ML20078A290

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Provides Addl Info on Status of Review of Potential Pipe Support Design Nonconformance,Submitted w/830901 Ltr.Two Supports Not Visually Inspected Were Redesigned/Relocated Per Mark I Program
ML20078A290
Person / Time
Site: FitzPatrick Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 09/21/1983
From: Bayne J
POWER AUTHORITY OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK (NEW YORK
To: Vassallo D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
JPN-83-83, NUDOCS 8309230111
Download: ML20078A290 (2)


Text

t

~ '

123 Main Street White Plains, fJew York 10601 914 681.6240 4 NewYorkPbwer a es>> iia n r -

1# Authority

!=O*O*"'

September 21, 1983 JPN-83-83 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 Attention:

Mr. Domenic B. Vassallo, Chief Operating Reactors Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing

Subject:

James A.

FitzPatrick Nuclear Power Plant Docket No. 50-333 Additional Information Concerning a Potential Pipe Support Design Non-Conformance

Reference:

NYPA letter J.

P.

Bayne to D.

B.

Vassallo, dated September 1, 1983 (JPN-83-79), concern-ing the same subject.

Dear Sir:

In the reference letter, the Power Authority provided the status of our review of a potential pipe support design non-conformance.

The purpose of this letter is to provide additional information on the status of our review, and to clarify information contained in the reference letter.

As stated in the reference letter, our consultant provided us with a list of 20 supports which he identified as poten-tially non-conforming.

The consultant claimed that the list of 20 included some supports which show evidence of physical damage. Of these 20 supports, only 18 still exist in their original configuration and location.

These 18 supports were visually inspected and 17 were found to be undamaged and acceptable in the as-found condition.

The condition of the remaining support, on the main steam line, was described in the reference letter.

The 2 sur. ports not visually inspected have been redesigned or relocated as a result of the Mark I program.

One of these original supports was removed during the 1981-82 refueling outage.

8309230111 g39993 DR ADOCK 05000333

/120l s

PDR Ilo i

6 The other support was redone during the 1983 refueling outage before it could be inspected.

The independent third party review by United Engineers and Constructors (UE&C) is continuing.

UE&C has informed us that their review to date.has not resulted in any signif-icant findings.

Due to the extent-of the UE&C review, it will not be completed within 2 to 4 weeks as stated in the reference letter.

The Authority anticipates UE&C's final report in the near future.

We will keep you informed antil this report in submitted to you.

If you have any questions, please contact Mr.

J.

A. Gray, Jr.

of my staff.

Very truly yours,

/

4 &-

s'.

P.

Bayne 7

Executive Vice-President cc:

Resident Inspector U. S.

Nuclear Regulatory Commission P. O. Box 136 Lycoming, New York 13093

-