ML20070B867

Advises That Details of Insp Re Containment Liner Weld at Facility Contained in Insp Rept 99900509/81-02,Section I.B

ML20070B867
Person / Time
Site:	Nine Mile Point
Issue date:	07/01/1981
From:	Potapovs U NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION IV)
To:	Bruner E NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION I)
Shared Package
ML20069A584	List: ML20069A580 ML20069A610 ML20070B859 ML20070B867
References
FOIA-90-270 NUDOCS 9102040313
Download: ML20070B867 (1)

Text

_ _ _ _ _

o tto

)

<! '!s uq#o UNITED STATES

-8

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o

n REGION IV L

%* e.. e *e"[

t, 611 RYAN PLAZA DRIVE, $U(TE 1000 AR LINGTON, T E X AS 76011 J

JUL 011931 MEMORANDUM FOR:

E. J. Bruner, Acting Director, OR&PI, RI FROM:

Uldis Potapovs, Chief, VlB, RIV

SUBJECT:

CONTAINMENT LINER WELD PROBLEMS AT NINE MILE POINT 2 -

AITS F01002231F04 (VITS80-128)

In Mr. R. T. Carlson's memorandum dated June 4,1980, information was 7

requested regarding inadequate nondestructive examinations perfonned by Conam.

Since Mr. Carlson's request, Conam's contract was cancelled and all of the work performed by them has been redone.

Details of the inspection concerning this subject are contained in attached Inspection Report No. 99900509/81-02,Section I.B. of the Details.

We plan no further action on this item.

If you would like to discuss this matter further, please advise.

Uldis Potapovs, h Vendor Inspection Branch Attachment as stated f Lf Y,R'V3 f

cc:

G. W. Reinmuth J. R. Costello 9102040313 901031

,.[/

SO 270 PDR

/

V.i1 L D'S I ATE s j g'%'};'[. j NUCLE AR HEGULATORY COMMISS!ON 3 r.

y.-(

j.

nMmcio n. n. c. 2w.s

&Mll?., d. */

MRS r.m t.

Docket No. 50-110 Niagara Mohawk Power Ccrporation f

ATTN: Mr. Donalo P. Dise l

Vice president, Systems project Management l]

300 Eric Boulevard West

/

Syracuse, ' New York 13202 the use of the DYWIDAG Threaddar System for I structures.

We have reviewed your request and the additional information yo ry provided by letters, dated June 17, 1980 and October 28, 1980.

Based on our able provided the following conditions are met: review, we have c (1)

Compliance with the applicable provisions of Section lil, Division 2 of ASME Boiler and pressure Yessel Code,1950 Edition, inclucir.g th Sumer 1980 accenda; (2)

Compliance with the applicable provisions of Section 7.5 and 7.6 of ACI Code 349-76, " Code Requirements for Nuclear Safety Relatec C Structures",

in addition prior to the use of the DYWlDAG_ Threadbar System with unstagger splices, pro, vide the following information for the staff's review an (3)

Statistical sumary of test data which substantiates that the strain ceasured over the fuli length of the connector at 90% of yield does not exceed the strain of an unspliced bar by more than 50%;

(4)

Sample. calculations indicating that the stress levels in the reinfore-ing bars are below 50% of the specified yield strength under all of the unstaggered splices is intended. applicable load condit at least a typical joint situation, such as a wall-floor junction.These These calculations should include the complete procedures and assu used in the analysis to arrive at the stress levels in the reinforcing bars.

Also provide sketches showing the details of the reinforcing; (5)

Tensile test data on spliced, unstaggered specimens consisting of a d.

group of a least five bars to determine their group efficiency.

E data is required for bar sizes 11,14 and 18.

Thi s The group of bars should be arranged in a typical spacing as planned to be used in the l

containment and should be tested while imbedded in concrete.

these results with similar unspliced specimens.

Compare If a test in concrete

$e.

/

'1

. _ _ _ _ _ _. s.jhm d C-a

.a justification that the effect of n

te e.

accordance with Section CC-4333.2 of the previously mentio code;

'(6) bars and its adecuacy in terms of concrete placem and avoidance of void formation.

, compaction,

.)'

'n'e require you to submit a co:r,itment to comply with the codes -liste

-(l) and (2) above and to receive the staff's ap Threadbar System in CategoryJ _Stru.ctures..

,p.

u..

[1(c.

OO B. J tic /sn. Y,oungblood, Chief sing Dranch No. 1 Division of Licensing cc:

See next page l

.o

.?

4 8

k

', hi/Le t.r. A P o n Awn t'owt n cotironMioN /.ipii r ing terArg i venn wr ri. 5 rittry:;r n v l

i ns, t ' i l 1. in t p i' 11 arch 18, 1 91.41

/l 4

(/

. Mr. B.J. Youngbloco, Chief i

l L icensing Uronch lio. I v

Div'ision of Liccusing Cffice of tiuclear Reactor Regulation O.S. tiuclece Regulat ory Co:wis s ion

's o s h i n g t on,

D,. C.

2005b e

De a r l'.r.

Youngb lood :

.,110 :

Hine Mile Point Unit 2 lint h et 110, 50-410 Enclosed cre the hcudouts provided at the .crCh 6, I90I niOClifig w it h rar.ters of the Conniission St a f f to othtress unstaggered splices.

Your tho ch '

1981 letter granted opproval for the ute of the Unli:AG 1 hi cadber Sys tem in stLggered applications at tiinc Mile Point l' nit 2 proviced the followinn concitions are met:

1)

Compliance w ith the applicobic provisions of S c r, t i vo 111, Division.

of ASME Eoiler cnc Pressure vessel Code, 1960 E d it ion, includ ing th-Su m.er 1980 cedenda; 2)

Compliance with the epplicable previsions of $cction /. 5 and 7. ri of ACI Code 369-76, " Code Requirci..co'.s f or liuclec.r Scf ety Relat ed Concrete Structures".

Accitionally, !(iagcro Mohawk requests approvcl to elilire the Un'!:eM

'ihreacber System in unstcggered applications subicct to the !iniit a t ions orni ccr.ditions cescribed belon:

i.

Compliance with the alaove reicrenced cooes.

2.

1. imited to bar s ices tiG-hil.

3.

i 4mited-to-doweling ci. slob to wall junct ions as typically shown it Sketch 1.

I C

d.

- i h e' concrete desian is in occordcoc o w i th t he s t ronot h nm un.ul and allowebie stressei as outlined in ACl-310.?G Code.

- All seismic Class i reinf urc eil concrete s tr uc t ui et are dost gu e:1 ut iiiZ ing (he load Comb in.it ioris (or t he chet,i' ing ties it,ni i bud i1 IU4 spec if ico in the Hinc Mile Point Un it P Prei hainar. c af ri g b oa y i-Report 50ctico 12.3.9.

f or fiine l'.i l e Po int Unit P.

l. h e U t ' o t at wall slab junction of scismic Cicss I st rut t ui es ai e <tv. iup. I t -

t he maximum mun.cnt ochieved f rein the worst i mu l i n g t omb i n.s. t, b. i f. r hh' pt23 ' eroting,or design condition.

/

1 Ld--

4-W y m. -

. '=

9 '. ~. _ _

-(;

4 l

q Project.-the stress levelIn' ccsc of-_unslappered splicos r

in the dowels will be bel '

)

appliceble. Ioad conoit iens (i.e., spec if ied yicid st ren

..i

-cesign calculation showina the strouless than 20 ksi),

I. t yp i r. a l for two elevations icwis r.t woli etteched handcuts from the U. orch 6,in the Reactor Buildino is c in the 1981 hecting. '

• a 5.

The minimum spacing criterio for s.plices that will be used the format icn of the 6ticched handouts from the l'. orch 6 voids during concrete placement o

is clso cont a ire-J i 1

,. 941.me e t in g',

As requestec at elcngation c'no strafnTof Ipl,icedt he P.c rc i,,6,...I,9J 1. ac o t.ing, 'ki t

~

1 the specified yield strength.

As shtsn by this t obic the clongat ico O splice specimen -is essentially identical,cith the clongation of bar et this stress level.

a t he ' unsp l ic ed splice is adequately-contro-lled by:The ACl 349-76 code ass slip in the i;

Demonstrat ing through qualif ication test ing t hat the ~ ste:in spliced ;pecimen at 0.9 'cf n the an unspliced specimen by raere then 50%.the sp exceeo _that of 2._

l.imiting the maximum computed design load stress in the 1c than 0.b of the-specif ied yield strength.

o leis Theref ore, Miagara b'.chawk does not believe that gro Sections 7.5 and 7.6 ofsplices.in concrete is necessary based on th up testin') cf-nnstagueied ACI 349-76..

ewaly w ith Based on the cbove,

_Threacber System in unstaggered splices as spec if ied obuth

, Marc:t31; 1981, ve, is requer.t<0 by Very truly yours, wh$h Donald P. Di".c Vice Prt*sidcot Engineerinq e

j i

-1 1

1 I

i i

i I

i 1

4 -7 PROJ.

a'.

+

.. f.,......

p

.- 8 DWLS 912' c.1

4 TOP & SQT

@J ' '

lt-

1. e,

- o

. t 2.: c,. n.

r-ri e p = y,,.m _-

.2="

1EL 3CG

.(

h,

.,I lp al a

=. ~ " :

=.-

.=. =... =. -

1 11 IW

[.1 %., >

\\

c 7

_ _.-..3 v ir i;m I ^. d,

.o b'---

' " ~'~-

e:Cn..e.

y

-m 1

-%n..

ri i

i i

t l

L CCNTAINMENT l

WALL

'Yi

. >[,

l t

1

(

, ; \\.=

Cf

~*

i u

,.._. ~< 3.

s, w

A t n O J.

P P

. 4, s %'

tt

.y w

. n.

N '.

NINE MILE POINT NUCLE AR STATION - UNIT P.

m.@y$NI AGAGR A MOHAWK POWER CORPORATION J. O. I c,i

.' 7 r -. PCWin e,p.9 av CACVP ' 7 t it. C

,i.

I.-

GlJ.

~ ~ ~ ~

o,cceto WALL-SLA5 JUNCTICN

. i ~u g '

j$.,'. 'c:ca~c,"

J SEC. CONMT, WA LL -REAC70 P.

P

t. -.

}.'$ i,,

Arnnoveo !

SLDG.

'<t.icni.

. _C VIs 'C 4 5 h

lh fh

1..

.Y A

.n. ' ;

~

Statistical Surmary c' Elongetion in a Spliced Bar Specimen versus Elengation i

of an.Vnspliceo Ear Specimen at 50 percent.of minimum requirc< yield (30 ket) 5;,

ed Specimen 0.010-0 0 0.010 0.010 Jnsplicec Specimen 0

001 0.0

-0.003

-0.001

-0.001

-0. 0.)J 0.0015 050001 0.0 0.0003

-0.0 m

-0.0 m

4. N AM i

re ei r n (in./in.)

No. 7 Elongation in 12 inch Spliced Spa imen 0.012 0.012 0.013 0.0 13 0.013 0.011 0.0123

>nspl ic ed: Spec imen 0.015 Sifferen;e in-12 in.

0.003

-0.003

-0.002

-0.002 0.002

-0.004

-0.0027

)iff erence in Strain -0.00025

-0.00025 -0.00017

-0.00017

-0.00017 0.00033 -0.00023 (in./in.) -]

No.

8 Elongation in 14 inen Spliced Spsimen 0.013 0.012 0.013 0.012 0.012 0.012 0.0 c)

Jnsoliced Specimen.', 0.017

)ifferenee'in 14 in.

0.004

-0.005,-

-0.004

-0.005

-0.005

-0.005 -

0.00 0

)tfference in'Str6in' 0.00029

-0.00036 -0.00029

-0.00036

-0.00035

-0,00026 0.0Tn4

'(in./.in.) lj No. 9 Eicngation in 15 in.

Splicec Specimen

0. 017

-0.017 0.017 0.017 0.015 0.017~

4.0101 jnspliceo Specimen

0. 017

-lif f erene e in 15 in.

0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

-0.002 0.0

-0.0003 liff eren:e in Strain 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0

-0.0000 0.0

-0.0002 (in./in.)

N o.1 10-Elongation in 18 inch Splicec Specimen 0.021 0.021 0.019 0.022 0.020 0.020 0.0205

nsplicea Specimen 0.019 lif f erene e in 18 in. 4.002

+0.002 0.0

+0.003 4.001

+0.001 4.0015 liff erence in Strain +0.0001

+0.00011 0.0 4.00017 4.00006 4.00006 0.00308

'(in./in) ho, 11 Elcr.gation in 18 inch Splice: Specimen 0.019 0.022 0.018 0.018 0.020

_0.017 0.0 19 incplicec Specimen-0.019 liff erence in 18 in.

0. 0 4.003

-0.001

-0.001 _

4.001

-0.002 0.0 difference-in 5 train

0. 0

-0.00017 -0.00006

-0.00005 +0.00006 0.00011 0.0

- ( i n. /_in. )

he. 14 Elengation in 22 inch Spliced Specimen 0.020 0.021 0.021 0.023-0.021 0.022 0.0213-nspliced Specimen 0.023 iff erence in 22 in. -0.003

-0.002

-0.002' O.0

-0.002

-0.001

-0.0017 iff erence in Strain -0.00014

-0.00009 -0.00009 0.0

-0.00009 0.00005 0.00000 (in./in.)

No. 18 Elongation in 30 inch Spliced Specimen -

0.033 0.032 0.031 0.029 0.033 0.031 0.031b nspliced Specimen 0.031 iif f crenc e in 30 'in,,40.002

+0.001

0. 0

-0.002

+0. 007.

c. O v3, w>0',

)iff orence.jnj $ train. +0.00007;, 4.00003 ',. 0.0, 4 ;

-0.00007

+0.00007

0. 0

• 0.i C 2

t(in.'/,)n?)pg $*p. :.. ',,..e.A.'K$.14@' *:...

i h I h' N

.h

)

n L

N n*M AN & Ilot;rziso E n.13 C.

a=

ieis o e aa v. ~ *

>.s..-.-.

.c,~.

a m.,

'* l'7f,',,'fj, _

• A S H IN C.T O E O C 2OC36 f,*7/j7m,,,,

' L*f;7

• ll: ' ' ";;cy

.'~fd j'?7.'

' ' *55 56 C.L,

E(0),d

"Jt:.','.!:'..

ll:::1L'::'; -

%7l.':.W

• i2 ;" =..

.'.::': ' "i.":.

. ;: l'.%.

":l".*.?r:.

C:JiT!!;.T.

=::, w.t..,

u~

=

P" '."'r m'.'.:!,=.

1

a c....':.:m".

-::..v..m:. -

= = ; -

2...:::.:. '::::.\\.,

=r.. ::::.

.....,o

.i

::"

EYTk

... m.,.

June 13, 1990 3.U;S;$/;'j,

e

0'EC. m

2.'.;.;"

w......:

liAND.. DELIVERED f.REEDOM OF IMf0RMAll0N ACT REQUEST Director, Division of Freedom of Information:and Publication

p. gy%

Services

/j h Office of Administration-U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 At.tantion:

Ms. LindaiRobinson Re Erncdom_O Linformation _AC.t_Reque s t 1

Dear 1Ms. Robinson Pursuant to the Freedom-of Information-Act (FOIA), S-U.S.C.-.-S SS2,..et se.g., as supplemented by the NRC's implementing regulations,.'10 C.F.R. S 9.11, el Eeg., :ve hereby-. request tha t

_you produce for inspection and copying'the documents described in

-the attachments to this letter.

This request primarily involves 1

-documents relating to the~ design and construction.of--.Nine-Mile-

-Point = Unit 2-(NMP-2), NRC docket no. 50-410.1 set -- forth-in -

Attachment A hereto is:the-1ist of the categories of= documents we wouldLlike to review.

These categories include all documents related to the specific NRC meetings, correspondence, Linspections, and_ reports-identified in. Attachment A.

Set'forth i

-in Attachment D is a detailed description of some of the particular types of' docuraents that we would -like to review relating to each of the categories identified in Attachment'A.

As used herein, the term "NRC" includes all of fices and divisions.within the Agency having any involvement with the i;

subject. matter of this request, including the NRC'Begional Office

-l l

Newxa. & ilotnixor.n P. C, 2

for Region I,'the NRC Resident Inspector's office at the NMP site, and the Office of Inspection and Enforcement.

As also used herein, the term "documenta, unless otherwise specifically.

limited, means all correspondence, letters, memoranda (internal and external), records of telephono conversations, notes, reports, agreements, guidelines, procedures, meeting slides, and the like, whether in draf t or final form, that are in any way relevant - to the categories of documents identified in the attachments.

We look forward to your response within the time limits prescribed by the regulations.

We would note that in the event you consider any document to be exempt from production, the non-exempt portions of the 6 cument should be released.

We also appreciate that this FOIA request is fairly extensive, and we are more than willing to _ provido you with any additional information or_ offer any clarification you may need in processing this request.

Further, due to the potential voluminousness of the initial production for inspection, we would ask that you consider releasing the documents to us in stages as you accumulate them rather than waiting until all documents subject to production have been accumulated.

Finally, consistent with the regulations, we agree to pay whatever charges are.in _ Jed in processing this request.

Please give me a call at (202) 955-6790 if you have any questions on those matters.

Very,truly yours, l}

,.j l

','lr

~-

John C. Person e

....~

1 Nr.wirAw & Hotcr71Nonn, R C.

+-

A11AchmentiA l

-Following below'are the specific' categories of M

documents;for which we are seeking.related-documents, as described more fully'in. Attachment B.

- l'.

. Letter from Kenneth L..Kiper, NRC : Project Manager Licensing Branch:No..l', to Niagara Mohawk Power Corp. (NMPC),

dated March _'4, 1981,_ re:

Summary of meeting held January. 26, 1981Eto discuss the reorganization of-NMP-2-QA.

'2..

JAll personal files, memoranda, and notes-of W.-

3

Kiper, W.

Haass, J. Gilray, and P.

McKee'that relate to the meeting-heldron January' 26,.1981 to discuss the reorganization of.

-NMP-2 QA.-

3.

Letter from Eldon_J. Brunner, Chief.of_the NRC

- I i

. Projects Branch-No._1, Division of Resident and Pioject.

Inspection, to NMPC,~ dated'Soptember 4, 1981, re Inspection =50-3 410/81-08 performed at NMP-2 from August-4-6,'1981.

4 All_ personal files, memoranda,:and notesLof R.A.

Feil.and H.B."Kister that ~ relate to Inspection 50-410/81-08 1

_ performed;at NMP-2 from August-4-6,-1981.

I 5.

. Meeting'.between NMPC and Region I held in; 1

1Bothesda', Maryland on or about January 13, 1982, i

=6.

Construction Appraisal Team (CAT) Inspection 50-410/82-13' dated. March. 17,.1982, conducted between November 30,

-1981'and-December 18)-1981 at NMP-2.

l 7.

. All; personal files, - memoranda, and notes 1 of S.K.

a Chaudhary, R.J. Paolino,'S.D.1 Roynolds, L.E. Tripp,'R'.~ Schultz,

- and S;D.'- Ebneter-that relate to CAT Inspection: 50-410/01-13

. conducted between~ November 30, 19 81o and December

-18,-- 1981.at: NMP-2.

18.

NRC Inspection' Report No.'82-03 transmitted to:

-3

NMPC.by' letter dated Juno-19, -1982,1 summarizing _ inspection

- conducted 3between Marcht29, 1992 sand;Apri-1 30, 1982.

9.

Al'l-personal liles,~ memoranda, Land: notes of--R.D.

-Schultz, A.S. Varela, H.lB. Kister, and-R.W. Starostecki that

- relato_to-NRC-Inspection Report.no. 82-03.

10.. Mooting between the NRC-and'NMPC concerning

Inspection 50-410/81-13 held at the Region--IJ of fices on or :about April: 14, 1982.

j 11.

All personal files, memoranda, and notes of R.T.

- Carlson,.S.D. Ebneter, E.J.

Brunner, L.E.

Tripp, and S.K.

y u

f g3

.-n-

.g.

m m-

--tr

~m=

m MP' F

-"--N,-

M

'F r41 7

' 'r m :a x & H o n. u No e n. P. C..

Chaudhary that relate to the NRC meeting on Inspection 50-410/81-13 hold on April,14, 1982.

12.

Managomont Mooting Report No. 50-410/02-06 dated June 1, 1982, as transmitted to NMPC by letter dated Juno 18, 1982.

13.

All personal filos, memoranda, and notes of R.W.

Starostocki, E.J.

Brunner, H.B.

Kist er, and R.D.

Schultz that relate to the NRC management meeting summarized in Report-no. 50-410/82-06.

14.

Enforcement Conference Roport No. 50-410/82-08 dated July 6, 1982, as transmitted to NMPC by lottor dated September 1, 1982.

15.

All personal files, memoranda, and notes of.E.J.

Brunner, S.D.

Ebneter, D.J.

Holody, R.W.

Starostocki, and R.D.

Scholtz that relato to the enforcement conferenco referred to in Report no. 50-410/82-08.

16.

Enforcement Conference Roport No. 50-410/82-13 dated October 20, 1982.

17.

All personal files, memoranda, and notes of R.C.

Haynes, D.J. Holody, H.B.

Kister, R.D.

Schultz, and R.W.

Starostocki that relate to the enforcement conference referred to in Report no. 50-410/82-13.

18.

Lotter from the NRC's Starostocki to NMPC dated October 28,-1982 (references a meeting held on October 20, 1982).

19.

NRC Investigation 50-410/1/-82-078 conducted between November 1-4, 1982.

20.

All personal files, memoranda, and notes of R A.

.Matukas, R.K.

Christo Fitzgerald that relate to NRC investigation 50-410/phor, and J.A.

1/-82-078.

21.

Systematic Assessment of Licensoo Performanco-(SALP) report for NMP-2 dated December 12, 1982, covering the period Octobor-1, 1981 through September 30, 1982.

22.

All personal files, memoranda, and notes of R.W.

Staros tocki, T. Martin, E.G.

Groenman, H.B.

Kistor, R.D.

Schultz, and M.

Lynch that relato to the SALP report for HMP-2 dated Docomber 12, 1982.

23.

NRC Inspection No. 83-01, conducted from January 3, 1983 through February 4, 1983.

l:

Newnaw & Hottr asor.n. E C. -

24.

All personal files, memoranda, and notes of R.D.

Schultz, J. Grant, H.B.

Kister, and R.W. Starostocki that relate p

to NRC inspection 83-01.

L 25.

Enforcement Action Letter 50-410/EA-83-16, dated L

April-26, 1983, -concerning an NRC inspection at NMP-2 conducted between August 30, 1982 and September 30, 1982.

26.

All personal files, memoranda, and notes of R.

Abbott, J. Ash, C. Austin, W.

Baker, J. Bebko D. Cordone, J.

r Dillan,_D. Dise,.A. Kordalewiski, T. Loomis, C. Eillian, J.-Ptak,IO tid R.

Smith, C.

Stuart, C. - Te rry, J. Warne r, C. Silc zek, Jr., G.

Wilson,-A. Zallnick, K. Ward, end R.

Pulsifer that relate to the

> inspection conducted between August 30, 1982 and September 30, Qfh 1982 at NMP-2.

)

i 27.

Management Meeting Report No. 50-41/83-09, dated May 23, 1983.

2 8.-

All personal files, memoranda, and notes of S.D.

Ebneter, R.B. Keimig, H.B.

Kelster, and R.W, Starostecki that

~

relate to-the management meeting ref erred to in ' Report No. 50-41/83-09.

l-29.

Enforcement Action Letter 50-410/EA-83-16, dated August 2, 1983, concerning NRC audit c anducted between August 30, 1982 and September 30, 1982.

30.

NRC Inspection 83-12, c onducted between August 8, 1983 and Septemberc21, 1983.

31.

All personal files, menoranda, and notes of' d. A.

Gramm, J._ Grant, R.M.-Gallo, and R.W.

Starostecki thht relate to l

NRC Inspection 83-12 for NMP-2.

32.

Enforcement Confe ence Report No. 50-410/83-14, dated August 30, 1983.

33.

All personal files, memoranda, and notes of J.A.

o

Allan, S.D.

Ebneter, R.M. Gallo, R.A. Gramm, J.M. Grant, E.H.

. Gray, D;J. Holody, H.B.

Kister, T.T.

Martin, L.M.

Narrow, and R.W.

Starostecki that relate to tle Enforcement Conference referred to in Report No. 50-410/83-14.

34.

Minutes dated December 29, 1983 of a meeting held on December 12, 1983 concerning the NMP-2 FALP evaluation for the L

period October 1, 1982 through September 30, 1983.

I i

Nawwa n & Hot.rz ino r.n. P. C.

4-35.

All personal files, memoranda, and-notes of R.W.

Starostecki, H.B. Ki ster, ' A. Schwencer, R.M. Gallo, S.J. Collins, L. H.- Bettenhausen, N.P.

Haughoy, and R.A.-Gramm that relate to the NMP-2 SALP Report dated December 12, 1983, 36.

Meeting between the NRC and NMPC held on or about Janua ry 30, 1984, re SALP/ CAT Audit Results.

37.

All personal files, momoranda, and notes of J.

Milhoan, J. Gilray, G. Na I n t a, M. Haughey, and M.

Jones that relate to the meeting bor.we'n the 9RC and NMPC held on or about January 30, 1984 concernirtg the SALc/ CAT audit results.

38.

CAT Inspection Bepor 50-410/83-18 dated January 31, 1984, concerning inspection cor. ducted at NMP-2 between Novembe_

7, 1983 and December 9, 1983.

39.

All pe rsonaj files, menoranda, and notes of A.B.

Beach, G.B. Georgir, M.A. Hansen, D

. Osborne H.W.

Phi ips,E. Y. p g' H.J.

Wong, J.M. Grant, R.M. Comptor, D.C.

Ford, W.

Marin,

MLrindale}4.A. Pimental7and R.P. Heishmann shat relate to CAT 4'

Inspection 50-410/83-18.

40.

Enforcement Action Letter EA 83-137, aated March 20, 1984, re CAT Inspection conducted in November und December 1983.

41. NRC Inspection 84-06, conducted'at NMP-2 between April 9, 1984 and May 11, 1984.

42.

All personal files, me,moranda, and notes of R.A.

Gramm, W.H.

Bateman, S.J. Collins, M.

Haughey, and J. Spraul that relate to NRC Inspection 34-06.

43. Meeting between the NRC and NMPC held on or about May 23, 1984.

44.

All personal files, memoranda, and notes of M.

Haughey, A.

Schwencer, N. Srinivasan, A.

Ungaro, J. Knigh;, and M.

P]egec that relate to the meeting between the NRC and NMPC held on or about May 23, 1984.

45.

Meeting between the NRC and NMPC heJd at Region I on or about January 11, 1984 concerning the 1983 SALP resalts.

46.

NRC Meeting at Rogion I held on or about Navember 15, 1984 relative to an NRC order dated March 20, 1984.

47.

All personal files, memoranda, and notes of A.B.

Beach, R.A. Gramm, R.H.

Harris, R.F.

Heishman, S.P. Hudson, R.W.

E-i ll N ew wax & Hot.Tr t No zit. P. C, -

Starostecki, T.R.

Hurley, S.D. Reynolds, H.B.

Kister, and S.J.

Collins that relate to the NRC meeting at Region I held on or about November 15, 1984 relative to an NRC Order dated March 20, i

1984.

48.

NRC Region I SALP review and evaluation dated March 28, 1985, covering the period October 1, 1983 through January 31, 1985.

49. All personal files, memoranda, and notes of S.J.

Collins, J.P.

Ourr, R.A. Gramm, J.

Linville, and A. Schvencer that relate to the NRC Region I SALP Peview and Evaluation summarized in a document dated March 28, 1983.

50.

Meeting held between the NRC and NMPC on or about April 25, 1985 at Region I to discuss the April 17, 1985 SALP

.ropor t.

51.

-All personal files, memoranda, and notes of T.

Murley, R.W.

Starostocki, S. Collins, J.

Linville, R. Gramm.,

J.

Durr, S.

Ebneter, and A. Schwencer that relate to the meeting hold between the NRC and NMPC on or about April 25, 1985 to discuss the April 17, 1985 SALP Report.

52.

NRC Independent Measurements (NRC VAN) taken at-NMP-2 between December 9, 198 5 a nd De.c ombe r 20, 1985.

4 1

Nr.w m, o liou mor n. E c.

At1Athment_D The topics or ovents identiflod in Attachment A for which wo are seoiing to review rolovant documents fall generall within the following categorios (1) lotters and other corre y

~

spondenco; (2) mootings and mooting mlr.utos; (3) inspections and inspection reforts; and (4) other reports.

The following is a description of the types of documents we would like to review for each of thoso four categories.

1.

1,0119 r v.JJul_f11v r.IQ r.rRPPOndnicJt (a)

The final draft, including attachmonts, and all nonconforming copics.

(b)

All prior drafts.

(c)

All documents that relato or portain to the reason or roodons for writing the lettor.

(d)

All responso9-to the lotter.

(o)

All correspondenco, moinoranda, and other concun' cations betwoon any offico and divicion of tho NRC, including communica-

-tions to and=from Rogion I and the Resident Inspector at !!MP-2, relating or portaining to tho lettor.

s (f)

All intra-divisional and intra-offico correspondonce and monoranda concerning the lettor.

(g)

All personal notes, memoranda, filos, diary entries, or logs that relato or portain to the letter.

(h)

All documents relating to any mootings hold in responso to or in connection with the lottor.

2.

Mc(;110gE.JDdJR911ngJimilfa (a)

The final-draft, including attachments, and all nonconforming copics.

0 (b)

All prior drafts.

N (c)

All documents that relat, or pertain to the reason or reasons for holding tho :ncoting.

(d)

All agendas, flip charts, and handouto prepared in connection with the mooting.

(o)

All correspondenco, memoranda, and other communications bot.woen any offico and division of the NRC, including communica-N k

Newn A u & llou n wo r n, P. C.

2 tions to and from Rogion I and the Rosident Inspector at NMP-2, relating or portaining to tho mooting.

(f)

All intra-divisional and intra-offico correspondonco

'and memoranda concerning tho meeting.

(g)

All personal notes, memortada, filon, diary entries, or logs that relate or portain to the mcating.

3.

I nspMi.j ont_AndJn apst inn _ Ilepp.rla (a)

All documents that relato or pertain to the selection of the inspection team, including the soloction of any consultants or third parties to serve as team members.

(b)

All documents relating to the reason or reasons for conducting the inspection.

(c)

All documents cotting forth the goals and objectivos of the inspection.

(d)

All documents sotting forth the guidolines, rules, or procoJuros to be followed in the inspection.

(o)

All documents that portain or relate to the selection of function'I areas subject to evaluation and the actual measuromet sf offectivonoss in these areas.

(f)

A2. documents that relate or pertain to the criterion by which the overall conclusions or results of the inspection wera measured.

(g) 4; reports, ovaluations, or analysos prepared by any connultcnt or third party in connection with tho inspection.

(h)

All correspondence, memoranda, and other communications-

-botween-the officos'and divisions of the NRC, including communications to and from Region I and the Resident Inspector at NMP-2, relating or pertaining to the investigation.

(1)

All intra-divisional and intra-offico correspondence-and memoranda concerning the inspection.

(j)

All personal notos, memoranda, filos, diary entries, or logs that relato or portain to the investigation.

(k)

All-other documents prepared as tho result of or in connection with the inspection.

Ntwwe w a !!oi i r rmir n, it C.

3 i

l 4.

Other.lopm ia L

(a). All documents that relato or portain to the reason or reasons for preparing the report, (b)

The final draft, i ncluding attachmonts, and all i

nonconforming copies.

(c)

All prior draf ts.

(d)

All documents prepared as a result of or in responso to j

the report.

(a)

All minutes or notes f rom any mooting hold in connection with or in responso to the report.

(f)

All correspondence, memoranda, and other communications betwoon.the officos and divisions of the NRC, i ncluding l

communications to and. f rom Region I and the Resident Inspector at NMP-2, relating or portaining to the report.

(g). A11. Intra-divisional and intra-of fico correspondence and rnomoranda concerning the report.

(h)

All personal notes, memoranda, files, diary entries, or logs that relate or portain to the report.

i l

l l

l-L c. _,.. _,, - -,..

.-..c.,

_.__,,-y,....-,.--r_-,

,-v,,-

- 7

._-c,--

-