ML20072M452
| ML20072M452 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Harris  |
| Issue date: | 07/11/1983 |
| From: | Sean Flynn CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
| To: | WILSON, R. |
| References | |
| ISSUANCES-OL, NUDOCS 8307140437 | |
| Download: ML20072M452 (49) | |
Text
f'
?CLOWCoiUCSPOfiDENCn 0
N, /g UNITED STATES OF AMERICA N
Dem s'9 CTO 9
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
]
V MI31933>g-l BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARS
\\'D.
Cmec er rg
/. /
'iy %r.
- 7. I In the Matter of
)
~ ~,, iC,y
)
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
)
AND NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN MUNICIPAL )
POWER AGENCY
)
)
Docket Nos. 50-400 OL (Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant,
)
50-401 OL Units 1 & 2)
)
APPLICAN'IS' RESPONSE TO REQUEST FOR SUPPLEMENTATION OF ANSWERS TO INTERROGATORIES (LETTER FROM R. WILSON, MAY 23, 1983)
Through the process of informal resolution of discovery disputes, Dr. Richard Wilson has requested Applicants to supplement certain of the answers contained in Applicants' Response to Richard Wilson Interrogatories (May 10, 1983).
Applicants have considered Dr. Wilson's requests and provide the following responses. Applicants are providing these supplemental responses in an effort to achieve resolution of disagreements through the informal negotiation process encouraged by the Board. In providing these responses, Applicants do not concede that their previously filed responses were incomplete. Each request for supplernentation is quoted at length below and is followed immediately by Appheants' response thereto,.
Interogatories [ sic] 1(a)-1 and 1(a)-2 Your response presents a conclusion but no basis for that conclusion, as is called for in the generalinterogaf6ry and question 1(a)-2.
In addition, your response limits itself to C1, whereas most of the chlorine in the 2
drif t will be combined available chlorine. Please supplement your answer in accordance with these points.
ANSWER. Applicants have not performed an analysis of chlorine transport in the vapor and aerosol effluent from the Harris plant cooling towers. The absence of reported 8307140437 830711 l.
PDRADOCK05000g 3 503
fin' dings of adverse environmental impacts caused by chlorine transport in cooling tower vapor and aerosol effluents at operating power plants supports Applicants' conclusion
{ hat there would be no adverse environmentalimpact caused by chlorine transport in the Harris plant cooling tower vapor and aerosol effluents.
\\
Interrogatory No.1(a)-1 referred to chlorine transport and Applicants, therefore, addressed chlorine as (Cl ) and not chlorine compounds.
2 Chlorine will be added as hypochlorite solution. For an explanation of resulting reactions involved in this process, see EPA Development Document for Effluent Limitations and Standards for the Steam Electric Point Source Category (draft) EPA 440/1-80/029-b pages 68-74.
The percentage or volume of the chlorine compounds which may be formed and dispersed has not been calculated by Applicants.
However, Applicants believe that any chlorine compounds formed will not exist in great enough conceintration upon deposition to cause adverse effects upon biota.
Any chlorine compounds present will be highly diluted and the concentrations reaching the ground will be negligible, and thus would be expected to have no adverse effects.
Because Applicants have performed no specific analysis of the chlorine
~
transport in the vapor and aerosal effluent from the Harris Plant cooling towers, the answer to Interrogatory 1(a)-2(a) (1) through (.9) continues to be as originally stated, i.e.,
not applicable.
i I
s I
Interrogatory 1(a)-3 You did not specify concentrations and durations that might i
be needed for any of the situations you mentioned.
They can be reasonably well i
predicted.
Please do so.
Please include situations in which you may be granted a variance from the NPDES requirements.
ANSWER. Applicants stated in their original response that the concentrations and duration of chlorination under the various conditions mentioned would fall within the
- l. L
. - normal range of operations. In Section 3.4.2.4 of the ER it is stated that the chlorine j
i requirements are expected to be approximately 3-5 ppm. The NPDES permit limits free l
gnd total residual concentrati >ns and these limits will not be exceeded even when maximum chlorination occurs.
Applicants do not anticipate seeking any variances from the limits imposed by the NPDES permit.
Interrogatory 1(a)-5 See comments on 1(a)-1 and 1(a)-2.
Please supplement accordingly.
ANSWER. See answer to 1(a)-1 above.
Interrogatory 1(b)-1-3 Your response presents a conclusion but no basis for that conclusion, as is called for in the generalinterogatory and 1(b)-2. If you have " performed no such specific study" how do you know there will be no adverse impacts? I am seeking a detailed quantitative answer.
ANSWER. Applicants have not performed an analysis of dispersal of chlorinated organic compounds in the vapor and aerosol from the Harris Plant cooling towers. The facts mentioned in Applicants' original answer plus the absence of any reported findings of adverse environmental impacts resulting from dispersal of chlorinated organic compounds in the vapor and aerosol from cooling towers at operating power plants support Applicants' conclusion that dispersal of chlorinated organics in vapor or aerosol from the Harris Plant cooling towers will have no adverse impact on the " biosphere".
Interrogatory 1(b)-5 Please specify the type of monitoring which you have begun.
ANS'WER. In January 1983, monitoring of selected cations, anions, nutrients and I
trace elements in the Harris Plant reservoir was initiated as part of a biological l
monitoring program. The purpose of this monitoring is to characterize the system in l
terms of the general physical and chemical limnology as it relates to the aquatic biota.
Interrogatory 1(b)-6 Please explain how chlorination " eliminates" organic enemical compounds.
1 ANSWER. Applicants' original answer to Interrogatory 1(b)-6 was perhaps unclear. In that answer, the word " organics" was intended to refer to organic matter, guch as algae, bacteria, fungi, etc. and not to organic chemicals as such.
Interrogatory 1(b)-9 Contention 1(b) and 1(d) show a broad concern with compounds which may be dispersed in the atmosphere. The exact percentage of the 129 compounds which are chlorinated organies (approx. 33%) is irrelevant.
Please respond to the question as it is written.
ANSWER. Applicants are willing to, provide to Dr. Wilson tne information set forth below in the interest of finally resolving the disagreement between them concerning appropriateness of Interrogatory 1(b)-9.
In providing this information, however, Applicants do not waive their position that Interrogatory 1(b)-9 is improper as seeking information which is beyond the scope of Wilson Contention 1(b) and is irrelevant thereto and do not concede that any of the information provided is relevant.
Statistics concerning nuclear power plants in operation or under construction in the United States are set forth in a document entitled " Commercial Nuclear Power Plants, Edition 15" (February 13, 1983) issued by NUS Corporation. The term " comparable in design" is too vague to permit Applicants to provide further response to this portion of the Interrogatory.
Applicants do not have the *results of priority pollutant analyses performed for power plants owned or operated by other utilities.
Copies of Applicant CP&L's. submittal t'o'the EPA with respect to its Brunswick and Robinson Plants are attached hereto.
s Interrogatory 1(d)3,4 My general concern is with compounds which may be dispersed into the atmospher,e from, cooling towers. Whether you add the compounds to the water in the tower or before the water reaches the tower (i.e. in the lake) is irrelevant. Please respond to the questions as written.
1 ANSWER. Applicants are willing to provide to Dr. Wilson the information set forth below in the interest of finally resolving their disagreement concerning appropriateness l
. l l
i L
e
. of Interrogatories 1(d)-3 and -4.
In providing this information, however, Applicants do not waive their position that these interrogatories are improper in that they seek ipformation which is beyond the scope of Wilson Contention 1(d) and is irrelevant and do not concede that any of the information provided is relevant.
ANSWER 1(d)-3. None of the three species is known to be present in either of the Harris reservcirs. This is based on surveys of those reservoirs by personnel of the Applicants' Environmental Technology Seetion during the Spring of 1983.
Hydrilla could become e'stablished in the reservoir (s). Water hyacinth and/or alligator-weed are not expected to become established in either reservoir, based on their habitat requirements, present distributions, or temperature tolerances. See "A Manual of Marsh and Aquatic Vascular Plants of North Carolina with Habitat Data" by E.
O. Beal, N. C. Ag. Exp. Sta. Tech. Bull. 247, pages 149 and 176; " Manual of the. Vascular Flora of the Carolinas," by A. E. Radford et al, UNC Press, pages 272 and 422. '
t Hydrilla has been controlled with various aquatic herbicides, biological organisms, and mechanical methods.
The most effective method of controlling hydrilla has been achieved with aquatic herbicides. Biological control has been achieved with the use of grass carp (Ctenocharvngodon idella), but present regulations prevent that species from being stocked in public waters in North Carolina ex' cept in confined experimental areas approved by the North Carolina Wildlife Resources Commission. Mechanical control, while producing immediate results, is slow and expensive.
Herbicides registered and commonly used" for-hydrilla control include s
Diquat, various formulations of copper complexes, and Endothall (Aquathol K) (North Carolina Agricultural Chemicals Manual, page 221).
Application rates oi doses for the above listed herbicides are available in product label instructions.
~
If hydrilla becomes established in the Harris reservoir and if herbicides are utilized for control purposes, the expected frequency of use of any of the above glentioned chemicals is one time per year. Duration of the application would be related to how long the herbicides remain active af ter their application. There is no interval over which the treatment is made. Typically, these herbicides either break down or are immobilized in from one to 14 days, (TechnicalInformation Manual for Endothall, page 6; Diquat Technical Information, 4/78), depending on temperature, water turbidity, and other factors.
ANSWER 1(d)-4(a).
None of the above mentioned herbicides is expected to be released in the cooling tower plume. This is because of the rapid breakdown and/or immobilization of the compounds that would occur before they would be drawn into the cooling tower makeup water intake structure.
ANSWER 1(d)-4(b). Not applicable. Chemicals would not be expected to enter the cooling tower water.
ANSWER 1(d)-4(c). Not applicable.
ANSWER 1(d)-4(d). Applicants assume that the intervenor's intent in asking this question is to determine the fate of herbicides on.the ground after they were deposited by way of the cooling tower plume. Because this is not expected to occur, the answer is not applicable.
Interrogatory 1(e)-5 Your answer does not indicate whether you are aware of any studies of toxic materials in the river.
ANSWER. Applicants.have no knowledge of any studies 5f toxic materials in the s
Cape Fear River.
l Interrogatory 1(e)-6 This ques, tion is posed in the context of exploring potential
-dangers from toxic chemicpls in the river. Please explain the monitoring program in a manner responsive to the intent of the question.
.-~
ANSWER. The Cape Fear River quality is monitored as part of a biological monitoring program. The purpose is to characterize the general physical and chemical 1,imnology of the river water.
Alonitoring is not intended to explore the " potential dangers from toxic chemicals in the river.".
This the
//
day of July,1983.
hw/
S A
A Samantna Francis Flynn f)
Associate General Counsel Carolina Power & Light Company Post Office Box 1551 Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 Telephone: 919-836-7707
~
Thomas A. Baxter, Esquire
~
John H. O'Neill, Jr., Esquire Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge 1800 Al Street, N.W.
Washington, D. C. 20036 O
e e
M*
i e
e O
4 o.
~
a.-
f
~'i.,
v R....
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA yh,L ~ \\933 i
3 j
e i2[j, ll-NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3
BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD;./
p N
s In the Matter of
)
)
CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT COMPANY
)
Docket Nos. 50-400 OL AND NORTH CAROLINA EASTERN
)
50-401 OL MUNICIPAL POWER AGENCY
)
)
(Shearon Harris Nuclear Power Plant, Units 1 and 2) ~
')
)
AFFIDAVIT OF WILLIAM T.
HOGARTH County of Wake
)
)
State of North Carolina
)
William T. Hogarth, being duly sworn according to law," [
deposes and says that he is Manager - Environmental Technology Section of Carolina Power & Light Company; that the responses contained in " Applicants' Response to Request for Supplementation of Answers to Interrogatories" of Richard Wilson are true and correct to the best of his'information, knowledge and belief; and that the sources of his information are officers, employees, agents and contractors of Carolina Power &. Light Cdnipany.
~
s 52mm,;7. & W William T.
Hogafth Swddn to and subscribed before ine this_ / j. day of JuJy, 1983.
L!
5.I
/0b? J
< Notary Public v
...:. a : -
My commission expires r
(,
..: 8
' s.
.N w
- s' g
/
March 27, 1981 99 '.j
.S
~
~
e~
${_Ih NI Mr. John K. Yeager, Manager
~ F'#'
NPDES Ad=4nistration Section p
Enforcement and NPDES Administration Division Department of Health and Environmental Control 2600 Bull Street Columbia, South Carolina 29201 RE: ROBINSON STEAM ELECTRIC PLANT NPDES PERMIT NO. SC0002925
Dear Mr. Yeager:
As requested by your letter dated October 17, 1980 to Mr. 3. J.
Furr, Carolina Power di Light Company has conducted analyses of Robinson ImpoaaA==at waters (at the plant intake and in the upper reaches) and the discharge canal at the Robinson Steam Electric Plant in accordance with -
40 CFR 122.53 (NPDES permit renewal requirements for determining effluent characteristics). The attached analytical results are submitted in support of renewal of the Robinson NPDES permit.
The data provided is considered to be reflective of ths quality and quantity of the vastewater discharges associated with plant operations (Unit Nos.1 and 2 in service) at the time of sample collection.
It should be noted that intake water quality variations may have primary influence on variation in discharge water quality.
Should you have any questions concerning this submittal, please contact Mr. T. J. Crawford in Raleigh (telephone:
919-836-6920).
Yours very truly,
)
P. W. Howe s
Vice President Technical Services PWH/tl Attachment bec:
Dr. W. T. Hogarth Mr. R. E. Jones Mr. E. A. Morgan.
Mr. W. T. Traylor t
6
,--------v--
e
,.w,e m.
.-~~--.+,,e-em
,,..---m-
w..
sf
~
3308 East Chace; Hd!!Ne: son Hignway P.O Box 12652 Research Triangle Park. NC 27709 fTbodCompuChem
~""eigig!!!!
17 March 81 Mr. Bill Wolf Carolina Power & Light Co.
Shearon Harris E & E Center Route 1, Box 327 New Hill, North Carolina 27562
Dear Mr. Wolf:
Thank you for selecting Mead Compuchem for your recent sample analysis.
We have completed the analysis that you requested and have enclosed a summary of the Compuchem data for your review.
Additional data details are available for purchase if you require them.
s>
As you know, EPA has promulgated detection limits for the priority pollutants in the December 3,1979, Federal Register, and we have reported all priority pollutant concentrations which have exceeded these limits. In addition, we have pennanently stored a complete record of your data on magnetic tape.
This includes chromatograms, mass spectra, calibration and quality control data for the organics. Therefore, your original data is readily available for future reference.
Should you require additional information from your data base, please contact ~us at 1/800-334-8525.~
Your confidence in our Compuchem service is appre.ciated.
We look forward to a continuing association.
Sincerelv,
/
Ro ert H. Calland s
Vice President., Marketing RHC/mm
Enclosure:
Report Intake A thru F 4065 Discharge A'thru F 4066 Head Waters A thru F 4067 t
l
c c
. @@?MSECHEM.
OfibodEervice REPORT OF DATA CUSTOMER PURCHASE NUMBER: 747710 SAMPLE IDENTIFIER:
INTAKE A THRU F COMPU/ CHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 4065 SUDMITTED TO:
MR. BILL WOLF CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT SHEARON HARRIS E & E CENTER ROUTE 1, BOX 327 NEW HILL, N. C.
27562
.~
SUDMITTED BY-:
s 7'
A i
R'.
LI MYERS:fPH.D.
l 4
j l
/DATE' l
4 9
9 we,-
g aw k
-'*-" 8 F
v' 1
(
(
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER:
INTAKE A THRU F COMPU/ CHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 4065 1.
ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY THE SAMPLES WERE PREPARED AND ANALYZED ACCORDING TO TWO (2) GENERAL PROCEDURES:
(1) " SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROCEDURES FOR SCREENING OF INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENTS FOR' PRIORITY POLLUTANTS," REVISED APRIL 1977, US-EPA, AND (2) EPA METHOD 624, " ORGANICS BY PURGE AND TRAP," AND METHOD 625, " BASE / NEUTRALS', ACIDS, AND PESTICIDES," US-EPA, REVISED
' DECEMBER 3, 1979. FEDERAL REGISTER (GUIDELINES ESTABLISHING TEST PROCEDURES FOR THE ANALYSIS OF POLLUTANTS).
THE LABORATORY PROCEDURES USED FOLLOW THOSE IN METHODS 609, 624. OR 625.
GUALITY ASSURANCE, SAMPLE CUSTODY, AND DOCUMENT CONTROL PROCEDURES WERE FOLLOWED WHICH MEET OR EXCEED EPA REQUIREMENTS.
2.
SAMPLE RECORD DATE A.
RECEIVED / REFRIGERATED 02/18/81 4
B.
ORGANICS 1.
EXTRACTED 02/20/81 2.
ANALYZED VOLATILES O2/21/81 BASE / NEUTRALS O2/23/91 ACIDS 02/23/81 PESTICIDES /PCBS 02/23/81 C.
METALS (CYANIDE & PHENOL)
ANALYZED NOT REGUESTED 4
O
'4 E
r r
,or-n
~
SAMPLE TDENTIFIER: INTAKE A THRU F COMPU/ CHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 4065 1
3.
PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS REPORT CpMPOUNDS '
CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (UG/L)
(UG/L)
I V.
ACROLEIN BDL 100 2V. ACRYLONITRILE BDL 100 3V. BENIENE BDL 10 4V. BIS (CHLOROMETHYL) ETHER BDL 10 SV. BROMOFORM BDL 10 6V. CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BDL 10 7V. CHLOROBENZENE
~
BDL 10 BV. CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE BDL 10 9V. CHLORCETHANE BDL 10 10V. 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER BDL 10 11V. CHLOROFORM BDL 10 12V. DICHLOROBROMOMETHANE BDL 10 13V. DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE BDL 10 14V. 1,1-DICHLORCETHANE BDL 10 15V. 1,2-DICHLORCETHANE BDL 10 16V. 1,1-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 10' 17V. 1,2-DICHLOROPROPANE BDL 10 18V. 1,3-DICHLOROPROPYLENE BDL 10 -
19V. ETHYLBENZENE BDL 10 20V. METHYL BROMIDE BDL 10 28V. METHYL CHLORIDE BDL 10 22V. METHYLENE CHLORIDE 4.7 10 23V. 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLORDETHANE BDL 10 24V. TETRACHLORCETHYLENE BDL 10 25V. TOLUENE BDL 10 26V. 1,2-TRANS-DICHLORDETHYLENE
~
BDL 10 27V. 1,1,1-TRICHLORCETHANE BDL 10 28V. 1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE BDL 10 29V. TRICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 10 30V. TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE BDL 10 31 V.
VINYL CHLORIDE BDL 10 1 A.
2-CHLOROPHENOL
~
BDL 25 2A. 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL BDL 25 3A. 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL BDL 25 4A.
4,6-DINITRO-O-CR.ESOL BDL 250 4A. 2,4-DINITROPHENOL BDL 250 6A. 2-NITROPHENOL BDL 25 7A. 4-NITROPHENOL BDL 25 SA. P-CHLORO-M-CRESOL BDL 25 i
9A. PENTACHLOROPHENOL BDL 25 10A. PHENOL BDL 25 11A. 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL BDL 25
- 18. ACENAPHTHENE BDL 10 2B. ACENAPHTHYLENE BDL 10 OB. ANTHRACENE
(
BDL 10 BDL= BELOW DETECTION LIMIT n
-r
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: INTAKE A THRU F COMPU/ CHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 4065 COMPOUNDS.,
CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (UG/L)
(UG/L) 4B. BENZIDINE BDL 10 5B. BENZO (A) ANTHRACENE BDL 10 6B. BENZO (A) PYRENE BDL 10 7B. 3,4-BENZDFLUCRANTHENE BDL 10 BB. BENZO (GHI) PERYLENE BDL 25 9B. BENZO (K) FLUORANTHENE BDL 10 10B. BIS (2-CHLORDETHOXY) METHANE BDL 10 lab. BIS (2-CHLORDETHYL) ETHER BDL 10 12B. BIS (2-CHLORDISOPROPYL) ETHER BDL 10 13B. DIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE BDL 10 14B. 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER BDL 10 15B. BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE BDL 10 16B. 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE BDL 10 87B. 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER BDL 10 ISB. CHRYSENE BDL 10 89B. DIBENZO (A,H) ANTHRACENE BDL 25 20B. 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE BDL 10.
21B. 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE BDL 10 ^
22B. 1,4-DICHLORBENZENE BDL 10 23B. 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE BDL 10 24B. DIETHYL PHTHALATE BDL 10 25B. DIMETHYL PHTHALATE BDL 10 26B. DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE BDL 10 27B. 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE BDL 10 2BB. 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE 29B. DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
~
BDL 10 BDL 10 30B. 1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE BDL 10 31B. FLUORANTHENE BDL 10 32B. FLUORENE BDL 10 33B. HEXACHLOROBENZENE BDL 10 34B HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE BDL 10 s
35B. HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE BDL 10 06B. HEXACHLORCETHANE BDL 10 373. INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE BDL 25 QSB. ISOPHORONE B Di_
10 39B. NAPHTHALENE BDL 10 40B. NITROBENZENE BDL 10 41B. N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE BDL 10 42B. N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE BDL 10 43D. N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE BDL 10 44B. PHENANTHRENE
~
BDL 10 4 5B. PYRENE' BDL 10 i
46B. 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE BDL 10 l
iP. ALDRIN BDL 10 2P. ALPHA-BHC BDL 10 BDL= BELOW DETECTION LIMIT n---
SAMPLE 2DENTIFTER: INTAKE A THRU F COMPU/ CHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 4065 9
CpMPOUNDS,~
CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (UG/L)
(UG/L) 3P. BETA-BHC BDL 10 4P. GAMMA-BHC BDL 10 SP. DELTA-BHC BDL 10 6P.
CHLORDANE BDL 10 7P.
4, 4 '-DDT BDL 10 SP. 4.4'-DDE BDL 10 9P.
4,4'-DDD BDL 10 10P. DIELDRIN BDL 10 11P. ALPHA-ENDOSULFAN BDL 10 12P. BETA-ENDOSULFAN BDL 10 13P. ENDOSULFAN SULFATE BDL 10 14P. ENDRIN BDL 10 19P. ENDRIN ALDEHYDE BDL 10 16P. HEPTACHLOR BDL 10 17P. HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE BDL 10 1SP. PCB-1242 BDL 10 19P. PCB-1254 BDL 10.
20P. PCB-1221-BDL 10 ^
21P. PCB-1232 DDL 10 22P. PCB-1248 BDL 10 23P. PCB-1260 BDL 10 24P. PCB-1016 BDL 10 25P. TOXAPHENE BDL 10 4
m 4
g e
t e
p c.
~
SAMPLE IDENT1FIER INTAKE A THRU F COMPU/ CHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 4065 4.
SPECIAL ANALYSIS QpMPOUNDS..
CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT i
1.
CYANIDES, TOTAL DDL O.01 MG/L 2.
PHENOLS, TOTAL
- O.02 O. 01 MG/L 4
f 4
e T
em e.
4 b
j s
1 i
e e
i I
i e
0 4
e
~~
~
@ @ I RlDC H E E ofTbod5ervce REPORT OF DATA CUSTOMER PURCHASE NUMBER: 747710 SAMPLE IDENTIFIER:
DISCHARGE A THRU F-COMPU/ CHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 4066 SUBMITTED TO:
~
MR.
BILL WOLF CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT SHEARON HARRIS E & E CENTER ROUTE li BOX 327
~
NEW HILL, N. C.
27562 S
s SUBMITTED Bi':
CC s-m R.
L.
MYERS, p.D.
~
14A.
' DATE e
g g
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER:
DISCHARGE A THRU F COMPU/ CHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 4066 g
1.
ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY THE SAMPLES WERE PREPARED AND ANALYZED ACCORDING TO TWO (2) GENERAL PROCEDURES:
(1) " SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROCEDURES FOR SCREENING OF INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENTS FOR PRIORITY POLLUTANTS," REVISED APRIL 1977, US-EPA, AND (2) EPA METHOD 624, " ORGANICS BY PURGE AND TRAP," AND METHOD 625, " BASE /NEUTRALSa. ACIDS, AND PESTICIDES," US-EPA, REVISED DECEMBER 3, 1979, FEDERAL REGISTER (GUIDELINES ESTABLISHING TEST PROCEDURES FOR THE ANALYSIS OF POLLUTANTS).
THE LABORATORY PROCEDURES USED FOLLOW THOSE IN METHODS 60S, 624, OR 625.
GUALITY ASSURANCE, SAMPLE CUSTODY, AND DOCUMENT CONTROL PROCEDURES WERE FOLLOWED WHICH MEET OR EXCEED EPA REGUIREMENTS.
2.
SAMPLE RECORD DATE A.
RECEIVED / REFRIGERATED 02/18/81
~ '
B.
ORGANICS 1.
EXTRACTED O2/20/81
~
2.
ANALYZED VOLATILES 02/23/81 BASE / NEUTRALS O2/24/81 ACIDS O2/23/81 PESTICIDES /PCBS 02/24/81 4
C.
METALS (CYANIDE & PHEN 0L)
ANALYZED 03/04/81 e
e a
o e
e 0
,w
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: DISCHARGE A THRU F COMPU/ CHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 4066
~
l 3.
PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS REPORT l
CpMPOUNDS.,,
CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (UG/L)
(UC/L) 1 V.
ACROLEIN BDL 100 2V. ACRYLONITRILE BDL 100 3V. BENZENE BDL 10 4 V.
DIS (CHLOROMETHYL) ETHER BDL 10 S V.
BROMOFORM BDL 10 6V. CARBON TETRACHLORIDE 7V. CHLOROBENZENE
^
BDL 10 BDL 10 BV. CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE BDL 10 9 V.
CHLORCETHANE BDL 10 2 0V. 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER BDL 10 11V. CHLOROFORM BDL 10 12V. DICHLOROBROMOMETHANE BDL 10 13V. DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE BDL 10 14V. 1,1-DICHLORDETHANE BDL 10 15V. 1,2-DICHLORCETHANE BDL 10 86V. 1,1-DICHLORCETHYLENE EDL 10 17V.
1, 2-D ICHLOROP P.3P ANE BDL 10 ISV. 1,3-DICHLOROPROPYLENE BDL 10 -
19V. ETHYLBENZENE BDL 10 20V. METHYL BROMIDE BDL 10 22V. METHYL CHLORIDE BDL 10 22V. METHYLENE CHLORIDE 63 10 23V. 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLOROETHANE BDL 10 24V. TETRACHLORCETHYLENE BDL 10 25V. TOLUENE BDL 10 26V. 1,2-TRANS-DICHLORCETHYLENE
~
BDL 10 27V. 1,1,1-TRICHLORCETHANE EDL 10 28V. 1,1,2-TRICHLORCETHANE BDL 10 29V. TRICHLORDETHYLENE BDL 10 30V. TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE BDL 10 31 V.
VINYL CHLORIDE BDL 10 1 A.
2-CHLOROPHENOL 2A. 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL BDL 25 3A. 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL BDL 25 BDL 25 4A.
4, 6-D I NI TR O-O-CR.ESOL BDC DA. 2,4-DINITROPHENOL 250 BDL 250 6A. 2-NITROPHENOL BDL 25 7A. 4-NITROPHENOL BDL 25 BA. P-CHLORO-M-CRESOL BDL 25 9A. PENTACHLOROPHENGL BDL 25 10 A.
PHENOL
~
BDL 25 11A. 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENOL BDL 25 1B. ACENAPHTHENE BDL 10 2B. ACENAPHTHYLENE BDL 10 3B. ANTHRACENE BDL 10 BDL= BELOW DETECTION LIMIT
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: DISCHARGE A THRU F COMPU/ CHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 4066 CpMPOUNDS.,
CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (UG/L)
(UG/L) 4B. BENZIDINE BDL 10 9B. BENZO (A) ANTHRACENE BDL 10 6B. BENZO (A) PYRENE BDL 10 7B. 3,4-BENZDFLOORANTHENE EDL 10 BB. BENZO (CHI) PERYLENE BDL 25 9B. BENZO (K) FLUORANTHENE BDL 10 10B. DIS (2-CHLORDETHOXY) hETHANE BDL 10
'113.
BIS (2-CHLORDETHYL) ETHER BDL 10 12B. BIS (2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER BDL 10 13B. BIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE BDL 10 14B. 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER BDL 10 I SB. BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE EDL 10 16B. 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE BDL 10 17B. 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER BDL 10 18B. CHRYSENE BDL 10 193. DIBENZO (A,H) ANTHRACENE BDL 25' 20B. 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE BDL 10.
22B. 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE BDL 10 22B. 1,4-DICHLORBENZENE BDL 10 23B. 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE BDL 10 243. DIETHYL PHTHALATE 25B. DIMETHYL PHTHALATE BDL 10 BDL 10 26B. DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE BDL 10 27B. 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE BDL 10 28B. 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE 29B. DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE
~
BDL 10 BDL 10 30B. 1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE BDL 10 31B. FLUORANTHENE 32B. FLUORENE DDL.
10 BDL 10 33B. HEXACHLOROBENZENE BDL 10 34B. HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE BDL 10 35B. HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE BDL 10 36B. HEXACHLORCETHANE BDL 10 373. INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE BDL 25 38B. ISOPHORONE BDL 343. NAPHTHALENE 10 BDL 10 40B. NITROBENZENE BDL 10 423. N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE BDL 10 42B. N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE BDL 10 43D. N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE BDL 10 44B. PHENANTHRENE BDL 10 4 5B. PYRENE-BDL 10 46B. 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE 1P. ALDRIN BDL 10 BDL 10 2P. ALPHA-BHC BDL 10 BDL= BELOW DETECTION LIMIT w
1
+ -,
w e
SAMPLE 8 DENT 1FTER: DISCHARGE A THRU F COMPU/ CHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 4066 4.
SPECIAL ANALYSIS 4
C,OMPOUNDS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT I
i 1.
CYANIDES. TOTAL DDL O.01 MG/L 2.
PHENOLS, TOTAL BDL O. 01 MG/L 9
6 e
i a
e-u e
as i
4 4
e 4
1 l
s l
I
=
e 4
e j
i l '.
t
{
l.
r e
~
,m, 9 9 r-.
w y
y_.,-
'e--
g yr-w
-,et
.e vmr,w.-m---
=g--g--e.+w---
-+m--,.
,c.
e,
- -p--
,f w-w,<.-w-.-?
3 -w:-
eg e -
e-,
y-
-..:..-.=:.--.........
~
@@RTiPUDCH2iiM..
O(T9005ecN10e REPORT OF DATA CUSTOMER PURCHASE NUMBER: 747710 SAMPLE IDENTIFIER:
HEAD WATERS A THRU F COMPU/ CHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 4067 4
SUBMITTED TO:
~
MR. BILL WOLF CAROLINA POWER & LIGHT SHEARON HARRIS E & E CENTER ROUTE 1, BOX 327 NEW HILL, N. C.
27562
~
.~
6 1
s SUBMITTED BY:
g-R/ L. ' MYER@ PH. D.
~
/
DATE I
?
l 1
SAMPLE IDENTTFTER D8SCHARGE A THRU F COMPU/ CHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 4066 1
s
,~.
,7 CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT COMPOUNDS (UG/L)
(UG/L)
/
3P. BETA-BHC BDL 10 4P. GAMMA-BHC BDL 10 SP. DELTA-BHC BDL 10 6P. CHLORDANE
/
BDL 10 7P. 4,4'-DDT
/
BDL 10 SP.
4, 4 '-DDE BDL 10 9P.
4,4'-DDD
~
s
~
BDL 10 AOP. DIELDRIN BDL 10 12 P.
ALPHA-ENDOSUCFAN BDL 10 12P. BETA-ENDOSULFAN-
~
BDL 10 13P. ENDOSULFAN 3ULFATE s'
BDL 10 14P. ENDRIN BDL 10 15P. ENDRIN ALDEHYDE BDL 10 16P. HEPTACHLOR BDL 10 17P. HEPTACHLCR EPOXIDE' r BDL 10 18P. PCB-1242 BDL 10 19P. PCB-1254 BDL 10.
20P. PCB-1221 BDL 10'.
2aP. PCB-1232 T'
BDL 10 22P. PCD-1248-BDL 10 23P. PCB-1260 BDL 10 24P. PCB-1016 B DL-10 25P. TOXAPHENE
~
BDL.-
10 p
9
/
G p..
4
/
e O
e i
v i
D
.,m y
3
~
v.
W t
.}
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER:
HEAD WATERS A THRU F COMPU/ CHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 4067 1.
ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY THE SAMPLES WERE PREPARED AND ANALYZED ACCORDING TO TWO (2) GENERAL PROCEDURES:
(1) " SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROCEDURES FOR SCREENING OF INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENTS FOR PRIORITY POLLUTANTS," REVISED APRIL
- 1977, US-EPA, AND (2) EPA METHOD.624, '" ORGANICS BY PURGE AND TR AP, " AND METHOD 625, " BASE / NEUTRALS, ACIDS, AND PESTICIDES," US-EPA, REVISED DECEMBER 3, 1979, FEDERAL REGISTER (GUIDELINES ESTABLISHING TEST PROCEDURES FOR THE ANALYSIS OF POLLUTANTS).
THE LABORATORY PROCEDURES USED FOLLOW THOSE IN METHODS 608, 624, OR 625.
GUALITY ASSURANCE, SAMPLE CUSTODY, AND DOCUMENT CONTROL PROCEDURES WERE FOLLOWED WHICH MEET OR EXCEED EPA REGUIREMENTS.
2.
SAMPLE RECORD DATE A.
RECEIVED / REFRIGERATED C2/18/81 j
B.
ORGANICS 1.
EXTRACTED 02/20/91 2.
ANALYZED VOLATILES' 02/23/81 BASE / NEUTRALS O2/24/81 ACIDS 02/23/81 PESTICIDES /PCBS
,s 02/24/81 i.
C.
METALS (CYANIDE &PHENGL) 5 ANALYZED 03/06/81 s
i T
I f.
g i
t e
.T
\\
l
e SAMPLE ZDENTIFIER HEAD WATERS A THRU F COMPU/ CHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 4067 3.
PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS REPORT C,OMPOUNDS,,
CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (UG/L)
(UG/L) 1 V.
ACROLEIN' BDL 100 2V.
ACRYLONI'TRILE BDL 100 3V. BENZENE BDL 19 4V.
BIS (CHLOROMETHYL) ETHER BDL 10 SV. BROMOFORM BDL 10 6V. CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BDL 10 7V. CHLOROBENZENE BDL 10 BV. CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE BDL 10 9V. CHLORCETHANE BDL 10 10V. 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER BDL 10 11 V.
CHLOROFORM BDL 10 12V. DICHLORODROMOMETHANE BDL 10 13V. DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE BDL 10 2 4V.
1,1-DICHLORCETHANE BDL 10 15V. 1,2-DICHLORCETHANE BDL 10 16V. 1,1-DICHLORGETHYLENE BDL 10' 17V. 1,2-DICHLOROP.ROPANE BDL 1 C, A BV.
1,3-DICHLOROPROPYLENE 3
BDL 10 -
19V. ETHYLBENZENE BDL 10 20V. METHYL BROMIDE BDL 10 21 V.
METHYL CHLORIDE BDL 10 22V. METHYLENE CHLORIDE 56 10 23V. 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLORGETHANE BDL 10
'24V.
TETRACHLOROETHYLENE BDL 10 25V. TOLUENE,
DDL 10 26V. 1,2-TRANG-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 10
~.
27V. 1,1,1-TRICHLORCETHANE BDL 10 28V.
1,1,2-TRICHLOROETHANE DDL 10 29V, TRICHLORCETHYLENE DDL 10 30V. TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE BDL 10 31 V.
VINYL CHLORIDE BDL 10 1A. 2-CHLOROPHENOL BDL 25 2A. 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL
BDL 25 3A.
2, 4-D IMETHY'CPHENOL BDL 25 4A.
.4, 6-D I N I TR O-O-CR ESOL.
B DC.
4A. 2,4-DINITROPHENOL 250 BDL 250
,, 6 A.
,2-NITROPHENOL BDL 25 7A..4-NITROPHENOL BDL 25 BA. P-C. ACOR O-M-CR ESOL BDL 25 9A. 'PENTACHLOROPHENOL BDL 25 10A. u PHENGL DDL 25 11A.' 2 4,6-TRICHLOROPHENDL BDL 25 18.3ACENAPHTHENE BDL 10 2B. ACENAPHTHYLENE BDL 10 3D. ArJTHR ACENE '
BDL 10
,BDL= BELOW DETECTION LIMIT k
SAMPLE IDENTIFTER: HEAD WATERS A THRU F COMPU/C' HEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 4067 CCMPOUNDS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (UG/L)
(UG/L) 4B. BENZIDINE BDL 10 5B. BENZO (A) ANTHRACENE BDL 10 6B. BENZO (A) PYRENE BDL 10 7B. 3,4-BENZO.LUORANTHENE BDL 10
- 88. BENZO (GHI) PERYLENE BDL 25 9B. BENZO (K) FLUORANTHENE DDL 10 10B. DIS (2-CHLOROETHOXY) METHANE BDL 10 12B. BIS (2-CHLOROETHYL) ETHER BDL 10 12B. DIS (2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER BDL 10 13B. DIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE BDL 10 14 B.
4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER BDL 10 I SB. BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE BDL 10 2 6B. 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE EDL 10 17B. 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER BDL 10 ISB. CHRYSENE EDL 10 19B. DIBENZO (A,h) ANTHRACENE BDL 25 203. 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE BDL 10-,
213. 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE BDL 10 22B. 1,4-DICHLORDENZENE BDL 10 23B. 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE BDL 10 242. DIETHYL PHTHALATE BDL 10 25B. DIMETHYL PHTHALATE BDL 10 26B. DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE BDL 10 27B. 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE BDL 10 28B. 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE 29B. DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE BDL 10 BDL 10 30B. 1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE BDL 10
-32B. FLUORANTHENE 32B. FLUORENE DDL 10 BDL 10 333. HEXACHLOROBENZENE BDL 10 34 B. HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE BDL 10 35B. HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE BDL 10 36B. HEXACHLORCETHANE BDL 10 372. INDENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE BDL 25 RSB. ISOPHORONE BDL 10
~~
39B.. NAPHTHALENE BDL 10 403. NITROBENZENE BDL 10 41B. N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE BDL 10 42B. N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE BDL 10 433. N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE BDL 10 44B. PHENANTHRENE BDL 10 453. PYRENE" BDL 10 463. 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE BDL 10 2P. ALDRIN BDL 10 2P. ALPHA-BHC BDL 10 BDL= BELOW DETECTION LIMIT
~
(
~
SAMPLE' IDENTIFIER: HEAD WATERS A THRU F COMPU/ CHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 4067 COMPOUNDS.,
CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (UG/L)
(UG/L) 3P.
BETA-SHC BDL 10 4P. GAMMA-BHC BDL 10 SP. DELTA-BHC BDL 10 6P. CHLORDANE BDL 10 7P. 4,4'-DDT BDL 10 BP.
4,4'-DDE BDL 10 9P.
4,4'-DDD
~
DDL 10 10P. DIELDRIN BDL 10 11P. ALPHA-ENDOSULFAN BDL 10 12P. BETA-ENDOSULFAN BDL 10 13P. ENDOSULFAN SULFATE BDL 10 14P. ENDRIN BDL 10 ISP. ENDRIN ALDEHYDE BDL 10 26P. HEPTACHLOR BDL 10 17P. HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE BDL 10 I SP. PC3-1242 BDL 10 19P. PCB-1254 BDL 10 20P. PCB-1221 BDL 10 21P. PC3-1232 EDL 10 22P. PCB-1248 BDL 10 23P. PCB-1260 BDL 10 24P. PCB-1016 BDL 10 25P. TOXAPHENE BDL 10 O
o I
e g
l 4
?
l I
?
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER HEAD WATERS A THRU F COMPU/ CHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 4067 4.
SPECIAL ANALYSIS COMPOUNDS.-
CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT 1.
CYANIDES, TOTAL BDL O.01 MG/L 2.
PHENOLS, TOTAL BDL O.01 MG/L e
as O
e S
e e
s o
4 '
e 6
0 w
DR rWC.i)Ls ew h
g
.8 a m %.
(@W c
Carohna Power f. Light CompanyYy[---d-At.'AL Y TICA L L A90RA TORY
\\
LA30GATORY ANALYSIS FORT /.
- t. abor.icry Lench No, k"'Nb R(owester A
A-f-L.L #
Accress Cate km !ed O'I)~ !
Cate Re:'Aved
'# I * [
cnuge Nuw.nct SX 9* U!! N$ 5~~ 5* L ' 9 5I* $$ l ) /L'd s'~ CP 1 Dest.ricsson ct Samp6e h/A DES ~ Pr.o /.Ay fo//~L& wAk_r-si y e_.- - /~LB. /TA~.s o ~
t J
Desired Analysh i
Fnrama
=r e.,,,
ICIA s
S~7 3 TN l
I.r 4 xh d O u c4 e d 64.L M !
/
C'_
Fecal Celifore. Colcries/1_00 ml O
O C
l Oil and Grease, mc/L
/, ~3
/, f 5', O l
I' s-t.n v n.o.n.
-- / r
.r 7 4.(/
.0.q i
T o.C.. n2/t f.5-t/,8 J' g i
C.o.v.
--/t 97 3F 3 E' l
Suennadaa enlige r41 nq0-rg/L
/,
k 4) r Bromide, eg/L
- l. 'D-(L
/, Q C>1er, Chloroolstinate Units 3f
~
clf 3O riuoriae. ec/t 20, /
<o,/
< o, /
l Nitrate-Nitrite GvN). ne/L C.0 d
._ C. Of O.OQ l
g Total Phosphorus. ne/L OO1 O.01 O. O ~lL I
Total Sulfate. re/L c?, d A,1 R,1 j
Total Sulfite. ec/L
(_ /,D
/ /, O d /,o l
REMARKS
- l s
(
O. 01 A c<k '
. Aavs,s em...a c.y 6. 0
- $. G~.-o ; 1. Eur~.t um e ->,
m
_.... _ m..e,._.... 1 y O.te A wers.:C c.w.p.
3N l
~
r.:3e A,V V k
{$$fbb
'D QQ sci.na.%r s, t en comnanATggI Ar.'AL YTICo'.L L AllCRA TO'iY Le',00'4 ATO.'iY ANALYS!S FORM v..w,
.:. >e,.u uum,m,mu up. 171 s-Pu ~.rPY ou, s.,eco P -o -f /
oate Received b/8~
Charge Numcst oe.utotior of Sample 4
ceaa., au, tl.6 lblo ~s, J A/Obes: Pe.-r.f v (b//.r.%2'
. l i
Parameter i
Scmole
{
! JF;L.
rr3 gyc/
W = h ir d, ( b. a l m en_G S L W l Total sulfide, mc/t Uo
(/.o 2_i.o l
<k l
9..
c,,
- e
/t I dO.D C DD,4 7 (C,o7 l
Total Orcanic Nitronen. ec/L O. Q f Or d )
0, F P i
Total Residual Chlorine. me/L d C.O A (D n A
/ C,01 I cH
=$
$l
- g. 3 o
Temperature, C
/ d.
A/
p6 l
l A monia. m2/L O' O L O.3 A o.D x Radioactivity (Total Alpha. uCi/ml)
< U< S3Y/#
d/. A3 # D~
d.S.7Ax/a l
b S'/00' Radioactivity (Total Beta, uCi/ml) 4.a. C WO#
4 d. 57 g/oi Antimony, m2/L D.C$
O.Ce
< O 06 g
Arsenic,'ac/L C, OJ/
a 041 g, gog n-711<u. -e/t d O *0AI (d,025-d a,D id o
Cn dmi n--
~ /t
- d. C. O O 4 (0,0 o 4 (0,t)O t/
RE?.*A R KS:
- n.ua 2 c.o ~
j
~...,~_e..,
x. e,_. a. c-g,a.
Cn-c=eo ey JN b 6$ Of.
M l
o.,e u...,c
,,,o.
%-7-h
.. ~
~~.
! q e-a.5 y
(
O,",N D ?{.
A'
'P M**S$V4 I
j q
C soima Power & Light CompanyD]-p ANAL YTICAL L ABORA TORY C
Lt.cORATCRY ANALYSIS FORM i
R ec ue n" 9
Lboravoiy Samo.e No. P/-57;-57$
Oc:: S w.ctec 8d'N Date Pe: ived A -1 IY[
Chr.rge Numkw Desciotson of SJfPSie i
/ 3.
448 M fo,U Mkbh=Y Ers pr'.4/ h /L'h wh
/
1 Desired Analysis 0
l l
1 I
s-Pa rareter l
Sar. ole j
l 6N
,$73 tyb i
OC~%ke-)
(?)iscAm a ) ^ bi4Ard&
4 l(0, o A Chrerium, er/L
( oeO'A
.00(
Copper. =c/L 6 03
&81 0.01
~
.7/T.
do.o A
( 8."D Q
~ 4 0, 6 4 j Tw l
Mercurv. me/L l C.#80 ~A C.OC)O h O,ocoq l
1 Nickel, =2/L dC of
( ).a f
( p,a p l i
so' w m.
~~It
.C. c?o I do,c o (
o, cc (_
Silver. m /L
(,o,o 1 (c. c g (o, o y 1
Tha',lium, mg/L (o.o f'
( a.of gap l
- /in e.
c/t
' O, o 's O.03 o.02 l
1 Aluminiin, r?/L dO, /
( 6, '[
/.,,, d, f l'
Earium, c2/L C,O6 40,og-40, g p Boren, me/L
/_ O, f 4, y,5-( q., p,
i Cobalt. =c / L' (o,1 (o, (
Lo, Q t'
RE!.tA RKS: -
4 4
l
' AA slysis P*eformed t3y _. $,bf_A2/
M, fj *,\\ cg e....,
m, in in n vWa%
- 6a) i Cases n
,,,,co,,,
Q7g/
Super, sor. A nas,,,c4 i,,,,,,,,,,
r T di E-Y oP y 30 pst O?W:.9 7.!~ih's &TT-ora w
GQ
)5
.g Carolins Prr.<cr & Lignt CompanyY4 C
ANAL YT/ CAL LABORA TORY LA2 ORATORY ANALYSIS FORM f
R GW"N Laboratory Samcle No. N~NA '8 f
Ade'ress E'#)'
Dat? Sim;!ed Date Received A 'l E ' [
Charge Nur.t=<
a Oes:riotion of Sample o
N.R,h I d.> a MAb d'( ff aor sh hp ll.sh &
Oesired Aravus p
f Parameter c._,io WS
.3
((V bud <1a,ymr.hlu. J
+
r Iron. mc/L lOG) g,3 4 g, ylq l
Macnesium. rc/L D,(
O,f f a go j
N#2.o 7
{ o,o _g-(f)g Of Mclybdenn-- -7/T.
Mancanese, mc/L O,o3 o, ot/
g, d 3 l
Tin. m2/L
(*p, r t4. A 40 1 Titanium. mc/L C.3 lL L O,/ f de, jg lL ic.oy zo.s <j
- o. og l
% sA.un. ~a o
$$$ Y A? GO (Q(
l s
1 I
REMARKS: *
~
o Y h0 e
a
<-.o, ro Lu-c.i. 4w.,s c:,mo.
3 7-0 s...........
..e,
., m,.......
~
- p..,
g
\\
\\Q
//
y
/c)
' s.,
~
\\/
~
g-4 n sS3 ', r uO
,k
Cetober 31, 1980 4-Tf p
7 Mr. L C. Turnage, Jr. Manager gre?)ihsv-t@
Peraits and Engineering Section x
N@
itarironaestal Operations
, t2 U Divisica of Environmental Mananezcat P. O. Box 27637 Raleigh, Earth Carolina 27611 RE BRU.SSUICI STCAX ELD,"12IC PLAT.r NPDES PIR' FIT 50. NC 0007064
Dear !!r. Turnage:
Carolina Power & Light Company has conducted analyses of the intake waters and the ocecu outfall discharge at the trunswick Steam Cicctric Plant tu accardance with 40 CTR 122.53 (NPDES persit roseval requiraenco for iotoc-uinin'; effluent characteristica). The attached analytical rasalta are nabuitted in support of ronwal of the Brunavick.4PDES permit.
The datn provided is considered to be reficctivo of tha quality ~
and quantity of the wastountar dischar; tea associated with plast operations at the cima of sample collection v' th both genurat.ing unita in service.
It should be noted that iatshe unter quality variatimts nay have primry infinance na variation in discharge water gaality.
It is our undarstanding tint *.rith receipt of tha ettschc.d analytical '
data. DCf will be able to proceed with public notice and issuanes of a "5 year" h7 DES permit for the Brintsvich Plant.
The cooperation of D:Di personnal in this sattar is raost appreciated.
Yours very truly, I.'. -
f P. V. Lovs
( Technical Servic:en V?cc 7rcsidctic
~
~
PW/t1 Attactaments l
cc Mr. L. P. Eenton, Jr.
l Mr. V. C. liills j
ltr. Charles Wakild bec:
Dr. W.'T. Hogarth Mr. R. E. Jones Mr. E. A. Morgan I
lir. Roger Pasteur
~
1 l-n
~~
C &* * *j' C.uohna Po.ver a Light Conou
~
42 %
~
A?lAt Y TICAL L ACOriA TOR Y LADOR ATORY ANALYStb{ FORM Om Dakiod 80-5114-5115 Requester Lateratory Sampf t No.
gcuress Date Ga.ngted 10-1-RO rne neceseo 10-1-80 H20N55-524 cNsge Numbe, ceurionon or samnie MEP_va.t.er sr.;1.e_f or !GE S_p.crtrait (Intake & Dischar;:e)
Desired Analysis FL o W =
ISSo /M 6 D 1
Parameter Results l 80-5114 (1) 80-5115 (2)
- Fecal Coliform. Colonies /100ml 3
5
- 011 and Greace, mg/L 3.5 1.1 5 - Day BOD, eg/L 7.6 5.6 Total Orcanic Carbon. mc/L 8.2 53 Chemical Oxygen Demand, mg/L
< 250
< 250 Suspended Solids @ 103 C, mg/L 28 22 Bromide, mg/L 60 64
'20 20 Color, Chloroplatinate Units Fluoride, mg/L 0.8 0.5 Nitrate - Nitrite (as'N), og/L O.09 0.10 Total Phosphorus, mg/L 0.07 0.0?
Total Sulfate, =g/i 2300 2200
~~
Total Sulfite, mg/L
- 0. 9 0.4 Total Sulfide, mg/L 0.6
1.0 REAfARKS
- Avera2c__of _four_(4) nr'ab samples:
All other results are sint:le _ valves from 24 hr. composite samples.
(1) 80-5114: Intake O
(2) 80-5115: Dischar.ge I. Brannan, B. Brandon -
Analysi: Performed by M. Miles, D. Black, J. Evans b y Y0 'll] N O Y *T
'f v c,,,,,)
suoe,..so,. a aivi,cai unor.ior, eneeuec oy
/d - Td "N o.ie an sys, como.
l'il L' / OI 4 f (-dm .: o FA .m hgff \\' T u.n. s ,t.-Q4h Y ' jj Carnhna Prrwr & Light Corn any ANAL Y TICAL L ABCRA TORY LADOR ATORY ANALYSIS FORM Tom Crauford 80-5114-5115 gequeuw %,,,,y 3,,,, no, Aodres o,,, 3,m,, red 10-1-80 10-1-80 Date Received Charge Numt er Description of Samsde Desired Analysis '~ f Results Parameter 80-5114 (1) 80-5115 (2) Surfactants, mg/L < 0. 4 <-0. 4 Tor.al Organic Nitrogen, mg/L 0.48 0.40
- Total Residual Chlorine, mg/L
< 0. 2 < 0. 2
- pH 7.4 7.3-
- Temperature, C
23.2 32.7 l Ammonia, mg/L c0.02 < 0. 02 Radioactivity (Total Alpha), pCi/ml < 7_. 6x10-8 < 7. 6x10-8 Radioactivity (Total Beta), pCi/ml "4.3x10-7 4,5xio-7 ~ s . ggy,,g gf
- h erage of a H) g ab v.@k; M oder re WM &Q vahn from 24 hr. composite samples.
C ~ I Brannan, B m n h ,,,,,,,,,e,, o, meo,, A6 J$ IAl) /f v e,,u e.., Casperv6sor. Anatytical Laboratory / ~/ o.ie Analysis Comp. ~
COMPU/ CHEM Post Office Box 12652 Research Tnang e Par ( NC 27709 919-549-8264 M MT NM 6
- U"
- 800 334-8525 30 October 80 Mr. Bill Wolf Carolina Power and Light Harris Environmental Center New Hill, N.C.
27602
Dear Mr. Wolf:
4 Thank you for selecting Mead COMPU/ CHEM for your recent sample analysis. We have completed the analysis that you requested and have enclcsed a ) sunmary of the COMPU/ CHEM data for your review. 2 As a result of a laboratory accident, we were unable to complett the analysis of certain parameters. The results for these parameters are indicated as "LA". Should you wish to resubmit samples, we will enalyze for these parameters free of charge. As ycu know, EPA has promulgated detection limits for the priority poilutants in the December 3, 1979, Federal Register, and we have reported all priority pollutant concentrations which have exceeded these limits. In some instances, however, cur analytical techniques and/or the particular nature of your sample enabled us to measure concentrations below the EPA detection limits, and we have reported these results for your information. In addition, we have permanently stored a compiete record of your data on magnetic tape. This includes chromatograms, mass spectra, and calibration data for the organics. Therefore, your original data is readily available for future reference. Should you require additional information from your data base, please contact us at 1/800-334-8525. Your confidence in our COMPU'/ CHEM service i,s appreciated. We look forward to a continuing association. ' Sincerely, ~~ r? " ' /Q /f / s I / l mr Robert H. Calland Vice President, Marketing RHC/mm
Enclosure:
Report Di,scharge Sea Water - 1802-Intake Sea Water 1798
( 4 i-OCT9065efVice REPORT OF DATA CUSTOMER PURCHASE NUMBER: 733013 SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: INTAKE SEA WATER COMPU/ CHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 1795 SUDMITTED TO: ~ MR. BILL WOLF CAROLINA POWER AND LIGHT HARRIS CENTER ~ NEW HILL, NC 27602 d .~ l s SUDMITTED BY: r f/ ./ / ns R / L. NYERS, Pj)l D. l u/A DATE, l-k ~
~ ( ( SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: INTAKE SEA WATER COMPU/ CHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 1798 1. ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY THE SAMPLES WERE PREPARED AND ANALYZED ACCORDING TO TWO (2) GENERAL, PROCEDURES: (1) " SAMPLING AND ANAt:.YSIS PROCEDURES FOR SCREENING OF INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENTS FOR PRIORITY POLLUTANTS," REVISED MARCH 1977, US-EPA, AND (2) EPA METHOD 624. " ORGANICS BY PU.' IGE AND TRAP," AND METHOD 625, " BASE / NEUTRALS, ACIDS, AND PESTICIDES," US-EPA, REVISED DECEMBER 3. 1979, FEDERAL REGISTER (GUIDELINES ESTABLISHED TEST PROCEDURES FOR THE ANALYSIS OF POLLUTANTS). REGUIREMENTS OF DOTH PROTOCOLS WERE MET AND ANALYTICAL CONDITIONS SET BY METHOD 624 AND 625. GUALITY ASSURANCE, SAMPLE CUSTCDY, AND DOCUMENT CONTROL PROCEDURES WERE FOLLOWED WHICH MEET OR EXCEED EPA REGUIREMENTS. 2. SAMPLE RECORD DATE ~ ' A. RECEIVED / REFRIGERATED 10/2/80 B. CRGANICS 1. EXTRACTED 2. ANALYZED 10/22/80 VOLATILES 10/21/80 BASE / NEUTRALS 10/29/80 ACIDS 10/24/80-PESTICIDES /PCBS 10/29/80 ACROLEIN - ACRYLONITRILE 10/7/80 t. METALS ~~ 1. DIGESTED 10/I7/eO 2. ANALYZED 10/20/80 p 9 i l 1 f 4 , p
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: INTAKE SEA WATER COMPU/ CHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 1798 3. PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS REPORT COMPOUNDS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (UG/L) (UG/L) 1 V. ACROLEIN BDL 100 2V. ACRYLONITRILE BDL 100 3V. BENZENE BDL 10 4V. BIS.(CHLOROMETHYL) ETHER BDL -10 SV. BROMOFORM DDL 10 6V. CARBON TETRACHLORIDE BDL 10 7V. CHLOROBENZENE BDL 10 BV. CHLORODIBROMOMETHANE BDL 10 . 9V. CHLOROETHANE BDL iO 10V. 2-CHLOROETHYLVINYL ETHER BDL 10 11V. CHLOROFORM BDL 10 12V. DICHLOROBROMOMETHANE BDL 10 13V. DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE BDL 10 14V. 1,1-DICHLORGETHANE BDL 10 15V. 1.2-DICHLORCETHANE BDL 1-0 16V. 1.1-DICHLORCETHYLENE BDL 10 '- 17V. 1,3-DICHLOROPROPANE BDL 10 1 GV. 1, 3-D I CHLOR O.5 R OP YL EP 'E BCL 10 19V. ETHYLBENZENE BDL 10 20V. METHYL BROMIDE BDL 10 21V. METHYL CHLORIDE BDL 10 22V. METHYLENE CHLORIDE 16 10 23V. 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLORCETHANE BDL 10 24V. TETRACHLORCETHYLENE ~ BDL 10 25V. TOLUENE BDL 10 26V. 1,2-TRANS-DICHLORCETHYLENE BDL 10 27V. 1,1,1-TRICHLORDETHANE BDL 10 ~ 28V. 1,1,- 2-TR I CHLOR OETHANE BDL 10 29V. TRICHLORCETHYLENE BDL 10 30V. TRICHLOROFLUOROMETHANE BDL 10 31V.' VINYL CHLORIDE BDL 10 1 A. 2-CHLORCPHENOL BDL 25 s 2A. 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL BUL 25 3A. 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL BDL 25 4A. 4,6-DINTRO-O-CRESOL BDL 250 SA. 2,4-DINITROPHENOL BDL 250 6A. 2-NITROPHENOL BDL 25 7A. 4-NITROPHENOL BDL 25 BA. P-CHLORO-M-CRESOL BDL 25 9A. PENTACHLOROPHENOL BDL 25 10A. PHENOL BDL 25 l'1 A. 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPHENGL BDL 25 1B. ACENAPHTHENE 2B. ACENAPHTYLENE , BDL 10 BDL 10 3D. ANTHRACENE BDL 10 BDL= BELOW DETECTION LIMIT
s ~ SAMFLE IDENTIF?E. TNTAKE SEA WATER COMPU/ CHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 1798 COMPOUNDS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT i (UG/L) (UG/L) 43. BENZIDINE BDL 10 SD. BENZO (A) ANTHRACENE BDL 10 6B. BENZO (A) PYRENE BDL 10 7D. 3,4-BENZDFLUORANTHENE DDL 10 BB. BENZO (GHI) PERYLENE BDL 25 9B. BENZO (K) FLUORANTHE,NE DDL 10 103. BIS (2-CHLORCETHOXY) METHANE BDL 10 11B. BIS (2-CHLORCETHYL) ETHER BDL 10 12B. DIS (2-CHLOROISOPROPYL) ETHER BDL 10 13B. BIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL).PHTHALATE 130 10 145. 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER BDL 10 ISB. BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE BDL 10 26B. 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE EDL 10 17B. 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER BDL 10 ISB. CHRYSENE BDL 10 19B. DIBENZO (A,H) ANTHRACENE BDL 25 20B. 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE BDL IV, 21B. 1,3-DICHLORODENZENE DDL 10 222. li4-DICHLORBENZENE BDL. 10 23B. O,3'-DICHLORODENZIDINE BDL 10 24D. DIETHYL PHTHALATE DDL 10 253. DIMETHYL PHTHALATE BDL 10 26B. DI-N-SUTYL PHTHALATE BDL. 10 273. 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE BDL 10 28B. 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE BDL 10 29B. DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE BDL 10 30B. 1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE BDL 10 318. FLUORANTHENE DDL 10 328. FLUORENE BDL 10 ~ 33B. HEXACHLOROBENZENE BDL 10 34B. HEXACHLOROBUTADIENE BDL 10 35B. HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE BDL 10 36B. HEXACHLORCETHANE BDL 10 37B. INEENO (1,2,3-CD) PYRENE DDL 25 G88. ISOPHORONE BDL 10 398. NAPHTHALENE DDL 10 40B. NITROBENZENE BDL 10 41B. N-NITROSODIMETHYLAMINE DDL 10 42B. N-NITROSODI-N-PROPYLAMINE DDL 10 43B. N-NITROSODIPHENYLAt1INE BDL 10 44B. PHENANTHRENE DDL 10 453. PYRENE BDL 10 468. 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE BDL 10 IP. ALDRIN DDL 10 2P. ALPHA-BHC BDL 10 l-DDL=.BELOW DETECTION LIMYT L ~
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: INTAKE SEA WATER COMPU/ CHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 1798 COMPOUNDS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (UG/L) (UG/L) 3P. BETA-BHC BDL 10 4P. GAMMA-BHC BDL 10 SP. DELTA-BHC BDL 10 6P. CHLORDANE BDL 10 7P. 4, 4 '-DDT BDL 10 BP. 4, 4 '-DDE BDL 10 9P. 4, 4 '-DDD BDL 10 10P. DIELDRIN BDL 10 11P. ALPHA-ENDOSULFAN BDL 10 12P. DETA-ENDOSULFAN BDL 10 13P. ENDCSULFAN SULFATE DDL 10 24P. ENDRIN 4 BDL 10 85P ENDRIN ALDEHYDE BDL 10 16F. HEPTACHLOR BDL. 10 17P. HEPTACHLOR EPOXIDE BDL 10-ISP. PCB-1242 BDL 10-19P. FC3-1254 BDL 10 20P. PCS-1221 BDL 10 21P. PCB-1232 DDL 10 22P. PCB-1248 BDL 10. 23P. PCB-1260 BDL 10 24P. PCB-1016 BDL 10 25P. TOXAPHENE BDL 10 METALS CON' CENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (MG/L) (MG/L) I M. ANTIMONY, TOTAL .BDL O. 5 2M. ARSENIC, TOTAL 3M. BERYLLIUM, TOTAL BDL O.05 BDL O.025 4 M. CADMIUM, TOTAL BDL O.025 5M. CHROMIUM, TOTAL BDL _- O.1 6M. COPPER,' TOTAL BDL O. 1 7M. LEAD. TOTAL BDL O. 5 BM. MERCURY, TOTAL O.0058 0.0002 9M. NICKEL, TOTAL BDL O.15 10M. SELENIUM, TOTAL BDL O.05 11M. SILVER, TOTAL BDL O.06 12M. THALL 1UM, TOTAL BDL O.05 13M. ZINC, TOTAL BDL O.02 14M. CYANIDE, TOTAL BDL O.01 15M. PHENOLS, TOTAL 0.13
- 0. 01 4
w
.( SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: INTAKE SEA WATER COMPU/ CHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 1798 4 SPECIAL ANALYSIS ^* COMPOUNDS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT 1. ALUMINUM BDL 10.0 MG/L 2. DARIUM BDL 10.0 MG/L 3. DORON DDL 100.0 MG/L 4. COBALT DDL 1.0 MG/L 5. IRON BDL
- 1. 0 MG /L 6.
MAGNESIUM ~ 1150
- 0. 1 MG/L 7.
MANGANESE BDL O.5 MG/L 8. MOLYBDENUM BDL 10.O MG/L 9. TIN BDL 10/O MG/L
- 10. TITANIUM BDL 20.0 MG/L 11.
CYANIDES, TOTAL LA O. 01 MG/L
- 12. PHENOuS, TOTAL LA O.01 MG/L
- 13. CYANIDES, TOTAL BDL O. 01 MG/L 14.
PHENOLS, TOTAL O. 12 0.01 MG/L
- 15. CYANIDES, TOTAL DDL-0.~ 01 MG/L
- 16. PHENOLS, TOTAL O.068 0 01 MG/L Items 11 & 12 - Intake 2 Items 13 & 14 - Intake 3 Items 15 & 16 - Intake 4.
e 4 g e* l s a e i
@ @ N PQDC M RL ' O(Thod5?rvice REPORT OF DATA CUSTOMER PURCHASE NUMBER: 733013 SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: DISCHARGE SEA WATER COMPU/ CHEM SAM.7LE NUMBER: 1802 SUBMITTED TO: MR. BILL WOLF CAROLINA POWER AND LIGHT HARRIS CENTER NEW HILL, NC 27602 .~ i \\ s SUBMITTED BY: / . n/ fm - ~ l R. ' L. hYERS, (Pfi. D. D 'DATE - r +
~ SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: DISCHARGE SEA WATER COMPU/ CHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 1802 1. ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY THE SAMPLES WERE PREPARED AND ANALYZED ACCORDING TO TWO (2) GENERAL i PROCEDURES: (1) " SAMPLING AND ANALYSIS PROCEDURES FOR SCREENING OF, I INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENTS FOR RRIORITY POLLUTANTS," REVISED MARCH 1977. US-EPA, AND (2) EPA METHOD 624, " ORGANICS BY PURGE AND TRAP," AND METHOD 625, " BASE / NEUTRALS, ACIDS, AND PESTICIDES," US-EPA, REVISED DECEMBER 3, 1979, FEDERAL REGISTER (GUIDELINES ESTABLISHED TEST PROCEDURES FOR THE ANALYSIS OF POLLUTANTS). REGUIREMENTS OF BOTH PROTOCOLS WERE MET AND ANALYTICAL CONDITIONE SET DY METHOD 624 AND 425. GUALITY ASSURANCE, SAMPLE CUSTODY. AND DOCUMLNT CONTROL PROCEDUREE WESE FOLLOWED WHICH MEET OR EXCEED EPA REGUIREMENTS. 2. SAMPLE RECORD DATE A. RECEIVED / REFRIGERATED 10/2/80 D. ORGANICS 1. EXTRACTED 10/13/80 2. ANALYZED VOLATILES 10/21/80 DASE/ NEUTRALS .~ 10/24/80 ACIDS 10/24/80 PESTICIDES /PCBS 10/24/80 ACROLEIN, ACRYLONITRILS '10/7/80 C. METALS s 1. DIGESTED 10/17/EO 2. ANALYZED 10/20/80 e 4 m
SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: DISCHARGE SEA WATER ~ COMPU/ CHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 1802 3. PRIORITY POLLUTANT ANALYSIS REPORT COMPOUNDS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (UG/L) (UG/L) 1V. ACROLEIN BDL 100 2V. ACRYLONITRILE BDL 100 3V. DENZENE BDL 10 DDL 10 4V. BIS (CHLOROMETHYL) E.THER SV. BROMOFORM BDL 10 6V. CARBON TETRACHLORIDE DDL 10 BDL 10 7V. CHLOROBENZENE SV. CHLOPODIBROMOMETHANE BDL 10 9V. CHLORCETHANE BDL 10 10V. 2-CHLORCEThYLVINYL ETHER DDL 10 11V. CHLOROFORM BDL 10 12V. DICHLORODRGMOMETHANE BDL 10 13V. DICHLORODIFLUOROMETHANE BDL 10 14V. 1,1-DICHLORCETHANE BDL-10 15V, 1,2-DICHLORDETHANE DDL 1.0-16V. 1,1-DICHLORCETHYLENE DDL 10-17V. 1, 2--DICHLOR OPROP ANE DDL 10 1BV. 1,3-DICHLOROPROPYLENE BDL 10 19V. ETHYLDENZENE BDL 10 20V. METHYL BROMIDE EDL 10 - 21V. METHYL CHLORIDE BDL 10 22V. METHYLENE CHLORIDE 32 10 23V. 1,1,2,2-TETRACHLORCETHANE BDL 10 24V. TETRACHLORCETHYLENE BDL 10 25V. TOLUENE BDL 10 26V. 1,2-TRANS-DICHLOROETHYLENE BDL 10 27V. 1,1,1-TRICHLORCETHANE BDL 10 2SV. 1,1,2-TRICHLORDETHANE BDL 10 29V. TRICHLORCETHYLENE-BDL 10 30V. TRICHLOROFLUOROMETFIANE BDL 10 31 V. VINYL. CHLORIDE DDL 10 1 A. 2-CHLOROPHENOL, DDL 25 2A. 2,4-DICHLOROPHENOL' BDL' 25 3A. 2,4-DIMETHYLPHENOL DDL -25 4A. 4, 6-D I NTR O-O-C R ESOt. BDL 250 5A. 2,4-DINITROPHENOL BDL 250 6A. 2-NITROPHENOL BDL 25 7A. 4-NITROPHENOL DDL 25 BA. P-CHLORO-M-CRESOL. BDL 25 9A. PENTACHLOROPHENGL BDL 25 EDL 25 10A. PHENOL BDL 2.5 11A. 2,4,6-TRICHLOROPMENOL 1D. ACENAPHTHENE' BDL 10 2B.-ACENAPHTYLENE DDL 10 3B. ANTHRACENE BDL 10 Tif
.w ~ SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: DISCHARG,E SEA WATER ~ COMPU/ CHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 1802 COMPOUNDS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (UG/L) (UG/L) 43. BENZIDINE BDL 10
- 53. BENZO (A) ANTHRACENE BDL 10 6B. BENZO (A) PYRENE BDL 10 7B. 3,4-BENZOFLUORANTHENE BDL 10 BB. BENZO (GHI) PERYLENE BDL 25 9B. BENZO (K) FLUORANTHENE BDL' 10 BDL 10 10 B. BIS (2-CHLORCETHOXY) METHANE 119. BIS (2-CHLORCETHYL) ETHER BDL 10 12B. BIS (2-CHLORDISOPROPYL) ETHER BDL 10 13B. BIS (2-ETHYLHEXYL) PHTHALATE 370 10 14B. 4-BROMOPHENYL PHENYL ETHER BDL 10 15B. BUTYL BENZYL PHTHALATE BDL 10 16B. 2-CHLORONAPHTHALENE BDL 10 17B. 4-CHLOROPHENYL PHENYL ETHER BDL 10 ISB. CHRYSENE BDL
_10, 19F. DIBENZO (A,H) ANTHRACENE BDL 2Z-20B. 1,2-DICHLOROBENZENE BDL 10 21B. 1,3-DICHLOROBENZENE BDL 10 22B. 1,4-DICHLORBENZENE BDL 10 23B. 3,3'-DICHLOROBENZIDINE BDL 10 24B. DIETHYL PHTHALATE BDL 10 - 25B. DIMETHYL PHTHALATE BDL 10 263. DI-N-BUTYL PHTHALATE BDL 10 27B. 2,4-DINITROTOLUENE BDL 10 28B. 2,6-DINITROTOLUENE BDL 10 29B. DI-N-OCTYL PHTHALATE BDL 10 30B. 1,2-DIPHENYLHYDRAZINE BDL 10 31B. FLUORANTHENE BDL 10 32B. FLUORENE ,BDL 10 33B. HEXACHLOROBENZENE BDL 10 34B. HEXACHLORODUTADIENG BDL 10 35B. HEXACHLOROCYCLOPENTADIENE BDL 10 ,368. HEXACHLORCETHANE BDL_ 10 5F YRENE BDL 25 37B. INDENO (1,2,3-CD) 383. ISOPHORONE BDL 10 39B. NAPHTHALENE BDL 10 40B. NITROBENZENE BDL 10 j 418. N-NITROSODIMETHYLAt1INE BDL 10 l 42B. N-NITR OSOD I-N-P R OP YLAMINE-BDL 10 43B. N-NITROSODIPHENYLAMINE BDL 10 l 448. PHENANTHRENE BDL 10 45B. PYRENE BDL 10 46B. 1,2,4-TRICHLOROBENZENE BDL 10 1P. ALDRIN BDL 10 2P. ALPHA-BHC BDL 10 BDL= bet _OW DETECTION LIMIT r
~ ( ( SAMPLE IDENTIFIER: DISCHARGE SEA WATER COMPU/ CHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 1802 COMPOUNDS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT (UG/L) (UG/L) 3P. BETA-BHC BDL 10 4P. GAMMA-BHC BDL 10 S P.- DELTA-BHC BDL 10 6P. CHLORDANE BDL 10 7P. 4, 4 '-DDT BDL 10 SP. 4,4'-DDE BDL 10 9P. 4, 4 '-DDD BDL 10 10P. DIELDRIN BDL 10 11P. ALPHA-ENDOSULFAN BDL 10 12P. BETA-ENDOSULFAN BDL 10 13P. ENDOSULFAN SULFATE BDL 10 14P. ENDRIN EDL 10 15P. ENDRIN ALDEHYDE BDL 10 16P. HEPTACHLOR BDL 10 17P. HEPTACHLCR EPOXIDE BDL 1_O 1SP. PCB-1242 BDL 10; 19P. PCB-1254 BDL 10 20P. PCB-1221 DDL 10 21P. PCB-1232 3DL 10 22P. PCB-1248 BDL 10 23P. PCB-1260 BDL 10 ~ 24P. PCB-1016 BDL 10 25P. TOXAPHENE BDL 10 METALS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT '(MG/L) (MG/L) I M. ANTIMONY, TOTAL BDL O. 5 2M. ARSEN;C, TOTAL ~'L O.05 BD 3M. BERYLLIUM, TOTAL BDL O.025 4M. CADMIUM, TOTAL BDL O.025 SM. CHROMIU'M, TOTAL BDL s 6M. COPPER, TOTAL DDL __ O.1 O.1 7M. LEAD, TOTAL DDL O'. 5 SM. MERCURY, TOTAL O.0014 0.0002 9M. NICKEL, TOTAL BDL O.15 1 10M. SELENIUM, TOTAL BDL O.05 11M. SILVER, TOTAL BDL O.05 12M. THALLIUM, TOTAL BDL O.05 l 13M. ZINC, TOTAL BDL 0.02 l 84M. CYANIDE, TOTAL BDL O.01 15M. PHENOLS, TOTAL O. 13 O. 01 b
SAMPLE' IDENTIFIER: DISCHARGE SEA WATER COMPU/ CHEM SAMPLE NUMBER: 1802 4. SPECIAL ANALYSIS ~ COMPOUNDS CONCENTRATION DETECTION LIMIT 1. ALUMINUM DDL 10.O MG/L 2. BARIUM DDL 10.0 MG/L 3. DORON DDL 100.O MG/L 4. COBALT DDL 1.0 MG/L 5. IRON DDL 1.0 MG/L 6. MAGNESIUM 960 O.1 MG/L 7. MANGANESE DDL O.5 MG/L 8. MOLYBDENUM DDL 10.O MG/L 9. TIN BDL 10.0 MG/L
- 10. TITANIUM DDL 20.0 MG/L
- 11. CYANIDES, TOTAL DDL O.01 MG/L
- 12. PHENOLS. TOTAL O.058 0.01 MG/L
- 13. CYANIDES, TOTAL DDL O.01 MG/L
- 14. PHENOLS, TOTAL C.13 0.01 MG/L
- 15. CYANIDES, TOTAL DDL O. 01 MG/L
- 16. PHENOLS, TOTAL O. 2
- 0. ^ 01 MG/L Items 11 & 12 - Discharge 2 Items 13 & 14 - Discharge 3 Items 15 & 16 - Discharge 4 e
b om O S 4 m w w ~c-y ' ' ' ~
. -m N CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE . :.s I hereby certify that a ecpy of " Applicants' Response to Request for. Supplementation of Answers to Interrogatories" of Richard D. Wilson and have beens. y served by deposit in the United States Mail, first class prepaid, addressed to the parties' listed below this the lith day of July,1983. fames L. Kelley, Esquire John D. Runkle, Esquire Atomic Saf ety and Licensing Board Conservation Council of North Carolina U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission 307 Granville Road Washington, D. C. 20555 Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514 Mr. Glenn O. Bright M. Travis Payne, Esquire Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Edelstein and Payne U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Post Office Box 12643 Washington, D. C. 20555 Raleigh, North Carolina 27605 i Dr. James H. Carpenter Dr. Richard D. Wilson l Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 729 Hunter Street U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Apex, North Carolina 27502 t Washington, D. C. 20555 Mr. Wells Eddleman Charles A. Barth, Esquire 718-A Iredell Street Myron Karman, Esquire Durham, North Carolina 27705 Office of Executive Legal Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Thomas A'. Baxter, Esquire Washington, D. C. 20555 John H. O'Neill, Jr. ~ Shaw, Pittman, Potts & Trowbridge Docketing and Service Section 1800 M Street, N.W. Office of the Secretary Washington, D. C. 20036 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 Dr. Phyllis Lotchin 108 Bridle Run Mr. Daniel F. Read, President Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514 Chapel Hill Anti-Nuclear Group Effort Bradley W. Jones, Esquire Post Office Box 524 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27514 , -Region II 101 Marietta Street i Deborah Greenblatt, Esquire Atlanta, Georgia 30303 1634 Crest Road .I Raleigh, North Carolina 27606 Karen E. Long, Esquire Staff Attorney i Ruthanne G. Miller, Esquire Public Staff Atomic Safety and Licensing North Carolina Utilities Commission s l Board Panel Post Office Box 991 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Raleigh, North Carolina 27601 l Washington, D. C. 20555 a-aeA. k k 4 m a--< Samantha Francis Flyng/ ~ Carolina Power & Light Company Post Office Box 1551 ' Raleigh, North Carolina 27602 , (919) 836-7707 i-t i _,...,. _, _ _,,,,,,. _.., _ _,, _.,., -,. _ _ _}}