ML20077E574
| ML20077E574 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 07/25/1983 |
| From: | Bradley E PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC |
| To: | Schwencer A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8307280338 | |
| Download: ML20077E574 (4) | |
Text
.
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY g
gf 2301 M ARKET STREET
/
P.O BOX 8699 PHILADELPHIA. PA.19101 EDW ARD G. B AU ER, J R.
1215)841-4000 veCE PREstDemy amo emessmak counsak EUGENE J. BR ADLEY associava asummat causesst DON ALD BLANKEN RUDOLPH A. CHILLEMI E. C. MI R M H A LL T. H. M AH ER CORN ELL PAUL AUERBACH AssisvaNT eENEWah CoWNsEk EDW ARD J. CULLEN, J R.
THOM AS H. MILLER, J R.
ORENE A. McMENN A assesvant counsak Mr.
A.
Schwencer, Chief Licensing Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing U.
S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
Subject:
Limerick Generating Station, Units I and 2 Procedures and Test Review Branch Re ference :
PECO and NRC Conference Call dated 7/15/83 File:
GOVT l-1 (NRC)
Dear Mr. Schwencer:
As a result of the discussions in the reference conference call, the attached draft FSAR page change concerning availability of Test procedures for fuel loading, initial startup testing and supporting activp ies will be incorporated into the FSAR, exactly as it appears on the attachments, in the revision scheduled for August, 1983.
Sincerely, k
Eug ne B ad ey RJS/gra/39 Copy to:
See Attached Service List 8307280336 830725
\\
PDR ADOCK 05000352 l
A PDR bl
a cc: Judge Lawrence Brenner (w/o enclosure)
Judge Richard F. Cole (w/o enclosure)
Judge Peter A. Morris (w/o enclosure)
Troy B. Conner, Jr., Esq.
(w/o enclosure)
Ann P. Hedgdon (w/o enclosure)
Mr. Frank R. Romano (w/o enclosure)
Mr. Robert L. Anthony (w/o enclosure)
Mr. Marvin I. Lewis (w/o enclosure)
Judith A. Dorsey, Esq.
(w/o enclosure)
Charles W. Elliott, Esq.
(w/o enclosure)
Jacqueline I. Ruttenberg (w/o enclosure)
Thomas Y. Au, Esq.
(w/o enclosure)
Mr. Thomas Gerusky (w/o enclosure)
Director, Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency (w/o enclosure)
Mr. Steven P. Hershey (w/o enclosure)
Donald S. Bronstein, Esq.
(w/o enclosure)
Mr. Joseph H. White, III (w/o enclosure)
David Wersan, Esq.
(w/o enclosure) l Robert J. Sugarman, Esq.
(w/o enclosure)
Martha W. Bush, Esq.
(w/o enclosure) j Spence W. Perry, Esq.
(w/o enclosure) i Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board (w/o enclosure)
)
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel (w/o enclosure)
Docket and Service Section (w/o enclosure)
I i
4 j
t I
f L
i
---.--n,-,
wwrc - -,,.,, <,. -,..,, -
,,,n,,,,,,,,.-,._,n-,
r--,
,.n-,.
.>m.,.e-
c$w[Y k
SUT-6."
These procedures comply with the general guidelines and regulatory positions contained in Regulatory Guide 1.68 (Revision 2, August 1978).
Test abstracts establishing the objectives, prerequis;tes, test method, and acceptance criteria for these procedures are presented in Table 14.2-3.
14.2.11 TEST PROGRAM SCHEDULE The schedule, relative to the initial fuel loading date, for conducting each major test phase of the initial test program is presented in Figure 14.2-1.
This figure illustrates that the preoperational test program is scheduled for 15 months duration for Unit 1, 12 months duration for Unit 2, and that the subsequent s' artup test programs are scheduled at 3 months duration for each unit.
Since Unit 2 fuel load is scheduled at 18 months after Unit 1 fuel load, the test programs do not overlap.
However, if schedule compression occurs, the staffing and organization of the groups responsible for the initial test programs preclude significant divisions or dilutions of responsibility.
Approved test procedures are intended to be available for NRC review a t least 60 days prior to scheduled p : =(
implementation.
h__
/'~ The sequential schedules for conducting individual preoperational I
tests for each unit are presented in Figures 14.2-6 and Figure 14.2-7.
These sequential schedules offer one possible y
JCys/A7 plan for an orderly and efficient progression of testing.
While these sequences may be preferred, numerous acceptable Nt/ r alternatives exist because few preoperational tests are dependent on nerformance of other preoperational tests.
The actual test bbh sequences are determined daily at the jobsite to reflect construction status, manpower availability, and test prerequisite status.
l The sequential schedule for conducting Unit 1 and Unit 2 startup tests is presented in Figure 14.2-5.
This schedule establishes l
the required order of startup testing as a function of test phase and power level.
Even though this basic order of testing is required, there is still considerable flexibility in sequencing l
the startup testing specified to be conducted at each test phase or startup level.
Detailed startup testing schedules,
' commensurate with the requirements of this schedule, are developed at the jobsite to schedule startup testing when opbrationally expedient.
s 14.2-21 Rev. 10, 09/82
7
'\\
t 1
. u.
pa- -
,,..a p
o
)
3.-
larr du.d!' 'c u u
Copies of test procedures for fuel loading, initial startup tes ting
, and supporting activities are intended to be available for NRC examination not less titan 60 days prior to the scheduled f uel load date.
/
14.2-11 es.
3,,,.,
,oa
% j)d d h M h M y. s = ~ ~w. n g
.4,
a Q A.J L #-
t 4
9
~ - -, - - -, - _.