ML20070K041
Text
,=,
~s e
VI RGINI A ELECTRIC AND PowEn Coni >ANy Ricnwonn.Vinouxu coce December f, 1976 Mr. Noru n C. Moseley, Director Serial No. 301/102176 Office of Inspection and Enforcement P0&M/ALH:clw U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Docket Nos. S O M Region II - Suite 818 230 Peachtree Street, Northwest 50-281 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 License Nos. DPR-32 DPR-37
Dear Mr. Moseley:
This is in response to your letter of October 21, 1976 in reference to the inspection conducted at Surry Power Station on September 15-17, 1976 and reported in IE Inspection Report Nos. 50-280/76-14 and 50-281/76-14.
We have reviewed your letter atId_the enclosed inspection. reports.
Our response to the specific violation is contained in the attachment to this letter.
We have determined that no proprietary information is contained in the reports. Accordingly, the Virginia Electric and Power Company interposes no objection to these inspection reports being made a matter of public disclosure.
Very truly yours, C. M. Stallings,
Vice President-Power Supply and Production Operations Attachment w
8212290172 821130 PDR FOIA SCHLISse2-534 PDR
~
.s rs RESPONSE TO VIOLATION REPORTED IN IE REPORT NOS. 50-280/76-14 AND 50-281/ 76-14 VIRGINIA ELECTRIC AND POWER COMPANY SURRY POWER STATION UNIT NOS. 1 AND 2_
NRC COMMENT
" Contrary to Technical Specification 6.4.D, csrtain log book I.
entry, review and initialling requirements specified in Vepco Administrative Procedure 29, " Conduct of Operations" were not followed during the period of August 23 through September 16, 1976."
RESPONSE
Spec-The above infraction is correct as stated in the inspection reports.
ifically, pursuant to Section 2.201 of the NRC's " Rules of Practice," Part 2, Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, the following information is submitted.
Corrective steps taken and r_esults achieved.
?
1.
Administrative Procedure 29 (ADM-29) inas been redistributed to all Operations Department personnel.
The import'ance of the proper documentation practices required by ADM-29 has been Log keeping and plant surveillance was covered emphasized.
during 'the first phase of the '.'In Plant Training Program" con-ducted in September and October 1976.
All high pressure auxiliary operators and half of the assistant control room operators have completed progress examinations in this area.
A review of logs and records in use has been conducted.
Necessary modifications have been made to reflect all current The " Required Reading" form has been plant conditions.
modified to reflect the fact that personnel in licensing l
training receive the required information through the Training Department.
y
_g_
._.y
.c_
ri.
g q
)
i 2.
Corrcetive steps which will be taken to avoid further violations:
The program outlined above should pre. vent further viola tions.
3.
The date when full compliance will be achieved.
{
Full compliance has-been achieved.
.l
=
I
^
t 5
f l'
t k
+
i i
i
T.
,'.. p svection/ Investigation Repor' N Only 7
' g-Distribution Code PDR COORDINATOR ONLY Report sent to HQs and hold copics reproduced Date [O [ [
In tial Incoming Licensee Correspondence Licensee Response to Non-Enforcement Report 2.
Licensee Response to Enforcement Report Licensee Response to IE Bulletins 4.
General Licensee Correspondence 5.
Licensee Event Reports a.
Licensee /?act11ty z',0 Q ~
U/Yo
/60
[ -'
d b.
Report No.
/
ZI/ /
?
d.
Date Received M d/I Doctment. Date M-[
c.
J e.
Section Chief / Qf m m f.
Principal Inspecto'r (26 i
O g.
Document transferred to Branch Date Initials Licensee Response to Enforcement' Report'Only Acceptable h Not-Icceptable Initials h 2.790 Information YES NO Init-isis NOTE:
If Yes, mark necessary documents to delete 2.790 Informatibn and return with this form along with acknowledgement letter to the PDR Coordinator.
j.
Should the attached and related correspondence be placed in the FDR?
YES N
NO Initials FDR COORDINATOR GNLY e
Incc sing Licensee Correspondence and related documents sent to EQs 1
and FDR.
Date /
/
Initia An w.-
.