ML20076A639

Forwards Unpublished 1980 Per Curiam Decision of Us Court of Appeals for DC Circuit in Duke Power Co Vs Nrc,Per ASLB 830808 Request During Prehearing Conference.Related Correspondence

ML20076A639
Person / Time
Site:	Catawba
Issue date:	08/16/1983
From:	Cottingham A DEBEVOISE & LIBERMAN, DUKE POWER CO.
To:	Callihan A, Foster R, Kelley J Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
80-2253, NUDOCS 8308180230
Download: ML20076A639 (2)

Text

---~w-- . .v.. ..

/ P*ATED COI:f!ESPONntWes DOCKETED l uw orrices or OEBEVOISE & LIBERMAN imo'$3cv g g s - w WASHINGTON. O C. 2 0 Ocypnowc goaqasj-eeCo 00CXE-ijn3 & Sgg<yy,r DRANCH August 16, 1983 fir. James L. Kelley Chairman Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Dr. Richard F. Foster Conmission Post Office Box 4263 Washington, D.C. 20555 Sunriver, Oregon 97702 Dr. A. Dixon Callihan Union Carbide Corporation Post Office Box Y Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 Re: Duke Power Company, et al. (Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2), Docket Nos. 50-413, 50-414 .

Gentlemen:

Pursuant to the Board's request during the August 8, 1983 prehearing conference in this proceeding, I am enclosing, on behalf of Mr. McGarry, a copy of the unpublished 1980 per curiam decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit in Duke Power Company v. NRC.

Sincerely, ,

ffb k V VD '

Anne W. Cottingham cc: All Part,ies Enclosure 8308180230 830816 PDR ADOCK 05000413 *

.O .PDR

~

,lf3 ,

• I ,

4.0R T.O. BE. FUBLISHED - SEE LOCAL RULI a (t) hitch States Enurf of AppealsFoR THE DisT AiCT oF Co6UMBI A CIRCulT No. 80-2253 September Term,198c Duke Power r.oupany, Fetitioner United StatBS COUit Of App 031s fer the District cf Cc,l.me!2 Circ ::

v.

United States Nuclear Regulatorv Cor=iission ALED SEP 2 9 rI -

.o

• "d GEORGE

• CLERK A. FISHER United Matas of America, Respondents PETITION FOR REVIE'4 0F AN ORDER OF THE UNITED STATES UUCLEAR REGULATORY CG1 MISSION Before: TAIM ,and 'JII. KEY, Circuit Judges; and FRIED}M*, Chief Judge, United States Court of Claims 2 R,R & E Upon consideration of Peti :ner's request for review of the rule on emergency planning of the Respondent Nuclear Regulatcry Commission (see 45 Fed.

Res. 55,402 (1980), it is ,

ORDERED, by the Court, that the petition be dismissed, since there is no live controversy before the Court at this time. At oral argument Respondent's counsel gave unequivocal assurance that Respondent will judge Petitioner's compliance with the rule according to the standard of performance criteria promulgated in November 1980 jointly by Respondent and the Federal Emergency Management Agency, and Petitioner's counsel stated that this would be entirely satisfactory.

Per Curisr.

For the Court A c.o W ,

George .. Fisher Clerk

• Sitting by designation pursuan't to Title 28 U.S.C. S293(a) .

J

~

Bills of ecsts must be filed v;ithin 14 days af ter entry of jutp: cut. The Court ice.s with disf avor l

upon mots.ons to flie bills of costs cut of ti e.

.