ML20064D652
| ML20064D652 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | McGuire, Mcguire  |
| Issue date: | 10/16/1978 |
| From: | Parker W DUKE POWER CO. |
| To: | James O'Reilly NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION II) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20064D650 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 7811080211 | |
| Download: ML20064D652 (3) | |
Text
i
,s e
f, DUKE POWER COMPm Powes Best.nswo 422 Sorin Cwesen Stsees. Cnanterte. N C saau October 16, 1978
.,u......,.
- '*- W " ' *-
v.c.
s..... n. s. e.
a'a Mr. J. P. O'Reilly, Director U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Cons:ission Regico II 101 Marietta Street, Suite 3100 Atlente, Georgia 30303 RE: RII: B s-369/78-26 50-370/76-12 Dest Mr. O'Reilly:
P1: ace find attached our response to Items 369/78-26-01, 02, 03 and 370/78-12-01,
'02, 03 which were identified in IE Inspection Report No. 50-369/78-26, 50-370/18-12.
Duke Pcwer Company does not consider any information in the inspection report to
'b2 proprietary.
,V2 truly yours,
/
/
4 u l.0 44 _%
William O. Parker, J.
GJP:ses Attechnent 78110 8 0 AII Q
IE INSPECTION REPORT: 50-369/76-26 50-370/76-12 l
APPENDIX A NOTICE OP VIOLATION License No. CPPR-83 Duke Power Company i
I 8-11, 1978, it lBasedentheresultsoftheNRCinspectionconductedonAugust I cppscrs that certain of your activities were not conducted in full compliance These items have been categorized
[ with NRC requirements as indicated below.
31, 1974.
l cs dsscribed in our correspondence to you dated December Criterion V of Appendix B to 10 CTR 50, as implemented by commitments set l A.
l forth in the DPC Topical Report, Section 17, paragraph 17.1.5 specifies,
" Activities affecting quality shall be prescribed by documented in part, that nstructions, procedures,
. and shall be accomplished in accordance with these instructions, procedures,
." Procedure QA 602 of the DPC Quality Assurance Department Quality Assurance Manual requires that any deficiency found as a result of QA surveillances shall be documented utilizing Quality Assurance Fora QA-602B (Vendor Surveillance Deficiency Report).
l Contrary to the above requirements, the inspectors found that all deficiencies This was being documented on vendor surveillance deficiency reports.
cre not ovidenced by a review of ITT Crinnell and Fisher Controls surveillance reports discussing deficiencies which were not documented by vendor surveillance d2ficiency reports.
This is a deficiency.
Criterion V of Appendix 5 to 10 CFR 50, as implemented by comtments set forth 3.
in the DPC Topical Report, Section 17, paragraph 17.1.5 opecifies, in part, that
" Activities af f ecting quality shall be prescribed by documented instructions, data paragraph 17.1.18 of DPC's Topical Report states that audit procedures."
cre analysed for quality trends and the results are forwarded to management.
Contrary to the above requirements, the inspector noted that DPC's procedure analysis of departmental audit data for quality QA-304, f ailed to implement Aa a result, audit data for departmental audits was not being analysed trcads.
for trends and the results were not being forwarded to management.
This is a deficiency.
Criterion V of Appendiv 3 to 10 CFR 50, as implemented by ceumitments set forth is the DPC Topical Report Section 17, paragraph 17.1.5 specified, in part, that C.
'~
" Activities af f ecting quality shall be prescribed by documented tastructions, Ptscedures,... and shall be accomplished in accordance with these tastruc-tiens, prs >cedures,...." Procedure OA-210 of the DPC Quali y Assurance Department Quality Assurance Manual requires, &a part, that the Audit Divisies and detetuise that effective corrective acties has bees takes se each findtag the audit team shall evaluate the action taken and perfere a reaudit. if ame-esaary, se verify implenestaties of the serrective acties.
a
- finding IV-5 Contrary to the above requirements, the inspectors found that of a ccepleted Civil and Electrical Division Audit E-77-4 had not been enrrected in one area of the finding.
This is a deficiency.
RESPONSE:_
The specific deficiencies addressed in your report have been resolved with Procedure QA-602 vill be revised by November 1, 1978, to pro-A.
vide more complete instructions on how to document and resolve deficiencies of tha vendors.
different degrees of severity.
intended to address trend analysis of audit findings.
Procedure QA-304 is not In perf orming each audit, Audit Division personnel review previous audits and B.
curveillances for evidence of recurring items., Procedure (M-210 will be revised by November 1, 1978, to formalise this practice.
Audit Corrective action for finding IV-5 of audit E-77-4 has been verified.
Division personnel have been reinstructed in the requirements for verification C.
finding.
of corrective action prior to closing an audit i
i 1