ML20079E621
| ML20079E621 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 01/06/1984 |
| From: | Baranow S STONE & WEBSTER, INC. |
| To: | Quamme D CONSUMERS ENERGY CO. (FORMERLY CONSUMERS POWER CO.) |
| References | |
| SWOC-84-002, SWOC-84-2, NUDOCS 8401170369 | |
| Download: ML20079E621 (8) | |
Text
STONE A,ND WEBSTER MICHIGAN. INC.
P.O. BOX 1963, MIDLAND, MICHIGAN 48640
, - (, - p q
!sars
!3D j,M
- * * ~ * - 14509 g
- . o..
N/A SD - 320 r ~- swoc n -sos via t i..
N/A l
DEAR SIRS:
rat oLLoWWo a E h Avv Cato.
==Nr f sP 4=rELvi To D. L. QUAMME, CPCo Midland (site)
-.c-o o.
_ co its INr.
t ooucist.Es a, E=vu t CA=cs -
Eacn o-j O o aw ~os O s sci >cario~s i
O oo=u- ~rs O ~ ores o co~ a ~er
)
STATUS l
PLEASE NOTE l
SENT FOR YOUR I O
~au O a ovio 10 visio~s O o-iss>o~.
l 0 ovat O co-- ~r I O u--a r O a ovio== avis = = ('
's"',',',",',,*a,_ l O aoortio. O co icrio.s O us.
O. o -ario~
l O
=co-- ~r O u==:er vasta I,
O co-
~rs O
O tes O co eu i~ce in ra OPEN rTI ACTION sooors,,o~s.s ~o,,o f YOUR ATTENTION IS DIRECTED TO THE FOLLOWING:
natsASED =OR: 0
- a. car >o~ O u e ass o ~ecessa
-ari.*ts lO t i
43 ews: =~o so.-r-
~rs r
oovci='s=
-ic o it-a e ru== ca os.
-13 ai ooucis'es
-ic o iua
-ru= = ca => o. Doo=u-i<rs Oo - as O s-o orvait O eta=== su==<r O tnas6 arvu ~ o-= co r==ca o vais==re ia' = aa -o voua ova 6 o co-- ~rs.
10 trass ac ~owtioce icri r o vais -are. ' =r s'o~~a *~o Tu ~. a r-e i~ctosso co v o r-es o ~
! O - v ust v e r ass ~ ores a
- acco===~ce wir-voua u~on sta~=~~a. e or. trass movisa vs I
s outo a~e rvisio~ vo occu-s~ts o o awmas Tu a.co we rwna mvotva a
- ct me rass run su -us
-ust =ori -
IM PORTANT weesve u c=*smo os a t-e=r wrra-va~ noi oars evia vnous os mns ssumare ca~~or es sava~ ar twe rms ov-a.svo~e,
.sa.r-c u cansa weu. co=sios vas avisio~s -aos wrraour cosv.
The following Open CIO Item / Hold Point Notification (s) is (are)~ attached for your action /information:
Mem 04{
hm 04E JMR.m 09.,3
)
gh s
t S. W. Bar now Program Manager cc: JGKeppler, US NRC JJHarrison, US NRC P1JCook, US NRC RAWells, CPCo CIO Site File hkoo O
A e g&
i 1
g g l
~
Sheet 1 of 2
.bTONE & WEBITER HEM NUMBER l HOLD POINT NUMB 9
CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION O TRACKED ACTION ITEM OVERVIEW
" ^ '
MIDLAND NUCLEAR PlANTJ.0. N0.14509 TRACKED REC 0 LED O ITEu REFERENCE (S) EKo Letter of Deca: Der 28,19tB, berlat ffBCCC-
-(-) UNTRACKED ITEM 8852, Erergency Diesel Generator, Transaterica Delaval, Inc.,
O HOLD POINT NOTIFICA. TION pcomt fee Poetrrtim of installntim CONDITION DETAILS The referenced letter indicates that BPCo is preparing for resumption of installation work on the emergency diesel generators.
BPCo Material Requisition 7220-M-18 (Q) requires that the emergency diesel generators be furnished in accordance with several listed BPCo specifications and drawings.
~
Additionally, this work may be affected by current activities relative to the evaluation of Phase III activities on FCRs/FCNs, vendor drawings and FSKs.
Therefore, please provide CIO with CPCo plans and schedules for assuring that prior to releasing the diesel generator installation work, the above issues are resolved.
You are also requested to address your plans for covering other activities relevant to this work such as training / qualification of personnel, material control, installation control, etc.
YES [of.,',
E NO (Please see Sheet 2)
ATTACHMENTS DATE RESPONSE REQ'D.
INITIATOR /DATE INITI ATIO 4 APPROVED /DATE
/Wk -
/ ~ d - E/
&j
/ ~ f -hC/
RESPONSE
/
'~
f I
l tr40E YES N o.'s)
NO ATTACHMENTS EST. CORRECTIVE ACTION RESPONDENT TITLE DATE COMPLETION DATE RESPONSE ACCEPTED DATE RESPONSE VERIFIED /CLOSEE DATE 9
Item Number 041 J
Sheet 2 of 2 CONDITION DETAILS (continued)
After review of the requested information, CIO will determine whether in-process evaluation of CPCo actions will be conducted or a Hold Point will be established
.at the completion of CPCo action for CIO to assess the readiness to proceed.
/
Sheet 1 of 1 i
STONE & WEBSTER
""U"BE"lH LD POINT NUMBER 94 CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION O TRACKED ACTION ITEM
"^
" ^ '
N/P'4NP NvCIEAR PldNT J.0. NO. /4S09
-O TRj"KED RECOMME D ONITEM REFERENCE (S) InterofflCe H31DrandlEl, SWranow to D%w, O UNTRACKEDITEM P.
7 N
b/
O HOLD POINT NOTIFICATION n
CONDITION DETAILS The above referenced documents refer to the formalization of procedures for the training of CPCo perscnael (SMO) who will be performing tasks relative to the Construction Completion Program.
It is requested that these procedures be provided to CIO for review and evaluation.
' ^ ',
NO
[o.s YES ATTACHMENTS DATE RESPONSE REQ'D.
IlJIT! AT O R/ D AT E INITIATION APPROVED /DATE 1120iB4
//rYC s~ g. p c/
/fN$~
t~ f. C y
RESPONSE
(PAGE YES NO.*ss NO ATTACHMENTS l
EST. CORRECTIVE ACTION RESPONDENT TITLE DATE COMPLETION DATE RESPONSE ACCEPTED DATE RESPONSE VERIFIED / CLOSED DATE 1
4 4
7 Sheet 1 of 1 NWBE HOW POINT NMER STONE & WEBSTER
' ' oa*3 CONSTRUCTION IMPLEMENTATION E3 TRACKED ACTION ITEM MIDLAND NUCLEAR PlANTJ.0. N0.14509
'"",*"'*'"' ""^EDYO
,g cggngeC0 ITEM REFERENCE (S)
O UNTRACKEDITEM ufa O HOLD POINT NOTIFICATION CONDITION DETAILS: CIO Phase III evaluation of Architectural / Civil document control measures resulted in the findings listed in Attachment 1.
CIO is aware that MPQAD Audit has resulted in similar conditions being identified and that these were re-ported in MQAR-DAT-1 dated 1-4-84.
Please provide CIO with CPCo's plan for addressing the problems noted and for im-plementing and verifying corrective action on both MQAR-DAT-1 and this report.
Your response should cover, but not necessarily be limited to the items in Attach-ment 2 to this report.
Upon receipt of the above, CIO will evaluate the information and will establish any necessary CIO assessment plans and/or Hold Points and notify CPCo.
x YES '//..', 3 NO ATTACHMENTS DATE RESPONSE REQ'D.
INITI AT O R/ D TE INITI ATI N APPROVED /DATE
,, y /} w j.f gg 1/13/83
,/&Nw j.f.gg
RESPONSE
v (PAGE 0 YES N o.'s t NO ATTACHMENTS EST. CORRECTIVE ACTION RESPONDENT TITLE DATE COMPLETION DATE e
RESPONSE ACCEPTED DATE RESPONSE VERIFIED / CLOSED DATE
Item Nunber 043 Z
Page 1 of 2 PHASE III EVALUATION RESULTS DOCUMENT CONTROL 1.
Drawing Registers Distribution Control a) It is necessary to consult several registers to determine the correct distribution of controlled documents e.g. FDDL, Vendor Prints, FSK, Composite Register Specifications, Revision Register etc.
b) Computer input errors in one or more registers compound Ia.
c) The System of retiring documents (The R Symbol) has inconsistencies between the flat files (drawer files) and the field blue lines.
d) The exemption list compounds problem la.
2.
Document Control Field Stations a) Existing controls (cards, registers, transmittals) do not readily identify controlled documents.
Therefore, Field Stations cannot easily identify those documents they should have.
b) Some Stations follow the practice of de-controlling drawings. This practice is apparently not proceduralized.
c) Distribution and accuracy of information contained on sepia is in-consistent between DCC and Field Stations.
3.
The FDDL is not representative of field drawing distribution (copies).
Station 10: The following Design Drawings and Specifications have in-consistent quantity distribution. The Bechtel FDDL does not agree with the actual field count - Specification #C '95, C-197, C-198, C-200.
Design Drawings #C-1492, C-1493-1, C-97, C-8 and.C-2031.
4.
Sheet numbers from Registers are inconsistent. For example Station 10:
FSK 1060 shows in the Register as FSK 1060 sheet 7, however it should be Revision 7 with only one sheet.
FSK 1062 shows in the Reginster as sheet 6 Revision 4, however it should be Revision 6 with only one sheet.
5.
The exception list is constantly changing causing potential control problems. This situation indicates that a higher level Document Control Center may be required.
6.
There is no way to verify the final disposition of controlled documents since. transmittals for vendor prints are not receipt acknowledged.
4 t --
e - -. - r
..--7
9 Item Number 043 Page 2 of 2 7.
At the time NIR 011 was written, Document Control Center could not supply any one source of information that could identify which documents were affected by the Retired Document Procedure (FID 2.100).
8.
Change Documents are improperly posted on drawings. For example at Station 10, the Design Drawing C-2031-19 Revision 1 did not have FCR 6974 attached to the drawing. Other drawings had incorrect "R" designations. Some drawings have inapplicable Change Documents attached.
9.
Given the total number of documents, the wide distribution and the number of changes. The sheer bulk of documentation is a problem and effort should be made to reduce the bulk.
9
-_,..,,y
..m,.,
. _ _. - _. _.... ~ -
~
Item Number 043 Page 1 of 1 CFCo CORRECTIVE ACTION PLAN INFORMATION REQUEST 1.
CPCo plan for implementing and verifying corrective action on a generic basis with time phasing (schedule).
2.
Plan for packaging corrective action measures by discipline, work station, etc., and method for presenting discrete work groups to CIO for evaluation.
3.
Plans, if any, to pull back documents from field stations to affect cor-rective action.
4.
Method for assuring the identification of all changes which affect all documents and for verification that Document Control and Field Stations are consistant in their records.
5.
Method for identification of all data necessary for the control of dis-tributed documents, discipline, stations, sheets, revisions, hanging paper, "R" status.
6.
Any plans for reduction in the numbers of documents issued to/used by field stations or in the number of field stations themselves.
'7. - Since Bechtel drawings are distributed to off-site vendors and these drawings have FCRs/FCNs will they be subject to review?
8.~
Method for notifying CIO of progress in corrective action, readiness for CIO evaluation and, ultimately, CPCo lifting of Stop Work Orders (for CIO final evaluation of overall corrective action program).
e W
w y
-..m m
y r
-r7 m._.p,,_
y
.9e.,.
~