ML20078S000
| ML20078S000 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05200004 |
| Issue date: | 02/01/1995 |
| From: | Singh T GENERAL ELECTRIC CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20078S014 | List: |
| References | |
| PROC-950201, NUDOCS 9502230260 | |
| Download: ML20078S000 (94) | |
Text
-
c.
GE NuclearEnergy PANDA Project Control Plan, and Quality Assurance Procedures
,,,,nnmy 3 y.
' Wi
"";;;a:w
' 14% l.l %
-N"'"*'
Q. y?y
,f',
3'3_ ; i
~,r
.m,g yyyg*;gygg
, c.er r p:"
a" erF* '
s n.y.
r t
0 7
/;..*
' f:
b y.~,
_ e \\. ~4y q
n.
t.y
/
l pAQ a
t; j'
LL j.
e*
k
, l,5 P
,f?,
i,
_7 r.
}t -
e i-F
{
lf ;
t f
j.
f.
s-
+
ll, f'
[
fa
("t'
- u
$g f
V t
Q L':"
'g-L:
,l s"
,.e.P,
- r t.
s l
,l
}
_-n s
i~
+-
jf y!!
r
, a.u j
\\
le e
y 4,
f:
'R^*
+
6
,. f. /
p
. > e -usw.
?.
7 4
f.i y:
"t
,c e,
i~
i p
6;~,
4 s-v.
L i.
9502230260 950216 5
+
o L..
/
/-
i f
PDR ADOCK 05200004 a
~
W g
PDR o,
-y f
0 1
o GE NuclearEnergy PASDA Project Control Plan, and Quality Assurance Procedures UC($ TROLLED COPY For revision andstatus ofprocedures, please contact:
International Senices Quality Manager 175 Cunner Avenue, MC 264 San Jose, CA 95125, USA (408) 925-3270, FAX (408) 925-4441
PANDA Project ControlPlan, and Quality Assurance Procedures Table of Contents TAB Procedure No.
Description Rev.
Issue date 1
PPCP-QA-01 PANDA Project Control Plan 0
31 Jan.,1995 2
PQAP-DC Document Control 0
31 Jan_,1995 3
PQAP-PC Procurement Control 0
31 Jan.,1995 4
PQAP-TC Test Control 0
31 Jan.,1995 5
PQAP-CC Control ofMeasuring and Test 0
31 Jan.,1995 Equipment 6
PQAP-DA Data Acquisition System Control 0
31 Jan.,1995 7
PQAP-V Verification 0
31 Jan.,1995 8
PQAP-NC Nonconformance Control and 0
31 Jan.,1995 Corrective Action 9
PQAP-R Quality Assurance Records 0
31 Jan.,1995 10 PQAP-PT Personnel Training and Qualification 0
31 Jan.,1995 The above quality assurance procedures are approved and issued for distribution.
l Of Nj / 797 Approved By:
q Manager, Interndional Services Quality Date 175 Curtner Ave., MC 264 San Jose, CA 95125, USA Telephone: (408) 925-3270 FAX: (408) 925-4447 I
Attachment:
Distribution List l
l PANDA Project ControlPlan, and Quality Assurance Procedures
-Feb.1,1995 Distribution List i
Copy No.
Name Location 1.
Varadi G.
PSI Switzerland 2.
McIntyre T. R.
GE M/C 781 3.
Singh T.
GE M/C 264 4.
Torbeck J. E.
GE M/C 264 5.
Arretz A. G.
GE M/C 264 6.
Novak P. E.
GE M/C 788 7.
Hansen C. A.
GE M/C 788 8.
Kaye D. A.
GE M/C 788 9.
Barclay N. E.
GE M/C 217 10.
PANDA DRF No.: T10-00005 GE (Torbeck)
The issue and distribution of procedures is maintained at:
Quality Assurance Records Center GE Nuclear Energy 175 Curtner Ave.
San Jose, CA 95125
Contact:
Rachel Coffey at (408) 925-2501, M/C 041
Project ControlPlan
+-
PANDA PROJECT CONTROL PLAN PPCP-QA-01 Prepared for PANDA PROJECT AT PSI 3
Revision Status Prepared /
Reviewed and Approved by Rev.
Revised by' G-ISOMs GSM P-APM lesue Date Remarks
[g g ph
[p"[
31.1.95 0
T. Singh "
i l
i Ref. PANDA DRF # T1065
GEPanda Document No. PPCP - QA-01 Project ControlPlan
" " " ", ", ' E os,,
TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION TITLE 1.0 GENERAL 1.1 Introduction to GE PANDA Project Control Plan (PPCP) 1.2 Management Commitment Statement 1.3 Control and Distribution of PPCP and PQAPs 1.4 Project Data 2.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT 2.1 Project Quality Assurance Requirements and Procedures 2.2 Organization 2.3 Interface end Communication 2.4 Project Planning / scheduling / resources 2.5 Training and Quali5 cation 3.0 PROJECT OPERATION 3.1 Design Control 3.2 Document Control 3.3 Procurement Control 3.4 Test Control 3.5 Control ofMeasuring and Test Equipment 3.6 Data Acquisition System Control 3.7 Verification 3.8 Nonconformance Control and Corrective Action 3.9 Quality Assurance Records i
4.0 PROJECT ASSESSMENT 4.1 Audits 4.2 Surveillances i
r 5.0 TERMS / DEFINITIONS / ABBREVIATIONS 6.0 LIST OF NITACHMENTS l
i l
I
m i
i l
x
.r GEPenir Document No. PPCP - QA-01 froject ControlPlan
.e ot,,
1.0.
' GENERAL
-1.1 Introduction
{
i An agreement has been established between the Swiss Confederation, represented j
by the Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) of Switzerland and the General Electric._
l Company acting through GE Nuclear Energy, San Jose, California, U.S.A.; and the Electric Power Research Institute Inc. (EPRI) of the District of Columbia, U.S.A.; on passive decay heat removal and fission product retention tests, and model qualification. Under this agreement, PSI is performing the PANDA test.
prcject. GE Nuclear Energy hereafter is addressed as "GE" in this Project Control
-l Plan.
i r
1.1.1 Scope j
1 This GE PANDA Project Control Plan (PPCP) describes the organization, quahty related activities, events and procedures necessary to ensure and verify that the I
PANDA project at PSI is conducted under the provisions of the GE SBWR Quality Assurance Plan as described in the SBWR Design and Certification i
Program Quality Assurance Plan, NEDG-31831 (May 1990). In this connection, the PPCP will address the following stages of project execution:
l 1.
Project quality assurance requirements and procedures.
2.
Organization, functional responsibilities and authonties.
3.
Training and quahfications ofpersonal.
j 4.
Design control.
5.
Document control.
6.
Procurement control I
7.
Test control.
f 8.
Control of measuring and test equipment.
9.
Data acquisition system.
I 10.
Verification.
)
11.
Nonconformance control and corrective action.
l 12.
Quality assurance records.
l 13.
Audits and shrveillances.
l 1.1.2 Structure The PPCP is structured in such a way that it will demonstrate the integration and
)
validity of the GE SBWR Quality Assurance Plan at PSI in three categories of l
activities;
s GEPanda Document No. PPCP-QA 01 Project ControlPlan E os,,
eae PROJECT MANAGEMENT Definition of the organization, responsibility, planning, allocation of resources, coordination, direction, management and support necessary for effective project execution.
PROJECT OPERATION A'.1 the activities, including those for review and verification, designed to generate the results prescribed in the agreement as applicable to the PANDA project.
PROJECT ASSESSMENT All activities specifically designed to evaluate the degree ofcompliance with this PPCP and the requirements of the GE SBWR Quality Assurance Plan identified in paragraphs 1.1.1 and 2.1.
1.1.3 Emohasis
)
The PPCP emphasizes adherence to the project scope of work in general, and to the following points in particular-l l
I Timely review and implementation of the PPCP; Identification and specification of the individual technical and quality related activities that need to be performed for the PANDA project.
Planning, acquisition and training of the resources necessary for the performance of the above activities.
The provision ofobjective evidence to demonstrate that the above activities I
have been satisfactorily completed; Timely identification and implementation of changes to specified requirements.
Timely identification and resolution of deviations to specified requirements.
l Timely verification and review of test results and documentation.
I 1.2 Manneement Commitment Statement 1.2.1 It is the policy of GE to attain quality leadership, and to achieve and maintain high quality in products and services through timely and effective compliance with all quality requirements.
. ~...
1 m
GEPomb Document No. PPCP -QA 01 Project ControlPlan
" " * ' * * ", *
- E or,,
1.2.2 The GE Site' Quality Assurance Representative assigned to the PANDA project at
^j PSI is sufficiently independent of other functions and possesses the necessary authority to effectively discharge his responsibilities to achieve this end, and has l
direct access to GE management.
l 1
1.3 Control and Distribution of PPCP and PANDA Ouality Assurance I
Procedures 1
1.3.1 This PPCP and the supporting GE PANDA Quality Assurance Procedures (PQAP) are approved, including revisions thereto, by the GE International Services Quality i
Manager (G-ISQM), GE Project Manager (G-PM) and PSI ALPHA Project Manager (P-APM);
i 1.3.2 The issue and distribution control of the PPCP and PQAPs will be maintained at GE San Jose under the responsibility of the G-ISQM. The G-ISQM will be responsible for creating a distribution list and maintaining an up-to-date record of the recipients and revision number of the distributed copies. Additional copies will be distributed as required. An uncontrolled copy, duly identified, may be provided.
to the requestor as deemed necessary.
i 1.3.3 The issue and release of supporting PQAPs for PANDA project use will be maintained at GE San Jose. The controlled use of PQAPs at PSI shall be j
maintained by the GE Site QA Representative per the Quality Assurance Procedure PQAP-DC, Document Control.
l i
1.3.4 Should a subsequent revision of the PPCP or PQAP be required, each revised paragraph will be identified with an asterisk (*) in the left margin, and a notation i
(* Denotes Change) reflected at the bottom of the affected page. In those cases l
where the document is substantially revised, the notation " General Revision" will appear in the remarks column of the revision status sheet, as determined by the G-ISQM.
l 1.3.5 For each revised issue, the title page with revision status of the PPCP/PQAP shall be updated to reflect the next subsequent revision to the PPCP/PQAP.
j 1.4 Proiect Data 1.4.1 Proiect Identification The project is identified as follows:
i PANDA
. - ~ ~
j 1
GEPemia Document No. PPCP.QA41.
Revision No. 0
)
^ Project ControlPlan Ps e eos,,
l
'l.4.2 Iygg of Anreement i
The type, terms and conditions are defined in the three pany agreement between PSI, GE and EPRI executed on April 1,1991 and amended on April 18,1994.
l 1.4.3 Location l
a.
Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) -
CH-5232 Villigen PSI Switzerland b.
GE Nuclear Energy (GE) 175 Cunner Avenue San Jose, CA 95125 U.S.A.
i 1.4.6 Proiect Time Schedule l
Tentative schedule for co:npletion of PANDA project activities:
i Readiness A==*==mant/ Audit by GE
- January,1995 e
Initial Testing
- February,1995 e
Project Completion
- December,1995 2.0 PROJECT MANAGEMENT i
1 2.1 Project Ouality Assurance Reauirements And Procedures a.
GE will assume full responsibility for the quality assurance of the work
.I performed by PSI in accordance with the GE SBWR Quality Assurance l
Plan as described in the SBWR Design and Cenification Program Quality' i
- Assurance Plan NEDG-31831, May 1990.' This GE SBWR Quality l
Assurance Plan meets the requirements of ANSI /ASME NQA-1-1983 and its Addenda (NQA-1a-1983).
l l
b.
This PANDA Project Control Plan (PPCP) with its supponing GE i
PANDA Quality Assurance Procedures documents the quality assurance s
programmatic requirements applicable to the PANDA project activities to be condected at PSI under the provisions of the GE SBWR Quality Assurance Plan.
j i
2.1.1 GE PANDA Ouality Assurance Procedures The following is a list of the GE PANDA Quality Assurance procedures (PQAP) which supplements this PPCP and will be implemented, during the execution of j
i I
I 1
GEPanda Document No. PPCP -QA 01 Project Control' Plan
"""'"",e' s
om this proje.:t. These procedures are the basis of the quality assurance system implecented by PSI and GE in meeting the requirements of the GE SBWR Quality i
Assurance Plan.
Number Title PQAP-CC -
Control of Measuring & Test Equipment PQAP-DA Data Acquisition System Control PQAP-DC Document Control PQAP-NC Nonconformance Control and Corrective Action PQAP-PC Procurement Control PQAP-PT Personnel Training and Qualification PQAP-R Quality Asrarance Records PQAP-TC Test Control PQAP-V Verification 2.2 Otranization 2.2.1 Project Organization a.
See Attachment I for GE-PSI PANDA project organization chart.
2.2.2 Responsibilities and Authorities The functional responsibilities and authorities of GE Project Manager, GE International Services Quality Manager, PSI ALPHA Project Manager, GE SBWR QA Engineer and GE Site QA Representative are defmed generically in this i
section. Further details of responsibilities for specific activities are desented in the implementing GE PANDA Quality Assurance Procedures (PQAPs). The responsibilities ofPSI PANDA Project Manager, GE/ PSI engineer, testor, calibrator, reviewer, verifier and document controller are described in the PQAPs, as applicable.
a.
GE Project Manager (G-PM)
Broad Function and Authority Manage PANDA GE project work scope witltin budget, quality, and schedule commitments to satisfy the contractuel requirements.
4
l GEPanda Document No. PPCP -QA-01 Project ControlPlan
""*",",e*Eam Princioal Resoonsibilities:
1.
Creating resource plans and cost estimates in support ofproposals
~
and securing contracts.
2.
Staffing the project with adequate resources to achieve GE's objective, while minimizing cost application on the project.
Assuming responsibility for and administration ofpersonnel assigned to the project.
3.
Leading a team effon in achieving quality and satisfactory results.
4.
Establishing and maintaining interface and personnel relationships with customer, regulatory agencies, and interfacing organizations including subcontractors, suppliers, and GE support organizations for the purposes of communication and maxinuzing en:;1omer satisfaction.
5.
Assuring procedures, tools, procurement activity, resource personnel, personnel certification records, subcontracts and alliances are scheduled and implemented properly to achieve satisfactory completion of the project.
6.
Review and approval of procedures including revisions (PPCP,PQAPs TP&P) and assuring effective implementation at opimum costs.
7.
Establishing project disciplines and delegation of responsibilities and authority for the prrsject(s) in the areas of engineering design review, financial controls, travel and living, contract personnel rates, shift schedules and document control.
8.
Assuring quality as well as accuracy and verification of technical documents and test results.
9.
Preparing project status and financial reports for the project as necessary to provide project status required by GE management.
10.
Completing the project to achieve optimum customer satisfaction on content and schedule.
I 1.
Conducting project meetings and lessons learned at meaningful points in the project and at project closure.
12.
Assuring proper project closure, including records retention.
i i
GEPanda Document No. PPCP -QA 01 Project ControlPlan cs,,
b.
GE International Services Quality Manager (G-ISQM)
Broad Function and Authority:
Plan, organize, schedule and direct quality assurance activities necessary to provide adequate confidence that an item or service is provided satisfactorily at an acceptable quality level in accordance with the provisions of the GE SBWR Quality Assurance Plan (see paragraph 2.1). Provide for the preparation, maintenance and implementation of the quality assurance plan / program and coverage to verify compliance with the established plan / program and procedures.
Provide necessary consultation and communication to assure successful i
achievement ofquality objectives.
Princioal Responsibilities:
i 1.
Plan, organize and manage the quality assurance activities for the assigned Project.
2.
Provide the quality assurance programmatic requirements for the PPCP and supporting PQAPs including revisions thereto, approve, issue and maintain distribution control.
3.
Assure that GE personnel assigned to the PANDA project are adequately indoctrinated in the quality assurance programmatic requirements.
4.
Assure effective implementation of PPCP and PQAPs. Schedule and arrange audits to assess the effectiveness of programmatic quality requirements.
5.
Provide quality related technical consultation and directions, at all levels, to j
assure successful achievement of GE and PSI quality objectives.
i c.
PSI ALPHA Project Manager (P-APM)
Princioal Resoonsibilities Plan, organize and nianage the operational and quality assurance activities necessary to provide adequate confidence that the PANDA testing project is satisfactorily completed at an acceptable quality level in accordance with GE requirements. These include, but are not limited to:
1.
Review and approval oftest Plan and Proc'. dure, PPCP and PQAPs and l
revisions thereto. Assure their effecdve implementation during various phases ofPANDA project and establish test control.
2.
Establishment of a PANDA document control and issue system.
i
s i
- GEPenda Docunent No. PPCP-QA 01 Revision No.'
0 i
Project ControlPlan es.
,o os,,
)
D 3.
Establishment and maintenance of a PANDA Test File containing required QA and engineering documentation.
4 Preparation and implementation ofinstrumentation calibration procedures i
and documentation.
[
L Training ofPSI PANDA personnel to applicable procedures and quality L
5.
requirements.
6.
Preparation of a data acquisition system validation plan (both hardware and
~
software), completion of the plan, and documentation of the validation.
.i 7.
Verification of specific calculations (GE will assist in identification of e
necessary verifications and approve the content).
i
'i 8.
Maintain effective liaison with the G-PM to assure awareness of the
[
technical and quality requirements and the prompt integration and l
resolution of quality matters.
d.
GE SBWR Quality Assurance Engineer Princioal Resoonsibilities i
1.
Create procedures / plans / methods to accumulate objective evidence of l
quality activities, utilizing the best principles of proven techniques to meet.
j the GE and PSI goals and measure concurrent progress.
2.
Audit and measure compliance of GE engineers and project personnel with
-I the requirements of the GE SBWR Quality Assurance Plan, this PPCP and implementing procedures.
j 3.
Assist GE-PM to conduct training sessions to indoctrinate all personnel in
.j the quality assurance requirements and procedures applicable to the PANDA project.
j 4.
Provide evaluations and audits of suppliers' quality systems, fabrication i
processes and testing methods to assure compliance with the GE requirements.
e.
GE Site QA Representative Princioal Responsibilities The principal responsibility of the site representative is to provide day-to-day interaction with PSI and provide coordination to implement quality assurance requirements as defined in this PPCP and PQAPs during the PANDA project test
I GEPanda Document No. PPCP -QA 01 Project ControlPlan
"d "," '
, om activities at PSI. The site representative will also evaluate the adequacy of the documentation in general, to meet the quality requirements. Additional i
responsibilitiesinclude:
1.
Review applicable quality documentation as outlined in the PPCP and PQAPs for quality integrity and completeness. (procedures, test data sheets, certifications, etc.)
2.
Assist PSI in establishing document control and test files for QA records and in the performance of assigned work.
3.
Assist PSI in training PSI personnel assigned to PANDA project.
4.
Review and approve applicable procedures, instructions and documentation to establish control ofPANDA test activities.
5.
Witness applicable test activities as planned.
i 6.
Participate in actions to prevent nonconfonnances and follow-up of corrective action implementation.
7.
Conduct periodic surveillances to assess effective implementation of PQAPs and procedures during PANDA test activities at PSI. See paragraph 4.2 8.
Maintain effective liaison with the PSI representatives and GE International l
Services Quality Manager to assure awareness of the quality requirements and the prompt integration and resolution of quality matters. Coordinate resolutions of PSI issues / concerns and timely completion of required corrective actions.
2.2.3 Deleration The performance of duties may be delegated to other personnel who are qualified to perform such duties; however, the responsibility for these duties cannot be transferred. Managers and supervisors may perform the work of their subordinates if qualified. In all cases, independence of delegated personnel has to be maintained l
for inspection, review and verification activities in accordance with the procedure PQAP-V.
2.3 Interface and Communication i
See Attachment 1 for GE-PSI PANDA project organizational interfaces.
2.3.1 Communication with Reculatory Authorities All contact with the US regulatory authorities will be established by the G-PM.
Any SBWR Certification Project communication by PSI individuals with the US l
1
)
a-(??
' GEpamir Document No.. PPCP-QA 01 bPrbject ControlPlan a,e 2 or,,
- ref=*my authorities will occur through GE interfaces All contact with US regulatory authorities by PSI PANDA project individuals will be reported to the G-PM.
2.3.2 Language
. All communication between GE and PSI will be in the English language, both -
verbal and written. _GE and PSI will mutually agree on the language for.
individually issued documents. ' In general, either English or German is acceptable i
for documents.
i i
2.4 Pmiect Plannine/Scheduline/ Resources
~
Planning, scheduling and resource allocation is a combination of factors. The 2.4.1 reigned GE Project Manager has the authority and responsibility ofobtaining the j
required GE resources (manpower and equipment) to accomplish the PANDA
{
tash. The GE Project Manager willinterface with the PSI ALPHA Project Manager to assure adequate resources are available at PSI for the PANDA project.
2.4.2.
The assigned GE Project Manager is responsible for evaluating and applying proper project management tools for planning, scheduling, GE ast accumulation, and status reporting for the project.
2.4.3 The close of PANDA project will be upon the acceptance of :he final test ieport and the closure and microfilming of the applicable Design Record Files.
I i
2.5 Trainine and Oualification
-l 2.5.1 The Quality Assurance Procedure PQAP-PT defines the requirements and l
documentation method for training and qualification of all GE and PSI personnel i
performing activities affecting the quality of the PANDA test project.
i 3.0 PROJECT OPERATION Project activities will be controlled and maintained by the GE established quality l
assurance system as documented in this PPCP. The PQAPs shown in l
paragraph 2.1.1 are to be utilized in implementing quality assuranc.e requirements i
and to establish control of the PANDA project activities at PSI.
3.1 Desien Contml 3.1.1 GE will maintain the prime responsibility for SBWR technology and design documentation. GE willissue requirements and specifications for PANDA test project in accordance with established GE Engineering Operating Procedures.
a
=.-
.,... ~.
GEPanda Document No. PPCP -QA-01 Project ControlPlan s om 3.1.2 GE will review and approve the PSI verifications ofPANDA test results.
3.2 Document Control i
The Quality Assurance Procedure PQAP-DC describes the methodology and requirements for Document Control of engineering, testing and other documents that need to have controlled approval, issuance, and distribution i
3.3 Procurement Control l
i 3.3.1 The Quality Assurance Procedure PQAP-PC describes the requirements and applicability for purchasing ofPANDA equipment.
3.4 Test Control All inspection and tests shall be performed in accordance with documented and approved procedures. The Quality Assurance Procedure PQAP-TC describes the process to establish test control and requirements for fonnat, review and approval for the Test Plan and Procedure including revisions thereto. Also PQAP-TC i
descdbes review and approval of test results.
3.5 Control of Measurine and Test Eauipment The Quality Assurance Procedure PQAP-CC describes the requirements and methodology to establish control ofmeasudng and test equipment.
3.6 Data Acouisition System Control The Quality Assurance Procedure PQAP-DA describes the requirements and process for achieving data acquisition validation, vedfication and control.
3.7 Verification The Quality Assurance Procedure PQAP-V describes the requirements and process for the achieving an independent vedfication of the PANDA engincedng and test documentation.
3.8 Nonconformance Control & Corrective Action 3.8.1 All nonconformances shall be reported, documented and resolved in accordance with the Quality Assurance procedure PQAP-NC.
Yt f
GEpamir Document No. PPCP-QA 01 l
Project ControlPlan s.
.m 3.8.2 Corrective actions as a result ofNonconformance or deviations to test requirements shall be identi6ed, documented and implemented in accordance with l
the Quality Assurance Procedure PQAP-NC.
3.8.3 Corrective actions as a result of audit findings identified by the Lead Auditor j
during assessments or audits performed during the project shall be processed in accordance with GE Procedure EOP 75-3.00, Corrective Action and Audits.
These audit findings will be identified as observations or will be recorded on Corrective Action Requests (CAR) and followed to satisfactory implementation of l
acceptable corrective actions.
3.8.4 Any quality assurance programade deviation to the requirements of this PPCP will be identified to the GE Project Manager and the GE Site QA Representative who will document them and achieve resolution in consultation with the GE International Services Quality Manager.
3.9 Ouality Assurance Records The Quality Assurance Procedure PQAP-R describes the requirements and process '
for the accumulation, review, filing and maintenance of QA records in Test Files at
-l PSI during the testing phase and transferring after project completion to Design Records Files maintained at GE.
4.0 PROJECT ASSESSMENT 4.1 Ang[itg 4.1.1 Project implementation of this PPCP and elements of the quality assurance system will be assessed by conducting an internal audit in accordance with requirements of GE established Procedures P&P 70-11, GE-NE Quality System Requirements, EOP 75-3.00, Corrective Action and Audits, and Administrative Guide AG-017.
The audit will be conducted by GE certified auditor (s). The audit routine includes elements for the following:
Preparation of an audit plan and schedule i
Preparation of an audit checidist Audit team preaudit orientation and training if required j
i Assessment 1
Preparation of audit report and issue to management Issue of Corrective Action Requests (CARS) and obtain resolution of audit findings.
Follow-up to closure of CARS.
a.
GEPands Document No. ' PPCP-QA 01 Project ControlPlan
}
.se s or,,
4.1.2 Readiness assessment will be performed and corrective actions, if any, taken prior to commencement ofthe PANDA test activities.
i
,4.1.3 Follow on audit (s) shall be scheduled during the project life cycle as mutually
{
agreed ber;;w GE and PSI Project Managers and the GE International Services Quality Manager.
1
' 4.2 :
Surveillances The GE Site Quality Assurance Representative will perform surveillances at periodic intervals during PANDA test activities at PSI to assess compliance to the.
requirements of the established procedures (PPCP, PQAPs TP&P and PSI procedures related to PANDA project). Results of the surveillances shall be documented in the Surveillance Inspection Reports and maintained as QA records.
See Attachment 2 for a form of Surveillance Inspection Report.
{
5.0 TERMS / DEFINITIONS / ABBREVIATIONS CAR Corrective Action Request EOP Engineering Operating Procedure GE General Electric Nuclear Energy'.
G-PM GE Projects Manager G-ISQM GE International Services Quality manager M&TE
. Measuring and Test Equipment NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission - USA.
~
PPCP GE PANDA Project Control Procedure j
P&P
-GE Policies and Procedures PSI Paul ScherrerInstitute P-APM PSI Alpha Project Manager PQAP GE PANDA Quality Assurance Procedure
'i TP&P Test Plan and Procedure I
i 1
6.0 LIST OF ATTACHMENTS j
6.1 GE-PSI PANDA Project Organization 6.2 Surveillance Inspection Report l
GE Panda Document No.
PPCP - OA Proj.ect ControlPlan w*n m D
Pese 16 of 17 ATTACHMENT 1 GE-PSI PANDA Project Organization PSIRPHA GE PANDA GEint1 Services I
Protect Manager Quel # Manager Y'"5 T. R. McIntyre T. Singh PSIPANDA pg, N8CID Purchasing J. Dreier I
Document troHer Respone Engmeer Responsible Engineer aA p
J.E.Torbeck D. A.Kaye or A.G. Anett
-Testor G. A.Wingate C. A.Hansen
- Reviewer
~ D*" *I
- VeriRet Verilcatons Test File Chw Custodien(s)
- Reviewer
- Cusbdian in
I GEPanda 0ocument No. PPCP-OkO1 Revision No. O Proj.ect ControlPlan
- e..
,, os,,
ATTACHMENT 2 Surveillance inspection Report AREA On LOCATIcet AfsD TYPE OF SURVIALAastE PEflPORMED:
DATL PEE Ise.:
ftESULTS OF SU8 tyre e amars SIGNA 11JetE DAlt IEECOMWENDED C0futECTurE ACnpet.
M.
ACTUAL CORRECTWE ACT10st:
e ItEVERIFICATICBI 80sSPECDOst GF flEQUEIItal:
REQUtfED ACDopfS CouPLETED' l
080%21 W93 60
M i
^GEPanda Quality Assurance Procedure i
I DOCUMENT CONTROL PQAP-DC l
3 l
I Prepared for PANDA PROJECT AT PSI
)
I l
1 Revision Status Prepared /
Reviewed and Approved by Rev.
Revised by G-ISOM,
G.RM P-APM
. Issue Date Remarks N
f;,I 0
T. Singh 31.1.95 s
f rec: PANDA DRF # 7100005 I
l i
.. _. _, ~.
I
+.
I GEPanda Document No.
PGAP -DC Quality Assurance Procedure
" " " ' ", " 'Eem ae DOCUMENT CONTROL 1.
PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this procedure is to define requirements and process for, issue, resision, and distribution control ofPANDA project documents.
1.2 This procedure implements the applicable requirements of GE Engineering Operating Procedures EOP 42-8.00, " Document Issue and Application by ERM" and EOP 55-2.00
" Engineering Change Control" 2.
SCOPE This procedure applies to only those documents controlled by Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) in support of the PANDA project. Typical documents that must be issued and controlled are given in Attachment 1.
3.
DEFINITIONS 3.1 Document - a record containing design, technical and quality assurance information (including, but not limited to: drawings, specifications, test reports, procedures and instructions), that must be maintained over time.
3.2 Control-procedure or method by which documents are issued and their distribution I
information is maintained.
3.3 Issued-process by which a document is released through the document control system.
3.4 Revision - process by which changes are made to an issued document.
3.5 PSIPANDA Project Manager (P-FM) - the PSI individual identi6ed as the PSI Subproject leader for PANDA Project.
3.6 PSI Document Controller (P-DC) - the PSI individual identified as responsible for the document control system.
3.7 PSI Responsible Engineer (P-RE) - the PSI individual who initiates or prepares a document.
3.8 GE Project Manager (G-PM) - the GE individual identified as the Project Manager who is responsible for GE SBWR Test Operations and Analysis.
3.9 GE Site QA Representative (G-SQR) - the GE Quality Assurance individual assigned to the PANDA test site.
3.10 Test File - is a Sie established for compilation of quality assurance records documenting the activities performed at the PSI PANDA facility in support of the PANDA project and constitutes a subset of the GE PANDA Design Record File.
)
I
GEPanda Document No. PGAP -DC QualityAssuranceProcedure om i
4.
REQUIREMENTS 4.1 GE engineering drawing and specifications originally issued or revised by GE and applied to the PANDA project shall be issued and controlled in accordance with EOP 42-8.00 and EOP 55-2.00.
4.2 The PANDA Project Control Plan (PPCP-QA-01) and supporting Quality Assurance Procedures (PQAPs) shall be reviewed, approved, issued and distributed in accordance with requirements specified in PPCP-QA-01.
i 4.3 The requirements and responsibilities for review and approvals of procedures implementing speci5c activities for PANDA test program are described in the following PQAPs:
PQAP-TC for Test Plan and Procedure PQAP-CC for calibration procedures PQAP-DA for Data Acquisition System procedures 4.4 Documents shall be reviewed for comments by use oithe PANDA Engineering Review Memorandum (P-ERM) form of Attachment 3. All comments shall be resolved.
NOTE P-ERM may not be usedfor review and approval ofdocuments issuedprior i
to issuance ofthis Procedure. However, any subsequent changes ;o those documents shall be reviewedfor comments by use ofP-ERM 4.5 Revisions to issued drawings and specifications shall be processed by the use of the PANDA Engineering Change Notice (P-ECN) form of Attachment 4.
4.6 All engineering and technical documents and any revisions to previously issued documents shall be independently verified prior to their being issued. Independent verification shall be perfonned in accordance with PANDA Quality Assurance Procedure PQAP-V, Verification.
4.7 Documents issued or revised by PSI after the issuance of this Procedure and applied to the PANDA Project shall be controlled in accordance with the requirements of this Procedure.
Documents issued by PSI prior to issuance of this Procedure shall be checked for technical i
adequacy and completeness by P-RE, reviewed by G-SQR, approved by P-PM and approved by G-PM. This may be accomplished by use of an P-ERM or a
" Review / Approval" stamp with following information:
GEPanda Document No. PQAP -DC Quality Assurance Procedure
"""",e* 1om s
PANDA DOCUMENT REVIEW / APPROVAL Checked by Date PSI Responsible Engineer Reviewed by Date GE Site QA Representative Approved by Date PSI PANDA PM Approved by Date GE Project Manager 4.8 A document index of all issued documents applied to the PANDA project shall be maintained. The document index shall be traceable to the Test File and contain the following minimum information:
document title and/or type document number e
document revision (issue date is acceptable for previously issued PSI documents) date ofissue 5.
PROCEDURE AND RESPONSIBILITIES 5.1 The overview of document control process to be used for the PANDA project is shown in.
5.2 PSI PANDA Project Manager (P-PM) 5.2.1 Designate one individual as Document Controller (DC), responsible for maintaining the document index showing the issue and revision control of all documents.
5.2.2 Review documents as required and/or concur with the reviewers and verifiers designated on the P-ERM/ECN.
5.2.3 Approve all documents for issue prior to their initial issue or issue as a revision. This approval assures that the total impact of the document or revision has been considered and that all the pertinent people have reviewed the document or document revision.
i 5.2.4 Approve the distribution list for the documents listed.
1 5.2.5 Approve documents for release and use. (See " Release Stamp" in paragraph 5.3.2).
5.3 Document Controller (P-DC) 5.3.1 Maintain a document control system consisting of a document index containing the status of all issued documents. The record shall identify all documents by a unique document title, identification number, revision number, and the date ofissue. Refer to paragraph 4.8.
2
- g GEPanda Document No. PGAP -DC Quality Assurance Procedure s,e em t
5.3.2 The P-DC shall also maintain a file of the master copies of allissued documents. When a document is revised, all previous master copy revisions shall be identified " Superseded by Revision
" and/or " Issue Date", and all obsolete copies shall be removed from the test areas.
i NOTE:
Master document will be identified by a " Release Stamp" uith the following information:
PANDA MASTER DOCUMENT i
Released by Date PSI PANDA PM I
Date GE Site QA Representative t
5.3.3 The master document file shall be a subsection to the " Test File" 5.3.4 PSI PANDA documents (except drawings) shall be identified as, " ALPHA-Y NN" where "Y" is the last digit of the year ofissue, and NN is a 2 digit number. As not all ALPHA project documents are applied to PANDA, not all sequential numbers will be referred in the document file.
5.3.5 Preliminary documents shall be identified by a sequential alpha revision numbering system, (i.e. A, B,....). Preliminary documents need not be issued. Final documents shall be issued and also controlled by a sequential numeric revision system.
5.3.6 Drawings shall be identified using a unique PSI drawing designation.
5.3.7 Issue approved documents with P-ERM or P-ECN, as appropriate. See paragraphs 4.3 and 4.7 for exceptions. A document unique distribution list shall also be maintained.
5.3.8 Maintain logs for numbering of P-ERMs and P-ECNs.
5.4 PSI Responsible Engineer (P-RE) 5.4.I Initiate P-ERMs (Attachment 3), to process documents and specifications for review and verification by PANDA PSI and GE personnel (see Attachment 2, Document Control Process). Resolve comments and obtain acceptance from all affected reviewers and verifiers.
5.4.2 Initiate P-ECNs (Attachment 4) and secure review / approval of revision to drawings and specifications. The P-ECN shall be routed to all affected PAhTA PSI and GE personnel for review and comments resolved accordingly.
5.4.3 Secure independent verification from PSI Verifiers in accordance with PANDA QA Procedure PQAP-V.
l I
GEPanda Document No. POAP -DC Quality Assurance Procedure an 5.4.4 Obtain the approval to issue a document from the PSI PANDA Project Manager and GE Project Manager by using the P-ERM or P. ECN forms, as applicable.
5.4.5 Define the distribution of a document and obtain the approval of the P,PM.
5.4.6 Forward approved documents requiring control (Attachment 1) to the P-DC for issue and document control.
5.5 GE Project Manager (G-PM) 5.5.1 Review PSI documents as required.
5.5.2 Approve P-ERM/ECN for issuance of PSI documents, as required.
5.6 GE Site QA Representative (G-SQR) 5.6.1 Assist the P-PM to establish a document control system at PSI including methodology for accumulation, indexing, statusing, retention and transmittal aspects of the system.
i 5.6.2 Review documents and provide quality assurance inputs.
1 5.6.3 Approve documents for release and use. (See Release Stamp in paragraph 5.3.2).
]
5.6.4 Review the completed documents and records for completeness, accuracy and legibility for reproduction and archiving.
)
i 5.6.5 Conduct surveillances to assure that the document control procedures are followed and correct revisions of documents are used during all PANDA tests. Maintain records of Surveillance Inspection Reports (see Project Control Plan for format).
6.0 ATTACHMENTS 1
List ofTypical Documents to be Controlled at PSI 2
Document Control Process 3
Engincedng Review Memorandum Form for PANDA Project 4
Engineedng Change Notice Form for PANDA Project i
i v
l, GEPanda Document No. POAP -DC
. Quality Assurance Procedure
- an ATTACHMENT 1
[
List of Typical Documents to be Controlled at PSI
{
1.
Test Specification 2.
PANDA Project Control Plan 3.
PANDA Quality Assurance Procedures 4.
Test Plans and Procedures 5.
Test Facility Design Drawings
{
6.
Test Facility As-Built Drawings 7.
Procedures Calibration DAS Validation i
Any other procedure applicable to PANDA test program 8.
Test Reports Apparent Test Results Reports Final Test Reports j
i 1
Document No.
POAP-DC GEPanda Revision No.
O
~
Quality Assurance Procedure ATTACHMENT 2 Document Control Process WHO WHAT
^
PSIPANDA Review P-E ECN APPIOV'f0f Project Documents as Release for issue Manager Required; Concur with jk Reviewers /
N qg Verifiers on PSI P-ERM / ECN lssue
+
Update &
Document j(
Document Maintain Document Controller with Release Index and qg Stamp Master Doc. File N
II PSI Identifies initiate Resolve -
+
Secure include Responsible Reviewers ERM or Reviewers Approvals Records Engineer
& Verifier ECN Comments a"
in Test l
D stri on 1I N
File 3fj(
Review Approve GE Project Manager as rec ulred for issue II V
GE Site QA Approve for Representative 1f Release PSI Reviewers Review (if needed) as required 1I PSI Verifiers Verify per PQAP-V
GEPam/a
~ Document No.~
POAP-DC ' ~"
Quality Assurance Procedure
- n ATTACHMENT 3 C,.
1 SUBKCT P.ERM NO.
PAISA
.nzar or asomEEWNo NEMEWNENORANDWN 04TEfSSUED RESPONSIBLE ENGINEER OATE COMP EXT MC
=
3 AREA 0F flEVIEW 18DOCUMENTBE900 APMIOWL SleIIATURES l.
INTERFACE COMPATAetITY 5.
OLMllTY ASSUPANCE Y
N 2.
hMTERIAUPROCESS APPtlCATION 8.
00CUMENT QUALIFY SUPERSEDED g
g NM N N MM 3.
INDEPENDENT 0E880NVERIFICATION 7.
OTHER OB8OLETE O
O 4.
EYSTEMAPPUCATON INACIM 0
0 M PARMPROfECT M45GER DATE VERFICATION STATEnENT (E PRChlECII44040ER DATE DATE I
fESPGIOlBLE ENWEERFtR MTE DOCUMENTISSUE 00CIDENT PROMCit fEG) flEVIEW -
REVIEVU SYSTEM tTEM DENTFICATION GROUPOR RW SCE APPLICAil0Nf REVIEW COMP ASSIGNEO flEVIEW REV! EWERS C0hPL COMMENTS 940 OR SUB10 NUhgER PNtiNO NO.
CODE USE DATE GE PSI flEVIEWER 8MfulE DATE VE8MO NR NfA PSA GE48UUR a
1P 9h 1%
a i
ftEF.: PANDA ORF 0 7140008 APPROVAL SHEET
GEPamla Document No.
PGAP -DC Revision No. 0
--Quality Assurance Procedure e...
to or n P-ERM NO.
PANDA sNEET oF NNNM DATEISSUED REVEWER'8 COMMENT 8(800N AND DATE)
RESPONSNILE ENGINEER"S RESOLUTION (810N 8 DATE) e l
REF.: PANDA DRF # 71@005 COMMENT SHEET '
GEPanda Document No.
PQAP-DC Quality Assurance Procedure i, a n ATTACHMENT 4 M BT!
r.4 r= = <=1 cs PANDA FRGINEERNIG CHANGENOTICE are anus mes 1,,a D arra.zenaus pauscTs/
GE-SBWR sunsammD riawrs
- - __.= nuszumaR's e
stemrum DOC REY N IDSff MD.
RET NO.
DOG 2Geff TITTA Age TTPE CEnsem TO
.~2aus, Dascarrrzm ar cammas 4
DISTRIBUT! W APFmDTAL coup Ps! SIESFWSIB A EMGINEER
=_- -- 78 DATE M PRMScT==-
TERIFISD BT Pet PAack PWIDJECT MhMhf3ER 3tBF.1 thack DRF $71-00005
1 GEPanda Document No.
POAP-DC fievision No. 0 Quality Assurance Procedure P,ae
,2 a,2 F4CN INETRUCTIONs, nenrurrT10N OF CHANCE NO.
O PANDA momOm m.om o.O sms BGNEERNG CNANGEN011CE
- RU m mi
=2 or 2 1
I
)
i l
i
r.. - oren a rs-er.==
F i
GEPanda Quality Assurance Procedure PROCUREMENT CONTROL PQAP-PC I
l Prepared for PANDA PROJECT AT PSI Revision Status Prepared /
Reviewed and Approved by Rev.
Revised by G-ISOM G-PM P-APM issue Date Remarks h h-F hN 0
D. Kays / -. y $,,Mb, g,. pf gro,f, p f 31.1.95 T. Singh y
mar
?
Ref.: PANDA DRF No. T1065 e
GEPanda Document No. POAP-PC Quality Assurance Procedure
"""' ""l,'
E or s PROCUREMENT CONTROL 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this procedure is to define the requirements for procurements initiated by PSI in support ofPANDA test project, after test facility commissioning, for equipment and senices defined in this procedure.
1.2 This procedure implements the applicable requirements of GE Engineering Operating Procedures, EOP 45-1.00, Procurement Initiation and Control, EOP 45-2.00, Procurement of Engineering Senices, and in part EOP 35-3.20, Calibrati 6n Control.
2.
SCOPE The requirements of this procedure apply to all procurements in support of the PANDA project, after test facility commissioning, for components which can influence test results.
This applies to manufacturer provided equipment, calibration and testing services for the PANDA test, data acquisition system and instrumentation.
3.
DEFINITION 3.1 PS Responsible Engineer-the PSI individual assigned responsibility for determining and applying technical and engineering requirements to material requests.
3.2 PSPurchasing - the PSI organization assigned responsibility to place purchase orders and interface with suppliers.
11 3.3 GESite QA Representative-the GE Quality Assurance representative assigned to the PANDA project at PSI site and responsible for specifying quality requirements and assuring procurement from approved suppliers.
3.4 GE ApprovedSupplier - an organization (manufacturer, supplier and/or subcontractor) that has been evaluated / assessed and approved by GE Quality Assurance Auditor (s) for :.
defined scope of supply of equipment and/or senice.
3.5 Swiss Federal Office ofMetrology - is the Swiss government agency responsible for nationally recognized standards in Switzerland (equivalent to USA National Institute of Standards and Technology).
3.6 European Government Agency - is the government agency of a country in Europe responsible for the nationally recognized standards in that country (equivalent to USA National Institute of Standards and Technology).
3.7 Accredited Calibration Laboratory - a supplier of calibration services which has been assessed and approved by the applicable European Government Agency.
c
GEPanda Document No.
PoAP-PC Quality Assurance Procedure as 3.8 Equipment - is a device or instrument used for measuring, testing and/or data acquisition in support of the PANDA project and which can influence test results.
3.9 Test File -is a file established for compilation of quality assurance records documentmg I
the activities performed at the PSI PANDA facility in support of the PANDA project and constitutes a subset of the GE PANDA Design Record File.
I 4.
REQUIREMENTS 4.1 The PSI established hiatedal Request / Purchase Order forms and purchasing system shall l
be utilized to initiate purchase orders.
I 4.2 hiaterial requests to initiate procurement of equipment and services described in paragraph 2.0 shall be processed, reviewed and approved as defined in this procedure.
4.3 Procurements shall be made from GE Approved Suppliers.
4.4 Upon PSI request, GE Quality Assurance Auditor (s) will evaluate and approve suppliers in accordance with the applicable requirements specified in EOPs 35-3.20, 45-1.00 and/or 45-2.00 and the following criteria:
a.
Criteria for evaluation and assessment of a PSI supplier's ability to meet sub-contract requirements will be based upon the scope and complexity of the i
equipment / service to be purchased and the applicable technical, quality assurance and regulatory requirements. hiethods to be used in evaluating such a prospective supplier shall include any or all of the following:
1)
Review and evaluation of supplier's previous performance history of delivering like equipment and/or service. Historical data should be relevant to the product to be provided and should be representative of the supplier's I
current capability. This may include evaluation of the supplier's current quality assurance records supported by documented qualitative or quantitative information such as inspection / test or statistical data or other i
l quality records which can be objectively evaluated.
l This should also include review and evaluation of the supplier's quality assurance program, procedures, and instructions as appropriate.
2)
Direct evaluation and assessment of supplier's quality system, facilities, process, personnel, quality assurance records, and the implementation of i
his quality assurance program by audit process.
3)
Review and evaluation of records which substantiate that the supplier is the Swiss Federal Office of hietrology or a Accredited Calibration Laboratory l
i l
l E
I GEPanda Document No. PQAP-PC Quality Assurance Procedure
" " " ' " ",. ' E et s which has been assessed and approved by the applicable European Government Agency.
b.
It is the responsibility of the GE International Senices Quality Manager and the GE Project Manager to assure that proper supplier evaluations and assessments are completed in a timely and acceptable manner.
4 4.5 Copies of purchase orders and associated documentation shall become part of the Test File to provide traceability of quality requirements specified in the procurement documents.
4.6 All purchased equipment after being received shall be inspected and the results shall be documented by the PSI Responsible Engineer. Equipment received in uncalibrated t
condition shall be calibrated in accordance with the procedure PQAP-CC. Calibrated i
equipment shall be verified with calibration certificate. The GE Site QA Representative will review and verify acceptance of all equipment and results.
4.7 Nonconformances noted during inspection and need to be resolved (dispositioned) shall be documented and processed per procedure PQAP-NC.
5.
PROCEDURE AND RESPONSIBILITIES 5.1 The procurement control process is shown in Attachment 1.
5.2 PSI Responsible Engineer (P-RE) 5.2.1 Review technical information from suppliers, as required.
5.2.2 Initiate material request / material request change and assure that quality assurance and engineering requirements are delineated in the material request / material request change.
For instruments and devices to be used for measuring and testing, requirements for traceability of calibration to the nationally recognized standards and certification shall be specified.
5.2.3 Assure that related technical requirements documents are forwarded with the material request / material request change. As applicable, specify any shipping instructions to control damage or deterioration during handling and shipping of equipment.
5.2.4 Assure that material test reports and certifications, calibration certi5 cations with traceability to nationally recognized standards and reporting of as-found conditions (for re-calibrations), as applicable, are requested when initiating material regt,ests.
5.2.5 Obtain review from GE Site QA Representative.
4
~ GEPanda Document No. PQAP-PC Quality Assurance Procedure
""*'*"",e' E ate 5.2.6 Complete and document a receiving inspection after receipt of equipment. The copy of
' the purchase order provided to the P-RE may be used to document the inspection results.
5.2.7 Assure that equipment requiring calibration is calibrated in accordance with the procedure PQAP-CC.
5.2.8 Maintain copies of procurement, technical, certification and receiving inspection documentation in the Test File.
5.3 GE Site QA Representative l
5.3.1 Review material requests / material request changes for applicable quality assurance i
requirements to assure that the equipment meets the applicable engineering, code and regulatory requirements.
l 5.3.2 Identify the documentation and receiving inspection requirements which must be completed before the equipment can be used or accepted.
5.3.3 Assure that a GE Approved Supplier is identified on the material request. If suppliers are not approved, notify PSI PANDA Project Manager and coordinate with the GE International Services Quality Manager to obtain supplier evaluation and approval.
5.3.4 Review and approve the inspection / test performed by the PSI Responsible Engineer.
Assure that the equipment / service has been purchased from GE Approved Supplier.
5.4 PSI PANDA Project Manager (P-PM) 5.4.1 Review and approve material requests / material change requests.
5.4.2 Assure that procurement is being made from GE Approved Suppliers. Coordinate with GE Project Manager and/or GE International Services Quality Manager to obtain supplier evaluation and approval by GE when required.
5.5 PSI Purchasing 5.5.1 Process purchaser orders on GE Approved Suppliers.
5.5.2 Provide copies of purchase orders and purchase order revisions to P-RE for retention in the Test File.
6.0 ATTACHMENTS Procurement Control Process
GEPanda Document No.
PQAP-QA-PC '
Revision No.
O Quality Assurance Procedure e...
eors ATTACHMENT 1 i
Procurement Control Process WHO WHAT PSI PANDA Review & Approve Project Manager Jk V
PSI Responsible Define Technical & Quality -
-> Maintain Receive &
Maintain Documents m
Engineer Requirements for Copy of PO Check
& Certifications
^
Equipment Service, and in Test File Equipment & __
in Test File Documents Initiate Material Request (s) y I
Jk jg PSI Issue Purchasing Purchase Orders on GE Approved V
GE Approved Provide Supplier Equipment or Service p
& Documents PSI
-> Calibrate instruments Calibrator per PQAP-CC Ak l
V y
l GE Site QA Review forQA Requirments Review Review Documents &
Representative
& Supplier Evaluation Equipment identification Approval Status Accept E--
GEPanda Quality Assurance Procedure TEST CONTROL PQAP-TC Prepared for PANDA PROJECT AT PSI Revision Status Prepared /
Reviewed and Approved by Riv.
Revised by G-1SOM f G-E M P-APM issue Date Remarks I*I*
P.
.f 9
Ref.: PANDA DRF No. T1065 b
x t
' GEPanda Document No. POAP-TC
' Quality Assurance Procedure
" ' ' " ", ' Eore i
s, TEST CONTROL 1.0 PURPOSE f
1.1 The purpose of this procedure is to define the process for specifying, performing, evaluating, and documenting the PANDA test.
1.2 This procedure implements the applicable requirements of GE Engineering Operating Procedure EOP 35-3.00, " Engineering Tests" 2.0 SCOPE This procedure is applicable to PANDA tests including facility characterization tests
[
(pressure and leak tightness tests, heat loss tests, and line pressure loss tests) and matrix tests (tests run in accordance with test matrices delineated in the Test Specification) conducted at PSI.
3.0 DEFINITIONS 3.1 PSI ALPHA PROJECTMANAGER (P-APM) - the PSI individual identified as the PSI
\\
ALPHA Project Manager.
3.2 PSIPANDA Project Manager (P-FM) - the PSI individual identified as the PSI Subproject leader for the PANDA Project.
i 3.3 GE ProjectManager (G-PM) - the GE individual identified as the Project Manager who is responsible for GE SBWR Test Operations and Analysis.
3.4 GE Site GA Representative (G-SQR) - the GE Quality Assurance individual assigned to the PANDA test site, 3.5 PSI Test Shift Leader (P-SL) - the PSI individual with the responsibility for the tests carried out in the PANDA facility.
4.0 REQUIREMENTS 4.1 A Test Specification for the PANDA test will be prepared and issued by GE per the requirements and guidelines defined in EOP 35-3.00.
4.2 All Panda tests shall be performed by qualified PSI personnel and in accordance with documented procedures approved by GE.
GEPanda Document No. PQAP-TC Quality Assurance Procedure lat e ac 4.3 A Test Plan and Procedures (TP&P) document will be prepared and issued by PSI per the requirements in the Attashment 1 to this procedure.
5.0 PROCEDURE AND RESPONSIBILITIES 5.1 The test control process overview is shown in Attachment 2.
5.2 PSI ALPHA Project Manager (P-APM) 5.2.1 Review the Test Specification (TS) and identify any issues to be resolved with the G-PM.
5.2.2 Review and approve the Test Plan & Procedures (TP&P).
5.2.3 Issue the TP&P in accordance with FQAP-DC, Document Control.
5.2.4 Initiate Test File as specified in the Test Specification and PQAP-R, QA Records.
5.2.5 Assure that personnel who are assigned to perform or evaluate tests are qualified and trained per PQAP-PT, Personnel Training and Qualification.
4 5.2.6 Assure purchased hardware and software comply with PQAP-P, Procurement Control, as required.
I 5.2.7 Approve revisions to the TP&P.
5.2.8 Approve revisions to TS.
5.2.9 Review Apparent Test Results (ATR) report.
5.2.10 Evaluate the Final Test Report (FTR) to confirm that the test satisfied the requirements in the TS and TP&P. Advise the P-RE if the test did not meet these requirements. Approve j
the FTR upon completion of any required changes.
j 5.3 PSI PANDA Project Manager (P-PM) 5.3.1 Review the Test Specification (TS) and identify any issues to be resolved with the P-APM.
5.3.2 Prepare a Test Plan and Procedure (TP&P) per the Test Specification.
5.3.3 Maintain Test File as specified in the Test Specification and PQAP-R, QA Records.
5.3.4 Document the facility configuration and the test equipment status per PQAP-DC, Document Control, and calibration status per PQAP-CC, Control of Measuring and Test Equipment, in the project Test File.
4 r
GEPanda Document No.
PQAP-TC Revision No. O Quality Assurance Procedure r,,e we 5.3.5 Review and resolve all test anomalies identified during the test. Document resolutions, conditions requiring correction and corrective actions per PQAP-NC.
5.3.6 File the review and approval of resolutions and corrective actions in the project Test File.
5.3.7 Evaluate data obtained from the use ofgages and instmments that are out of calibration, damaged, or exceed their calibration date during the test. Document evidence of evaluations in the Test File per PQAP-R.
5.3.8 Prepare Apparent Test Results (ATR) reports per TS and TP&P requirements. ATRs contain preliminary data that has not been evaluated or verified.
5.3.9 Prepare Final Test Report (FTR) providing for the complete description of the tests and the test results, including reduction, interpretation, and correlation of the data as specified in the TS and TP&P. Integrate ATR data into the FTR.
5.3.10 Close the Test File and transfer to GE.
i i
5.4 PSI Test Shift Leader (P-SL) 5.4.1 Perform tests in accordance with TP&P.
5.4.2 Assure that test logs are established and maintained.
5.4.3 Modify TP&P during testing to reflect changes in how the test data is obtained. Obtain review and approvals as soon as feasible, but before issuance of ATR.
5.4.4 Report anomalies from the TP&P to the G-PM and G-SQR per PQAP-NC, Nonconformance Control and Corrective Action. Test anomalies are defined as conditions outside of the acceptance criteria.
5.4.5 Provide test results to P-PM.
5.5 GE Project Manager (G-PM) 5.5.1 Establish Design Record File (DRF) to be used to file and maintain technical, quality and j
project documentation at GE offices in accordance with EOP 42-10.00, Design Record File.. Include any special requirements regarding filing unique technical information in the DRF.
1 5.5.2 Defme requirements for Test File in the procedure PQAP-R to be used by PSI to file documentation at the PANDA test site during the facility construction and performance of the tests.
I GEPanda Document No. PGAP-TC Quality Assurance Procedure ae et e 5.5.3 Prepare and issue a Test Specification (TS).
i 5.5.4 Plan and implement design reviews per EOP 40-7.00, Design Reviews, as required.
5.5.5 File the Test Specification, and any revisions, in the project DRF.
]
5.5.6 Approve the TP&P 5.5.7 Confirm the readiness of the test facility and/or personnel to perform the tests.
5.5.8 Approve all TP&P changes. This approval should be made as soon as feasible, but before i
issuance of ATR.
I 5.5.9 Revise it e Test Specification (TS) to reflect changes as required.
5.5.10 Review and approve resolutions and corrective actions per PQAP-NC taken during the test where test anomalies from the TP&P have resulted.
J 5.5.11 Evaluate the ATR and FTR to confirm that the test satisfied the requirements addressed in the TS and TP&P. Advise the P-PM, if the test did not meet these requirements.
l Approve the FTR upon completion of any required changes.
5.5.12 Close the DRF.
5.5.13 Responsibilities as noted above may be delegated to GE Responsible Engineers assigned to PANDA project 5.6 GE Site QA Representative (G-SQR) 5.6.1 Review TP&P and establish inspection, witness and hold points to verify completion and acceptance of the test activities.
5.6.2 Prepare r. pporting work control plans, checklists, data sheets, etc., as required to monitor u
the PANDA te;st activities and document objective evidence of veri 6 cations, test results j
and status.
5.6.3 Witness the test preparation and performance as planned.
5.6.4 Assure that the configuration and test equipment status are documented adequately.
5.6.5 Approve all TP&P changes. This approval may be made as required during the actual performance of the test.
GEPanda Document No. POAP-TC Quality Assurance Procedure Ease i
5.6.6 Assure that the test anomalies determined as nonconfonnances are documented, resolved and corrective actions taken as required in accordance with PQAP-NC.
5.6.7 Monitor test activities and perform site surveillances at periodic internals to assure that requirements of PCPP, PQAPs and test procedures are implemented. Obtain resolutions i
and corrective actions to any procedural deviations. See PPCP-QA-01 for the
)
l Surveillance Inspection Report Form.
i 6.0 ATTACHMENTS j
Test Plan and Procedure Requirements Test Control Process j
i
\\
^
i l
l l
1 l
l l
l
GEPanda Document No.
POAP-TC Quality Assurance Procedure nt e ATTACHMENT 1
[
Test Plan and Procedure Requirements l
l 1.0 TEST PLAN Describe how the test is to be set up and performed to meet the TS and any special safety conditions associated with the test. Include requirements for test records, instrumentation, data acquisition system, data reduction and reporting.
2.0 TEST PROCEDURES Describe the specific procedures required to perform the test. Address the following in the procedures.
2,1 Give each test a unique test number.
2.2 State the purpose for each test.
2.3 Define the initial conditions for each test.
2.4 Specify the step-by-step actions to be performed by the test facility operators.
2.5 Define the checks necessary to assure proper data acquisition and recording during a test.
2.6 Define inspection, witness and hold points to verify completion of test activities.
2.7 Identify dangerous aspects of the tests with precautions and limiting conditions at which a test has to be interrupted.
28 Specify end-of-test conditions.
2.9 Define post-test status of the facility which will allow it to be left unattended.
GEPanda Document No.
POAP-TC Quality Assurance Procedure o, e ATTACHMENT 2 Test Control Process mio miaI PSIALPHA Review &
W Review &. Issue Review &
Review Review Project Concur Approve TP&P Approve as Manager per Required j(
j(
PQAP-DC Ik
- Select &
Mk Train Personnel POAP-PT
- Establish Tett F#e
" ^ ~ ' "
lf If lf lf V
GE Project Prepare Test -
Review &
k Perform Review &
Review &
Review &
Review Review Manager Specification Approve Readiness Approve Approve Approve Review j(
)(
N bl AN N
lf lf jf
)
lf PSIPANDA Review Prepare 4 MaintaWRevise-Review Peview &
File Test y issue h Finalg issuegClose Pro}ect Test Plan Test Fite TP&P as Resolve per Records Apparenf Test Final Test Manager Appropriate PQAP-NC in Test Report
- Report, File Procedures Test File Report (FTR)
Copy jk (ATR) to jg j(
ak j(
Test
(
j(
File
] f
] f PSI Test Shift MPerformh Modify W Reporth Provide Leader per TP&P if Annomalies Test TPSP 4 Necessary4 from Results TP&P to lf lf l f
}f l
Review &
Review &
Review &
Review R:presentative gpp,,,,
Appve Approve Approve Review
GEPanda Quality Assurance Procedure CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT POAP-CC i
Prepared for PANDA PROJECT AT PSI l
{
i Revision Status Prepared /
Reviewed and Approved by i
I Rev.
Revised by G-ISOM GSM,
P-APM lasue Date Remarks 31.1.95 T.
7 FI 5
Jo
+
Ref: PANDA DRF No. 71-00005
GEPanda Document No.
PQAP-CC Quality Assurance Procedure Eose e,e CONTROL OF MEASURING AND TEST EQUIPMENT 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this procedure is to deSne requirements and to establish process and procedures for calibration and control ofMeasuring and Test Equipment (M&TE).
1.2 This procedure implements the applicable requirements of GE Engineering Operating
)
Procedure EOP 35-3.20, Calibration Control.
2.0 SCOPE The requirements of this procedure apply to all inspection, measuring and test equipment utilized by PSI for the PANDA project.
3.0 DEFINITIONS 3.1 PSI Calibrator - the PSI individual who performs calibration of measuring and test equipment (M&TE).
3.2 GE Site QA Representative (G-SQR) - the GE Quality Assurance individual assigned to the PANDA project at PSI site.
3.3 PS1 Responsible Engineer (P-RE), User - the PSI individual responsible for application of measuring and test equipment (M&TE).
3.4 PSI PANDA Project Manager (P-FM) - the PSI individual identified as the PSI Subproject leader for the PANDA test project.
l 3.5 Measuring and Test Equipment (M&TE) - are devices or systems used to calibrate, measure, gage, test, inspect or control in order to acquire test data or to determine compliance with the requirements and acceptance criteria. Systems used for measuring or testing include components from the sensing element to and including the output or recording device.
1 3.6 Test File - is a file established for compilation of quality assurance records documenting the activities performed at the PSI PANDA facility in support of the PANDA project and constitutes a subset of the GE PANDA Design Record File.
1 l
3.7 Swiss Federal Office ofMetrology - is the Swiss government agency responsible for i
nationally recognized standards in Switzerland (equivalent to USA National Institute of Standards and Technology).
I 8
GEPanda Document No.
PQAP-CC i
Quality Assurance Procedure
"""'",",e' Eote 3.8 European Government Agency - is the government agency of a country in Europe responsible for the nationally recognized standards in that country (equivalent to USA National Institute of Standards and Technology).
t 3.9 Accredited Calibration Ioboratory - a supplier of calibration services which has been assessed and approved by the applicable European Government Agency.
i I
4.0 REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Procurement of subcontracted calibration services shall be procured from suppliers approved by GE in accordance with Quality Assurance Procedure PQAP-PC, Procurement Control. Calibration by GE Approved Suppliers, other than the Swiss Federal office ofMetrology and Accredited Calibration Laboratories, shall be performed in accordance with procedures approved by the P-PM and G-SQR. Calibration certificate shall be provided with each calibration from all suppliers.
4.2 All M&TE calibrated by PSI shall be calibrated in accordance with a documented and approved calibration procedure (s).
j 4.3 Primary or secondary measuring standards shall be traceable to a nationally recognized l
standard. If no standard exists, the basis for calibration must be documented and approved by the P-PM and G-SQR.
4.4 Calibration Intervals for each type of M&TE shall be established and the M&TE calibrated at the prescribed intervals.
4.5 The calibration for all M&TE shall be documented by completing a PSI calibration /
maintenance record form, Attachment 2. A computerized format stmeture to capture data is acceptable provided the equivalent information shown in Atta hment 2 is maintained.
4.6 Each instmment shall be labeled or tagged in a manner so that it can be traced back to its t
I calibration record, function and location. The calibration record shall also reflect the calibration status: calibration date, calibration due-date, and the calibrator's identification.
4.7 When not in service, calibrated instmments shall be stored in a secure area so that they cannot be removed. Instruments not calibrated shall be so marked and stored separately from calibrated instruments.
I 5.0 PROCEDURE AND RESPONSIBILITIES 5.1 The overview of Control ofM&TE process is shown in Attachment 1.
GEPanda Document No.
POAP-CC QualityAssuranceProcedure
" " * ' ", " ' iote
,e 5.2 PSI Responsible Engineer (P-RE), User 5.2.1 Select M&TE that is of proper range, type, and accuracy.
5.2.2 Review calibration requirements and calibration interval for each type of M&TE specified in the Test Plan and Procedure. Document in the calibration record.
5.2.3 Review the calibration procedure for technical adequacy.
5.2.4 Assure that each M&TE is identified, the calibration status is current and is entered into the calibration records.
5.2.5 Check to verify that the M&TE have been installed correctly.
5.2.6 Notify Calibrator when recalibration, readjustment or repair of a M&TE is required.
5.2.7 When any discrepancy is found in a M&TE, prepare Measuring and Test Eqmpment i
Discrepancy Report Form, Attachment 3, and obtain review and approval from the PSI PANDA Project Manager and by GE Site QA Representative. Provide completed form to l
Calibrator for action and/or filing.
5.2.8 Maintain completed calibration maintenance record forms, supplier manuals and certification documentation in the Test File.
5.3 PSI Calibrator (C) 5.3.1 Prepare procedures for calibration of M&TE and obtain review and approvals from the User (P-RE), P-PM and G-SQR.
i 5.3.2 Calibrate M&TE in accordance with approved calibration procedures. Maintain standards and their records traceable to the nationally recognized standards. If no standard exists, document the basis for calibration and obtain approval from P-PM and G-SQR.
5.3.3 Assure that calibrated M&TE is stored in a secure environment.
5.3.4 Affix identification control (IC) number.
5.3.5 Prepare a calibration maintenance record form (Attachment 2) for each piece ofM&TE.
Identify calibration requirements and procedures, intervals, and methods. Include equipment type, identification control (IC) numbers, location, check methods, acceptance criteria, and the action taken when results are unsatisfactory.
5.3.6 Maintain log ofcalibrated M&TE.
i i
GEPanda Document No.
POAP-CC I
Quality Assurance Procedure
,e ae 1
5.3.7 Provide the completed M&TE calibration maintenance forms and records to the User (P-RE) for filingin the Test File.
5.4 GE Site QA Representative (G-SQR) f 5.4.1 Review and approve PSI and GE Approved Supplier's calibration procedures.
NOTE:
Calibrationprocedures of the Swiss Federal Office ofMetrology and the Accredited Calibration Laboratories are not required to be reviewed and approved Referenceparagraph 4.1.
5.4.2 Periodically monitor the calibration and PANDA test activities to assere that the M&TE i
used is calibrated, recalibration status is valid during the period ofuse, and calibration documentation is maintained in the Test File.
5.4.3 Assure that the subcontracted calibration services are provided by GE Approved Suppliers per requirements ofPQAP-PC.
5.4.4 Review the calibration cenificates provided by suppliers to assure that it reflects: as found condition ofM&TE, traceability to the nationally recognized standards and the calibration procedure used for calibration.
5.4.5 Review and approve Measuring and Test Equipment Discrepancy Repons to assure acceptability of previous inspection / test results or the phase of test activity. Perfo7n evaluations to determine the validity of previous inspections or tests and the acceptability j
of the effected items or the phase of test activity that has been perfonned. Document results of evaluations and resolutions / dispositions on the M&TE Discrepancy Rcpon forms.
5.5 PSI PANDA Project Manager (P-PM) 5.5.1 Review and approve the calibration procedures prepared by PSI and GE Approved Suppliers (see paragraph 4.1 for exception).
5.5.2 Review and approve the Measuring and Test Equipment Discrepancy Repons to assure all aspects of evaluations are performed and resolutions / dispositions are accomplished.
i 6.0 ATTACHMENTS 1.
Control ofMeasuring and Test Equipment Process.
2.
Calibration / Maintenance Record form j
3.
Measuring & Test Equipment Discrepancy Repon form
GEPanda Document No.
PGAP-CC puality Assurance Procedure
- * " *",",*'Eare ATTACHMENT 1 Control of Measuring and Test Equipment Process
(
l Mig WHAT PSI
> Prepare-Calibrate Mark & Label Establish ReceEbrate Send Calibrator Canbration Instruments instruments & Maintain
& Repair + Copies Procedure to Relate to togof M&TE of CaKbralion Instrument Caubration Records Status Records
)k IN to Test File d
V U
pgl Select Prepare ~
Review Verify Verify that Complete __
File ResponsbNe instruments Calibration
> Calibration Correct Canbrated + M&TE Records in Engineer (Deat with Regrmts.
Procedure installation Instruments Discrepancy Test File (User)
Replacemertt Estabfish of are in use Forms for Instruments) Cahbration instruments Reca5bration Interval d
& Repair Ak V
V GE
> Prepare
- Calrcrate Recamate I[g'(I Approved CaHbration instruments Suppuers.
Procedure
& Provide (See para. 41 As-Found for exceptions Conditions &
Certification
]f Y
GE Site QA Approve Review Perform Review &
Representative Caftbration SuppEer Survellence vaNak j
D pancy j
Procedure Certifications on use of
& As-Found CaNbrated
& Detennbe l
Conditions Instruments Acceptance g
of Previous Resut N
V V
PSI PANDA Appfeye Approve Project Catibration M&TE Manager Procedure Diacrepany Report
i GEParda Document No.
PQAP-CC Revision No.
O i
Qualty Assurance Procedure
- e..
, or e ATTACHMENT 2 GE/PSIPANDA PROJECT r
Calibration / Maintenance Record ICNO EQUIPMENT NAME LOCATION MANUFACTURER MODEUDWG No.
SERIAL NUMBER AE58GNED PW CYCLE DATE SERVICE K.AuBRATED DATE CAUBRATION DUE SERVICED /CAUBRATED BY PROCEDURE / SPECIFICATION USED TYPE OF SERVICE LAB ENVIRONMENT D W trasl.
O Cdbrdarl D Terisiemswa
- C or *F D
D D Preerttatwo Mainlanarice 0 Olhar D Rei. H.amdty D Olhar (specify) s CALIBRATION STANDARDSilNSTRUMENTS USED nauw s -
-Nm em nexf ourcAL namuracrunsa
, ave cm esKT DuE C4L CAUBRATION DATA 8Escir1EmiorFUNcnosanamot:DennectuusTcfisTEDaseR3utTs suminiestatwiefious l
I I
l REVIEWED BY:
DATE:
Ret PANDA PQAP-CC AttachmerW 2
GEPanda Document No.
PQAP-CC Revision No.
0 Quality Assurance Procedure
- e..
e Os e ATTACHMENT 3 GE/PSIPANDA PROJECT Measuring and Test Equipment DiscrepancyReport USER WRITTEN BY DATE pemme at usTE unn) ensessen.commenw)
LOCATION ISSUED DATE paste Assyme This report is twquired for deposition of measurement and test equipment that have been found to be non-conforming.
l METE NAME MANUFACTURE MODEUTYPE ID NO.
DATE CHECKED PREVIOUS CAL 1
NOTED DEFECT I
l 1
PRESENT M&TE STATUS EVALUATIONS AND RESOLUTIONSIDtSPOSITIONS YES NO METE USED FOR FINAL ACCEPTANCE OR TEST DATA D
D OUT OF TOLERANCE CONDITION AFFECTS DATA / PRODUCT ACCEPTANCE D
D l
PRODUCT INVESTIGATION IS REQUIRED D
D REMARKS REPAIR. CAUBRATE AND RETURN TO SERVICE D
D SCRAP AND DELETE FROM SYSTEM D
D AFFECTED PROGRAMS AFFECTED DOCUMENTS DRF. NO.
OTHER SIGNATURE SIGNATURE og see oA Rapemenemme osas WANDA Propect Manspor Duas Ref P90APo@cCAmmasoners3
k GEPanab l
QualityAssuranceProcedure DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM CONTROL PQAP-DA Prepared for i
PANDA PROJECT AT PSI t
)
Revision Status er.p.r.d/
n.vi.w.d and Approved by i
Rev.
Revised by G-ISOM.
GPM P-APM lesue Date Remarks
%%bf[W io77N
~
o J w=k 31.1.95 Raf. PANDA DRF # T10 00005 4
GEPanda Document No. PQAP-DA Quality Assurance Procedure
"""'",",e' Eors DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM CONTROL 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this procedure is to define requirements and responsibilities for the control ofData Acquisition System (DAS) hardware and software utilized for the GE PANDA test project.
1.2 This procedure implements the applicable requirements of GE Engineering Operating Procedure EOP 40-3.20, " Data Acquisition Systems Control" 2.0 SCOPE This procedure is applicable to the data acquisition system (DAS) used for all PANDA tests at PSI.
3.0 DEFINITIONS 3.1 PSIPANDA ProjectManager (P-PM) - the PSI individual identified as the PSI Subproject leader for the PANDA Project.
3.2 PSI Test Shift Leader (P-SL) - the PSI individual with the responsibility for the tests carried out in the PANDA facility.
3.3 PSIDASEngineer (P-DAS) - Person responsible for maintaining, modifying, and operating the PANDA DAS as assigned by the PSI Project Manager.
3.4 GEProjectManager (G-PM) - the GE individual identified as the Project Manager who is responsible for GE SBWR Test Operations and Analysis.
3.5 GESite QA Representative (G-SQR) - the GE Quality Assurance individual assigned to the PANDA test site.
4.0 REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Hardware and software associated with the PANDA DAS shall be tested, calibrated, vedSed, and controlled in accordance with this procedure.
f 5.0 PROCEDURE AND RESPONSIBILITIES l
5.1 The Data Acquisition Control process overview is shown in Attachment 1.
GEPanda Document No. PQAP-DA Quality Assurance Procedure s,
of s 5.2 PSI PANDA Project Manager (P-PM) 5.2.1 Specify DAS requirements and define technical contents in the Test Plan and Procedure (TP&P).
5.2.2 Review and approve that the DAS hardware / software packages assigned by the P-DAS are suitable for the application.
5.2.3 Review and approve procedures for testing and calibration of DAS.
)
5.2.4 Assure that testing, calibration, and maintenance of hardware and software are performed and documented, 5.2.5 Identify and assure that testing, calibration, and security of hardware and software are performed / maintained and documented.
)
5.2.6 Resolve errors in accordance with nonconformance procedure PQAP-NC.
5.3 PSI Test Shift Leader (P-SL) 5.3.1 Conduct test utilizing accepted DAS and procedures.
5.3.2 Notify the P-PM if errors in programs are discovered.
I 5.4 PSI DAS Engineer (P-DAS) 5.4.1 Design and document DAS hardware / software. Assign titles and maintain a file of all l
applied DAS software.
5.4.2 Maintain inventory ofDAS hardware.
i 5.4.3 Obtain the P-PM review and approval to assure that the assigned DAS hardware / software packages are suitable for the application.
5.4.4 Obtain design verification of new and revised DAS hardware / software packages per PQAP--V.
5.4.5 Prepare procedures for testing, calibration, verification, and maintaining security ofDAS hardware / software. Obtain required review and approvals.
5.4.6 Provide records to Test File. Document as a minimum: DAS procedures, software, hardware, calibration, testing, security, design verifications, requester's approval, and revisions.
l
-A GEPanda Document No. POAP-DA Revision No. O
-Quality Assurance Procedure esae a ct s 5.5 GE Project Manager (G-PM) 5.5.1 Review and approve DAS requirements specified in TP&P.
i 5.6 GE QA Site Representative (G-SQR) 5.6.1 Review DAS requirements specified in TP&P and provide quality assurance inputs.
5.6.2 Review procedures for testing and calibration of DAS and provide quality assurance inputs.
i 5.6.3 Monitor testing and calibration activities to assure that testing, calibration, and maintenance ofDAS hardware and software are performed, documented and are acceptable in accordance with the established requirements and procedures.
6.0 ATTACHMENTS Data Acquisition Control Process i
l
5 GEPanda Document No.
PQAP-DA
-- Quality Assurance Procedure Page 5 of 5 ATTACHMENT 1 Data Acquisition Control Process WHAT Review &
GE Project Approve Manager 4k V
Review &
Review &
PSIPANDA Specify DAS Resolve + Maintain Project Per Test Approve Approve Errors per Recordsin Plan Manager JL jk PQAP-NC Test File per
& Procedure PQAP-TC g
/L AL PSI Test Shift Conduct -->- Notify-->- Provide Test Leader Test per Errors to Results to Approved P-PM P-PM Procedures 1
V V
j(
PSIDAS Design & -->.
Prepare -> Test & --> Provide i
Document DAS Procedures for Calibrate Records I
En9 neer Software &
Testing &
DAS to Hardware &
Calibration per Test File Secure of DAS PQAP-V l
Verification ll jg per PQAP-V Y
U V
- Monitor, Representative Review &
Accept 1
m
. GEPanda Quality Assurance Procedure VERIFICATION POAP-V Prepared for 1
PANDA PROJECT AT PSI Revision Status Prepared /
Reviewed and Approved by Rev.
Revised by G-ISQl4 G_-PM P-APM lesue Date Remarks o
T. m gh M
31.1.95 Ref.: PANDA DRF No. T104Ko5
a GEPanda Document No.
POAP-v Quality Assurance Procedure
""'"' " ",*ie Eano r
VERIFICATION 1.
PURPOSE i
The purpose of this procedure is to implement the applicable requirements of GE EOP 42-6.00, " Independent Design Verification" and 40-7.00, " Design Resiews" for verification of the PANDA test facility configuration and testing actisities.
2.
SCOPE
{
The requirements of this procedure applies to activities performed by Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI) on the PANDA project.
3.
DEFINITIONS 3.1 Venfication - is an activity to assure and document the correctness, adequacy and completeness ofPANDA engineering / test documentation (hereafter referred to as
" design / document" in this procedure).
3.2 PSI Venfier - is a qualified individual (by background, knowledge, or experience),
other than the person responsible for design, who performs an independent verification to assure the correctness of a design / document or change to the verified design / document. The G-PM, by approval of the verification, assures adequacy of the independence of the verification.
3.3 Checking - applies to ensuring the correct transfer ofinformation from one document (that is verified) to another document (which is being verified).
F 3.4 IndividualDesign Review - formal, design adequacy evaluations performed by a knowledgeable person not directly responsible and accountable for the design.
3.5 Tecan Design Review - formal, design adequacy evaluations performed by a team of knowledgeable persons not directly responsible and accountable for the design
(
document.
l 3.6 Alternate Calculations - is the use of alternate methods to verify correctness of the original calculations.
_ 3.7 PSIPANDA Project Manager - the PSI individualidentified as the PSI Subproject-
.- - H 3
leader for the PANDA project.
3.8 PSIResponsible Engineer - the PSI individual who initiates or prepares a document.
G
1 1
GEPanda Document No.
POAP-V QualityAssuranceProcedur:
"""'*" " is lona Ps 3.9 GE Project Manager - the GE individual identified as the Project Manager who is responsible for GE SBWR Test Operations and Analysis.
- 4. -
REQUIREMENTS 4.1.
Verifications will address the accurate documentation of facility configuration and I
test performance. Verifications shall be performed on the following:
calculations affecting test results measuremmtr sppearing on as-built drawings 1
changes tc pm;, valve, instrument, and tank anangements instrument preparations and data acquisition system outputs.
test initial conditions (levels, pressures, temperatures, valve lineups) e speci6 cations, drawings, rd test reports to be issued in accordance with f
PQAP-DC, Document C,mro; 4.2 Activities, configuration, and procedure changes for testing or which might affect subsequent testing shall be verified for acceptability ofimpact due to differences from the original baseline configuration or alignment.
4.3 Verification records shall document (See Attachment 3) the following:
e scope inputs e
method outputs closure of all open items or questions arising from the verification process e
statement of the adequacy of the object ofverification sign offs with the l
name and dates for the originator, verifier, and management approval
( See Attachment 4 for an example of a completed Verification Sheet )
4.4 The documentation and records which provide evidence that veri 6 cation processes were performed shall be processed and maintained in accordance with the
_ PQAP-DC, Document Control and PQAP-R, Test File.
4.5 Verification by team design reviews is the responsibility of GE and will be performed in accordance with the requirements of the EOP 40-7.00.
i
GEPanda Document No.
POAP-V QualityAssuranceProcedure
- ' " ",*ie j
e ono 5.
' PROCEDURE AND RESPONSIBILITIES 1
i 5.1 The Verification process overview is shown in Attachment 1.
5.2 PSI Responsible Engineer (P-RE) 5.2.1 Assure that all new design / documents and changes to verified design / documents are verified before issue or application as numeric revision documents. Data transmitted in noncontrolled documents to others for use shall also be veri 6ed.
t 5.2.2 Determine when the design / document is ready to be verified.
5.2.3 Determine and document the scope and method ofverification to be used to l
confirm that the design / document meets its specified requirements or the requirements ofits application. Refer to Attachment 2 for applicable design / document veri 6 cation guidelines. For drawings, identify any independent checking required to detect drawing discrepancies which could affect design / document adequacy.
l 5.2.4 Select a Verifier who:
f a.
qualifies by knowledge and experience to perform the verification, and b.
has sufficient independence as approved by the G-PM.
NOTE The Venfier should be an individual other than theperson responsiblefor the design' document, but may befrom the same organi:ation. (The Responsible Engineer, Venfier msd i
GE Project Manager must be mutually exclusive, i.e. Three differentpeople).
t 5.2.5 When the design / document or design / document change is complete, provide a verification package to the Verifier. The package shall consist of the informatiun the Verifier needs to perform the verification, and includes:
_. The design / document results.(including assumptions. calculations,__ _
a.
design / document related notes and reports, etc.) to be verified; b.
The documented scope and method of verification including specification of any necessary additional checking of documents; 1
r-
)
GEPanda Document No.
PQAP-V Quality Assurance Procedure
"""'"",i, Eono e
c.
Identification of the design / document requirements, including a list ofinput documents; d.
Selection and identification of the detailed infonnation on drawings to be checked by the independent Verifier; 5.2.6 Provide clarification, additional information, or necessary corrections to the design / document documentation as requested by the Verifier. When changes are made as a result of technical or veri 5 cation reviews, consider what verification these changes require, and have the verifications performed.
5.2.7 Assure that the verification statement made by the Verifier is either on the Engineering Review Memorandum, Engineering Change Notice, or verification form (see Attachment 3) and 4 filed in the Test File.
5.2.8 Assure that all pertinent verification data generated for inclusion in a Test File are recorded per the requirements of PQAP-R, QA Records 5.3 PSI Verifier 5.3.1 Upon receipt of the verification package from the Responsible Engineer, perform se verification within the scope and method established by the Responsible Engineer to assure that the design / document satisfies its requirements. Utilize applicable design / document verification guidelines contained in Attachment 2. If the Verifierjudges that the established scope, method, and/or design interfaces are not sufficient to verify design / document adequacy, the Verifier shall discuss and l
resolve them with the P-RE.
5.3.2 Obtain additional iaformation or necessary corrections from the P-RE, as required.
i 5.3.3 When the design / document is verified, the Verifier shall prepare and sign a verification statement that includes:
a.
Identification of the design / document being verified.
b.
Description of the verification performed, including scope, method, inputs, and outputs.
- c.-
Any open items resulting from the design / document verification process -- ---- - -
have been resolved and closed.
d.
Statement of design / document adequacy made by the Verifier from results of the verification.
l GEPenda Document No.
POAP-V
'QualityAssuranceProcedure
"" " " *i.
es ono e.
The name of the Verifier and the date ofverification.
i 5.3.4 Return the verification package and the verification statement to the P-RE l
5.3.5 If the design / document cannot be verified, document the reason and return the verification package to the P-RE.
l
- 5.4 GE Project Manager (G-PM) l 1
5.4.1 Review and approve completed verification package for the design / document or design / document change to assure that verification is sufficient including the independence of the verifier. It is not necessary for the G-PM to approve the l
detailed elements of the verification as long as the total verification is approved.
5.4.2 Assure design / document requirements are identified and technical issues that result i
from the verificatio.1 are resolved.
5.4.3 Transmit completed verification package to P-RE for inclusion in the Test File.
'l 6.0 ATTACHMENTS Verification Process Overview l
Design / Document Verification Guidelines j
Verification Cover Sheet Sample of Completed Verification Sheet l
i i
i l
i 1
?
GEPanda Document No.
PQAP-V Quality Assurance Procedure
- '*""*f
- of,o ATTACHMENT 1 Verification Process WHO WHAT PSI Does the Identifies Complies Resolves
- Secures File Records Responsible
_ Work, Verifier (s) g Comments Management in Test Engineer identifies
& Signs Review &
Flie Need &
Verification Approval Approach for Verification Ik j(
u v
Performs Verification. -
Accepts -
Makes Resolution PSI
- Comments,
& Signs Verifier Develops Verification Verification Statement Reviews Approves
- Approves -
GE Project
> Verifier &_
& Signs Manager Approach Verification 1
GEPanda 0ocument No.
POAP-v Quality Assurance Procedure
"" " "l;
- ono ATTACHMENT 2 Design / Document Verification Guidelines Consider the following questions:
Al Were the design / document's inputs correctly selected and incorporated?
A2 If assumptions had to be made in order to perform the design effort, were the assumptions reasonable?
A3 Are the appropriate quality assurance requirements specified?
A4.1 Have technical interfaces been identified and addressed?
l A4.2 Have participating design organizations reviewed and concurred with documents involving technicalinterfaces?
A5 Was an appropriate design method used?
A6 Are the outputs reasonable compared to the inputs? If possible, compare the outputs with outputs from a previous design / document to check if the changed output is consistent with the changed input.
GEPanda Document No.
PGAP-V Quality Assurance Procedure Luo a.
ATTACHMENT 3 -VERIFICATION COVER SHEET GE PANDA PROJECT Vmfication CorerSect (reference PQAP.V)
Docurnent/Section:
Subject:
1.
VERIFICATION REQUIREMENT Designated Verifier:
1A.
APPLICATION:
IB.
METHOD OFVERIFICATION:
Chedang, Akanate Cdc, In&v. Ikagn Raeau, TaxmIkngn Revuw, Test (cirde as nad&) Onho(datnbe)
IC.
SCOPE:
(identify schat is to be tenfied, e.g. levd ofdetai!)
l l
ID.
INPUTS:
IE.
OUTPUTS:
IF.
Responsible Engineer (print name and sign)
Date 2.
INDEPENDENTVERIHCATION Conunents: No Yes R 2A. VERIFICATIONSTATEMENT:
(The method and scope of tenfication) 2B.
Independent Verifier (print name and sien)
Date 3.
APPROVAL OF VERIFICATION SA. GE PROJECT MANAGER'S APPROVAL:
3B.
Pro]. Manager or Delegate { print name and sign)
Date (A.
Are there attached sheets for I A,1B,1C,1D,1E,2A, SA (cirde as applicable) s
q t GEPanda Document No. PQAP-V QualityAssuranceProcedure oono
- ATTACHMENT 4-VERIFICATION COVER SHEET EXAMPLE GE PANDA PROJECT V ;'^ Camer.het (referunar MAP-V)
Docannent/Section: TM42-94-11 ALPHA 410
Subject:
PANDA TEST PLAN 1.
VERIFICATION REQUIREMENT P - ',; "- 1 Veriner:
-G.G.
Khan IA.'
APPIJCATION:
PANDA TEST FACILITY 18.
METHOD OFVERIFICATION:
Gadwqs; Aksmate Csk, India. Duqps Rasag TannDsqgn Rmang Tar (drdeas nanimi) 0the(dmaile)
Combination checking and individual design review'as described in scope section 1C.
IC.
SCOPE:
(identsfy schat is to be tenped, eg. levd ofdetail)
Verify test initial condition requirements have been i;
correctly specified in the output document.(test procedure) by checking against the input document values (PANDA test spec) and that facility total. calculated heat loss estimate
[
is reasonable.
L ID.
INPUTS:
PANDA Test Specification, 25A5587 rev.0 and estimated heat loss calculation.
IE.
OUTPUTS:
PANDA Test procedure, S1-XX, rev. 1.
IF.
J. P. Getty 11/9/94 Responsible Engineer (print name and sign)
Date 2.
INDEPENDENTVERIHCATION Comunents: No X Yes 2A. VERIFICATION STATEMENT:
(The method and scope of tenfcation)
The method and scope of verification as stated in 1B and 1C are appropriate for the inputs as identified in 1D.
All comments and technical issues are resolved. The verification establishes that the output identified in IE is correct and is adequate for its intended application as identified in 1A.
28.
J.B. Briggs 11/9/94 Independent veriGer (print name and sign)
Date l
S.
APPROVAL OF VERIHCATION SA. GE PROJECT MAN 4GER'S ANROVAL:
All design *;equirements have been identified and all technical issues are adequately resolved. The verification described in the above sections 1 and 2 is sufficient to issue / apply the results.
SB.
A.T. Hune 11/9/94 Proi. +
- a. or Delegate (print name and sieni Date 4A.
Are there attached sheets for I A, IB,1C, ID, IE,2A, SA (circle as applicable)
GEPanda Quality Assurance Procedure NONCONFORMANCE CONTROL AND CORRECTIVE ACTION PQAP-NC Prepared for PANDA PROJECT AT PSI l
Revision Status Prepared /
Reviewed and Approved by Rev.
Revised by G-ISOM, G-JWI P-APM
_ Issue Date Remarks
[T[NTf) y o
T. w -
a f
31.1.95 1
i Ref: PANDA DRF No. 7100005
I GEPanda Document No. PGAP-NC l
Quality Assurance Procedure
' " " ' ", ",, * ?.cs NONCONFORMANCE CONTROL AND CORRECTIVE ACTION 1.
PURPOSE i
i 1.1 The purpose of this procedure is to establish the requirements and describe the procedure for the identification, documentation, resolution and control of nonconforming items for the PANDA project.
i 1.2 This procedure also descdbes the method used to assure that the conditions adverse to l
quality, as identified by nonconformances, are promptly identified and corrected.
1.3 This procedure implements the applicable requirements of GE Engineering Operating Procedures EOP 75-4.10," Control ofNonconforming Material", and EOP 75-3.00,
" Corrective Action and Audits".
2.
SCOIE 4
2.1 This precedure applies to all PANDA quality related activities that can affect PANDA test results.
3.
DEFINITIONS 3.1 PSI ALPHA Project Manager (P-APM) - The PSI individual identified as the PSI Alpha Project Manager.
3.2 PSIPANDA Project Manager (P-PM) - The PSI Individual responsible for the performance and test control of the PANDA project at PSI.
3.3 PSIEngineers - Individuals who have responsibility for test activities as assigned by the P-PM.
3.4 Nonconformance - A deficiency in a test facility charactedstic, documentation, or procedure that renders the quality of the data unacceptable or indeterminate, or abnormal occurrences in the test results.
3.5 Nonconformance Report (NCR) - The form used for documenting the nonconformances and the resulting conrective action. (See Attachment 2) 3.6 Corrective Action - A remedial preventive action as defined by this procedure, shall be implemented and documented to assure that conditions adverse to quality, such as repetitive nonconformances, tests failures, and deviations are promptly identified and corrected.
3.7 GE Site QA Representative (G-SQR)- The GE Quality Assurance individual assigned to the PSI PANDA Site.
l:
e GEPanda Document No. PQAP-NC Quality Assurance Procedure
""*' ",",' Le s 4.
REQUIREMENTS 4.1 Any nonconforming item which can affect PANDA test results (including parts, components, equipment, supporting systems of an already commissioned test facility) or deviation from the test specification / procedure or test conditions and results showing abnormal occurrences shall be identified, treated as nonconformance, and documented and reponed for resolution (disposition) prior to continuation ofsubsequent phase of testing.
4.2 Nonconformances found are to be processed in accordance with this procedure and process flow shown in Attachment 1, to meet the control and documentation requirements for nonconfonning items and material. Known changes to test procedures should not be I
handled as a nonconformance but made and approved prior to conducting the test.
4.3 Corrective action required as a result of the nonconformance will be implemented promptly and the completion of the corrective action will be verified by the GE Site QA Representative.
4.4 The completed nonconformance report with the associated documentation will become a pan of the test file.
5.
PROCEDURE AND RESPONSIBILITIES 1
5.1 The Nonconformance Control and Corrective Action process overview is shown in l.
5.2 PSI engineers shall notify immediately the P-PM and G-SQR that a nonconformance has occurred.
5.3 Any nonconformance found will be documented in the test log and in a nonconformance report (NCR). See Attachment 2 for a NCR form. The P-PM is responsible to assure that nonconformance is documented on NCR..
5.4 The P-PM and the G-SQR will meet to evaluate, document and approve the appropriate resolution and necessary corrective action to be taken as a result of the nonconformance.
5.5 The nonconformance evaluation will result in providing one of the following resolutions (dispositions):
i a) accept test data as-is, continue test program and document justification as to reason for continuing, b) accept test data as-is, take corrective action (to correct cause/ reason for the nonconformance), document and continue test program, l
l i
I-
l GEPanda Document No. PGAP-NC Quality Assurance Procedure
- nes c) take conective action (to correct cause/ reason for nonconformance) and repeat those tests which were nonconforming and document the reason for repeating the test.
i I
5.6 The P-PM is responsible to provide technicaljustification and guidance to the G-SQR.
5.7.
Documentation of the resolution / disposition made as the result of the nonconformance evaluation will be completed on the nonconformance report (NCR).
5.8 The nonconformance report will be approved by the P-PM, GE-SQR and P-APM. The P-APM is responsible for final approval of the NCR.
5.9 The G-SQR is responsible to maintain a log, status and proper closure ofNCRs, and assure that the completed NCR with associated documentation are made part of the test file.
5.10 Corrective Action 5.10.1 The P-PM and G-SQR shall review all nonconformances for conditions adverse to quality or for a repetitive nonconformance and determine remedial action to prevent
'j reoccurrence.
5.10.2 The P-PM will assure that the corrective action (remedial action) to be taken is agreed to by the performing individual or organization with an agreed to completion date, document and approve on the NCR. In addition the G-SQR shall review and approve the committed corrective action and agree that it is adequate to prevent reoccurrence.
5.10.3 All documentation related to corrective actions taken must be identified with traceability to the related NCR numbers, dated and approved by the PSI Engineer (s) responsible to implement the corrective actions.
~ 5.10.4 The P-PM is responsible to assure that the agreed upon corrective action is implemented as committed.
5.10.5 The G-SQR is responsible to verify that the corrective action is completed as committed, and NCR form completed accordingly. The completed NCR with corrective action documentation will be made part of the test file.
6.0 ATTACHMENTS 1
Nonconformance and Corrective Action Process 2
Nonconformance Report form
GE Parufa Document No, PGAP-NC Quality Assurance Procedure Eors ATTACHMENT 1 Nonconformance Control and Corrective Action Process WHO WHAT Review &
PSI Alpha Project g
Manager Approve 4L V
PSI PANDA
+ Evaluate NCR y
Provide Project Manager and Propose Technical Resolution /
Justification &
Disposition Corrective Action AN U
V PSI identify + Document Review &
Implement Engineer (s)
Apparent Concur, as
" Corrective Action On NCRs Required
& Documentin Nonconformances Test File AL JL U
V U
+ Evaluate NCR Review &
Monitor to GE Site QA Representative and Propose Approve Closure Resolution /
of NCR Disposition
-.~
GEPaula Document No. POAP-NC
. Quality AssuranceProcedure
- * ' " ",. ' Eas ATTACHMENT 2 GEJPSIPANDA PROJECT NONCONFORMANCEREPORT SYSTEW1 LOCAfra PCR NO.
fEFERENCE e N INSCNPD0lf 0FNON0000CCIWNICE.
fROPOS W fus0LAmcIISWp0EMOE O Acompt test data ask and cxrenue inst program O Acospt test data ask tahs conoceve acton and conanus test program D Take conoclPue action and fupset sie tests TEOceCALJUSTIRCAfl00t i
PsiPAPOA PS!AUHA mom-dan enom m e i
i E Sf7E M REP.
DATE DATE i
C - r o m,0,e
- co,m-n 1
I PSIPAPO4 E SITE CA 790ECT WNAGER DATE REP AIPRCWAL DATE M ABC RammedandAcomposi NCRCkmed C0ftRECTNE ACTIDII COeIPLETED--
Ref PAND4PGAPM: AsummeM2 Pap 1of1
p-GEPanda QualityAssuranceProcedure QUALITY ASSURANCE RECORDS PGAP-R Prepared for PANDA PROJECT AT PSI l
Revision Status Prepared /
Reviewed and Approved by Rev.
Revised by G-ISQM G-PM, P-APM issue Date Remarks 0
- 0. WW "
f-g 9
31.1.95 Ref.: PANDA DRF No.T10-00005
GEPanda Document No.
POAP-R Quality Assurance Procedure
""*'","; E or, 1.
PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this procedure is to define the requirements for identification, accumulation, review, maintenance, and retention of Quality Assurance (QA) Records in the PANDA Test File.
1.2 This procedure implements the applicable requirements of GE Engineering Operating Procedures EOP 42-10.00, Design Record File, and EOP 75-6.00, Quality Assurance Records.
2.
SCOPE 2.1 The requirements of this procedure applies to records generated during PANDA project activities performed by Paul Scherrer Institute (PSI).
2.2 The QA Records generated in the framework of the PANDA project include but are not j
limited to:
- inspection documents
- commissioning test documents
- calibration records 1
- calibration procedures
- test facilitylogbook
- test procedures
- test results
- test report
- design documents (for modifications)
- as-built drawings
- nonconformance and corrective action reports.
- audit reports 2.3 The GE PANDA Design Record File shall be controlled at GE, San Jose in accordance with EOP 42-10.00.
3.
DEFINITIONS 3.1 Test File - is a file established for compilation of quality assurance records documenting the activities performed at the PSI PANDA facility in support of the PANDA project and l
constitutes a subset of the GE PANDA Design Record File.
A GEPanda oocument No. POAP-R
. Quality Assurance Procedure sae as e 3.2 GEDesign RecordFile - is a compilation of records associated with the tests, analysis, and design of the GE SBWR Project as a result of the GE PANDA project 3.3 Quality Assurance Records (QA Records) - n.e documents generated in the framework of the PANDA project which:
- are of significant value in establishing, maintaining, reworking, repairing, replacing or modifying the components / equipment of the test facilities
- describe experimentation in accordance with programs, procedures and instmetions
- report / indicate nonconformances
- cover organizational aspects of the PANDA project (responsibilities, duties, handling of documents, etc.)
- document the test facility configuration j
l 3.4 PSIPANDA Project Manager - the PSI individual identified as the PSI Subproject leader i
for the PANDA Project.
3.5 PSIDocument Controller - the PSI individual identified as responsible for the document control system.
3.6 PSI Responsible Engineer - the PSI individual who is routinely charged with maintaining the Test File.
3.7 GE Project Manager - the GE individual identified as the Project Manager who is responsible for GE SBWR Test Operations and Analysis.
3.8 GE Site QA Representative - the GE Quality Assurance individual assigned to the PANDA test site at PSI.
l 4.
REQUIREMENTS l
l 4.1.
For the PANDA project a central file of QA Records, the Test File, shall be established with an index/ table of contents similar to that given in Attachment 2.
4.2 QA Records shall be legible, accurate and complete. Any corrections will be made by single lining the error, initialing and dating it, then making the correct entry.
l l
j GEPanda Document No. PGAP-R Quality Assurance Procedure
,e or e 4.3 The Test File of the PANDA project shall be stored in an archive for the duration of PANDA testing activities. At the completion of the test, the Test File will be transmitted to GE for inclusion in the PANDA Design Record File.
4.5 The Test File shall have an index, kept up to date, to assure completeness, traceability and relocation of allits contents.
4.6 Distribution of the first issue of QA Records as well as ofnew revisions of already existing QA Records has to be organized in such a manner that the retrieval replacement of such documents is, whenever needed, possible.
5.
PROCEDURE AND RESPONSIBILITIES 5.1 The Quality Assurance Records process overview is shown in Attachment 1 5.2 The GE Proiect Manager (G-PM) 5.2.1 Define requirements to establish a system which addresses the Test File organization and contents (see Attachment 2).
5.2.2 Review and approve the closure of the Test File for the PANDA project.
l 5.2.3 Receive and review Test File and integrate it into the GE PANDA Design Record File.
5.3 The PSI PANDA Proiect Manager &-PM) i 5.3.1 Establish and maintain the Test File for the PANDA project.
5.3.2 Periodically review the Test File for completeness and accuracy.
5.3.3 Review and approve the closure of the Test File for the PANDA project.
5.3.4 Assure that the Test File is maintained at PSI for the duration of that project and assure that the closed test file is transmitted to GE..
5.4 The PSI Responsible Engineer &-RE) 5.4.1. Review every QA record for accuracy, completeness and legibility.
5.4.2 Maintain and update the Test File for the PANDA project.
5.4.3 Prepare the Test File for closure for the PANDA project.
t i
GEPanda Document No.
PQAP-R QualityAssuranceProcedure ae ore 5.4.4 Assure that, after completion of the PANDA project, the QA Record index (Test File Table of Contents) is hii7ad and the corresponding Test File closed and handed over to the P-PM for archiving.
5.4.5 Upon closure, transmit the Test File or a copy of the Test File to the GE Project Manager.
NOTE:
GE is responsible for long term archiving of QA Records which are used in support of SBWR Certification.
5.5 GE Site OA Reoresentative (G-SQR) 5.5.1 Review QA Records for completeness and legibility for microfilming.
5.5.2 Periodically survey the test area (s) and Test File system to assure that test records and documentation detennined as QA Records according to this procedure are properly identified, accumulated, indexed, reviewed and maintained in the Test File.
6.0 ATTACHMENTS 6.1 Quality Assurance Records process overview 6.2 Test File Table ofContents (Sample) j t
GEPanda Document No.
POAP-QA-R Quality Assurance Procedure ATTACHMENT 1 Quality Assurance Records Process WHO WHAT PSI PANDA
,Periodicelly_
Review &
Project Monitors Approve 4
Manager Test File Test File for Closure Transmit PSI Closed p Prepare
+ Test File Responsible s-est N to GE fw Engineer Test File for inclusion Closure in GE g
DRF I
GE Project Establishes Review &
Include l
Manager Test File Approve -
Closed l
Test File
+ PSI Test Organization /
m for Filein Contents Closure GE DRF GE Site OA p g g gy Representative Monitors _
Test File
s GEPanda Document No. POAP-R QualityAssuranceProcedure
,e afe 1
/Samp/e PANDA Test File l
Table of Contents Resp.
Number Comments Contents Eng./Date of Pages 1.0 TEST REQUIREMENTS DOCUMENTS l
1.1 Test Specification 1.2 Quality Assurance Program 1.3 Test Plans and Procedures l
2.0 TESTFACILITY DESIGN 2.1 Facility Design Drawings i
2.2 Design Reference Documents Books
{
2.3 Design Resiew 3.0
- IEST FACILTlY CHECKOUT 3.1 As-Built Drawings 3.2 Commissioning Tests 3.2.1 Hydrotests 3.2.2 Heatless Tests 3.2.3 Line Pressure Drop Tests 4.0 INSTRUMENTATION 4.1 Instrumentation List 4.2 Range and Accuracy Requirements 7
l 4.3 Manufacturers' Specifications j
4.4 Uncertainty Analysis
{
4.5 Calibration f
4.5.1 Plan / Procedures 4.5.2 Records 4.6 Exact Location on Test Facility (drawings orsketches andtables) i 5.0 DATA ACQUISITION SYSTEM 5.1 DAS Hardware Requirenaents 5.2 DAS Hardware 5.2.1 Desenption 5.2.2 Configuration 5.3 Wire / Cable Lists.DAS Hookup 5.4 Wire / Cable Lic.s Verification
e n...
j: _-
p 4
' GEPeada Docum.nt No.
POAP-R QualityAssuranceProcedure
" " ' ' ' * ", " * ' E,S 5.5 DAS SoAware 5.6
. DAS Soeware Verincation
-6.0 TESTMATRIX 6.1 Facility Configuration (System / valve line-up) 6.2 laitial Conditions Basis
' 6.3 laitial Conditions / Acceptance Criteria 6.4 Expected Test Results 6.5 Test Ar=*-~~ Criteria
- 7.0 SHAKEDOWN TESTS 7.1 Facility Configuration (System +alw line-up) 7.2 Initial Conditions Basis 7.3 laitial Conditions /Ar je== Criteria 7.4 Ep~' Test Results 7.5 Nonconformanceitems 8.0
'IESTOPERATION 8.1 Pre-test Checkluts/ Procedures 8.1.1 Preconditioning / Final Valve Alignment 8.1.2 Initial Condition Ar=pe==
8.1.3 DAS/ Instrumentation Acceptance 8.2 1%st-test Checklists / Procedures 8.2.1 Test Logs l
8.2.2 Facility Shutdown Records i
8.2.3 Nonconformanceitems 8.3 Data Printouts I
8.3.1 Pre-test i
8.3.2 Post-test
-l 84-Data Storage Information l
l 9.0 DATA REDUCTION i
9.1 Data Reduction Plan 9.2 Data Reduction Software 9.2.1 Analytical Basis 9.2.2 Computer SoAware 9.2.3 Software Validation 9.3 Reduced Data Records 9.3.1
- Data Reduction inputs 9.3.2 Reduced Data Printouts / Plots (comparison oftest results to pretest predictions)
6' GEPanda Document No.
POAP-R Quality Assurance Procedure
""*'"",a' a
of 0
[
9.3.3 Electronic Data Storage Information 9.3.4 Data Reduction Verification t
10.0 TESTREPORTS 10.1 Apparent Test Results Repons 10.1.1 Analytical Basis / Supporting Data 10.1.2 Draft Report Comment Resolution 10.1.3 Report Verification 10.2 FinalTest Reports 10.2.1 AnalyticalBasis/ Supporting Data 10.2.2 Draft Report Comment Resolution 10.2.3 Report Verification 11.0 PERSONNEL TRAINING AND QUAL. RECORDS 12.0 AUDIT REPORTS 13.0 ISSUED DOCUMENT FILE
GEPanda QualityAssuranceProcedure PERSONNEL TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION PQAP-PT Prepared for PANDA PROJECT AT PSI Revision Status Prepared /
Reviewed and Approved by Rev.
Revised by G-ISQM, EPM.
P-APM _
issue Date Remarks I
p 4Tp o
D.
- o 31.1.95 Ref.
- PANDA DRF No. T10-00005
__J
p GEPanda Document No. POAP-PT Quality Assurance Procedure
""*' " "l.'
E e, e PERSONNEL TRAINING AND QUALIFICATION 1.0 PURPOSE 1.1 The purpose of this procedure is to establish the personnel training and qualification requirements to be implemented on the PANDA project.
1.2 This procedure implements the applicable requirements of GE Engineering Operating Procedures EOP 75-5.00, Quality and Technical Training, in part EOP 75-2.00, Qualification and Certifications ofPersonnel which satisfy the requirements of ANSI /ASME NQA-1 and ANSI /ASME N45.2.6-1978 standards.
2.0 SCOPE 2.1 This procedure is applicable to training and qualification of all GE and PSI personnel performing activities affecting the quality of the PANDA test Program.
3.0 DEFINITIONS t
3.1 Proficiency - Proficiency means the achievement of a minimum acceptable competency through indoctrination, training, education, and prior experience of personnel on an individual or collective basis as applicable.
3.2 PSI ALPHA PROJECTMANAGER (P-APM) - The PSI individual identifled as the PSI ALPHA Project Manager.
3.3 PSI PANDA Project Manager (P-PM) - The PSI individual identified as the PSI Subproject leader for the PANDA project.
3.4 GEProject Manager (G-PM) - The GE individual identified as the Project Manager who is responsible for GE SBWR Test Operations and Analysis.
.I 3.5 GE Site QA Representative (G-SQR) - The GE Quality Assurance individual assigned to the PANDA test site.
)
3.6 GEInternational Services QualityManager (G-ISQM) - The GE individual identified as the International Service Quality Manager who is responsible for the overall quality assurance program implementation for the PANDA project.
4.0 REQUIREMENTS 4.1 There are two areas in which individuals who perform activities affecting the quality of the PANDA project must be proficient: technical discipline and procedural system.
m a.
- GEPanda Document No. PQAP-PT Quality Assurance Procedure
"""'"",e' a
or e a.
Technical Discipline Qualifications for technical disciplines shall include minimum education, experience, and/or special technical training requirements. Individuals are considered to be qualified if or when their knowledge in their technical specialty meets the needs of the assigned position. Individuals responsible for adherence to code or regulatory requirements shall maintain their knowledge of current provisions of such codes, rules, and regulations.
b.
Procedural System Each individual, prior to assignment ofwork activities affecting the quality of the PANDA project, shall be indoctrinated or instructed in the applicable quality assurance procedures. Indoctrination and training shall be attained and maintained by methods such as procedure reading, class training, and/or on the job training.
4.2 Qualifications 4.2.1 There are three basic levels of qualifications. Minimum levels of capability required for project functions are tabulated below:
Minimum Level Project Function L-I L-II L-III Recording inspection, examination, and testing data X
X X
Implementing inspection, examination, and testing procedures X
X X
Planning inspections, evaluations and tests; setting up tests including X
X preparation and set-up of related equipment Evaluating the validity and acceptability of inspection, examination, and X
X i
testing results Reporting inspection, examination, and testing results X
X Supervising equivalent or lower level personnel X
X Qualifyinglower level personnel X
X Enluating the adequacy of specific programs used to train and test X
inspection, examination and testing personnel Qualifying same level personnel X
4.2.2 The following is the minimum education and related experience requirements that must be satisfied for each level of qualification:
l
- c j s.
L GEPed:
Document No. PQAP-PT 1 Quality Assurance Procedure ss on
. LeveI I.
High school graduation and six months of related experience in equivalent.
a.
inspection or testing activities; or i
' b.
Completion of college level work leading to an Associate Degree in a related discipline plus three months of related experience in equivalent inspection testing activities; or c.
Four year college graduation in a related discipline plus three months of related experience in equivalent inspection or testing activities.
Level U One year of satisfactory performance as Level I in the corresponding inspection or f
- a. -
test category or class; or b.
. High school graduation plus three years of related experience in equivalent inspection or testing activities; or i
c.
Completion of college level work leading to any Associate Degree in a related j
discipline plus one year related experience in equivalent inspection or testing activities; or d.
Four year college graduation plus six months or related experience in equivalent inspection or testing activities.
LevelID a.
Six years of satisfactory performance as Level II in a corresponding inspection or test category or class; or b.
High school graduation plus ten years of related experience in equivalent inspection or testing activity; or high school graduation plus eight years experience in equivalent inspection or testing activities with at east two years as Level II and with at least two years associated with nuclear facilities - or if not, at least sufficient training to be acquainted with the quality assurance aspects of a nuclear facility; or c.
Completion of college level work leading to an Associate Degree and seven years of related experience in equivalent inspection or testing activities with at least two j
years of this experience associated with nuclear facilities - or if not, at least sufficient training to be acquainted with the quality assurance aspects of a nuclear j
facility; or d.
Four year college graduation plus five years of related experience in equivalent i
inspection or testing activities with at least two years of this experience associated with nuclear facilities - or if not, at least sufficient training to be acquainted with the quality assurance aspects of a nuclear facility.
o GEPanda Document No.
PQAP-PT hevision No. O Quality Assurance Procedure e.g.
s ete 4.2.3 The PSI ALPHA Project Manager and GE Project Manager will determine any physical examination required for the personnel assigned to the PANDA test project.
4.2.4 Qualifications of all GE and PSI engineers (except GE Q 4 Engineer / Representative) who will be performing inspection, testing, calibration, evaluation, verification, review and approval ofverifications of PANDA test results shall be evaluated for compliance with the above requirements and qualified to at least level II discipline. Qualification data and status shall be documented on the form shown in Attachment 3.
4.2.5 Evaluation of PSI PANDA personnel and determinatior of qualification level shall be made by the PSI ALPHA Project Manager and approved by the GE Project Manager.
4.2.6 Evaluation of GE engineers assigned to PANDA project and determination of qualification level shall be made by the GE Project Manager and approved by the GE International Services Quality' Manager.
4.2.7 The GE Site QA Representative shall be qualified and certified to at least Level II discipline in accordance with the procedure EOP 75-2.00.
4.2.8 The qualification shall be effective for one year from date of approval.
4.3 Training 4.3.1 All GE and PSI personnel performing work for the PANDA project will be required to read and acknowledge understanding of this PPCP and supporting PQAPs. Records of this indoctrination shall be documented and maintained utilizing the form shown in. bdoctrination may be perfonned as a training session to a group of project personnel. In such a case, training records will be maintained utilizing the form shown in.
4.3.2 Each individual performing testing or calibration activities affecting the quality of the PANDA test project shall read or be instructed in the practices and procedures which are directly applicable to the assigned work. Records shall be maintained per applicable form (Attachment 1 or 2).
4.3.3 GE employees are trained and indoctrinated in accordance with the program specified in GE Procedure P&P 70-30, Personnel Proficiency in Quality Related Activities and EOP 75-5.00, Quality and Technical Training. GE management is responsible for assessing and obtaining the training required. Furthermore, it is the responsibility of the GE Project Manager to assure that the GE personnel assigned to PANDA project are adequately trained in the GE system.
a.
l GEPanda Document No. POAP-PT Quality Assurance Procedure s.
et e 4.4 The GE Lead Auditor and auditors will be certified and qualified in accordance with requirements contained in GE Engineering Operating Procedure EOP 75-2.00, Qualification and Certifications of Personnel.
5.0 PROCEDURE AND RESPONSIBILITIES 5.1.
The PSI ALPHA Project Manager shall be responsible to assure that the PSI personnel assigned to PANDA project are adequately trained and qualified in accordance with this procedure.
5.2 The GE Project Manager shall be responsible to assure that the GE engineers assigned to PANDA project are adequately trained and qualified in accordance with this procedure in addition to GE training and indoctrination. Also he shall approve qualifications of PSI personnel.
5.3 The PSI PANDA Project Manager shall be responsible to assure that all PSI personnel assigned to PANDA test program are adequately indoctrinated and trained in the applicable procedures for their assigned work and records are maintained.
5.4 The GE Site QA Representative shall assist the PSI ALPHA Project Manager and PSI l
PANDA Project Manager in indoctrination and training of PSI personnel regarding PANDA Project Control Plan and supporting Quality Assurance Procedures. He shall also assure that indoctrination / training and qualification records are adequately maintained in the Test File per procedure PQAP-R.
)
5.5 The GE Intemational Services Quality Manager shall be responsible to assure that the GE QA engineers assigned to the PANDA project are qualified to at least level II discipline in the requirements of this procedure and the GE Site QA Representative in accordance with paragraph 4.2.7. He will also approve qualifications of GE engineers.
5.6 The GE International Services Quality Manager will provide counsel and interpretation of this procedure and other Quality Assurance Procedures as required.
6.0 ATTACHMENTS 1.
Record ofIndoctrination i
2.
Training Record 3.
Record of Personnel Qualification i
i I
G E P a ula Document No. PQAP-PT l
QualityAssuranceProcedure a,
ATTACHMENT 1 i
GE)PSIPANDA PROJECT Record ofIndoctrination Nasse:
Posioontride:
1 have read and attest by my signaturv that i understand the requirements of the documents identified below and that all questions invoMng my job responsibilities have been answered.
Seemmem ma
-ties assense ess
]
i I
4 i
j i
l 1
I i
l nw morwmen 1
i
)
GEfendr Document No. PQAP-PT QualityAssuranceProcedure ore ATTACHMENT 2 l
GETSIPANDA PROJECT Training Record W
Date:
Training Hours:
susacT: (Plan /Procedurss/ System etej ATTENDANCE Name Personalldentification Position / Title Signature w sec.me.sio 3
l e
pesinUCTOR E8GNATURE TITWORGANLZATION DATE hel P90AFOPPM Anschmes 2
s GEPemb Document No. PQAP-PT QualityAssuranceProcedure
- r.,
a, ATTACHMENT 3 GE/PSIPANDA PROJECT E
RECORD OF PERSONNEL QUAUFICATION i
PoemDNTma:
ORSAIEEATIceliDONmsENT:
f JOB MSCftlPMON:(Ansch Ponent Gede N apersprote) l SPECIAA. ABRJTES:(Jab Rahand)
SPECIAL PHYSICAL Cw atACTERISTICS REQUptED:
PHyscAL ExAu REsui.Ts ANo oATE:
LJtNTATICOS OftIWSTIWCTICIGE soucAfions:
D Hgphachool O couage Years Degree Mesor EXPWWEIf0E: (Unt sessend openenes or semah Ramsee) menese :(Reemed to cunne PommmE I certWy that the above indudual has demonstrated that he%e con sensfactordy perform the acemhos of his/herjob descriphort This indudual has receeved the necessary trawung and indocannehon to perform these functions and will be annuany evaluated in accordance with PAPOA Quality Assurance procedure PQAP.PT i
EVALUATING BAANAGER DATE APPROVING MANAGER DATE IIPF.PEftIOD OF QuM.
i M NMN NI
-