Text

Forwards Package of Info Containing Various Documents Re Investigation of Charges Made by Complainant & Circumstances Surrounding Release of Complainant from Plant Work Force
	ML20077D117
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Saint Vrain
Issue date:	04/29/1993
From:	Crawford A; PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF COLORADO
To:	Milhoan J; NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
Shared Package
ML20077D103	List: ML20077D117; ML20077D163; ML20077D181;
References
	FOIA-93-600, FOIA-93-610 NUDOCS 9412080062
	Download: ML20077D117 (100)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:0 Public Service-Putsc Service %.< c-- l P O BOX 840 DENVER CO 80201 0640 A. Clegg Crawford Vce Preedent April 29, 1993 Electric Producten Fort Saint Vrain Unit No. 1 P-93042 Y Q $] 0 0 I! U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Region IV ~" ATTN: Mr. James Milhoan, Regional Administrator /" 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 1000 AcR 2 91993 Arlington, TX 76011 ) Docket No. 50-267 Eh,",[.....

SUBJECT:

APPARENT VIOIATION OF 10 CFR 50. 7

REFERENCE:

NRC Letter Milhoan to Crawford, March 19, 1993

Dear Mr. Milhoan:

In accordance with your request in the above referenced letter, please find enclosed a package of information containing various documents pertaining to the investigation of charges made by the complainant and circumstances surrounding the release of the Complainant from the Fort Saint Vrain work force. The Department of Labor findings were keyed primarily on the issue that we released the complainant after we learned of complaints to our Quality Assurance Department and the Health Physics Supervisor. Our preparation for litigation was therefore focused in this area. The referenced letter raises another issue concerning the Complainant's alleged complaints to Public Service Company of Colorado management about the performance of a radiation technician with respect. to safe radiation safety practices. Given this situation, we have also included some documentation in the enclosed package that addresses events which involved both the complainant and the radiation technician. The contents of the document package are summarized on the cover sheet of the attachment. With the time that has passed since the Office of Inspection investigation and the situation described above concerning the alleged employee conflict, we had sope difficulty identify h the specific documentation refnranced_ inE_, J1Lne 1_0, 1992 1 p+- t er +'o h In this respect we have included a variety of documents from our plant files as well us__the files of our attor m ' $.3 ' /d '$ $ 9412000062 931202 g PDR FOIA / O'MALLE93-600 PDR

1 d April 29, 1993 P-93042 ' Page 2 l 4 We un'derstand that the enforcement conference has been established in your regional office for May 10, 1993, at 1:00 pm. We will plan to meet with you at that-time. Public Service Company will be represented by Ted Borst, Charles Fuller, Salle O'Malley, Don Warembourg and A.C. Crawford. If you have any questions on the

documentation package or need any other information, please give Mr. Don Warembourg'a call at (303) 620-1009.

i Sincerely,- g $. ^f A.C. Crawford Vice President Electric Production ? ACC/DWW Attachments ~l cc: (w/o Attachments) Mr. Ramon E. Hall, Director Uranium Recovery Field Office I J

~ ATTACHMENT TO P-93042 DOCUMENTATION PACKAGE CONTENTS 09-15-88 Memo, Woodard to Porter, Disciplinary Action 10-03-90 Memo, Woodard to Porter, Two Week Suspension 10-25-90 Nuclear Directive, Stop Work Authority 11-16-90 Memo, Quintana to Fuller 11-12-90 Fuller Narration of Sequence of Events, Marna Porter thru Incident 11-19-90 02-06-91 Information/ Night Log 02-18-91 Litigation Documentation Prepared bf Fuller, Destaffing Plan 03-13-91 H.P. Tech Log Sheet 03-14-91 H.P. Tech Log Sheet 03-22-91 Woodard Narration of Events, McTiernan/ Porter 03-26-91 Letter, McTiernan to Dept. of Labor 04-01-91 Letter, Dept. of Labor to Woodard 04-01-91 QA Monitoring Results, QAC-91-0146 thru QAC-91-0148 04-18-91 Memo, Crawford to all Employees, Authority on Safety 04-22-91 Dept. of Labor Interviews, Borst, Woodard, Alps, Baird, Stroud 05-02-91 Borst, Preparation for Litigation Memo 05-23-91 Fuller, Summary of Events Covering the Period of February 22, 1991, thru April 29, 1991 02-21-92 Letter, PSC Law Firm to Don Gietl

,... =,.:. ,n3e.,3 Interoffice Memo X .PublicService Pcc-83 a => o r e es som e m r,et c d em m (MTE: Septes6er 15, 1988 TO: Marna Porter, Health Physics Technician FRGt: Bill Woodard, Health Physics Supervisor (acting) I [ SUO: DI5CIPLINARY ACTION, FAL5!FICATION OF SURVEY RECORDS l On 9/13/88 you w re placed on indefinite suspension pendtag j [ completion of an investigation involving the falsification of survey records. These survey records wre for the time period of 9/03/88 ) through 9/07/88, 9/11/88, and 9/12/88. A seating was held on 9/12/88 ) with you discussing the initial results of the investigation. You indicated you had falsified survey records by not taking a survey on 9/07/88, and taking only partial surveys on 9/03/88, 9/04/88, 9/06/88, and 9/12/88. You also indicated you had falst fled surveys F on three separate occasions several weks previous. Your reason was you were not feeling well. You recognite that these are very serious infractions Which could isopardize the health and safety of the public and plant personnel. h { ied on the seriousness of this matter, you are being gives the e A saximum disciplinay action that can be taken ostside of employment i termination. You are hereby suspended fer three days without pay. 6 The dates of the suspension are 9/13/88, 9/14/88, and 9/15/t4. willbecauseforfurtherdisciplinaryaction& W future infractions up to and including tersfnation. YGLM. Y. hMlfA-JJ$ 2 i harna Porter 1 'Woodard W Health Physics Technician Health Physics Supervisor leo y 3:hleiger W j Superintendent of Cheafstry and Radiation Protection ec: Eroloyee Flie Fuller, C. Labor Relations Novschek, F. Schleiger, T. 8W:de O __.,..._----.--..A sow so sucees

n... Interoffice Memo @Puesssonenecomise,,wm si;0;i bo ^ PublicService Paga 2 Any future infractient will be cause for further disciplinary action up to and including termination. h A ll! U e ha'rna Porter ETll Woodare Senior risalth Physics Health Physics Supervisor 5At4AhA2$4ssF b'&/ L Frederict(J ; Borst IImesny E 5chtsg er Nucisar Thtfiing & Superintandant of Chemistry & d Support Manager Radiation Protection la b 1 l I W H n d u d b 1 peau oc ses4sene )

- TOTAL PAGE.24 *=

J s. 3 'S1 15.se ecQT SAlmT (QA N PAGE.BE osmammmmmme Interoffice Memo O g PCC-90-0105 CATE: October 3,1990 TO: Marna Porter, Senior Health Physics Technician FRON: Bill Woodard, Health Physics Superviser 8 SUBJ: TWO VEEX SUSPENSION i On September 19, 1990, you provided Health Physics coverage for access into the Hot Service Facility (H5f) to bag and remove five l 5 radioactive samples drilled from a Region Constraint Device (4C0) and two Metal Clad Reflectcr i Elements. These elements had radiation levels as high as 930 R/hr. and the sample radiation levels were unkncvn. You allowed Mr. Halvorson, a Maintenance Mechanic, to sater the H5F uncer RWP #11377 prior to any survey being taken, even though the cor.ditions in the H5F could reasonably have changed since the w last survey. Because no survey was taken, a proper evaluation of protective and monitoring equipment such as respiratory protection equipment, extremity dosimetry, stay times, etc., could not be performed. r O a This resulted in an individual going into a potentially artremely L high radiation area. Also, when the samples were brought out of the H5F into the access ares, an uncontrolled 10 mR/hr. radiation area i was left for approximately nine hours without proper posting to control access. Your actions violated requirements of HpP-115, HPP-125, NpAP 10, and NPM-29. I ciscusseo the events with you curing a counselling session on t L September 21, 1990, and at that time you recognized the seriousness i of your actions when you asked me if you were going to be terminated. You did say that you accepted responsibility for your actions and were not thinting straight. r You recognized that this event was a very serious lack of control necessary to protect the health and safety of personnel and i-c;uld have easily resulted in an over exposure. plant One of the basic and l' primary responsibilities of the Health Physics staff is to protect the health and safety of the public anc plant personnel, Based on the seriousness of this matter, you are being suspended, o without pay, for a period of two weets. The suspension dates are October 4, 1990, through October 17, 1990. D -,ci m

-) Public Service' No. w NUCLEAR OPERATIONS l r 3 NUCLEAR DIRECTIVE - NO. 10 EMPLOYEE STOP-WORK AUTHORITY I. PURPOSE This directive describes the Nuclear Operations policy concerning the management approach and philosophy regarding the performance level employee's authority, and responsibility, to stop work in those instances where the employee has concerns about his ability to comply with approved procedures or where the employee has concerns about his ability to complete the job in a safe manner. II. APPLICABILITY A. This directive applies to all personnel within Nuclear Operations. B. This directive provides guidance for those situations in which m the employee determines that a procedural or personnel safety problem exists with a job in progress. C. For the purposes of continuity, the policy of Nuclear Operations concerning safety and procedural compliance dated June 26, 1990, (VPO-90-0122) is repeated in its entirety: l EACH NUCLEAR OPERATIONS EMPLOYEE WILL COMPLY WITH ALL FORT ST. VRAIN SAFETY POLICIES AND PROCEDURAL REQUIREMEN IF IT IS DETERMINED THAT YOU CANNOT COMPLY, OR YOU MUST G0 BEYONDM THE PROCEDURAL REQUIREMENTS, THEN THE JOB WILL BE STOPPED UNTIL SATISFACTORILY RESOLVED.

MORE0VER, IF AN INDIVIDUAL OBSERVES UNSAFE WORK PRACTICES / CONDITIONS OR UNAUTHORIZED DEV PROCEDURES, THAT INDIVIDUAL MUST NOTIFY THE INDIVIDUALS INVOLVED AND ASK TMAT THE JOB BE STOPPED.

l III. STOP-WORK AUTHORITY IF an employee determines that a procedure compliance problem exists OR observes unsafe work practices / conditions OR observes unauthorized deviation from procedures, THEN the employee stops work OR notifies individuals involved and stops work. Date Issued: October 25, 1990 Signed # - .- ] A. Clegg Crawford Revision: New Vice President Nuclear Operations Page One of Three L

i Public Service' No. m NUCLEAR OPERATIONS L F 7 2 IV. RESOLUTION OF SAFETY CONCERNS A. Employee informs first line supervision that work has been stopped l and that resolution of a safety concern is necessary. B. Supervisor and employee (s) discuss the problem and develop an approach for resolution. Involved personnel should obtain assistance as necessary for problem resolution; Quality Assurance, the Systems Engineering group, or Sa fety Comittee personnel should be involved as appropriate. C. First line supervision is responsible for defining activities necessary to resolve the problem. I 0. Supervi er informs employee (s) of planned resolution and obtains employee (s) agreement. M E. IF employee (s) and supervisor cannot agree on resolution of i

problem, THEN supervisor informs next level of line management of the problem.

F. Supervisor, employee (s), and manager discuss problem and develop 1 approach for resolution. G. Involved management is responsible for defining activities necessary to resolve the problem. M H. Manager informs employee (s) of planned resolution and obtains employee (s) agreement. I. IF employee (s) and manager cannot agree on resolution of problem. THEN division management will detennine the appropriate course of action. J. Af ter the problem is resolved, work will resume. V. RESOLUTION OF PROCEDURAL PROBLEMS A. Employees are empowered by the administrative controls established in G-2, "FSV Procedure Systems," to initiate corrections to procedural inadequacies at any time. If an employee believes that it is not possible to accomplish an activity within the bounds of the procedure, then he/she should inform first line supervision that a problem exists. Page Two of Three k_.

Public Service' i ,,. m NUCLEAR OPERATIONS L F '2 B. The employee (s) and first line supervision discuss the problem and develop a plan for resolution. As with-safety concerns other expertise should be involved to assist in problem reso,lution. Supervisors should involve procedures coordination personnel as soon as possible. C. Either the employee (s), supervision, or procedures coordinator may initiate procedure revision in accordance with G-2. It is the responsibility of the first line supervisor to obtain agreement with the employee (s) that the resolution is adequate. D. IF the proposed procedure change is not acceptable, THEN either the supervisor or the procedure coordinator infonns the next level of line management of the problem. E. Management, supervision, procedures coordinator, and the employee (s) discuss the problem and develop a plan for resolution.. i F. Procedure revision in accordance with G-2 is initiated. It is the responsibilit of the involved manager to obtain agreement with the employee ( ) that the resolution is adequate. i G. IF the resultant procedure change is not acceptable, m li THEN the division manager is notified. If necessary division I management will detennine the appropriate course of action. H. Once an acceptable resolution is accomplished within the i requirements of G-2, work will resume. M a:ll m th i Page Three of Three L \\

) l Novemb,er 16, 1990 Mr. Charles Fuller Manager Nuclear Production Public Service Company ~of Colorado Dear Mr. Fuller h I feel it incumbent upon me to formally inform you of the situation in the Health Physics Department which I belive + needs the full attention of you and your management team immediately. I'm sure that you are some what aware of the present situation in the Health Physics Department between' Ms. Marna Porter and other members within her department. In the past week Ms. Porter has been.the subject of malicious i acts directed towards her, the destruction of her safty . equipment, the spreading of trash within her work area, and a i number of her H.P. records which have turned up missing. The records in question were her daily log entrees dated October ~ 18th through october 27th and November 2,-1990. Along with the above mentioned missing documents, her daily surveys records from October 27th through November 2nd are also missing. Nore recently and most concerning to her-and I, was - 1 i the flatting of her right rear tire in the parking lot on November 13th. I believe that these actions are totally out of place at this site or any work location. These acts place Ms. Porter in a very uncomfortable working environment. The fact that these incident have oedurred within the same short period of time can almost discount coincidence. I would request at this time you and your management team do everything within your power to put a halt to these acts. We as an organization can not put up with this kind of conduct. Thank you for your cooperation very r p gours g ]

ffj2f',12%

ark Quintana Chief Steward Fort St. Vrain cc: IBEW Local 111 Crawford, A. C. Borst F. J. l -.-y..-

4

Monday, 11/12/90 Received a call from Mark Quintana at home at about 2145 hours.

i Mark said that he-had just gotten off of the phone with John O'Donoghue at the plant. John was very upset because Marna Porter's logs for the period from 10/22/90 to 11/2/90 were missing. John was suspicious that the missing logs might have something to do-with Marna's ' discipline - subject. i Mark asked me if I knew anything about it. I told him that I didn't have the slightest idea. I also told him that it didn't make much sense that it was associated with the discipline subject. since that subject was all over with long before 10/22/90. Mark agreed. I told Mark that I would call Ted Borst to see if he knew anything about it. Mark appreciated that and said that he would call John back at the plant and tell him that I didn't know anything about it. 1 I called Ted after Mark and I finished. Ted did not know anything about it either. He agreed that it didn't make much sense that it i would be associated with the discipline issue. Ted said thst he would. follow-up on it in the morning. Tuesday. 11/13/90 Ted had come in early to discuss the missing logs _ issue with Bill Woodard and Tim Schleiger. Ted then had to go down town. At about 0745. I paged Tim and asked him to come to my office to discuss the issue. Tim told me that John had been doing his routine activities, one of-which is collecting the logs for transmittal to Record Storage. It was at that time that John noted that Marna's logs (and only Marna's logsi were missing. Tim told me that he and Bill had had a staff meeting with the HP j Techs this morning. and told them in no uncertain terms that they were concerned with the loss of the logs. One implication is that records of surveys are lost and that could have serious repercussions to the plant. 9 i w e --- w u---,-

Tim also told me that he was made aware this morning that Marna's hard hat had been broken about a week ago, and this was the first he had heard about it. Marna had apparently told Bill about it at the time. Bill had logged it, but noted,that it was one event. However. Marna has now also had trash thrown under her desk. Putting all those together seems to indicate that there could be someone out there that is trying L make Marna look bad. Tim and Bill discussed this with the staff and told them that they needed to be on the lookout for any unusual activity. They also told them that sueb. behavior would not be tolerated. Finally, according to what Tim relayed on to me. Bill made it very clear that he wanted the staff to make him immediately aware of any unusual activities involving Marna. Wednesday. November 14. 1990 At about 0715. discussed yesterday's information with Ted Borst. Ted confirmed that the logs for the cited dates were missing and not yet found. Ted also mentioned that the daily survey forints) were { missing. Ted is sure that the logs and surveys were completed 1 because they are reviewed on a daily basis. If they had not been done. it would have been noted by the reviewer. Ted and Bill discussed the action to take for the missing logs. Bill will generate a memo stating that the information was obtained and reviewed. and that there were no unusual readings /results. Bill will then have the involved HP techs sign the memo. Hopefully, this will provide sufficient documentation to satisfy the Tech Spec requirements. Ted 'also informed me that Marna had a flat tire yesterday on the way home from work. According to the rumor mill. it is possible that , there was part of a pair of scissors in the tire. As a result of this. Ted. Tim. and Bill looked around the parking lot this am to see if they could find the rest of the scissors. At this time. we do not have first hand information. Apparently Marty Stoecklein. Maintenance Supenisor. helped Marna change the tire. Ted will discuss the problem with Marty as soon as they can get together. probably this morning. Ted will call the NRC (Bairds to let them know about the missing logs.

l Ted and I discussed the possibility of bringing in an investigator to l evaluate the situation. We concluded that this may be desirable if we start to get more definitive information. l With respect to the Second Step Grievance. Bruce alleged that " Arbitration Law" and "Due Process" were violated because Ted sat on the Company Committee. Called Labor Relations to identify the Company. position on this. On several occasions in the past this has happened and no protest from the Union was presented. Walt Wagner returned my call with respect to the above paragraph. Walt stated that in no uncertain terms does the Union have the right to dictate who is on the Company Committee. This is in accordance with the contract which only requires the " appropriate division manager and two of his associates." Walt believes that this point could have been made at second step. However one or two sentences in the response letter should be made -to ensure that the company intends to enforce our rights under the contract. Thursd ay.. 11/15/90 Talked to Ted at about 0645 about Marna's flat tire. Marty Stoecklein helped Marna in the parking lot. When Marna brought the tire in to be fixed. a three to four inch piece of scissors was found in the tread. There is no evidence either way that this was or was not a deliberate act. Ted also brought Mark Q. up to speed on the event. Mark indicated that he believes management is taking the appropriate actions. Ted also discussed the possibility of the investigator with Mark. At this time Mark advises that we do not bring in an investigator until after the grievance is resolved. There could be a perception that the investigator was trying to find out more to support the grievance , rather than investigating the recent events with Marna. Mark's advice will be considered. Discussed the possibility with Ted oi conducting interviews with the HP staff (and possibly others to see if we can determine any more information. We will pursue this and probably do the interviews personally. Ted will get back with Bill to determine who will be available on Monday and Wednesday of next week. Friday. I1/16/90

Received a letter from Mark Quintana expressing his concern with the situation in HP. I agree with the concerns expressed in the memo. and agree that such actions. if deliberate. are totally out of place in the work place. Ted and I will be conducting the interviews mentioned above on Monday.

Monday, 11/19/00 Ted discussed the interview schedul:.

First one will be at about 1000 hours. At about 0715. Bill showed rr the piece of scissors that had punctured her tire. The broker, end looks like it has had some wear on it, indicating that she had possibly driven some small distance with it in the tire. Marna had given the piece to Bill. It looks more like the insertion of the piece of scissors did not occur in the parking lot. Perhaps this isn't something to indicate harassment after all. Hopefully, the interviews can shed some light on this.

02/06/91 INFORMATION/ NIGHT LOG 1) PSCo time cards through 02.'17/91 by 02/13/91 at 1300 due to th ' President's Day holiday. 2) Everyone has received a copy of ' System Numbers' as a reference for determining what numbers go on survey forms. Thanks Harna for putting this out. 3) Attached is a copy of the ISSUES and primary assigneG individuals. Give your input to these individuals if you have suggestions / comments. If any other things anyone sees that can improve our Health Physics program, contact me, so I can add it to the list. 1 4. J.O. G.Mc. pV 4r.,, A.U. G.T. K.S. G.C.M. / s I7 i-itko T.S. l t.H. M.P. R.R. K.B. D. B. DAT f D.Bl. b2 I.S. T.M. M G.Sh 1 i

~ i l STATUS AS OF 02/06/91

1). RWP JOB-BRIEFINGS

[ NEED: CRITERIA ESTABLISH TO DETERMINE WHEN A RADIOLOGICAL JOE BRIEFING:IS REQUIRED, WHAT INFORMATION NEEDS TO BE DISCUSSED AND WHAT ' DOCUMENTATION IS REQUIRED. ASSIGNED TO: RANKIN, STEVENSON STATUS: INTERIM CONTROLS ESTABLISHED ON 02/01/91. PERMANENT ~, CONTROLS DEVELOPED FOR PROCEDURE CHANGES TO NPAP-10. PDR TO BE SUBMITTED AND. EFFECTIVE ON 02/07/91 2) HOT SERVICE FACILITY AIR SAMPLING NEED: -DEVELOP A METHOD TO TAKE AIR ACTIVITY IN THE HSF PRIOR TO J ENTRY. beM.w% \\ TILLMAN, 4Mrft9649[* ASSIGNED TO: -STATUS: POSSIBLY MOVE PING TO LEVEL 9 30 IT CAN BE' USED, WHEN NEEDED TO MONITOR THE AIR INSIDE THE HSF. AN OLD BETA PARTICULATE MONITOR IS BEEN SET UP TO PROVIDE THIS FUNCTION WITHIN A COULE OF WEEKS. 02/06'/91 BETA PARTICULATE MONITOR SET UP OUTSIDE HSF, LEVEL 9 AND HAS BEEN REPAIRED AND CALIBRATED. NEED SAMPLE HOSE INSTALLED INTO HSF, FREQUENCY OF FILTER CHANGE, WHEN, WHERE AND HOW WE SAMPLE, SOURCE RESPONSE TESTING FREQUENCY ETC, 3) RFF RADIOLOGICAL CONTROLS: NEED: DETERMINE HOW TO PROPERLY CONTROL 'rHE RFF WORK AREA TO PROVIDE BETTER CONTAMINATION /EIPOSURE CONTROL. ASSIGNED TO: R RANKIN, J O'EONOGHUE, D BLAIN STATUS: 01/31/91 A DIAGRAM OF THE PROPOSED CONTROL AREAS HAS BEEN DEVELOPED. THIS WILL BE DISCUSSED WITH THE RFF SUPERINTENDENTS BY WCCCARD. THE RWP CRITERIA WILL BE DEVELOPED. 02/06/91 THIS IS COMPLETE WI'ni THE ESTABLISHMENT OF THE RFF CCNTROL AREA AND RWP CONTROL. i i ,~.m

4) WIPE COUNTING WITH FRISKER: NEED: DEVELOP THE ABILITY TO 'IOUNT WIPES USING A FRISKER AND WHEN IT CAN BE DONE. ASSIGNED TO: PORTER, BARE STATUS: 02/05/91 ESTABLISHMENT OF THE RFF CONTROL AREA HAS CORRECTED THE PROBLEM OF PEOPLE WALKING ACROSS POTENTIALLY CONTAMINATED AREAS. NEED TO EVALUATE THIS OPTION IN OTHER COVERAGE THAT WE PROVIDE. 5) BLANKET RWP FOR HP TECHNICIANS: NEED: TO DEVELOP A STANDING RWP FOR HP TO WORK UNDER TO INCLUDE GUIDELINES AS TO WHEN IT SHOULD BE USED. ASSIGNED TO: HP GROUP STATUS: 02/06/91 TILLMAN HAS A COPY OF ONE FOR REVIEW FROM THE HP GROUP MEETING ON 02/04/91. 6) RWP SURVEY INFORMATION: NEED: DEVELOP AS SYSTEM FOR TO PROVIDE ADDITIONAL INFORMATION ON RWP'S FOR THE WORKERS AND HP. IE: ATTACH SOME SURVEY RESULTS ASSIGNED TO: MILLER, BLACKERT STATUS: 02/05/91 ADDRESSED IN THE NIGHT LOG DATED 02/05/91. FURTHER REFINEMENT TO BE INCLUDED IN PROCEDURE NEEDED. 8) EXPOSURE TRACKING: NEED: A MEANS TO KEEP THE WORKERS AND/OR HP TECHNICIANS INFORMED OF CURRENT DAILY, WEEKLY, QUAR.'ERL7 AND AN!!UAL EXPOSURE. ASSIGNED TO: MCTIERNAN. ULKICH STATUS: 02/06/91 NO ACTION ON THIS YET. 9) POSTI:!G INFORMATION: NEED:

4 HAT ARE REQUIRED FOR POSTING, CONSISTENCY, INFORMATION, UPDATE FREQUENCY ETC.

II: IS POSTING AREAS-AS ' RADIOLOGICAL CONTROL AREAS' OK? ASS:GNED TO: RANKIN, STEVENSON ) l ETATUS: NO ACTION IN THIS AREA YET. I

) 10) PROTECTIVE CLOTHING CONTROL NEED: PROTECTIVE CLOTHING NEEDS SOME TYPE OF CONTROL TO PREVENT BEING TAKEN TO UNCONTROLLED AREAS. ASSIGNED TO: STROUD, BRAATHEN STATUS: 02/06/91 NO ACTION IN THIS AREA YET. 11) AIR SAMPLING REQUIREMENTS , ) NEED: DEFINE WHEN, WHAT TYPE, WHERE AIR SAMPLES ARE TAKE AND WHAT AIR SAMPLE INFORMATION NEEDS TO BE ON THE RWP ASSIGNED TO: STROUD, BRAATHEN

TATUS:

02/06/91 No ACTION IN THIS AREA YET. 12) RELEASE"OF PADICACTIVE MATERIAL NEED: BETTER DEFINITION OF - WHEN RADIOACTIVE MATERIAL CAN BE RELEASED i ASSIGNED TO: STROUD, GIVE INPUT TO ED... STATUS: 01/24/91 INITIAL SUGGESTION INCLUDED THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA. LESS THAN 1000 DPM/100CH2 NDA ON FRISKER NDA WITH HICRO-R METER 02/06/91 NO CHANGE IN STATUS YET. ~ 10) TOOL CONTROL j l NEED: METHOD TO IDENTIFY TOOLS WITH FIXED CONTAMINATION ASSIGNED To: STROUD, STATUS: 01/24/91 POSSIBLE COLOR CODING TOOLS WITH FIXED CONTAMINATION 11) LABELING OF RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS !;EED: BETTER DIRECTION FOR WHEN/HOW RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS NEED TO IE LABELED. ASSIGNED TO: BLAIN, STROUD,... STATUS: 01/31/91 PRELABELED BAGS HAVE BEEN ORDERED. NEED TO EENTITY ~4 HAT OTHER CONTROLS ARE NEEDED. 02/06/91. NIGHT LOG DATED 02/05/91 AODRESSE3 INTERIM ACT*0N TCR j MATERIALS COMING CUT OF CONTROL AREAS. NEED FURTHER EVALUATICN ANO

i 12) RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS BEING IN THE SAME AREAS THAT EATING, DRINKING AND SHOKING IS ALLOWED. IE: HP OFFICE NEED: IDENTIFY AREAS IN WHICH THIS OCCURS AND WHY IT OCCURS. ASSIGNED TO: WOODARD STATUS: 02/06/91 GOOD HP PRACTICE. REQUIRES THAT RADIOACTIVE MATERIALS WHICH COULD CAUSE A SPREAD OF CONTAMINATION NOT BE BROUGHT INTO EATING AREAS: IE HP OFFICE. THIS APPLIES TO WIPES, CONTAHINATED, MATERIALS, ETC. GIVE ME INPUT ON THE RADIOACTIVE SOURCES AS THESE ART PERIODICALLY BROUGHT INTO THE OFFICE. 14) HP LOGS' NEED: DETERMINE WHAT CHANGES NEED TO BE MADE TO THE WAY HP LOGS INFORMATION r ASSIGNED TO: - PORTER, BARE I i l

At y'our request, and in preparation for litigation. I have prepared the following chronological information regarding the situation with Mr. George McTiernan. Monday, February 18, 1991 On this day at 0745 hours, I met with members of my staff to discuss the subject of reducing our staff size. In attendence were Ms. Kitzman, Messrs. Reigel, Deniston, McCauley, Born, and myself. This was brought about by the fact that shipping to Idaho had been postponed from beginning the week before. As a result of this postponement, Executive Management (i.e.. Mr. A. Clegg Crawford) had directed that we review our 1991 staffing plan. These instructione /::: given at the ELT meeting of 2/12/91. Mr. Crawford directed aat we review the staffing plan with respect to two scenarios. The first scenario was to assume that we received permission to ship in the near future Specifically, it was to be assumed t. at the shipping campaign would begin April 2,1991. The second scew;io was to assume that we did not receive permission to ship to Idaho. Instead, we were to staff in accordance with completion of the ISFSI. and begin defueling to the ISFSI on 12/1/91. Mr. Crawford indicated that his strong inclination was that he would recommend to Mr. Hock that we pursue Scenario #2, and we should concentrate our efforts on that plan. The results of these reviews were to be finalized and submitted to the Program Office no later than 3/10/91 (effectively 3/8/91 because 3/10/91 was Sunday). I had prepared a handout for discussion with the staff (Exhibit 1). In particular, I asked them to fill out the Scenario 2 destaffing table, or equivalent. We discussed the work activities that needed to be done, so that everyone would have a common understanding of resource requirements (Exhibit 2). I then directed the staff to have the staffing information put together by Friday, February 22,1991, for a meeting at 10:00 am. This date is distinctive for several reasons: 1. A staff meeting had already been set up for that date. 2. On February 18, 1991, I apologized for the short response time to my staff, but the week of Febmary 25, 1991, was out of the question because my schedule was packed solid, and the

i-2- ' following week was too late to resolve problems if they should develop. 3. Mr. McCauley's staffing results (Exhibit 3, last page), shows his actual staffing on February 22, 1991. Friday, February 22, 1991 I' met with my staff at 10:00 am in my conference room to discuss the results of their reivew. All of the staff had come prepared with the results. Ms. Kitzman took notes so that she could update our staff size data base and provide me with information to use for tiansmittal to the Program Office. We reviewed each of the results provided by the management staff. In particular, note Mr. Borst's results that states that he planned on releasing four contre.ct personnel "now", with the caveat that he was assuming that we ot.!d be staffing fuel deck related work on a one shift / day basis. Single shift coverage had not yet been decided. Ms. Kitzman summarized the information and provided a typed 3 version from her notes (Exhibit 5). Ms. Kitzman's summary substantiates the meeting results. -

s a r.,s.,. +---c .1-+ a a a o e a-+ + a~ .w.t.. + - a u s-a, ...-o s --e. .s. ,.a-z. a 4 i 0 LAST DAY R GASS 02/11/91 T STEVENSON 02/22/91 D BRAATHEN 03/11/91 A ULRICH 03/15/91 G HCTIERNAN 03/22/91 i a r S - l I i f 9 1 i k s t h i ti t 4 5 9 L t +n-g y,y --c-y e y--g-s- = m ,w,e-w w

~e*3 a - r. \\ N .'{$ k r g.*E \\ % Y h.i p m..:.j f 'Q 1;< b# .W v

..v:~..c h sam.%y y; o.. w

,,.., w, dV $1it M%..?

%Qy{:.;,.o.,.y4. ;weyrgw 4.1 ' ' E My,.pt

g..y;y4",

w,.,_.,. y $/4 4'

e. yA/W A 8 T,s.er '-

,y *..' > e.

- te. wM Q: . -.. e.o,..m

..,.. u. ~ y k, %) .g j ~

s twh g

s

=.x 4.

h M~ N r:t A v" 't o n : uw. - r t h 1 kr f ~ t p p,m. { ,' '4 R$1h s;; f

.w m w n 2 -

w']! g,, ,.e -m.o. :..o. g W G ) et CJ,.-.' w g ~..) 3 .t. h .. l 3,'h [ gg ' 3,h@ I k h i l O dH{rp g U ' L { , 1 g .; : y u e, a .o 4., e W ~ _ ' N N h ";' 3 k kh C 4T V N.l ? '.} V * '"- ~ h g s s ! 3 4 3 e r. j M ~

= b bQ p

at m.. ..s r t-4 g w g? r n .M o .{ - 5 m' .! g '~ Q 5,..'.& n-s h 3 -~ . - - - - - - - - ~ ,f -,n.r-i- r n r ~ M 6-cx p a t.. :, e, 1,. t .i.'..s w u,... 4 ~. *. A E i d, '.;,, '.

.; c' t y f,, L,, ', J.

,i t r* 2 .g De, - 8 M"; 'a : T' p it ; m v. h j y l g< r;g. -3 w er - y 'yM j! M ~2 ;: 7 ';' in riF T ~ ~ ~ T,*; 1 ]g jf.j f a; ' cH -f /I i b I

1..C :p ;+ e l '.h.'if v k

i i vi d-.1 er T z y u a-2, ' Z. fy .'fl9 O C j" l'- s A: ? e l , LM 3:' + q g V tr-V' T f GO. v, Al. N: 'l l l ]{ .g.1. s/h 1 Q.l a 64 s l_ .{ a- - k. g ^ gs 4,, -- --Q --& ~ - f

- ~ ~ - ~ '

~ ~ - a> t .c - pr z 4 .s

.T J, c: '

hu M O D. *... + -- ..1

r.t*

.. )

s.

.o h V E h,hh 4 f'; g s' S

&.)

~ 1 .+ m: e a:,-., a a.. 4,- a S-S.' ~ e qq. gj " g P. et : 7"f, -- e t F. .r a.a. e f,E / f] Id M b 'r: I 'T -,a# 4 -Q j ^ x w f !.- f. -@ - [ p. n c.- p ~t % 5 Am u... =. s I& l' ;.. ' 55, k .? ?. .*~ ye - m, < :Q ks y }

r,

'i .f; .O .Q; 4M_. en ,k, ] . " '? ( h [. a t.i; i g Jj...sF ~~ ~ . %i$k@ , $).. - r., ..L (y f.4.t p. , L.

', 4

, r {;a(' ' ?, ..c $.:,.} ?, '. \\ ,1 4 I.- V1O 7 3 .Ek18 ~l h,s, s [..MNb h$ 'I

1' f

'. " r-3 4=d , 'J "y 't 'e "5 'i mg.cgmg;..:,.+ww.: memw%w'; 5 b b.g c g- SW j 1 (h.,bb i.

.4.-

N'q"

A..

- wa

.ee 5 aw y4 a-k dW . +

i i a 1 i N s l ly lll!4 44i i '. g !$ i ! '. i i d i i ! N ;L i@%@!! $!llO.. Bl4 i ~ AN,I ~ 4 I N g; i '.'3l i ;$*i it'-Qi} -D [Af I \\ I i i ii i i! N dl *i Q. W I t i ike i .u h ! = i i i N i l 3 i j f d V I i . r - t. m o M L'N L i.! I I i i si - T tl* w SM V i ilik'[isjb.! g$4 Ngi 1 i i i i kg k i j e, g iii! j 3 0.. khrN ' !. O! ! h.! y g i I I _.i-.. !, D, I,fli i i 1 s. 1

ia i

i

c.d i ;

i i e-i"" ~ i i l i ,* =_ i i, .7.-, .j. 1 1 ; i i ,' 6

1,

' i i i a , =, 4:$i l i i l l r .., ;w. i t i i 4 t 2 1 y-1 ! _ i, i s. ;%. g: N s; ;y ; i : 1 -3..--...... .~. .A b; z . th... i -3 1 4;,O':.;NN N. 6 .o. NN !: ' ' ig i i i ' ~ihib ih h W ! i '4

p1!

141 r-i.;: -%: N y s's: ) lbw gi b.I i !m\\! li .fd., !

h. :h t

l l i. i 4 2 t.t 'h i ik W i ! !)iM l j!,

\\.

4 Ith l4! l !) I$. ' !$ v..Nb.(;!*i i Q b i :Q i i ._:le .' 9, yi3 W y s. it i .l y.1% q;. i

i. i 9-i :

1 s' .ip .} i i + t g s i 4. i . lm9 w H, ! N. --.it._q, i i 1.: -- p_. I i i i - t i ! j i 3 ; iii L E l e Z. Y { t I $ i! i i. i i j 4 3

"?

.;.. A..:..

=

y *, ~

c..==;

=; Si e Il 21 m Ei

s .' I' lQMi ; :b i ' k I"! g Il lI-h!

i

( i i i

N ;l.'

4Mi C j

1Ti ' t i

i k it !.'I i-g t igN:

s !

Slg i 1 i i : i I t ' s: i h4 isi 7 !{%! if*t N !5iig ~ i i i N A: F l Xit,!. ; !! ["S. ! ! ; i gi 1 !\\ ixi lui ig%, +i m\\biti i % ' !. !( I Ni f l'! MCl! M i l

4 l: mN i

b.p: W. m n \\lw= i ;, i ,,. i i i i El .ui g! \\. o +. j\\p i 4. j9;g l!. i i M ! i4 . *j i Ii Mvjt lh,' l 'I

i. -

i iM! i l 4ig! iy tis! :! t ! '! k 4 li b: %}o t l - - No i h! i a l 1 I i i i n! i t s:% gt i I l. h% f.

$iu tk b -

( i f4 N gli 6 h's! N! 5! ici i !v i ikhi h. g l i i l f! i O l .a ., ~ s_ ~ i t 2 1 i a ! ( i i t }' l t i .r-i i i -=l3 . ; 3 i i i i

i;.

1 I,,i i., 4 : i i i,,,

.=i

i.

I .i i 3 3 i ,A, .:. m 4 ! i ..,. di-i r 2 i i i l- ,w l

i 4

i i I r. .....i 4.

.,, : s. tN N y

~ I. Q ,..i i, g 4, 4

= cikiti ; W stc :.L N N I. g s.

!w: t - r ,t i i - h%:

g i ',

!p gi 3%

b(d.d i N : -

! d. :3:r.gA. 4.t N :d. l 5 N s i; .'. ' i

i

!. T i ! ! i i 'h (N., ' wi QQ ;V4 ( W Q1' !Y! 1 ! sal

s i

tN 19 I i i 4 i nt 4 m1. 1 1

- gg:

4: gi

'4 i, 1 1

;j i i i: i Cl ;W 9

48 h AQi i 'i + ! iV $ 'i i I i i e

4 bi 9!

i ; l } i mwN. m' it; t

- j q.. > 4 : : ;-.

p 2_ L..: 4 i._i. ; _.4

i,

i t i i

t j I i l 5 i; f C. i 'i i j

i

"~ I f

- h k..

J. .e -. Zh O hl".! -01

i Of C "l

'r O, i o =i

y t s % - 3 s~"p. .:;1 y, ( ',e s

s. - o

?, $ ~ $ ,', e' 43 3 .s g 4-- - e *. 'v $,, '..,;, M..k *, o $'i,Ik.

0..;g,.a o.. u,,.,, c 2-c c.

a 5 -f p 9 o~b 2 *, 3 \\_ /*,' l 3 Q't 9 .'N. _g 3',1"

7 um.

n ~m 'q y

Lf

.C 'Qi.* 'h,$ W. M, Dj ' E'M. i C l :. c i ! y i

W g.V

i i:

'8 W y. t -e '" w. ii : JD l. i -~i'- t ts

io

~ f'. h .N E }. f !.')* o.; 9.7 I l h7 f ') +d .~ N N i t.; ;. : i--l E : % Q:. l: ' . E '<d . c: 'y .i ' s' '*: e 3.gI9'! 4 v y. g g l + l.E.,5 -.& N e .r co t 4 ocl N. t (0 i - D D, e -

> - N.5 ^$

t ~- h.f. i 9 O O e. -.i,S,% ew ~ 4 Y g, , a '"4 O. . '5!3 st.6 GsygS l' .h h. t, . i d,U g,* h V, s,'d

Y'k O k h C O C Q Q G bOldb

. I n '- n 1 n 'ne' .O. q 4 '>3'J .N .t g O;j:$,, q q R. g g

os.r..

d$- O'. w, h-ei es ce r= r s w . m,

y

,. 6 re. et. ei ec,;,g n,, ,g,c.,c,,oto h a n e. ,e n. a e, ~~ g- ~ ,y ~. = =y a Z e.<:! i -y-a ,u y i e-w .h k r =- y ' ~ ;. ' -N q V d .t ,R, j;, ' c: ...:: : 0 7 t3 y.

s-

.d N k.-r.- 'I,b,,, 4, 3 e.) w s e-jT C

3. - -

5-d% (* ~~ 7y-t' . y; g ., 9 "< Q,..s.,.. -; e : : : ,: y .s. ....L._

a

.y g ..._ i... y 7_ k d N-2 e h,h ")A e q. .D. h 2. p: a.I s ( E,. ) g,Q: Q; a J, t p.,~t' T*: .-9 -c= .e g '<l', cra=;r.' i -- 1 9s 0,, C >.,,,, t t, 3-4' s ae T-Eh [i-r.aC.' s a*'r P ' h .h3 67 ' ~ - k

f MJ N.

2 7,3% t7 t .A ~ e c t . $. N 'p'?I h -0. k, '-F -i dV I EL .0 _.. U S-b lJ $.2 ? 9. ~1 ? . ' JG 'C 4 -; q'. G..e yD.;A,$Y v?'-4. l d,I ; .:- e-e. ,: c, -. 4' M. 4t s .. g.. -. g 'yt .tS$ -i d 4 'pP s a =d U at ac.; .--t w 'i'. C cg e at

e SCENARIO 81 This is the " Reference Schedule

Begin Shipping Campaign on 412/91 Be able to pull back by 2 weeks Be able to expand by 2 months Assume we have the POL by 3/15/91 Assignment Determine if there are.g,w; bg,

,g r= labor savings we can implement teif * *;n L ~l

rO*Q*i' Revise our existing schedule to the Reference 1

Schedule Feedback needed on: How long do we have meaningful work without POL 7 How long do we have meaningful work with POL? How many people can you let go, temporarily? How many people can you later fill with contractors? .z y v u e.: e t j:n i.c tti e 'd SCENARIO e 2 This is the " Worst Case" schedule Begin Defueling to ISFSI on 12/1/91 Retain ability to ship to Idaho, at rate, at any time d " Retain does not necessarily mean ~on-site' Be able to pull back by 3 months Be able to expand by 2 months Assume we have POL by-3/15/91 Assume we so to "Projectized Organization

Assignment Consider all possible means to reduce st=1r Loanees 90-Dav noticu BackfiB with contractors Answer the following:

How Manv? When? How much dowe save? Remarks Ceasequences Considerations Use the attached format l ,m, --.,e..~

0 e / e i I 1 .i. .r .I

, i.

i e J f b . i

-i I.

l ' i ~ i I ! I l l 3 t { 4 8 'I

j eI l

5 k i I I l l ' I 1 4 I i. f a j 's i, j I g i, i, s t' ). E I }' .{ e i Rot ! ' I j I I ! - i i !M l i iM i I I i {bb j

i

= j l' -i i 'I j i o ;t i f i . 1 s I

)

- } I ,i !. ! 'i i, j. 1. 2 i + i I I } -l j

}

i ~ 6 . l l 3 I s ? + 8 l I g . j t t -I t' I' a

f

.i -i . i -i t g e 1 i i t } t t t t i

i. -

} 4 l <} t ? + i t i I. t ~ +. t i .l . i t. +. ! i. ! s 1 -i : 1 t I l ^ ,i i 1 I i. i ; t. ? : i. 1 i i,. ( l.i 1 l 4 ' f. i. i i ' 4 i i. t - : ca::, i - g 4 t 1 1 e. i . i - l i i ?..=ll.g .g e. .l t t. i. i S. } j 3 . M'i m i f' i i i i. e 3 i 4 i 4 kyi. t { ! } i i. i. ; i 2 t ,. +. j i. a tt i i 8

i. m -

e e 8

%, -. ~

- t i i t i ' i i f i . i - 1 -i.. .).- ;. .-... -{ t 2 ~. a l

===; - ! [ t j -.4.~-- 3-t i 1 =0#. r. I u.p a bh.d g 1', I t ~ z ,I I I .f ,I i I l

== ] t-1 I 3 a. I .a. ! i i. .i l =.= e I. t i t l t ' 6 d,.g s . E );* *=. $ } \\ .) i i r x,. g = i I j t i 1 1 ',W. -.

1 1

? i 7,,g, l - T , e, 1 - i - ~ .. ~. .i 1 r - 3. i 3 .} 2 -. ~........ =. .i a 1 ? 4 i I , en

8 i

3 I i ! i i i. i ,i i. s. ...y u g . 1 ; i

r-i k

i i ! ; . i ' :. "I . i

?

i i I 1 1 i ?

i. i f

l= i e t l ! 2 } 8 l g . i j.

,.. i..

s 5 f f 3 f t e- .....I..; I -- _4 --- s .-J. hi-i.- d-i 4- : d.~. ~. - 4-- s 'i . - i,; i 2 I e i i s 4 - ~... j g } } i i 1 1 ? . :t 3 ; i ..e-g h E e=. t t i 8 2. t t 2 1 i '( 3 i f i s t i E ,,. j >=.,.g 4. C.,,,,;! =; .1 = 4.n. ? W e.s El

4 .* Qh OI -lL, q. k.} s Department Name Title Num. When Monthly Comments Wages 6 l, [g ). Operahoris None Fleactor Operators 0 N/A N/A Operatons is at nunsmam staff. One - Eqimpmait Operators already ident6ed Aumhary Tender il C (Ihg Aum4ary Taiders could be released esty, but sawngs wadd %.o.be onset by omrtme Shelt Superwsors ..r) 1&C Scan Olson St. hist. Tech. 1 Done $'D50 Loonee to Vebegunt b cut back on cosis ('6M fp g,y) ( Bruce Hogm[ St. Inst. Tech t Near Term $3400 Lomnee to Genesed*4/ a,b,cis'. .u tair. a - s. A..,-we lossd trasung pogram lor staff. l&C a already tuules poposed staffung levd.Do not now have Wety lur 24-hour cswerage. Y YMh p $[M '?> $y/18.G' y h Ip1f Ika{ P&S ' Dde Sleiert N Contract Schedieng 1 Late Ap 16300 Rdesse would acymdy ugact b/ ^ ? --o Engmeer /.. scheduhng expertse. Investgatrq possdely of reducing hours to about f}, ',,.' j 30 hrsfuk as altanatve. // (O. Beley Ibn.. N,Sdicdubng.Tedi 1 Late Apa' $1960 Fielease possede but unusse-Technician responsible for admwustering Sie Tech Spes; Survesence program. Functon must contnue, so wodri have to pick up elseudiere en Sie aganizaton. Bonnie Case ' Contact Oerk i Near Tem $1900 Reisese wall peclude atsey to pmede unremnce rgarang data. Investgatsig tour days per week as alienstve. l ll' k ( ( All b 1dl (

m Y xws l

h

4~1 sw-spo%. a)/dtite Department Name Title Num. When Monthly Comments Wages Mantmance By Smianty Mignghts 3 Late Apd $9000 Loanees, and assumes: Fud Harusers ordy on Top Head and CRD pogect No cormment removal beyond CRDs and RCDs No baddog reducten (pesent NRC assue) No rmit-shrft cowerage By Senety Wdders 3 Late Apd $9600 Loanees wri above assurmtons, and no additonal weking work (contary to expersence m 1990) By Senionly Maciunist 1 Late Apd $3150 Loanee wth atom assurmison By Semanty.. Electuaan Speaakst - I Late June $3400 Rdease-assumes allISFSI CN wek km elecknaans is corq2ekxt, and no new surgwases regimog PSC elect aans for ISFSt. Larry Cogdie Mantmance Superusor Late Apd $3050 Loanee for Mantenance aew Alan Koppman Megrght i Late June $3t50 Rdease (tansfer early), aller onrent work cor@dekxt Robert Gamhart Contuction Spec. 1 Late August $3550 Rdease. Assumes ISFSI corgietal and Caporate Hazardous Waste popam ggrafes cormleted (rmny of As assigned by PSC PSC Constucton misch remmes to be sdent6ed). 3 Constuctson deparenent Late August $11000 Rdease. Assumes ISFSt. Bams, Trader Phase 2. Ha: Mat Storage area Przybyski Centact HVAC 2 Septemiber $4000 completed. Foy Cut work by artiitronal 50% aber g i sunrner. CurrenWy on 4 days / week 1 i Go to %eak before work" pogram, versus cistent,ellectve PM program. i 2

Department Name t itle Num. When Monthly Comments Wages Trarung GotschaN Nuc. Tranmg Spec. 1 Now $3650 Loanee, cunmity to Electic and Gas Distitiubon (EGD). M rdesse veien hey no longer need. John Ewms Nuc Temning Spec. I late Apd $3250 Loan to EGD or release. Assumes we drop af Electiman and l&C taanmg (some NRC aposure) Ptml Beady Nuc. Tramung Spec 1 Late Apd $3650 Loan to EGO a release. Assumes no new sdentbed ISFSI or SSLO tarung. Wayne haagnene Nuc. Tranung Spec. 2 J me $7000 Dutt Bottor11 Loan to EGD te idease. Assumes no new wient6ed ISFSI or SSLO tarmy Greg Smoot, or Nuc Tramng Spec. 1 Late August $3500 Dexter Bates Loan to EGD m rdease. Assumes ISFSI tarang as pat of Functonal Test pogram r2 congdeled (ISFSI budt and ready for FT)-) Ernergency Ranee Mdleson St. Enwgency Plannrg 1 Sgten1ber a $3350 Planrurg Specialist Decertmr Rdease m Septerrder of no exercise, a Deceober il exerase. Assumes no blure wwicy plannweg effet required (NRC esarption?) Health Physics TBD Contact HP techneaans 4 Aptd $14000 Can release soon of no naA-shift comrage on lueldedr. Re hee when detueirig resumes M need more han laur rnore d ship to ISFSI. Nuclear TBD contract clerk 1 Late June $1800 Just a guess Documents q i.:,..). ,; 4 :. a d e..I i. g i ~ dn Yt e > l'-/W9f 3 L

i Department Name Teile Num. When Monthly Comments Wages Fud Ded Ned Snyde Fuel Dod Managa 1 Mars 11 Reassqyved to Comanchee Rob Gappe Fad Dod Supt 1 Late Apsd On 90% notce Rdesse aber HSF resches and tumcner to Redmond Den Johnson Fuel Dod Supt t Now ] Reesmgned b ED for assatance on ISFSI desgn progect. Aprd ( i[.,) John Hak Fued Dod Sgt. 1 Inwstgoteg i-- ^ ^i of senrtng to SynHyted plant km assatance si tiesr startup Joe Hunior Fuel Dod Sgt. 1 Mardi Reassaped to ED to assest si de.4-.~.; of Decor.mssioneg procedures.No samngs to N.O. Statt Dave Weber Senil Assatent 1 Mars Same as Hunter Also, drop *essue Lasr pacedure eNort, seasagn ISFSI proodures, divisions assume .)// responsabd% for ties ones pocedure t Me u j . ' ' . f gnah. No 2-as to N O s 4 A ____,___..--a---- - - ~ " - ' - -

l HP TECHNICIAN LOG SHIFT: grass ( hleh.) ~' DATE: ~6 - 13tt i Plant Status at: %AO Purif A: 8: Pri: Press: 1 1 "' Temp: i do*F Deupoint: f1o i s t ur e :- ~ GU: A: l Ao

8:

6* LU: A: 10" B: O f1a n : f.36 TR) RBS: Pruw 3Rb W 1 Time Remarks 3% Tfo F= Rom &Go&6G s WTTERMPU. ..... 1 n n.u D3tS cIR 'ARseisur - RT' %4*VI-t 15 cos. w. cAmouu4 Reco @ d345 Rev'h 6.u; it M 7A Fo8 PIMA. al64kvN1 -7 Re A. oots GAu'.45ueh RujP. ns8 3. cor-germ,d. to eue su.,oes in m,l. Pbsce.E. RiiPn_..... 4 11589 oor OPS 4Tet tW. 11588 in RwP.Fu.E! 4FraR 'hsg) oP 64 wt ss Rr,. co4s b u h ' ',li.s o o d f r ' 5 5 W h in ) - 5 '6Roicin~ RaiO^ ^~ Proses 5'ods - A)o Peccard

o Auv Rm I4 U.: Sect _r i o

~~5ooRee 14rE sTochtM( oPeAl' Of3o Recrv ues aho hu._.ceter Wuhav) w6Ly coM P bd 3A g l. Pocah * % P a. utsB9 ca ers hv.. Icea esi,.Ar cecurecoin SWO* #1588 ou ixce e. A-7 35P,_JecesI P o i r a.1, u c r4ft% & uss.p s,ns R h ,ca.s.- r e. a r-u u s m anaa zaeA. ooss LA:re eWY - ch 2E r% R.n (noc. rAdv. c AJ '2eURc.. rea o <t,'4 2e-C J:uo Phess - eac c. id ' kee,w, O 53c CcrnA.aTus LurNe% PANR 61;c A K. 6 LEAD G.ceA. rRoc rrl. ePWM Es. CL.lo .~, 8 n'=~ CE P:r.T P AuT' a r e '1 uEEb PtW.:3 i:c < 'rTHC. e ?. t o 3 co tic 'ro y v. or o s= T.

^ wP *ECHNICIAN LOG { SHIFT:_NRN63 b 45d DATE: 3 M - 91 Plant Status at:_oc.35 TECHNICIAN:_ r6RtfA Purtf A:- 9: Pri: Press: lO A Temp: IMT Dewpoint: noisture: - GU: A: Ato* 8: _ d* LU: A: . = (c " B: s '- non: I 3V' RBS: 'he'8 w S o s"'P Time Remarks 33co rfo >Ao m Ao a hAu nic. _A3 s clo bRte% u4. A>o m c4 s Pat. .5 A m # a A.x. Reo i., %-0. e os3e Re uw u es w%was. wv ARueV Feusss ge n m w4wn, I r W -st %c4 ( cr4-Aac e cu.csu. A tro ( t4 t L a 754.c Ca sib.;4h. ( A PL 4 dC'W T*IY5. HotoERA, E, Defh't.toa. gg ., u v C. J DC.-4J Tee c416 c6 Oc A M C4 3o At o 2 G' (Avub2V. MA5 s.A h4c at. soTo (UAft% Pc4 t'hodt bdtc4J ('b4 2.mc.t R CHk u(, c4 A eF TefEM A 'Tu,kCX Mor/. Go dCh), os~ neo.> am, A wet w.w uur.s 4 n>a c, 065o u s w Os?e W,*?< ku7"5TM ut. 0 ")Co 77o re Ma t+,e r. Y s g- .a* i k 4'. s Y Y.* '. u 4

3/Ja/9 i s.m ?4 a= jf.i.,. h /.$5 o./.uf OA&J ceJ e. oded G- #/c %an f ^ .ad t/e cm Als w2a' s>W ori z;i a fdu,.,tod {si s B y.i' /'J?Jly

c.. C p.gefe a ii&-

A v h d p p- //' s.A., 1./h 62ua,x bJ.4 A% a>iC - d :. r.se.e i & L y: :. 6 s a wm Jecrus cf J!i AkI.4 e

du~-

w w.

=

a j; feet' .4. wr.t,'?.t Y ..lY .% Q* 8 ';A ~ .r.<,j o i% p.nf cu.c/',h Y.42.2s--pff. w.e.4.. 0 d }' W e[ lA S f:.

2. d.5* Y

./ A, .:1v.+/mpi2 i, <z,.d.ru A 9 o<a.u s /A f u c.r. ~ .d.z<d,,1.a /.2/ A.? < wpi /& ,4a, .)/a. //2 daup' He ca.tL4 a.ak ydt-d&f ln0 J we. 2 a/ sy' u o d se e j f:r ahl. . sawn m1 we 2 A* > ir. -

1s a

.J.2J 07.h .,ume 9 w.atf x.s-& o M e n r &L. s evA/ .a. - //c.ds.h A 4 4 7:J'.A #r ]. / 6sv/' eemdd y' CHe

A y M.

/# db d CPAsw9.pd. led,a was sz l0 t PJ JNe40VJ Ob.?O.1.2 y /JArAt/.a N cst t/.Arl 0 /'.cf.db.h At C./.w/ ct fJ Cd j j'- f t / O-Ao. J o ?.c ' < " w. n v M ' J c<Ad' ds-e/ h wsj .4-~ f us 7xf4.6 st.4..s/ "ps,9 a kJA /s .,es .Jeuw.nle A h llr.!'.25 can .,o.,i.1 av i /r.d' G. t - i

4-2.gi-- .d aJb--- a <G a 67/ 5 /9.2 9

9

/M .P e

g 9

Y g r12.A.4 pu&.w'.

h a a L A.-

g ,4.c :: x 1 c .i. - .a k.Aue,te.a a5:.. r G.ary Ac 7.aw~ s.> w~Jg /; w.t' s ;}. x b-l%,2,:0 n.N 7. 2 41x .//f.L$s, o i a/s/9o i 3.2/ga . h 2$ .h " ~ ei dat JiC k k s. / j /\\ 7.0:k~ -w A j.!...r 5 sk .af h-f.jr. A /me + w.Ad' sauQf .25 .h d> He Aau g Xb1'./ Y p / f 2a:c/.AJ $- $>v d} 4 .n u A:l /l5- &l%' 44, l& f Th) Jf'd<!2 W.i'1 -Ik' Gr /MA' b A/'. ChkLb - 1 1 4 i l f J

a A-4 ,.e .1-- a <u-' 4 -m-- -4_ ~ _ A, b<.a-Ab6/9) (.o v d.sJ f 'L vd ] <za<<.2. A t 06/0 6 Mic Te.een A as4~fa:a,wwAw . sew m a4 per d m in frzw A 4 s.d i e- .A ur.& la m p. bs' m/ Jecasa eA M Jr4 pud A Af of /A&acdrae srhar en ys.e yp1. 1.24 za. ,ay a i o,& 4 saki Aw 8o h,z-I cjurird Thn < /16A r2.4J AA Crg O f ).o< j cu s' . des wus.. th And A Ad 7J us.<A /.aAlAtW h {#r ! auw- $bu T.l%. //)L71) - .JMw .s~ 0 ap.eakce /D .spnC: A. ). 4 p ds.> >< s,A pac a cd c.c l/2.)4. ace.A )?ea dfMd bed ht;Z w i

s

.At. 1 .] 6 ds srju a,J / g 14 /jac74&. 2ad//.an<d/.& s4jd y s.i k s o vl 4 c w.z~ a us # aA:ud-4 ch A & wb j,do.L<f. / s$.AldD.,s /-shaeA< sA 4 i .duk.6.x6;a n c p t s p D. d e 2 /.- j I l J l D ,w w w

(46S. S/27/9/ //k hr2i $4t 0609 A ab6d 6 .29 N w<M //fMtv. A >Mc h a &A cas:v / r <L, # A.A p.2"$V #"m4A ra s~ A &-e 154' # f } n A a r; s .2 s .n&As.A 7)a ydb is m,, a p

.,.n,, a ,m-- -,m-,. DEv-2J,ts/9i ~/S/O $ w. frh f .4r.2 .,.ib JJ>br.f S .o l Grh 4f rak w Y,x y./A sgrA aat A isy was A sy .sxx ,et.r.Md? s.a. A e ~*# ha.bd gn A $ alN A $s JA^ M cn / dea instanh in f % ? .D xv .2.xs> .rA.f inreA cd A cLw,.a 4 yW ~. / r,a A .dc ox M sA wad A & /aAsack: r >'r M a h / k . d k c ff a z, s? Bed .4 wd xva/Ac'T w-ra n c u d A, e:P wa rfzd

pt 62.rp

&M u \\ n .z.4 +b o./ y' i 14. wa n d p +//fs nA,p l i

d =+ = t Fn-3/,/n1 os@ c? .2de6 Gu y y k A x Ma was ^ u-app.rpw.a<. a>J A A & ad ar--.Ja a p a w.a b re andh A .A<,d a. yp;r.u2 sarar g4 ,,2 .s.au& A2 w w//. A e p:d r4 msd: ,% p.,<~ Act.r.A m> ..,..n .au en cn tA sa-.s.4 en/dvT ' aclu / p' )rstv )A WN b d-k'#4 pu A -n us6. L 26ca-n fa2 O '1 -a.U C(Y wc' d i e

3 9 J 9m. a se :...= a

.4'a

w

[ 3/4/91 ~ i350 (.O Cr1&D G p, /71e 7.x.b.m./;.fr.,mw f. 8dfp d' 4 bi^ AtA dtsev cd . afhu.- x'. Th. . J # w.rs tr L 7.- .4 4 c M cx/ a a. .41 'l4fpo &u,a$a$$ 'I D a_ 0/ct a.s!k o s W A.xA ki wfrC ; ,as /4.b-m,, wa x.x /> xn n'a n rh .oss ,yav y ~ w.=i awa.. no sestI Aw .2 7-A m. 4 F.s >? //.< t/s r.o.u/' 8~ ./.W i ? JA') AdM j )usfA t As .A WN 8.A i 8 i.,w-f V J'* nu 02 8 Adh. d na. s'e us nbp 1 xA r s 2.< e said .,Jad 0 Y .A .su/ s A.x a.n,1.N..w n>/ //.s .$r w./ Zr.A, 44s 6 U< <e gs .3 n sw .4s 7u A >(i'a?-a 2 m!'l'^A s<> 1,y?sfj%D' Y; O, a as .&i sd a,- asrA t oun Qsk. . sad. A-A ' &e / m d../, a c e

a ue ds

.i a N'. a,da$ a n.d.<>euh>x m e 4,. A l i /OJf.G A % Q $a c l 7 22 A n d .a e tt. si a,. - n't ma. -.ald nu sz A$d.y#p,.:- xs.w c si ic M.Ih k 4. s < s

t 7

2:< p. 7sa fuct s.,1 L., '/g': zy, c.zd..q _ oa

..u.+A.:.J

. a '

4 Yl.tw & ' a -t' 9 e s.:.s A /

d. $ Y J gi l 5 a l -

.4a J41 e

rJa, p

.,4 ms;pw crAd cAe/ W./.scr/nk ,a w J /h./

S, o

4af xJ.s /. foe.. l C2A&J 0 0/0:: 9 .J.ded.A-k;e. ~ 7 c? cwa 9 .6 -Aku. J 2a s e l/ m w~ . y n b J a. A >.- n i /nt'we.cA' 7.~A/ ;A w.Aw$ ? ty'e ss<.3 aw s 9 /2.s z2 o n 4. ~ 2im M .so4cas~ zJ /s &1 W 1 9, 8 '4.e e , d

4 2 e '-a /

w s - L., ) 2 -,te*.t d .ed 2s1&2 ~ / fr A,7; z'A,t/% ' T./Af.&

r/L J gd224

,se e fe Yc ? an Y ' 0M'id a J & Sx' /xAf- -7Av Q n. v,/.s?., v C w s a }.J, /le ~[h ! a c yNI 'bpofxg cu b.6/,/Ja b. . 4 . m, f.,s.A 9' s j 1? ua,.>. j p.2/ ):o f+e ,,1J.a. (J/./ u! ad AZ. - st.o // ' csn q . s. h d ' i j u p .7. A f % A. as A Lu a sps,.a A.y'.~u s w a s o .2 p' i, A c a s - .a &n-J ~b jn sa sconx& p 4.'.e.v.ht - 9 cxfac' BAC., &As>< susug-A~, #s(BAc a. r 9 csAfd Sfbud 6.,e}r:r a J .4 A h cse.< J.1~ j csjf.A ad Aou + )J:nf.Aw i /s.19 2Ar }'.e v h,d/,rw ) $ )Me 1.<.<m vi~ w % ' x n> + ist.it& x /tva? N-r ~ &e awJ~ aJ / y of b .A ~. I .J c.2227 o s-ed Lx& , b A .a&&, aaM Jsel i Jarf p csdd n ?ch ;& wY ' as aa s.a/a..'a:uw. ,2ahY-c'AY.zh cs> AAeA,f n A(2. n, % :... h. J ' i s. .A '~'.A h? -)

W s., [ G orgo S. McTicrnen 9528 HirOmar red 0160 [, San Diego, Ca. 92128~ . p N'd; United States /7 Q ~\\ Department of Labor [$ 9 Vage/ Hour Division G P.O. Drawer 3505 S er; Denver, Co. 80294 9 / 4 Cl ' l gL T.'.+Y' / Not v 03-26-91

Dear Department Personnel,

Following is a written complaint to your office, submitted within thirty days of the violation, regarding an illegal termination of employment effected against me by the Public Service Company at the Fort S t. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station. I claim that the termination was illegal because it was directly related to my having answered questions by the site QA inspector one week previously. Additionally, a " layoff with two week notice" was changed to an immediate dismissal after I had indicated a desire to talk to the resident NRC inspector and pursue legal recourse against the layoff. I believe that represents a violation of to CFR 19. I am a contract Health Physics Technician. I had been at Ft. S t. Vrain for 17 months. The actual company I work for is Allied Radiological, out of Georgia. (1-800-241-6575) None of my complaint is directed toward ARC. They had no involvement in this violation. I was terminated from Ft. S t. Vrain for reporting numerous radiological safety violations and poor work practices of one particular technician. Initial reports to the Health Physics Supervisor were ig?

red. At one point in my job, I was approached by one of iae PSco QA inspectors. I did not seek out this Inspector, rather he was monitoring the task at hand and as'ted questions regarding my performance.

The Technician I had been reporting, Marna E. Porter, had worked the midnight shift. In that capacity, she was responsible for performing the daily radiological survey in the reactor building, and cisc prepara our counting instrumentation for the next day's use.

Page a. wo had only. two counting instrumsnts available, an " automatic" counter and ~ a counter that - samples need to be loaded into one at a time. Each sample takes one minute to coun t.' When Ms. Porter performed her rounds, she found that the automatic changer had been cross-contaminated during that day's work and needed to be wiped down prior to use. This takes' about 20 or 30 minutes to perform. Ms. Porter did not do this. Additionally, she didn't use the manual counter to analyze the samples from her survey, but rather left them for dayshift to ' perform. On dayshif t. I-had my own responsibilities; Checking work areas radiological 17 prior to maintenance in them, performing contamination analysis of tools and equipment leaving the-protected area, and providing HP_ coverage while different covers were removed. from the core area for-inspections. All of my _ duties required the use of the instruments I described earlier. The automatic changer was not available, until a specifically assigned crew had "deconned" it and counted the two hours worth of samples Ms. Porter had left behind. The manual changer. was only sporadically available, j since it was being shared by every technician doing coverage that day. A QA Inspector noticed my difficulty and asked questions regarding them. Thursday, the 14th of March is the date that this was discussed with QA. One week later, on the 21st of Warch. I was laid off with a two week notice, and the next morning I was terminated. That morning, I did interview with Mr. J.B. Baird, the resident NRC inspector. (756-2281) The PSCo supervisor that directly supervised me and effected the termination was ' Mr. Bill Woodard. (620-1130) The QA inspector I had worked with is Mr. Paul Miles. (620-1550) I want to add that just two weeks earlier I had been ensured that there would be no man-power based layoffs before August, and when I was laid off it was over two unqualified persons with less then two months on site. I had been there 17 months and had qualified as " Shift Technician." The violation that I reported to GA was not a major safety concern. However. Ms. Marna K. Porter has such a history of poor performance, including the falsification of records and knowingly violating procedures, that supervision's reluctance to in any way enforce accountability for this individual results in an unsafe working environment. i- .--s--

== e senr- +-

~.. ragt n. .- f p. /- Following cro oramples. of th0 prob 10ms that exist. Dates are approximate when neccessary,.as my access to records has been removed. ~ In closin's I will include a list of personnel that can verify and substantiate the listed occurrences. August, '90 Ms. Porter caused a potential for overexposure, and created a radiation area that went undetected for two shifts. ' The cause. was from improper job briefings, improper surveys, (She had given the radiation dose rate meter to an unquallfled worker, and told him to monitor himself. The task called for continuous, on-the-spot coverage.)(Maintenance worker John Halverson, 620-1266) Ms. Porter was not to be disciplined for +his, until an exiting employee informed the NRC of the occurrence. The NRC came back with five " Notices of Violation" against PSco. No civil penalty was assessed. Marna Porter received one week off, no pay. (Summer '89 Ms. Porter was given one week off for falsifying documents. She claimed to perform nightly surveys, yet no record of "k e y-ca rd" entries into the controlled area existed.) February, 91 - Harna Porter was to perform the monthly survey of the FSV site. This Job is cycled among techs each month. Several days into the month. I was working a midnight shift. One duty included the writing and updating of Radiation Work i s Permits. I was looking for an older package, that should have been processed and filed by Ms. Porter. Not finding it in the proper location. I looked on her desk. i I found the wipe samples from the monthly survey on Ms. Porter's desk. A policy adopted shortly before by the department restricted bringing wipes, samples and other contaminated materials into the lunch room. It is against sound radiological prac t. ices to, bring radioactive materials into the food area. A safety issue trists, but the level is low. The next morning, I informed Bill Voodard Health Physics Supervisor, of finding the wipes. I had removed the wipes from the lunch area, and analyzed them. I told Mr. Woodard of the results. (Counting the wipes indicated that they weren't con t a mina ted) 4 + w l

= - Page 4. Mr. Woodard indicated that bo wsu14 not be spe: Ring to M. Porter regarding bringing wipes into the lunch room. He assigned me to write M. Porter a note indicating that I l had counted +.he wipes for her. A hand written note was generated. The original was in the possession of 3.Woodard - but has disappeared. The-note read, Marna. I found wipes on your desk. Wipes are not allowed in the lunch room, as per the night orders - of -(Date), which you initialed. I counted your wipes, and all read <MDA. I would have recorded the information on your survey sheets, but you have all your wipes taken without having logged any locations on your map. I've never seen a survey done this wa y, but I guess that's your buisness. Well, <MDA, that's what I wanted to tell you. George M. Porter claimed that I had harassed her. I. was counselled. Within one week, a different H.P.. Technician, Mr. George Tillman, found air samples on M. Porter's desk. Air samples have a higher potential for being contaminated then do routine wipe samples. Mr. Tillman approaches M. Porter about the air samples on her desk. They remained there two additional days. On the third day, the air samples disappeared. These samples require a three-part process; initial paperwork done by the technician, a request form filled out in the Radiochemistry la b, and subsequent analysis by the lab. This was not performed on any of the air samples that M. Porter brought i into the lunch room. The contamination levels on - those air i samples are not known. The airborne contamination levels for the work that the samples were drawn for are not known. 1 March, 91 Continuing with the monthly survey Three weeks after the survey is due, D. Blain (620-1779), acting in a su pervisory role, and R. Rankin, (620-1127) _j performing a monthly task of records collection and storage, find the survey in M.Por ter's desk. This was on 3/19/91. The top two. pages - of the survey were incomplete, and the remainder were blank. Copies were made. M. Porter has claimed that this work was completed, and someone has stolen her work. 4

. Pcga 5. (SOverc1. acnths age, M.Portcr Uca occigncd, \\ thru written night orders, repeatedly and specifically to check certain equipment for contamination and release it from the Refuel

Floor controlled area. M. Porter refused to do this work, and at the end of the week all the night orders and all of M.Portsr's written loss and have been reconstructed for proper recordsurveys disappeared. The surveys keeping.)

.In closing, I maintain that I was fired for complaints against an unsafe co.-worker. I had just been told that I would not be laid off. for manpower reasons until. August at the earliest. My performance is. above average. I had recently received a commendation hand-signed by Marty Denisson Ted Borst. - Tim Sch11eger, and Bill Woodard for work I had done-for them. After talking to GA, I was fired within a week, ' ahead of two Junior personnel. The following personnel can provide verification: M r. Paul Miles...Q A Inspector, fired as a result of talks with this gentleman. 620-1550 Mr. Bill Vood a r d...H.P. Supervisor. Responsible for firing me af ter talking to GA. 620-1130 Mr. Darrell Blain... Health Physicist. Involved - with Air Sample and Monthly Survey occurrences. As Refuel Floor Coordinator, can provide personal reference with regard to work ethics and job performance. 620-1779 Mr. George Tillman...H.P. Technician. Involved with Air Sample occurrence. Can verify dates and provide information regarding work performance levels of co-workers and general conditions within the department. 620-1127 Mr. Ed S troud....H.P. Tech nicia n, ARC Site Re presen tative, can verify that I had been told that no personnel were to be laid off until at least August. Can attest to performance levels of co-workers.. Many character references are available. l 1 1 i -A

~. e 3. I will be leaving the Colorado area on Friday, the 29th of March, to work for Allied radiological at the Limerick Nuclear Station. My permanent address will be: 9528 Miramar #164 San Diego, Ca. 92126 i If you need to contact me by phone, you may do so thru my i brother, David McTiernan, at 429-8606. Thank you for your efforts toward correcting this situation. j George S. McTiernan Senior Health Physics Technician

U.S. Department of Labor Ernpioymeru Stancares Aann,straeon moe ano Hour oms,on PCL Drawer 3505 ,m, Derwr, Colorado 80294 A l { P CERTITIED MAIL P 471 793 737 REC'El\\/Fn aoe 0 8 40o4 Du:GHu1ci l Mr. Bill Woodard, H.P. Supervisor Public Service Company of Colorado Fort St. Vrain Nuclear Generating Station Platteville CO 80651

Dear Mr. Woodard:

i This will notify you that the Wage and Hour Division of the U S of Labor has received a complaint from George S. McTiernan alleging . Department discriminatory employment practices in violation of the Energy Reorga i i Act. This charge was received by our office on March n zation enclosed a copy of the complaint, 29, 1991 We have and a copy of the pertinent section of the Act.a copy of Regulations, 29 CFR Part 24, The Act requires the Secretary of Labor to conduct an investigation int the alleged violations. This case has been assigned to George Anderson j o whose first action will be to try and achieve a mutually agreeable settl If this is not possible, be conducted as soon as possible.the law requires that a fact-finding investigation ement. You are encouraged to present any relevant

nformation or evidence to our representative and will be given every opp!

to do so. n ty Thank you for your cocperatica in this matter. Sincerely, i j l-l f o's Gerald H. Hill District Director Enclosures Nuclear Regulatory Commision cc: Associate Regicnal Solicitor of Labor, Henry Mahlman Regional WH Administrator, Loren Gilbert J:r.c: "ccettar i \\

~

Interoffice Memo 9b QAC-91-0146 msenese ceammar of coewsde DATE: April 1, 1991 TO: Mr. L. R. Sutton, Supervisor, QA Auditing, Fort St. Vrain FROM: P. F. Moore, Supervisor, QA Technical Support, Fort St. Vrain SUBJ: QA MONITORING CONOUCTED IN AUDIT AREA: ERrN QA monitoring activity, QAMP-RAP-08-91-03 (Radiation Work Permits), was performed during March 1991. This monitoring activity: Identified problem (s) in area (s): o for which corrective action was initiated. Refer to CARS /QDRs: Identified minor in:ensistencies and/or requires follow-up, c in area (s): for which corrective action was not deemed necessary. / Indicated compliance /conformance to monitored area's requirements. c Indicated outstanding / exemplary conformance to monitored area's requirements. The subject monitoring report is available for your review in the QA Monitoring File, maintained by QA Clerical. If you have any questions regarding this or other QA Monitoring activities, please let me know. Oh P. F. Moore P slw I poeW eri m?9m.e cc: QAMP-RAP-08-91-03 File

QAMP-RAP 9/ - g Page J of g OA MONITORING PROGRAM REPORT QAMP - RAP @ - #8 Monitoring Category - Area Number TITLE: RADIAT!0LWORK PERMik(RWPs) d fu Prepared b M Date.1-//- 9/ Review N Date 7-// - f/ Performed /J Date 8-//-#/ 8'aff-9/ Date Date 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this monitoring is to review and evaluate the following plant activity or functional area activity to determine the ef fectiveness of the activity. Verify by performance based monitoring that the guidelines for establishing Radiation Work Pernits and the soplicable procedures governing Radiation Work Permits are adhered to and properly implemented.

QAMP-RAP 9/ _gg7 Page d of L 5,CbP! 2.0 This monitoring activity will include direct observation and/or review of the following specific items / attributes (e.g., work performance, procedures, technical specifications, radiation protection, QC) of the subject area. Review of active RWPs. Observation of persons entering, working in, and exiting the RWP area to verify compliance to: - Adherence to RWP instructions - Standard HP oractices - Standard safety practices 3.0 METHODS The following methods were utilized for development an#or performance of this monitoring activity: 3.1 A review of the following previously completed QAMP(s) was p formed to determine trends or recurring deficiencies. 6M/ ( 1 i lh. A standard checklist (attached), or 3.2 l[j The specially developed checklist (attached) was utilized for direction and guidance for performance of this monitoring. i 3.3 The following personnel were contacted in conjunction with .d, M / j'

OAMP-RAP-08-4/ -g Page 1 of A i 4.0 RhFERENCES i The following documents were utilized during development or performance of this monitoring (List applicable issue number or -ev.) A/)$ff/0. & f 8db )/.s19

6 13

// S W

5.0 CONCLUSION

S M W_ A Y -AhsAMA/ DAM dawn AFAssz sded&df / dLded Mddw a-A A& csw-ska ei.d l i e > Date 88-9/ Signatur / ,/ 1

QAMP-RAF 9/ - g i Page 1 of 1 l-6.0 FOLLOW-UP 6.1 Follow up Requirad: Yes _ No

if Yes, by Date i

6.2 Corrective Action Initiated (QORs/ CARS /NCRs): / Al,q Approved by M Date V-2.-f / Approved by W. Date 4 4 h} n~ i Approved by Date

QAMP-RAP 9/ _gd Page [ of 7 RADIATION WORK PERMIT (RWP) COMMENT t YES NO N/A No. ~ 1. Is the RWP form properly filled in? ~- (NPAP-10,4.1) / 2. Are the protective clothing requirements ~'"~ clearly marked? (NPAP-10,4.1) / 3. If applicable, are any special instructions ~~~ clear and easily understood? (NPAP-10,4.1) / 4. Is the protective clothing specified by the RWP being properly worn by the personnel in the RWP area? (NPAP-10,4.2.2.c) / 5. When existing, is the protective clothing properly removed? (NPAP-10,4.2.3) i /' 6. If applicable, does H.P. provide job coverage .for the controlled area? (NPAP 10, 4.2.3) Completed b /> Date3#f / {

QAMp RAP 8/-$ Page k of L f COMMENTS: Y 0 /V W/ A/M W // A //W//M y asnORh>do me,mAa'w&, MdaEA+/-s M%2/4 n -0duwdAnweds ) $296 A o $ rAkAwsdudf2411a A >, b n J n J J zsc d%C,%%22 ALM % o u A>AM.clx ( / -G~2Jse wMJL ll#1/h-inAAW A Adas J M~ Jstian2tWAiV/>42n AhdwAlim /disiAdjacoe/& AJMnKLA [1Cf6?aAsM4pA /E > / / d,, X o z. c.,,.e. a. .se/ e

Interoffice Memo . 9 seneseG.,etconomes W QAC-91-0147 m DATE: April 1, 1991 TO: Mr. L. R. Sutton, Supervisor, QA Auditing, Fort St. Vrain FROM: P. F. Moore, Supervisor, CA Technical Support, Fort St. Vrain SUBJ: QA MONITORING CONCUCTED IN AUDIT AREA: MCPC QA monitoring

activity, QAMP-MNT-18-91-03 (Maintenance Work Control - Fuel Deck), was performed during March 1991.

This monitoring activity: Identified problem (s) in a,ea(s): o 'for which corrective action was initiated. Refer to CARS /QDRs: Identified i onsistencies and/or requires follow-up, .v in area (s). /N[,_'; ///A A. for which corrective action was not deemed necessary, o Indicated compliance / con formance to monitored area's requirements. o Indicated outstanding / exemplary conformance to monitored area's requirements. The subject monitoring report is available for your review in the QA Monitoring File, maintained by QA Clerical. If you have any questions regarding this or other QA Monitoring activities, please let me know. W P. F. Moore PF

slw I-,ci....

cc: QAMP-MNT-18-91-03 File

QAMP-MNT 9/-48 Page 1 of 1 0A MONITORING PROGRAM REPORT QAMP - MNT 9/- 8.f Monitoring Category - Area Numcer TITLE: Maintenance Work Co htol Prepared />- Date 88-9/ Reviews n R Date M -#/ s Y Date 8-N-M-9/ p _As Performed / Date ~ ( Date 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this monitoring is to review and evaluate the following plant activity or functional area activity to determine the effectiveness of the activity. Performance based monitoring of Mec.anical, Electrical, and I&C Maintenance project ar.tivities to verify adherence ~ to Administrative Procedures, safety policies, and good work practices. 4 )

- QAMP-MNT-18, #V-M ~ Page 2 of 7 2.0 SCOPE This monttbring activity will include direct observation and/or review of the following specific items / attributes (e.g...' work performance, procedures, technical specifications, radiation protection, QC) of the subject area. Monitoring of activities associated with maintenance department routine work and/or special projects. Monitoring is to consist of, but is not limited to..the review of documentation and the observation of work in j progress for 1) adherence to safety, 2) adherence to procedures, and 3) technical ability. 3.0 METH005 The following methods were utilized for development and/or I performance of this monitoring activity: 3.1 A review of the following previously completed QAMP(s) was i pe to cetermine trends or recurring deficiencies. 1 ) "'L 3.2 l[g i stand'ard'i:hecklist (attached), or l[I The specially developed checklist (attached)was utilized for direction and guidance for performance of this monitoring. 3.3 The following personnel were contacted in. conjunction with this monitori AAM ms A& K Bf M Albf4 4 / g l I

t QAMP-MNT W -0.4 Page 3 of f_,

4.0 REFERENCES

The follou ng documents were utilized during development or performance of this monitoring (List applicable issue number or rev.) h& Cub /) f j A k) ) W & a t.e W A Y/ M l f/ ClWJA i $ll-/M, '/094 :-3 fdfDJ-A/A -9 i

5.0 CONCLUSION

S h Y ADft/2$4s v w ehhesaG#d A A-Y -rbA O /e [b H ? sb$AjlAA 5 )$ 4 LA-%2km/Adire4d Xn%na= Mmx ( / i i C 5 ;ratur Y4 oste 3-:.Y-f/ / [

QAMP-MNT-18-9/~C/ Page 4 of 1 - i ) 6.0 FOLLOW-UP 6.1 Follow-up Required: Yes No if Yes, by Date i l 6.2 Corrective Action Initiated (QORs/ CARS /NCRs): N/+ a Approved by Date d/-L4 / 3 Approved by 1 cM Date 41 9 hh v f 4 i Approved by Date i \\

~N ~ Pa e MAINTENANCE WORK CONTROL COMMENT YES NO N/A No. / / 1. Is the procedure the latest revision? / 2. Was the procedure followed during the course of the task? A 3. Was the procedure adequate as written to complete the task? / 4. Were there any temporary changes in the procedure, and if so, were they properly i entered and a:ed? / 1 5. Was it a working copy / controlled or information only? g 1 6. If required, were all personnel observed signed in on the proper RWP for the job? _/ J 7. Were the requirements of the RWP adhered to? /_ 8. Were instruments used in calibration? / 9. Is QC involvement required? /

10. Was portable maintenance and test equipment (M&TE) used, and if so, was it's calibration current?

11. Was installed plant equipment used, and if so, was it's calibration current?

/

12. Was M&TE used suitable to the application?

/

13. Was a clearance required and used per SMAP-19?

/

14. Was Control of Equipment maintained by Operations?

Comp 1eted b - As/ s Date S Y f/

p f f N'Y QAMP-MNT-18-$-d7 Page L of L MAINTENANCE WORK CONTRCL ComENT YES NO N/A No. /

15. Were any unsafe conditions noted? (Sa fety

~ belts, hard hats, eye protection, etc.) /

16. Was an SSR required, and if so, was it filled out correctly for the job observed?

/

17. Old all documentation have proper approvals?

Completed by / Oate 8- # #/ \\

i OANp-M yr-//-9/ og Page 1 of 2 O COMMDES; E _' h b "+ A* o/ & m/ A b l w & ds i /- Md& LMA // ~ / sChzM Ademan -s 2/hws$Im?At ss sm_t&s _m LMAYY /"~ c / A N s ~ ~ d A,w d s s. /w k,: A f W Jhevd inJh p % $$ $ A d - d- / 77 A dc $AW-AB4/4/-01 4.'10d M d e.lsu b,u n d_ dwowKClfa D.aAusows.r d1htAWded-wde#s h22%_e_ Add 4lA 13-/f4P

M A &M.)se_YY EkNY A cWJAA a.i6w b sL=*

//,f-/V4kosw Abe/d4//wshfd //m - J & } s i d - 4 ; M ~ %1x1-- Of4 A-1/A='-NM22 XwWM/M-/.r-#+s. Completed b Date 8##/ 7

Interoffice Memo O PublicService pese panese con,any atcdonde QAC.,1 01., OATE: April 1, 1991 TO: Mr. L. R. Sutton, supervisor 0A Auditing, Fort St. Vrain FROM: P. F. Moore, Supervisor, CA Technical Support, Fort St. Vrain SUBJ: QA MONITORING CCNDUCTED IN AUDIT AREA ERCN CA monitoring activity. 0 AMP-RAP-15-91-02 (H.P./ALARA Practices), was performed during March 1991. Tnis monitoring ac :vity: Identified problem (s) in area (s): .for which corrective action was initiated. Refer to CARS /QDRs: ! Identified minor inconsistencies and/or reautres llow-up, in area (s): AA M /ea n /Z. foywhich correc/ s tive action was nr. deemed necessary. c Indicated compliance /conformance to monitored area's requirements. Indicated out standing /e xempla ry conformance to monitored area's requirements. The subject monitoring report is available for your review in the OA Monitoring File, maintained by OA Clerical. If you have any questions regarding this let me know. or other QA Monitoring activities, please b P. F. Moore Pr - ,.slw I ronu <cs emmes cc: QAMP-RAP-15-91-02 File

QAMP-RAP-15 d2C Page / of /0 QA *CNITORING PROGRAM REPORT QAMP - RAP 91 - Of Monitoring Category - Area nut.oer TITLE: H.P./ALARAPRAC'!CESN Prepared b /f/ o. _/ Date 8 ~//- 9/ Reviewed h Date 7-//-4 / Derf rmed b j //f Date S-ll-AV-V/ Date \\ Date 1.0 PURPOSE The purpose of this monitoring is to review and evaluate the following plant activity or functional area activity to determine the effectiveness of the activity. Performance based monitoring activity to evaluate Health Physics (H.P.) and ALARA practices relative to activities associated with Controlled Areas. i P l

l \\ l OAMP-RAP-15 O Z l Page 1 of 1 0.0 SC' OPE i This monitoring activity will include direct . ion and/or review of the following specific i tem s /a t t ri t.,, (e.g., work performance, procedures, technical specifications, radiation protection,'CC) of the subject area. Specific attention will be given to the observation of H.P. personnel perfoe ance relative to: - Controlling activities in controlled areas. - Maintaining survey readings of a controlled area. - Interaction with other deoartments. 3.0 METHODS The following methods were utilized for cevelopment and/or performance of this monitoring activity: 3.1 A review of the following previously coroleted QAMP(s) was pe formed to determine trends or recurring deficiencies. W ( 3.2 l(( A standard checklist (attached), or l[l The specially developed checklist (attached) was utilized for direction and guidance for performance of this monitoring. 3.3 The following personnel were ntacted in conjunction with this monitorin /DL -AA27M y i

QAMP-RAP-15-91-#4 Pa ge g o f,fp_,

4.0 REFERENCES

The following documents were utilized during develocment or performance of this monitoring (List applicable issue number or rev.) HPP-105, Issue 2 [d/.5 //.f[d //ff9 HPP-120, Issue 4 //f[/ //((3 HPP-125, Issue 5 //f/3 //59/ HPP-130, Issue 6 //ff4 NPAP-10, Issue 5

5.0 CONCLUSION

S l A6f /k/ d h /P/mi bds WA %AlA/wAc.de sof%mAAAw; GAAA f# / O 7 A Date 3-N-9/ 5ig atu hs j

CAMP-RAP-25 v3 Page W of f 6.0 FOLLCW-UP 6.1 Follow-up Recuired: Yes No if Yes, by Date 6.2 Corrective Action Initiated (00Rs/ CARS /NCRs): k lA-1 i i Approved by (b Date 4-2.-6i 3 Date 44 f Approved by 'T .] l ~ Approved by Date

i QAMP-RAP-15 g page f of g t H.p./Al. ARA PRACTICES Radiation Wort P e * ## ts (RWPs) CO.vMENT YES NO N/A No, I-i 1. Were all persennel observed signed into the Rad area, signed in on the proper RWP for the job? / 2. Were the requirements of the RWP adhered to? 3. Verify that prior to entering the area, workers shall- /_ a) Be Qualified to enter the area and complete work. t/ b) Notify Health physics prior to entry into the area initially and prior to resuming work after exit. / c) Ensure the area is adequate to support tne work to be completed. g d) Read and understand the RWP. I_ e) Ensure sufficient radiation exposure is available to complete work, f) Attend radiological pre-job briefing by HP which would include: 1. Radiological conditions discussed with workers and applicable survey data available. / 2. Workers instructed in the use of proper radiological practices unique to job scope. / 3. Workers instructed in the use of ~ respiratory protection equipment as required by the RWP. Completed b - Date 88-9/ s

~ ) QAMP-RAP-15-91-g Page (, of A H.P./ALARA PRACTICES Radiation Work Dermits (RWPs) CCMMENT 1 N/A N No. 4 Health Physics involvement discussed with wockers. 5. Procedural review completed. / 6. Job briefings performed for jobs ~~ which excess the limits set in NPAP-10, 4.1.2.N. will be documented on Attach. NPAP-100. NOTE: The signature indicates RWP has been read and understood, job briefing by HP has been given, and the individual will comply with all requirements of both. / g) Sign the RWP sign in sheet similar to Attachmert B, and complete applicable data. / h) Dress in protective clothing and wear dosimetry as required by the RWP. kM / i) Report tne presence of open or --~~ untreated wounds to Health Physics. 4 During work in an area controlled by an RWP, Health Physics personnel shall: a) Take action to prevent the spread of contamination including maintaining good housekeeping. / b) Periodically read self reading dosimetry, if provided. I__ c) Wear protective clothing properly as required by the RWP. Completed z, s __ < Date J-J/-9/

QAMP-RAP-15 4 Page 7 of g ~ H.P./ALARA PRACTICES Radiation Work Permits (RWPs) CCMMENT YES' NO N/A No. [ d) Limit the amount of material that has to be decontaminated or disposed of as radioactive waste. e) Leave the area if conditions - ~ unexpectedly deteriorate significantly. / f) Obey instructions from Health Physics including "stop work orders." g) Decontaminate the area or equipment as instructed by Health Physics. h) Properly remove protective clothing when exiting the area. 1) Inform HP of chaaging work scope or radiological conditions. 5. During work in an area controlled by an RWP, Health Physics personnel shall: a) Provide job coverage as required by the RWP. b) Conduct radiation, contamination, and airborne radioactivity surveys as necessary to determine changing radiological conditions. c) Update the RWP survey results if radiological conditions change significantly. For

example, contamination levels change by a

factor of ten or more; radiation levels change by a factor of two or

more, or; airborne radioactivity levels change by more than 25% of the applicable MPC or approach 25% of the applicable MPC.

Completed Date d - # 8 / ,/ ~ (

f 4 H.P./ALARA PRACTICES Radiation Work Permits (RWPs) COMW.ENT YES NO N/A No. / d) Prepare revisions to the RWP or issue a new RWP if radiological conditions warrant a change. / e) Trend exposure per Section 4.5 informing the HP Supervisor and worker if administrative exposure limits are being approached. 1 6. After exit from the area workers shall take the following actions. a) Frisk or be frisked for contamination as required by the RWP. b) Sign out on the RWP. / c) Return the RWP to the Health Physics Office if work is to be discontinued for more than one shift. /- d) Notify Health Physics of job completion or cancellation. 7. After job completion, cancellation, or RWP termination date Health Physics shall terminate the RWP by the following actions: /__1 a) Complete the RWP log for the activity type. _/ 2 b) Destroy the pink and yellow copies of the RWP. g g c) Review the RWP and sign in sheets for accuracy and errors. Sign and date tne termination blank. 1 d) Forward the RWP for an independent review and signature prior to filing. . /.. Date 3S-9/ Completed b

1 QAMP-RAP-15 O S. i Page 1 of X ~ l COMMENTS: l M M &AeZ42 >~ AA-ma/ '/0/Wm& UL4LEM

sk-mA, RAM f

Assit#AJ2ffm ~nst Exa. ~ \\ J. ' LLAnskdaM-L J aanti> / m :t m M ' x46 -A 28 ewwater/2 f ( / A u' b - d ' m u / d * / Q A J ' ~ m n ia M M s. A atw A ds l&L_4 m ) a/ AuMbJM's/>fs 6 . &-K hm / As mSAAMR&~LA4 ,7/o u.m

2. 7,2:s a huanwo-AMA E 3-s u l $ d e e f- $N i s R Uzed-ss=d v

i Cempleted b - Date 8" # f/ [ i

OAMP- #M./E#/-42.2. l-Page g of J .i I CSMwENTS: A-sb ALk- '4 2d& usn aseedfard/w \\ d dA]WN-ANAN / \\ d4 isAG-mAM No mAA2+2DSSf ( / LL uw-YA 2M1 -, \\ 7 kJsi'm$ b'?$sm N l/m>$)fA_A$s$_YYAd ' AnddfumAu L A MLnacsdAdd-u 2 Darts Xadh/123 4 -s-J L M n = 'a i A K 4 A M G:' e E / /*wA) k' W' W 8f, w&sMAAAMe -L4' J/m sw L M A b e d h f' gg] Q/ / / u w.. = J A J M_ / 1 1 oa e u si \\ 9

d;. . OMS No.1244094 -p - o..,.; -

- - t 5,..

Eapire: 044048 Employee Personal Interview Staht.9.- US. Department bWar <;p e, _., W , ege and Hour Olvi. ion 9 e This report is authertred by Section 11 of the Fair Labor Standards Act and other Wage Hour laws. Wh!!e you are Act(s).to respond. your cooperstlen is needed for the Wage Hour Division to make a determination of cornpliance / i

OJf/

EAxY 0+t,of.., 4-3 3 / EAiwMA' ~ ~' fM 7241 '"TurFCEn,e_a>u hear,s of *es. Mann/hm been) employed by !IC, o e. - - , e. 2,p _.- r, b[b . i,fhue,# eor me oro im.ie perioe trom /hA m *.. W.. ~.,,>,,,>J A,J. h. =# A,# Ni fhowAA AlhfL4NA.d stat nt:

1. }/N//./d. sJ.T

.l'-.C ~ t k s/t B % u/ w a u a d'# 6 v as A \\ i%ui/J2a rk Aaah' i ACW J kMdLELD% LiJ mti1Lu EXskisLX%F 2h G,~r s t i 2 G L,. h w a i & M % i 'i m E i % u ez h As &>i /~. % 4 ~ h 3 %M u4Ahik]%~A 17Hfn, kiL M fAJhd LDx4suf % A 6 #A-iJ D ok Ldn/ R ws MD i kNs % M'm/a' '4A/l /f T&w \\ M altd k uran L, % vna % M J D n A n fiX h GIlu M a H.4A ar QL/1 swa.o./G G D' ~ r '. ~;. t );,a p M L x / n n. r. c7s/s in

7 swe m m .M wu:W A<xbVsf & t i lWAhi&/Wu/awA . p4' As42tq97,,.. ,, _... -.. W. -. -M a/ w $ Av- % an in. +%uA/Av&n xks;hfLi Ild6 ku6kiiht2 /wL2ADidSwan D "S2n' sU k kGfiiho.' AAfashsL>,/zA;- hiiKinl~issnan;bA 'D iuXVnddvowndmarha ,MaunGdWu AL)R hsJn an %ds AJn sLh%21/hitA i i ;,~ % ~, N F A 9 L L l D L J J \\ 'L R MbfJidd 4 2a4~hRET' ./.. ,v-yy, l 2 d $/ UMN k W .U - ht 2,ux au/ An1'%ms AMfv tsM Psa/77nLAlA%} h/5Z% BMhwh 9 Eu %7AbJK'87nr. ~ ~ 5 AlStl4LMbq tlr / (CuAJZc ' TR K1 m #14 ? Dita ' ntukap. su 4/u/n Wi&A.' & dn/am, no 0+ dest-Fin /91 u I I g .,w i l

Interoffice Memo @ Massendeecompegetcaknade Public Service-PPC-91-0519 DATE: April 18, 1991 TO: All Nuclear Operations Personrel FROM: A. C. Crawford, Vice President, Nuclear Operations ATTN: J. B. Baird, NRC Senior Resident Inspector SUBJ: CONCERN RAISED DURING ALL-EMPLOYEE MEETING ( At one of my recent all-employee meetings, a concern was raised regarding the ability to identify safety concerns to QA or the NRC without fear of reprisal from management. I want to make my position crystal clear in this regard. Every employee has the right and responsibility to raise safety concerns when fdentified. This is no different than the responsibility each employee has to stop work if it is not being performed safely or in accordance with regulatory or procedural requirements. Concerns should normally be first raised to your management for resolution prior to taking them outside of your organization. But if this is not possible or has not met with success, do not hesitate to take your issue to QA or the NRC. Federal law prohibits management from discharging or otherwise discriminating against any employee as a result of raising safety concerns to QA or the NRC. I hope this allays any concerns you may have with respect to reporting safety issues. A. C. Crawf6f d l Vice President, Nuclear Operations ACC:FJB:djm 3 \\ l 1om.i.n..

g cmo orment kanoe,m Sm y new we %r tuve.i l This report is autherland by Section 11 of the Fair Labor Standards At and other Wege Hour tows. Wh CD respond, your cooperation is needed for the Wege Hour DMslon to make a determination of compile Act(s). / / 4/n/W ur. / />// YAA -%vk2hW ,ot ~ k lY h]/d i, J ~ ' 'fs" TT Okdrit n - -e a

s. -

a. -. _ e.,

vem of age. lose /hm ban) anpaoyed by IM. /J" 4FlfAr / O for the approximate period from - to

/i///

,, H,R'"%%rl;i% ~ M"W 1 ~ toccuoecon or descretion of ettaal $tOtoment' I / M (( 4 5 t h :.1 % 2 6 S AI M fv & /n'211oah9eZn A s r11, A FRWaK72A XJiWL mb/n&sd M'Asil24<s<>dddw, %%AuD A M A M % % o A s l K 6 M E, it /; L2 77);M 4 &JoAx 22Am./ Ji M dr& W K M Prd %;id/21 ~ n a &,1 b ; d 4 M J ~' ~ ~ ' ~ ~ fs Z h !fi f % K i rlh M & w arc Zr LDAkhuri k/ru LhwX M ina. ' I> '%, P..' Inh Au,r.;4Ac Av mh l ll INT / 6id%Uavl,,esihm Aw k sik s%J/o~d, h, fin,,wfs): astD ) 6 I hi;JtrrAdn d2DirkksJs. ' h2w %%Mi awWssa2;" a -,, (if addisonaa e,.co is need.d consnue on mereel 5-i

W A$ {$// I '.*i' Osf.R $A4n / >w ~% ~ ~ M@W.. i 'E AAwM Nndi . G/ A W M #714 W fat /& ~ ww&&&aHKak/$%. kA1 k lW A b/A21 Y Od } ~HA,kh. nX4%/J. ~ ~ d_. G s 6 1 s f t M l' n H J y n. i,, B a s sAb%. ') NML' A M/f& A9d MNsmJs'ndj & W 1kY' ~Ai K D A2] ] A s sX M m. = 'DisF~ XMWakf% Ahwn As D Asl WdIsCh.'.1A1 W M sA f %nolA S1LXisAmf i Ai) ';lsi %hsia A Hn27L5 %.' l1 Ed %L E AaTi'R f i 2 24md,va k EMk Mh; Ja2 ~ ~ k sT'iik l i D //sw & Li/ Lud'm2/ siawk Asha #bM % XDLE% sYnLADJ " "dGlJM, kc Ln LL%#1,L. %Jrun Al,Ku A im72LLl-ih, ihv naAfafK hh2s : i2~) , L, o #, E. s L.. E.RWZ E o ~ 7- ~ --+-r-n

~ PersonalInterviewStat$t US.C511....;e M bOM A =.. z. , e .y x _. V Wegeand Meer p ,,. t*i# 4'.' ' *** v ' ~ This report s authorized Dr Sectlen 11 of tw' Fair OMr Standards 'Act and other Wa O resporwl,)your cooperation is needed for the Wege Hour DMsion to ~ Ac'*ls). e on of compilanca under the applicatie ( + -. t, Y - )), of -

t. _ -

ICity or tossed ~ State ._ years of age, (was/have been) employed by _ (Tetaphone nwnesri ZIP coes (Estees.oric 0 (Locatw et establishenenti _ for the approximate period from ._ to { litrotsernoseres itses "passeaf*) j (0 _^-tion or descrocon of dw Statement: M d / ]Y h $.1m,,s s24/2./.dk EL/MA' ( .4 Md / k w 3 / > l m u d a.1-k.sw&nd hsL WhiAfCtk D MiBd'd fid~5uCL i 141% mGau%f P Guaa &o 66H2 uA L& fAR O d'YdD*h4 sbzRXW% J, % s % : D 4 L L. D k. h e d h Mt,rADIORL Mcoi2.h,wam/ )%:w&nd%L: AnAuhs,11fL u g g k2/. m,'%r&<bi> L,kwd ~. .. ( Mn't & 3/21 K; sMsdinu A dis'&ii12/212 AAD2einiAux,, ALL,, /au/A/r u) %D VsL/J' ~21b isK LA?T Fly M a A.,c,,,,mr's. w. fa 1/ni %~M r]

... W /-%.&{. W Y!&g- -- W..49-W 2 7 Q. S l t*- A.. , I f u A n W o.. ~ r A a s d p A MRc. m =-- /YNb $lM i / ) d%AGO'mv2It'ZN M2 /%A9 %'h L aA%f9am D kkQ /bfA MA M XM M dbAsya1Md,9 A # 5%//w. % Bo 1td 'A2J '.d]W." ~ ~ ~ Y "%d L/%fh>JJMb An M,h 4 A'd m T J u hao 2 M ALAnA,ux,/ i n u m D A % s "7r ra u A hdf] hk 1lAMM 2 d lhid / h W ^.~ U # acD 27d C' ou,-,,n * ^ ~ b4 dAv:L,e Uh%n : Sit ddmu cv ...1 s. o e

1

. g ..s, ,h.. y

Ao *.st st,en y e This report is authortged by Section 11 of mt Fair t abor Standards Act and other wage Hour tows. White you are not required to d, your coopersson is needed for the Wage Hour Olvisign to make a determination of cornpliance urW the appilcable / /

& gq/ -

< -y 1, of ~ Bb>11tG7 '" D Y i Y f D - 7 7 2 (CJay Fined / Sten ' ZIP Lan (Tet. phone nwnaarl' cars of age Wave becn) employed by / for the approximate period from - Io / t - (Loestion itjw'ishenea'd s / [ (It'stu emplevid i sn L/ $2/h/11,2L A llAlN N 00 ski. " #1 1 .7 m a r u d.n o, d// sun W 'i L s A u... ,,,,e,ne,,,. . An N[71 bdETAL ViX/h/AAAf/d): ki% %Itnaa,E)BsMinau u n A<4 M iriZuk, D JA:is h b64/L.ks>x.1 LUiMbA K a Afss Ls. R K.. /au. s g. 4 4 9 n.f/ZE,A!exbij k J'O fn & D/AviL4 i MiiJ WA mdk K.._.iL._2A. 2d_ m, 2 L Aw L., f,. ~~ i lll / ) ll}$ $5 // // Assh a.sh %%;' K1six,aa-AuA ksinnufiksss/v2 A'2d i 'nuf sA nivfu dismi16u, MVA Dild 9A tiiL'tsJ6.' ~ " ~1 M, id, ko & AJ.,ZmJ fA. &i, 4G,,,VL Of addiden) soane Isingeded continus on reverse) 8-

.., r p.,, y c= 1 c. a 4;... .n. o. :... r. o..;.y. w;aa Cra*aWM Q Wf e Er'elayment Standards Adrr4nistratios Wees and Hour Division This report is authodasd Ey Section 11 of the Fair t. abor Standards Act and other Wege Hour laws.While you are not foquired ,to re,s, pond. your cooperation is needed for the Wage Hour Division to make a determination of compilance under the a c, / o - -4/)>fff ~ ' < o ->jg [iAIA$1'~.' $T R bay.of ld. W C46*~~"~ " ~~" P W If fl ? 7 X 4 ?fl IQTyortousse S ~ ZlFcess ' (Totaphene nummer) F M..Yeert of age. Mave been) employed by d r m.,-- ,o, ine. a,p, o,na,s - / 7 e w to 4 / W m # . 4% o, .n .<y r n,.dii /sh /41YA 0} as DJA /%A /dL

~"**n

- e g tis e,or 4 eonr,, oea /L, hw bjsf D'/ M s>;s,t/n. ,ta,, _ t. ei.aaMa's'AAdwh/sv6h %M XA, A/A (JA' ' ~~..' ' 'LG; n %wilhJm2/nW n k lf1./rI..' 4 h X m lvo u A D d' A A'L a>& D D L & La/5W M i K.'We2,J L ;,Xj K f AL Rh L1k'6A hwMdd2 A d w' L 's X 2 s i G G A 2.<.P 2 M % L suh k ia." rih u L bd h AdA,r,'1/hWL,1&nk ' l i w A & > 'o ! ! y fv 4 h Y / k Z C L u A J Z/ M'MZMLB sn2kaK' 'Dsu 4 KL ink %MJMig L.WL'i12 hkW As-xAkk/7s- ~dLVhw3 A11k k JparawL.~. si .La..h.. iMXW 'il N AauA. ' \\ ge .\\ ~ f a f 'a ****\\ perm M (b h M

~ 4tepeAu$Acv6/e<2f;szA /4g A -g;ci f;+5/#iry-gssed t 'D/Q W Q blicib.T 6 ) rmt.snf' % 4 2 4 /',

nvg OJ.. ( _ ~

% / M 9 F ))y % M j, ~. kDA9m MLAinA'xX 4 % e i d 2,x C m 2 s j & m i x " Ao. '%A &L L s L'/AYinK ~K o Az,M s;vh;i asmW ' N-s J r M a f s k RfA M A J L & r/ \\ 1 6 a L i j s, 9 A o m, K R. . L....' %J st%msL A 4'wKSATJ As Ifr fik sJiskss/M2bl sses/4/ f%Lokk hL22%.L isdAL,/T.' gggg. ~ ' 4 hd is2,6mn1DAjaAumm ff 5h i s i ki h d ?/ L % % ~ ~ &^l ' CPA i/x 2 As Alfhad duRLJ'YhE 'n/ Emdsu and/w sMa ibAT '4 a Li;b l a k Snu a a u ft n %,, ribn2 lip k u M Jith 2 3 1u,LE- ~ Lh> ZJzMuh 25d LG: Esn. 'E%AMnwn:L&k \\ \\ 2nL(uA-i daba JLAR MJi%. L LM MG, R % di . A d,.,.. w i u h a u > d,4 . J a rb 2 1 4 s //

. - - _. ~ _. . _ _ ~ - -.

. -. ;.. J s y..

y U.S. Departmw '.i[. ' ' E " '.:.% %,%g - .- T -c 6,, ; V8est end Howe OMeson.ti J. - k I. ', ' 7,,' ' 4,',,* I to fmoond, your cooperation is needed for the Wage Hour D e l. At(s). mpilan .. ce O.,h,,, , o%-pa,,,,, ? 'l$;p'-QMQ1,.}{, I... t0**.,q y~.. }, s=

r= :

. (Marne es agspoveel [. libanner, seen, apt en) scay er . sum . zie sees ~ ' years of age, (was/have been) employed by (tenon.ny n. nne,s - "': 2 ::: ..s (Loesdon of emetWistwnend for the approximate period from - - to c lif 888 enwiered_ t steen "pensent'1 (Or*'eWon or A' tion of chaossi + l Statement:.- b NA NN N I d i v A D A. b a t e N i n A h 8 c A l.. ~ 'i K u ksn6n n k inanAA / // v A $ 2 11 N 51 $ A1 Y $ A W i d A IE N A U hw asn X.G K 20 ~'. Mmaa6 ,62 M LJ,.Lul a,m.nuf. 1A M 11 Y k B M J 70SOAM JN n 3b? / %lAsn AO f/h JLu nseA ///udlMAwAo b ]bldfi$ A/5t/I& AA2h 4tu*r, dA' o - ,n. _D/s " bi, d ',E. B L o ~ b y W i y / Y. 2 Y M.M., - - n1 " .7 _ A ,..y //k m.! % 6 Awa " ~ W k.<AQ)Jnuwt-AntAAA.. AA,. b .e 4 y afta 99 884.- n -8

5 Emomyment kendere A ~ -~ ~ en nmersue. i 7 This report is arthorfand by Section 11 et me Fair Labor $tendards Act and other Wage Hour laws. While you are not regelred to respond. your c:;;1eh is needed Ser the Wege Hour DMsion to make a det.rmination of compliance under the applicable ~t <s i. 1 4h3/fl- 2 L / ,.W) i $ ) .., 5 7 / T j fftd,/ ~de 2 mk i.,_w . 44f-7kC. n s. n / h 2=. = - i. e.,.u - z 1 ., ~ arc -e s,< s

e. -

,e. ~, <Mrr.,,p'swi,f ^ app,0..,pe - .,s.aT. J" 7. 77."*Ad

== '^ w,_. d Statement: / 8.2-N - LAK hsi AkimAad. A r a c a A lan k L J a te d %AdwwKl 6 REda>&as,. Iin ALL &fnui.hihR & G 's J L 6 6 D a.k/ss u X % Kk oht1 4,6 a.M, nM. ~ ~ ~- ~' - / 1 Gm 9/+/1/ B;//WJAed/dn& i#MELAl b}]d2 rA&isia,/A L i C M A 1 6 im d A A M d/L s/J sin 2 < AL MMA ^l56MJ ' Wrt.8;h1Dd&.kr 2VEMJA o K u x 8 lw n 2, w s M K O W kiinkAbdic %.J K L k2k bs ll l AO / /- ~ A l Ef/ N/A / AA A J k % 2 k ni % m ; iris u 3 M K W o: g -g ...-e ,y Of adddend space la needed condnue se powersal b-

.z 4 .gg,.. s,wsqex w y ' u"u p i.3 ? W 4 / d 6 4 s h H g h. ^gog. m ;4 %ay & 4 ~, n w n - h s u % y f t' li/wh M IG4/ J12J' ff MbiM o Au X L Nh2; L s 'A)h6 L ML mn:ihiDAXs 10pinfLAF 6.k. r,s. /LM,,fisAna. k. ~ '~ ~' Y

> R m u u F s m % v # s G 's L duj

~2i% X k m.2,44 & M 6 w1.' i f2 K s;% 6 A L A M n i A > J Lau Lu;r ninDf/2sikv K A B a i if2 h k L '/ m % f m d a i %MDi h 65bsm>Lfb G'3LWAs]w>ih iJduk av2/6M 194 M a w, ~ 1%d Lf;A h&uh2s/m nAff A w kj K. _,A. J, fr,i,h,. M.. b.>el. .m. l D) .A s a K.. A ; &, &, K. R,, t}/d M J,sn>_ /[ .i.. \\ r/ : A.a.. y g y... s -,,w..,4. s

~ M ~. -.m ..cs.s e a v.mu a / ~ _-. _. akandse Adsnsiaeresten venes and Mevr o e e. J \\ This report is rMM by Section 11 of Wie fr 6r L. abor Standerth Act and other Wege Hour laws. While y a (3 respond yogr cpoperation is needed for the Vtage Hour DMsaon to enake a determinet(on of complian I . Actis). ae - r e, s. .,~, torna Ber. ~ IPleue W ia*Moud ( '. / Imed stTesudeysel (Nisamer eneet,act maJ.... - ~ i fcer er touwd .Steen ZIP sede..= 8 (Tesomene nwneed -oe s. m w omp ove. w .e w :. -for the approximage period from (L.mesasen et mumisswnenet _ te tefeen masseyed a sense pensand g !& 2 er essertpson et enseel Stet:mont: M l. M/V / a / AA hisA 1 / n W o d R s h 's k. K ; M iaA 6 1

a.. / S, L._. W... & A 'tt K L &.I.... !.

f .Ad M l O n-W$ e / ~, BA ~ fM Z} & ' e e. e. e o e m e Form M1 (b. Amy iW M askedanaf an

3. ~w

---a-

yee renonai intervey StateRat U.S. Department cb s e stone -e e venee end Hour om i

Tnis report is authottasd by Section 11 of the Fair Labor Standards Act and other Wage Hour laws. While you are not Ired to respond, your c+ s'm' is needed for the Wage Hour Division to make a determittation of compliance under the appilcable Act(s). 4/25/91 i (Oseal ter. Denver DO mace of nmerwie.4 1, Ed Stroud , of (Name et emp6eysel (Nunter, savest. agn. nej (City er seuse stees ZIP coes (Te6sohens nummer) - o< . ~i emoved av (a- - " for the approminate period from to (t e of astetdishmend page 3 of 3 (it sign wneseyed eines w..a toccuoeson or esacripsen ev eneel i i Sta m. TELEPHONE Ed reported about a meeting which he believes occurred 3/6 according to notas on his calendar. Ed, George McTiernan, Bill Woodard, Marna Porter and John O'Donahugue s (union steward representing Marna) all met together. Meeting was a follovup on George' temo on 2/10 (approx) to Marna criticizing her work. (Bill had directed George to vrite the meno.) Now Marna demanded apology from George for harsh tone of the memo. George apologized at the meeting but Marna vasn't satisfied. She complained to Bill that all H.P. technicians were against her. Ed questioned whether she was complaining specifically about George or all H.P. techs; Marna replied it was all of them, espec-ially contract (ARC) techs. She said she didn 't vant anymore criticism from covorkers. j Bill indicated he vill handle the problem. Ed and George vere dismissed from meeting. Stroud reports that Marna is always in conflict with other employees. Her person-ality is hard to interact with and she is incompetent. When I indicated to Ed that Marna may have made some type of claim of sex discrimination or harrassment against George Ed responed "basaless and ridiculous". In his position as ARC sita repre-seatstive at Fort St. Vrain Ed acts as liason and intermediary between PSCo and ARC and of ten is present at meetings between workers and supervisors. At no time until 1 mentioned sex harrassment did Ed every hear anything like this. Ed believes it's

adst unlikaly such serious charges would be made against an ABC worker without him knowing about it. Another common procedure if there is problem between PSco and ARC is for the fdruer to contact Robert Grant, personnel manager in ARC main office in Georgia, if it involves employees. Ed checked with Grant and learned PUBSco had not contacted him regarding George or any sex charge. I asked Stroud vbether he requests confidentiality for all the information he siawwwi . w a. - vne furnished in the 2 statements. He said no--if his information vill help speed the case to conclusion. co&ndens l 1 -a -x'Th,

s l

2 31 12:36 FORT 5AINT U AIN 9 PAGE.02 3 Interoffice Memo %dh PCC-91-0046 H DATE: May 2, 1991 W TO: Ms. Salte O'Malley, Kelly, Stansfield, & 0'Donnell, H08, Suite 900 u FR(M: Frederick J. Borst, Nuclear Training and Support Manager, F$y ATTN: Messes. A. C. Crawford and C. W. Fuller SUBJ: PREPARATION FOR LITIGATION 4 The following Tnfirmation"'ha s " Teen prepared periour request in ~ 4 anticipatton of litigation. We are,also seektog..your legal advice in this matter. Late in 1990, we brought four (4) cohtric~t' Health' Physics Technicfans to Fort St; Vrain through our contractor, ARC, in order to support n fuel shipping, which was scheduled to begin in February of 1991. ~ i. Shortly af ter February 1,1991, it became obvious that o we were not golag to ship, so we began to prepare to downstre four (4) contract Health Physics Technictans. Initially it was thought that we would staply release the four (4)newestTechatcfans,whichwouldleave o Mr. McTiernan on site. However, through February and early March, n m several things happened which led me to decide to release Mr. McTiernan and keep, instead, Mr. Keith Bare, one of the new a d contract Health Physics Technicians. These included the following: I was getting indication from Mr. Bill Woodard, Health Physics Supervi sor, that Mr. McTiernan's attitude and i morale had been decifning since the first of the year, because he was unhappy that the new Technicians were making i the same salary that he was, and that we were treating .a contractors dif fe rently in terms of eligibility for evertime. I was able to confirri Mr. McTiernan's change in o attttude through personal observation. I was becoteing more and more impressed with Mr. Keith Bare, m both technically and interpersonally. I felt that his response to the contamination event in the Hot Service Factitty was noteworthy. When asked, the PSC Health u Phystes Technicians were unanimous that Keith should be .1 kept. W On March 6,

1991, Mr. John O'Donoghue, the Health Physics Union 5towand, and Ms. Marna Porter, one of our PSC Healta Phystes

+ Technicians, requested a meeting with Bill Woodard and me. At that meeting, Marna empressed her concern wf th the treatment that she was ei receiving from Mr. McTiernan, and stated that she felt that it a L constituted sexual harassment. Mr. O'Donoghue supported her concerns. Management was requested to review the situation and take appropriate action. ] i

Interoffice Memo h PublicServkMr ecc-91-o m edesanneas t.,2;eerw, 2 H91 j J On March 4,1991, Mr. Woodard and I met with Mr. McTiernan to discuss, concerns relative to his interpersoaal skills. Mr. McTiernan dented o that he had a probles, while acknowledging that he was sarcastic. He a indicated that he felt that his comunications style was appropriate, and indicated that he was not willing to change. Immediately following this meeting, I made the decision that Mr. McTlernan would i i be the fourth and final contract Health Phystes Technician to be released due to the fact that we were not shipping f: el. I discussed i 4 this decision with Mr. Chuck fuller on March 8, 1991, and he a concurred. This was six (6) days prior to the discussion that George had with Mr. Paul Miles, a Quality Assurance Inspector, and thirteen -1 i (13) days prior to Mr. McTiernan being informed that he would be released. i It should be noted that Mr. Woodard continued to champion keeping i Mr. McTiernan based on his technical cospetence, and the decision to release Mr. McTiernan was made by se based on siy perceived til fit of a 4 George into the Health Phystes Unit from a team building aspect. One of the stated goals for the Health Physics organization is to have an i a excellent Radiation Protection Progras durtag the Defueling and Decommissioning of Fort St. Vrain. To have such a program requires a cohesive and cooperative group. Mr. McTiernan did not fulfill these i a requirements. I On March 21, 1991, Mr. McTiernan was informed that he was being 4 released, and he became very upset. He demanded that he be allowed a to leave the site immediately, and after conferring with Mr. Don Alps, Security Supervisor, Mr. Woodard decided to let him go for the i 4 day and pull his unescorted access to the protected a rea. d Mr. Woodard called me and informed me of these events at 4 approximately 1:30 pe. I concurred with Mr. Woodard's decision, and 1 mediately called Mr. Fuller to discuss the events of the day, along J with my thought that we consider releasing Mr. McTlarnan4n March 22, a 4 1991, rather than allowing him to stay for several more weeks. s Mr. Fuller concurred with the decision of Mr. Woodard, and agreed i that we should discuss Mr. McTiernan's release date the next day, March 22, 1991. 4 Later on March 21, 1991, after leaving the site, Mr. McTiernan called 8 Mr. Woodard, requested his home phone number, and indicated that he I should be expecting some telephone calls at home that night. When Mr. Voodard informed me of thf s at approximately 4:30 pe on March 21, a a 1991, my interpretation was that Mr. McTiernan was thrntening a Mr. Woodard with harassment or physical harm. W IC3 MM i

m Wt 4 si 12;37 FGRT in;NT v4 A; e P AGE. 0.s Interoffice Memo NdDM PCC-91-0046 m%, gm May 2, 1991 Page 3 H On the morning of March 22, 1991, Mr. McTiernan arrived at the site and announced to all who entered the protected area that he was being u fired for talking to Quality Assurance. Based on my belief that Mr. McTiernan was no longer going to be a productive member of the Health Physics Unit, I stde the decision to release him that day. This decision was ag reed to by Mr. Fuller. In order to allow Mr. McTiernan the opportunity to freely express. his concerns, Mr. Fuller and I inttf ated a private meeting between Mr. McTiernan and Mr. J. 8.

Baird, U.

S. Nuclear Regulatory Consission Seafor Resident inspector, on March 22. 1991, inside the protected a rea. Mr. McTiernan lef t the site late the morning of March 22, 1991. rederickgBorst FJB/alk i = I f FORM ICI nod 490

e TATOs Decr 0A **

~ 1-CHRONOLOGY OF MCTIERNAN EVENT Ettgared for discussion with counsel on 5/23/91 Monday. February 18. 1991 First staff meeting .l Issued " Scenarios" developed at ELT of 2112/91 Next meeting 2i22I91 Discussed work activities Erid_a_y. February 22. 1991 Reviewed proposed changes Ted submitted "four HP" to be released "now" Actually two of fou r already gone Wednesday. March 6.1991 Fuller transmitted destaffing table to Fisher at 0900 Fuller incorporates April date if Multi-shift coverage Release soon if no Multi-shift coverage Borst /Woodard meet with Porter /O'Donoghue Porter feels she is harassed by Mr. McTlernan Friday. March 8.1991 New staffing plan due to Crawford Borst /Woodard meet with Mr. McTiernan regarding Porter Mr. McTiernan denies he has problem Mr. McTiernan states he.will nat change Borst talks to Fuller about letting Mr. McTiernan go Mr. McTiernan is technically qu allfled Woodard would like to keep Mr. McTiernan Mr. McTiernan not a team player-major HP issue Impact on HP staff adverse to making changes Decide to let Mr. McTiernan go. Fuller concurt Discusa.cLks.eping two weeks after notification to give George _ time to adjust-OK Tuesday. Match 12. 1991 Crawford informs ELT that decision on Hiatus staffing is forthcoming, but plan on it (ie early release) >v-

2 Thursday. March 14.1991 Miles performing monitoring of activities on Fuel Deck l Overhears Mr. McTierna n and Miller (?) Miles approaches M r. McTier nan Mr. McTiernan complaining that Porter did not get wipes counted on araveyard shift l Would impact schedule on Fuel Deck M r. McTlernan complains that he would have to finish graveyard

counts, plus dayshift counts-schedule impact Problem was that Automatic couater was down Technically a possible procedural violation Fridav. March 15. 1991 Miles talks to Gappa Asks how things' went on 14th Gappa says OK but didn't get everything done they wante d to because of counting delay Miles intends to talk to Woodard Woodard in Texas Decides to talk to him on Monday, March 18, 1991 Monday. March 18. 1991 Miles talks to Woodard See if procedural violation occurred due to cou nts not J

being read on graveyard shift of 3114!91 1 Bill explains problem with Auto counter Counter contaminated on dayshift 3/13/91 j Graves on 3/14/91 couldn't use counter Better an11gipation on part of Graveyard HP tech could have been done. but not a sericuc problem. No names mentioned betwee n Woodard and Mr. Miles at this time Miles talks to his supervisor (Moore) about the event Miles tells su pervisor that he considers it an isolated instance Miles tells Moore that " Appears to be internal HP problem, not a safety issue" - Moore tells Miles that it is not QA role to get involved in ) l internal problems-agrees not a safety issue Miles thinks issue is dead Thursday. 3/21/91

3 Miles on vacation .i Woodard informs.Mr. McTiernan of his release, offering two week notice or reasonable time to get another~ job Mr. McTiernan becomes extremely Irate Demands to be allowed to go home-Rants that Woodard can't release him because he is buying a new truck i Accuses Woodard of using OA issue to release him-Bill doesn't immediately recall-issue Mr. McTiernan threatens law suit if released Demands to see NRC/OA immediately. then demands to be let off to go home immediately Accuses SEG (site contractor 1 of blackballing him Retracts statement about law suit-again demands to go host i Woodar J confers with Alps on letting Mr. McTiernan go for the day _l Releases Mr. McTiernan for the day l Adminir tratively withdraws unescorted access due to Mr. McTici nan's emotional behavior-Alps recommendation Woo &.rd escorts Mr. McTiernan off-site Mr. McTiernan gets on Gaitronics-says ??? Woodard calls Baird and fills him on on the situation Woodard calls ARC and informs them When Borst returns, Woodard discusses with Borst, and Borst concurs with Woodard's action Borst calls Fuller to let him know of the behavior of Mr. McTlernan when he was informed, and of Mr. Woodard's decision to let Mr. McTiernan go home for the day Borst recommends immediate

release, versus two week notice i

Borst concerned about Mr. McTiernan's unstable behavior i Borst / Fuller agree to decide the next day l Perhaps Mr. McTiernan will have calmed down Mr. McTlernan calls Woodard and demands to know Bill's home telephone number Tells Woodard to expect several phone calls that night i Woodard provides phone number Woodard feels intimidated and threatened Woodard tells Borst of this phone call Friday. 3/22/91 Fuller arrives on site at about 0645 i

.= -..- I+ 4 Observes Mr. McTiernan. at main entry, an nou ncing to all that he was released for talking to QA-nearly out - of

control, emotionally Accuses PSC of refusing to let him talk to NRC Loudly pronounces, that he is going to sue PSC and "get them" Fuller immediately proceeds to Borst's office to discuss with Borst Borst informs Fuller of Mr. McTiernan's phone call demanding Woodard's number Fuller asks Borst about M r.

Ric 1 ternan's allegation 'o n refusal to permit access to NRC Borst questions how PSC was doing that when everyone on site knows JB and his number is published. Also Woodard informed Jh of incident previously Borst calls Baird and informs him that we have an employee who is alleging PSC refuses to let him talk to NRC-sets up meeting between JB and Mr. McTiernan Based on Mr. McTiernan's continued emotional behaviour, Fuller / Borst decide immediate release is appropriate Private meeting between Baird and Mr. McTiernan occurs Miles on vacation 3/25/91 Mr. Miles hears rumor from Moore that-Mr. McTiernan is saying he was released because of his talking to QA Mr. Miles stresses to Moore that he (Miles) had _ approached Mr. McTiernan, and not the other way around Ed Stroud (ARC rep) comes over to.QA to talk to Miles. i

..m Insert interview with Miles Insert comment from Miles that he had heard that we were going to 5e forced to bring George back Insert comment that Miles stated he had been interviewed but that - he didn't know if he had done any good. My comment to tell it like it is 4/26/91 s Walked into Ted's office this pm while he was having a phone conversation with Mary Will. Mary stated that she was under the-understanding that the decision on George was going to go-against us. I asked on what basis and she said that she-wasn't positive, but that it looked like it would be on the fact that the Labor rep. thought' that t there was some basis' to George's assertion that the reason he was let go was because he had talked to QA about a safety issue. This surprised me since George's discussion with QA was not a safety issue at all. 3 I asked Mary what our options were and she stated that we could either pay George the une week's salary that he had lost (between jobs) or that we could go to hearing. I asked what " going to hearing" meant, and she said that is where we could present our case. Obviously, going to hearing -would involve a great deal more expense ' to PSC than one week's salary, but Mary stated that it was really a management decision on what we wanted to pursue. The conversation ended with Mary telling us that she would keep us posted. Apparently the Labor rep still had to get his recommendation through his boss before anything formal came back to PSC. Mary thought that we could be expecting something soon, probably on Monday. 4/29/91 At about 3:40 pm received a call from Frank Novachek. Frank had apparently received an inquiry from the Rocky Mountain News (presumably via Media Relations or Labor Relations) regarding the dismissal of George McTiernan. Frank was unaware of the subject. I filled Frank in on what had gone on from my perspective. I indicated to Frank that I was astounded about the allegation since it

had no merit. Frank specifically wanted to know if we had received anything from the Dept. of Labor regarding the decision from them, I told him I did not know, and that I personally had not received anything. We also discussed the fact that I had been in Ted's office last Friday (4/26/91) when Mary Will; had relayed on her understanding of what the Labor Dept investigator's opinion was (see above). From home, I called Ted Borst to see if he had heard of any formal decision. He said that he had not, but he had been assured by Sally O'Malley and Mary Will that they would let him know as soon as they had gotten anything official. During the course of this conversation. Ted asked me if I recalled that he and I had discussed the release of George McTiernan hs.fne the incident with QA, so it didn't make any sense that George could assert that that was the reason he was let go. I told Ted that I would have to check my notes. but that is also exactly how I remembered it. I also asked Ted if he felt there was any way he or I could be on the " garden path'. He said he didn't think so--everything was on on the up and up. We discussed the fact that Bill Woodard was very supportive of George with respect to not letting him go because of George's technical skill. Again, neither Ted, nor Bill, nor I had any heartburn with George's technical skill. In fact from a technica'. perspective, Bill was in favor of letting Keith Bear (?) go and keeping George. Ted and I had discussed that earlier (again before the QA incident) and concluded that equally important to the technical issue was the teamwork issue. George had a reputation of not being a team player within HP and elsewhere, and this is exactly what the major issue was in HP, both from our prospective and the NRC. Ted and my objective was to develop a better team in HP I also asked Ted about Mary Will's passing comment on the Friday conversation about sexual discrimination with regard to her belief that Marna had said that during her interview. Ted stated that on March 6,1991, during Ted's interview with Marna (John O was present) Marna had said that she felt that George was discriminating against her just because she was a woman in HP. This is different than Marna's statements to me previously, (back in November, 1990) in which she stated that she wasn't sure what was meant by sexual discrimination, but she didn't think so. Ted and I both remember that during those interviews. Marna didn't zeally want to point the finger at anybody (regarding the possible harassment she was

. =.. 1 getting--see the.Marna Porter files but that she was suspicious of one person. I had to press Marna to say who that was, but she. eventually indicated that her - feelings were directed-at George McTiernan. i t 4 2 L l 1 1 ..}}

ML20077D117

Contents

Text

SUBJECT:

REFERENCE:

Dear Mr. Milhoan:

Dear Department Personnel,

Dear Mr. Woodard:

5.0 CONCLUSION

4.0 REFERENCES

5.0 CONCLUSION

4.0 REFERENCES

5.0 CONCLUSION

Navigation menu

ML20077D117

Text

SUBJECT:

REFERENCE:

Dear Mr. Milhoan:

Dear Department Personnel,

Dear Mr. Woodard:

5.0 CONCLUSION

4.0 REFERENCES

5.0 CONCLUSION

4.0 REFERENCES

5.0 CONCLUSION

Navigation menu

Search