ML20067B172
| ML20067B172 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Sequoyah |
| Issue date: | 11/30/1982 |
| From: | Mills L TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY |
| To: | Adensam E Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| References | |
| GL-82-22, NUDOCS 8212060076 | |
| Download: ML20067B172 (2) | |
Text
__
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY CH AYTANOOGA, TENNESSEE 37401 400 Chestnut Street 'Ibwer II November 30, 1982 Director of Nuclear N actor Regulation Attention: Ms. E. Mensam, Chief Licensing Branch No. 4 Division of Licensing U.S. Nuclear kgulatory Consission Washington, D.C.
20555
Dear Ms. Adensam:
In the Matter of
)
Docket Nos. 50-327 Tennessee Valley Authority
)
50-328 Enclosed is our response to D. G. Eisenhut's October 26, 1982 letter to all pressurized power reactor licensees regarding the congressional request for Information concerning steam generator tube integrity. 'Ihis information was verbally provided to Carl Stahle of your staff in a telephone conversation on November 30, 1982.
If you have any questions concerning this matter, please get in touch with J. E. Wills at ETS 858-2683.
Very truly yours, TENNESSEE VALLEY AITIHORITY L. M. Mills, Manager Nuclear Licensing Sworn to s
before me this J y of
, 1982 (4,E ha w&i41. -
My i
Expires 8
[
/
Enclosure cc:
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Cannission Region II Attn: Mr. James P. O'Reilly, Regional Administrator 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlanta, Georgia 30303 0(
(0 8212060076 821130 PDR ADOCK 05000327 P
PDR An Equal opportunity Employer
ENCLCSURE
.f U. S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Approved by OMB
'd 3150 0092 STEAM GENERATOR-RELATED - QUESTIONNAIRE RESPONSE BY YEAR 1979 1980 1981 1982 HOW MANY DAYS OF UNSCHEDULES OUTAGES CAN BE ATTRIBUTED TO 10.6 None
?
STEAM GENERATOR-RELATED DIFFICULTIES PER YEAR AT YOUR SITE?
DURING EACH OF THE YEARS IN QUESTION, HOW MANY STEAM GENERATOR TUBES HAVE BEEN None None PLUGGED IN EACH STEAM GENERATORt None None SLEEVED IN EACH STEAM GENERATOR?
WHAT HAVE BEEN THE TOTAL COSTS AND SPECIFICALLY REPLACEMENT 5.86 POWER COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH STEAM GENERATOR MAINTENANCE,
, Milli n None REPAIR AND REPLACEMENT AT YOUR PLANT?
WHAT HAS BEEN THE TOTAL OCCUPATIONAL RADIATION EXPOSURE (IN PERSON-REMS) CAUSED BY STEAM GENERATOR 14.3 71.93 MAINTENANCE?
None Non'e REPAIR / REPLACEMENT?
WHAT PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL ANNUAL EMPLOYEE DOSE HAS BEEN 14.9%
23.9%
ATTRIBUTABLE TO STEAM GENERATOR RELATED WORK AT YOUR SITE (S)?
DURING THE YEARS IN QUESTION HOW MANY WORKERS HAVE RECEIVED MEASUREABLE RADIATION DOSE 5 134 200 FOR STEAM GENERATOR RELATED WORK?
WHAT PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL WORKFORCE.. DO THESE WORKERS 8.9%
7.6%
REPRESENT?
HOW MANY TEMPORARY WORKERS (defined by the NRC as all workers other than those hired directly by nuclear power plants on a conventional, long-term basis) RECEIVED DOSES FROM STEAM 32 38 GENERATOR-RELATED WORK AT YOUR FACILITY EACH YEAR?
WHAT PERCENTAGE OF TOTAL WORKERS INVOLVED WITH STEAM GENERATOR-RELATED WORK 23.8%
19%
00 TEMPORARY WORKERS REPRESENT?
1%
.6%
i THE TOTAL WORKFORCE DO TEMPORARY WORKERS REPRESENT?
HAS YOUR COMPANY USED INDEPENDENT FIRMS TO FIND TEMPORARY EMPLOYEES WHO HAVE RECEIVED AN OCCUPATIONAL DOSE FROM STEAM No No GENERATOR-RELATED WORK?
1 DO YOU ANTICIPATE MAJOR STEAM GENERATOR REPAIRS IN ANY OF YOUR UNITS IN THE NEXT FIVE YEARS, AND IF SO HOW MUCH WOULD THESE REPAIRS COST, PLEASE SPECIFY.
No major steam generator repairs are planned and/or anticipated in the next five years.
l
+
+
e
_ _,