ML20078J703
| ML20078J703 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Midland |
| Issue date: | 08/15/1983 |
| From: | Baranow S STONE & WEBSTER, INC. |
| To: | James Keppler NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20078J662 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8310170610 | |
| Download: ML20078J703 (6) | |
Text
_ _ _ -____ _ - _
STONE & WEBSTER MICHIGAN, INC.
P.O. box 2325. BOSTON, M ASSACHUSETTS O2107
~
-Nr. J. G. Keppler, Administrator, Region III August 15, 1983 Nuclear Regulatory Commission J.0. No. 14509 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137 NRC File #83-08-15 RE: DOCKET NO. 50-329/330 MIDLAND PLANT - UNITS 1 AND 2 OVERVIEW 0F THE CONSTRUCTION COMPLETION PROGRAM REPORT NO. 9 A copy of the Construction Implementation Overview Report No. 9 for the period August 5, 1983 through August 12, 1983 is enclosed with this letter. There were no scheduled Management CCP meetings during this reporting period. Evaluations performed of the CCP and status of CIO program development is attached.
Very truly yours, S.W. Baranow Program Manager Enclosure SWB/ka cc: JJHarrison, US NRC Glen Ellyn, IL RCook, US NRC Midland (site)
DMiller Jr., CPCo Midland (site)
R8 Kelly, S&W APAmoruso, S&W C0 Richardson, S&W
[
~
G 1 6 :983 8310170610 931003 PDR ADOCK 05000329 0
Report No. 9 August 5, 1983 through August 12, 1983 PhsonnelonSite
~
S one & Webster Michigan, Inc.
S. Baranow R. Scallan J. Thompson J. Langston F. Bearham A. Smith W. Sienkiewicz J. Chawla J. Barr G. Foley (temporary)
Meetings Attended l
August 11, 1983 AM - Presentation for approval of the CCP by the US NRC to the Government Accountability Project and Lone Tree Council.
August 11, 1983 PM - Presentation for approval of the CCP by the US NRC to the Public August 12, 1983
- Discussion of findings of the SALP report July 1, 1981 -
March 31, 1983 with CPCo and Lone Tree Council.
ACTIVITIES Training
- 1. - CIO attended and evaluated a training session on R gust 11, 1983. The evaluation was determined to be satisfactory and was in compliance with the requirements of FPG 4.00 " Training Evaluation Team Organ!zation and l
Responsibilities."
l l
The subject matter of the training session was:
Inventory Control, FPG 4.00 Rev. 4 Results of the evaluation have been documented on Checklist No. MP-MIS-001E i
l and are available for review.
i 2[ Review of training records for Bulk Hanger Organization Team No. 31 is l-continuing for; l
- compliance to matrix requirements
?
l
- completed training to specific documents f
- proper identification of personnel as course rosters vs. computer printout l
1
JOB NO.
14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 9
- PAGE'2
- i. Thirteen areas of discrepancies were observed where the requtred training 7 identification as noted in the training matrix did not agree ~with the
~. computer prinout, i.e., required code per training matrix is 3 - computer printout lists 2.
- 4. The fourteen areas of discrepancies, code training identification vs. computer printout, noted in our Report No. 8 covering 3 members of BHO Team #30, have been corrected with the exception of one discrepancy. Causes of discrepancies (11) listed a member on an assignment matrix as a Mechanical Field Engineer where in fact, he should have been listed as a Lead Field Engineer. The computer printout was corrected to agree with the training matrix for two discrepancies of two members.
Training record were reviewed and were found to be compatible with the computer printout and the training matrix.
The one open discrepancy lists a member as being trained to Code 3.
Actual training records reviewed reflected training to Code 2. Nonconforming Identification Report NIR #001 has been issued.
- 5. System Interaction Walkdown of the Auxiliary Building continues in accordance with Procedure WTP-3-Q, " Procedure for Performing Walkdowns of SSIP/S Targets."
The CIO evaluation was performed utilizing attribute Checklist MP-MIS-WTP-3-Q.
Twenty three (23) interactions were analyzed and documented, eight of which were witnesses by CIO.
- 6. In preparation for verification of HVAC activities, CIO visited Zack's Welder qualification area on August 13, 1983. CIO witnessed, a trainee perfoming a test to Welding Procedure 2-1-2, preparation of test plates and fit-up. Documentation for the above activities was reviewed anf found to be in compliance with Welding Procedure 2-1-2.
Action Items Responses covering open items contained in the CPCo letter dated July 1, 1983 and responses to CIO reports through Report #7 dated August 1, 1983 have been received from CPCo on August 12, 1983.
T]ie following CIO concerns addressed in Report #6 dated July 25, 1983 have been tasponded to:
7 17 Concern
" Adequacy of drawings - Large Bore Pipe Hangers" cfosed by this letter.
New item opened. Advise CIO of redline NCR and its impact of DVP.
JOB NO. 14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 9
' PAGE'3
~
iesponse: The majority of the Field Redlines (FRL) in question 5affected pipe
- supports within the scope of the Hanger Reinspection Program. Approximately 5%
pf the FRLs affected small bore pipe drawings.
Immediately upon identification of the FRL problem, the necessary procedural controls were implemented by the affected organizations.
These controls include:
- 1) Project Engineering identifying which drawings are affected and placing them on hQld in accordance with EDP 4.46.
- 2) Upon notification from Project Engineering, Field Document Control issues a drawing hold cover sheet to all affected organizations on drawing distribution. This action is in accordance with FPD-1.000 Rev 16.
- 3) Quality Control has issued an " activity hold" in accordance with AAPD/ PSP G-3.2, preventing any liispections to a drawing with an outstanding FRL.
These programatic controls are sufficient to preclude inspection acceptance of affected items.
In addition, all of the individual holds are forecasted to be releared and revised drawings redistributed by 9-8-83.
For this reason, the redline issue has no quality impact on the QVP.
Resolution: Response is accep' table - this item is closed and Hold released.
- 2) Concern
" Material Traceability of Installed Hangers." (E3)
Response: Material traceability in general is the subject of a draft report completed by the MPQAD Principle Quality Advisor. Although this draft report recommends some changes for future work, it concludes that the Project does meet the applicable requirements. A memo from the Executive Manager - MPQAD to the Management Review Committee presents this conclusion.
Since the conclusion is that material traceability requirements are currently being met, there will be no impact on reinspecitons during QVP or the Hanger Reinspection Program.
Rjsolution: CIO accepts this response - item is closed and Hold _ released.
33 Concern: "Hasaprogrambeendevelopedandresponsibilitiese[stablished of personnel assigned to process nonconfomances?"
.}
Response: Remains open as indicated in I (3) below.
JOB NO. 14509 MIDLAND NUCLEAR POWER PLANT REPORT NO. 9 PAGE 4 1
I:(3) Need to describe and present procedures on the NCR disposition process.
~
Response: The NCR disposition process to be used for the QVP is the normal process as described in PSP 3.2. A revised procedure (F2-M) l for preparing and processing NCR's will become effective August 30, 1983.
NCR's generated from the hanger reinspection only will have an additional step to develop a recommended disposition prior to final disposition in accordance with the above procedures. These additional procedures will be made available to the CIO. The Nutech portion of the NCR process remains open until we provide the CIO with the process. The Nutech Process was developed for the hanger reinspection program and should not be a restraint to CCP (which includes the QVP). Project Engineering will discuss process with CIO.
Resolution - Response is satisfactory. This item will be closed out when procedures are received and discussion held with Project Engineering. Hold is released.
- 4) Concern - MRC to convene to confirm or modify recommendations of MPQAD (last paragraph of R. A. Wells memorandum dated June 17, 1983 (Serial 22848)
Response: J. W. Cook letter to J. A. Rutgers, CPCo Serial 23624 dated July 13,1983 acts on the recommendations made by R. A. Wells and con-cludes for the MRC (Management Review Committee) that all constraints to the QVP, other than NRC approval, have been closed.
Resolution - Response is satisfactory. This concern is closed.
Open Items s
(
- 1) Report No. 7 August 1, 1983 page 1 " Ten course rosters were determined to be unsatisfactory due to transcription errors and improperly filled out."
Resolution - No response has been received from the Training Coordinator.
- 2) CIO identified to MPQAD of a potential problem area. Welding criteria are duplicated in PQCI's. The potential exists that if a PQCI is revised, then allother PQCI's which repeat the information may not be revised, i and,as a result, inspections could conceivably be performed td superceded i
data. A meeting has been scheduled for week of August 15, 1983 with MPQAD.
General
'.~-
Resume of J. L. Barr, replacement for W. D. Miller, is being transmitted to Mr. J. J. Harrison US NRC Glen Ellyn, IL.
STATUS OF CIO PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT J.
PQCI Activity Checklist Development Status To Date Total To This Week 8-5-83 8-12-83 Acolicable POCI Reed 0
68 68 POCI -1st Draft 0
62 a) 62 Acoroval Cycle 0
65 b) 65 Tvoino 1
sa c) 57 Accroved for Issue 0
34 di la Issued 0
0 CN's 5
94 99 Rev.
3 35 38 a) 56 Actual - 6 Rewrites due to revisions b) 51 Actual - 16 Rewritten due to revisions and change notices c) 44 Actual - 13 Retypes due to revisions and chage notices d) 32 Actual - 2 Reprocessed and rea> proved due to revisions Total To To Date II. MP-MIS Activity This Week p_s_pq
- g_37_g, MIS-Draft Cycle 3
in ai 71 MIS-Aporoval Cycle 2
19 hi 21 MIS-Typing 4
13 c) 17 MIS-Approved for Issue 0
7 di 7 MIS-Issued 1
0 1
a) 15 Actual - 6 Rewritten b)_15 Actual - 6 Rereviews c)_- 13 Actual - 4 Retypes d}'- 5 Actual - 2 Reprocessed and reapproved W
2 9
e