ML20065B860

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Correspondence Re Site Emergency Planning,Including Anl Evaluation of SOPs for Oh & Clermont County,Oh.Draft of Brown County,Oh Radiological Emergency Response Plan Distributed
ML20065B860
Person / Time
Site: Zimmer
Issue date: 02/17/1983
From: Wetterhahn M
CINCINNATI GAS & ELECTRIC CO., CONNER & WETTERHAHN
To: Eilperin S, Rosenthal A, Wilbur H
NRC ATOMIC SAFETY & LICENSING APPEAL PANEL (ASLAP)
References
NUDOCS 8302230529
Download: ML20065B860 (24)
v • d • e


Text

1 CCCKETED

nc LAW OI'FICES CONNER Sc WETTERHAHN. P.G.

"?.3 RB 22 E11 :i8 TROY B. CONN ER. JR.

M ARK J. W ETTE RH AH N WASIIINGTON, D. C. 2 0000 ROBERT M. R ADER A RC H A. MOO R E. J R.

  • RO BERT H. PUBL February 17, 1983

.wot amurtTen sw v.o g,og,333,33,o CABLE ADDRESS: ATO M LAW Alan S.

Rosenthal Howard A. Wilbur Chairman Atomic Safety and Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Licensing Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 Washington, D.C.

20555 Stephen F. Eilperin Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.

20555 In the Matter of The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, et al.

(Wm. H. Zimmer Nuclear Power Station)

Docket No. 50-358 Gentlemen:

A draft of the Brown County (Ohio)

Radiological Emergency Response Plan for the Wm.

H. Zimmer Nuclear Power Station (designated Rev. O) has just been distributed to county, State and Federal officials for comment.

This plan describes Brown County's support role in implementation of protective actions such as access control and food, milk, water and livestock feed control for a

radiological emergency at the Zimmer Station as discussed during the hearing before the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board.

If the Appeal Board wishes to receive copies of this document, please let me know.

8302230529 830217 PDR ADOCK 05000358 0

PDR

'a Alan S. Rosenthal Stephen F. Eilperin Howard A. Wilber February 18, 1983 Page 2 I an enclosing for the information of the Board three pieces of correspondence relating to emergency planning for the Zimmer Station which have recently come to my attention.

I would note that the attachment to the December 22, 1982 letter from the Federal Emergency Management Agency, Region V,

to *.he Ohio Disaster Services Agency was already sent to the Appeal Board by NRC Staff counsel on January 11, 1983.

Sincerely, Mark J. Wetterhahn Counsel for the Applicants MJW:sdd Enclosures cc:

Judge John H. Frye, III Dr. Frank F.

Hooper Dr. M.

Stanley Livingston Chairman, Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board Panel Chairman, Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel Charles A.

Barth, Esq.

Deborah Faber Webb, Esq.

Andrew B. Dennison, Esq.

Lynne Bernabei, Esq.

John D. Woliver, Esq.

Brian Cassidy, Esq.

David K. Martin, Esq.

George E.

Pattison, Esq.

William J. Moran, Esq.

Docketing and Service Branch Stephen H.

Lewis, Esq.

Sty.

% rec,eral nmereency Management A=eency

r gg, e

F 8

Region V 300 South Wa:1.::,24th Roor. Chicago, IL 60606 (312) 353-1500 W

titiling zidress : Federal Ce::er, Ez:_le Creek, P.ichigz: 490'.o Lece=ber 22, 19E2 we_,,eg

. a e,

a.-..<.. -. De v

.N. n.-..-.

Ohie Disas e: Se vices Agenry 2525 Wes: Granville Road w - _....e..-..-.. o.w <.,

,g

.....e.....

.u s..<.,< a-w____

Dez fir. Grace:

E :1 sed is the resui: of Arg:=nc Na:icnti 1.ab=rz:= y 's reviev =f the 5:z dard Goers:ing Procedures (SOPS) i=

er radiological emergency preparedness pic=s.

As indi:2:ed by :he review, the SOPS were :c--

..=ase:;uz:e an: - ;; rec =:..re =m: ::.ca::.c= se:=re they are a::eptable.

TDiA Regien V is also==ndu :i=; an independe=: review of these SUPS and v_-11 provide you the results =f i s review.

We h=ne :he Arg ae revier se:ves as : useM =c=1 f=r your c=dezv:rs

==dif
he SO?s.

Sincerely,

., 5 %

'7%i n

sE: s. De:2en:

Chai0ZO.

Regi= a1 Assis z:=e *~-

d::ee 1 *10sure l

l t

IV/J.UATION OF SI/JDAP.D 0?IRATING FROCEDURT.S FOR CHIO AND CI.ERl'.ONT COUNTY, OHIO A-kT LIM' E. 21 F:.I NUCLEAF. P0kTR STATION O

Table of Contents Pace l.

Overview 1

2.-

C:=pliance with E=ergency Preparedness 2

Co=plezien Schedule 3.

Evalua:ien of Co=pel:ed Cler=on: Coun:y Off-Site 3

5:andard C erating Prc:edures 7

4.

Evalua:icn of Cc=ple:ed Ohio Off-Site Standard 8

Opera:ing Procedures 5.

Public Infor=a: ion Package 10 6.

Deficiencies Identified in the Atonic Safety 11 and Licensing Board Initial Decision

[

l l

I i

1 O..-,

r.;w, ssas This review cf the 'a'illia= E. Zi==e Nuclea: Power Station (ZN?S)

~

S:asdard Operati=g ?:ocedures (30?s) evalua:es the adecuacy of the 50?s for Ohio and Clermos: Ceu=:y, Ohio, lis:ed in the E=ergency Preparedness Com-pletion Schedule as subsitted by the applicant, Cinci==a:1 Cas & Ele : ic Co=pany (CG&E), to the A:c=ic Safe:y and Licensing Board (ASL3) on March 3,1982.

Co=pleting this task required several s:eps:

(1) c = pari =g the SO?s sub=1:ted by CG&E vi h the C =ple:ie: Schedule :o de:er=ine which, if any, have :::

bee: sub=itted; (2) evalua:ing the ex:en: :o which each SOP is consistent with n~EIG-065!./?IMA-I."-1, Rev. 1, a:d the Ohio a:d Cler=en: Coun:7 Nuclea ?cuer Station E=e:Se cy Response Plans :c which : hey are appended; and (3) where relevant, evaluating each SO? assics: :he Jc=e 21,19S2, Initial Decisions en IN?S by the ASLE.

In addition, :his repor:

s"-- rises the c' rrent s:atus of CG&I u

c==pliance with require =ents i=pesed in the Initial Decision which were not i=: ended to be addressed by the SC?s.

1: :he in:erest of brevity, this dis-cussion focuses c: deficie cies; where no ec==en: is =ade, no proble= with :he 50? vas fou=d.

As a resul: cf this evaluatic=, i: vas concluded tha: there were a variety of discrepancies, =est of which can be generalized into so=e areas of concer=.

First, there is a u= artainty as to whe:her the draf ters of these docu=en:s f:llowed any basic criteria with respec: :o what S0?s are and how they are to Anis evaluation further disclosed a nu=ber of =issing portions which se usec.

indicates tha: the prepara:ics of these 50?s =ay not have been as thorough as i: should have been.

e

--s c,

9 e.

2 CO.'91IA:i I k'ITE DfIEGINCY PEI?AEEDNESS COMPLITIC

  • SAL 1E As'of this date, the Ohio a:d Cle =en: Coun:y S0?s listed in the E=erge:cy Preparedness Co=pletion Schedule have no: all bee: finished, although =os: appear :o be ec=plete.

All of the Off-Site Scandard Operati=g Procedures fc: Cle=o:: County have bee: sub=1:ted.

All of the Off-Site S:a:dard Opera:i=g Procedures fer Chio have ei:her been sub=itted or are no longer releva::, vi:h :he excep:iens cf A :iden: Assessment and Ingestio:

Pa:hvay Sa=pling.

The A::iden: Assess =en: S0?s =ust be evaluated at the S:a:e IOC and the Inges: ion Pathway Sa=pling 50? has no: been prepared.

Ee-

=aining :: be developed in the Public Inf:=atio: Package is the Circle of Safe:y Pa phler.

The Telephone Book I ser: has been rece=:17 co=pleted and will re:uire an evalua:ics :o deter =ine :he sta:e of adequacy.

Neither the

?ublic Hotifica:ic: Syste= Test n=

the Off-Site Training has occurred; the la::er is ::: expe::ed :c begi: un:il jus: prior to the nes:: scheduled radio-icgical e=ergency preparedness exercise.

.rinally, :he Ohio and Cle=:st Coc.::y plans have ::: been reviewed as specified in the ce=pletion schedule.

i e

-~,,

a 3

.r........ 0:

Cv..s, ;... -

,?.u..o -

w

.. Cs..,."T 0:~4 v ; S4/JCA.n.3 r_..<...

0?I?.J. n;G FROCIOU?.IS

!= general, 1: vas difficul: to understa=d hev the ce=pleted SOPS were to be used i= cc ju:::ic=.-ith :he exis:i=g Clemen: Cou::7 Pla=.

The subje::s covered i= the Cle==== Coun:7 S0?s and the Cle=o=: Cou::7 Plan vere ide::1 cal is a==ber of instances, bu: they differed in i=per:an: respects 1= the i=-

s:ructicus gives.

Since no sche =e was eviden: :o explain to e=erge: 7 v:rkers whe: :s use the pla= and when to use :he 50?s, c e cz= predic: ccusiderable cc fusic in the even: of a radi:*.ogical e.=erge:cy.

Indeed, :he Cle===:

County S0?s :epea: s: =uch of wha: already is i: the Cle==== cou=:7 ?*.a

(:fte: i= differen: verds) :ha: these 50?s rese=ble plan a=e:d=en:s.

I=arg e::7 L. $

resp :se veuld be i= proved by re ri:ing :he Pla: and 50?s in:o a si gle d::=e::.

except for the E3S/!DAA =essage SC?s.

.t...*

C.

s.u..n. Co w... v.

.e..n.,.,.,. 0L.... n. s (.e e.r... m.i 1.3) u

-he legal au:h:rity : hat is ne:ed c page c:e of :he 50? in:redue:1 =

. '[,,.

~

c.~.-

is differe:: f== :ha:' i:ed c= page II-A-I i: :he Cle===:. Coun:7 Plan.

r..s e

C.....u:.:.

0. _. _. m...:::... w.a g

. :........ 3 u:

Tne c:=positien cf radielegical==:1:=ri:g :er.=s as described i=

this S0? is a varia=ce fro: :ha: outlined i: :he Cle=en: Cous:y Pla=, which 1:self differs f::= the Ohio Pla=.

Tne Cle===: County S0?

I sta:es 1: 1:s discussie: cf :he C:::ep: cf Opera:icas (page :Vo) tha: separa:e S:a:e a:d C::::y tea =s vi.11 be c:;a=1:ed.

However, the Cle=ms: Cou=:7 ?la:

(page II-E-I) says tha: each== 1:::1=g tea = vill consis: cf o=e Cou=:y =e=her and :vo S:a:e =e=bers.

.Meanwhile, the Ohio Pla: (page II-E-3) sta:es tha:

i I

==itori=g tes=s vi'.1 he ce=pesed of :hree S: ate =e=bers.

3.3

!;CTIy CATICI; A:O VI?.!y!CATIO!; (C1.I?.M0';T C00- Y SOP SIRIES 100)

Tne e=ergency classificatica sys:e= used is i=1: dally :o:1fying e=e ge::y v :kers is no: consistent vi:h 1."J?.IG 0654. tdt;-RI?-1, Rev.1, D.3.

The Sheriff's n

L

C.'.' ' ~ a N....'.'.*....'.- ~ *...~..~ c d " ~. a ( S R..'

.n.'.n. ',

a C e.*.* v e ) c..-. e s

h. a - ~. ~ 1.e>a n.~' 's effice ::a sla:es the utili:f's classifica:ics of the e=e: gen:7

('.e., u= usual eve::, aler:, si:e area a=erge::y, or general e=erge::y) i=:o a==~2er ra=gi=g f c: c e te f::: vhe: :: ifyi=; e=erge:cy workers :o reper: to the e=erge::7 eperati:g ce::e (IOC).

This is c==: ary to TD'A pla= ing guidance and could cause :: fusi:: in as actual e=argen:y.

The classificatien syste= used whe:

..<:<..- e e.e,..c,.

.......<e s snot,d ce.he sa=

as... a. o.

.,e 3

v

.t t.a. a.,._.. s. c.:. u...,.e. e u e

,.ag.-

._._,. s

..u..a. a e e.._a e.a.

o < e..

e_,3....

,e.s n

.. _ < s s _<. 3

._.. S m. 5 e,.<, s, 0v a.:

. s -.. oe J

s... 4...-e..

.v...._-...m....

..e._a-(S m.

.e. r...- _e -a.,0Cs

.s

..,.-.m.,.

CC. n 0h.

s i.

. e c._.

.~...

.e.e._-....r.,

s. =.v.r... )

"" v.s..-...

.v v.

f

..., s C e _ -...

t..,.......e C..,

e s d,.e.<..<,.

_4.

.r. s., -

s.a. es 4

espe s.

. u..

s-,,<3 pc<.,.

<,,a

.e._

<.._..<.g

,.c e d

_4,.,e.a..:,. _..u.e u

v 3...

r. a.. ~. (...".."' O.',, a s. o = e ).

..-.ev-.,

=c

.b..' g

  • s a

u

_,.. <.. e. a....... e. s-,,<.-,..s.o..se.<.

,.g,... a s :.- _ < g.........<,.,e.

<g

.,...-.,...:,.2.,. g..,

,.,.,..., g o. a.

.,. =...

s.. u... c,. _... c...... ;,., a.,.

ce

a. c o.a.,....<. s,,. s:<,s.u., p ese e..e.a s u.,, <. 3.

.<.s <.. e Co..:._

a-3 e.-.

.a......,....2

.-..4.._..s.3.-.e - e..<,_..

,4

- s. (sos v.,

3 a 3,.

ee) s..

si= ply states :ha: " pro:ective e:;uip=e::, as =ecessary" should be carried by i

ea.

.ea

c. _, _a e

s

o. su... e..<,.__

u..ou.,.:-. s,e.,. c <c,.d 4,.ne Sv%..

w 2 _.

m.

- r. 7.a.e _r.e.v_.-

C". _r e.v.0.. C ut.,. -. S m.

.e

.-_S

.,,0 0 a.o The ?le=e Irpesure Rate Verifica:ic: 50? (50? #302, s. are twe) s:a:es :ha:

t, C.,.... _ : <,, 2.... _ -..... <.. -. e ms

. e. o p,. - < c d < c a.,., _..<.-.

.nea-. p e s...a,

.2os<-,.e.s 3.

and radio bach :c.he IOC for fur:her instructions in case the readi=g ex:eeds 3/4 cf full s: ale.

Since =any cf :he desi=e:ers in Cle==== County are :he COV-7/<2 =odel, whese scale ranges f c= :ero :o ve hundred re=s, tt.is 50? could be read :o au:h::1:e exposure cf s==e workers of up :o 150 re=s before the ICC

_s eve _..._.'.=..

~. ' s c....#_' d... s ". '.h h u...s- 0'.54

."_'_s'

=. ', Rev. _i, K..*',

vhi-h c=1y pe _-i:s exposures in excess ed I:vire==e=:a ?:::ectie Age =cy Ge= era 1 ?:::ee:ive Guidelines vi:h pric per=issie: ed appropria:e cddicials.

3.6

?.ADIATICN :_. 0512,2 CONT?.0L (SOP SI?.IIS 400)

The K.adielegi=al Iquip=e:: 50? /.50? !

  • 01, page :vo) provides der e=erge==y verkers to be issued CDV-742 self-readi=g p::ke: dosi=eters.

This is in-appr:pria:e== der h1. 23 0654, ?D'.A-II?-1, T. 3.a der such pers==s because the 7

dese level a: a ::: lear power pla=: accide:- is e=pe::ed :o be cc siderably lover tha: :he COV-74 is inte:ded :s indi a:e.

.e resul: could be "- e: essa:7 exposure :: 1:2 (bu: still da=gereus) adit:i:: levels a===g verkers whose dos'~e.e.s ".e

=...-. s

.'.c'....'y s e.. s _'..'. e..- ' ' '- = ~. e.- - v. expos.e a.

Ei:her :he C""*-730 (indicates 0-20 c=s) :: :he CDT-740 (i=dicates 0-100 re=s),

s

. ' -- = -

e.'. ' v,

~.*.e w-V.'.a s-( '._.'..'.... e s 0.- '. _' '- '. e=s ) _' s e

  • o en.' e'.

each verke.

..,.2.< s e. <. a '.,- ' r _ =....-: (.~..~. :..', rage..c) --

.ad'--.s.he C.1=..-.-...

s..

C.... v. = 1.=.

'. '.. ' ' s - ~ s s '..... ~.'

=. ~. _ - -......- -..' '. s ' - = ~. e. s.

~...e.'.-~.~.*-

s. s-. e s ( o..- ~ =...' ' ) ~.~~.a

,.. c v ' c _'.-.. s s '...'.' *.- =..- '

.'.-. v. e -_. = ~ ~. e."..-..'.

2-..s<

e.e.,.....s...

..e_...... s a.... s..... _...

<,.s

._. cos<. e,.s sn..._3a. be ver: by e=erge=cy v :kers i_# available.

17.7.I3 0654, FD'A-EI?-1, Rev. 1, K.3.a requires per=anen: recc d dosi=e:ers; this S;? should be==dified to be ec=-

s ' s - e. v'.. '... '..' s. e, ~ _' ~. = e. a. '. %.. e C.'....-. C c"

~.~.r=..' a:.

.ne c.a::. logical Equip =e=: 50? (S0? ? 1, page evo) s:stes tha: e= erg e==7 v-. k e. s a. =_..-. =. a d.h e.". d., s.'...= ~. e~. s ev e.

' ' '. e e. _'.~ ~. e s a.'. *. o c

..' c.- - e any abne.al in : case to their supe.-risers.

This interval =ay c: =ay sc: be 2pe.-,..<

.,, z e g e n. 2.<.,. g c. < < e _n g

. 2 <. <...,,

e q " '. e s... '...*.. g e_.= ~. g =_~ ~ v.

verkers te unders:and wha an ab ::=al increase is.

This 50? should be

=edidied in a=:c dance with N1.7.IG 065!., FD'.-E..'-1, Rev. 1, K.3.b to require

)

. u.... Q* t.

... we.,.

go. or uS o.1.'-

A.e.,_<

e

.%. 2 p --n..

..S uG-4,,aY.,.33 r..-

-.o

..._u

..y g

u-c ' ~ c"_s. a~.. ~ = s c.' an a..' o' e... a ' ' n s.. ~.~. e- = ~. s e ~..~.~; "..~ ~. ' =. s a c o. '.'

g.' s.

r.

.s. 7

.e.n - C.a r e.t.

O c., C..r 4 I:-.

.e.c. S 500)

(S,o u

v.

Several aspe :s cf this 50? are unclear.

Firs:,.the discussie:

cf.:he du:ies of :be Superi=:enden of Schocis (SOP f 501, page Ovelve) s:a es :ha: :he Superi=:e=de:: is to c:::a:: the schools listed i: table III-A 1: the Cler:::: Coun:y Plan.

': is ign::es :he Cle==== Cous:7 Schec1 Sys:e=

n Kadiclogr. cal E=ergen:y ? rete :ive A:: ion ? =cedures.

Second, f=:= 502-27

(.cc.= i.Sc=, r-e v1,.e.:,..s

..ea;.e..,

.n, no.<

<.a.<--,a. -~ - s. t a.

n v..c.. ~...e s

A. <

o,;..

3

.,}.<

..o

..._<.,e...k.=. Cle on: Coun:y Pla: lis.

Finallv, s

f :he ab:ve discussicas :f -he Superintendent's responsibili:ies clearly n:ne indicate whether he is o rep :: :c :he IOC firs up:

being no:1fied of an energency a: IN?C, or whe:her he is :o ac:ify the schocls of :he si:ua:ics z.>.

...,...,.,-..c u..,. ecc.

... ese 1..e.s e -<.,.

c.,a.a:<...<

--~s.-.

.. =

v...: u-: _ eu.,. : o v--,.,..:.r-m s

r,.e 2 3-.. ?.S t00)

(".s 0..".. "' U.'. _

_N.

~_~_ Cw'".'. ?~ ' 0.".

-.A s

s. =.=. _e,

.e. r.=.,. -.. r.m. :v:. :

1. : -)

L.

<.<e.

a,s..e.e....:

.... < s u e..-... C t.... s u..>.

.. c.

<- __r..e.v... - e m, - --.- c r u..mmt S v..... v. :. - m _.e <. u.. '

r

.--..u...-v. 3 - - r.-.. s -.v.. 4 C"*i vr

.u.....

.u

.%/- s.m

.

~ - -

,. a y,., g ~...,. aa-g...y..,..a

.... <...a g. y. a s

.e. y

<.u.. - g.

u.,.

.-.....,g s.

'.. a d ' ' - '.-

~. ~. '. = d '..'.'.'.~ 1..* *. s ~c.~.' ~ ~. e ^.~ ~. ~. ' n. h.

<*. c ' -

a.'..- 'a De*'s'~.~

(discussed separa aly belov).

First, it appears tha: the sys:e.= f : n tifying _j 1. = b c...'.

y e - 4.=v. '.~.~s

~.'..

  • s n..-. *.* ' c a..' c
  • s s-". L. a..',~ ~

.e z u..,u..,...,

g<.e..<....... c' r,..

.s=~..

v.

yAt

$:,: k -

a:.ces:,.ts: poss:.:1y unver.r.asl e.

.ne 50? requires :.ne Superin: enc.e:: c: :.ne J., s Cle:::n-Ceun:y 3 card ef Educa:ien and as appointed assistan: to teleehene

,/ 5 v..

be:veen :he: :he head of each cf :he eighteen separate schoci dis::i::s in and

g. at..>. u..,.. = =.. a.. 2.a, e.:.. e s a...,,.,

-.g..... y.eags, <... u...,. o. e,e,e..n n e...,.

u.

a g.,p e..<... e..;. e...

., v e. 4.a

. g. e s.4.ua. <. u.,..:.-. e s ak' n g ~. c. e c. '.ve a c..' -..s.

- ~~. ' s y

f

~ = 2. s ~. '..a. t u ~ ~. e.,.' e -" s. p a...<..' r -..-

s s.~ e

.%.. d.' '.'n e.~.*. t e.'. e -'c~ a ca' ' s e

before n=:1fiez:1:

cf schocis vill be c==plete.

A =cre efficies: s.s:e=

s e,..

e.

Se==nd, :he ?:::ective A:-1:: ?:ccedures lack =.any of :he teleph==e N/m4 a

53 'f'%

,e.s c.:

. a. t.s. <.:..,, s.u..,,,s

<.u sonce., d4 s..<..

n,a s

..s.

a,.,.

...,. s e te'eph=ce =u=hers =us: be en:ered before this 50? can be acceptable.

.. o

- Ss,e..i.

a.. a....,. -,,. n,.v.e.a.-.

.2

..-.e. 43- =e.

.. C,., (w e nm.,.

CO.

,nySA.e. R e.....

w....

.e: :.\\.. C..e

.w-. v:. a.,

.e..

0:.av,..,..

.-.e.r.. r.C.,,.

, a.D.... 7.0"m" a.m. a..w x.

~.L.".: :.

$. :,.....6,.: )

mI e

s-,.s

...az,eg.<....,s,. :...

, Os. sa

...<.2., go:s 2.e CC :us.<.g.

..a 4.n

?..< r..

...J c

..,4.ed e

e

.%.. -a.>.....

.J e s

.. <. 8.. J... es.......<

c

utes; sin:e a p:.=ary purpose =f :he IIS a=d NOAA =essages is to isdicate

...,. s e, <...,...:

u..,..,.

.e

.o :.a... ex

..e u..... ev a....e.<.=.s.e -,.s

<n a

o.,a.

Ad

-..-.ea..=..-.1.*.'.-.

.-". = s.

.c. e..-...,

.'n e s a.-. c.

12

.d.. e nca' S u".' va"'.d

". cb.. N. "' <

~~

<r.

c., a. e

.z.

.e...,;..a> s, as..e-as s e..o.s, so.... e

..c a as. e.

,,t.1;

... n

,: e a es.. s...

..y.s....4....

. s.,

c u. e,.,

n

. u..,..-. <..,......:......<...

..........:, 2.

aps <...>.<ca.<.-

.. 3 o-5 r..,,g

.a.... < s...... <.

..,.... e. < y e

.. <.. < s.... <... <.

. u. e n

c e - -... c

-.....y

(

. e.. r..

v

..~ e

..3 c.. a... r 3 e ),..s.4.s..

5 3

7 sp e c '.'v.

. %.. =. s =.. ~..~ ~. '. e s ' ~.. a '...s.' ~..- % 1 e.'

.1

c. ',~u=..= " O.' a* !., W==' '. '.ev..'

3 r

4 u

.,.e-....,

.s.

e...

s: Cn.u-s_-~. =3 C. :.~.-...:....

.c. ~-n. Dn=.3 0 =. = =. 1.~. - v, u..u -'.D'a.. a-n.

...- ~.,.. n. v..

Sig.' fica.: discrepancies u~.:e found be:veen wha: the F.=erge:cy Prepared-

, s s C -~~e ' e..'.. S.%..*. ' ~ _' e 1_' s. e ?..=..c

.~ ~.s 1...n~, O'..'.o S O.'s an' vha. O'_' o D.'s s.e-

<.-,.". o 5 0'. s ". '-' ^.. a.=

$ e. a. e s <..... p e. s...,1 s u. a... a :o.

.e.t. e u.

g..;

a g. e.a <..

.u... e.-

.e.<c.

5cye.a.

_,e _,.,u.,. _< g c

.,.., _ nryw" Ac.t yg.* - n na s..... a.e c-..

a_anez <-.he Ou_t,. = an m.

. < < <..,. a.-, n z.

, c.,. Sv.a.s.,..

(?igures II-C.-2 and !!-0 ~, respe:-.vely).

Since these already have been

. e..._,.. e : as.,.

_..:.u..,. :.. g o..a

..a.s.

e.

_._a...,

ey;e.. c.:. h.

c s_o.o n

.., _., ec,s,a s.eg s...ye

.. e...., y,... -. ya,....e.a_e.,.z

.e

.,a,

.n.

3.._.

n.

n r.:5,/,3.3_s. A.,va.,

e..,, a

. s.... _r - u_...,,,._.....

s....,._ s.n

.. 2 a...

.n

,.e

.v. s s a c =.. e e.-.... _...." a.e..o

~.=.....n.

o.h.e 0%..'o =1a.

. '.. = '. ~. ~. e -

2.. 2 a c, e -.. cct....

. e a..e.

a.s ex.....<ye.n-

-. -.... u.e us.:

3.

. u..,. 3v :. s. _, _as., a.

u a.;

a c.,.,,.

m a. s... _a.. (

a..g

....,..g.,a ag g....

.a

..n e w _-_71 e..c.. q.n e..". A e.s 1.....'=.....ssess a...

an.J. 9 9... $ e s

.- a...". a v,

+

II OO g

g

_94

." '.. a V *.*..-. v a.. '.,. a. n g * '.... a..J

'. '. -..e..'e..

h.e.#o._e. ayyg. e..*. i y s 4

.3

-c

.;,.s...

_,..a,..,

a.

.u.e w...t 0e. uec.,se.

4 _

su 4

.-e..s. e,

u....

.s

.s.

-1

..r..

"*e*.~.'...'.~,o.'

a..=....-.~..=.'..~.~m,..~.,

v.'".=.s.~~.=..,.'...-.'..=.C~y=..-..'.-.... ' -

.e

. 4 3

.. -. y e... - =. =.. s.... f,...

...... a n _.

. - t. w.. : e..a O a-v >: CO..7.0. a m.

.s 2.

.. - ? 0 - -. C..,

v..e.---. 3. -

(us e : :.: u.i_-....-.n-.-.v-

.s-vw

... vr u

..s Q s. * -=. S; --e.., H

m..,. =.= _ ; COs.rg t.r=. ?. O"..

S u"'. 3'v _?

n y i = ?_a..=.? v., Cv...-=.0 t

. Se es g

._m..,

..s v.

.n

".q., A....g.:

e..,... t _ -

. e c',. e s.,,_ s..g; t 4,,n... a. c.4 g.

.4.g a....

g..,

we...... 3...

.n.

I

.a...

2,.....

a.

.a..c

.,,._s.u..a.

a.. c,re.a. e.2 l

a.s.- c.,,

.y. e.:.as. ; _.-...a..

_a _.

.3 by the Chic Disas:e: S e vic e s A g r.- -.e.

T.e 50? con:ains procedures fc: the

.<,<.g.a..,.. c '. e.= ~ s

.~.%.. e a.'.'..-..=.'.-. e a s, e,~__', ~ e....o b e u s e.'. a '.

~.%..e l

s. e, _.- y _ g. e,r

-..e,.:.

sg

.u.

..<--.., us,.2..,

.h. e p n -,

.22<cae.<y, o

e a.' s o ay '.,e dero s '.. e.'..

4o.2. 4.. e c.-... e... _.. <.. e.

a y

.,.........e..4..

A

- e s.-..%. e. s 1 ~ a. '.-.. s.'.-.. m'.'.- ' -. '..' s.- ~.~r '.'. 3,

.'n =. s e n s '. _' v '. v c ' th. e^. A ' '.a..'..

i

de:e :1:: ins::=ents :o be used, nad precadures for ce=u:icatie=s :e bs used by the===1:::ing tea =s.

  • devever, radia:1:n con::ci measures are only

=en:1cned vi:h respe:: :c :he===1:ering a:d de::::a=ina:10: :ea=s.

s.. e. - >

, e s-. s. o. e. <.. e

.:-... z.., a. a a t o n..a 1,..s2.c >e.s.ua.

e.

u

.s-2:e f a=iliar vi:h desi=e:rf and decen:a=1:::ica precedures.

Assu=i.g :'..z: the responders are ::ci=ed pers===el, :he S0? deali:g vi-h Radiological M::i:cri:g centains ne deficiencies, t

t E

l l

5

L..

c,v.-.Oh.

A...,

u-i

.m-c

.w 1

.ne c 3..

m.

1 g s.o

..i<s ca.. -....a d s a.c:p1e*.e a.

.k..ds s..d...d. g.d.s

.k..e

..s..;

s.~.s<

. v,c.<:<.a.<

.2.og a...

. <s

.s<s s.,.,: ~

s.*"...r..e b e c* *. s.*.g..*.. e A.

_d a

'..e eve.. o.# an ac dde....

,.,< - 2<.e

..a..... b.. a..a. s exp 1 a.'. s.'n e s d e..s..b..d.a' sd

b = s at..

'ed.,

-. e -. s. '.. =

..~... =.. c *. h e a -. ~ ~ ~ ~ dr..,..a.e

.=.'S o.

.a

.d.~.*. '. a..'.. a J. '.~, an' -.'.-

. <. -.. - s1

..8
. <.s ea. s a... s-. e 0. a s.

. a..

..o ~. ve.-.o.. ;cn -c.e.s

..<s, z<

u

.....e.a ev...a.e.

.v.

a :<

we.

<..<es..e.e.c..

.a.

-. u. e

.. s<-e s, u...

..... e s-.

n...,.

< s. <. <. < s.. exp e. o a.. s,...u..e C. ; o r. s ' e...

.,.g

%.,.-...,. :.-. g.a.so.:.e g.e.. <gg.-...a g., x. S c.g. < -.g.s.--.- -,p p g.sg.

e.<..

u.

..a

.... g

1. g.

. u.. g

. <.,.n.. ey. g,.eg.ea..

I I

i i

l l

{.

I

(

f l

I L

__,_ - -. ~

4

-^*?9 T"T...*.*.

-.?.w- ;.S T.Cy.

- r -- -. v.. a. ; ;

m. *..-.. s& ;v. su v..
a...
  • A.m,_

T T.m. 'i.e -P '*

aw s v- -

.-s.......

.o

.ne _t.a.9

.J e n..a.S e.

n.:

.L..,.

A.

4

.c, : t... Ld Lo t

J gg s _-~ t*og..J L._ g

~~g.

.. e..

.... ~.

6 e

~

~

o -

.J ".~.. s --,. ' *.. '..

'L...'.

..L. be. c.: e. e.' '...< e C.< =. S. '..

.%.. e ~r.1 * -- * ~ g.* 0. E. 2d.' O-

  • .. g 4,. g
  • gog.

.e..s.. s.. e....,. 3.,. s ey., gf 3 3 C.-v.i.4,,g...-

g........

s.

-..g...w;

..e.

Schedu's u15

. '... = ~ o. *... 3 ~. *.. =

.'. ' L.' D =. ' S.'.-.,

he e 's o. ensc

~.0 en. -...... b..,

.e. w an..S..%.

4...f 4

%.94 2... 4.. g.h. g C

.1 g.4..C3 Sw-h. edu.' e

..s w

w y.

....._*f

............:.ne p. 1.. e._

4.J.,.. e_

4J 4.,

.s..e J.

_eS. g.,

Ogggyg,

a 4.

. o. g

.......a.

... g..., u..

, 5 5,

.y. 3 S,.C.<

.....v.

w_4SC.1.es...e C...e..

g +..a-%.

.ye 30:.S 2

3

.a. 2 4 e._

4 e 5

..u..a.

L...%..,

f,. e.et

C..

2 w.

n.

s...J eX.J 1 4. e.~. ~. ge. g

.2.~.. g a

a-w u.,

... J.,.. E..

.u..e.

,C.

u.

e.e r.....

s.

.a

.......g th........

b.

L,

.y.,_ C.S..,.

.....,y.

L.....

...u

....,- p g w., e t...e..

(. s... =..v..

).,,.s

.S

..e a3.414.y.o eyaC

s.. e e.

-2,_...

b.._...

g

., =. 45

., J. C s..

-.._. e :..n _ i.. g.9 4... e ;.., e ph o n a.

.. =.

.s...

4.

. n, 5 %...

s.S o...&.. a. e,

s.,

.t S.. ::.. 4,. a.,.

,. 38 C:

u,

._.._a..e...

. _... s..... a.

a. L. 3 *.,_ s.. g. :..... s.

..%. 4.C..

L s.. _e t _J.,,

s...J

.s.

e., J.... s...

a.,.4 1 4.

"O

.t s.

_...... e. 4. s..

a s...,

_i 3...g Jo....

r9.e _.-..

....... c.g.,

1 cyg gg w.s..,.

s.

s.

s. J..a
  • .. s.,
  • 7.

. g.

.g.

..4

...J....e

....d.

...b...,

4,.

..... 4.

..g.w

....... g....

E.JJ.. eses

-. a...

.J.,. 4 4 4 e.. a.... e S.

g*-

._.._...4...

.J e.e o.S S e;.

4.

.%.es, t..c.eJo_..$

4.5 C.-_,..e.1

.e.1 eph..,e E J.

3

,..e....w,

t. S -,Ce
S %.Cn.1 3..3 d a\\,e S.

n

_a.

5.-- = s.-..ev d..d e S s. e 1... ~.....

'. 6.s^i'.e, 7

3..-

.k e S e d..#.d..' e....'. S.

e S.,

. s.. e *i t.. ; 4 s._.n.

..N e.y. e.J.

.c. s..

,9_

J 4

45 4 S.1.14., 4. S 0..

1JeO

.. S.

s...

.g I

S..S.,

, 1_i.%..o u s%.. 4

4. 5 n o. e.cp. C.. J s.e. e.n.4ve t..

41 w.gu g C

_...a 4..

9 s.-...

r l

3 3

Cn..,n

deCOnC, Cu.-

is S*neC".,e: 10 S e

  • k', *._ n &_33 C., *Re SCgCC. Super-l gOeS a

4.. J.a... g J.

.s.# 4. e.-. g.J d.4 3.-4...c.g c...*.. a.

a..

1.C. :.S

.c y..-n ga a gyg.g=

.#.a-s y.

C..e

..s.Se

.J,:e a..,nC.t.,.S.

...3 h

i

4...*

.c..=...o.=,.

..m. e m.o===;;.. w i. -

o. 3;?..c ms.i-m*-*

o v

  • .r.

t.l e. e g ".* *. *. =

g g c S.#.-..

  1. .~~J.a S *. S as s"

'.#

  • e *.. S a C C.. "..*. *.
  • C " (p a t,, *.

e 4

.g. g

. b.. s.. g

g..., y

.o.r y i..

.e..S

.9

&a..egn.f E.

.. g. n.).

.. g y a.

S.. c.c.e.n.e.....,.:..ESE

.e.2 0

.%. Nu *

g. *.e.1g. ~.

.. s.. S

.. a...... ;... -

c.

o--

7....

r-s 1

.g e on--.g-e.z~

V %.... S. 4.1 1

.ee.,.ed

.c E

-6.--.e S S.. S..::

.O E S S...e S...%..

4

.t...-.

6-~

.s..

r.--

..a.a. g g g. $

m.i..e.

AS

,,,V.e.C S,a,

_e.. u..,

2. 1.,.

S.

ps.u...tng

....g.:

. %.. $3 y 4

g....

.y s.

s-;

g-...

o.

r.

. L.. eg -- e gg

.. a.e...e..

un eve..

.e..e 5 }....

. %.. s.. Cw.c %..gg

.A y.1.g e.d g 14.

g u..y. ).

fe.e..e.s....e

... e. g.

.y

.g.

g. v i._..gg.g s; 4

.e 2... S

.C

....e.a....e..

4 3.-.

7....

.b....

.....$.e.

..,i.e.. -..... s S n e.4... i. ;..

ex.

c..

4..

e.

ge

.S..S,.

s.

.r.->.

4..

.........e..;

. \\. e.,,;..s. ~. a. ~.;-a = ;e.

-a T. Ta c es* -

-.-..*3

..s..

r.

. 1 4

c..

2..e.e.,

(,p 3 g.

0.,.a, ).*3 e

... e o. g.,...

~..

.J e 3 e..-. _e

,5e5 s5 c.

.u...,.

. e..., s u. e...e... %.

S e c.s..e.e,

.e. n..y L$$

.e..

.h. g o.g.fg c

..e s..

p

.J,..Jr - g..

s*..se.E 4

.L.

gg:S &#d**SSeS

....g_7 4..

PE.g..S '.- -..

..s.....

. b.. e.

  • 4...$....-.J.4.d

.a

..........s.

.. % 6 6.. 2. r...%m.i r '.'

6%

Dr.. 3 :.

..-.... -.33 C.

6.i a. r.-

~.....' %:

.L * :

L'....y s s. o.t. ').ht....4.e

..a.,..Se

..a.e.e..

au..,.

.e.

e.a.

-7 5,.4 cS a

.e e--

. s

.,24 s25 a.s.e. e s..

4.S..at a.. e.

..2

.L....,-- *.-

. s..

..,.3

.s..

r.. s........
2...e._4.. e ".e. =..;....,"

4.

e,

.. e n. t..' a.d.d. e S S

..,.2 4

_...e. e.. e..,.

i*.._4...,

.. s.

ar..

o e 3, e s.... S...e

. hgg

. %..: 3.4 e.3g

...d.e.

  • J.Cv.

V s.,

.4. e.S e...

e.m

. L.. c... %....

to

.s..

.*ne....

e..e 1

k...

e S.. t.

e.J. -->. 41.9 he. -. Cpe.. 4.e.....,.._ 1...e.4. c.

.s...

.y...

.s..

s..

...v.... %.

1 c.=.J.

J..e..4. S.. e ;

.e.

a:S.t

..b..e.Cn

.5

.O

- e

._.....,.4.

S

.o

.. m..

3.i

4...--..

s..e 2.C.5...e... 4-.0$eS &S 3.i.e.. S e

.C 3 J.e. 4Q,.. ( A s..

O..C ).k..t

. g... e.

g...

e s.

_s e

-e.yg...e

.4 :._1.e..

. s.. g.. s..

.. t. *.e

. e "ge. 1e.:.a....."

...eS.C

-a.

g r.

..s.

s %.....

S..

J s-a.14

  • s.k..* e n *.. 7.a s- *. d a..

.a...... S a =...J c...eSS"ed.

h. *
  • k...a.i,a d.
  • k.. e

.a 50?S addresses :hiS license condi-3:n.

"evever, i: 15 kne n tha-C:;&E in end:

a.cun.

5.e enA c.e

. o..c.'.

d g...ie...gye. '....S c a..

k.. e. S A.........

.-7 I

I i

1

  • e
..,.. u..2 S

> m...m.

2,...

'US OS:isi:

i=70ses as a license ::::11:10: (pass CI) the re:;uire=en:

.a

= " ' '.-. a ' e. - - - <.-

.. s -. <..... J

-e-c --.=., s.=..ee ' a*.

  • e..

.~n.-

  • 14.

h.::..:=g :.: :h e S o? s a d i. e s s =.s.*..' s ' ' c -~.s

~.-.' <. '.-..

e-----.

4 m

a I

+., -

n:

_.,,,w-n

STATE OF OHIO ADJUTANT GENERAL'S DEPARTMENT 282s WESr cRANVtLLE RoAo i: AYMcNo R cALLoWAY WoRMNGToN, OHIO G8s MAJOR cENERAL rHE AoJUTANT cENCRAL RICHARo F. CELESTE GOVERNOR DISASTER SERVICES AGE.NCY AGO.1-DS February 1, 1983 John Anderson, Regional Director Federal E=ergency Management Agency Region V 300 S. Wacker St.

Chicago, Illinois 60606

Dear Mr. Anderson:

~~

ne Ohio Disaster Services has reviewed the co=ments of the Argonne National Laboratory Review Group for the Cler=ont County Standard Operating Procedures (SOP's) as suggested in a letter dated December 22, Sement, FEMA, Region V, RAC.

1982, from Dan Our office finds the review to be unacceptable specifically due to the lack of direct reference to any single part, paragraph or line number of the SOP's.

The review is subjective in nature, and can only be considered as an opinion voiced by a review group without a specific standard sgainst which to base the review.

It is our belief that the Stone 5 Webster Engineering Corporation made a bonefide attempt to write down the procedures used by county agencies as they were described to them by each specific agency.

As the letter indicates, we will await a final review comment from FF.MA, Ragion V, which will indicate an official viewpoint on the written 50P's.

Based on the January 6,1983, meeting conducted by FEMA, Region IV and V, it would appear that field verification schedules for these SOP's will provide the opportunity for the FEMA staff to make a final judgment as to whether the agencies can implement the SOP's as written.

FOR TdE DIRECTOR WILLIAM V. N. GRACE Acting Deputy Director JRN: liv c.c.

Dan Bement - FEMA V - Battle Creek Stone 6 Webster Engineering Corp.

Clermont County DSA Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co.

414 Walnut Street, Suite 1COc Cincinnati, Ohiu 45202 January 19, 1933 The Honorable Richard F. Celeste Governor, State of Ohio The State House Croad & High Streets State Office Tower Columbus, Ohio 43215 Dua r Covernor Celes te :

On behalf of our organizaticns, we wish to offer, once again, our sincerest congratulations to you on your reconc election victory.

We stand ready to ascist you in the difficult task of insuring the economic strength of our great state and the uccini and physical well being of all Ohicans, both today and for generationr. to come.

It is La this spirit that we write you to propose that you appoint a Governor's Advisory Council to help you address the concerns which we share about the safety, relia-bility and expense of the William H. Zi=mer Nuclear Power Station (Zimmer).

The State of California established the precedent for state participation in resolving similar issues in the Diablo Canyon case.

Our proposal tailors this precedent to Ohio's needs.

We recoc=end that the Advisory Council be made up of between five and nine citizer s of the State of Ohio who have demonstrated an understanding and concern for the problems of the facility which is being built near Moscow, Ohio by the Cincinnati Can and Electric Corgany, the Columbus and Southern Ohio Electric Cumpany and the Dayt.on Power and Light Company.

The purpose of the Council would be to =enitor, for l

thu Governor and the citizens of this state, the work of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC), the Cincinnati Gas and l

Electric Company and its agents in their review of the safety and construction of the plant.

The Council would then monitor the federal and utility evaluation of the steps needed to complace the construction and the licensing of the facility.

Finally, this advisory group would assist in addressing the proj ect's financial impact on Ohio's consu=crs, including the financial impact of any mismanagement which might be uncovered by the review and audits.

The magnitude of the problem at Zimmer is outlined in.

the November 12, 1982 NRC order halting construction.

The order

e O

The IIonorable Richard F. Celeste January 19, 1983 Page 2 no tes, "The Zi=mer facility has been cons tructed without an adequate quality assurance program.

resulting in the construction of a facility which currently is of indeter=inate quality."

The need for the Council is acconced by NRC Regional Administrator James Kappler who said recently, ".

I think that there is a serious ques tion over the capabilities o f the utility to do this job properly and I think that, clearly, the NRC has a stigma attached to its performance in the past Despite the record of nearly a decade of problems at Zimmer, the public has not had any level of state or local government, other than the office of the State Boiler Inspector, conducting ongoing scrutiny of the project.

Even without the assistance of the resources of their government, Ohio's citizens have parricipated in the process of uncovering what James Keppler has called the " total breakdown" in quality assurance at the plant.

In fact, NRC Commissioner Jaces Asselstine said at a hearing before Congressman ottinger's subcom=ittcc that "We (the NRC] weren't the ones that identified the breakdown in the Zimmer case.

They were identified by members of the public, not by the agency."

The present and future cost associated with the prob 1ccu at Zi==er is a matter of great public concern.

When construction began, the proj ected cons truction cost uns $240 million.

While it is now certain that the final cost will exceed $2 billion, the utility is unable to predice neither the final cost nor the plant's completion date.

Based upon the troubled history of the Zi==er plant and the resultant lack of public confidence in both the utility and l

rhe NRC, we arrongly believe thne the citizens of Central and l

Southwuut.ern Ohio cannut rely uululy upots the NRC Lu insure their public health and safety interests, nor does the NRC have any interest in the project's i= pact on Ohio's consumers.

We have concluded that the safety and the financial interacts of Ohicans can be defended adequately only with the participation of the State of Ohio, working in close cooperation with the concerned citizens of Central and Southwes tern Ohio.

The proposed Advisory Council would foster this cooperation by carrying out the following tasks:

1.

Monitor the upcoming management review and technical audits of the Zimmer project to scrutinize the degree of competence and independence of the auditors and reviewers and issue periodic reports to the Governor on these matters.

_.,.,_~ __.

The liuuu rata le Richard F.

Ce l e s t.e January it), 1963 Page 3 2.

Carry out public education, with the Governor' a approval, on the process; facilitate broad-based public partici- '

pation where it is called for and insure that the NRC lives up

)

to its conraitments and obligations to the public, such as its i

conuni cmen t to hold meetings on Zimmer in the public view; 3.

Con:=unicate any point of view or policy of the Covernor it these public meetings; 4

Revicw the written material which is gene. raced by the man ia ;,uim:n t. revi.ew tuid audits and snaku appropriate cumutents; 5.

Cor=unicate with management reviewers and auditors where appropriate to seek answers to questions raised by thu Covernor and the pecplo of the State of Ohio, and; 6.

Develop cos t-cffective strategies for the direct involvement of the State of Ohio in the licensing process.

There is no public or private entity in the State of Ohio doing these tasks in a consistent and comprehensive way.

The leadership of the Covernor and the resources of s cate govern-tan t are badly needed to insure that the incarests of safety, incogrity and reliability are served.

l

//

1 lCINCINNA}'IENV}JL RONMENTAL

/

SIERRA CLUS, !!IAMI GROUP, ADVISORY OUNS.

//

/

OHIO CHAPTER i

/

/

l

/

i By k

)(

l By

&#d h

v-(

t

s. LEAGUE OF FOMEN VOTFRS OF THE CINCINNATI AREA ZDtMER APIA CITIZENS /0HIO 9

4

9

. ()

CLERMONT COUNTY CIVIL DEloENSE ISASTER SERVICSS AGENCY

.-(r y

- Batavia, Ohio 45103-

. t m.,

. ec,.m.;

Couets:,

Am i! % p);'$ f

' Wl

~#

-:r.r.

11, 1963

....!chn Anderson, Regiona) Director Fe :c ral E=argency Management Agency Re.;:.cn V 300 S.

Wacker Street Chicago, Illinois 60606 Cear.97.

Anderson:

A3,cu are prchably aware, the Ohio Disaster Services Agency s u. - - -

".. - c y o u a letter dated February 01, 1983, statinc.

.n.

: : 1 c i a., Position cn the review comments of the Clermont 7 mn -. Standard Operatina Procedures (SOP's) as prepared for "E:*.A 'cy the Argonne National Laboratory Review Group.
.;.cewi sc, this letter will serve to inform you of the Clermont Ccunty pcsition on the Argonne review.

I have discussed the ec=mants provided by the Argonne National Laboratory with both the Ohio Disaster Services Agency and our consultants, Stonc &

'.ebster Engineering Corporation.

I concurr with the Ohio Disaster

.5ervices Agency position as sta".ed and therefore the Argonne review camments arc not acceptable to Clermont County as they arc ccnsidered t.o bc subjective in nature without having specific standards in which to base such review comments.

n. tne r:.cre, I am confidcnt that Stone & Webster Enginecring C:rpcraticn nas piaccd forth a bonafide offort to develop i;ncticnal SOP's which are capable of being implemented, based

.:p. init:.al information provided to them by numberous Orcani:.tiens.

The Clermont County Disaster, Services Agency nas taker. every possible measure to ensure adequacy and cens:stancy through coordination efforts with both Stone &

<!abster Engineering Corporation and the Ohio Disaster Services Acancy.

The Radiological Emergency Response Plan and the Standard Jrerati:.c Procedures are living. documents, subject to revision, n

crder te assure a positive approach to emergency respense and r rer.tred.. ass w i th re.;.trd to radiolo.;ical emergency situatinn.

.. c.c cut.en: a a re c::rrently being revised in order to correct

.. f. cic nt eie:: c: 2 nt:.' r;'Or.i t e new resource capabi1It2c:. as

... ; ; ; c n... perdan;.et.t r e train 0d anc/or emergCnCy vtiuipmGr.t is Cel.;mun w.n. l ans and Warninc.; System =).

_.:c

._.c.,

.~*

r.n Anderson li, 196.5 1...

hased On a January 06, 1983, meeting conducted by FEMA Region V

.:.o.,

Scb Shapiro), it is apparent that FEMA field verification schedules for Clermont County SOP's will provide the opportunity for FEMA :o formulate an offical position as to the adequacy of currently drafted SOP's and a determination of whether or not

ney can effectively be implemented.

I will await a formal SOP cea3uation from FEMA Region V, which hopefully will serve as a meaningful review, thus providing the necessary standard in which

., base such comments.

Should you have any questions concerning this matter, please feel free to contact me at (513) 732-7235.

Sincerely,

/

H % 3El*AA' ! M F.enneth G. Conover DIRECTOR /CCORDINATOR KWC:brp cc:

Dan Bement, FEMA Region V - RAC Ohic Disaster Services Agency Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company Board of Clermont County Commissioners Files - SNPS Project Files Outgoing Correspondence FY83 Director

.

Retrieved from "https://kanterella.com/w/index.php?title=ML20065B860&oldid=4440039"