ML20064H943
| ML20064H943 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | McGuire, Mcguire  |
| Issue date: | 12/06/1978 |
| From: | Parker W DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20064H941 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7812270359 | |
| Download: ML20064H943 (2) | |
Text
_. -
DUKE POWEN COMPANY Powen Bt:stalwo 422 SouTu Cauwen Simrzr.Cataninric, N.C.voa4a w u.a u o. P4a n c a. s a.
December 6, 1978 vice Possiorme TELrp=owt: Aata toa 5'ta= Paoovction 373-4083 i
Mr. J. P. O'Reilly, Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region II 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 E
T' Atlanta, Georgia 30303
^
2.
CY. -
RE: RII:MDH IR 2.
50-369/78-34
~
50-370/78-14 N
N
Dear Mr. O'Reilly:
Please find attached our response to Item 370/78-14-04 which was identified in IE Inspection Report No. 50-369/78-34, 50-370/78-14.
Duke Power Company does not consider any information in the inspec-tion report to be proprietary.
Ver truly yours, I
u e..
~
k'illiam O. Parker, Jr.
CJP:ses Attachment t
wi227 oM9 d
M.
[.
D d
IE Inspection Report 50-369/78-34 50-370/78-14 APPENDIX A NOTICE OF VIOLATION Duke Power Company License CPPR 84 Based on the results of the NRC inspection conducted on October 3-6, 1978, it appears that certain of your activities were not conducted in full compliance with NRC regulations and License conditions as indicated below. These items have been categorized as described in our correspon-dence to you dated December 31, 1974.
Criterion V of Appendix B to 10CFR 50, as implemented by commitments set forth in the DPC Topical Report " Quality Assurance Program - Duke 1" Section 17.1.5, states in part that:
" Activities affecting quality shall be accomplished in accordance with requirements imposed by.
. instructions, pro-cedures and drawings."
Procedure M-24 of the Construction Quality Assurance Program specifies that:
"QC inspectors shcil monitor to verify that if weld joints are to be left overnight in a fit-up or tacked but not welded condition, the joint area is protected to prevent the entry of contaminants."
Contrary to the above requirements, on October 5, 1978, the inspector found that fit-up/ tacked joints on the pressurizer surge line ISO-MCF1-2NC 2 had been left nnprotected.
This is an infraction.
RESPONSE
In response to this item both craf t personnel and Quality Control Inspectors have been reinstructed in the requirements of Procedure M-24.
The weld joints identified in this report have been checked for com-pliance to Procedure M-24 and taped to prevent the entry of contaminants.
3 S
O
'N vs1221:
u
'\\j
.