ML20070T535
| ML20070T535 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Issue date: | 03/21/1991 |
| From: | NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM) |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20070T532 | List: |
| References | |
| NUREG-BR-0053, NUREG-BR-0053-S01-R2, NUREG-BR-53, NUREG-BR-53-S1-R2, NUDOCS 9104040253 | |
| Download: ML20070T535 (24) | |
Text
,
b PART 11 - PROCEDURES FOR HANDL!HG PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKlflG P_agt 11.1 Preliminary contacts and filing..................................
226 11.3 Preliminary processing and threshold determination...............
228 11.5 Petitions not meeting threshold requirements.....................
230 11.7 Petitions eligible for fast-track processing.....................
231 11.9 Fast-track processing............................................
234 11.11 Routine processing...............................................
235 11.13 Processing after publication for public comment..................
238 11.15 Completing action on a petition..................................
241 PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING 225 MARCH 1991 9104040253 910321 PDR NUREG BR-OOS3 R PDR
4 11.1 preliminary contacts and filing.
(a) The Administrative Procedure Act provides anj interested temon with the right to petition an agency for the issuance, amendment, or rc;cel of a rule (5 U.S.C. 553(e)).
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) imple-ments this statute in regulations that establish the procedures by which any interested person may file a petition for rulemaking with the Commission (10CFR2.802).
(b) A prospective petitioner may consult with the NRC before filing a petition for rulemaking by writing to the Director, Division of Fr!:edom of Information and Publications Services, Office of Administration, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, Attention: Chlef, Regulatory Publications Branch. A prospective petitioner tuy also telephone the Regulatory Publications Branch (RP8) on (301) 492-7086 or on the toll-free number for inquiries concerning NRC regulations:
(800)368-5642.
(c)
In any consultation prior to the filing of a petition for rulemaking, the assistance that niay be provided a prospective petitioner by a member of the NRC staff is limited to --
(1) Describing the procedure and process for filing and responding to a petition for rulemaking; (2) Clarifying an existing NRC regulation and 'he basis for the regulation; and (3) Assisting the prospective petitioner to clarify a potential petition so that the Commission is able to understand the nature of the issues of concern to the petitioner.
PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING 226 MARCH 1991
et g
(d) The exter* to which a member of the NRC staff may assist a prospective petitioner is limited by 10 CFR 2.802(b).
This means that the NRC l
staff may not -
(1) Write or assist in the writing of a petition for rulemaking to amend I
10 CFR Chapter ! for an external party; (2) Ne00tiate wording for a specific revision to 10 CFR Chapter I with a petitioner or prospective petitioner; or (3) Encourage a prospective pet.tioner to submit a petition for rulemaking in order to bypass normal ageng procedures for the initiation and development of a rulemaking action.
(e)(1) Paragraph (b) also specifies that in providing the above described
_ limited assistance, the NRC staff will not draft or develop text or alternative O
approaches to address matters in the prospective petition for rulemaking.
This
. V means that NPC employees may not prepare or assist a prospective petitioner in the preparation of a petition for rulemaking.
However, NRC employees may not discourage a prospective petitioner from submitting a petition for rulemaking.
NRC employees may not negotiate wording for revisions, or encourage a prospective petitioner to submit a petition for rulemaking in order to bypass normal agency procedures that provide for employee initiation of changes to 10 CFR Chapter 1.
~
S PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING 227 MARCH 1991 e
=~
e- %.
-.r--4
-e--
-.. -,...,,-...- -. --m
_.--w-
., -e
,,,...,y
.,.g-..
y-,..
1 s
4 However, informing an individual of the option to petition the Commission V
or the agency contact for assistence witn the petition process it, not considered prohibited assistance.
Neither is the staff prohibited from consulting with external parties to asserrble necessary information to clarify regulatory deficiencies and evaluate their health and safety significance.
If a prospective petitioner needs guidance regarding the submission and processing of petitions for rukmaking, refer the individual to the Regulatory publications Branch, Office of Administration.
(2)
Should any staff assistance be provided to a prospective petitioner regarding technical or substantive issues, that assistance must be disclosed to the Commission in the paper forwarding the rulenaking action for approval.
Staff assistance must also be disclosed in any public notice regarding the petition and in any rulen.aking that may result from the petition that is L'
published in the federal Register, l
(f) A prospective petitioner may file the petition with the HRC by addressing it to: The Secretary, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Washington, DC 20555, Attention:
Docketing and Service Branch.
If any other NRC employee receives a petition for rulemaking or a document u
that may qualify as a petition, the employee shall forward the document immediately to the Chief, Docketing and service Branch. Office of the Secreta ry, l (
PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKlHG 227a MARCH 1991 L
a 11.3 Preliminary processing and threshold determination.
O (a) When the Office of the Secrt tary (SECY) receives a petition for rulemaking or a document that may qualify as a petition for rulemaking, it i
recor6 the date of receipt of the document and sends a copy of the document to RPB. RPB, together with the Office of the General Counsel (0GC) and the offices responsible for the regulatiuns subject to the petition, then deter-mines whether ur not the document meets the threshold requirements for a petition for rulcaking.
(b) As set out in 10 CFR 2.802(c), to meet the threshold require-ments, a petition for rulemaking must --
(1) Set forth a general solution to U problem or present the substance or text of any proposed regulation or amendment or specify the regulation which is to be revoked or amended; (2) State clearly and concisely the petitioner's grounds for and it.terest in the action requested; and (3)
Include a statement in support of the petition that sets fortn Lne specific issues involved, the petitioner's views or arguments.ith respect to those issues, relevant technical, scientific, or other data involved that is reasonably available to the petitioner, and any other pertinent information necessary to support the action sought. Where possible, the petitioner should note any specific cases where the current requirements are unduly burdensome, deficient, or need to be strengthened.
This informat',on may prove to be extremely important when the NRC considers the merits of the petitioner's suggested amendments.
9 PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING 228 MARCH 1991
(c)
If the document meets the reeuirements for a petition for tulemaking, RPB assigns a docket number to the petition, informs the Office of the Secretary, 4.n writing, of the assigned docket number, and forwards a copy of the petition to the appropriate office. Within ten working days, RPB forwards a request for a decision from the staff office on whether the petition should be processed t outinely or handled as a "f ast-track" petition.
A " fast-track" petition is initially published for comment in the Federal Register as a proposed rule in accordance with 62.802(e).
RPB encloses a draft notice of receipt of the petition with the "f ast-track" request.
If the staff office determines that the petition for rulemaking is not suitable for "f ast-track" processing, the staff office is requested to comment or concur en the draft notice of receipt and return st ts RPB for publication in the Federal Register.
(d) After a petition has been submitted and the staff has reviewed the merits of the petition, discussions between the staff aiid petitioner regarding the wording for specific provisions of the regulations must occur in an open, public forum.
PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING 229 MARCH 1991
11.5 Petitions not meeting threshold requirements.
(a)
If a petition does not include sufficient information to meet the threshold requirements for i petition for rulemaking (see 11.3(b) of this handbook), the Executive Director for Operations (E00) will make a deter-mination that a petition is deficient.
This determination, based upon the recommendation of the cognizant office, 000, or RPB, should be made within 30 days from the date of receipt of the petition by SECY.
RPB prepares a memorandum to the E00 containing this recommendatior.
The memorandum in-cludes a draft letter to the petitioner peinting out the aspects in which the petition is deficient.
(b) The petitioner is informed as to how the petition is deficient and is given an opportunity to submit additional information.
If a petitioner does not correct the deficiency within 90 days from the date of notification by the ED0 that the petition is incomplete, the petition may be returned to the petitioner without prejudice to the petitioner's right to file a new petition.
When this occurs, RPB will draft the appropriate letter to the petitioner, obtain the concurrence of OGC and the cognizant office, and forward the letter to the ED0 for signature.
(c) The Commissioners are placed on distribution for any letter to a petitioner which states that a petition is deficient or which returns a petition to a petitioner because it is incomplete.
O PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING 230 MARCH 1991
i 11.7 Petitions eligible for "f ast-track" processing.
(a) Occasionally, NRC receives a petition for rulemaking that requests an amendment to the regulations that is obviously meritorious, in order to expedite the rulemaking process, these petitions for rulemaking may be published initially for public coment as a proposed rule. This " fast-track" procedure eliminates the usual step of publishing a notice of receipt of a petition for rulemaking and inviting public coment on the petition when the additional procedurt i step i: unnecessary.
" Fast-track" petitions are processed by the staff according to the procedures specified in this section and 11.9 of this handbook. The "f ast-track" procedure may not be used for the expedi-tious denial of a petition for rulemaking.
(b) Following a determination that a petition for rulemaking meets the threshold requirements for a petition, RPB assigns the petition to the appropriate staff office to determine whether the petition is eligible for "f ast-track" processing.
The assigned staff office assigns a contact person to handle the petition. The contact person then makes the "f ast-track" determination within 10 working days.
(c) The NRC may consider a petition eligible for "f ast-track" processing if it --
(1) Proposes action granting or recognizing an exemption from requirements in 10 CFR Chapter I or granting relief from restrictions while not imposing additional burdens upon or increasing the risks to the health and safety of any segment of industry or the public; PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING
'c 31 MARCH 1991
(2) Proposes action involving interpretive rules, rules of agency organization, procedure, or practice, and rules for the orderly conduct of Commission business; (3)
Proposes action involving an amendment to 10 CFR Chapter I that is corrective or of a minor or nonpolicy nature and that does not substantially modify existing regulations; (4)
Proposes action involving --
(i)
A minor safety, safeguards, or environmental issue.,
(ii) An increase in NRC efficiency; or (iii) A reduction ir. the regulatory burden on licensees.
(5)
Proposes action involvin:j a request already under consideration in an ongoing rulet iq nroceeding (Note, however, thot NRC consideration of a request already...cluded in an ongoing rulemaking depends on the status of the rulemaking proceeding);
(6) Proposes other action that is clearly meritorious and will not adversely affect the rights of other licensees or persons.
(d) The NRC normally will not consider a petition eligbile for
" fast-track" processing if the proposed action will --
(1) Require the preparation of an Environmental Impact Statement; (2)
Impose new or increased reporting, application, or recordkeeping requirements subject to clearance by the Office of Management and Budget; (1) Have a significant economic impact on a substantial nu:nber of small entities (see discussion of Regulatory Flexibility Act requirements in sections 3.19 and 5.19 of this handbook),
O PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING 232 MARCH 1991
.. -. -.. ~ - -..-.-..-. _ -.-... -
f (4) Have a significant impact on flRC staff and resource commitments; or (5)
Result in denial of the petition for rulemaking, i
1 4
h i
t J
2 PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING 233 MARCH 1991
._m_.,
11.9 Procedures:
Fast track processing.
9 (a) If the contact person determines that the " fast-track" process is appropriate for a petition for rulemaking, the assigned office inform RPB of this decision.
The assigned office begins processing the petition under "f ast-track" procedures by developing a notice of proposed rulemaking that addresses the issues in the petition.
(b) Under " fast-track" procedures, the assigned office shall develop the proposed rule for transmittal to the E00 or the Commission for approval within 90 days af ter the assigned of fice informs RPB that the "f ast-track" process is appropriate.
(c) The assigned office is responsible for implementing ED0 or Commission action for a proposed rule (see section 1.7 of this handbook, NRC rulemaking process).
4 PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING 234 MARCH 1991
11.11 Routine processing.
j l
(a)
If the contact person detr.rmines that the "f ast-track" process is not appropriate for a petition for rulemaking, the assigned office shall inform RPB of this decician.
The assigned office shall also concur or provide comment on the draft notice of receipt of petition for rulemaking prepared by RPB for Federal Register publication. The notice of receipt describes the contents of the petition and allows at least 60 days for public comment.
(b) The assigned office shall establish a schedule with intermediate milestones, as appropriate, and a target date for resolution of the petition.
The schedule and target date are intended to cover the period from the date of receipt of the petition by the NRC to the date on which the response indicating resolution of the petition is transmitted to the E00.
(1) A petition is considered resolved when the assigned office has determined what regulatory decision will be made concerning the petition.
A petition may be re.nolved by deciding to grant the petition ('01 or in part) and to proceed with a rulemaking action or by deciding to deny the petition. However, the resolution of a petition does not complete action on the petition. The resolution of a petition consists of the decision on the course of action the NRC will follow to complete action on the petition by either granting or denying it.
(2) Action on a petition is completed and the petition is " closed" when the HRC formally grants the petition by completing and publishing PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING 235 MARCH 1991
the final rule necessary to grant the petitioner's request or when the NRC denies the petition by publishing a notice of this action in the Federal Register and by advising the petitioner of this action in writing, in addition, action on a petition may be completed if the retition is withdrawn by the petitioner.
For additional information on the closure of a petition, see Section 11.15 of this handbook.
(c) The E00 has established procedures to ensure that the resolution of a petition for rulemaking is accomplished on a timely basis.
(See the memoranda from the E00 to Office Directors dated August 13, 1986, and April 6, 1988). These procedures require that the resolution of a petition for rulemaking occur within 12 months from the date the notice of receipt
, the petition for rulemaking is published in the Federal Register.
(1) The assigned office shall report the status of each petition for which it is responsible on a quarterly basis.
These status reports are to coincide with the quarterly updating of the NRC Regulatory Agenda (NUREG-0936).
The schedule for the resolution of each petition will be included in the Regulatory Agenda.
(2) Any proposed extension of the resolution date of a petition must be approved by the E00 in advance.
The E00 reviews proposed extensions of resolution concurrently with the quarterly review of completion of rulemaking dates.
RpB prepares a report to the E00 that indicates the status of each petition.
The status report includes the reason for any extension of the resolution date for a petition and the proposed new resolution date.
PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING 236 MARCH 1991
-..- - ~
p (d) The staff should note that in approving SECY-77-526, " procedures for petitions," in November 1977, the Commission stated:
" Schedules for responding to specific petitions should be set individually, taking into account the priority and-dif ficulty of the issues.
However, the Conunission believes that the time for response should seldom exceed 6 months for minor petitions or 12 months for major ones. When the response is rulemaking, the 6 and 12 month schedule limits can be interpreted as applying to the date of publication of the proposed rule in the Federal Register.
"On petitions of substential policy significance, the staff should submit an information paper or present a briefing to the Commission, about three months after receipt of the petition, i
identifying issues and options, and any preliminary staff views."
L l
\\
l I
i:
O PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING 237 MARCH 1991 1
w 11.13 Processing after publication for public comment.
O 3
(a)
" Fast-track" petition (published as proposed rule).
At the conclusion of the comment period specified in the proposed rule, the contact person in the assigned office sends a letter to the petitioner enclosing copies of any comments that were received in response to the publication of the proposed rule in the Federal Register.
The letter also states the initial target date for completion of staff review of the comments received and development of a final rule.
The assigned office is responsible for notifying the petitioner of any subsequent changes in the target date or of the contact person to whom the petition is assigned.
(b)
Routine W_ition (notice of *eceipt published for comment).
(1)
At the conclusion of the comment period specified in the Federal Register notice of receipt of petition (normally 60 days), RPB sends a letter to the petitioner enclosing copies of any comments that have been received concerning the petition.
The letter also states the initial target date for completion of staff review of the petition and the name and telephone number of the contact person responsible for the petition. The assigned office is responsible for notifying the petitioner of any sJbsequent changes in the target date or of the contact per.on to whom the petition is assigned.
(2) A petition for rulemaking may remain active for a considerable time following publication for comment in the Federal Register. The contact person should give the petitioner a status report on the petition, every three months.
A petitioner may, over a period of time, change s m.,,ee e _
m Ame 1ee1
positions on a particular issue or determine that an initial concern has been satisified by actions occuring after the petition was filed with the Commission.
Thus, periodic contact with petitioners may result in withdrawal of part or all of a petition by the petitioner.
P,outine correspondence to the petitioner may be signed by an appropriate official in the responsible office.
The assigned office shall send copies of correspondence sent to a petitioner to RPB and to the official docket file maintained by SECY.
(3) Any meeting between the staff and the petitioner to resolve issues raised by the petition or to negotiate wording for revisions to specific provisions of the regulations in question must be publicly noticed. The assigned office is responsible for preparing and coordinating publication ot the notica cf meeting.
(4)
If an assigned office determines that action on the petition has been completed through administrative measures other than publication of a Federal Register notice, it should consult with RPB and OGC for a final determination.
Af ter it reviews staff actions taken during tha processing of the petition, RPB will notify the assigned office if all necessary action on the petition has been completed and describe how the proceeding is to be terminated.
(c) Assistance during processing.
(1) RPB is available to help the staff prepare and review Federal Register notices required durinc the processing of petitions for rulemaking.
(2) OGC is available to give legal advice to the staff during the processing of petitions for rulemakir.g.
PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING 239 MARCH 1991
(d)- Staff response to significant actions.
The contact person for a petition for rulemaking is responsible for notifying RPB, and where appropriate, OGC, of any significant action or change that occurs during the processing of the petition.
Negotiations or understandings reached with a petitioner can materially affect the handlin; and disposition of a petition.
The staff shall coordinate plans nec'ssary for actions such as the potential or actual withdrawal of a petition with RPB.
Staff coordination is necessary to enable RPB to keep the E00 informed of the status of petitions for rulemaking and to describe the status of petitions accurately in the Regulatory Agenda.
O O
PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING 240 MARCH 1991
11.15 Completing action on a petition.
Q' Action on a petition for rulemaking is considered complete or " closed" when the petition, or each of its parts, has been withdrawn, denied, or granted.
(a) Withdrawal of petitiot for rulemaking.
(1) Only the petitioner may withdraw a petition or part of a petition.
If the witidrawal is made by telephone, the contact person should request that the petitioner submit an official letter of withdrawal to serve as a record of the request.
If the petitioner does not submit a written request for withdrawal, the contact person should make a written record of the conversation noting the date, name, and position of the person claiming to represent the petitioner.
The contact person should send a *ollowup letter to the petitioner that confirms the withdrawal.
(2)
If the petition is withdrawn, RPB, after consultation with the contact person, prepares a Federal Register notice that informs the public of the action.
The-Federal Register notice i: circulated to the assigned office and OGC for concurrence before it is submitted to the E00 for signature.
(b) Denial of petition for rulemaking, t
(1) A petition or part of a petition is denied through the publication of a Federal Register notice and the official written notification to the petitioner.
If pact. of a petition is c.nied, the assigned office is responsible for processing the remaining parts of the petition until each remaining par +. has been withdrawn, denied, or granted.
PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING 241 MARCH 1991 l
l. -.
(2) The assigned office prepares the following documents in the case of a denial of a petition:
(i)
A memorandum to the EDO or a commission paper.
(ii) A Federal Register r.otice of denial (to be signed by either the EDO or the Secretary of the Commission).
The E00 has the authority to deny petitions for rulemaking concerning 'ssues of a miner or nonpolicy nature where the grounds for denial do not substani..sily modify existing precedent (10 CFR 1.31(c).
Petitions that address major or policy issues require action by the Commission.
(iii) A letter to the petitioner to be sent to the petitioner prior to publication of the notice of denial in the Federal Register (to be signed by either the Executive Director for Operations or the Secretary of 'he Commission).
(iv) Congressional letters (to be signed by the Director of the responsible office).
(v)
A draft public announcement, if appropriate.
(3)
In preparing the Federal Register notice of denial of a petition, the assigned office shall ensure that each of the issues raised by the petitioner has been addressed.
The NRC's response to each of the issues raised and the reasoning for denying the petition must be presented in a manner and with sufficient detail to indicate that the NRC has adequately considered each of the petitioner's requests.
Each Federal Register notice of denial of a petition must include --
(i)
A complete summary of each of the issues raised in the petition; PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING 242 MARCH 1991
4 (11) A sumary and analysis of any public comment received; V
(iii) NRC's response to each of the issues raised; and (iv) NRC's reasons for denying the petition.
(4)
When_ preparing a Federal Register notice of denial of a petition, the following format items are omitted from the Commission paper and Federal Register notice --
(i)
The standard statements concerning the regulatory analysis, Paperwork Reduction Act, Regulatory flexibility Act, and National Environmental Policy Act; (ii) The authority citation; and (iii) The list of subject index terms.
(5) See Section 15.10 of this handbook for a sample denial of a petition for rulemaking, p)
\\'
(c) Granting a petition for rulemaking.
A petition or part of a petition is granted through issuance of a final rule that responds to the petitioner's request or other Commission action acceptable to the petitioner.
Other acceptable actions may include the issuance of a regulatory guide, policy statement, or legal interpretation.
(d)Incorporationofpetitionfor-rulemaking. When similar or related issues are involved, it is often possible to incorporate a petition or part of I
a petition into an ongoing rulemaking._ This can be done provided that three l
factors are taken into consideration.
First, incorporation of the petition or l
l-
- part of the petition into an ongoing rulemaking may delay
' p k
PETITIONS-FOR RULEMAKING 243 MARCH 1991 L
the completion of the rulemaking to an extent that is undesirable given the Commission's established priorities.
Second, incorporation of the petition or part of the petition into an ongoing rulemaking could delay the resolution of the petitioner's request to the point that the delay in reaching a final decision on the merits of the petition amounts to a denial of the petition.
Finally, the action to incorporate the petition should occur at a stage in the rulemaking that permits adequate consideration of the issue involved.
If any of these factors exist, the petition or the part of a petition under review should be treated separately.
(e) Actions that do not complete action on a petition for rulemaking.
The administrative or procedural steps discussed in this paragraph do not grant, deny, or complete action on a petition for rulemaking or any of its parts. Action on a petition for rulemaking is completed only when the steps set out in paragraphs (a), (b), or (c) of this section have been accomplished for the petition or each of its parts.
(1) The resolution of a petition does not complete action on the petition. The resolution of a petition for rulemaking consists of a decision on the course of action the NRC will follow to complete action on the petition by either granting or denying it.
(2)
Incorporation of a petition or part of a petition into an ongoing rulemaking does not cause the petition or its parts to lose the identity of a discrete agency action item that must eventually be withdrawn, unied, or granted.
Incorporation, by itself, does not " grant" or
" complete" action on a petition for rulemaking.
PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING 244 MARCH 1991
(3) The intermediate procedural or administrative steps and milestones used by NRC offices to control the processing of petitions for rulemaking (e.g., reviews, analyses, reports, studies, position papers, issuance of NUREG series publications) do not " grant," " deny," or " complete" action on a petition or its parts.
3 (f) Dockets and files.
(1) SECY maintains the official docket file on a petition for rulema king.
The assigned office should send a copy of all petition-3 related documents for inclusion in the official docket. The assigned office should also send a copy of documents related to a petition to RPB so that RPB can monitor the current status of each ongoing action.
(2) A file of currently active petitions for rulemaking that have been filed with the NRC is maintained in RPB.
Documents concerning current petitions and petitions that have been completed through E00 or Commission action are published in the NRC Rules and Regulations.
Questions concerning the status of any petition for rulemaking may be directed to the RPB (ext. 27758).
O PETITIONS FOR RULEMAKING 245 MARC 1991
Sample 2 - List of standard Congressional addressees.
O The Honorable Bob Graham, Chairman Subcommittee on Nuclear Regulation Committee on Environment and Public Works United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 cc:
The Honorable Alan Simpson The Honorable Philip Sharp, Chairman Subcommittee on Energy and Power Committee on Energy and Commerce United States House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 cc: The Honorable Carlos Moorhead The Honorable Peter H. Kostmayer, Chairman Subcommittee on Energy and the Environment Committee on Interior and Insular Aff airs United States House of Representatives Washington, DC 20515 cc: The Honorable John J. Rhodes APPENDICES A-7 MARCH 1991
-_..._.2-8I
Sample 3 - Congressional letter.
O The Honorable Bob Graham, Chairnian Subcommittee on Nuclear Regulation Comittee on Environment and Public Works United States Senate Washington, DC 20510
Dear Mr. Chairman:
The NRC has sent to the Office of the Federal Register for publication the enclosed proposed amendment to the Comission's rules in 10 CFR Part 50. The amendment, if adopted, would require licensees of nuclear power plants for which an operating license has been granted to establish, document, and implement procedures to ensure that personnel with unescorted access to protected areas are not under the influence of drugs, alcohol, or otherwise unfit for duty because of mental or temporary physical impairments that could affect their performance in any way contrary to safety.
The Commission is issuing the proposed rule for public comment and has specifically requested comments with respect to the scope, level of specificity, and methods of implementation of the rule.
Sincerely, O
Eric S. Beckjord, Director Office of Nuclear Regulatory Research
Enclosure:
As stated cc:
The Honorable Alan Simpson O
APPENDICES A-B March 1991
~.. _ - -.
-.. - _. _ _. ~
e i
1 0
120555139531
[yN"ph"$$nuBL1 CAT 10NS SVCS TPL-POR*NUREO P-223 DC
' 0 S E' "
J
.I i
i l
l l
O
-