ML20072T724

Annual Environ Operating Rept 1982,Vol I - Nonradiological

ML20072T724
Person / Time
Site:	Cooper
Issue date:	03/15/1983
From:	NEBRASKA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT
To:
Shared Package
ML20072T716	List: ML20072T713 ML20072T724
References
NUDOCS 8304080306
Download: ML20072T724 (13)

Text

- - - -

~_ .. . . .

4 4

Nebraska Public Power District

. COOPER NUCLEAR STATION 4

i I

ANNUAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT

~

Volu:ne I - Nonradiological I

I i,

t 7'

d USNRC Docket'50-298-8304090306 830315 ,

.PDR'ADOCK 05000g a . _.

/

TABLE OF CONTENTS

. 4 Page,

'Section I . Technical Specification 2.0 I-1 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CONDITION Section II . Technical Specification 4.0. II-1 ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEILLANCE AND SPECIAL STUDIES O

e O

e

..g w

s

,. 11  ; .

~

^

. .o

?

Section I Technical Specification 2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CONDITION e

e

-I-1

2.0 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION CONDITION Requirements of Section 2.3 (Chemical A alyses and Chemical Use Report) have ,

been met as demonstrated by Table 1 and the following summary text.

2.3 Chemical Analyses and Chemical Use Report Chemical Analyses

. River water samples were collected by plant personnel and analyzed monthly-from January through December 1982. The samples were. collected at the intake structure and the discharge canal of Cooper Nuclear Station (CNS).

Analyses for turbidity, specific conductance, chlorine, copper, ' iron, ,

potassium, sodium, and pH were conducted by plant personnel as specified in the' CNS Environmental Technical Specifications (ETS). Turbidity and specific conductance at the discharge were within 10 percent of the inlet values and therefore did not exceed the ETS limitations. Total chlorine in the discharge.

canal did not exceed the ETS maximum concentration limit of 0.1 mg/1. The pH values ranged from a minimum of 7.7 ~ to a maximum of 8.4. The pH was well within the ETS limitations of 6.5 to 9.0. The concentration'of copper, iron, potassium, and sodium in the discharge' canal does.not indicate any substantial.

increase due to plant operation.

The: limitations - of the above-mentioned parameters were not' , exceeded; therefore, there has been'no significant chemical effect on.the Missouri River.

water due to station operation in 1982.

u I-2

TABLE 1- I 5

SEMIANNUAL BULK CHEMICAL USE' REPORT -

, January 5. 1982 to' July 15, 1982-i-

3--

\

PREVIOUS PRESENT l CHEMICAL INVENTORY RECEIVED' INVENTORY USED 2

Sulfuric' Acid 7,450 gals 6,239' gals 1,600 gals 12,089 gals Sodium Hydroxide ~ 6,300 gals 9,808 gals: 10,600 gals 5,508 gals

}

Bulk Lime 44,000 lbs 84,440 lbs 26,240 lb's -102,200 lbs-

j. Calcium Hypochlorite 470 lbs 200 lbs' 390 lbs 280'lbs Alkameen

~

75 gals 0~~ 65 gals 10 gals i Dearborn 253 AF 286'lbs 12 lbs* 293 lbs 5 lbs n

Dearborn 521 67 gals 0 47 gals 0 j ,

}

Dearborn 713 79 gals 0 78 gals:

1^ gal' i

Dearborn 922 2 gals 0 -2 gals 0- .

1 -

, Nalcolyte 8103 190 gals 0 105 gals -85 gals-1 j- Sodium Sulfite 120 lbs 200 lbs' 300=1bs ' 20 '. lbs -

' Sodium Nitrite 176 lbs O' 176 lbs 0

Dearborn Sludge-trol-600 23 gals 0 '22 gal's 1 gal-1 i *12 lbs received to adjust previous inventory to correct. amount 4

t 1

i-j- ' r..

i 1 .

e 7

1.;

i I-3:_ _ l

., .1 4, - a.

TABLE'1 (CONT'D)'-

~

SEMIANNUAL BULK CHEMICAL USE' REPORT 1

July 15,~1982 to January 18, 1983 -

PREVIOUS PRESENT CHEMICAL INVENTORY- RECEIVED INVENTORY USED Sulfuric Acid 1,600 gals 6,521 gals 4,250 gals 3,871 gals

~

Sodium Hydroxide 10,600 gals 16,955 gals 4,600 gals 22,955: gals Bulk Lime 26,240 lbs 120,520 lbs -62,000 lbs 84~,760 lbs i

. Calcium Hypochlorite 390 lbs 300~1bs 535 lbs 155 lbs Alkameen 65 gals O gal 65' gals 0 gal Dearborn 253 AF 293 lbs 0 lbs 290 lbs 3 lbs Dearborn 521 47 gals 0 gal 47 gals 0 gal j Dearborn 713 78 gals 'O gal 77.5 gals 0.5 gal-1 .

Dearborn 922 2 gals O gal 0 gal 2 gals j Nalcolyte 8103 105 gals 110 gals 145 gals '70' gals

• Sodium Sulfite 300 lbs O gal 2230 lbs 70'1bs Sodium Nitrite 176 lbs 0 lbs 171 lbs 5 lbs Dearborn Sludge-trol-600 22 gals 0 gal 21 gals- -1 gal

~

Tri Sodium Phosphate 0 lb 100'1bs~ 50'1bs- 50 lbs-Dearborn 66 0 lb 110 lbs ~110'1bs 0 J1b e

e s

-I-4,

< c 1

4 -

t

. ..+

r j-Section II Technical Specification 4.0

$ ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEILLANCE AND SPECIAL STUDIES e

0 4

6 0

9 '

II-1

4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SURVEILLANCE AND SPECIAL STUDIES Requirements of Cooper Nuclear Station ETS paragraph 4.1.1.2 (Plant Cooling ,

Water Systems Fish Entrapment) have been met as demonstrated by Tables 1 through 4 and the following summary.

4.1.1.2 Plant Cooling Water Systems Fish Entrapment Limits Samples of fish impinge'd on the traveling screens were collected in accordance with the ETS. Sampling was conducted hourly at least twice per month with the July,- August , and September collections being performed during hours of-darkness.

• During the 1982 impingement sampling -(28 hourly periods), 621 fish .

representing 14 species were collected (Table 1). Monthly impingement rates ranged from an average of 0 (March) to.98.3 (October), fish per hour.

Predominant fishes impinged, in order. of decreasing magnitude, included gizzard shad, freshwater drum, carp, river carpsucker, smallmouth buffalo, and white. bass. These six species represented 96.6 ' percent of the total fish

, impinged. . Game species including white bass, channel ; catfish, ' flathead -

catfish, white crappie, white perch, bluegill, and paddlefish comprised only 3.7 percent of the impinged fish. Species composition and relative abundance-of fish impinged during the 1982 ' sampling were similar to . those of' previous years (Table 2), except for_the white perch collected 11n August. 'This.was thei

.first time this species.was collected at~CNS.-

I l

II-2

- m

. +

Nineteen of the ~ 28 impingement sampling periods were during periods of darkness -(1900-0770 hours). .The . nocturnal' impingement rate averaged '

' 30.4 fish / hour' while the ' diurnal ~ impingement rate averaged 4.9 fish / hour during nine sample period's (Table 3).

The greatest rate of impingement.at CNS during 1982 was 253-fish / hour and occurred on October 21, 1982. In accordance with ETS paragraph 4.1.'1.2.B.4, the sampling frequency was increased to every other day until two consecutive-samples each resulted in no more than 90 fish. Sampling on October 23 and 25, 1982, resulted in impingement rates of 80 and 48 fish / hour, respectively.

Fish impinged on the traveling screens at CNS are returned to the Missouri via a return pipe from the continuous wash system. During 1982, 40.6 percent of.

the impinged' fish were classified as alive and active (Table 4) and can be assumed to have' survived the impingement process.

G

~

f

-II-3:

Table 1.. Monthly. summary of fish impinged (total number) at Cooper Nuclear Station, January-December, 1982.

- Percent Month Total of'.

Taxon Jan. Feb. Mar. Apr. May June July Aug. Sep. Oct, Nov. Dec, No. Total' Smallmouth buffalo - - - - - - - - -

8 -

4" 12 1.9 Gizzard shad - - - -

4 -

6 34 63 315 18 33 473 76.2 Freshwater drum - - -

2 - -

2 3 - 54 - 5 66 10.6 LCarp 2 - -

5 1 2 7 - --

10 -

1 28 4.5-River ~carpsucker - - - - - - - 9 3 1 - -

13 2.1 White bass 1 - -

4 - - - - - 3 - - 8 1.3

. White crappie - - - - - - - - -

1 - -

1 0.2 White perch - - - - - - -

1 - - - - 1- 0.2

.Coldeye - - - .- - -

3 - - - - 1 4 0.6 Bluegill- - - - -

1 - '- - - - -- -

l' - 0. 2

' Q Shortnose gar - - -

1 - - - - - - -

1 2 0.3 1,. ' Unidentifiable - - - - - - - - -

1 - -

1 0.2 Paddlefish- .- - - 1 - - - - - - - - 1 0.2 Channel catfish -

3 - - - - - - 2 - - -

5 0.8 Flathead catfish ~ -

2- - - - - - - - - -

3 5 0.8 TOTAL. 3 5 0 13 6 2 .18 .47 68 393 18 48 621

.No.' of Hourly Collections. 2- 2 2 2 2. 2 3 2 2 4 2 3 28 Mean No./Hr. 1.5 2.5 0.0 6.5 3.0 1.0 6.0 23.5 34.0 98.3 9.0 16,0 22.2

. $ . . O 8 auwmaY =M

. . . - . . - - . _ . - . - . - ~ _

Table 2. Summary of the relative abundance (%) of fish impinged at Cooper Nuclear Station, 1974-82, '.

Year

-Taxon 1974 1975 1976 1977 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 Sho'velno'se sturgeon <0.1 -

0.1 0.2 -

0.4 - - --

Paddlefish <0.1 0.5 0.1 0.7 - - - -

0.2 Longnose gar <0.1 - -

0.1 - -

0.4 - - -

Shortnose gar 0.6 0.4 0.1 0.4 - -

0.8 0.6 0.3' Unidentified gar 0.1 -

0.1 0.3 -

0.4 - - -

Gizzard shad- 66.4 32.7 56.1 41.2 47.0 63.7 35.8 70.7 76.2 Goldeye- 0.6 1.3 2.8 3.8 1.1 0.7 3.5 3.3 0.6 Carp- 2.1 4.4 2.5 4.6 6.4 10.7 3.5 4.8. 4.51 Unidentified minnows 0.9 6.2 3.0 2.6 10.9 0.7 4.3 0.6 -

River carpsucker 3.3 26.0 10.2 22.3 0.8 1.9 3.5 6.9 2.1

-White sucker - -

0.2 - - - - - -

Blue sucker - -

0.4 - - -

0.4 - -

- Bigmouth buf falo -

1. 6 0.4 0.8 0.4 1.1 0.4 0.6 -

Smallmouth buffalo 1.4 0.5 0.3 0.8 -

0.4 -

0.3 1.9 Unidentified buffalo- - -

0.4 0.1 - - - - -

M Unidentified suckers - - -

0.2 - - - - -

di Black bullhead <0.1 0.5 0.1 0.1 0.8 1.1 - 0.4 - -

Unidentified bullhead <0.1 1.5 -

.0.3 - - - ~- -

' Char.nel catfish 0.4 1.6 2.2 1.1 1.9 0.4 2.3 .- 0.8 Flathead catfish- 0.4 1.9 0.8 1.2 0.4 1.9 1.2 -

0.8 Unidentified catfish - -

0.2 -

1.5 2.2 1.2 0.9 -

White bass.' 1.4 1.6 1.7 1.5 0.8 -

3.9 0.3 1.3-Green sunfish .- 0.1 - - - - - - -

Bluegill 0.4 0.5 ' O.8 0.5 0.4 -

0.4 0.3 0.2.

Smallmouth bass -

0.1 - - - - .-

Largemouth bass 0.1 0.1 0.5 0.2 0.8 - - - -

Crappie.(Pomoxis spp.) -0.4 0.9 2.2 0.3 1.1 -

2.7 0.3 0.2 Unidentified sunfish - -

0.4 -

0.4 0.4 - - -

.Sauger- <0.1 0.9 0.5 1.7 0.4 -

0.4 0.3 -

Freshwater drum -21.2 16.3- 14.1 15.0 25.2 14.1 34.6 10.1 10.6 Unidentified. .- - -

0.1 - - - -

0.2 White Perch - .- - -

0. 2 ~

Table 3. Number of fish impinged per hour during diurnal and nocturnal sampling periods at-Cooper Nuclear Station, January-December 1982.

Diurnal (0700-1900 hr.) Nocturnal (1900-0700 hr.)

No. of '

No. of Sample No. of Sample No. of Month Periods (Hr.) Fish No. /llr. Periods (llr.) Fish No./Hr.

January 1 2 2.0 1 1 1.0 February 1 2 2.0 1 3 3.0 Fbrch 1, 0 0.0 1 0 0.0 April 0 - -

2 13 6.5-May. 1 3 3.0 1 3 3.0

, June 2 2 1.0 0 - -

July 0 - -

3 18 6.0 August 0 - -

2 47 23.5 September 0 - -

2 68 39.0 m -0ctober

,1 12 12.0 3 381 127.0 Y November 1 2 2.0 1 16 16.0

-December 1 21 21.0 2 27 13.5 TOTAL ". 9 44- 19 577

'Hean No./llr. 4.9 30.4

~-

• ~..

~

e Table.4. Summary of the physical condition of fish impinged at the intake structure at Cooper Nuclear.

Station, January-December 1982.

Dead With -Dead With Alive and Alive and No Physical Physical Active Inactive Damage Damage Species No.  % No.  % No.  % No.  %

Smallmouth buffalo - -

2 16.7 6' 50.0 4 33,3 Gizzard shad 178 37.6 240 50.7 34 7.2 21- 4.4 Freshwater drum 21 31.8 27 40.9 15 22,7 3' .4.5-Carp. 21 75.0 3 10.7 1 3.6 3 -10.7'

, River-carpsucker. 12 92.3 1 7.7 - - - -

. White bass 7 87.5 1 12.5 - - - -

~ White crappie - -

1 100.0 - - - -

White perch -1 100.0 - - - - -

Goldeye..

2 50.0 1 25.0 - -

1 25.0

Bluegill' 1 100.0 - - - - - -

5.sShortnose gar 2 100.0 - - - - - -

4. Paddlefish. '

I 100.0 - - - - - -

--Channel catfish' 4 '80.0 1. 20.0 .

-Flathead catfish 2~ '40.0 3 60.0 - - - -

Unidentifiable ..- - - - - -

1- .100.0 TOTAL 252- 40.6 280 45.1 56 9.0 33 '5,3 e

1

.m. _ _ . . _ _ . . _ _ _ . - _ . _ _ _ _ _ . _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ _