ML20065T474
| ML20065T474 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Palo Verde  |
| Issue date: | 10/25/1982 |
| From: | Van Brunt E ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE CO. (FORMERLY ARIZONA NUCLEAR |
| To: | Sternberg D NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| References | |
| 10CFR-050.55E, 10CFR-50.55E, ANPP-22093-GHD, NUDOCS 8211020534 | |
| Download: ML20065T474 (8) | |
Text
r Docket Nos. 50-528/529/530 50.55(e) Report gp
.o. Box 21666wo --rom emmgw P
PHOENIX, ARIZof*A 85036 STA.
October 25 1982 ANPP-2209
/{gg U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regiot V Creekside Oaks Office Park 1450 Maria Lane - Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596-5368 Attention:
Mr. D. M. Sternberg, Chief Reactor Projects Branch 1
Subject:
Final Report - DER 82-8 A 50.55(e) Report Relating to G.E. Switchgear Has Parts Not Certified By Subsuppliers For Nuclear Use File:
82-019-026 D.4.33.2
Reference:
(A) Telepitone Conversation between T. Bishop and G. Duckworth on March 11, 1982 (B) ANPP-20651, dated-April 7, 1982 (Interim Report)
(C) :ANPP-21254,. dated June 22, 1982 (Time Extension)
(D) ANPP-21673, dated August 25, 1982 (Time Extension)
Dear Sir:
Attached, is our final written report of the deficiency referenced above, which has been determined to be Not Reportable under the requirements of 10CFR50.55(e).
Very^truly yours r
1 L.
CLLL OLLL E. E. Van Brunt, Jr.
APS Vice President Nuclear Projects Management ANPP Project Director EEVBJr/GHD:db Attachment cc: See Attached Page 2 My f'
8211020534 821025 PDR ADOCK 05000528 S
f
~
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission October 25, 1982 Attention:
Mr. D. M. Sternberg, Chief ANPP-22093-CHD/BSK Page 2 cc: Richard DeYoung, Director Office of Inspection and Enforcement U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C. 20555 T. G. Woods, Jr.
J. A. Roedel D. B. Fasnacht C. C. Andognini A. C. Rogers B. S. Kaplan W. E. Ide J. Vorces J. A. Brand A. C. Gehr W. J. Stubblefield W. G. Bingham R. L. Patterson R. W. Welcher R. M. Grant D. R. Hawkinson L. E. Vorderbrueggen G. A. Fiorelli Lynne Bernabei, Esq.
Harmon & Weiss 1725 "1" Street, NW Suite 506 Washington, D. C. 20006 R. L. Greenfield Assistant Attorney General Bataan Memorial Building Santa Fe, New Mexico 87503
v FINAL REPORT - DER 82-8 DEFICIENCY EVALUATION 50.55(e)
ARIZONA PUBLIC SERVICE COMPANY (APS)
PVNGS UNITS 1, 2 6-3 I.
DESCRIPTION OF DEFICIENCY 2
Section 4.12.3 of specification 13-EM-009 requires the supplier to certify that the metalclad switchgear has been manufactured in compliance with an applicable QA Program and that the equipment meets the requirements of the procurement documents.
Contrary to the above, installed components to the switchgear supplied and certified by General Electric to purchase specification 13-EM-009 were later identified by Attachment 1 as not in compliance with purchase specification.
The vendors supplying component parts to General Electric refused to certify certain parts for nuclear use; however, alternate parts which have been certified were being furnished _as-replacements. This DER was initiated to document the evaluation of a con'ern that equipment was being delivered c
prior to being fully qualified, since GE did not submit a Supplier Deviation Disposition Request (SDDR) or equivalent document prior to initial shipment of the equipment.
(See Attachment 4.) c II.
ANALYSIS OF SAFETY IMPLICATIONS:
This condition is evaluated as not reportable. As evidenced by Attachments 2
& 3, the IE breakers and relays in question are in the process of being qualified and the environmental report has not yet received Bechtel Status 1.
However, the equipment was shipped and' accepted by Bechtel with the under-standing that a deviation did not exist since all equipment would eventually be qualified prior to fuel load by performing any rework or modification which might be required.
This condition is being controlled by-Bechtel's Internal Procedure IP-5.22, Revision 3, which has been specifically implemented to assure that all Class IE equipment is properly certified prior to fuel load. This procedure also provided guidance on how qualification failures and/or problems will be dealt with by project engineering. APS Nuclear Engineering further reviews this condition under Nuclear Projects Department Procedure NS-15, Equipment
^
Qualification.
- ?_
III.
CORRECTIVE ACTION 1.
Nonconformance reports EJ-1147, 1467, 1468 and 1469 will be dispositioned to replace the identified components as directed by General Electric.
This action will correct all equipment. deliveries to the jobsite.
2.
GE's IEEE 323 qualification report, seventh submittal, in currently being reviewed by Bechtel. Final resolution and assignment of Status 1 to this document will document that all technical con'derns have been resolved.
,4*
r
~
'e r
Final Report - DER 82-8 Page 2
\\
~
)F
- 3. documents that CE will revise and resubmit all related drawings, bill of materials, etc., to reflect as-built conditions.
o ATTACHMENTS 1.
General Electric letter H.O. Champica,(Burlington, Ia) to Dick Barrett (I&SE-Phoenix, A3) dated December 2,:1980.
2.
General Electric letter L. R. Fickel to W. G. Bingham dated April 22, 1982.
3.
General Electric letter E. Phi 311ppi to W. G. Bingham dated July 26, 1982.
4.
APS Quality Assurance Finding SF-47 dated December 20, 1981.
\\
. ~
- y Ie
'f
'g.
m h-s s
N'
r o
}
- .. g3
. G E N ER AL @, ELECTHSCs 3
7g 1
t!. C. Adams-Phil.
)
December 2,1980 com s.
'em ooh. 8*326-6424 o.it.
S.L. Barbagiovanni-Buri.
F.J.
S ta pl e ton oui. Switchgear Business Department P.O. Edx 488 Burlindton, IA 52601 ao..us.
Attachment i to DER 82-8 flUCLE AR MODI F1 C AT 10ft sunnet.
CUST:
Arizona Public Serv. Co.
Pa.lo Verde #1, #2, & #3 f!EQri:
480-54640 1
S.0.:
929599, 900, 903, 904, 906, &~907 GEN. ELEC.
TO:
Mr. Dick Barrett-I&SE General Electric Co.
UtC 3 1u90 P.O.
Box 10419 Phoenix, AZ 85064 l ?: S. E. PHOENIX Atfached you will find a listing of parts which need
~
to be changed out in the subject Switchgear Equipment.
r refused The vendors who supplied these parts have now
,j to certify these par'ts. for liuclear use.
kle,would request that you supply us with an estimate for making these modifications on a complaint basis.
Engineering assures me that each part is directly inter-changeable wi th the part it replaces and no rewiring is required.
Thank you, t
s C-ntCHA'W
<f,
,,, y _ c u,
,~
H.D'.
Chambon O.
'l
' ' ',W 'O
- p ProWuct Service-536 e-DurTington, IA x? G,
\\
nDC/dmj
-2
/g t t a c hme ri t
,0, TELECOPY n)
M vf
~
DAlp7.P f/ rn-10 A h5"'
~
_t FR0M;N E g) 9 p1
.r.
1 i
f.
Attachnent 2 to DER 82-8 GENER AL $ ELECTRIC stscraic uritiry SALES DIVISION GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,9350 E. FLAIR DR., EL MONTE, CALIFORNtA 91734 Phone: (213) 572-5200 MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. BOX 2830, TERMINAL ANNEX. LOS ANGELES, calif. 90051
/MM
' Janneec7
_n u 2lIse. 4 4 4 L-April 22, 1982 IJS 26'82 a
e
~1 g ~se w Bechtel Power Corporation 3 T fise
--$L1-P.O. Box 6C960, Terminal Annex Los Angeles, California 90060 7
% ar L
- y Attention:
W. G. Bingham an,e 8u en
Reference:
Arizona Nuclear Power Proj ect
~_ _e m' en P.O.
10407-EM-009 L I " --
4.16KV Class lE Switchgear M
D.E.R.
No. 82-8 L
7" Z
L Gentlemen:
Jg",
suw REs s= < W At the time this equipment was shipped, the lE breakers and relays hMe question were in the process of being qualified and the environmental report had not yet received Bechtel status 1.
However, the equipme k i _.
i.]
was shipped with the. understanding that a deviction did not exist since all equipment would eventually be qualified.
Sometime af ter the eqzipment was shipped, the manufacturers of certain breakers and relays, General Electric and Agastat, decided not to qualify the particular models we had shipped.
In accordance with our committment to comply with qualification requirements, the GE breakers have been re-placed and the Agastat relays will be replaced in the near future with fully qualified equipment.'
Since a nonconformance or deviation did not exist, GE does not feel that it was necessary to issue a SDDR.
Very truly yours,
/
L. R. Fickel Sales Engineer LRF/kc cc:
M. Torikian, Bechtel - LA
~
L J
I
~ to DER 82-8 G E N ER A L (h E LECTRIC at craic uriury SALES DIVISION GENERAL ELECTRIC COMPANY,9350 E. FLAIR DR., EL MONTE, CALIFORNIA 91734 Phone: (213) 572-5200 MAILING ADDRESS: P.oSOX 2830, TERMINAL ANNEX, LOS ANGELES, CALIF. 90051
'newn ntt A -dOf July 26, 1982 M3N A
A
] ~P r 49NM t
's
.i snte
~
Bechtel Corporation
,T'O.,
P. O. Box 60860, Term. Annex j
"R" Los Angeles, California 90060 ijV NO 1
Attention: W. G. Bingham hi3 cms
.7 i
Subject:
ANPP - Palo Verde b'"
EM-009 Swgr. MOC 205602 L3,
m se.
G. E. Regn. 480-54640 Qualification Report lL
___;,gjf
{._-
Dear Mr. Bingham:
N I'It In response to your 6/23/82 letter in which you listed 7htaa t '4 C questions:
The first two questions relate to the environmental and seismic qualification.
An analysis is requested to show how the seismic tests on non-certified components apply to certified environ-mentally qualified components.
Our position on these questions
/
is that we have completed our obligation on the environmental qualifications and we cannot continue to respond to additional requests on this report.
For example, the IEEE 323. qualification report has been revised a number of times (six revisions) at Bechtel's request.
The latest revision was mailed 7/22/82 and supposedly answered,all of Bechtel's questions, per the meeting of last month.
Your third request is that General Electric revitie'all related draw-ings, bill of materials, etc., to reflect replacements of unqualified components.
General Electric accepts this as our responsibility and iI' intends to do this after all modifications on the equipment are com-plete.
l l
Very truly yo s,
E i
\\g EP/mw E. Phi lippi
s.
e.
QUALITY ASSURANCE FINDING QAF Identification S F-81-l.7 Attachment 8+ to DER 82-8 Page 1
Of I
Eoj;ct Activity Identification Documents Review of Purchase Palo Verde Nuclear Genrating Station Specification 13-Df-009 Rev.2 Organization Responsible Date Discovered Date Reply Due Bechtel 11/20/81 12/20/81 Initiator (s)
Controlling Document: (Section, Paragraph)
Discussed With D. Anderson 10CFR 50 Appendix B Criteria VII C. Drewy Requirement Measures shall be established to assure that purchased material, equipment and services,... conform to the procurement document.
Description of Finding Contrary to the above, installed components to switchgear equipment supplied & certified by GE to purchase specification 13-DI-009 were later identified by GE as not in compliance with the purchase specification. These components were not acceptable for nuclear application as originally certified on GE documentation. Refer to attached original C of C GE Requisition 480-54640 GE Shop Order No's: 929599, 929900 and 929903. Refer to the letter attached dated 12/2/80 from H.D. Champion. Burlington IA to Dick Barrett GE Phoenix.
Recommended Corrective Action 1.
Audit CE to determine valadity of certification provided on all GE supplied switch-gear accessories.
2.
Review NCR #EJ-ll47, EJ-1467,1468, and 1469 and the above requisition and shop orders to identify significant deficiencies in certified documentation that are reportable under 10CFR 50.55 (e) 10CFR Part 21.
Corr ctive Action - Including Action to Prevent Recurrence Prepared By Authe rized By Date -
Corrective Action Evaluation Comments Acceptable Not Acceptable Verification Required Yes No Evaluator Date Varification Comments Acceptable Not Acceptable Evaluator Date COPY 1 - To Responsible Organization to be Returned With Response. COPY 2 -To File.
COPY 3 - Responsibfe Organization Copy. COPY 4 -Initiator's Copy.
g 7
' b}jf Pveis o2c
~
L.