Letter Sequence Other |
|---|
|
Results
Other: 05000336/LER-1983-007-01, /01T-0:on 830318,nonconservative Safety Analysis Assumption Discovered in Steam Generator Tube Rupture Analysis.Caused by Failure of Analysis to Consider Impact of Automatic Valves.Analyses Will Be Docketed Shortly, A03323, Forwards Addl Info Re Methodology Utilized in Performing Safety Analysis Supporting Cycle 6 Operation,In Response to Question 400.5 in, A03413, Submits Addl Info Re Steam Generator Tube Rupture Event Analyzed in Support of Cycle 6 Operation,Per 830725 Request. Current Steam Generator Tube Rupture Analysis Adequate to Support Cycle 6 Operation, B10788, Discusses Re Proposed Revs to Tech Specs for Cycle 6 Reload.Current Tech Spec Limits Provide Acceptable Margin of Safety, B10944, Forwards Suppl to Reload Safety Analyses for Cycle 6 Operation. Cycle 6 Reload Design Does Not Result in Previously Acceptable Safety Limits for Any Incident to Be Exceeded.Startup Scheduled for 831230, B11096, Forwards Startup Test Rept Cycle 6. Results within Acceptance Criteria W/Exception of Low Power Measurement of Control Element Assembly (CEA) Reactivity Worths.One CEA Bank Slightly in Excess of Criteria, ML20039C038, ML20072Q703, ML20073M245, ML20073M276, ML20073M288, ML20080K548, ML20080K696, ML20082L244, ML20087P713
|
MONTHYEARML20039C0381981-12-17017 December 1981 Revised Tech Specs Re Cycle 5 Reload Analyses Project stage: Other B10353, Application to Amend License DPR-65 Incorporating Revisions to Tech Specs to Support Cycle 5.Completion of Revisions & Reanalysis Required for Item II.K.3.30 of NUREG-0737 Scheduled for 8207011981-12-17017 December 1981 Application to Amend License DPR-65 Incorporating Revisions to Tech Specs to Support Cycle 5.Completion of Revisions & Reanalysis Required for Item II.K.3.30 of NUREG-0737 Scheduled for 820701 Project stage: Request ML20072Q7031983-03-18018 March 1983 RO 50-336/83-07:nonconservative Assumptions Discovered in Steam Generator Tube Rupture analysis.C-E Failed to Utilize Conservative Secondary Side Steam Pressure Values in Analysis.Addl Info Will Be Provided Project stage: Other 05000336/LER-1983-007-01, /01T-0:on 830318,nonconservative Safety Analysis Assumption Discovered in Steam Generator Tube Rupture Analysis.Caused by Failure of Analysis to Consider Impact of Automatic Valves.Analyses Will Be Docketed Shortly1983-03-31031 March 1983 /01T-0:on 830318,nonconservative Safety Analysis Assumption Discovered in Steam Generator Tube Rupture Analysis.Caused by Failure of Analysis to Consider Impact of Automatic Valves.Analyses Will Be Docketed Shortly Project stage: Other B10688, Application for Amend to License DPR-65,revising Tech Specs to Reflect Changes in Cycle 6 Reload Operating Characteristics1983-04-13013 April 1983 Application for Amend to License DPR-65,revising Tech Specs to Reflect Changes in Cycle 6 Reload Operating Characteristics Project stage: Request ML20073M2761983-04-30030 April 1983 Steam Generator Tube Rupture Event Project stage: Other ML20073M2881983-04-30030 April 1983 Proposed Tech Specs Changing Cycle 6 Reload Operating Characteristics Project stage: Other ML20073M2451983-04-30030 April 1983 Reload Safety Analysis Project stage: Other B10788, Discusses Re Proposed Revs to Tech Specs for Cycle 6 Reload.Current Tech Spec Limits Provide Acceptable Margin of Safety1983-05-16016 May 1983 Discusses Re Proposed Revs to Tech Specs for Cycle 6 Reload.Current Tech Spec Limits Provide Acceptable Margin of Safety Project stage: Other ML20076K3231983-07-0101 July 1983 Forwards Response to 830610 Request for Addl Info Re Methodology Used to Perform Safety Analyses Supporting Cycle 6 Operation.Analyses Performed Based on C-E Owners Group Rept CEN-199 in Response to NUREG-0737,Item II.K.2.17 Project stage: Request A03323, Forwards Addl Info Re Methodology Utilized in Performing Safety Analysis Supporting Cycle 6 Operation,In Response to Question 400.5 in1983-07-15015 July 1983 Forwards Addl Info Re Methodology Utilized in Performing Safety Analysis Supporting Cycle 6 Operation,In Response to Question 400.5 in Project stage: Other A03413, Submits Addl Info Re Steam Generator Tube Rupture Event Analyzed in Support of Cycle 6 Operation,Per 830725 Request. Current Steam Generator Tube Rupture Analysis Adequate to Support Cycle 6 Operation1983-08-0808 August 1983 Submits Addl Info Re Steam Generator Tube Rupture Event Analyzed in Support of Cycle 6 Operation,Per 830725 Request. Current Steam Generator Tube Rupture Analysis Adequate to Support Cycle 6 Operation Project stage: Other B10944, Forwards Suppl to Reload Safety Analyses for Cycle 6 Operation. Cycle 6 Reload Design Does Not Result in Previously Acceptable Safety Limits for Any Incident to Be Exceeded.Startup Scheduled for 8312301983-11-17017 November 1983 Forwards Suppl to Reload Safety Analyses for Cycle 6 Operation. Cycle 6 Reload Design Does Not Result in Previously Acceptable Safety Limits for Any Incident to Be Exceeded.Startup Scheduled for 831230 Project stage: Other ML20082L2441983-11-30030 November 1983 Suppl to Reload Safety Analyses for Cycle 6 Operation Project stage: Other ML20149E0211983-12-30030 December 1983 Safety Evaluation Supporting Amend 90 to License DPR-65 Project stage: Approval B11011, Application for Amend to License DPR-65,revising Tech Specs Re Power Distribution Limit Total Planar Radial Peaking Factor1984-01-20020 January 1984 Application for Amend to License DPR-65,revising Tech Specs Re Power Distribution Limit Total Planar Radial Peaking Factor Project stage: Request B11013, Application for Amend to License DPR-65,changing Tech Specs by Revising Total Planar Peaking Factor Limits1984-01-25025 January 1984 Application for Amend to License DPR-65,changing Tech Specs by Revising Total Planar Peaking Factor Limits Project stage: Request ML20080K5481984-01-25025 January 1984 Proposed Tech Spec Changes,Revising Total Planar Peaking Factor Limits Project stage: Other ML20080K6961984-01-31031 January 1984 Proposed Tech Specs Re Power Distribution Limit Total Planar Radial Peaking Factor Project stage: Other B11096, Forwards Startup Test Rept Cycle 6. Results within Acceptance Criteria W/Exception of Low Power Measurement of Control Element Assembly (CEA) Reactivity Worths.One CEA Bank Slightly in Excess of Criteria1984-03-27027 March 1984 Forwards Startup Test Rept Cycle 6. Results within Acceptance Criteria W/Exception of Low Power Measurement of Control Element Assembly (CEA) Reactivity Worths.One CEA Bank Slightly in Excess of Criteria Project stage: Other ML20087P7131984-03-31031 March 1984 Startup Test Rept Cycle 6 Project stage: Other 1983-05-16
[Table View] |
Text
,
.~
NORTHEAST UTIEJTIES I
EEEEEE:~~
ENES " *""' '
t
<L====:
March 18, 1983 MP-4801 Mr. Ronald C. Haynes Regional Administrator, Region I U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regional Office 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406
Reference:
Facility Operating License No. DPR-65 Docket No. 50-336 Reportable Occurrence R0 50-336/83-07
Dear Mr. Haynes:
This letter provides notification of Reportable Occurrence 83-07, pursuant to the requirements of Millstone Unit 2 Appendix A Technical Specifications, Section 6.9.1.8.h.
This letter describes an error discovered in the transient analyses that could have permitted reactor operation in a manner less conservative than assumed in the safety analysis.
This report documents the discovery of non-conservative assumptions in our Steam Generator Tube Rupture Analysis.
Millstone 2's Steam Generator Tube Rupture Analysis was performed by Combustion Engineering.
The error was discovered by Northeast Utilities while performing an in-house Steam Generator Tube Rupture Analysis with the RETRAN 02 MOD 2 computer code.
Combustion Engineering failed to utilize conservative secondary side steam pressure values in the analysis.
Combustion Engineering used the minimum secondary side pressure to maximize flow thru the ruptured tube.
This maximizes break flow but fails to account for the opening of the atmospheric dump valves.
With RETRAN, Northeast Utilities using the maximum secondary steam pressure as a precondition for the tube rupture, found that the secondary side atmospheric steam dump valves would open and increase radiological consequences.
The bounding case using a maximum secondary side pressure resulted in a 0.25 REM dose to the thyroid at the site boundary.
The Combustion Engineering case showed a.006 Rem dose to the thyroid at the site boundary.
Both of these dose valces are significantly below the 300 REM dose to the thyroid at the site boundary which is allowed by 10CFR100 limits.
S
'..n ci.
.Mr. Ronald C. Haynes Page 2 Combustion Engineering therefore ' erred in not performing a parametric analysis on secondary side steam pressure to determine which pressure provided worse case radiological consequences for. the Steam Generator tube rupture transient.
l Further information will be provided in the two week report.
Yours truly, NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY COMPANY h
E. J. Mroczka Station Superintendent Millstone Nuclear Power Station EJM/JP:jlc cc:
Director, Office of Management and Program Control, Washington, D.C. (3)
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission,fc/o Document Management Branch, Washington, D.C. 20555' s
e e
v-