ML20073B646

Performance Indicators Monthly Rept

ML20073B646
Person / Time
Site:	Fort Calhoun
Issue date:	03/31/1991
From:	OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:
Shared Package
ML20073B645	List: ML20073B642 ML20073B646
References
NUDOCS 9104240302
Download: ML20073B646 (100)

Text

/

FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS MARCH 1991 A

s.

s Prepared by:

Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group

.a-p[

h I

)

x 9

4 kwd of eaczka w wn, abb,...

d A wuden, wnd Ajud nwnl...

y d w a, ydians, cas

%g emnandnwal...

dwa,wayal1$...dwdaig Ljob 9MLpdliyne,muyto.

Jlw twns-dimbd, md L wwll of eaisund y,a wo<a sw,n,afwodh-dn ws as wnd Lpide, wnd $tadisn, as c_q_ % L 9u %e pean,, neljud u de&ng L qV %p.

)auns).6 % m

[

I 1

Omaha Public Power District Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicator Report Prepared By:

Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group March 1991 i

I 4

Fort Calh:un Station Perftrmance indic; tor Report ABSTRACT PURPOSE The ' Performance Indicators Program

• is intended to provide selected Fort Calhoun plant performance information to OPPD's personnel responsible for optimizing unit performance. The information is presented in a way that provides ready identification of trends and a means to track progress toward reaching corporate goals. The information can be used for assessing and monitoring Fort Calhoun's plant performance, with emphasis on safety and reliability. Some performance indicators show company goals or industry information. This information can be used for comparison or as a means of promoting pride and motivation, 9

SCOPE The conditions, goais, and projections reflected within this report are current as of the end of the month being reported, unless otherwise stated.

in order for the Performance Indicator Program to be effective, the following guidelines were followed while implramenting the program:

1) Select data which most effectively monitors Fort Calhoun's performance in key areas.

2) include established corporate goals and industry informttion for comparison.

3) Develop formal definitions for each performance parameter. This will ensure consistency in future reports and allow comparison with industryaverages where appropriate.

Comments and input are encouraged to ensure that this program is tailored to address the areas which are most meaningful to the people using the report. Please refer comments to the Test and Performance Group. To increase personnel awareness of Fort Calhoun Station's plant performance, it is suggested that this report be distributed throughout your respective departments.

REFERENCES INPO Good Practices OA 102, " Performance Monitoring Management Information" INPO Report Dated November 1984, " Nuclear Power Plant Operational Data' NUMARC 87-00, ' Guidelines and Technical Bases for NUMARC Initiatives Addressing Station Blackout at Light Water Reactors", Revision 1, Appendix D, "EDG Reliability Program", dated April 6,1990.

l l

_m_-_____._______

~ _- -..

- - ~ _..

S i

Fort Calhoun Station Pcrformance Indicator Report -

Table of Contents 1

INDUSTRY KEY PARAMETERS PAfd I

a F o r c e d O ut a g e R a t e.................................................................................................. 2

=

Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical...................................................... 3 1

Unplanned Safety System Actuations(INPO Definition)...................................................

4 -

i Unplanned Saf ety System Actuations(NRC Definition).................................................... 5 I'

-GrossHeatRate.......................................................................................................6 E q ui va le n t A va ila bility Fa c t o r...................................................................................... 7 Fu el R elia bility i n dic a t or........................... _................................................................ 8 j

Pe rsonn el Ra diation E xpo s ure (Cum ula tive).................................................................. 9 1

i Volume of Lo w-le vel Solid Ra dioa ctive Wa st e.............................................................. 10

- Disa bling inj u ry Freq ue ncy Ra te................................................................................. 1 1 OPERATIONS S t a tion N e t G e ne ra tio n.............................................................................................. 1 F o rc e d O u t a g e R a t e.................................................................................................. 2 Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical...................................................... 3 Unplanned Safety System Actuations - (INPO Definition)............................................... 4 Unplanned Saf ety' System Actuations (NRC Definition)................................................... 5 GrossHeatRate.......................................................................................................6 E q ui va le n t A va il a bility Fa ct o r...................................................................................... 7 Fu el R eli a bility I n d ic a t o r............................................................................................. 8 D a ily The rm al O utp ut............................................................................................... 1 2 Equipment Forced Outages per 1000 Critical Hours...................................................... 13 Opera tions and M aintena nee Bu d o et.......................................................................... 14 D o c u m e n t R e vi e w................................................................................................... 1 5.

o MAINTENANCE l'

Emerge ncy Diesel G enerstor Unit Relia bility................................................................. 16 Die sel G e ne ra tor Relia bility (2 5 De ma nd s)................................................................... 17 A y e of O utsta nding M alnte na nce Work....................................................................... 18 l-M ainte na nc e Work O rde r Brea kd own.......................................................................... 19 Corrective M aintenance Ba cklog > 3 M onths Old........................................................ 20 R atio of Pre ve nti ve to Total M aintena nce................................................................... 21 i

l

__. J

5 MAINTENANCE (con't)

Mftf Pr e ven tive M aint ena nce item s O verd ue...................................................................... 2 2 Number of Out of Service Control Room instruments.................................................... 23 -

- M s in t e na nc e O ve rti me..................................................,,......................................... 2 4 Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance)..................................................... 2 5 Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non Outage)............................................, 26 '

Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities:

~

( Electrical M ain te na nc e )................................................................................. 2 7

( Pre ss u re E q ui p me nt)................................................................................... 2 8

( G e ne ra l M a ir.te na n ce )................................................................................... 2 9

( M e c h a nic al M - Y.ie n a n e e ).............................................................................. 3 0 -

(Instrume nta tion & Control)............................................................................ 31

- Number of Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports.................................. 32 Number of Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPRDS) Reportable Failures.................. 33 M a lnt ona n e e E ff acti ve ne s s........................................................................................, 3 4 Che c k Valve Fail u re R a te.......................................................................................... 3 5 CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION Pe rsonnel Ra diation Expo su re (C umulative).................................................................. 9

-Volu me of Low-le vel Solid Radioactive Waste.............................................................. 10

- S e c ond a ry S yst em C hemis try.................................................................................... 3 6 i

- Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Out of Limit............................................ 37 Auxiliary Systems Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits............................................ 38 I

in Line Chemistry instruments Out of Service.............................................................. 39 :

H a z a rd ou s Wa s t e Pr od uce d....................................................................................... 4 0 l'

M a xim u m Individ ual Radla tion Exposure...................................................................... 41 Total Skin a nd Clothing Conta minations...................................................................... 4 2 -

- Deconta minated Au xilia ry Buildin g............................................................................ 4 3

- R a diological Work Practic6s Prog ra m.......................................................................... 4 4 N u m b e r o f H o t S po t s............................................................................................... 4 5 Gaseous Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Environment.................................. 46 Liquid Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Environment..................................... 47 il

4 Fort Calhoun Station Porformance indicator Report Table of Contents

~ SECURITY P_AG E Logg a ble/Reporta ble incidents (Security)..................................................................... 4 8 Se c u rity i ncid en t Bre a k d o wn.................................................................................... 4 9 Secu rity S ys t e m Fa ilu r e s.......................................................................................... 5 0 MATERIALS AND OUTSIDE SERVICES A mount o f Work O n H old A waiting Pa rts.................................................................... 51

' S p a r e Pa rt s i n ve n t o ry V a lue...................................................................................... 5 2 S p a r e Pa rt s i s s ue d................................................................................................... 5 2 i n ve n t o ry A c c u ra cy................................................................................................. 5 3 StockoutRate........................................................................................................53 E x pe d ited Pu rc h a se s................................................................................................ 5 4 i n v oi c e B r e a k d o w n..........................................................................................

M at e ria l R e q ue s t Pl a n nin g......................................................................................... 5 5 DESIGN ENGINEERING O u t sta n din g M odifica tio n s........................................................................................ 5 6 T e m po ra ry M odi f i c a tl on s.......................................................................................... 5 7 Outstanding Engineering Assistance Requests (EAR's).................................................. 58 Enginee ring Cha nge N otice Sta tus.............................................................................. 5 9 Enginee rin g Cha n ge Notice Breakd own....................................................................... 60 INDUSTRIAL SAFETY Disa blin g injury Freque ncy Ra te................................................................................. 1 1 Recordable injury Ca ses Freq uency Ra te..................................................................... 61 HUMAN RESOURCES

- Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs............................................................ 62

- Pe rs on nel Tu rnove r R a te........................................................................................... 6 3 S t a Hin g Le v el.......................................................................................................... 6 3 TRAINING AND QUAllFICATION SR O / R O Lic e ns e E x a mina tion Pa ss R a tio......,........................................................... 64

. Lic e n s e Ca n did a t e E x a m s.......................................................................................... 6 5 H otline Training M e m e s............................................................................................ 6 6 til

- - - -. =

TRAINING AND OUAllFICATIOR (cont'd)

.PAGE

- To t al I n s tru ction H ou r s..........................................................................................

Tot al H ours o f Student Trainin g................................................................................. 6 8.

REFUELING OUTAGE MWO O verall Sta tu s ( 19 91 Re f ueling Outa ge)............................................................. 6 9 Progress of 19 91 Outage M odification Planning........................................................... 70 Overall Project Status (19 91 Ref ueling Outage)........................................................... 71 QUALITY ASSURANCE Number of Violations per 1000 Inspection H ours......................................................... 72

- Cumulative Violations and Non Cited Violations (NCV's)............................................... 73 Outstanding Corrective Action Reports (C AR's)........................................................... 74 Overdue a nd Extended Corrective Action Reports......................................................... 7 5 Corre ctive Action Reports C u rre nt S ta tus.................................................................... 7 6 P E R FOR M A N C E IN DIC ATO R D E FIN ITI O N S.................................................................. 7 7 INDEX TO SAFETY ENH ANCEMENT PROGRAM (SEP) INDIC ATORS.....,......................... 86 PERFORM ANCE INDIC ATOR REPORT DISTRIBUTION LIST............................................ 88 SUMM ARY SECTION A d ve rs e Tre n d R e p ort................................................................................... 8 9 Indicators Needing increased Management Attention......................................... 89 -

Performance indicator Report Improvements / Changes........................................ 90 L

i l

f l

~

i f

I' l

!.\\:

t i

av

i

.s 30 Not Gens.ation (10,000 Mw hours) 40-35.1

. 31.27 26.se 27.26-20-16.36 10 0.-

Apr90 - May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb =- Mar 91 f

STATION NET GENERATION This indicator shows.the net generation of the Fort Calhoun Station for the report.

Ing month.

-During the month of March 1991, a net total of 242,258.8 MWH was generated i

by the Fort Calhoun Station.- This low net generation reflects the fact that the Fort

~ Calhoun Station was operated at 70% powcf for the entire month of March 1991.

Data Source:--

Station Generation Report

~

Adverse Trend: None I

e 4.

I i.

1 n

.. = -

15%-

- Forced Outage Rate O P rt Calhoun Goal (2.4%)

o

-D-Industry Uppcr 10 Percentile (0,25%)

0000 3.7 h

9% -

6% --

3% -

O - - O O ~ ~ O-O~

O - O

~O O~

-O O - O 1.4 0

g 9_.-O --O --O---O--O O-G --O -O --O

'88 '89 '90 Apr May: Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb91 Mar 91 FORCED OUTAGE RATE The forced outage rate was reported as 11.9% for the i.ast twelve months.

To achieve the Fort Calhoun Station (FCS) forced outage rate goal of 2,4%, the plant cannot be forced off line more than 19 hours2.199074e-4 days <br />0.00528 hours <br />3.141534e-5 weeks <br />7.2295e-6 months <br /> for the remainder of 1991, i

Data Source:

NERC GAD Forms Adverse Trend: None e

t 2-

-y

,,-,wer,,,,,-..v,

,-------w--,

. - ~ -,,, - -, -

.-.ww--rv.---,---.m.er<,--,-.y._

_r,.w--.-w--.-_,--.----v~-,---

3

~

l

-o-Fort Calhoun Goal

-e-Industry Upper 10 Porcontilo E FCS Reactor Scrams 2-1

- O-0-

-O-

- o - ~ O - - - o- - +

-o-

-o 0

0 0 0

0 ---C O

O O

O O

O D

0 O-0 O-

'87 '88 '89 '90 Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 91 UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL There were no unplanned automatic reactor scrams in March 1991. The last un-planned automatic reactor scram occurred on July 2,1986.

The 1991 goal for unplanned automatic reactor scrams while critical has been set at Zero.

The industry upper ten percentile value is zero scrams per unit on an annual basis.

The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper ten percentile of nu-clear power plants in this area.

Data Source:

Plant Licensee Event Reports (LER)

Adverse Trend: None 3

3-E Safety System Actuations

.l Fort Calhoun Goal 4

-O-Industry Upper 10 Percentile l-g.

t Good h

i

- - - - - - - - Ij..

E i

1

.I Q

C C

O C

O C

3 O

O g_

'88 '69 '90 Apr90 May Jun Jul Au0 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 91 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS - (INPO DEFINITION)

There were no unplanned safety system actuations during the month of March 1991.

The 1991 goal for the number of unplanned safety system actuations is zero.

4 The Industry upper ten percentile value for the number of unplanned safety system i

' actuations per year _ is zero. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the t

- upper _ ten percentile of nuclear power plants for this indicator.

i Data Source:

Plant Licensee Event Reports (LER) l Adverse Trand; None-1 --

t 4

. _.. _.. _. _, _, _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _. -, _. -. _ _. _. _ _ _. -....... -. _ _. _,, -.. - ~.,

.c M Safety System Actuations (SSA)

- 12 Month Running Total SS A

--- Critical Hours g,

$ 0-600 M

. -- y l,,--,

y 1 -

\\

l s

a s

e s

f\\

, -f I

\\ j'

'v 6-v g

g

/

000 l

\\

l

\\l d

l j [ \\

\\/

Y

~ ' "

3 3

s

, '1 a

2-1@

D 0

i, i j1 1

7

j a

y /

ll N ]

b n

0 u

'88 '80 '90 AMJJ S-0 N D J FM MJJdSbNb J F. M 19s9 1990 1991 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS - (NRC DEFINITION)

This indicator shows the number of unplanned safety system actuations (SSA's)-

which include the High and Low Pressure Safety injection Systems, the Safety injection Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators..The NRC classification of i

SSA's includes actuations when major equipment is operated and when the logic

. systems for these safety systems are challenged, The last event of this type occurred in November 1990 when the Diesel Genera-tors DG 1 and DG 2 experienced anticipatory starts when the turbine was tripped due to a forced shutdown of the plant. This forced shutdown was due to an in.

- strument Air System line failure in the Turbine Building.

The msjority of SSA's displayed above were related to 1990 Refueling Outage activities and are currently being reviewed under the Safety System Actuation Reduction Program, The goal of this Program in to reduce the_ number of SSA's at -

Fort Calhoun,

' Data Source:

Plant Licensee Event Reports (LER)

~ Adverse Trend: None l

l.

L 5

.~

.w

=

13 -

O Monthly Gross Heat Rate

-A-Year to Dato Gross Hoat Rate

-O-Fort Calhoun 1991 Year End Goal 12 -

-s-Industry Upper 10 Percontile aeo 8

- 11 GOOD v

10270,0 g ic3 N 1

h w-gw g= - --O ---O -O -O -O - O

- -O ------O g

y-g

_gg g g

g a

g g

g g

to -

"j :ig

^

l

,j (G i

(L '

dl W y +p d

a

'88 '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 GROSS HEAT RATE The Gross Heat Rate Indicator goal has been changed. This goal was changed due to the rescheduling of the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage which resulted in a reduction in operating power to save fuel.

This indicator shows the Gross Heat Rate (GHR) for the reporting month, the provi-ous 1991 months, the year to date value, and the year-end GHR for the previous 3 years.

The gross heat rate for the Fort Calhoun Station was reported as 10,297 BTU /

KWH during the month of March.

The year to date gross heat rate was reported as 10,241 BTU /KWH, The above year end Fort Calhoun goal (10,250 BTU /KWH) is the theoretical best gross heat rate that can be achieved by the Fort Calhoun Station during 1991.

The gross heat rate industry upper ten percentile value is 9,935 BTU /KWH, Data Source:

Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trends: None 6

e cv Monthly EAF

- Year to Date EAF

-G-Fort Calhoun Year to Dato Goal s

0- Industry Upper 10 Percentile i

+

w g.-. - p?/&.. 9.-. O.-.. 9 -9. ~.g _..cy..g.. ~ g n

,y (4

0

( T O

O O

e O

O

-E:

O o

i;) ?)

66.6 60% -

1" sa w

y

,p

h n GOOD m

\\

40% - y"W y&

k pg s

,)

)N

$,]l

"']$i g.

j f$ y 7 r8 q;ca.

b[

il 0% _

\\

'88 '89 '90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Do001 EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR This indicator shows the plant monthly Equivalent Availability Factor (EAF), year to datr, EAF for 1991, and the EAF for the previous 3 years.

The EAF was reported as 98.9% for the month of March. The EAF was not of-fected by the 70% power reduction during February, since the reduction was under management control and for reasons of economy (fuel savings).

The year-to date EAF was reported as 85.6%.

The EAF Fort Calhoun goalis 69% for 1991.

The EAF Industry upper ten percentile value is 82.5%.

Data Source:

Dietz/Parra (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trends: None l

l 7

.._._.._.m___..

6-

- Fuel Reliabiltty Indicator 4-Fort Calhoun Goal (1 A)

-O-Industry Upper 10 Percentile (.04) r

-6 Industry Median (2) d' GOOD hj 2.4hi 2-6 a

o o

o 4

6 o

o e

o o

N$$

1.5 1.5 i'

%y {

... o...o.... o....o.... o....o.... o....o.....o 1

1 0

0"

=O~

O " - O-

-O'

-O

-O

-0 0-O' ~ 0 --

'88

'89

'90 Janet Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul

/cg Sep oct Nov Dec91 FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR

-The Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) was reported as 1.30 nanocuries/ gram for the month of March. This INPO Indicator uses an industry normalized letdown purifi-cation rate. The FRI value using the plant's actualletdown purification rate was reported as 2.08 nanocuries/ gram, i

The Cycle 13 fuel performance continues without an observed fuel failure. The high FRl value is indicative of previous fuel failures and an industry letdown factor rather than a plant specific factor. The last detected fuel failure was during Cycle 10, The 1991 fuel. reliability goal has been set at 1.4 nanocuries/ gram.

It

- The fuel reliability indicator industry upper ten percentile value is 0.04 nanocuries/

gram.

Data Source:

Holthaus/Lofshult Adverse Trend: None 8

400 -

- Personnel Cumulative Radiation Exposure (Man Rem)

L

-o-- FortCalhoun AnnualGoal(75)

-e-Industry Upper 10 Percentile (166)

Good j

272 270 h

rm W

p 33 w

s,.

fj

{

200 -

~"

n __o ___o o__o_o-g

- o._o a __g _ a

-g

_1 f

S0 p;

93.4

~

100 c-.. o....o.... o....o.... o.... o....o.... o....e.... o....o.... o M

g l

l n/

.A

'88 '89 '90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE)

During March 1991,4.2 a.J.'. rem was recorded by TLD's worn by personnel while working at the Fort Calhoun Station. The year to date exposure is 23,2 man rem.

- The Fort Calhoun goal for personnel radiation exposure (cumulative) during 1991 is 75 man rem, t

The personnel radiation exposure industry upper ten percentile is 166 man rem per unit per-year.

Data Source:-

Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 54 l

9 u-....-

l C Radioactw Oil Sent For Proceanano (in 9ations)

[ Dry Adtve Waste $6nt For Processing (in cubic feet) 3000 -

2000 -

1000 -

0 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun sul Aug Sep Od Nov De:91

=== Cumu!strve Radicadtve Wette Bveed

-C+- Fort Cahoun Goal For Waste bried (4Fi c

@ industry Upper 10 Percentile wanto % ed 0072)

{

C Radion:tve Waste Burwid (in cae teen 4310

~

3-4500 -

C O

O O

O

-O O

O O

O O

Yr 3000 -

D-D-O-O O -O--G -O-@- -G

G - O s

q; 16M -

j a

O 17.3 39 1

._168 i

'89 S0 JanD1 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Od Nov Dec91 Year end Total VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE The upper graph shows the volume of radioactive oil and dry radioactive waste sent for processing.

The lower graphs shows the volume of monthly, cumulative annual total, and year end total of re-dioactive waste buried the previous 2 years.

The monthly and cumulative volumes of radioactive waste which were buried during the months of Januwry and February 1991 have been revised. These revisions are due to the delay involved in the shipping for processing, the processing, and the burying of radioactive waste.

Cumulative volume of radioactive oil shipped off site for processing (gallons) 4,330.0 Cumulative amount of solid radwaste shipped off site for processing (cubic feet) 5,218.0 Volume of solid radioactive waste which was buried during the month (cubic feet) 158.1 Cumulative volume of solid radioactive waste buried (cuble feet) 214.5 Amount of solid radioactive waste in temporary storage (cubic feet) 0.0 The Fort Calhoun goal for the volume of solid radioactive waste which has been buried is 4,500 cubic feet.

The industry upper ten percentile value is 3,072 cubic feet par unit per year. The Fort Calhoun Station was in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plants for this indicator in 1986,1987 and 1988.

Data Source: Patterson/Breuer (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP54 l

10 l

4 8

1-C 1991 Disabling injury Frequency Rate

+ 1950 Disabling injury Frequency Rate

-*- S Year Average Disabling injury Frequency Rato GOOD

-o-Fort Calhoun Goal h

-+- Industry Upper 10 Percentile

.6 -

b l

L L.

.4 -

O-.. - - o -. _o -..o

. o.

-0.... O --o.

.o.

_ p. -.o _ ;

o

.2 -

~% =

O A

l

=

=

+-

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc l

i DISADLING INJURY FREQUENCY RATE (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE)

This indicator shows the reporting month disabling injury rate in column form. The 1990 disabling injury frequency rate and the 5 year average of the corresponding monthly disabling injury frequency rate are also shown.

There wore O disabling injuries reported at the Fort Calhoun Station in March. The total number of disabling injuries that have been reported during 1991 is zero.

The 1991 disabling injury frequency rate goal was set at 0.31%.

The industry upper ten percentile disabling injury frequency rate is 0%.

Year Year End Rate l

1988 1.6 l

1989 0.4 1990 0.5 Data Source:

Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 26 11

LJ Fort Calnoun Unmet 1495 MW Goal F7 Thermaioutput Tech Spec 1500 MW Limit 1500--

1200-900--

000 -

300 -

f

. s.,

0-1 3

5 7

0 11 13 15 17 19 21 23 25 27 29 31 DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT The above thermal output graph displays the daily operating power level during March 1991, the 1500 thermal megawatt average technical specification limit, and the 1495 thermal megawatt Fort Calhoun goal that was not met.

Plant power level was reduced to 70% in February for fuel conservation in support of the extension of power operations for Cycle 13. This power reduction will con-tinue until the summer months when 100% power will be resumed. Reduced power operations will be resumed in the fall.

Data Source:

Holthaus/ Gray (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 12

2-

- Equipment Forced Outage Rate 1.4 -

1.6 -

)

1.4-1.2 -

GOOD 1-4

.8 -

.6 -

.53

'l

.4-

.2 -

,,3 0 E o

'88 -

'89

'90 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES -

PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS There were no equipment forced outages reported during the month of March 1991.

The last equipment forced outage occurred in January 1991 and was due to the December CEDM ' housing leak which carried outage time into January.

Data Source:

Plant Licensee Event Report (LER)

Adverse Trend: Nr,.ne l

13 l

,.. _.. _,. ~. - -

. - _ - ~ ~... _. - _ _. - _, _ _ _, ~.. _,. _ _. - _.... ~.. -. _.. - - - -,

1 80-

-+- Operations 1991 Budget ($ Million) j.

,,. * - 'y*,'*"

60-

"*- 1991 Cumulatke Total ($ Million) 40-

\\

)

20-0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 25 -

-+- Maintenance 1991 Budget ($ Million) y' 20 -

- 1991 CumulatNe Total ($ Million) 15 -

y' 10 -

,,, _. - +

5-0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET The Operations and Maintenance Budget Indicator shows the budget year to date as well as the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance for the Fort i

Calhoun Station.

The above 1991 expediture budgets do not rsflect the extension of power opera-tions and refueling postponement for Cycle 13.

The budget year to date for Operations was 16.7 million dollars for March while the actual cumulative expenditures through March totaled 13.7 million dollars.

The budget year-to date for Maintenance was 4.2 million dollars for March while the actual cumulative expenditures through March totaled 1.5 million dollars.

Data Source:

Gleason/ Parent (Manager / Source) l Adverse Trends: None 14

r 4

1500 -

d

- * - Documents Scheduled for Review

~

i

-+ Documents Reviewed y

[

-+- Overdue DoCJmento i

1200 -

li\\

.'I i

l \\

\\

f, i

900 -

l\\

i l \\

l

\\

l \\

l

\\

l

\\

l

\\

l

\\

l

\\

600 -

i

/

I

\\

l

\\

l

\\

l

\\

l'

\\

l

\\

V l

'z i

\\

l 300 -

l

\\,l

(

/

s i

.. -- K

\\

X ~ * ~.

f..

6.....s...

1..h-

~~'*

Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 91 DOCUMENT REVIEW This indicator shows the number of completed, scheduled, and overdue (greater than 6 months past the scheduled due date) biennial reviews for the reporting month. These document reviews are performed in house and include Special Pro.

cedures, the Site' Security Plan, Maintenance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance Procedures, and the Operating Manual.

During March there were 425 document reviews completed while 48 document re-views were scheduled. At the end of March, there were 45 document reviews l

overdue. The overdue document reviews at the end of March consisted primarily.

of_ Operations documents.

.During the month 'of March there were 89 new or renamed documents reviewed.-

These new or renamed documents will need to be reviewed again in 1993.

Data Source:

Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None-SEP 46 15

End of Month Trl00er Valuot, For:

Number of FrIturers20 Demands - 20 Demands C Number of Fauures/50 Domands - 50 Demands GOOD 10 l

l Number of Failures /100 Demands -

100 Demands iY 8-6-

4 4

4 4

3 3

3 3

22 22 22 22 2_

2 2

2

. I'>

i

{

0-Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 EMERGENCY DlESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABILITY This bar graphs show three monthly indicators pertaining to the number of failures that were reported during the last 20, 50, and 100 emergency diesel generator demands at the Fort Calhoun Station. Also shown are trigger values which corre-spond to a high level of confidence that a unit's diesel generators have obtained a reliability of greater than or equal to 95% when the failure values are below the corresponding trigger values. These trigger values are the Fort Calhoun 1991 goal.

The demands counted for this indicator include the respective number of starts and the respective number of load runs for both Diesel Generators combined. The number of start demands include all valid and inadvertent starts, including all start-only demands and all start demands that are followed by load run demands, whether by automatic or manualinitiation. Load run demands must follow suc-cessful starts and meet at ; east one of the following criteria: a load run that is a renuit of a realload signal, a load run test expected to carry the plant's load and duration as stated in the test specifications, and special tests in which a diesel generator was expected to be operated for a minimum of one hour and to be loaded with at least 50% of design load (see exceptions and other demand criteria in the Definition Section).

Data Source:

Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 16

I I DG 1 Fallares/25 Demands 5*

C DG 2 Failures /25 Demands Failure Trigger Value for 25 Demands 4-3-

2-1-

0 00 00 00 00 0

Nov90 Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct91 DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (25 DEMANDS)

This indicator shows the number of failures experienced by each emergency diesel generator during the last 25 start demands and the last 25 load run demands. A trigger value of 4 failures within the last 25 demands is also shown. This trigger value of 4 failures within 25 demands is the Fort Calhoun goal for 1991.

It must be emphasized that in accordance with NUMARC criteria, certain actions will take place in the event that any one emergency diesel generator experiences 4 or more failures within the last 25 demands on the unit. These actions are de-scribed in the Definition Section. A Standing Order has been drafted for the Fort Calhoun Station to institutionalize and formally approve / adopt the required NUMARC actions.

Diesel Generator DG 1 has not experienced any failures during the last 25 de-mands on the unit.

Diesel Generator DG 2 has not experienced any failures during the last 25 de-mands on the unit.

Data Source:

Jaworski/Ronning (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 17

400 -

l l January 1991 Outstanding MWO's l

l February 1991 Outstanding MWO's March 1991 Outstsnding MWO's 300 -

200 -

'1%

< v m

100-Oo Wi; a q ;-

i %.

i s;;,,

l l

l QQ ;-ig dyq N 'd r-Od 8

03 Months 3 6 Months 6-9 Months 9-12 Months

>12 Months AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the age of corrective non outage maintenance work orders (MWO's) remaining open at the end of the reporting month.

Data Source:

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None.

18

P 400 -

l l January 1991 l

l February 1991 C March 1991 Y

200 -

100 -

/

'_; s "1

.i !

[

j Total Open Total T9n Open Open M W O's Open faty High M W O's

> 3 Months Safety Related Priority Old Related M W O's MWO's MWO's

> 3 Months Old MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the total number of corrective non outage MWO's remaining open at the en' "' the reporting month, along with a breakdown by several key categories.

Data Source:

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 l

L i

l 19

i

- Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old 8x-

-o-Industry Upper Quartile Go0D l

Y l

s% -

1 o

o - o-o -- -o ----o -o-- o -o - - o -

o-o l

4W-l j

2%

Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Od Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 91 CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (NON OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the percentage of open corrective non outage maintenance work orders that are greater than three months old at the end of the reporting month.- -

The' percentage of open corrective non outage maintenance work orders that are l

greater than three months old at the end of March was reported as 39.7%.

The industry upper quartile value for corrective maintenance backlog greater than 3 months old is 45.8%. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper quartile of nuclear power plants in this area.

Data Source:-

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 20

- Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance 9W-

-s-Industry Upper Quartile (57.7%)

A I

--o-FortCalhounGoat(60%)

gg.

GOOD 70% -

6%-

p._- - v - - --- o --- - - o-- - -- -e - - - o - - -- - o - ---o- - - +-- - -- o ---- o - -- o o---

e.

-g e.-

D-D - -D

-O -D-D ---O 50% -

40% -

3W-20%

Apr90. May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov

- Dec Jan Feb Mar 91 RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE (NON OUTAGE)

The ratio of preventive to total maintenance indicator shows the ratio of completed non outage preventive maintenance to total completed non-outage maintenance.

The ratio of preventive to total maintenance was 54% in March.

The Fort Calhoun goalis to have a ratio of preventive to total maintenance greater than 60%. The low values for the months of January through March 1991 is due to the low number of PM activities scheduled to be completed during these months.

The industry upper quartile value for the ratio of preventive to total maintenance is 57.7%...

Data Source:

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: - None SEP 41 l

l l

21

• ~

Preventive Maintenance iterns Overdue

-O-Inductry Upper Quartile

-c--

Fort Calhoun Goal (1.2%)

7_

GOOD 4

2% -

D 0

0 0

D D

D D

0 D

D 1%-

os Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar 91 PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE The purpose of this indicator is to monitor progress in the administration and exe-cution of preventive maintenance programs. A small percentage of preventive rnalntenance items overdue indicates a station commitment to the preventive maintenance program and an ability to plan, schedule, and perform preventive l

maintenance tasks as programs require.

During March 1991,948 PM items were completed. All PM's were completed within the allowable grace period.

The Fort Calhoun goal is to have less than 1.2% preventive maintenance items overdue. The' industry upper quartile for preventive maintenance items overdue is 1.2%. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the industry upper quar.

ti!e for this indicator.

Data Source:

Patterson/ Linden (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 41 22

l 50 R Total Control Room Instruments Out of Service

.' Number of C.R. Instruments Repairablo On Une 1

40 Industry Upper Quartile For Total Out of Servico instruments 0- Fort Calhoun Goal For Total Out of Service Instruments 33 33 30 30-29 pg 27

\\

25 24 24 23 23 21-21 20-p.

... 1.c..

......og

~O.

15 10 +

[4 D-

- D --

-- -D--- -D+ -- D --

- D -- --D-

-- d' ES

- fd

- n m#

Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar 91 NUMBER OF OUT OF SERVICE CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS This indicator shows the number of out of service control room instruments, the number of instruments repairable during plant operations (on line), the industry upper quartile for this indicator, and the Fort Calhoun goal.

There was a total of 33 out of service control room instruments at the end of March. A plant outage is required to repair 12 of these 33 control room instru-m onts.

The Fort Calhoun goalis to have less than 15 out of service control room Instru-ments. The industry upper quartile value for the number of out nf service control room instruments is 7.

Data Source:

Patterson/ Adams (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 1

23

i

- Maintenance Overtime

-*- 12 Month Avorage G-Fort Calhoun Goal GOOD 60% -

4 40% -

N

\\

g

\\

\\

5.... g..... o..... o......e..... o..... o....g..... o..... o 20% "

0%

Apr00 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doe Jan Feb Mu91 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The Maintenance Overtime Indicator monitors the ability to perform the desired maintenance activities with the allotted resources. Excessive overtime indicates insufficient resource allocation and can lead to errors due to fatigue.

The percent of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 8.2*4 during the month of March 1991. The 12 month average percentage of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 13.9%

The Fort Calhoun goal for the percent of maintenance overtime hours worked has been set at 25*A for non outage months and 50% for outage months.

Data Source:

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 24 l

15 -

l l Open IR's Related to the Use of Procedures (Mainterance)

C Closed IR's Related to the Use vi Procedures (Maintenance)

(~l Procedural Noncompliance IR's (Maintenance) 10 4 5-U 3

3 3

3

]

e 2

2 2

_2

_2

_.2 7

1

! 1 11

'T"0 n

d:

d w

000 000

0 00 00 00 00 00 0

Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 91 PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the number of identified Maintenance incidents Reports (IR's) that are related to the use of procedures, the number of closed IR's that are re-lated to the use of procedures (includes IR's that were caused by procedural non-compilance), and the number of closed IR's that were caused by procedural non-compliance, it should be noted that the second and third columns willlag behind the first col-umn until the IR's are closed. This reporting method is due to the process in which IR's receive their cause category codes. IR's recolve their cause category codes when they are closed.

Data Source:

Patterson/McKay (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 & 44 l

25

l l

800-A Open MWO's

)

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal 1

600 -

0

-o- -O---- Q s

513 7

o..__o_....o_ _ o, M

444 O~

' O ' '- O 430 423 400-A

%.a 0

301 h

h h@k!' O" Q

329 A

. S

~"~~"

293 302 s.-

a

. wm c4;

<y ;

r;- Ajj

< m, 289 c<;m s j

o m

'4,'m w

jb[p 3

e m&T y LG

,+

l{!

- <j h s; >

'Q %

t' 5g

'[i

,?

U,~

}

Mpp lqe.

ef,l Jg+,

SE

.O!

y j

}g

- i) s mn

.'s w

s, g.p

... 4 200-

~

.; a a

j;j s

. p' '

w' g

Apr00 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 91 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVE NON OUTAGE MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the number of corrective non outage Maintenance Work Orders (MWO) that were open at the end of the reporting month.

The goal for this indicator is to have less than 450 corrective non outage mainte.

nance work orders remaining open.

Data Source:

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 26

._.__.m...____.____._._.__-._.__

- Completed Scheduled Activities (EM)

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal 100% T 4

\\

80% O-+. - O - --O

"---O O - o- - o-

.-o 1

60% --

40%

1/13 1/20 1/27 2/3 2/10 2/17 2/24 3/2 3/9 3/16 3/23 3/30 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES

^

(ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activi-ties as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Electrical Maintenance Maintenance activities include MWR's, MWO's, ST's, PMO's, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

Reoortino Month Comoleted Scheduled Activities Week 1 88 %

Week 2 93 %

Week 3 97 %

Week 4 100%

Week 5 (if applicable)

.94%

Data Source:.

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 l

1.

27

Completed Scheduled ActMties (PE)

I-O-Fort Calhoun Goal 100% -

i 80% O--O-0--

- O ----O --- O-- o- - -- -O-- 0--- -o 60% -

4096 1/13 1/20 1/27 2/3 2/10 2/17 2/24 3/2 3/9 3/16 3/23 3/30 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCF ACTIVITIES (PRESSURE EQUIPMENT)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activi-ties as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Pressure Equipment Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWH's, MWO's, ST's, PMO's, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal 19r this indicator is 80%,

Reoortino Month Comoleted Scheduled Activities Week 1 89 %

Week 2 97 %

Week 3 97 %

Week 4 97 %

Week 5 (if applicabic) 97 %

Data Source:

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 28

- Completed Scheduled ActMties (GM)

-O-Fort Calhoun Goat 100%

s 80% O --

0 ---- ----G 0- -- - 0-'-- ----- - o -- - O -

O - --

--& -- - O --- - O I

60%-

1 40%

1/13 1/20 1/27 2/3 2/10 2/17 2/24 3/2 3/9 3/16 373 3/30 PERCENT OF COMPLET,ED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (GENERAL MAINTENANCE)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activi-ties as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning General Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWR's, MWO's, ST's, PMO's, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%

Reoortina Month Comoleted Scheduled Activities Week 1 88%

Week 2 100 %

Week 3 91 %

Week 4 82%

Week 5 (li applicable) 83%

Data Source:

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 l

l 29 1

t

- Comp lsted Scheduled ActMiles (MM)

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal 100%

80% O- - &~

-O- -o---o--

0-

-o----o - -o e

60% --

i:

40%

1/13 1/20 1/27 2/3 2/10 2/17 2/24 3/2 3/9 3/16

%2?

• 10 PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVI'llE3 (MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE) i This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activi-ties escompared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Mechanical Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWR's, MWO's, ST's, Li

- PMO's, callbrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities, y

The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.

Reoortino Month Comolated Scheduled Activities

_ Week 1 88% -

4 Week 2 95 %

Week 3 82%

. Week 4 74% -

l Week 5 (if applicable)-

79 %

L Data Source:

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse-Trend: None SEP 33 r

- 30

- Completed Scheduled ActMties (10) l l -O-Fort Calhoun Goal

'00% -

~

80% O -- -O -

-G - --O- -O- --O - - O -

0--

- O - - - - O --- O- -- O 60% -

40%

1/13 1/20 1/27 2/3 2/10 2/17 2/24 3/2 3/9 3/16 3/23 3/30 PERCENT OF COMPLETE:0 SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL)

This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activi-ties as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Instrumentation & Control. Maintenance activities include MWR's, MWO's, ST's, PMO's, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.

The Fort Calhoun Stat lcn goal for this indicator is 80%.

Reoortino Month

.Qpmoleted Scheduled Activities Week 1 91 %

Week 2 96%

Week 3 100 %

Week 4 99 %

Week 5 (if applicable) 98 %

Data Source:

Patterson/Schmitz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 31

6 6N Number of Missed ST's Resutting in LER's I

I

)

i O

a 1

1

%9 4i.

N$

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 0

0 89' 90' ApSO May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 91 NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS This indicator shows the number of minwd Surveillance Tests (ST's) that result in Licensee Event Reports (LER's) during the reporting month. The graph on the left shows the yearly totals for the indicated years, During the month of March 1991, there were no missed ST's that resulted in LER's, Data Source:

Plant Licensee Event Reports (LER)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 60 & 61 32

I C Total NPRDS Component Failures U Confirmed NPRDS Component Failures 24 24 5

20-

4

13 13 10-

.1,1 i

5 5 51 5 5 4

5 81 ]1 ]l 3

lu

?

O O 0""'] O Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

,lan Feb Mar 91 NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY DATA SYSTEMS (NPRDS)

REPORTABLE FAILURES This indicator shows the total number of NPRDS component failures and the num-ber of confirmed NPRDS component failures. The total number of NPRDS compo-nent failures is based upon the number of failure reports sent to INPO. The number of confirmed NPRDS component failures is based upon the number of failure re-ports that have been accepted by INPO. The difference between these two figures is the number of failure reports still under review by INPO.

During March 1991, there were no (0) confirmed NPRDS component failures.

Data Source:

Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 33

-+-- Components With More Than One Fallure

-x-Components With More Than Two Failures 10-h S-

,,, m.... y.... n..... y......g

,y.

.y.....y

',' x,,

,/

0

'N' Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 91 --

MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS The Maintenance Effectiveness Indicator was developed following guidelines set forth by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's Office for Analysis and Evaluation of _ Operational Data (NRC/AEOD). The NRC/AEOD is currently developing and verifying a maintenance effectiveness indicator using the Nuclear Plant Reliability

-Data System (NPRDS) component failures.

.This indicator shows the number of NPRDS components with more than one failure during the last twelve months and the number of NPRDS components with more

_than two failures during the last twelve' months. The number.of NPRDS compo--

nents with more than two failures in a twelve-month period should indicate the effectiveness of plant maintenance.-

During the last 12 reporting months there were 4 NPRDS components with more than-1 failure, of which 2 of the 4 had more than two failures. The NPRDS compo-nents tag numbers with more than two failures were CH 1B and CH-1C.

-Data Source:

Jaworski/ Dowdy-(Manager / Source)

~

Adverse Trend: None 34

20 "

- Check Vatvo Failure Rate per Million Comp. Hours Industry Check Valve Failure Rate per Million Comp. Hours o-Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal (2.00) 15 -

t 10 --

10

~~~

$L 6

6 6

6~- - d - 6 6

1 I

I o

1 09' So*

Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 91 check vane Failures CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE This indicator shows the Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate, the Fort Calhoun goal and the industry check valve failure rate. This rate is based upon failures dur-ing the previous 18 months. The check valve failures at Fort Calhoun Station, for i

the previous two-years, are shown on the left.

The data.for the industry check valve failure rate is three months behind the re-

porting month due.to the time involved in collecting and-processing the data.

L

~ For December 1990,' the Fort Calhoun Station reported an actual check valve fall-L

..ure.raye of 1.95E-6 while the industry reported an actual failure rate of 2.59E 6.-

l At the.end of March, the Fort Calhoun Station reported a calculated check valve -

L failure rate of 1.95E-6. The Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 2.00E-6 failures l_

per one million check valve operation hours.

l.

Data Source:

Jaworski/ Dowdy (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 43 35

- Secondary System CPI Secondary System CPI Limit 1.5 -

GOOo

..e-Fort Calhoun Goal (.45)

+

-o-Industry Upper Quartile 1-

.38

,34

• M

&w& 4%

W o

6 6-6 A

o 6---o o

o A-6 p

ngM 0

'89 90 Mar 9 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb9 Hours Chernistry is Outside OG Guidelines 757.7 175:

m

@{

150; oooo

@j 125 ;

4

_100 75 -

146.1 50f g

25;

~

0

'89 50 Mar 90 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb91 YearEnd Totals SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY The top graph, Secondary System Chemistry Performance index (CPI), is calcu-lated using the following three parameters: cation conductivity in steam generator blowdown, sodium in steam generator blowdown, and condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen. The bottom graphs shows the total hours of 13 parameters ex-ceeding the Owners Group (OG) guidelines during~ power operation.

1 A new goal has been added to the CPI graph. The Fort Calhoun goal for the CPI is i

l'

-0.45. The CPI was reported as 0.446 for the month of February. The industry

?

upper _ quartile value for this indicator was 0.16 for August 1989 through Dec.

L

'1989. The CPI industry value then changed to 0.24 for 1990.

I The number of hours outside the OG guidelines was reported as 3.6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> for the reporting month.

The above two chemistry indicators are one month behind the reporting period due to the time needed for data collection and evaluation of the station chemistry data.

Data Source:

Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trends: None 36

c 10% "

- Primary System Cherstry Out of Umit

-e-Fort Calhoun Goal 8%-

GOOD h

6% -

4% -

19 1.8 2% --

o---- o bN 97 MMQ

% W; 0%

'89

'90 Mar 90 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb91 PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT The Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Out of Limit indicator tracks the primary system chemistry performance by monitoring six key chemistry parame-l' ters.100% equates to all six parameters being out of limit for the month. This l

Indicetor is one month behind the reporting month.

A new goal of 2% has been added to the graph for this indicator.

The Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of Limit was reported as 0%

- for the month of February, j

The high percentage of hours out of limit for the primary system during June and July was due to startup after the 1990 Refueling Outage and various power fluc-t l

_tuations which occ'urred during June and July. A plant shutdown and startup in l'

September and a plant outage in November / December resulted in a higher per-centage of hours out of limit.

Data Source:

Franco /Gi, tz (Manager / Source)

- Adverse Trend: None 37

t 10-Hours Auxiliary Syrtem Chemistry Out Of Umit Industry Upper Quartile 8-GOOD 6-4-

2-O o

L n

m m

m m

m m

m m

m

'09

'90 Mat 90 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb91 AUXILIARY SYSTEM (CCW) CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS The Auxiliary System Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits indicator tracks the monthly hours that the Component Cooling Water (CCW) system is outside the station chemistry limit. The above chemistry indicator is one month behind the reporting period due to the time needed for data collection and evaluation of the chemistry data for the station.

The auxillary system chemistry hours outside station limits was reported as O for the month of February.

The industry upper quartile value for auxiliary systems chemistry hours outside station limits is 2.6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br />. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently performing in the upper quartile of all nuclear power plants for this indicator.

Data Source:

Franco /Glantz (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 38

20 -

M Number of Instruments Out of Service

-- G-Fort Calhoun Goal

, <16 16-q

, jd{[$[

m lf' O TU '

12 12 12 - D JL 9ypey gv

- '7@d t!'k

'jg..f

,uh pnp g

3

'p Yi fd old i

.j c vp $;g gg,u n

a i

8-yg g

9A :y 7

7 7

Of; w-

. [kh[&'$[p. f];fy'.,.h.

.. Q. gj

..cNA.. [

_. -g'h;...p--...o.____.o 1

s n.

n

. ~

$., c 4_

-,1?$

'f;$

fl}p4

'",;k,"FD 09 g gd 7

g g!

r*,

)

v e g^: &

q 90 c.

g g;p 4

n Q,i Ti L

Ll.,

L

,w

..sf 3

hN k

h h,l

$?

Yfk f:q f

f

%Y'

~

i

!W.g %r, &a

.w

' n,N{'

%p w s

L

.7 "

.b d'w@'A f,n

$gdfM,3

%n w~

4

,$; sh

@$;d HM

[c d N

s7 f

"i 0

W Ox

g y

Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan -. Feb Mar 91 IN-LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-OF-SERVICE l

This indicator shows the total number of in line chemistry system instruments that l

are out of-service at the end of the reporting month. The chemistry systems in-volved in this indicator include the Secondary System and the Post Accident Sam-pling System (PASS).

At the end of March there was a total of 3 in-line chemistry instruments that were out-of service. Of these 3 instruments 1 was from the Secondary System and 2 l

were from PASS.

The Fort Calhoun goal for the number of in line chemistry system instruments that are out of service has been set at 6. Six out-of service chemistry instruments make up 10% of all the chemistry instruments which are counted for this indica-tor.

l Data Source:

Patterson/Renaud (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 39

@ TotalWaste Produced (Kilograms)

- Federal & State Monthly Limit (Kg) 1000-800-600-400 -

q$,$d$

w 222,2 200 -

f7 gg 89 8 7o,4 0

.AprSO May Jun~

Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 91 HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED L

L This indicator shows the total amount of hazardous waste produced by Fort L

.Calhoun each month. This hazardous waste consists of non halogenated hazard-ous waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and'other hazardous waste produced.

L

'During.the month of March,0.0 kilograms of non halogenated hazardous waste

- was produced,39.9 kilograms of halogenated hazardous waste was produced, y

l.

and 0.0 kilograms of other hazardous waste was produced.

1 1

Data Source:

Patterson/Henning (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None L

40'

5000 -

l I Highest Exposure for the Month (mrem)

OPPD 4500 mRemlyr.Umit 1: l Highest Exposure for the Quarter (mrem)

Highest Exposure for the Year (mRom) 3000 -

2000 -

1000 -

727

-727 0

Match 1991 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE During' March 1991, an individual accumulated 269 mrem which was the highest individual exposure for the month.

The maximum individual exposure to date for the first quarter of 1991 has been

--727 mrem.

The maximum individual exposure reported to date for 1991 has been 727 mrem.

. The OPPD limit for the maximum yearly individual radiation exposure is 4,500 mrem / year.

. Data Source:

Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source) 1 Adverse Trend: None l

41

I 237:

- Monthly Personnel Contaminations -

Cumulative Personnel Contaminations

-&- Fort Calhoun Annual Goal (144) g.

-o-Industry Upper Quartile (129)

GOOD E

350 1

e e-

-e - o e

e e

e e-e-e e

1oo -

t o.... o... o....o.....o...o.... o...o..o.... o.. _e.....o l

50 -

8 6

0

'89 :

90 Jan91 Feb Mar Apr - May Jun Jul-Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS This indicator shows the numbdr of skin and clothing contaminations for the re-porting month.- A total of 22 cumulative-contaminations have occurred during

1991, s

There was a total of 237 skin and clothln' g contaminations in 1990, i

The-1991 goal for skin and clothing is 90 contaminations.

i l;

The industry upper quartile value for total skin and clothing contaminations is 129 per unit annually. -

Data Source:

Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source) l Adverse Trend: None-SEP 15 & 54 x

42

,,3,_w-.,

- ~..

,m._

m m

d -

4 100% -

- Decontaminated Auxiliary Building

-O-Fort Calhoun Goal 90% -

o..._.o... _. n.

.n.

ceo..._..#._.y._ o _.o 80% -

C' t

GOOD 70% -

60% -

50%

Apr90 May Jun Jul

~Aug Sep Oct Nov -Dec Jan Feb Mar 91 1

DECONTAMINATED AUXILIARY BUILDING I:

L.

This graph shows the percentage of the auxiliary building which is decontaminated j

(clean) based on the-total square footage, a Fort Calhoun goal of 85% decontami-nated auxiliary building (non outage-mon _ths) and a goal of 75% decontaminated l

auxiliary building (outage months).

As of-the end of the reporting month,87% of the total square footage of the auxil-tlary building was decontaminated. An increase in the percentage of the auxiliary

~ building which is decontaminated is expected after the auxiliary building painting is.

completed.

Data Source:

Patterson/Gundal (Manager / Source) l Ad' verse Trend: None SEP 54 l.

ll l

43

~

~

~ _..

-.~.

=

14-E Number of identified PRWP's 12-10-8-

7-

' ]

4,

)

)qhl 4-l 3,

?

2

'q l ^

1 1

1 1

1 1

dd

!kk!

kb 0

h

$k!)

hk 0

0 0

0 Apr90 May, Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec.

Jan Feb Mar 91 RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM iThe Radiological Work Practices Program Indicator shows the number of Poor Radiological Work Practices (PRWP's) which were identified during the reporting month.

The number of PRWP's which are identified each_ month should indirectly provide a means to qualitatively assess supervisor accountability for their workers' radiologi-cal performance.

During the month of March 1991, no (0) PRWP's were identified.

Data Source:

Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

. Adverse Trend: None SEP 52 l

l 44

. =

75 -

@ Total Number of Hot Spots l

l Number of Additional Hot Spots identified 53 53 53 a

7 50- ij g

g 5

~a ki k) 25 -

N f

a.

l 0

Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec91 NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS This indicator shows the total number of hot spots which have been identified to exist in the Fort Calhoun Station and have been documented through the use of a hot spot identification sheet. A hot spot is defined as a small localized source of high radiation. A hot spot occurs when the contact dose rate of an item or piece of equipment is at least 5 times the General Area dose rate and the item or piece of equipment's dose rate is equal to or greater than 100 mrem / hour.

Data Source:

Patterson/ Williams (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trends: None 45

Monthly Radioactive Gas Discha ged (Curles)

- CumulatNe Rad onctive Gas Disctwged (Curies) o CumulatNo AnnualGoal(Curios)

Jes 800 -

3y jp}g j

MOD 4

600 -

l

$,.A'i y

ipw niv.,

yiMI 400 -

g;g O- - - - o - - - & - -- -G- -- - o -- - -o - - --o ---- o - -- A - -. n e----o

@j@t

/

??

184 200 -

~

m

$gQ T

ib

~E

^ ^ ' "

O

'88

'89 Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Ju!

Aug Sep Oct Nov ' Doc 90 GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for January 1990 through December 1990. A total of 465.3 curies have_been re-leased to the environment from January through December of 1990. The Fort Calhoun Station goal was 360 curies for this indicator.

l The high value of gaseous radioactive waste that was released to the environment during the month of February 1990 was due to a containment purge associated with the 1990 Refueling Outage.

The gaseous radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every_six months.

Data Source:'

Franco /Krist (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend:.None l

l 46

e I

M4 Monthly Radioactive Liquid Discharged Cumulative RadioactNe liquid Discharged

--o-- Cumulative AnnualGoal 228 231 228 300 -

lIl200, S.. o.... o...o... c.... o...e....o... o...o.....o... o GOOD 100 -

h 54 8

$k[f '

3 4

4 3

3 10.3 6 04

'87 '88 '89 JanDO Feb Mar Apr May JJn Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec00 40000 -

35000 -

e g 30000 -

{ 25003-0 20000-15000 -

10000-5000 3199 341o 351o 3:50 3:so 4170 pc7o 0

Jan90 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jat Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec90 LIQUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is shown for the months of January 1990 through December 1990. The liquid radioactive waste that was discharged to the environment from all sources totaled 175.5 curies from January through December 1990. The Fort Calhoun Station goal for 1990 is 256 Curies.

The bottom graph shows the volume of liquid radioactive waste that has been released from the radioactive waste monitor tanks and steam generators. The volume of liquid radioactive waste discharged to the environment from the radioac-tive waste monitor tanks and the steam generators totaled 20.7 million gallons from January through December 1990. The liquid radioactive waste that was re-leased to the environment includes liquid released from the steam generators due to the fact that radioisotopes were detected in the steam generator blowdown.

The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to the environment is calculated every six months.

Data Source:

Franco /Krist (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 47

0 Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Does not include System Failures) 25-20 ;

GOOD 15 -

y

! \\

S-

=

O Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 91 120 -

Security System Failores GOOD 80-4

~

40-O Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 91 LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY)

The Loggable/ Reportable incidents (Security) Indicator is depicted in two separate graphs..The first chart depicts the total number of loggable/ reportable incidents concerning Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV's); Security Badges; Security Key Control; and Access Control and Authorization which occurred during the reporting month. The bottom graph shows the total number of loggable/ reportable incidents concerning security system failures which occurred during the reporting month.

During the month of March 1991, there were 79 loggable/ reportable incidents

[

Identified. Security system failures accounted for 97% of the loggable/ reportable l

Incidents reported this month. There were 2 loggable/ reportable incidents reported l

_ in the 4 other major areas of concern. Both incidents involved the improper use i

and handling of security badges by plant personnel. Environmental failures con-L tinue to cause concern and considerable efforts are being made by Security, Main-l tenance, and System Engineering to alleviate this problem.

Data Source:

Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 48

16--

R Security Report / Log incidents December 1990 14 -

!!h Security Report / Log incidents January 1991 l

l Security Report / Log incidents February 1991 12 -

Security Report / Log incidents March 1991 10 "

GOOD oM 90 4

y Jan91 6

8-Feb91 0

Mar 91 2

6--

4~

',TS1 y

2-G-

> :p 0

0 0

0

'd 0

0 0

0 0

0 @

0 0

LDVs Badges Key Control Access Control SECURITY INCIDENT BREAKDOWN This indicator now shows the number of incidents concerning the following items for the reporting month: Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV's); Security Badges; Access Control and Authorization; and Secur:ty Key Control.

Data Source:

Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 49

m-_

?

50'-

l-l Environmental Fallures.

43

fV System Failures 40-

[

GOOD 4

30-l-

. '20 -

10~

8

_6 5

l 5

a 0

0 0

Alarrns ccTV Computer Search Equip.

Doors Card Readera s

SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES This indicator shows the number of incidents concerning the following items for the reporting month: Alarm System Failures, CCTV failures, Security Computer Failures, Search Equipment Failures, Door Hardware Failures, and Card Reader Fall-L uresl. Alarm systems and CCTV failures will now be divided into two categories:

fenvironmental failures and system failures.

. Number of incidents:

- Feb 91 Mar 91

System Failures

- Env. Fail.

Eaulo; Fall.

Env. Fall.

Eaulo, Fail.

- Alarm Systems 3

8 10-6 CCTV 34 1

43-5.

i l

Computer n/a-3 n/a 8-i -

Search Equipment n/a 2

n/a 0

- Door Hardware.

n/a.-

10 n/a 5

- Card Reader n/a' O

n/a 0

y

. Total -

37 24 53-24 Data Source:

Sefick/Woerner (Manager / Source) 1 Adverse Trend: None SEP 58 l

50 l

- 10% -

-o-Amount of Work On Hold Awahing Parts O - Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal 8% -

GOOD h

6%-

s.7%

s.7%

4.yg dd%

4.3%

3.9% /

39%

3.9%

d%

O y

......o....o 2% --

0%

Apr90 _ May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dee Jan Feb Mar 91 AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING PARTS (NON-OUTAGE)

This procurement indicator displays the amount of open, non outage, maintenance items that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total amount of open, non outage, maintenance items,-expressed as a percentage.

There was a total of 720 open, non-outage, maintenance items with 31 of these items on hold awaiting parts at the end of the reporting month.

The 1991 Fort Calhoun Goal for this indicator is 3.5% of the total number of open non-outage maintenance items awaiting parts.

. Data Source:.

Willrett/ CHAMPS (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 51

=

+ Spare Parts inventory Value ($ Million) 12 -

m

$9 -

m C

F

~

$6 Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 91 SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALUE The spare parts. inventory value at the Fort Calhoun Station at the end of March was reported as $11,962,942.

Data Source:

Steele/Hullska (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None

-500

-o-Spare Parts Issued ($ Thousands) 400 -

300 -

/

100 -

~

$0 Apr00 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 91 SPARE PARTS ISSUED The value of the spare parts issued during March totaled $145,475, t

-Data Source:

Steele/ Miser (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None L

52

-* - Inventory Accuracy

-O-Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal (98%)

100%

~

W

-m

m 95%-

90%--

85%

Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 91 INVENTORY ACCURACY This indicator shows the accuracy of the actual parts count for the warehouse compared to the counts contained in the MMIS computer system for the reporting month.

During March,566 different line items were counted in the warehouse. Of the 566 line items counted,12 items needed count adjustments. The inventory accuracy for the month of March was reported as 98%. The Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator is 98%.

Data Source:

Wilfrett/Fraser (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 4 --

Pick Tickets With Parts Not Available G-Fort Calhoun Goal 3-2--

1--

0 0

Apr90 May_

Jun Jul Aug Sep.

Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 91 STOCKOUT RATE This indicator shows the percentage of the number of Pick Tickets generated with no parts available during the reporting month.

During March, a total of 831 Pick Tickets were generated. Of the 831 Pick Tickets generated, O Pick Tickets were generated with no parts available.

The Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal is 0%

Data Source:

Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 53

2%.

-o- % of Total Purchases that are Expedited

-o-Fort Calhoun 1991 Goal (0.5%)

1.5% -

1%--

.5% --

o--- o- -

-o 0%

Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 91 EXPEDITED PURCHASES This indicator shows the percentage of expedited purchases compared to the total number of purchase orders generated during the reporting month.

During March, there was a total of 402 purchase orders generated. Of the 402

. purchase orders generated, there were 0 expedited purchases.

The Fort Calhoun goal for this indicator 0.5%.

Data Source:

Willre tt/Fra s e r- (M a na g e r/S o u rc e)

Adverse Trend: None 54

.-~--

i 100-s January '91 On Hold involcos 80 R February '91 On Hold invoices March '91 On Hold Invoices 60 "

52 ikhNh 40-34 20--

?;

13 O

'kN 0

0 0

Shelf Ufe COE Miscellaneous INVOICE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows the number of invoices that are on hold at the end of the reporting month due to shelf life, COE, and miscellaneous reasons.

At the end of March, O invoices were on hold due to shelf life reasons,22 invoices were on hold due to COE reasons, and 13 invoices were on hold due to miscella-neous reasons.

Data Source:

Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 100% -

• Percentage of Material Requests for lasues with the Request Date the same as the Need Date 80% -

~

60% -

40%-

20%

Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 91 MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING This indicator shows the percent of material requests (MR's) for issues with their request date the same as their need date compared to the total number of MR's for issues for the reporting month.

During the month of March, a total of 831 MR's were received by the warehouse.

Of the 831 total MR's received by the warehouse,525 MR's were for issues with L

their request date the same as their need date.

Data Source:

Willrett/Fraser (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 55 t

s

.~ -

s

- Total Modification Packages Open t

500 -

425 425 j

400 -

N I'

337 I 300 -

~

200

'88 '89 '90 Apr90 May Jun. Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov "ac Jan Feb Mar 91 Year End Numbers i:

OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS

.This indicator shows the total number of outstanding modifications (excluding out-standing modifications which ate proposed to be cancelled).

L L

Cateoorv

_ Reoortino Month Forrn FC 1133 Backlog /In Progress 14 Mod Requests Being Reviewed 96 t

L':

Design Engr. Backlog /in Progress 102 Construction Backlog /in Progress 24 Desian Enar Uodate Backloa/In Proaress 70' t

Total 306 I

As of the end of March,10 additional modification requests have been issued this J

. year and O modification requests have been cancelled.' The Nuclear Projects Re-view Committee (NPRC) has completed 12 backlog-modification request reviews this year. The Nuclear Projects Committee (NPC).has completed'12 backlog modifi-

cation _ request reviews this year.

L

Data Source:

Jaworski/ Turner (Manager / Source).

lz Scofield/Lounsberry (Manger / Source)

L

' Adverse Trend: None l

L56

=

100 -

TotalTemporary Modifications l

--G-Fort Calhoun Goal 80 ]

60 -

40 -

20

.s e.....e..

.o.....g.....e_

..q....o.....g......e.....o.....o.... o O

Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 91 W January 1991 10 -

l l February 1991 g

1

. March 1991 g.

6-M:

}!h;

'.3 4-mL g

M i 2-l;'j w

~

0 0-3 Months 3 6 Months 6 9 Months 912 Months

> 12 Months TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING)

The top graph shows the total number of temporary modifications (TM's) installed in the Fort Calhoun Station and the Fort Calhoun goal The bottom graph shows the age of all installed TM's in the plant for the respective month.

At the end of March, there was a total of 22 TM's installed in the Fort Calhoun Station. As of the end of the reporting month,9 of the 22 installed TM's require an outage for removal. The current Fort Calhoun goal for the total number of in-stalled TM's is less than15.

Data Source:

Jaworski/ Turner (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 & 71 1

57

\\

200-

+- Total Number of Open EAR's 150 100 -

E 50-O Jul90 Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun

[

l l January 1991 80-C February 1991 Mare 1991 00

-~

40-20 0-0 3 months 3 6 months

>0 months OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE REQUESTS (EAR's)

The top graph shows the total number of open EA ;': st the end of the reporting month. The bottom graph shows the total number of op,9 EAR's broken down by their age in months.

There were a total of 159 open EAR's at the end of March.

Data Source:

Jaworst;;/ Van Osdel (Manager / Source)

SEP 62 Adverse Trend: Although the total number of open EAR's is indicating an accept-able trend, the EAR's open over 6 months still have an adverse trend. EAR's are being closed in accordance of assigned priority. The increasing total number is the result of lower priority EAR's not being completed as rapidly as newer or higher priority EAR's.

58 l

l 180-

-G-ECN's Backlog in DEN

• - ECN's Opened During the Month U,

150-

-*- ECN's Completed During the Month i

e/

120 -

e 90-

/

y t

60-N X-s p ','l'

.\\

~

N.

j

'y

, ?" ',, *

'7.,

' N,,

j

\\

x..--R j

_30-N

..e

...s,..

x' X

0 Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 91

[

ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS 4

This indicator shows the number of Engineering Change Notices (E_CN's) awaiting completion by DEN, the number of ECN's opened during the reporting month, and F

the number of ECN's completed by DEN during the reporting month.

At the end of March 1991, there was a total of 168 DEN backlogged open ECN's.

.There were 24 ECN's opened, and 23 ECN's completed during the month of March.-

t

.Although the number of'open ECN's is currently high, activities are in progress to i

reduce the backlog of open ECN's. It is expected that in several months the num-ber of open ECN's will begin to decrease.

Da'ta Source:

Pb ;ips/Bera (Manager / Source)

SEP 62 L

Adverse Trend: None 59 m

-_i_L,,-,__...

_,_.._~,.r.~..

._a_,

.. - ~.,

400 -

E DocumentChanges l

I Substitute Replacement item E FaelutyChanges 3g3 300 --

242

,;g 200-A-

189 i

+

5 4

100 -

67 i

A k

3k 8

8 7

e 7

10

1. g M-l 0-Total Open ECN's Opened ECN's Completed ECN's Total ECN's Reev ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE BREAKDOWN j

This indicator breaks down the number of Engineering Change Notices (ECN's)-

that remain open awaiting completion by Design Engineering Nuclear (DEN), the number of ECN's that were opened, and the number of ECN's that were completed by DEN during the reporting month. The total number of ECN's received by DEN since tha initiation of the ECN process in 1989 is also shown-,

Data Source:

Phelps/Dera (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 1

60 F

_%m

I 4'

E 1991 Recordable injury Frequency Rate

+ 1990 Recordable injury Frequency Rate 3.5

+- 5 Year Average Recordable injury Frequency Rate 3-25-2.4 GOOD m

t,

' ty; 4

i 2-

'\\, k N

s,

's

/

N 4

, 4.58 N,'

I 1.5 -

. y w.., y... +,

%a' ' y!!;

N s

-** " - - + - - - - - +

sn 1-l

. v # -

~

q Yb

.5 -

i kg v 0,

i 00 0

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FREQUENCY RATE

' This indicator shows the 1991 monthly,1990 monthly, and the FCS 5 year monthly average of the recordable injury cases frequency rates.

l A recordable _ Injury case is reported if Nuclear Operations Division personnel are injured on the job and require corrective medical treatment. The recordable cases l'

frequency rate is computed on a year to date' basis, a

di.pp were 0 recordable injury cases reported during the month of March There hi,10en a total of 2 recordable injury cases so far in 1991, h

\\s N.

i Year Recordable Cases Year End Rate 1988 11 2.6 l

.1989 11 2.2 1990' 13 2.1 1

~ Data Source:

Sorenson/Skaggs (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 & 26 61

E Uoensee Event Reports 4

M l

l Personnel Errors Reported in LERs j}

=+- CumulatNe Ucensee Event Reports 6-CumulatNe Personnel Errors Reported in LERs H

Q 31

$j!q y

29 30-h" 21i l

~

EH tj N

l; 20 -

gg 11 7

n L

L 9

10-y g

F

, fig g' N l

L

..K'k 0

'88

'89

'90 -

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LER'S This indicator shows the number of Licensee Event Reports (LER's) with event dates during the reporting month, the LER's attributed to personnel errors, and the cumulative total of both. The year end totals for the three previous years are also

shown, in March 1991, there were 2 LER's reported.1 of these LER's was attributable to personnel error.

There have been 7 LER's reported so far in 1991 and 3 LER's have been attribut-able to personnel error.

Data Source:

Therkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 15

\\

l 62 L

L....__-.,.._

$58 600 *.

634 I

l Actual DMsion Staffing 400 -

1.1

, - Authorind DMsion Staffing

. o..:

190 204

$2 I

0 Nuclear Operations Production Engineering Nuclear Services STAFFING LEVEL The authorized and actual staffing levels are shown for the three Nuchar Divi-sions.

Da:a Source:

Sorenson/ Burke (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 24 10-

-e-Nuclear Operations Division Turnos er Rate

+ Production Enginooring Divisio1 Turnover Rato 3

-o Nuclear Services DMslon TLrnover Rate A

,Ag's'd' G

g 4....g... 81'- +

o D

2-7 '-

- - - o-o-o

-o -o o-o_o-o-o-o 0

s N89 089 JD0 F00 M00 ADO M90 J90 J90 A90 s90 o90 N90 000 J01 F91 M91 PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE The turnover rates for the three Divisions are calculated using only resignations from OPPD.

DiylfdQD Turnover Rate NOD 4.5%

PED 6.6%

NSD 1.8%

Currently, the OPPD corporate turnover rate is being reported as approximately 4.0% This OPPD corporate turnover rate is based on the turnover rate over the last four years.

Data Source:

Sorenson/ Burke (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 63 J

SRO Exam Pass Ratio (H Exams Administered) l-1 RO Exam Pass Ratio (if Exams Administered)

- Fort Calhoun Goal 100% -

)

80% -

60% --

40% -

20% -

0%

s NRC Generic Fund NRC Site Specific NRC Requal OPPD Requal SRO AND RO LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO SRO License Examination Pass Ratio The Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) License Examination Pass Ratio Indicator shows the number of NRC administered Generic Fundamentals Exams (GFE's), the number of NRC administered Site Specific Exams, the number of NRC administered license requalification exams, and the number of OPPD administered license re-qualificatl0n exams.

RO License Examination Pass Ratio

'The Reactor Operator (RO) License Examination Pass Ratio Indicator shows the number of NRC administered Generic Fundamentals Exams (GFE's), the number of NRC administered Site Specific Exams, the number of NRC administered license requalification exams, and the number of OPPD administered license requalification exams.-

The 1991 Fort Calhoun goal for this Indicator is 100% pass ratio.

No tests were administered during the reporting month.

Data Source:

Gasper / Herman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 64 l

R SRO Exams Administerod SRO Exams Passed 35 -

C RO Exams Administered 30

@@ RO Exams Passed

~. _,

25 -

L O

i 20 -

~II

~

I

~

J l

I 33 i

j l

l 10 -

~

s.

\\

t g

0 Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 91 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS This indicator shows the number of Senior Reactor Operator (SRO) and Reactor Operator (RO) quizzes and exams taken and passed each month. These internally administered quizzes and exams are used to plot the SRO and RO candidates' monthly proDress, During the month of March 1991,31 SRO quizzes / exams were administered and 30 of these SRO quizzes / exams were passed.

During the month of March 1991,18 RO quizzes / exams were administered and 17 of these RO quizzes / exams were passed.

Data Source:'

Gasper / Herman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 65

I l Hotlinesinitiated W Hotlines Closed 30

• E Hotlines Overdue < 4 Weeks

[_) Hotlines Overdue > 4 Weeks 25 -

20 -

15-3 i

l 10-s y

l

.l, 5

J

~

5-c t

+

l s

.it i

i:

l r-ig ln r

-E

l I

l'

't n t

!1 q

t J

.L Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 91 HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS This indicator shows the number of Hotline Training Memos that were Initiated, re-turned for close out, overdue less than four weeks, and overdue greater than four weeks for the reporting month.

March 1991 initiated Hotlines 06 Closed Hotlines 02 Hotlines Overdue < 4 wks.

05 Hotlines Overdue > 4 wks.

00

,, s $.

Data Source:

Gasper /Newhouse (Managlvhd.rce)

Adverse Trend: None 66

)

1

E Other Training (1000 Hrs.)

E General Employee Training (1000 hrs.)

C Technical Support (1000 Hrs.)

C Chemistry and Radiation Protection (1000 Hrs.)

[ Maintenance (1000 Hrs.)

m C Operations (1000 Hrs.)

3 gi 3.87 383 4-- -

lll' 3.19 I

M

,3.1 $

peus 2.99 2.76 l

2.54 umu wi

.. a c 23 2.26

..w.

1 l, HlI l'.

mum immai 2 -

hh E{

.]

l a

N l?5 5

'tE I

. m.

0_

[b N.

[

l[d i

5

(

m

~

Mar 90 Apr May Jun Jul Aug 3ep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb91 TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS This indicator displays the training instruction hours administered to the listed departments for the reporting month.

This ind!cator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time required for data collection and processing.

DEPARTMENT J AN 91 Total Hours FEB 91 Operations 552 329 Maintenance 1206 1300 Chemistry and Radiation Protection 880 610 Technical Support 1094 658 General Employee Training 548 369 Other 199 96 Total 4479 3262 Data Source:

Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 67

c s

30 --

E Other Training (1003 Hrs.)

E General Employee Training (1000 hrs.)

C Techncal Supput (1000 Hrs.)

25-C Chemistry and Radiation Protection (1000 Hrs.)

Maintenance (1000 Hrs.)

V Operations (1000 Hrs.)

20-18 o6 uns 15.3 g 15 55 15.04 15-1511 l

ig 12.7 12.92

,, 3,

["a "[

EE g

10-

"A F

0.29 5

..~/-

~

i M

IMINI E

M P'

5-y

~

l 5

7 mm k

fk h 5hij

~Y fh [

I g

Mar 90 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb91 TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING This indicator shows the total number of student hours for Operations, Mainte-nance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, General Employee Training, and Other training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station.

This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time needed to collect and evaluate the data.

QgPARTMENT J AN 91 Total Hours FEB 91 Onerations 1880 1518 Maintenance 4024 5711 Chemistry and Radiation Protection 1504 1805 Technical Support 1202 1947 General Employee Training 3146 1047 Other 941 338 Total 12697 12366 Data Source:

Gasper /Newhouse (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 68 i

l l

Total Outage MWO's MWO'e Ready to Work

- Outage MWR Backlog 800 600 -

400-b 200-6 2

^

o.. o. -

0 Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 MWO OVERALL STATUS (CYCLE 13 REFUELING OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the total number of Maintenance Work Orders (MWO's) that have been written over the past reporting periods for completion during the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage and the number of MWO's that are ready for work (the parts for these MWO's are staged, the procedures are approved, and the paperwork is ready for field use). Also included is the number of outage Maintenance Work Requests (MWR's) which have been identified for the Cycle 13 Rcfueling Outage, but have not yet been converted to MWO's. Any MWO's written after the start of the outage will be reflected in the indicator labeled Emergent MWO's. Approxl.

mately 3000 maintenance orders were completed during each of the previous two refueling outages.

A decrease in the number of MWO's ready to work is a result of reclassification of MWO's generated prior to 9/24/90. Pre 9/24/90 MWO's will be validated and converted to the 3 page format before being considered ' ready to work'.

Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes avall-able.

Data Source:

Patterson/ Hyde (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 69

L.

- Total Outage Modifications

- Mods With Planning Document Approved

-G-Mods With Final Design Approved

-+- Mods With Construction Package Approved 30 20 - -------~~~--------~~~~~------------~~-~~-~~~-----~~------~~---------------~~------

10- -----------------~~~~--------~~~----------~~----------~~--------------~~~---------

K s

s+

%,.x.-

0 Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 PROGRESS OF CYCLE 13 OUTAGE MODIFICATION PLANNING This indicator shows the number of modifications approved for planning (to deter-mine feasibility) for completion during the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage (RFO). Addi-tional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes available.

The decrease in the number of MODS with final design and construction packages approved was due to a redesign effort on MOD 8714 (replacement of HCV 249 &

HCV 2988) and the on line completion of MOD 90-40 (Al 133A/B panel ventila-tion).

The current schedule for completion of the modification phases of the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage is as follows.

Outage Scope Freeze' Oct 1.1990 Planning Documents Approved' Feb 22,1991 Final Designs Approved' Apr 24,1991 Construction Packages Approved

• Jun 15,1991 Schedule incorporated' Jul 26,1991 Material On Site' Jul 20,1991 Construction Started Feb 15,1992 Construction Complete Mar 30,1992 Accepted By SAC Apr 10,1992

• indicates milestones which have not been changed as a result of the new Jan 92 refueling outage start date. A forced outage after Nov 91 could result in an early start date of the Cycle 13 RFO.

Data Source:

Patterson/ Hyde (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 70 l

Total Outage Projects

Projoets with Preliminary Schedules Submittod

-+- Projects with Detailed Schedules Subrnttted 50 40 30

_ x 6

^

20 10

• /'

O 1

Aug90 Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan91 Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul91 OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (CYCLE 13 REFUELING OUTAGE)

This indicator shows the status of the projects which affect the scope of the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage.

Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes avall-able.

The schedule for the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage projects is as follows:

All Projects identified and Outage Scope Frozen Oct 1,1990 All Projects Scheduled in Detail Jun 28,1991 Procedures Ready Oct 26,1991 Parts Staged Nov 16,1991 Data Source:

Patterson/ Hyde (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trond: None SEP 31 71

12-Violat' ns por 1000 Inspection Hours o

-o-Fort Calhoun Goal Good

+

9-p. _ _.o _ _ _ o. _ _ _ o. _ _.o _ _ _ o _ _ _ _ g _ _ 4... o _ _ _ n i

\\

\\

6-i i

\\

'\\

3.7

\\

\\

ll2.3 j

3-N i

O ---- O 0-

'88 '89 '90 Mar 90 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb91 VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS

[, f This indicator displays the number of NRC violations cited in inspection reports per

~

1000 NRC inspection hours. This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved with collecting end processing the data.

The violations per 1000 inspection hours indicator was reported as 1.9 for the month of February 1991.

The Fort Calhoun Goalis 1.6 violations per 1000 hours0.0116 days <br />0.278 hours <br />0.00165 weeks <br />3.805e-4 months <br /> of inspection for 1991.

There was a total of 7,672 inspection hours in 1990 which resulted in 20 viola-tions.

Data Source:

Thorkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 72 I

75 -

[R Number of Violations During the Last 12 Months C Number of NOVs During the Last 12 Months

)

50 -

,1

- 36 3[

3, 34

~

28 da 25 -

21 21 21 19 yo go te 1

1 E

L' 12

12

, 33 gi g

-j y,

0

-U Ma$0 Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 000 Jan Feb91 CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCV's (TWELVE MONTH RUNNING TOTAL)

The Cumulative Violations and Non Cited Violations (NCV's) Indicator shows the cumulative number of violations and the cumulative number of NCV's for the last twelve months.

This indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved with collecting and processing the data for this indicator.

Data Source:

Thorkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 73

Total Outstanding CAR's l

l Outstanding CAR's > S!x Months Old C Outstanding CAR's That Are Modification Related 200 3 150-100 -

50 -

w

!I 1 4

k E

iI '-

f4 i'tII 6

q Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar 91 OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS This indicator shows the total number of outstanding Corrective Action Reports (CAR's), the number of outstanding CAR's that are greater than six months old, and the number of outstanding CAR's that are modification related.

As of the end of March 1991, there were 118 outstanding CAR's,36 CAR's that are greater than six months old, and 6 CAR's that are modification related.

Data Source:

Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trond: None 74

20-

-O' NOD O4rdue CAR's 15 6 NOD CAR's We Mewors GraNed j/

10-5-

D

,g....

...__ g.,,,

' O ' " -- - - 6...

O v

w v

v v

m v

v u

Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar 91 30 -

• "EU O*'d* CAN

25 -

-6. Pto CAR's We Exte mons orasd 20 -

15 -

,, 6 s,

, A ' -

-5,,

6*~O 6- - -- - - 6 ' '

' ~g... - - - - g' '

(g w/N N1 a

m n

n_

-n 0

w v

m Apr00 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar 91 6-e Wer Oerdue CAR's 5,

6 other CAR's With Extensions Granted 4,

3-2-

1-

,,, b ----- 4~...

,,,6...

h.,,

0 Gr' O

O

'O' O

'TJ D

O-E' O

'O 3-Apr90 May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Doc Jan Feb Mar 91 OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS This indicator shows the number of overdue CAR's and the number of CAR's which received extensions broken down by organization.

Overdue CAR's January 91 February 91 March 91 hod 0

0 0

PID 4

0 1

Othem 0

0 0

Total 4

0 1

Extended CAR's Janusy 91 Febmary 9i March 91 NOD 2

1 1

PED 12 8

9 Others 1

0 0

Tobi 15 C

10 Data Source:

Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None 75

I 1990 SALP Funct. Area CAR's Signif. CAR NRC Viola.

LER's A) Plant Operations 62 0

2 10 B) Radiolog. Controls 28 2

0 0

C) Maint/ Surveil.

180 8

6 4

D) Emergoney Preparodness 7

0 3

0 E) Security 26 0

6 3

F) Engr / Tech Support 172 5

3 12 G) Safety Assess /Oual. VerH.

29 0

0 0

H) Other 1

0 0

0 Total 505 15 20 29 I

1991 SALP Funct. Area CAR's Signif. CAR NRC Viola.

LER's A) Plant Operations 10(2) 1 0

1 B) Radioiog. Controls 7(0) 0 0

0 C) Maint/ Surveil.

30 (4) 0 0

0

0) Emergoney Preparednoss 0

0 0

2 (2)

E) Secunty 1

0 0

1 F) Engrffecn Support 30 (12) 0 0

3 G) Safety Assess /Oual.Verif.

3 0

0 0

H) Other 0

0 0

0 Total 81 (18) 1 0

7 (2)

Note: ( ) indicate value for reporting month CARS ISSUED vs SIGNIF. CARS vs NRC VIOLATIONS ISSUED vs LERs REPORTED The above matrix shows the number of Corrective Action Reports (CARS) issued by the Nuclear Services Division (NSD) vs the number of Significant CARS issued by NSD vs the number of violations issued by the NRC for the Fort Calhoun Sta-tion in 1990 and 1991. Includer! In this table is the number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) identified by the Station each year. The number of NRC violations reported is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved in col-lecting and processing the violations. There were 0 violations due to personnel errors during the month previous to the reporting month.

Data Source:

Orr/Gurtis (Manager / Source)

Therkildsen/Howman (Manager / Source)

Adverse Trend: None SEP 15, 20, 21 76 I

1

Fort Calhoun PCrformance in@icator Roport indicator Definitions AGE OF OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE WORK DISABLING INJURY FREQUENCY RATE (LOST ORDERS TIME ACCIDENT RATE)

This indicator tracks the total number of This indicator is defined as the number of outstanding corrective non outage Maintenance accidents for all utility personnel permanently Work Orders at the Fort Calhoun Station versus assigned to the station, involving days away their age in months.

from work per 200.000 man hours worked (100 man years). This does not include AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLD AWAITING contractor personnel. This indicator tracks PARTS personnel performance for SEP #26.

This indicator is defined as the percentagt of open, non outage, maintenance work orders DOCUMENT REVIEW (BIENNIAL) that are on hold awaiting parts, to the total The Document Review indicator shows the number of open, non outage, maintenance work number of documents reviewed, the number of orders.

documents scheduled for review, and the number of document reviews that are overdue AUXlLIARY SYSTEMS CHEMISTRY HOURS for the rcporting month. A document review is OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS considered overdue if the review is not The cumulative hours that the Component complete within 6 months of the assigned due Cooling Water system is outside the f,tation date. This indicator tracks performance for SEP chemistry limit. The hours are accumulated

1. 46.

from the first sample exceeding the limit until additional sampling shows the parameter to be EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT back within limits.

RELIABILITY This indicator shows the number of f ailures that CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE were reported during the last 20,50, and 100 The Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate and emergency diesel generator demands at the Fort the industry check valve f ailure rate (failures per Calhoun Station. Also shown are trigger values 1 million component hours). The data for the which correlate to a high level of confidence industry f ailure rate is three months behind the that a unit's diesel generators have obtained a Performance Indicators Report reporting month, reliability of greater than or equal to 95% when This indicator tracks performance for SEP #43, the damand f ailures are less than the trigger values.

CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG 1)humber of Start Demands GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD All valid and inadvertent start demands, The percentage of total outstanding corrective including all start only demands and all start maintenance items, not requiring an outage, demands that are followed by load run that are greater than three months old at the demands, whether by mutomatic or manual end of the period reported, initiation. A start-only demand is a demand in which the emergency generator is started, but CUMULATIVE VIOLATIONS & NON CITED no attempt is made to load the generator.

VIOLATIONS (12 MONTH RUNNING TOTAL)

2) Number of Start Failures The cumulative number of violations and Non-Any failure within the emergency generator Cited Violations for the last 12 months.

system that prevents the generator from achieving specified frequency and voltage is DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT classified as a valid start failure. This includes This indicator shows the daily core thermal any condition identified in the course of output as measured from computer point maintenance inspections (with the emergency XC105 (in thermal megawatts). The 1500 MW generator in standby mode) that definitely Tech Spec limit, and the unmet portion of the would have resulted in a start failure if a 1495 MW FCS daily goal for the reporting demand had occurred, month are also shown.

3) Number of Load Run Demands For a valid load run demand to be counted the 77

Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicator Report Indicator Definitions load run attempt must meet one or more of the open awaiting completion by Design following criteria:

Engineering Nuclear (DEN), the number of A)A load run of any duration that results ECN's that were opened, and the number of from a real automatic or manualinitiation.

ECN's that were completed by DEN during the B)A load-run test to satisfy the plant's load reporting month. The total number of ECN's and duration as stated in each test's received by DEN since the initiation of the ECN specifications, process in 1989 are also shown.

C)Other special tests in which the This indicator tracks performance for SEP #62, emergency generator is expected to be operated for at least one hour while loaded ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) STATUS with at least 50% of its design load The number of ECN's that were opened, completed, and open backlog ECN's awaiting

4) Number of Load Run Failures completion by DEN, for the reporting month.

A load run failure should be counted for any This indicator tracks performance for SEP #62, reason in which the emergency generator does not pick up load and run as predicted. Failures EQUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 are counted during any valid load run demands.

CRITICAL HOURS Equipment forced outages per 1000 critical

5) Exceptions hours is the inverse of the mean time between Unsuccessful attempts to start or load run forced outages caused by equipment f ailures, should not be counted as valid demands or The mean time is equal to the number of hours f ailures when they can be attributed to any of the reactor is criticalin a period (1000 hours0.0116 days <br />0.278 hours <br />0.00165 weeks <br />3.805e-4 months <br />) the following:

divided by the number of forced outages caused A) Spurious trips that would be bypassed in by equipment f ailures in that period.

the event of an emergency.

B) Malfunction of equipment that is not EQUIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR required during an emergency, This indicator is defined as the ratio of gross C)lntentional termination of a test because available generation to gross maximum of abnormal conditions that would not have generation, expressed as a percentage, resulted in major diesel generator damage or Available generation is the energy that can be

repair, produced if the unit is operated at the maximum D) Malfunctions or operating errors which power level permitted by equipment and regulatory limitations. Maximum generation is would have not prevented the emergency the energy that can be produced by a unit in a generator from being restarted and brought given period if operated continuously at to load within a few minutes, maximum capacity, E)A failure to start because a portion of the starting system was disabled for test EXPEDITED PURCHASES purpose,if followed by a successful start The percentage of expedited purchases which with the starting system in its normal occurred during the reporting month compared alignment, to the total number of purchase orders Each emergency generator failure that results in generated, the generator being declared inoperable should be counted as one demand and one failure.

FORCED OUTAGE RATE Exploratory tests during corrective maintenance This indicator is defined as the percentage of and the successful test that follows repair to time that the unit was unavailable due to forced verify operability should not be counted as events compared to the time planned for demands or f ailures when the EDG has not been electrical generation. Forced events are failures declared operable again, or other unplanned conditions that require removing the unit from service before the end ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) of the next weekend. Forced events include BREAKDOWN startup failures and events initiated while the This indicator breaks down the number of unit is in reserve shutdown (i.e., the unit is Engineering Change Notices (ECN's) that remain available but not in service).

78

m ame Fort Calhoun Performance Indicator Report indicator Definitions FUEL REllABILITY INDICATOR greater than 30% power. The 13 parameters This indicator is defined as the steady state tracked are steam generator pH, cation primary coolant 1131 activity, corrected for the conductivity, boron silica, chloride, sulf ate, tramp uranium contribution and normalized to a sodium, feed water pH, dissolved oxygen, common purification rate, hydrarine, iron, copper, and condensate pump Tramp uranium is fuel which has been discharge dissolved oxygen, deposited on reactor core internals from previous defective fuel or is present on the IN LINE CHEMISTRY INS 1RUMENTS OUT OF surface of fuel elements from the manuf acturing SERVICE process.

Total number of in 1:ne chemistry instruments Steady htste is defined as continuous that are out of sersi:e in the Secondary System operations above 65 percent power for at least and the Post Accident Sampling System l

seven days.

(PASS).

This INPO indicator uses an industry normalized letdown purification rate. The FRl has also been INVENTORY ACCURACY calculated using Fort Calhoun's actualletdown The percentage of line items that are counted purification rate. These calculations revealed each rnonth by the warehouse which need that the use of the plant's actual rate would count adjustments, result in an approximate 45% increase in FRI data.

INVOICE BREAKDOWN The number of invoices that are on hold due to GASEOUS RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING sheh life, COE, and miscellaneous reasons.

DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT This indicator displays the total number of LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS Curies of all gaseous radioactive nuclides This indicator shows the number of SRO and/or released from the Fort Calhoun Station.

RO quizzes and exams that are administered and passed each month. The License Candidate GROSS HEAT RATE Exams Indicator tracks Training performance for Gross heat rate is defined as the ratio of total SEP #68, thermal energy in British Thermal Units (BTU) produced by the reactor to the total gross LIOUID RADIOACTIVE WASTE BEING electrical energy produced by the generator in DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT kilowatt hours (KWH).

This indicator displays the volume of liquid radioactive waste released from the radioactive HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED waste monitor tanks, to include releases The total amount (in Kilograms) of non.

through the plant blowdown if radioactive halogensted hazardous waste, halogenated nuclides are detected in the blowdown system, hazardous waste, and other hazardous waste The curies from all releases from the Fort prnduced by the Fort Calhoun Station each Calhoun Station to the Missouri River are also

month, shown.

HOTLINE TRAINING MEMOS LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS The number of Hotline Training Memos (HTM)

(SECURITY) that are initiated / closed, and overdue less or The total number of security incidents for the greater than 4 weeks for the indicated month. A reporting month depicted in two graphs. This HTM is a training document sent out for indicator tracks security performance for immediate review. The HTM should be reviewed SEP#58, and signed within 5 days of receipt of the HTM.

MAINTENANCE EFFECTIVENESS HOURS CHEMISTRY IS OUTSIDE OWNERS The number of Nuclear Plant Reliability Data GROUP GUIDELINES System (NPRDS) components with more than 1 Total hours for 13 secondary side chemistry f ailure and the number of NPRDS components parameters exceeding guidelines during power with more than 2 failures during the last 12 m nths.

operation. Power operation is defined as 79

Fort Calhoun Station Pcrformance indicator R* port Indicator Definitions MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG the General Area dose rate and the item's dose The number of corrective non outage rate is equal to or greater than 100 mrem / hour, maintenance work orders that remain open at the end of the reporting month. This indicator NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT RELIABILITY was added to the Performance indicators Report DATA SYSTEM (NPRDS) FAILURE REPORTS to trend open corrective non outsge SUBMITTED maintenance work orders as stated in SEP #36.

The dets plotted is the total number of NPRDS component failures (confirmed and possible)

MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKDOWN and the number of confirmed NPRDS This indicator is a breakdown of corrective non-component failures. The total number of NPRDS outage maintenance work orders by several component failures are based on the number of categories that remain open at the end of the failure reports that have been sent to the reporting month. This indicator tracks institute of Nuclear Power Operations ilNPO),

maintenance performance for SEP #36.

Confirmed NPRDS component f ailures are based upon failure reports that have been accepted by MAINTENANCE OVERTIME INPO. Possible NPRDS component failures are The percentage of overtime hours compared to based upon f ailure repcrts that are still under normal hours for maintenance. This includes review by INPO.

OPPD personnel as well as contract personnel, NPRDS is the Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System, and is a utility industry users group MATERIAL REQUEST PLANNING program which has been outlined by INPO and The percent of material requests (MR's) for implemented at the Fort Calhoun Station.

Issues with their request date the seme as their need date compared to the total number of NUMBER OF OUT OF SERVICE CONTROL MR's, ROOM INSTRUMENTS A control room instrument that cannot perform MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION its design function is considered as out of-EXPOSURE service. A control room instrument which has The total maximum amount of Gamma and had a Maintenarice Work Order (MWO) written Neutron (Whole Body) radiation received by an for it and has not been repaired by the end of individual person working at the Fort Calhoun the reporting period is considered out of service Station on a monthly, quarterly, and annual and will be counted. The duration of the out of-

basis, service condition is not considered. Computer CRTs are not considered as control room MWO OVERALL STATUS (CYCLE 13 instruments.

REFUELING OUTAGE)

The total number of Maintenance Work Orders NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED (MWO's) that have been written for completion IN LER'S during the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage, MWO's The number of Licensee Event Reports (LERs) which are written after the start of the attributed to personnel error on the original LER Refueling Outage will be labeled Emergent submittal, This indicator trends personnel MWO's Also shown is the number of MWR's performance for SEP #15.

which have been identified for the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage, but have not yet been NUMBER OF MISSED SURVEILLANCE TESTS converted to MWO's. This indicator tracks RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS performance for SEP #31.

The number of Surveillance Tests (ST's) that result in Licensee Event Reports (LER's) during NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS the reporting month. This indicator tracks The number of radiological hot spots which missed ST's for SEP's #60 and #61, have been identified and documented to ex!st at the Fort Calhoun Station at the end of the OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET reporting month. A hot spot is a small localized The year to-date budget compared to the source of radiation A hot spot occurs when the actual expenditures for Operations and contact dose rate of an item is at least 5 times 80

Fort Calhoun Performance inGicator Report Indicator Definitions Maintenance.

4) Construction Backlog /in Progress The Construction Package has been issued or OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION construction has begun but the modification has REPORTS not been accepted by the System Acceptance This indicator displays the total number of Committee (SAC).

outstanding Corrective Action Reports (CAR's),

the number of CAR's that are older than six

5) Design Engineering Update Backlog /In months and the number of modilication related Progress CAR's.

PED has received the Modification Completion Report but the drawings have not been OUTSTANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE updated.

REQUESTS (EAR's)

The above mentioned outstanding modifications The total number of open EAR's and the do not include modifications which are number of opan EAR's broken down by their proposed for cancellation, age in months. This indicator tracks performance for SEP #62.

OVERALL PROJECT STATUS (CYCLE 13 REFUELING OUTAGE)

OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS The number of projects which affect the scope The number of Modification Requests (MR'S)in of the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage and the any state between the issuance of a number of projects for which detailed schedules Modification Number and the completion of the have been submitted. This indicator tracks drawing update.

performance for SEP #31.

1) Form FC 1133 Backlog /in Progress The Form FC 1133 has not been plant OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE approved.

ACTION REPORTS The number of overdue Corrective Action

2) Modification Requests Being Reviewed Reports (CAR's) and the number of CAR's This category includes:

which received extensions broken down by A.) Modification Requests that are not yet organization for the last 6 months.

reviewed B.) Modification Requests being reviewed by PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED the Nuclear Projects Review Committee MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (NPRC)

The percent of the number of completed C.) Modification Requests being reviewed by maintenance activities as compared to the the Nuclear Projects Committee (NPC) number of scheduled maintenance activities These Modification Requests may be reviewed each week. This percent is shown for each several times before they are approved for craft. Mairaenance activities include MWR's, accomplishment or caricelled. Some of these MWO's, ST's, PMO's, calibrations, and other Modification Requests are returned to miscellaneous activities. These indicators track Engineering for more information, some Maintenance performance for SEP Reference approved for evaluation, some approved for Number 33.

study, and some approved for planning. Once planning is completed and the scope of the PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE work is clearly defined, these Modification (CUMULATIVE)

Requests may be approved for accomplishment Collective radiation exposure is the total with a year assigned for construction or they external whole body dose received by all on site may be cancelled. All of these different phases personnel (including contractors and visitors) require review, during a time period, as measured by the thermoluminescent dosimeter (TLD). Collective

3) Design Engineering Backlog /In Progress radiation exposure is reported in units of man-Nuclear Planning has assigned a year in which rem. This indicator tracks radiological work construction will be completed and design work performance for SEP #54.

may be in progress, 81

Fort Calbrun Stati:n P:rf:rmance Indicat:r Rep:rt Indicator Definitions 1

surveillance testing and calibration procedures)

PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE to the sum of non outage corrective The ratio of the number of turnovers to average maintenance and preventive maintenance employment. A turnover is a vacancy created completed over the reporting period. The ratio, by voluntary resignation from the company.

expressed as a percentage, is calculated based Retirement, death, termination, transfers within on man hours. This indicator tracks preventive the company, and part time employees are not maintenance activities for Safety Enhancement considered in turnover.

Program (SEP) #41.

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDUE RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FREQUENCY This indicator is defined as the percentage of RATE (RECORDABLE INJURY RATE) preventive maintenance items in the month that The number of injuries requiring more than were not completed by the scheduled date plus normal first aid per 200,000 man-hours a grace period equal to 25 percent of the worked. This indicator trends personnel scheduled interval. This indicator tracks performance for SEP #15 and SEP #26.

preventive maintenance activities for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) #41.

SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE INDEX PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY % OF The Chemistry Performance Index (CPI) is a HOURS OUT OF LIMIT calculation based on the concentration of key The percent of hours out of limit are for six impurities in the secondary side of the plant, primary chemistry parameters divided by the These key impurities are the most likely cause total number of hours possible for the month, of deterioration of the steam generators. The The key parameters used are: Lithium, Chloride, chemistry parameters are reported only for the Hydrogen, Dissolved Oxygen, Fluoride, and period of time greater thun 30 percent power.

Suspended Solids. EPRIlimits are used.

SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS PERFORMANCE INDEX (CONTINUED)

IMAINTENANCE)

The CPIis calculated using the following The number of identified incidents concerning eauntiom maintenance procedural problems, the number CPI = ((Ka/0.8) + (Na/20) + (0 /10)) / 3 2

of closed IR's related to the use of procedures Where the following are monthly averages of:

(includes the number of closed IR's caused by Ka = average blowdown cation conductivity procedural noncompliance), and the number of Na = average blowdown sodium concentration closed procedural noncompliance IR's. This 02 = average condensate pump discharge indicator trends personnel performance for SEP dissolved oxygen concentration item Numbers 15 and 41.

GECURITY INCIDENTS BREAKDOWN PROGRESS OF CYCLE 13 OUTAGE The number of Security loggable/ reportable MODIFICATION PLANNING incidents is broken down into the following The number of modifications approved for teo planning (to determine feasibi!ity) for completion Li:

Designated Vehicles (LDVs) during the Cycle 13 Refueling Outage. This incidents related to the use of LDVs, e.g., keys indicator tracks performance for SEP #31.

left in the vehicle, loss of keys, or f ailure to RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM retum yys.

2) Secunty Badges The number of identified poor radiological work incidents associated with improper use and practices (PRWP) for the reporting month. This handling of security badges, incidents include indicator tracks radiological work performance security badges that are lost, taken out of the for SEP #52.

protected area, out of control on site, or inadvertently destroyed or broken.

RATIO OF PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL

3) Access Control and Authorization MAINTENANCE Administrative and procedural errors associated The ratio of preventive maimenance (including 82

l Fort Calhoun Performance indicat:r Report Indicator Definitions with the use of the card access systsm such as This indicator tracks security performance for tailgating, incorrect security badge issued, and SEP #58.

improper escort procedures. This also includes SPARE PARTS ISSUED incidents that were caused by incorrect access The dollar value of the spare parts issued for authorization information entered into the the Fort Calhoun Station during the reporting security system computer.

period.

4) Security Key Control incidents involving Secunty key control, e.g.,

SRO & RO OPERATOR LICENSE EXAMINATION lost Security keys, Security keys removed from PASS RATIO site, or f ailure to return Security keys. This type The SRO & RO license examination pass ratio of event does not reflect incidents concerning for NRC administered Generic Fundamentals LDV keys.

Exams (GFE's), NRC administered Site Specific This indicator tracks security performance for Exams, NRC administered license requalification SEP #58.

exams, and OPPD administered license roqualification exams. This indicator tracks SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES Training performance for SEP #68.

Incidents involving alarm system f ailures, CCTV failures, security computer failures, search STAFFING LEVEL

{

equipment f ailures, door hardware f ailures, and The actual staffing level and the authorized I

card reader f ailures. These system failures are staffing level for the Nuclear Operations further categorized as follows:

Division, the Production Engineering Division,

1) Alarm System Failure Detection system and the Nuclear Services Division, events involving false / nuisance alarms and mechanical f ailures.

STATION NET GENERATION

2) Alarm System Environmental Failures.

The net generation (sum) produced by the Fort Degradations to detection system performance Calhoun Station during the reporting month, as a result of environmental conditions (i.e.,

rain, snow, frost),

STOCKOUT RATE 3)CCTV Failures Mechanical failures to all The total number of Pick Tickets that were CCTV hardware components, generated during the reporting month and the 4)CCTV Environmental Failures Degradations total number of Pick Tickets that were to CCTV performance as a result of generated during the reporting month with no environmental conditions (i.e., rain, snow, frost, parts available expressed as a percentage, fog, sunspots, shade).

5) Security Computer Failures Failure of the TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS multiplexer, central processing unit, and other The number of temporary mechanical and computer hardware and software. This category electrical configurations to the plant's systems, does not include software problems caused by

1) Temporary configurations are defined as operator error in using the software, electrical jumpers, electrical blocks, mechanical

6) Search Equipment Failures Failures of x ray, jumpers, or mechanical blocks which are metal, or explosive detectors and other installed in the plant operating systems and are equipment used to search for contraband. This not shown on the latest revision of the P&lD, also includes incidents where the search schematic, connection, wiring, or flow equipment !s found defective or did not function diagrams.

properly during testing.

2) Jumpers and blocks which are installed for

7) Door Hardware Failures Failure of the door Surveillance Tests, Maintenance Procedures, alarm and door hardware such as latches, Calibration Procedures, Special Procedures, or electric strikes, doorknobs, locks, etc.

Operating Procedur1s are not considered as

8) Card Reader Failures Incidents caused by temporary modificaWns unless the jumper or mechanical breakdowt: of card readers, but not block remains in placg after the test or improper use of the card readers. (See Access procedure is complete. Jumpers and blocks Contrc! and Authorization) installed in test or lab instruments are not considered as temporary modifications.

83

Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicator Report Indicator Definitions

3) Scaffolding is not considered a temporary room.

modification. Jumpers and blocks which are installed and for which EEAR's have been

4) Critical means that during the steady state submitted will be considered as temporary condition of the reactor prior to the scram, the modifications until finut resolution of the EEAR effective multiplication f actor (kett) was equal and the jumper or block is removed or is to one, permanently recorded on the drawings.

This indicator tracks temporary modifications

. UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS for SEP's #62 & #71.

. (INPO DEFINITION)

This indicetor is defined as the sum of the TOTAL INSTRUCTION HOURS following safety system actuations:

The total number and department breakdown of training instruction hours administered by the 1)The number of unplanned Emergency Core Training Center.

Cooling System (ECCS) actuations that result from reaching an ECCS actuation setpoint or TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING from a spurious / inadvertent ECCS signal The total number of student hours of training for Operations, Maintenance, 2)The number of unplanned emergency AC Chemistry / Radiation Protection, Technical power system actuations that result from a loss Support, General Employee Training, and Other of power to a safeguards bus training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station.

An unplanned safety system actuation occurs when an actuation setpoint for a safety system TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING is reached or when a spurious or inadvertent CONTAMINATIONS signal is generated (ECCS only), and major Reportable skin and clothing contaminations equipment in the system is actuated. Unplanned above background levels greater than 5000 means that the system actuation was not part dpm/100 cm squared. This indicator trends of a planned test or evolution. The ECCS personnel performance for SEP #15.

actuations to be counted are actuations of the high pressure injection system, the low pressure UNPLANNTD AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS injection system, or the safety injection tanks.

WHILE CRITICAL This indicator is defined as the number of UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS unplanned automatic scrams (reactor protection (NRC DEFINITION) system logic actuations) that occur while the The number of safety system actuations which reactor is critical. The indicator is further include (20jy) the High Pressure Safety injection defined as follows:

System, the Low Pressure Safety injection Syrt em, the Safety injection Tanks, and the t

1) Unplanned means that the scram was not part Emergency Diesel Generators, The NRC of a planned test or evolution.

classification of safety system actuations includes actuations when major equipment is

2) Scram means the automatic shutdown of the operated and when the logic systems for the reactor by a rapid insertion of all control rods above safety systems are challenged.

that is caused by actuation of the reactor protection system. The scram signal may have VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS resulted from exceeding a setpoint or may have This indicator is defined as the number of been spurious, violations sited in NRC inspection reports for the Fort Calhoun Station per 1000 NRC

3) Automatic means that the initial signal that inspection hours. The violations are reported in caused actuation of the reactor protection the ye'er that the inspection was actually system logic was provided from one of the performed and not based on when the sensors monitoring plant parameters and inspection report is received. The hours conditions, rather than the manual scram reported for each inspection report are used as switches (or pushbuttons) in the main control the inspection hours.

84

s Fort Calhoun Porformonce Indicator Report Indicator Definitions VOLUME OF LOW LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE This indicator is defined as the volume of low-level solid radioactive waste actually shipped for burial. This indicator also shows the volume of low level radioactive waste which is in temporary storage, the amount of radioactive oil that has been shipped off site for processing, and the volume of solid dry active waste which has been shipped off site for processing.

Low level solid radioactive waste consists of dry active waste, sludges, resins, and evaporator bottoms generated as a result of nuclear power plant operation and maintenance.

Dry active waste includes contaminated rags, cleaning materials, disposable protective clothing, plastic containers, and any other material to be disposed of at a low level radioactive waste disposal site, except resin, sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low level refers to all radioactive waste that is not spent fuel or a by product of spent fuel processing.

This indicator tracks radiological work performance for SEP #54.

9 85

Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicator Report

-Index to SEP Indicators The purpose of the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Performance Indicators Index is to list performanc6 indicators related to SEP ltems with parameters that can be trended.

S E P R e f e r e n e e N u m b e r 1 5........................................................................................ P Ant increase HPES and IR Accountability Through Use of Performance Indicators Procedural Nonenmpliance incidents (Maintenance)..................................................... 25 Total S kin a nd Clothing C onta min ation s..................................................................... 4 2 Recordable injury Ca se s Frsquency Rate................................................................... 61 N u mbe r o f Pe rs onn el Errors R e pnrte d in LErl's............................................................. 6 2 CAR's issued vs Significant CAR's issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LER's Reported..... 76 SEP Refereneo Number 20 Quality Audits and Surveillance Programs are Evaluated, improved in Depth and Strengthened CAR's issued vs Significant CAR's issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LER's Reported..... 76 SEP ReferencqJumber 21 Develop and Conduct Safety System Functional Inspections CAR's issued vs Significant CAR's issued vs NRC Violations issued vs LER's Reported..... 76 SEP Reference Number 24 Complete Staff Studies StaffingLevel.........................................................................................................,63 SEP Reference Number 23 Evaluate and implement Station Standards for Safe Work Practice Requirements Dis a bling i nj ury Freq ue ncy R a te................................................................................ 1 1 R e c ord able i nju ry Ca s e s Fr e q u e n cy R a te.................................................................... 61 SEP Reference Number 31 Develop Outage and Maintenance Planning Manual and Conduct Project Management Training MWO O verall Status (Cycle 13 Ref ueling Outag e)....................................................... 6 9 Progress of Cycle 13 Outage Modification Planning.................................................. 70 Overall Project Status (Cycle 13 Refueling Outage).................................................. 71 SEP Reference Number 33 Develop On.Line Maintenance and Modification Schedule Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities

( Gle c tri c al M ai n t e n a ne e )................................................................................ 2 7

( Pr e s s u r e E q u i p m o n t )................................................................................... 2 8 (G e ne ral M ainte nanc e)................................................................................. 2 9

( M echa nic al M ainte na nee).............................................................................. 3 0 (I n stru m o n t atio n & C o nt rol)............................................................................ 31 SEP Reference Number 36 Reduce Corrective Non-Outage Backlog Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage Maintenance)......................... 26 Maintenance Work Order Breakdown (Corrective Non Outage Maintenance).....................19 SEP Reference Number 41 Develop and implement a Preventive Maintenance Schedule R atio of Pre ve ntive to Total M aint e na nc e............................................................... 21 Pr e ventiv e M aintena nce i te m s O ve rd u e.................................................................... 2 2 86 l

F:rt Calh un Stati:n Perftrmance Indicator Report index to SEP Indicators SEP Reference Number 43, implement the Check Valve Test Program C h e c k V a I ve F a il u r e R a t e.......................................................................................... 3 5 SEP Reference Number 44 Compliance With and Use of Procedures Procedural Noncompliance incidents (Maintenance)..

................................................25 SEP Reference Number 46 Design a Procedures Control and Administrative Program D o c u m e n t R e vi e w.............................................................................................. 1 5 EEILBefefence Number 52 Establish Supervisory Accountability for Workers Radiological Practices Radiological Work Practices Program...

....................................................................44 SEP Reference Number 54 Complete implementation of Fadiological Enhancement Program Personnel Ra diation Exposure (Cumulative)................................................................. 9 Volu m e of Lo w.Le vel Solid R a dioa ctive Wa ste........................................................... 10 Tot al Skin a nd Clothin g Con ta min a tio ns...................................................................... 4 2 Dec onta mina t ed A u xilia ry Buildin g............................................................................. 4 3 SEP Reference Number 58 Revise Physical Security Training and Procedure Program Log g a ble/R e po rta ble incide nts ( Security)................................................................. 4 8 S e c u ri ty i n cid e n t Br e a k d o wn.................................................................................... 4 9 S e c u rity S ys t e m Fa il u re s......................................................................................... 5 0 SEP Reference Number 60 Improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports....................... 32 SEP Reference Numbgr.,,$j, Modify Computu Program to Correctly Schedule Surveillance Tests Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports....................... 32 1

SEP Reference Number 62 Establish interim System Engineers l

Te m p o ra ry M odific a ti o n s....................................,.................................................... 5 7 l

Outstanding Engineering Assistance Requests (EAR's).................................................. 58 En gine erin g Cha n g e No tice S ta tu s.............................................................................. 5 9 Engin e e ring C h a ng e N otic e Brea kd own....................................................................... 60 SEP Reference Number 68 Assess Root Cause of Poor Operator Training and Establish Means to Monitor Operator Training S R O / R O Lice n s e E xa min a tion Pa s s R atio................................................................. 64 Li c e n s e Ca ndid a t e E x a m s.......................................................................................... 6 5 SEP Reference Number 71 Improve Controls over Temporary Modifications Te m p o r a ry M o d ifica tio n s....................................................................................... 5 7 87

Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicator Distribution List J. C. Adams R. M. Hawkins D. G. Ried R. L. Andrews M. C. Hendrickson G. K. Samide G, L. Anglehart R. R, Henning T. J. Sandene W. R. Bateman K. R. Henry B. A. Schmidt K. L. Belck J. B. Herman S. T. Schmitz A. D. Bilau G. J. Hill F. C. Scofield B. H. Blome K. C. Holthaus L. G. Sealock C. N. Bloyd M. A. Howman H. J. Sofick J.P.Bobba L. G. Huliska D. K. Sentel C. E. Boughter C. J. Husk P.

Sepcenko M. A Breuer K. C. Hyde J. W. Shannon C. J. Brunnert R. L. Jaworski R. W. Short M. W. Butt R. A. Johansen J. R. Shuck

" 't C. A. Carlson W. C. Jones C. F. Simmons

(

J. W, Chase J. D. Kecy E. L. Skaggs i

G. R. Chatfield J. D. Keppler J. L, Skiles g

A. G. Christensen D. D. Kloock F. K. Smith

]I A. J. Clark J. C. Knight R. L. Sorenson L

'^

O. J. Clayton D. M. Kobunski K, E. Steele

[

g R. P. Clemens G. J. Krause W.

Steele

,,j >

J. L. Connolley L. J. Kripal H. F. Sterba G. M. Cook J. G. Krist G. A. Teeple M. R. Core J. B. Kuhr M. A. Tesar S. R. Crites L. T. Kusek T. G. Therkildsen D. W. Dale L. E. Labs P. L. Thompson R. C. DeMoulmeester M. P. Lazar J. W.-Tills R, D. DeYeung R. C. Learch D. R. Trausch D. C. Dietz S. E. Lee P. R. Turner D. E. Dirrim R. E. Lewis J. M. Uhland K.S. Dowdy R. C. Liebentritt C. F. Vanecek J. A. Drahota C. J. Linden G. L. Van Osdel T. R. Dukarski

- B. R. Livingston J. M. Waszak R. G. Eurich J. M. Lofshult W. O. Weber H. J. Faulhaber J. H. MacKinnon G. R. Williams M. A. Ferdig G. D. Mamoran S. J. Willrett V. H. Frahm J. W. Marcil W. C. Woerner F. F. Franco N. L. Marfice M. T. Frans D. J. Matthews H. K. Fraser T. J. Mcivor J. F. W. Friedrichsen R. F. Mehaffey S. K. Gambhir R. A. Miser J. K. Gasper K. J. Morris W. G. Gates D. C. Mueller M. O. Gautier R. J. Mueller S. W. Gebers W. L. Neal J. M. Glantz J. B. Newhouse J. T. Gleason M. W. Nichols L. V. Goldberg C. W. Norris D. J. Golden J. T. O'Connor D. C. Gorence W. W. Orr R. E. Gray L. L. Parent M. J. Guinn T. L. Patterson E. R. Gundal R. L. Phelps A. L. Gurtis T. M. Reisdorff R. H. Guy A. W. Richard 88

l Fcrt Calhoun Station Perform:nce Indicator Report Summary Section ADVERSE TREND REPORT A Performance Indicator which has data INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED representing three(3) consecutive months of MANAGEMENT ATTENTION REPORT declining performance constitutes an adverse trend. The Adverse Trend Report explains the This section lists the indicators which show conditions under which certain indicators are inadequacies as compared to the OPPD coal showing adverse trends. Indicators with data and indicators which show inadequacies as showing an apparent adverse trend which is no1 compared to the industry upper quartile. The considered adverse, will have an explanation indicators will be compared to the industry which defines the reason why an adverse trend upper quartile as relevant to that indicator, does not exist.

Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance Outstandina Enor. Assist. Reauests (EARI (Page 21)

(Page 58)

The ratio of preventive to total maintenance Although the total number of open EAR's is was reported below the Fort Calhoun goal of indicating an acceptable trend, the EAR's open 60% and the industry upper quartile value of over 6 months still have an adverse trend.

57.7%. This ratio decreased in December and EAR's are being closed in accordance with January due to the high number of hours in assigned priority. The increasing number is the which maintenance was involved in corrective result of lower priority EAR's not being maintenance activities associated with the completed as rapidly as newer or higher priority forced outage. A decrease in the number of EAR's, scheduled PM related activity hours resulted in the below goal February and March ratio.

End of Adverse Trend Report.

Number of Out of Service Control Room instruments (Page 23)

The number of out of service control room instruments was reported as being above the Fort Calhoun goal of 15 out-of service control room instruments and above the industry upper quartile value of 7 out of service control room instruments. Twelve (12) of the 33 total control room instruments out of service require an outage for repair.

Epcondary System Chemistrv Performance Iridex (Page 36)

The CPI value for the Fort Calhoun Station has been above the industry upper quartile value of 0.24 since the first CPI value was taken after staitup in May of 1990. Part of the reason for the high CPI values is the fact that the Fort Calhoun Station has been involved in various derates and forced outages since startup in May. Another reason for the high CPI values is the fact that the Fort Calhoun Station uses morpholine to control PH The use of morpholine also raises the CPI values.

89

Fort Calhoun Station Performanoo indicator Report Summary Section Amount of Work on Hold Awaitina Parts (Non.

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR Outaae)

REPORT IMPROVEMENTS / CHANGES (Page 51)

The percentage of open, non outage, Two Fort Calhoun Station 1991 goals have maintenance items on hold awaiting parts was been changed. The reason for these changes above the Fort Calhoun goal of 3.5% Of 720 was the rescheduling of the Cycle 13 Refueling open, non outage, maintenance items,31 of Outage from the end of September 1991 to tl.e these items were on hold awaiting parts.

end of January 1992.

Gross Heat Rate Temocrary Modifications (Excludino Scaffoldino)

(Page 6)

The Fort C. $ h i noal for this indicator has (Page 57)

The number of temporary modifications which been changh aUn 10,150 BTU /KWH to are installed in the plant is currently above the 10,250 BTU /KWH. This change was due to the Fort Calhoun goal of 15 temporary power reduction of the plant to approximately modifications. Part of the reason for the 70% during the Spring and Fall months of 1991 increase in the total number of installed to save fuelin order to operate the plant until temporary modifications, is the fact that quite a the end of the month of January 1992.

few temporary modifications require a refueling outage for removal. Currently,9 temporary Total Skin and Clothino Contaminations modifications require a refueling outage for 1Page 42) removal.

The Fort Calhoun goal for thio indicator has been changed from a total of 144 skin and Violations Per 1000 Insoection Hours clothing contaminations to a total of 90 skin (Page 72) and clothing contaminations. This goal change The number of violations which have been was due to the rescheduling of the Cycle 13 identified per 1000 NRC inspection manhours is Hefueling Outage, currently above the Fort Calhoun goal of 1.6 violations per 1000 manhours of inspection.

Eight (8) new performance indicators goals have been added to the Performance Indicators End of Management Attention Report.

Report. They are:

Seconderv System Chemistry (Page 36)

The Fort Calhoun goal for the CPI is 0.45.

Primarv System Chemistry Per Cent of Hours Out of Limit 1Page 42)

The goal for this indicator is 2%

Check Valve Failure Rate 1Page 35)

The goal for this indicator is 2.00E 6 failures per one million check valve f ailures.

Amount of Work On Hold Awaitino Parts (Page 51)

The goel for this indicator is 3.5%

inventory Accuraev (Page 53)

The goal for this indicator is 98%

90

. 4 Fort Calhoun Station Performance Indicator Report Summary Section Stoekout Rate (Page 53)

The goal for this indicator is 98E Exoedited Purchases (Page 54)

The goal for this indicator is 0.5%

SRO and RO License Examination Pass Ratio (Page 64)

The goal for this indicator is 100%

End of Indicator improvement / Changes Report 91

l FORT CALHOUN STATION l

OPERATING CYCLES AND REFUELING OUTAGE DATES Event Date Range Production (MWH)

Cumulative (MWH)

Cycle 1 09/2693 02/01/75 3,299,639 3,299,639 1st Refueling 02/0195 05/0905 Cycle 2 05/0995 10/0196 3,853,322 7,152,061 2nd Refueling 10/0196 12/13n6 Cycle 3 12/13D6 - 09/3097 2,805,927 9,958,888 3rd Refueling 09/3097 12/09/77 Cycle 4 12/0997 10/1498 3,026,832 12,985,720 4th Refueling 10/1498 12/2408 Cycle 5 12/2498 01/18/80 3,882,734 16,868,454 5th Refueling 01/18/80 06/11/80 Cycle 6 06/11/80 09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 Sth Refueling 09/18/81 12/21/81 Cycle 7 12/21/81 12/06/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 7th Refueling 12/06/82 04/07/83 Cycle 8 04/07/83 03/03/84 3,406,371 27,736,405 8th Refueling 03/03/84 07/12/84 Cycle 9 07/12/84 09/28/85 4,741,488 32,477,893 9th Refueling 09/28/85- 01/16/86 Cycle 10 01/16/86 03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 10th Refueling 03/07/87 06/08/87 Cycle 11 06/08/87 09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 11th Refueling 09/27/88 01/31/89 Cycle 12 01/31/89 02/17/90 3,817,954 45,589,459 12th Refueling 02/17/90 05/29/90 Cycle 13#

05/29/90 02/01/92

1. Planned Dates 13th Refueling #

02/01/92 05/01/92 Cycle 14#

05/01/92 09/18/93 14th Refueling 09/18/93 11/13/93 Cycle 15#

11/13/93 03/11/95 15th Refueling #

03/11/95- 05/06/95 FORT CALHOUN STATION CURRENT PRODUCTION AND OPERATIONS

• RECORDS" First Sustained Reaction August 5,1973 (5:47 p.m.)

First Electricity Supplied to the System August 25,1973 Commercial Operation (180,000 KWH)

September 26,1973 Achieved Full Power (100%)

May 4,1974 Longest Run (477 days)

June 8,1987 Sept. 27,1988 Highest Monthly Net Generation (364,468,800 KWH)

October 1987 Most Productive Fuel Cycle (4,936,859 MWH)(Cycle 11)

June 8,1987 Sept. 27,1988 l