ML20066D912
| ML20066D912 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Braidwood  |
| Issue date: | 12/05/1990 |
| From: | COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20066D888 | List: |
| References | |
| BWAP-1205-3TI, NUDOCS 9101170105 | |
| Download: ML20066D912 (7) | |
Text
.
'...a 1
ATTACHMENT-Revisions to the Offsite Oose Calculation Manual (00CM) are reportable to the NRC in accordance with this station's technical specifications.
Braidwood Station's Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) has been updated to identify new dairy ownership and/or locations for milk sampling are as follows:.
80-II-Horris Farm. 2.'4 mi E was retitled to-the Morris / Mack Farm to-indicate there is owner / operator relationship.
This change is to provide 3
consistent reporting in the OOCH, -the Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Repor', and the REMP Contractor's Monthly Report of analysis results.
80-17 Trotter's Dairy, 4.8 mi NH (7.7 km Q) was changed to Halpin's Dalry, 5.-5 mi SSH (8.8-km K).
B0-23 Klausing's farm, 4.3 mi E (6.9 km E) was added.
The changes do not reduce the accuracy and reliability of the setpoint
. determinations or model methodology.
v c
'T ZEPCHRON,6/Pa:94-9101170105 910110 PDR ADOCK 05000456 p
- )
BwAP 1205-371 R0 vision 2 r
Brcidrood on-sito RevlCw cnd Investigation Report OSR Humbert I/O - /3 /
Datet /d "/ 4D Subject Reviews l fildk thL (Wh-)
tt u AS-, b i<ticitt+ t/-
hkldt //
fidun u tfal $&fulteliaL /dtnkt%Wim I4fS; //-/
Requested bys 5 N & LAM W W Oired5L l klittn S ~.04*$4-
[NtoMitewl b O
Disciplines Required [A Huclear Power Plant Technology (D Reactor Operations OC Reactor Engineering O f Chemistry 4
EE Radiation Protection DJ Instrumentation and Control 70 _Hechanical and Electrical Systems
Participants:
/V 5 #
Ts 5
!!E l"A. fn K
// F/0 OSR Hembership Approved Technical Statf Supervisor
/
Date
~
M
- - - - - - - Y/N 10CFR50.59 Saf ety Evaluation is Required?
If yes, attach completed documentation in accordance l
with DwAP 1205-6.
Cencurrence Required by Offsite Review? (per Soction C.10) - - - Y / H A/
rindings and Recommendations:
Of)a'it2Yel. YD htt d l u 1 64l) da Ms_. Mt7ttsche asA/6-L. hHebsw !s t,
'$ill %v9ih Y Me A4dbn and Nb Thd.rical %e:!'U.ecm).
0 I?tehtrittml 0ertuel.
//
l l-
- * *********** ** ************** ***e eee eee e eeman ne**
- eme nemmen enem enem e n e emee n e en On-Site Review Committee's Signature indicates concurrenc9 with Findings and l
Racciamondations and 10CFR50.59 Sofety Evaluation.
l' fdgnatures Dis ciplindtd
. htg.
. b illi n $ b k k o 12:5-%
f hfg^--
Nfid/t1 I) C-4 0 kJ(tY< Yk h.
/)
- S
- O f hthu AD2)C CS*0fC90 som L
~-
~
Approved by:
'/
t,
/ 2b 4,
$TATION MANAGER DATE APPROVED (Final)
MAY 0 31990 01'l0(020190) 1
- AI en Alowoo,D,,
-m i
Rovision l
-Proc 0duro/ Tost / Modification Numbar Nhdt Ortec M 4 M n M 4ued Rov. 1 0, t3 y
Tit 1~0 s hidOt'u+td. Chtpt //, littkit%nup.Q 0didsnaQ ikod%'ar,, YbAt //-l l
U Q~
1.... Description of the change (s) to the procedure or test or description of the Modt (4pgs%L h (< iUW (144
<*w?.tra).
n1kAl0% ~$6-eab r
'hitJg Stt y ds i
-1.b. Purpose of the change (s) to the procedure or test or purpose of the Modt LMOO b
u it. C4 M ktA h t l-l SW '
UT O LAAY,, W f
f f
12rfi o a clu le Cc4.4 H
st systh4 le) d componen e 1.c.
s an ts affected ap 2.
List reference documents reviewed which describe the components or administrative controls applicable to the procedure or test.
Proposed tests must include review of l
UFSAR chapter 14.
REVIEW DOCUMENTS REVIEWED 3,/4 11 f.
Tire Protection Report Section(s) #//)-
c.
UTSAR Section(s)
/
b.
SER Section(s)
N/A g.
JIO's
/
I
/.
c.
Tech Specs I
h.
CFR's I
d.
Previous Safety Evaluations 1.
Reg. Guides
/
I o.
Unit Operating License j.
Other 66d/4 dhM4L //
v
.3.
State the ofred.s of the proposed change on the following functions a)
Site or Security d/A b) Mecha'alcal c)
Structural d)- Electrical 0)
Instrument and Control I
f)
Fire Protection I
g)
Radiological I
h) riood Protection 8
t 1)
Administrative Control v
NOTE:
FOR MODITICATIONS, SETPOINT CHANGES, COMPONEhT REPLACEMENTS, QUESTIONS 4, 5,.AND 6 ARE NOT APPLICABLE.
l.1.
Does the procedure or procedure revision constitu.e a change to a procedure as described I
in the UFSAR7 YES (
) NO ( / )
3.
Does the test involve operating methods or configurations contrary to those as described in the UFSAR7 YES (
) NO ( / )
1.
Is a Tech. Spec. change regelred?
YES (
) NO ( / )
o If ALL of the answers in A. 5, or 6 are NO, this evaluation is complete.
e If AHX of the answers in 4, 5, or 6 are YES, answer the 10 CFR 50.59 questions on
-BwAP 1205-671.
APPROVID
,Ylmte $ bt4 u
/ IL S-QO V
APR 131989 erepared By J
BRMDwooo
l November 16, 1990 3
a l
To:
K. Kofron Braidwood Station
Subject:
Onsite Review of Braidwood Station ODCM Annex. Rev. 0.8 i
The enclosed revisions have been prepared'for approval.
Table 11-1 on page 11-7 has been updated to show the Morris / Mack. Helpin's and Klausing's-Dalries.
Milk samplings for the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program occur at these locations.
Subsequent changes are found in the Index on page 11-1 and to Figure 11-3 on page 11-17.
Please contact B. Ferguson on X8154, if you have questions.
4 0 Ab5W w
I. M. Jo n
Emergency Preparedness Direc;or lHJ/smy.-
Attachments cc:
t.. Boyle J. Golden EPG-20-M25 ZEPCHRON/6/Pg:113 L
L
._ _.__,_,f/g o
BRAIDH000 REVISION 0.8 AUGUST 1990 BRAIDH000 ANNEX INDEX Eard BEVISION CHAPTER 11 11-1 0.8 11-11 0.A 11-111 0A 11-tv 0.A 11-1 0
11-2 0
11-3 0
11-4 0
11-5 0
11-6 0.A 11-7 0.8 11-8 0
11-9 0A 11-10 0.A 11-11 0
11-12 0.A 11-13 0
11-14 0
11-15 0
11-16 0
11-17 0.B i
l 11-1
BRA'DM000 REVISION 0.8 ;
AUGUST 199.0 i
Table 11-1 (Cont'd) t b Exposcre Pathway Sampling or Type and Frequency I
and/cr Sample Sampline or Monitorino Locations 4
. Collection Frecuency of Analysis 3.
Materbornee j
(Cont'd) d.
Coolino Mater 80-08. Intake Pipe No. 3, 5.0 mi E (8.0 km E) Meekly Gross beta analysis 8D-09. Discharge Pipe No. 4. 5.0 ml E Meekly (8.0 km E) c.
Shoreline 80-10. Kankakee River downstream of Sealannually Gamma 1sotopic Sediments discharge. 5.0 mi ENE (8.0 km D) analysis on each sample.
4.
Inaestione a.
Milk Indicators Semimonthly: May to October Gamma Isotopic and i
Monthly: November to April I-131 analysis on each i
80-11. Morris / Mack Farm. 2.4 al E (3.9 km E) sample.
80-17. Halpin's Dairy, 5.5 al SSW i
(8.8 km K)
B0-23. Klausing's Farm. 4.3 mi E I
(6.9 km E) l Controls i
80-18. Biros Farm. 10.5 al N (16.9 km N) j-i b.
f_ish 80-07. Kankakee River upstream of discharge. Three times a year (spring.
Gaauna Isotopic d
5.4 mi E (8.7 km E) summer, and fall) analysis on edible i
portions.
i 80-10. Kankakee River downstream of i
discharge. 5.0 mi ENE (8.0 km D)
}
c.
Veaetables 80-14. Pinnick Farm. 1.8 al N (2.9 km A)
Annually Gamma Isotopic 4
BO-15. Girot Farm. 1.4 mi N (2.2 km A) analysis on edible 80-16. Clark Farm. 3.3 at ENE (5.5 km D) portions.
11-7
--s
5066N 1950 f
g 22
- b p.
Y) f
\\(
'~
4 kKankakee River
/,,
Bra;dwooo e ':
.-)
g 333
,3,,
i s
'6 e s
se t fe
/
BB a WOOD
,o
, 23 ai o z/ Braceville
{
s W
&[
County t.ine Rd, f
Gardner Essex Aice Rd
)____
South Wilmirpton
- 17 swe o
5 2
3 S
1 i
t_._..
a g
4 g
g 10 Kilomelett i
?
i_
.1, 0FFSITE DOSE CALCULATION MANUAL BRAIDWOOD STATION FIGURE 113 INGESTION AND WATERBORNE EXPOSURE P ATHWAY SAMPLE LOCATIONS i
$N*-m 11-17
-