ML20069D891
| ML20069D891 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre  |
| Issue date: | 05/31/1994 |
| From: | Marsh W SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. |
| To: | NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM) |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9406060264 | |
| Download: ML20069D891 (16) | |
Text
.+
.j
.l
/
o Southem Califomia Edison Company P'l PAltKER S TREET INVINE. CALIFORN; A927183 May 31, 1994 m, _
. wAuf R C MARGH MAbeMsEft Ct* >HX;4.f AR M1004. A70HY AFP AIMG (714)464 440"5
'O. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attention: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C.
Subject:
Docket Nos. 50-361 and 50-362 Proposed Changes for SONGS Units 2 and 3 NPDES Permit Renewals San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Units 2 and 3 Pursuant to Appendix B of the Units 2 and 3 Technical Specifications, Section 3.2, Environmental Protection Plan, to Operating License Nos. NPF-10 and NPF-15 for San Onofre Units 2 and 3, respectively, enclosed is a copy of the proposed changes to the NPDES Permit Renewals for SONGS Units 2 and 3.
As required by the Technical Specifications, this application is being submitted to the NRC at the same time it is submitted to the permitting Agency.
If you require any additional information, please let me know.
Sincerely, b0 n
cc:
L. J. Callan, Regional Administrator, NRC Region IV K. E. Perkins, Jr., Director, Walnut Creek Field Office, NRC Region IV J. A. Sloan, NRC Senior Resident Inspector, San Onofre Units 2 & 3 H. B. Fields, NRC Project Manager, San Onofre Units 2 and 3 l
0;x q q
y I
]
9406060264 940531 PDR ADOCK 05000361 v
P PDR L
s J
,~,;":t, :?
,y 1
,: a.
Southem Califomia Edison Company
- 9. c. oOx.uo 2244 WALNUT CRO% E AVENUE AOSEMEAD, CAllPomNiA 91770 May 27,1994 Mr. Arthur L. Coe, Executive Officer Califomia Regional Water Quality Control Board, San Diego Region 9771 Clairemont Mesa Blvd., Suite B San Diego, CA 92124-1331
Dear Mr. Coe:
SUBJECT:
COMMENTS ON TENTATIVh. ORDER NOS. 94-49 AND 94-50 --
NPDES PERMIT RENEWALS FOR SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERA'ITNG STATION (SONGS) UNITS 2 AND 3 We have reviewed the subject tentative draf permits and propose numerous changes which are t
attached. We notice the Unit 3 permit contains many changes over the previous per. nit, but these changes are not reflected in the Unit 2 permit, which should be nearly identical. We presume this is because the deadline to issue drafts for public comment arrived before your staff could complete their editing. Accordingly, many of our comments are minor editorial corrections aimed at consistency between the two permits and many of our comments can be applied to both of the permits. If a cormnent on the Unit 3 permit also applies to Unit 2, we provided a notation in parentheses. Text to be added is shown in italics and text to be deleted is shown in strikethrough.
We look forward to an opponunity to discuss these comments with your staff prior to the June 9 Board meeting. Please call me at (818) 302-2149 if you have any questions.
Sincerely, j
O.
DAVID W. KAY, D. Env.
Sr. Environmental Specialist i
1 Enclosure j
cc: Ms. Debra Denton, U.S. EPA Region IX L__
__________uuma_ m cm_____a m m_m_ - u _______ h
td:
R.V.D. Reid (w/o att.)
H. W. Newton (w/c att.)
E. M. Goldin (w/o att.)
N. J. Mascolo M. J. Johnson R. S. Grove K. T. Herbinson K. C. Yhip M. Goeders m
MM
1 sot;T11ERN CALIFORNIA EDISON COMPANY COMAf
'S ON TENTATIVE ORDER NOS. 94-49 AND 94 50 NPDES PERMIT RENEWALS FOR SAN ONOFRE NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION (SONGS) UNITS 2 AND 3 May 27,1994 ORDER NO. 94 50, UNIT 3 1.
Finding No. 2, Page 1 The finding should read the same as in the Unit 2 draft permit.
2.
Finding No. 3, Page 1 The fmding should contain the same language as the last paragraph for Finding No. 3 of the Unit 2 draft permit.
3.
Finding No. 7, Page 2 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit)
In the first sentence, insert the word "a" between the words "contain" and " fish" In the second sentence, change the word " consist" to " consists" 4.
Finding No.11, Page 3 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit)
At the end of the first sentence, change the Order No. "76 26" to "72-26'.
5.
Finding Nos.11-14, Page 3 Delete the prefix "WQ" from the references to Order No. 73-5 throughout.
6.
Finding No.18A, Page 4 (comr ent also applies to Unit 2 permit)
In this finding, reference is made to a repon by SAIC under contract to EPA entitled " Review of Southern California Edison, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) 316(b) demonstration" We obtained a copy of this report from EPA and were surprised to find SAIC's disclosure that it relied heavily on infonnation from the Coastal Commission's Marine Review Committee (MRC) Final Report but completely excluded any review of the voluminous
]
information submitted by SCE challenging the MRC's findings. Also, SAIC notes that the report is a draft which was apparently never Snalized (copy of cover letter atached).
As you know, SCE provided the Regional Board with hundreds of pages of expert testimony which refuted many of the allegations made in the MRC report. Ultimately, the Regional Board agreed with SCE's arguments Accordingly, we feel that reference to the SAIC repon without the i
l 1
05/27 14:31 (TX/RX NO. 1442]
@ 004
above qualifications is a serious omission of facts. We propose that Finding 18 A. be rewritten as follows to address this deficiency:
The general intent inherent to Section 316(b) appears to be satisfied by operations at Units 2 and 3.
The available infor: nation indicates that the design, construction, location and operation of the intake reflects Best Available Technology (BAT).
Ih;c ww, -in format-ion-presented-in the---repc t " Rev-iew of-ht4x. n Calafcrnia Odir'n, Can-Gnofe-Nueleae-Generoti-ag GBat-len fFONGS) 3-16-fb) demenser,st-ion" i ndic: t.c:
that opcrations c i-CONC S-de-eeuse-edverse-- impae ts-to--or-ganisms--in not--enl y-t he-coo l-ing-wa te r--nys-t+m of th f cility but 100 vcrisua bi+4esica1 populat-ions-er-cemmunit-ies-in--t+.c vieini-ty of--the-int-akesd+cch a r g:
1 car.icn; for the-stetion
"'he s e of4eet-s include--mortali ty for
- fich, capccially egg cad
-lorvac,
t41s t-are----teken--into the station
-ci th thc cooling waeeer--and-ereoting-a-somet-iees-tur-bid-plume -the a f f c e t c the kelp, fish, and-invet cebretes-4n--th<.rsan-onof-re-kelp-bed, 7.
Finding No.18.ll(b), Page 4 (commen also applies to Unit 2 permit)
Change the last sentence to read as follows-SCE shall meet the Coastal permit mitigation requirements as prosantly constitutad or as amended later including li) installing, and maintaining, and evaluating behavioral barriers shall-cent-inue-the-eurrent tva-leat-ien-of the ef4eee of -.rcury ec.per-kights--ob-+he-E-ish-ovoluotion-leeat-ien in the
- FRS, (ii) restoring
- wetlands, and (iii) eenstruction constructing an artificial kelp reef.
8.
Finding No. 21, Page 5 In the first sentence, insert a comma (,) after the word " surfaces" 9.
Finding No. 22, Page 5 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit)
(a)
Item (b) should be changed fiom ' Component cooling water (24.5 MGD)"to " Saltwater cooling system (49 MGD)".
(b)
Item (g)(5) should read " Full flow condensate polishing demineralizer".
(c)
Delete the second sentence of the last paragraph which refers to the " flush hydrotest" system.
2 05/27 14:31 (TX/R1 NO. 1442]
@ 005
r 10.
Finding No. 24, Page 6 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit)
Change the paragraph to read as follows; The component cooling water system (CCWS) is a closed loop system designed to remove heat from various reactor auxiliary systems.
This system provides a
radioactivity monitored intermediate barrier between the reactor auxiliary systems and the salt water cooling system.
The salt water cooling system (SWCS) functions to remove heat from the
- CCWS, via a
single-pass exchanger.
An average flow rate of 244 49 MGD is discharged from the SNCS to Outfall 003 [002 in Unit 2 permit].
As shown in Attachment B,
the CCWS, the system is withdrawn and returned (recirculated) to the condenser cooling water stream.
11.
Vinding No. 29, Page 7 (comment also applies to (hilt 2 permit)
Delete the fmding entirely. The flush and hydrotest waste strearn no longer exists.
12.
Finding No. 31, Page 8 (comment also applis s to Unit 2 permit)
(a)
Change the nrst sentence to read as follows:
The calent radwaste system MRG+ provides radiological waste management.
(b)
Change the last sentence to read as follows:
The maximum radiological wastewater discharge flow to Outfall 003 is Ortu 0. 2 MGD.
13.
Finding No. 36, Page 8 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit, Page 9)
(a)
Change the fourth sentence to read as follows:
This system provides a radioactivity-monitored intermediate barrier between the closed loop CCWS and the SWCS, which removes heat frcm the CCWS, via a single-pass heat exchanger.
('o)
Add the following sentence to the end of the paragraph:
During pariodo of dischargo structure maintenance and amargencies, the SWCS may discharge through Outfall 005, the Across-tho-Doach dischargo point.
3 05/27 14:31 (TX/RX No. 14471 Q)006
14.
Finding Ha. 37, Page 8 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit)
Change the word " grab" to "24 hour2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> composite" 15.
Finding No. 38, Pages 9-10 (Duplicate the tablefor Unit 2 permit)
(a) Label the table with the headings, ' Parameter", Afonitored Use" and ' Monitored Concentration. rng/l".
(b) Change the monitored use of Boric acid as follows; used in the peimary reactor coolant
- systems, pPrior to discharge the borated water is treated to meet radiological and-pH limits; Steam generator Corrosion Control.
(c)
Insen <0.1 as the monitored concentration of Ethylene glycol polymers.
(d) Add EDTA, a byproduct of mixed waste processing. at a concentiation of <0.1 mg/l (e) For the monitored use of hforpholine, delete the word " products" follows.
(f)
For the monitored use and concentration of Phosphates, the word " steam" is misspelled.
(g) Change the monitored use of Potassiuin molybdate as follows follows:
water treatment for high-voltoge heat, ventilation, air conditioning system (g) For the monitored use of Sodium hydroxide. the word "regenerants" is misspelled.
16.
Finding No. 50.A.. Page 13 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit)
A balanced finding on the turbidity issue requires inclusion of SCE's position as well as that of the MRC. Change the paragraph in both perrnits to read as follows:
The Ocean Plan staten that
" natural light shall not be significantly reduced at any point outside the initial dilution zone as the result of the discharge of waste".
The Marine Review Committee (MRC, 1989a) estimated that the average level of natural light at the bottom at stations downcoast from SONGS during a downcoast current was lowered by 6-16% relative to the level that would occur in the absence of SONGS du ri-rvr---c-<lowneocret-eu rten t.
The results of the MRC study suggest that turbidity levels are increased by discharges from SONGS.
SCE challenged the NRC assertions in j
lta 1989 Annual Receiving Water Honitoring Report (SCE, 1990),
contending that the measured di((erences in turbidity were n:>t 4
05/27 14:31 (TX/RX No. 1442]
@ 007
significant and were duo only to a redistribution of naturally occuring turbid water.
17.
Finding No. 50.B, Page 13 (comment also apphes to Umt.? permit)
Change the fmding to read as follows, for clarification:
Because of some remaining uncertainty as to the relative contribution of turbidity from operation of the SONGS onco through cooling systems intake ctructurec.
SCE shall perform j
a 1-year study to evaluate the impact of in-plant waste, i
streams on the relative contribution of turbidity in the discharge.
The study will consist of daily sampling from the station in-plant intake and discharge streetwee conduits and analysis of these samples for turbidity. The resulting data will be evaluated and submitted in a special report to the Executive Officer.
Upon completion of this one-year study period, monitoring in the cooling wa t.c r intake and combined discharge will revert to monthly sampling.
18.
Finding No. 58, Page 14 This fmding repeats Finding No 52 and should be deleted and replaced with the language of Finding No 66.
19.
Finding No. 59, Page 15 (comment aho apphes to Unit 2 permit)
Add the following item (j):
(k)
The results of SCE's annual receiving water monitoring studies.
20.
Prohibition A.8., Page 16 Insert the word /brornination" after the word " chlorination" in the last sentence.
21.
Discharge Specification B.I., Page 16-18 (a)
On Page 16 change the ftrst sentence to read as follows-l The corrbined discharge, dischorgc-with outf all 003, from SONGS Unit 3.....
l (b)
On Page 18, the table for acute and chronic toxicity limits should reference Endnote No.
13.
)
i 5
l 05/27 14:31 QTX/RX NO. 1442D.
@ 008
. - ~.
l 22.
Discharge Specification B.7., Page 19 In the first sentence, the word " treatment" is missing the letter "t" 13.
Discharge Specification B.12, Page 20 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit, B.13, Page 21)
The word " polish" should be changed to " polishing" 24.
Discharge Specification B.16., Page 22 j
The entire table should be deleted and replaced with that of Discharge Specification B.8, Page 22 of the Unit 2 draft permit.
25.
Discharge Specification B (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit)
A new specification B.17 should be added to address the discharge for the Unit I and Mesa wastewater treatrnent plant efIluents Currently, the Unit 1 permit includes limits on Oil & -
Grease, Suspended Solids, Settleable Solids, Turbidity, pH and acute toxicity. Acute toxicity should be excluded since it is addressed elsewhere in the the new permit.
26.
Heat Treatment Discharge Specification C.3, Page 23 In the third sentence, the degrees syrnhol (*) is illegible.
27.
Receiving Water Limitation D.1.(c)(2), Page 25 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit)
Change the sentence to read as follows:
The discharge shall not cause esthetically undesireable discoloration of the ocean surface as a result of wastes added by the station.
28.
Receiving Water Limitation D.2., Page 27 Delete the radioactivity limits after the end of the table. They are addressed in D.l.(f).
29.
Provision E.S(c), Page 28 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit, E4(c)), Page 30)
Delete this provision. SCE has withdrawn its 301(g) variance request.
30.
Provision E.17.(s), Psge 33 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit, B.16.(a). Page 35)
In the last sentence, the word " careless" is missing a letter "e" 6
05/27 14:31 (TX/RX NO. 14421
@ 009
s 31.
Provision E.18., Page 34 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit. E.17., Page 36)
Change the paragraph to read as follows:
In accordance with Section 316 (b) of the Clean Water Act (33 U.S.C.
1251 et seq.) the location, design, construction, and capacity of SONGS Unit F2-3 cooling water intake structure che.11 r ; f ice.
reflects the best technology available for minimizing adverse environmental impact.
The discharger shall comply with any standards and guidelines which rnay be established by EPA pursuant to Section 316(b) of the Clean Water Act.
The discharger shall conduct such studies activities as described in Finding e2-18.B to demonstrate compliance with Section 316 (b) of the Clean Water Act.
32.
Reporting Requirement F.1.(f), Page 34 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit, Page 37)
Change the sentence to read as follows:
Any planned physical alterations or additions to the permitted facility which result in a material change of the character, amount or location of tha vasto discharge.
33.
Reporting Requirement F.4.(e), Page 36 (comment also apphes to Unit 2 permit. Page 38)
Delete this requirement. The Regional Board staff has traditionally not required that SCE report within 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> minor exceedances of effluent limitations-Such exceedances are routinely reported in the monthly monitoring report along with an explanation of the cause of the exceedance and measures undenaken to prevent a recurrence. These instances are covered by Monitoring Provision A 13 in the Monitoring and Reporting Program.
34 Reporting Requirement F.5.(a)(1) and (2), Page 36 The unit abbreviation for micrograms per liter is pg/l, not mg/l.
35.
Endnote 12, Page 42 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit, Page 45) l Change the endnote to read as follows-The monthly median in this casa refore to a calendar month, oxcept in cases where a TUc of greater than 10.0 19 observed during a given month.
In that case, the monthly median refers to a running month, or 30-day moving average.
7 1
05/27 14:31
[TX/RI No. 14421
@ 010
s 36.
Endnote 13.b., Page 43 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit, Page 45)
The last sentence should read as follows:
The chronic toxicit.y objective is expressed as 10.0 1 TUc based on a monthly median.
31.
Endnotc 17, Page 43 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit, Page 46)
Change the sentence to read as follows:
A "significant difference" is defined a a biological or physical impact causing dogradation and a
statistically significant difference in the means of two distributions of sampling results at the 95 percent confidence level.
MONITORING AND REPORTING PROGRASI NO. 94-50. UNIT 3 1.
Monitoring Provision A.3., Page 1 (comment also applie.s to Unit 2 permit)
This provision is obsolete and should be deleted entirely. In response to your letter dated October 2,1990 (attached) SCE conducted a thorough evaluation of flow rneasurement devices and I
methods at SONGS Units 1, 2 and 3 and provided a report to you on January 8,1991 (also attached).
We presume this report addressed to your satisfaction the accuracy of flow measurement techniques at SONGS.
This provision therefore no longer serves any useful l
purpose.
2.
Monitoring Provision A.4., Page 2 (comment also applies to Unit 1 permit)
In the first sentence, add a letter 't" to the end of the word ' State" and change the word l
" Protected" to " Protection" 3.
Monitoring Provision A.6., Pnge 2 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit)
Monitoring results are also reported to EPA on preprinted DMR forms.
4.
Monitoring Provisian A.8., Page 3 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit) l In the last sentence, change the second and third uses of the word "of' to "or".
j 5.
Monitoring Provision A.12., Page 3 (comment also applies to Unit 1 permit)
Delete this provision. It is a duplicate of Provision A.25 on Page 7.
2 8
05/27 14:31 iTI/RX.NO.
1442)
@ 011
6.
Monitoring Provision A.13., Page 3 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit)
The two references to "F.6" should be changed to "F.4" 7.
Monitoring Provision A.14., Page 3 The reference to "F.15" should be changed to "F.10" 8.
Monitoring Provision A.17(b), Page 4 (comment also apphes to Umt 2 permit)
Change the word " difference" to " differences" 9.
Monitoring Provision A.18., Page 5 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit)
Insen the unit " mph"' after the value "16,000" 10.
Monitoring Provision A.20., Page 5 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit)
In the second sentence, change the term '24-hour composite"to 'trab" This is consistent with chronic toxicity sampling and with the requirements on other dischargers.
11.
Monitoring Provision A.21., Page 6 (comment also apphes to Unit 2 permit)
Change the last sentence as fellows:
The chronic toxicity limitation is:
1) a monthly median expressed as 20. 0 4-Tuc cr....
12.
Monitoring Provision C. - Cooling Water intake Monitoring, Page 8 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit)
Change the footnote to read as follows.
Turbidity may be measured more frequently during the first ear, based on th<.mtecte#f-the-study--<k.oisc ac dic= :cd in rinding &hB 50.B of the Order.
After the first year, turbidity shall be measured monthly.
13.
Monitoring Provision D. - Combined Discharge Mor.itoring, Page 9 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit)
(a)
In the table, change the fTequency of the Turbidity entry from Daily to Monthly for consistency with the associated footnote.
(b)
Change the first footnote to read as follows:
9 05/27 14:31 iTX/RX NO. 1442]
@012
Turbidity may be measured more frequently during the first year, based on bhe--cutcem cf the ctudf-desQn-as-dieeussed-4n finding G1-4 50.B of the Order.
After the first year, turbidity shall be measured monthly.
In the second footnote, the word " reduction" is misspelled.
14.
Monitoring Provision E. - In-Plant Waste Streams Monitoring, Page 10 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit)
(a)
Delete the first four parameters from the table (Flow, TSS, Oil & Grease, and pH). These parameters are analyzed monthly in each individual low volume waste stream under Monitoring Provision F, Low Volume Wastes Monitoring (Pagel3).
Therefore, their inclusion in the table under Provision E is duplicative.
(b) The sample type for all remaining constituents in this table should be a flow-weighted composite, not a grab sample. This is the requirement under the current permit and will allow for adequate rnonitoring of the wastes through a single analysis, rather than ten individual analyses.
15.
Monitoring Provision F. - Low Volume Wastes Monitoring, Page 13 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit)
Add pIl to this table of analytical pararneters.
16.
Monitoring Provision G. - Fish 11andling System Monitoring, Page 13 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit) l Change the term" fish handling systems" to " Fish Return System" 17.
Monitoring Provision 11.1., Receiving Water Monitoring, Fish Populations, Page 13 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permat)
Change the term "thermographs" to " temperature recording devices"
)
l 18.
Monitoring Provision H.3., Receiving Water Monitoring, Fish Populations, Page 14 l
(comment also applies to Unit 2 permit)
The word " quarterly" is misspelled 19.
Table 1, Page 17 (comment also applies to Umt 2 permit)
Include Kelp Density ant 'elp Monitonng in this summary table.
10 05/27 14:31 (TX/RX No. 1442]
@ 013
l 20.
Endnote No.1, Page 18 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit)
Change the paragraph to read as follows:
Samples shall be collected and analyzed for total residual chlorine / bromine ond-4eee-eva4-1-able-chlor 4ne at times when the concentration of total residual chlorine /bromina and--f-r+e cvcilchic chlorine in the combined discharge is the greatest.
The times of uninterrupted chlorine / bromine discharges on the days the samples are collected and the t.mes at which the samples are collected shall be reported.
References to free available chlorine need to be deleted since it is not possible to analyze for free available chlorine in seawater.
21.
Endnote No. 8, Page 19 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit)
The chronic toxicity limitation is:
1) a monthly median expressed as 2 0. 0 4 Tuc or....
22.
Endnote No.10, Page 19 (comment also applies to Unit 2 permit)
(a)
Delete entry No. 2 for flush hydrotest and storage tank draindown.
(b)
Entry No. 6 should read " full flow condensate polishing demineralizer".
ORDER NO. 94-49. UNIT 2 1.
Finding No.1. Page 1 Delete the reference to San Diego Gas and Electric Company and replace it with (hereinafter discharger).
2.
Finding No. 3, Page 1 At the end of the third sentence, delete the words,"and cooling for cenain maintenance" 3.
Finding No. 22, Page 5 (a)
Item (a)(1), the " flush hydrotest" system, should be replac ed with "thennophilic digester".
11 05/27.t4:31
[TX/RX'NO.' 1442]
@ 014
(b)
In the last paragraph, the fifth sentence should read as follows:
Domestic sewage generated at SONGS and the Mesa facility is treated at an activated sludge oewage treatment plant at SONGS Unit 1 or the Mesa plant prior to discharge thru Outfall 001, 002, or 003.
(c)
In the last paragraph, delete the last sentence that referes to a separate NPDES permit for outfall 004.
4.
Finding 23, Page 6 Insert the words "or bromine" after t'.c word " chlorine r
5.
Finding No. 36, Page 9 This fmding should read the same as : hat in the Unit 3 permit, including the changes noted above.
6.
Finding No. 38, Pages 9-10 The table should exactly duplicate that m the Unit 3 permit including the changes noted above.
7.
Finding No. 65, Page 16 Delete this fmding entirely. It is not applicable to the Unit 2 permit.
8.
Prohibition A.8., Page 16 The paragraph should read as follows for consistency mth the Unit 3 Permit:
Total residual chlorine / bromine may not be discharged from any single generating unit for more t.han two hours per day unless the Discharger demonstrates to the permitting authority that discharge for more than two hours is required for macroinvertebrate control.
Simultaneous multi-unit chlorination /bromination is parmitted.
9.
Discharge Specification B.2., Page 19 The first sentence should read the same as the Unit 3 permit:
As a result of wastos addad by the station the SONGS Unic 3 discharge to the Pacific Ocean shall be essentially free of:
10.
Discharge Specification B.7., Page 20 Replace the existing language with that from B.7 of the Unit 3 permit, Page 19.
12 AMUUlAOU UtKdMutBLJ1MU f% @
fl.
Discharge Specification B.8., Page 22 This specification should be renumbered as 17 i
L2.
Discharge Specification D 10, Page 20 This and all following specifications need to be renumbered.
13.
Heat Treatment Discharge Specification C, Page 24 Iri the first sentence, change the section reference from B.9 to B.7 14 Heat Treatment Discharge Specification C.4, Page 24 Delete this specification. It applied to plant startup and is obsolete 15.
Receiving Water Limitation D.2., Page 29 Replace the table with that from the Unit 3 pernut, Receiving Water Limitation D.2., Page 26-27, 16.
Reporting Requirement F.6.
There is no F.6. The requirementsjump from F.5. to F.7.
MONITORING _AND REPORTING PROGRAM NO. 94-49, UNIT 2 1.
Title Page On the title, change the EPA 1.D. No. to CA0108073 and change from " Unit 3" to " Unit 2" 2.
Monitoring Provision A.14., Page 3 The reference to "F.15" should be changed to "F.11"
-l 13 ELfASL 1/LLilf fl5tRd6LA6L AAAfd M
-