ML20071K956

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to NRC Re Violations Noted in IE Insp Repts 50-443/82-04 & 50-444/82-04.Corrective Actions: Installation Contractor Reinspected Installed Batteries, Identified Discrepant Conditions & Performed Rework
ML20071K956
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 07/19/1982
From: Johnson W
YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC CO.
To: Starostecki R
NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML20071K934 List:
References
SBN-295, NUDOCS 8208020283
Download: ML20071K956 (2)


Text

'

s u a su m IPUBLIC SERVICE e.g.n., ornc Companyof New Hampshw e 1671 Worcester Road Framinchom. Mossochusetts 01701 (617) - 872 - 8100 July 19,1982 SBN-295 T.F. B 4.2.7 United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission Office of Inspection and Enforcement Region I 631 Park Avenue King of Prussia, PA 19406 Attention:

Richard W. Starostecki, Director Division of Resident and Project Inspection

References:

(a)

Construction Permits CPPR-135 and CPPR-136, Docket Nos. 50-443 and 50-444 (b)

USNRC Letter, dated July 8,1982, ** Combined Inspection Nos. 50-443/82-04 and 50-444/82-04," R. W. Starostecki to W. C. Tallman Su bject :

Response to Inspection Nos. 50-443/82-04 and 50-444/82-04

Dear Sir:

In response to the violation which you reported in Reference (b), PSNH offers the following:

Notice of Violation:

(443/82-04-02) 10 CFR 50, Appendix B, Criterion V and the Seatrook Station PSAR require that activities affecting quality be accomplished in accordance with instructions and procedures. Fischbach-Boulos-Manzi (FEM) procedures, FECP-511 and QCP-511, indicate that the 125V station control batteries shall be installed, to include torquing, per Manufacturer's specification and shall be inspected to same.

Quality Control (QC) witness of torque application is required.

Contrary to the above, as of June 11, 1982, two 125V station control batteries (1-EDE-B-1A and IB) were inspected and accepted despite visual evidence that the installation did not conform to specific items in the Manufacturer's (Could) specification and procedural requirements, as follows:

Terminal and cell connector bolt hardware was not torqued on both the head and nut sides, as required by Gould.

QC witness was not provided for torquing inter-tier cable connector (i.e.: jumpers) bolt hardware.

8208020283 820728 PDR ADOCK 05000443 G

PDR

o United Stetce Nuclear R:gulatory Commission July 15, 1982 Attention: Richard W. Starostecki Page 2 Certain inter-cell connectors were inctalled upside down relative to the position on the battery cell posts as required by the Manufacturer's specification.

This is a Severity Level IV Violation (Supplement II).

A.

Response

Corrective Action Taken and Pesults Achieved The installation contractor has re-inspected the installed batteries, identified discrepant conditions and performed appropriate re-work and re-inspection to assure that contract and component manufacturer requirements have been satisfied.

Fischbach-Boulos-Manzi has issued an interim change to their procedure for inspection of battery racks (Q. C. Procedure QCP-511) which incorporates appropriate manufacturer's specification.

Corrective action was completed on June 25, 1982.

Very truly yours, YANKEE ATOMIC ELECTRIC COMPAh7

/

10A3 W. P) Johnson 2

Vice President COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS)

)ss MIDDLESEX COUNTY

)

Then personally appeared before me, W. P. Johnson, who, leing duly sworn, did state that he is a Vice President of Yankee Atomic Electric Company, that he is duly authorized to execute and file the foregoing request in the name and on the behalf of Public Service Company of New Hampshire and that the statements therein are true to the test of his knowledge and belief.

y;.

ydu s.

fe-0 '-

A.

L'.' Legendre, Jr."

Notary Public

  • hi My Commission Expires August 5, 1988 s:^

?

  • Zl 4:

.J t

j j.'!..c R y,.. -ps%w t