ML20063N658

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Application for Amend to License DPR-65 Revising Tech Spec 3.1.2.2 to Require Both Boric Acid Tanks & Corresponding Facility Dependent Flow Paths to Be Operable in Modes in Which Operability Is Required for ECCS
ML20063N658
Person / Time
Site: Millstone Dominion icon.png
Issue date: 09/24/1982
From: Counsil W
NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY CO., NORTHEAST UTILITIES
To: Clark R
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20063N659 List:
References
B10564, TAC-48919, NUDOCS 8210050179
Download: ML20063N658 (2)


Text

- .

e

  • General Offices
  • Seiden Street, Berlin, Connecticut sY Es5aEc xv<=E . *<a co.a. c""

HARTFORD, CONNECTICUT 06141-0270 ss0*h4 ASTUTUf(S 5tfMCE COnarnas, (203) 666-6911 esORT*4 aSt %CLf an Eest#Gv C0hspasov September 24,1982 Docket No. 50-336 B10564 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Attn: Mr. Robert A. Clark, Chief Operating Reactors Branch #3 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555

References:

(1) R. W. Starostecki letter to W. G. Counsil, dated July 7,1982.

(2) 'V. G. Counsil letter to R. W. Starostecki, dated August 5,1982.

I Gentlemen:

MILuSTONE NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT NO. 2 PROPOSED REVISIO!;^, TO TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS BORIC ACID FLOW PATH REQUIREMENTS Pursuant to 10CFR 50.90, Northeast Nuclear Energy Company (NNECO) hereby proposes to amend its Operating License, No. DPR-65, by incorporating the attached revisions into the Millstone Unit No. 2 Technical Specifications.

The proposed change is intended to clarify the requirements for boration system flow paths as utilized in reactivity control and emergency core cooling systems.

The change modifies Technical Specification 3.1.2.2 to require both boric acid tanks and corresponding facility dependent flow paths to be operable in the modes in which operability is required for ECCS considerations. This change provides consistency between specification 3.1.2.2 and 3.5.2 of the Millstone Unit No. 2 Technical Specifications. The proposed license amendment fullfills the commitment made in Reference (2) in response to Reference (1).  ;

gl

.s All necessary reviews have been completed including the reviews pursuant to jj 10CFR50.59. NNECO has determined that the attached proposed license amendment does not constitute an unreviewed safety question. f, e n, vt The Millstone Unit No. 2 Nuclear Review Board has reviewed and approved the attached proposed change and has concurred in the above determination. p 900.o0 These changes have been reviewed in accordance with the requirements of 10CFR170. NNECO has concluded that the proposed license amendment constitutes a Class Il license amendment.

8210050179 820924 PDR ADOCK 05000336 P pyg

e 4

The basis for this determination is that the proposed change is administrative in nature and has no safety -or environmental significance. As such, please find enclosed the appropriate Class 11 license amendment fee of $1200.00.

Very truly yours, NORTHEAST NUCLEAR ENERGY COMPANY

/

W. G. Couhsil kW4 '

Senior Vice President -

1 J

l t

,1 1

4

_ _ _ _ _ , _ . . . , , _ . . . _ . _ _, ,.~. _ _ _ . . . . . ~ . _ _ _ _ _ , , , , .- _ _ _ . . . . _ , . . , _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ . .._ _ _ - - , _ , - . _ , . e