Text

Performance Indicators for Apr 1991
	ML20073Q587
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	04/30/1991
From:	Gates W; OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:	; NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
	LIC-91-167R, NUDOCS 9105300171
	Download: ML20073Q587 (100)
	v • d • e

6 Omaha PutAlc Power District 444 South 1Gth 5treet Mi!

On u'u, Ne taa.Ga 6810?-2247 43?/f36 2000 May 20, 1991 LIC-91-167R U. S. Iluclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Mail Station Pl-137 Washington, DC 20555

Reference:

Docket IJo. 50-285 Gentlemen:

SUBJECT:

fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicators Please find enclosed the monthly fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicator Report dated April, 1991.

If you should have any questions, please contact me.

Sincerely, 7

st &,

f1

')

. M-

/Au6, W. G. Gates Division Manager Nuclear Operations WGG/sel c:

LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby & MacRae R. D. Martin, f1RC Regional Administrator, Region IV W. C. Walker, NRC Project Manager R. P. Mullikin, NRC Senior Resident inspector B. A. Boger, NRC Director, Reactor Project 111, IV, and V Special Projects l

9105300171 910430 l

l PDR ADOCK 05000205 R

PDR i

455124 D v rM', }f

.ML V

U.t J

FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS APRIL 1991 c^m

-IN I lll@

-wel,.

ms y

s,

,i Prepared by:

Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group

t I

i

)

kwd,ofura%zwwn,audnA...

d tawak wudarn, wnd wwndjud anud...

g d w a, 2 Pdiam,, cam

%g, cornandaned...

4 d w a, way, of !;!s...d w do&ng, bkjob i

W 6% / d 6, weaf 6.

Jl w 9

A wnev-dimbd, ud bk mal y udevnal

~

paa, a w owu ows fe wedb wk un, ws wnd bk p6 wnd $tadies idcomlwn,?niing,ik 9Vkndof puson,, mdjud u de&ng, iG 9Vk.p

)aans).6%wu 1'wvw

- W-9 y ur wftTr

med' w*-vt-CM-wt-w*mr MTe y -ww 1 ww **e M-D s'v N1gare' w t*

qqW-c'=--g-ew y wmW y*

Tw tirm-y 9 a opp +t 9 m-pp g *w upi 4--

.p+-44+My m + ei e 9 ay yr g

afe gg q y ' g *yg gy-,,,

wwgy39-r y yyymage 7.p g- -

^

Omaha Public Power District Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicator Report c

Prepared By:

Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group April 1991

fort Cclhoun Station' Performance indicator R* port ABSTRACT PURPOSE The ' Performance Indicators Program' is intended to provide selected Fort Calhoun plant performance information to OPPD's personnel responsible for optimizing unit performance. The information is presented in a way that provides ready identification of trends said a means to track progress toward reaching corporate goals. The information can be used for assessing and monitoring fort Calhoun's plant performance, with emphasis on safety and reliability. Some performance Indicators show company goals or industry information. This information can be used for comparison or as a means of promoting pride and motivation.

SCOPE The conditions, goals, and projections reflected within this report are current as of the end of the month being reported, unless otherwise stated.

In order for the Performance Indicator Program to be effective, the following guidelines were followed while implementing the program:

1) Select data which most effectively monitors Fort Calhoun's performance in key areas.

2) include established corporate goals and industry information for comparison.

31 Develop formal definitions for each performance parameter. This will ensure consistency in future reports and allow comparison with industry averages where appropriate.

Comments and input are encouraged to ensure that this program is tailored to address the areas which rire most meaningful to the people using the report. Please refer comments to the Test and Performance Group, To increase personnel awareness of Fort Calhoun Station's plant performance, it is suggested that this report be distributed throughout your respective departments.

REFERENCES INPO Good Practices OA 102, " Performance Monitoring Management Information' INPO Report Dated November 1984, ' Nuclear Power Plant Operational Data' NUMARC 87 00, " Guidelines and Technical Bases for NUMARC Initiatives Addressing Station Blackout at Light Water Reactors *, Revision 1, Appendix D, 'EDG Reliability Program *, dated April 6,1990, i

Fcrt C8thoun Station Peform:nce Indicator Rsport Table of Contents INDUSTRY KEY PARAMFTERS PAGE ForcedOutageRate.................................................................................................2 Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical.................................................. 3 Unplanned Saf ety System Actuations(INPO Definition)................................................ 4 Unplanned Saf ety System Actuations(NRC Definition)................................................... 5 GrossHeatRate..................................................................................................0 E q ui v a l e n t A v a il s bili t y Fa c t o r.................................................................................... 7 F u e l R e li a bilit y I n d i c a t o r............................................................................................ 8 Personnel R a diation E xposure (Cumula tive)............................................................... 9 Volum e o f (.ow le vel S olid R a dio a c tive Wa s t e............................................................. 10 Di s a bli n g i nj u ry F r e q u e n c y R a t e............................................................................ 1 1 F

OfERATIONS S t a t io n N e t G e n e r a tio n..........................................................................................

ForcedOutageRate................................................................................................2 Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical..................................................... 3 Unplanned Saf ety System Actuations - (INPO Definition)................................................ 4 Unplanned Saf ety System Actuations (NRC Definition)...................................................

5 GrossHeatRate....................................................................................................6 E q ui v al e n t A v a il a bili t y Fa c t o r...................................................................................... 7 Fu e i R e lia bilit y i n d ic a t o r....................,,,...................................................................... 8 D a ily Th e r m a l O u t p u t............................................................................................... 1 2 Equipment Forced Outages per 1000 Critical Hours.................................................... 13 O p era tion s a nd M a int a na nc e Bu d o e t.......................................................................... 14 DocumentReview.................................................................................................15 MAINTENANCE Eme rg ency Die sel G e ne ra t or Unit R elia bili ty................................................................ 16 Die s el G en e ra t or R elia bility ( 2 5 De ma n d s )................................................................... 17 Age of Outstandin g Maintenance Work Orders........................................................... 18 M a int e na n c e Work O rd e r Br eakd own......................................................................... 19 Corrective M aint enance Backlog > 3 M oriths Old...................................................... 2 0 Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance............................................................... 21 i

______.-___m MAINTENANCE (con't)

EACt[

Pr e ve n ti ve M a int en a nc e 't e m s O ve r d u e..................................................................... 2 2 Number of Out.of. Service Control Room Instruments.................................................... 23 I

M a i n t e n a n c e O v e rt i m e.......................................................................................

Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance)...................................................... 2 5 Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non. Outage)........................................... 20 Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities:

( E l e c t r ic a t M a in t e n a n e e )...............................................................................

( Pr e s s u r e E q u i p m e n t ).................................................................................... 2 8 (G e n e r a l M alnt e n a nee).................................................................................

( M e c ha nie al M sint en a nc e ).............................................................................. 3 0 (In s t r u me nt a tion & C ontr 01)............................................................................ 31 Number of Surveillance Tests Resulting in License? Event Reports.................................. 32 Number of Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPRDS) Reportable Failures.................. 33 M s in t e n a n c e E t f e c ti v e n e s s..................................................................................

C h e c k Wlv e F a ilu r e R a t e........................................................................................

CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION Pers onnel Ra diation E xposure (Cumulative).................................................................. 9 Volume of Low level Solid Ra dioa ctive Wa s te.............................................................. 10 S e e o n d a ry S y s t e m C h e mi s try.................................................................................... 3 0 Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit............................................ 37 Auxiliary Systems Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits............................................ 38 i n Line Che mis try Inst rumen t s Out-of Service.............................................................. 3 9 H a r a rd ou s Wa st e Pr od uced....................................................................................... 4 0 M a ximu m Indi vid u al R a dia tion E x po s ur e...................................................................... 41 Tot al S kin a nd Clot hing Conta mina tion s...................................................................... 4 2 De cont a min at ed Au xilia ry Building............................................................................. 4 3 Ra diologic al Work Pra clic e s Prog r a m......................................................................... 4 4 NumberofHotSpots.............................................................................................45 Gaseous Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Envitcament................................. 46 Liquid Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Environment..................................... 47 il

~ - - -

i Fort Calhoun Station Performance indicator Report Table of Contents ECURITY PAGE l

Log g a ble/ Report a ble incid ents (Security)..................................................................... 4 8 S e c u rit y i n c id e n t Br e a k d o w n.................................................................................... 4 9 S e c u r i t y S y a t e m F a il u r e s..........................................................................

..........50 l

MATERIALS AND OUTSIDE SERVICES Amount o f Wor k On H old A wa itin g Pa rt s................................................................... 51 S p a r e Pa rt s i n ve n t o ry V a l u e...................................................................................... 6 2 S p a r e P a rt s I s s u e d...................................................................................................

I n v e n t ory A e e u r a c y.................................................................................................. 5 3 StockoutRate......................................................................................................63 E x p e di t e d Pu r c h a s e s.............................................................................................. 5 4 i

lnVolceDreakdoWn..................................................................................................55 M a t e rial R e q u e s t Pla n n in g......................................................................................... 5 5 DESIGN ENGINEERING Cuts t a ndin g M odific a tion s.........................................................

...........................56 Te m pora ry M o dific a tion s.......................................................................................... 5 7 Outstanding Engineering Assistance Requests (EAR's).................................................. 58 En gin e erin g Cha n ge N otic e S t a t u s.............................................................................. 5 9 E n gine e rin g C ha ng e N o tic e Br e a kd o wn..............................,........................................ 60 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY Dis abling inju ry Fr e q u e ncy R a1e................................................................................. 1 1 R e c ord a ble inj ury Ca a e s Fr eque ncy R a t e..................................................................... 61 HUMAN RESOURCES N umber of Personnel Errors R eport ed in LER s.............................................................. 62 P e r s onn e l T u rn o v e r R a t e...............................................................................

S t a f fin g L e v e l......................................................................................................... 6 3 TRAINING AND QUAllFICATION S R O / R O Lic e n s e E x a mina tion Pa s s R a tio................................................................... 64 Lic e n s e C a n d i d a t e E x a m s..............................................................................

l H o tlin e Tr a inin g M e m o s.......................................................................................... 6 0 lii

,.,__._,--u-u

l TRAINING AND OUALIFICATION -(cont'41....

....PAGE T o t a l I n s t r u c tio n H o u r s..................................................................................... 6 7 Total Hours o f S tud en t Training..........................................

........................68 RITUEllNGAUTAG.E MWO Overall Status (1991 Refueling Outage)............

........................................69 Progress of 1991 Outage Modification Planning............................................. 70 Overall Project Status (1991 Ref ueling Outage).................................................... 71 QUAllTY / SSURANCE Number of Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours.....................

...................72 Cumulative Violations and Non Cited Violations (NCV's)........................................73 O ut st a ndin g Cor r ective Action R eport s (C AR's)...................................................., 74 Overdue and Extended Corrective Action Reports.................................................. 7 5 CARS issued vs Significant CARS vs NRC Violations issued vs t ER: Reported.............. 70 PE R F O R M A N C E IN DI C AIQR D E FINITI O N S.,......................................................... 7 7 INDEX TO S AFETY ENH ANCEMEfT PROGRAM (SEP) INDIC ATORS...............,,............. 80 PERFORM ANCE INDIC ATOR REPORT DISTRIBUTION LISI.......................................... E 8 SUMM ARY SECTION A d v e r s e T r e n d R e p o rt................................................................................ 8 9 Indicators Needing increased Management Attention......................................... 89 Performance Indicator Report Improvements / Changes........................................ 90 l

iv

l l

50-C Nel Generation (10.000 Mw hours 40-35 1 31.27 30 --

2_C Q9 23 1 26.94 2 _4,16

,l 24.76 24 23 21 03 20 -

i 1 31 y

10 -

e 47

'I'

j 0

May90 Jun Jul Aug Sept Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr91 STATION NET GENERATION This indicator shows the not generation of the Fort Calhoun Station for the report-in0 month.

Durin0 the month of April 1991, a not total of 219,323 MWH was Generated by the Fort Calhoun Station. This low not generation reflects the fact that the Fort Calhoun Station was operated at planned reduced power for the entire month of April,1991.

Data Source:

Station Generation Report Adverse Trend: None 1

1

15% -

- Forced Outage Rato

- O Fort Calhoun Goal (2.4%)

-O~ Industry Upper 10 Percentile (0.25%)

GOOD gy

-ri l

9% -

y 4

j 0% -

n 9"J 3%-

O-O--

-O-O-

4--O-

-O-O-

-O -

O-O.

C 1.4

d 3 _ _..O - -- 0 -- - - O --- - D - D - - O - - - O -- - O - - - O - - - O - - -O 0

'88 '89 '90 May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 FORCED OUTAGE RATE The forced outage rate was reported as 11.9% for the last twelve months.

To achieve the Fort Calhoun Station (FCS) forced outage rate goal of 2.4% the plant cannot be forced off line more than 19 hours2.199074e-4 days 0.00528 hours 3.141534e-5 weeks 7.2295e-6 months for the remainder of 1991.

Note: If no forced outages occur, the 12 month average Forced Outage Rate will remain constant at 11.9 A until August when it will decrease due to the August 1990 forced outage being deleted from the 12 month interval.

Data Source:

NERC GAD Forms Adverse Trend: None l

2 l

3 T Fort Calhoun Goal

-U-Industry Uppor 10 Porcentiio FCS Reactor Scrarns 2-1 O-O-

Cr-O-

O O-

--O

-C 0

0 0 0

0 0

D D

0 0

O e

0 0--O o

0-

'67 '88 '89 '90 May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr91 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL There were no unplanned automatic reactor scrams in April 1991. The last un-planned automatic reactor scram occurred on July 2,1986.

The 1991 goal for unplanned automatic reactor scrams while critical has been set at zero.

The industry upper ten percentile value is zero scrams per unit on an annual basis.

The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper ten percontile of nu-clear power plants in this area.

Data Source:

Plant Licensee Event Reports (LER)

Adverse Trend: None 3

3-Safety System Actu%ons

+ Fort Calhouc. Goal Industry Upper 10 Percentile 2-GOOD Y

1 1 -

4 d13 0

0 1

~

0 0

6 G

G O

O O

G L

O Cr G-

'68

'89

'90 May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mct Apr91 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS - (INPO DEFINITION)

There were no unplanned safety system actuations during the month of April 1991.

The 1991 goal for the number of unplanned safety system actuations is zero.

The industry upper ten percentile value for the number of unplanned safety system actuations per year is zero. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently perforrning in the upper ten percentile of nuclear power plants for this indicator.

Data Source:

Plant Licensee Event Reports (LER)

Adverse Trend: None 1

I 4

..___~_ _ _____._._ _

O Safety System Actuations (SSA';

12 Month Running Total SSA

Critical Hours 10-8'

-600

~"'s

,!% * * ~ ~ 3,

,'\\

,m.

7 s

s

/

'\\/

I f\\

...,[g

/

6

\\ l/

600 i

e s

'\\

\\

l

\\

,l i

4-

\\

j

\\j 400

\\

,I

'2 2-I 200 1 1

/1 1

/

0-l+

[,

o

'88 '89 '90 MJ J A S O f4 D J FMAMJ J A S O f4 D J FMA UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS - (NRC DEFINITION)

This indicator shows the number of unplanned safety system actuations LSSA's) which include the High and Low Pressure Safety injection Systems, the Safety injection Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators. The NRC classification of SSA's includes actuations when major equipment is operated and when the logic systems for these safety systems are challenged.

The last event of this type occurred in November 1990 when the Diesel Genera-tors DG-1 and DG-2 experienced anticipatory starts when the turbine was tripped due to a forced shutdown of the plant. This forced shutdown was due to an in-strument Air System line failure in the Turbine Building.

The majority of SSA's displayed above were related to 1990 Refueling Outage activities and are currently being reviewed under the Safety System Actuation Reduction Program. The goal of this Program is to reduce the number of SSA's at

- Fort Calhoun.

Data Source:

Plant Licensee Event Reports (LER; Adverse Trend: None 5

13 -

l-

-1 Monthly Gror.s Hoat Rato

-A-Year to-Date Gross Heat Rato

-o-- Fort Calhoun 1991 Year End Goal I

12 -

-G-Industry Upper 10 Percentile Rm 8

11 -

GOOD y

10270 10520 10304 M44 -o.

.. o

.o.

..o.

g,) -

.o-o St_ =gs 10 - 4 Ja=

=c1

c:

c e

o a

e___e_.__e a

[

3 9

'88 '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc 01 GROSS HEAT RATE The Gross Heat Rate Indicator goal has been changed. This goal was changed due to the rescheduling of the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage which resulted in a reduction in operating power to save fuel.

This indicator shows the Gross Heat Rate (GHR) for the reporting month, the previ-ous 1991 months, the year to date value, and the year end GHR for the previous 3 years.

The gross heat rate for the Fort Calhoun Station was reported as 10,424 BTU /

KWH during the month of Aprs.

The year-to date gross heat rate was reported as 10. '43 BTU /KWH.

The above year-end Fort Calhoun goal (10,250 BTU /KWH) is the theoretical best gross heat rate that can be achieved by the Fort Calhoun Station during 1991.

The gross heat rate industry upper ten percentile value is 9,935 BlV/KWH.

Data Source:

Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trends: None 6

l l

C Monthly EAF Year to Dato EAF

-O-Fort Calhoun Year to Dato Goal 100% -

0- Industry Upper 10 Percentile 9

r g.

..g.

..g.-U-

-0 -D-

- D- -O g

gg

. _c_....o - 4 9_e o _-e_o- ---(.-- e 66600%-

A

.~

I4W-s

,_J _

l GOOD

,1 20% -

g

'88 '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec01 EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF), year-to

-date EAF for 1991, and the EAF for the previous 3 years.

The EAF was reported as 91.62% for the month of April. The EAF was not of-fected by the 70% power reduction during February, since the reduction was under management control and for reasons of economy (fuel savings).

The year to-date EAF was reported as 87.48%.

The EAF Fort Calhoun goalis 69% for 1991.

The EAF industry upper ten pe centile value is 82.5%.

Data Source:

Dietz/Parra (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trends: None 7

6-Fuel Rollability Indicator

-e-Fort Calhoun Goal (1,4)

. Industry Upper 10 Percentile (.04)

-A-Industry Median (2)

E

$4~

GOOD i

4 s

C b

2-O O

U S

S S

O A

1.5 1.5 a

T g

_. o ___ _ ___ o ____e ___ o ___.e.___ o ____ p ___ o ___ 9____.o i

Y l'

O O~

O O

'O

~O

~O'

~O

~O' O

O' O

O

'88

'89

'90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR The Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) was reported as.317 nanocuries/ gram for the month of April. This INPO indicator uses an industry normalized letdown purifica-tion rate, The FRI value using the plant's actualletdown purification rate was reported as 1.28 nanocuries/ gram.

The Cycle 13 fuel performance continues without an observed fuel failure. The high FRI value is indicative of previous fuel failures. The last detected fuel failure was during Cycle 10.

The 1991 fuel reliability goal has been set at 1.4 nanocuries/ gram.

The fuel reliability indicator industry upper ten percentile value is 0.04 nanocuries/

gram.

Data Source:

Holthaus/Lofshult Adverse Trend: None i

8

400 -

-- Personnel Cumulative Radiation Exposure (Man-Rem)

--o-Fort Calhoun AnnualGoal(75)

Industry Upper 10 Percentilo (166)

GOOD h

272 276 200 -

g..._g.

.o

.g.

g

.g.

g.

.a

..g D3.4 100 g- _ _ _ o _..e_ _ _ _ o _ _ _.e. _.- - o - - - o - - - -o- - - - c - - -e- - - - o - - - o - - - - o 0-

'88 '89 '90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)

During April 1991, 3.1 man-rem was recorded by TLD's worn by personnel while working at the Fort Calhoun Station. The year-to date exposure is 19.1 man-rem.

The Fort Calhoun goal for personnel radiation exposure (cumulative) during 1991 is 75 man-rem.

The personnel radiation exposure ;ndustry upper ten percentile is 166 man-rem per unit per year.

Data Source:

Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 54 s

1 9

Radoactre Oil Sent For Processing On Dallons)

[ Dry Active Waste Sent For Processing On cubic feet) 4000 2000 -

0 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decs1

-*= Cumul alive Radioactrve Waste Buned

-E+- Fort Calhoun Goat For Waste Buned (4500) 0195 7500 r C Radcactve Waste Bured On cubic feet) 6000 -

4310 45no -

C+ -+-

O O

D-3 O -- - -- D -0 0 - -- O - ---0 ~-

-O - - D -

-G- --O D

15v '

327.2

, '3,3 g

-- m 6

'89

'90 JanP' Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 Yebr end Total v0 UME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE The upper graph e-w:. tru volume of radioactive oil and dry radioactive waste sent for processing.

The lower graph show. ae volume of monthly, cumulative annual total, and year-end total of radio-active waste buried the previous 2 years.

The monthly and cumulative volumes of radioactive waste which were buried during the months of Janucry, February, and March 1991 have been revised. These revaions are due to the delay in-volved in the shipping for processing, the processing, and the burying of radioactive waste.

Cumulative volume of radioactive oil shipped off site for piocessing (gallons) 4,330.0 Cumulative amount of solid radwaste shipped off site for processing (cubic feet) 5,218.0 Volume of solid radioactive waste which was buried during the month (cubic feet) 33.6 Cumulative voleme of solid radioactive waste buried (cubic feet) 417.2 Amount of solid radioactive waste in temporary storage (cubic feet) 0.0 The Fort Calhoun goal for the volume of solid radioactive waste which has been buried is 4,500 cubic feet.

The industry upFer ten percentile value is 3,072 cubic feet per unit per year. The Fort Calhoun Station was in the upper te.1 percentile of nuclear plants for this indicator in 1986,1987 and 1988.

Data Source: Patterson/Breuer (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 54 I.

10

1-Q 1991 Disabling injury Frequency Rate

--*- 1990 Disabling injury Frequency Rate o 5 Year Average Disabling injury Frequoney Rate GOOD

.8 _ Fort Calhoun Goal h

-+- Industry Upper 10 Percentile

.6 -

A A

/

O O -- O - -

O-i-O& -- O - - O -- - O ---- O - - O - - O --- C"

-O

.2-+-

4M 7M

/

4 '

0 --*

A

=

4 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec DISABLING INJURY FREQUENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE)

This indicator shows the reporting month disabling injury / illness rate in column form. The 1990 disabling injury / illness frequency rate and the 5 year average of the corresponding monthly disabling injury / illness frequency rate are also shown.

There was one (i) lost time accident reported at the Fort Calhoun Station in April.

The total number of lost time accidents that have been reported during 1991 is one (1).

The 1991 disabling injury / illness frequency rate goal was set at 0.31 %.

The industry upper ten percentile disabling injury / illness frequency 1are is 0%.

Year Year-End Rate 1988 1.6 1989 0.4 1990 0.5 Data Source:

Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 26 11

l l Fort Calhoun Unmot 1495 MW Goal l

l Thermal Output Tech Spec 1500 MW UmN 1500 -

1200 -

Cv 900--

600 --

300 -

0 1

1 3

5 7

9 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 DAILN iHERMAL OUTPUT The abov3 thermal outp' t graph displays the daily operating power level during April 15r1, the 1500 therma' megawatt average technical specification limit, and the 145,., t%rrt u.4' Fort Calhoun goal that was not mot.

'2' Plant power level was reduced to 70% in February for fuel conservation in support of the extension of power operations for Cycle 13. This power reduction will con-tinue until the summer months when 100% power will be resumed. Reduced power operations will be resumed in the fall.

The power reduction of April 23 thru 26 was to repair the Feedwater Reg. Valve (FCV-1101).

Data Source:

Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 12

?,

Equipment Forced Outage Rate 1.8 -

1.S -

1.4 -

1.2 -

GOOD I

h

.8 -

.6 1

.53

~

mmp A-4

, -j{

S

.13

' ~

0 Q

0

'88

'89

'90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS There were no equipment forced outages reported during the nionth of April 1991.

The last equipment forced outage occurred in January 1991 and was due to the December CEDM housing leak which carried outage time into January.

Data Source:

Plant Licensee Event Report (LER)

Adverse Trend: None l

13

80-

~+- Operations 1991 Budget ($ Million) 60-1991 Cumulative Total ($ Million)

,/

40-

~

20-

~ ' ' '

0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 25 -

-.- Maintenance 1991 Budget ($ Million) 20 -

1991 Cumulative Total ($ Million) 15 -

10 -

,,, - - + ' ' _

5--

,. - * ' ~

O Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET The Operations and Maintenance Budget Indicator shows the budget year-to-date as well as the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance for the Fort Calhoun Station.

The above 1991 expediture budgets do not reflect the extension of power opera-tions and refueling postponement for Cycle 13.

The budget year-to-date for Operations was 21.8 million dollars for April while the actual cumu'ative expenditures through April totaled 17.7 million dollars.

The budget year-to-date for Maintenance was 5.4 million dollars for April while the actual cumulative expenditures through April totaled 2.0 million dollars.

Data Source:

Gleason/ Parent (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trends: None 14

t 1500,

-+- Documents Scheduled for Review

+ Documents Reviewed z

M00 -

Overdue Documents 900-l\\l \\

l \\

l

\\

l

\\

600 -

l

\\

l

\\

l

\\

~

l

\\

x l

\\'

q e

300 -

/

i y

I

\\

g...

c'^

N

%-_%-i...

I O

q.

May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr DOCUMENT REVIEW This indicator shows the number of completed, scheduled, and overdue (greater than 6 months past the scheduled due date) biennial reviews for the reporting month. These document reviews are performed in-house and include Special Pro-cedures, the Site Security Plan, Maintenance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance Procedures, and the Operating Manual.

During April there were 237 document reviews completed while 13 document re-views were scheduled. At the end of April, there were 26 document reviews over-due. The overdue document reviews at the end of April consisted primarily of Op-erations documents.

During the month of April there were 198 new or renamed documents reviewed.

These new or renamed documents will need to be reviewed again in 1993.

Data Source:

Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 46 15

l End of Month Trigger Values For:

Number of Failures /20 Demands - 20 Demands 31 Number of Falluros/50 Demands 50 Demands GOOD 10-l l Number of Failures /100 Demands -- -100 Demands I

8-6-

i i

4-

.. L L

L L

3 2

22 22 22 2

2 2

2-l l0 0

0 0

0 O

Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Ju,

Jul91 EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABILITY This bar graph shows three monthly indi::ators pertaining to the number of failures that were reported during the last 20, 50, and 100 emergency diesel generator demands at the Fort Calhoun Station. Also shown are trigger values which corre-spond to a high level of confidence that a unit's diesel generators have obtained a reliability of greater than or equal to 95% when the failure values are below the corresponding trigger values. These trigger values are the Fort Calhoun 1991 goal.

The demands counted for this indicator include the respective number of starts and the respective number of load-runs for both Diesel Generators combined. The number of start demands includes all valid and inadvertent starts, including all start-only demands and all start demands that are followed by load run demands, whether by automatic or manual initiation. Load-run demands must follow suc-cessful starts and meet at least one of the following criteria: a load-run that is a result of a realload signal, a load-run test expected to carry the plant's load and duration as stated in the test specifications, and special tests in which a diesel generator was expected to be operated for a minimum of one hour and to be loaded with at least 50% of design load (see exceptions and other demand criteria in the Definition Section).

Data Source:

Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 16

l l

l DG-1 Failuros/25 Demands 5-M DG-2 Failures /25 Demands Failure Trigger Value for 25 Demands 4-3-

1 2

la 0

00 0 0 00 00 00 0

Nov10 Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (25 DEMANDS)

This indicator shows the number of failures experienced by each emergency diesel generator during the last 25 start demands and the last 25 load-run demands. A trigger value of 4 failures within the last 25 demands is also shown. This trigger value of 4 failures within 25 demands is the Fort Calhoun goal for 1991, it must be emphasized that in accordance with NUMARC criteria, certain actions will take place in the event that any one emer0sncy diesei generator experiences 4 or more failures within the last 25 demands on the unit. These actions are de-scribed in the Dcfinition Section. A Standing Order has been drafted for the Fort Calhoun Station to institutionalize and formally approve / adopt the required NUMARC actions.

Diesel Generator DG-1 has not experienced any failures during the last 25 de-mands on the unit.

Diesel Generator DG-2 has not experienced any failures during the last 25 de-mands on the unit.

~

Data Source:

Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source) l l

Adverse Trend: None 17

4001 I

-l Feor'Jary 19')) Outstanding MWO's R Mr. Oh 1991 Outstanding MWO's

}:. t--l ADril1991 300-200 -

100 -

~

I V

^

O 0 3 Months 3 6 Months 6 9 Months 9-12 Months

>12 Months AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON-OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the age of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders (MWO's) remaining open at the end of the reporting month.

Data Source:

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None.

18

400 -

l- -l February 1991 j

~

l l March 1 300 -

i April 91 f:

,)

'r_ *

.99,.

sp N 100 -

, W

~

??

l i

)

l

+

Total Open Total Open Open Open MWO's Open Safety High MWO's

> 3 Months Safety Related Priority Old Related MWO's MWO's MWO's

> 3 Months Old MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the total number of corrective non-outage MWO's remaining open at the end of the reporting month, along with a breakdown by several key categories.

Data Source:

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 19

Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old 80 s. Industry Upper Quartile Good Y

60% -

O --- - O -- - O - - -G -

O - - - O --- O ------- O - -

-D-O -- - -

D --

-O 40% -

20%

May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON-OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the percentage of open corrective non-outage n'aintenance work orders that were greater than three months old at the end of the reporting month.

The percentage of open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that were greater than three months old at the end of April was reported as 37.6%.

The industry upper quartile value for corrective maintenance backlog greater than 3 months old is 45.8%. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper quartile of nuclear power plants in this area.

Data Source:

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 20

Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance 90% 3

-e-Industry Upper Quartile (57,7%)

A J

l

-o-Fort Calhoun Goal (60%)

gog,

GOOD 70% -

60% -

- -- - o - -- - - o - - -- -o

-- -e- - - -- o - - - - o - - --& - - - - o - - - - - o - - - - - o -- - - -o o

-e e--- - - e -

-o ---o - -e - o e -- -- D

- O - 7 50% -

40% -

30% -

20%

May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE (NON-OUTAGE)

The ratio of preventive to total maintenance indicator shows the ratio of completed non outage preventive maintenance to total completed non-outage maintenance.

The ratio of preventive to total maintenance was 57.6% in April.

The Fort Calhoun goalis to have a ratio of preventive to total maintenance greater than 60% The low values for the months of January through April 1991 are due to the low number of PM activities scheduled to be completed during these months.

The industry upper quartile value for the ratio of preventive to total maintenance is 57.7 %

Data Source:

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 41 21

.. _ _ _ __._. _ -. _ _ _ _. _. _ _.. ~ _. -. _

Preventive Maintenance items Overdue 4%}

-O-IndustryUpperQuartile 4%.

--o-- Fort Calhoun Goal (1.2%)

~

Id_$,

m 3.g 3% -

2% -

~

O

--C 0

0 0

-0 0

0 0

1% -

~

0%

May90 Jun-Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov -

Dee Jan Feb Mar Apr91 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE

-The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in the administration and exe-cution of preventive maintenance programs.' A small percentage of preventive maintenance items overdue indicates a station commitment to the preventive maintenance program and an ability to plan, schedule, and perform preventive maintenance tasks as programs iequire. -

During April 1991,1145 PM items were completed. All PM's were completed within the allowable grace pellod.

The Fort Calhoun goal is to have less than 1.2% preventive maintenance items -

overdue. The industry upper quartile for preventive maintenance items overdue is

~1.2% The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the industry upper quar-

. tile for.this indicator. _

Data Source:

Patterson/ Linden (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 41 22

50 I

l Total Control Room Instruments Out of Sorvice R Number of C.R. Instruments Ropairable On-Uno 40-

"D-Industry Upper Quartile For Total Out of Service instruments

- Fort Calhoun Goal For Total Out-of Service instruments 33 33 32 30 -

29 r

~

27 25 24 24 23 21 21 21 20-15 16 10-g.

g

.. -. {3....... g.

....g.. _...g _.q'.

. _...g_

._. ;gj

._ jg4

__ [g 0

May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr91 NUMBER OF OUT-OF SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS This indicator shows the number of out-of service control room instruments, the number of instruments repairable during plant operations (otline), the industry upper quartile for this indicator, and the Fort Calhoun goal.

There was a total of 32 out-of-service control room instruments at the end of April. A plant outage is required to repair 11 of these 32 control room instruments.

The Fort Calhoun goal is to have less than 15 out-of service control room instru-ments. The industry upper quartile value for the number of out-of service control room instruments is 7.

Data Source:

Patterson/ Adams (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 23

l l

Maintenance Overtime

12 Month Avorage o-Fort Calhoun Goal GOOD 00% -

1y Q

40% -

N

'y

\\

o____ o____ o _____e_____o ____o _____e_____.e.___o_____o _____o 20%-

0%

May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr91 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The Maintenance Overtime Indicator monitors the ability to perform the desired maintenance activities with the allotted resources. Excessive overtime indicates insufficient resource allocation and can lead to errors due to fatigue.

The percent of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 5%

during the month of April 1991. The 12 month average percentage of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 11.3%.

The Fort Calhoun goal for the percent of maintenance overtime hours worked has been set at 25% for non outage months and 50% for outage months.

Data Source:

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None l

1 24

15-l l Open IR's Related to the Use of Procedures (Maintenance)

R Closed IR's Related to the Use of Procedures (Maintenance)

~

l l Procedural Noncompliance IR's (Maintenance) 10-b 5-3 3

3 3

k 1

l 1

1 1 1 11 0

0 000 000 0

00 00 00 00 00 000 May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov

-Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the number of identified Maintenance incidents Reports (IR's) that are related to the use of procedures, the number of closed IR's that are re-lated to the use of procedures (includes IR's that were caused by procedural non-compliance), and the number of closed IR's that were caused by procedural non-compliance.

It should be noted that the second and third columns will lag behind the first col-umn until the IR's are closed. This reporting method is due to the process in which IR's receive their cause category codes IR's receive their cause category codes when they are closed.

Data Source:

Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 & 44 25

- - -. - - ~

1 R Open MWO's Fort Calhoun Goal 600 -

C

~

444 434 430 423 0

406 400--

~

361 348 m

329 302 293 2

287

'ys

%p 's e

q g

s n.

u y

y

' +

' %i

~

200 May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the number of corrective non outage Maintenance Work Orders (MWO) that were open at the end of the reporting month,

.The goal for this indicator is to have less than 450 corrective non-outage mainte-nance work orders remaining open.

Data Source:

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 26

Completed Scheduled Activities (EM)

-o Fort Calhoun Goal 100% -

80% e-

- - o-

-o-

-o - -- o - o

- o ~ -- - ~ o -

o-o.

-o 60%-

40a4 2/10 2/17 2/24 3/2 3/9 3/16 3f23 3/30 4/6 4/13 4/20 4/27 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activi-ties as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Electrical Maintenance Maintenance activities include MWR's, MWO's, ST's, PMO's, calibrations, and miscel!aneous maintenance activities, i

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%

l Renortino Month Comnieted Scheduled Activities I

Week 1 100 %

Week 2 97 %

Week 3 86%

Week 4 90 %

Data Source:

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 27

Completed Schoduled ActMtios (PE)

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal 100% -

80% 6-0-

-O

- -- - O

--O 0-0-

- O-

-O

--- O 60%-

40%

+

H 2/10 2!17 2/24 3/2 3/9 3/16 3/23 3/30 4/G 4/13 4/20 4/27 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (PRESSURE EQUlPMENT)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activi-ties as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concernin0 Pressure Equipment Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWR's, MWO's, ST's, PMO's, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

Reoortino Month Comoleted Scheduled Activities Week 1 97 %

Week 2 98 %

Week 3 100 %

Week 4 87 %

Data Source:

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 23

- Completod Schedulod ActMtios (GM)

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal 100% -

l 80% t ~ +

-G-G - - - - - - - - - - --- - - O --

-0

--O-

-O 60% +

40%

2/10 2/17 2/24 3/2 3/S 3/16 323 3/30 4/6 4/13 4/20 4/27 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (GENERAL MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activi-ties as e

' to the number of schedu;cd maintenance activities concerning Genr ance. Maintenance activities include MWR's, MWO's, ST's, oMO'

.u.oaons, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fo t Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

REDortint Month Comoleted Scheduled Activities Week 1 88 %

Week 2 88 %

Week 3 62 %

Week 4 100 %

Data Source:

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 l

29

Completed Scheduled Activitios (MM)

-o-Fort Calhoun Goal 100% -

80% 6-- 1 ---O----

- -O ----O - -- -- O

---O-----'----O------&---

- - O-3 60% -

40%

r 2/10 2/17 2/24 3/2 3/9 3/16 3/23 3/30 4/6 4/13 4/20 4/27 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activi-ties as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Mechanical Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWR's, MWO's, ST's, PMO's, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

~

Reoortina Month Comoleted Scheduled Activities Week 1 100 %

Week 2 100 %

Week 3 82 %

Week 4 80 %

Data Source:

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 30

Completed Scheduled Activities (IC)

- Fort Calhoun Goal 100's v B0ch + ----- c -

-O

---O----+---

O -- - - O --

-O--

-O-

-O 60*4 40%

2/10 2/17 2/24 3/2 3/9 3/16 3/23 3/30 4/6 4/13 4/20 4/27 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES llNSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activi-ties as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Instrumentation & Control. Maintenance activities include MWR's, MWO's, ST's, PMO's, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

Reoortina Month Comoleted Scheduled Activities Week 1 97 %

Week 2 100 %

Week 3 97 %

Week 4 94 %

Data Source:

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 31

l l

I W Number of Missed ST's Resulting in LER's 1

0 0

0 Mahs0 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 89' 90' NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS This indicator shows the number of missed Surveillance Tests (ST's) that result in Licensee Event Reports (WR's) during the reporting month. The graph on the left shows the yearly totals for the indicated years.

During the month of April 1991, there were no missed ST's that resulted in LER's.

Data Source:

Plant Licensee Event Reports (LER)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 60 & G1 1

32

.. - ~

~

1 W Total NPRDS Component Failures R Confirmed NPRDS Component Failures 20 --

13 13 10-7 7 5 5 5 5 5 5 4

.' E

- 7 *-

2 2 J 0 90 0 0 May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEMS (NPRDS)

REPORTABLE FAILURES l

This indicator shows the total number of NPRDS component failures and th 3 nur ber of confirmed NPRDS component failures. The total number of NPRDS compo-nent failures is based upon the number of failure reports sent to INPO. Tho' number of confirmed NPRDS component failures is based upon the number of failure re-ports that have been accepted by INPO. The difference between these two figures is the number of failure reports still under review by INPO.

During April 1991, there were no (0) confirmed NPRDS component failures.

Data Source:

Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 33

0'

-*- Components With Moro Than One Failure

+ Components With Moro Than Two Failures 10 -

h

- /

x

~

5-

/

s N

.g

' y_ _ _ _ _ _ : :_ _ _ _ _ _w _ _ _ _.,. _ _ _ _ _ q p _ _ _ _x _ _ _ _ _ _q N,

s

'x

/

'y N

May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 MAIN l ENANCE EFFECTIVENESS The Maintenance Effectiveness Indicator was developed following guidelines set forth by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (NRC/AEOD). The NRC/AEOD is currently developing and verifying a maintenance effectiveness indicator using the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPRDS) component failures.

This indicator shows the number of NPRDS components with more than one failure during the last twelve months and the number of NPRDS components with more than two failures durinc the last twelve months. The number of NPRDS compo-nents with more than two failures in a twelve-month period should indicate +.he effectiveness of plant maintenance.

During the last 12 reporting months there were 6 NPRDS compcnents with more than 1 failure, of which 1 of the 6 had more than two failures. The NPRDS compo-nent tag number with more than two failures was CH-18.

Data Source:

Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 34

20 -

Check Valve Failure Rate por Million Comp. Hours

-a-Industry Check Valve Failure Rate per Million Comp. Hours 0 - Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal (2.00E-6) l s

GOOD

" lY g..

.. 4 3... _6_.. _ _.. d 6 --

O o

69' Do' May90 Jun Jul AuD ses oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 Check Va!ve Failures CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE This indicator shows the Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate, the Fort Calhoun goal and the industry chtck va!ve failure rate. This rate is based upon failures dur-ing the previous 18 months. The check valve failures at Fort Calhoun Station, for the previous two years, are shown on the left.

The data for the industry check valve failure rate is three months behind the re-porting month due to the time invoived in collecting and processing the data.

For January 1991, the Fort Calhoun Station reported an actual check valve fiiilure rate of 1.95E-6 while the industry reported an actual failure rate of 2.71E-6. At the end of April, the Fort Calhoun Station reported a calculated check valve fEilure rate of 1.95E-6. The Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is a failure rate of 2.00E-6.

Data Source:

Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 43 35

Socondary System CPI

-+- Secondary System CPI Limrt 1.5 -

.+ Fort Calhoun Goal ( 45)

GOOD 6 Industry Uppor Quartilo 1-

+

-+

4

~

.38

.34 D

9 6-6-- -6

---6

- s-6-

6-6 0

gg

go Apr9 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Fob Mar 9 146.1 200:

Hours Chemistry is Outside OG Guidehnos

-~ 9 175 -

s 150 GOOD 125{

0 100; 75 -

w:

N 25 [

0

'90 Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 91 SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY The top graph, Secondary System Chemistry Performance Index (CPI), is calcu-lated using the followin0 three parameters: cation conductivity in steam Generator blowdown, sodium In steam generator blowdown, and condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen. The bottom graphs shows the total hours of 13 parameters ex-ceeding the Owners Group (OG) guidelines during power operation.

A now goal has been added to the CPI graph. The Fort Calhoun goal for the CPI is 0.45. The CPI was reported as 0.413 for the month of March. The industry upper quartile value for this indicator was 0.1S for August 1989 through Dec.1989. The CPI industry value then changed to 0.24 for 1990.

The number of hours outside the OG guidelines was reported as 2.8 hours9.259259e-5 days 0.00222 hours 1.322751e-5 weeks 3.044e-6 months for the reporting month.

The above two chemistry indicators are one month behind the reportin0 period due to the time needed for data collection and evaluation of the station chemistry data.

Data Source:

Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source) l l

Adverse Trends: None 36

Pnmary System Chemistry Out of Umit o-Fort Calhoun Goal 8%-

GOOD h

C% -

4% -

19 1.8 2% -

& - -- o- -- - o 0%

'89

'90 Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feo Mar 91 PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT The Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit Indicator tracks the primary system chemistry performance by monitoring six key chemistry parame-ters.100% equates to all six parameters being out of limit for the month. This Indicator is one month behind the reporting month.

A new goal of 2% has been added to the graph for this indicator.

The Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit was reported as 0%

for the month of March.

The high percentage of hours out of limit for the primary system during June and July was due to startup after the 1990 Refueling Outage and various power fluc-tuations which occurred during June and July. A plant shutdown and startup in September and a plant outage in November / December resulted in a higher per-contage of hours out of limit.

Data Source:

Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None l

37

= _ -. -.. - -.. - - -

10-Hours Aaihary System Chemistry Out of Umit

- Industry Uppor Quartile 8-GOOD i

s-Y 4-2-

0 0

0-6 6-m m

m m

'89

'90 Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar 91 AUXILIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS The Auxiliary System Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits indicator tracks the monthly hours that the Component Cooling Water (CCW) system is outside the station chemistry limit. The above chemistry indicator is one month behind the reporting period due to the time needed for data collection and evaluation of the chemistry data for the station.

The auxiliary system chemistry hours outside station limits was reported as O for the month of March.

The industry upper quartile value for auxillary systems chemistry hours outside station limits is 2.6 hours6.944444e-5 days 0.00167 hours 9.920635e-6 weeks 2.283e-6 months . The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper quartile of all nuclear power plants for this indicator.

Dath Source:

Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trond: None 38

i C t mbor ofinstruments Ost of Sarwco o-Fort Calhoun Goal 16-12 -

1 8

)

7 7

7 n u

' O.

.-.;.0

. -. ?,.,

...c.

.. p

..9..

...},...

...sw....g.....

. ~.o 3

3 7

^

-3 0-

~-

May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr91 IN LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT OF SERVICE This indicator shows the total number of in line chemistry system instruments that are out of service at the end of the reporting month. The chemistry systems in.

volved in this Indicator include the Secondary System and the Post Accident Sam-pling System (PASS).

At the end of April there was a total of 3 in line chemistry instruments that were out of service. Of these 3 instruments,1 was from the Secondary System and 2 were from PASS.

The Fort Calhoun goal for the number of in line chemistry system instruments that are out of service has been set at 6. Six out of service chemistry instruments make up 10% of all the chemistry instruments which are counted for this indica-tor.

Data Source:

Patterson/Renaud (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 39

TotalWaste Produced (Kilograms)

-.s Fodoral & State Monthly Lirnit (Kg) 1000-800-000 -

.e 403-1 222.2

~

200 -

144,5 89.8

~

2 1

8'9 2

09 9 34 9 0'7 0

' ~ '

M '

May90 Jun Jul Aug Sop Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr91 HAZARDDUS WASTE PRODUCED This indicator shows the total amount of hazardous waste produced by Fort Calhoun each month. This hazardous waste consists of non halo 0enated hazard-ous waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste produced.

During the month of April,0.0 kilograms of non halogenated hazardous waste was produced,34.9 kilograms of halo 0enated hazardous waste was produced, and 0.0 kilograms of other hazardous waste was produced.

Data Source:

Patterson/Henning (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 40

___- _.._..._=- ___ = _--

l l

5000 -

[

l Highest Exposure for the Month (mRom)

OPPD 4500 mReQr.Umit l

l_

l Highest Exposure for the Quarter (mRom)

E Highest Exposure for the Year (mRom) 3000 -

2000 -

10% -

800 800 210 0

^

April 1991 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE During April 1991, an individual accumulated 210 mrem which was the highest in-dividual exposure for the month.

The maximum individual exposure to date for the first quarter of 1991 has been 800 mrem.

The maximum individual exposure reported to date for 1991 has been 800 mrem.

The OPPD limit for the maximum yearly individual radiation exposure is 4,500 mrem / year.

Data Source:

Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 41

250~

G MontNyPersonnelContaminations 37 Cumulatke Personnel Contaminations 2@-

-c"-

Fort Calhoun Annual Goal (90)

-o Industry Upper Quartile (129)

GOOD 157

!Y 150 -

o o

o-o-

0

-o o

o o

o-o o

100 -

c _ _ _.e. _ _. o _ _ _ _ c _ _ e _ _ _ _ o _ _ _ _ o _ _ _ + _ _ _ o _ _ _ _ o _ _ + _ _ _.o 50 -

0-

'89

'90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS This indicator shows the number of skin and clothing contaminations for the re-porting month. A total of 25 cumulative contaminations have occurred during 1991.

There was a total of 237 skin and clothing contaminations in 1990.

The 1991 goal for skin and clothing is 90 contaminations.

The Industry upper quartile value for total skin and clothing contaminations is 129 per unit annually.

Data Source:

Patterson/ Williams (Mana0er/ Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 & 54 42

100% -

Docontaminated Auxiliary Building

--O-Fort Calhoun Goal 90% -

s o.._ o __. n

.n rev....

t,_..... v -.. o.... o.... o 80%-

O' 1

GOOD 70%-

60%-

50%

May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr91 DECONTAMINATED AUXILIARY BUILDING This graph shows the percentage of the auxiliary building which is decontaminated (clean) based on the total square footage, a Fort Calhoun goal of 85% decontaml-nated auxiliary building (non outage months) and a goal of 75% decontaminated auxiliary building (outage months).

As of the end of the reporting month,87.3% of the total square footage of the auxil!ary building was decontaminated. An increase in the percentage of the auxil-lary building which is decontaminated is expected after the auxiliary building paint-ing is completed.

Data Source:

Patterson/Gundal (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 54 i

43

14 -

C Nurnbor of Identified PRWP's 12 -

10-1 8-G-

4-u 2-1 1

1 1

1

~

W 0

y 0

0 0

r 0

May90 Jun Jul

'< ag Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Fob Mar Apr91 RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM The Radiological Work Practices Program Indicator shows the number of Poor Radiological Work Practices (PRWP's) which were identified during the reporting month.

The number of PRWP's which are identified each month should indirectly provide a means to qualitatively assess supervisor accountability for their workers' radiologi.

cal performance.

During the month of April 1991, one (1) PRWP was identified.

Data Source:

Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 52 l

44 1

75 -

R Total Number of Hot Spots C Number of Additional Hot Spots identified 53 53 53 M

50-25 -

~

10 0

Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS This indicator shows the total number of hot spots which have been identified to exist in the Fort Calhoun Station and have been documented through the use of a hot spot identification sheet, A hot spot is defined as a smalllocalized source of high radiation, A hot spot occurs when the contact dose rate of an item or piece of equipment is at least 5 times the General Area dose rate and the item or piece of equipment's dose rate is equal to or greater than 100 mrem / hour, Data Source:

Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trends: None I.

l 45

@ Man:Ny Radioactive Gas Dizharged (Cnries, Cumulatus Rad oactrve Gas DLvharged (Cunes)

O-Cumulath/e AnnualGoa!(Curics) 785 800 -

i GOOD 600 -

Y 400 -

0- - - - G - - - - & - - - -o- - - - o - - - - EF - - - -o - - - - O - - - n- - -

r s ----o 1c,4 200 -

F q

'o 0 7' um=a-.I

'88

'89 Jan90 Foo Mar Apr May Jun Jo' Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec00 GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for January 1990 through December 1990. A total of 465.3 curies have been re-leased to the environment from January through December of 1990. The Fort Calhoun Station goal was 360 curies for this indicator.

The high value of gaseous radioactive waste that was released to the environment during the month of February 1990 was due to a containment purge associated with the 1990 Refueling Outage.

The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months.

Data Source:

Franco /Krist (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None i

I 1

46

l i

l r

R Monthly Radioactive Uquid Dscharged CumutaWe RadoacWe liquid Dscharged

-c-Curautative AnnualGoal 3%-

228 231 228

g. _ _ _ o. _ _ o _ _ _ _o_ _ _ g _ _ _ _ g _ _ _ _ o_ _ _ _ o.. _ _ o. _ - - o..

.o... o

y i:1

&r 200 -

y J

)y GOOD 0

3

^ ' 100 -

Y m

m t

U

TE 10 17.1 15 3 17

,,,,,2.::

l i

.r 0*

l~~'---'

'87 '88 '89 Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jan Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Decf4 40(AYJ -

350 % -

300M -

p gy 25003-p 2xx

, sox.

10000 -

5030 -

u 3410 3$10 a250 3280 41J0

,c73 0

I I

II I

Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun JJi Aug Scp Oct Nov Deut LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for the months of January 1990 through December 1990. The liquid radioactive waste that was discharged to the environment from all sources totaled 175.5 curies from January through December 1990. The Fort Calhoun Station goal for 1990 is 256 curies.

The bottom graph shows the volume of liquid radioactive waste that has been released from the radioactive waste monitor tanks and steam generators. The volume of liquid radioactive waste discharged to the environment from the radioac-tive waste monitor tanks and the steam generators totaled 20.7 million gallons from January through December 1990. The liquid radioactive waste that was re-leased to the environment includes liquid released from the steam generators due to the fact that radioisotopes were detected in the steam generator blowdown.

The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months.

Data Source:

Franco /Krist (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 47

30-Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Does not include System Failures) 25-20; GOOD 15 -

E 10 -

May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 120-Security System Failures GOOD 80-E 40-(

O May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 LOGGABLE/REPORTACLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY)

The Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Security) Indicator is depicted in two separate graphs. The first chart depicts the total number of loggable/ reportable incidents concerning Licensee Designated Vehic!es (LDV's); Security Badges; Security Key Control; and Access Control and Authorization which occurred during the reporting montn. The bottom graph shows the total number of loggable/ reportable incidents concerning security system failures which occurred during the reporting month..

During the month of April 1991, there were 87 loggable/ reportable incidents iden-tified. Security system failures accounted for 97% of the loggable/ reportable inci-dents reported this month. There were 3 loggable/ reportable incidents concerning the improper use and handling of security badges by plant personnel. Microwave Alarm non environmental failures were higher this month primarily due to Secul ty i

Services personnel conducting vulnerability testing on the system. This testing detected several areas of concern which are now being or have been corrected.

The environmental failures were primarily due to the poor weather conditions experienced during this reporting period.

Data Source:

Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 1

48

. = _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _. _..

16 --

R Security Reporttog incidents January 1991 14 -

-H Security Report / Log incidents February 1991 l

l Socurity Roporttog incidents March 1991 12 -

Security Report / Log incidents April 1991 10-GOOD

.la e 91 6

y Feb 91 0

8-Mar 91 2

Apr91 3

6-1 '

2 2

0 0

LDVs Badges Key Control Access Control SECURITY INCIDENT BREAKDOWN This indicator now shows the number of incidents concerning the following items for the reporting month: Licensee Designated Vehicles (LOV's); Security Dadges; Access Control and Authorization; and Security Key Control, Data Source:

Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 49

50 -

l l Environmental Failuros R Systom Failures 40-4 34 GOOD d

30-20 -

17 17 10 ~

7 8

0 0

d 0

0 0

0 Alarms CcTV computer Sea'ch Equip.

Dws Carc Aeaders SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES This indicator shows the number of incidents concerning the following items for the reporting month: Alarm System Failures, CCTV failures, Security Computer Failures, Search Equipment Failures, Doot Hardware Failures, and Card Reader Fall-ures. Alarm systems and CCTV failures will now be divided into two categories:

environmental failures and system failures.

Number of incidents:

Mar 91 Apr 91 System Failures Env. Fail.

Eauin. Fail.

Env. Fall.

Eauip. Fail.

Alarm Systems 10 6

17 17 CCTV 43 5

34 7

Computer n/a 8

n/a O

Search Equipment n/a O

n/a 1

Door Hardware n/a 5

n/a 8

Card Readar n/a O

n/a O

Total 53 24 51 33 Data Source:

Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 l

I 50

10% -

-:- Amount of Work On Hold Awatting Parts O Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal t

8%-

GOOD h

6% -

57%

N 4.7%

i 44%

433 w w,% /

d4 39

~

,3 9%

39%

4%-

p... o.

0,

.o 2g4 2%

0%

May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS (N0N-OUTAGE)

This procurement indicator displays the amount of open, non outage, maintenance items that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total amount of open, non outage, maintenance items, expressed as a percentage.

There was a total of 745 open, non outage, maintenance items with 21 of these items on hold awaiting parts at the end of the reporting month.

The 1991 Fort Calhoun Goal for this indicator is 3.5% of the total number of open non-outage maintenance items awaiting parts, Data Source:

Willrett/ CHAMPS (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 51

15-

-:- Sparo Pads inventory Value ($ Million) 12 9-m c--

$6-May91 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE The spare parts inventory value at the Fort Calhoun Station at the end of April was reported as $12,397,306.

Data Source:

Steele/Huliska (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 500 -

~~ Spare Parts issued ($ Thousands) 400 -

300 -

/

$0 May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Fieb Mar Apr91 SPARE PARTS ISSUED The value of the spare parts issued during April totaled $208,851.

Data Source:

Steele/ Miser (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 52

_m_.

+ Inventory Accuracy

-o-Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal (98%)

f

%1 95% -

90% t 85%

May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 INVENTORY ACCURACY This indicator shows the accuracy of tt I parts count for the warehouse compared to the counts contained in computer system for the reporting month.

During April, 560 different line iter ited in the warehouse. Of the 560 line items counted,17 items needea ;

istments. The inventory accuracy for the month of April was teported as lhe Fort Calhoun goal for this indica-tor is 98E Data Source:

Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source) 4 Adverse Trend: None g

g g

-G-Fort CcJhoun Goal 3-2-

It 1

0 May91 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 STOCKOUT RATE This indicator shows the percentage of the number of Pick Tickets generated with no parts available during the reporting month.

During April, a total of 903 Pick Tickets were generated. Of the 903 Pick Tickets generated, O Pick Tickets were generated with no parts available.

The Fort Calhoun 1991 Goalis 0%.

Data Source:

Wilfrett/Fraser (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None i

53 i

s 2%-

-- % of Total Purchases that are Expedited 0- Fort Calhoun 199t Goal (0.5%)

1,5% -

1%-

.5% -

0--

o---CH-D 0%

May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr91 EXPEDITED PURCHASES This indicator shows the percentage of expedited purchases compared to the total nurnber of purchase orders generated during the reporting month.

During April, there was a total of 268 purchase orders generated. Of the 268 pur-chase orders generated, there were 0 expedited purchases.

The Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator 0.5%.

Data Source:

Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 54

r 100-l 80-i 60 -

40-20-14 13 0-i' l

Service invoices COE Invoices Miscellaneous INVOICE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows the number of service invoices, COE invoices, and miscella-neous invoices for the month of April 1991.

Data Source:

Wilirett/Fraser (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 100%-

- Percentage of Material Requests for issues with the Request Dato the same as the Nood Date 80%-

x 60%-

40%-

20%

May91 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING This indicator shows the percent of material requests (MR's) for issues with their request date the same as their need date compared to the total number of MR's for issues for the reporting month.

During the month of April, a total of 903 MR's were received by the warehouse.

Of the 903 total MR's received by the warehouse,404 MR's were for issues with their request date the same as their need date, t

Data Source:

Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 55

- Total Mcdfication Packages Open 500 -

425 425 400 337

- ' I 300 -

l[

.y 200-

'83 'ag '90 May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr91 Year End Numbsrs OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS This indicator shows the total number of outstanding modifications (excluding out-standing modifications which are proposed to be cancelled).

Cateoorv Reoortino Month Form FC 1133 Backlog /In Progress 15 Mod Requests Being Reviewed 97 Design Engr. Backlog /In Progress 103 Construction Backlog /in Progress 27 Desian Enor. Uodate Backloo/in Prearess 70 Total 312 As of the end of April,13 additional modification requests have been issued this year and 4 modification requests have been cancelled. The Nuclear Projects Re-view Committee (NPRC) has completed 12 backlog modification request reviews this year. The Nuclear Projects Committee (NPC) has completed 10 backlog modifi-cation request reviews this year.

Data Source:

Jaworski/ Turner (Manager / Source) l Scofield/Lounsberry (Manger / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 56

__ _ _ _ _ ~ _ ___ _ _ _ _ ___.-_. __ _ __ _ _ _ _ __

i 100 -

TotalTemporary Modifications 0- Fort Calhoun Goal 80 -

00 -

40 -

o_ _....o..... o..... o.... s,_... y _. - - - - - - o - - - - - - - - G - - - - - o - - - - - O O

May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 R Iabruary 1991 10-l l March 1991 g.

A_

4e April 1991 6-4 g-0--

0 3 Months 3-6 Months 6-9 Months 912 Months

> 12 Months TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING)

The top graph shows the total number of temporary modifications (TM's) installed in the Fort Calhoun Station and the Fort Calhoun goal. The bottom graph shows the age of allinstalled TM's in the plant for the respective month.

At the end of April, there was a total of 24 TM's installed in the Fort Calhoun Station. As of the end of the reporting month,9 of the 24 installed TM's require an outage for removal. The current Fort Calhoun goal for the total number of in-stalled TM's is less than 15.

Data Source:

Jaworski/ Turner (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 & 71 l

l l

l 57 l

\\

__ _ _ __ _-.._ _____.___.~ _ _. - - _.. - - _ _ _ _ _

200-

~ Total Number of Open EAR's 150 m

100 g

t 50-O Ju!90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun

~

l l February 1991

~

March 1991

<r 100-April 1991 50-m 0-0-3 months 3-6 months

>6 months OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUESTS (EAR's)

The top graph shows the total number of open EAR's at the end of the reporting month. The bottom graph shows the total number of open EAR's broken down by their age in months.

There was a total of 166 open EAR's at the end of April.

Data Source:

Jaworski/ Van Osdel (Manager / Source)

SEP 62 Adverse Trend: Although the total number of open EAR's is indicating an accept-l able trend, the EAR's open over 6 months still have an adverse trend. EAR's are being closed in accordance of assigned priority. The increasing total number i the l

result of lower priority EAR's not being completed as rapidly as newer or higher l

priority EAR's.

58

1 l

+ ECN's Backlogged in DEN

~

+ ECN's Opened During the Month 150-

-+ ECN's Completed During the Month

,8

/

p/g 120 -

/

~

p/'

90 -

CL,

. v 60-k

/(

N

/

's,

's

/

y

N

'N *~.,,! ~.....x% q s-j'.-.

x,'N..s 30-

',~.-,.',y,,~"'

s

, - p

/

s, 0-May90 Jun Ju?

Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar Apr91 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS This indicator shows the number of Engineering Change Notices (ECN's) awaiting completion by DEN, the number of ECN's opened during the reporting month, and the number of ECN's completed by DEN during the reporting month.

At the end of April 1991, there was a total of 179 DEN backlogged open ECN's.

There were 33 ECN's opened, and 6 ECN's completed during the month.

Although the number of open ECN's is currently high, activities are in progress to reduce the backlog of open ECN's. It is expected that in several months the num-ber of open ECN's will begin to decrease.

Data Source:

Phelps/Bera (Manager / Source)

SEP 62 Adverse Trend: None i

l l

1 59 l

_ -. ~.. -. ~

- - - _ _ - _ - _ - ~.

400" C Document Changes l

l Substituto Replacomont Itom E FacilityChanges 32771 300 -

h 248 200 -

201 f

1 100-C3 68

~~~""~'

4 8 14 tt 0 --

Total Open ECN*c Opened ECN's Completed ECN's Total ECN's Reev ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE BREAKDOWN This indicator breaks down the number of Engineering Change Notices (ECN's) that remain open awaiting completion by Design Engineering Nuclear (DEN), the number of ECN's that were opened, and the number of ECN's that were completed by DEN during the reporting month. The total number of ECN's received by DEN since the initiation of the ECN process in 1989 is also shown.

Data Source:

Phelps/Bera (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 60

_ _ _. _. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

5 C 1991 Recordable injury Frequency Rate 4.5 -

- 1990 Recordable injury Frequency Rate 3

-+- 5 Year Average Recordable injury Froquoney Rat 4-i 3.5 1 s

I 1

GOOD 3-

~

h 86~

E 2.g5 2'

+.- --.~.

..e..... +.... - e

?

j,[g

+ '

1.5 -

~

N

,A N

h

/

.5 -

~

0 Jan Feb Mar npr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Ccc RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FREQUENCY RATE This indicator shows the 1991 monthly,1990 monthly, and the FCS 5 year monthly average of the recordable irpry/Hiness cases frequency ratec, A recordable injury / illness case is reported if Nuclear Operations Division personnel r:*e injured on the job and require corrective medical treatment. The recordable cases frequency rate is computed on a ypn-to date basis.

There were 2 recordable injury / illness casua reported during the month of April.

There has been a total of 4 recordable injury / illness cases so far in 1991.

Year Recordable Cases Year-End Rate 1988 11 2.6 1989 11 2.2 1990 13 2.1 Data Source:

Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: Based on the 5 year average recordable injury / illness frequency rate, an adverse trend is indicatad.

SEP 15 & 26 61

50-Ucensee Event Reports m

4 7

l l Personnel Errors Reported in LERs Cumulatrve Ucensee Event Reports 40 ]

t Cumulative Personnel Errors Reported in LERs 31 29 30-g 20-3 -.

': 12 9._ 10-3

~

0

~

'88

'89

'90 Jan Fet Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LER'S This indicator shows the number of Licensee Event Reports (LER's) with event dates during the reporting month, the LER's attributed to personnel errors, and the cumulative total of both. The year-end totals for the three previous years are also shown.

In April 1991, there we e 2 LER's reported.1 of these LER's was attributable to personnel error.

There have been 9 LER's reported so far in 1991 and 4 of these LER's have been attributable to personnel error, Data Source:

Tharkiidsen/Howman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 62

_____m

_ _ _-... _ _ _ ~.. _.

GOO '

$36 558 l

l Actual Division Staffing 400 -

l 1 Authorized DMsion Staffing 100 204 200-55

$2 0

I l

Nuclear Operations Production Engineering Nuclear Services STAFFING LEVEL The au'horized and actual staffing levels are shown for the three Nuclear Divi-slons.

Data Source:

Sorersson/ Burke (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 24 10-

-e-Nuclear Operations DMslon Turnover Rate 8-

-t Production Engincoring DMslon Turnover Rate

--o-Nuclear Services Division Turnover Rate o....a f

N.

" t ',, g y....s... p A.

,b.

y a

, a

..g.

g '..e-2- 0

-o-o-o-o-o o

o __o _o -o --o _ o --o Das Jdo reo M90 A90 M90 J$0 J90 A90 s o90 N90 D90 J91 F91 M91 A91 PERSDNNEL TURNOVER RATE The turnover rates ei the three Divisions are calculated using only resignations from OPPD.

Division Turnover Rqte NOD 4.5%

PED 6.5 %

NSD 1.8 %

Currently, the OPPD corporate turnover rate is being reported as approximately 4.0%. This OPPD corporate turnover rate is based on the turnover rate over the last four years.

Data Source:

Sorenson/ Burke (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 63

E 3RO Exam Pass Ratio (if Exams Administered)

Il RO Exam Pass Ratio (if Exams Administorod)

Fort Caboun Goal 100% -

80% -

60% -

40%-

20% -

0%

NRC Genoric Fund NRC Site Specific NRC Requal OPPD Requal SRO AND RO LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO SRO License Examination Pass Ratio The Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) License E amination Pass Ratio Indicator shows the number of NRC administered Generic Fundamentals Exams (GFE's), the number of NRC administered Site Specific Exams, the number of NRC administered license requalification exarns, and the number of OPPD administered license re-qualification exams.

RO License Examination Pass Ratio The Reactor Operator (RO) License Examination Pass Ratio indicator shows the number of NRC administered Generic Fundamentals Exams (GFE's), the number of NRC administered Site Specific Exams, the number of NRC administered license requalification exams, and the number of OPPD administered license requalification exams.

The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal fnr this indicator is 100% pass ratio.

No tests were administered during the reporting month.

Data Source:

Gasper / Herman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 64

_.__._.__-m 40-li al SRO Exams Administered xams PassM 35-

4. RO Exams Administered 30-E RO Exams Passed

-j T

1

~

i I

2$-

f j

20 -

~}

,i

~

I l

^

j j i

15-l l

~~

f

~ I l

u I

j g

l 10 -

j i

- j l

{

i ll 4

i 5-l

(

l f j O

I

'T i

N l

0 May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS This indicator shows the number of Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) and Reactor Operator (RO) quizzes and exams taken and passed each month. These internally administered quizzes and exams are used to plot the SRO and RO candidates' monthly progress.

DW.; the nanth of April 1991,20 SRO quizzes / exams were administered and 20 of these SHO quizzes / exams were passed.

During the month of April 1991,12 RO quizzes / exams were administered and 12 of these RO quizzes / exams were passed.

Data Source:

Gasper / Herman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 l

l t

65

...~.

355 Hotlines Initiated B: Hotlines Closed 30 -

E Hotlines Overdue < 4 Weeks l ' DI Hotlines Overdue > 4 Weeks 25 -

20-15-10 -

~.,

[{

[L_

s

~

5-I

-I I

n g j

- l N

""~

l

]

E

~

I U

O May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS This indicator shows the number of Hotline Training Memos that were initiated, re-turned for close out, overdue less than four weeks, and overdue greater than four weeks for the reporting month.

Aoril 1991 Initiated Hotlines 05 Closed Hotlines 07 Hotlines Overdue < 4 wks.

04 Hotlines Overdue > 4 wks.

01 Data Source:

Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 66

-. - _ ~... ~ _

E Other Training (1000 Hrs.)

E General Employee Training (1000 hrs )

s-Technical Support (1000 Hrs,)

C Chemistry and Raduttion Protection (1000 Hrs.)

Q Maintenance (1000 Hrs.)

is Operations (1000 Hrs.)

Y.. a 4-3 gg 3 B7 3.93 E

3.19 3 15 L7 manus 2.99 t

MEREI 2.76

((

I lh 2.54 ussus s.1 i

lth

'-m 23 2.26

.i

,1 L1 a

4 -

9 m%I-l

,,a LL la -I

y f

2-h f

=

n

~,

w a

f V

lK "

REi N

Nb 33-a=si NkN Ms 535 0

Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 01 TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS This indicator displays the training instruction hours administered to the listed departments for the reporting month.

This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time required for data collection and processing.

DEPARTMENT FEB 91 Total Hours M AR 91 Operations 329 187 Maintenance 1300 1313 Chemistry and Radiation Protection 610 1776 Technical Support 558 1004 General Employee Training 369 822 Other 96 39 Total 3262 5141 Data Source:

Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 67

.. _ ~

30--

Other Training (1000 Hrs.)

{@ oeneral Ernployee Training (1000 hrs.)

Technical Support (1000 Hrs.)

25

~ chemistry and Radiation Protection (1000 Hrs.)

Maintenance (1000 Hrs.)

@ Operations (1000 Hrs.)

20-1em 18.36

-m 15.31 15.55

(

15

^

14.31 12.92 id 12.37 h

12.7 Y

'@*4ha h

L

'3E [

g

e l

l

'I mt 10-

/

8.29 b

l l

gp hh A

MINIE fl Nll,,

hi;;

5!hi y

Nk 5--

l: dl Q

i e

E 7

8 LT 0

Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 91 TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING This indicator shows the total number of student hours for Operations, Mainte-nance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, General Employee Training, and Other training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station.

This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time needed to collect and evaluate the data.

DEPARTMENT FEB 91 Total Hours M AR 91 Operations 1518 524-Maintenance 5711 4579 Chemistry and Radiation Protection 1805 5543 Technical Support 1947 4694 General Employee Training 1047 2905 Qther 338 112 Total 12366 18357 L

Data Source:

Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source) l Adverse Trend: None 68-

Total Outage MWO's a MWO's Ready to Work Outage MWR Backlog 800 600 -

- - - A- -

400 -

200 -

0

-47' " o o. _. _ o -

0 Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Ju!91 MWO OVERALL STATUS (CYCLE 13 REFUELING OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the total number of Maintenance Work Orders (MWO's) that have been written over the past reporting periods for completion during the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage and the number of MWO's that are ready for work (the parts for these MWO's are staged, the procedures are approved, and the paperwork is ready for field use). Also included is the number of outage Maintenance Work Requests (MWR's) which have been identified for the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage, but have not yet been converted to MWO's. Any MWO's written after the start of the outage will be reflected in the indicator labeled Emergent MWO's. Approxi.

mately 3000 maintenance orders were completed during each of the previous two refueling outages.

Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes avail-able.

Data Source:

Patterson/ Hyde (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 69

Total Outage Modifications o Mods With Planning Document Approved

--C+- Mods With Final Design Approved

-+- Mods With Construction Package Approved 30 20- ---------------------------~~-----------------~~~------~~----------------------~~

10 ------------~~~~~------~~~-------~~-------~~~--------

~~------~~-------------'

~

N s

z+

a% 4 A

0 w

Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 PROGRESS OF CYCLE 13 OUTAGE MODIFICATION PLANNING This indicator shows the number of modifications approved for planning (to deter-mine feasibility) or for completion during the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage (RFO). Ad-ditional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes avall-able.

The current schedule for completion of the modification phases of the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage is as follows.

Outage Scope Freeze

Oct 1,1990 Planning Documents Approved

Feb 22,1991 Final Designs Approved

Apr 24,1991 Construction Packages Approved

Jun 15,1991 Schedule incorporated

Jul 26,1991 Material On Site'

- Construction Started.

Jul 26,1991 Feb 15,1992 Construction Complete Mar 30,1992 Accepted By SAC Apr 10,1992

indicates milestones which have not been changed as a result of the new Jan 92 refueling outage start date. A forced outage after Nov 91 could result in an early start date of the Cycle 13 RFO.

i Data Source:

Patterson/ Hyde (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 l

70

Total Outage Projects

-Jr Projects with Preliminary Schedules Submitted

-+- Projects with Detailed Schedules Submitted 50 40 30

_N 20

/

10 g

f'p-

/

0 Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (CYCLE 13 REFUELING OUTAGE)

Thls indicator shows the status of the projects which affect the scope of the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage.

The projects that do not yet have preliminary schedules are Liquid Effluent Re-leases and Radiography.

Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes avail-able.

The schedule for the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage projects is as follows:

All Projects identified and Outage Scope Frozen Oct 1,1990 All Projects Scheduled in Detail Jun 28,1991 Procedures Ready Oct 26,1991 Parts Staged Nov 16,1991 Data Source:

Patterson/ Hyde (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 71

12-Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours Fort Calhoun Goal GOOD

+

9-O-- - - G - - - - O - -- -O- - - - -G -- - - O -- - - O- - - - -G - - - - O

\\

i 6-

\\

3.7 i

ll3-

\\

N 6---e----m 0

'88 '89 '90 Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 91 VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS This indicator displays the number of NRC violations cited in inspection reports per 1000 NRC inspection hours. This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time 'avolved with collecting and processing the data.

The violations per 1000 inspection hours indicator was reported as 1.78 for the month of March 1991.

The Fort Calhoun Goal is 1.6 violations per 1000 hours0.0116 days 0.278 hours 0.00165 weeks 3.805e-4 months of inspection for 1991.

There was a total of 7,672 inspection hours in 1990 which resulted in 20 viola-tions.

Data Source:

Therkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 72

l l

75 -

I l Number of Violations During the Last 12 Months R Number of NCVs During the Last 12 Months 50 -

41 1

37 31 31 L

25 -

39 20 21 21 20 21

~

16

~

16 N

U

~

33 12 12

. 11 11 l;

ci; Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 91 CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCV's (TWELVE-MDNTH RUNNING TOTAL)

The Cumulative Violations and Non-Cited Violations (NCV's) Indicator shows the cumulative number of violations and the cumulative number of NCV's for the last twelve months.

This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved with collecting and processing the data for this indicator.

Data Source:

Therkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 73

i Total Outstanding CAR's l

l Outstanding CAR's > Six Months Old I

l Outstanding CAR's That Are Modification Re'ated 200 -

150 -

100 -

50 -

~

0 May90 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr91 OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS This indicator shows the total number of outstanding Corrective Action Reports (CAR's), the number of outstanding CAR's that are greater than six months old, and the number of outstanding CAR's that aro mcdification related.

As of the end of April 1991, there were 108 outstanding CAR's,35 CAR's that are greater than six months old, and 5 CAR's that are modification related.

Data Source:

Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 74

i 1

20 3 9 NOD overcue CAR's J-NOD CAR's van Extewons Granted 15 l C

10 4

\\

I

\\

o 5 3 4_. _h. 4. _ _ _ _ _ _~4.

., b _ _ _ _.,

O ' ' '

-6

- _ s m

a_,,

x 0

0

'O 3

0 b~ " ' ' b - ~ - --A 0

7-May91 JJn Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr 30 -

i 25 _

9 PED Overdue CAR s 20,

PED CAR's W<th Extensions G anted 15 -

10 j

-h----a'-',s.

', n

's

_.. -5. _ _ _ _ g. -

'r ~~. '~

3 u

0

'O E '~*

2 C -

~

May91 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr l

5i Other Overdue CAR's 4, Other CAR's W.th Extens ons Granted 34 2-0 e[^----$' '

,9

_u_

O 1-

/M[' ', E

_, -'I f

a

-ta m

a m

u m

May91 Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS This indicator shows the number of overdue CAR's and the number of CAR's which received extensions broken down by organization.

Overdue CAR's Februa y 91 March 91 April 91 NOD 0

0 0

PED 0

1 1

Others 0

0 0

Total l 0

1 1

Extended CAR's Februay 91 March 91 April 91 NODI 1

1 8

l PEDI B

9 2

l Otners 1 0

0 1

I Total i 9

10 11 Data Source:

Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None l

75

1990 SALP Funct. Area CAR's Signif. CAR NRC Viola.

LER's l

A) Plant Operations 62 0

2 10 B) Radiolog. Controls 28 2

0 0

C) Maint/Sarveil.

180 8

6 4

D) Emergency Preparedness 7

0 3

0 E) Security 26 0

5*

3 F) Engr / Tech Support 172 5

3 12 G) Safety Assess / Qual. Verif.

29 0

0 0

H) Other 1

0 0

0 Total 505 15 19*

29

' Revised because a pending violation was later categorized as a non cited violation.

1991 SALP Funct. Area CAR's Signif. CAR NRC Viola.

LER's A) Plant Operations 11 (1) 1 0

12 (1)

B) Radiolog. Controls 7(0) 0 0

0 C) Maint/ Surveil.

34 (4) 0 0

3(1)*

D) Emergency Pro?aredness 3 (3) 0 0

0*

E) Security 1

0 0

1 F) Engr / Tech Support 33 (3) 0 0

3 G) Safety Assess /Oual Verif.

10(7) 0 0

1 H) Other 0

0 0

0 Total 99 (18) 1 0

9 (2)

Note: ( ) indicate value for reporting month

Two LER's were incorrectly attributed to Ernergency Preparedness during March. The LER's should have been attributed to Maint/ Surveil.

CARS ISSUED vs SIGNIF. CARS vs NRC VIOLATIONS ISSUED vs LERs REPORTED The above matrix shows the number of Corrective Action Reports (CARS) issued by the Nuclear Services Division (NSD) vs the number of Significant CARS issued by NSD vs the number of violations issued by the NRC for the Fort Calhoun Sta-tion in 1990 and 1991, included in this table is the number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) identified by the Station each year. The number of NRC violations reported is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved in col-lecting and processing the violations. There were 0 violations due to personnel errors during the month previous to the reporting month.

Data Source:

Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)

Therkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 15, 20, 21 76

Fort Calhoun Performance Indicator Report Indicator Definitions AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK Tech Spec limit, and the unmet portion of the ORDERS 1495 MW FCS daily goal for the reporting This indicator tracks the total number of month are also shown.

outstanding corrective non outage Maintenance Work Orders at the Fort Calhoun Station versus DISABLING INJURY FREQUENCY RATE (LOST their age in months.

TIME ACCIDENT RATE)

This indicator is defined as the number of AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING accidents for all utility personnel permanently PARTS assigned to the station, involving days away This indicator is defined as the percentage of from work per 200,000 man-hours worked open, non-outage, maintenance work orders (100 man-years). This does not include that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total contractor personnel. This indicator tracks number of open, non-outage, maintenance work personnel performance for SEP #26.

orders.

DOCUMENT REVIEW (BIENNIAL)

AUXILIARY SYSTEMS CHEMISTRY HOURS The Document Review Indicator shows the OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS number of documents reviewed, the number of The cumulative hours that the Component documents scheduled for review, and the Cooling Water system is outside the station number of document reviews that are overdue chemistry limit. The hours are accumulated for the reporting month. A document review is from the first sample exceeding the limit until considered overdue if the review is not additional sampling shows the parameter to be complete within 6 months of the assigned due back within limits, date. This indicator tracks performance for SEP

46.

CARS ISSUED vs SIGNIFICANT CARS vs NRC VIOLATIONS vs LERs REPORTED EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT Provides a comparison of CARS issueo, NRC RELIABILITY violations, and LERs reported.

This indicator shows the number of failures that were reported during the last 20,50, and 100 CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE emergency diesel generator demands at the Fort The Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate and Calhoun Station. Also shown are trigger values the industry check valve failure rate (failures per which correlate to a high level of confidence 1 million component hours). The data for the that a unit's diesel generators have obtained a industry failure rate is three months behind the

- reliability of greater than or equal to 95% when Performance Indicators Report reporting month.

the demand failures are less than the trigger This indicator tracks performance for SEP #43.

values.

1) Number of Start Demands

- CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG All valid and inadvertent start demands, GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD ~

including all start only demands and all start The percentage of total outstanding corrective demands that are followed by load-run maintenance items, not requiring an outage, demands, whether by automatic or manual that are greater than three months old at the initiation. A start-only demand is a demand in end of the period reported, which the emergency generator is started, but no attempt is made to load the generator.

CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS & NON-CITED VIOLATIONS

2) Number of Start Failures (12 MONTH RUNNii4G TOTAL)

Any failure within the emergency generator The cumulative number of violations and Non-system that prevents the generator from Cited Violations for the last 12 months, achieving specified frequency and voltage is classified as a valid start failure. This includes DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT any condition identified in the course of This indicator shows the daily core thermal maintenance inspections (with the emergency output as measured from computer point generator in standby mode) that definitely XC105 lin thermal megawatts). The 1500 MvV would have resulted in a start failure if a 77

Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicator Report Indicator Definitions demand had occurred.

ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN)

3) Number of Load-Run Demands BREAKDOWN For a valid load run demand to be counted the This indicator breaks down the number of load-run attempt must meet one or more of the Engineering Change Notices (ECN's) that remain following criteria:

open awaiting completion by Design Engineering Nuclear (DEN), the number of A)A load-run of any duration that results ECN's that were opened, and the number of from a real automatic or manualinitiation.

ECN's that were completed by DEN during the B)A load-run test to satisfy the plant's load reporting month. The total number of ECN's and duration as stated in each test's received by DEN since the initiation of the ECN specifications, process in 1989 are also shown.

C)Other special tests in which the This indicator tracks performance for SEP #62, emergency generator is expected to be operated for at least one hour while loaded ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) STATUS with at least 50% of its design load The number of ECN's that were opened, completed, and open backlog ECN's awaiting

4) Number of Load-Run Failures completion by DEN, for the reporting month, A load.run failure should be counted for any This indicator tracks performance for SEP #62.

reason in which the emergency generator does not pick up load and run as predicted. Failures EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 are counted during any valid load run demands.

CRITICAL HOURS Equipment forced outages per 1000 critical

5) Exceptions hours is the inverse of the mean time between Unsuccessful attempts to start or load-run forced outages caused by equipment f ailures, should not be counted as valid demands or The mean t,me is equal to the number of hours i

failures when they can be attributed to any of the reactor is critical in a period (1000 hours0.0116 days 0.278 hours 0.00165 weeks 3.805e-4 months ) the following:

divided by the number of forced outages caused A) Spurious trips that would be bypassed in by equipment f ailures in that period.

the event of an emergency.

B) Malfunction of equipment that is not EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR required during an emergency.

Th.is indicator is def.ined as the rat.io of gross Cilntentional termination of a test because available generation to cross maximum of abnormal conditions that would not have generation, expressed as a percentage, resulted in major diesel generator damage or Available generation is the energy that can be repair.

produced if the unit is operated at the maximum D) Malfunctions or operating errors which power level permitted by equipment and would have not prevented the emergency regulatory limitations. Maximum generation is generator from being restarted and brought the energy that can be produced by a unit in a to load within a few minutes.

given period if operated continuously at E)A failure to start because a portion of the maximum capacity.

starting system was disabled for test purpose, if followed by a successful start EXPEDITED PURCHASES with the starting system in its normal The percentage of expedited purchases which alignment.

occurred during the reporting month compared Each emergency generator failure that results in to the total number of purchase orders the generator being declared inoperable should generated.

be counted as one demand and one failure.

Exploratory tests during corrective maintenance FORCED OUTAGE RATE and the successful test that follows repair to This indicator is defined as the percentage of verify operability should not be counted as time that the unit was unavailable due to forced demands or failures when the EDG has not been events compared to the time planned for declared operable again.

electrical generation. Forced events are failures or other unplanned conditions that require removing the unit from service before the end 78

Fort Calhoun Performance Indicator Report Indicator Definitions of the next weekend. Forced events include HOURS CHEMISTRY IS OUTSIDE OWNERS startup failures and events initiated while the GROUP GUIDELINES unit is in reserve shutdown (i.e., the unit is Total hours for 13 secondary side chemistry available but not in service).

parameters exceeding guidelines during power FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR operation. Power operation is defined as This indicator is defined as the steady-state greater than 30% power. The 13 parameters primary coolant 1131 activity, corrected for the tzhd are steam generator pH, cation tramp uranium contribution and normalized to a conductivity, boron silica, chloride, sulfate, common purification rate.

sodium, feed water pH, dissolved oxygen, Tramp uranium is fuel which has been hydrazine, iron, copper, and condensate pump deposited on reactor core internals from discharge dissolved oxygen.

previous defective fuei or is present on the surface of fuel elements from the manufacturing IN-LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT OF process.

SERVICE Steady state is defined as continuous Total number of in line chemistry instruments operations above 85 percent power for at least that are out-of-service in the Secondary System seven days.

and the Post Accident Sampling System This INPO indicator uses an industry normalized (PASS).

letdowa purification rate. The FRl has also been calculated using Fort Calhoun's actual letdown INVENTORY ACCURACY purification rate. These calculations revealed The percentage of line items that are counted that the use of the plant's actual rate would each month by the warehouse which need result in an approximate 45% increase in FRl count adjustments, data.

INVOICE BREAKDOWN GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING The number of invoices that are on hold due to DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT shelf life, COE, and miscellaneous reasons.

This indicator displays the total number of Curies of all gaseous radioactive nuclides LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS released tecm the Fort Calhoun Station.

This indicator shows the number of SRO and/or RO quizzes and exams that are administered GROSS HEAT RATE and passed each month. The License Candidate Gross heat rate is defined as the ratio of total Exams indicator tracks Training performance for thermal energy in British Thermal Units (BTU)

SEP #68.

produced by the reactor to the total gross electrical energv produced by the generator in LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING kilowatt-hours (KWH).

DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT This indicator displays the volume of liquid HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED radioactive waste released from the radioactive The total amount (in Kilograms) of non.

waste monitor tanks, to include releases halogenated hazardous waste, halogenated through the plant blowdown if radioactive hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste nuclides are detected in the blowdown system.

produced by the Fort Calhoun Station each The curies from all releases from the Fort month.

Calhoun Station to the Missouri River are also

shown, HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS The number of Hotline Training Memos (HTM)

LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS that are initiated, closed, and overdue less or (SECURITY) greater than 4 weeks for the indicated month. A The total number of security incidents for the HTM is a training document sent out for reporting month depicted in two graphs. This immediate review. The HTM should be reviewed indicator tracks security performance for and signed within 5 days of receipt of the HTM.

SEP#58.

79

Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicator Report Indicator Definitions

- MAIN 1ENANCE EFFECTIVENESS NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS The number of Nuclear Plant Reliability Data The number of radiological hot spots which System (NPRDS) components with more than 1 have been identified and documented to exist at failure and the number of NPRDS components the Fort Calhoun Station at the end of the with more than 2 failures during the last 12 reporting month. A hot spot is a smalllocalized

months, source of radiation. A hot spot occurs when the MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG contact dose rate of an item is at least 5 times The number of corrective non-outage the General Area dose rate and the item's dose maintenance work orders that remain open at rate is equal to or greater than 100 mrem / hour.

the end of the reporting month. This indicator was added to the Performance Indicators Report NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY to trend open corrective non-outage DATA SYSTEM (NPRDS) FAILURE REPORTS maintenance work orders as stated in SEP #36.

SUBMITTED The data plotted is the total number of NPRDS MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN component fai!ures (confirmed and possible)

This indicator is a breakdown of corrective non-and the number of confirmed NPRDS outage maintenance work orders by several component failures. The total number of NPRDS categories that remain open at the end ct the component failures are based on the number of reporting month. This indicator tracks failure reports that have been sent to the maintenance performance for SEP #36.

Institute of Nuclear Power Operations (INPO),

Confirmed NPRDS component failures are based MAINTENANCE OVERTIME upon failure reports that have been accepted by The percentage of overtime hours compared to INPO Possible NPRDS component failures are normal hours for maintenance. This includes based upon failure reports that are still under OPPD personnel as well as contract personnel.

review by (NPO.

NPRDS is the Nuc! ear Plant Reliability Data MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING System, and is a utility industry users group The percent of material requests (MR's) for program which has been outlined by INPO and issues with their request date the same as their implemented at the Fort Calhoun Station, need date compared to the total number of MR's.

NUMBER OF OUT-OF SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION A control room instrument that cannot perform EXPOSURE its design function is considered as out-of-The total maximum amount of Gamma and service. A control room instrument which has Neutron (Whole Body) radiation received by an had a Maintenance Work Order (MWO) written individual person working at the Fort Calhoun for it and has not been repaired by the end of Station on a monthly, quarterly, and annual the reporting period is considered out-of-service

basis, and will be counted. The duration of the out of-service condition is not considered. Computer MWO OVERALL STATUS (CYCLE 13 CRTs are not considered as control room REFUELING OUTAGE) instruments.

The total number of Maintenance Work Orders (MWO's) that have been written for completion NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED during the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage. MWO's IN LER'S which are written after the start of the The number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs)

Refueling Outage will be labeled Emergent attributed to personnel error on the original LER MWO's. Also shown is the number of MWR's submittal. This indicator trends personnel which have been identified for the Cycle 13 performance for SEP #15.

Refueling Outage, but have not yet been converted to MWO's. This indicator tracks NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS performance for SEP #31.

RESULTING IN t.:CENSEE EVENT REPORTS The number of Surveillance Tests (ST's) that result in Licensee Event Reports (LER's) during 80

Fort Calhoun Psrformance Indicator Report Indicator Definitions the reporting month. This indicator tracks require review.

missed ST's for SEP's #60 and #61.

3) Design Engineering Backlog /in Progress OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGCT Nuclear Planning has assigned a year in which The year to date budget compared to the construction will be completed and design work actual expenditures for Operations and may be in progress.

Maintenance.

4) Construction Backlog /In Progress OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION The Construction Package has been isseed or REPORTS construction has begun but the modification has l

This indicator displays the total number of not been accepted by the System Acceptance outstanding Corrective Action Reports (CAR's),

Committee (SAC).

the number of CAR's that are older than six months and the number of modification related

5) Design Engineering Update Backlog /in CAR's.

Progress PED has received the Modification Completion OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE Report but the drawings have not been REQUESTS (EAR's) updated.

The total number of open EAR's and the The above mentioned outstanding modifications number of open EAR's broken down by their t'o not include modifications which are age in months. This indicator tracks proposed for cancellation.

performance for SEP #62.

OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (CYCLE 13 OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS REFUELING OUTAGE)

The number of Modification Requests (MR'S) in The number of projects which affect the scope any state between the issuance of a of the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage and the Modification Number and the completion of the number of projects for which detailed schedules drawing update, have been submitted. This indicator tracks

1) Form FC 1133 Backlog /In Progress performance for SEP #31.

The Form FC 1133 has not been plant -

approved.

OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS

2) Modification Requests Being Reviewed The number of overdue Corrective Action This category includes:

Reports (CAR's) and the number of CAR's A.) Modification Requests that are not yet which received extensions broken down by reviewed organization for the last 6 months.

B.) Modification Requests being reviewed by the Nuclear Projects Review Committee PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED INPRC)

MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES C.) Modification Reouests being reviewed by The percent of the number of completed the Nuclear Projects Committee (NPC) maintenance activities as compared to the These Modification Requests may be reviewed number of scheduled maintenance activities ssveral times before they are approved for each week. This percent is shown for each accomplishment or cancelled. Some of these craft. Maintenance activities include MWR's, Modification Requests are returned to MWO's, ST's, PMO's, calibrations, and other Engineering for more information, some miscellaneous activities. These indicators track approved for evaluation, some approved for Maintenance performance for SEP Reference stud r, and some approved for planning. Once Number 33.

plaru ing is completed and the scope of the work is clearly defined, these Modification PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE Requ ests may be approved for accumplishment (CUMULATIVE) with n year assigned for construction or they Collective radiation exposure is the total may as cancelled. All of these different phases external whole body dose received by all on-site personnel (including contractors and visitors) 81

Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicator Report Indicator Definitions during a time period, as measured by the practices (PRWP) for the reporting month. This thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLO), Collective indicator tracks radiologica! work performance radiation exposure is reported in units of man-for SEP #52.

rem. This indicator tracks radiological work performance for SEP #54.

RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE The ratio of preventive maintenance (including surveillance testing and calibration procedures)

PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE to the sum of non outage corrective The ratio of the number of turnovers to avera;n maintenance and preventive maintenance employment. A turnover is a vacancy created completed over the reporting period. The ratio, by voluntary resignation from the company.

expressed as a percentage, is calculat, based Retirement, death, termination, transfers within on man-hours. This indicator tracks preventive the company, and part time employees are not maintenance activities for Safety Enhancement considered in turnover.

Program (SEP) #41.

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE RECORDABLE INJU ' / CASES FREQUENCY This indicator is defined as the percentage of RATE (RECORDABLt: INJURY RATE) preventive maintenance items in the month that The number of injuries requiring more than were not completed by the scheduled date plus normal first aid per 200,000 man-hours a grace period equal to 25 percent of the worked. This indicator trends personnel scheduled interval. This indicator tracks performance for SEP #15 and SEP #26.

preventive maintenance activities for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) #41.

SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE INDEX PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY - % OF The Chemistry Performance Index (CPI) is a HOURS OUT OF LIMIT calculation based on the concentration of key The percent of hours out of limit are for six impurities in the secondary side of the plant.

primary chemistry parameters divided by the These key impurities are the most likely cause total number of hours poss sie for the month.

of deterioration of the steam generators. The The key parameters used are: Lithium, Chloride.

chemistry parameters are reported only for the Hydrogen, Dissolved Oxygen, Fluoride, and period of time greater than 30 percent power.

Suspended Solids. EPRIlimits are used.

SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS PERFORMANCE INDEX (CONTINUED)

(MAINTENANCE)

The CPI is calculated using the following The number of identified incidents concerning equation:

maintenance procedural problems, the number CPI = ((Ka/0.8) + (Na/20) + (0 /10)) / 3 2

of closed IR's related to the use of procedures Where the following are monthly averages of:

(includes the number of closed IR's caused by Ka = average blowdown cation conductivity procedural noncompliance), and the number of Na = average blowdown sodium concentration closed procedural noncompliance IR's. This 02 = average condensate pump discharge indicator trends personnel performance for SEP dissolved oxygen concentration item Numbers 15 and 41.

IN BRE M O M PROGRESS OF CYCLE 13 OUTAGE er f Security loggable/ reportable MODIFICATION PLANNING incidents is broken down into the following The number of raodifications approved for categoh planning (to determine feasibility) for completion see Des, nad VeWes Ws) a during the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage. This Incidents related to the use of LDVs, e.g., keys indicator tracks performance for SEP #31.

left in the vehicle, loss of keys, or failure to retum Mys.

RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM 2 Security Badges The number of identified poor radiological work 1

82

Fort Calhoun Parformance Indicator Report Indicator Definitions incidents associated with improper use and alarm and door hardware such as latches, handling of security badges. Incidents include electric strikes, doorknobs, locks, etc.

security badges that are lost, taken out of the

8) Card Reader Failures incidents caused by protected area, out of control on-site, or mechanical breakdown of card readers, but not inadvertently destroyed or broken, improper use of the card readers. (See Access

3) Access Control and Authorization Control and Authorization)

Administrative and procedural errors associated This indicator tracks security performance for with the use of the card access system such as SEP #58.

tailgating, incorrect security badge issued, and improper escort procedures. This also includes SPARE PARTS ISSUED incidents that were caused by incorrect access Tho dollar value of the spare parts issued for authorization information entered into the the Fort Calhoun Station during the reporting security system computer.

period.

4) Security Key Control incidents involving Security key control, e.g.,

SRO & RO OPERATOR LICENSE EXAMINATION lost Security keys, Security keys removed from PASS RATIO site, or f ailure to return Security keys. This type The SRO & RO license examination pass ratio of event does not reflect incidents concerning for NRC administered Generic Fundamentals LOV keys, Exams (GFE's), NRC administered Site Specific This indicator tracks security performance for Exams, NRC administered license requalification SEP #58.

exams, and OPPD administered license requalification exams. This indicator tracks SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES Training performance for SEP #68.

Incidents involving alarm system failures, CCTV failures, security computer f ailures, search STAFFING LEVEL equipment failures, door hardware failures, and The actual staffing level and the authorized card reader failurer,. These system failures are staffing level for the Nuclear Operations further categorized as follows:

Division, the Production Engineering Division,

1) Alarm System Failure - Detection system and the Nuclear Services Division.

events involving false / nuisance alarms and mechanical failures.

STATION NET GENERATION

2) Alarm System Environmental Failures.

The net generation (sum) produced by the Fort Degradations to detection system performance Calhoun Station during the reporting month, as a result of environmental conditions (i.e.,

rain, snow, frost).

STOCKOUT RATE 3)CCTV Failures - Mechanical failures to all The total number of Pick Tickets that were CCTV hardware components.

generated during the reporting month and the 4)CCTV Environmental Failures Degradations total number of Pick Tickets that were to CCTV performance as a result of generated during the reporting month with no environmental conditions (i.e., rain, snow, frost, parts available expressed as a percentage, fog, sunspots, shade).

5) Security Computer Failures Failure of the TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS multiplexer, central processing unit, and other The number of temporary mechanical and computer hardware and software. This category electrical configurations to the plant's systems.

does not include software problems caused by

1) Temporary configurations are defined as operator error in using the software, electrical jumpers, electrical blocks, mechanical

6) Search Equipment Failures - Failures of x-ray, jumpers, or mechanical blocks which are metal, or explosive detectors and other installed in the plant operating systems and are equipment used to search for contraband. This not shown on the latest revision of the P&lD, also includes incidents where the search schematic, conne.:ction, wiring, or flow equipment is found defective or did not function

diagrams, properly during testing.

2) Jumpers and blocks which are installed for

7) Door Hardware Failures - Failure of the door Surveillance Tests, Maintenance Procedures, i

l 83

Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicator Report Indicator Definitions Calibration Procedures, Special Procedures, or

3) Automatic means that the initial signal that Operating Procedures are not considered as caused actuation of the reactor protection temporary modifications unless the jumper or system logic was provided from one of the block remains in place after the test or sensors monitoring plant parameters and procedure is complete. Jumpers and blocks conditions, rather than the manual scram installed in test or lab instruments are not switches (or pushbuttons) in the main control considered as temporary modifications, room.

3) Scaffolding is not consideted a temporary modification. Jumpers and blocks which are

4) Critical means that durn,g the steady state installed and for which EEAR's have been condition of the reactor prior to the scram, the submitted will be considered as temporary effective multiplication factor (k gg) was equal e

modifications until final resolution of the EEAR to one.

and the jumper or block is removed or is permanently recorded on the drawings.

UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS This indicator tracks temporary modifications

- (INPO DEFINITION) for SEP's #62 & #71.

This indicator is defined as the sum of the TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS The total number and department breakdown of 1)The number of unplanned Emergency Core training instruction hours administered by the Cooling System (ECCS) actuations that result Training Center-from reaching an ECCS actuation setpoint or from a spurious / inadvertent ECCS signal TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING The total number of student hours of training 2)The number of unplanned emergency AC for Operations, Maintenance, power system actuations that result from a loss Chemistry / Radiation Protection, Technical of power to a safeguards bus.

Support, General Employee Training, and Other An unplanned safety system actuation occurs training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station.

when an actuation setpoint for a safety system is reached or when a spurious or inadvertent TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING signal is generated (ECCS only), and major CONTAMINATIONS equipment in the system is actuated. Unolenned Reportable skin and clothing contaminations means that the system actuation was not part above background levels greater than 5000 of a planned test or evolution. The ECCS dpm/100 cm squared. This indicator trends actuations to be counted are actuations of the personnel performance for SEP #15.

high pressure injection system, the low pressure UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS This indicator is defined as the number of (NRC DEFINITION) unplanned automatic scrams (reactor protection The number of safety system actuations whicts system logic actuations) that occur while the include (g_nt y) the High Pressure Safety injectir l

reactor is critical. The indicator is further System, the Low Pressure Safety injection defined as follows:

System, the Safety injection Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators. The NRC

1) Unplanned rneans that the scram was not part classification of safety system actuations of a planned test or evolution.

includes actuations when major equipment is operated and when the logic systems for the

2) Scram means the automatic shutdown of the above safety systems are challenged.

reactor by a rapid insertion of all control rods that is caused by actuation of the reactor VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS protection system. The scram signal may have This indicator is defined as the number of resulted from exceeding a setpoint or may have violations sited in NRC inspection reports for been spurious-the Fort Calhoun Station per 1000 NRC 84.

Fort Calhoun Performance Indicator Report Indicator Definitions inspection hours. The violations are reported in the year that the inspection was actually performed and not based on when the inspection report is received. The hours reported for each inspoction report are used as the inspection hours.

VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE This indicator is defined as the volume of low-level solid radioactive waste actually shipped for burial. This indicator also shows the volume of low-level radioactive waste which is in temporary storage, the amount of radioactive oil that has been shipped off-site for processing, and the volume of solid dry active waste which has been shipped off site for processing.

Low-level solid radioactive waste consists of dry active waste, sludges, resins, and evaporator bottoms generated as a result of nuclear power plant operation and maintenance.

Dry active waste includes contaminated rags, cleaning materials, disposable protective clothing, plastic containers, and any other material to be disposed of at a low-level radioactive waste disposal site, except resin, sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low-level refers to all radioactive waste that is not spent fuel or a by-product of spent fuel processing.

This indicator tracks radiological work performance for SEP #54.

p 85

Fort Calhoun Station Porformanco indicator Report Index to SEP Indicators The purpose of the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Perfor nance Indicators index is to list performance indicators related to SEP items with parameters that can be trended.

S E P R e f e r e n e e N u mbe r 1 5.............................................

increase HPES and IR Accountability Through Use of Performance Indicators Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance).................................................... 25 To ta! S kin a nd Clothin g Con ta mina tions................................................................... 4 2 R ecorda ble injury Cas e s Frequency Ra te.................................................................... 61 N u mber o f Pe r sonnel Errors R eport ed in LER 's........................................................... 62 CAR's issued vs Significant CAR's issued vs NRC Violations Jssued vs LER's Reported..... 76 SEP Reference Number 20 Quality Audits and Surveillance Programs are Evaluated. improved in Depth and Strengthened CAR's issued vs Significant CAR's issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LER's Reported..... 76 SEP Reference Number 21 Develop and Conduct Safety System FunctionalInspections CAR's issued vs Significant CAR's issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LER's Reported.... 76 SEP Reference Number 24 Complete Staff Studies S t a f f in g Le v el.......................................................................................

SEP Reference Number 25 Training Program for Managers and Supervisors implemented Dis a blin g injury Frequency R ate.............................................................................

SEP Refere_nce Number 28 Evaluate and implement Station Standards for Safe Work Practice Requirements Disablin g injury Frequency Ra te.............................................................................

R ecord able inj ury Ca se s Fre q uency Rate............................................................... 61 SEP Reference Number 31 Develop Outage and Maintenance Planning Manual and Conduct Project Management Training MWO Overall Status (Cycle 13 Refueling Outage)....................................................... 69 Progress of Cycle 13 Outage Modification Planning...................................................... 70 Overall Project Status (Cycle 13 Refueling Outage)...................................................... 71 SEP Reference Number 33 l

Develop On-Line Maintenance and Modification Schedule Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities

( Ele ct ric al M a i n te n a n c e ).......................................................

( Pr e s su re E q uipm e n t).................................................................................

l (G o n e ral M a in t e n a n ee )..........................................................

l

( M e cha nical M aintena nce)..........................................................

l (Instrumentation & Contro1)..............................................................

............31 SEP Reference Number 36 j

Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog l

Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage Maintenance)......................... 26 Maintenance Work Order Breakdown (Corrective Non-Outage Maintenance).

..............19 SEP Reference Number 41 Develop and implement a Preventive Maintenance Schedule Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance......................................

......................21 86 l

Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicator Rsport index to SEP Indicators Preventive M aint ena nee it e ms O verd u e................................................................. 2 2 SEP Reference Number 43 Implement the Check Valve Test Program Ch e c k Va l v e Fa ilur e R a t e.............................................................................

SEP Reference Number 44 Compliance With and Use of Procedures Procedural Noncomplian e incidents (Maintenance)........................

.....................25 SEP Reference Number 46 Design a Procedurek Control and Administrative Program D o c u m e n t R e vi e w................................................................................

SEP Reference Number 52 Establish Supervisory Accountability for Workers Radiological Practices Radiological Work Practices Program.............

.................................................44 SEP Reference Number 54 Complete implementation of Radiological Enhancement Program Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative)................................

........ 9 Volume of Low-Level Solid Radioactive Wa ste......................................................... 10 Total S kin an d Clothin g Conta mina tions................................................................ 4 2 Decont a mina t e d Au xiliary Building......................................................................... 4 3 SEP Reference Number 58 Revise Physical Security Training and Procedure Program Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Security)........................................................... 4 8 S e cu ri ty i n cid e n t Br e a kd o wn............................................................................. 4 9 S e c u ri ty S ys t e m Fail u re s................................................................................ 50 SEP Reference Number 60 Improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports..................... 32 SEP Reference Number 61 Modify Computer Program to Correctly Schedule Surveillance Tests Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports.....

...............32 SEP Reference Number 62 Establish Interim System Engineers Te m p o ra ry M od i fi ca t i o n s.......................................................................................... 5 7 Outstanding Engineering Assistance Requests (EAR's).......................

4................

........58 Engine e ring Ch a ng e Notice Sta tu s............................................................................ 5 9 En gin e e ring Chang e N otice Brea kdown...................................................................... 60 SEP Reference Number 68 Assess Root Cause of Poor Operator Training and Establish Means to Monitor Operator Training SRO / RO License Examination Pass Ratio............................................................. 64 Licen se C a ndid ate E x a m s.........................................................................

SEP Reference Number 71 Improve Controls over Temporary Modifications Temporary Modifications..........................

.......................57 87

Fort Calhoun Station Parformance Indicator Distribution List J. C. Adams R. M. Hawkins D. G. Ried R. L. Andrews M. C. Hendrickson G. K. Samide G. L. Anglehart R. R. Henning T.J.Sandene W. R. Bateman K. R. Henry B. A. Schmidt K. L. Delek J. B. Herman S. T. Schmitz A. D. Bilau G. J. Hill F. C, Scofield B. H. Blome K. C. Holthaus L. G. Sealock C, N. Bloyd M. A. Howman H. J. Sefick J.P.Bobba L. G. Huliska D. K. Sentel C. E. Boughter C. J. Husk P.

Sepcenko M. A. Breuer K. C. Hyde J. W. Shannon C. J. Brunnert R. L. Jaworski R. W. Short M. W. Butt R. A. Johansen J. R. Shuck C. A. Carlson W. C. Jones C. F. Simmons J. W. Chase J. D. Kecy E. L. Skaggs G. R. Chatfield J. D. Keppler J. L. Skiles A. G. Christensen D. D. Kloock F. K. Smith A. J. Clark J. C. Knight R. L. Sorenson O. J. Claytor.

D. M. Kobunski K. E. Steele R. P. Clemens G. J. Krause W.

Steele J. L. Connolley L. J. Kripal H. F. Sterba G. M. Cook J. G. Krist G. A. Teeple M. R. Core J. B. Kuhr M. A. Tesar S. R. Crites L. T. Kusek T. G. Therkildson D. W. Dale L. E. Labs P. L. Thompson R. C. DeMeulmeester M. P. Lazar J. W. Tills R. D. DeYoung R. C. Learch D. R. Trausch D. C. Dietz S.E. Lee P. R. Turner D. E. Dirrim R. E. Lewis J. M. Uhland K.S. Dowdy R. C. Liebentritt C. F. Vanecek J. A. Drahota C. J. Linden G. L. Van Osdel T. R. Dukarski B. R. Livingston J. M. Waszak R. G. Eurich J. M. Lofshult W. O. Weber H. J. Faulhaber J. H. MacKinnon G. R. Williams M. A. Ferdig G, D. Mamoran S. J. Willrett V. H. Frahm

-J. W. Marcil W. C. Woerner F. F. Franco N. L. Marfice M. T. Frans D. J. Matthews H. K. Fraser T. J. Mcivor J. F. W. Friedrichsen R. F. Mehaffey S. K. Gambhir R. A. Miser J. K. Gasper K. J. Morris W. G. Gates D. C. Mueller M. O. Gautier R. J. Mueller S. W. Gebers W. L. Neal J. M. Glantz J. B. Newhouse J. T. Gleason M. W. Nichols L. V. Goldberg C. W. Norris D. J. Golden J. T. O'Connor D. C. Gorence W. W. Orr 4

R. E. Gray L. L. Parent M. J. Guinn T. L. Patterson i

r ".Gundal R. L. Phelps A. L. Gurtis T. M. Reisdorff R. H. Guy A. W. Richard 6.

l l

___.__m Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicator Report Summary Section ADVERSE TREND REPORT INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTION REPORT A Performance Indicator which has data representing three (3) consecutive months of This section lists the indicators which show declining performance constitutes an adverse inadequads as compared to the OPPD goal trend. The Adverse Trend Report explains the and indicators which show inadequacies as.

conditions under which certain indicators are compared to the industry upper quartile. The showing adverse trer.ds. Indicators with data indicators will be compared to the industry showing an apparent ndverse trend which is aq1 upper quartile as relevant to that indicator, cor'sidered adverse, will have an explanation which defines the reason why an adverse trend Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance does not exist.

(Page 21)

The ratio of preventive to total maintenance was reported below the Fort Calhoun goal of Outstandino Enor. Assist. Reanita (EAR's) 60% and the industry upper quartile value of

. (Page 58) 57.7% This ratio decreased in December and Although the total number of open EAR's is January due to the high number of hours in indicating an acceptable trend, the EAR's open which maintenance was involved in corrective over 6 months still have an adverse trend.

maintenance activities associated with the EAR's are being closed in accordance with forced outage. A decrease in the number of assigned priority. The acreasing number is the scheduled PM related activity hours resulted in result of lower priority EAR's not being the below goal February and March ratio.

completed as rapidly as newer or higher priority improvement is indicated by the April ratio of EAR's, 57.6 %

Number of Out of-Service Control Room

. Recordable Iniurv Cases Frecuenev Rate instruments (Page 23)

(Page 61)

The number of out-of service control room This indicator has been defined by the Manager instruments was reported as being above the of the Safety Department (E. Skaggs) as Fort Calhoun goal of 15 out-of service control exhibiting an adverse trend based on the 5 year room instruments and above the industry upper recordable injury frequency rate, quartile value of 7 out of-service control room instruments. Eleven (11) of the 32 total control room instruments out of service require an End of Adverse Trend Report.

outage for repair.

Secondary System Chemistry Performance index (Page 36)

The CPI value for the Fort Calhoun Station has -

been above the industry upper quartile value of

- 0.24 since the first CPI value was taken after startup in May of 1990. Part of the reason for the high CPI values is the fact that the Fort Calhoun Station has been involved in various derates and forced outages since startup in May. Another reason for the high CPI values is the fact that the Fort Calhoun Station uses morpholine to control PH. The use of morpholine also raises the CPI values.

89

~

-~~-

~ _.. -.

Fort Calhoun Station Porformance Indicator Report Summary Section Temocrarv Modifications (Excludina Scaffoldinal (Page 57)

The number of temporary modifications which are installed in the plant is currently above the Fort Calhoun goal of 15 temporary modifications. Part of the reason for the increase in the total number of installed temporary modifications, is the fact that quite a few temporary modifications require a refueling outage for removal. Currently,9 temporary

. modifications require a refueling outage for removal.

Violations Per 1000 Insoection Hours (Page 72)

The number of violations which have been identified per 1000 NRC inspection manhours is currently above the Fort Calhoun goal of 1.6 violations per 1000 manhours of inspection.

End of Management Attention Report.

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORT IMPROVEMENTS / CHANGES Disablino iniurv Frecuency Rate (Page 11)

SEP 25 has been added as a reference. Text has been revised to specify " injury / illness".

Invoice Breakdown (Page 55)- -

indicator has been changed to reflect categories of Service invoices, COE Invoices, and Miscellaneous invoices for the reporting month.

Recordable iniurv Cases Frecuency Rate (Page 61)

Text has been revised to specify " injury / illness".

End of Indicator improvement / Changes Report.

l ll.

90

FORT CALHOUN STATION OPERATING CYCLES AND REFUELING OUT AGE DATES Event Date Range Production (MWH)

Cumulative (MWH) _

Cycle 1 09/26/73 02/01D5 3,299,639 3,299,639 1st Refueling 02/01D5 05/09D5 Cycle 2 05/09D5 - 10/0196 3,853,322 7,152,961 2nd Refueling 10/01/76 12/1396 Cycle 3 12/13D6 09/30D7 2,805,927 9,958,888 3rd Hefueling 09/309 7-12/09/77 Cycle 4 12/09/77-10/14/78 3,026,832 12,985,720 4th Refueling 10/14/78 - 12/24D8 Cycle 5 12/24/78 01/18/80 3,882,734 16,868,454 5th Refueling 01/18/80- 06/11/80 Cycle 6 06/11/80 - 09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 6th Refueling 09/18/81 -12/21/81 Cycle 7 12/21/81 -12/06/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 7th Refueling 12/06/82 - 04/07/83 Cycle 8 04/07/83 03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 8th Refueling 03/03/84 07/12/84 Cycle 9 07/12/84 09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893 9th Refueling 09/28/85- 01/16/86 Cycle 10 01/16/86 03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 10th Refueling 03/07/87 - 06/08/87 Cycle 11 06/08/87-09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 11th Refueling 09/27/88- 01/31/89 Cycle 12 01/31/89- 02/17/90 3,817,954 45,589,459 12th Refueling 02/17/90- 05/29/90 Cycle 13#

05/29/90 02/01/92

Planned Dates 13th Refueling #

02/01/92-05/01/92 Cycle 14#

05/01/92 09/18/93 14th Refueling 09/18/93 -11/13/93 Cycle 15#

11/13/93 - 03/11/95 15th Refueling #

03/11/95 - 05/06/95 FORT CALHOUN STATION CURRENT PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS

RECORDS

First Sustained Reaction August 5,1973 (5:47 p.m.)

First Electricity Supplied to the System August 25,1973 Commercial Operation (180,000 KWH)

September 26,1973 Achieved Full Power (100%)

Mhy 4,1974 l

Longest Run (477 days)

June 8,1987-Sept. 27,1988 l

Highest Monthly Net Generation (364,468,800 KWH)

October 1987 l

Most Productive Fuel Cycle (4,936,859 MWH)(Cycle 11)

June 8,1987-Sept. 27,1988

-

ML20073Q587

Text

Reference:

SUBJECT:

Navigation menu

Search