ML20076E935
| ML20076E935 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Limerick  |
| Issue date: | 08/22/1983 |
| From: | Bradley E PECO ENERGY CO., (FORMERLY PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC |
| To: | Schwencer A Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8308250129 | |
| Download: ML20076E935 (4) | |
Text
,
'y s
PHILADELPHIA ELECTRIC COMPANY e
2301 MARKET STREET P.O. BOX 8699 PHILADELPHIA. PA.19101 EDW ARD G. B AUER. J R.
a osans at counsak
- hY EUGENE J. GR ADLEY 4h ~ '?
assoc,a,...m..a6co s.6 DON ALD BLANxEN
)
RUDOLPH A. CHlLLEMS August 22, 1983 E.C.xiRxHALL T. H. M AHER CORN ELL PAUL AUERE ACH assistant asummas covmeak EDW ARD J. CULLEN, J R.
THOM AS H. MILLER, J R.
IRENE A. McMENN A mesisvaser counssk Mr.
A.
Schwencer, Chief Licensing Branch No. 2 Division of Licensing U.
S.
Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
Subject:
Limerick Generating Station, Units I and 2 Procedures and Test Review Branch Re ference :
PECO and NRC Conference Call dated August 3, 1983 File:
GOVT l-1 (NRC) i
Dear Mr. Schwencer:
f As a result of the discussions in the reference conference call the attached revised draft FSAR page changes addressing the availability of approved test procedures for the initial test program will be incorporated into the FSAR, exactiv as i
it appears on the attachments, in the revision scheduled for September, 1983.
Sincerely, O
I Euge e B adley RJS/gru/13 Copy to:
See Attached Service List 8308250129 830822 O
\\
i
a s'
cc:
Judge Lawrence Brenner (w/o enclosure)
Judge Richard F. Cole (w/o enclosure)
(w/o enclosure)
Judge Peter A. Morris Troy B. Conner, Jr., Esq.
(w/o enclosure)
Ann P. Hodgdon, Esq.
(w/o enclosure)
Mr. Frank R. Romano (w/o enclosure)
Mr. Robert L. Anthony (w/o enclosure)
Mr. Marvin I. Lewis (w/o enclosure)
Judith A. Dorsey, Esq.
(w/o enclosure)
Charles W. Elliott, Esq.
(w/o enclosure)
Jacqueline I. Ruttenberg (w/o enclosure)
Thomas Y. Au, Esq.
(w/o enclosure)
Mr. Thomas Gerusky (w/o enclosure)
Director, Pennsylvania Emergency Management Agency (w/o enclosure)
Mr. Steven P. Hershey (w/o enclosure)
Angus Love, Esq.
(w/o enclosure)
Mr. Joseph H. White, III (w/o enclosure)
David Warsan, Esq.
(w/o enclosure)
Robert J. Sugarman, Esq.
(w/o enclosure)
Martha W. Bush, Esq.
(w/o enclosure)
Spence W. Perry, Esq.
(w/o enclosure)
Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board (w/o enclosure)
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel (w/o enclosure)
Docket and Service Section (w/o enclosuru)
/
4 DRAFT
(
SUT-6."
These procedures comply with the general guidelines and regulatory positions contained in Regulatory Guide 1.68 (Revision 2, August 1978).
Test abstracts establishing the objectives, prerequisites, test method, and acceptance criteria for these procedures are presented in Table 14.2-3.
i 14.2.,11 TEST PROGRAM SCHEDULE The schedule, relative to the initial fuel loading date, for conducting each major test phase of the initial test program is presented in Figure 14.2-1.
This figure illustrates that the preoperational test program is scheduled for 15 months duration i
for Unit 1, 12 months duration for Unit 2, and that the L
subsequent startup test programs are scheduled at 3 months duration for each unit.
Since Unit 2 fuel load is scheduled at 18 months after Unit I fuel load, the test programs do not overlap.
However, if schedule compression occurs, the staffing and organization of the groups responsible for the initial test programs preclude significant divisions or dilutions of responsibility.
Approved; test procedures are intended to be available for NRC review at least 60 days prior to scheduled implementati The sequential schedules for conducting individual preoperational tests for each unit are presented in Figures 14.2-6 and Figure 14.2-7.
These sequential schedules offer one possible
~~{u scRT plan for an orderly and efficient progression of testing.
While -
these sequences may be preferred, numerous acceptable h)G*p alternatives exist because few preoperational tests are dependent on performance of other preoperational tests.
The actual test gq;'
sequences are determined daily at the jobsite to reflect construction status, manpower availability, and test prerequisite status.
The sequential schedule for conducting Unit I and Unit 2 startup tests is presented in Figure 14.2-5.
This schedule establishes the required order of startup testing as a function of test phase and power level.
Even though this basic order of testing is required, there is still considerable flexibility in sequencing the startup testing specified to be conducted at each test phase or startup level.
Detailed startup testing schedules, commensurate with the requirements of this schedule, are developed at the jobsite to schedule startup testing when opq[ationally expedient.
(
14.2-21 Rev. 10, 09/82 m.,._ - _-_-,..._ ___ m,y m
-,m, pewcm.,._y_._...._.
DRAFT Copics of approved test procedures for fuel loading startup testing (zero power testing),
, initial through Phase II of the initial test program are i tand supporting activities available for NRC examination not less than 60 days prior to th n ended to be scheduled fuel load date.
(Low Power Testing Copics of test procedures for Phase III e
the initial test progra)m are intended to be avail bland Phase IV (Po of examination not less than 60 days prior to the schedul d f a
e for NRC load date.
Every effort will be made t6 provide approved t e
uel procedure ')
- however, rocedures will be provided.if such procedures are not available, cop of draft est GRum I w @
i
/
Tusa,
Pe,
/4. 2. - 2. /
l l
l l
- _