ML20066G614
| ML20066G614 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Fort Calhoun  |
| Issue date: | 12/31/1990 |
| From: | OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20066G612 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 9101280132 | |
| Download: ML20066G614 (193) | |
Text
--
FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS t
DECEMBER 1990
.+ % ~ . ,
7"9%hj[
~ ' '
namma L
!f!!Imunl [lgjglgsfinns
~===~gygc::spnge ~, + , /-
Prepared by:
Production Engineering Division System Engineering Test and Performance Group w nas unnes R
PDR l
i
.e OMAHA PUBLIC POWER DISTRICT FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS d
y PREPARED BY:
PRODUCTION ENGINEERING DIVISION SYSTEM ENGINEERING L
i i
DECEMBER 1990 l
l l
l l
I
[
.D i_ 4 ---. u - -
A r- - - ,.-
9
)- .,
)
i 1
I
& O # W OJ e e e it inwstver a>iedsm aszd sswndjudgmentl
- -# 4 0 .
a ts . , sj e p ...a c, % & j a qu spi w, , w. si cr a '
inuna a%eled, not u muR sj uxlennwl man, a c~ ~ s - 4 a - a a ~
%d esmer jwnv f>einzp & 9 zl f funzd sj p _ , rza s us a % w q i azi,z7 .
9 - 9. o'c _
1 4
- - . - .a . . , - , ~ ,-
TABLE OF CONTENTS PM Distribution. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . iv Prefcce . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1 Purpose . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2 Scope . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3 1990 Performance Summary. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4 Adverse Trend Report. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8 Indicators Needing Increased Management . . . . . . 9 Attention Index to Safety Enhancement Program (SEP)
Indicators . . .....,........... 13 Index to Performance Indicator Graphs . . . . . . . 17 Performance Indicator Graphs. . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Significant items of Interest . . . . . . . . . . 159 Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 150 Basis for Establishing 1990 Performance Indicator Goal s . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . 179 Operating Cycles and Refueling Outage Dates . . . 181 Production and Operation Records. . . . . . . . . . 183 Data Source . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 184 References. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 188
@IE: THE FORT CALHOUN STATION PERFORMANCE INDICATORS REPORT PROGRAM IS TAILORED TO ADDRESS THE AREAS WHICH ARE MOST MEANINGFUL TO THE PEOPLE USING THE REPORT. COMMENTS AND INPUT ARE ENC 0URAGED, PLEASE REFER COMMENTS TO THE TEST AND PERFORMANCE GROUP. TO INCREASE PERSONNEL AWARENESS OF FORT CALHOUN STATION'S PERFORMANCE, IT IS SUGGESTED THAT YOU DISTRIBUTE THIS REPORT THROUGHOUT YOUR DEPARTMENT. -
e -
DISTRIBUTION l
'd, C.: Adams- .D. C. Gorence- R. J. Mueller R. L. Andrews- R. E. Gray- W. L.: Neal G. L. Anglehart M. J. Guinn J . B. Newhouse W. R. Bateman E. R. Gundal M. W. Nichols K. L. Belek A. L. Gurtis C. W.- Norris
-A.,D. Bilau R. H.- Guy J. T. O'Connor B.-H. Blome' R. M. Hawkins W. W. Orr
- C. N. Bloyd .M. C. Hendrickson- L. L. Parent
=J. P.LBobba~ R. R. Henning T. L. Patterson C. E. Boughter K. R. Henry R. L. Phelps M.: A. Breuer J. B. Herman T. M. Reisdorff i
-C. J. Brunnert G. J. Hill A. W. Richard M. W.1 Butt K. C. Holthaus D. G. Ried C. A. Carlson L. G. Huliska G. K..Samide-J. W. Chase -. C..J. Husk T. J. Sandene G. R. Chatfield R. L. Jaworski B. A. Schmidt A. G. Christensen R. A. Johansen S. T. Schmitz A. J. Clark J. W. Jchnson F. C. Scofield O. J.-Clayton -W. C. Jones L. G. Sealock
'R.-P.-Clemens J. D. Kecy H. J. Sefick '
-J._ L. Connolley J. D. Keppler D. K. Sentel G. M. Cook D. D. Kloock P. Sepcenko >
lM.sR.-Core J. C. Knight J. W. Shannon S. R. Crites D. M. Kobunski R. W. Short !
D. W. Dale .
G. J. Krause J. R. Shuck-R. C. DeMeulmeestar L. J. Kripal C. F. Simmons R. D.~DeYoung J. B.-Kuhr E. L. Skaggs D. C. Dietz L. T. Kusek J. L. Skiles 1 D. E.-Dirrim L. E. Labs F. K. Smith e
K. Sl.. Dowdy M. P. Lazar R. L. Sorenson
.J. A.;Drahota' R. C. Learch K. E. Steele T. R. Dukarski S. E. Lee W. Steele R.-G. Eurich R. E. Lewis H. F. Sterba H.-J. Faulhaber R. C. 'Liebentritt R. K. Stultz 1 M. A.- Ferdig- C. J. Linden- G. A.-Teeple 1i
- V. H. Frahm- B. R. Livingston -M.-A. Tesar- !
J. M. Lofshult n F. F.. Franco- T. G. Therkildsen
..M. T. Frans J. H. MacKinnon P.-L. Thompson'
'H X. Fraser . G. D.-Mamoran J. W. Tills L .J. F. W. Friedrichsen J..W. Marcil D. R. Trausch r ~S...K. Gambhir N. L. Marfice P. R. Turner ,
L .J .K. Gasper' D. J.-Matthews J.' M. Uhland W.:G. Gates J. M. Mattice- C. F. Vanecek l<
4 M. O. Gautier T. J, M::Ivor G. L. Van-Osdel
-J. M. Waszak S.LW. Gebers R. F. Mehaffey :
it J. M. Glantz R. A. Miser W. 0, Weber L J. T. Gleason K. J. Morris G. R. Williams .
m L. V. Goldberg D. C. -Mueller S. J. Willrett f D. J. Golden W. C. Woerner l
iv
?
l L
i PREFACE PERFORMANCE INDICATORS REPORT IMPROVEMENTS Four indicators have been changed. One indicator is in the Maintenance Section, two of these indicators are in the Refueling Outage Section, and one of these indicators is in the Quality Assurance Section.
The Number of Out-of-Service Control Room Instruments Indicator found on page 65 has been changed. This indicator previously snowed a Fort Calhoun goal of less than 7 out-of-service control room instruments.
This indicator now shows a Fort Calhoun goal of less than 30 out-of-service control room instruments.
The MWO Overall Status (1991 Refuelina Outaael Indicator found on page 146 has been changed. The outage MWR backlog has been added to this indicator. The MWR backlog 1s the number of MWR's which have been identified for the 1991 Refueling Outage, but have not yet been converted to MW0's.
The Overall Pro.iect Status (1991 Refuelina Outaae) Indicator found on page 148 has been changed. The number of projects for which detailed schedules have been submitted has been added to this indicator.
The Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours Indicator found on page 151 has been changed. A new data source has been accepted for this indicator.
This new data source will supply data which can be more easily compared to the rest of the nuclear industry. The graph for this indicator has also been changed to reflect the new data.
I 1
- 1 4
4 -
3
- )
"PURPOSEL j
. Ji
~
k
- Thic prog' ram titled " Performance: Indicators" is intended to provide ~ -
selected Fort Calhoun planti performance- aformation to OPPD's' s la
- q
,. . personnel responsible for- optimizing unit- performance. The- 1 i
~ information is presented in a. way 'that 'provides readyr i
identification - of tre'nds and a t means to track: progress; towardt Lj q
reachingccorporate goals. The information can be used for assessing- El and monitor.ing Fort Calhoun's plant ' performance, with emphasis on l safety and - reliability. .! Some performance indicators show company .
] !
goals. or1 industry information. This information _ -can ' be . used .for 1
+ ,
comparison or as;a means of' promoting pride-and motivation, d 4 (
1 i
~
1 1- i. . )
i
-a
- {
a 4 1
1 s
N
. _ . . , ,- . , . - _ . . , , . _ . . _ . . _ , . . _ -. . - , . . . .-, .. . . _ . ~ . - - - , - . .
1 SCOPE in order for the Performance Indicator Program to be effective, the following guidelines were followed while implementing this program:
Select the data which most effectively monitors Fort Calhoun's performance in key areas.
Present the data in a straight forward graphical format using averaging and smoothing techniques.
. Include established corporate goal s and industry information for comparison.
Develop formal definitions for each performance parameter.
This will ensure cor,sistency in future reports and allow comparison with industry averages where appropriate.
Comments and . input are encouraged to ensure that this program is tailored to address the areas which are most meaningful to the people using the report.
l- _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ .
-1990 PERFORMANCE
SUMMARY
7
. ~ GOALS: MET: l i
> ,Page: -1990- - 1990 Coal Performance j
' Indicator' Number 1 Scram 0 Scrams Unplanned Automatic' L29 :
4 Reactor Scrams '
'While; Critical j Personnel Radiation 1 41 287 man-rem 275.9 man-rem ;
. Exposure 1 (Cumul ative) ' '*
.i
,5000 cubic ~ feet - 4310.1 cubic. feet- 1
- - Volume of Low-level-43 l
Solid Radioactive Waste * -
60%. - 63.2% y
. Ratio of. Preventive- 6tl
- l s to Total Maintenance: ~
-3 1.0%x A P'reventive Maintenance .63 l'. i%
-Items Overdue' *
~
-Number:of Out-of-Service: 165- 30 instruments - 29 instruments' !
ControlLRoom Instruments ]
18.1% 32.l%
- Maintenance Overtime .67 ll 500 MW0's 329 MW0's1 Maintenance Work Order- ~69 4
Backlog ?(Corrective Non-Outage):
Decontaminated Auxiliary .97 85%- 85.9%
- j.
1 Building -
i c
i t
I o
U ;
1 i
- ' Indicators-that track performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP)' Items.
4--
My y * -(" ~ -e'* --4ep vr 4 y g-
- vp g- "--'ww- p--y, y-
L 1990 PERFORMANCE
SUMMARY
(CONTINUED)
G0ALS NOT MET:-
Page 1990 1990 indicator Number Goal Performance Forced Outage Rate 27 2.4% 9.7%
Unplanned Automatic 31 0 actuations 1 actuation
- Safety System Actuations
-Gross Heat Rate 35 10,200 BTV/KWH 10,304 BTU /KWH Equivalta. 37 65.4% 56.6.
Availability Factor Fuel Reliability 39 1 nanocuries/ gram 1.4 nanocuries/gra.?
-Indicator Disabling injury 45 0.31% 0.48%
. Frequency Rate
- In-Line Chemistry 88 6 instruments 7 instruments
. instruments Out-of-Service Total Skin and- 95 150 contaminations L37 contaminations Clothing Contaminations
- Temporary Modifications 127 15 temp. mods. 23 temp. mods.
(Excluding Scaffolding) *
- Indicators that track performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Items.
1990 PERFORMANCE
SUMMARY
(CONTINVED)
Page 1990 Industry Indicator Number Performance Performance Forced Outage 27 9.7% 0.25%
Rate **
Unplanned Automatic 29 0 Scrams 0 Scrams Reactor Scrams While Critical **
Unplanned Automatic 31 1 actuation 0 actuation Safety System ,
Actuations ** l Gross Heat 35 10,304 BTV/KWH 9,935 BTV/KWH Rate **~
Equivalent 37 56.6% 82.5%
Availability !
Factor **
Fuel Reliability 39 1.4 nanocuries/ gram 0.04 nanocuries/ gram Indicator ^*
Personnel Radiation 41 275.9 man-rem 166 man-rem
, Exposure (Cumulative)
Volume of Low-level 43 4,310.1 cubic feet 3,072 cubic feet Solid Radioactive Waste * **
Disabling Injury 45 0.48 0.0 Frequency
. Rate * **
Corrective Maintenance 59 52.6% 45.8%
Backlog Greater than 3 Months Old Preventive to Total 61 63.2% 57.7%
Maintenance Preventive Maintenance 63 1.0% 1.2%
Items Overdue
- Indicators that track performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Items.
- Industry upper ten percentile figures for industry performance are shown for
- these indicators. Industry upper quartile figures for industry performance are shown for the other indicators.
1990 PERFORMANCC
SUMMARY
(CONTINUED)
Page 1990 Industry Indicator Number Performance Performance Number of Out-of-Service 65 29 instruments 7 instruments Control Room Instruments Total Skin and 95 237 contaminations 129 contaminations Clothing Contaminations
- Indicators tha: track performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Items.
- Industry upper ten percentile figures for industry performance are shown for these indicator . Industry upper quartile figures for industry performance are shown for the other indicators.
i ADVERSE TREND REPORT 1he Adverse Trend Report explains the conditions under which certain indicators are showing adverse trends. An indiator that is defined 3' as AN ADVEREE TREND IS ONE IN WHICH THE _ DATA REPRESENTED FOR THREE
[QSSECUTIVE MONTHS IS SHOWING A DECLINE IN PERFORMANCE for that particular '.ndir$+or. Indicators which show an apparent three month decline, but ett agi considered an adverse trend, will display an explanation which defines the reason why an adverse trend does not exist.
f.gr_qtd Outaae Rate - Page 27 The forced outage rate for the Fort Calhoun Station has been increasing since July o r 1990. One forced outage occurred in the month of August 1990 and was due to seal problems encountered in reactor coolant pump RC 3A. Another forced outage occurred in September 1990 and continued into October 1990. This forced outage was due to design basis questions concerning containment cooling capabilities. A third forced outage occurred in the month of November 1990 and was due to an Instrument Air System line failure
-in the Turbine Building. A fourth forced outage occurred in the month of December and was due to a Control Element Drive Mechanism (CEDM) housing leak.
Recordable In.iury cases Freouency Rat _e - Page 133
- The recordable injury frequency rate has been increasing since September 1990. This increase in the frequency rate is due to 12 recordable injury cases which have occurred during 1990.
8-
INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTION This section lists the indicators which show inadequacies as compared to the OPPD goal and indicators which show inadequacies as compared to the industry upper quartile. The indicators will be compared to the industry upper quartile as relevant to that indicator.
- f. greed Outaae Rate - Page 27 The forced outage rate for year end 1990 was reported as being higher than the Fort Calhoun goal of 2.4%. The rise in the forced outage rate during the month of August was due to seal problems encountered in reactor coolant pump RC-3A. These problems resulted in 172.6 forced outage hours. During the month of September and October the plant was shutdown due to design basis questions concerning containment cooling capabilities. This forced outage resulted in 212.0 forced outage hours being reported. In November another forced outage occurred due to an Instrument Air System line failure in the Turbine Building. This forced outage resulted in 60.3 forced outage hours being reported. in December a forced outage occurred due to a CEDM housing leak. This forced outage resulted in 404.3 forced outage hours being reported. During 1990 a total of 849.2 forced outage hours have been reported. These reported hours result in a year end forced outage rate of 9.7%. The goal of 2.4%
was based on approximately 210 forced outage hours.
Vnolanned Safety System Actuations - (INPD Definit'on) - Pale 31 The Fort Calhoun Station has experienced an unplanned saftty system actuation during 1990. This unplanned actuation was a start and load of DG-2 due to an inadvertent trip of backup lockout relay 86/2BF5. The Fort Calhoun goal for unplanned safety system actuations during 1990 was set at zero actuations.
Gross Heat Rate - Page 35 The monthly gross heat rate for the months of August, September, October, November, and December were reported as being above the Furt Calhoun monthly goal. These high monthly gross heat rates were due to four forced shutdowns of the plant which occurred during August, September, November, and December.
The year to date gross heat rate was above the goal of 10,200 BTV/KWH.
The gross heat rate values for January and February were high due to the fact that the first stage of the high pressure turbine was removed during the months of January and February. During May startup from the 1990 Refueling Outage caused the gross heat rate to be high. During July, August, September, October, November, and December various derates, and four forced outages caused the gross heat rate values for these months to be higher than the Fort Calhoun goal.
9
INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTION (CONTINVED)
Eouivalent Availability Factor Page 37 The monthly EAF for December was below the goal of 93% due to the forced outage which occurred during December involving a Control Element Drive Mechanism (CEDM) housing leak. The year to date EAF was reported as below the year to date goal of 65.4% due to various power fluctuations which occurred during the month of June and due to forced outage hours which occurred during the months of August, September, October, November, and December.
Fuel Reliability indicator (FRI) - Page 39 The FRI has been above the fort Calhoun goal of 1.0 nanocuries/ gram. The FRI value for December using the actual plant letdown rate was reported as 2.39 nanocuries/ gram.
Disablino In.iury Freauency Rote (Lost Time Accident Rate) - Page 45 The year end disabling frequency rate was reported as being- above the Fort Calhoun goal of 0.31%. The year end rate increased during December due to 2 disabling injuries being reported during the month. During 1990 ,
a total of 3 disabling injuries were reported.
Daily Thermal Output Page 47 ,
The daily thermal output was reported below the Fort Calhoun goal of 1495 thermal megawatts from December 14, 1990, through December 31, 1990. The reason for this increase in the daily thermal output was due to a forced outage which occurred during December and was a result of a CEDM housing leak.
Corrective Maintenance Backloa Greater Than 3 Months Old (Non-Outaae) - Page 59 The percentage of open corrective non outage MW0's older than 3 months old is currently above the industry quartile value of 45.8% due to 173 open MWO's that are older than 3 months old.
Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance Page 61 The ratio of preventive to total maintenance was reported below the Fort Calhoun goal of 60% and below the industry upper quartile value of 57.7%
for the month of December 1990. The reason for this decrease- in the ratio of preventive to total maintenance was the increased attention put forth by Maintenance to complete the required corrective maintenance associated with the forced outage which occurred in December 1990.
10-
_ _ _ . _ _ __ _ _ _ _. . . . _ . _ . _ . _ . . - _ _ - _ . -. _ . . . _ _ . _ ._._m C
INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED
, MANAGEMENT ATTENTION (CONTINUED)
Number of Out of Service Control Room Instruments Page 65 The number of out-of service control room instruments has been above-the industry upper quartile value of 7 out of-service control room instruments since November of 1989.
Percent of Comoleted Scheduled Maintenance Activities - Page 70 (Electrical Maintenance)
The percent' of completed maintenance activities for Electrical Maintenance was.-reported below the Fort Calhoun goal of 80% for 3 of the-5 scheduled weeks which ended in December 1990.
Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities - Page 71 (Pressure Eauioment)
The percent of completed maintenance activities for Pressure Equipment was reported.below the Fort Calhoun goal of 80% for 1 of the 5 scheduled weeks which ended in December 1990. 7 Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities Page 72 i
-(General Maintenance) ,
The percent. of completed maintenance: activities for General Maintenance was reported below the -Fort Calhoun goal of 80% for 1 of the 5 scheduled weeks which ended in December 1990, t
Percent of-Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities - Page 73 (Mechanical Maintenance)
The percent of completed maintenance activities for Mechanical s Maintenance-was reported below the Fort Calhoun goal of 80% for 2 of the !
5 scheduled weeks which ended in' December 1990. j I Check Valve Failure Rate - Page 80 L The[ Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate as of the end of August was l
above the- industry check valve failure rate. The reason for the high check valve failure rate is that the plant is performing maintenance on:
check valves which have not been tested for failures before. The check
=
valve failure - rate is expected to decrease as the - check valves are
-maintained and monitored through the Check Valve Program, i i
j 11-a
, ,.n,- ....;,, a~n i~,- . - - - - - - ~~ , ~ . - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - -
INDICATORS NEEDING INCREASED MANAGEMENT ATTENTION (CONTINUED)
Secondary System Chemistry Performance indgx - Page 83 The CPI value for the Fort Calhoun Station has been above the industry upper quartile value of 0.24 since the first CPI value was taken after startup in May of 1990. Part of the reason for the high CPI values is the fact that the Fort Calhoun Station has been involved in various derates and forced outages since startup in May. Another reason for the high CPI values is the fact that the Fort Calhoun Station uses morpholine to control PH. The use of morpholine also raises the CPI values, in-Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service - Page 88 There were 7 out of-service chemistry instruments at the end of December. The fort Calhoun goal is to have less than 6 out-of-service chemistry instruments. Six (6) out-of-service chemistry instruments make up 10% of all the chemistry instruments counted for this indicator.
Total Skin and Clothino Contamination 1 - Page 95 The total number of skin and clothing contaminations has been above the Fort Calhoun goal of 150 contaminations since the month of April 1990.
The total number of skin and clothing contaminations has been above the industry upper quartile value of 129 contaminations since the month of March 1990. The high number of skin and clothing contaminations during the months of March and April 1990 was due to increased activity *.a the Radiation Controlled Area (RCA) assoc;ated with the 1990 Rafucling Outage.
Ifmoorary Modifications (Excludina Scaffoldina) - Page 127 The number of temporary modifications which are installed in the plant
's
. currently above the fort Calhoun goal of 15 temporary modifications.
I
! i
SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (SEP)
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS The purpose of' the Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Performance Indicators pages is to list the indicators related to the SEP items with parameters that can be trended.
SEP Reference Number 15 - Increase HPES and IR Accountability ELq2 Through Use of Performance Indicators Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance) . . . . . . . . 68 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations . . . ... . . . . . . . 95
' Recordable injury Cases Frequency Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LER's . . . . . . . . . . 135
~ CAR's Issued versus Significant CAR's issued versus l NRC Violations issued ver:us LER's Reported . . . . . . . . . . 158 SEP Reference Number 20 - Quality Audits and Surveillance Programs are Evaluated, Improved in Depth and Strengthened CAR's Issued versus Signific' ant CAR's issued versus
'NRC Violations Issued versus LER's Reported . . . . . . . . . . 158 SEP Reference Number 21. Develop and Conduct Safety System Functional Inspections
' CAR's issued versus Significant. CAR's issued versus NRC Violations issued versus'LER's Reported . . . . . . . . . . . 15 8 !
SEP Reference Number 24 - Complete Staff Studies Staffing Level . ... .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
137 SEP' Reference Ntmber 26 - Evaluate and Implement Station Standards for Safe Work Practice Requirements Disabling Injury Frequency Rate ...............45 Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . 133 SEP Reference Number 31 - Develop Outage and Maintenance Plannir<g Manual and Conduct Project Management Training MWO Overall Status l(1991 Refueling Outage) . . . . . . . . . . ..
146 Progress of 1991. Outage Modification Planning. . . . . . . . . . 147 Overall Project Status (1991 Refueling Outage) . . . . . . . . . 148
SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (SEP)
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (CONTINVED)
SEP Reference Number 33 - Develop On Line Maintenance and Modification Schedule !
Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (Electrical Maintenance) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (Pressure Equipment) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (General Maintenance). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (Mechanical Maintenance) . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (Instrumentation & Control). . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . 74 SEP Reference Number 36 Reduce Corrective Non Outage Backlog i Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non Outage Maintenance) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 69 i SEP Reference Nymber 41 - Develop and Implement a Preventive Maintenance Schedule f
Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance . . . . . . . . . . . . 61 Preventive Maintenance items Overdue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 i
' SEP Reference Number 43 - Implement the Check Valve Test Program Check Valve Failure Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . 80 l
-SEP Reference Number 44 - Compliance With and Use of Procedures I Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance) . - . . . . . . . . 68 .
SEP Reference Number 46 Design a Procedures Control and Administrative Program '
1 Document Review. . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . 53 SEP Reference Number 52 - Establish Supervisory Accountability for Workers .udiological Practices Radiological Work Practices Program. .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98
SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (SEP)
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS (CONTINUED)
SEP Reference Number 54 - Complete Implementation of Radiological Enhancement Program Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative). . . . . . . . . . . . 41 Volume of Low-Level Solid Radioactive Waste. . . . . . . . . . . 43 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 Decontaminated Auxiliary Building. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 SEP. Reference Number - Revise Physical Security Training and Procedure Program Loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Security) . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 Security Incident Breakdown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 Security System Failures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 SEP Reference Number 60 - Improve Controls Over Surveillance Test Program Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 SEP Reference Number 61 - Modify Computer Program to Correctly Schedule Surveillance Tests Number of Missed Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 SEP Reference Number 62 Establish Interim System Engineers Temporary Modifications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 Outstanding Engineering Assistance Requests (EAR's). . . . . . . 128 Engineering Change Notice Status . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 129 Engineering Change Notice Breakdown. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130 SEP Reference Number 68 - Assess Root Cause of Poor Operator Training and Establish Means to Monitor Operator Training SR0 License Examination Pass Ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 R0 License Examination Pass Ratio. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139 License Candidate Exams. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140
SAFETY ENHANCEMENT PROGRAM (SEP) LERFORMANCE INDICATORS (CONTINVED) SEP Reference Number 71 - Improve Controls over Temporary Hodifications Temporary Modifications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 1 16-
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS l INDEX TO GRAPHS i INDUSTRY KEY PARAMETERS 1988.and 1989 Forced Outage Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 26 Forced Outagc Rate .c. . .-. . . . . . . . . . .-. . . . . . . . 27 1986-through 1989 Unplacocd. Automatic Reactor Scrams Wh il e Criti cal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical. . . . . . . . 29 1988 and-1989 Unplanned Safety System Actuations (INPO De finition) . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 - Unplanned Safety System Actuations - (INP0 Definition) . . . . . . 31 R Unplanned Safety System Actuations - (NRC Definition). . . . . . 33
'1988 and 1989 Gross Heat Rate... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 Gross-. Heat Rate. .n. . ...-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 35 ,
1988 and 1989 Equivalent Availability Factor . . . . . . . . . . 36 Equivalent Availability Factor . . . - . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . 37 1988 and 1989 Fuel. Reliability Indicator . . . . . . . . , . . . 38 Fuel Reliability Indicator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 39
- 198SJand 1989 Personnel: Radiation Exposure (Cumulative). . . . . .
40 Personnel. Radiation Exposure -(Cumulative). ' . . . . . . . . . . . 41 1988 and 1989 Volume.of Low-level Solid Radioactive Waste. . . . 42 Volume of Low level . Solid Radioactive Waste. . . . . . . . . . -. 43 , t 1987 and 1988 Disabling Injury Frequency Rate. . . . . . . . . . 44 1 Disabling Injury Frequency Rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ~45 i I l 4 f I s
q PERFORMANCE INDICATORS .: INDEX TO GRAPHS -i
, (CONTINUED)
L OPERATIONS
-1988 and 1989 Station Net Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 24 Station Net Generation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 25
- c. 1988 and 1989 Forced Outage Rate . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . 26 Forced Outage Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 27 1986 through 1989 Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams- l Whil e Cri ti cal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 28 Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical. . . . . . . . 29 1988 and 1989 Unplanned Safety System Actuations
( INPO De fi ni ti on) . - . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . - . . . . 30 ! Unplanned Safety System Actuations - (INP0 Definition) . . . . . 31 i Unplanned Safety System Actuations (NRC Definition). . . . . . . 33 1988 and 1989 Gross Heat Rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 34 - Gross Heat Rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .-35 6
- 1988 and 1989 Equivalent Availability Factor . . . . . . . . - . . 36 ,
Equivalent- Availability Factor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37 j 1988 and 1989 Fuel Reliability Indicator . . . . . . . . . . . . 38 Fuel Reliability Indicator ...................-39
- Daily. Thermal Output . . . . . . . . . - . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 47 !
1988 and 1989 Equipment Forced Outages per 1000
- Cri t i cal Hours . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48 Equipment Forced Outages per 1000 Critical Hours . . . . . . . . 49 -1989 Operations and Maintenance Budget . . . . ... . . . . . . . . SC -i Operations and Maintenance Budget. . . . . . . . .-. . . . . . . .
51 1989 Document Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .-52 Document Rev i ew, . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 53 MAINTENANCE
. Emergency Diesel Generator Unit Reliability. . . . . . . . . . . 54 Diesel Generator. Reliability (25 Demands) . . . . . . . . . . . 55 1
Age of:0utstanding' Maintenance Work . . . . . . . . . . . .-. . 56- l Maintenance Work Order Breakdown . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 57 I
l I 1 PERFORMANCE INDICATORS l INDEX TO GRAPHS l (CONTINUED) l l MAINTENANCE (CONTINUED) l 1988 and 1989 Corrective Maintenance Backlog >3 Months Old . . . 58 Corrective Maintenance 8acklog >3 Months Old . . . . . . . . . . 59 1988 and 1989 Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance . . . . . 60 Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance . . . .-- . . . . . . . 61 1988 and 1989 Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue . . . . . . . 62 Preventive Maintenance items Overdue . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 l 1988 and 1989 Number of Out-of-Service Control Room Instruments. 64 { Number of Out of-Service Control Room Instruments. . . . . . - . . 65
)
. 1989 Maintenance Overtime. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 66 Maintenance Overtime . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 67 ,
Procedural Noncompliance Inc' i dents (Maintenance) . . . . . . . 68 Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage) . . . . . 69 i Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (Electrical Maintenance) .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 70 Percent.of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (Pressure Equipment) . . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . 71
' Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (General Maintenance). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 72 Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities (Mechanical Maintenance) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73 Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities.
(Instrumentation & Control). . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 q 1989 Number of Surveillance Tests Resulting in Licensee Event Reports . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .-76 Number of Surveillance . Tests Resulting in ; Licensee. Event Reports . . . . .- . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 77 s Number of Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPRDS) Reportable Failures . . , . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 78 3
. Maintenance. Effectiveness. . . . . , . . . . . . . . .-. . . . . 79.
Check Valve Fail ure Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80 y , y rm v.- -v- - p.,a
PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS (CONTINVED) CHEMISTRY AND RADIOLOGICAL PROTECTION 1988 and 1989 Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative). . . . . 40 Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative). . . . . . . . . . . . 41 1988 and 1989 Volume of low level Solid Radioactive Waste. . . . 42 Volume of Low level Solid Radioactive Waste. . . . . . . . . . . 43 1988 and 1989 Secondary System Chemistry . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 Secondary System Chemistry . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 83 1988 and 1989 Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Ou t o f Li mi t . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 84 Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Out of Limit . . . . 85 1988 and 1989 Auxiliary Systems Chemistry Hours Outside St at i on L imi t s . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 86 Auxiliary Systems Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits . . . . 87 In Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service . . . . . . . . . . 88 1989 Hazardous Waste Produced. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 90 Hazardous Waste Produced . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 91 1988 and 1989 Maximum Individual Radiation Exposure. . . . . . . 92 . Maximum Individual Radiation Exposure. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 93 ! 1988 and 1989 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations . . . . . . 94 Total Skin and Clothing Contaminations . . . . . . . . . . . . . 95 1988 and 1989 Decontaminated Auxiliary Building. . . . . . . . . 96 Decontaminated Auxiliary Building. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 97 Radiological Work Practices Program. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 Number of Hot Spots . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 1988 and 1989 Gaseous Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Environment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 Gaseous Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Environment. . 101 1988 and 1989 Liquid Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Environment. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 102 Liquid Radioactive Waste Being Discharged to the Environment . . 103
i PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS (CONTINVED) SECURITY Loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Security) . . . . . . . . . . . . -.104 Security incident Breakdown. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 105 Security System Failures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 106 MATERIALS AND OUTSIDE SERVICES 1988 and 1989 Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts. . . . . . . 108 Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts. . . . . . . . . -. . . . . .109 1988 and 1989 Spare Parts Inventory Value. . . . . . . . . . . . 110 Spare Parts Inventory Value. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 111 1988 and.1989 Spare Parts-Issued . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .112 Spare Parts Issued . . . . .,. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .113-Inventory Accuracy .-. . . .-. . . . . . . . . . . . ...u. . . . 114 Stockout Rate. . . . . .-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 115-Warehouse Receipts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .'116 Warehouse Issues . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 117 i Warehouse; Returns... . . . . . . . . . .-. . . . , . . . . . . . 118 Material' Requests Awaiting Approval . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . _ 119 - Expedited Purchases. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 120 Invoice' Breakdown. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 121 Material Request Planning. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
- 122 .
DESIGN ENGINEERING
-1988 and 1989 Outstanding Modifications. . . . . . . . . . . . . 124 Outstanding Modifications._'. . . . . . . .. .-. . . . . . . . . . 125 1988 and 1989 Temporary Modifications. . . . . . . . . . . . . ..
126 Temporary. Modifications. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 127 Outstanding Engineering Assistance Requests (EAR's). . . . , . . - 128--
-Engineering Change Notice Status . . .-. . . . . . . . . . . . . .129 Engineering Change Notice Breakdown. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 130
l PERFORMANCE INDICATORS f INDEX T0' GRAPHS. (CONTINUED) INDUSTRIAL SAFETY 1987 and 1988 Di_sabling Injury Frequency Rate. . .. . . . . . . . 44 Disabling Injury Frequency Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . _. . . 45 1987 and 1988 Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate . . . . . . 132 Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate . . . . . . . . . . . . . .133 HUMAN RESOURCES 1988 and 1989 Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs. . . . 134 Number of Personnel Errors Reported in LERs. . . . . . . . . . . 135 Personnel Turnover Rate. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . - . . 136 Staffing Level . . . . . . . . . . .-. . . . . . . . . . . . . . 137 JRAINING AND OVAllFICATION SR0 License Examination Pass Ratio . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 138 RO: License Examination Pass Ratio. ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . 139 t License Candidate Exams. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 140 Hotlines ... . < . ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 141 , t 1989 Classroom-(Instructor) Hours. . . . . . . . . . . . . , . . 142 ! Classroom-(Instructor) Hours . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 143 1989 Total Hours of Student Training . . . . . . . . . . . . . L ._ .144 Total Hours. of Student Training. . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . 145 REFUELING'0VTAGE MWO Overall Status- (1991_ Refueling Outage) . . . . _ , . . . . . . 146' f Progress of 1991 Outage Modification Planning. . . . . . . . . . 147 Overall Project Status (1991. Refueling Outage) . . . . . . . . . 148 - OVAllTY ASSURANCE 1988 and 1989 Number of Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours . . 150 Number of Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours . ._. . . . ._._. 151 Cumulative Violations and Non-Cited Violations- (NCV's) . . . . . 153 1988 and 1989 Percent of CAR's Greater Than Six Months Old. . . . 154 Percent of CAR's Greater Than Six Months Old . . . . . . . . . . 155-
. , ~ . . .- - .,; . , . - - - . . . . . = , .a
i l PERFORMANCE INDICATORS INDEX TO GRAPHS . (CONTINUED) OVALITY ASSURANCE (CONTINUED) Overdue and Extended Corrective Action Reports . . . . . . . . . 156 l Corrective Action Reports Current Status . . . . . . . . . . . . 157 CAR's issued versus Significant CAR's Issued versus. . . . . . . 158 NRC Violations issued versus LERs Reported
500000-
!J Station Het Generation M 400000-8 i 9 -
a 300000-t t H 200000-o U . r s 100000-i 0-Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1988 500000-l l Station Net Generation M 400000-e 9 a W 300000-a t . t H 200000-o u - r 5 100000-I l 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989
,-.-n
500000- l IStation Net Generation l 400000-M- e- _ 9 a-
- W- 300000-
-a t -
.g H- 200000-
-o
- u-r s
100000-O Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 i STATION NET GENERATION During the month of December.1990, a net total. of 163,610.5 MWH was generated by the fort Calhoun. Station. The net generation of the Fort Calhoun Station was- low due to ' 404.3 forced outage hours being-reported. This forced outage was due to a Control Element Drive i Mechanism (CEDM) housing leak. The net generation for the month of August was -low due to a forced -outage which occurred during the
; month This. forced outage was.-due to seal problems on reactor coolant pump RC-3A, The net generation for the months of. September ani October were also low due to a forced outage. The forced outage which occurred in September and continued into October- was due to a design basis question _ on containment cooling capabilities, November's net generation was also low due to a forced outage. This outage was due to an' Instrument Air System failure in ths Turbine Building.
The net. generation totals for the months of March and April were zero and the net generation total -for the month of May was low due to the plant being shutdown for the 1990 Refueling Outage. Adverse Trend: None
- - ~~v, - . , , . . - ---ra .s w +n -- .e- , , - ,.-,-.--,,m- -r, ,-e-,,e-, e -- -.,e-,vve--s>..a~ ~
1
- Forced Outage Rate
-G- Fort Calhoun Goal G Industry Upper 10 Percentile 5-4-
R a 3, t e G - - - - + - - - - G - ----O --- --O - -- - - O - -- - - O - -- - - O - - - - - O - - -- - G - -- - - G - -- - - O 2-D ------ -G - - - O ~ . .._ g . ~ ~ G- - -O - -O- -O- - O -- O- O -- D 0 Jan .Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1988
- Forced Outage Rate
-e- Fort Calhoun Goal
-G Industry Upper 10 Percentile, 6-5-
4-R a 3, t , e ! 2- @ ~ -- - O - ~ ~ - O -- - - -O - -- ~ ~O - - ~~ -O -~ ~ - - O - - ~ ~ ~ O - ~ ~ - - * - - -- - G -- - - - G - ~ ~ - - O
), g __. . g _..._ _ -g b
0 . m. m. m.- Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989
- Forced Outage Rate 15 G- Fort Calhoun Goal
-G Industry Upper 10 Percentile i
GOOD 10- p R a t e 5-1.4-rg g -
&. .. e .. ..e. ._ _ e .__ e_...g _ _ _ e. 9_..O ---G---O---O VG 6:
0 0 4 al{ 0 m m #--G-E~ O --G~~-O-O -G -G-O *
'87 '88 '89 JIn fib Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec l 1990 FORCED OUTAGE RATE The forced outage rate was reported as 9.7% for 1990. The rise in 'the forced outage rate for the Fort Calhoun Station -during the month of December was due to 404.3 forced outage hours being reported dur.ing December due to a CEDM housing leak. I The industry upper. ten percentile value for the forced outage rate is 0.25%.
- The 1990 goal- for forced outage rate is 2.4% and -is based on seven days of forced outage ~ time. The basis for establishing the 1990 performance. goals can be found on page 179.-
Adverse Trend: The forced outage rate has been ' rising since July i 1990. This rise in the forced outage -rate was due to four forced L outages which occurred in August; September and continued into l ' October; November; and December. The first forced outage was due to seal problems. encountered in reactor coolant pump RC-3A, the second forced: outage was due to design basis questions concerning containment cooling capabilities, the third forced outage was due to an Instrument Air System line failure in the Turbine Building, and the fourth forced outage was due to a CEDM housing leak. l-
10-
, .m Reactor Scram 8- G- Fort Calhoun Goal S *
+ Industry Upper Quartile cr 6-a.4 g ..., . 4_.. 4 .._-, . 9 ._ q . . 4 .. ..q . 4, ._ . . q., . 4- O- O 2-
- e. _ _ _ _ _e _ _ . _ _ o _ _ _ _ _ o _ _ _ _ _ f . _ _ _ e. - - ] . +.4 - - -O - - - - -O - - - - -
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1986 10-L,2J Reactor Scram 8- .o. Fort Calhoun Goal e 6- + Industry Upper Quartile j r - a 4-m . 2 Q. -.Q.. . . Q . .. Q ,_ _ _. O - - - - O -- - O - - O- - - --O .
- o. __ _ e _ _ _ _ _o _ _ _ _ _ e _ _ _ _ _ o _ _ _ _ _ e _ _ _ _ _ e _ _ _ _9_ _ _ _ q. _ _ _ _o _ _. o _ o
~
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 5 19P7 10- -
- s' Reactor Scram 8-
-G- Fort Calhoun Goal 3
c6 -& Industry Upper 10 Percentile r . a4 t m . l 2-O -- O -- - D - - - - -O - -- -- O - - -- - O - - - - - G - -- - - G - - -- - G - - -- - G-- --- G -- - --O
'" " " " " " " " m O
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1988 10-M Reactor Scram 8-
-G- Fort Calhoun Goal I S l
c 6- -O Industry Upper 10 Percentile r - a4 m . 2- : e.. . _ _ .e. _ _ ._ _ e _ _ _ .0 - - - - -O - - -- - O - - --- O - - - -- O - - - - - G - - - - - G --- -- G- - - - - O 0 O C v w - -- Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989
Reactor Scram 5-
-G- Fort Calhoun Goal e Industry Upper 10 Percentile 4-S 3 GOOD C
r 4 a m 2-1 _.y 1 o.__ .e_.. .e.__. e....e.___ e...__e.__ o__._e _. .o .__.9 .._.e ws 4
", "k'_ z 0 0 0 ' ~ "
-- 0 :- --
'86 '87 '88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov - Dec 1990 WPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHILE CRITICAL There were no unplanned automatic reactor scrams in December. It has been 1,643 days since the last unplanned automatic reactor scram which occurred on July 2, 1986.
The-1990 goal for unplanned automatic reactor scrams while critical has been set at 1. The industry upper ten percentile value is l zero scrams per unit on- an annual basis. The Fort Calhoun Station is currently in the upper ten percentile of nuclear plant l performance in this area. I l Adverse Trend: None j .. .
4-
- Safety System Actuations e- Fort Calhoun Goal O Industry Upper 10 Percentile 3-A C .
t u a 2-t i .o - n s 1-O m u m m a e Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1988 4- L g Safety System Actuations G- Fort Calhoun Goal G Industry Upper 10 Percentile 3-A C - t u a 2-t i o n
-s _
l- O-- ----O- - - -- -G- -- - --G - -- - -G - - -- - O -- - - - O - - - - - O - - - - - G - - - - - G - - - -- G - -- - - O O v u u :: w v -- - Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989
. _ . _ _ _. . . ~ . _ . . _ _ _ . . . . . ... . ..__._-e .. _ . . _ .. _ ._ _._.._.. . .._. .... ..
i 4; p.* Safety System Actuations
~
-e- Fort Calhoun Goal
-e Industry Upper 10 Percentile 3
--A C
t j GOOD l[.2-o Y n
' s ;. ,
1- o t'h y 3 w O' 0 0 " " " " - - - " " ' " " " " ' " " ----
- 0 87 '88 '89: Jan Feb- Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov _Dec
'1990 P
- UNPl.ANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS - (INP0 DEFINITION) f
-There.-were : no. unplanned : safety system 1 l actuations - during the month of December i.
1990, 1 il 1 The .1990 goal for . the Lnumber of !
- _ unplanned safety system actuations -is ;
- zero. - This. goal was based . on past ;
' performance at the Fort Calhoun Station.
I :' H The:Lindustry upper ten: percentile value ; L for- ethe- number of unplanned safe.ty 1
- system actuations per year is zero.-
~ Adverse Trend: None l? ___
i 1 31-
"'m W wm w -WT-wi u% w e -e swr w --' 4 "*'v'=- -v tr--%wT--e'*" '
e e-rit,e e ur ,r 4T -re-r- -Y ='m=W ew G' T'MT-1lE-FM-*w %
i This page intentionally left- blank. i' I
- . . - . - . . - -. ~. . .-
1 m Safety System Actuations (SSA)
- 12 Month Running Total SSA
---- Critical Hours 10, 1000 i
8 -800 N u N ,,
,'--', / - '--'i , 'i u - / 's i \ ! \ l \
b m I \ j' \l \ l \' b 6- '\/ \ l<\i 600 *p e l j i i,V S Y ! ; I \
~# '
o f 's / i o
~ f4 l \ l } 400 g I O N5 S f "% S.
l \ \ t U Y J A l' \ I k$$ 2- l-77 i l l' -260. s
.l l1 k l- ? -
l k 0 0 - h-- h - h ? - I 0 '88 '89 J F M A M J J'A S 0 N D J F M A N J J A S 0 N ,0 1989 1990 UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS - (NRC OEFINITION1 This indicator shows . the number of safety system actuations (SSA) which include the High and Low Pressure Safety injection Systems, the , Safety Injection Tanks, and the Emergency Diesol Generators. The NRC classification of SSA includes actuations when major equipment is operated And when the logic systems for these safety systems are: - i challenged. The last event of this type occurred in November 1990 when Diesel Generator _ D-1. and Diesel Generator DG-2 'exp.erienced sympathy starts when the turbine was tripped due to a forced shutdown of the plant. '
' This forced shutdown was due to an Instrument Air System line failure in the Turbine Building.
The majority of SSA displayed above were related to 1990 Refueling 1 Outage activities and are currently being reviewed under the Safety System Actuation' Reduction Program. The goal of this Program is to reducc the number of-SSA at Fort Calhoun. Adverse Trend: None
O Monthly Gro.s Heat Rate 13000-Year to Date Gross Heat Rate
-G- Fort Calhoun Gcal
-O Industry Upper 10 Percentile
, 12000-B T U
/ 11000-K _
W -- H- _l 10000- M~ I*- Of C TEF 2- 4'~@ r -@ & =c@r :@ l i (
-9000 Jan -Feb Mar Apr ' May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1988 I IMonthly Gross Heat Rate l
-13000- .- Year to Date Gross Heat Rate
~ G- Fort Calhoun Goal 43- Industry Uppe'r 10 Percentile
- 12000-B' T-
-U'
/
-gh11000,
- H CT, ,I I ;
e.... p u . m. _.x . y ._e _.. e .._ 9 ... w __. & ,
.I
< l 10000- O & - - -
-G --
-e c- e -
43- --
-G -B--- -
G -
-0 1
I ) 1 i
! 1
.9000 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep :Oct Nov Dec 1989
13000-I lMonthly Gross Heat Rate
. - Year to-Date Gross Heat Rate B
e- Fort Calhoun Monthly Goal ,
-+- Fort Calhoun Year-to-Date Goal h12000- -O, Industry Upper 10 Percentile
/
y K W H GOOD 11000-
- 1D5"..J 1027) k ( 6 " -
gpm-ryCM . _
- 10014 5g '
h. bDT q <y gi10000 O ~ 0 0- O- O' ~ 0- - O - O - a RW; r
+
6 +
% g3 tw i
f k2 . t h'87/.'e G Jf91Jan $sFeb. J Mar '9000
'$ 4 l
'88- '89 Apr May Jun Jul iu Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 1
GROSS HEAT RATE The gr'oss heat mte for _the- Fort Calhoun Station wr., reporten e,10,001 !
- 810/KWH. during hii month of ' December. This monthly gross her rai c was
~
- i. _ above the month'y gross heat rate goal of 9,975 isTU/KWH. The high mm.hly '
l gross heat rate was due to a forced shutdown of the plant.< l
.The year-to-date gross heat rate was reported as 10,304 BiU/KWH.. This:
year-to-dote value was higher than the year to-date gross heat _ rate goal l of 10,200 -BTU /KWH. The ' year-to date gross heat rate is above the -Fort -
-Calhout goal due to the fact that the first stage of the high pressure L tpANI es removed prior to the 1990 Refueling Outage. Additionally, the
. gross het rate values for the months of May, June, and July 1990, were - L high due to /tartup afte* the 1990 Refueling Outage"and various derates. ' I The high gros. heat; rate . values for September, October, tiovember, and December were oca to st(rt Ups after forced outages which occurred in- ~ these months. q l The above monthly and rear-to date Fort Calhoun goals are the best gross heat rate that can be ucs,%ved by the Fort Calhoun Station. - The gross heat rate indust)y upper ten percentile value is 9,935 BTV/KWH. Adverse Tre.011: None l, ll u
' [~'~} Monthly EAF
- 12 Month Average EAF
-O- Fort Calhoun Goal e Industry Upper 10 Percentile ,
100-I x 80- O~ ' ~ ~ G- ' ' ' ~ O -G- - - - - D- - D~ -- 0- - -~D- 0 -~ - D - 0- O p , c ; _ _ .e- .._- -g- ---
-e-..--e--_- _e- --. -e-- - - - 9 _ _ _ --g - -- - g - . .e *p 60-C .
n 40-t 20-I I O Jan Feb ' Mar Apr- May - Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1988 l -l Monthly EAF 12 Month Average EAF G- Fort Calhoun Goal-Industry Upper 10 Percentile 100-
~
---- o---- -n- - -
Q ;-, ,,.g -m, q. --
.-g- ,. q-. m- - ,g e , --g, -,-
,g- .-- -g 80- --- - G - - -Q
/
P
-e. 60- l l l-r .j w C'
l. Le 40-n t - 20-Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989
1 I I Monthly EAF
- Year-to Date EAF n !
-G , Fort Celhoun Monthly Goal
-o-- Fort Calhoun Year-to Date Goal GOOD
- G Industry Upper 10 Percentile 100-
,e.___e.___ e __ e____e___.e
. c. O.
.7 7- 80- O
'\ O~ ~C O ~ O ' ~~~ O -O ~O ~ O~~ O ~~ C 71 Y \\ l l RT da 66 9a),]
i
\
x F,
'" s
-,_ x g; !' T, i \ \
w sy; %@)eP r \ / v E yY2 (H. e
\
b
'\,
s , l / qs ,- s
' x ,
@n. W , r' n 40- i \ l p wg ,.
g t i N ,
$1 k
& M k M -
\
\gl; f M M 3 4 w
20- '\ /- W w;t os' +m - i i ; y 4
'in i ;
Ed NQ \ 8 m +u ^ 0 A ^
'87 '88 '89 :Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun :Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 E0VIVALENT AVAILABillTY FACTOR J The EAF. was reported as 45.7% for the month of ' December.
This EAF. was lower than- the Fort Calhoun=-monthly goal of 93%' due to forced outage- hours being -reported -during _ December.-This forced outage occurred due to a CEDM housing
-l e a k.
The year-to-date EAF was reported = as 56.6%. This year-to-date value was lower than the year-to-date goal of - 65.4%. -The low year-to-date EAF was due to -various power
. fluctuations which occurred during the month of June and the forced outage hours being reported during the months of -
August, September, October, November, and December. The EAF _ industry-upper' ten percentile value is 82.5%. Adverse Trends: None
- :1 3
---- Fuel Reliability Indicator l
-G- Fort Calhoun Goal s Industry Upper 10 Percentile 4 n- -
6-o -- C=
-u- .
r-
.i e 4 s
/
9 -
- r- I a ;
;m 2-i
~l 0 O-Jan Feb ., Mar Apr- May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov- Dec !
1988 ,
- Fuel Reliability Indicator G- Fort Calhoun Goal ;
-Eh Industry Upper 10 Percentile
.6- -
1: l.
. i L . 4-I i-l' D 2-Li. -
. e._ _ _ _ e _ _ __ _ e _ _ _.e. _ _ __ e _ _ _ ._9._ _ _ e _ _ _ _ e __ _ _ _g _ _ _ _g _ _-- G -----O 0
E - 0 0 0 " 2 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec i 1989 w,e . -- .
w
-8 - Fuel Reliability Indicator 1 Ga Fort Calhoun Goal e Industry . Upper 10 Percentile -
d - Industry Median 6-n a' 4 n* f s u GOOD l r 4; i v, 1 e s j . + 2.4 U- ;
- r -
l ~. 5 O O O O O O O
'@j dQ O "- O----O - -- e -- --
--- - & - -- - -- e -- - G- - - -G - - -O a.3 eh hif"fl _
^^ ^ n-i 0 ~
G - CJ - m - "
'.88 ; '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep. Oct Nov Dec -j 1990-1
-FUEL-REllABillTY INDICAT2B-
-The FRI was reported as .1.58 nanocuries/ gram for the-i month of ' Decembers This INP0- indicator _ uses ' an industry ,
? normalized: letdown- purification ' rate. The FRI was also- 1 calculated using Fort . Calhoun's' actual. letdown- -
u .purificationtrate.- The FRI .value using the plant's actual y letdown. purification rate was reported as 2.39< nanocuries/ gram. . The- 1990 - fuel reliability goal has- been-- set. at -l . 0 . nanocuries/ gram. L The fuel reliabi.lity indicator industry upper ten: i
. percentile value~is 0.04 nanocuries/ gram.
Adverse Trend: None l+
i
- Personnel-Radiation Exposure e- Fort Calhoun Goal i
-G Industry Upper 10 Percentile -
400-300- g _ _. g..- - O , R , c' E' -O M g _. . . O - - --- G - ~O-- D - G-/D- -- E 200- /
/
I d ,
./
l 1' 100- /
/
o v
. v
. Ot l- Jan Feb. Har Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ! 1988 l i.
- Personnel Radiation Exposure L
l
'400- G- Fort Calhoun Goal
-G- Industry Upper 10 Percentile L
1 300- , i '~ R G 8- O E 200-
~M ~D--G- B--G- - B --O 8 - - O t
-O
-@ _ . ._.e.-
1 100- -g - -O
- g._ _. .e
~o...o
. _ . . . . p .. . o OC.
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 i
Personnel Radiation Exposure 3881 400 -& Fort Calhoun Goal
-O Industry Upper 10 Percentile a
['
.e GOOD 300-
.272- 4 e -O p -& -O __.
u- \ { g - O ~~ ~O ..q I^< kg{ R - y WQ E 200-h1s s 't H sil ?" O-0-D 4 D-0-0 0 0-D- O _3 . ' i 4 d,, hk );k ,,. , 93;4
. .}oo. ,
j 2$l i$! / w% %$ah a% s
,A
(!);bf , ih 'I' OL
'87 '88 '89 Jan. Feb Mar Apr. May Jun Jul Aug Sep _Oct Nov Dec 1990 PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE ,
(CUMULATIVE)
- During December 1990,: 16.9 man-rem was recorded by_'TLD's worn by personnel while working at the Fort Calhoun Station. -
The monthly cumulative exposure goal for -i December was 287 man-rem - while the' actual - cumulative exposure _through December totaled 275.9: man-rem. The exposure cumulated in 1990 > has been- high -due ~ to the increased ~ activity in , L the Radiation Controlled- Area (RCA) associated ; with the .1990 Refueling Outage and four forced outages which occurred inE1990. g .. x The' personnel radiation exposure industry upper ten percentile is-166-man-rem per. unit per year. Adverse Trend: None SEP 54 L y i 4 w
i to M nthly Radioactive Waste Shipped
.12500-
- Cumulative Radioactive Waste Shipped
-G- Fort Calhoun Goal
- - n usky Upper 10 NcenWe -
10000-C- . t u-f7500-C- F e 5000- i e g._- -g. _ g..- -D -- -G -- --- O - 0- -O - - - -- D ~ - - - O '
.t .
O-- - - - G - - -- - O - - - - & - - - - o -- - - -O- -- - - & -- - - O - - -- e - - - - O - - - - - O -- - - -O t 2500- !
. /
. 0
#* d k "M --
.Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 4 1988 l 12500- 8 Monthly Radioactive Waste Shipped >
- Cumulative Radioactive Waste Shipped
-G- Fort Calhoun' Goal 10000 -O- Industry-Upper 10 Percentile C i
.u
'b .7500-i; ,
c ! e.____e_____e ___ e____e_____e ___e____e____ e __ e____e_749
.c e
5000-D - B--O f [ t . ; j ;*;w g g- -g- 9 .. O - O- -- - -B --- G - O 2500- - t ,
)
11 7-
,lfh i ;
O Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989
[g!) Monthly Radioactive Waste Shipped 12500-
- Cumulative Radioactive Waste Shipped
-e- Fort Calhoun Goal
-& Industry Upper 10 Percentile 10000-C u
y GOOD c 7500- 4 6195 F e e t 5000- o--- - e - - --e --- e --- -e --- e----e- - - e-- --o --- e --- o --- e 4454
- k 75 O -- O - - D- -- -- D ~ -D - --- O - D - 'O-f 0 - -O
- - 2500-
! 1722 C
M M
'b i;!; O
~ -
k d
'87 '88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE The above graph shows the amount of low-level radioactive waste shipped off-site for disposal. The table below lists the amount of waste actually shipped off-site for disposal and the amount of low level radioactive waste which is in temporary storage. The amount of solid radioactive waste which was shipped off-site during the month of November 1990 was reported as 0.0 cubic feet in the November 1990 Performance Indicators Report. The actual amount .of solid radioactive waste which was shipped during November 1990 was 2,043.2 cubic feet. This discrepancy was due to the manner in which the radioactive waste is processed and shipped for disposal. Scientific Ecology Group (SEG) processes the radioactive waste from the Fort Calhoun . Station.
After processing, SEG ships the processed waste and reports the volume of the processed waste to the Fort Calhoun Station.
.The volume of solid radioactive waste is (cubic feet):
Amount Shipped in December - 540.2 Amount in Temporary Storage - 158.1 1990 Cumulative Amount Shipped - 4310.1 1990 Goal - 5000.0 The industry upper ten percentile value is 3,072 cubic feet per unit per year. The Fort Calhoun Station was in the respective upper ten percentile of nuclear plants for this indicator in 1986, 1987 and 1988. Adverse Trend: None SEP 54
- 3, Disabling . Injury Frequency Rate G- Fort Calhoun Goal cO- Industry Upper 10 Percentile ,
. 2-r
' l-9.... e _ _ _ e _ _ _ _ e _ _ __ _ e ._ _ _ e . _ _ _g_ _ _ _ ,f _ _ . .
a _ __ _ gge g ....._.. E O --- G-- - O ' --O ------O - - D - -- D--G- -0 0 , Jan .Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov- Dec 1987 I 3- .
- Disabling injury Frequency Rate e- Fort Calhoun Goal j
-0 : Industry Upper 10 Percentile .j i
i 2-l I I l-18 l. k 9._ __ _ .e . . .e. _ _ _ _e ._ _ _ _ e _ _ _ _ e _ __ _ e _ _ _ e _ _ _ . 9_ _ _ _ e ._ _ _ _ e _ _ _ _ _ o - O - a u m m -- -- w D G C
'Jan Feb- Mar Apr- May- Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1988 l
T cn v . G r
> ' ' 2- m .19901 Disabling . Injury Frequency Rece ;
+ 1989: Disabling-Injury Frequency Ra w y
- 1.75- 4. 5 Year Average Disabling Injury Frequency Rate G . Fort Calhoun Goal 1
-1.5- e Industry Upper 10 Percentile l i
.l.25-R GOOD a
_t li ! 4 Ie - f
,75- , l i
'5- N '
N a ; e.. __.e_ __.e_- _____e.___ g_____
.25-Y %e _____ 9Wn ____ 9 _____e_____
v . - g:3u h 1 h* )*h! h*h r t d r; O
-0_
- Jan: . Feb.. :
Mar Apr. May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec : 1 i p- DISABLING INJURY FRE0VENCY R611 ; (LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE) This indicator shows the current- monthly disabling injury rate in i K column form. The- 1989. disabling injury frequency rate and the Fort Calhoun _ Station 5 year ' average disabling -injury frequency rate are , also shown. There were two. disabling injuries reported at the Fort 1
- Calhoun ~ Station in' December. The total. number -of. disabling : injuries !
.that were reported in-1990 was three. -
The[1990 L disabling . injury frequency. rate goal: was -set at 0.31% and - g was Jbased on one disabling injury -occurring in 1990. -
- o L >The " industry upper ten . percentile: disabling- injury frequency rate is 3
% 0%. l{ ' The year end : disabling . injury frequency rates for '1987,_ 1988, and
?l989:were'0.6,_l.6, and 0.4 respectively. _
' Adverse-Trend: None- SEP 26 l-l- '
This page intentionally left blank. 1 l
.. . . m___: .
i- -+- Thermal Output
- Technical Specification Limit j
-e Fort Calhoun Goal 1500s ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ; ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^ ^
1200-
/
M g 900- , 600 / 300-0 , , , , . , , , , , , , ,,, ,, , ,,,,, , , , ,n 1 7 14 21 28 December 1990 DAILY THERMAL OVTPUT The above thermal outputLgraph displays the daily operating power level, the 1500 thermal megawatt average technical specification
. limit, and the- 1495 thermal megawatt Fort Calhoun goal . The cross hatched. area represents the difference between the maximum allowable operation and the actual plant operatien.
The percent power operation of the Fort Calhoun Station during December 1,1990 through December 14, 1990 was approximately 100%. The . plant was then shutdown for the rest of the month due to a
-forced outage. This forced outage was due to a CEDM housing-leak.
Adverse Trend: None
\ \
' _ i
- Equipment Forced Outage Rate 2- !
1.8-1.6-1.4-1.2-R . a 3, t: , e
.8-
.6-
.4-
.2-0 . .
Jan Feb' Mar Apr' May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec. 1988 2-
'~ Equipment Forced Outage Rate 1.8-1.6-1.4-1,2-R .
a 3, t e
.8-
.6-
.4-
.2-l A Jan Feb M'ar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989
_ . . _ . . . . __. . . . . ~ . - _ ~. . ~ g m l q
-[
2 _
. Equipment forced Outage Rate 1.8- ;
1.6-l '. 4 -
.1.2- GOOD- ,
R ' a + . j. t
.8 ;.
, t
.6- ,
, t i
.4- '
.13 .
ll j .2- , 0 :0- *A. 0 4 1-
, '87l '88 '89- Jan Feb Mar Apr M'ay Jun Ju'1 Aug Sep Oct Nov- Dec
~1990 4
.LOUIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES.
PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS . There were 404.3 -equipment -forced
, outage hours 3 reported . during: the
- month of - December 1990. These.
forced 'outaget hours were reported-
-due to a CEDM housing leak. ,
The last equipment forced outage occurred in November of 1990 and was due to an Instrument Air System f ailure in;.the Turbine Building. Adverse Trend: N a
. .. - ,-- =- - . . . . . - ._ - . . . . . . -- -..
- Actual Operations Expenditures 125]
M-
~
Operations Budget 1 100- - - .1 0 . l0 11 .75-ol - na 50- ,
$r ' '
s ,, o 25- ' f . 0 Jan Feb Mar .Apr May Jun Jul Aug- Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 40- - Actual Maintenance Expenditures M
-
- Maintenance Budget j
j 30-1-D I o- . 1 il ol 20-na sr ' s 10-f n Jan Feb- Mar. Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989
- Actual Operations Expenditures 125-
+:- Operations Budget 0
g 100-i 75- :
]d 11 y M
ol 50. X' na sr j/',
' 25' f' v/,
~
0- l Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep - Oct Nov Dec 1990 1 40-
- Actual Maintenance Expenditures ,
" " ""*"C' "9 M 30-i' _
- 20 0, 7" 10-r s
/
/-
'O -
Jan Feb Mar. Apr May Jun -Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 OPERATIONS ,,ND MAINTENANCE BVDGEI
.The Operations and Maintenance Budget Indicator shows. the budget year to .date as well as the actual expenditures for operations and maintenance for the Fort.Calhoun Station.
The budget year-to-date for Operations was '78.0 million dc11ars for December while the actual cumulative expenditures through December totaled 71.9 million dollars. - < The budget . year-to-date for Maintenance was 25.3 million dollars for. 4 December while the' actual cumulative expenditures through December totaled 17.5 million dollars. Adverse Trends: None 1500-
+- Documents Scheduled for Review
-X- Documents Reviewed l Overdue Documents 1200-ND uo 900-mc bu em -
re n 600-ot fs X 300- ,
, ; ; e
.X. , , 1 o ,--. . pawi
- X .s o----- % m v ,.. ,_ __ xs~~y,,._, \ ,, . -M Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989
't i
2000
+- D'ocuments Scheduled for Review a
-X- Documents Reviewed -l
! Overdue Documents- l
[
.1500-I ND y" u o- - 'mc i b'u 'I !
e m 1000- , r e. ji .
,n l l\ \ .)'
o tt -
/ .i T
fs- / \' , I i
/ i j ,
500- / \ ' i i,
/ \
l~ \ l t
/ \ j Ow l \i .
X~K X Us x V --% M 4 p t . a-p---- s.
---y l. s)4_ __; _]
Jan .Feb Mar- Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Dec -!
.Nov
-1990 i DOCUMENT REVIEW-This indicator ~ shows the-. number of biennial. reviews completed during
- the -reporting month, the number of biennial reviews scheduled for the :
. reporting month,- and the number of -biennial reviews -that are overdue.
These documentL reviews areL performed lin-house and include Special . Procedures, ~ the Site- Security Plan, Maintenance Procedures, Preventive Maintenance Procedures, and the Operating Manual. , 1During HDecember- there were 79 document . reviews. completed ' while 48
- document 1 reviews were scheduled. At the end of December, there were -60' document reviews ~ overdue. 'The overdue document reviews at the end of-December consisted primarily of.0perations' documents. ;
i During the month of December there- were 57.new or renamed documents
. reviewed. These new or renamed documents .will need .to be reviewed again in'1992.
The high number of documents scheduled for: review for the month of t June 1990 was - due to the high number of . document reviews -that were a completedJ during the month of June 1988. The reviews that were completed during June 1988 were due to be reviewed in June 1990. l Adverse Trend: .None SEP 46 i
t 4 1 End of. Month Trigger Values For:. I Ifailures/20 Demands - 20 Demands 10 P"4 Failures /50 Demands 50 Demands s E Failures /100 Demands -- 100 Demands . J
.8 , , . .. .. .. .. {
1 l - N p. GOOD -! y u 8 m 6- 4 ; b) e t u- ' r 4 . l o f
*s- , _. ._ . . .. _ ._. _ _ ___ . , _ . . _ _ _ _ _ _ . . . _ .
i 2- ; -g 7 -; 7 ? I $ i i 4 != j j j j 3 5 O Aug Sep Oct Nov -Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun: Jul 1990' 1991 L EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABILITY u p = This bar graph shows three- monthly indicators pertaining to the number of failures that .were reported during the last 20, 50, and 100 emergency diesel !i 4
; generator demands at the Fort Calhoun Station. Also shown are trigger values
-which correspond to- a high level of: confidence' that a unit's diesel generators l4 ' have obtained a reliability of greater than -or equal to 95% when the failure
' values are 'below the corresponding trigger values.
The demands counted for this indicator include.the respective number of starts .' And the respective number of load-runs for both Diesel Generators combined.-.The l number of- start demands include All valid and inadvertent starts, including all .
. start-only demands and all start demands that are followed by load-run demands, :
P. whether by automatic or manual. initiation. Load-run demands must foll ow - 1 successful starts and meet at.least one of the folloding; a load-run that is a result of a real -load signal; a load-run test expected to carry the plant's i
- load; and duration as stated in the test specifications; special tests in which
! ~a diesel generator was expected to be -operated-for a minimum of one hour'and to be loaded 'with' at least 50% of design load (see exceptions and other -demand criteria in the Definition Section). The last 2 demand' failures occurred in' the month of June 1990 and were :due to problems with DG-l's static exciter voltage regulator. Adverse Trend: None i l~
,. IDG1 Failures /25 Demands..
5- w DG-2 Failures /25 Demands
- Failure Trigger Value for 25. Demands- 7 4-
-N g
-u a
.m j 3-
'b): '
e ' GOOD u: e s 2 - f l f i 1 ! 00 0 Nov- .Dec Jan- Feb Mar Apr' May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct 1990 1991. 5 DIESEL GENERATOR REllABILITY (25 DEMANDS) This indicator . shows: the number of f ailures ' experienced by each emergency diesel.' generator during the last- 25 start demands and 25
' load-run ' demands. A trigger value of 4 failures within the last 25
' demands -is. also shown.
o It'must be emphasized that in accordance'with.NUMARC criteria, certain actions will take place in the event that any one diesel generator experiences 4 or-more failures within the last 25 demands on the unit. These actions are described in the Definition' Section. ' A Standing i Order will be drafted- for- the Fort -Calhoun-Station to institutionalize and. formally. approve /adopttherequiredNUMARCactions. Diesel Generator DG-1 has not experienced any failures during the last . 25> demands on the unit. Diesel Generator DG-2 has not experienced any failures during the last 25 demands on the unit. i Adverse Trend: None 55-
. . . . =. , - . . -. . . - . - -
, .-.~
, .400- .i
. October 1990
' E November 1990
-0 u I IDecember 1990 j t
3
~300- ]
t- ! 4 a: , n i
-d I
'. i 200-n.
_g_ M- 35 ' 1 . W $ - i$ 0: 100-g
- s 55 'i
~
N " f.
.g;;a+
0-H -
' i
- 3 3-6 6-9 9-12 >12
.)
Age-in Months . a L AGE-0F OUTSTANDING MAINTENANCE-WORK ORDERS (CORRECTIVE NON-0UTAGE); 'l This.-indicator: shows .the < age of corrective non-outage maintenance -work orders (NW0's) -; remaining-- open --at the end of the reporting 4 month.- Adverse Trend: None-i
- l '
j ^
.s
- . - -. . . = . . - - - . .. - .- .. - - - .
~ '
i
+ October 1990 l FI2lNovember.1990
$$NO I IDecember 1990 l300- E mm M
M 200- 5
$$ M5nii i M sh M M !
SEi ME MI 555 1
.100- $
+= :=,=
= !
M mm M
=m M w, ,
' =E= m=
M mn= M mm M M es= ms 0-
== ~
Total. Open Total Open Open Open MW0s Open Safety High MW0s -> 3 Months Safety Related Priority 0ld Related MW0s MW0s MW0s > 3 Months : Old < I, l MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BREAKOOWN (COPPECTIVE NON-0UTAGE) This indicator' shows the- total number of corrective non-outage MW0's remaining open at the i end of the reporting month, along- with a 1 L breakdown by several key categories. i Adverse Trend:-'None o 1 I
80- - Corrective. Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months Old
-O- Industry Upper-Quartile 60- _
_f P - e r O '-'- --' ~ O '~ - ~O ~ ~ O - O -- O -- -O +-+-- 4- ---& -O c 40-e i n
~
t 20-O Jan Feb Mar Apr May- Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1988
- Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3. Months Old 80-
+ Industry Upper Quartile 1
60-e r o W o- o -O O~-" -O ' O O- *~-~~+~~-O- C c 40-e n t
'20-0
- Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989
-- Corrective Maintenance Backlog > 3 Months 101d !
20 Industry Upper Quartile-i 80-60- A / P i I q.--O ~O- ~D -- -O - iO~ - -O ---O --O:-O-O :- -O c e 40- i n t . j 20-4- O Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun- Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ; 1990 ; i
' CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS OLD (N0N-0UTAGE)
;This . indicator shows the percentage of open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that are greater than three months old at the.end :
of.- the reporting month. The percentage of -open corrective non-outage maintenance work orders - that are greater than three months old ' at -the end of December was-reported as 52.6% The industry upper quartile value for corrective-maintenance backlog greater than 3 months old is-45.8%.
-Adverse Trend:
. one
1 1 1
- Ratio of Preventive 'to Total Maintenance l H) . Industry Upper Quartile l 90 -G- Fort Calhoun Goal 80'- !
P.' . 7 70-
.C -
e O - -- - e - - -- G - ---- ; -- -- - O ----- O - -- 60- - - - - -O- - - - G- - - - - G -- - - - G - - - - O
-n <
g . 50- O - - O ---- - 4 -O- -O - -O -- -- - O --O - - -O - -O- O 40- ; 30-20 Jan Feb iMar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1988
- Ratio of Preventi', to Total Maintenance Industry Upper Quartile 90-e- Fort Calhoun Goal 80-70- i 60- -- - & - -- - G - -- _- - _Q .__-.._...g.
_-Q.. _-... - _@<, --y- - p p 4g...._ .._-Q_- _- - ,Q_-q- _.Q . v e
-r 50- -O- -O -O' C' -
e' n 40 i t' 30-20 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989
_ - - - ~..- - . ~ -.
- Ratio of Preventive to Total Maintenance o Industry Upper Quartile 90- -G- Fort Calhoun Goal .
80- . 1 1 70: , 1
. p. -
-f 60- . g> _-
y _e._- q -e - o_ v
- y ..- - _ . y, - - . .so--_-__-og, - - - - g.. - - e.y , .- __ o,s - - - - 9o, _ . - . o s,-. -
n 50-t- - , 40-
^
~
GOOD l 30- ----f 20 Jan- Feb- ' Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 i RATIO 0F PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENAN 1 (NON 0UTAGE) The ratio -of preventive to ibtal maintenance indicator shows' the ratio of completed non-outage _proventive maintenance-to total completed non-outage maintenarce. The ratio of preventive -to total maintenance at the Fort : Calhoun: Station decreased to 51.8% in December, l The low ratios in August, September, .0ctober, and December 6 were due to the increased involvement of maintenance in corrective maintenance activities . associated with the three forced outages which occurred .in August, . September, and December. The Fort Calhoun goal is to have .a ratio of preventive to L- total maintenance greater than 60%. The industry ' upper quartile value for the ratio of preventive to total maintenance is 57.7%. Adverse Trend. None SEP 41 l
'-*'"'y w w p. - - -
f h. } _ I
'20- -- Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue t: -4). Industry Upper Quartile
. -G- Fort Calhbun Goal .
. 1 P . ', e' r-
. c 10-e
- n. .
..t -
i, 5
/
q ..-. 4. ~ .. _4_.. - q .. .-q _ . y. .. o ...-- 4 4..-.- q-- 4 ._ o 0 0 Jan 0 Feb 0 - - G --- O-
. Mar .Apr May.
8 Jun O Jul
-D Aug v
Sep 1Oct O' 7 - Nov. Dec 1988 Preventive Maintenance Items Overdue 5 , 47 Industry Upper Quartile
-O- Fort Calhoun Goal
. i 4-P e 3 <
y ,. c e n 2-t
, 4 _, ._. 4 .- .__... q._ q _.4._-_._4 . .._ e. n _ ___4 o----- o--- - er C--e----- o----- e- ---- o----- e ----- o ---- e -----o ---- -o
.1 -
/
0
.Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989
\
{- Preventive Maintbance "ams Overdue 5, + Iniurtry U/per Quartil, 1 s G- Fort tehoun G1al I GOOD p
- t! 3-r C -
e [ 2-
^
. y _.
.. ..__ . Q
- e. _ _ _ _ e _ _ _ e e - e_ _ ..e _ __ _p ___p___ e _ _- _ o _9__ _,o q
\ /
J~ % . U--- -- -
~~%~-s--
Jan f tt . Har Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Mov Dec 1990 PREVENTIVE MAINT QANCE ITEMS OVERJDUl The purpose af this indiute.r is to monitor progress in the adini ni s t r.at ion and execution of preventive maintenance programs. A small percentage of preventive maintenance items overdue indicate: a station commitment to the preventive maintenance program and en ability to plan, s ch ed ul e , and perform preventive maintenance tasks as
~
prograus re@1re. During Decniber 1990.. 1,104 PM items were completed. A total of zero FM 'tems i wen not completed within the 7.llovable gnco psried. The Fof t CGhoun goal is te have less than 1.2% preventive maintenance ite:ns overdue. The industry upper quartile for preventive maintenance items overdue is 1.2%. The Fort Calhovn Station fr currently performing in the industry upper quartilt for this indicator. MvprJ1_.Lrand: he no SEP 41 I
40 O Control Room Instruments Out-of-Service
;-o Industry Upper Quartile
. -G- Fort Calhoun Goal 30-
?
Nn ) us - , mt , n .. br eu 20-rm
- e > ,
h on -
+
ft W' js1 - y 4 s ? '
-~- :- y
- ' Y
, ,-y y,fq 10-p;., 4 a g
t
- ..7 , z y s :'
, ;.g s.. .
w g g4 ...
.g; ... 4;. . . . .
.Q ..
.g7 ... ....
y ,
- .r NA: ...; * >
Nj 4 , i, {h, ' 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1988
~
40-O Control Room Instruments Out-of-Service o Industry Upper Quartile
-e- Fort Calhour, Goal 30-1 Nn us -
mt - br eu 20- .
.a, --..s
@m$2; 5
f 3,,,. _ f{?) ( e . v
'ni "i Q jf' ""T'""
oD - [*q, ;Wi s, , $ ,,. . /; ft . W 'a w v > J., 7@ s G s Wr.
.~. n' e# N,. m,,=a W..
x +e
-s' _
10- IA w $'N: da n m % - ( {! ? , & -- a. m kf--~ f - Q -
&7 -
Q-- --~o- - -- (? h,. :.8.,), .2. h.< y .$. _ Qp f, _t .. 41 .
.$_. ... g.....gy_.. Q.:.9.1.. ..o_l.
. ' n m, ,Q "@ , t% 3,:y ,.pl&
; ;.s ,.
(fi.l C Aj} 'T g '- - M;$i ' "* Sf( c,
;g 3 :g <
% @ q . '
m
. .y m2 ,
. a ., .
+
*p o , ,
~
0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989
1 i
.40 Ej Total Control Room Instruments Out-of Service
+ Industry Upper Quartile for Total Out of Service Instruments G- Fort Calhoun Goal For Total Out of-Service Instruments 30- ,
O
" T~
l GOOD f l' , Nn , 4 f'T n
/b j
us W mt : M ', l b r< _ %,. .
.] j 9(1 6
; g m
i { e u 20- ~ + 's M :n l . - rm M W.p W #9 -- .' mI :m l % Aq -;
~
, n; -
1.
;;'i, $ ,)
on 4-e> g sa J g < a% ' ft y '% 'y
;@ ff } % lp
'm A L ;V.
s 4' - O m\' r;; ai , S m -.. ,n m W$ JB d 5
- FM 21 10 - y 6
, ;9< um;
_v a e4 %, 0; : k ,> P4 % is mig x s Lths if ! t% .Gl l %& N: ?% % n.. M$;d " 0"Q, aik s 'C :, . l, : a/; g .. g .. ..
,9j,s .._
g ..g .g n q g g .. -..
.; j
.g=,-
z,g n;;; g%;m y w >
&,p 9- ?g<
3?AS a o My g g6
%b a'
M W A N!
% &"* K 3t %g: $ ->
9((
't
' p, o kk }jg ?, j );9, N('t i tl s 'y sf Q,4 ./ ;
j u % ih 'h ~ :) aY% 34/M .W g7 M, , 5lQ afa 4-- > ' As i
? ~~) ff :'Qlf
'f---
qf f fj , > 0 Jan Feb -Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 M NUMBER OF OUT-Or-SERVICE
. CONTROL ROOM INSTRUMENTS The Number of Out of-Service Control Room Instruments Indicator has been changed. This. indicator previously
' presented the Fort Calhoun goal. as: less than 7
-out-of service control room instruments. The current Fort Calhoun goal is less than 30 .out-of-service
- ontrol room instruments.
This indicator shows the number of out-of-service control room instruments, the industry upper quartile for this indicator, and the Fort Calhoun goal. There was a total of 29 out-of-service control room instruments at the end of December. , The industry upper quartile ~ value for the number of out-of-service control room instruments is 7.- Adverse Trend: None 1 r r - i r. . r q
l i l I 1 l 1
- Maintenance Overtime 80-
+-- 12 Month Average G- Fort Calhoun Goal b
60-P Q , e \, r N c 40- N e ' g . . . g . . . . 9 . . . . .g. . . . . .g. . . .. .y . . . . g. . . . o . . . . g . . . . g . .. . .e t . 20-x x ;; ,
+ ;-: s:_ -X X l l
0 , Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov- Dec ! 1989 ( i
)
1
.\
l l 1 l i . - ---. ,- rs. - _ - , . . - ~ . , _ . - - _ . , - . . , . . . . - , , , - - . , - - , .-
m .-_w . + - - a= 4 d. 80-
- Maintenance Overtime
-H- 12 Month Average
-G- Fort Calhoun Goal GOOD E
60-P
'o-----o N.,
40- - N C / _N e \ n l f \ t / N d 'o_____9.___g____ 9 ___ g ____e.___o 20
- N ,
O Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 1 MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The Maintenance Overtime Indicator monitors the ability to perform the desired maintenance activities with. the allotted resources. Excessive > overtime indicates insufficient resource allocation and can lead to errors due to fatigue. The percent of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 17.0% during the month of December - 1990. The 12 month average percentage of overtime hours with respect to normal hours was reported as 18.1%. The high percentage of overtime hours reported for the months of February 1990 through May 1990 was due to increased maintenance
- support- associated with the 1990 Refueling Outage. The high percentage of overtime hours reported for August, September, October, November, and December 1990 was .due to maintenance activities associated with the 4 forced outages during these months.
i The Fort Calhoun goal for the percent of maintenance overtime hours worked has been set at 25% for non-outage months and 50% for outage months. Adverse Trend: None
20- 'l IOpen IR's Related to the Use of Procedures (Maintenance) u Closed IR's Related to the Use of Procedures (Maintenance)
- - . Procedural Noncompliance IR's (Maintenance)
N u-m b , e r
- o. 10-f 88 1 - ~T
.R s '
5- . u , g V s 3 3
~ -
22 $ f 2 ) 2 2 1 $1 '; l 1_ $1 11 1 1 - 0
" 0 1 $ 0 30 000 000 ]O 00 [ 00 I Jan Feb Mi,r Apr May Jun Jul -Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec -1 1990 t
PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE)
~This indicator shows the number -of identified.
Maintenance Incidents Reports - (IR's) that are related to - the use of procedures, the number of , closed IR's that are related' to the use of
. procedures. (includes IR's that were caused- by procedural nonccmpliance), and the number of closed IR's that were caused by procedural noncompliance.
It should be noted that the .second and third columns will lag behind the first column until the IR's are closed. This reporting method is due to the process in which IR's receive category codes. . IR's receive their category codes when they are closed. Adverse Trend: None SEP 15 & 44
, , . _ _ . - . _ . _ . _ . . __ _ _ ~ . _ _ _ _ - _ . . _ . . _ -
900-
- Open MWO's
~
-G- Fort Calhoun Goal 800-o 700 Nf -
u mM bW 600- & ---- G---- e ----o-----& ---- o---- e ---- o e0 \, r'
\,
8 500- V 'e -- - e---- o---- e 400-300 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG (CORRECTIVENON-0UTAGEMAINTENANCE) This indicator shows the number of corrective non outage maintenance work orders- that cre open ~! at the end of the reporting month. At the end of December 1990, there were 329 corrective non-outage maintenance work orders remaining open. The goal for this indicator is to have less than
- 500 corrective non-outage maintenance work orders remaining open.
Adverse Trend: None SEP 36 ,
t Electrical Maintenance
- Percent of Completed Scheduled Activities G- Fort Calhoun Goal !
100-80- & -& -----0-he - -T - -- - - O - -- - - m - - - -f - - - - G -- - - - O - - - - G - -- - - O P. 60- i e r - C ' e 40- Forced i n _ Outage i 2C- ; ; y Forced y
; 3 Outage l
' i 0 . . .
1 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 1 2 3 4 1 8 4 1 8 5 2 9 6 3 0 0 0 0 N N N N D D D D D C C C 0 0 0 0 E E E E E T T T V V V V C C C C C
-9: 9 9- 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 i 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i
PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (ELECTRICAL MAINTENANCE) This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance -activities as compared to the number of scheduled
~
maintenance activities concerning Electrical Maintenance, ; Maintenance activities include MWR's, MWO's, ST's, PM0's, calibrations, and miscellane'ous maintenance activities.- !
.The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80L l WEEK ENDING PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED ACTIVITIES 12/02/90 77 i 12/09/90 94 12/16/90 91 12/23/90' 45 12/30/90 65 Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 . . - . - . _ . . --- i
- . . = _ - .. _. -- . . - - _- . . . _ _ _ - - - .__
Pressure Equipment
- Percent of Completed Scheduled Activities
-G- Fort Calhoun Goal 100-80 O --- e --- 4 -----G -----O -
- 7-O ----- o - --- o ----- ---G-- e I
P 60- ! e r - Forced 4 e 40- Outage N;< 4 n t
- 20 ! l l Forced
' i
- Outage i ;
j 0 . . . . . .' .
.1 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 1 2 3 4 1 8 4 1 8 5 2 9 6 3 0 0 0 0= N N N N D D D D D C C C 0 0 0 0 E E t E E T T T V V V V C C C C C 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 0- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i
PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDVLED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (PRESSURE E0VIPMENT) {
-This indicator shows the percent of the number of . completed maintenance -activities' as compared. to the number. of , scheduled maintenance ' activities concerning Pressure Equipment Maintenance.
Maintenance activities include MWR's, MW0's,- ST's, PM0's, i calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.
-The fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.
HEEK ENDING PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED ACTIVITIES 12/02/90 95 ; 12/09/90 92 ! 12/16/90 81 1 12/23/90 76 12/30/90 82 Adverse Trend: None SEP 33 71-
_. . ~ . _ . - - - . _ _ . _ . _ _ _ . . _ ._ _ . _ _ . _ . l l _ General Mainj nance
- Percent of Completed Scheduled Activities )
G- Fort Calhoun Goal j- 100-1 80- L O - - - - O- - - - - G- - - - G - - - - G -- - - - O - - - - - - - -O-- - - t. ---- G----- O P e 60- ' r ! C 8 7, 40-t . ; Forced d 20- Outage Nj < y Oub g9
\
4 i L O . . . 1 - 2 2 0 ~1 1 2 0 0 1 2 3 ! 4 1 8 4- 1 8 5 2 9 6 3 0 0 0- 0 N N N N D 0 0 0 0 C C C 0 0 0 0 E E E E E T T- T 'y y y V C C C C C 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 i PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (GENERAL MAINTENANCE) This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance . activities concerning General Maintenance. Maintenance ; activities include MWR's, MWO's, ST's, PM0's, calibrations, and
~
miscellaneous maintenance activities. The fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%. WEEK ENDING PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED ACTIVITIES 12/02/90 54 12/09/90 100 12/16/90- 80 ' 12/23/90 85 12/30/90 100 Adverse Trend: None SEP 33
. - _ _ _ . _. . __. . ~ . -
Mechanical Maintenance ___
- Percent of Completed Scheduled Activities G- Fort Calhoun Goal 100- ,
I l 80- 0-- - - - G - - -- G - - - - - - t - - -- -d - - -- -O - -- O - - - - -O-- - - -O - - - - - O - - - - O i P 60- 4 e r - Forced u age e 40-n
\; '
t *
' i *
< * "* b >
20- ; Outage j 0 . . , l . , , . . . I 2 2 0 1 1 2 0 0 1 2 3 4 1 8 4 1 8 5 2 9 6 3 0 0 0 0 N N N N D D D D D C C C 0 0 0 0 E E E E E T T T V V V V C C C C C 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0: 0 c PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (MECHANICAL MAINTENANCE) This indicator shows the percent of the number of completed maintenance activities as compared to the number of scheduled maintenance activities concerning Mechanical Maintenance. Maintenance activities include MWR's, MWO's, ST's, PM0's, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.
.The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80L WEEK ENDING PERCENT 67 COMPLETED SCHEDULED ACTIVITIES 12/02/90 90 12/09/90 96 12/16/90 55 E 12/23/90 75 12/30/90 94 Adverse Tread: -None SEP 33 + ., - , . - - -
Instrumentation and Control
- Percent of Completed Scheduled Activities
-e- Fort Calhoun Goal 100-
^ ~ ^ ^ ^
O v 0 80 C P60-e
- r. -
Forced c ' Outage e 40 n
- l t
Forced y 20- < Outage l
~
' I 0 .
0 0 1 2 3 1 2 2 0 1 1 2 8 8 5 2 9 6 3 0 4- 1 ~4 1 0 D D D D D 0 0 N N N N 0 E E E E C -- C C 0 0 0 E T V V C C C C C T T V V 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9 9' 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 l j PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES (INSTRUMENTATION & CONTROL) This indicator' shows the pe' cent of the number of completed maintenance activities as coapared to the number of scheduled l maintenance activities concerning Instrumentation & Control. ; Maintenance activities i ncl ude MWR's, MWO's, ST's, PM0's, calibrations, and miscellaneous maintenance activities.
.The Fort Calhoun Station goal for this indicator is 80%.
j' WEEK ENDING PERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED ACTIVITIES 95 l 12/02/90 91 12/09/90' 95
'12/16/90 81 12/23/90 81 12/30/90 i
SEP 33 Adverse Trend: None
- . . .. _ .- _ _ _ _ - . _ = . . . .- - _ _ _. . . . _ -.
}
l l 1 This page intentionally left blank.
5 9 Number of Missed ST's Resulting in LER's 4-N 3- ; u i m , b e r 2-t 1 1 1 1-g% s u. , . , '
%e .. %gu-
<:n .
',4, Yd
$.WM ',,
i 0 ? '?$C 0 'M 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 1
)
1 l l l 1 l l
. ~ . , _ . .
l 5- <m Nutber of Missed ST's Resulting in LER's 4-N 3' u m b e r 2-1- 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aut Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 flVMBER OF MISSED SVRVEILLANCE TESTS RESULTING IN LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS This indicator shows the number of missed Surveillance Tests (ST's) that result in Licensee Event Reports (LER's) during the reporting month. During the month of December 1990, - were zero missed ST's that resulto LER's. Adverse Trend: None SEP 60 & 61 l l
35-l l Total NPRDS Com70sent failures
.30 ' FH Confirmed NPRDS Component Failures 25-N l
uF - {$20- _
?
eI g l- ru g x r 15- m 7g *jn - g e- ,
.fs m m da .~ __
10-
- a 4 l
s 9 m; l$
$ Skl1 w h gp 5- n: ;9 $gy N ,
$ 2 & & '
l l,<.
~)
M M 23 % h ' R N D
._L 0
kS '
! i Jan Feb- Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec l 1990 1
NUMBER OF NUCLEAR PLANT REllABILITl DATA SYSTEMS (NPRDS) l REPORTABLE FAILVRES This indicator shows the total number of NPRDS component - failures and- the number of . confirmed , NPRDS component failures. .The. total' number of l; .NPRDS component- failures is based: upon the number i. of . failure reports ~ sent to INP0.3 The numter of confirmed NPRDS com)onent failures- .is based upon
-the number of fanlure reports that have been accepted by INP0. The difference of these two
! figures- is the number of failure reports still .. under review by INPO. During December 1990, there was a total of zero confirmed NPRDS-component failures. Adverse Trend: None o ; i t
. _ _ _ _ . .__ .~ . - _ _ ___ _ _.- ___ __ .
15 --<- Components With More Than One Failure
+:- Components With More Than Two Failures N -u m
b- GOOD 10-o f C x \
\ >
$ 5-
-n e-
.,. ,,_,,j,,,,
.. - , , , , , ,s
\
-t -
,' x ... w .__ _y.____.x._____x.,
3
'y
-0
, Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 'Jul Aug. Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 , MAINTENANCE' EFFECTIVENESS ~ The. Maintenance Effectiveness Indicator.was developed following l guidelines set forth by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission's
- Office for Analysis and Evaluation of Operational Data (NRC/AE0D). 'The NRC/AE00 is currently developing and verifying a
- maintenance- effectiveness indicator- using the -Nuclear Plant Reliability. Data System (NPRDS) component failures.
This indicator. shows the number of NPRDS components with more. than one failure during the last twelve months and the number of NPRDS components with more than two failures- during the last
. twelve months.-The number of NPRDS components with more than two failures i n a twelve-month period should indicate the.
effectiveness of plant maintenance. During December 1990, ther were 3. NPRDS components with more than one failure and zero NPRDS components with more than two failures.
- Adverse Trend:' None-p.- g -- --m.- - - y e w ,py, y py ---
- 3 20- - Check Valve Failure Rate Industry Check Valve Failure Rate 15- ;
Fo5 GOOD a j 1p - o y ,
)Mn u
ie r1n 10-
'lt i
p oH - e"*u r r 5-s %
- _ _ g _ ....g.. -d-- ~d - d - h---d-+~~d -6 0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 CHECK VALVE FAllVRE RATE This indicator shows the Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate and the. industry check valve failure rate. The data for the industry check valve failure rate is three months behind the Performance Indicators Report reporting month due to the time involved in collecting and processing - the data. The industry failure rate is based upon failures that have occurred in the previous 18 month interval. For September 1990, the Fort Calhoun Station reported a check valve failure rate of 3.91E-6 while the industry reported a failure rate of 2.42E-6. At the end of December, the Fort Calhoun Station reported a check valve f ailure rate of 1.96E-6. As of the , end of September, .the check valve failure rate for Fort Calhoun was higher than the industry check valve failure rate. The reason for the high _ check valve failure rate is that the _ plant is performing maintenance on check valves which have not been tested for failures before. As time goes on, the check valve failure rate is expected to decrease due to the fact that the check values-are now being maintained through the Check Valve Program. Adverse Trend: None SEP 43
-- .. - . . . . _ _ ~ . . - . . _ . _ _ .
h This page intentionally left blank. i i l l I l r
1 1.5- - Secondary System CPI j
. +- Secondary System CPI Limit 1
1- 4-----+----+-----+----+----+----+-----v----+-----+-----+-----+
.C l
. p . I
.5-
~
0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1988 1000-
. - Hours Chemistry is Outside OG Guidelines 800- -4 Industry Upper Quartile l
H-o 600-u- - r 400-S . 200-
- o. .o_ . o _. .. _
_._o_._o _ q ,...._o _...o -..o..._ .o._ _o l 0 -- Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec ! 1988
- Secondary System CPI
-F- Secondary System CPI Limit 1.5-
. <>- Industry Upper Quartile 1 +_.___t.......t-----+----+----+-----+-----+-----h-----+-----+-----b :
C , P-I
.5- p o _.-o ._..o_ .
....o . ._. ._o . .. o .. _.,..o .. - - .4 ._o 0
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 4 1989 1000-
. - Hours Chemistry is Outside OG Guidelines _1 800-H-
o .600-
- u. -
Y 400-s . 200-0
~
f \ Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 i
1 1
- Secondary System CPI l l
--F- Secondary System CPI Limit 1.5- 1
-o Industry Upper Quartile GOOD 4,
1- +----+---+--"---4-----b---+--~+----A----+---a----F
.5 /
0
,y y v r -O O- - O -O - + -O - -O o 0
'88 '89 Dec Jan Feb Mar _Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1989 1990 1000- - Hours Chemistry is Outside OG Guidelines .
757.7 800-M H
~
?S o 600-PJ sa u -
GOOD 4' 359 4 r 400
~~~~~t (p} " s ,
f,3 $k e 200-I 3 11 - 0
\
'87 '88 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr- May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1989 1990 SECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY li:e top graph, Secondary System' Chemistry Performance Index (CPI), is calculated using three parameters. The three parameters used include; cation-corductivity in steam generator blowdown, sodium in steam generator blowdown, arJ. condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen. The CPI was reported as 0.31 for the month of November. The CPI values for June, July, and August are high due to startup after the 1990 Refueling Outage, various fluctuations in power which have occurred, and a forced . outage in August. The industry upper
. quartile value .for this indicator was 0.16 for August 1989 through December 1989. The CPI industry value then changed to 0.24 for 1990. .
The: bottom graph, Hours Chemistry is Outside Owners Groun Guidelines, tracks
=the total hours of 13 parameters- exceeding guidelines during power operation.
The number of hours outside. owners group guidelines was reported as 0.0 hours for.the month of November. The above two chemistry indicators are one month behind the reporting period due to the time needed for data collection and evaluation of the station chemistry data. Adverse Trends: Nane
~- __ ____ .. _ .- .. _ _ ~ _
10-
- Primary System Chemistry Out of Limit !
8-P e 6-r C - e n4 t 2-0 Jan 'Feb Mar. Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1988
- Primary System Chemistry Out of Limit 8-P e 6-r C
e n4 t 2- t O Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec t 1989
i 10-
- Primary System Chemistry Out of Limit 8-P 6- _
[ GOOD e 4 n t 4
. N 1.9 2-3((0j'a fl+,
- O N 0-
'88 '89 Dec Jan Feb Mar ~ Apr May .Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1989 1990 PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERCENT OF HOURS OUT OF LIMIT The Primary System Chemistry - Percent of Hours Out of : Limit indicator tracks the primary system chemistry performance by monitoring six key chemistry
. parameters. '.
The Primary System Chemistry Percent of Hours Out of limit was~ reported as 1.7% for the month of November. The high percent of hours out of limit for the primary system during June and July was due to startup after the 1990 Refueling Outage and various power- fluctuations which occurred during June and July. The high percent of hours out of limit for the month of September 1990 was due a shutdown - and a startup which occurred. The high percent of hours out of limit which was reported for November was due to a shutdown and startup which occurred.100% equates to all six parameters being out of limit for the month. Adverse Trend: None
% ~ 9,en-m+m -4m-- g -w -
- Auxiliary System Chemistry Out Of Limit
+ Industry Upper Quartile 100-o _._ ._o. . ..o
\'
80-
, H 60- '
0 u - r . i s 40-z. 20-6 ...o._ .._ o .._.o .._o . .._ o __o .. _. o _. o O Jan Feb Mar' Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1988 l
- Auxiliary System Chemistry Out Of Limit l
-O Industry Upper Quartile 40-l l
i' L 30-
'H 0 1 u ' 20- '
.r S
~
o . o. ...._Q 10-i s
'o-. -o .o o__ o o q_ _. ._o._ ., ..o l 0 . . . .
Jan. Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oc't Nov D'ec 1989 l !
, . . _ . , _ . - _ s_ . . , . . _ _ _ . _ . , - . .
I
- Auxiliary System Chemistry Out Of Limit
+ Industry Upper Quartile 5,
GOOD 4- + H 3- , 0
, o_ _o.__ o r
s 2- {
\
1-
. \
^
0 0 \^ ^
.0 . . . . .. J --- 1
'88 '89 Dec Jan Feb: Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov , 1989 .1990 l 1 i AUXILIARY SYSTEM (CCW)-CHEMISTRY H0VRS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS l The. Auxiliary System Chemistry Hours Outside Station Limits indicator tracks the monthly a hours that the Component Cooling Water (CCW) ; system is outside the station chemistry limit. The above chemistry indicator is one ! month behind the reporting period due -to: the i time needed for data collection and evaluation of the chemistry data for the station. i
- The auxiliary system. chemistry hours outside ';
station' limits was reported as zero _ for the month of. November. The industry upper quartile value for auxiliary systems chemistry hours outside : station limits is 0.0 hours. The Fort Calhoun- Station is currently performing in _i-the upper quartile of all nuclear power plants for this indicator. Adverse Trend: None i
p g Number of Out-of-Service instruments , 20- 'G- Fort Calhoun Goal k I h, n - M
$3N
- mem kN k==a hN$
?EE us NM 5:
M* XKG 2 ** 5 ee Miifi
=
m t 12- IEE3 'iM#1 52 ='== == #"=el b e u- - NE sua N$
==
5KG
==1 C-s=as :=
f:23
==
rm MM Eiss T22 EEE 5 - - ~ N YN $N N N NN e 8- umm g-gy===
=== ==?3 - -
o Il haun Tia2;h gl Q
^= ===
g .gg..f I~t s Q-[.grjy
== maa
= -= sn==- ====
g'L=&jf .;.g:== == l9fj_ _ _ _{p35
- ==
==s
-3 M. ,
?5?5 ?=5,5 && i==.2 3.Tr.T l-T& +1H ~'n T55 [- =.=~..s?1 ggg y== gg g gg=3-5 ggg y = gg;; .gg g=
4- g4 7mt rear -ess ;;=a ggg= =::: ==
;;;;g= = . = s_ _ _ :==--== .
_ _ .~~ FM 1- h=
- iRMi f22 MG2 = = ~ tzf == ET_7 Et _
- D
- = 5 5 '
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug .Sep Oct- Nov. Dec 1990' - IN-LINE CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS OUT-0F-SERVICE
-This: indicator shows the total number of in-line chemi stry system instruments. that are ;
out of-service at-'the end of the reporting month. l The chemistry systems involved in, this indicator - include the Secondary System and the Post Accident Sampling System (PASS). At .the end of December there were a total of 7
.in-line chemistry instruments that were
, out-of-service. Five of these -instruments were from the Secondary System and two were from PASS. The Fort Calhoun goal for the number of in-line chemistry system instruments that are
.out-of-service has- been set at 6. Six-out-of-service chemistry . instruments make up 10%
of all the chemistry instruments which are counted i for this indicator. 1 Adverse Trend: None I
.. . i. - - . . , . - - - . . - . . - - - , - - , . . - . _ - , , - . - - - . - ....... - -.
. , . = _ . .. --. . ..._.__.. .-. . - . . . - - . - - ._ . - . .. _ . - -. . . . . . . This page intentionally left blank.
\
- ._ _. .._ ._ _ , . .._.. __ . - . _ _ _ . . _ _ . _ _ . _ _ . _ . _ . _ _ _ . _ _ . _ ~ . - . . .
4 l l l l l 10000- ! l Total Waste Produced I
- Federal and State Limit 8000-
~
K o kf 6000-0 W ' 9a r af4000-S e S - 2000-I i 0 I Il l I ! 1 1 > I I Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 I l l
+
3 (_J Tota! Weste Produced federal and St ale Li, nit , _ __ __J 1000- - .- K 800-10 jf . j c gN l 600-
.r a a s .
t m
'Ss 400 200-I I >
0 ' Jan- Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov' Dec
'1990 HAZARDOUS WASTE PRODUCED ,
'This indicator shows the total amount 'of hazardous waste produced by Fort Calhoun each month. This hazardous waste consists. of- non halogenated hazardous waste, halogenated hazardous waste, and other hazarcous waste. produced. ;
During' the month of December, 0.0 kilograms of non-halogenated hazardous wasto was produced, 70.4 kilograms of halogenated hazardous waste was produced, and 0.0 kilograms of other > hazardous waste was produced. ]. Myerse Trend:- None l-l l L_---____:__.:____.. - . , . . . - . . . . -
5000-i 1 Month U Quarter Year 4000-3000-m R. ~ E M 2000-9 j
~
'p s 1000- 'f gp n,e v; /,
' ,1 , .
< se' 'i7" 4
- ggy . .
;;l p Q' "' '
8% - - -
0 1986 - 5000-1 IMonth
@ Quarter 4000- M Year 3000 m
s R . r E M 2000-S *, 1989
L
.5000- -
I ! Month G] Quarter OPPD Limit E Year 4000-3000-m R . E M " 2000- , 1000-3 + [] if - 4
, , j.
J 0
*N 'A
December 1990 4 MAXIMUM INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE During December 1990, an individual accumulated 1,073 mrem which was the highest individual exposure for the month. The maximum individual exposure for the fourth quarter of 1990 was 1,097 mrem. The maximum individual exposure reported for 1990 was 2,233 T mrem. The high maximum individual exposure reported for the month of December, the fourth quarter and the lear of 1990 was due to the 1990 Refueling Outage and four forced outages which occurred in the latter part of 1990. The maximum accumulated 1989 inJividual exposure was 1,165 mrem, received by a Health Physicist. The OPPD limit for the maximum yearly individual radiation exposure is 4,500 mrem / year.
. Adverse Trend: None
500; LW@ Monthly Contaminations
. -. Cumulative Contaminations _,
-G- Fort Calhoun Goal 400- -0 Industry Upper Quartile P
e p 300-s o i n
-n 200-e 1
,N
+ ~~ i, 100- O- --- O -o - ~~'O ~'-~O-~~""O~ ~~~O ~ ~~O~~ i' ~ ~~+ ~~ ~ ~ ~ O r
n au :gg...o
~
I
' 0 a '
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct- Nov Det 1988
.500h m Monthly Contaminations
- Cumulative Conta'ninai. ions i e- Fort Calhoun Goal '
400-- -& Industry Upper Quartile P e .-
.r 300-s
.o' -
n-n .200-
-e I .
O~~~~~*~~~C' ,.o o -o- 9 a y._.._.o .._ .. o - 100- -O O
- g ..... O
. ..... g - -9 ..... &
6- ~ & ~~~ 0 EI ' ' " ' ' ' '- ^ ' " ' ' N~~~~ ' " ' Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 l
b g Monthly Contaminations ;
- 500.-
- Cumulative Contaminations
-l-G- Fort Calhoun Goal
-O Industry' Upper Quartile. .;
400- >
- 357 P -!
w - e 1
- gl 'r d,
s-o 300- GOOD l l
$ n +
n / W@$?n 0: 200 I -' i 157' - s - 0-- '- O - -- & - O--- O --- G - --O -- - G - -- G-- -O --- &- - -O ,
$g l g,, O - -- - O- -o -o- -O - -O - -O - + -O - --O-O -O i'$lg i :100- >
T$! M3 - N h $$ $N i p$h h 0
' - - ~' ' '
- -M
'88;189 Jan'. ~ Feb Mar Apr May- Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov -Dec 1990- ];
i TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMINATIONS '[ s There was. :a . total of 15 skin and clothing contaminations .
- reported .for the Fort Calhoun- Station during December, 1990, i There has been a total of 237 skin.and clothing'. contaminations d u r;i n g 1990. The high . number of -skin and clothing .
contaminations which occurred during the months ' of March and April 1990.were related to increased = activity .in the. Radiation Controlled Area.(RCA) during the 1990 Refueling Outage. .; There .was a total of.157 skin and clothing contaminations in 1989. The 1990 goal -for skin and clothing contaminations is 'less than 150 contaminations. This 1990 goal of .150 contaminations _ includes a Fort Calhoun goal of 23 skin contaminations.- The industry upper quartile value for total skin and clothing contaminations -is 129'per unit annually. Adverse Trend: :None SEP 15 & 54
.i 100- - Decontaminated. Auxiliary Building !
-OJ Fort Calhoun Goal 190- 'l P
-e .r c- -
O- "O -- -O--O --O - -O - O --O -- O - - O - -O- -O e n 70_ t 60-
. t 50-Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun. Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec i
1989 100- - Decontaminated Auxiliary Buildin 90-
~
~
.p ,
e 80-r- C. e _ U 70-t
' ~
1 50 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 l
)
i Decontaminated Auxiliary Building
-O- Fort Calhoun Goal 100-i 90-o p____a____n n c ., _ _ _ ,3
- 80- 'A 7 0' C- 'N /
e . ' q- _ - _ _ " t ' 70-t GOOD 60- ! I 50 Li Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug_ Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 DECONTAMINATED AVXILIARY BUILDING This graph _ shows the percentage of the auxiliary building 'which is decontaminated (clean) based on the total -square : footage. The Fort : Calhoun goal is 85% decontaminated ~ auxiliary: building (non-outage months)
- and 75% decontaminated auxiliary building (outage
-months).
As of- December 31, 1990, 85.9% of _the total square footage of the auxiliary building was decontaminated.
.An increase in the . - percentage of the auxiliary building which is decontaminated is expected.after the i auxiliary building painting is completed. !
l Adverse ~ Trend: None SEP 54 i l l' I 1 1 i 20- .i
-, E Number ofs. Identified PRWP's-
. 1
;l "N -
1
-- u i 15-
.m-b; 1 e :> .
1 r- : I
, 'i.10' .,
.}
P f~ h rfsh
]
'1-P, .
5- % i A _{
.g--
q
- 2 -- ) .
I 0
, H O' O. b 0 Jan Feb' Mar-- Apr May Jun Jul -Aug Sep 'Oct' Nov- Dec j
- 1990 'l a
;l
-RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM. l i
.The ' Radiological ' Work Practices' Program m
~Indic'ator shows the : number of Poor: :I Radiological Work Practices .(PRWP!s) which:
'.were identified during the reporting month' .
)!
The!. number of- PRWP's which are -. identified '
'each month -should' indirectly provide a means -
Lt o ..q u a 1 i t a t.i'v e l y assess supervisor
'a ccoun t ability, for their- workers' radiological' performance'.-
During the -month of ' December 1990,- no PRWP's i were identified. Adverse-Trend: None SEP 52 i ! -- /
75- 1 ITotal Number of Hot Spots s Number of Additional Hot Spots Identified 50- - - mt - - - b eS ! rp - o ot fs 25-0
' G Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May 1990 1991 NUMBER OF HOT SPOTS :
This indicator shows the total number of hot spots which have been identified to exist in the Fort Calhoun Station and have been
-documented through the use of a hot spot identification sheet. A hot spot is defined as. a small localized source of high radiation. A hot spot _ occurs when the contact dose rate of an item or piece of equipment is at least 5 times the 'ieneral Area dose rate and the item l or piece _ of equipment's dose rate is equal to or greater than 100 mrem / hour. .At the end of December, 46 hot spots were identified and documented to exist in the Fort Calhoun Station. During the month of December, no - additional hot spots were identified to exist in the Fort Calhoun Station.
The Station ALARA committee established a goal to eliminate at least 5 hot spots during 1990. The Fort Calhoun Station has exceeded this goal. Adverse Trend: None
)
I i Monthly Radioactive Gas Discharged 800, - Cumulative Radioactive Gas Discharged
-e- Cumulative Goal B 600-f-
. C l: u O----- G ---- G ---- - O -- -- @ -- -- G - -- - C--- -- G - -- -- O -- -G- --- G --- - O i r 400-si e
-s . ,
4 i-200-l' ' ~
~ 0- - -
! Jan- Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1988 l- 800 l l Monthly Radioactive Gas Discharged
- Cumulative Radioactive Gas Discharged ,
-G- Cumulative Goal ;
600'- i
~
- C u --
Y 1 400
.i e
s . 200-l e.__ _ _ .e_ _ _._ e. _ _ _ _e _ _ _ e __ _ _ e _ _ _ _ e _ _ _ _ _ e _ _ _ _ e . _ _ ___o. _e___
' ' I !' '
0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989
-100-1 i
1
. - - . - . . . . . . .= .- -- -. -.
f 1
, I- -1 Monthly Radioactive Gas Discharged 3
-- Cumulative Radioactive Gas Discharged -[
.;, G- Cumulative Goal J
7854 800-vi _ i GOOD i ~? . 4 4 l C 600- -i _. u 7
.i .
j i [ 400-p __9 __e __ _e.__ e.__e. _ e _ _ _ g __ _e __ _ e._ _ _g__ _~o I Y n
, ! t
'l g 164_ 200-
~-
9 .
*4 5 y
, l ,"
0 88- '89I Jan Feb- Mar Apr- May Jun Jul Aug-~Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 1990 ; GASE0VS RADI0 ACTIVE-WASTE BEING l DI_SCHARGED TO THE-ENVIRONMENT The gaseous' radioactive- waste being discharged to the - environment 1_is shown 4for January 1990 through June L1990. Antotal .of- - 261 curies have been released; to the - . environment from - January . through June of._ 1990.--The Fort Calhoun Station goal is 360 , curies-for this indicator. .. The high value ' of gaseous radioactive waste h that was releasedEto. the environment -during the- month of. February 1990 was: due to containment purge associated. with the 1990 Refueling Outage. The gaseous radioactive . waste being. discharged to -the environment- is calculated'
- i. every six months, i.
l Adverse Trend: None L
-101-
%c . ~ ~ . .,.#-
. . _ . , - - , - . , _ + w . = , , . -
I l' Monthly Radioactive Liquid Discharged
- Cumulative Radioactive Liquid Discharged 400.
-e- Cumulative Goal C
300-u r 200 G-- -- - G - - - -+- --- G - - --e - -- - G --- - G- -- - G - -- - + -u : . O i 100 0
'I I" ' l' ' ' ' '
Jan^ Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov- Dec l 1988 i B o j f 200-1 G- - 1aE 150-i1f - o 1 f_. 100-n o1 snu 50- i se -
.l' 'I l' !' '
o n 0 f t Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov- Dec ; 1988 . l l Monthly Radioactive Liquid Discharged
- Cumulative Radioactive Liquid Discharged e- Cumulative Goal C- 300 G-- G ---e-- G --e--- G --e-- G - --e --- G ---e - -- O u .
- r. .200-i L- 100 I I ' 'I I' '
0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May 'Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec W l989 T h a > s 1200-l o
'uG t 900- -s o eTa - t am n M n. 600-k -
d0 t l -s uhns 300-L. s 1 - L t 0 I II l' ' 'l Il l' '
.f o Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec r 1989
-102-
+
--. f+ t
i l l Monthly Radioactive Liquid Discharged
- Cumulative Radioactive Liquid Discharged j G- Cumulative Goal
.231 400 q 228 228c m n hj i) ;j C 300-
! (o r O--G-- G--- G ---G ---O -- @ -- e--e - e--- G--- O ,
W h( i 200-1 e GOOD g pr M
@f ~
100- & > h '89 0 J 87 '88 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 ;
. 20000-T h '
-15000-O G i
- u. 8
.s3 a
10000-n)0- t d s 3_ 15000-f 1 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May -Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 'Dec 1990 LIOVID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT The liquid radioactive waste being discharged to. the environment is
- shown for the months of January 1990 - through June 1990. The liquid radioactive - waste that was discharged--to the environment from' all sources . totaled 55 curies- from January through . June-- 1990. The Fort Calhoun ' Station goal- for 1990 is 256 curies.
The bottom graph shows the volume of liquid- radioactive waste that has been released -from the radioactive ~ waste. monitor -tanks and steam
. generators. The . volume : of liquid radioactive' waste discharged to the environment- from the radioactive waste - monitor' tanks and the. steam generators totaled ll.6--mill'on gallons from January through June 1990. I
.The -liquid radioactive waste that was released to .the environment I includes liquid released from the steam generators due 'to the fact that radioisotopes were detected in the steam generator blowdown.
The liquid. radioactive waste being discharged -to the environment is calculated every six months. q Adverse Trend: None
-103-I
30; _.Loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Does not include System Failures) N ' F 25-a m 205 - b G000 el 15;
.r u .
4 r 10 :, o' 5-gs 0 Nov Dec Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oc't Jan 1990 120- - Security System Failures Np . ua GOOD ,
'm j 80-b) Y
~
eu r ,
- r. 40 e
Os -
-f 0 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov ,
1990 LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS (SECURITY) The. Loggable/ Reportable Incidents (Security) Indicator is depicted in two. separate graphs. The top graph shows the total number of loggable/ reportable incidents concerning Licensee Designated Vehicles _ (LDV's), security , badges, security key control, ' escorting, and access control which occurred during the _ reporting month. The bottom _ graph shows the total number of loggab_l e/ reportable incidents concerning security _ system failures which occurred during the reporting month. During the month of December 1990, there were 101 loggable/ reportable incidents identified. Security system failures accounted for 97 of the .loggable/ reportable incidents (96%) reported this month. Forty five -( 4 5 ) of the loggable/ reportable security system failures were environmental failures due. to inclement weather conditions during the reporting period. As depicted in the top graph,- Security Services has considerably reduced the number of non security system failure related incidents. Continuous efforts are being made-to improve the maintenance of the security system. Mverse Trend: None SEP 58
-104-
i
~
October 1990~ i
'150- A November 1990' I -lDecember 1990 -- j a
iN.I 97 100-
- u n-89 mC- .-
bi- GOOD C
~
[r e Y b 65 n- 2i
*=
- ot-50' N ts 22 \'
M
. 55 5
4
- g 0 0-20 0 ,5 0 0 0 01 0 0 0 0 #d LLDV's . Badges Key. Escorting Access System Control Control? Failures
't '
SECVRITY INCIDENT BREAKDOWN The . Security. Incident Breakdown; Indicator-shows- the ~. number of incidents concerning- the~ following items for the reporting -month in - column , form. These items ' include:- Licensee Designated Vehicles: (LDV's), security badges, Jsecurity Ekey control, escorting, access control, and security system failures. ' Security ~ Items Number of Incidents DEC NOV OCT-
. Licensee Designated Vehicles (LDV'.s) 0- 0 0 Security Badges 4.- 5 0 -
Security Key. Control 0 0 0
-Escorting _ 0- 'l 0 Access Control 0 0 0 ;
. Security System Failures 97 65 89 Total' 101 71 89 Adverse' Trend: None SEP 58
-105-
If Envirotemental Failures 40 5 System Failures N 32 b 30- ?NN i} e am== r }yy i GOOD
#M L Y
h N5 f 20- Mg jJj F 2355 ;
~
13 1 c=I=w ," u .10 r
$. MM+
i [J d?M9 6 6 e "i s -
$$ fg.3 gj Mg 4
Q;===e 2 155% .- - 3
" ~ "
0-Alarm System CCTV Computer Terminal Door Card Reader SECURITY SYSTEM FAILURES This indicator shows the number of loggable/ reportable incidents concerning the following items for the reporting month. These items include: alarm system failures, CCTV failures, security computer failures, terminal failures, door equipment. failures, and card reader failures. In addition to this information, alarm system ' failures and CCTV failures will be divided into two categories, environmental and system failures as indicated in the Definition Section. System Failures Number of Incidents DEC 90 NOV 90 OCT 90 ENVIRONS FAILURES ENVIRONS FAllVRES ENVIRONS FAILVRES Alarm Systems 13 33 10 16 5 22 CCTV 32 6 28 2 42 4 Computer N/A 4 N/A 0 N/A 3 Terminal N/A 1 N/A 1 N/A 1 Door Equipment N/A 6 N/A 8 N/A 11 Card Reader N/A 2 N/A 0 N/A 1 Total 45 52 38 27 47 42 Adverse Trend: None SEP 58
-106-
This page intentionally left blank. 4
-107-i
- Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts
.12-P e 9' r
~
C e n 6-t' 3-O Jan :Feb Mar- Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep- Oct Nov Dec 1988
. Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts 15-12-P
.e 9-r.
~
C e
-n '6-t 3-
/
O Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct' Nov Dec 1989
-108-
i i
~!
15-
- Amount of Work.0n Hold Awaiting Parts g ;
'12 -
GOOD-P 9- 4 e-
- r. t
.c. .-
j e- .j
- n. :
t- 6- : i 3 .- l 0 Jan Feb . Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec i 1990 j 1 s AMOUNT OF WORK'0N HOLO AWAITING PARTS (NON 0UTAGE) This procurement indicator displays the amount of open, non-outage, maintenance items -that .are on hold awaiting parts, to the total amount, of open, non-outage, <
--m a i n t en a n ce :i tems , expressed as a 4 percentage.-
1 The percentage of work on hold. awaiting- ! parts increased to 4.0% in December. As . of December 31,.- 1990, there were. a . total .of -799 open, non-outage, maintenance items with 32 of these items on hold awaiting parts. -1 i Adverse Trend: None *4 l.. l
-109-
}
12-Lg-
- Spare Parts' Inventory Value - ;
.i 1
~1 i i'
4 O 10-n I S 0 ' l
~
f
'D !
o 8- . i 1 :
.1~
a - r -- S 6 Jan. Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct .Nov Dec
.I 1988 I
-_ Spare Parts. Inventory Value .
12 M 4
.q 1 i i
1:
-1 '
o-10-- l
.n. :
s j o f D - '8-
-o 1
1 a . ', r 4-s 6
-Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989
-110-
. . . . - ~ . _ .
m ,
. ..j
. . ;; o . .
' - Spare Parts Inventory Value- --
n -_ t . , n' up , if ' . : j .i i i
- u ,
- o. 10
- n. .;
-s -
S, . i l-o
.f.
1 i m
+
.o; D: f j p ;_ 8- ,
i n; . a '.
- r. .'
-s.
. i a
i i
.6..
Jan Feb. Mar .Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct .Nov- -Dec 1990
.p1 . ..
q t SPARE PARTS INVENTORY VALVE' i 1-The ; spare' partsj-inventory value at the . Fort-
.Calhoun Station at; the end.of December ~ 1990 o
.wasireported as $10,978,039.
4 [AdverseTrend:. None. 4
+_ ' .
\
' )(
i 4
=
-111-
~
3
,r+ 4
7501 - Spare Parts issued T: . h O 600-u S' ~ a n- l d 450- ! s O f 300-D .; 1
;1.150-r -
j s : 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr~ May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov .Dec ; 1988 ~l 750- - Spare Parts issued T-h' o u 600-s- ) a . n- t I . d 450- 's o. f-
-.300-D 0 -
l'
'l 2150- __
a-r , s O Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989
-112-
i
. 7 50.- ;
T
. Spare Parts issued ;
h: o
=u '600-s a -
n. 450-
-o-I 300-D
.l 0 :
150- _
.a -
r
.s 0
' Dec .. Jan Feb Mar Apr .May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1989' 1990 1
SPARE PARTS ISSVED The value 'of the spare parts issued during November 1990, totaled $201,806.- ,
~
- The l value of -_the spare parts -issued during
. December -1990, wasinot available -at the time '
- of- publ i shing.
' Adverse Trend: 'None t
-113-
- Inventory Accuracy idO-
/
95-P e - T c e 90- , n t 85-80 Jan Feb- Mar Apr May Jun. Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 INVENTORY ACCURACY This indicator shows the= accuracy of the actual parts count for the warehouse compared to the counts contained in the hni5 computer . system for the reporting month. During December, 853 different line items were counted in the warehouse. Of the- 853 line items counted one item ' needed its count adjusted. The-i nventory accuracy _ for the month of December was reported as 99.9%. Adverse Trend: None 4
-114-
; 5'
- . Pick Tickets With' Parts Not Available'- !
4-P , pi
.e c :
, -r, k ' 3-
-c --
e T- , n'. i -
-{
-t c k - ;
o'O.
.j
.f t .
's .
1 1- i V l 0
-Jan .Feb Mar- Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov .Dec 1990 i
i STOCK 0VT~ RATE
..q l
LThis:oindicator shows the- percentage of the. number of PickiTicketstgenerated with no parts available during - the reporting month. Dur.ing the month of December, a ' total of 747 Pick
- Tickets - were- generated. Of the 747 Pick' Tickets tl generated, zero Pick Tickets were -generated -with. no parts' available..
Adverse Trend: None l l 1 l
-l l
-115- l 1
-, - ... ~ . . . . . . -. . . .. .
' ~
,m
- 1500; t Total . Receipts i= T Spare Parts Receipts
, W ' t- -
.,3. Standard Stores Receipts
>' Direct Charge Receipts
, 1200-
- NR-'
U
- lmeJ- 900- .
.w C
.b m
- *e..i. i e
rh. 600-o fg.
/
ho <
!300- O' . O .-
.,, g 'M---d.% '
A- ---' (&G ,': 9f ~~.*o- W'"'% f . 2 0 Feb- Mar - Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep. Oct Nov Dec- -Jan '! 1990 1991 o 2 i
' WAREHOUSE RECEIPTS -i' t:
'h
'This- indicator shows the total: -number o f"- 3
, warehouse receipts, the number of J spare parts-
? receipts,ctheenumber of standard.storesfreceipts, -
and, the number of L direct' charge: receipts: during-
.the reporting month.
.'During December the warehouse received a total of; '
415 receipts., Of the-~ 415 - receipts- received,102 - were spare- parts receipts, 80 were standard stores receipts, . ' and 233 were direct charge
~
receipts. ; i Adverse Trend: None : l l
-116-
, .,.y.. .e.- , . ~ , , y--
4000- O Total Issues Spare Parts Issues 4- Stanclard Stores -Issues
+:- Direct Charge Issues 3000-u I
m s s
'b s
e 2000-u r, s O o - f
' O--O 1000- Y 'g- 14 s -U O ~O'
t' ,. o ~ 'O~' g. -O 0
d__f -# ===~ Feb Mar Apr May Jun- Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan I 1990 1991 WAREHOUSE ISSUES This indicator shows the total number of warehouse issues,-the number of spare parts issJes, the number
'of standard stores issues, and the number direct charge issues for the reporting month.
During December the warehouse completed a total' of 1,075 issues. Of the 1,075 isturs completed, 289 were spare parts issues, 565 were standard stores issues, and 221 were direct charge issues. Adverse Trend: None
-117-
I $1._ , ju f, , g hi l80-; -G-L Total- Returns - j 6- Spare Parts Returns .
* = . -O- Standard Stores Returns .
n:- ^ --X- Direct Charge; Returns 60- k T s
- of et ,
^
ra-c1'
- nI e--_ 40-i
- t s:.
G T , s <
'\c -
.m
.ou1 ,
, g
- fe. A'- / \
\
m ,. 1s e ,20- .
-a j / \ .s,.', / ; i, .
i
/ u. O h, -E3 :-
g, ,,, _,f' o -- - o ,_,_ g .. - 4__ _gh ',, O " O o -O 3
'O--o '
' O '~' ' ' ' '
.0 .
F'eb Ma'r A'p'r May' Jun- du'l A'ug S'ep Oc't Nov De'c Jan'- -! . 1990 .1991 J q
\
f ,
.'- f-
. WAREH00SE' RETURNS :!
I. n1 *
- The Warehouse; Returns-- InCcator shows the -percentage- of l '
- the total unumber :of warehouse returns, the number - of:
-spare- parts returns,. the number - of standard ' stores returns, . and. the number of --~ direct icharge returns - t conpared to the total 1 number"of warehouse . issues: during- .. ;
- thecreporting month.. .
- 1. : During the month of December-there were a total of 1,075.
warehouse issues. =0f the 1,075 issues, there -were 159 _ total returns. These returns consisted . of 114' spare 1 parts returns and.45 standard stores returns, er L Adverse Trend:' None
-118-4 .w . k-y-+,- -,,,-u - , - . ..,,,,m..y , ,.,,,%, , , , , - , . , . - _ . . , , , _ . . . , ,m. , , , - , , ,
i 25- ! lOctober 1990
~
(x1 November 1990
':15 December 1990 M 20-a t
e Nr ' u i~15-ma bl , o rR e 10-oq - fu
^
==
--~
qq. . O L-0-5 6 10 11-15 36-20 21-30 >30 Age in Days MATERIAL RE0 VESTS AWAlilNG APPROVAL This indicator shows the number of material requests awaiting approval at the end of the reporting month broken down into their age .by days, At the end of December, 7 material requests were awaiting approval, b_dverse Trend: None
-119-
- Percentage of Total Purchases that are Expedited l j
1.5-p- - e __ r , c 1-e n t
.5-O Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 i
EXPEDITED PURCHASES This indicator shows the percentage of expedited purchases compared to the total number of' purchase ordsrs generated during the reporting month. During December, there was a total of 406 purchase orders generated. Of the 406 _ purchase orders generated, there were 2 expedited purchases. Adverse Trend: None o
-120-N l + - _ _ - _ - - - - -
1
r j
?
150' ( October 1990
, O November 1990
[ $ December 1990 120 N 90-V ' b 0 e - C o e 60-fS _.__ , y... y 30- - 0 esm**" t Shel f 1.ife CQE Miscellaneous INVOICE BREAKDOWN This indicator shows the number of invo:( that are on hold at the end of the reporting month due to shelf life, CQE, and miscellaneous reasons. At the end of December, 4 invoices were on hold due to shelf life reasons, 43 invoices were on hold due to CQE reasons, and 21 invoices were on hold due to miscellaneous reasons. Adverse Trend: .None 121-
100- - Percentage of Material Requests for issues with the Request Date the same as the Need Date 80-P 60-r C e n 40 t 20-0
-Jan Feb Mar -Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 4
MATERIAL RE0 VEST PLANNING This indicator shows- the- percent of material requests (MR's) for issues with their request date the same as thair need date
~ compared to the total number of MR's for issues for the reporting month.
During the month of December, a total of 747 MR's were received by the warehouse. Of the 747 total . MR's ~ received ' by the warehouse, 557.MP.'s were, for issues with their request date the same as their need date. Adverse Trendi None 4
-122-
This page intentionally left blank. i 123-
700 - Total Modification Packages Open 600-N 500-u m . b 400-7 300-Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct .Nov Dec 1988 700-
- Total Modification Packages Open 600-L N ~500-u $ f -
e r; 400-300-Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989
-124-
700~
- Total Modification Packages Open 600-r 500-425 425 384 400-
. /Q q
l[I _
%g $ h 300-
/
L: A ($i
. k
'87 '88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 a
OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS The total number of outstanding modifications decreased by 9 during the month of November. [ATEGORY OCT 90 NOV 90 DEC 90 Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress 13 14 16 Mod Requests Being Reviewed 137 134 130 Design Engr.- Backlog /In Progress 90 98- .99 Construction Backlog /In Progress 39 -38 40 Desian Enar. Update Backloa/In Proaress E E E Total 340 346 337 As of the end of December, 72 additional modification requests have been issued this year and 15 modification requests have been cancelled. The Nuclear Projects Review Committee (NPRC) has completed 171 backlog modification request. reviews this year. The Nuclear Projects Committee (NPC) has completed 150 backlog modification request reviews this year.
- The ~ number of. reviews completed is high due to. the fact . that some. of these requests were reviewed more than once.
L Adverse Trend: None
- l. l L l o
l L -125-t i l
\ -. . - - , ,, --. -- --w . .-r- ,.~ .
M 100-o l Temporary Electrical Modifications N d 80[ 6- Temporary Mechanical Modifications mg bj 60- --! O c ' ' 40 a h-----h-----6 0 1 20-
-b - - - 6 ~. - h -- --h -----6 g .
A----- h ... -h ----.g 0 n 0l ' s Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec l l 1988 M 40-0 l l Year.End 1988 Nd - ui 30-mf ' bi ec 20-ra . o'f10-fo -
- n. O s 0-3 b-6 6-9 9-12 > 12 Age in Months ,
M 100 _.
- - Total Temporary Modifications N h: 80-uj l 60 __
e.c. 3 r a 40-t - 01 ' f o. 20- , D 0 5- 'Jan -Feb ' Mar Apr May Jun- Jul Aug' .Sep Oct Nov Dec g 1989 40-Ny . l l Year End 1989 ; u i ' 30-mf - bi ! ec 20-r a- , of10-fo - n o _
$ 0-3 3-6 6-9 9-12 > 12 Age in Months
-126-
. .. -- ._ ... - . . - ~ - - - _- . - . . _ -- . - -
l 100, Total Temporary Modifications M . G- Fort Calhoun Goal Nd 80-ui - 1 mf 60-bi 1 ec - ra 40-t
~~ ~
- 20 ' w _ . . _ . . . _ . _ . . . _ . . _ . . _ . . _;
s 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul .Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 4 1990 E October 1990 f 15- IE9 November 1990 Nd I IDecember 1990 ui
.m f }o.
b1
,eC~ .ra '
t 5- w;
'o i O @
fo $ inM $$ E 13 I n 8 0- N- N Ei - - - - - i 0-3 3-6 69 9-12 > 12 1 Age in Months. TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS (EXCLUDING SCAFFOLDING) The top graph shows the-total number of temporary modifications installed in the Fort Calhoun Station and a Fort Calhoun goal. At :the end of ' December, there -was a --total of 23 temporary ' i
. modifications installed .inithe Fort Calhoun Station. The Fort Calhoun. goal . for .the total number of installed temporary modifications is less than 15 installed temporary modifications. !
l The ' bottom- graph, .: Aae of Temocrary - ModificationE, displays. the age of all. temporary : modifications by months installed in' the
. plant.
The number of temporary modifications which are 6-9 months old have been ' increasing, but further investigation reveals that 4 out of the 6 temporary modifications that are 6 months old require an outage 'for removal.
- Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 & 71
-127-
200 + Total Number of Open EAR's N 150-u - 1 G [100 -- g r 50-
-0 Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun 1990 1991 October 1990 80- P M November 1990 N
u 1 I ecember 1990 60-0 40
=
Mt .
=fi r sd N 20 fA3 N 0----- .
* - W
- 03 .3-6 >6 Age In Months 0UTSTANDING ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE RE0 VESTS (EAR's) ,
Thertop~ graph shows the total number of open EAR's at the end' of t1e reporting month. At the end of December, there :
. was a total' of 134 open EAR's.
. The' bottom graph . shows- the total number of open EAR's
.broken down by their age in months. '
Adverse Trend:- None SEP 62 I
-128-
200- O Total ECN's Open W- ECN's Opened Duria.9 the Month
- -o- ECN's Completed During the Month " 150-m b
e r B,/a U G ; C l \ N-
' x,' ' o ./ \ ,,
,!'N 50- ' ~ -j s .,'y,;o,.; A ,
' ~
'y ' ',,
. ,y *k. o ,-l ._o.
%~,
s, . ., c s, -
.._.o ,
'y ,y y/
e O Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE STATUS The indicator shows the total number of open Engineering Change Notices (ECN's), the number of ECN's opened during the reporting month, and -the number of ECN's completed during the reporting month. At the end of December 1990, there was a total of 134 open ECN's. During the month of December, 22 ECN's were opened, and.15 ECN's were completed. Adverse Trend: None SEP 62 129-
l' ' 300 I IDocument Change , W Substitute Replacement Item 277 l Facility Changes , 250-1 '.
. 220
- = m 200- yg ass N
???
150- $$145 i Miss f h$
- x=w:
l 100- - 5id x= sit? M1 , 52 ML 50- 43' 39 Ni Mas NN mz ' L.
- = W M ESM 9 9
-4 4 g M I W I Ld W5 Total ECN's ECN's Opened ECN's Completed Total ECN's Open During the Month During the Month Received ,
ENGINEERING CHANGE N011CE BREAKDOWN This' indicat'or breaks down the-total number of Engineering Change [ p Notices- (ECN's) that remain open at the end of the reporting-month, > L the number of ECN's that were opened during .the reporting month, the number 1of ECN that were ~ completed during the reporting month, and
'the number of ECN's received by ' Design . Engineering during the reporting month into several categories. These categories include:
ECN's requiring a document change to-complete,.ECN's requiring L ' substitute replacement items to complete, and ECN's requiring facility H: changes to complete. Total Ooen Opened Comoleted Received Document Changes 43 9 10 277 ( L Substitute Rep 1acement'- 39 4 1 220 - Facility Changes 52 9 4 145 E Adverse Trendi None SEP 62 h
-130-
i l I i l l l r i i This page intentionally left blank 1 s i
-131-
12-
- Recordable Injury Cases Frequency Rate
'10-F
~
r 8-
- u. .
e n 6'- C y R4 a L' 2-0
.Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep 0:t' Nov Dec 1987 i 12-Recordable injury Cases Frequency Rate
.10 F-a., r -
e
; q 8-e u ,
L e n 6-C y . l L' R' 4-lE a ll- t - l. 2-f . i.l l 0._. i Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec l-l 1988 L o
-132-L
- .. - - . - - - _ . . - . - - - ~ , .
1 5- = 1990 Recordable ' Injury Frequency Rate 41989 Recordable injury Frequency Rate , 4*5-
+- 5 Year Average Recordable Injury Frequency Rate 4-3.5- "
- GOOD 3-R .
+
a t
.5 eA e s ,A s ;
2- N ,-
. '\ ;V ,'% . ~ b 1.5-N+[ 'd-h j.....+,'~~g .. .g 4 ...:.y - g
, / ..
3 l-
~~
e< g m M
?d a '%r" '
~
f
)Jan . $f$
F'e'b Mar q $ $ $ M $ $ $ $ Apr May- Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1 RECORDABLE INJURY CASES FRE0VENCY RATE This indicator shows the monthly recordable injury cases frequency rate in column form. The above graph also includes the 1989 recordable injury cases- frequency rate and--the Fort Calhoun Station 5 year average , recordable injury cases frequency rate. A recordable injury ccse is reported if Nuclear. Operations Division personnel are injured on the. job and require corrective medical treatment. The recordable cases frequency rate is computed on a year-to-date basis. There were three recordable injury cases reported
- during the month of December. There has been a total of 12 recordable
-injury cases so_far in-.1990. !
'- There were eleven recordable cases reported in 1989, eleven reported in 1 1988, and eight! reported in 1987. The year end recordable injury frequency rates =for 1987, 1988, and.1989 were 2.5, 2.6, and 2.2 - respectively. Adverse Trend: The recordable injury cases frequency rate has been increasing since September 1990. This increase in the frequency is due to 5 recordable injury cases which have occurred since September 1990. SEP 15 & 26 y- ! -133-
.- . . - ~ . - _ _ . _ , . _ _ . _ _ - . - _ . -- -
i 50-G Licensee Event Reports 1 I Personnel Errors Reported in LERs
- Cumulative Licensee Event Reports 40-
- ~ Cumulative Personnel Errors Reported in LERs 30 20-10- ,
,1
- :1_ ..
7
.. ... m ._ 95 A._ }Ja 0- ' b'N I"* '
Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1988 50-A Licensee Event Reports
! 1 Personnel Errors Reported in LERs 40-
- umulaWe Ucensee hent Repods
- Cumulative Personnel Errors Reported in LERs 30-20-10- ~ ' ".
.;m ,. '
;, "l~ ~ , f ,..., ,{A Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989
-134-
- s Licensee Event Reports l l Personnel Errors Reported in LERs
- Cumulative Licensee Event Reports-
-- Cumulative Personnel Errors Reported in LERs 50-46 g
39 ,, 40 g' - 31-30
; % 26 ;g /
a a m m m. h 20- , m*
- e. .
a
+c C @p.l 2 x M .
M R 10-
])
g l 7 .. ,,..-.- _ _
"~~~
0" U "~~' ' '
'87 '88 '89 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 NUMBER OF PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED IN LER'S .
The. Number of Personnel Errors Reported in. LER's . Indicator reports the Licensee Event Reports (LER's) by their event date. In-December 1990, there were'2 LER's reported. One of these LER!s was attributable to personnel error. There have been 29 LER's reported so far in 1990 and 9 LER's have been attributable to personnel errors. Adverse Trend: None SEP 15
-135- . _ . . ~ . . _ . _ _ , ._ __ _ _ . . . _ . _ _
l Nuclear Operations Division Turnover R:te 10- ' o- Production Engineering Divir lon Turnover Rate
-@. Nuclear Services Divi.31cn Turnover Rate 8-T-
u . r
,b~ ~~ L
~
e g g___g____g 4- k / ,, U j a .
't' t .._ _ g _ _ _ a , _ ,
e g. .g y --~o -# ~, A9-o, ____ 9 _ _ 9 _ - 9 _ _ G - O D _ O_-_O , s'
/
^ O 0
X S 0 N D J F M A M J J A S 0 N D ; 1989 1990 i
+ PERSONNEL TURNOVER RATE
' Data' dating. from July 1,1988 has been assembled to produce
- the annual turnover rates for the.three Nuclear Divisions. The turnover -rates for the three Divisions are' calculated using only-resignations from OPPD.
e DIVISION TURNOVER' RATE N0D -5.2%
- PED 4.6%
'NSD- 1.8% .;
Currently, the OPPD' corporate turnover rate is being reported , as : a) proximately 4.0%; This OPPD corporate turnover rate' is. - 7 basec on the turnover rate over the last three years. Adverse Trend: None I
-136-
l 600- 9 Actual Staffing 6I l l Authorized Staffi:,9 542 s:
,,:q:
, Ng
., 4 ,
w P 400-
, ind,'
G' e ; 7 (: a y+ s - o - '
.Ll n 'e ", ';
n .
^
e 20s 195 1 200- @ , 91 ' ,
.: e ,
e, , .
,; ~ y '
Y 1 i. , r / i' fg'? , t$ i^ l^ ,Q [j
, '; j?
, , ', , . , , ' c 4% 55 52 V ;- ,
v e , mu~ ;;3
-lQf_
s *
'" k l 0
Nuclear Operations Production Engineering Nuclear Services Division Division Division STAFFING LEVEL The authorized and actual staffing levels are shown for the three Nuclear Divisions. Adverse Trend: None SEP 24 l l l i l
-137-
l lSRO Examination Pass Ratio ! 100-S R- 80- i 0 P 60-8 R- . 1 a 40-t
- i. - i o ;
20-
. No Exams I Administered 0
NRC Administered NRC Administered NRC Administered OPPD Administered Generic Site Specific Requalification Requalification < Fundamental Exams Exams Exams Exams SRO LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO The SRO License . Examination Pass Ratio Indicator shows the , number of NRC administered Generic' Fundamentals Exams (GFE's), . the number of NRC. administered-Site Specific Exams, the number i of NRC -administered license requalification l exams, and the number of OPPD administered license requalification exams. No ;~ exams were administered in December.- i
'0 PPD ADMINISTERED NRC ADMINISTERED Requal Generic Fund. Site Spec. Requal.
DATE- % PASS RATIO' % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO %' PASS RATIO Feb 1990 - 100 - - c Oct 1990 - 100 100 - Nov 1990 . 88.5 - - -- Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 i
-138-I
_m . . . _ . _ _ _ . . ._._ l -lR0 Examination Pass s'atio 100-R 80-0-
~
P a s 60-s R -e a 40 t i . o 20-
. .No Exams
, Administered
.NRC Administered NRC Administered NRC Administered OPPD Administered
- Generic- Site Specific Requalification Requalification Fundamental Exams Exams Exams Exams R0 LICENSE EXAMINATION PASS RATIO l
Thei .'R0 Licens'e Examination Pass Ratio Indicator shows the number of: NRC administered. Generic . Fundamentals Exams (GFE!s);- + the number of NRCv administered Site Specific Exams, , the -number of NRC administered license requalification exams, and the. number of OPPD administered license requalification exams.-No' exams were administered during December. OPPD ADMINISTERED NRC ADMINISTERED Requal - Generic Fund. - Site Spec. Requal. , DATE % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO % PASS RATIO % PASS RAllQ; ! heb'1990 - 100 - - l May 1990_ - - . 100 - Oct 1990' - 100 100 - r Nov 1990 90.1 - - - i
, Adverse Trendi None SEP 68
--139-
- +e -e-m *' +r 4-ss+- e w er =*N-+ == e e- w- we-:* 4 e N4se - r t---ew q wmpt '* M 'e r +t-u--tv4' -'imT'WPr$-- ll
l lSRO Exams Administered 40 G SRO Exams Passed e R0 Exams Administered wx R0 Exams Passed 3x Y N 30-5 gg u r m- I $5 b jg (jj e- g g;s y r g gg j gg o f 20-h< f3 "Ef i hf sA
@i s 51 ' '
= )$
E - g g gj ggy 7 g : :
$ Ej _ Ej a-g .
; , g- , g; m 10 y A :
s 41 6!:: ll g E. E.
- {
E:
- p 5 F 5j 5: 5.Ih5 ll:
s .: : x E' h . 29 2 : Eth
- n .
g -n y : g : p . : : qg
^' "
0 Jan' Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 LICENSE CANDIDATE EXAMS This indicator shows the number- of SRO and R0 quizzes - and exams taken and passed each
' month. These internally administered quizzes i and exams are' used to plot the SR0 and R0 candidates' monthly progcess.
During the month of December 1990' 16 SRO , exams were administered. Out of the 16 exam: taken, 16 exams were passed. During the month of December 1990, 24 RO exams were administered. Out of the 24 't0 exams taken, 24 exams were passed.- .; Adverse Trend: None SEP 68 I l 1
-140- ;
i
E Hotlines Initiated 50-
@ Hotlines Closed s: Hotlines Open Under 4 Weeks 45-Hotlines Open Over 4 Weeks N
u 40-m b 35-e r 30-o f 25-H 7 20- - 0 : t ~ 7 1 15- _l
~
i : s5 x .-
- 3 3
Is u y 3 M E
- j
_: 9 3 ,; g El n 10- : r 3 t g
-:5 iz g (g r-pf w
p j 1 e Ej i
. I '
! = I Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1990 HOTLINES This indicator shows the number of Hotlines initiated during the reporting month, the number of Hotlines closed during the reporting month, the number of Hotlines that remain open and are less than four weeks old, and the number of Hotlines that remain open and are older than four weeks old.
During the month of December 1990, there were 10- Hotlines initiated, 8 Hotlines closed, 5 Hotlines that remained open and were less than four weeks old, and 6 Hotlines that remained open and were older than four weeks old. Adverse Trend: None
-141-
4- O Planned Classroom Hours
! I Actual Classroom Hours ( l' l
\
l
- l t
T l h
- o 3- _
l u _
- s S -
g ,5._. a .
.. o. ; w n -
x~ 7 4 - &- id s d ., o s ' S y: 1%-
?::.;, ,,
2 -
./,, ,,,
' n' a
* ' ; M
' ^ ^
- o_
\ 0, , y , u* Y #/ , g
' ' t 4 r, 5 h
w
?,/,': . ,
=
' _' r q' ? f,,?,he 7, ,
i u
'? 'h, ;'
ht"_, f'Z , n q: y 4* - f.A y l ../ .y,
->;3 ~}h. ' > _ .y; Q f: .:- f+ n $:: , ,
/
1 *. ,,7 ,,' u i eX. < 4
,i i , :n m# e r s i W i ,,
.,h,
/
s^ ' Yli- ! .
,O ."
- , l ', (
+y&
, h g
?i o
t i
',, w u, ,, , n ;'
Q. :q di 4%- 4 ej ,j, iR sg ll$ N M*: - dt
I 9
$d U 02;,
b;;$
,; d u.
.', $y:R 5
. !j'f 9-
- i i !
, ,: c; ,
h iX
*, "I i ,
#(r *f '
B M O Jan Feb Mar Apr. May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989 l l
-142-
4-Planned Classroom Hours l l Actual Classroom Hours d h 3-o .-. u - - s a - , , n - _ . 4 d , , . _ s"~' ~ o - : - f
,u 14 p -
H 1 'T Ty a;; y o a - ,s - i ." '< ' , / l-u g ;; q - u - 7' r
~,7' , u .
g ,,
= ., p
, m /
, :} '
M - n
. , , {;fi, k+ , ,
0 Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1989 1990 CL_ASSR00M (INSTRUCTOR) HOURS This indicator displays the number of planned classroom hours and the number of actual classroom hours for the Fort Calhoun Station. This indicator is one ' month behind the reporting month due .to the time involved in collecting anci processing the needed information. Adverse Trend: None
-143-
l l l l Operations 35- Maintenance Chemistry and Radiation Protection 30-
@ Technical Support
(+ General Employee Training T ' h E Other 0 25-u s ,. a n 20-d s .
- 15- W f
mqp
$!h'h W)i3~$mum 10- M r
s h '
%f/x Y
h~
- "4 f }
f
- d. s
~~~
k'
~
~~ ~ -
5-
l E
~ ~
i [_'_ '_ '__ O Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989
' -144-
I 10perations Maintenance
" Chemistry and Radiation Protection 30- @ Technical Support x:: General Employee Trainin9 T
h Other o 25-u s a n 20-d 3 o 15-l i Ll " H IM y d !. j o .10- f" E ! - b lyj u : : g y p r V//)
. ; &j l=.
{ ., b ~ s a _ u = --- 7.
=1 ,
""" ~~-'
5- - _ . . _
-Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 1989 1990 TOTAL H0VRS OF STUDENT TRAINING This indicator shows the total number of student hours for Operations, Maintenance, Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, General Employee Training, and Other training conducted for the Fort Calhoun Station.
This indicator. is one month behind the reporting month due to the time needed to collect and evaluate the data. Total Hours IRAINING DEC 1990 NOV ?9S0 Operations 2,124 2,634 Maintenance 3,770 2,565 Chemistry and 1,777 1,632 Radiation Protection Technical Support 1,605 3,697 General Employee Training 3,569 3,855 Other R16 1.922 Total 13,061 16,305 Adverse Trend: None
-145-
3 1
- Total Outage MWO's .
MWO's Ready to Work
-O- Outage MWR Backlog 600 ,
I N 400- - - - - - - - - - '- -- mM
- bW e0 -
r' s o 200- - - - - - - - - - - - - -- - - - - - - f - --- - - - % 6- ;.
- 0 0
.Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul
-1990 1991 MWO OVERAll STATUS (1991 REFUEllNG OUTAGE)
The MWO Overall Status (1991 Refueling Outage)1 Indicator 4 has. been changed. The outage' MWR backlog 1.as been added to this indicator. The outage MWR backlog includes MWR's which have been identified for the 1991 Refueling Outage, but have not yet been converted to MW0's. C This indicator shows the total number of MW0's that have been written over the past reporting periods for completion during the 1991 Refueling Outage and the number of MWO's that are ready for work (the parts for these .MW0's are staged, the procedures are approved, and the paperwork is' ready for field use). Any MW0's written after the start of the outage will be reflected in the indicator labeled Emeroent MWO's. Approximately 3000 maintenance orders were completed during each of the
. previous two refueling outages.
Additional data points will be added to this indicator as information becomes available. Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 i
-146-l 1
- Total Outage Modifications c Mods With Planning Document Approved
-O Mods With Final Design Approved
-s- Mods With Construction Package Approved 30
.H -
o Nd-ui - 20- -------------- - ------------------------------------- --------------------------- mf ' bi-e c-ra.
.t o i- lo_ __________________________________________________________________________________
fo n . s S { n
-. y gr 0
Aug Sep' Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar- Apr May Jun Jul l 1990 1991 PROGRESS OF 1991 OUTAGE MODIFICATION PLANNING : This indicator. shows the number of modifications approved for planning i (to determine feasibility) for completion during .the 1991 Refueling- , Outage. Additional ' data points will . be added - to this indicator as--
-i information becomes availablo.' ;
The current-schedule for completion of the modification phases of the : 1991 Refueling Outage is-as follows. j
.J Outage Scope Freeze ............................ OCT 1, 1990 Pl anning Documents Approved . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . FEB 22, 1991 i Final Designs Approved......................... APR 24, 1991 Construction Packages Approved ................ JUN 15, 1991 Schedul e incorporated . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . JUL ' 26, 1991 Materi al On Si te . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . JUL 26,-1991 Construction Started .......................... 0CT 21, 1991 Construction Complete . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . NOV 4, 1991 Accepted By SAC-................................ NOV 15, 1991 Adverse Trend: None SEP 31
-147-1 i
i
- Total Outage Projects A Projects with Preliminary Schedules Submitted 4
*-: Projects with Detailed Schedules submitted 50 1
40 N p. ,
~
u
-m r
bj30 %_ _ e, a
~
r ! c o t'20 8 f 10 g i, 0 lAug Sep Oct .Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul 1990 -1991 OVERALL PROJECT STATUS q (1991 REFUELING OUTAGE) The Overall Project' Status -(1991 Refueling Outage) Indicator has been changed. The number of projects in which their detailed schedulos have-
'been submitted?has:been added. ThisLindicator also shows the status of the-projects which affect the scope of the 1991 Refueling Outage.
- The reduction in. the number of total outage projects is due to reclassification of former projects to ECN's or Maintenance items.
Additional-' data points will be added to this indicator as information
~
becomes available. TN achedule for the 1991 Rafueling Outage projects is as follows. All Projects: Identified and-Outage Scope Frozen .......-0CT 1, 1990 All. Projects Scheduled in Detail . . . . . . JUN' 28,1991 Procedures Ready ...................... AUG 2, 1991 ' Parts Staged .......................... AVG- 16, 1991 :' Adverse Trend: None SEP 31 0
-148-u
v e 3 4 This page . intentionally lef t blank, e s. (
-149-L
+ ,g
i
- Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours ,
' e- Fort Calhoun Goal 10-o-- -- - G-- - -- O - -- - e - --- + -- - - G- - -- - O -- - - @ - -- - + - - -- G - -- - - O - - - - -O 8- :
s 4-
--i 2 ~-
0
.Jan Feb _- Mar Apr May- Jun Jul Aug Sep- Oct Nov Dec 1988
- Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours ,
-e- Fort Calhoun Goal ;
15- t 12- ; O --- G-- - O - - -- @ - - -- G- -- - -G--- - - O - --- @ - --- + -- -- G - -- -- O - - -- -O 1 6-3- 0 4 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989
-150-
- Violations per 1000 Inspection Hou'rs G- Fort -Calhoun : Goal-15-GOOD 10.6 12~
4 (ofi 9-Q{j 0 --- G --- G ---- O ---G---G - -- ~O---- G --- @ - --G --- G --- O Mil
'5 . 6-i 3.7 2 .) 7 hh hhh N /
"F; tyi hhh; Mg gg~i '41 Bik WN 9l$1 $ 0
'i37ETWi7sf Jan Feb Mar Apr May .Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov 'Dec 1990' i
y]0LAT10NS-PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS The Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours Indicator has been changed. A new data source -has -been accepted which will supply data which can be more directly compared to the rest of . the nuclear ' industry. The graph .for athis indicator has 1 also been changed to reflect the new data. , This indicator displays -the -number .of' NRC violations cited in inspection reports ~per 1000 NRC-inspection hours. This- indicator is one month behind the reporting month due to the time involved with collecting and processing the d at a'.
-The violations per 1000 inspection hours indicator was reported as 2.6 for the month of November 1990.
s. There - have been a total 'of 7,672 inspection hours in 1990
.which have resulted .in 20 violations.
The' goal for the = number of violations por 1000 inspection'.
~ hours is less than 8.2.
Adverse Trend: None
-151- <
1 I i t This p, .entionally left blank. I
-152-
r i 75- I Number of Violations:During the-.Last 12 Months-7 1
,Le g Number of NCV's During-the Last 12 Months V- -
4 o 1- t a. N t: 50- 47
~
- uI >
m' 0
.41
-41 l
- b n_ .38 37 s -
36- -
-e _ _
34 34 +
'r - -
-o n! .28 27 ;
fd ' 25 N- . 19 20 2d E 20 .; C -- y 14- - 16 W 6 s# 4 Pt 4 ER 16 14 14 111 7 $* . g}}* k@ kfe }q)g ;f g TE 12 12 sl IEj g$f P' L' I 3 IId M M 3 p @$ $j# f 3 f 3 $ l Af 4 $) M g$ $@ h W! {$
$ igj %
0
~ - - - -- - -
Jan:, F e b _ _. Mar LApr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec d 1990 l
'CVMULATIVE VIOLATIONS AND NCV's
- (TWELVE-MONTH RUNNING TOTAL).
LThe - Cumul ative . -Violations - and!Non-Cited
. Violations -(NCV's) Indicator shows: the cumulative number Lof violations: for the .last -
twelve . months ' and the - cumulative - number of
.NCV's' for the last twelve months.
During the last twelve : months, 20 violations.
~
have been identified. andR12 NCV's have been
.identi fi ed '. - i Adverse Trend: .None-u
-153-
+,-r , + .% , .c. , , , .-_.m , .- ,.
300- - Total Outstanding CAR's [gj Outstanding CAR's > Six Months Old 250-N u m l b 200-e r o 150-f , C \ A 100-
~ R, .
s 50- . ;&p y,r
~/w .a. u h. Mf.
n - ,#m , A$Nu
- >yk 9 ,. m y ,b.; '
j up,1)mws m t;egga":,1 / WY ~A s,fhiVkkkk&hhhby't'$kf Ai , ' ikfYb ' h N 0 - - Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1988 i
- Total Outstanding CAR's i 300) W Outstanding CAR's > Six Months Old I
Outstanding CAR's That Are Modification Related N 250-u m b 200- - e t - o 150-f . C 100-A R .- afir Lj+ ix0? a.
' bu ,e
. ,M.N%.m V ' ':9
,H. .A. % -
s 50- ., . ufj ., r'i,.,M. - 0a .,,,, ?- + xpial j,w A ?l fNhh
?! .NM$;@Yb$r <f% f?l$ 098 h'h!, kn
' y.y <# -h.$ .
{hi J$*p'l'#"h,$l0$Nkhfly,@!f'dlu$$$$ $#i ' ' 3%#b 3 ldRT 0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec 1989
-154-
- Tctal Outstanding CAR's Q Outstanding CAR's > Six Months Old E Outstanding CAR's That Are Modification Related 300-250-o 200-Nf -
u 150 - r' s 100-
') -
h 8 0-- Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov. Dec 1990 OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS This indicator shows the -total number of outstanding Corrective Action Reports l (CAR's), the number of outstanding CAR's that I are greater than six months old, and the number of outstanding CAR's that are modification related. As of the end of December 1990, there were
.171 outstanding CAR's, 53 CAR's that are greater than six months old, and 11 CAR's r that are modification related.
1 Adverse Trend. None l 1
-155-l
s , ,:
- t. -o 0 N0D Overdue CAR's-
. Nf;;40-u':30- NOD CAR's With Extensions Granted 20-r g....g- -l-Q _ ....$ ---- p.. .. ,..... ... -g -----g ---- g }
Jan : Fib :MYr .Apr May An El Aug Sep OIt NYv Dec ll
'1990 j
- o 60 -
-1
-e PED ' Overdue CAR's .
N fx40-
- u. 6- PED CARf s With Extensions Granted ]
-mC 30-
-b A 20-r 10
@ ._.- G -----6 g--p---g
Jan Feb- Mar Apr May Jun Ji1 Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec- , m 1990 'i 10- . 6N 8-
.O Other.0verdue CAR's'
-u. 6- Other ' CAR's With Extensicas Granted 1 6-
\< mC 4
Lb A 4 . e R' a r' - k .
)
Is 0 ^ " " '"' b ' ' ' ~ " E ^ U l s JTn; .FTb F ar, :Apr May Nn . #1 ,AEg STp -Oct 'NYv DTc 1990 -I i OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTSL : This ' indicator shows. the number of' overdue CAR'.s and the number cf
.- i
-CAR'.s which ; received : extensions broken down. by organization. )
OVERDVE CAR's 0RGANIZATION OCT 90 LNOV DEC 90- t LN00, 0 0 0 -H
-PED 1 1 0 Others 0 0- 1 f Total- 1 1 1 1 CAR's WITH EXTENSIONS GRANTED.
ORGANIZATION 10CT 90 NOV 90 DEC 90 '
.N00 - -6 5 4 PED' 7 6. 14 Others 0 '0- 0 Total 13 :11 18 Adverse Trend: None
-156-
. s,
- 150; N .- & N00 CAR's >6 Months Old 6- N00 CAR's <6 Months Old -
L"nC)100-
- 50- 6 ,,,. .g .. g. . . --& - --6 -6
-4, -g - --- - ---- -6 ~', . 6 0.
U ' G " 'O " O " ' I C U i Jan Feb Mar -Apr .May Jun. _Jul Aug Sep. Oct Nov Dec. l
'1990
.o: 150.i
'Nf O PED CAR's >6 Mon _ths Old 1
a- PED CAR's <6 Months Old [ mC 100 ; bA i 50- 6 7gQ--- a jR g g- ,gg _
. ,_ _ _ f ,,, _g, _,, _ g , ,=g _, _ _ _ g _ _ , _ _g S. 0 l' Jan. Feb' . Mar- .Apr '
May Jun Jul. Aug Sep Oct Nov_ Dec , ,1990 t o_ 40J t Nr. - G .0ther CAR's >6 Months Old i
=u 30-
,4 6- Other CAR's <6 Months Old mC 20-
. b A.-
nq r R L10- g ,,.g -06 , ,,,_,.. g. . -- d j
-6 4,, g'
=
, s 10 n " O ^
u " EO e b "E _;
'Jan- Feb -Mar = :Apr May Jun Jul: Aug; _Sep- Oct Nov 'Dec '
1990 .;
-9 q CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS-CURRENT STATUS- 'i i
- This indicator shows the number of-CAR's:.that are older than 6 months and the~ number of CAR's that 'are lessJthan .6_ months old broken down_ l
.~by organization.
CAR's: GREATER THAN'6-MONTHS OLD ?! x ORGANIZATION OCT 90 NOV 90- DEC 90 ' N00 8 .10 10 , PED 43 43 41 1 z0thers 1 2 4 ' Total- 52- 55 55 j
% < ; CAR's-LESS THAN 6 MONTHS-0LD ORGANIZATION OCT.90 NOV 90 'DEC 90 ;
N00 40 54- 61 ! PED 35- 39 38 Others 5 9 17-Total 80 112 116
' Adverse Trend: None 157-
.f-
-- _, ,. - . , ~ , - _ , , , - ,
1989 1990 C?PD SIGNIFICANT NRC . 0 PPD. SIGNIFICANT. . NRC SALP FUNCTIORAL AREA CAR's- CAR's VIOLATIONS LER'S CAR's CAR's VIOLATIONS : LER'S A. Plant Operations 11 0- 8 2 62' (7) 'O 2. 10--(1)
- 8. Radiological Controls- 30 1- 2 1 28- 2 0 -0 C. Maintenance / 140 8 2 10 180 (6) 8 6 4.
Surveillance D. Emergency 8 0 0 0- 7 0 3 0 Preparedness E. Security 26 2 6 10 26 (1) 0 6 3 (1) F. Engineering / 134 2 7 7 172 (IS) 5 (1) 3 12 Technical Support G. Safety Assessment / 68 0 1 0 29 (7) 0 0 0
- Quality go Verification H. Other 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 Total 417 13 26 31 505 (36) 15 (1) 20 29 (2)
CAR'S ISSUED VERSUS SIGNIFICANT CAR'S VERSUS NRC VIOLATIONS (CAR's) issued by the Nuclear The above matrix shows the number of Corrective Action Reports Services Division versus the number of Significant CAR's issued by the Nuclear Services Divi versus the number of violations issuedinby Included thisthe table Nuclear Regulatory is the number Commission of Licensee (NRC) for the Event Reports Calhoun Station in 1989 and 1990. behind the reporting month due to the time involved in collecting In December, 1990, there were 36 CAR's issued, one Significant CAR issued, and 2 LER's id During November zero NRC violations were issued. Thus no vi in parentheses. SEP 15, 20 & 21
1 q
')
~
SIGNIFICANT ITEMS 0FJ1NTEREST d
. q ThisisectionLislintended to provide information on events which are- ^
significantito 'the- Fort Calhoun _ Station. and will give a " heads-up" = ..! 3:1 11ook.at;what is scheduled-in:the coming months. '
... l
^
3
-- - The " Procedure '_ Upgrade- Project. 'and ~ the~ Plant have 1 approved .and issued 811- safety related procedures. . -i This meets a- Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) - Item - j Number 48 milestone commitment.- -l 1
- - The. Electrical-.Distribut' ion Safety --' System Functional -f Inspection:isi lanned p for March 1990. LI The' inspection of the thermalf shield was approved. as a- 1991 Refueling . Outage . task. As _a result, the .;
Refueling ~ 0utage _ length will .be extended.- The nletigth of:this? extension:.is being determined, u T
.g d
i .. r . _ j q 4 . - 1 l 1 i d
-159- i n
v- n-w,. -.3, , % ,., .-,.w,m , .-_ , -+ .- , , , . ~ . ,
.o , -
f( i
"* , ' FORT-CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS-Y ,
li! ? j"-- . . K ,
, ' AGE OF'0VTSTANDING' MAINTENANCE-WORK ORDERS This . indicator tracks: the total number of outstanding- corrective non outage Maintenance' Work Orders at the Fort Calhoun Station versus their age in. months.
J ' AMOUNT OF WORK ON HOLO' AWAITING PARTS This indicator--is defined as the percentage of open, non-outage, maintenance work orders that are on hold awaiting parts, to. the . total number-of open, non-outage, maintenance work orders. AUXILIARY SYSTEMS CHEMISTRY HOURS OUTSIDE STATION LIMITS , LThe cumulative- hours that the Component Cooling Water system is outside-the' station l chemistry limit.. The hours are accumulated from the first
- sample exceeding the limit Luntil additional sampling shows the parameter ,
to-be back.withinilimits. !
' CHECK VALVE FAILURE RATE o The- Fort Calhoun check valve failure rate and the industry check valve-tfailure rate (failures per .1 million component hours). The- data for the oindustry - failure rate is - three months behind- the Performance - Indicators Report > reporting month. This indicator tracks performance for SEP sitem
- 43 B CLASSR00M llNSTRUCTOR) HOURS The number of planned classroom hours .and the number of actual classroom hours-for-the: Fort Calhoun Station.
CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORT CURRENT STATUS
- The number of. Corrective - Action Reports (CAR'.s) that - are -older than 6 months and othe number -ofi CAR's that are less - than 6 months old broken down. by organization for.the last 6 months.
CORRECTIVE MAINTENANCE' BACKLOG GREATER THAN 3 MONTHS-0LD The percentage of total' outstanding corrective maintenance items, not requiring an outage, that-are greater than three months old at the end of i the period reported..
-160-
4 FORT CALHOUN. PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED) CUMULATIVE' VIOLATIONS AND NON-CITED VIOLATIONJ (TWELVE-MONTH RUNNING TOTAL) The- cumulative number of. violations and Non-Cited Violations for the last 12 months.- DAILY THERMAL OUTPUT l The. daily' core thermal output as measured from computer point XC105 in i thermal megawatts. DISABLING INJURY FRE0VENCY RATE--(LOST TIME ACCIDENT RATE) This indicator is' defined as the number of accidents for al1 utility personnel permanently assigned to the station, involving' days away - from work per 200,000 man-hours worked (100 man-years). This does not . include . contractor personnel. This indicator tracks personnel performance for . Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item 26. i DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABIL'ITY (25 DEMANDS) The numer of failures for each emergency diesel generator in the last 25 start: damaM3 and the- last -25 load-run demands. A trigger value of 4
~
failures in the-'last - 25 demands is also shown. .lf any one diesel generator. experiences 4 or more failures within the last 25 demands en the unit, thc -unit is-defined as a problem-emergency diesel generator and in- accordance with NUMARC Initiative 5A,. corrective actions must be-taken.* A Standing Order will be drafted in February 1991- for the Fort Calhoun Station to institutionalize and formally approve / adopt the required' actions., Number of Start Demands All- valid and -inadvertent start : demands,- including all start-only
- domands and all start demands that are followed by load-run demands, whether - by- automatic or manual initiation. A -start-only- demand is a demand in which the emergency generator is started, but -no- attempt is made to load the generator.
Number of Start Failures
; Any. failure within the emergency generator system that prevents .the generator from achieving.specified . frequency and voltage is classified as a valid start failure. This includes any condition . identified' in -the -
. course of. maintenance inspections -(with the emergency generator in
-standby mode) that definitely would have resulted in a start failure-if a demand had occurred.
Number of Load-Run Demands For a valid . load-run demand to be counted the load-run attempt must meet one or.mnre of the following; I
- A load-run of any duration that results from a real automatic or .
manual initiation. i
-161-i 1
[ l FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINVED) DIESEL GENERATOR REllABILITV (25 DEMANDS) (CONTINVED)
- A load-run testi to satisfy the plant's load and duration as stated in the test-specifications.- )
- 10ther special tests in which the emergency generator is expected to be _ operated for at least one hour while-loaded with at least 50% of - !
.itsidesign load.
Number--of load Run Failures . , A load-run failure should be counted .for any reason in' which the emergency generator .does =not pick up -load and run as predicted. Failures ' are counted during any valid load-run demands. it ' Exceptions
> Unsuccessful attempts to start or load-run should' not be counted as valid demands or failures when they can be attributed to any of .the following; !
-. Spurious trips:that would'be bypt.ssed in the event of an emergency.
- Malf. unction of- equipment that is not' required during an emergency.
-- Intentional termination of- a test because of abnormal- conditions that would. not- have -resulted in major diesel generator damage or repair.
-- Malfunctions or operating: errors which would have not prevented the emergency generator from being restarted and brought to load within a few minutes. i
- A . failure: to start because a - portion of the starting system was disabled for test purpose,1 if followed Lby a successful start with the; starting system in ;its normal alignment.
Each emergency generator failure that results in the generator being declared inoperable should be counted as - one demand and one failure. Exploratory. tests during corrective maintenance' and the successful test that. follows repair to verify operability should not be' counted as demands or failures when the EDG has not been declared operable again.
- Problem emergency diesel generator actions include:
, , -(1) Determine the root cause of each new failure.
(2) LReview applicable past failures. (3) Evaluate the corrective maintenance tracking history. (4) Assess actual failure history against critical review elements. (5) Perfonn corrective Actions.
-162-
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINVED) DIESEL GENERATOR RELIABILITY (25 DEMANDS) (CONTINVED)
- Problem diesel generator actions (continued)
Following completion of corrective actions, restored performance of the problem diesel generator should be demonstrated by conducting seven consecutive failure free start and load-run tests (at a frequency of no less than 24 hours and of no more than seven days between each demand). All starts and load-runs performed during this period should be included in the unit diesel generator reliability data so long as the diesel generator is operable. This process of evaluating recent demands and taking appropriate action on the individual diesel generator experiencing recurring failures is a key element in providing reasonable assurance that diesel generator performance is restored to an acceptable level. DOCUMENT REVIEW (f,IENNIAL) The Document Review Indicator shows the number of documents reviewed during the reporting month, the number of documents scheduled for review during the reporting month, and the number of document reviews that are -overdue. This indicator tracks performance for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Reference Number 46. EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIABILITY The number of failures that were reported during the last 20, 50, and 100 emergency diesel generator demands at the Fort Calhoun Station. Also shown are trigger values which correlate to a high level of confidence that a unit's diesel generators have obtained a reliability of greater than or equal to 95% when the failure values are below the trigger values. Number of Start Demands All valid and inadvertent start demands, including all start-only demands and all start demands that are followed by load-run demands, whether by automatic or manual initiation. A start-only demand is a demand in which the emergency generator is started, but no attempt is made to load the generator. Number of Start Failures Any failure within the emergency generator system that prevents the generator from achieving specified frequency and voltage is classified as a valid start failure. This includes any condition identified in the course of maintenance inspections (with the emergency generator in standby mode) that definitely would have resulted in a start failure if a demand had occurred. ) l l
-163- ,
> r FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED) j EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR UNIT RELIADILITY (CONTINVE01 Number of Load-Run Demands
~ For a valid load-run demand to be counted the load-run attempt must {'
meet one:or more of the'following;
- A load-run of - any duration that results from a real automatic- or manual initiation. .;
- A load-run. test to satisfy the plant's load and duration as stated in the test-specifications.
- Other special tests in which the emergency generator is expected :to-be-_ operated for at least one hour while loaded with at least 50% of- l its design load, Number of Load Run Failures .
A110ad-run: failure should be counted for any reason in which the. emergency generator does not pick up load and run as predicted. Failures are counted-during any valid ~ load-run demands. Exceptions-Unsuccessful attempts- to start or -load-run should not be ' counted as valid demands .or failures when they can be attributed to any of the , following;
- Spurious trips that would be bypassed in the event'of an emergency.
-- Malfun'ction of equipment that is not; required during an emergency. ,
Intentional termination of a - test- because of abnormal conditions that- would not ' have resulted 'in major diesel generator damage or repair.- 4 u
- Malfunctions or operating errors' which would; have not prevented the emergency- generator from being restarted and brought to- load within- .1 a few minutes. ,
A failure to start because- a portion -of the starting system was
. disabled . for test : purpose, if- followed by - a successful start with the-starting system in its normal alignment, t
Each - emergency generator failure that results in the generator being declared inoperable should be counted as one -demand and one failure. Exploratory tests during corrective maintenance and the. successful test that Nilows repair to verify operability should not be counted as demanc,, or. failures when the EDG has not been declared operable again.
-164-
_ - . - ~_- -
)
FORT CALH0VN PERFORMANCE-PARAMETER-DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED) 1 ENGINEERING' CHANGE' NOTICE (ECN) BREAK 0OWN 1 The breakdown of the total number of:open ECN's, the number of ECN's that '
. were - opened .during the Lreporting month,. the number of ECN's that .were
~
completed during the' reporting month, and the number of ECN's received during4 .the reporting month into three -categories.- These categories
-include; 1) document changes are required to complete the ECN's, _. 2). 1 substitute. nr replacement items are required-to -complete the ECN's, or 3) facility changes are_ required to complete the ECN's. This indicator j
tracks performance for.SEP. item 62. 1 ENGINEERING CHANGE NOTICE (ECN) STATUS
'The. number -of ECN's that remain open' at the end of the reporting month,
-the number of ECN's that were-opened -during the reporting month, and the
-number of ECN's that are completed during the reporting month. This indicator tracks performance. for SEP item 62.
E0VIPMENT FORCED OUTAGES PER 1000 CRITICAL HOURS-Equipment forced outages per 1000 critical hours is the inverse of.the mean time between forced outages caused by equipment failures. The mean time 'is equal to- the- number of hours the reactor is' critical in a period (1000 hours) divided- by the-. number of forced outages caused by- equipment failures.in that period. E0VIVALENT AVAILABILITY FACTOR, This indicator is defined as the. ratio .of gross available, generation to gross maximum generation, expressed as a percentage. Available generation is the energy that can be produced if the' unit is operated at the maximum ; power ' level . permitted by equipment and regulatory limitations. Maximum generation is the energy.that can be produced by a unit in a given period if -ope"ated continuously -at. maximum capacity. '
' EXPEDITED PURCHASES Thel percentage of exl. edited purchases which occurred 'during the reporting-
. month-compared.to.the total number of purchase orders generated.
FORCED OUTAGE RATE-This. indicator is defined as the percentage of time that the unit was unavailable due to forced events compared to the time planned for electrical . generation. -Forced events are . failures or other , unplanned conditions that require removing the unit' from service before the.end of the next weekend. Forced ' events -include startup failures and events initiated while the unit is in reserve shutdown (i.e., the unit is available but not in service.
-165-l
? yFORT-CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFIN1TIONS (CONTINUED)
'{
FUEL RELIABILITY INDICATOR t This- indicator is defined as the steady-state -primary coolant I-131 activity, corrected for= the tramp uranium contribution and normalized to , , a common purification rate. Tramp ~ uranium is fuel which has been deposited on reactor core internals from -previous defective fuel or ' is present on the surface of fuel elements from-the manu.facturing process. Steady ' state is defined as continuous operations above 85 percent power for'at least seven days.
~
This INP0 indicator. uses an industry normalized letdown purification !! 4 rate. ?The FRI has also been calculated . using Fort Calhoun's actual letdown pt:rification. rate. These calculations revealed that the use of the -plant's actual rate would result in an approximate 45% increase in_- 1 FRI data.
', ' GASEOUS"RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO-THE-ENVIRONMENT This indicator displays the total number of Curies of = all- gaseous radioactive 4nuclides released from the Fort -Calhoun Station.
GROSS HEAT RATE
' Gross heat rate is defined as the ratio of total thermal energy - in
- British Thermal Units .(BTV) produced by the reactor to' the total gross t electrical energy produced by the generator in kilowatt-hours (KWH).
HA7ARD0VS4 WASTE PRODUCED The total amount (in Kilograms) of non-halogenated hazardous waste, ihalogenated hazardous waste, 'and. other -hazardousjwaste: produced by the Fort Calhoun Station each month.
~HOTLINES !
The number of. Hotlines that are initiated, closed, overdue, and open for a: given -month, LA Hotline. isL a training document sent out for immediate review. The - Hotline should be reviewed - and signed within 5 days of receipt of the Hotline. HOURS CHEMISTRY IS OUTSIDE OWNERS GROUP GUIDELINES Total > hours for 13 secondary side chemistry parameters exceeding guidelines during power operation.- l Power operation is defined as greater than 30% power. The'13 parameters tracked are steam generator pH, cation conductivity, boron silica, chloride, sul fate, sodium, feed water pH, dissolved oxygen, hydrazine, iron, copper, and condensate pump discharge dissolved oxygen.
-166-
\
~ .- . . . - - - - -. . -
d FORT'CALHOUN PERFORMANCE' PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED) T LIN-LINE-CHEMISTRY INSTRUMENTS'0VT-OF-SERVICE Total number of. in-lino chemistry -instrume'nts that are out of-service in
-the SecondaryLSystem and=the Post Accident Sampling System (PASS).
INVENTORY ACCURACY ~ The- percentage of line items that are counted each month by the warehouse which need count adjustments. INVOICE BREAKDOWN The - number Lof -invoices that are on hold due to shelf life, CQE, and l miscellaneous reasons, i LICENSE-CANDIDATE EXAMS I This indicator shows: the number of SRO and/or R0 quizzes and exams that ; are' administered and- passed each month. The ' License Candidate Exams Indicator tracks Training: performance for Safety Enhancement Program item Number 68. ; L10010'RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE BEING DISCHARGED TO THE ENVIRONMENT This - . indicator-' displays the volume of liquid radioactive waste- released from- the radioactive waste' monitor tanks. The curies from all releases 3 from the Fort Calhoun Station to the Missouri River are also shown.
- LOGGABLE/ REPORTABLE INCIDENTS -(SECURITY) j The-total number of security incidents for the reporting month. This
- indicator tracks security performance. for Safety Enhancement Program Item Number 58.
i MAINTENANCE' EFFECTIVENESS l lThe number -of Nuclear Plant Reliability Data System (NPRDS) components-o with more than one failure and.the number of NPRDS components with more
.than two failures _ during .the last twelve months, tLAINTENANCE WORK ORDER BACKLOG L The number -of corrective non-outage maintenance work orders that- remain open .at the ~ end of the Lreporting month. This indicator was .added. to the ,
Performance Indicators -Report ' to trend open corrective' non-outage l H maintenance work orders as stated in Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) '; l Item No. 36. t o
-167-
FORT ~CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED) k MAINTENANCE WORK ORDER' BREAKDOWN i This indicator is a breakdown of corrective non-outage ' maintenance work ' orders by several ecategories that remain open at the end of'the reporting- l month.- MAINTENANCE OVERTIME The percentage of overtime hours compared to normal hours for maintenance. This includes OPPD personnel as well as contract personnel. MATERIAL RE00EST PLANNING The percent of material requests (MR's) for issues with their request date . the same as their need date compared to the total number of MR's. MATERIAL RE00ESTS AWAITING APPROVAL' The number .of material requests awaiting approval at the end of' .the reporting-month broken down by their age in days, i MAXIMUM' INDIVIDUAL RADIATION EXPOSURE
-The ' total -maximum ' amount of Gamaa and Neutron (Whole Body) radiation received by an individual person w eking at the Fort-Calhoun Station on a-monthly, ~ quarterly,. and annual basis. 3 MWO OVERALL-STATUS (1991 REFUEllNG OUTAGE)
.The. total number of Maintenance Work Orders (MW0's) that have been written for completion during the.1991 Refueling: 0utage. MW0's which are written
-after ' the start of the' Refueling ' Outage- will=..be labeled Emergent MWO's.
This indicator also shows' the number of MW0's which are ready to work for the =1991 . Refueling and the outage MWR backlog. The_-MWR's which are backlogged Lare -MWR's which have been -identified, but not' yet converted to MW0's. This indicator tracks performance for SEP Reference Number 31. > -NUMBER-0F HOT SPOTS - The ' number of radiological - hot spots which . have been identified and documented to . exist at the Fort : Calhoun' Station at the end of the i reporting month. A hot spot is a small -localized source of radiation. . A -hot spot occurs when the contact dose rate of an item is at least 5 times- , the General Area dose rate and the - item's dose rate is equal to or _ greater.than 100 mrem / hour.
-168-
1 V- ~ FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINVED);
- j i
NUMBER OF' NUCLEAR PLANT - REllABILITY DATA SYSTEM - (NPRDSF FAILURE REPORTS SUBMITTED-
--The data = plotted -is' the total-' number of NPRDS component failures (cenfirmed and possible) and-- the ' number of confirmed NPRDS component feilares. The total number of NPRDS component failures are based on the number of failure repor_ts that-have been sent to the~ Institute of Nuclear Operations.(INP0), j Confirmed NPRDS component failures are based upon failure reports that have <
~been accepted br INPO. Possible NPRDS component failures are based upon ;
failure' reports.that are still under review by.INP0.- NPRDS is - the ' Nuclear Plant- Reliability Data System, and is a utility- j industry- users; group . program which has been . outlined by INP0 and i implemented at the-Fort Calhoun Station, j NUMBER OF OUT-0F-SERVICE CONTROL-ROOM INSTRUMENTS 'I A : control' room' instrument that cannot perform its design function is
" considered? as out-of-service. A control room instrument which has had a
, Main _tenance -Work 10rder . (MW0) written for' it and. has not been _ repaired by the endiof the' reporting- period -is considered out-of-service' and will be-counted. The duration of the out-of-service condition is not considered.
Computer CRTs are not considered as control room instruments. j NUMBER'0F PERSONNEL ERRORS REPORTED'IN LER'S ,
!The number of Licensee . Event Reports (LERs)- attributed to personnel error j
-on the original LER -submittal :.This indicator' trends personnel performance ;
n for SEPcltem No.-15.- NUMBER OF- MISSED -SURVEILLANCE TESTS RESVLTING IN - LICENSEE EVENT REPORTS- 3 The'. number xof Surveillance Tests ~-(ST's) that< result _in. Licensee Event Reportso(LER's)-during the reporting. This indicator tracks missed ST's for 4 LSafety Enhancement Program.(SEP) Item Numbers 60 and 61. 4
--OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE BUDGET-
- The year to date budget compared to the actual expenditures for operations 4
,and' maintenance.
OUTSTANDING CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS This indicator 1 displays the total number of outstanding Corrective Action Reports-(CAR's), the' number of CAR's that are older than six months and the ! number of modification related CAR's.
-169-
}
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED) OUTSTANDING' ENGINEERING ASSISTANCE RE00ESTS (EAR's)
~
~ The; total number of open EAR's and -the number of- open EAR's broken down
- by: their.Lage Lin' months.- This indicator tracks performance -for SEP item
-62. 1 OUTSTANDING MODIFICATIONS i The number of Modification Requests (MR'S) in any state between the l
- issuance of'a Modification Number and the ' completion of the drawing i update. l Form FC-1133 Backlog /In Progress j l
The Form FC-ll33 has not been plant approved. } Modification Requests'Being Reviewed. _, This _ category includes: q
'l.)'
- Modification Requests thattare not yet reviewed 3
2.)
- Modification Requests being reviewed by the Nuclear Projects Review Committee-(NPRC) 3.)
- Modification Requests being reviewed by the 1 s
Nuclear- Projects Committee (NPC) 1
*' These . Modification Requests may be . reviewed -several ' times l before they are approved for accomplishment or cancelled. Some of these Modification Requests -are returned to Engineering for more information, _some approved; for evaluation, some approved -;
for' study, and some appNved for planning. Once - planning is i completed' and the . scope of the work is clearly defined, these a
. Modification -Requests. may be approved for accomplishment with a '
year - assigned for construction or they may be- cancelled. All of these different phases require review. Design Engineering . Backlog /In Progress Nuclear: P1anning has assigned a . year in which construction will , be; completed-and-design work;may be in' progress. Construction Backlog /In Progress
-The: Construction Package _ has been i ssued or construction has-begun but' the modification has not been accepted by the System
. Acceptance _ Committee (SAC).
Design Engineering -Update Backlog /In Progress PED has received the Modification Completion Report but the drawings have not been updated.
-170-
---r- ,
...,,---u., ,
s> ; ' U. M[ ' FORT-CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINVED) I
.y ,
0VERALL' PROJECT STATUS (1991' REFUELING OUTAGE)
, , . The - number of' projects which . affect the scope of- the 1991: Refueling-Outagei Also shown is - the number of- projects in which, their preliminary schedules have been submitted and the number _of projects in which their :
detailed- schedules have.been submitted. This indicator tracks performance ; for:SEP Reference Number 31. q o 4 OVERDUE AND EXTENDED CORRECTIVE ACTION REPORTS -1
.The number of overdue Corrective Action Reports (CAR's) and the number of ..
. CAR'sl which received extensions broken down by; organization ;for the last-
'6 months. >
LPERCENT OF COMPLETED SCHEDULED MAINTENANCE ACTIVITIES-Then aercent of -the number of completed maintenance activities as compared
, tootle number of- scheduled maintenance activities each week. :This percent ,
-is . shown; for each craft. Maintenance activities include MWR's, MW0's,
'ST! s_~,: ?PM0's,- calibrations, and -:other - miscellaneous activities. These:
indicators. track: Maintenance performance for SEP Reference Number 33.
? PERSONNEL-' RADIATION EXPOSURE (CVMULATIVE) 1
- 1 Collective = radiation -exposure is the total' external whole-body dose receivedeby allf on-site personnel (including contractors and ' visitors) i
-during~ ' a- time period,- as . measured by the thermoluminescent' dosimeter
.(TLD). _ Collective radiation Lexposure is . reported in units of manirem. i cTh i s< 'i nd.i cator tracks radiological work performance for Safety:
Enhancement Program ((SEP)' Item-Number 54. E RSONNEL' TURNOVER RATE 4, 1Theiratio-of theinumber of : turnovers to average employment. A turnover is 1 ia= vacancy' createdrby ; voluntary resignation from the company. Retirement, , death,Vtermination, transfers within the'. company, and part-time employees
=are not considered in turnover, y
' PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE ITEMS OVERDVE This indicator iso defined 3 as the percentage of preventive maintenance
. items - in~ the ' month: that were not completed by the scheduled- date plus a -
grace period equal _-to ' 25- percent of the scheduled interval. This ; indicator- tracks preventive maintenance activities for Safety Enhancement i
'> Program (SEP)11 tem Number 41.
PRIMARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY - PERCENT OF HOURS OUT 0F LIMIT The percent 'of- hours out of limit are for six primary chemistry parameters divided -by the total number of hours possible for the month. The key parameters used Jre: Lithium, Chloride, Hydrogen, Dissolved Oxygen,: Fluoride, and Suspende Solids. EPRi limits are used.
-171-i
m > o j [,'
}
l FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONT 1NUED)_ j.
*+- -PROCEDURAL NONCOMPLIANCE' INCIDENTS (MAINTENANCE) {
m ,
.The = number' of- identified- incidents concerning maintenance -procedural z !!
-problems,1 the number -of closed IR's' related to the use of . procedures '
-(includes' the number of closed IR's caused by precedural noncompliance),
Jand the number of closed - procedural noncompliance IR's. This indicator trends' personnel- performance. for SEP Item Numbers 15 and 41. i PROGRESS OF 1991 OUTAGE MODIFICATION PLANNING. The' number :of modifications approved: for planning (to determine feasibil,ity) for comoletion during the 1991 Refueling. This indicator
'trackscperformance for SEP Reference' Number 31.-
< - RADIOLOGICAL WORK PRACTICES PROGRAM
-Theinumber of identified poor radiological work practices (PRWP) for the <
reporting month. This indicator tracks radiological work performance for 3
*- -Safety Enhancement (SEP)' Item Number:52.
1 1 ' RATIO 0F: PREVENTIVE TO TOTAL MAINTENANCE- -
.The ratiosof- preventive maintenance '(including surveillance testing and:
. calibration--procedures) -to the sum of non-outage.. corrective maintenance
-and'! preventive . maintenance . completed; over ' the reporting period.- The ratio,- expressed 1as a percentage, is calculated based on . man-hours. .This indicator tracks preventive' maintenance activities for Safety Enhancement Programj(SEP) Item Number 41.
--RECORDABLE-INJURY-CASES FRE0VENCY RATE (RECORDABLE INJURY RATE)
The number of injuries requiring more -than normal first aid per-200,000-1 manhours 1 worked. This' indicator trends personnel performance for SEP Item No.-15 and SEP-Item 26.-
'R0 LICENSE EXAMINATION' PASS RATIO- 1 1'
The.- R0 license examination pass ratio for NRC administered: Generic
= Fundamental s ; - Exams (GFE's), NRC administered Site' Specific. . Exams, NRC i
administered license requalification exams, and OPPD administered' license requalification- exams.- This indicator : tracks Training performance. for Safety Enhancement Program? Item Number 68.- EECONDARY SYSTEM CHEMISTRY PERFORMANCE INDEX The Chemistry Performance- Index (CPI) is . a calculation base administered license requalification exams, and OPPD administered license requalification exams. This indicator tracks Training performance for Safety Enhancement Program Itera Number 68.
-174-l
a.. : , ;, ].
' FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED) a E AFFING LEVEL The actual staffing -level and the authorized . staffing level for the Nuclear Operations Division, . the Production Engineering Division, and the ;
Nuclear Services Division. STATION NET GENERATION.
' The- net generation -(sum) prc,duced by the Fort Calhoun Station during the -i reporting month.
STOCK 0VT RAT'E' l The total number of Pick Tickets that were ma 'ted during the reporting ] month and the total number of Pick Tickets thc. were generated during the reporting -month:with no parts avaliable. TEMPORARY MODIFICATIONS The number of temporary mechanical and electrical configurations to the
- pl ant's . systems.
- Temporaryi configurations are defined as electrical jumpers, electrical blocks, mechanical jumpers, or mechanical blocks which are installed in the plant operating systems and are not shown on' the latest revision of :
the P&ID, schematic, connection, wiring, or flow diagrams. Jumpers: and blocks which are- installed for' Surveillance Tests, Maintenance Procedures, Calibration - Procedures, Special Procedures, or Operating- ProceduresL are not considered -as temporary modifications unless the njumper Lor block ' remains -in _ place- after -the. -test ' or procedure is complete. Jumpers and blocks installed in test or lab instruments are not considered as temporary modifications.
= Scaffolding- is not considered a temporary _ modification. Jumpers- and
. blocks which are: installed and for which EEAR's have been submitted, will g be considered' as a temporary modifications until final resolution of the '
EEAR and the jumper or block is removed 3or-is permanently recorded on the drawings. This indicator tracks temporary modifications for Safety Enhancement Program (SEP) Item Number 62 & 71. TOTAL HOURS OF STUDENT TRAINING R The total number of student hcurs of training for Operations, 3 Maintenance, . Chemistry and Radiation Protection, Technical Support, 1 General Employee - Training, and Otner training conducted. for the Fort Calhoun Station.
-175-c _ _ _ _ _ - - _ _ - -
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINtTIONS (CONTINUED) TOTAL SKIN AND CLOTHING CONTAMIFt110NS . Reportable skin ad clothing contaminations above background levels greater than 5000 opm/100 cm squared. This indicator trends personnel performance for M P ltem No. 15. UNPLANNCD AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAMS WHilE CRITICAL This indicator is defined as the number of unplanned autenic scrams
' reactor protecticr. :,yst.em logic actuations) that occur while t'ae reactor Is critical. The indicator D further defined as follows:
- Unplanned means that the scram was not part of a planned test or evolution..
-- Scram means the automatic shutdown of the reactor by a rapid !
insertion of all control rods that is caused by actuation of the reactor protection system. The scram signal may have l resulted from exceeding a setpoint or may have been spurious. *
- Automatic means that the initial signal that caused actuation of the reactor protection system logic was provided from one of thoLsensors monitoi:ng plant parameters and conditions, ather than-- t he - 'nanual scram switches (or pushbuttons) in the main
- control room. 3 Criticai :means that during the steady state condition' of the reactor prior-to the scram, the effective multipilcation factor j (keyff was equal to one.
UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS - (INPO DEFINITION) g i This indicator is defined as the ' sum- of the following safety system actuations: l 1 the number of unplanned Emergency ' Core Cooling System - (ECCS) !
'y actuations that result from reaching an ECCS actuation ~ setpoint-or from a spurious / inadvertent ECCS signal
- the r. umber of ' unplanned emergency AC power system actuations that result from a loss of power to a safoguards bus 1 An unplanned safety system actuation occurs when an actuation setpoint for a safety system is reached or when a spurious or inadvertent signal is generated (ECCS _ only), and major equipment in the system is actuated.
Unplanned means that the system actuation was not part of a planned test -l or evolution. Ther ECCS actuations to be counted are actuations of the high pressure :) injection -system, the low pressure injection system, or the safety
. injection tanks.
-176-
_ -_ _ _ _ _ i
I FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTIN 9[D) UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS - (NRC DEFINITION) The number of safety system actuations which include (Enh) the High Pressure Gafety injection. System, the Low Pressure Safety injection ' System, the Safety injection Tanks, and the Emergency Diesel Generators. The NRC classification of safety system actuations includes actuations when major equipment is operated and when the logic systems for the above safety systems are challenged. VIOLATIONS PER 1000 INSPECTION HOURS ,, This i' ;r is defined as the number of violations sited in NRC inspect amrts for the Fort Calhoun Station per 1000 NRC inspection hours. b ,dations' are . reported in the year that the inspection was actually performed and not based on when the inspection report is received. The hours reported for each inspection report are used as the inspection hours. c 10LUME OF_ LOW-LEVEt SOLID RADI0 ACTIVE WASTE This indicator is defined as. the volume of low level solid radioactive waste actually shipped for disposal. This indicator also shows the volume of low-level radioactive waste which is in temporary storage. Low level solid radioactive waste consists of dry active waste, sludges, resins, and evaporator bottoms generated as a result of t. clear power plant operation and maintenance. Dry active. waste includes contaminated rags, cleaning materials, disposable protective clothing, plastic containers, and any other , material to be disposed of at a . low-level radioactive waste disposal site, except resin, sludge, or evaporator bottoms. Low-level refers to all radioactive waste that is not' spent fuel or a by product of spent fuel processing. - This. indicator tracks . radiological work. performance for Safety ! Enhanc.went Program (SEP) Item Number 54. WAREHOUSE ISSUES The total. number of warehouse issues, the number of non-CQE stock issues, k the number .of CQE stock issues, the number of direct. charge non-CQE issues,-and the number of direct charge CQE issues which occurred during the reporting month.
-177-1 l
FORT CALHOUN PERFORMANCE PARAMETER DEFINITIONS (CONTINUED) WAREHOUSE RECEIPTS The total number of warehouse receipts, the number of non-CQE stock receipts, the number of CQE stock receipts, the number of direct charge non-CQE receipts, and the number of direct charge CQE receipts which occurred during the reporting month. WAREHOUSE RETUPNS The percentage of the total number of warehouse returns, the number of spare parts returns, the number of stt tdard stores returns, and the number of direct charge returns compared to the total number of warehouse issues.
-172-
BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING 1090 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR G E J This section will explain the basis used in establishing the 1990 performance. goal s. FORCED OUTAGE RATE AND E0VIVALENT AVAILABIllTY FACTOR The Forced Outage Rate (FOR) and Equivalent Availab'lity Factor (EAF)
' goals have been established from 1990 to 1992. The follwing table is a breakdown of the hours allotted for each category over 6.* next three years.
STARTUP GENERATOR FORCED OUTAGE PLANNED ON LINE OUTAGE TIME OUTAGE PERIOD EAF FOR
,1EAS (HOURS) (HOURS) (HOURS) ,@0M51 (HOURS) M M 1990(*) 6356 168 172 2064 8760 65.4 2.4 ;
1991(*) 6956 168 172- 1464 8760 75.9 2.3 1992' 8520 240 0 0 8760 92.9 2.7 (*) Refueling Outage Years UNPLANNED AUTOMATIC REACTOR SCRAM 5 WHILE CRITICAL The 1990. goal for Unplanned Automatic Reactor Scrams While Critical has
.been set at one. The Fort Calhoun Station has had one unplanned automatic ,
reactor scram in the past four years of operation. UNPLANNED SAFETY SYSTEM ACTUATIONS-The Unplanned Safety System Actuations goal for 1990 has been established
.at zero. The Fort Calhoun Station did not have an unplanned safety system actuation for six years, a i
GROSS HEAT RATE The 1990 Gross Heat Rate goal for the Fort Calhoun Station has been set at '10,200 BTU /KWH._ This heat rate goal is based on 10,435 BTV/KWH for'the month of January, 10,450 BTU /KWH for the month of February, .10,325 BTU /KWH' for the month of May, 10,225 BTV/KWH for the month of June, 10,325 BTV/KWH for the month of July, 10,250 BTV/KWH for the month of August,10,125 BTV/KWH for the month of September,10,050 BTV/KWH for the month- of -October, 10,000 BTV/KWH for the month of November, and 9,975 BTV/KWH for the month of December.
-179-
BASIS FOR ESTABLISHING'1990 PERFORMANCE INDICATOR G0ALS (CONTINUED) FUEL-RELIABILITY INDICATOR The 1990 Fuel Reliability Indicator (FRI) goal has been set at 1.0 , nanocuries/ gram. This level allows for approximately one to two fuel pin ', failures. - Although Cycle 11 was completed without any apparent fuel pin failures, there are a number of Advanced. Nuclear. Fuels Corporation (ANF) assemblies entering into a third or fourth cycle of operation. When a , fuel pin has been used for three or four fuel cycles there is an increased probability of fuel failure. The Failed Fuel Action P3an,
- Standing Order 0-43, allows for approximately four fuel pin failures prior to implementing any increased action levels. ;
PERSONNEL RADIATION EXPOSURE (CUMULATIVE) The 1990 Personnel Radiation Exposure (Cumulative) goal is 287 man rem. This' goal was based on- 234 man rem of cumulative exposure for the 1990 Refueling. Outage and, approximately 5.9 man rem of cumulative exposure for each non-outage month. VOLUME OF LOW-LEVEL SOLID RADIOACTIVE WASTE l The:1990 Volume of low Level Solid Radioactive Waste goal is 5,000 cubic , feet. This goal-was based on a recommendation made' by the Fort Calhoun l ALARA . Committee and approved by the Division Manager of the Nuclear Preduction-Division. QJJf/ JING INJURY FRE0VENCY RATE
~
The Disabling Injury frequency Rite 1990 goal has been set at 0.31. This goal- allows for.one lost time accident in the Nuclear' Production Division during 1990., l-i I 1 l
.i
( y. l
-180- ,u, -_ _ _ _ _ _ __ . _ . _ _ _ ._. . . _ _ _._._. __, . _ . . . _ .a
l. FORT CALHOUN STATION OPERATING CYCLES AND REFUELING OUTAGE DATES PRODUCTION CUiiULATIVE i EVENT FROM - TO (MWH) (MWH)- l Cycle 1 09/26/73 .02/01/75 3,299,639 3,299,639 1 First Refueling 02/01/75 05/09/75 Cycle 2 05/09/75-10/01/76 3,853,322 7,152,961 Second Refueling 10/01/76 - 12/13/76 Cycle 3 12/13/76-09/30/77 2,805,927 9,958,888 i Third Refueling 09/30/77 - 12/09/77- j Cycle 4 12/09/77 - 10/14/78 3,026,832 12,985,720 Fourth Refueling 10/14/78-12/24/78 Cycle.5 12/24/78 - 01/18/80 3,882,734 16,868,454 !
-Fifth Refueling 01/18/80-- 06/11/80 Cycle 6 06/11/80 - 09/18/81 3,899,714 20,768,168 Sixth Refueling 09/18/81 - 12/21/81 Cycle 7 12/21/81 - 12/06/82 3,561,866 24,330,034 j Seventh Refueling 12/06/82 - 04/07/83 i Cycle 8 -04/07/83 - 03/03/84 3,406,371 U ,736,405 '
Eighth Refueling _ 03/03/84-.--07/12/84 i
. Cycle 9 07/12/84.- 09/28/85 4,741,488- 32,477,893 Ninth Refueling 09/28/85 - 01/16/86 Cycle 10 01/16/86 - 03/07/87 4,356,753 36,834,646 j
Tenth Refueling 03/07/87-06/08/87 Cycle 11 06/08/87 - 09/27/88 4,936,859 41,771,505 Eleventh Refueling 09/27/88 --01/31/89
-Cycle 12 01/31/89 - 02/17/90 3,817,954 45,589,459
' Twelfth Refueling 02/17/90 - 05/29/90
-181-1
L FORT CALHOUN STATION OPERATING CYCLES AND REFULLING OUTAGE DATES (CONTINUED) PRODUCTION CUMULATIVE EVENT FROM - TD (MWH) (MWH) Cycle 13 05/29/90 09/28/91* Thirteenth Refueling 09/28/91*- 11/22/91* Cycle 14 11/22/91*- 02/12/93* Fourteenth Refueling 02/12/93*- 05/06/93* Cycle 15 05/06/93*- 09/30/94* Fifteenth Refueling 09/30/94*- 11/26/94* b
* - Planned Dates
-182-1 I
FORT CALHOUN STATION PRODUCTION AND OPERATION RECORDS The following seven items are tne current production and operation ,
" records" for the Fort Calhoun Station. I 1
- 1. First Sustained Reaction. . . . . . . . . . . . . August 5, 1973 (5:47 p.m.) l
- 2. First Electricity Supplied to the System. . . . . August 25, 1973
- 3. Commercial Operation (180,000 KWH). . . . . . . . September 26, 1973 1
- 4. Achieved full Power (100%). . . . . . . . . . . . May 4, 1974
- 5. Longest Run (477 days) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . June 8,1987 - Sept. 27,1988
- 6. Highest Monthly Net Generation (364,468,800 Tk'H). October 1987
- 7. Most' Productive fuel Cycle (4,936,859 MWH). . . . June 8, 1987 - Sept. 27, 1988
. (Cycle 11) 183-
l PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCES 1: PERFORMANCE INDICATOR ~ MANAGER / INDIVIDUAL m Age of Outstanding Maintenance Work Orders Patterson/Schmitz-Amount of Work On Hold Awaiting Parts Patterson/ CHAMPS Auxiliary Systems Chemistry Hours Outside Station-Limits Franco /Glantz CAR's Current Status Orr/Gurtis CAR's Issued Versus NRC Violations Issued Chase /Simmons L Orr/Gurtis ! Classroom (Instructor) Hours Gasper /Newhouse 1 L Corrective-Maintenance Backlog.> 3 Months _ Old Patterson/Schmitz Cumulative' Violations and NCV's Chase /Simmons
- Daily Thermal Output Holthaus/ Gray Decontaminated' Auxiliary Building Patterson/Gundal 4 i Diesel Generator Reliability (25 Demands) DG Log-Diesel Generator Unit Reliability DG Log l Disabling--Injury Frequency Rate Sorenson/Skaggs
.t I ' Document Review ,
Patterson/McKay l Engineering Chan'ge Motice Breakdown, Phelps/Bera l 1 Engineering Change Notice Status Phelps/Bera i
-Equipment Forced Outages per 1000 Critical Hours Holthaus/ Gray ,
Equivalent Availability Factor Dietz/Parra I. ' Expedited Purchases Willrett/Fraser l Forced Outage Rate. Holthaus/ Gray Fuel Reliability Indicator Holthaus/Lofshult-t Gaseous Radioactive Waste Discharged to-the Environment
' Franco /Stultz Gross Heat Rate- Holthaus/ Gray a Hazardous-Waste Produced Smith /Henning
-184-
._. . _ . c. __ ._ _ __ . - . _ .. . , . . . _ _ , . _ _ , . _ . _ . _ , _ _ _ _
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCE (CONTINUED) Hotlines Gasper /Newhouse
~ 1n-Line Chemistry Instruments Out-of-Service Patterson/Renaud Inventory Accuracy Willrett/Fraser !
Invoice Breakdown Willrett/Fraser License Candidate Exams Gasper / Lazar ; Liquid Radioactive-Waste Discharged to the Environment Franco /Stultz Loggeble/ Reportable Security incidents Sefick/Woerner. Maintenance Effectiveness Jaworski/ Dowdy
- Maintenance Work Order Backlog (Corrective Non-Outage) Pctterson/Schmitz
' Maintenance Work-Order Breakdown Patterson/Schmitz:
Maintenance Overtime Patterson/Schmitz -e Material Request Planning Willrett/Fraser i Material- Requests Awaiting Approval Willrett/Fraser Maximum Individual Radiation Exposure Patterson/ Williams HWO Overall' Status (1991 Refueling Outage)
. Patterson/ Hyde !
Number.~of Hot Spots _ Patterson/ Williams Number of NPRDS Reportable Failures Jaworski/ Dowdy Number of Outeof-Service Control Room Instruments Patterson/ Adams-
, Number of. Personnel Errors Reported in LER's Chase /Simmons L
Number of Missed ST's Resulting in LER's P1 ant LER's~ Operations and Maintenance Budget Gleason/ Parent Outstanding CAR's Orr/Gurtis i Outstanding Engineering Assistance Requests (EAR's) Jaworski/ Van Osdel Outstanding Modifications Jaworski/ Turner
-185-1
. - - - - - - -. -- - . . - -_ . _ _. .- - - . =_ - .
PERFORMANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCE (CONTINUED) t Overall Project Status (1991 Refueling Outage) Patterson/ Hyde Overdue and Extended CAR's Orr/Gurtis Percent of Completed Scheduled Maintenance Activities Peterson/Schmitz Personnel. Radiation Exposure (Cumulative) Patterson/ Williams Personnel Turnover Rate Sorenson/ Burke Preventive Maintenance items Overdue Patterson/ Linden
- Primary System Chemistry - Percent Hours Out of Limits Franco /Glantz
' Procedural Noncompliance Incidents (Maintenance) Patterson/McKay
- Progress.of 1991 Outage Modification P1anning Patterson/ Hyde Radiological' Work Practices Program- Patterson/ Williams Ratio of Preventive- to Total Maintenance Patterson/Schmitz.
Recordable. Injury Cases frequency Rate Sorenson/Skaggs l-l R0 License Examination Pass Ratio Gasper / Lazar - Secondary System Chemistry Franco /Stultz SecurityLincidentBreakdown- Sefick/Woerner j Security System failures Sefick/Woerner Spar _e Parts Inventory-Value Steele/Huliska Spare Parts Issued Steele/ Miser-SR0 License Examination Pass Ratio- Gasper / Lazar-
. Staffint level Sorenson/ Burke
. Stockout Rate Willrett/Fraser Temporary Modifications Jaworski/ Turner
~
Total Hours of Student Training Gasper /Newhouse t u-Total Skin:and Clothing Contaminations Patterson/ Williams Unplanned Automatic. Reactor. Scrams While Critical Plant LER's
-186- f
,-c- , , - . ,-w,, ,m . -,---,,-.a en,--- - - , . - , e - ,,we.-,-,-,-,----- ,, ,-w- - , e~ , - s- -r , -
r ~ s
PERFORHANCE INDICATOR DATA SOURCE (CONTINUED) Unplanned Safety System Actuations (INPO) Plant LER's Unplanned Safety System Actuations (NRC) Plant LER's Violations per 1000 Inspection Hours Chase /Howman Volume of Low level Solid Radioactive Waste Patterson/Breuer Warehouse issues Willrett/Fraser Warehouse-Receipts Willrett/Fraser Warehouse Returns Willrett/Fraser
-187-
REFERENCES INP0 Good Practices OA-102, " Performance Monitoring - Management Information" INPO Report Dated November 1984, " Nuclear Power Plant Operational Data" NUMARC 87-00, " Guidelines and Technical Bases for NUMARC Initiatives Addressing- Station Blackout at Light Water Reactors", Revision 1, Appendix D, "EDG Reliability Program", dated April 6, 1990.
-188-
.}}