ML20063N658
| ML20063N658 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Millstone  |
| Issue date: | 09/24/1982 |
| From: | Counsil W NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY CO., NORTHEAST UTILITIES |
| To: | Clark R Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20063N659 | List: |
| References | |
| B10564, TAC-48919, NUDOCS 8210050179 | |
| Download: ML20063N658 (2) | |
Text
-
e General Offices
- Seiden Street, Berlin, Connecticut sY Es5aEc HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT 06141-0270 xv<=E. *<a co.a. c""
(203) 666-6911 ss0*h4 ASTUTUf(S 5tfMCE COnarnas, esORT*4 aSt %CLf an Eest#Gv C0hspasov September 24,1982 Docket No. 50-336 B10564 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attn:
Mr. Robert A. Clark, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #3 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555
References:
(1)
R. W. Starostecki letter to W. G. Counsil, dated July 7,1982.
(2)
'V. G. Counsil letter to R. W. Starostecki, dated August 5,1982.
I Gentlemen:
MILuSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT NO. 2 PROPOSED REVISIO!;^, TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS BORIC ACID FLOW PATH REQUIREMENTS Pursuant to 10CFR 50.90, Northeast Nuclear Energy Company (NNECO) hereby proposes to amend its Operating License, No. DPR-65, by incorporating the attached revisions into the Millstone Unit No. 2 Technical Specifications.
The proposed change is intended to clarify the requirements for boration system flow paths as utilized in reactivity control and emergency core cooling systems.
The change modifies Technical Specification 3.1.2.2 to require both boric acid tanks and corresponding facility dependent flow paths to be operable in the modes in which operability is required for ECCS considerations. This change provides consistency between specification 3.1.2.2 and 3.5.2 of the Millstone Unit No. 2 Technical Specifications. The proposed license amendment fullfills gl the commitment made in Reference (2) in response to Reference (1).
.s All necessary reviews have been completed including the reviews pursuant to jj 10CFR50.59.
NNECO has determined that the attached proposed license amendment does not constitute an unreviewed safety question.
f e n,,
vt The Millstone Unit No. 2 Nuclear Review Board has reviewed and approved the attached proposed change and has concurred in the above determination.
p 900.o0 These changes have been reviewed in accordance with the requirements of 10CFR170.
NNECO has concluded that the proposed license amendment constitutes a Class Il license amendment.
8210050179 820924 PDR ADOCK 05000336 P
pyg
e 4
The basis for this determination is that the proposed change is administrative in nature and has no safety -or environmental significance. As such, please find enclosed the appropriate Class 11 license amendment fee of $1200.00.
Very truly yours, NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY COMPANY kW4
/
W. G. Couhsil Senior Vice President -
1 J
l t
,1 1
4
_ _ _ _ _, _...,, _... _. _ _,,.~. _ _ _..... ~. _ _ _ _ _,,,,.-
e