ML20064N534

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Discusses Request for Addl Info on Two Items Identified Re Civil Engineering Design Rept & Forwards Justification for Calculating Vertical Seismic Loads Using Vertical Acceleration & Dead Loads
ML20064N534
Person / Time
Site: Calvert Cliffs  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 03/22/1994
From: Denton R
BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO.
To:
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
TAC-M85222, TAC-M85223, NUDOCS 9403300013
Download: ML20064N534 (2)


Text

.

t j

Monu< r E. Ursros llaisimore Gas and Occtric Company Vice Presiden, Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Nuclear linergy 1050 C"I *'CIllI'Y"'k*"?

Lusby, Afaryland 20657

.sto $ '6-22txa lht..$.t$$ local h

.sto 2txt.).455 llaltirnore l

l l

l Mareh 22,1994 l

l U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission I

Washington, DC 20555 ATTENTION:

Document Control Desk

SUBJECT:

Calvert Cliffs Nuclear Power Plant Unit Nos.1 & 2; Docket Nos. 50-317 & 50-318 Request for Additional Information - Civil Engineering Desigr Report (TAC Nos. M85222 and M85223)

Following discussions with the NRC Staff on February 17, 1994, there were two items identified which required further clarification. One issue involved the use of live loads and dead loads in the scismic evaluation of the safety-related Diesel Generator Building. Attachment (1) provides justification for calculating vertical seismic loads using vertical acceleration and dead loads. We do not anticipate extensive live loads to be present in the building, even during maintenance periods.

There is no large equipment which has not already been identified and shown on the preliminary drawings provided to the NRC in the Mechanical Systems Design Report. The second issue dealt with the design of the anchor bolts in the building. Based on discussions with the NRC Staff, we have rechecked the stresses on the anchor bolts using criteria which resolved the NRC concerns and the stresses meet the new acceptance criteria.

Should you have any further questions regarding this matw. se will be pleased to discuss them with you.

Very truly yours, A

9403300013 940322 i

n PDR ADOCK 05000317

/

W P

PDR I

RED / PSF / dim cc:

D. A. B anc, Esqaire J. E. Silberg, Esquire R. A. Capra, NRC D. G. Mcdonald, Jr., N RC T. T. Martin, NRC

.Ob 2 0 0 0 0.3 P. R. Wilsgn, NRC

,i I R. I. McLean, DNR J. II. Walter, PSC

_ ~

97 ATTACilMENT (1)

The generic load case for the operating basis carthquake (OBE) scismic condition is characterized by the following equation:

1)

DL + 0.25LL + OBE (DL + 0.25LL)

DL Dead Loads

=

Live Loads LL

=

Operating Basis Earthquake Acceleration OBE

=

(specified as a fraction of the acceleration of gravity)

NOTE: The 0.25 factor accounts for unspecified live loads. Where live loads can be identified and expected to be present during normal operation, a factor of 1.0 is used.

Within the Diesel Generator Building, no specific live load in excess of 0.25 LL has been identified.

The OBE Door acceleration at Calvert Cliffs is less than 0.3 g; however,0.3 g was assumed for the OBE acceleration. Since flexibility was included in the building model for the seismic analysis, this floor acceleration includes the effects of vertical floor flexibility. Substituting 0.3 for the OBE acceleration into equation 1) yields the following:

j DL + 0.25LL + 0.3 (DL + 0.25LL) l simplifying:

l DL + 0.25LL + 0.3DL + 0.075LL combining live load terms:

DL + 0.325LL + 0.3DL j

Substituting OBE (DL) for 0.3DL yields:

2) ' DL + 0.325LL + OBE (DL)

Assumption / Basis 8 of the calculation for Structural and Miscellaneous Steel Framing, Composite Slabs and Miscellaneous Platforms identifies an equation used to reduce the number of load combinations which would need to be evaluated:

3)

DL + LL + OBE (DL) l t

Since 1.0LL > 0.325LL, equation 3) conservatively envelopes equation 2) for the expected Diesel Generator Building live loads. Therefore, using equation 3) to multiply the vertical acceleratien by i

the dead load only (sheet Nos.12,20 and 50 in the above mentioned calculation) conservatively calculates the vertical seismic load.

1