ML20070M134
| ML20070M134 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook |
| Issue date: | 01/07/1983 |
| From: | Bisbee G, Kinder E NEW HAMPSHIRE, STATE OF |
| To: | PUBLIC SERVICE CO. OF NEW HAMPSHIRE |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8301120312 | |
| Download: ML20070M134 (9) | |
Text
. _
_ %,,N x.1: p _. 3 WTED #,*,.g ;;7CSCC h-DOCKETED
,S!;Rc 1
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
'g3 AN 0 A!0:49 NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION me,.
~
' " E '-f,,5ECREp,,e v
- a.. S[rr,q. --
- n.i.. 9c3 g:
.c
~ ;.
Before the f-C ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD q.:-
__.y
- ;9
, l-
- _ y In the matter of:
)
-.". f4 qm
)
}
g_h[ ~
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE)
Docket Nos.:
50-443 1 :.M..
)
and C ""T
)
50-444
$N;I,
)
7,1 (Seabrook Station, Units 1 and 2)
)
January 7, 1983
.dy
.x.-
THE STATE OF NEk' HAMPSHIRE'S THIRD SET OF INTERROGATORIES
- 1.
4 AND REQbEST FOR PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS r
TO PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, INC.
utan
.1 Pursuant to 10 C.F.R.,
Section 2.740(b) and 2.741, the jh;-
LG' Intervenor State of New Hampshire requests that the attached Third! Set of Interrogatories be answered fully in writing and v.
under oath by any members of the Public Service Company of New W ii Hampsh~ ire, Inc. (" Applicant") who have personal knowledge
. Ti thereof.
The answer to each Interrogatory should contain the 5~
name(s) and identification of the person (s) supplying the
.S answer :and whether or not he or she has verified the answer.
jpJ
,As-used herein, the term " document" means all original writings of any nature whatsoever and all non-identical copies
- ->- +
T_
thereof in the possession, custody, or control of the Applicant
~~
and includes but is not limited to the following items:
V communications, correspondence, notes, field notes, studies, a
reports, summaties, instructions, charts, schedules, sketches
~
and drawings, records, accounts and accounting records, opinions and reports of consultants.
Asfused herein, the term " identify" means:
..v 1.
In the case of a natural person:
l l
l 8301120312 830107 36}
gDRADOCK05000
'h.7:M;.r - :
a_%,
m w.
w*
M
- ;~;.
.37 (a) 'name; 9
(b) last-known address; a,.
_ ',, (c) employer or business affiliation; and c.
N.:.
.l-fF :(d)' occupation and business position ~. held.
2.-
In the case of a document:
- c (a) identity of the person or persons preparing it; S
(b) its title.or a description of the general nature of the subject matter;
~
l.-
(c) the identity of the addressee; i
(d) date of preparation;
.2 (e) identity of persons who can identify it; and
- u..
n
- r (f) all of the aforementioned information should be
~
supplied with such reasonable particularity as is 2e_
22-sufficient for a specific demand for production.
In lieu of the foregoing, a copy of the document may be supplied,
[
In the case of oral statements and communications:
3 q
?
- 1 (a) when and where they were made; X:
/;p
'+
(b) identify of each of the makers and recipients thereof;
- .f.
(c) the medium of communication; and
~
(d) substance of the statement and/or communication.
Pursuant to 10 C.F.R., Section 2.740(e), responses should be supplemented under circumstances when new or different information becomes available.
If the Applicant cannot answer the Interrogatories in full, so state and indicate when the Applicant expects to be able to answer the Interrogatory.
- Thebbtate of New Hampshire further requests that the Applicant, pursuant to 10 C.F.R.,
Section 2.741, provide copies of or make available for inspection and copying the documents identified by the Applicant in response to certain of the accompanying Interrogatories within thirty (30) days af ter
]j., c.
- a 4
Production of such documents shall-be at' the service hereof.
offices"of the Applicant in Manchester, New Hampshire,.or. a mutually convenient place.
""'" INTERROGATORIES RELATED TO SPECIFIC CONTENTIONS-
[' '
CONTENTION NH 9:
Radioactive Monitoring
'The Seabrook design does not provide an adequate,
program for monitoring the release of radioactivity to the plant and its environs either under normal operating conditions or in pre-and post-accident circumstances.
Thus, the application is not in compliance with general design criteria 63, 64 of Appendix A, 10 C.F.R. Part 50, and the requirements of NUREG-0737 and NUREG-0800.
Definition The term radioactivity monitoring system as 6 sed in
~
these Interrogatories means the instrumentation and
~
displays and sampling capability for the monitoring of radioactivity within systems and areas of the pla'nt including both operational and post-accident monitoring systems.
2.-
NH'9.46
" ~ -
Is the emergency operations facility equipped with
,j necessary indicators to monitor containment conditions and releases of radioactivity from the plant?
If the-answer is yes, please indicate whether these indicators and associated circuitry meet Class lE requirements.
~
NH 9.47 Some problems associated with the accelerated aging technique used in environmental qualification of Class lE electrical equipment are discussed in the literature (W.W. Weaver, Aging Techniques and Qualified Life for Safety System Components, Nuclear 1
r
j;,yp:-
y y
% 2 5:-y z - m c... A..
w.. ~-m. s,.-,
. n 1 - -
~..
,., a.:
..:1..,:.1:.L.
.=,. a.
+.... *.. -
- m +
ss-L 3 6. :.:.
- L
~..
- -/
v
.~
M.EE+-.:ec Safety, Vol. 21, P.51, January 1980) A If. the
'T E' d
.;.5,
Applicant is using this technique to qualify Class lE
. instruments,. such as the Manipulator Crane Monitors,
.ae " ' - - >
T/tL M-Y. M i the Containment Structure Monitors, the Plant Vent E EN:[N M b[g.' Monitors, and-the. Control Room Air Intake Monitors, TT. --i. Ju+.C' please prbide documentation as to how these problems 4.,
M _M dcc-Ae-%.,_.__ (such as synergistic effects) have been resolved for
~
== y.
. ;g _
each instrument tested.
? ?.. i:.........
n~; m., ~ -
- lfC ::
x.,;37 d.
- - -~
.t,.<
3-
.,=4ths,.
.m
. ~ * * * - * '
.=
t -
_.c,c 2 :,i.;;;
CONTENTION NH 10 g..r y L"-
a :- :;.t.
Contr01 Room Design F
The Seabrook Station control room design does not C.
b-comply with General Design Criteria 19 through 22 and
- 6G1.
2.. n..
10 C.F.R. Part 50, Appendix A, and NUREG-0737, Item s..
ga
. =f I.D.1 and I.D.2.
.~
.=.=T.
" ^ D.,D.
2'*
t,z.._. _. _.
~~. T...". :._
z; w~
=NH 10.20
~.
~
e gg a
m (a)
What are the critical plant variab.les and gi; SQQF parameters which will be presented by the sa'fety
.1
- ec.+~
parameter display system (SPDS)?
Explain how TT
" ? 'E'.
these variables were selected.
Identify all x
~~?
iME documents which describ'e the basis on which 9 9.2.-
.ijM..t'.f parameters were' selected.
..:.a
..v..
- ~**"*-=:
\\
?,$.',
' T,M
+
s um.
- 2
- +.. ii Es.a.:
(b)
Where will the SPDS be located?
y
-y
- - y )y,.
- .n w..
C'.
w-i=
(c)
Please provide a pictorial representation of the SPDS display.
u :.
--g 5
m tcr- (d)
Explain how the SPDS is designed to incorporate'
- N.2
" * " ~
accepted human factor principles.
9 n
- F
2-2_-
-S-O (e)
Does the Applicant intend to rely on the Preliminary Design Assessment or on the Detailed Control Room Design Review for licensing?
Explain the basis of this decision.
'E k
CONTENTION NECNP I.B.1 The Applicant has not satisfied the requirements of General Design Criteria 4 and General Design Criteria
~"
34 in that~all systems required for residual heat
~
removal, such as steam" dump valves, turbine valves,
.c and the entire steam dumping system are not safety
~~
grade and environ ~msntally qualified.
NECNP I.B.1
.u:
1, Please provide design date and specifications of the steam generator of the Seabrook plant.
Indicate whether the specifications have been modified or l
~
changed from the original version.
If they have been modified, please specify the changes and the basis for them.
Identify and produce, pursuant to 10 C.F.RI.,
2.741 all documents pertaining to any modifications in n-the specifications of the steam generator.
ib NECNP I.B.l.2-Please describe the chemical water treatment process used for the steam generator, identifying and producing all documents relat'ing to this process 1.
pursuant to 10 C.F.R.,
2.741.
l l
w i
-t
o.
3,
~y.
y y
y,---
-..7 3
i g._ y
.p+
9-,...
3.I,:
n.m
-o g,a.
4w 7 '.f 1 -
- m.,
s-q
. ('
l.
ll
?'
9 c u.
<L,
e s; n
s n,
t:
,e i
4
.. d' n:.
a r
g f
f g
_ f, - 9 e
V'
/
J g
r.
o s
i.
,NECNP I.B.1.3
' N. ' r
~
~ Have any alternatives-br <-
re sa[ bdiny considered 1;
to lessen the relianca ai r ?
u qener stor as the means of residual heek-c, al.
th ave.nt of an u,D accident?
If.so, p3 ecee. hseri' Josa alternntives.
' 12,=
If not, please exp'. air.
si no si ch. cor.aideration was.
undertaken.
~'
.o
,,,: s o
NECNP I.B.l.4
[
s
~
Please describe the efforts that have been or/ are -
being made to deal with the ggneric safetyf ir, sue of-tube rupture problems in steam generators'of* PWR plants.
Please identify.and produce pursucnt' to 10 C.F.R.,
2.741 all documents relating to such. an ef fort; V
i -
x.
=-
ae.
~
Respectfully submitted,
.Jf THE STATE OF NEW HA.MPSHIRE GREGORY H. SMITH ATTORNEY GENERAL
.v m
By
[#MM E. Tupper Kiadhr Assistant Attorney General Environmental Protection Div.
Office of Attorney General State House Annex Concord, New Hampshire 03301 37 Tel. (603) 271-3678
~
r l
[
-.=e..,
m.3-g@_y,
9
.~-r.
T-Y O :t{'.;;q
';l.
4' b
i
_;{hE'
^
_7-
,9s r 1 3.'g ~, i l- '. '
.-2_
[ l) 'J 'c-O s.~..
- a
.. -^ t/,*.PDated f~ January 7 1983 By I
I George D&na Bisbee U
..v_
..~'
Attorney
'2
~
~*/
Environmental Protection Div.
7%
office of Attorney General
< ~ ";
'/1 ~
State House Annex
- 7 Concord, New Hampshire 03301
<Y
~~
Tel. (603) 271-3678 u
.t b h.
PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, INC.
.,: r.
e 4
- ,qy J/
By Dated:.
1;....
Its ir.
.. {ii}
.h Q
THE'.ISTATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE 26 HILLSBOROUGH, SS.
- 2...
. ;;.2
.y_
3-Personally appeared
, before me, the undersigned offica, and made oath that the foregoing
,m statements are true to his best knowledge and belief.
r.-
Notary Public/ Justice of the
-7 Peace qse Dated:A
'* 7),
9
f
=,
~-
8-f, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I,,E. Tupper Kinder, Esquire, hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing State of New Hampshire's Third Set of
'T Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to the
. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Staff and The State of New
' Hampshire's Third Set of Interrogatories and Request for Production of Documents to Public Service Company of New Hr,mpshire, Inc. have been mailed this 7th day of January, 1983,
~
by.first class mail, postage prepaid, to:
Helen-F. Hoyt, Chm.
Dr. Emmeth A. Luebke Administrative Judge Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Board Panel U.S..NRC U.S. NRC Washington, D.C.
20555 Washington, D.C.
20555 Dr.~. Jerry Harbor Jo Ann Shotwell, Asst. AG Administrative Judge Office of the Attorney General
, Atomic Safety and Licensing One Ashburton Place,19th Floor Board Panel Boston, MA 02108..
U'.S.rNRC Washington, D.C.
20555 Mrs. Beverly Hollingsworth r
822 Lafayette
~ Road Roy;P.rLessy, Jr., Esquire P.O. Box 596 Rob ~ert'Perliss, Esquire Hampton, New Emmpshire 03842
'~
Officeof Executive Legal Dir.
U.S.e.NRC William S. Jordan, II, Esquire Washington, D.C.
20555 Ellyn R. Weiss, Esquire Harmon and Weiss Robert A. Backus, Esquire 1725 I Street, N.W.
116 Lowell Street Suite 506 P.O. Box 516 Washington, D.C.
20006 Manchester, N.H.
03105 Edward J. McDermott, Esquire Phillip Ahrens, Esquire Sanders and McDermott Assistant Attorney General 408 Laf ayette Road State House, Station #6 Hampton, N.H.
03842 Augusta, Maine 04333 l.,
i r
o L
c' Robert C. Gad, Esquire
~
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Thomas u. Dignan, Jr., Esquire U.S. NRC Ropes and Gray Washington, D.C, 20555 225. Franklin Street Boston,. Massachusetts 02110 David R.
Lewis, Esquire JT,~
Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. NRC - Roon E/W - 439 Washington, D.C.
20555
=.,
f~'
~-
VIA4 E. Tupper Kinder Dated:
January 7, 1983 M'
O.
.1 e
a t 9
L.