ML20077B789

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-373/83-12 & 50-374/83-10.Corrective Actions: Personnel Briefed Re Proper Classification & Parameters to Be Considered When Evaluating Emergency Plan
ML20077B789
Person / Time
Site: LaSalle  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 07/11/1983
From: Farrar D
COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To: James Keppler
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION III)
Shared Package
ML20077B787 List:
References
6783N, NUDOCS 8307250435
Download: ML20077B789 (3)


Text

.

~'

Commonwealth Edison

  • /

o one First Nati nal Plata. Chicago, Ilkncis O 7 Addrzss Riply to: Post Offica Box 767 y Chicago. Illinois 60690 July 11, 1983 Mr. James G. Keppler, Regional Administrator

- Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 799 Roosevelt Road Glen Ellyn, IL 60137

Subject:

LaSalle County station Units 1 and 2 Response to Inspection Report Nos.

50-373/83-12 and 50-374/83-10 l

NRC Docket Nos. 50-373 and 50-374

{

t Reference (a):

W. D. Shafer letter to Cordell Reed l

l dated June 13, 1983.

Dear Mr. Keppler:

This letter is in response to the inspection conducted by Messrs. W. G. Guldemand and A. L. Madison on March 11 through April 10, 1983, of activities at LaSalle County Station.

Reference (a) indicated that certain activities appeared to be in noncompliance with NRC requirements.

The Commonwealth Edison Company response to the Notice of Violation is provided in the enclosure.

To the best of my knowledge and belief the statements contained l

herein and in the attachment are true and correct.

In some respects

(

these statements are not based upon my personal knowledge but upon i

information furnished by other Commonwealth Edison employees.

Such information has been reviewed in accordance with Company practice and I l

believe it to be reliable.

l If you have any further questions on this matter, please direct them to this of fice.

Very truly yours, 4,hs D. L. Farrar Director of Nuclear Licensing CWS/1m Attachment cc:

NRC Resident Inspector - LSCS 6783N 0307250435 830719 PDR ADOCK 05000373 g

PDR

~6' 1

ATTACHMENT Response to Item of Noncompliance Inspection Report Nos.

50-373/83-12 ano 50-374/83-10 Item of Noncompliance Technical Specification 6.2 requires that detailed written procedures shall be written, approved and adhered to for emergency conditions involving potential or actual release of radioactivity and references both-the " Generating Station Emergency Plan" and station emergency and abnormal procedures.

LaSalle Emergency Procedure LZP 1310-1, " Notifications", specifies the communications-requirements for an Unusual Event and Table LA 5-1 of the Generating Station Emergency Plan requires that an Unusual Event be declared-in the event of a non-spurious ECCS initiation.

Contary to the above requirements, on March 22, 1983, following a react'or

-scram, the High Core Spray System automatically initiated and an Unusual Event was not declared nor were the notifications required by LZP 1310-1 made.

}

' Response Corrective Action Taken and Results Achieved The required ENS phone notification was made within one hour of the event identifying the Reactor Protection System actuation (reactor scram)'and High Pressure Core Spray (HPCS) initiation Additionally, the. Unit Operating Engineer and Assistant Superintendent Operations were notified of the event within a short time.

While the HPCS did auto ~ initiate (not spurious) and assist in returning reactor water level to normal; the event was not considered as a loss of Primary

- Coolant as identified in Generating Station Emergency Plan (GSEP) l implementing procedures and thus the Unusual Event classification was not identified.

Ai the time of the notification, the primary concern was, in fact, high reactor water level.

i I

y c-w

--,s--.+,

y

--me

.-.r e..-,-, - -

-,e.- - -.... -.-

s'

, Corrective Action Taken To Avoid Further Noncompliance The station personnel involved in the event have been briefed-as to the proper classification and parameters which must be considered when evaluating GSEP classification.

Additionally, the reporting requirements of this event will be presented to the licensed shift supervisors.

Date When Full Compliance Will Be Achieved Full compliance has been achieved at this time.

6783N l

t

-