 dbranklin Research Center ERC Project Ns. C5257 Pago A De of The Franklin Insnture FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streess. Phde.. Pa. 19103 (2151 448 1000 FRCTask No. Ce A /Cm EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. / 0. EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X'= DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence or Qualification Mequate Mequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established 1 Aging Degradation Evaluated Mequately 1 Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate l o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate " Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied & } Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied X Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification A II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified . III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available T i 4 . ..wm pm . e . . w .- ,,.,-wt.,.--- _ .m o r - m . . . , . , .__ _ ,
- - . . -r- - - -.. . .
A, NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 . JNEnidin Research Center FRC Project No.C5257 Page A Dwoon of The Freren tasawe FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20th and Race Soests. Phda.. Pa.19103 (215) 4481000 FRC Task No. f~4 4 /f d'7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2.b I LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER 4 G. These transmittars are being roolaced wita new Foxnoro N-E10 Series transmitgaes wnica are presently qualified to IEEE 323-1971 inclucing 2.2 x 10 Rads gamma radiation and I.E! 344-1371. A utfif ty Transmittar- , Qualification Grovo has been formed ts qualify tnese transmitters s IEEE 323-1374 and IEEE 344-1375. The final qualification is scaecuted to to coagleted by the environmental qualification ceadline. It is our intention taat tae reclacements be comoleted by 'une 30, 1982. The transmi.tters wnica are located. in.sico containment or outsice contairment in the vicinity of high energy lines are all Foxcore transmittars wnien have been tastad for taose conditions. In sost cases, the transmittars are being reglaced because of a lack of traceacility on ce satarials which prevents us from analyzing the aging caaracteristics. The Fox = ore transsisters will, in our opinion, perform tasir safety function in us extremely unitkely event of a 1.0CA or HE!.3 actident. The other tisns-sittars outsica containment (Sarton's) will nave performec 13eir safety function prior to being exsosed to a severe environment frem taat accident. It is unlikely that the transmitters nave cegraced in taef e approximataly 10 years of coeration sines we hava seen no evicence of suca degradation. Therefore, tne continued safe aceration of 13e plant is assured until the .transmittars are regiaced. _. I l t l t i
'~ , '7 - +r, ,. 7 . .~ . .,7 _
#s N RC Contreet No. N RC-03-79-118 .. J5nklin Research Center FRC Project No. CS257 pig 3 -
A o. . son of The Frankhn insnrure FRC Assignment No.13 5
?nh and Race Streets. Phda-. Pa. 19103(215)448 l
- FRC Task No.R 6 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /6:2.
. i l Checksheets [ /, f<g y
- d. M have been removed due to the proprietary nature of inf ormation contained therein.
h h I i i i e 1 l l ! I l l
- a 1
UMkNN
- E -
na k '8 F ^" "'-
- - , s
A NRC Contr ct No. NRC-03-79-118
- 22) Franklin Research Center . FRC Project No. C3237 Paga A Civ.s.on of The Frannhn Insraute FRC Assignment No.13 l o, 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215i 448 1000 FRC Task No. 50fo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. //
EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 11 LEVEL TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT, ELEV. 66' FOIBORO MODEL 613HM
- REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 30 MINUTES.
TER CHECKSHEET NO. 11 . I LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 639 I F1'NCTION (PLANT ID): TRANSMITS PRESSURIZER LIQUID LEVEL MEASUREMENT (1-LT426, ' 427, 428, 433) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL [7]: SCEW(S): IV-1 t r J DESIGNATION -FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) i R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS , h S , (R) , M, I, QM, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, j Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:
! Contents Checksheet Page No.
4 Equipment Item la i Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb j Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 l Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, ;-, L, 30 [ System Consideration Review ';, ti, !;, M, 40, if Equipment Environmental Qualification Review ';, ,5b, 5;, ~d, C., Z,- a , 2., n , :; Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6, 05 Equipment Summary I - Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary ., ,u, ,-
- 1 .
2
%, t '- - ; .,g*. --_._,..-.
4 ,4 - s
- ; ._ ,2 _ ; , . . ...,.,Ls_
s , g _. . ,7
.g,
- e A NRC Crntract No. NRC-03-79118 ddbb Franklin Reserreh Center ~ FRC Project No. C5257 Paga A Own of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phas.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 . FRC Task No. To(a/Td"7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /1 i
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: 1 Tne Licensee (has/ hee-eeW provided a response to the SER concerns. L The Licensee (has/h:: :t' specifically stated that the equipment T3 - 2""if1:d :.M/a will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. ~
'The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.
g The Licensee (has/hO ..wi) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. 1 Justification for interim operation (has/h:: 20t> been provided by the Licensee for tnis equipment item. X Corrective action specified by the Licensee Equipment replacemant with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment ! Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a oasis for justification for interim operation. [The Licensee (nas/h:: ..oJ provided a schedule for the proposed corrective ac n. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action Mo >fbz .) (( / The Licensee dettes that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency {I.b Modification 3 III.a Exempt AA.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available
'*3 ,(.N$ k iU "T* NY 'oT 8"". -E6*S**** * -'#^ #~
- 6 ,. . *#[f ' T". ' - **'
A~ NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 CfjblFrapklin Reserrch Centir . FRC Project !!a. C5257 P:gs A DWmon of The Franidin Insntute FRC Acalgnment No.1 2 20th and Race Seeses. PMio.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTaskNo. Id/ TO EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION:
' NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY - !]
Documented Evidence of Qualification Mequate Mequate, Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Y l l Aging Degradation Evaluated Mequately v Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) . Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Mequate e Peak Pressure Mequate o Duration Mequate o Required Profile Enveloped Mequately l o Steam Exposure (If Required) Mequate j Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied . Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied & Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied 1 Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied , Critaria R4.garding Functional Testing Satisfied - Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) ' DESIGNATION: l
! NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification 1 l II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established . II.b Equipment Not Qualified i II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life ! or Replacement Schedule Justified f III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available i
l lc 1 I hm o .ecogrgeMs tw **=.e +ag e* 9 mag Wremeuap e see w. p_ _e,gg., t em 9a** m]
NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 A, ddj Fr nklin R:seixch Center FRC Project N3. C5257 P:g3 j A Dimston r" The Frankhn Insnture 30 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 10 % FRC Assignment FRC Task No. Cd6/ No.1:]To-"7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL OUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. // LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER l G. These transmittars are being replaced with new Foxboro N-E10 Series transmitjers which are presently qualified to IEEE 323-1971 inclucing 2.2 x 10 Rads gamma radiation and IEEE 3a4-1971. A utility Transmitter Qualification Group has been formed to qualify these transmitters to IEEE 323-1974 and IEEE 3a4-1975. The final qualificatien is senecuted to be completed by the environmental qualification coacline. It is cur intention that the replacements be comolated by June 30, 1982. The transmitters which are located insica c:ntainment or cutsica c:ntairment in the vicinity of high energy lines are all Foxbero transmitters wnici have been tested for snose c:ncisions. In mest cases, the transmitters are being regiaced because of a lack of traceasility :n tne materials wnica prevents us frem analyting the aging enaracteristics. The Fox ore transmitters will, in cur coinion, perform neir safety functi:n in :ne extremely unlikely event of a LCCA or HE!.E accident. The :ther trans-mitters cutside c:ntainment (3 art n's) will nave :erformac tanic safety function prior to being exposed to a severe environment f-em snat accicent. It is unitkely that the trpnsmittars have cegraced in their a;;;roximately 10 years of coeration since we have seen ne evicenes of suen cegracation. Therefore, tae continued safe c:erati:n Of tne ;lant is assurta until the , transmitters ars replacac. O. [ .$j . O"M ]O ,[ '
- . , j k h* #,, ,b6 N a - - . - ,, , ,_ - -. .= _ _ " - - . .
A NRC Contract No. N RC-03-79-118 DJ Franalin Research Centxt FRC Project No. C5257 Pcg3 A Duson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignmgnt No.13 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (2:$) 4481000 nog lc FRC Task No. EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAIJFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M 4 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 12 LEVEL TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN THE AUXILIARY BUILDIh'i, ELEV. 46' , BORIC ACID TANK AREA FOIBORO MODEL 613DM REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 DAY . TER CHECKSHEET NO. 12 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 639, 567 ' i FUNCTION (PLANT ID): TRANSMITS BORIC ACID TANKS LIQUID LEVEL MEASUREMENT (1-LT106, 172,'190; LT102, 171, 189) l LICENSEE SUBMITTAL [7]: SCEW(S): III-1 DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, (tr, RT, P, H, CS , S, (R) , M, I, QM, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: i Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la l Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb l , Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, OL, Ow, Sa-System Consideration Review L., 'L, 4w, 40, ?e, Of-Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 50, 55, Sc. Sd, St. 5 f ,-
;; 4, Oh, 51, Si l Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation b, GL , } Equipment Summary I
! Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7 , 7L, 7c-a.
' - . y s .. % . ..:,. ,y., - _ . . - .._.% . . _
7 _
.f. w c. . - - - , . . . - .q._
n ; --
4 NRC CentrEct ND. NRC-03-79-118 Paga dihJ Fr:nklin R:setrch Ccntir FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A oimion of The Frankhn insnture FRC Assignment No.13 lb l 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103(215)448 tmo FRC Task No. S'~o6/S'O7 ' EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. ./.J!- St.MMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: 1 Tne Licensee (has/'a ee-not) provided a response to the SER concerns. g The Licensee (has,^ rr ..a) .pecifically stated that the equipment is-
~"-' '"'r' --er will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. ~
The Licensee has presented information which'shows there are no l outstanding qualification deficiencies. b The Licensee (has/hr :t) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. gJustification for interim operation (has/hr .::) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment- item.
>< Corrective action specified by the Licensee:
K Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item j that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. M The Licensee (has/h. m ) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective act . (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action > 3o /9/ L .) The Licensee at that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency
, fI.b Modification]
A A.a Qualifi.:ation Not Established III.a Exempt III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available l
*% , -m;T ,or L . . .- 7 - - ~**""N ^ ~ " ' " * ' " " "
- A. ~ NRC Contrac1 No. NRC-03-79-118 00DJ Franklin Rrsench Center FRC Project Ns. C5257 Pag 3 A Dwison of The Nnkhn innam - . FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Sweets. Pheia.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. fd (r/f"O EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4s'k i .
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM f DESIGNATION: 1 NRC REQUIREMENT _S X = DEFICIENCY -
~
- Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate l
! Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established 1 * ~
Aging Degradation. Evaluated Mequately 1
; l Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) i ! Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)
Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Mequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Seque'nce Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accura y Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied i Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) i DESIGNATION: f NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified i i I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X I Equipment Qualification Not Established l II.a
! II.m Equipment Not Qualified 8
II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available
- . i l
( I
+ 6 f=_- ; 2 i
4 r m ,m . .. .s27- t. :-- ,. m g.-- ,; . __ - m nm . m.1_ _
A NRC Contract Na. NHC-03-79-118 P:g') dWJ Franklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 A Divmon of The Frankhn Insatute FRC Assignment No.1@ . 3a 20th and Race Serests. Phde.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. Cd (/377'7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .l.mL LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER G. These transmittars are being replaced wita new Fox oro N-E10 Series transmitgerswnicaarepresentlyqualifiedtoIEEE 323-1971 inclucing 2.2 x 10 Rads gamma radiation and IEEE 344-1371. A utility Transmitter Qualification Group has been formed to cualify enese transmitters t IEEE 323-1974 and IEEE 344-1975. The final cualification is seneculed to be completed by the envirennental qualification ceadline. It is cur intention that the replacement 4 se cemaleted by *une 30, 1922. The transmitters whien are located insica c:ntainment or cutsica containment in the vicinity of high energy lines are all Fcxtore transmitters wnien have been tasted for those c:nditions. In most cases, tne transmitters are being replaced because of a lacx of traces:ility en ne materials whica prevents us frem analy:ing tne aging enaracteristics. The Fax:cre transmitters will, in our coinion, perform neir safety function in tne extremely unlikely event of s LOCA or HEL3 accicent. The :ener trans-mittars outside containment (Sarton's) will have :erformed sneir safety function prior to being exposed to a severe environment ft:m that accicent. It is unlikely that the transmittars nave egraced in neir approximately 10 years of cperatien since we have seen no evicence of suca cegradation. Therefore, the continued safe ::eratien of tan plant is assured until the . transmitters are replaced.
"** **' f **T* * , .g*);'% t/M
e i P** 4.eemov9 top gag y, g , g#rg s ,.*we'g .. , e*. r * *t y - * * - - ****We*"**r='uw*.*****semav**w
.p
*- NRC ContrIct No. NRC-03-79-118 s S Franklin . Resench Center FRC Project No. C5257 Paga A Divisen of Tha Frenkhn k nturs FRC Assignmsnt No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phsa.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44d 1000 FRC Task No. f06 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M , EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 13 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT, ELEV. 66' j FOXBORO MODEL 611GH j REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 YEAR TER CHECKSEET NO.13 ! LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 639 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): TRANSMITS REACTOR COOLANT-WIDE RANGE PRESSURE '
MEASUREMENT.,(1-PT420) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL (7): SCEW(S): V-4 i t ( DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEN(S) ONLY: 1 (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, QT, RT,P,H,CS,hS, (R) , M, I, QM, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,
; Not stated, Not applicable 1
LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:
}t Contents Checksheet Page No, 1
l Equipment Item la l Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb l Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2
- i Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 25, 2;, 2d -
! System Consideration Review -42, 45, 00, 4d, te, 40 j Equipment Environmental Qualification Review t , Si, ~ , Od, !;, ~f, -Ci,i Sh, 31, 5 7 Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation -0. , ', L Equipment Summary )
Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7;, 75, 7:
.- - 7 7 7 -~m , .;-~~.-~~,- , ,, - n~ _ , ; 37- 3~,3,_ , , .,3 .--_
NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-79-118 g)tidFrank!In R:setrch Center FRC Project No. C5257 P g3 A Dimon of Ths Frtnkhn Insnture FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phh.. Pa 19103 :215) 44810m FRC Task No. fo A /f'd*7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 42t SIMMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC- SER - CNLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: 1 Tne Licensee (ha.fL.. .m) provided a response to the SER concerns.
~M 1 The Licensee (has/k s- specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or 14111 function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.
The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. M he Licensee (has/h:- .n) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. 1 Justification for interim operation (hasA n = % been provided by the Licensee for tnis equipment-item. {CorrectiveactionspecifiedbytheLicensee Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification I Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (t'esting/ analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) g The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. 1 The Licensee (nas/hrr :M provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action M-- > ._7 b , / ML- .) G- / The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION. CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency TI.b Modificatior( III.a Exempt II.a quaAulcation Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available AL *IT M*gM4 gh1 -- .-- **?** '" *W" - - - - -
A NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 3 renklin Rrsetrch Centa FRC Project No. C5257 P go A Cwn of The FranWin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phde.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. Tad /rd "7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _43 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM i.
, i DESIGNATION:
NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY , ; Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate . ! 4 Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established 1 I Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Y Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) \ Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) . Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:
- o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)-Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied l
Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied i Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied ~ Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)
$ DESIGNATION:
NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY i l i I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X. II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified 4 II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified l i III.a Equipment Exeispt From Qualification l III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation' Not Made Available i 1
- k. ...n cy y t- . . . .. ,,..,e y_,_ , . , .
4
*~ - . 4 . i.T x - uk' % e
- _ s
' f in Vi c'*0. r-2 4 :.3 w ;/%
A NRC Contract N . NRC-03 79-118 NJ Frankhn Rtseirch Center FRC Project NO. C5257 P:rja A Ow on of The Franklin insatute FRC Assignment No.14 30 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. fod/N7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 43 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER
- 0. The. modifications specified in Qualification Reference 98 for Foxmore transmitters have not been made to these transmitters. A review of the seal design for the Foxtero units and a review of tae environmental qualification tests of the Foxboro units, lead to the conclusion tnat taese transmitters would perform their short-tars safety trip functien.
Therefore, the continued safe operation of the plant is assured. F. These transmittars will be replaced with redundant environmentally cualified transmitters. The replacement senecule.was estanlisnec in our responsa to Three Mile Ist'anc Short-Ters f.essons 1. earned (NUREG-0573). G. These transmitters are teing rsolaced with new Foxsoro N-E10 Series transmit 3ars wnica are presently cualified to IEEE 323-1371 inclucing 2.2 x 10 Rads garma raciation and IEEE 3aa-1371. A utility Transmittar Qualification Grous has been formed to qualify tasse transmittars to IEEE 323-197a anc IIII 3aa-1975. The final qualification is seneculee to be ecmoleted by tne environmental qualification deacline. It is our intention :nat tne roolacements te comoleted by June 30, 1982. The transmittars which are 1ccated inside containment or outsica containment , in the vicinity of high energy lines are all Foxboro transmitters wnich have been tasted for those conditions. In most casas, the transmitters are being replaced because of a lacy of traceability on the materials wnien prevents us from analyzing the aging characteristics. The Foxocro transmitters will, in our opinion, perform tatir safety function in the extremely unitkely event of a LOCA or HEl.3 accident. The other trans-mittars outside contairment (Barton's) will have performed sneir safety function prior to being exposed to a severe environment from that accident. It is unlikely that the transmitters nave degraced in their approximataly 10 years of operation since we have seen no evicence of sucn degracation. Therefore, the continued safe operation of the plant is assured until the transmittars are rtplaced.- i 4 l l e se
****.^",*#T"',P87 g- ge pgig ,,q - =+e 7- m e
NRC Ctntrzet No. NRC-03-79-118 4' f,) Franklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Pcg3 A Divison of The Frsnk:in insatuts FRC Assigrimsnt No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phea.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. Sola EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. lY EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 14 LEVEL TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN CONTAIN!'ENT, ELEV. 25' FOXBORO MODEL 613HM REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 30. MINUTES TER CHECKSHEET NO. 14 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 639 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): STEAM GENERATORS-NARROW RANGE LEVEL INDICATION (1-LT461, ' 462, 463; 1-LT471, 472, 473) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL [7]: SCEW(S): VI-1, VI-2 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): STEAM GENERATORS-HICH RANGE LEVEL INDICATION (1-LT460 & 470) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL [7]: SCEW(S): VI-1, -2, -3 . DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) - R, T, QT, RT, P,H,CS,hS, (R), M, I, gM, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No. i
- Equipment Item la I
Sumary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb ( Equipment Environmental Qualification Sumary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, L, i , ad System Consideration Review I;, ti, ':, id, ', ?! ( Equipment Environmental Qualification Review L, L, k, 'd , b , 5f r .
.,, - . . , 5', 5j j ,
l Installed TMI Lessons L9arned Implementation 5, 55-Equipment Sumary n l
', Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Sumary -7e, 7t, 7; l
i
. - .- - -e - - , . . . _ , , , .,,,--m , ~
q' l .L '. A '_ '
- N - ,1 , i, s N,* / , ' v: .=,',' ,,g, ,411.L's f/gj '1. ;, , *
.g, J , ,,. e.-p,_ n , i .g_,,' ,,,,.[,..
m l
A NRC Contract NT. NRC-03-79-118 M') Franklin R:setrch Csnt:r FRC Project Ns. C5257 Prg3 A Dimon of Tha Frankhn Institus FRCTaskAssignm:nt 13 lb 20th and Race Streers. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 4481a00 FRC No. ION1.M/fd'7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /'-/ .
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: 1 Tne Licensee (has/uee .~y provided a response to the SER concerns. 1 The Licensee (has/h -- 2:t; specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function *,nen exposed to the applicable DBE ' environmental service ~ conditi.ans. The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no - outstanding qualification deficiencies.
'/ The Licensee (has/h c .;t) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.
X Justification for interim operation (has/h:: ret: been provided by the Licensee for tnis equipment item. g Corrective action specified by the Licensee: I Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress _ Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment . tem that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. X The Licensee (nas/h-- aa" provided a schedule for the proposed corrective act n. (Schedule forjecomplishing the corrective action s 3 s. -
/# r 2.- .)
The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) l I.a Qualified _ II.c Qualified Life Deficiency l10 Modification] III.a Exempt II. e olancation Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b No- Qualified IV Documentation Not Available 4 ,:. c .m-~,. _ . u ~.g- . as . . e : m. -+.r-.~ . . - . _ . _ . . . . . . . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . __ . _ . _ , ,_ __ ____ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . _~ _ . . _
l l
#A NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 Pcg3 %W Frsnk!!n Rrsesrch Canta . FRC Project No. C5257 ,
A civmon of The Nakha Insmute FRC Assignment No.-1 ?
~
20th and Race Sweets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. fo4. To ~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM No. /(/ s EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: - NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY - Documented Evidence of Quilification Adequate . Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established A'A Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately ' Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) 1 Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) - Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate _ _ _ o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately - , o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate l Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied. Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied R Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied X. Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied l Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) r
- DESIGNATION:
NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY t ! I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification 1 II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.o Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified
; III.a Equipment Exenopt From Qualification t III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available m
l i
- - m,q m ,, , .,- g,g g;y, - - -- ~-g--- z;f - - - . _ _ . = . _ _ - _ _ . . __ _--
. o , ~
4 NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 Paga i dllNranidin Research Center FRC Project No.C5257 j A Deseen cf The Frenlen inmuum FRC Assignment No.14 3a 2ce .nd mi . se m. Phda.. Ps 19103 (215)448 1000 FRC Task No. CD6/Yo7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. N 1 LICENSEI: RESPONSE 'to NRC SER
- 0. The modifications.speciffed in Qualification Reference 98 for Foxsoro transmitte-s have not been sade to these transmittars. A review of the seal cosign .for the Foxtore ur.its and a review ~of the environmental qualification tests of the Foxcore units, lead to the conclusion :nat these transmitters would perform their snort-ters safety trip function.
Therefore, the continued safe coeration of the plant is assurec. F. Thest transmitter, will be rtJlacsd with rtdundant envirormentally qualifted transmittars, The rtolacement scr.ecule.was esta:lisned in our respensa to Three : tile Island Short-Term Lessons Lear ec (NUREG-0573). G. These trs.ismittars ars teing raciaced with new Fox:oro N-!10 Serf es transmitjers .nica ars.,2 resentl y qualified to IEEE 323-137. inclucug
- 2. 2 x 10 Rads gamma-ractation and IEEE 344-1971. A Uttifty Transmitter galification Gruyo has seen formed to qualify these transmitters to I::: 323-1974 and IEEE 344-1975. The final cualification is seneculee to be comaletec by cae environmental qualification coacline. It is our intention that tre reciacaments de comcleted by June 30, 1382. The transmi*ters .nica are located inside containment or outsica containment in the vicinity of high erarci lines are all Foxtore transmitUrs whien have been tasted for those conditions. In most cases, tne transmitters are teing replaced 'secaust sf a lacx of tractacility on tne materials whien prevents us from analyzing the aging characteristics. The Foxcore transmitters will, in our opinion,' perform their safety function in the extremely unlikely event of a LOCA cr HELS accident. The otner trans-mitters outside contairment. (Barten's) will have performeo their safety function prior.to being exocsed to a severt environment from that accident. It is unlikely that 'he transmitters have cegraced in :neir approximately 10 years.of operation since we have seen no evicence of such cegradation. Therefore, the :entinued safe cperation of tne plant is assured until the .transmitt.srs are replaced.
I
#4 NRC Ccntract No. N RC-0079-118 '.U." Frankhn Research Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 . Paga A Div.s.on of De Franan inst.ture FRC Assignment No.13
- Ia 20th and Race Streets. Phca.. Pa 19103 1215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. ICO EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUloMENT ITEM NO. I 1 Ct
+ ;c :
EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 15 FI4W TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT BUILDING, ELEV. 66' '
%' - t A
F0EBORO MODEL 630 ' "
! REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 30 MINUTES , -s
, TER CHECKSHEET NO.15 . l ' LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): Nor CITED , g FUNCTION (PLANT ID): TRANSHITS MAIN STEAM LINE FLOW INDICATION (1-FT464, 465, ~ l 474, 475) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL (7]: SCZW(S): VII-5 1
\ ,' '\ ._ ,T \ , .
i
. g s
s ,.,.,t
\ i ,.
I i x i .= 4 I
;k *- i. &w y- - " ..
i . DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) '
- f R, T, QT, RT,P,H,CS,hS, (R), M, I, gM, EXN,SEj,QI, RPS, None, s' 3
*)!
! 3 ! Not stated, Not applicable ~> x
^;%Y - s , x d ')
LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECESHEETS: - s Contents CbEc'cshe t Page No. I Equipment Ite:a la i s
! Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb -
Equipment Environmental Qualification Sumary Forms .2 . i { Licensee Response to NRC SER 34, 25, 'e
- System Consideration Rowiew tb,th, 'r, M, i:, if-
- s. '.-
i Equipment Environme#.41 Qualification Review %, 5L, L, %, b, %, '
t ; 5g, SP, 5i, Sj , , , 7, ;
Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 5;, Sh ' Equipment Sumary . ,i .-
, , 3 s t
Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary $ 7;, 70, 76- , 1 \ Y ' ? M , M "3. W y; y ,,.y; x , y-] Qj'i';T,.. _; , ; ": , ,: 'yF 'c O W ,._* ._. .
< , 1
_ .. _. e i
. e6-M NRC Contr:ct N2. NRC-03 79-118 P:g3 . $yd Fr::s Jin R:se rch Cent:r FRC Project N2. C5257 A Oswseon of The Fran.dn ; cst:rute j' ' g FRC Assignment No.13 lb ' 20th and Race Streets. Phsa.. Pa . Is103 (215) 448 INO FRC Task No. <0 #3 / Ed7 %1
- ' - EQUIPHENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. / f
(\ . ,. s l t .s ,; SIMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - CNLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: s s ' [ Tne Licensee (bas / lie. n:'Q provided a response to the SER concerns.
~N \
L The Licensee (hasAaa-aoet specifically stated that the equipment A s' - , q"a ified e..4/e.- Vill function when exposed to the applicable DBE
' Yl environmental service conditions. ' a The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no ,. outstanding qualification deficiencies. } M The Licensee (has/1.ee .~+) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.
{s \ T~ % Justification for interim operation (has/h:2 r O een provided by the
, Licensee for tnis equipment-item.
Corrective action specified by the Licensee: i Equipment replacement with qualified equipment uipment modification h s[ ' 3 Equipment relocation above submergence level I Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source T, . Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment t Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be ccnstrued as a basis for justification for interim operation. I The Licensee (nas/.'.;; . ;t1 provided a schedule for the proposed corrective ac d.on. (Schedule for pccomplishing the corrective action h 36. / f d' L
.)
fj' / Tne Licensee scrtes.that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency JI.hJ hodificatd , ' III.a Exempt 911.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified , IV Documentation Not Available u k
'i
~ _ 'mp . y m. ~, -v. u rs,- - - - - >~~<m -~ - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ " ' = " ~ ~ * - - -- l' ( . _i * , , - Q
& NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 Pcg3 WW Franklin R:se:rch Cent:r FRC Project N3. C52G7 A Deveen of The Frankhn Instwuse 2 20th and Race Seeens. Phde.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Assignment FRC Task No.17(0">
No. Cd (e / EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 5 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: MitC_REQtREEMENTS X = DEFICIENCY - Documented Evidence of Qualification Mequate _ X __ . Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied' Criteria ~ Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified t I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification R !' II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified i II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life
} or Replacement Schedule Justified l III.a Equipment Exeapt From Qualification iI III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available l i-I f =- . - n.= n-:,. ,.n= = - =. = .mn. -
1 A- NRC Contract N . NRC-03 79-118 l Jb)Fr nklin R:se:rch Center FRC Project N2. C5257 P go l A o on of h Frankhn Insnture FRC AssignmentJo.13 3a 20m and an. se.eu. PMa . Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. 6 6 6 /fd7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. / f LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER G. These transmittars are being replaced with new Foxboro N-E10 Series transmitjars wnica are artsently qualified to IEEE 323-1971 including 2.2 x 10 Rads gamma radiation and IEEE 3a4-1971. A utility Transmittar Qualification Grous has been formed to qualify these transmitters t: IEEE 323-197a and IEEE 3aa-1975. The final qualification is seneculed i to De ccacleted by tne environmental qualification deadline. It is our ' intention tnat tne replacements be c:meleted Dy 'une 30, 1982. The transmittars wnica are locatec inside containment or aussica containment in tas vicinity of high energy lines are all Foxtore transmitters whica nave teen tested for tnose c:ncitions. In most cases, the transmitters art teing replaced because of a lacx, of traceamility on tne materials . whien artvents us fecm analyzing tne aging enaracteristics. The Fox:cro transmitters will, in cur coinion, perform eneir safety function in the i extremely unlikely event of a t.CCA or HE'.3 accicent. The otner trans-mittars outside c:ntainment (Sarton's) will have performed their safety function prior to being exposed to a severe environment frcm inat
. accident. It is unlikely that the transmittars nave cegraced in ineir approximately 10 years of operation since we nave seen no evicence of suca degracation. Therefore, tne continued safe operation of tne plant is issurta until the transmitters art replacec.
1 1 l
. l l
l l
~
l l l 1 ._ - . . . . - - . m. , .t. . _ . . - . . . . - . - . . . _ _
4x NRC C:ntract No. N RC-03-79-118 Page
...jEnklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 A Des.on of The Franan insnrute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Strws. Phda.. Pa 19103 6215e 4481000 FRC Task No. Sols EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. %
EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 16 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN THE ADAILIARY BUILDING, ELEV. 6' , SPENT :TUEL PIT AREA F0EBORO MODEL 611GM REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 30 MINUTES TER CHECKSHEET NO. 16 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 567
- FUNCTION (PLANT ID): TRANSMITS MAIN STEAM LINE PRESSURE INDICATION (1-PT468, 469, 478, 479, 482, 483)
. LICENSEE SU3MITTAL [7]: SCEW(S): VII-3, VII-4 f
DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLYI (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
' R, T, QT, RT,P,H,CS,hS, (R) , M, I, QM, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable j LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHEKSHEETS: ! Contents ,
Checksheet Page No. l Equipment Item la
, Sunsaary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb ; Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 i
Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, ;L, 1. , a l , System Consideration Review h, 15, 46, !d, 52, if-i Equipment Environmental Qualification Review ~,e , Sh, 50, Ed, 5;, 5f,
~
- s, L , 31, 31-l l
Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 0, L
) Equipment Summary i
l Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7;, 7b, 7; I
----===y =m-*==== peq., -e --. . ry . . ==-, - - - , ,..47-._--,. - -- y n ~ _
g**. y,g y e- , ., yggeypr ..
4 NRC Contract No. NRC-03 79-118 Prgo dJ Franklin Rese:rch Cent:r FRC Project N2. C5257 A Diwson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.1)O 7 lb 2cm and Race Streets. PMa.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. FCG/ EQUIPMENT ENV"lRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.1.la. SUAMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES M THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: _)g,,Tne Licensee (has/hes not-) provided a response to the SER concerns. 4 The Licensee (has/t;; ...:.) specifically stated that the equipment to--- edi 1.6 .nuf or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service coriditions. The Licensee has presented information which shows' there are no I outstanding qualification deficiencien. 1 The Licensee (has/':: .- W proposed a cc ective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. U Justification for interim operation (has/t. .ww) been provided by the Licensee for tnis equipment item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation, j The Licensee (nas/;. . m.a; provided a schedule for the proposed corrective act . (Schedule fog accomplishing the corrective action 3J / fr L--i
.)
The Licensee sta es that the equipment item does not require qualification - and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC OUALIFICATION EVALt}ATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency ' fl.b ModificationJ II.a Qualificat1M Not Established III.a Exempt III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available rz - c- .
. a m a, m n .
_,...___._~-. m~
- ~ . - x sn
A NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 branklin Rrse:rch Csntrr FRC Project No. C5257 Paga A Dwson oiThe Frankhn instdute 2 20th and Race Streets. Ptule.. Pa.19103 G15) 448-1000 FRC Assignment FRCTask No. fd No.13,Td 6/ 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. l,/.: 1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM l DESIGNATION:
~
NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY l' . Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate - Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Y Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately V' 2ualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation
; Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation S4tisfied (If Required)
Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Hadiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies i (If Any) Satisfied Critaria Pegarding Functional Testing Satisfied ~ Criteria Regarding Instrument Accu;;=y Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function ' Time) Satisfied l Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)
)
i DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY j I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X 4 II.a Equipment Qualific& tion Not Established f; ' II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life j or Replacement Schedule Justified
- l III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification
; III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available i
bf6 f f A'- r ~ . ;m _,2:r ... , ==;=
p NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 N Frtnklin R:setreh Ccnter FRC Project N2. C5257 P:g3, A Division of The Frankhn insature - 3a 20th and Racs Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. SD (oNo.1;D7
/
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /4 l 1 LICENSEE Rr3PONSE TO NRC SER l l l
- 0. 1 The sodifications.specified in Qualification Reference 83 for Foxboro transmitters have not been mace to these transmittars. A review of the l seal casign for the Foxcore units and a review of the envir:nmental qualification tests of the Fox: ore units, lead to the c:nclusten u at these transmitters would perform their short-tars safety trip function.
Therefore, the continued. safe operation of the plant is assured. G. These transmitters are being replacac with new 7:x: ore N-E;0 feries
.ransmitjerswhicnarepresentlyqualifiects:EEE 323-137' inclucing 2.2 x 10 Rads gamma radiation anc !EEE 3a4-13-.. A g -p i y 7.ansmim -
Qual,1fication Group has been f:r :ec ta qualify tnese :ransmi::ers .. IE:: 322-1974 anc IEEE 344-1975. 0 Ce c:moleted by the envir:nmental qualiff:stien :aacline.The It is final cualift:at :n {tentionthatthereplacements:ecercleted:yAne30,;332. The
.. ansmitters wnica are locatac insice c:ntainment :P cutsice ::ntainment
- in the vicinity of high energy lines are all Foxter: transmitters which have been tested for those c:nditions. In most casas, tne transmitters are being replaced because of a lack of tracestility on :ne materials wnfen prevents us frem analyzing the aging enaractaristics. The Fox oro transmitters will, in our opinion, perform eneir safety function in the extremely unlikely event of a LCCA or HEL3 accident. The other trans-mitters outside containment (Sarten's) will nave performed tneir safety function prior to being exposed to a severe environment frcm that accident.' It is unlikely that the transmitters nave degraced in their approximately 10 years of operation since we have seen no evicence of suca degracation. Therefore, the continued safe ::eratien :( the plant is assured until the . transmitters are replacad.
+ ..,,-,.,,,,,,...#-......., -. - -~- --. - -
ge - NRC Contrcct No. NRC-03-79-118 Ptga
- 2) Frankhn Research Center FRC Proj;ct No. C5257 A Divsen od The Fresn Instaute FRC Assignrnant No.13 lc 20m and Race 5erms. P5da.. Pa.191031215) 44d loon FRC Task No. 50fo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I'7
, EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 17 LEVEL TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN THE TURBINE BUILDING, ELEV. 26' , CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK AREA F0EBORO MODEL 613DM i REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 DAY ' TER CHECKSHEET NO. 17 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 639 , i FUNCTION (PLANT ID): INDICATES CONDENSATE STORAGE TANK LEVEL (LT-4025, 4031) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL [7]: SCEW(S): X-l' I. DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITI24(S) ONLY:
, (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
R, T, QV, Itt , P , H , CS , S, (R) , M, I, QM, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable l l LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: l i i Contents Checksheet Page No. i j Equipment Item la Sunsaary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Suaunary Forms 2 l Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, OL, L, SJ System Consideration Review -te, OL, 4;, 44, 0. , O f - Equipment Environmental Qualification Review h, L, t, 00, ~;, ;f,- 5g, 2, ~ a ;- ' I Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation S. S i Equipment Summary - 4 i j Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary -7. , 7 b , 76 l 1 i . . . - . . , .- . . _ _
'"'. - . . . . - . ,. - ~. ,. .: ._ -n ' ' u.~ 1 ,w-s.<- a.u a. 2Le~: , . w .
- . L
8X- "* ..;2Y i . 4 's ' - id . ,.. ~: :w- .
~
NRC Contract N2. NRC-03 79-118 A,h W Franklin Resurch Centxt FRC Project No. C5257 P ga A Cimon of The Frankhn Instrrure FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. T~o G k d"? EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. ./_2 SUAMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: I I l 1 Tne Licensee (has/L.. . y yrovided a response to the SER concerns. l
, ( The Licensee (has/h.. ... ' specifically stated that the equipment-ts--
! pli"i;f ;.. 2/= will function when exposed to the applicable DBE ! environmental service conditions.
~
1 The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. i 1 The Licensee (hasA... .~i-) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item wnose qualification has not been fully established. 4 Justification for interim operation (has/h: 2 n)--been provided by the Licensee for tnis equipment- item. l dCorrective action specified by the Licensee 4 Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment - e that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. I The Licensee (nas/."= =M provided a schedule for the proposed corrective ac . (Schedule fojeccomplishing the corrective action dA/W2-
.)
The Licensee st'arces that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or snould be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) 9 I.a @=1ified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency
_JI . b M:xtificationl III.a Exempt AA.a Qualification Not Estab'.ished III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available
'W~*~*J V ' :":"h s'. .*; sn. ?fy*23 . '.3' Z .: - - T')v .** :. . . .. ' < T
- ____-.v'_ _ - - - _ _ _ " _ _
~
A NRC Contract N 2. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 3 Li!'b j Fr:nklin Rrsearch Centr FRC Project NO. C5257 A Diveen of The Frankun Inuaure FRC Assignment No.13 2 20m and Race Streets. PN!a . Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. T6 G/f~# 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FOIU4 I DESIGNATION: ~ ! NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Mequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established V j Aging Degradation Evaluated Mequately g Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisficd (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Mequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied , Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied __ Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) 4 DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATE00RY t I.a Equipment Qualified
- I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification __2L, II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified ; III.a Equipment Exeinpt From Qualification III.c Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available & h j +ll- Y h I
i I n , -,. _ ,m.w.._ .
= . - . ., . , , . , , . , , , . _
. . ~ v A NRC Contract Ns. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 3 Ub Fr nklin R:seirch Cener FRC Project N3. C5257 A Diwsion of The Frank!1n Institute FRC Assignment No.13 30 20th and Race serests. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. C M /Ce)'7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _Q LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER O. The sodifications specified in Qualification Reference 38 for Foxboro transmitters have not been made to these transmitters. A review of the seal design for the Foxsoro units and a review of the environmental qualification tests of the Foxtero units, lead te the c:nclusion tnat these transmitters would perform their snort-term safety trip function.
Therefore, the continued safe operation of the plant is assured. G. These transmitters are being replaced with new Fox:oro N-~'.0 forf es transmit;ers wnica are presently qualified to !!!! 323-137. inclucing. 2.2 x 10* Rads gamma radiation and IIII 3a4-1971. A 'Jtility Transmittar Qualification Group nas teen fer ed to cualify these transmitters to IEEE 323-1974 and IEEE 344-1975. The final qualificatien is seneculec to me c:moleted by the environmental qualification ceacline. It is :ur intention that tne replacements te c:meleted my June 30, 1332. The transmitters wnica are 1ccated inside c:n.ainment er outsice c:ntainment in the vicinity of high energy lines are all Foxtore transmitters wnica have been tested for tnose c:nditions. In most cases, the transmitters are being replaced because of a lack of tracsacility en tne materials wnica prevents us from analyzing tne aging enaracteristics. The Fox: ro transmitters will, in our opinion, perform eneir safety functica in tne extremely unlikely event of a LCCA or HE!.3 accicent. The otner trans-mittars outsica containment (Bart:n's) will nave performed sneir safety function prior to being exposed to a severe environment frem that accident. It is unlikely that the transmitters have degraded in their approximately 10 years of operation since we have seen no evidence of suen degradation. . Therefore, the continued safe oceratien of tne plant is assured until the , transmitters are replaced. 4
-'% F 4 m h: [ _. 1 --
(, [ g g.._
,,m -
- Y 7",, , T7 c - - --s-
. n .--
Aw NRC Contract No. N RC-03-79-118 2 ) Franklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Pcgs A o,m.on of ne Franknn Institue FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 4481 coo FRC Task No. IO(o EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. II EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 18 SOLENOID VALVE LCCATED IN THE AUXILIARY BUILDING, ELEV. 8' , LOWER PIPEWAY 'll ASCO MODEL LB83146 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 YEAR - TER CHECKSHEET NO. 18 i LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): Nor CITED
! FUNCTION (PLANT ID): OPERATES REACTOR COOLANT HOT LEG SAMPLE LINE ISOLATION ! VALVE (ISV966C)
LICENSEE SUBMITTAL [7]: SCEW(S): III-2 l i i 4 DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITDi(S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) 6 R,T,QT,RT,P.H,CS,hS, (R) , M, I, yM, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, i Not stated, Not applicable l
! LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:
A Checksheet Page No. Contents Equipment Item la f} l ; Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, L , L , 3J-j System Consideration Review Oe, 4L, i, id, !:, if Se, ~L,
~
j' ! Equipment Environmental Qualification Review ~, ~J, Oe, Of, l t -!;, Oh, !i, Ej . I 1 Installed TMI. Lessons Learned Implementation 6:, 55 Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary L , IL, 7;
.q , . ,...--...,.:,.-,,_.n.,.-,--.,... . = , , _
_ 7,
4 NRC C:ntrret No. NRC-03 79-118 Pags Mli!U FrarAin Rsserrch Centsr FRC Prrjtct No. C5257 A Dimon of The Franun Inst:tute !b 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 191034215) 448 1000 FRC Task FRC Assignment No. To 4No.1)TM
/
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - CNLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: 1 Tne Licensee (has/h;; ..eL7 provided a response to the SER concerns. 4 The Licensee (has/Mr .. ,L; specifically stated that the equipment ,Ls
<:"-"i:2 nd,'Or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. ~
The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. [TheLicensee (has/hs; ..e;} - proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. [ Justification for interim operation (has/h;; ::t) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. kCorrectiveactionspecifiedbytheLicensee: Y Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source _ Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim , operation. 1 The Licensee (has/h ; ..wii- provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action action 8vd[. / N(Schedule ~2 - for accomplishing the corrective . ) The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC OUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) i I.a cualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency
[I.b Modification / III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available
,. w -. u n- ,
m, w . .-. m,w -
,,,- - ~ -- ,w , . . . , - - ,-m,- --, ~. . .-,,, -,w
i l Ar NRC Contrcct No. NRC-03 79-118 P:ga i 2.') FrankHn Rustreh Canta FRC Project No. C5257 A oms.on of The Frankhn Insmute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Sarwis. Phda Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 $~56/fa"7 l FRC Task No. EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .J.t EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM
! DESIGNATION: , NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Y -
Mequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established T Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation , Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) . Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) l DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY ( I.a Equipment Qualified j I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification Y II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified l II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exeinpt From Qualification l III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available l 1 1 i :
...,,....... .m_ . . , _.r , , . . . .,., _ .m m.. m , . .m ._,.,,.m,__
- w. .-- , . . - - . , _ _ . _ _ _ _ , . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _
!AOUbu Franklin Research Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Pago A civmon of The FrankL,InEaute FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20th and Rue Streets. Phde.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. A o 4/fa 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _![
LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Q. These components are not required to sitigate LCCA or HELS ac:idents and continued
- safe operation of the plant is therefore assured. These components are required to be avallanle by tne TMI Action Plan to allow the reactor operators to samole and analyze reactor coolant caemistry.
It is our intention to replace these components wita environmentally qualified components by June 30, 1982. t 4 e e eg*i$ MQ Me IMN " *M-g'p G. Ewe M Wsg e-M'e4f f' # %$ " , ___ ,_ ___
---- w - - - , - - -, p
4dj Franklin Research Center N RC Contr:ct No. NRC-03-79-118 Pago FRC Pr: Ject No. C52J7 A Cimn of The Franen Inst ture FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103(215#448 1000 FRC Task No. 600 . EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /9 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 19 SOLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT, ELEV. 80' ASCO MODEL LBX831614 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 YEAR TER CHECKSHEET NO. 19 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): Nor CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): OPERATES PRESSURIZER PORY (PORV'S) (1-RC450, 431C) . LICENSEE SUBMITTAL (7]: SCEW(S): V-2 DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R,T,Or,RF,P,H,CS,hS, (R), M, I, QM, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,
! Not stated, Not applicaole i LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS s-l Contents Checksheet Page No. ! Equipment Item la Surunary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb l
i Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 34, 25,' 36, 3d System Consideration Review t;, 15, t;, 44, 4=, 42 Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 52, 55, 5;, 5d, Ce,-if7
; 5 . 55, 5i, Sj ; Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation -0e, O Equipment Summary l Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary Oe, Tw, 7v j ; t i - .yy3.,vy ,y , . - _ .., .e- , ; p. y. p.+,. , _ . m:.- aa. _~ 3- _ . r .;.1 - . . , . re- . - ~;~ -v,_~ , y
4 NRC C ntr:ct No. NRC-03-79-118 . Pags ad Franklin Rtsearch Center FRC Project No. C5257 A Divmon of The Frankhn Insnrute
'FRC Assignment No.M 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda.: Pa 19103 (215) 448 10 @ FRC Task No. fo f3'7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /f 4
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: 1 Tne Licensee (has/t.;; ::tk provided a response to the SER concerns. The License's (has/t;; .., ;.i specifically stated that the equipment -tir- . v_11 1.u .u&- will function when exposed to the applicable DBE ' environmental service conditions. The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no satstanding qualification deficiencies. . {TheLicensee (has/':: :: .; proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. N Justification for interim operation (hasA.;; n;;; been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. 1 Corrective action specified by the Licensee: f Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee-has provided other information for this equipment item l that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. ( g The Licensee (has/h: ..;^.) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action Suur 30 /9/7- ._ .)
/
! The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) i I.a Qualified _
II.c Qualified Life Deficiency
; }A.o . Modification) III.a Exempt .
i G I.a gua).lfication Not Established III b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available
~ =.~~ ~ 90 A5%: mvr u: w. -
W T* . .:w :-' - v? . - -
. .. _7
}
-. ~_ -
4 4du 7 ttnklin RsseIrch Centa NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Pago A Divmon of Ths Frenh Instauu FRC As:Ignmsnt No.13 2 20th and Race Sweets. Phda.. Pa.19103 (215) 4481000 FRC Task No. 9 o f. k d 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .j_3 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM
+
DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY -
^
1
! Documented Evidence of Qualification Mequate X ,
Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradaticn Evaluated Adequately
; Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)
' Program Established to Identify' Aging Legradation l Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)
! Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:
{ o Peak Temperature Mequate o Peak Pressure Adequate i o Duration Mequate o Required Profile Enveloped Mequately I o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied
' Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied . Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied j Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied ; Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) l DESIGNATION:
NRC OUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified i I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X
)
II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established i II.D Equipment Not Qualified !! II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified j III.a Equipment Exeispt From Qualification III.c Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available i , t I i - l i e
- 6-h' Ng.. OEM %
" g ,,gE = 1 g ,** * -
A NRC C:ntract No. NRC-03 79-118 UDJEnklin R seirch Csnter FRC Project No. CO257 Pass A Divisen of The Franklin Insuture FRC Assignment No.19 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phde.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. [04 / D~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. # LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER P. These comoonents are not required to sitigate LOCA or Hign Energy Line Greek (HEL3) accidents, therefore, continued safe operation of tne plant is assured. However, these c:moonents c:uld be used *4 aid the reactor coerator in reactor coolant pressure control under some postu-lated accident situations. It is our intention to recla:e these ::m-soments wita environments 1.ly. qualified.cocconents t/ 'une 30, 1882... a f 4 I 1 we rE rE p
' . , 4 . Je % 4 g !"
A, N RC Contr!ct No, NRC-03-79-118 i,j5nklin Research Centey FRC Project No. C5237 Paga A Cinon of The Franx!in instaute FRC Assignmtnt No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. PMa.. Pa 19103(215)448 tas FRC Task No. Tolo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. A0 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 20 SOLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT, ELEV.100' l ASCO MODEL 8320A7 i REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 10 SECONDS TER CHECKSHEET NO. 20 1 LICENJEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED l FUNCTION (PLANT ID): OPERATES CONTAINMENT PURGE SUPPLY & EXHAUST CONTAINMENT . I ISOLATION (1-HV3213, 3245)
! LICENSEE SUBMITTAL [7]: SCEW(S): IX-3 1
l i 1 h 4 { DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY*
! (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, S, (R), M, I, QM, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable r LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No, i i l l Equipment Item la Sumary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sumary Forms 2 g Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 25, 2., 3J-i System Consideration Review u., Ib, k, 'f,
--, 4f
( j Equipment Environmental Qualification Review -5 2, 55, 52, 5d, I, :f,
- 23, Oh, 5i, 5j l
I Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 0., GL Equipment Sumary i Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Sumary -7.., ~t, ': l l I \ ..;- - ~ ; - = g ? _ .;.
- ~r , ~ . . wa . , -
I
4 NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project N2. C5257 Pag 3 dQ Franklin Rrs crch Center A OMsen of Th2 Frtran Insntute FRC Assignm:nt No.13 lb 20in and Race serms. Phda.. Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRCTask No.- (~0 4/fd") EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIP. MENT ITEM NO. .sfp l
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES T THE NRC SER - CNLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: N Tne Licensee (has/'w) provided a response to the SER concerns. L The Licensee (has/ hee sme) specifically stated that the equipment h
;n'ifi.0 .. 4/wr will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. ~
The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. M he Licensee (ha s/14.. . m. ) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. k Justification for interim operation (has/';; r.;t) been provided by t'he Licensee for this equipmenc item. 1 Corrective action specified by the Licensee: X Equipment replacement with qualified equipment . Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) i Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. 1 The Licensee (has/.'.;; ;;t provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. ( c edule for accomplishing the corrective action 8(/A84 To /
~ .)
The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY SASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) l I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Lifa Deficiency II.b Modification ( III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available i
Q3 :--
~ ' . . - - .,n .
_-- g.= 3..- -n :- .
4 NRC Contract N2. NRC-03 79-118 P go WJ Frenklin Rrsetrch Center FRC Project No. C5257 A DMson of The FrenWin Inctura FRC Assignm:nt No.13 2 2Drh and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. (d 4 /fd""? EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. s!9 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATICN
SUMMARY
FORM
, DESIGNATION:
NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY . Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate l , t Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) i Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Pagarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Seque'nce Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied i Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) I i I DESIGNATION:
- NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification 1 II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualificatioc III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review l
IV Documentation' Not Made Available O, em m I l t s I
~ ~ ~ ~ 3 - - ~,~.-~ ,:~; ~.3 ,,
q- ---- , , ; .3 , ,;;:m-.~,y - ~. --
A NRC Contract No. NRC-03 79-118 GJ Frtnk!!n R:se:rch Centir FRC Project N2. C5257 Pass A cms.on of The FrankDn insatute FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20in and R c.sw is. Phda.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. To6/re9 f EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. JEb LICENSEE RESPONSE TV NRC SER J. This equipment would perform its safety-relatait function prior to the time wnen it would see a severe environment from the accident. The long-term monitoring function would most likely be performed adequately in spite of the adverse environment, althougn this cannot te documented. There art several nack-un means of performing this long-term monitoring function that are availacle snould the component fail. ' Therefore, the continued safe aceration of the plant is assured until this equipment is rtolaced. It is our intention to reclace the acuitment wita environ-mentally qualified equipment :y tne equipment qualification deactine. 4 l
- ~.- s . .. n . : . , - . . . , . . ._,,m. . ~ , . , - - - .-.. ...-.7,-..~,_, .
.~ . . _. .. - # 3 NRC Contrcet No. NRC-03-79-118 S.7ltanklin Research Cent:r FRC Projtet No. C5257 Pago A OMseen of The Franan institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 506 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. El EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 21 SOLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT, ELEV. 66' -
ASCO MODEL HB8302C25 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 10 SECONDS
, TER CHECKSHEET NO. 21 -
LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): Not CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CONTAIIGIENT ISOLATION FOR RADIATION MONITORING SAMPLING . LINE (1-HV3200C) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL [7]: SCEW(S): IX-2 i 3ESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: ' j (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R,T,QT,RT,P,H,CS,hS, (R) , M, I, QM, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable f 1
- LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:
Contents Checksheet Page No. j , Equipment Item la \ 1 Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER
~
lb l l Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 l Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, OL, L. , ;J l System Consideration Review I, 4L, Oe, 40, ., ! l Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 52, 55, 5, 52, L, ;!, 5;, Sh, Si, :j l Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 52, 55-Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 72, 75, ?c-
' --,. ,m m,-. - n _ A .,,
_ _ r. . r , , - -. e m - -,.r.-.,~...._
= - -
4 NRC C:ntr:ct No. NRC-03-79-118 P:g2
'JM Franklin Rssench Centu FRC Project No. C5257 A Dimen of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and nace sire.is. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. OS 4 /_Cd ~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. d L
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: T Tne Licensee (has/L... .n) provided a response to the,SER concerns. 1 The Licensee (has/ .. ..% - specifically stated that the equipment i.s 7r11 1.4 ...J/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmentai service conditions. The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. l The Licensee ('has/W proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. X Justification'for interim operation (has/im. uvd -been provided by the Licensee for tnis equipment item. h Correactive action specified by the Licensee: y Equipment replacement with qualified equipment N Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)
,,,,,,_ Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )
The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item i that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim l operation. ! 1 The Licensee (nas/h=- :20 provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action 74 us 34 / ffz. .) The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification i and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) l l I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency
- 1_I . b Modificationl III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established _ III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available l
l 4
.- e _ .. .,, -- _7, . - m m- - - ,--- 7-, --
A. NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79118 dlEU Frrnklin Riserreh Csnt:r FRC Project N2. C5257 P:ga A Divison of The FranWin Insraute FRC Assignment No.13 1 20m and Race Sweets. Phde.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. CoOfo"7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. e2 / EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION:
~ ; NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY l Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate V .
Mequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established
- l Aging Degradation Evaluated Mequately
' Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)
Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate
' o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied . ,
Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied
. Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) i I DESIGNATION:
I NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY
's l f I.a Equipment Qualified l i I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X l '
II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life 4 or Replacement Schedule Justified , l III.a Equipment Exeispt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review l , IV Documentation Not Made Available i l 8 mr~r:m m m m m w r m. . - -- -
.-m-==~,- --
r-=
h - NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 P:g3 WJI) FrankI!n Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 A om on of The Frankhn insinute _ FRC AsaignmenJo.13j t 3a 20th and Race Sweets. PMe.. Ps. 19103 (215) 4tJ 10co FRC Task No. 5 oaf CJ"7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. s$.-2 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER J. This equipment would perform its safety-related function prior to the time wnen it would see a severe environment from the accident. The long-term monitoring function would most likely be perforsee adequately in spite of the adverse environment, alcough uis cannot te coc ;mentad. There are several nack uo seans of performing this long-term monitoring function that are available should the c:moonent fail. Therefore, the continued safe oceration of the clant is assured until this ecuioment is reclaced. It is our intention to rectaca tne ecui: ment vita environ- . mentally qualified equipment ey the equipment tualification dancline. s
?
- - w n n ~~ .. =*- ; - -- n.
- e: ~ ~o -.ewm .===
#s NRC Contrret No. N RC'03-79-118 , . A ' .dJEnklin Research Centir FRC Project No. C$237 N Pag 3 <
A Diwsen cf Tha Franun Ir stitute FRC Assignmsnt Nc. 4 lc i 20th and Race Streets. PMa . Pa. 19103 (215) 44d 10AX) ' FRC Task No. - }gofo .J
~
I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW <0F EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M d . 4
.4 r
EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 22 '
. )
SCLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT, ELEV.11' \.\
- ASCO MODEL LBIS31614 - '
'T REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 10 SECONDS TER CHECKSHEET NO. 22 i LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED ,
FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CONTAINMENT ISOLATION FOR AUXILIARY CHAAGING LINE ' i (1-CV1296)
! LICENSEE SUBMITTAL [7]: SCEW(S): IX-1 , \ r ..\ -s . .
f ' s
\ % 4 '( 1 I
C 6
\ N, ,' ) i y 'l DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC ' SER CIRCLED ITEM (S) CNLit (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) t i
l R, T, m', RT,.P, H, CS, S, (R), M, I, QM, h EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable x] LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: ,
}
Contents Checksheet Page No. , Equipment Item ,la Summary of Licensee Re,y ;se.z to the NRC SER lb Equipment Envifor e- , ,1 r. Alification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Respont. %t3, .S 3a, 2, L, :d System Consideration Review 44 -! b , !:, !d, *u, G Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 52, 55, 5 , , h, O f ,- 5; , Tr. , i, P I
] Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Ge, 2 ) Equipment Summary Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary 7 , 7m, 7%
9 .e,.p2.s...
. _..,.-,---y ,. . -- e .w . .-- . -, ~~ . -7 i
s% NRC Contrtet No. NRC-03-79-118 Page
. d' Frankhn Researer. Center FRC Project No. C5257 % otus.on of The Frankhn inrtitute FRC Assignment No.13 lb FRC Task No. f6G /fd 7 9 2hh *ad bce strecer. Pw.. Pa. 19103:215) 448 1000 ix EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M $p ,
i k SUMMARI OF LIMNSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: M Tne Licensee (has/u . av W-provided a response to the SER concerns. i Thesj icensee I (has/t;; .~Li specifically stated that the equipment La , A i qu'lified ...sor'will function when exposed to the applicable DBE i 'q f ' environmental service conditions.
; 't l
The Licensee hr.s presented information which shows there are no s . t \f outstanding qualification deficiencies. s g The Licensee (has/h -- -^ t) proposed a corrective action for this equipment
'Y item whose qualification has not been fully established. \\ .
V Justification for interim operation (has/hae-net) been provided by the
! Licensee for tnis equipment-item.
x (Corrective action specified by the Licensee: j Equipr=ent replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source , verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress 1 Other ( )
- The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim
> operation. t X The Licensee (has/h:2 .~L) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. 30 / k(Schedule for accomplishing the corrective .)
~
action JpF 7- [ The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. c h DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency
%b Modificaticn] _
III.a Exempt
~II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Availablo k
A ' NRC C:ntract No. NRC-03-79-118 YShranklin Rrserrch Cent:r FRC Project Ns C5257 P ga A DMmon of The Franiuin !nsntu;e FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (2156 448 1000 FRC Task No. TOGA ~0"7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2d EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION:
~
NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY l Documented Evidence of Qualification Mequate 1 - Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)
- Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)
- Criteria T.:garding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:
o Peak Temperature Mequate
, o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate
- j. o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately i o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Critaria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding ' Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) i 4
^
DESIGNATION: l NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY l I.a Equipment Qualified f I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification ,,,,,2(,,,, II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established j II.b . Equipment Not Qualified j II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life j or Replacement Schedule Justified l III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification l j III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available t i
)
i l '- -~,-r-- * -: m ~ ~ - - - - - . - ~; -- ~m- ----- 3--- - g g -
, -- . g.3- ~- - -~ - -
A NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 M' )Fr:nklin Rssetrch Center FRC Project Ns. C5257 Pag 3 A civ.on ci ne Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20th and Race Sweets. Phda,. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. 804 Mo 7, EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. @ LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER J. This equipment would perform its safety-related function prior to the time when it would see a severt environment from the accident. The long-term monitoring function would most likely be performec adequately in spite of the adverse envircement, althougn this cannot te documentad. There art several back up means of performiing this long-tors monitoring function that art availante should the component fail. - Therefore, tne continued safe acerstion of tae slant is assured until this equi: ment is replaced. It is our intention to reclace tne ecuicment with environ-mentally qualified equipment ty the equipment qualification ceaaline. O or l l I i 1 i w m u.m m n.se t u .m ._ ,,, l
A NRC CCntrcct No. NRC-03-79-118 SSnkiin Research Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C3257 - , PIga A Oims.on of The Frank in insnrure FRC Assignm:nt No.13 lc 20th and Race $rreets. Phda.. Pa. 19103(215; 448 1000 FRC Task No. 80(o EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. M EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 23 SOLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT, ELEV. 20' ASCO MODEL LB83146 l REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 YEAR - TER CHECKSHEET NO. 23 l LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED i FUNCTION (PLANT ID): OPERATES REACTOR COOLANT HOT LEG SAMPLE VALVES (1-SV955) . l I j . LICENSEE SUBMITTAL [7]: SCEW(S): XII-l o DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS , h S , (R) , M, I, QM, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, j Not stated, Not applicable I , LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents , Checksheet Page No. 1 Equipment Item la
, Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb I
i Equipment Environmental Qualif,ication Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, Ob, Oc, 2 0-- System Consideration Review ', !b,
. 4-, ,0, ::, if ; Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 5, !b, ~;, Ed, 50, 5 f, ,
M, 55 5!. 5F s j Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation - 0., Ob-Equipment Summaty i i f Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary 7 , 7L, 7c L . . . . . - --.;. -
. . ~ . - - m, .3.,~ m. a ~ -,- .- . ., - . . . :o * < ~ . . - - . '. ~ . . * -
~
A NRC C:ntrict No. NRC-03-79-118 3' JKnklin Rss:rrch Centar FRC Project No. C5257 P:ga A Dimion of The Frankhn Inscrute FRC Assignment No.13 ib
- Oth and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. ToMJO7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. mL.3
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: I Tne Licensee (has/... ..;;) provided a response to the SER concerns.
..;M 4 The Licensee (has/'r pecifically stated that the equipmenW
! ;;;'.ifi.a .uG/wr will function when exposed to the applicable DBE l environmental service conditions. ' The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. 1 The Licensee (has/haa nat) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. ( Justification for interim operation (has/':: n:M been provided by the Licensee for this equipment- item. 1 Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. , The Licensee (has/h:2 r tL provided a schedule for the proposed 1 corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action Jma;r_W f fh .) The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. j DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC OUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
I.a cuati:2 II.c Qualified Life Deficiency f.b Modification III.a Exempt , u .a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualif'ed l IV Decumentation Not Available .
"bY MY hO N ,g r-N - ,,er'-
f F=O m * " '"'
- .-a,.
l A NRC C::ntract N2. NRC-03-79-118 dud Frrnklin Rxserreh Csntrr ' FRC Project No. C5257 P:g3. A Otvmon of The Franklin insature FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448.imo FRC Task No. Cd 4/D ""> EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.20 1 l l l EQUIPMENT E.WIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM ! l- DESIGNATION: i NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY I I Documented Evidence of Qualification Mequate . Mequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established ' Aging Degradation Evaluated Mequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Prograin Established to Identify Aging Degradation
; , Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) -
Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Mequate I o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Mequate o Required Profile Enveloped Mequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied i Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied { Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied
, Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) t i,
i DESIGNATION:
! NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I
I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification Y II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established l II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life
; or Replacement Schedule Justified l
III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available l t
?
b
-3,,_..,.-- . _ . , . _ , _ _ _.m .,.,,.s. , , _ _ .__. ,._. ,... .._.. _
& NRC Contrrct No. NRC-03 79-118 d0ijd Frtnklin Rsse rch Cent:r FRC Project N2. C5257 P g3 A Cimen of The FranWin Insuture 3a 20th and Race Streets. Ptula.. Pa. 19103 (215)448 1000 FRC FRC Assignment Task No. fd4 No.13[f'd7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. eEJ LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Q. These components are not required to sitigate LCCA or HELS accidents and continued safe operation of the plant is therefore assured. These components are required to be availacle by the TMI Action Plan to allow the reactor operators to samole and analyze reactor coolant caemistrf. . - It is our intention to replace taese components with environmentally qualified components by June 30, 1982.
l i l ~ ~ - ~ . . - . - . . _ _ _ _ _ _ , . . . . . . ,,,.u_ _
g _s_ NRC Contrtet No. N RC-03-79-118 f.02 Franklin Ressarch Centsr FRC Prclect No. C5257 Piga A Dusen of The Frankhn Insnture FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 600' EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. JY EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 24 ELECTRIC MOTOR LOCATED IN THE AUXILIARY BUILDING, ELEV. 8' , SAFETY INJECTION PUMP AREA l WESTINGHOUSE MODEL 688.5H, CLASS B THERMALASTIC EP0XY INSULATION REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 YEAR TER CHECKSEEET NO. 24 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 14, 604 . FUNCTION (PLANT ID): SAFETY INJECTION PUMP. MOTOR (1-P15A, B) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL [7}: SCEW(S): 1-2 DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: (see Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, h h RT, P, H, CS, h S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applict;.ble LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la
; Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, OL, L, ;J System Consideration Review 1;, , 4 , 40, !., if Equipment Environmental Qualification Review L, ~, L , ~ , La, ;., 5f, i % , CL, ~', Sj_
Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation G, 0L-Equipment Summary i Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary a, iu, - c I ' I
-n, r . .. . . , - . - - --:. n~- -- .-- - - . ~ , -
4 NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 Pcgs dEnklin Resezrch Center FRC Pr: Ject Ns. C5257 j A Dmmon of The Frankhn Insnture FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and, Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 566/Sa> EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 39. StMMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLb: L Tne Licensee (bas / hee-not) provided a response to the SER concerns.
,_L, The Licensee (has/h) specifically stated that the equipment is l qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE '
environmental service conditions. ~ X The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for tnis equipment-item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level _,__ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .) The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for I49end)
I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I. Modification III.a Exempt I. Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available 1 i T MM A N.E "M ?. 4 % ' w-' - - - FI .~i- - , - D 7 1
- I ----
, NRC Contract No. NRC-03 79-118 nklin Rrserrch Crntzr FRC Project No. C5257 Paga A Dimon of The Franklin insature FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Sereets. Phde.. Pa.19103 (215) 4481000 FRCTask No. 3tn /So>
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _A.Y EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REOUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Quilification Adequate X - Adequate Similarity-Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately X Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) X Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation X Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)- Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied X Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Fu .ctional Testing Satisfied , Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established W II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available I
' n - .- . -- w _-- ;, -
p.- - . ~ ., _e .
A NRC Contract N3. NRC 03-79-118 ddU Franklin Rtseach Cent:r FRC Project No. C5257 P ga A Diws on of The FrankhnInstaure FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20th and Race Sweets. PMe.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. M /Mo 7 EQUIPMENT ENi/lFIONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. A.M qs. l LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER T. T% Safety Injection ($!) Pune. Seefeuel Meet Removal (RMA) pume. ane the Cantafrusant teerpncy Fan Caelee noters are all weetingneuse esters vi12 CIsee S *Thermeisetfc feesy* fneulatien syetene. The fasulatien i anu toering system of these esters more generically guelf ffee for ' h efetty, restatten, and 44 tag by testing =nica is etc u entes in l WCAP=4754 (Quelf fication Reference log). The esters were seguentfally l tested for tneruel and voltage strosa aging. secnenical cyctfng, and i tneraal cyctf ag to a quelf ffee If fe of 44.000 running hours (f.a.. greater taan 5 years) ane 40 years total life at an amotent yreture of 40*C or fees and for an integretse res14tten esse of 2 a 13 taas geese. These esters are locates in the aumflfary Butleing enere tassert* tures are meletaines senseen 65 ane SS*F. These esters are eserstes en lesa taan a 13 esty cycle. Therefers. the esters are judged to te quelf fice to escreta for eere taan 40 years (at 1105 eutf) fellemee 3y a ensign-sasts accisant vita a seat-accieens esersting time of see year. The Setenttal for uneseectee cegree4tten eue *.e aging 19 addresses my perfeetc f assections, electrical tests. ans escaanical tests. Perietic esintenance temos tasse esters in an *as ws* caneitten over tneir 40 year eueIfffas Iffe. See wIscensf n tiectr4c's seetemeer 11. *581 . letter te nr. Mereld 4. Canton eencerning ressense V ine fSMP enstesn= eental aself ficatten SER (seeciffcally taclosure 1. Sectten 3.7) *se a furtner eiscuesten af aging. The postulated accident restatten case over one year of less taan a z 'J I Rees .f11 causeI w qlfgible 3egrace-tien causares ta tae suelf fication level of 2 a 10 2 ass. *he evalffi-cation for ICS relattve 9midity was cleerly demonstrated 3y t*e insulation testa of ester staters fuersed in tas water and salt .ater. The quelfficatten for 1005 relative mustetty of tse nearing system .es demonstrated ey saturated steen (LOCA) tests doc uentee in'aCAP-7829 (Cualfficatten teference 25). Since ifgn relative numidity is wt eneocted in tBe auallfary building anyway. these esters are judges ta De quellfies for relative hefeity. In conclusion. taa p ters are ceneteered euelf fted for 105 relative Mustetty. 2 a 13' taas gamme restatten, a0 years eging. and a oest-accicent operating time of one year in their aselfcatten at PSNP. s j .. i I 1 j l l 1 1 -~., ne. m , em v.w. :- w a ,v m , , , ,. .n~.
A,._ - NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 P qa du Franklin Research Canter A Dmson of The Frsnian Insutur: FRC Assignm2nt No.13 5f 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 4481c00 FRC Task No. SC(o /507 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M noTzs i 71,, , & c e.,. :a nn LA b L pm_ M aal- a v v v v a . u s. A1 er y ..o_ n.u siA s . A h,, a, a L rs.- e J
-s of -_ .r u . M .psa m y an h w 1--
w e A p.n n u a D J.
- v u - c_g i 3 Ma i 21L,./ & . > cad w %/.1,W % L L'
, aae*
[am 10 oQ r$a'- *
- _^ B N N sela> w ed Asa d .
w y o i
- ee.np-evsn ,A U A o m H;.2 1;Lo s) an me,,,
' s a y y / r w n a a w c~ sJ J a4 er--n a 1:_' L %'6. 0 TLa_1I e e _ n a a lu us n d m _.*J. d u u , 0 ~ L :+ 1 ,} I dnL_. '. m a no t. -
- 9. L n on+ i, -w' e i A 1o A, -
a u o
+L1. da t e- ;Jask +L1. >a L -- a 2 A_a _ a-d .
s t [ I i
- 7tt n r .n 1. a & .L ]tA J w n n 1 J. ;M u
& r A O o.La.$ w : aid _.Q.t.T$i_AAaL rn >- n /*L :J lh fa . a a V,
WY k $1a A A A S a 0 nanunYA 9A- &
- flr rs i ebN i g dw U
1 i 4
- T Y li W ^OR & d e $_'f_ AA rrt & '=- w 0 l^ e n $^ e A I
aLoL AM:L Lm /L1,e'.. +.
. u o I
i * -rlt I; w a- w < ,6 thd a a ud--o alw 1%'M i u uy u k k _ n A* f L M io & +l,s. h in L N It a 'l & W
'l f M 6 1.n ,1 L / k o i I l t i
i . y_._.._... ,
,.,7. .. _ ._ . . . . . ,
_ _ _ . ~ _ . . . _ _ _ _ _ _ - -
, NRC C:ntrtct No. NRC-03-79-118 4[J d Franklin R setrch Center FRC Prsject No. C5257 Paga A Diwson of Th3 Franidin Insntuts FRC AssignmInt No.13 , le .
20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 50(o EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 25
' ELECTRIC MOTORS LOCATED IN THE AUXILIARY BUILDING, ELEV. 8' , CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP AREA WESTINGHOUSE MODEL TBDP FRAME 444TS, CLASS B PREMIUM MOISTURE RESISTANT INSULATION REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 DAY TER CHECKSHEET NO.-25 LICENSEE REFFJtENCE(S)! 14, 24, 25, 26, 605 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): ' CONTAINMENT SPRAY PUMP MOIOR (1-P14A, B)
LICENSEE SUBMITTAL [7]: SCEW(S): I-l DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, RT, P, H, CS, h S, - (R) , M, I,'QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la l Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Suzmaary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER ' 3a, 3b, L , ;d - System Consideration Review Mr. '.1, 0;, 44, Oe, if Equipment Environmental Qualification Review -5 2, 52, 5, 53, 5:, Sf,
- Sg, ,L, 31, j Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation h, 1 J
Equipment Summary - j Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Sunusary 72, 71, L
* '+
E' y \ Y O- ,- YN ---O i -
,Y
- NM sYf _ ,, * - --N .-
-~ -,_c --,_.-.,,..,,_,_,,f'_.-
6jbranklin Rzsetrch Cant:r NRC Centrcct No. NRC-03 79-118 P:ga
- FRC Project N . C5257 .
A Can cine Frankhn insatme FRC Assignment No.13 lb-20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44a.t000 FRC Task No. 544 /50 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M SCMMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: 1 Tne Licensee (bas /'w) provided a response to the SER concerns.
~
l The Licensee (has/' : .6) specifically stated that the equipment is' - qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.
~
1 The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for tnis equipment-item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee:
. Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equip 3ent modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiatior. source
_ Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress _ _ Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. _ The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed i corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .) The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification
, and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
i DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
I.a Qualified' II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt
@ Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope i II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available i
i i i i _ .;,.,.._ ...... 7 ... ,. _ .. . m
6 NRC Contract N D. NRC 03-79-118 7
!!00d tankun Research Center FRC Project No.C5257 FRC Assignment No.13 . Page A owmen of The FranhanInseuse 2 20m and Rue Seeen. Phde.. Pa.19103 (21.9 448 1000 FRCTaskNo. Sc6/So'r EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2f_ l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: NBC REQUIP 2MENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Mequate X Maquate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen EstablistM Aging Degradation Evaluated Mequately X Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) X Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Mequate o Peak Pressure Mequate o Duration Mequate o Required Profile Enveloped Mequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Mequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied X Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)
~
DESIGNATION: l NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established L II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.m Equipment Not in the Secpe of the Qualification Review j IV Documentation Itat Made Available l l
-.--..v~- --m,__ __- . ._
{
l t r; % NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79118 dhu Frtnidin R: search Ccnter FRC Project ND. C5257 pig 3 A b on eine FranunInseMe FRC Assignment No.13 3a ! 20th and Race Seeses. Phds.. Pa. 19103(2151 448 1000 FRC Task No, SCG/SO 7 i ! EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .df i LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER
- 3. Only the anstract, introduction, conclusion, and a summary of the researen resort on this motor were reviewed and are documented in the central equipment qualification file. De information in those sectior.c ~
of the report (f.e., Westingnouse Researen Report 71-1C2-RA0MC-R1 datad Decaneer 31,1370 'and revised AoM1 10,1971, "De Effect of Radiation on Insulating Materials Used in Vestingneuse Medium Motors") is detailed *
~
enougn to a11ew evaluation of the motors for environmental qualification. Oue to the large volume and the prooMetary carsorata classification of me reports, the vendor would not send us completa contes of tha report.
. nose reports are availaale, however, for NRC audit at the vencer's M*' office. Ve are attampting to octain a concleta ==y of tne resear:n resort for our dccumentation files. ~
ne recort documents the tasting of tne actor matarials for uermal and ir-adiation aging. De tasting consistad of "elec: Meal and ;nysical ' tests on.ue sataMals canditioned in two way*: (1) Heat aged in an oven equivalent to 20 years of operation, and (2) Heat aged clus f r-radiatad to a dose of 10' Rads.* n e conclusion section statas cat
*ue results indicate that virtually all sataMais tasted would accear to be satisfactory for use in actors for ~20 years in a radiation environment for wnica us maximum accumulated cose was 10' Rads". De Westingnouse Medium Motor and Gearing Division statas tnat
- total accumulated gama cosages of 2 x 10* Rads are witnin ce cacanility of us suaject motors' and "a total gamma dose of uis amount will have negligible offect on life expectancy.* ne motor mataMais were taersally aged pHor to tr-adiation for the equivalent of 20 years of +
operation under the usual service conditions of NEMA Standard MG1-14.02. Tnis standar1s includes an amaient tamperature range of 0*C to 40*C l (104*F). De ancient tamperature range in the auxiliary building whers-l these motors are located is controlled to a value between 65'F and SS*F. nortfore, bota the average and saximum amoient tamoerature experienced by these actors are well below the design saximum tamoerature. of 104*F and below the maximum tamperaturt cacanility of us notar of 122*F as claimed by the vendor. Since the c=mponent cooling numo sotors coerata on a 50% duty cycle and the c:ntainment scray cumo motors are only operated for seriodic tasts, the exoected life of these motors in their acclication at PSNP is at least twice the equivalent lifetime of 20 yeare used in the anovg tests. Bertfort, these motors are judged to be cualified for 2 x 10 Rads integratad gamma radiation dose and a 40 year qualified life with margin. De octantial for unernected degradation due to aging is addressed by periodic insoections, electrical tasts, and sechanical tests. PeModic saintenance kesos these setors in an *as new" condition over their 40 year cualified life. See Wisconsin ElectMc's sectancer 11, 1981 lattar to Mr. Harold R. Genton concerning response to the PSNP environmental cualification SER (speci-fically Enclosure 1, Section 3.7) for a furtner discussion of aging.
! ne humidity cacanility of the motor is stated by the vendor as 100%
l et14tive humidity. D e Premium Moisture Resistant (PMR) Class S Insula- ' , tion systas in these motses was soecifically cesigned for hign resistance to degradation and electMeal breakcown due to noisture attacx. A lateratory test was run on the insulation systas in wnica actor stators
, wers excosed to 10C% relative humidity for one weet. De insulation resistance to grcund remained acave tarse megannes for the entirt week.
1
! $1nce the stator insulation is tae only part of the matar that =uld l . be significantly affected 'sy nign humidity (non-concensing) and nign l l humidit'/ is not expected in this : art of the auxiliac/ tuilding anyway, I : the sotors are judged ta be qualified for relative Municity.
e l l ...._..-.-...a
._.,-y .
4dCU Franklin Research Center NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Pag 3 A oim.cn of N Frankan insmute - FRC Assignment No.13 3b 20th and Race Sweets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. SO4/So 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITE,M NO. 21 l LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER (Continued) The qualified operating time.was determined by a review of caen of ne environmental parameters (i.e., humidity, radiation, and aging) for te required operating time. Since these motors envelo,2 all of tne soecifice parameters for the operating time required and have been snown my coersting experience to operata far in excess of the recuired comrating time, the meters are judged to be qualified for the required ocerating time. . i l I I _- ==uer=..n. n e , w ... - :-
.--=__,_:._ , , = _- .
_-._-.=__._._.
. . .- . . .~ -.
l 4- NRC Contract Nc. NRC 03-79-118 Paga Cl!Nnklin Research Cmer FRC Project No. CO257 PROPRIETARY A o.mion of The Frankhn insatute FRC Assignment No.13 iNFORMATICN 5f-20m .nd a=e Seems. Phde.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44s.1000 FRCTask No. fog /50'? ECUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Af NOTES: i l 7'A in }4 e_m reeruoa ns_ a A'A *. M y
,d,. u 9 n,.. - d t " u u a g -
- .An At'. $t.En ox ws.e b.19XtoSQ ). TL11,wn see k n 1 L fa d
~ . . s .
flm+ a+La, enu;ena-.. k G mitemm h i d d a,^1,s; nee l 8 i
+La e-> 1 nanen& 11 laa 'td k an nsen nsf eCree_4ed {
u s
} < io a1-Cre,-te 4(a bu oA Ei h L ocA. ,' 7 G 9
- Th. h a n s e< kn r a ,eeseeA w a ~.n te m i
e n d h + b -t A m d em w e m em + .<e_4 ,1 o r a D rk, n - ml- me sea 1u s+3~. r o L E. _(es ass 6y w. l s s I g i y , ur ad).
/
h
$$ W dmo 5 G]t%h t*
- Y n b tth E Jo on's b'Y $^ bY uu a Ist M 8 a -- a O a is I* a chied radi Ik e ht , .n d 3
Tlu:L dard G q Srde ;14tel A ce ater 1 un d cA<.e.co ted. Do.oJLa 6 i v G hf'8 DR +l.L a f* t a I A A m NO f?c_M u l e e 1 M +bt G V Wer e_ et-Hem a41an 4e a k4 h a oa41rt enna f en e I Q lQ l.Jes41nok_m_ino_. TLa e,uteuseA doei_2 M dddce,t,*
. W 6 M u a k ifsEneset ti3 r* + h._ F91h@C 4e 4G S hisua y >
g e f +kte4e-i._ i n i < L 'Ae',1 e u (4 em de be_ e n n s tAein.L l V tu c A1. > a n-C n a 0*bh M _ 't n%, L ei s 1. n n u v b = - a t" _^ _ _ 40 h d- b Ya . c1/e ce 6m 0 eci k rt'A . W is I J h J I h .21_e-- . O nar W /m c .*li on & A c>_, ~ a 4 I . a qi
- n14 we Leto A h ne_c ,w; & cu ,.An d d i
i > Ps oleMet' M c_e suo 4m cL. iA4' m al ew eOua M M A re9e(i 4o4L.L^""S'h N k d f % ., i,
- . . . - . - - . , - , ,e
4 NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C3257 PROPR!ETAR'f Pago 2)ll Franklin Resetrch Canter - A Divmon of The Franan inmrute FRC Assignment No.131NFORMATICN 5g. 20th and Race Sweets. Phda.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 . FRC Task No. SO(= /4o ') EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M I , , , _
*NN $
- TLo I,e , nee eld A creu'Ao w de .. . t #-L 4e ~.;I:$. +Lt %lwel 1 ., U V A A Ah (n k 0 x Y lsLke%g $. --
h
. rklu,.-uoddeda.o,M m m L,o M . < s /1plaAmu0. % ~{-W ka a ~ wA/m a n as(L. ) u l
] 1 a 1 i i i
?
.i I i l J f
^ ' -
'I
- M?",*7 *% )*eP@W 'W %'% 'M g, # 99 f *JF4# - . fv* Q 5 '"*. - f *, r ]* T ,, , 9!**% , *,
_____,,'*,,._"re-
l A NRC C;ntract No. NRC-03-79-118 i S.$%nk!in Research Centsr FRC ProJ:ct No. C5257 P gs A Dw.s.cn of The FrankLn Insnrues FRC Assignmsnt No.13 . tc 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 I215) 4481000 FRC Task No. 80f0 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 26 ELECTRIC MOTOR LOCATED IN THE AUXILIARY BUILDING, ELEV. 8' , COMPONENT COOLING PUMP AREA WESTINGHOUSE MODEL ABDP FRAME 504US, CLASS B PREMIUM MOISTURE RESISTANT INSULATION .
, REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 YEAR TER CHECKSHEET NO. 26 '
LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 14, 24, 25, 26, 605 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): COMPONENT COOLING WATER PUMP MOIOR (1-Pila, B) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL [7]: SCEW(S): II-2
. DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: ,,,( See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) i h h RT, P, CS,hS, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, fr +
Not stated, Not applicable l i LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: i Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb i' Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Iicensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b,-2;, 20-- System Consideration Review 42 '
-t h , .., Oi, 44, !" ~ ~' ~- -'
! Equipment Environmental Qualification Review - 5f, l 5g, :h, 51, :j
; Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation h, L ; Equipment Summary j Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary 7 , 75, 7; l I .I - . . .,. . y .. - -. 7 = , , , _
4dUij Franklin Resetrch Centar NRC Contract Ns. NRC-03-79-118 Prgs j FRC Project N3. C5257 A Desen of The Frankhn Insnrure FRC Assignment No.13 lb l 20th and Race Streets. Phda_. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. SN /507 i t EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2.6 l '
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'to THE NRG SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: 1 Tne Licensee (has/':: ..n) provided a response to the SER concerns. l The Licensee -(has/';; ...;) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. l The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no i outstanding qualification deficiencies. .
. i The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.
Justification for intorim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment _ Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. i The Licensee (bas /has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .) l The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification 4 and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. . DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt i Q Qualification No't Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available . .~,,--. . -- r.vn .n. _
. +5n , . .mw.-~ .--. -} M C.&.-A.-~.- v- ~.- a : ,- ~ ~, m .- .-n -
A NRC CIntrcct No. NRC-03 79-118 Ubr:nklin Rese:rch Cent:r FRC Project No. C5257 P:ga A Otvmon of The FrinMin Instaun FRC Asalgnment No.13 2 20th and R.c. sw s. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215)448 1 2 0 FRCTaskNo. 506/So p EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT PEM NO. .a'Ua EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM 6 DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY - Documented Evidence of Qualificati'on Adequate )( .
, Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established I Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately X
Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) X Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposura (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied X Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY , t
. I.a Equipment Qualified __
I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life
; or Replacement Schedule Justified . III.a Equipment Exeinpt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available I
t t
---.- . . ,.- y .; - . . - . .,: g . , , _ _
. v ,
7 A NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 dbanklin &semh Center FRC Project N2. C5257 P ga A Duesson of The Frankan Insneure. FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20ih.nd a.c.ser PMe Pa. 19103 (2153 448 1000 FRC Task No. 6CG/50'7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _Rir l i LICENSEE RESPONSE 'to NRC SER
- 3. - Only the abstract, introduction, conclusion, and a summary of the research report on this motor were reviewed and are documented in-the central equipment qualification file. The information in those sections of the report (f.e. , Westingnouse Research Recort 71-1C2-RACNC-R1 dated Decancer 31, 1970 and revised Ap H 1 10, 1371, "The Effect of Radiation on Insulating Materials Used in Westingnouse Medium Motors") is detailed enough to allow evaluation of the motors for enviro 6 mental qualification.
Que to the large volume and the proprietary corporata classification of the reports, the vendor would not send us completa copies of the report. These reports are availaale, however, for NRC audit at the vendor's office. We are attamoting to cbtain a concleta copy of the research report for our dccumentation files. The recort documents the testing of the motor materials for thermal and irradiatica aging. The testing consistad of "elec*rical and physical tests en the 9ataMals conditiened in two ways: (1) Heat aged in an oven equivalent to 20 ye9rs of cperation, and (2) Heat aged plus f r-radiated to a dose of 10 Rads." The conclusien section statas that "the results indicate that virtually all sataM 41s tasted would acoear to be satisfactory for use in motors for ~20 years in a rydfation i environment for watch the maximum accumulated dose was 10 Rads". The Westingnouse Medium Motor and Gearing Division states that " total accumulated gamma dosag'es of 2 x 10* Rads are within the capability of the sucject motors" and "a total gamma dose of this amount will.have negligible offect on life expectancy." The motor mataMais were thermally aged prior to frradiation for the equivalent of 20 years of ooeration under the usual service conditions of NEMA Standard MG1-14.02. This standard includes an amoient tamperature range of 0*C to 40*C (104*F). The ancient tamperature range in the auxiliary butiding where these motors are located is controlled to a value between 65'F and 8S'F. Therefore, both the average and maximum ancient temperature experienced by these motors are well below the design saximum temperature. of 104*F and below the maximum temperature capability of the motor of 122*F as claimed by the vendor. Since the component cooling pumo motors operata on a 50% duty cycle and the containment spray puso motors are only operated for periodic tests, the expected life of these motors in their application at PSNP is at least twice the equivalent lifetime of 20 years used in the anovg tests. Therefore, these motors are judged to be qualified for 2 x 10 Rads integrated gamma radiation dose and a 40 year qualified life with margin. The potential for unexoected degradation due to aging is addressed by peModic inspections, electrical tests, and mechanical tasts. PeM odic maintenance keeps these motors in an "as new" condition over their 40 year qualified If fe. See Wisconsin Electric's sectameer 11, 1981 letter to Mr. Harold R. Denten concerning response to the PSNP environmental qualification SER (speci-fica 11y Enclosure 1, Section 3.7) for a further discussion of aging.
. The humidity cacability of the motor is stated by the vendor as 100%
relative humidity. The Premium Moisture Resistant (PMR) Class S Insula-tion system in these actors was specifically designed for high resistance to degradation and electrical breakdown due to moisture attack. A laboratory test was run on the insulation system in which motor stators were exposed to 100% elative humidity for one week. The insulation resistance to ground remained above three megaohms for the entirt week. Since the stator insulation is the only part of the motor that could be significantly affected by hign humidity (non-concensing) and hign humidity is not expected in this part of the auxiliary building arr/way, the motors are judged to be qualified for relative humidity. M t.$gm -e' s w % %.% . - ----erm7 '.F_ .-_ , 84
- Q *=Q W ***94, 5 ,- 9 7 8********M r-, -
i A NRC C:ntract N2. NRC.03-79-118 ij0bhrtnklin Rsseuch Center FRC Project N2. C5257 P G2 A Cmsson of Ths Franidin Insutus3 FRC Assignmcnt N2.13 3b 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448.'000 FRC Task No. SC4./So 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .M LICENSEE RESPONSE M NRC SER (Continued)
. The qualified ocerating time- was determined by a review of caen of the i environmental parameters (i.e. , humidity, radiation, and aging) for the required operating time. Since these motors enveloo all of tac soccifice l parameters for the operating time required and have been snown by operating experienes to operata far in excess of the requirec coqrating j time, the motors are judged to be qualified for the required coersting .
l time. 1 4 E 4 1 1 4 1 i i 1 .
. -- .- - . . . :.. . 3 -: ,y. ., y ~ .p -.- r - ---..y+..~~~.----- ., - - - . - ~ . . - -
y , . . 1
- NRC Crntract N3. NRC-03-79-118 A[f) Frank!!n R:serrch Centsr FRC Project No.C5257 PROPRIETARY . P ga A Dmsson of The Frs.nkan insnture FRC Assignment No.13iNFORMATION 5f 20 8 ano nace sir es. Phda.. Pa. 19103(215)448 10 5 FRCTask No. SoG/507 l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. afs.
NOTES: 7'b in id e_m reeth a w_ a A*l
- YtS & m 9 n L- d n AGL emn.. e 6m uo%v\ & heennae n
- u u e g, a t-A s
M 8m"f" dtlaA EM ulen a m ed b b Osth i e 4C1_A des M <=n ss Al .i S inc e
- s - gs 25^-1 . bunen&is fora $ Y l Al%n osan d eCCec49d{
u A io al @.'ceto 4(4 b s4 A N E LR et L oc.A. (T C 9
- TkL h tenset han rt4'erenceA n n~nc le k.tn e.s4 dt h +ka-t4LL mr#nn we re ee . s+ c,. e 4 el rJ id.
D rk ,nm.d. m e soa n s+.s~, r m .. L & (es Rss69 x e y > s D /AM . , bkYMS LaJ d%h t!" I na 9_t), uO M ene** 8 Y EaId i uu u Im_4savaOaale l d l'and.%Y_k e sma t e .n # _ TldL M Ar i s 0 e StA w.MAtd A ce u er,1 imun d e.Meco ted Po.a.la y 6 i o ha WL M a f* HL I A A . N G_ f iM e n _tf e JL M -f" M 0 y ' War e_ & Hema 41aa 4e n k4E h o m41 re_ c an d f ra m I Q lQ VE14inA k_u_ _inO- . 710 r's o tes)ed dae uM a:ded cew.i
- v e-ano a k ; sh c.cM m,'+ k- resneef 4e das +t a -
u q of +kt.eh i n i ci l M s u (f em 4e ine_ e nn s rde nd V Eu t A. bro es-C a a 0*A*5 M _ T at,d an nian u v b - a t? _b 40 a d- eb YA . (1/e we b m 0 e r I 44.ft' A L a kJ. J h J h .4 l_a_a_, m O a a f ,, [a, $4i*frirQA h d ow n _h 3 3
- 0 q i - ud 3meIabA.t,sne_cm;& & Aomhd
. 1 s.
1 . N h DM@ O !N Y r Wi4k re9ec + .4 4ts_g.4poA sm og+ti._p. , l , -n. n. m -
.: ' n,.& - .. . Eme- ... ~ . . n.
h.c.: -
- _, _- _ ._. , - . _ _ l
A,, '
. NRC Contract No, NRC-03-79-118 d!!UU Frankhn Research Centsr FRC Project No. CS257 PROPRIETARY Pags A Cmsen oi The Frankhn insatuts . FRC Assignmant No.131NFORMAT10N 5g 20th and Race Streets. Phde.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. SC4/6o) *r EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.E \
NOTES: 4 l~ e T h I.e e u e s of.w xd oce,0;Ao w dee .nt L 4e ~ 1: N. & E k WJ.
~
J
- nlAO at. bceh /s.dsr i e,g M .
m _ i Q.
- TLA Ire nman ct)n& can,Jda a An o 9,e 1d .
.a j /1h30dna 0. h h he. % a /m o , e m n ce _
V U O i i i j l l 3 1 1 1 l l l -, . .
..,,.,..u. w= ~- - - - - . , - . , . , ...-_w.u.s..;2,...,._,,_..,
# 4 NRC C ntract No. NRC-03-79-118 $b Frank!'n Rssetrch Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 Pago A Duse, of The Fra.Mn Institute FRC Assignm nt No.13 lc 20:h and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa.19103 r215) 448-1W FRC Task No. 50 6 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.M ~
EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 27 ELECTRIC MOTOR LOCATED-IN THE AUXILIARY BUILDING, ELEV. -19' , RER PUMP CUBICLE WESTINGHOUSE MODEL TBDP, FRAME 445TS, THERMALASTIC EP0XY INSULATION REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 YEAR TER CHECKSHEET NO. 27 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 14, 604 FUNCTION (PIANT ID): RESIDUAL HEAT REMOVAL PUMP MOTOR (1-P10A, B) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL (71: SCEW(S): 11-1 DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, RF , P,hCS, 'S , (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, 1 Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Cortents checksheet Page No. Equipment Iten la Sununary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Envircnmental Qualification Sumnary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a,-25, :-, 2' System Consideration Review -0;, th, te, "
, 'c. 'f-Equipment Environmental Qualification Review % , ;b, :c, d, 5;, 5f, 4;, 55, Si, Sj- .-_
Installed TMI Lesnons Learned Impicmentation 62, 55 Equipment Summary - Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7e, 7b, 7 c- i l
~ ~
w.~ vm- n., . .m.sT; . ~ ,. Y. n5&. i _ J;^=Y& . -_." -
6' NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 P g3
'dhranklin Reserrch Cent r ,
A Dmsen of The Frankhn lesritute FRC Asaignm:nt No.13 Ib 20th arid Race Strxts. Phas.. Pa D103 (215) 448-102 FRC Tcsk No. SN /sa)
\
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAL!PICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO., A2. i d
. , <l *+r
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLEr j .
,,1 ,Tne Licensee (has/ hee. not) provided a response to the SER concerns. .
i 1 The Licensee (has/hes siet) specifically stated that the equipment is ~ qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applikable DBE environmental service conditions.
% The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no
- l. Ni s outstanding qualification deficiencies.
The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment j item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the ; Licensee for this equipment item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee: ' Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equip 3ent modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or thield equipment from radiation source verify qual'.fication by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress _._ Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for thi,s equipment item j that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. _ The Licensee (has/has not) provided a .achedule for the proposed i , corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action . .) The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification l and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. -
, DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BAS 2D ON REVIEW
- i - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY
- (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) r I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency .
I.b Modification III.a Exempt l Q Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scbpe l II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available l , i i i .) , 1
..._ m , ...,,p.. . . , - --- , - . . , - - . .- ..
_ m a _. t . y. , i s - i * , y - .% . +. ,,.
a A NRC Contract N3. NRC-03 79-118 J' 0W Frrnkhn R:sench Center FRC Project N3.C5257 P 03 i A Otvmon of The FronWinInsature FRC Assignment No.13 2 h ~ { 20th and Race Sereses. Phde,. Pa. 19103 (215) 444-1000 FRCTask No. EC4/mi EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .A2. s i EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of. Qualification Mequate' X Mequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Mequately X Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Y Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation X Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Mequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Mequate o Required Profile Enveloped Mequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate
, Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Y ^
( Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied ___ Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)
' ~
DESIGNATION - NRC CUAY.IFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b ^ Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X - II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life l or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equiytent Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review l IV Docu:aentation Not Made Available I
?
l I
~ , ' ?%*ST -~W% ; L ,, n . . . .-id.*.% --
2
,_ ._ yff %; a _ _ , _ r; ;y ; ,
.,Cw NRC Contract N2. NRC 03-79118 FRC Project N3. C5257 Pag 3 !2) Frmklin R:se:rch Ccnter . A Desion of The Fianihn Insatuu FRC Assignm:nt N3.13 3a 20th sad Race Streets. Phe.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. ScG/So )
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .d 1 LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER
- r. The safety injeciten (st) aus. Resteusl meat te oves (anni swo. ano the Cantainment Fan Caeler notars are all oestiegneuse esters
=tta Clase 8 *Theree.astic Esesy* fasulatten systems. De insulatten and toering system of tnese seters . ore generically qualtff ee for -
nwietty, restatten, and aging by testing .nten is secuentee in I WCAP=g7S4 (Qualtftcatten Referente 138). The estare .ere soeuentially tasted *me tneraal and voltage strees aging, enspanical cyct feq. aed thereal cycifny to a cualiftee Iffe of as.300 running neurs (f.e.. - greeter tnee S years) and a0 years total If fe et an asetent teperature of 40*C er I*es ene for an integretas reef atten dose of 2 a W taas games. These esters are locates f a tne aust1f ary sulleing =nere taneert-These esters are seerstee an tures are estatatnee less taan a 13 auty seeseen 65 ene 88',F. cycle. Therefore tse esters are juegos ta se emotifies to eserate for more taan a0 years (at 1105 outy) fotfewee ty a ereign-sests accisent atta a post *accicent seeratteg stee of see year. The setenttal for uneseectae degneation ne ta aging ts aseressed Dy se*1eetc inseections, electrical tests, and ses.9antui tests. 8erioef e saintenance seees tsese estars en an *as 9ew* tanettien over their a0 year sueltries Itfe. See eiscsasin Electr*c's testeseer O.1381 fetter ta Mr. Merete 4. "enten concerning reseense ta tse *gMP environ-mental suellfication 5t2 (specifically tactasure 1. Iectten 3.7) for a furtner siscussten af aging. De ;estulatee 5 ac:teent roeistion :sse over one year of less tren a a 13 aacs et11 cause gnegif gisle tegesca-tien cesseree to tne sueltffcation tevel of 2 s la taas. De cualtff-cation 'er 105 relative iwietty es clearly semeestratae ny tre insulation testa of estar statars foersee in tas seter and salt .atar. The qualf fication for 17,05 relative iuntetty of the nearing systas as semenstratae Dy saturated steam (LOCA) tests secumentee in .CA7-7821 (Guellfication taference S). $1nce hign relative humietty is set espected in the austif ary tulleing acywy. taese meters are begee ta te quellff ed for relative %stetty. Inconcluston,treptarsare considerse ovellfies far *f.GE relative iuscity. I a 13 taas games restatten. 40 years aging, ans a cost'acticent coersting time of one yeer in taetr aselication at PSMP. p.. l 1 i i
pjb Fr:nWin R:se:rch Cent:r NRC Contract N3. NRC 03-79-118 FRC Project ND. C5257 Pag 3 A ovi.cn of The Frenann Insmusa FRC Assignm:nt No.13 5f 20m no Race streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. w.1 ara > EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. JL2. NoTzs: 71 a n - ,,,e7.,.a r e., :n n .LAL kL, c_->. a a eta;_ a v v v o a A A An*= h - OY Or.AinAD_ (3.MAtinE Q V TkL llhtn 800 he f't S M B k 4.1 e A D - R 1 '</ cm
- n1J J om >- 1*L2s f ' . Ps R so,t enh Ll:5=>
- v u- u 4 + xb l 2H.d & .n_a & 4.2a;91 %gn. A s.
sJ.wx+A l~.,,xuac#-..-udi 4 ee4 u J % d.
. v y 9 1
- we.np-evsq > A_I A a - H:J 1:1s J aa m ,.,
v o i r w ntu % .(~s J as cin-n a l '_'. h (Md. 0 0 TLt h e e a a n & ><d ~D d u w 0~ L AL,3 I hL.L nn w ~ t., f i n en+ ? mJs 11lo L ~ i V V M cla h i w,,a'daAi 4.Ln.j= A-w ad A_e no cf . r i /
- 7tt h w e 1.no & ,.L.JtAA w e n kl. Ma M And w: aid a V
H , .,r G.y, U ' W +bL i k $sa A A A E -0 3=_N * ^ Adu o I{ob r.IeW __ MU w.
- T$Jl. l41 n an_ k an J a t s.A e n.e] j ,- e e / ,, . d _, J l
nekL 0u A eG Louw /M.' J o i l
- Tit );w - An < <L rhA n a ud- o Ju'M g yy u Fen. n Ac'. A * % 2r & +/s. hfn L N j*_r_3! J _
- 'I W f
&m $ A n i/ h fs5__0
- I i
g ' [s*
-_.V,- - _ " - ' - .' '%.m F '
t 1 * < 's " ' ' 9! *h- '
* '.7 7 hs. . _ _ . . . , _ _ _ = . . ' _ _ _ _ _ . ~ . . - _ -
A NRC Crntract No. NRC-03-79118
' . J Frank'in Res: arch Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 Page A c,wson oi The Frar.en insn wis FRC Assignm':nt No.13 lc 20:n and Race stre ets. PMa.. Pa. 19103 (2:5) 44s.;ono FRC Task No. 50 lo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. oU EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 28 ELECTRIC MOIOR LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT, ELEV. 46' AND 66' WESTINCHOUSE MODEL ABDP, FRAME 504US, CLASS B TERMALASTIC EP0XY INSULATION j
REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 YEAR TER CHECKSHEET NO. 28 l LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 14, 604, 606
. FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CONTAINMENT AIR ACCIDENT FAN COOLER MOTOR (1-WlA1, B1, ! C1, D1) ! LICENSEE SUBMITTAL [7]: SCZW(S): VIII-l DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY:
(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, RT, P, H, CS, S, (R) , M, I, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la Susanary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, M , 2;, 2d I System Consideration Review ";, C, i, 40, Oo, Of l Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, 5b, Sc, 5d, Se, 5f, 1
,3 , ~, L , ~,1, ~;
I 1 l Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation L, 'L
! Equipment Summary
{ Maintenance ana Replacement Schedule Summary 7a, 't, 7;-
,_.u.-,..<,-....m, , .. mw.;,- r.7 . ;.... .
# 2 NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 '2Nrank!1n Resetrch Cent:r FRC Project N2,C5257 Pag 3 A DNun of The Frankhn Insn ws FRC Assignm:nt No.13 lb
, 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 '215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. are C /SD ) EQUlPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2d
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES '10 THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: 1 Tne Licensee (has/' ; ..;;; provided a response to the SER concerns. ! 1 The Licensee (has/h) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.
~
A The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment _ Equipment modification _ Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source _ Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other (__ ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action -
. )
_ The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification , and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC OUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEN
- CIRCLED ITDI ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt Q Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available
- p g N S 4 "-
g [ , g. g 1g ed Mg*,'g h* O & 4 W b M OdEiin. %. J T
J 4 NRC Centract N3. NRC-03-79-118 P:g3 MU Franklin R:se:rch Ccnt:r FRC Project N3. C5257 A om on o(The Frankhn insature FRC Assignrnant No.13 2 20th and Race Sweets. Phde.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. S84 /So) EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. SC.L j EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: f X = DEFICII:NCY - NRC REQUIREMENTS l Documented Evidence of Qualification Mequate . Mequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Mequately X Qualified Life or ReplacementiSchedule Established (If Required) X l Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation
; Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) M .
Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures i o Peak Temperature Mequate e o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required)- Adequate criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied 4 Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied X Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies j (If Any) Satisfied
; Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied I ! Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) i DESIGNATION:
NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY l I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established Y
, II.b Equipment Not Qualified l II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life ! cr Replacement Schedule Justified 1 III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification ! III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review l IV Documentation Not Made Available l
a . I 1 1 1 l
-, :n . . n, . . m- .- _ . - . . .
ed'A
- NRC Contract N:. NRC-03 79118 Peg.3 MJ Fr nkun R: search Ccnter FRC Project No. C5257 A bsson of The Franun Insosuse FRC Assignment N2.13 3a 20th and Race Streets. PMe.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. SMho 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .AS.
I LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER i AA. The centefamant fan cooler esters f acluding toering fuericant ene gewer caele selices more environmentally testes Dy vestingneuse Electr1C i Cerstraties as estimentee in WCAP*IS29. Relates testa for sletter Estere sees eutales containment are escumentee fe hCAP=47$4. The statere of the esters testes werey to an eeufvalent of 40 years in namel service by the method of Isms Standare 134 The *'e is emelffted for aging er esentin4 e orience one seering I" ire testa of 13.000 hears and tne fact that the grease is reelaces annually. Sface the enters are only escreted far perteste testa and the nereel aseient tammereture of tne astere is fees tnan 10S'F. tne grosse is not es-Sectes to age significantly ever one year. The esters were aise scenenically ane siteetten ages. The getantial for weseptet osernea-tien eue to aging is nearessee ey seriodic inosections, eiectrical tests, ans escaenical testa. Perieefc setntanance seems tnese notars In an 'as Reu d Caneitien ever tnotr 40 year euelf fies 'lPe. See etscansfn Electric's 5estanser 11. 1301 letter ta nr. parete 4. :enten concoming ressense to tne etna environmental evallficatten stA (seeciffcally inclosu m 1. Section 2.7) for a furtnee ejec.asten se agieg. D e estar ane gnese were aise f resetatae to 2 s to taea samme restattaa ta account for nemet ane accieent caetatten. The caele solices .ece not pre egos er ore-freediates or*er to cesign-easts event (:88) testf ag, sut tae selfces are cualtfies ey senarete effects testa ano analysee (see note (). T%e CSE testa steulatae LOCA conettiene instee tPe containment. **e taasereture ans sressure test arsfiles enveloose tne eseutree scoff tes. N cPeeHeal sersy censistee of 1.a3 weignt percent (25C0 com) teric acid (M330 ) auffered vita sesf ue 9yerestee (NeGM) te a sM tecueen 9.5 and 10.3. . f t De*1c acte cancentration 18 Mgner and tne an is eit3fn the range seeC1fice for #gPP. Therefore, the emergenC'/ fan coeter unit fs consteered qualiffee for tausersture, pressure. c?amical serty, restatten, and aging. The nintetty casanf1f ty of tae seter is demonstretas sy tae saturates staan essesure for seven cays at is psig. The containment conettiene at penP are ensected to return te nereal escent for restation ene mustetty within 12 neurs of the accieent fattiatten. The meter unit to
- a. - : ty atr unica nas been erosa tnrougn a coef fag unit unten removes entsture and tDe seter nas an integrel nest escnanger cooler.
Thefen tae meter seule not se essesee to 1005 relative 9unteity air for long periees of stes. The Deering system nas been testae f n oosta LOCA consistene for 13.000 hours (alsest tue years) (see M7194L. Tag 8L. 78144, one 7722!.) at 175'F. Therefore. as states in 'a AP=7829 r
' features caneteeres te se smallff ee but not aselfcitly preven ey testa in accareence vita !!II 234 f aciuse long-stre (e te one year) sost-acc1eens eseration of neet escnanger seteet,
- t. This caele solice fs steitar out not feentical to the enes successfully tastes en aeference 13. The containment ran cooler estar selfce (westingneuse Omg. No. *06C391) was casserve in cetatt ta the safeguares a fnetes contalment self ce (Secntal Oug. no. SE t-145 tev.1) usee '
elsemnere in the cantai ment. The 8ecatet solicos use General Electric Ca. RTV-102 Tyee ETV aeneef ve/seelant en tne coneuctars. =nereas tne meetingneuse fan caster ester selfce uses Deu Carning segg 4TV. These anterials are similar in their resistance to aging and resiation i engreestion. In any case, they perfers ne cettical function after the insulatten is la place. The tecntal solice uses Raycnem Tyse 574 (Illfcone tuseer) nest sneineasle tusing for insulatten. The westing = nouse selfce uses Scotca 870 silicane ruseer *.aoe in tarse layers (wita nelfalasetng) alternated atta MICA tase and surrounced wita a vesting = nouse sittcone ruoter-glass tame everall. The s11f tene ruecer yteles tae insulating and tensile streegta sresortf es reeutree for Sata settces. State the stitcone ruseer perferes the crittcal functions on meta seltces, the tue selfces are juegos ta emnisit feentical resistance ta esgreestion free aging ane restation. note tnat eacn selfte =es testad seeerstelyfortneetnerLOCA/>(L4environmogtalsarasotars. In asettien, seearata effects testing ta 2 s la aacs gamme radiatten ano steen essesure (see wCAP=7829. Taele 22) en vestingneuse silfenne rummer-glass tase. Scoten e70 tase. ane Sew Caming segg tTV coment snes ne sfgniffcant effects. Thgrefore,sincethelecstalselfce=es sueltfies to 40 years and 2 a 10 taas game esetation. the westtegneuse selfce f s consteeres evalf ffee to the same Itaits.
~.
on.- ,ym - =. e. p *n .~, - . , . _K3 -
.OQ - *"C'**"'r*" -
#N NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-79-118 P;g3 CLNnklin R:srtrch Cent:r FRC lir; ject Ns. C5257 A Dimn ol The ft:nahn inst: uis FRC Arsignm:nt No.13 50
- D h aad Rue Sneets. PMa . Pa. 19103 (215) 448 !M FRC Tash No. 26/9 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REV EW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 38 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW Criteria: DOR Guidelines ; NUREG-0588, Cat. I ; NUREG-0588, Cat. II .
i . i NRC REQUIREMZNTS DEFICIENCY 1 WITH SECTION REFERENCE , LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR ~ l (DOR /0 58 fs-I/O 588-I I) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.) EQUIPMENT DESCRIPT g ! , ! g, jg,44,;g ,y,4,g. !
! Equipment Type !Clet +e t t- ! ! ! m.4,_
Manufacturer's Name ' (5.2.2/-/-) s41 3W lWestiyk8kel
- 1
' 1 *ASOF N/A !
Model Numcer (5.L 2/-/-) ;go g peamg*, . g Serial Number I *. p/A !
. . 1 Features / Mounting Cloaep g . M*
- O
! 2a kp M f (5*2*6/-/-) : .
g *M$ W- ! g g y+y,tc. E pa ng W.E. ' Connections / Interfaces 141c to ua%. I Air io wade.r t-(x
- Woff. .T.
(5.2.6/-/-) ! Hi I l* Location / Elevation !CenMwmed! Equipment ID No. Wlpl, gs;(, g QUALIFICATION REPORT ! ! ! (8.0/5.0/5.0) ! ! ! Report ID Number !w t. A P Pgtg 'hac,Ap. g g
! APM N, Report Date 4pr ;g yg' .f Issued by w s. ! w.S +3 g e34.i gk,.4 , f l Prepared for 4u ! wesingLe-Asl.
f . . f.
, Referenced Reports !,,+sfitad ! n>. F S W !
Qualification Method ! g ! g[P I (5.1, 5.3/2.1, 2.4/2.1, 2.4) 13 ! - l ! ! ! l QUALIFICATION TEST PROGRAM ! ! ! ! 5 Functional Test Description ! nesA ! / DIC k N 'C'" N I l l (5.2.5/2.2.9/2.2.9) 1 ! !
- 1 ! !
l Operating conditions !
! s)/st- !l g g ;,g p,g, l (-/2.2.10/2.2.10) ! 0
- Ioad/ Cycles / Voltage / ! ! 00 Y 'A !
l Current /Freq. ! ! M H%*r artch t-- ! l \ g Y g , % ,_j * ? "b" s *
- t % s, l
A NRC Contract N2. NAC-03 79-118 Pag 3
!dll Fr nklin R: search Cent:r FRC Project N2. C5257 A Div=en of The Frankun lasmv:e FRC Assignment No.13 $b l 20th and Rue Seecs. Phde.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. SCG /607
- EQUlPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .ad. j NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)
Acceptance criterla !WJA 1 #f 6ts.Ed 1 (5. 2. 5/2.,2.1/2. 2.1) ! ! ! Accuracy (5,2.5/-/-) kd4 h M 4T P l iM h Number of Specimens ! #/4 ! l ! Test Instruments Calibrated ufA . netsi M , Safety Function (Active / !g4;g ! gg, ! Passive) (-/2.1.3/2.1.3) ! ! ! Test Duration (5.2.1/-/-) doLae [s-iL,+ e N k
! I !
tettk Accident Duration (Envir. ! l g,g , ! , ! Above Normal) (5.2.1/-/-) .! ! ! Required Function Time !1 % ! ! Test Sequence (General) ! ! Ap[meck.54ress[34.,fpen/, ! (5.2.3/2.3.1/2.3.1) Test Sequence (NUREG-0588, ! ! Cat. I) (-/ 2. 3.1/-) ! ! !
- 1. Representative Sample ! ! !
- 2. Baseline Data ! ! !
- 3. Performance Extremes ! ! !
- 4. Thermal Aging ! ! !
- 5. Radiation Aging ! ! !
- 6. War Aging ! ! !
- 7. Vibration / Seismic ! ! !
- 8. DBE Exposure ! ! !
- 9. Post-DBE Exposure ! ! !
- 10. Inspection ! ! !
Aging ! ! ! l (5.2.4, 7.0/4.0/4.0) ! pebbF.d !2 [Amo*C !X Uof t A , Thermal Aging / Basis ! ! ! l Material Aging iMSN knot st*I4d k Evaluation (7.0/-/-) ! Materials Susceptible kGwe4A., Int; 5 pp.4 S k , (Thermal) (5.2.4, 7.0/-/-) ! ** *
- la'45t ka! !
Radiation Aging, Type !y 1g '
-. -- , _.n-.,, s. m. ...:,- - _
NRC Contr:ct Na. N RC-03-79-118 A((Nnkhn R:scarch Cent:r FRC Pr: Ject NO. C5257 . Pag 3 A Dmsson oi The Fr:nuin instruts FRC Assignm:nt No.13 Sc 20th and Race Saeets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1 @ 0 FRC Task No. Sbc /So ) EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .Ad. NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIDICY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.) e e e Radiation Aging, Dose (rd) * -( got AX 100( h. + Ap.Q
; ! 1 -
Radiation Aging, Dose Rate ! M3W n. +9p! pa t c.; M ! Radiation Aging, Method , ! ,, j p Materials Susceptible ' (Radiation) (5.2.4, 7.0/-/-) !s
! m.4ew ,e g nb sp.,
O *MMN@. ! epe.ee 1
, Operational Aging ! ! t week ed A D *F/ip3;qG !
(-/4.2/-) ' ' Other Age Conditioning ! ! ! (-/4.2/-) ! ! ! Qualified Life Claimed / ! Established (5.2.4/4.10/-) ! WP f
' j X AhM A,3 1 1 !
Normal Ambient Temperature Normal Amnient Radiation
!Q$4 Normal Ambient Humidity ! ! !
On-Going Surveillance .and !re M y ! !
. Preventive Maintenance ! p ! ! ?
(7.0/-/-) ! ! ! On-Going Analysis of ! ! ! i ; Failures and Degradation ! ! . ! i (7.0/-/-) ! ! ! i ! ! ! Margin (General) ! ! ! , . (6.0/3.0/3.0) ! ! ! l ! ! ! ! ; Margin (NUREG-0588, ! ! ! Cat. I) (-/3.2/-) ! ! ! i 1. Temperature (+15'F) 1 ! !
- 2. Pressure (+10%, ! ! !
j 10 psig max) ! ! ! I t 3. Radiation ! ! ! (not required) ! ! !
- 4. Time (+10%, +1 hour ! ! !
{*
; + function time minimum) ! ! !
I, i ! 4 l i
- - ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ - ~ ~ - - --~ ~v~- m- ~* : ~7.- p- m e m , , - - - .
l
A NRC Contract Ns NRC-03 79-118 ONhrrnklin Rrsearch Crnt:r .FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 P;g3 A Divm.on of The Franklin Insntute FRC Asalgnment No.13 5d 20th and Race Sweets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. W/ro7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. ML 4 NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUAI.IFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.) ACCIDENT CONDITIONS 1 1 1 1 ! ! IDCA/MSLB/HELB/ Uncontrolled ! L 6 c.4 ! t.cc, A ! (4.1, 4.2, 4.3.1, 4.3.3/ ! ! ! 1.1, 1.2, 1.5/1.1, 1.2, 1.5) ! ! ! Radiation Type ! ! &* !
!y ! ! -
Radiation Dose (rd) ! l,gxio& R ! g 1 (4.1.2/1.4/1.4) ! W.+4ag) ! 'Yb ! Radiation Dose Rate (rd/hr) ! %4m2ii/ ! mt4% Tad ! Radiation Qual. Method ! 4pW 1 +ss.+ 6@ ! (5.3.1/-/-) ! ' ! ! Proxi:nity to Concentrated ! ! . ! Radiation ! ! ! (4.1. 2/1. 4. 6/1. 4. 6) ! ! ! Equipment Susceptible to Beta Radiation (4.1.2/-/-)
! Mf,W !! M s1M I !x gd Radiation Dose (Normal + 1,gg ! 1 Accident) ( 4.1. 2/-/-) !g ! AMgS !
Plateout Dose Considered !u ! no ! g gjef g. 4 (-/1. 48/1. 48) 1 ! ! Galsna + Beta Dose (rd) 1 ! ! ( 4.1. 2/1. 4. 7/1. 4. 7) ! ! !
. 7,-- - ,r; t. .- .. , wn n. s w.. m: ;;;_2, a. . r:m" ~ ~ ~~~= r:w = -
i
& NRC C:ntract No. NRC-03-79-118 1 ';hd Franklin Research Centsr FRC Prcject No. C5257 Ptga !
A Divmon of The Frankhn Insnruta FRC Assignm nt No.13 5e , 20th and Race $rreets. Phila.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. faa/4a7 ) EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _M NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE No.) ENVIRONMENTAL PROFILE 1 1 !
, OF ACCIDENT CONDITIONS ,
Rate of Temp./ Press. . lt.S*F/.A. 5 Increase ! ! ! Peaks 'F/psig/RH/ Time Ag0*P[yy[po k 313 F[7 7paigfleeb[q ja, ! Decrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time /50[g ;/m/ i Decrease To: *F/psig/RH/ Time ! ! ! Decrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time ! ! ! Equipment Surface Tempera- ! !
!g eure (MSLB) (-/1.2.5.C, 2.2.6/1.2.5.C, 2.2.6) ! ! !
Spray Qualification Metnod ! I
! g* ! .Y 4 p 4,3.t- !
' (5.3.2/1.3, 2.2.8/1.3, 2.2.8) ! ! ! Spray Composition ! g3po3.gggg ! p H 9.6 +o /c !
' (4.1.4/1.3, 2.2.8/ ! tel h pH9.P 2! !.% w.pt% $b03"A340H}!
l 1.3, 2.2.8) 1 ! # ! I Spray Density (gpm/f t 2) {ggW {.t5 W e M { l ! ! Spray Duration ' Asg !4 f l Submergence Duration l (4.1.3/2.2.5/2.2.5) ! ! I In-Leakage Considered ! ! StM d(enep fn ! j (5.2.6, 5.3.2/-/-) ! ' gressuee. A') ' 2 Time to Suomergence '! ! !
] ! ; Dust Environment ! ! (-/2. 2.11/ 2. 2.11) ! ! !
1, i _. J l i I T I .. . . . ~ . . . _.,-~. ---.,..-_.-..-.~;--s---,- =.-..: . , ~ . . - - - - , . - - - , , . , .
1
, NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 nklin Rsserreh Center FRC Froject N3. C5257 Paga A Dmson of The Frtnkhn Insntut's FRC Asilgnm:nt Ns.13 5f 20th and Race Streets. Phita.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44310m FRC Task No. er. /40 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M NOTES:
e rl_n- a da rea> ' . . - > L*] a t.: % s+.a- le - . a e ne_u a u o u = 1 rad :c._N-_ el n-
- o catan a A &_%-Aesta'- tlat1r .<eei1 g/ U c a,Adu =' 5in mo w uland < Mso es. 19)a_j La-. Q s,,,ae Q
Q0 ( h 5a3 ina w:,.fu.ada r+ sk al M W ~ MI- l att a 4e w . t JJ v A', e w h m> a o L,'] n o,wt L. 4 a,,, ,o s J k I 6 [ ~' q J l 6 a/Ja-med i eo4i M *w u i 4k + /JL e a' aa I Ia* $14 S e 4%. . o V V A 4Lt U lle A JA. J O 'e T * $h 0$a Y~h $ -J K ' L& U ^ bIek L bY W 0 U mEu.'YO '&L n., & .'.i Y__ A_. a 4 A Q. cIar a B $ E (~40% s:= a e _ vo% a.i.m,t.A A a a i 3- d J_Wie. G tjele a :.rb. Neo n on la wMm a d w>dal J 41. wL c ,as% n i
. , .y n u .i g him.aI4m rabfa^i*-
_ .(mM L 1 -b_t4A.ana--' b e_lamoANL) G co4 e s:- aC A 9-8 754 e 2 U. 'A= - JA U /Ss 4 4+eca t'A l.a. - ~ ad~ c_lans R /* .:. -f, tlc. It ** - >= L n n e-+ = n t LL'
~ .., n -u..:..iw _ w.+ a,1 g Q C A P.79 19 h # ca /. Jn a_ . 8 1 J It h h __ ,.4.a_
e d d.oA s i e la bd4e a.f- y M V O u A ) O k '4 : T k li w M o W Y t w*,In r ed & > $$n-in n $1+& uJ fV j '
'" h - E fL crA E 6 h k i.etcI. ~
_ w i m /a t ) I .* -__ _ ce,tt-a -l # ,l.., w re , A h i y -*,m -vey -
.-*;,-- ,.,,;, , , = = ._ =.--,y- f s .pg _ _,; ;y.. _.
A NRC C ntr ct No. NRC-03-79-118 Edd Fr nklin Research Cent:r FRC Pr; ject N3. C5257 P;go A Cimon of The Franwin instauta FRC Assignmcnt NO.13 7a, 20tn and Racs Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 1215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. So G 15o 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. aft. MAINTENANCE AND REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE SIEMARY The following information regarding the maintenance and replacement schedule (s) for components, sub-components, and materials has been provided by the Licensee. . RepI03 f- b O I b / i i
}
t
.. . . . - - . . . . -, , . - . - - - - .:--,-.,--~~ ~ ~- - , -:. : --~~~_
4 2 NRC Contract No. NRC-03 79-118 Pags Sh Franklin Rese:rch Cent:r FRC Pr: Ject Ns. C5257 A Division of The Franklin Insnrute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 2cth and Race Sweets. Phda.. Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Tack No. 80 (* EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF IQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M
~
EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 29 ELECTRICAL CABLE SPLICE LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT, ELEV.15' WESTINGHOUSE DRAWING NO. 206C391 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 YEAR TER CHECKSEEET NO. 29 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 639, 606 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): , ELECTRICAL SPLICE FOR CONTAINMENT AIR ACCIDENT FAN COOLERS (1-WlA1, B1, Cl, D1) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL [7]: SCEW(S): VIII-3 l DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, @t, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,
~
(Notstated)Notapplicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sunusary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 25, 2 , 24 System Consideration Review it, St. i;, id, I;, if Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 52, ;L, 5;, 53, ;., Sf, Sg, 5h, Oi, ;j Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 5;, fi Equipment Sununary Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Sununary 1., 75, 7;
-.. .- - n , . . z x,, nm n . . . . :.w__ _ _ . . _ = . . .. . . , ~ . , -
l l , A NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 M Franklin Research Centsr FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 P@ A DW on of The Frsnkhn insrate FRC Asalgnm:nt No.13 Ib Nth and Race Streets. Phta.. Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. Sof, /f4 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.,2 9 l
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC DER '- CNLY CI'ECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: ;
- I
\
f X Tne Licensee (has/. __ .._ _; provided a response to the SER concerns. . ! I i l The Licensee (has/ hee-not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will ' function when exposed to the applicable DBE
- environmental service conditions. '
2 The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. j ,__ The Licen,see (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. i Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for tnis equipment item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Etguipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)
. Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )
The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim j operation. l The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed j corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)
; The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.
DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY SASED ON REVIEW l - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) i I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency l I.b Modification III.a Exempt I LII.a Qualification Not Establishedl III.b Not in Scope II.o Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available
?
_e . ?, ., e , #
m __ _ __ ___ __ - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - A NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 P g3 00br:nklin Research Center FRC Project Nc. C5257 A DMaon of The Frenan Inamme FRC Assignment No.13 2 Ekh aad Race Sews. Phdao Pa.19103 (215) 4481000 FRCTask No. 50 #f"o7 j EQUtPMENT ENVIRONMSNTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M l l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM 1 DESIGNATION: l NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY i
- Documented Evidence of Qualification Mequate Mequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established 4
^
Aging Degradation Evaluated Mequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:
- o Peak Temperature Mequate o Peak Pressure Mequate o Duration Mequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)
DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established 1 II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review l IV Documentation Not Made Available l T' EY [(y .. 3 . "Yd7,~ y,- -"* * '] -
. _ w] =as ;", et* .- ,.,ep--__ _ ,,
~ .
A NRC Contrrct No. NRC-03-79-118 N3 Frankhn Riseuch Center FRC Project No. C5257 Piga A Otvmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 30 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. #o &/D 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. W LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER t. AA. De containment fan cooler meters inclueing tearing luericant and gemer caele solices were omstrennentally tastee ey westingneuse Electric Carperetten as e m tee in WCA b 7829. Reletae testa for stattar esters usee eutates containment are secumentee in WCAb 4754. The - staters of sne esters-testee were ages to an eeutvalent of so years in nereel service ey tne nouse of !!!! Stanears 334. The gnase is qualified for aging ey eserating esserience ane nearing itto tests of 13.000 hours ane tne fact that tae gnese la restacee annually. Stace the seters are only esersted for periodic testa and tae nonal aseient tassersture of ue meters is less taan 10$'F. tae grease is not en-sectae to age significantly over one year. The notars won also tecnanically and vibration ages. The potential for uneseeetre cegraca- - tien eue ta aging is aderessee ny perieetc inspections, eiestricti tasta, ane escaanical tests. Perieetc maintenance seecs tress sotars f a an *as new* canettien over taetr e4 year cualifice It fe. See wisconsin i (1ectric's leouseer 11. 1541 letter ta we. aarste 4. Santen carcerntng i ressense ta tne flM7 environmental qualiff cation Stjl (specifically
! tactosure 1. Section 3.7) for a furuer ejscussten sf aging. TPo estar ane grease were also irradiated to 2 e ic facs gamma restatten ta acesunt for nereal ano accident rectatten. Be caste soltees were eet pre-ages er pre-irrastatae prior ta sesign-sasts event (:!!) testing, sus ce solfcss are qualifies zy seoarsta effecta tasta ano analyses (see nota (). .
The Ott tests simulated LOCA canettions insica tae contatement. The taasersture and pressure test sref tles enveloces tae recuirse profiles. The caemical spray consistee of 1.43' weignt percent (21CC :ss) norte acte (Is,80,) buffene vita soef um nyerestee (MACH) ta a Ort tetween f.$ ane 10.0. *This teric acia cancentration is nigner and tse an is vitain tne range specified for PEMP. Therefore, tne sergency fan eseler unit is consteene qualified for tassersture, pressure, enesical soray, restatten, and aging. l The nimHetty casast11ty of tne notee f s semenstrates my the satunted l 1 staas excesure for seven says at 18 psig. The containment caneittens J at PgNP are ea0ected to return te nereal excest for rastation and huntetty witain 12 neurs of the accisent initiatfen. The metar unit is surrouneee ty air unica nas been erswa tarougn a casting unit .nten removes seisture and tae notee has an integral neat escaanger esoter. Thefere, tne setse veule not se assesse ta 1001 relative numidity atr i for long periees of time. The hearing system nas seen testae in oost-LOCA cenettions for 15.000 hours (41eest two years) (see wCAb7315L. l 7494L. 7414L. ane 7722L) at 173*F. Therefore, as statec in wCAh 7823, t "featune esasicered ta te qualified tut not emolicitly preven ny tasts in accareance vita !!!! 334 tectuee long-ten (uo ta one year) sost-acticent oserstion of neet eacnanger matars. i,
; t. This caele sollce is slettar but net icentical to the ones suc:essfully tasted in Aeference it. The containment fan coe'er estar solita i i' (Westingneuse Owg. Me. 206C091) was comoaree in cetatt to us safrivares instes containment solica (leental Owg. No. 5K-E-153, tev.1) usee l alsewnere in tse cantainment. The locatel spitess use General Electric
! Ca. tTV-102 Type 4TV acnestve/ sealant en tse conductors, unenas tse l , westingneuse fan cooler estar solice uses Cow Carning #89147V. These materials are sta11ar in Voir netstaMa ta aging ace radiatten degensation. In any case. they perfere no critical function after tae insulatten is in alace. The 8eental splice uses Eaycase Tyge 514
, (5titesne funcer) neat snrinmaale tuatr.g for insulation. The westing-nouse solice uses Scaten #70 stitcone rucaer tape in taree layers (wita j half-lapoteg) alternatae vita MICA tace ace surrowneee vita 4 '*esting- ! Meuse stitcone ruecer glass taos overall. The stitcone ruccer yieles , tne insulating and tenstle strengtn properties recutree for sota solices, Since ce silicone ruocer perferes ce crittcal funettens en sotn -j solices, tne two solices are judged to uniett tcentical resistance ts } esgrecattan free aging and restation. Mets that eaCa saliCe was testas secarately far the etaer LOCA/Mt13 environnegtal parameters. In asettlen, seearsta effects testing to 2 a la Raes games ractatten and steam emessure (see WCAh7823. Taele 22) en westtagneuse stitcsee .
russer-glass tase, Scoten 870 tape, and Ocw Carning et99 47 casent
, snow ne significant effects. Thgrefore, since the locatel salica was s qualifies to 40 years and 2 a la Raes gama raatation. t3e westtegneuse j splice is constoeroe evaliftee to the same 11eits. %. .ev - . ,- - - . er- _ ,n .g;. . n .. , -- ,,.-,-y-,
#A NRC Contract No. NRC-03 79-118 03bu Franklin R:serreh Cent:r FRC Project N3. C5257 P:g3 D. von of The Frankhn Insnture FRC Assignment No.13 5f 'thh . and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. fd d/f d'"r EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 23 NOTES:
The report cited by the Licensee as evidence of cualification makaa no mention of the solice described on the licensee SCEV sheet. Someffically cha-report identifes the drsian features which were cualified as f o 11 nt.rn t
'. . ?l , ; " . I,' , ',. . ~ ' TABLE 2 ' .. 6 i ." 5. "~ - DESIGN FEATURSS CUALIFIED*' -
Bearing 'Sests - Same labyrintn seal uwd en every rootor Bearings - Antifriction, heat stabilized ,
~ - , -
Shaft float .C55 to .105 in , Bearing looseness .0012 to. 0023 in . . Lubricant .Wastinghouse S#773A773-G05 frradiated to 2x1G8 rods for all tests
~
Lands - Silicone rubber insulated ~.. . Space heaters -- Required on all motors ~, , , Oversize terminal boxes - Required on all motors U -1
~
Insulation voltage class - Westinghouse uses one class above N.P. rating
. insulation ~ thermal rating - C: ass F; Class A design level.
Quality Control - QCS.1 required Avoid aluminum and zine - Westinghouse uses only brazed rotors Mounting configuration - Any ~ Insulation hot spot in steam - 200*C Windings - S'mgfe or dual
- The same motor was tested with and without a heat excharrer.
[6o63 The report does, however, indicate a qualification level for radiation resistance as describ/d in table 22 as reproduced on page 5g. $ ,o [ WE w- w
- O -
1$g \ =-.a [ '- . g -- #
_. . ~.
.:4 m . !' 8 O c 'i e -c fa <=
a la T 3
'a M - E g>3 2 9 N
J m - 3 E.
... . . Z E5=
q .n 3 a TABLE 22 .'. '. .. 4 .:. r. m IE
*, '"t.1. i;' ;. N ' i . 7 ~ *< $_ f *;f,, E ?AATERIAL EXPOSuilE TEST DESULTS 3 .x.,,... 3 != . :o , r Maiorial Descsiption ~
8 Effect of 2 m 10 R>Js . Elfcct Af St i.n - -
~ ^~
E. ksdese ..5' Conchison f
, O z 7IQ er, 3 . . .
E 7 w...co .s.isoae
.. c. ...
m 4)E a g l Monor lead catJe Llehisuttaaing i-
. c. ., ., e. q ,.f, ' O .. .
Susfase safacahig l , 8 *,; . Ascepiatte *, , , , , , 2 tis
.l AtJwc-Giese Tage ~
- :. ~4 5 Sconcli 70 Tape spilte ear.a Nei poilcsa:de ,. Noi segrJf.c sas .1 ,-:'....
. .- , , ' . . . . . .. , . Act:ptatdo , . > , . > u G . .', : r-A'a. y 0:tonee Tap spike see - . .; ..Nos acaysalde .
g I;utAred sad snasale, , '.f(,@y.,;_1? C '-C g ' ' weap.e..e he uu.2 te : eece eier suAC eiur.aed a weeked '.,'.5,*gady wha'ni.( ruessned'sne.tledcallv#*, :
., u. r.a : - ~ *- >
Naopreas Elech Lead ws.s,esos (LAC) stiffensd & esoebed WedericJ swshaal.sus ; * ; * . . . I,. r- 5
.*%i. -- :i;H *., Aglyc+*
5
- whh care i :4 -
8
~ . . , . ** v . W 'e; ,- 3 .l Cook nsop eae Onken (MACI dia:c,sied ' ~~
Omkeamt snJ hl;.saad . .' 3
- l'",h.;. Ge( la so 9eeselen O.
c < . . . Het scespeadse .
. . , ., s >
ei.. ora.a.u m. so s.dke kli - cruded la s") p.la sneeni ,:. -j nnnz
,2 .m_ .. .
O "DDDD I Westaaviovie ~ tast a.caan Dek gesea ia ian . Giudened when v us%sJ
- undna 155 C
.i '* . ; imaw. ' ' ' Acceptatdo evitida
Healia ' Z oooo
-0 >
5#773A P 73G05 4 krs faed ei l'MC O
. ~ -
m g a"U o Leed Splice 20",C338, tut 6 he e peifacaai s , Nos sl,alikeni i
. c; .. ...,; ; ;Acceptai>Ie ;. gyg xog+ 3 < z3 g
ca.k cemrai saiahi cosat chads ,,-~ weauaed and e.rtsaitted ,,,-,- * .8.,Uee idisi semisen, , ,
. o S .+ zg .. . <y, . . , .
suoioad n 2e7 ca . a cuamas. i.e. ca.k.aea n. e s w i a:#,ci _:..,. . . ,,. Acc pe.ue,. _, r# g ,o oz sceoi>=aa n ms e no cuadas. sac.: o ya.s . ;,. ... .u. .a,aaksai r etrus y, S. . . . . . . .4. t .;4a.apioide . ,. q , O o z Q- i
...... n m e o u. 2 ., :. ct ....p) a, .,
gr a ae,iside ocese sea n.r.v. sea.ai mi nu.a. . . P woi.i,ar m . u , 3.;
, sod .
y O P, a ~y'<.i...t . ' ,. .,EAmepi.ede'; * ... r oC as4o a.T.v. .ea.a. mi e.u.a. noi enuai .
~ .
c c oC arie c,ev coa-ai . Si e w ai nai es :sciai . !- . y 3 . Aases.wej c!;.j .,. g- J g DC 103 Wh.se isacelucani Daskeaed
'. DeskeaeJ st,jaeticsaaly .s. * , .: Une entien care E m .a , Z N, Faiai 86alahee se l' seed la Agq>aadle F. r'. -4 - = + -4 j 0 m , 6' , E i
LJ z i O s .,
% u ,o' o 4 e a
b i . .
..e- - - -- -a- -
4!!00U Fr:nk!!n Research Ccnter NRC Contract N3. NRC-03 79118 FRC Project N2.CS257 Pago A bon of The Frankhn insmuw FRC Assignment No.13 - 5h mh and Race Sweets. Phas.. Pe. 19103(2151 448 1000 FRC Task No. (a 4 / f d'7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. df NOTES: Regarding the applicability of WCAP-7410L to the solice, note E (Reoroduced on page 3a) states that the construction is similar and could be considered qualified. However this evaluation sucears to be in conflict with the documentation provided by the licensee as evidence of cualification of cable solices. An excerpt from IPSR 211 is reoroduced below. II . R EFERENCE GEllER AL 1:0T'E 3, USE OF SCOTCH TAPE LAYERS OVER CO:!;ECTOR IS !!OT ACCEPTABLE, BECAUSE SPLICE TdSTS FOR AEf DID' t:0T II CLUDE Y 'S AllD T'S Wi!ERE SKOTCll TAPE IS SPECIFIED. - REVISE I.'OTE TO USE llEAT S):3II:KADLE TUBitiG OF APPLICABLE TfPE PER PDU-B-3070 AND PDV-B-3179 AS FOLLOWS: Therefore this equipment is assigned to NRC CategorvIIa because docunented evidence of qualification has not been provided. I 1 l l l 1 -- l - - - - .
-. . . mA,. - _ . ,wma,en - - . .v m ,.- va--- - -- ,
& NRC C:ntr:ct ND. NRC-03-79-118 12 Frank!!n Research Center FRC Pr ject No. C5237 Paga A Dmsen of The Frinkhn Inst;twe FRC Assignm:nt No.13 lc .
20th and Race Streets. Ph:!a. Pa 19 03(215s 444-1000 FRC Task No. 506
~
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. JO EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 30 RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE DETECTOR LOCATED IN THE AUXILIARY BUILDING FOXBORO MODEL DB13U226W REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 YEAR TER CHECKSHEET NO. 30 . LICENSEE REPERENCE(S): 27 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): MEA.jURES RER SUCTION & DISCHARGE LINE TEMPERATURE ~ CONVERSION (1-TE627, 630) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL [7]: SCEW(S): II-21 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): MEASURES COMPONENT COOLING HEAT EXCHANGER OUTLET LINE TEMPERATURE (1-TE621) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL [7]: SCEW(S): II-23
; . DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) CNLY:
(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, QP, RT,P,H,CS,hS, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable l LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No, i i Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, L, L, % System Consideration Review !c, !b, 0;, !d, !;, 42 l ' Equipment Environmental Qualification Review L, 1, "c, %, kr 5f, l S,f A si , da, JJ I $ i Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation '- ' l l . Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary L , 7b, Tc ~ l I 1 i _ _, a c J 3. '. ;'M~"GF - % c .9 ' '" T ~ ~' ' ~"- * * " ~ ~ N -x . ~ 1
7 6 NRC C:ntract No. NRC 03 79-118 P:go l dbhrznklin Resetrch Canter FRC Project No. C5257 A Dmsen d The Franklin Insnruis FRC Assignment No.13 lb. , 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. To 4 I To 7 : EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M , SUAMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: Y Tne Licensee (has/ t i) provided a response to the SER concerns. [ The Licensee (has/hamsmue$ specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment j item whose qualification has not been fully established. , 1 Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for tnis equipment item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source _ Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for iatoria operation. . The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action . ) The Licensee states that the equipment ' item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED.ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) l I.a Qualified I.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification .a Exempt i II.a Qualification Not Established III b Hot in Scope I II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available 4
MS j" O M
-- , , - - w.- iI - -
i r,, ] e- - - - - _-*Or - _ --~ ,
6- NRC Contr;ct No. NRC-03-79-118 00fi7J r:nklin Resesreh Cent:r FRC Project No. C5257 P g3 A Dwien el The Frtnklin Instaus2 2 20th and Race Streets. Phde.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Assignm:nt FRC Task No. No.1}TO"Y 50(af, EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQU!PMENT ITEM NO. 3.0 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION:
} NRC RE^ffrtEMENTS ~
X = DEFICIENCY l Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X " l Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Y
, Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) ' Program E4tablished to Identify Aging Degradation _
Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Seque'nce Satisfied Critaria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) . Satisfied i Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied ( ! Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied
!' Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)
DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY
, I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified X III.a Equipment Exeispt From Qualification IIl.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available i
l
.E .-%
A NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 dhJ Fr nk!!n Rese:rch Center FRC Project No. C5257 P:g3
, A Div, mon of The Frankhn Insature FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10M FRCTask No. 5O(# kOS I
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF E'QUIPMENT ITEM NO. M LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER A. These devices contain 0-rings and diachrages (only for electro-pneumatic transducers) made of* Nitrite Ruober (SUNA-N). These are the only components in these devices susceptible to significant degradation due to thermal or radiation aging. BUNA-N is susceptible to thermal aging" degradation after accroximately tan years service at temperatures of up to 10a*F. The nor' sal ametent tamperature where these devices art
. located is saintained netween 60 and SSSF. Therefore, little degradation is expected to have occurred and no aging failures have occurred un to this time. These SUNA-N parts will be rtolaced with a periodicity of
. 10 years or less. See Wisconsin Electric's Sectammer 11, 1981 letter to Mr. Harold R. Denton concerning resconse to the PENP environmenta.1 qualification SER (specifically Enclosun 1. Section 3.7) for a' further discussion of aging. Several references stata tse esdiation damage threshold for $UNA-N,ruceer is 1 x 10* Racs ganna or higner.' Therefore, these conoonents art considerno gualifice for a sinimum of 10 years ano a games radiation dose of 1 x 10 Rads. Since radiation is the only
" harsh" accident envircenent parameter. the devices art qualified for radiation, and they have coerated satisfactorily for years in :ne normal environment, it is judged that they could continue to operate for at least one year following an accident. Therefort, the qualified l operating time is considered to be one year.
The electro pneumatic transducers (EPTs) are designed such that. failure of the SUNA-M diaphragm results in failurt of the valve controlled by it to the safe position for accident mitigation purposes. The failure of the 0-rings in both the EPTs and (TDs is not exsected to result in failure of this component to operata in an accident. These devices are not exposed to high pressure, temperatures, or estative humicity since there are no high energy lines in the vicinity of taen and they are located in relatively open areas of the auxiliary building. Therefort, continued safe operation of the plant is assured until these parts art rtolaced. It is our intention to replace these carts as soon as =rac-ticable, but in any case, befort the equipment qualification deadline. l N. Humidity is not a problem because humidity in this large open area in the auxiliary building would not remain high for more than one or two hours at one time. The RTD head is designed and constructed for
" drip proof, splash-proof" operation. The head cap is sealed with an 0-ring and the conduit part is also sealed with a conduit seal (see 1 Qualification Reference 198 for description and drawings). Therfore, t no significant amount of moisture can enter the RTD housing and the RTD is considered qualified for ICC:ll relative humidity. '.6*e 6* eee awe e# e e . ", lF V N' n e . ~ "
S
r
! NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 6'. 0 Yj rank!!n Rssearch Center FRC Pr: ject No. C5257 Page A Dmsson of Ths Fr:nklin Instituts 5f 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Astignm:nt'f0fo FRC Task No.
No.13I% ; 'O Y EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M , e ts, k t ,sr_.,,,, *
. . t . . . . . hIk.L4- . %&
v a .
! It is.not certain that Foxboro can identify what non-metallic l materials were'used'in the construction of these pa'.cicular dyna-therm resistance temperature detectors. The best we can hope to l i do is ask our. product people for thin.information on new, replace- .i ment units. Foxboro does not have access'to any environmental I qualification tests which may have been done on these units by Westinghouse.
Foxboro Standard Model DB13U-226 RTD's currently utilize a Buna rubber 0-ring as the connecting head cover gasket; fiberglass ties and braided insulation ch the nickel sensor and lead wire, Dow-Corning "Silsastic" high temperature end seal, and a epoxy composite terminal board laminate. w \;,.-- ~ b. s
.A awkrQ AAe4 % kk H 1 weLe a.gt.a4~~4 uu-.u..
i 1 i i t b. i f I a r 1 ., i
}
L. - ., _m..
.r , * ._ : . . ' *_~.
m.-.. i ~!U = "U . -'^ >
=~ ' +*
- . n NRC C:ntract N3. NRC-03-79118 dl Frenkhn Reserrch Center - FRC Project No. C5257 Pago A Dnesion of The Fiankhn instaute FRC Assignment No.13 la 20tn and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 44d 1000 FRC Task No. 50(o EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF 50UIPMENT ITEM NO. 3I ~
EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 31 THERMOCOUPLE LOCATED INSIDE THE REACTOR VESSEL, ELEV. 30' CONTROL PRODUCTS CORP. MODEL 5649D18 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 YEAR TER CHECKSHEET NO. 31 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): Nor CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): NEASURES REACTOR CORE EXIT COOLANT TEMPERATURE (1-TEl-39) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL [7]': SCEW(S): V-9 DESIGNATION POR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITDi(S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, Or, RF, P, H, CS, A, S, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Notstated,(Notapplicable) LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEE_TS Contents Checksheet Page No. ) , Equipment Item la
- Sunusary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SCR 3a, 25, 0-, ;J System Consideration Review tc, et, !;, tl, t;, if Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 5;, 55, !;, Od, 0., !!,
. 5;;, 55, Si, Sj Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6a, 6b Equipment Sununary l Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary "';, 'b, ': l MM - ,.Mf 1 N'fP . W 88 .N"..
iES
6 NRC Crntract Nc. NRC-03-79-118 dOU Franklin Resarch Center FRC Project No. C5257 Pagb 4 Dmsson of The Frsnkhn insnruts FRC Assignmsnt No.13 lb ' Zhn and Race Streets. Phita.. Pa 19103 (215,448.imo FRC Task ho. To C. [ 9 ~7 r. EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT' ITEM NO. 3I St'MMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: _X, Tne Licensee (has/b -- -^ t ) provided a response to the EZE concerns. -
' 1 The Licensee Ghae/has ,not) specifically stated that the equipment is _ ,
qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. , r The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. s ! M The Licensee (has/ ham) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.
, Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for tnis equipment item. , ,
- t. , . ,
't Corrective action specified by the Licensee: , ,
t Equipment replacement with qualified equipment , Equipment modification 3 Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source , -[ Verify qualification'by additional (testing / analysis) ' Equipment relocation to a mild environe,ent .
, Qualification testing of equipment in progress ,
i g Cther ( bb, s ,;R ooA4.,,1 .u:~.A J Mee.ht :m,hm bm. ) / ' d
; <; 3, y The Licensee has provided other information for this equipresnt ited' '
i that can be construed as a basis for justification for int erjm ' ' I operation. The Licensee (nas/h;; 2 ) provided a sched.ule for the proposed N, corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective l action w:4\. h.2.L'T 1 =~. 4 W. :4 7 h:. ' o n iM . A r L{ ) s , ( 2. (y egWpp Jr. 4 = M.A.4 ) * ' The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification '
, and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. ,
DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW l
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) , )
l l l I.a Qualified II.c Qaalified Life Deficiency l l C.b Modification III.a Exempt - II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope l II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available i - l 1 : , 1
- ...;.::.2. , +.,.. ~ ~ . -- n- .
r, u . . _ o -
,. A NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 'Aql, !] Franklin Rase:rch Center FRC Project Nr. C5257 P 03 A Divem of Tha Franluth bs-aute.. FRC Aasignment No.13 2 20th arri Race $#reets. Phda . Pa.19103 G15) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 5%/Tc7 e
ECUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .l!/. E P_ MENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENQ - X = DEFICIENCY a t
< i D)cumented Evidence M Qualification Adequate X Mequate Similarity 'Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately 1 Jualiflod Life cc Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) ,Prograa h Establist[ed to identify Aging Degradation 1 j \ ,1 iCritoria P5garding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) '? Oriteria ksgarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure 4 y o Peas Tamparature Adequates f o Peak Pressere/ Adequate; ,-) o Duratioq Mtquate , ,
o Require (lPrefile Saveloped Adequately
'i o Steam 3xpcsure (If Roquired) Adequate b' d Criteria Pagdtding Spray' Satisfied' _ +
Criteria Regarding Subtergence satisfied Cri teria Regarding Padjation Satisfied
' ; Criteria Regard $g Tes6 Sequenca Satisfied ? Y f Criteria Regarding Test Fail' rco ~
u or
- Severe Anomalies l;/ '
'l (If Any)eSatisfied - , Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied f'
Criteria Regarding InstrumenO Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour' + Function Time) Satisfied g- . , Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) g x '_,
;;f/ \ , . /f f DESIGNATION:
NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY
.* y s j
l 4I.a Equipment Qualified. . l I.b[ II.a s Equipment Qt.'alification Pending Modification Equipse.t Qualification Not Established 1 7 - II.o N Equipme]nt Not Qualified
'II.c Equipment Satisfies All Rt.quirements Except. Qualified Life ,or Replacement Sched41e Justified y .,III..t A quipment E Exes.pt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review 3
Documentation Not 'Made Available IV a p ' * ~e*' j
*j' , ! /
4 i + [ ./ A
'[
!
- J i
I J
/ 1 5 ^ '
e-w ep a.#c-- -- _ e s tam *u.w*== . r sr- r
- va ses **[ a--ene - .-
_, - _ - . . _ _ _ . _. _ a_-. . . __ .__ _ _ _
NRC Contr ct No. NRC-03-79-118 Paga QbJ Frank!!n Resetrch Cant:r FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Diviseon of Tha Fr:nkhn Insnruta FRC AsaignmInt No.13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103(215)448 two FRC Task No. eac./Tc7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 3.L. LICENSEE RESPONSE i i 5. The In-core (core exit) Thermocouple system is not es tronmentally qualified. 3 . This system is required to be environmentally qualified by
', the.TNI Action. Plan. This. system is not required to mitigate postulated design-basis accideets, therefore, continued safe operation of the plant is assured. It is our intention to environmentally qu If fy the t connectors, cabling, and reference junction boxes my the environmental t qualification deacline, if possible. The connectors and canling will to rectaced with qualified eoui ment and the ref t-ence junction oozes .
will ne moved to a c:ntrolled environment. The presently installed thermocouples themselves are Judged ac:sotante based en many years of operation in ineir nornally harsn environments. 4 4 p I t a e r
.~ -. , - _ _, ._
7 . . ,. .
6 NRC CIntract No. NRC-03-79-118 pag 3 000Jhranklin R:se rch Center FRC Project No. C5257 A Devmon of The Frankhn Insmuu FRC Assignmint No.13 60 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa.1Hu3 (215) 4481000 FRC Task No. 50(o /So ~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M INSTALLED 1MI LESSONS LEARNED IMPLEMENTATION EQUIPMENT
SUMMARY
NRC requested an evaluation of the environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment located in harsh environments required for.TMI - Lessons Learned Implementation. The objective'is to evaluate qualification f documentation of equiquent within the scope of IE Bulletin 79-01B, Supplement 3 (item 2), in accordance with criteria established-by the NRC (see Section 2 1 of- tais report) in a manner identical to the evaluation of all other safety-related electrical equipment. The scope of this review is limited to 1MI Action Plan equipment associated witn specific sections of NUREG-0737 which have an instiallation implementation date of January 1,1981 (sections are identifiec below) . Where applicable, a review is to be performed on installed equipment with implementation dates af ter January 1,1981 if adequately , identified by the licensee. I This plant is a PWR 1 , BWR . The NSSS Vendor is Westinghouse (W) Y , Babcox & Wilcox (B&W) , Combustion Engineering (CE) , General Electric (GE) . l With respect to this equipment item, it is noted (applicable section checked): f l The Licensee does not provide adequate information with respect to ' identification of TMI Action Plan equipment installed as of 1/1/81. The Licensee has not provided the correlation of this equipment item with l the specific sections of NUREG-0737. [The correlation is needed to ensure l that all items are included in the review, e.g., if a transmitter is I identified as a 1MI Action Plan item, are the cable and the terminal blocks associated with the device also identified 7] The Licensee has not provided the approximate installation date for the TMI Action Plan equipment items so that the appropriate qualification criteria (NUREG-0588 or DOR Guidelines) can be used in the EEQ evaluation. The Licensee has provided a standard owners' Group position with respect to a IUREG-0737 technical area. The Licensee has requested extensions of implementation dates. Y The Licensee has stated that this equipment item is associated with the follcwing section of NUREG-0737. (This list of applicable NUREG-0737 sections has been identified by NRC as sections within the scope of this review) : II.B.3 (ALL/1-1-81) Post-Accident Sampling Capability of Reactor l Coolant and Containment 1 II.D.3 (ALL/1-1-81) Direct Indication of Relief and Safety Valve - Position l l -,-...m. .
- : .n-7 _ _ mn . 7 ^ -- w = r~. ~-- - .-
A. NRC Contract No. NRC-03 79-118 NFrarklin Rssearch Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 Pago A S- en of The Franbin Inscrute FRC Asaignm:nt N3.13 6h 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Fa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. S o 4 / 5'0 '7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. JI ' II.E.1.2 (PWR/1-1-81) Auxiliary Feedwater System Automatic Initiation and Flow Indication II.E.3.1 (PWR/1-1-81) Emergency Power Supply for Pressurizer Heaters j (Safety-Grade Interfaces II.E.4.1 (ALL/7-1-81) Dedicated Hydrogen Penetrations . II.E. 4. 2 - ( ALL/1-1-81) Containment Isolation Dependability i 4 II.F.2 (PWR/1-1-81) Instrumentation for Detection of Inadequate Core Cooling , II.G.1 (PWR/1-1-81) Emergency Power for Pressurizer Equipment (Saf e ty-Grace Interfaces) . II.K.2.10 (PWR/B&W/7-1-81) Safety-Grade' Anticipatory Reactor Trip II.K.3.9 (PWR/W/1-1-81) PID Controller Modification (If Hardware Change Involved) , II.K.3.12 (PWR/W/1-1-81) Anticipatory Reactor Trip upon Turbine Trip II.K.3.13 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Separation of HPCI and RCIC Initiation Signals , II.K.3.15 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Prevention of Spurious Isolation of HPCI and RCIC Systems II.K.3.19 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Interlock on Recirculation Pump Loop i II. K. 3. 21 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Restart of Core Spray and LPCI Systems (If Hardware Changed Out)
, II.K.3. 27 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Provide Common Reference Level for Vessel l Level Instrumentation (If Hardware Changed Out) l 4
i l l l t 1 i;_33 ._ , 3 n~,+-9 -- y . . . 1 ; ;_. - .
,_ _ - ; .v,- ;
. v . . -
A NRC C:ntract N3. N RC-03-79-118 dbnk!!n Rssetrch Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 pig 3 A Din.on of The Frankun Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448.ItXX) . FRC Task No. 6Clo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL' QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF $QUlPMENT ITEM NO. M EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 32 RTD LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT, ELEV. 35' ROSEMOUNT MODEL 176KS REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: l~ YEAR TER CHECKSHEET NO. 32 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 687 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): ', MEASURES REACTOR COOLANT COLD LEG TEMPERATURE (1-TE450A, ,
' B; l-TE451A, B)
LICENSEE SUBMITTAL (7}: SCEW(S): V-5 i DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, @', IU, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM , RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Notstated,(Notapplicable) LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, L, Ow, 30 System Consideration Review te, 4-, 4-, 44, 04, 4f Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, Sb, Sc, 5d, Se, Sf, 5g, Sh, Si, Sj . Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6a, 6b l Equipment Summary - l Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary
~
7;, 71, 7e-vvvWa4 .a. w w. - 2m- -. x - .. ;- c--- ,~'"-<- - : =L u . - r ,
i NRC C ntrcct No. NRC-03-79-118 ' pd.d Franklin R:setrch Centir FRC Projtct N3. C5257 Paga A D. vision of The Ferndn inst: tuts FRC AssignmInt No.13 lb 20th and Race Saeets. Phita.. Pa 19103 (215) 443-! % 0 FRC Task No. Sc< / 47 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _12
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - CNLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: j X Tne Licensee (has/baa-ere) provided a response to the SER concerns. . i i The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will ' function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. l
. The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.
X The Licens'ee (has/ hee-net) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. X Justification for interim operation (has/has-act ) ceen provided by the Licensee for tnis equipment item. , X Corrective action specified by the Licensee: I Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radie uon source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress X Other ( AJ14%.J2 Mp oe wobenM d.6 ed/GJ en,d ) i'he Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item l that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. Y The Licensee (aee/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed
, corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action _ W A 1: FMM W.31 : hM '91 id t w
- Omkw .)
(,"Etr (LTD G Mu- U2-Ma ) The Licensee states that the aquipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) .a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency
! . . Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope
, II b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available i
i
- - - - ~ ~ ~ - . . _ . . . . -. __-... _ ,,~. , , . - - - - -~
r-~ _, h.( ' (3 e ' (_ g #
.- .-e -- 2 =
A NRC Contract N3. NRC43 79-118 brrnklin Rese:rch Crnter FRC Project Ns. CS257 P ga A D6mion of The Frenidin Insneure FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Stroess. Phde.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. M/M EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. '35 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of, Qualification Mequate 't 2 Mequate Similarity Between.Bquipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Mequately 1 Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule EstaDlished (If Required) e Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: . o Peak Temperature Mequate o Peak Pressure Mequate o Duration Mequate o Required Profile Enveloped Mequately o Steam Exposurc (If Required) Mequate 1 Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied . Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Seque'nce Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failuras or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied X Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied _ g._, Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied - Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, cats I) DESIGNATION: NRC OUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY i I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification _,2C II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D . Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment EKempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review l IV Documentation Not Made Available l
\
6
#N IN UD I SY 3 *,, 4 (
a-- - <- ,- ,_a -4
.== _TfM*$7,
A NRC Contract N o. NRC-03-79-118 Page Udull Franklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 A Dw of The FranWininenwe FRC Assignment No.13 . 3o -l 20th and bce Seeses. Phds.. Pa. 19103 (21S 448 1000 FRC Task No. N / Tc'7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL CUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 37 LICENSEE RESPONSE 8 R.. The Reactor Coolant Systaar loco RTDs were only tasted to 1 x 10 Rads . ganea and were not thermally aged during qualification testing. The aeove radiation dose allows over 10 years of normal coeration followed by one week of post-l.0CA containment radiation. This would be sufficient time after a postulated accident ta place the plant in a staele condi-tion suca that the RTDs would not be recuired. In addition, back vo indication such as steam generator saturation pressure or Residual Heat ' Removal system tamoerature are availante decending on the acce of plant cooling., Therefore, continued safe operation of ue : Tant is assured. It is our intention to continue evaluation of the 2 resent RTDs for thensal aging and a higner radiation dose in order to fully qualify these RTDs to the CCR Guidelines. Hign normal amotent tamceratures and nign normal radiation dose ratas make tne environmental cualification of these casconents extremely difficult. It is our intention to replace taem with fully cualified RTUs by the environmental qualificatfort deadline, if possible. . . . . h O e l 1 8 l i
-- r , r-- - - ~ ~ - - - - -r-- " rey . r -- ,- , , . , ,
/h NRC Contract No. N RC-03-79-118 . 5nklin Research Cen:er. FRC Prcject No. C3257 PIga A ca..on of The Frankkn Inst: tate FRC Assignment No.13 5 20tn and Race streets. Phda . Pa. 19103 #215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. #44 i EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 33 Checksheets 84 h fj have been removed due to the , proprietary nature of information cdained therein. '
t 1 3 I \ l l t 1 r arc 3. ;;r ,,-r;:.~. .nm-~-~~------,. ,
- - - , _ .- - :-- -.- r :; r: --- - - -:
NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 4$hranklin Rese rch Center FRC Project N2. C5257 Pago A Dw onhe Franhaninmuwe FRC Assignment No.13 60 20th and Race Seseis. Phde.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. SM / W7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 31 INSTALLED TMI LESSONS IX.ARNED IMPLEMENTATION EQUIPMENT
SUMMARY
NBC requested an evaluation of the environmental qualification of safety- , related electrical equipment located in harsh environments required for TMI Lessons Imarned Implemen~tation. The objective is to evaluate qualification documentation of equipment within the scope of IE Bulletin 79-01B, supplement 3 (item 2), in accordance with criteria established.by the NRC (see Section 2 of tais report) in a mannar identical to r.he evaluation of all other safety-related electrical equipment. The scope of this review is limited to MI Action Plan equipment associated witn specific sections of NUREG-0737 which have an installation implementation date of January 1, 1981 (sections are identifiec below) . Where applicable, a review is to be perfor:ned on installed equipment with implementation dates after January 1, 1981 if adequately identified by the licensee. This plant is a PWR X , BWR . The NSSS Vendor is Westinghouse (W) X , Babcox & Wilcox (B&W) , Combustion Engineering (CE) , General Electric (GE) . With respect to this equipment ites, it is noted (applicable section checked) : The Licensee does not provide adequate information with respect to identification of MI Action Plan equipment installed as of 1/1/81. The Licensee has not provided the correlation of this equipment item with the specific sections of NUREG-0737. (The correlation is needed to ensure that all items are included'in the review, e.g., if a transmitter is j identified as a MI Action Plan item, are the cable and the terminal blocks associated with the device also identified?] The Licensee 'tas not provided the approximate installation date for the TMI Action Plan equipment items so that the appropriate qualification criteria (NUREG-0588 or DOR Guidelines) can be used in the EEQ evaluation. I The Licensee has provided a standard Owners' Group position with respect to a NUREG-0737 technical area. i l , _ The Licenset has requested extensions of implementation dates. 1 The Licensee has stated that this equipment item is associated with the i fallowing section of NUREG-0737. (This list of applicable NUREG-0737 3 sections has Deen identified by NRC as se;tions within the scope of this review): i
! II.B.3 (ALL/1-1-81) Post-Accident Sampling Capability of Reactor i
Coolant.and Containment II.D.3 (ALL/1-1-81) Direct Indication of Relief and Safety Valve Position i l i a: AW: . :- : '.. ' ^-- i P t " - l '"?
'~ ,R v ~ v '~~~ ** '* * * " rT - ....,_.._f._.
i;.; I :. J.. .: .
; ~ .T; ..; ~. . ' ., l .l ; V. / y - =_ z. .
- i .i 4;. .) ,; " _' ...j". r-A NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 dhrsnkhn Researen Center FRC Project No. CS257 Pcca A f. hon of Tne Frankhn Insnrute FRC Assignment No.13 6b 20ti. and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (21 S 448-1000 FRCTask No. Tdto / Tc7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. D II.E.1.2 (PWR/1-1-81) Auxiliary Feedwater System Automatic Initiation and Flow Indication
_ II.E.3.1 (PWR/1-1-81) Emergency Power Supply for Pressurizer Heaters (Safety-Grade Interfaces
. 1 II.E.4.1 (AI4/7-1-81) Dedicated Hydrogen Penetrations II.E. 4. 2 - (ALL/1-1-81) Containment Isolation Dependability V II.F.2 (PWR/1-1-81) Instrumentation for Detection of Inadequate Core Cooling II.G.1 (PWR/1-1-81) Emergency Power for Pressurizer Equiprr.ent (Safety-Grade Interfaces)
II.K.2.10 (PWR/B&W/7-1-81) Safety-Grade Anticipatory Reactor Trip II.K.3.9 (PWR/W/1-1-81) PID Controller Modification (If Hardware - Change Involved) II.K.3.12 (PWR/W/1-1-81) Anticipatory Reactor Trip upon Turbine Trip II.K.3.13 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Separation of HPCI and RCIC Initiation Signals II.K.3.15 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Prevention of Spurious Isolation of HPCI and RCIC Systems II.K.3.19 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Interlock on Recirculation Pump Loop II.K.3.21 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Restart of Core Spray and LPCI Sy3tems (If Hardware Changed Out) II.K.3.27 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Provide Common Reference Level for Vessel
, Level Instrumentation (If Hardware Changed Out) i l
i 4 9
, l. ,-.; .*vy.,.,. ,..gy,-%. ,, . . , ,p......,_...,... . , . , , , . . . . , - - - _ -- - \
- - u --
A NRC C:ntrtet No. NRC-03-79-118 KJ Franklin Resetrch Centzr
~
FRC Prcject No. C5257 Pags A Diws on of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 506 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF 50UIPMENT ITEM NO. 33 EQUIPMLNT ITEM NO. 33 E/P TRANSDUCER LOCATED IN TE AUXILIARY BUILDING FISER CONTROLS MODEL 546 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 YEAR TER CECKSEET NO. 33 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 34, 35, 3222 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): .RHR HEAT EXCHANGER. OUTLET LINES E/P CONVERTER (1-AC624,
'625)
LICENSEE SUBMITTAL [7 : SCEW(S): II-9 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): RER HEAT EXCHANGER BYPASS LINE E/P CONVERTER (1-AC626) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL [7): SCEW(S): 11-11 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): OPERATES SPRAY ADDITIVE SUCTION LINE VALVES (1-SI836A, B) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL (7]: SCEW(S): I-12
~
DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, h h RT, P,hCS,hS, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la Sumary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sumary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, L, L, Jo System Consideration Review ** '" M, 'I,
- h, O Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 50, 5' , " -, ~0, L , %,- - -15, L, M, &
Ah Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation #. Equipment Sumary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Sumary 7a, L, L .n.-.. ...,w,~ ..n , m. ,~. , , w-a w.~.-.n . . - . - - , - - - - - - -
402 Franklin Research Centtr NRC CIntr:ct Ns. NRC-03 79-118 P:ga FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Chnson of The Franklin Insnture Ib 20tn and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 44810m FRC FRC Assignm:nt Task No. fo No.1)Td 4/ '7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.13 SU.4 MARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - CNLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: 4 g Tne Licensee (has,'L.. uwd provided a response to the SER concerns. - . \/ The Licensee (has/h:2 c.4 7 specifically stated that the equipment is , qualified and/or will' function when exposed to the applicable DBE ' environmental service conditions. The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. _ The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed
; corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)
The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OFeRESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) ~R.a Qualified l II.c Qualified Life Deficiency
[ I.b Modification III.a Exempt
! II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available 3 x- m- : ~. ,- 3 . - - = ~ m- ~ . . ,. ,- - . ~~- .~ : - - ,,-,y +
A g NRC Contract ND. NRC-03-79-118 Pigs Mt! Frank!!n Rsseirch Cent:r FRC Pr: Ject N2. C5257 A Dimion of The Frankhn Insneure - FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Sneers. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRCTask No. To6/fo7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .J.JP EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: FRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of. Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria.Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied _ Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied
- Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied .-
Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG?0528, Cat. I)
. DESIGNATION:
NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified 'X I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.c Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available
/ > a ww.
n= ~
} ^
A em . . . __ ._ m._._ ,, _
. . = .-
A NRC C:ntr;ct No. NRC-03-79-118 ddlFranklin Research Centcr FRC Pr: ject No. C5257 Pags A Onnsen of The FranunInstaure FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phde.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. fa/e/fd7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. J3 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER A. These devices contain 0-rings and diachagas (only for electro-pneumatic
! transducers) made of
- Nitrite Ruocer (SUNA-N). These art the only components in these devices susceptible to significant degradation due i to thermal or radiation aging. SUNA-N is susceptible to taersial aging'
. degrecation after approximately ten years service at temperatures of up l to 104*F. The normal amoient temperature where these cevices art , . located is saintained between 60 and 858F. Therefore, little degradation is expected to have occurred and no aging failures have occurred up to this time. These SUNA-N parts will be rtolaced wita a periodicity of 10 years or less. See Wisconsin Electric's Septemoer 11, 1581 letter to Mr. Harold R. Denton concerning response to tne PSNP environmenta.1 qualification SER (specifically Enclosurt 1, Section 3.7) for a furtner discussion of aging. Several references state the radiation camage threshold for SUNA-N ruccer is 1 x 10* Racs gazt:a or higner.' Therefort, these conoonents are considered gualified for a sinimum of 10 years anc a gamma radiation dose of 1 x 10 Rads. Since radiation is ce only "harsad accicent environment parameter, the devices art qualifisc for radiation, and they have coerated satisfactorily for years in the normal environment, it is judged taat tney could continue to c erate for at least ene year following an accident. Therefore, see tualified ocerating time is, considered to be one year.
The electro-pneumatic transducers (EPTs) are designed 'suca that failurt of the SUNA-N diaphragm results in failurt of the valve contrelled y it to the safe position for accident mitigatton purgoses. The f ailure of the 0-rings in bota the EPTs and (TOs is not expected to result in failurt of this component to operata in an accident. These devices are not exposed to high pressure, temperatures, or relative humicity since there are no hign energy ifnes in the vicinity of them and they are located in relatively open areas of the auxiliary building. Therefore, continued safe operation of the plant is assured until these carts are replaced. It is our intention to replace these parts as seen as prac-l ticacle, but in any case, befort the equipment qualification deacline. I i l l l l > I e 1 i i I r-.- - . x, _
?- m ~ ~ "- = -. . :.c-~=
4 NRC C:ntrcet No. NRC-03-79-118 Pcgn 2000 Franklin Rrsearch Centxt FRC Prcject No. C5257 l A Civision of The Franan Inst:rute 7c, 20th and Race Streets. Phda-. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. 506 No.13[Td7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. D MAINTENANCE AND REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE StMMARY The following information regarding the maintenance and replacement schedule (s) for components, sub-components, and materials has been provided by the Licensee.; , SUNA-N is susceptible to taermal aging degradation after approximately ten years service at temperatures of us to 104*F. -The normal amotent temperaturs wnere these devices are
. located is maintained between'60 and 858F. Therefore, little gegradation is expected to have oc:urred and no aging failures nave oc:urrsc u: t tais time. These SUNA-N parts will be reclaced with a peri:dicity of 10 years or less. See Wisconsin Electric's sentemcer- 11, 1531 lettar to Mr. Harold R. Denton c:ncerning rescense to tne 75N7 enviren.menta]
pualification SER (specifically Enclosure 1, Secti:n 3.7) f:r a further ciscussion of aging. ~ I l i l
- - _ m.- y =+y . g na _ - r - ;; .- -era--
- , . NRC Contrtet No. NRC-03 79-118 IC #_EnkJin Research Center FRC Preitet No. CS257 Piga A onns.on of The Frenen Inst:rute FRC Assignrnent No.13 -lc 20th and Race Streers. Phda . Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 506 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUI'PMENT ITEM NO. N EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 34 MOTOR CONTROL CENTER LOCATED IN THE AUXILIARY BUILDING, ELEV. 8' , OUTSIDE CHARGING PUMP CUBICLES WESTINGHOUSE MODEL TYPE W -
j REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 YEAR
, TER CHECKSHEET NO. 34 4 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NDT CITED . ! PUNCTION (PLANT ID): 480' VOLT ELECTRICAL POWER DISTRIBUTION (1-332)
LICENSEE SUBMITTAL [7]: SCEW(S): II-l DESIGNATION. FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Notstated,(Notapplicable]
! LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:
Contents Checksheet Page No. { I Equipment Item la j Sununary of' Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb
. Equipment Environmental Qualification Su:nmary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, L , Ou, 20 i System Consideration Review t;, ti, ';, 02, 0,, Of Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 5;, T, Ce, 30, w, ^,
i 5;, Sh, Oi, 0;- Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 52, 55 { Equipment Summary 1 Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary -7 c. , 7 b , 70 -
} ..i--m--si---.-..---i--.m--
Ag NRC Crntr:ct NO. NRC-03-79-118 d$fFr:nkhn R:serrch Cent.r FRC Pr ject No.C5257 Pzg2 A Dawson of The FrukLn Institwe FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. SC4/56') EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EDUIPMENT ITEM NO. M
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: b Tne Licensee (has/he; .~;.) provided a response to the SER concerns. The Licensee Na/h.6 Ae+) 3pecifically stated that the equipment is qualifie~d and/or w'ill function when exposed to the applicable DBE ' environmental service conditions. The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. V The Licensee (has/h:2 .:t) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.
,,X,, Justification for interim operation (has/ha; ..e .) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment-item.
X Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source 1 Verify qualification by adde 4rirene& (M" ;/ analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.
,,,g,, The Licensee (ees/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed ;
corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action . ) The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW l
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
Ia Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency O Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Avsilable ~
~
y ,, & .i ,, . l4 ,. a n A -w
A NRC C:ntrtet N 2. NRC-03-79-118 Pags Ubranklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 A Dwmon oiThe Franklin tnstrute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. 50 6 Ere ? - EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 3.y EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM I DESIGNATION: ^ - NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY I j Documented Evidence of Qu lification Adequate X - l Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established l Aging Degradation. Evaluated Adequately 3 Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation i Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: 4 o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied
~
Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) I' DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY { i I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification L { II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established
} II.b Equipment Not Qualified Lj II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life l
or Replacement Schedule Justified i III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification - III.c Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available l .
NRC Contr:ct Ns. NRC-03-79-118 00b r:nklin R:se:rch Cent:;r FRC Project Ns. C5257 Pag] A o.visen of The FrankhnInsutura FRC Assignment No.13 30 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44810m FRCTask No. amf./co) EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATON REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2L4. I LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER St. The wetingneuse fyos e notar control centers (MC:s) are going to to analyzee try Westingneuse to evaluate tne effects of radiation and aging en the estarials uses in the construction of tnese .uC:s. The results of this analysts will 54 places in Wisconsin Electric's Central eeufe= aent eueltffcation file. In the Interie. ooeration of 7SNP can continue sf ace tne reetation esse calculates using Desf gn-tasis Accisent sourte torus fs well nelow tne value enten could cause seasurnale oograeation. la asettlan. all snart-te m safety functions are acenmelfsnee nefsre the MCCs are emeesee to any reetation. The long-tare functions (f.a. . Fellowing the initiat;en af ECO3 esctreulation) can te accoastisnet ny feprovtsee coerstar actfens (f.e.. LOCA and ptL3 accident estigation can to accamelfsnee even assutng a fatture af we 4:s in tne long tem. t I l
~ . - .. - . ,. . ;,- - _ ,, m m.,,,,.....m,
As NRC Contrret No. NRC-03-79-118
.5nklin Research Center FRC Project No. C3237 Pag 3 A D visen of The Franx:in insnruts FRC Assignmsnt No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phdt. Pa 19103 1215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 50G EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 35 ELECTRICAL PENETRATION LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT, ABOVE ELEV.16' CROUSE-HINDS MODEL WELDED CANISTER TYPE REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 YEAR TER CHECKSHEET NO. 35 -
LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 719, 1843, 3206, 3207,'3208, 1340, 3238, 3239, 12, 13,
! 30, 31, 32, 44, 45 .
I FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CONTAINMENT ELECTRICAL CABLE PENETRATION (PLANT ID NOT
! STATED)
LICENSEE SUBMITTAL (7]: SCEW(S): IIII-17 f DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: l (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) M h RT, h H, CS, h S, (R) , M, I, @i, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, j Not stated, Not applicable
. LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:
1 Contents Checksheet Page No. I j Equipment Item la
)6 Sumary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sumary Forms 2 l
l Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, Oh, 2a, 2d i
! System Consideration Review '0, . !b, ';, 40, . 0-, Of 1 -
l Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, 5b, Sc, 5d, Se, -Mr Sg, Sh, Si, 5; Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Ca, 55-
] Equipment Sumary I
j Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Sumary " ;, 't, 7; i
,* * {; . * * ~~ " ' "'*~
- l ]'y S*** *"* * ! " T - **-*****'*.",'"*"'"
. , _ - 7F*f'L CE, ..-*4*"*
A NRC Contract No. NRC-03 79-118 jQ FranWin Restrrch Centsr FRC Project No. C5257 Pcga A Dnnven of The Frankhn Insntute FRC Assignment No.13 1b - 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 44810m FRC Task No. 506/fo7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M SU.tMARY CF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: X Tne Licensee (has/ hee-not) provided a response to the SER concerns. g The Licensee (has/p;; . 4 specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. X The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstancing qualification deficiencies. , _ The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a-corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for tnis equipment item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement wita qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by ' additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. [ The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .) The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC OUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) ) I.a Qualified] II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.o Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available i ,
e
- . _ . _ . . . -m .. m . - . , -
. . ~ . . . . - . - _ - .e.2 . - ,. . . . - _ _ , - _ . . . -- ~-
A NRC Contrcct No. NRC-03-79-118 P;ga MJ Frrnklin Rtsetrch Centtr FRC Project No. C5257 A Davmon of The Frankhn instuute FRC AssignmentJo.13 2 20in and R.c. str es. Phde.~. Pa.19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTaskNo. O dNID EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 6 e EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: , NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Mequate Mequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established ' Aging Degradation Evaluated Mequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature MNuate o Peak Pressure Mequate o Duretion Mequate o Required Profile Enveloped Mequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Mequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied . Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied i Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied ~ Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified N I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification-
! II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established ~
II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification
! III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available i
k i k j n- =. .= m e ,- _ .w- _
, . -_ l
A NRC ContrJct N3. NRC-03-79-118 NNrtnklin ReseIrch C nt:r . FRC Project N3. C5257 P 09 A Divmon of The Frankhn Insnture FRC Assignment No.13 ~ 3a : 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (21s) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4'r ? h~ch EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATICd1 REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M LICENSEE RLSPONSE 'to NRC SER HH. The containment electrical penetration assemblies (E?As) in use at PSNP are Crouse-Hinds designed and Westinghouse constructed, hermet,1cally sealed, welded-canister type E?As. All . pressure retaining parts of the E?As are either metallic or ceramic. All materials used for hermetic sealing or structural integrity will not age significantly either thermally or from radiation over the 40 year design life followed by a design basis event including one year of post-accicent cperatien. See Wisconsin Electric's September 11, 1981 letter to Mr. Harold R. Centon concerning response to the PENP environmental qualification SER (speci-fically Enclosure 1, Section 3.7) for a furtner ciscussion of aging. The electrical feedthroughs consist of cables wnica have ceen previcusly qualified (i.e. , Kerite power and control caole and Okenite instrumen-tation caole). All other organic materials were only necissary for fabrication and perform no further safety functien. LCCA simulation tests were performed on the EPAs ine,luding 100% rela-ive humidity, > temceraturt, and pressure which envelop tne PSNP scecffied accident . ;rofiles. The EPA was successfully tasted separately for spray caemistry using a 4000 ppm boren solution using beric acid (H)303 ) buffered with sodium hydroxide (NaOH) to a pH of acproximataly 3.5 for seven days. Therefore, it is concluded that the PSNP E?As are environ-mentally qualified for all accident environmental parameters in accord-ance with the 00R Guidelines. b l
- . . - . . - - . ... . _ _ . . . . == -. -- -
4, . NRC C ntract No. NRC-03-79-118 - hku Franklin Rasearch Cent:r FRC Project No. C522 Paga A Cmsson of The Fr:nkhn Inst: rues FRC Asaignment No.13 5ct 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. fA A /T/J7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M NOTES:
~
This equipment is the same type as was reviewed for the R. E. Ginna plant and. the evaluation of the Penetration is reproduced on the following pages. s 4 l 1 i l 6
,rrr.: . - ~:=rm , . . . . .n,m ..
r = . :- - --- m r -- n -- =~- --
A~ NRC Contract No. NRC-03 79-118 000d Franklin Rise:rch Crnter FRC Project No. C5257 Paga A Diwuon of The Fr: nan insuturs ' FRC AsrignmInt No.13 5b 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44810m FRC Task No. 862 /rA""1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO g NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.) I /0
~
Acceptance Criteria 1 Mc>f k N#"[h (5.2.5/2.2.1/2.2.1) :. S/shd ! /A >
** M 8 2 o" ~.
Accuracy (5.'2.5/-/-) . p a p /dal/4 s
#df /p[M [
Number of Specimens. , g, N . [/) { Test Instruments Calibrated , g f<' j gu/ Uld Safety Function (Active / ,g__m > { Passive) (-/2.1. 3/2.1. 3) . . g Test Duration (5.2.1/-/-) g /. J S, jh, 4'#* ##4.J Accident Duration (Envir. Above Normal) ( 5. 2.1/-/.-) *Wl
- o2 6 h,
- Required Function Time l '
; 4 ##,3 ~7f4m ; /2/af h//dd,N
- Test Sequence (General) ; ;
(5.2.3/2.3.1/2.3.1)
, *hg
- Test Sequence (NUREG-0588, I
Cat. I) (-/ 2. 3.1/-) /t/ j j p ,
- 1. Representative Sample ;
yf M,* SUI
- 2. Baseline Data ; ; g ( gs,* svay /.r-47jsg j ##/
- 3. Performance Extremes * *
- 4. Thermal Aging I #^
I I #
- 5. Radiation Aging I I ,, ,# 4 '! /I
- 6. Wear Aging ! ! /
' (/ ! fa v dM #d
- 7. Vibration / Seismic
- 8. DBE Exposure I
! I
[M g)
! SV ' 80 /f.
- 9. Post-DBE Exposure ! ! -
! fg;da /flet
- 10. Inspection ! ! b OE M' # " !
l Y ! & ' L, o C# Ta st- 1 Aging ! ! ! (5.2.4, 7.0/4.0/4.0) ! ! ! Therma 1 Aging / Basis ! ' gg g /f ejhl u s 4Te s r* gg,pp os
- Material Aging ! !
0 f* fl?.*sC T'M T*!' s rs cMd j , y/gff, ! Evaluation (7.0/-/-) ! ! !
!/Yr/~Sfatsd : 6 Pok-( ,
Q-t Materials Susceptible ' # ' * "# C 4 '"'d ' 8 - ' (Thermal) ( 5. 2. 4, 7. 0/-/-) k' gefcer 70 Y 0 ## # # h '"# ' # k 7 n ri .j. t
,g . $ ! 3.#"'##i ic e>s
- V#rr/###WiS M#' '
Radiation Aging, Type *
- c* 4 b /e,"*/44S a /4 f ? v>1 *
. , . - ~ - - . - _ =.m. .g-. .- ; - z = ww.:-- n-.=.. - . . . - - - ~, e w - - . , - . _ - - - - . - - , - , - - ,
t I g.1._. NRC C ntrcct N3. NRC-03 79-118
$il Franklin Ressuch Centzr FRC Project ND. C5257 Pag 3-A Dimon d The FranMn Insmute FRC Assignment No.13 5c
- Oth and Race Strests. Phita.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. #a A /5d ~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. J_i~
NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.) j ! !- ! , 3 1 ! ! i Radiation Aging, Dose (rd{ 'g/[ M ! gp /gG(. ' Radiation Aging, Dose Rate
. ( lltM.[h. . /M .
Radiation Aging, Method
!pf,-/- /pfc/v ddd / i Materials Susceptible Sttied ! 19c.C'Ic)$ dd DSB i (Radiation) (5.2.4, 7.0/-/-) g#et*JI/3 fed ! / Fan d %d m7~/N/ *d ! , ,)* Ja!"#fylEcb b, ik c y e /<.r.
- Other Age Conditioning g jyf,jg. fy M g/Af C h #
,I ,w
(-/4.2/-) , gd . Qualified Life Claimed / > S0 y edt?5 $ 7d C k # J Established (5.2.4/4.10/-) {fla.n+'gso)*,
- MI'Y8 k
,;./r*
yd / 4 Normal Ambient Temperature
! ! ! M.5"[ . ~)o - /J2o8 A 40./A d * -
Normal Amoient Radiation Normal Ambient Humidity *4' /b f ss Wor airs. : ; i On-Going Surveillance and , ! ; y - f j(lo YgllCC'bl8
, ,reoy e : -
1 On-Going Analysis of * -/ s yg , ; ; gf (/YhM* Fa ures and Degradation j /7/d/M##'##8'#g
!f3R.~]O ! !
Margin (General) ! I ! Cviveld (6.0/3.0/3.0) 'yj jh)/6' /2/ Of,yf3 "/ ' gg7f g,g Margin (NUREG-0588, ! ! !b' ' j Cat. I) (-/3.2/-) ! pp:- 1 1 I !
-i r su e (+1 10 psig max) !
k{f'##b! ! b'#7#f l Od b/? !l N# 489" l
- 3. Radiation ! ! ! CM/V i (not required) ! ! . ! ;
l
- 4. Time (+104, +1 hour ! ! ! l
; + function time minimum) ! ! !
l ! ! ! . l k i r m r ni.*n z c m - - .. ,7 m: T : - ~~:P . ::; x-w:m m : ~~ - ~ ~ . -
4, N l '! , 6 NRC Contract N2.'NRO-03 '9 f10' '
, Pa'g1 . 1 NN) r:nklin R:se:rch Ccnt:r FRC Project No.C5257 e / >
A Otvtson of The Frankhn Insntute FRC Asaignment No.13 5d' 20th and Race Streets. Phda,. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 FRCTaA No. M4 //J 1 , 1 , EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPNENT ! TEM NC. EX"' I
.. i - r ~;
NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY, ' WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION , (X. OR (DOR /0588-I/O588-II) SUBMITTAL DCCUMENTATION ' ' NOTE NO.) L b . L, -
\ - :-
ACCIDENT CONDITIONS 1 1 ! 1 IDCA/MSLa/uBLa/ Uncontrolled ! k . .
- ! g,gf (4.1, 4.2, 4.3.1, 4.3.3/ 584 )- ,4.f g#/jge/ffe : g 1.1, 1. 2, 1; 5/1.1, 1. 2, 1. 5) g 8#M # V g,,,,..yg Radiation Type e e e ; C>.l.ninra :
C>c rri ts e . ; Radiation Dose (rd)
- I (4.1. 2/1. 4/1. 4) jys/-5/P// M { c 2. /'2 / 0 [ ,
Radiation Dose Rate (ed/hr) Radiation Qual. Method
* ,2,/ X/D i /d b NNg* ,
i M 9[ M -.6)*. (5.3.1/-/-) {
/ , , V e Proximity to Concentrated ! l Radiation
( 4.1. 2/1. 4. 6/1. 4. 6)
*#abgh4dl'Il gO/" pfh d dh N Equipment Susceptible to e '.I 9 f /jff/?.8 Beta Radiation (4.1.2/-/-) .
Mdf '
- Radiation Dose (Normal +
l -
; /,[X/0/12* I ey/ '/# h.
Accident) (4.1.2/-/-) . . 9 I 9 Plateout Dose Considered (-/1.48/1. 4 8) ! /FMfh'/8d A # #. 7 E 'd I Gamma + Beta Dose (rd) ! I '
, ! 's
( 4.1. 2/1. 4. 7/1. 4. 7) f g .f g- p',jy effs %/O . - I 3 ./
. O r-
. . .: y..w n , - -- . i =,- _ _ _ ,k _y+ : -- - -~~~m;.- _h: : - .-
~ ~~m ; , .
NRC Contr:ct NO. N RC-03-79-118
! s[%lh.4ran'!in Resean:h Center FRC Project ND. C5257 Page ! A cnmen of Th2 Frcoun Ir Ates ~
FRC Assignm:nt No.13 5e
- oth ane Race Streets. Phda . Pa. 19103(215)448 tmo FRC Task No. Io 6 /8d 7 EOUl3 MENT ENVISON. MENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M
/
s NRC itE/;UIREMENTS _ DEFICIENCY r WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (CO2/0588-I/0 588-II) ' SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE No.) EN'IIROtMENTAL PROFILE ~ ! ! ! OF-ACCIDENT CONDITICNS ..; ! ! ! , l, Rate of Temp./ Press. ! g, ! /1/jf- 4F/Sfe/ ! I~ Ircrease '
!g g
- Pe.sk s 'F/psig/RH/ Time _._ hg j, op7f!
g g, go /rc d/s. e Cecrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time go da /*'* g-o[ U8 / r*.I
- Decrease To: 'F/pstg/RH/ Time "[,,7// /g),{
/ g /*d /g /td /6 {
g W 7[/d[/ M' Decrease To: 'F/paig/RS/ Time { 1 g (( 1 Equipment Surface Tempera- , ,
- pyje ec os?f e
tune (MSLB) (-/1.2.5.C, */7/oY
/t/rf* / M/S dalV -
2.2.6/L.2.5.C, 2.2.6) } /f g//8dh/#
* *g f' f
{S#9 b' i Spray Qualification Method (5.3.2/1.3, 2.2.8/1.3, *7eg7 784 'I~ [,5 Im 01 'I6 M *o u S) !
- 2. 2'. 8 )
. i Spray Composition
- l*
I4.1.4/1.3' 2.2.8/ 200# # #
- 1.3, 2.2.8) -s (see a .3see FP e /9 c,d a .ge,e.e a' i
$ pa e,w,e ) .r-pH 7-to ; u)r Th M4& d*4 ?" ~" ;;
Spray Density (gpm/f t 2) . ' yad Spray Duration I I I Sucmergence Duration ./ ofW fl 4 (4.1.3/2.2.5/2.2.5) ! #sf . ! / fdT/ffjr//ddM /# ! In-Leakage Considered
! yphceble !
1 1 - (5.2.6, 5.3.2/-/-) ! Aes,14MT. ! g g , g- A p - ** c !
!In6o~ts-itke}s.I !
L!; Time to Submergence ! l'
// cd O4d I l
1 i
! go '
cab /J'!
$7 !
I Dust Environment ,
. d .e
(-/2. 2.11/ 2. 2.11) I [d h/# g7 1 1 t l I t l x . . . . : w~ :r : - .
' ~ .mw ==w ,
NRC Contract NO. NRC.03 79118 dJ Fr nklin R: search Ccnter FRC Project Nr. C5257 Pag 3 A Otvis.on of The Franklin Instwe 5g 20th and Race Sweets. Ph.ie.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC FRC Task Asaignment No. S66No.1;M / EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2.7 _.:. . .u....
..r. .
- c. . .. .
mp. ...;..
.4_. . . . . . ;.; , .. i.,. [ , i J .j ,.
c ,.-
,s . .
Me
.,s ss.
I.
.s .._.. . ._......._.,1_., ......... - . j .., .t me _. .r. ..
s .. e
-s . _... . . ... _ . . _. . r
- r. ...J.,
( . no ... .. 3...... . ., , e, .. . ._ a
- s. , ,
. . . .. .. . l
- i
.I w too - _. . . . , ,,_. s., , . . . . ., c 5 .
- 1. .
.i . = .. . , . .: _ t- . ,,n 3._ . .
1,. . . . . ue .__.. , , . _. . . . _ .,.. .+.
.. .. ., . 1. .
a ..
. . , .,1 .1 ; . i. . . . 2.. .. . . .. . . . .: . ....... . .. t. . . .... .. ., i .. . .l_
us. . . ..... . .. . .. .
. _ .. .. . .g.. . . , . .u..
t.
........m ... . _
4 ._. , . . . . r......
. u. . . ..
at. . ia - . to see asse
- 785 - sums ri,. . u 1.--
_.. - : .. e, - r.. . v.. ._ r 4
, . .,. .. .c.
34 j -. r . a.
- r. , . . . g... .
T..,. as . g
,. ., .e.. , .n . m sy .. , ,, _ . ., ..g ,
g
\ .. i g \ . N.. g. ... . . .e / ___ . .. .
I, .l .... N. s . A.L.$. D.A!.LA.SLE 1A1ACT. w s N N. g
..._.r....-...
g . . . - s ,
. 4 . g 3g . =- . . . -\ ..
g
,2, . '. ' . ,.. .'s . ' ' ' ., ' * '.. .
_ . .__. -. . . _ . s . 3.....p. . ' . . ... .
, .. : . . . . .. p . . .s ,I'. N < ..u... . . \
20 - Iti'U'I
/s e .4 *s 17 4itt.t** .
s n . . . . .. -
.. . . s s e
- l. . . _
+ 1. . .4 . . . . .. . . . ~
l ls 4*gg
. 2 1
- Q 1.*'.
f slo::: acus f s -
., .b. .
i . . .
. i ..
I . _ - . . . . .. ___.. . . . _ . . . .L
',e, , . . . s . . ^
I 0 it, . .
, g I le 300 1000 40.030
, Titet, wmai.9 FICuar M
. J l *v -* M * *t.#. .'.%.s, .* .S t gg} y;- . , Fj."g , [ *- *** .,81***,' - W ""*"**9- .- -
#,2._. NRC C:ntract No. NRC-03-79-118 3J Frankhn Ressarch Center FRC Project No. C5257 Pag 3 A D.vlsion of The Fnnan Inst:rute FRC Assignmsnt No.13 lc 2Cin and Race Sr,eets. Phu . Pa 19103 (2154 44d.1000 FRC Task No. 60G EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. db EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 36 ELECTRICAL CABLE SPLICE LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT, ABOVE ELEV.15' RAYCHEM, BECHTEL DWG. SKE165 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 YEAR l TER CRECKSHEET NO. 36 .
l* LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 639, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): ELECTRICAL CABLE CONNECTION (PLANT ID NOT STATED)
- l LICENSEE SUBMITTAL [7]: SCEW(S): IIII-16 f
1 . 1
? - } }
6 i I i DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY3 (3ee Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R,T,QT,Rr,P,H,CS,hS, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, t Not stated, Not applicable i LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:
- Contents Checksheet Page No.
t Equipment Item la
. Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb , Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, L, L, 30- -1 j Syetem Consideration Review '2 - 't - , L, a, w, 42 Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, 5b, Sc, 5d, Se, Sf, j Sg / 55, "i, %
i l j Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 02, !>
, Equipment Summary-
- I i Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary L , 7b, 7: ,
I I
' ~. 's ., + , . t e- ;
_b , g ,j
. .; - .
- _ .L . _ - - __ - - _ _ . _
l 4 NRC Contract N3. NRC-03 79-118 FRC Project N3. C5257 Pago dU Frrnkiin Rese1rch Cents , A oimen of The Frankhn Insnture FRC Assignment No.13 - Ib 20th and Race Screets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448*1000 FRC Task No. So(e/S O EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.G4
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: Y Tne Licensee (has/heeMeet) provided a response to the SER concerns. i The Licensee (has/Mr
- specifically stated that the equipment is qualified andNr will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.
g The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (has/has not) p'roposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment :nodification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .) The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW _ CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) (I. a Qualified _I II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b h fication III.a Exempt . II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available p*M h mt
**PW '4* ** *95 % gg. % #9 8>9 % p t g g ,- * 'gg h**_**geg @ $ m*'y ; *2g J.' * * + ewmguiemW* ! ** *tgj .
- Tem.,
. SP"
- _
. . . , , , . - - ~ , , NM * * - , - - . - - . - , , ~ - ,
A NRC Contrtet No. NRC-03 79-118 FRC Project N2. C5257 P:g3 NW Frrnklin Resersch Center A Deveen of The FranWinInsruute FRC Assignment No. }3 2 20th and Race Streets. Phde.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. (bfo / 3C EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUF1 CATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .s.7h i EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: ' NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY > ; Documented Evidence of Qualification Mequate Mequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established ' Aging Degradation Evaluated Mequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation l Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature /Pressuro Exposures o Peak Temperature Mequate i ) o Peak Pressure Mequate , l o Duration Mequate o Required Profile Enveloped Mequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Mequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied _
- Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied l Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied ,
, ! Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied l Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) DESIGNATION:
, NRC OUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified A' I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established ! II.b Equipment Not Qualified
{ II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life ', t or Replacement Schedule Justified
} III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification l
1 III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available , i , i i I
'~ ...:~- ~ z m .. 3 3 3 r, , , _ , g _ -- , - - - _ _- ,, -____E_________ -l _'# _ _ _ . _ ._.
A NRC Contract NO. NRC-03 79-118 FRC Project N2. CS257 Pag 3 Shrank 11n R:se:rch Ccnt:r A c non of The Frenklin Inscauee 3a 20th and Race Sweets. Phde.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Assignment F'RCTask No. ('d aNo.19(J
/ 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.M LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER GG. The electrical cable splices used inside containment for safety-related applications were made up in accordance with Sechtal Drawing No. 5X-E-165 using Raycnem Type SFR heat shrinkable tubing (silicone rubber) as confirmed by Westingnouse letter WEP-78-531 cated June 28, 1978. The environmental qualification tests for these splices were documented in WCAP-74101.. -The environmental tests incluced thermal aging to the equivalent of 40 years, irradiation to 2 x 103 Rads gamma raciation, and a three week 1.CCA simulation wnich included chemical spray anc 100%
- relative humidity. See Wisconsin Electric's Septemoer 11, 1981 letter to Mr. Harold R. Denton concerning response to the PBNP environmental qualification SER (specifically inclosure 1, Section 3.7) for a further discussion of aging. The enemical spray consisted of a 1.5 weign percent solution of beric acic (H 20 )3 auffered wita sedium hycroxide (NaOH)toapHvalueofapproximalaly9.25. Since all postulatec PENP ac:ident parameters are envelopec y the test profiles, tne splices are consiccred fully qualified to the CCR Guidelines.
l 4 m. O O ~Dk. . f #e* $N,9#N Y OO
* - -W % E ., ei - ' ~ W
. .. - .. -- . - . .- .. . ~ . .
i
~i #1 NRC Contract N3. N RC-03-79-118 . 5[anklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Pag 3 4 ov. son of The Franulin inst: tate FRC Assignment No.13 . 5 2t,th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103:215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. &4 6
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 3 Checksheets O- C ff have been removed due to the
! proprietary nature of information contained therein.
i . 4 6 i t i l Y l I 1 i
't I,
l 4 I l m r:m rre: m m m rv erm >
. u. pm ... _ rw- . - -
v: : -
i A NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 NFrank!!n Rise:rch Center FRC Project No. C5257 Pago A Devisen of The FrmkJin Insntuts FRC Assignmcnt No.13
- 5g 20th and Race Sweets. Phde.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. (o6/fo7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONME'NTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Jfa.
NOTES: WeS!!n flou!8 1050um Rivemde P'an Cheagoitlincts CCCCC
, Electric Corporation , ,312n 54 nca Nuclear Service Division ~
c - June 28, 1978
. ? -
i WEP 78-531 - ' REF: P3M-WP- 178 2- , Mr. William F. Geisheker, IL, IA - - Wisconsin Elcetric Power Company 23L West Michigan Street - Milwaukee, Wisconsin 55201
Dear Mr. Geisheker:
Point Beach Nuclear Plant Qualification of Containment Electrical Penetration Safeguards Solices In the referenced letter you requested information to ec=picte the documentation of the qualification of the containme'nt splices in the safeguards esbles. ~ Attached is a retyped copy of TWI PBW-B-3070 containing the specific splice instructions. Any deviations from the instructions containing
" in this TWI are explained and justified in the correspondence previded to you by Bechtel.
As discussed with you on the phone, the test results' for the splice test are documented in WCAPS 7410-L, volumes I and II and 7744, volu=es I and II, copies of which you have in your files.
} I trust this material will satisfy your requirements on this matter.
j , Sincerely, , I l . . l R.' L. Kelly, Manager l Northern Service Region l 1 ] i i 1 l
*'ge,,,#' 'e* a - * .* ^ ** *** * , . -- - - , , ----,-.----,e.- v_. _ , - , , - - - , . ., .--
. n ,. #x NRC Cantract No. NRC-03-79-118 MNnklin Rsnarch Centxt FRC Project No. C5257 Pags A oien of The Franun Instaute FRC Assignment No.13 lc mh and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 80(o EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. J.1 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 37 ELECTRICAL THERMOCOUPLE CABLE LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT, ELEV. 46' BOSTON INSULATED WIRE AND CABLE MODEL BOSTRAD7, THERMOCOUPLE EXTENSION WIRE -
CHROMEL ALUMEL REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 YEAR TER CHECKSHEET NO. 37 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S); NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): ' REACTOR CORE THE2MOCOUPLE CABLE CONNECTION (1 TEl-39) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL (7]: SCEW(S): V-16 9 e-I DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITDi(S) CNLYt (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, gr, Rr, P, H, CS,"A, S, (R) , M, I, VM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, (Notstated)Notapplicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 l Licensee Response to NRC SER 3 a, 5t , 2;, 2d-System Consideration Review i;, !b, 0;, "d,
. 44, if- ~
Equipment Environmental Qualification Review ,-, 0:n 50, 5d, !;, i f ,- 5;, Sr., :1, Oj-Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 4, . , L Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary ?;, 75, 7; l l [
. . . . ~ ._. . ._-=.a . -- -_ nr - ; ..; = , - - .n - ..,w--
4d) Franklin Rrsench Center NRC Cantract No. NRC-03 79-118 FRC Proj:ct No. C5257 Pago A Dwmon of The Frenan Inmtsie FRC lb 20th and Racs Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103(215) 448-I @ 0 FRC Assignmtnt Task No. 566 N3. 2[3fd7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAIJFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. J2 SU.4 MARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - CNLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: 1 Tne Licensee (has/hus not) provided a response to the SER concerns. 4 The Licensee (has/h:: ..e;.) specifically stated that the equipment A
;:rlifit' r' M- will'. function when exposed to the applicable DBE '
environmental service conditions. The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. g The Licensee (has.N:: ..e ;. ) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. 1 Justification for interim operation (has/h; nei) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. N Corrective action specified by the Licensee: 3 Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level 1 Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) i The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item-i that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. g The Licensee 4 hee /has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective ' f. action .) The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification j and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) ! I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency -
II . b Modification] III.a Exempt
; II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope j II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available ~
l. 4 83 e4 rea *h = e g' _ar. { ,% '314'e mme*y ,
.f*- f _ W ,, - N( 'r(**T _I- f M O T N '7**.- 4 'M CJa ** N-?
4iSW Frrnklin Rzse .rch Centsr NRC Contr"ct ND. NRC-03-79118 FRC Project No. C5257 Paga A oms.on et The Frankhn insniute 2 20th and Race Sersets. PMa.. Pa.19103 WN 4481000 FRC FRC Assignment Tack No. TO6/ No.13,707 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _@.7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Y ' l Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Eval'ated u Adequately Qualified Life or. Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied . Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Sa'tisfied
- Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)
DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified l II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Oualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scopo of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available 1
.+ ' - - 1 a-. u - g,_ ,_ , _ _
j .. ; gm._,--e . .;- . . ,
L i A NRC Contract No. NRCK)3-79-118 JJU Franklin Rase rch Ceur FRC Project No. C5257 Paga A Dumon of The FranMin Instauu FRC Asaignm:nt No.13 3a 20th and Race Strems. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. OS (, /fo"7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.J Z LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER
- 5. The In-core (core exit) Thermocouple system is not eiWironmentally
, qualified. This system is required to be environmentally qualified by the.TMI Action , Plan. This. system is not recuired to sitigata postulatec design-basis ac=1 cents, taerefore, continued safe operatien of the plant is assurec. It is our intention to environmentally qualify tae connectors, canling, and reference junction sexes by the environmental qualification deocline, if possible. The connectors anc caeling will to replaced with qualified ecui: ment and the reference junction :cxes will be sovec to a controlled environment. The presently installed thermoccuoles themselves are jucqec acceptante 2asec on cany years of operation in their hermally narsn environments.
f e 4 e e-9 e i i I _
', ':'li 11.E.'^1 h c ' 1. . ~ElW' ' ' . - - - ' a- ~ " * ~ ' C' *~ ' ' ~ ~ " W'M -.
#_N NRC Cantr:ct No. NRC-03-79-118 dl,0 Franklin hesetrch Cantar FRC Prcject No. C5257 Paga A Dimen of The Frankun tnstrute FRC Assignment No.13 la 2cth and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 1910U215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. SO(p EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF iOUIPMENT ITEM NO. M i EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 38 ELECTRICAL INSTRUMENT CABLE LOCATED IN CONTAINMENT, ELEV. 26' ROCKBESTOS MODEL FIREWALL RSS-6-ll2 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 YEAR TER CHECKSHEET NO. 38 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 37, 1110, 3246, 3247' FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CONDUCTS
- ACOUSTIC SIGNAL TRANSMISSION (PLANT ID NOT STATED)
LICENSEE SUBMITTAL [7}: SCEW(S): V-17 ; DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIEhCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITIIM(S) ONLY (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, QT, It!', P, H, CS, A, S, (R) , M, I, gM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, (Notstated)Notapplicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No, i Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sumnary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 55, 5 , 24 System Consideration Review ':, 't, 06, 40, 4w, 4f Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 2. *t, !;, 54, L , 5f,
. 5;, Sh, Si, !j Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 4;, 55 Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7;, 't, 7 c--
I *- 6N ,F *9).* $h - l 7*
- 5, W .- _ Mf.84.* *-) Aenenei f -- .
".._MT-_.
4 NRC Contract N3. NRC-03 79-118 ht.t Franklin Res:rrch Centsr FRC Project No. C5257 Pags A oms.on of The Frarkhn lesnruns FAC Assignm:nt No.13 lb 20th aed Rua Streets. Pha.. Pa 19103 G15) 4481000 FRC Task No. S~a G / rd 7 5 2 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF ECUll MENT ITEM NO. 8 SUAMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: Tne Licensee (has/has not) provided a response to the SER concerns. The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is ;
} qualified and/or will ' function when exposed to the applicable DBE '
i environmental service conditions. t The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. I The Licensee (has/mt) proposed a corrective action for this equipment i item whose qualification has not been fully established. g Justification for interim operation (has/hes-not) been provided by the Licensee for tnis equipment-item. [ Corrective action specified by the Licensee: 3 Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment :nodification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) l' The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim
- operation.
l
- j The Licensee (has/hetrmere) provided a schedule for the proposed j corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective .
; action S M M' / 9 P'7 .) ! The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification j and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. ; DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW j - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency l_I.b Modification] III.a Exempt
; II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope
{ II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available
;r g y 7.~3 _ ' --~~~:--- m . s; -~ .
3 . -- ~~__ .. : __
f 4 NRC Contract Ns. NRC 03 79-118 FRC Project ND.C5257 ECG3
- MU Fr:nklin Rrsench Center .
A D6voon of The Frankan Insmuse FRC Assignment No.19 - 2 20th and Race Sweees. Phda,. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. 5 o 6/f 8 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Ef EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM , DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate . 1 Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established ~ Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) driteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures
- o Peak Temperature Adequate t o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate
. Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Seque'nce Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failurer. or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied.
- Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)
DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY
\
I.a Equipment Qualified ) I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification 1 II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified ) II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available
" ~ - ~N , - - y t e* _ . e new _
q _ pw _ _
A NRC C ntract No. NRC-03 79-118 P g3 MU Franklin R:seirch Csnter FRC Project Ns. C5257 A Divisen of Ths Fr.nkan Insntuts FRC A3signm:nt Nc.14 3a 20m and Rue Streets. PMa.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRCTask No. Cd G /f(>"> ' EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. d
. LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER l .
i
? .
- v. ne ac usic .uiur snasucen ans ca.i. cua.cun en u. anssuriu-ca. i.e.cy ..i.. siscurse isn. nav a.s u.a envina nuity cuit-i riu. nis nyt is not naine, w.r u .isisas py ust;n-unis t
uct nu, is i. tun. ten,
, i. i.. acucinue n.i nr. .r si.a e.r u. is unor .
ii siut.ine. ..i.. e.sist.a in icaur my u. u. ei. .ru. .iuuio as ouitrication iin.. i t a n.ri.. unt:1.. i i e t I i t i 1
' , e' l "*b aa 4 9 , .g "t ,
L .
i
#A NRC Crntr ct No. NRC-03-79-118 dhdEnklin R:surch Centir FRC Project No. C5257 Page . o, uon of The Frankhn Instture FRC Asalgnment No.13 5f 3h and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103(215)448 tmo FRC Task No. MC NS7 ~
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 3f NOTES: 1 &, : 4'k e M A M m L Kss-c & 1 M. -- N %=1 / A ,m ,D' M? A A Dg M M=A A k '. s J J'A V 4 Eh
'M M Dh 'u La,: 21 . n .= 'm x &#d ,e_n 0 . '
l . l l
'h' 5w N - _ ., " g,. ---I
- kNI * * *
- M -
- N%
l 41,!!h._. Frank!in Res: arch Center NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 P;ga FRC Prcject No. C5237 A Den el The Frankiin Inst. ruts FRC AssignmInt No.13 lc 2'Jth and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 1910.1 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 606 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. d EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 39 ELECTRICAL CONTROL CABLE LOCATED INSIDE AND OUTSIDE CONTAINMENT ROME CABLE, 600 VOLT CONTROL CABLE REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 YEAR TER CHECKSEEET NO. 39 - LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 28, 29, 36, 1417, 2694, 3222 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): ELECTRICAL DISTRIBUTION (PLANT ID NOT STATED) " LICENSEE SUBMITTAL (7): SCEW(S): XIII-14. -15
^-DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:
(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) h h h Id', h h CS, h S, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:
. Contents ,
Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la Sumary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, Oh, 0;, 2d System Consideration Review 40, 'h, _ I;, Od, k, Of-Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Se, 55, 5;, 52, h, 6f 4 , Oh, Si, Oj Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Oe, 05 Equipment Summary
; Maintenance and Replacement Senedule Summary 72, 't, ~:
i b ---- --m . m.my - ~ n -- = c.. g .x
A NRC Crntrret N3. NRC-03 79-118
'MU Fr:nklin Rssench Center FRC Project N3. C5257 Pago 4 owien et The Frankhn ins:::urs 13 lb 20th and Race Streets Phita.. Pa 19103 (215) 44810m FRC Assignm:nt FRC Task No. togN3./D'*)
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .Qg St14 MARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: 1 Tne Licensee (has/t.;; .w;.) provided a response to the SER concerns. d The Licensee (has/her nat) specifically stated that the equipment 4e r 'ifi f --d'a- will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. j The Licensee (hasA:: . ;;) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. 1 Justification for interim operation (hash: 2 not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. I Corrective action specified by the Licensee: 8 Equipment replacement with qualified equipment , Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other (, ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item , that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim l operation. , I N The Licensee (has/hws 71UT) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule or accomplishing the corrective , action bd .) U X The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC OUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
- ,Ia Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency l "
"fI . b Modification f III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available W b* I 'iO #
k .. ,
---F- - - '
- . __ . . __ _ _ m . . . .. _ ._ .
A NRC C:ntra:t No. NRC-03 79-118 did Frenklin Rzserrch Cent:r FRC Project No. C5257 P 09 A Des.on of The Frankhn insaute 2 FRC AssignmenJt io.p_O 20th and Race Streen. Phde.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. -6 46/ 3 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.J.p. l l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SLEMARY PCRM i DESIGNATION: l NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY - h j Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X . j Mequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately i Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature /Pressuire Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate i o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied , Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing. Satisfied __ Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) 4 DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY 3 I
; I.a Equipment Qualified ___
I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification 1 i II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life i g or Replacement Schedule Justified j III.a Equip:3ent Exempt From Qualification
}
III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review
- IV Documentation Not Made Available i
'b ~
1 w 4
- 4 8shL-, O a , _. i M' e[ p ! gj f ,, g,.6
?% NRC Contract N2. NRC-03 79-118 Pcg3 I UNrenk!!n Rcse:rch Center FRC Project N3. C5257 A OMsion of The Frenidin Insnture FRC Assignment No.17 3a 20m and hee Sweets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. #M/ OJ ~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .lf LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER ,
O. *The only applications of Rome canle inside coetainment are signal caeles for the containment sump level switcaos (see Note C) and for control cable for the pressurizer PCRV blocking valve motor operators. The blocking valves are not safety-related since they are not required to sitigate a LOCA or HEl.3 accident The containment sump level, switches
. are also not required to mitigate LCCA or HEl.3 accident but they say be used by the operator for post-accident monitoring. Otner indications (e.g., Refueling Water Storage Tank water level) are available as back-up indications. The Rome caele consist: of conductors insulated by polyvinyl chloride (PVC) wiu a glass braid and sylar tape and jacketed with PVC. One reference estimatas taat PVC insulation nas a If fetime of >115 years after irradiatien to 5 x 10* Rads' gamma radiation.
Acme has artificially aged the cacia and Arrnenius calculations yield a qualified life of 47 years. See Wisecesir, Electric's Septammer 11, 1982. letter to Mr. Harold R. Centen concerning resconse to me PSNP environ-sental qualification SER (scocifically Enclosure 1, Section 3.7) for a furcer discussion of aging. Radiatiert tests my Re.no on PVC'jacyst satarial indicata taat it retains fis tensile strengu at a x 10 Rads. Other tests snow that PVC retains its jansile strenge and dielectric strengu at radiation levels of 1 x 10 Racs. .The caole was successfully testac by Acme for LOCA simulation (tamperature, pressure, and 10C% relative humidity caly). Therefort, the Rome caole is considered qualified for tempersture, pressure, and relative humidity bota inside and outside containment. One reference states that PVC is not attacked by strong acidic or strong alkaline chemical agents. Since the caole has both a PVC jacket and PVC insulation wnich is secarated by glass braid and mular tape, the caole is considered qualified for caemical spray inside containment by analysis. In conclusion, tae Rome control cable at PSNP is considered fully qualified to the COR Guidelines for use outaide contairment (see Nota H). Insice containment ce caole is qualified to survive all accident congitions for un to four sentas after the accicent (11mitad by 1 x 10 Racs radiation), sut it deus not - fully meet the documenta* ion requirements of tae OCR Guicelines fr.r one year of post-accident oceration insica centainment. The cable for tne sume level switees is :eing stolaced and tae caole on ce PCRV biccking valve ocerators is satisfactory since tae ecui; ment is not safety-related. Four montas of operation of the level switenes would allcw time for an alternate metaca of performing this function te :e 'isolementac. There-fort, continued safe oceration of the plant is assured until the caole . and level indicators art replacad. . O v re : :::y r <:,~ . .~;- d Z- y 1, na- r- nin _._ , ,
-- r .m -
4LLO Franklin Resstreh Centu . NRC Contract No. NRC-03 79-118 Page FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 c i.on of m Frenun Insnturs FRC Assignm:nt No.33 5f m and Race Screets. Phda.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No..,ff.f/M EQUlPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Of 1 NOTES:
! The licensee provided 2 letters from Rome Cable Corporation concerninst i
l PVC insulated and Jacketed cable. However the letrers [28, 29] are not evidence
~ < of qualification as required by the DOR stuidelines because they are not l
test reports which can be evaluated by an independent reviewer. [ 1 i Regarding the cables for the PORV block valves, the licensee stated that
'the valves are not safet'/.related eculpment and therefor the cable does not require qualification. However NUREG 0737 item II.G.1 indicates that power supplies require upgrading to maintain the ability to either open or close the PORV block valves. The Licensee should ensure that the cable is also qualifiedv i
i e l i i i l
+ , j 1
1
. 1. 4'. N[3 5
- 4N $7 L =% -# 84 8^ A d4* =[ -
"h< # - = ' - - * ^ *- ' . _ . - . -, l"_ --
#s NRC Centrrct No. NRC-03-79-118 $ffrInkhn Research Center FRC Prgject ND. C5257- Pags A omsen of The Frank!!n Instmute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race 5ereets. Phda.. Pa.1910U215) 448 Itax) FRC Task No. 80lo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 40 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 40 ELECTRICAL INSTRUMENT CABLE LOCATED INSIDE AND OUTSIDE CONTAINMENT BOSTON INSULATED WIRE AND CABLE MODEL BOSTRAD7, TWISTED SHIELDED PAIR REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 YEAR TER CHECKSHEET NO. 40 .
LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 23, 620, 3829 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): . CONDUCTS INSTRUMENTATION SIGNALS (PLANT ID NOT STATED) LICENSEE SUBMITTAL [7}: SCEW(3): IIII-12, -13 DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, gM , RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, , (Not stat h Not applicable i LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No. Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 ; Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, L, L, % System Consideration Review -t;, ,tb, t;, !d, !:, -! f Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, 5b, Sc, 5d, Se, 5f, Sg, Sh, Si, !j i Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation - 5 2, '5-Equipment Summary Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary 72, 'h,
-~~~~..~n~~. ..=~.t.. . . - - - m ~.- > = n - .. .:: ~r- ~ : - ~ ~ - - - - - - -- . -
t l i h, NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 Pago M Franklin R:serrch Center FRC Project No. C5257 A omsen or The Franthn institute FRC Assignmsnt No.13 lb zern'and Racs Scruts. Phda. Pa 191031245) 448 tmo FRC Task No. S"d A6 fb "7
. I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. ML !
l l
)
l
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: l i i 1 Tne Licensee (has/1--- cn , ,,rovided a response to the SER concerns. g The Licensee (has/h== -t) specifically stated that the equipment is
; qualified andfeg will ' function.when exposed to the applicable DBE " ; environmental service conditions. '
1 , l The Licensee has presented in5ormation which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiatson source
,_,,_ Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) ; Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress . Other ( )
The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item j that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim i operation. i i The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action . ) q The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) d. .[I . a Qualified { II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification' Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available j . N..'A.'. P:;. s '.... J.~ . Y' . . ..Y.,'. & } n * '
t $ j-.- v. g - - - 2 -
~ -, -- e- -,-,-- - - - .--r -- ,e.. --a------ - ~
v v . NRC CIntract N3. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project N3. C5257 Pag 3 h Fr:nkhn R:se:rch Center - A De of The FranWinInsntute FRC Assignment No.J3 2 20th and Race Sweses. Phde.. Pa.19103 (215) 4481000 FRC Task No. fo6 /f~d 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Mt EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Mequate Mequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Mequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Mequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Mequate o Required Profile Enveloped Mequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequare criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied l Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies i (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regardim; Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) . DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified Y I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification , II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available l
** =--
- w ~ ~ m - a. g g .
--~=, , _ . . _ , , ,
A NRC Contract No. NRC-03 79-118 brtnk!!n Reserreh Ccnter FRC Project N3. C5257 Peg 3 A Dmion of The Fran%n Instituts FRC AselCnment o.J3 3a 20m and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa.19103 (215) 4441000 FRC Task No. 6/TC7 _ EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. N t LICENSEE RESPONSE to NRC SER FF. The Boston Insulated Wire and Cable Co, instrue:entation cable used at
! PSNP consisted of twisted, shjelded pair conductors insulated and jacketed overall with Bostrad material. The thermocouple extensio9 ! wire was constructed similarly of identical materials. The Bostrad , ! cables were environmentally tested as documented in S N Report No. 3901
- and Conax Corporation Test Report No. I?$-348. The EIW tasts incluced thermal aging tests to the equivalent of 115 years of operation at 40*C (104*F) based on Arrhenius calculations. See Wisconsin Electric's September 11, 1981 lettar to Mr. Harold R. Centon concerning rasconse to the PSNP environmental qualification SER (specifically Enclosure 1, Section 3.7) for a further discussion of aging. The cables were suo-jacted to LOCA simulation after expcsure t,2 5 x 10' Rads gama raciation.
The S W test did not include chemical spray but tne tarcerature anc pressure profile did envelop the PSNP specificatens. The S W LCCA test included the maintenance of 10C% relative numidity. The tests concuctac by Conax Corporation incluoed pre-irradiation of tne caole to 1.3 x 10* Rads gamma radiation followed by LCCA simulttien for 24 hours f rcluding chemical spray. The chemical spray solution consistec of a toric acic (H3303 ) solution (2500 ppm Baron) tuffered with sodium hydroxica (NaCH) to obtain a pH of between ? and 10. Since environmental conditions inside the PSNP containment are expected to return to normal within 12 hours of the accident (except for radiation and humicity) and tests demonstrata the qualification of the cable for both rad 4 tion and 100%
; . relative humidity, the cante is considered qualified for all postulated accident parameters at PSNP based on the combination of the above tests. -l a i
1 I l t I i l - , i 1
""*' K'Cl W u_ '_._* ' * ;; _ , c T"'" " ~ ~. ~ < *c ' '~ XT,*% :W.* r*?~ -?
- ' - - - - ~ - ~ ~ - - ~ -
A NRC Contract N . NRC-03-79-118 Pag] lj00hr:nklin R:serreh Centr FRC Project N3. C5257 A Dimn of The frannhn inst:tute FRC Assignment No.13 50 20th and Race Screets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. EM/>/fo 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF E'QUIPMENT ITEM NO. h). EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTE QUEIFICATION REVIEW Criteria DOR Guidelines d ; NUREG-0588, Cat. I ; NUREG-0588, Cat. II . NRCREQUkREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE* LICENSEE QUEIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTE DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.) EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ! ! ! p.4 -[/_ Equipment Type [ [ Manufacturer's Name ! ! ! (5.2.2/-/-) !. 05 N ! OI ! Model Number (5.2.2/-/-) . Af fM . p[I* k Serial Numcer . g .
/)
Features / Mounting' ! ! ! l ! (5.2.6/-/-) ! ! ! Connections / Interfaces (5.2.6/-/-) ! G ! 1' ' ! ! Location / Elevation 3
!. OAgnnWdf. 1 Equipment ID No. ! g . .
QUEIPICATION REPORT ! ! ! (8.0/5.0/5.0) ! ! ! Report ID Number g j Gy - fg / . Report Date ! ! -
! 7/6 f ! f& 1 * "" * * *Y inyJ i BZA) i Prepared for ! ! ! .$$M d fd f .5 -r++ ec!.
Referenced Reports y 3 p. y y4 Qualification Method ! ! ! (5.1, 5.3/2.1, 2.4/2.1, 2.4) !~ g //- ! I 1 QUEIFICATION TEST PROGRAM Functional Test Description ! ! 1_ _, ,_,,; (5.2.5/2.2.9/2.2.9) AA(
, Operating Conditions ! ! !
(-/2.2.10/2.2.10) Icad/ Cycles / Voltage / ' ggg4_h ! Current /Freq. 2 ! ! . . _. . ... . , . . . . . .;a; . m ma- __ _..m - _m._,_.. _ _ . - - _. . . . . _ . . . _ _ _ _
.r .y i
4 , NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03 79-118 - 0 / ;' : - l Nrs.nklin R:serrch Cent:r FRC Pr: Ject N2. C5257 2ac,o \' A Otvmon d Thi Frcnnhn Insttuts 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa.19103 f215) 448 IT3 FRC Asalgnm:nt No.13 FRC Task No. S'~d G [ r 07 i5L - e- ,
. a 0
4" EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQdl5 MENT ITEM NO. f/4 l c.%
$/ #
( j j/ P b -,,) DEFICIENCY
~
NRC REQUIREMENTS . g ~ , 4 WITH SECTICN REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIPIC ATION- - (X OR ' - '< (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMIT *AI. DOCUMENfAT1*ih'I E
. NOTE NO.). i , ;, .~.
It Acceptance Criteria ! ! ! * 1 ( 5. 2. 5/2. 2.1/2. 2.1) i Mk ! ... _!
! # 3 1 f, + ' Y' .
1 . Accuracy (5.2.5/-/-) ! ,' . j4 -
.'. e '; . .~.s , .- u -
Number of Specimens j '
% p . /0 ! s; ' . . , :. z._
Test Instruments Calibrated ! ! (w . 1 1 () ~, , 3, ; Safety Function (Active / ! ! l' .- Passive) (-/2.1. 3/ 2.1. 3) !
! M[ .
2.; d Test Duration (5.2.1/-/-) -
}g -
Accident Duration (Envir. ! ! ~ -
' ' f", ,", . i *G .1 /: " 1, Above Normal) (5.2.1/-/-) !* 1 ( ' '
l'
'. '[ #. ~
Required Function Time ! F A A4^ - ! . < I' - .
/ ~p .
Vf
. .- y . ,
Test Sequence (General) ( 5. 2. 3/2. 3.1/ 2. 3.1) pp ! O j r-
~ ~ / !
g g e!- q ._ Test Sequence (NUREG-0588, ! ! ' ! ~ 1 ~' Cat. I) (-/ 2. 3.1/-) ! !- _ 1, ' /d
'~
- 1. Representative Sample
- 2. Baseline Data
! ! Me / - - !
_ _. ! 3
.x
- 3. P=rformance Extremes ! ! ! . - - . ;p
- 4. Thermal Aging ! J ! ,
! ' . d __ . 'w
- 5. Radiation Aging ! ! ,, ! ,
- 6. Wear Aging ! ! ! ' J ,i
-" l'
- 7. Vibration / Seismic !r "",
- 8. DBE Exposure ! ! c' .-
- 9. Post-DBE Exposure ! ! ,
,! 7
- 10. Inspection ! , f,- '! _ r J! ..,
! N/ ' ! m - 1 j- ! Aging ! I' " 1, - +
(5.2.4, 7.0/4.0/4.0) ! ! , Mh-- Thermal Aging / Basis g _. L g !' t Material Aging ! ' ' ; 1 Evaluation (7'0/-/-) ! N ....
! ;< /c ! F ! . ! ..- . , .~
j Materials Susceptible ![ ! ,4 ,3 . ,{~ ~
,,, K ! ;
(Thermal) ( 5. 2. 4, 7. 0/-/-) ! - v' !c '. - Radiation Aging, Type
~ ,a
__ _ eb /
. ~ ,e* 1 * .,*ee; , egasseg 9 -eem b owy pay =q.,+
l.- y = 9w 9 D***4.p*==% * . g.9 e= pre .e. , , .pg. *
- g e' , .,
me+ ' ' - *
.nn _ . 6 % . . - : : . . h' u. . sw .L.. ' '
t ' h . > J ; - 'd - . r Yh l %, , _. . __ .. *?.' l
U 6 1 A .. NRC Contract Na. NRC-03-79-118
, 8Nnklin Resetrch Center FRC Fr; ject No.C5257 Pago n' -
A omn'of The Franan Ingwte f IRC 5c 20th and Race Sa'sers. Phie.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1 2 FRCAssignment Task No. foNo.13[fd7 G l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFI' CATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Vd
,.l I ^'
NRC RFDUIREMENTS ,' DEFICIENCY f WITH'SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (. OR (DOR /0588-I/0 $ 88-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)
- * , Radiation Aging, Dese (rd) __ /1/ / g @ h '
y . Radiation Aging, ccse Rate ! ! . g !
! ! f 1 ' Radiation Aging, Method ! ! ! ~ + ,. Materials Susceptible ! ! ! / '(Radiation) .(5.2,4, 7.0/-/-) 1 ! !
3 4' Operational Aging. ! ! ! (-/4.2/-) , !
,~ Other Age Ccnditioning ! r
(-/4.2/-) ! ! D 1 Qualified Life Claimed / ! ! ! g# k# #
- Established (5.2.4/4.10/-) ! . .
Normal Amt:icnt Temperature !g ! jt/ A ! Normal Ambient Radiation ! ! [ "' Normal Ambient Humidity ! ! ! 3;
~ ! Y ! !
(, On-Going Surveillance and ! g ,g ! ' Preventive Maintenance 2 %"! i' . '( s 0 0/-/-) l On-Going Aulysis of ! ! ! Fail.ures.and Degradation ! Jj ! ! (7.0/-/-) ! V ! ! - / Margin (General) (6.0/3.0/3.0) g4 1
! I !
g Margin (NUREG-0588, k f k Cat. I) (-/3.2/-) ! ! !
.1. Temperature (+15'F) ! ! ,1
- 2. Pressure (+10%, ! ! !
10 psig max) ! ! !
~
- 3. Radiation !
(not required) ! ! !
- 4. Time (+10%, +1 hour ! ! ! + function time minimum) ! ! !
b a 5
;&km. . - n:c n=--=,, n= - n. == = - - -p-
A NRC C:ntract N2. NRC-03-79-118 0 branklin Rtserreh Cent:r FRC Project Nc. C5257 P293 A Otvisen of The Frcnkhn Instuti FRC Assignm:nt Ns.13 5d 20th and Race Streets. Phda Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. f4 6[ro 7 EQUlPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Wd NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.) ACCIDENT CONDITIONS 1 1 ! IDCA/MSLB/RELB/Uncontroll'ed ! ! ! (4.1, 4.2, 4.3.1,-4.3.3/ !I dC M ! kOC A ! 1.1, 1.2, 1.5/1.1, 1.2, 1.5) I ! ! Radiation Type ! ' '
~ ![ ! Radiation Ocse 20STRAD'!
Radiation Dose (rd) (4.1.2/1.4/1.4) ! j, gf, f I!
! 1 X 1C8 2 X 1C8 150 %
75 %
! ! 4 X 1C8 50 % !
Radiation Dose Rate (rd/hr) !)t/#f ! 5 X 108 25 % ! Radiation Qual. Method ! 67#t EM ! ! (5.3.1/-/-) ! , ! !
! I ! /.D/o# $
m ty to Concentrated 1 r !
,,7 m / p g (4.1. 2/1. 4. 6/1. 4. 6) ! ! !
Equipment Susceptible to Beta Radiation (4.1.2/-/-) A ' Radiation Dose (Normal + ! ! ! Accident) (4.1.2/-/-) ! ! !
, Plateout Dose Considered ! ! !
(-/1. 4 8/1. 4 8) I ! ! j Gamma + Beta Dose (ed) ! ! / !
)'
i ( 4.1. 2/1. 4. 7/1. 4. 7) ! ! ! l I ( t l t i { I ! )* t i* I l , i i l l l
*' f 79 0 E 'JE7 NN*""*M 5 ' *" T.MI N
- 7 T T'd )3 C- 7 *P ~ 8*I.b. X ! ~~ # '"7 " " " ' '
^ ' ' ~ ~"
A, NRC C:ntrcet N3. NRC-03-79-118 i du Frank!1n Rzsearch Csnt:r FRC Prclect N3. C5257 Paga i A Dmsen of The Frankhn Insnture FRC Assignment No.13 5e l 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 tom FRC Task No. Tde /f'd '7 1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. s1 I l I
-I NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY l WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE No.)
ENVIRONMENTAL PROFILE ! ! ! OF ACCIDENT CONDITIONS ! ! ! Rate of Temp./ Press. ! ! ! Increase ! ! ! Peakt *F/psig/RH/ Time
!ggj/_"/ ! h- !
Decrease To: *F/psig/RH/ Time p (**$" I'*,',','"p
, ,,,,,,,,, u, ,
wein io ..ca. sis- ms co mn Decrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time ! .. 'Ms,a .n, s g ;g
! iso on.-a4 ars. 2:s- :s ce Decrease To *F/psig/RH/ Time ! 4~~] . T"'"* # " ! ! G" !
Equipment Surface Tempera- ! ! .5 4e/l y sf/ro) t hu ! ture (MSLB) (-/1. 2. 5. C , ! // [ ! ,, fjf,y,/ fg/ ff r/As !
- 2. 2. 6/1. 2. 5.C, 2. 2. 6) ! !
Spray Qualification Method ! [p !
! 4 ge n d !
3 /1.3, 2.2.8/1.3, gg ' Spray Composition ! QB0-NaOH 3 ! # p p f3 g , n +- 1 (4.1.4/1.3, 2.2.8/ ! Solution ! ! 1.3, 2.2.8) ! pH: 7.9- !
#a. o rff (N f'/*
- 1
! 10.0 ,! !
Spray Density (gpm/f t 2) : Qg . Spray Duration 5 5 A yrM ! Submergence Duration ( 4.1. 3/ 2. 2. 5/2. 2. 5) 5 h A ! In-Leakage Considered ! ! ! (5. 2. 6, 5. 3. 2/-/-) ! ! ! Time to Submergence ! ! ! Dust Environment g[ h ! ] (-/2. 2.11/ 2. 2.11) ! ! I
~ -- :-. m r m - e .._.,_-.- - - - . . ~ , - _ - - - ; S ,' r I
NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79118 . A,lu LL Franklin Rssearch Centzr FRC Project No. C5257 P go A Dween of The Frenann insutuis FRC Assignmsnt No.13 5f
; 20th and Race Strws. Phde.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. To/, / S~d7 1
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. f.A l i NOTE 1's l
/ ^!- Le P- M JLe ' A a k s ' ~
kA - g a - l 3 i Wisconsin Electric Power Company
! - PSB Room 320 .
231 W. Michigan Avenue '
- Milwaukee, WI. 53201 . - Attention: R. K. Hanneman .
Gentlemen: ( - With regards to our letter of March 27, we are enclosing photocopies l -- of BIW Part Numbers 7244-H-002 and 7245-H-004.which you have requested. .
. These part numbers are constructed with hypalon insulation and jackets.
and meet the requirements set forth in our Report B901. Should you have any further questions, please contact us. I, Very truly yours,
~ ~
! BOSTON INSUl.ITED WIRE AND CABLE COMPANY
! L. S. Lisker l l _
Applications Engineer _ 1 k g.- 0 I . .' , a ,, j , p *
, ,,,4 1 _, , , , , , _ , , , ,
.. m -
e
/.,' % NRC Contract No. NRC.03 79-118 bd FranMin R:se:rch Cener FRC Project N2. C5257 P:go A Dimion of The Frankun Inuitute . FRC Asalgnment No.13 5g 20th and Race Streets. PMa.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 96 fd / 7 ~
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M
- ,,0 g-4.. %. ...Q, u ..4_ ...r. . .f.
n
.g.;.,..
- g. .p.. g.,., . ., J J. . .
, g h.
1
\ .g y ".: .* -. .
g .. . l. . . .. - CALCULAfte CONTAIPsit47 g.;.*J : :. _ 9 .
". n . .l . .
1
. %*l.t" It TUWIWWD100itTDif - . . o . - .'N.
l.
.. .;. j., / . .
g . s i . . . . .. ; . . i, ... , 7,
. ..... ... ., . l... .,....-. .. i . c..
L. 240
..... /.
3 ._. . . . . ... .... . _
\ .. .
1 j
, __ . ... -\ .
4 9_. . . . .
. .. .. .i. . . . .f , .1 1 c ..
A . .... ...l.
...e; ... .i.. . .. . . . . _ g .
3 220 ... - . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . ., . , ,
.I .. . . . . - .
l'. ..!
. . . . .... .. 3..... .
es ..
.y,s. .
- 4 I. .
,., .e ..
ll_ l. i., a .. .
.a. %. .. -. 1. ...t ....-l i l M 200 '_.
o g
., ., 2.. % .J. . t ,,..
i .
._ .: .;.. ~. , .1 .
1.. t:r,! .g.. ....
. , ~i _. l. .
y ... .
.. .,p . . .. .. . .. . "I, . ... . ... ..( .)' . ., . j .. ,I . ]...
1s0 i ,. .- . .
...a,.. ,n .>_ . . ,
a
..,l . :. .. l.. l .
7 ..4 s . . . .,
. . , . .i.T .. . . - . . . . . .. . -. .. .g. . . . . . .l, .. ,.i i. l .
6
= = 164. . .. . _ . . . . . . .\ .3 . .I . ;', .. .,. i .. . . .
- p. .i,
, , . g.1.... . .
g ...
..i .. g ., . .. . *f .l . , , .. . _ , ._ i, e . . . .. g . .. ... . . .. .. . . .,.T.J .m . _ .. . . .' . i. , ..
n . . s. 3 g....,..,......-.?.. 6
.. . . i 100 1Coe . 14 . 7385. srccares ,. F.l p re ja. , $WELIMNr fBRESMS TRARRIENT .. A .&& 1 pa * - ; '.. ,P'(... ** 4. . . . . p.
L.i j .
.h.,, '. ; . . 4. ,. 41. ../ % a. _,
(
. .r. 7 ., . .x '% . . . .. -:-... s & g , . .. ,. - g /- .J. .8 . -,,,,, .s . s g . ,. ., g ... ._ . . %_ s. g. , . ... . . ,u .
g . f\ . J s f f . N. .mg e40 ,/ .. . V -. .' . s , l' .t~ ~ {
=. ) [. [
P, , N. N . A.L.L M.A.l.l.A.8.LE. D.4 AC f
.e / * .I o g
_. . . . - . . _. \ . . . . -
.\h
[ U. h
* * *\ \ ._
N
\ . g E30 -.
gg 3 . .. .y \ .g _ gg e.
,.. J,.... -. ,
4 - 6..
. 6a .l. .. . , \ , . . . +a6.
g...
\.. . .. ..A. ... .-.. .
to j
..J,". .a.. ..A g-i aum // ..a... .... .... s AMIlY ' s/ ,-, I .. .
s 6... . s
. ... .. a = .1 J la . .af \. ... . ; . J. a .g
- 4. ... .. .: . . . .
.,.. l I s a . .. . I 3tOl.'D0s.74 % .gle -
- e. .
.. p l =.
m . , ;
._... e .e s... . i ; -
[
.. s . .s ...
g
.= . . . s ;. ..
O ! * . O I l'
- g t ' ' l II t '
0 -'
. e s -
M 1000 806 coa Tim, sacamos . Ftcuar 2A
.. , . 3 .- r.
yg _-ggjg j f.% 3e W J./M..m rr. - - -N
- L* ".N i - -NW!W1't e
. . ~
l A NRC Contrcct No. NRC-03-79-118 l di,3 Franklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5237 Paga ' A onns.on of The Frankhn institute . FRC Assignmtnt No.13 1a 20th and Race Streets. Phasa.. Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 50 fo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4I EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 41 ELECTRICAL POWER CABLE LOCATED OUTSIDE CONTAINMENT OKONITE; OKONEX INSULATED, OKOPRENE JACKETED, 5 KV POWER CABLE REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 YEAR
. TER CHECKSHEET NO. 41 -
4 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 36, 2694, 1417 j FUNCTION (PLANT ID): 4160 v. ELECTRICAL POWER DISTRIBUTION (PLANT ID NOT , j STATED)
; LICENSEE SUBMITTAL (7]: SCEW(S): IIII-9 1
1 i i f f '? i DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NPC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) RT, CS, S, (R) , M, I, gM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, l Not stated, Not applicable i LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: [ Contents Checksheet Page No. 1 Equipment Item la 1 l Sununary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environriental Qualification Summary Forms 2 s . l Licensee Response to NRC SER 3 a , t , 20, 2d 3
- System Consideration Review '
te, ;L, Oc, 02, 4 , 4 f-t i Equipment Environmental Qualification Review {, {, 5]. { *:, Of, I .,, . . . , .., , InstalledTMILessonsharnedImplementation Ca, 05-Equipment Sununary
~ }
i Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 72, 75, ?: 4 4 .. ..,g > -Am* ~
42JU Franklin Remrch Center NRC Contrcct No. NRC-03 79-118 FFtC Pr ject Ns. C3257 P:go A Diwson of The Franklin insmute FRC 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Assignrnent Task No. f6No.MT/'"7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. V/ SUMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: j Tne Licensee (has/ hee-eet-) provided a response to the SER concerns. g The Licensee (has/h:2 etl specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and)4r, will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. d The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for tnis equipment-item. Corrective action specified by the Licensee: Equipmeat replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification, testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed 1 corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective I action .) The Licensee states that the , equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) <
lI.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt , II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available k mm m ; o + e , , .:. g
. _, s N w.'t uu~ ' * * * * ~ * * * * * * '
_ ._ .. . awn :~ m *m *1-s=m" ?. .-_ - - - _ .
#x NRC Contr ct Nc. NRC-03-79118 FRC Project No. C5257 Pego.
ddNr:nklin Rssatrch Csnt:r A on on of The Franian Insutwe FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. Tod U#7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. V/ EQUIPMENT' ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM DESIGNATION: NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY - Documented Evidence of Qu'alification Adequate . Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Mequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) Criteria Regarding Temperaturs/ Pressure Exposure: o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Mequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied ( Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied
'. Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied i Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat., I) t DESIGNATION:
NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY i j I.a Equipment Qualified 1
- I.6 Equipment Qualification Pending Modification i II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established l II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life i or Replacement Schedule Justified i III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available 5
s yp Mp=As y 4 nyn n- 4 i 1 *@ WS4W-
.: = = =. n= g. ,-. .. . = .
A NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 ' lbrinkIIn R:se:rch Cent:r FRC Project Nr. C5257 P g3 A Diwson of The Frankhn Insneure FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20th and Race Ssreens. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44810m FRCTask No. So6 /W7
%m:
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. V/ LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER ca. n. at Cn. nit. sxv Ser emi.s us.e.c ,.r> sn.insuiatee saf.ty ins. onects.n ,w.(i..ete. rs ca.or.no , ame.nw ren.)are amenenc=ies. 3aczet.e (i.e., outyi nes.r a.ies ar. oni, e .esee t. :ocz relative notetty, rief ation. and aging. De sutyi ruocer insulation nas seen generically testee for aging to a 25 year life at 70'C in caseination witn rasiation to S a 13 taas gamma. Since taese cantes are normally scenergtree and are 1ecated in tne austliary ano control tellef aqs enere tse amatent tem.ersture eoes not normally exceee 81*F. tne cualified If fe was entra.elatae using the Arrnenius eewation ta suca greater taan 40 years. See etscansin Electric *s testammer 11. 1381 letter ta *. narste 4. :enton in ressanse ta tae 7tp environmental sueltff cation "X (ssocifically Esclosure 1. fection 3.7) for a furtner eiscussten af aging. De %etetty resistance at tutyl insulation was sesenstestae ty a suc:essful test ta satgritas steam (40 3:19,142'0) far 11 cays following essesure ta 5 ;3 taas samme. Sfstlar tests are setwentae for tae neeorsne jacnet also .6tn suc:sssful tsut ta. De seeortne jacnetee caste (not sutyl inplattan) .as aise sue:essfully testae ny Okantte several stees to 2 s 13 sees gassa ana '. :.A canottions. Dese tests srovtee suffittent sectmentation ts, tae evaliff cation of 5 tais caole 14100% relative mutetty. 5 : ;3 8aas samma esciation. 40 years 11fe, ano one year of sost-accicent sceration. %4g a ,w g m. ,, a . 4 N *' "*
.~ _
t 4._w NRC Contrzct No. NRC-03-79-118
.h%nkhn Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Pigo A oimen of The Frank:in Institute FRC Assignmsnt No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 191031215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 80lo EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. W l l
EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 42 ELECTRICAL INSTRUMENT CABLE LOCATED INSIDE AND OUTSIDE. CONTAINMENT
! OKONITE; OKOIHERM INSULATED, OKOSEAL JACKETED, TWISTED SHIELDED PAIR ! REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 1 YEAR TER CHECKSHEET NO. 42 .
LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 36, 1340, 1417, 2694
, FUNCTION (PLANT ID): INSTRUMENTATION CABLE LICENSEE SUBMITTAL [7]: SCEW(S): IIII-10, -11 i
DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)
@ @ h RT, CS,hS, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None,
-i Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: Contents Checksheet Page No. j Equipment Item la Sumary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb f Equipment Environmental Qualification Sumary Forms 2
, Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 35, 2;, 2d t*
System Consideration Review ia, 4L, 46, 44, -,G i Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 5e, 55, 5:, 52, Sc, 5f, Sg, Sh, Si, Sj j Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation S. 55- ' Equipment Summary 1 Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7. , 7 b , 7;
.l c r ,: ,. y ... = - m ,1 = r n. w .m _: - ,..- c=-
6- NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 7
$3d tank!1n Reserrch Centsr FRC Project No. C5257 P:gs A Diws.on of The Franklin Insnture FRC essignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. fd(o /rd"7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _S2.
SUMMARY
OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE: 1 Tne Licensee (has/hout) provided a response to the SER concerns. 1 The Licensee (has/hmt) specifically stated that the equipment is qualifiad and/ec will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. j The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established. Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment-item. J Corrective action specified by the Licensee: l Equipment replacement with qualified equipment l Equipment :nodification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source _ Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ) The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule- for accomplishing the corrective action .) The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC OUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW
- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3-of this TER for Legend)
I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt . III.b Not in Scope FII 2 nualificationNotEstablished] II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available i
<-w+c c_+-- --+ a ~~-w + =wer---~-- ~<
NRC Contract N:. NRC-03-79-118 A,MJ Frink!!n Rsseirch Centa FRC Project No. C5257 P g3 A 'Divmon of The Frankhn insnture FRC Assignment No. }3 2 20th and Race Streets. Ptuta.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. Tof, Ken EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 22.( r EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION
SUMMARY
FORM 1 i j DESIGNATION: X = DEFICIENCY NRC REQUIREMENTS Documented Evidence of Qu&lification Mequate . 9 Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established X j Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately i Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)
! Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Requi ed) * - Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:
o Peak Temperature Adequate f: o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied
- Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied I Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies j (If Any) Satisfied j Criteria Regarding Functior.al Testing Satisfied i Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied j Test Duration Margin (1 hour + Function Time) Satisfied _
i Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) l DESIGNATION: NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY l I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established 1 II.D Equipment Not Qualified II. Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except. Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.n Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available i i 1
1.9 A NRC Contrrct No. NRC-03-79-118 20 Franklin R: search Ccnter FRC Project No. C5257 P:s3 l A Daws.on of The FunkanInsecute 30 20th and Race Stroess. Phde.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC FRCTaskAssignment No. CoNo.13, 6 /1 ~07 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. d.1 1 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER i II. no Okenite instrumentation caele insics and outstes containment is
. Chetaere (stisenne russer) Insulated twistee sateldee pair concuctors wita am Okeseal (pelyvinyl caloride) jactat. a sistlar caole vita an e' verall glass trate in Itee of tae Pvc jacaet .as environmentally testes my Okentte as secuentee in Franatta Institute Final tesort F-C369e (Abstractee). The test reoort occuments that tae caoles .ere preeges for a calculatae eeutvalent 11fettae of 122 years Osing i arenentus metnedelegy) at an aselent temoeratan af 60'c (lac"). '
another reference states that untremotata4 stitcane ruccer f asalattan has a lifetime of 3113 years 49 7C*C. The caales were f reno 14tas during thereal agieg to $ a 10 Aacs gasuna raatatten. See etscansin Electric's $eeteneer 11. 1581 let".o ta =r. Marolo 4. :entan canca mteg neoense to tne 7th7 savironmenul saltf tcation 512 (s:ecifically Enclosure 1. Section 3.7) for a furt.v atscussten of agteg. ?> e cables were then simultaneously evans to raatattan. creetcal stray, and t.CCA cone 1tions. During tais 'm simulation, ue castes en essesee ta an aceittonal 1.5 a 133 Gas gamma notattan as . ell as caemical spray conststing of 20C0 =ca :orsa as soric acte (d,13,) aufferee to a ort of 3-11. The tamoerature ano aressure arsftiet as well as tne restation ano costcal stray tests envelos tae 85N7 re-gu.t rements. The 31 eay LOCA steulation inclucing 27 says at 212" and 1005 relative nateity was followee ny an accit? anal 100 say staas test at 212 4. These tests cualify tae caste for 10C n14tive %aicity are for the egutvalect sf treater than one year of :ost sectdent sceratica instee or outatee tae 79MP cantainment. The PVC jactat aas teen cacu-mentee to survive sistlar concittens, so its use in Iteu of tne averall glass trate will not adversely affect tae caole cultfication. The jaczet performe ne safety function after tastallation. Therfare, tels caele is constoeroe avaltftee far all enverensental parameters ssecif tee for PeleP. W' O
*-, . . , I Tbu 'M .6. +
- _ . . . , . . - . _ _ . - *.---w
A NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 Paga 300!! Frank!in Rsssarch Centrr FRC Project N2. C5257 A Divmon cf The Frenan Insntur: FRC Asaignm:nt No.13 5f 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa.19103 (215) 448. loco FRCTask No. fo6 / C~o'7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .!/_) NOTES: l The licensee Scew Sheet describes the installed cable as follows: l I
, Equipment Description -
SYSTEM: Generic fW r i PLANT ID N0.: N/A e l COMPONENT: Instrumen on-
% Cable, MANUFACTUllER: Okonite H0 DEL NO.: OkothernuQInsulatad OkosealAlacketed, Twisted, Shielded Pair The cables tested are described on pages Si and 51.
Neither the SCEW sheet nor the note (reproduced on page 3a) erovides sufficient information to establish that the installed equipment is the same as the equipment tested. The guideline requirements on similaritv of installed and tested equipment are reproduced below for convenience. Idaddition more detailed information on what is considered to be tvoe testing of cable is contained in IEEE-383-74. For Convenience the appropriate sections are reproduced below also.
- 2. Test Seeetmea The test specimen should be the same model as the equipment being qualified. The type test should only be considered valid for equipment identical in design and material construction to the test specimen. Any deviations should be ev4164ted as part of the qualifica- V
, tion documentation (see also Section 8.0 below).
Ol d. I d.d _i f
'^ - ' ' D U[ ' 'b'..*,,,.'
- _2MC~ ;[ *I _; i .. , ; . ;.-SI F. 1- J '
- - . IOf1 I '
4 NRC C;ntract N2. NRC-03-79-118 du Frenklin Rssurch Csntir FRC Project Ns. C5257 Prg3 A DMsion of The Franklin insatute FRC Asaignment No.13 5g 20th and Race Streets. Phde.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 80 (- EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. @ LliS6-3?3~2Y 1.11 W Desertasien. Thie denenstaen or 12 Type Test Samples. The temples tested af-=8-*= should include as a minusum: should contain the conductor. insulation fill. 1.11.1 Camdeetor - matenal identi, ers, jacket, binder tape, overall jacket, shield. Gemeien, aise, ser===84== coatine. Ing. and field sphces whica are representative
- 1.3.1.2 laeolation - material identi, et the cable casseory beins qualified. Table 1 Assessa, tauskmass, mothed of application. liste eisse which have been consuiered repre.
t.it_s Aamenably luultkonductor cables sentative of these estegories. The sample only) - number and arrassesment of coe. lengths should be sulficient to permat reliable dusesse. Silers, benders, test readings and evaluation consistent nith 1.3.1.4 Shieldins - tapes. estruseena, cond testing practice.
- bresda, or others.
1.11.8 Covering -Jacket or metallic ar. mer er bothe matenal identification. thick. naam, mothed of applicatson. 1.11.8 Charactenstics - voltase and seenparature reting inermal and emergency). For instruawntation cables - capacitance. attenuar. ion. charactenstic impedance, micro. yhenacs insulatsen resistance. as applicable. 1.3.1.7 Identificataon - manufacturer's trade name, catales numeer. 1.12 Flead Seisee ee Cennectsen f)enenessen se Ber4. This desenstion or esteification should include as a minimum: 1.111 Whether factory or field assern.
~
bled to cable.
, 1.12.2 Conductor connection - type, matenal identsfication, and method of assern.
bly.
~
1.3.2.3 Items frorn Sectione 1.3.1.2 throuch 1.3.1.7. Table 1 Represensentstive Cables for Type Teste Trre Tess Seeties Sise Up ta No3 Y multicendwetoe tan p essora ene me% tere 2.3.1 1,0 - 14 se 12 AEG east,s t esh.e se vues.sas, De tJoe mestiesadweter sees e,tP4itse sama hee.-tr a'oe 1.3.3 tic et M/C = ineste'iet eampaneetl*e theemal,see esperor retion 14 se 13 AWO shee.e senspeew poww es*ste dessen bana eve'il I.4 IJC se MIC ~ emetatase 14 es 12 AWO IfC -6. 4 er 3 AWC
*sensest Rome tant 21.6 1/C-14 et 42 AWG sea he fewe e,tle ersemitist **.*"al test f:ame iras *S4 tic -le 14 oe 12.*.WG bheteeg ps.e*, tripse ae tee.gieroture and e% sta ee 14t a pase sese'eed team f.-een me.ai easi6etee reenstanee 16 AWQ se octual sabie empest a.Me taecmae se.l'oeinasen 13.3 es pr. sere eensco basa eveat 14 s some6essen sepal '1 erie .# s ya Ccentet -etased at sesmpeestees sti meieesee 13.1 serinas esas esseu* i.eansment esene reess:acee thermal and rseiauen 2.33 espose.se deesse beene ***et 2.4 eeneestien eartici.i flame sees 3.1 C manies from unie annematy Sinsse ps.e merm,eespie ta an 2.3.1 sa:-- N A'.V estesses,e en.e re ie.nse.seen smace se.d m **.ee wie sf se fie G e e nesaa shoemas and endisem 2.3.3 eu rceeve l
i des.rt lasse evens 2.4 esme erties , e- .- entecal tray it.eie u st 13.4
*ereleal came sees eintes 25.4 remas cas.ae amma ny foot-t g eM y peeee vanae =e seeA teev Ossa 'ess 1SA 4 Au r' fi l V) l'C aripened .ed an=#siceedeetae 3,0 ae as9ee e/O u.lse vt a- . an-sm _sm mas Y ,..a.. . e. g... . , . . . . .. . - . -a. - * . % " a ' .5 Tg1 .e. - ~
_'M m
,= ,, e,b . i .
A NRC Contrcct No. NRC-03-79-118
'Abranklin Rssench Center FRC Project No. C5257 Prgs ~
A Dusson of The Frankhn Insature FRC Assignment No.13 5h 20th and Race Streets. Phde. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. (o (, / fo 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _9.eiL. NOTES: The' Licensee also included a letter from Okonite regarding cable furnished for Point Beach. The description provided does not agree with~either the SCEW sheet information nor the test cable description. The description contained in the letter is reproduced below. _ Electrical Cable Data _ Point Beach Nuclear Plant Bechtel Purchase Orders 6118-E-27 8e 6118-E-30 -
- I have received your letter of April 29,1980 with attachments of 3echtel-PO Nos. 6118-E-27 and 6118-E-30. These orders indicate that we _,
supplied Okonex (butyl bas,ed). insulation and Okolite 90 (oil based 90 C
, _ insulation) on the E-27 orders and Okoseal (PVC) on the E-30 order. -
6 I
+
l i
.g I
i 4 I
?? ![ ~.?'. ._ ~. . ! I.2.2 s : a- s '< ~'.?$ .e. _% %.T ~ ~ ?~I- ~~ ?-~ >I T *" ~
_.._.._.._-__-a_... _ _ _ . - _ . , _ . . _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ . . _ _ _
?
v . v - - - - NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 d, jFrank!!n Resairch Ccnter FRC Project N2.C5257 P gJ A oivmon of The Franklin Instnute FRC Assignment No.13 Si 20th and Race Streers. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. ca G /I'#") 1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. W NOTES: F-C3694
- 2. IDENTIFICATION OF TEST SPECIMENS CABLE NO.* DESCRIPU C'I Croup I Cables - Ethylene-Propylene (EPR) 3ase Product tira 13 7/C #12 AWC (7X) c' sated copper, 0.047" Ckonite plus 0.015" Ckolon, cabled, no fillers,11211 asbestos -
Mylar tape, 0.060" Gkolon Jacket, pre-aged 336 hours at 121*C in an air oven.** 1C -' Same as 13 except without pre-aging. 23 7/C #12 AWC (7%) coated copper, 0.030" Okonite plus 0.015" Okoprene, cabled, 6 mil asbestos - Mylar tape, 0.060" experimental thermoset jacket, pre-aged 336 hours at 121*C in an air oven.** 2C Same as 25 except without pre-aging.
'... 95 1/C #12 AWC (7X) coated copper, 0.045" Ckonite pre-aged 336 hours at 121*C in an air oven.**
9C Same as 95 except without pre-aging. 113 1/C d6 AWC (7X) bare cepper, Semicon tape, 0.090" Ckoguard, Samicon tape, 0.003" bare copper tape, pre-aged 336 hours at 121*C in an air oven.** 1
*throughout this report, the cables are identified as indicated in this column, except that the number and letter are reversed in the original-data sheets (e.g. ,13 and 51 refer to the same cable). **Information on pre-aging was provided by The Ckonite Company. *W- ** *
- ease e eoe- m-he == = ,
'Q "*"O, *MN *-'*M**" %' h MGM _ % %(*a 48+ =,MW". -MMO,8.#'9 '* ) [,4**O #p %M, _, ,
A NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118
$Nnkiin Rise:rch Cent:r FRC Project No. C5257 Pag 3 A Divmon of The Frankhn Insuture FRC Assignment No.1p 5j 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. f* */TO {
EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. VJ NOTES: i I l F.C3694 CABLE K0.* DESCRIPTION Croup II Cables - Flame Resistant Cross-Linked Polyethylene (f*R CI,PE) and Silicone Rubber Product Liaes 38 7/C #12 AWG (7X) coated copper, 0.030" ns X-01ene. cabled, no fillers, 6 mil asbestos - Mylar. 0.060* Okoprene, pre-aged 336 hou s at 121*C in an air oven.** 3C Same sa 3B except without pre-aging. 43 7/C $16 AWC (7%) coated copper, 0.038" Ckothers, glass braid, cabled, glass braid overall, pre-aged 336 hours at 121*C in an air ove% ** 73 s 1/C #12 AWG (7X) coated copper, 0.030" DM X-Olene pre-aged 236 hours at 121*C in an air oven.** 7C Same as above except without pre-agine. Group III Cables - Developmental Constructions 55 7/C #16 (7%) coated copper, 0.020" EPR plus 0.010" Neoprene, cabled. 0.015" belt extruded to fill, 0.060" experimental thermoset Jacket, pre-aged 336 hours at 3
. 121*C in an air oven.** . SC Same as 5B except without pre-aging.
6B 1/C #16 AWC (7X) coated copper, 0.020" EPR plus 0.010"
+
Neoprene, pre-aged 336 hours at 121*C in an air oven.** ( r 6C Same as 65 except without pre-aging. l l I I
*Throughout this report, the cables are identified as indicated in this l l column, except that the nunber and letter are reversed in the original l
data sheets (e.g.,18 and 51 refer to the sa:na cable). ' ! ; **1nformation on pre-aging was provided by The Okonite Company. t I l 6 i l l
' "' ~
n r r:7r 7 : ': m . , , WTT Ti 's c. . N ' '
A NRC C:ntrtet No. NRC-03-79-118
'[ld Franklin Research Centrr '}}