ML20071P381

Monthly Operating Rept for Nov 1981.Narrative Summary Encl

ML20071P381
Person / Time
Site:	Oconee
Issue date:	12/14/1981
From:	Reavis J DUKE POWER CO.
To:
References
NUDOCS 8211020496
Download: ML20071P381 (6)

Text

,. -

OPERATING DATA REPORT DOCKET NO. 50-287 DATE 12-14-81 COMPLETED BY J. A. Reavis TELEPHONE vnA_t71 R552 OPERATING STATUS Oconce Unit 3 Notes

1. Unit Name: Year-to-date and cununulative

2. Reporting Period: November, 1981 capacity factors are calcu-

3. Licensed Thermal Power ()lWt): 2568 lated using a weighted

4. Nameplate Rating (Gross MWe s:

934 average for maximum

5. Design Electrical Rating (Net MWe):

886 dependable capacity.

6. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Gross MWe): 899 ---

7. Maximum Dependable Capacity (Net MWe): 860 S. If Changes Occur in Capacity Ratings (Items Number 3 "Ihrough 7) Since Last Report. Give Reasons:

None _

9. Power Level To Which Restricted. lf Any (Net MWe): None

10. Reasons For Restrictions. If Any:

.+

t This Month Yr..to.Date Cumulative 720.0 8,016.0 61,008.0

!!. Hours in Reporting Period 720.0 6,166.8 44,569.9

12. Number Of Hours Reactor Was Criticaj -

13. Reactor Reserve Shutdown Hours 720.0 6,093.1 43,572.1

14. Hours Generator On-Line - - -

15. Unit Reserve Shutdown Hours

16. Gross Thermal Energy Generated (MWH) 1.828.683 15,325,802 105,630,143 .

630.910_, 5.265,980 36,497,194 17 Gross Electrical Energy Generated (MWH) i

! 18. Net Electrical Energy Generated (MWH) 603,045 5,014,923 34,729,318 100.0 76.0 71.4

' 19. Unit Service Factor 100.0 76.0 71.4

20. Unit Availability Factor 97.4 72.8 66.2

21. Unit Capacity Factor IUsing MDC Net) l 94.5 70.6 64.3

22. Unit Capacity FactorIUsing DER Net) l 0.0 2.8 15.2

! 23. Unit Forced Outage Rate

24. Shutdowns Scheduled Over Next 6 Months IType.Date.and Duration of Eschi:

June, 1982

25. If Snut Down At End Of Report Period. Estim,.ted Date of ',t:rtup:

l 26. Units in Test Status t Prior to Commercial Operation): Forecast Achieved

\

INITIAL CRITICA LITY i INITIAL ELECTRICITY l COMMERCIAL OPER ATION 8211020496 811214 PDR ADOCK 05000287 MN pu p' R PDR

50-287 LINII Siltl'IllOWNS AND l'OWI R Hl!DLCIIONS DOCKET NO. ,

I UNIT NAME _0conee Unit 3 IBATE 12/14/81 COMPLETEI) gy J. A. Reavis Hl:l'URI AIONill November. 1981

(, TELEPilONE 704-373-8552 i i

i

- e c

-, jE 'h _35'i 1.itensee ,E-r, ft Cause & Curreceive

%. Ibte y, 5g 2j& liven l-4 37 s? A ditm so -

[3 g2 5@c!

e Hepine # to' O ED O

, Picveni Recutscike 6

15-p 81-11-13 F --

B IIA TURBIN Reduced power to perform turbine valve I movement test.

16-p 81-11-23 F --

A --

IIC VALVES

• CCW-8 (condenser gravity flow discharge valve) failed at intermediate position.

Tech. spec. power reduction.

17-p 81-11-28 F --

A --

Cll PUMPXX Reduced power to isolate.3 "B" feed-water pump to repair seal injection line.

I 2 .I -l l- I usi et! Heanim: Meshuti: Exhibii G - hisisigelims S S heth. feil A l'aimpment I .nime il splam) 1 M.mual for Picparation of Data ll-Mainten.ince ni Tess 2 Manu.al Seeans.

C Reluchng Eni 3 Sheets fos I.icensee 1 Aulomatic Sts.mi. licent Repius (l.l:RII?ile (NLIRl.G-11 Itegulatus) Rests winen 1-Oshee ll.nplaini 01611 1: Opesaios is.uning .t I weuw I s.amm.nia.m l' A.imminisalive 5 G Operation.sl 1 our llNpl. uni lishibit 1 Same Source l'8/ / Il II Othes (lbplaml

AVERAGE D AILY L* NIT ?OWER LEVEL o

DCCKET NO. 50-287 tNIT oconee Unit 3 12/14/81 D TE .

COMPLETED BY J. A. Reavis TELEPHONE (704)373-8552 Novernber, 1981 310NDI _

DAY AVERAGE DAILY POWER LEVEL DAY AVERAGE DAILY POWER LEVEL (MWe-Nett i3lwe.Neg, 839 846 g g.

842 842 2 33 841 39 847 3

4 843 20 849 844 ,3 848 5

843 ,, 848 6

835 I -

7 843 33 842 ,4 847 3

839 847 9

10 26 842 846

j 845 ,3 714 12 ,

837 810 12 9 830 30 843 la 846 y, 15 16 843 INSTRL'CTIONS On th:s fern st, list :he ner:ge jady : ..t p;we. !e.e::n \lWe. Net for esen : 3., n .3, ef:3 g . c gn

.. ,._;,.g, .,

s

• : r.e2 rest Aheie .e32w:t:

\

ri - >

. MONTHLY REFUELING INFORMATION REQUEST

1. Facility name: Oconee Unit 3 .

2 .- Scheduled next refueling shutdown: June, 1982 .

3. Scheduled restart following refueling: August, 1982 ,

4. Will refueling or resumption of operation thereafter require a technical specification change or other license amendment? Yes .

If yes, what will these be? Technical Specification Revision If no, has reload design and core configuration been reviewed by Safety Review Connittee regarding unreviewed saf ety questions? NA .

If no, when is review scheduled? NA -

5. Scheduled date(s) for submitting pro osed licensing action and supporting informa tion: March. 1982 i .

t

6. I=portant licensing considerations (new or different design or supplier, unreviewed design or performance analysis methods, significant changes in design or new operating procedures).

7. Number of fuel assemblies (a) in the core: 171 .

(b) in the spent fuel pool: 438 .

8. Present licensed fuel pool capacity: 474 .

Size of requested or plannud increase: .

9. Projected date of last refueling which can be accommodated by present licensed capacity: .

December 14, 1981 DUKE POWER'COMPAIN Date: ,

Name of

Contact:

J. A. Reavis ,

DOCKET NO: 50-2iry7 UNIT: Oconee Unit 3 DATE: December 14, 1981 NARRATIVE

SUMMARY

MONTH: November, 1981 Oconec 3 began the month at near rated power. A power reduction was made on November 13, 1981 to perform a turbine valve movement test. Power was reduced on November 23, 1981 due to technical specification requirement when CCW-8 (condenser gravity flow discharge valve) failed at the inter-mediate position. Returned to near rated power the same day. Reduced power on November 28, 1981 to isolate the 3 "B" feedwater pump to repair the seal injection line. After repairs, the unit was returned to near

• rated power and continued the remainder of the month.

k

,s OCONEE NUCLEAR STATION Operating Status Report

1. Personnel Exposure For the month of October, no individual (s) exceed 10 percent of their allowable annual radiation dose limit.

2. The total station liquid release for October has been compared with the Technical Specifications annual value of 15 curies; the total release for October was less than 10 percent of this limit.

The total station gaseous release for October has been compared with the derived Technical Specifications ann;al value of 51,000 curies; the total release for October was less than 10 percent of this limit.

..+

i i

l

, . _ . _ _ _ _ _ _