ML20079D242

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Discusses 910424 Order Dismissing Scott/Bush/Cree Petitions to Intervene & Reasons for Default.Apologies Offered.Served on 910612.W/Certificate of Svc
ML20079D242
Person / Time
Site: Palo Verde  Arizona Public Service icon.png
Issue date: 05/27/1991
From: Michael Scott
AFFILIATION NOT ASSIGNED
To:
NRC
References
CON-#291-11857 91-633-05-OLA-2, 91-633-5-OLA-2, OLA-2, NUDOCS 9106280094
Download: ML20079D242 (4)


Text

_ _ _ _._ _

_y g

jj g57

=*0FCEED RULE $ 60-S f5Mf5 an- -

_.ewis & C ar< Co.ege

. %mc v

NOR111WLS1 LRN S 1100L 01-L AW M JW 12 A9 50 W'

r,,,.,

PULP!

- 3 t

3_

S May 8,,,

1991 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 t

E RE: ASLDP No. 91-633-05-OLA-2 On April 24, 1991, ALJ Smith and Judges Kline and Jordan issued an." Order Dismissing Scott / Bush / CREE Petitions to Intervene" in the above-captioned matter.

The named intervenors did not oppose that Order and therefore did not appeal to the Commission.

t i

Nonetheless, the Order was accompanied by at least an informal finding of " contemptuous conduct" that is both gratuitous and unwarranted.

Because the only sanction imposed was dismissal of the~. intervention request,-to which the e

intervenors had no objection having unavoidably but voluntarily defaulted, no formal reply was made.

For the sake of the i

' historical. record, however, some response is in order.

At no time did the intervenors intentionally conduct themselves in a discourteous or contemptuous manner.

The intervenors simply voluntarily defaulted, the appropriate response to which'is simple dismissal. -As to causing unnecessary effort for the Board'and Staff,-no such result was intended.-

If the. named intervenors had been the only or even the principal.

intervenors, the claim might have more force.

In fact, however, the named intervenors made it clear from the outset that they merely sought to join in the Mitchell contentions and to offer-supporting evidence, primarily on'the non-technical issues of worker harassment and management competence raised directly or indirectly by-the Mitchells.

(The-reference to the involvement of lawyers as CREE members was limited.to courtroom decorum-in the event.such evidence

was taken,-and was_ linked to-the statement that-CREE et al.

did not-seek to-expand the issues-beyond tMse raised by the' Mitchells.)' The Board, however, chose to.aterpret the.

Commission?s current public-involvement regulations narrowly

~

'and to demand from CREE et al._ specific allegations on technical contentions-that CREE'et al. never had addressed and had made

'it reasonably clear did not intend to address.. Itaving nothing to say on those-issues, CREE voluntarily defaulted.

.e 9106200094 910527 PDR_ ADOCK 0 % y8 icois & n n itt u s et m no

MO Q

PORTLANb"O 0 6N 97289 y

ruest; wuo.nec l AXt 90bf 64 H7) _

...,n

,n.,~

That, plus resource limitations and unavoidable difficulties that arose in attempts to communicate with the other intervenors, were the F,ule reasons for CREE's default.

14o disrespect or contempt was intended.

Nevertheless, CREE, Scott and Bush apologize to the Board and Staff for any inconvenience.

Si m y, V

I MYrun L.

Scott cc all parties

- 2

\\

i N1;ED u AiEE CF.an t l C A l

NUCLEAn hEGULniChi c MMIESlUN l

'4 ilatter ;,

.., h A PUBLl; 3ERVICE COMPAN't.

t No,isl

,;-N:S/$29/5?0-OLA-?

st.

.: 'erce Nuciser 'J e n e t a t. n c s

-4taon, unais 1.

J end ;)

LEhilf! LATE OF 6ERVICE u eby certtiv that coptes 0+

the foregonna LTR SCOTI 10 NRC OTD $/27/91 Ocen served upon the folicnina persons by U.S.

mail. +trst ;tess, except

ner wise noted ano in accordance with the recatrements at 1 CFR Sec. 2.712.

2

~1: detely and iactnstno supect Administrettyv Lsw Judce

..rc Ivan W.

3sath. Chairman luclear heaul ctor v L o t a-a v c a c n

.itomic 54fety and Licentinu Loard

'iaJton, LL Jubb5 U.S.

Nuclear Reauldlorv.camtssion 4ashinoton, DC 205L5 rentstrJtive Judge Administrative Judce

.rre R.

kline Walter H.

Jordan satte $4fety end Licenstna Boarc ASLSF

.:. Nuclear Reaulatory Commission 881 L'est Guter Drtve

-ashington, DC 20555 Dak Ridge. TN 37830 David K.

Colapinto. Escutre

.;e of the General Counsel Counsel for Allen & Linda ititchell Nuclear Reculatory Cammissten Kohn, Kahn & Colapinto.

F.

C.

,tnincten. DC 20555 517 Florida Avenue.

N.W.

Washington, DC 20001 er: ara S. Bush

-Ocutive Director Myron L. Scott

.a.ittion for Responsible EnerQy Lewis & Clark tducation Northwestern School of Law West Riviera Drive 10015 S.W.

Terwillinger Doulevard oce, AZ 85202 Fortland, OR 97219

  • ur C. Gehr. Esqutre Jack R. Newman, Esc.

- icel tar Licensee Newman and Holt 21ncer, f.C.

.no Wilmer 1615 L Street. NW calley Center Washington, DC 2003c

enix, AZ a5073 1

w&

a 4(

4.M.A---.%-f-

.ehm.M

,a,-.3=-

aa

-uW2a mhe1M,,L.n A.-

eik 4

s. $-

Ac-2 A4a g

>3 g

..g

!, J I I M*

  • $g 5N h 6 /e i

/

_.a!'

10 - int J f D '. / 2 7 / -41 se ; " C C L.v t 1 16. ii d. Ih1t r

--;nw

.+ June INI f

..b..

4,

/

Offico ci the incretars at the Cometeston c

m i

l' l.

i i

s I

t.

l 1.

..