ML20063M296

Indexes to Nuclear Regulatory Commission ISSUANCES.July- September 1993

ML20063M296
Person / Time
Issue date:	01/31/1994
From:	NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION (ADM)
To:
References
NUREG-0750, NUREG-0750-I01, NUREG-0750-V38-I01, NUREG-750, NUREG-750-I1, NUREG-750-V38-I1, NUDOCS 9403140325
Download: ML20063M296 (41)

Text

- -

NUREG-0750 Vol. 38 Index 1 INDEXESiTO; NUCLEAR!REGULATdRE TCOMMISSidN. i. lSSUXNC.ES.s

^

p 4

Ju yHSeptembe61993i

' ~

Qsff kWM/

4 h*d v

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION i

314 940131 0750 R PDR

' l i

. I Available from i

Superintentendent of Documents U.S. Government Printing Office Mail Stop SSOP Washington, D.C. 20402-9328 A year's subscription consists of 12 softbound issues, 4 indexes, and 2-4 hardbound editions for this publication.

Single copies of this publication are available from National Technical Information Servico Springfield, VA 22161 i

b Errors in this publication may be reported to the Division of Freedom of Information and Publications Services.

Offico of Administration -

U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission

-i Washington, DC 20555-0001 (301/492-8925) 1

' l i

- = =

h

.a.

u. ---

-F-e>--a wet g y v

c v

ar-ytad r

I l

NUREG-0750 Vol. 38 index 1 INDEXES TO NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION ISSUANCES July - September 1993 o

U.S. NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Prepared by the Division of Freedom of Information and Publica' ions Services Office of Administration U.S. Nucioar Rogulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555-0001 (301/492-8925)

-y3-y+,

.m e

w

+

Foreword Digests and indexes for issuances of the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel (LBP), the Administrative Law Judges (ALJ),

the Directors' Decisions (DD), and the Denials of Petitions for Rulemaking

?

(DPRM) are presented in this document. These digests and indexes are intended 10 serve as a guide to the issuances.

Information elements common to the cases heard and ruled upon are:

Case name (owner (s) of facility) -

Full text reference (volume and pagination)

Issuance number issues raised by appellants Legal citations (cases, regulations, and statutes)

Name of facility, Docket number Subject matter of issues and/or rulings Type of hearing (for construction pennit, operating license, etc.)

Type of issuance (memorandum, order, decision, etc.).

These infonnation elements are displayed in one or more of five separate formats arrangcd as follows:

1. Case Name Index The case name index is an alphabetical arrangement of the case names of the issuances. Each case name is followed by the type of hearing, the type of issuance, docket number, issuance number, and full text reference.

2. Digests and lleaders The headers and digests are presented in issuance number order as follows:

the Commission (CLI), the Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel (LBP),

the Administrative 1.aw Judge (AL)), the Directors' Decisions (DD), and the Denials of Petitions for Rulemaking (DPRM).

The header identifies the issuance by issuance number, case name, facility name, docket number, type of hearing, date of issuance, and type of issuance.

'the digest is a brief narrative of an issue followed by the resolution of the issue and any legal referrnces used in resolving the issue. If a given issuance covers more than one issue, then separate digests are used for each issue and are designated alphabetically.

111 1

-.-m

---,--_.,-m,

~ - -

,y

3. I egal Citations Index 1

• Ihis index is divided into four parts and consists of alphabetical or alpha-numerical arrangements of Cases, Regulations, Statutes, and Others. These citations are listed as given in the issuances. Changes in regulations and statutes may have occurred to cause changes in the number or name and/or applicability of the citation, it is therefore important to consider the date of the issuance.

The references to cases, regulations, statutes, and others are generally followed by phrases that show the application of the citation in the particular issuance. These phrases are followed by the issuance number and the full text reference.

4. Subject Index Subject words and/or phrases, arranged alphabetically, indicate the issues and subjects covered in the issuances. 'Ihc subject headings are followed by phrases that give specific information about the subject, as discussed in the issuances being indexed. These phrases are followed by the issuance number and the full text reference.

5, l'acility Index The index consists of an alphabetical arrangement of facility names from the issuance. The name is followed by docket number, type of hearing, date, type of issuance, issuance number, and full text reference.

P IV F

Y

l 4

l s

1 1

a 1

1 1

CASE NAME INDEX J

ADVANC) D MEDICAL SYSTEMS, INC LNIORCININ! ACTION, MEMORANDUM AND URDLR AITIRMING IN PART AND REVERSING IN PART ATOMIC SAFETY AND 1.!CLNSING BOARD'S ORDER. AND RLMANDING ISSUES, Docket No. 34 16055C vP (Cint Penahy); CLI-9L22, 38 NRC 98 (IW3)

HAI.TIMORE GAS AND LLLCTRIC COMPANY REQUT3T JOR ACTION; DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F R { 2 206; IMcket Nos. 72-8, 50-317, 50 318, DD-93-14, 38 NRC 69 (1993)

DOS 10N LDISON COMPANY OPERATING UCLNSE AMENDMTNTi MEMORANDUM AND ORDf R (Termmation of Proceedmg);

thicket No 50-293 OLA (ASLDP No. 91678 01 OI A) (Inality Operatmg tjeense Nu DPR 35),

t HP 93-19, 38 NRC 128 (1993)

GJYI LAND ELLCTRIC 11.LUMINATING COMPANY, et al l

OPERATING LICENSE AMLNDMINI'; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Ibrkel No 50 4:0-OlA 3;

/

CLI 9L21, 38 NRC M7 (1993) l ktQUEST LOR ACTION, SUPPLEMENTAL DIRlCTOR'S DFCISION UNDI.R 10 CF R. 6 2.206; 7

Docket No 50410 (License No NPF 55). DD-9Fl5. 38 NRC 159 (1993) a GEORGIA pow 1R COMPANY, et al OPLRATING LICINSE AMENDMLNT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. Ihrket Nm. SG424-OLA 3, 7

50 425-OLA-3, CIJ 9316, 38 NRC 25 (1093)

OPLRATING LICLNSE AMENDMENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Case Managenent); Docket

/

1 Nos 54424 0LA 3, 54425-OIA-3 (ASLUP No 93-671-0141A 3) (Re liense Anendnrnt, a

j Transfer to Southern Nuclear); LDP 9Ll5, 38 NRC 20 (1993) f OPERATING IICINSE AMENDMENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDLR (Discovery Motion); Docket

~

i Not 50424 OLA-3. 50 42LOLA-3 (ASLitP No 93471-01 OI A-3) (Re' License Anendmret, Transfer to Southern Nuclear); 1 BP-93-18, 38 NRC 121 (1993)

OPLRATING LICl}lSE AMENDMENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDLR (Georgia Power Motion to Reconsuler Scope of Procerdmg); Dockrt Nos. 50-424-Ol A 3, 54425-OLA-3 (ASLUP No.

4 9M71-01-OLA-3) (Re-ljcense Anendment; Transfer to Southern Nucleart 1.HP-93 21, 38 NRC

(

141 (1993) l RLQUI.ST IOR ACllON, MLMORANDUM AND ORDI R, Docket Nos 50-321, 50-3M. 50-424, 54425; ClJ-93-15, 38 NRC l (1993) 110YD P. 7LRR l

l'ROGRAM l'RAUD, RULING ON DEI ENDANTS MOTION TO DISMISS, Dmket No 9101-PF (ASLs;P Na 9M1101 PI); AU-911,18 NRC 151 (lW3) l NORTIIEAST NUClIAR I NERGY COMPANY Ol'I RATING LICI N5E AMENDMENT; DECISION AND ORDER (1cemmating Proceeding by Sumnury Doposinon); Docket No 543EOLA (ASLDP No 92 66542.OI A) (IOL No DPR45) l ISpent luci Pool Design); LBP-93-12, 38 NRC 5 (1993)

ONCOIDGY SI:RVICI,S CORPORATION l

INIURCEMI NT ACTION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDI R; Docket Na 3G31765 EA (Suspension

]

Or&r) (Hyproduct Matenal License No. 37-2854G01); ClJ 0317, 38 NRC 44 (1991) l I NIORCf MENT ACTION; MEMORANDUM AND ORDLR (Grantmg in Part NRC Staff Mouon to i

Delay Proterding. Reqmnng Subminion of Staff Status Reports), Docket No. 03G31765EA (ASLDP No 9M74-0%EA) (LA 93406) (Orkr Suspendmg Hyproduct Maienal ihme No 37-28540 01),

1 IIP 93-20, 38 NRC 130 (1993) l i

l 2

i l

4 4.

l l

l

.... -..~...

.... - - - _ ~.. --.

9 CASE NAME INDI:X PACIFIC GAS AND Lil:CI'RIC COMPANY OPERATING l.lC1.NSL AMLNDMINr; MI A10RANDUM AND ORDIR. Duket Na M275-OI.A 2.

- 50 323-OLA-2 (Construaion lYrimi Recovery). CLJ93-18,38 NRC 62 (1993)

. OPI' RATING IJCLNSE AMENDMENT; MI.MORANDUM AND ORDLR (Granting I.hervery Recpmst/keferring kuhng to Commiwon); Docket Nos. 54275 OLA-2,50 323 OLA-2 (ASLEP NL 92-669 03.Ol A.2) (Conuruction TYriod Recovery) (1-aaltry Operwing 1.icennes No. DPR BO, DPR-82),

IEP-9313,38 NRC 11 (1993)

OPERATING LICENSE AMENDMINT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Telephone Conference Call.

8/13/93); Daket Non. 50-275-OIA-2, 50 323 0LA-2 (ASLBP Na 92-669-03.OIA 2) (Construcuan Period Recovery) (Fitrihty Operaung Lkene No. DPR-80, DPR-82), LDP-91-17, 38 NRC 65 (1993)

SACRAMINTO MUNICII'AL IffILITY DISTRICT '

DECOMMIS$10NING, MEMOR ANDUM AND ORDLR, Docket Na 50 312-DCOM. Ct.193-19, 38 NRC B1 (1993)

- ST. JOSEPH RADIGIDGY ASSOCIAT13. INC. and JOSEPil L llSitLR. M D- (d b a ST. JOSI:PH RADIOthGY A550CIAT13, INC., arul IlSHER RADIOU)GICAL CLINIC)

ENIORCl} TENT ACTION, ORDER; Docket Nos. 03G(W)320 EA, 999 MX40A (AMEP No.

93472-02-LAr, LDP-9314, 38 NRC 18 (1993)

VERMOfff YANKi-I NUCIIAR POWIR CDRPORATION OP! RATING LICENSE AMENDMENT; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, Docket No M271 OIA.5, Clj.93-20,38 NRC 83 (1993)

OPERAllNG LICENSE AMlWDMINT; MEMORANDUM (Ternunaimn of Proceeding); Duket No.

M271-O!.A 5 (ASLEP Na 92 665-02 OIA 5) (lOL No. DPR 28); LBP 93-16, 38 NRC 23 (1993) 2 I

I e-n-

m_-

m_

____m_.

.. ~. _ _ _. - __. _ _ _. _ _.,

I l

l l

l l

l 1

i

,e a

4 i

n DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF TiiE NUCI.LAR REGULATORY COM\\flMION

)

l Cl ! 9 015 GEORGIA POWTH COMPANY, el al. Olatch Nudear Plant. Umts I and 2. Vogtle Liectric Generaung Plant. Unns I and 2), Docket Nos 50421,543% $442A 54425, El QUEST IOR ACflON.

l l

loly 14. Im, MI MORANDUM AND ORDER d

)

j A

W Conmnuion sua sptmte vacates and remands to die NRC Staff for furder runsiderauon the j

i 2

Maff's parnal drenion unth r 10 C l2 R.12 206, DD 9M, 37 NRC 314 (IM) The Commnsmn takes

.(

such act.on in view of de commemahty of sone of the innes &cidcJ m the petsuon both with mattern in 2

a penthag hccmc tramfer proceedmg and with oder matters femmmng for decision in the arctirm 2.206 C

peutum j

lt 1bc Commission generally ducourages use of secuon 2 214 procedures an an avenue for &ndmg i

nurrers that are under consideration in a pendmg ad mbranon, however, ilus gercral rule is mn intended to s

l f

I har peutmners from sccking imme< hate enforcenent action from the NRC Staff in circumstances m wiuch the prrsiding ofhcer in a proceedmg is not empowered to gram such rehef.

i Cl19116 GE ORGIA POWER COMPANY, et al. (Vogtle Liccinc Generatmg Plam, Units I and 2),

Z lbcket Nos. 50-424 OLA 3, 50-425-OLA-3, OPl.R ATING LICI NSE AMENDMINT; August 19,1993,

/

~

j i

MLMORANDUM AND ORDER i

7 A

The Comminmn consi&ts die appeal of a hecusmg board decismn, ISP 915, 37 NRC % (1993),

]

which granted a Ituuoner's request for imerwnuon and for heanng on a proposal by the Georgia Power

}

i i

[

Company to transfer its operuimg authoney over the VnFile nuclear power plant to a riew licensee; the 2

a Itoard's & cision alw a hmund one canwhdated contenuon The Conmussion denies the appeal and afhrms de ljcensing flumd's order, finding that the Pet.tioner has st.mdmg to intervene and has subnutted aJnusuble

/

cuntention J

Il The imcfrity or character of n hecmec's management perumnel bears on de Commiuion's abihty 2

to hnJ reamnable assurance that a facihty can be safely operated.

C 1 ack of cider tecimical contetence or character quahhcatians on the part of hcensee or apphcant

~

is suf ficient grounds for the revocation of a hcense ci de dernal of a hrense application D

in making determ nations about cl.aracter, the Comnussion nmy consider evidence bearing upon 1

l l

the hcenice's tandor, truthfulncu. withngness to abide by rrgulatory requnements, and acceptance of

[

l tc9rmsibihty to protect pubbc health and safety llowever, tot every hcensmg action d rows open an l

obviims relauornhip trtwern the character iunes and die hcensing acnon in dispute,

'7 l

opportumty to engage in an inquiry into the " character" of the hccmce. There must te some direct and I

L Tir past performance of nmnagement or high-ranking ofhcers, as reficcied in dehberate siolations j

l of rrgulauem nr unuuthful trporin to the Comnusmm, may imh(ate whether a heenre will comply with agency stamtards ami wdl candidly resp <md to NRC inqumes I

To determine wieder a petnioner has estabbshed sufhcient mierest to inicrvene in a procredmg l

the Comnuswm he long apphed judscial concepts of st.uuhng l

G Iur stamhnwcuuoner naast allcre an "mjury in f act" from the hecnung.h tion bemg dullenged, l

and thu injury net be to an interent arguably within the zone of mierests protected by the goveriung statute.

I 1he elleged injury must te comrete and paruculatind, feurly tra eable to the challenged acuon, and hkely to be redressed by a favorable deciunn il los protredmps inelving the iuuamt of a constructmn pernut or operating hccme, the Commis-l Orm rencrally has recottnied a prenumpoon in favor of stamhng for stne petinoners who tuve aufhcient corn to within t!r geographic area that could 'e afferred by a r&ase of lisuon prenhicts. Ilowever, for i

i l

1 l

l i

I 3

i l

l i

l

?

l l

I i

• -+f-e g

y-cry qqr,.v--u,-.gw-g--

wp-e-

.q.--g-y.w-.yg.gy-q..,se.gm--

g,y-

,.,.aw,,q.---

evwwg.y--~

ww

--eiu.q--+-w

--w--ri r w w.,m,v--,--y

L

'?

DIGESTS '

IMUANCM OF Tile NUCLEAR RFGULNIORY COMMISSION this presumpem m apply m hcenx anendnrut procceangs, tte propowd actmn rrmt involve " clear sm-pheations for the ofhtte envimnment, or major ahrranons to the faciiny with a clear potential fut oflute i

conwgences? florida Power and Ught Co. (St Lucie Nuclear Power Plant. Uruis 1 and 2), CLIM2L 30 NRC 325,329 (1989). Oderwie de petiuoner mud allege a specibe

• injury in fad" that will result i

fmm the propowd action 1

A request to tramfer opnating authority under a full pown beene for a powc reacmr may he l

deened an admn involving %) car int ention for the offsite environment," im purpows of deterrruning j

h Otreshold ir$ny J

Unkr 10 C F.R. I 2.714(bM2 Kin),if an upphcanon contams disputed informanon or onuts required -

information, the getitiorer ontmally rimt specify the portmns of the applicauon that are in thspute or are incompiere. Ihrwever, a peutmmr need not refer to a particular ponion of the beensee's apphcation when the licensee neither ihmified, not was obligated to i&nufy, tir dmputed inme in sta applicatmn Cij 90l?

ONCotDGY SERVICl3 CORPORATION, Docket No. 30 3176STA (Suspension Order)

(Byproduct Mainial License No 37-28544 01), LNK)RCLMINI' ACTION, Augni 19,199h MIST.

ORANDUM AND ORDER A

The Commission denies Oncolor,y Services Corporation's request to reverr LitP 9L10,37 NRC 455 (1991), wt&h grunted in pan the Nuclear Regulatory Comrniuion Staff's nouon for an adhtional

&Lry of this enforcenent procee&ng. and vacates as nent ponions of IEP-906,37 NRC 207 (190), an

. mder that hd granted the NRC Staff's ongimd maion for a stay.

Il The presidmg othcer nmy delay an enforcenent proceedmg far good cause.

10 C.F R 6 2 20?(c)(2)hi). In &tntmning wtether good came esists, die presidmg officer snust comi&r both tie pubbe brerest as weX as the interesta of the person subject to tM innrediately effective or&r.

C in &tcrmining whether to delay the conduct of an enforcenrni hearmg pursuant to 10 C F.R 52 202(cX2Xii), de Commmsion need not etwwme bet *cen de teu apphed by the Supreme Court in Umsed sintes v. Liglia Thousand 1:.ight flundred arid Ftfty Ikilars (R850) in Umted Swes Cunency,461 U.S.

555 (1983), and the test apphed by tie Suprene Coun iri II)lC v Manen,486 U.S. 230,242 (19M8), but j

nmy weigh tie fxtors considered by the Coun in both cases.

D in determining whether good cause esists for delay of an enforcernent proceedmg, the fators to te comidered in balancing the competing interests inchale (I) length of delay. (2) reason for delay, (3) risk of erroneous deprivnuun. (4) assertion rif one's right to prompt resoluuan of de contrmeny,(5) prejudice to the beenwe, mcludm8 harm to the heensee's interests and harm to de beensee's abibty to neunt an a&quate defense.

E De determinaion of whedre tte length of & lay is encessive depends on tie facts of the particular case and the nature of the pruccedmg.

P Tir risk of erroneous & privation is reduced if de beensee is given an opportunity to request that die presidsng officer set aside de irnnodiate effecuveness of the suspemion order by challenging wtrther the suspemien order, including the need for immediate effccuveness, is based on alequate evi&nce.

O Staff's showing of possible interference with an investigation being cornlucted by the NRC Office of inwstigauons and a strong interest in protecting the integrity of the investigation in conjunction with a demomtration that the risk of erroneous &privauon has teen reduced weighs heavily in the Staff's favor, 11 Irrespecuve of whrther the beenwe failed to challenge the basis for the imnediate efTecovencas of the Stafra suspension or&r, a keensee's vigorous opposition to a stay and its insinewe on a prompt adjudscatory hearing are entitled to strong weight.

I Wittmut a particularned almwing of harm to the hcemee's interests, heemec's argunent that the stay affects hs interests and the hcemee's vigorom opposition to a stay do not tip the scale in favor of the beenwe when balancmg the competing interests.

CLI9L18 PACIFIC GAS AND LIR*!RIC COMPANY (thablo Canyon Nuclear Puwer Plant, Umts 1 and 2), Ibcket Nos. 50 275 0LA-2,54323.OIA2 (Construenon Period Recovery) OPLR AllNG UCLNSE AMENDMINii August 19,1991 MI.MORANDUM AND ORDI.R A

The Commission dechnes to auldress tie issue, referred t>y the Ucensing floard, cf whcorr an Apphcant simuld te required to disclose to intenenor a dirument prepared by the Instuule Inr Nuclear Power Operanom The Commission noted that, after t!w Hoard had refened the issue to tte Commission, the Apphcant agreed in disclose the docunrnt and the Uc-nsmg floard issued a protective orde.Ld4ressing the s

4 I

i P

5

4 E

l I)IGESTS 1%UANCES OF "It!L NUCIAAR REGULATORY COMMi% ION conatunm umkr which the docunwns is to be tckawd T ac Commission found that these events rerukerd Cumrmuion interlocutory review of de nwtter unneces ary under 10 C E R. 4 2 7Wg).

B Where subsequent developnents imhcaica thr abseme of any inune& ate conuoversy suggestmg that imerh>cuinry rewew was appigwtate of a hcenuni board's order to dalme un auertedly Fivdeged documrrd, the Comnuss on dechnes review of the hccraitig board's referred ruimg CL1-9119 SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTilJTY DIS 1RICT (Rancho beco Nuclear Generating Station),

ikwtet No. 50 312-DCOM, DLCOMMISMONING. September 10,1993, MLMORANDUM AND ORDLR A

The Commisdon proviks guidance to the Atonne Safety and Lkenung Daard on one aspect of Environmental and Resources Comervation Organistion's (f;CO's) environmental comention which de Conmuulon admined in its decision. CtJ 93-3,37 NRC 135 (1991).

CLI 93-20 VERMORT YANKLE NUCIIAR POWLR CORPORATION (Vermtmt Yankee Nuckar Power Stanon). Docket No. 54271-OLA&, OPLRATING IJCENSL AMENDMLNT; September 16, 1993 MEMORANDUM AND ORDLR A

The Cmr.nussion afhrms the licensing Board's rulmg that the Board lacked authority under 10 C F R. fil0?ta) to address a notice of withdrawal dmt the Licensec had fiko after a hearing request had two refened to die Atumic Safety and liceming Board Pairl but before the Liceming Board had issued a Notice of licanng.11ie Commission reverses the licensing flourd's related ruhng that the NRC Staffs acceptance of tlw withdrawal had the effect of ernunaung de poceedmg. In de interest of efficiency, the Comminion &smiues the proceedmg on its own authority, rather than renumding it to the Board.

H Under 10 CT R 51107(a), de Uceming Board anunes juris,Jiction in address the withdrawal of an appheation in a hcense anrndnwnt proceedmg only after etw 6uuance of a Notice of IIcarmg as povi&d in 10 C itR.12105(e)Q) Prior to timt inuance, de Comnusson (or NRC Staff, by delegation of audmnry) has earlusive jurisection to address such withdrawak C

lie Comnumon's regulabons do not grani the NRC Staff the authonty to termmate a hccme amendnrnt pareeding after a hearing request has been referred to die Atomic Safety and licenung Board Punct tad before the neueng licensing board or ofhcer has inued a Nauce of llearmg, Nor has the Comminion, through case law, accorded Staff such authonty. Rather, it h the presidmg board or officer that has jurisectmn to ternuiute pocee&ngs urider such circunutances.

C119021 CirVILAND LLIGRIC ll1UMINATING COMPANY, et al. fitrry Nuclear Power Pkmt, Unit 1), Dmket No. 504140LA-3, OPLRATING LK'LNSL AMLNDMLNT; September 30,199h MEMORANDUM AND ORDLR A

11w Commission comiders the appeal of a Licensing Hourd decision, LHP 92-4,35 NRC 114 (1992), which denied, on the basis of lack of stan&ng, the appelbmts' petioon for leme to antervene and for a learing on a request by Clevehind Dettric Ulummaung Company to anend its operaung hccme for the IYrry fac.illiy, Unit 1 The hcense amendment tramfers die reactor venel noterial surveillance widuirawal schedule from de lYny pl.m(s technical spect6 cations and tramfers de actedule to the facihty's updated utfety analysis report On the gmund that the appellants alkged sufficient injury for standing, the Commisunn grants the appeal, teverses die Liceming Board's order, and remands the Peutioners' ronrention to tir Board for an evaluanon of the contention's admissibilny.

H lo determine wtether a peutioner has estabbshed the requisite interest to mtervene in a procceang, the Commiuku has long appbed comempornneous judicial concepts of standing C

To denomtrate stan&ng,. de pentioner must allege a concrete and paruculartzed injury that is i

fairly traceable to de challenged act on und is hkrly to be redrened by a favorable deciuon. The injury

+

nl40 nmt be to an imerest arguably within de mne of interests protected by the governing statute Injury stwy be actu4d or tfuratened.

The loss of the ri hts to notice, opywtunity for a heanng, and oppewtunny for juecial revew 1

D f

t.onstituien a dancrete hyury L

Stan&ng nuy be based upon the allrged has of a pmcedural nght, ns long as the procedure at luue h designed to protect agamst a threateird concrete irijuty F

Ibt rumeructmn pernut and operatmg breme pmcee&ngs, de Cornmmion generally has recog-nired a penumpunn in favor of stan&ng fur dme perums who base Impacnt emiacts with the area tear a nuckar power plant in lweme amendnrnt poceedings, residence near a nuclear facild) is authetent to estabbsh injury for stamhng if die prqw.a.Lachon savohes an %hvious potenual for offsite consequences?

5 t

b i

i i

l y.

m,

. _,, =

_,., ~

~,... _

m

~.

,. - -. - ~.~,-,- - -. --

-..~.

l 1

DIGISTS IEUANCES OF TIIE NOCI. EAR Rf GULATORY cottyggroN See lhwida Power arul Lirls Co. (St Lucie Nut. lear Power Mard, Units I and 2), CLIJ9-2L 30 NRC 321 329-30 (1989).

CL193-22 ADVANCED MEDICAL SYKIT.MS, INC. tone Iactory Row, Geirsa. Ohio 44G31), fAxLet No.

3416055-CivP (Ovil Penalry); LN)OHCEMLNT ACTION. Seriember 30.199L MEMORANDUM AND ORDLR AtTIRMING IN PART AND REVERSING IN pART ATOMIC SAfTTY AND LICLNSING BOARD S ORD[R, AND REMANDING ISSUES A

The Commission afbrms in part de Atomic Safety and ljcensing Board's decision, LBp.919, U NRC 212 (1991), in which the IJcensing Board granted (W Nuclear Regulatory Comminion Staffs f

motion for summary disposioon in a pmceedmg to impose a $6250 civil penahy on the 1.icensee, Advanced Mescal Systems, Inc. The Commission reverses the Licensing Board's disposi6cn of one violation and renends to Ow Board for further proceedings all issues related to that violanon.

B The party seeking summary judgnent bears the burden of showing the absence of a genuine issue as to any material fact and the evidence nest be wcwed in the light nwat favorable to the party opposing sumnwry d6 position.

C To preclude sumnury disposition. when the pmponent has trct its burden the party opposing the mouon may not rest upon nere allegations or denials, but must set forth specific facts showmg that there is a genuine issue. Bare assertions or geocral denials are not sufficiert D

The tipposing party trust controvert any nmterial fact properly set out in the staienrnt of material facts that accompanies a sumnery disposition rnation or thai fact will be deemed adnutted.

E Wlen the nv)vant has sansfied its initial burden and has supported its rrotion by aff6 davit, the opposing party must either proffer rebuttal evidence or submit an affidavit esplaming why it is impractical to do so. If the presi&ng officer determines imm affidavits hicJ by the opposing party that the opposing party cannot presets by of tidavit the facts essential to jusufy its opposition, the presiding officer nmy order a continuance to permit such affakwits to be obtened or may take other appropriate action.

F A licensee is excused from complying with the matiumm permissible dose standards set out in 10 C F R ( 20.101(a). only if the hcensee can satisfy the condicons set forth in section 20.201(b).

G Pnor NRC innpection reports that conclude that at the une of an inspection there were no regulatory violannns found do not in themselves raise a gemune issue of nunerial fxt. The failure by the NRC to detect a violation does not necessarily pmve the negative that no violation esisted The NHC inspectors are not omniscient, and limited NRC resources preclude careful review of all but a fracuon of the heemed activity 11 When determimng what constinnes a suney.10 CS R. 6 20.201 requires consideration of nore than quantitative treasurenents of raliation levels used to determine exposure. It also requires where s

appropriate, consideration of physical surveys of the location of materials and equipurnt.

I An evidentiary hearing is trcessary only if a gemdne issue of nmterial fact is in dispute.

i r

r b

r--

t 3

,p..-.

--4 e..

.y-,

....... -. - - -. - -.. - - - -. _.. ~

. ~. -

- - - - -. -.. ~...~.

~.. - - _..

I l

3 l

1 II j

1 1

4 4

t DIGESTS ISSUANCES OF Tile ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING llOARDS j

I DP-9Ll2 NORTi(LAST NUCLEAR ENERGY COMPANY (Millstone Nuclear Power Station, Umt 2),

4 l>icket Not 50-336-Ot.A (ASLHP No. 9246542-OLA) (TOL No. DPR45) (Spent Ivel Pool Des:;n);

OPER ATING LICENSE AMENDMENT; July 9,1993, DECISION AND ORDLR (Terminating 17oceeding by Summary Dnposition) 1 BP-9Ll3 PACIFIC GAS AND 11RTRIC COMPANY (Diablo Canyon Nuckar Power P1 wit, Units I and

-l d

2), Docket Nos %275-OLA 2,50-323-OLA-2 (ASLilP No. 924694LOLA-2)(Construct on renod Re-

'j-covery)(1 acihty Operating Licenses No DPR-80, DPR-82); OPERATING LICLNSE AMENDMEKT; July l

19,1993, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Granung Discovery RequeWReferring Rubng to Commission)

A Rubng on an intervenor discowry request, the Licensing Board orders production of a report of T

the Institute for Nuclear Power Operations (INPO), subject to a protectiu order; refers its ruling to the E

Comnuuion. and stays the effecuveness of its disclosure direcove pendmg Comnussion action.

II Under NRC rules, it is not clear when a balancing of imcrests is required trfore permitting h

disclosure of a report that is cl.uned to contain trade accrets or pnvileged or confidential commercied or huacialinformanon. The Federal Rules of Civil Procedure cicarly pernut a bahmcing. See Fed. R. Civ.

[

e P. 26(cK7). NRC rules include a comparable balancmg test, see 10 C.F R.12.740(c)(6), but this tea. is

/

subject to the provisions of 10 C.F.R. 9 2.790. In parucular, the balancing test appears to be overridden by scerion 2.790(bH6) Cf. Pacific Gas and Electric Co. (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Umts I and 2), CLI-80 24. Il NRC 775 (1980)(access by intervenors to secanry plan pernuned subject to protective C

5 3

g order)

LDP 9Ll4 ST. JOSLPfl RADIOIDGY ASSOCIATES. INC., and JOSLPit L TISilER, M D. (d b :L s T.

JOSLPfl RADIOLOGY ASSOCIATES, INC and FIST {ER RADIOIDGICAL Cl3NIC), Docket Nos.

01040320-EA,999 9000 LEA (ASIEP No. 93-67242-EA), ENTORCEMENT ACTION. July 20, 1993, r

Z ORDER 1.BP 93-15 GEORGIA POWER COMPANY, et al. (Vogtle Liectne Generatmg Plant, Umts I and 2), Docket Nos. 50 424OLA 3,54425-OLA-3 ( ASIEP No.93-67141 OLA-3)(Re: License Anrndrnent, Transfer l

to Southern Nuclear), OPERATING LICENSE AMENDMENT; July 2L 1993, MEMORANDUM AND ORDI R (Case Management) j A

The Ikmrd dete mined that when a contention is udnutted into a proceeding. the contention j

determines the scope of discovery. Flowever, as a matter of case management, the ikiard bmited the 7

lirst phase of discovery and hearing to the proffered bases. After the hearmg on the first phase, the Board z

wouhl deterfrune wtrther it had a complete record for decmon or whether further discovery and a further l

Iranng are necessary i

H An adnutted contention deternunes the scope of the proceedmg C

Discovery nusy be hnuted to adnutted bases donog the first phase of a proceeding. Alrer the heanng on tir hnt phw.e, the Board can determine whether it has a complete record for decision or whether further l

discovery is neceuary

(

LDP-9 t l 6 VERMONT Y ANKII NUCLEAR POWI R CORPOR ATION (Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Stauont Ibcket No. 50 271-OlA-5 (ASIEP No. 92 665-02-OlA-5) (l'OL No. DPR-28h OPERATING LICENSE AMENDMLNT; July 28,1993; MINORANDUM (Ternunatmn of Proceedmg)

LBP-9bl7 PAClflC GAS AND ElRTRIC COMPANY (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant, Umts 1 and 2k Docket Nos 50 275-OIA-2,54323-OLA-2 (ASLDP No. 924694LOLA-2)(Gmstruction Period Re-

)

i e

i i

I i

.. - - - - - _. ~

I I

i DIGINIS I

IMUANCf3 OF TiiE A10\\ llc SAFETY AND LICENSING llOARDS i

covery) 0 acihty Operaung license Nos DPR-80 and DPR 82); OpbRA11NG LICLNSE AMENDMLNT, August 13.1993, MI MOR ANDUM AND ORDf'R (Telephone Conference Call,8d 3N3)

A la response to a request by Intervenors Iur furtirr ducowry concernmg alleged anempts to alter fire top (the subject of an adnutted contenuon) as to which the NRC's Office of Invenugnuon had nuule j

pebndaary ingmries but found no furder inquiry warranted, tir IJcenung Board efers actum on tir motion pendmg cross-esamination at str tranng of tic custodian of the records regardmg any posuble fatuficahon The IWrd also requires that a samtszed copy of the letter raiung the quesnon be nale available to the Intervermrs.

IItP 9318 GI ORGIA POWL R COMPANY, et al (Vogile Electric Generaung Plant, Umts I and 2), Docket Nos. 50-424-OLA 3,50 42LOLA 3 (ASthP No.93-671-01 OLA-3)(Re: Licene Anendnrnt; Transfer so Smidern Nuclear). OPIRATING LKINSr, AMFNDMLNT; September 8,1993; MEMORANDUM AND ORDLR (Discovery Motion)

A De Hoard ruled that statemems were pnvileged both as attorney work product and attorney-f chent pnvilege when the statenenta were given to Appheant's attorneys at a ume that tiry had reason to trheve they were relevant en an 01invesagation that could occur. An allegation that the interviewees were "hounder to make them tell a comnma story is not enough to overcome the privilege. Huwcwr, persuasive evidence, pewnted at a traring, of houmling or otter irnproper attorney conduct could overcome the pivilege.

B Proof at a hearing that chems had been "hounder or otherwise ingeperty treated could overcome a claim of privilege, endier umler the work product pnvilege or tir anorrry<hent pnydege. Where a party is on notice that such proof may be presented. te may be ordered to have duputed docunents avaibible at die hearmg for purposes of possible production Attorney-chent and work roduct pivileges are not hmited to a controlling group with a corpo-C t

ration. Tir pnvilegen are broadly construed to encourage fullinformation gatlering by attorneys Upjohn Co. v. United States,449 UA 383 (1981).

D An evidentiary privilege held by a corporauon may be waived only by an authorized employce.

LSP-93-19 IlOSTON LDISON COMPANY (Pilgrim Nuclear Power Sudion), Dockrt No. 54293-OLA (ASLDP No.93 678-010LA)(Facihty Operaung License No. DPR 35), OPER ATING l3CENSL AMEND-MENT; September 13,1993, MEMORANDUM AND ORDIR (Termination of Ptoceedmg)

LHP-9120 ONCOLOGY SERVICES CORPORATION, Docket No. 030 31765-EA (ASLilP No 9L6744)3-EA) (EA 93-006) (Order Suspending Byproduct Material Liceme No 37-28540-Olh ENIORCEMLNT ACTION, September 21.1993; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Grantmg in Part NHC Staff Motion to Delay Proceedmg; Requinng Subnusion of SudiStatus Reports)

A In response to a third NRCW,ff nmtion for an addmunal delay in conductmg a heense suspension poceeding, the licensing Hoard orders dierovery delayed for seventy frve d.iys.

B in determining wtethes to delay an enforcenent proceeding pending the outcone of a Staff investiganon, five factors must he weighed Tiry are: (1)Irngth of the delay;(2) remons for the delay; (3) rid of erroneous depivation of the due process pmperty or hberty imerests of the been ce or any other p.irty- (4) assertion of the nght to a heannt by the party opposing tir delay; and (5) prejudice to the party opposmg the delay. See CL) 9.Ll7,38 NRC 44,49-52 (1993L C

la assening the balancing factor of the reasons for the delay 16 the pmceedmg, the presidmg officer is called upon to appraise two separate concernt First, ttere is the queshon of what legiumate government interest is served by the delay. his involves an inquiry into the propnety of the Staff's demonstration that dere will be a detnnental impact on the investigative process if the delay is not granted. Additionally, there is the quesuon of whether the Staff has shown that these is a legitimate basis for the period of delay it seeks This involves an inquiry into wtrther the Staff has made "a credible showing that it is attempung to complete its investigaunti expedmously." LDP-93-10,37 NRC 455,462,aff'd. Cl.1-9317,38 NRC 44 (1995).

D it in the rule m noministrative trannp that tranay evulence is generally admissible so kmg as it is rehable (as well as relevant and niaterial) evhlence See Duke Power Co (Perkins Nuclear Ibwer Station, Unies 1,2, and 3), ALAll 668,15 NRC 450. 477 (1982).

8

. 3 5

L i

c.y_..

..2

._._a DIGESTS' ISSUANCES OF TIIE ATOMIC SANTY AND LICENSING BOARDS T

E Two components that make up the factor of prejudwe to the party opposing delay in an enforanent procereng are prejudice to the party's abihty to conduct hcemed activities and prejudice to its ability to defend agamst tte charges in the enforcement order.

Regard ng the ability of the party oppoking any delay in an enforcement proceedmg to defend itself F

agaimt the charges leveled by the Staff, although de passage of time is likely to affect de nemory of some -

mtneues, the prejud ce arising from dus phenornenon is entrenely difficuh to gauge in the abstract, See CLi-93-17,38 NRC at 58-59 G

in granting a Staff request to delay an enforcement proceeding, the presidmg ofhcer has the i

reymnsibihty to minimize tie effects of any delay and to monitor closely the status of the Staff's investigation to rmure thal due dihrence is bemg exercised to imng its inquiry to a conclusion. See id. at 60.

L.BP-9121 GEORGI A POWl:R COMPANY, et al. (Vogtle Electric Generaung Plant, Units I and 2), Dot:ket Nos. 50-424-OLA-3,50-4254)LA 3 (ASLBP No 9347141-OLA-3)(Re: License Anendment; Transfer to Southern Nucleark OPERATING LICENSE AMENDMfNf; September 24,1993; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Georgia Power Motion to Reconsider Scope of Proceeding)

A Ttw Board acknowledged error in an earlier opinion, resuhing fmm accepting de unopposed argunems of Intervenur and therefore mterpretmg a poroon of the 1mervenor's Anended Petition out of coment. This opimon narrows tie issues.

B Mouans for reconsideranon are for the purpose of poinung out errors in 6 e existing record. not for statmg new aigunenis, liowever, new argunents have been presented and there is no titre preuvre in the present status of this cme. Consequently, the Board chose in its discretion to decide the motion on the nerits by granting it.

C Imervenors must carefully conununicate tlw scope of tirir comenuous so that neither the board nor the other parties need to guess tirir meamng Unclear contentions may be construed narrowly rather than having the parties search far materials that rnight have been referenced by a vngue, unspecific reference.

D ne Board refused to rule that contemions could not reference matenal not included in the petition -

It comidered it nmre important that the contenuons be clearly worded, with or wnhout references, and that the pames not be required by a nonspecific reference to hunt for a needle in a haystack.

E The anended petition should le construed in light of all four corners of the d(wunent, and indnidual panages simuld ret be interpreted out of context.

r P

h 9

w y

er

-y-y 3

~... -

._.. ~..,,

l l

,i l

I l

l l

4 DIGENTS ISSUANCE Ol' AD%11NISTRATIVE 1.AW JtJIM'E j

1 i

A1191 1 1.lDYD P. 71 RR.1.kicket No. 93-01-01~ (ASL11P No 91673 Ol PI'L PROGRAM IRAUD, Septenher 20.1993, RULING ON DLl'11N[) ANTS Myl' ION '!O DISMISS I

I I

P i

l i

f_

i I

/

i n

i

/

7 r

4 C

k 1

g I

l 4

l l

i u

i l

i i

4 t

d j

j

'r 0

1 l

j s

e i

I r,-

,--r-,,,-r.-

-,a--------

. ~. -

-- ~. - ~. -

e i

d j

i i

d j

i 4

o 1

i o

I 1)IGESTS ISSUANCES OF DlHECTORS' DFCIMON l

DD 9314 II ALTIMORE GAS AND FLIURIC COMPANY (Calvert CI:ffs Independent $ pent Fuel Storage 4

Installatmn), Dmket Nns.72 8,50-317,50-318,REQUIST I:OR ACilON, August 16,199L DIRICOR'S DLCISION UNDI R 10 C.lER. 5 2.206 l

A The Duector at the Office of Nuclear Material Safety and Safeguards demes a Pennon hied by die Maryland Safe Energy Coahdon regardmg the beensed Independent Spem fect Storage installauon (ISFSI)

{

ut the Calven Chffs Nuclear Power Plant Pednoner had requested that the NRC: (1) halt the transfer of nuclear waste from de spent fuel pool to the ISI'S! until cenmn alleged safety problems had been fully 7

solved, (2) conduct heanngs for funher rulemaking and regulation of nudcar waste at die plant, arxl (3) deny a Certaicate of Comphance (COC) and suspend the hcense issued to the licensee for dry cask storage I

of f. pent fud unni the concerns set forth in the Itubon had been mldrened by the NRC and die Licensee.

~

Prehminanly, the thrector noted that the hcensing of this ISISi ad not fall under the Subpan of 10 CER.

Pan 72 reqmnng rulemaking and issuance of a COC for approval of the cask design and, therefore, denied I

this pan of the Penuon. (liarber, die Director had infornwd the Petitioner that its request for further g

g ruk making and regulauon of dry cask storage was a request to modify die Conuniuron's regulations and

{

i hai admed de Peutioner to follow the provision of 10 CER g 2 802 ifit sought rulemaking ) The Director

/

then conudered each of the safety problems alleged by de Petnioner and concluded that the Pruboner had not tmsed any substantial health and safety issues. The Director. derefore, demed the remaining acuans r'

2 i

requested in t!r it6 tion C

DD 9L15 CLEVLLAND EllCTRIC ILLUMINATING COMPANY. et al. (IVrry Nuclear Power Plant

~

l Umt 1), Dxket No. 50-440 (Licenae No NPF 58). REQUts! FOR ACTION; September 21, 1993;

~

i SUPP11 MENTAL DIRECTOR'S DECISION UNDER 10 C F R. 6 2 206 A

The Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulanon, supplements his demal of dus perition regarding b

de construrbon and operation of an intenm onsite low-lesel rasoactive wasic processmg smd storage facihty 7

that was set fonh in DD-93 5 (37 NRC 238 (19931) In DD 93 5, the Director had concluded that the f

cormrucuon and operation of the proposed intenm facihty did not raise any substantial pubhc tralth and f

safety issues and that the licensee had comphed with all apphcable NRC regulanons and guidance, This s

Supplenental Decision was prepared to respond to a letter from tiv Pennoner to the Comnunitm assertmg that DD 93-5 fell far short of demonstraung die safety of tie ir.rrim low-level waste facihty itself and ordy ad1hened the effect the facility could have on emting eqv.pnent at the plant in this Supplemental

(

l Drcmon, the NRC Staff renews the Licensee's safety evuhydon and supponmg documentation for tir deugn, construenon, and operation of die intenm facility ar/ eencludes that due activines do not raise an "umeuewed safety question" under 10 C.lER. I 50 59 ew that the deugn and operatirm of the facihty mill j

conform to the Licensee's final Safety Analysis Rywt (i S AR) prepared for opernuon of the ltrry plant in confarnung his carher dtxismn, the Dtreetor clari'ed the followmg pomts (1) with hmited exceptions, the deuro and operanon of de interim facihty do rot involve chimges in the handhng and storage of low level nidumeuve waste as described in the ISAR;(2 time few changes to the l'SAR descnption do Imt involve unrenewed safety quesimos, and (3) therefore, under sectmn 50 59, NRC review and approval was not j

required for construction and operation of the f.shry, no federal acuon was required for the construction N

I und operation of this facihty, and the requirenrnts of the Nadonal Environnemal Puhey Act fNEPA) and the Comnusuon's NLPA implenentmg regulations do not apply i

i 1

1 13 i

i i

i

,,.vn,,,

,,,.-n-,

,....,-,.~ - -,, -..-.-,,;-.,- - - -.- -

,m--_

___m l

1 1

i il l

l 11 GAL CITATIONS INDEX CA$ES i

s A L Mc(Lhng lOuge 1.mes, im. v United States, %8 U S 324, 329 (1961) effret of pentiru of a prorecang on the decinion larlow, Cl! 9317, % NRC 49 (1V94

{

Adukra v Kreu & Co, 398 U S 144, 157 (1970) burden on proporrns of summary dnponmon, C119122, M NRC 102 (1994 Adnural Insmance Co v Ilmted Stairs Dntnct Court. MI I 2J 14% 1492 (9th Cu.19M9) l applu auon of anorery-chent pnilege an a corpwanon; 1.ltP-9018. 3M NRC 124 (lW3)

Addwry Conumttec Note to 1970 Amendnrnts to Ird R. Civ P., 4M l' R D 459. 499 (1970) excovery of utal preparanon nuiterials, LitP 9LlH. 38 NRC 123 (19')3)

Alahmna Pvwer Co. (beph M larley Nucicar Plant, Umin I and 2), AI AB 182. 7 Af C 210. 214,

/

l renmuded on other grnunds, CLI.74-12, 7 Al C 20') (1974) 7

)

apphcatiori of etlLi!ct;d estopgel pnnciples in udriunntranve prtxecdsngt (1.10-16, 3M NRC 38 39 7

n 27 (1991)

Alabanus ISwcr Co. (b.rph M larley Nuclear Plant Urain I and 2) AI.All 182. 7 Al C 210, 217 (1974) j appbcatmn of juacial starkt.eds for summary judgrant in NRC parcedmgs, Cli O 22, 3M NRC 102 f

(LWD Amona 1%hc Servxc Co (Palo Venic Nuclear Generaung Staimn, Umts I, 2. and % CI i 91 12, 34 r-NRC 149,155 56 (1991)

[

a lurnsmg nuttmnry to consider the reuh of su, jurkbruon to fasham a renedy ni driertmning redienubsbry, C119316. 38 NRC 18 n.25 (1993) l.huker v Wmro, 407 U.S $14 (1972)

Ins for grant of & lay of procerenga; CI.! 93-17, 3A NRC 50 (19H)

I thury v h.ncia, 44 i U S $$ (1970)

Isalanung of fachws for grant of & lay of pmcedmg. CLf-93-17, M NRC MI (IW3) j ltufhngton v. Halunure County, 913 F2d 113 (4ih Car 1990), cert demed. _ U S 111 S C 1106 i

(1991)

)

atuchorns of diutde jeopardy in a jury tnal, A!J 91-1, 38 NRC 10 (190) j Caruhna Power and I,ight Co (Shenron llarns Nmican Power Planth ALAH R37, 21 NRC $25. $16 (1986) j uppbcanon of collateral entappel pntwirlcs m adnunistranvc proccest.pt Cl.19016. 38 NRC 39 n 27 j

(19H) i Cleveland Board of Idocanon v. Inudernull. 470 U $ 532, 547 (1985)

I length of delay of }mwred ag. Cl) 9617., 38 NRC P (1991) l Ciculand I.lectrk IHununuung Co. (l'erry Nuclear Ihwcr Phmt, Umi (), t.11P 90-25,12 N14C 21 (1990) challenres to changes in tecluncal specahcuanna, ClJ 9) 21 M NRC 91 (199D Cicwland thinc illunarmung Co (Perry Nuclem Power I'lant Umts 1 am! 7) ALAH.443, 6 NRC 741, e

I 751 54 (1977)

I apphcatwn of ju&cial starduds for nummary ju Ig.nent in NRC pmerdmgs, C1.19L22, 3R NHC 102 s

(IWU l

Commonwealth liinon Co (7aon Stauon. Units I and 2h ALA!U185, 7 AFC 240 (1974)

I senpc of dacewry, l.DPW15, 38 NRC 21 n 2 (1991)

Commonwealih I:dwm Co (hun Stauon, Unita 1 and 2h AI Alt l% 7 AIC 457, 4//l (1974) e awovery of anni preparanon rnaierials, l.DP.9118, 38 NRC 171 (1994 1

l$

i I

j il

.we

-v.-r.w.n...,,--,,,,-.,_.,--__,..

. ~ _, _.

..w,

,_...m.-

-m i

j i

11G AI, CITATIONS INDEX f

CASf3 I

i Comnwnpy Nuinuun jmuture v Young,773 l'.2d 1356,1364 (D C C r 1985) agency authorny to dnpense with an evi&utiary tearing; Ct.! 9k22,33 NRC 120 n 85 (1993)

Comulidated IAm n Co. of New York (Inean Point. Uruts I, 2, and 3), Cl.175 8, 2 NRC 173,175 0975) standard for inutunon of show<ame promedings; DD 9Ll4, 38 NRC 77 090)

Cnucal Mass Energy Project v NRC,975 E2d 871 (DC Cir 1992), cert. denied,123 L id 2d 147 (Mar. 22,1993)

IOlA esemption for lasutute for Nudear Ibwer Operanons report, ISP-9L13, 38 NRC 12 (1993)

Dellums v. NRC, 863 F 2d 968, 971 (D C. Dr.1988) injury-in fact stand.ud for standing to intervene; C1.19k21, 38 NRC 92 (1993)

Departnrnt of Juure v. Reporter Comnuttee for Freedom of the Press, 489 U.S. 749, 776-80 (1989) degree of spect6 city required for governnrnt to prevail on ai,serdon of confidenuality as an exception to disdonore under ICIA: CLI-93-17, 33 NRC 56 0993; fvimit li6 son Co. (Enrico f crmi Atomic lbwer Plant, Urut 2), IEP 78 II, 7 NRC 381, 386, aff'd, ALAB-470. 7 NRC 473 0978) apphcability to hcensee's character for purpose of transfer of operaung authonly; CtJ-9116,38 NRC 36 n 22 (l993)

Diverufied Industres, Inc. v. Meredith, 572 F.2d 5% (8th Cir.1978) appbcauon of attorney-client privilege in a corporauon; LSP 9118, 38 NRC 124 0993)

Duke Power Co. (Catawba Nudear Station, Umts I and 2), CLI 83-31,18 NRC 1303,1305 (1983) apphcation of attorney <lient privilege in a corporutmn; ISP-9Ll8,38 NRC 124 0993)

Ikke Power Co. (Prrkms Nodear Station Uruts 1, 2, and 3), ALAfWA,15 NRC 450, 477 0982) adnnuion staridards for hearsay eudence, LitP-9F20, 30 NRC 135 n.2 (1993)

INke Power Co. v. Carolics tinvironmental Study Onmp, Inc.,438 U.S 59,74 0978) stanang to intervene on baxis of geographic proumity; CLI 93-16, 38 NRC 34 0993)

IDIC v. Mallen, 4% U.S 230,242 0988) trat for deternnrung length of a delay m a proceedmg; Cl1-9117,33 NRC 510993) l-ewell Geotedmical lingineering,144. Ohomas li Murray, Ra&ograpler), ClJ 92 5, 35 NRC 83, 84 (1992) omneness of pmcec&ng relaung to grant of stay; CLl-9Fl7, 33 NRC 49 0993)

Finlay Testing Laboratories, Inc., ISP 88-1 A,27 NRC 19 0988) prejudice to chunuuns from delay of proceedmg; CLI 9117,38 NRC 59 f1993)

Florida Power and IJght Co. (St. L.ucie Nucle-ar Power Plant Units i and 2). CLJ-89-21, 30 NRC 325, 329 30 0 989) geograpluc proxinuty as basis for standmg to intervene in operaung heeme anrndnwnt procec6ng; CL19116, 38 NRC 35 (1993); 0193-21, 38 NRC 95 0993)

Irnnsaw v.1.ynaugh, 810 E2d 518 (5th Cir.1987), ccet denied 483 U.S 1008 0987) double jeopardy apphcanom; AL1931, 38 NRC 153 0993)

Gagre v. Northwestern Nationed Imurance Co. 881 E2d 309,314 (6th Cir 1989) board's simienrnt about witness's creability as reversible error; CI19L22,38 NRC 112 n 50 090) j Gerrral Pubhc Utihties Nudent Corp. Ohree Mile bland Nudear Station, Uruts I and 2; Oyster Creek

~

Nuclear Crnerating Stauon), ClJ 854,21 NRC 561,56165 (1985) htigabihty of section 2.2tm penhon that raiws issues bemg considered in peneng ad)uacation, CL193-15,38 NRC 3 0993)

Grand Jury Subpnenas, 89-3 and H9-4. John Due f(9129 v. Umler Seal,902 E2d 244, 248 (4th Cir.

i 199))

auduory to waive attorray< bent pnvilere; tilP.9518,38 NRC 126 0993) llamhn Testing Laboratories, Inc., 2 Ar.C 423. 428 09ML aff'd sub som, llamhn Testmg laboratories, Inc. v. Af.C, 357 E2d 632 (6th Ctr.19t,6; paw perforrnance as a nemure of hermer's character; C119tl6, 38 NRC 310993) lidvering v Mountain Producers Corp, 303 U.S 3'st 399 0937) auttwmty of Congress to impose both avil and enminal sanctions with respect in the same act tw arrdsuon; A119LI, 38 NRC 155 Wr1D 16 b

i 9

g

+

.r w

.e.-

w

i t.1:GAI, CITATIONS INDEX CA5LS thckman v Tsylor. 329 U S 495 (1947) dacovery of tnal preparation vnaterials. LDP-93.Ilt,38 NRC 123 (1993)

Horne Bros, Inc. v. Iand, 463 F 74 1268 (D C. C r.1972; suspension of contractor to alk+w tme for preparation of criminal case, Cl19317, 38 NRC 57 a 4 (1993) llouston lighting and Power Co ( Allens Creek Nuclear Generating Sia; ion. Umi l). ALAlb629.13 NRC 75, 78 (1981)

Imrden on opponent of summary disposition. CLI93-22. 38 NRC 102 (1993) llointon Lighung and Power Co. (South lemas Itoject. Umts 1 and 2h Ct.l 80-32,12 NRC 281, 291 (1980) lark of technu.al competence or character quabhcations as grounds for revocatwn of heeme, CIJ-93-16, 38 NRC 31 (l993)

Kansas Gas and I:lectnc Co, (Wolf Creek Generating Stanon, Umt it ALAH-327, 3 NRC 408, 411 (1976) interk.cutary urkrs appropriate for Compnuson review,0L1-9318, 3R NRC 63 (1993) logan v. 'Amnerman Bnnh Ca, 455 U.S. 422 (1982) l delay of leanng as violarhm of indsvidual's due proceu rights; CIL9317, 38 NRC 50, 51 (1993) latjan v. Defen&rs of Wildlife,112 S. Ct 2130, 2136 (1992) standrd for estabbshmg injury in fact. CU93-16, 38 NRC 32 (1993); CLI-93 21, 38 NRC 92 (1993)

Matsushita Liectrical Industnal Cn,. LJd v. 7eruth Ratha Corp., 475 U.S. 574. 586-87 (1986) burden on opponent of summary dispostrion; CIL93-22, 38 NRC 102 (1993)

Maidews v. Eldndre 424 U.S. 319 (1976) delay of hearing as vmlanon of individuaPs due proccu rigists; CIL9317, 38 NRC 50. 51 (1993)

McGarry v. Secretary of the Treasury, 853 E2d 981, 985 (D.C. Cir.1988) geographic protinury as basis for standing to intervene; CIL93-21,38 NRC 94 n9 (1993)

Metropohtan IMson Co (Three Mi'a Island Nuclear Station, Unit 1). CLL79-8,10 NRC 141,147-48 (1979) licensing board authonty m knar discovery, iEP-93-15. 38 NRC 21 n 2 (1993)

Metropolitan IAson Ca (Three W !slana Nuclear Station, Umt 1), CL183 25,18 NRC 327, 332 (1983) application of judicial concepts of stand ng in NRC proacd ngs; CtL93 21, 38 NRC 92 (1993)

Metropohtan IWson Co (Three Mile Island Nuclear Statier., Unii 1), CLJ 859, 21 NRC 1118.11% 37, affd sub pont in re Three Mile Island Alert. Inc.,771 F.2d 720 (3d C r 1985), cert. denied,475 U.S 1082 (1986) evi&nce applicable to determinations of intnwe's character; ClL9316, 38 NRC 31 (1993)

Metropohtan IWson Co (Three Mile Island Nuclear Station, Umt 1), Cl3 85-9, 21 NRC 1118.1837, afrd sub nom in re 13nce Mile Island Alert, Inc., 771 F.2d 720 (3d Cir 1985), cert demed, 475 U.S.1082 l

(1986) standard for determining Lcemec's character and compcience; CLI-9316, 38 NRC 31 (1993) l Natitmal I abor Relations Board v. Robbins Tire, 437 U.S. 214 (1978) degree of speci6cuy required for govermtrnt to prevail on assertion of conhdentinhty as an excepuan to disclosure under ICIA; C119117, 38 NRC % (1993)

Northern States Power Co (Prairie lhland Nuclear Cn.ncrating Phmt Units I and 2). CIL73-12,6 AEC 241, 242 (1973), affd sub nom. BPI v. AEC, 502 E2d 424 (D C Ctr.1974) 6n hng recewary for board to summanly dcspose of all arguments on the basis of pleadh CLI 93-22, 38 NRC 102 (1993)

Pan 6e Gan and Electric CA (Ihablo Canyon Naclear Power Plard. Umts 1 and 2), ALAB-410.. WRC 139R,1404 n16 (1977) halancing aest for protection of pnvileged matter; LBP.9113,38 NRC 16 n,5 (1993)

Paci6c Gas and Iketne Cn (thablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Units I and 2), CL1-8(L24, il NRC 775 (1980) access to privileged matter subject to protective order, LitP-9L13, 38 NRC 1516 (1993) 17

. __ _ - ~.

LEGAL CITATIONS INDEX CASl3 Pacific Gas and ikctne Co (Diablo Canyon Nutlear hwer I%nt. Umts I and 2), C1181-6,13 NRC 441 (1981) htigabibry of secuan 2 216 pecuan that raises mues twmg crmsidacd in penang adjudicahon.

Cl19L15,38 NRC 3 (1999 Pacific Gan and Electne Co (Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plmt, Unns I and 21, LBP 911, 37 NRC 5, 20-21 (1993) grounds for amendment of contentions, LDP-9121, 38 NRC 148 (1993)

Paube Gas and Liectrie Co. (Stanishius Nuclear Project, Unit 1). CLI 82 5,15 NRC 4N 405 (1982) withdrawal of apphcations after iuuance of notice of heanng; G19Ll6, 38 NRC 38 n26 (1993)

Paafsc Gas ami Electric Co. (Stamslaus Nuclear Project. Umt 1), LBP.7&-20. 7 NRC 1038,1040 0978) f scope e f discowry; 1.DP 9115, 38 NRC 21 n 2 (1993)

Poller v Colunbia Dromkasdng System, Inc., 368 U.S 464 (1962) i thsui.enunt of apphcant as reversible enor, Cl19L22,38 NRC 120 n.85 (1993) i Poller v. Columina Ilroadcasting Systems. Inc., 368 U.S. 464. 473 (1%2) weight given to record suppon for opponent of summary espoudon, C119122. 38 NRC 102 (1993)

Public !>crvice Cn. of ineana,Marth Ibli Nudear Generaung Station. Units 1 and 2), ALAB-316,3 NRC 167,170-71 (1976) scope of hugnhle inues. CL1-911f>, 38 NRC 39 0993)

Puhhc Service Co of New ilamgahire (Seabrook Sianon, Unit 1), CL191-14, 34 NRC 261. 266-67 0991) standard for estabbshing mjury in fact. CLI 9116, 38 NRC 32 0903). C1193-21, 38 NRC 92 (1993)

Pubhc Service Co of New llampshire (Seabrook Statton, Units 1 and 2), ALAll-899, 28 NRC 93,97 e 11 0988). aff'd sub rum Mesachusetts v NRC,924 I 2d 31I (D C, Cir ) cert denied,112 S. CL 275 (1991)

Imensing bo-vd nuthonty to Unul escovery; LDP-9315, 38 NRC 21 p.2 0993) scope of hngable issues determined by basis for contention. CLI 9116. 38 NRC 42 (1993)

Pubhc Service Cu of New Hampsture (Seabrook Station, Uruts i and 2). G189 3, 29 NRC 234. 240.41 0989) contenunos referencmg ottwr, rnasuve docunents. LBP 93-21,38 NRC 146 0993)

Public Service Co of New llampshire (Seabiock Stanon, Units 1 and 2), G192-8. 35 NRC 145,154 0992) burden on oppotwnt of sumnury 6sposition, C119122, 38 NRC 102 0993)

Puerto Rico Electne Power Authoney (North Coast Nuclear I'lant, Unn 1), ALAHM5,12 NRC 153,154 0 980) jurisaction to ternunate a proceeding; C119120,38 NRC 85 0993)

Radiation Technohegy, Inc (Lake Denmart Road. Rockway, N) 078%), ALAB-567,10 NRC 533, 546 0 979) violanon of 10 C P R, 20 20l(at CLl 9122, 38 NRC 110 n 44 0993)

Ranadi C. Orem. D 0 C1.193-14, 37 NRC 423, 427 0993) 4 NRC pohey on truth and accuracy of informadon from heensers; CLI-9117,38 NRC 55 0993)

Regenus of de Umveruy of Cahfornia (UCLA 1(encarch Reactar), LBP-82-93,16 NRC 1391 (1982) inemtion of hcensing board's judgment upon hugators; CLI 93-22, 38 NRC 115 n 64 (1993)

Sacranento Municipal Vuhty thstrict (Rancho Seco Nudear Cenrraung Stadon), CL1-92-2,35 NRC 47, 56 0 992), aff'd, Environnental & Resourecs Defense Conservauon Orgamzadon v. NRC, No. 92-70202

)

(9th Car June 30, 1993) l appheadon of juacial concepts of stanang in NRC procee&ngs, C119516,38 NRC 32 0993);

C119121,38 NRC 92 0993)

Sacramento Mumcipal Unlity Datnd (Ranao Seco Nuclear Generating Stanon), CLI-913, 37 NRC 135, 142 43 (1993)-

inwerptetauon of section 2 714M2) as a pleadmg requirenrnt and as a pnnciple of integretadtm; J

1.HP 93-21, 38 NRC 146 0993)

Santubella v New York 4N U.S. 257, 92 S C 495,30 L. IA 2d 427 0971) enforaubibry of gea agreements; A1.3 93-1, 38 NRC 154 0993) 1 R

v I

I

+

c-:-

m c

e r

rr y"

. - _ ~_.

i LEGAL CITATIONS INI)EX CASI3

?

Sequoyah IsrIn Corp, CL19L7, 37 NRC 175,179 0993) withdrawal of apphcationa after iuuarwe of nouce of hennng, Cl3 9516, 38 NRC 38 n.26 (190)

Sierra Club v. Morton. 405 U.S 727, 73435 0972) geographic proxindry as baus for stan&ng to miervene; CtJ-9k21,18 NRC 94 n 10 0993)

Sinum v. fiasicen Krmudy Welfare Righia Orgamrarmn. 426 U.S 26,38 0976) redressa'nhiy of mjury in fact. CL1-9Ll6. 38 NRC 39 0993)

Steenrnt of Policy on Conduct of licensing Proceedmgs, Cij 81-8,13 NRC 452, 457 0981)

Commimon potwy on use of summary &sposi6on procedures. CLl-9122, 38 NRC 115 a 65 0993)

Tennensee Valley Authorny Olartsville Nuclear Plant, Units I A, 2A, ID, and 28), AIAh-418. 6 NRC 1, 2 0977) rrw arguurnts in nwens far reconsideration.1.11P-93-21, 38 NRC 145 0993)

Teams Uuhues flectric Co (Conmnche Peak Steam f lectric Stauon. Unit 1). ALAB468, 25 NRC 912, 930 0 987) purpose of basis teomrenrnt for contentions; LDP-9L21,38 NRC 14647 0993)

'lexas Uublics T.lectric Co. (Comanche Peak Sicam I.lectne Station, Unit I), ALAB-P68, 25 NRC 912, 932-33 0 987) purpose of basis and specificity requirenrnis for adnussion of contentions, C119316, 38 NRC 42 099D Tetas Uuhues Electric Co. (Comanche Peak Sicam Llectric Stauon, Units I and 2). LilP-84-10,19 NRC 509. 517 18 0 984) new arguments in nusons for reconuderation, IEP 9L21,38 NRC 145 0993)

Texas Utahues Electric Co. (Comanche Itak Steam Llectric Station. Units i and 2). LDP 8450. 20 NRC 1464. 1468-69 0 984) hmitations on attorney <hent and work-product pnvileges; 1J1P-93-18, 38 NRC 125 0993)

Texas Duhnes Generating Co. (Comanche Peak Steam Electric Stanon. Umts 1 and 21, IEP-81-25,14 NRC 241,243 0981) bcensmg board autherny to hmil &acovery; LEP-9115, 38 NRC 21 n.2 0993) l Transco Secunty, Inc. v. Freeman. 639 F.2d 318 (6th Or ), cert. denied. 454 U.S. 820 0981) suspermion of contractor to allow tme for preparation of criminal utse; C1J 93-17, 38 NRC 57 n d 0 993)

United States v. Daggett, 901 F.2d 1546 Olth Cir.1990). cert derued. _ U.S _111 S. Ct.168 0 990) attachnent of ekmble jeopardy wlen the court arepts a gmity plea; A11911,38 NRC 153 0993)

Umted Sinics v.13ght Tinmsand Light Hundred and lihy Dollars in United States Currency, 461 U.S. 555 09R3) l lest for grant of delay of procec&ngs. Cll-9Ll7,38 NRC 50 0993)

Umied States v Iuny-Seven Ttumsand Nine ilumired 13ghty Doll.as ($47.980) n Cana&an Currency, 804 F.2d 1085,1089 (9th Ot.1986), cen. demed. 481 U S.1072 0987) prenmture releasc of information as basis for addinonal delay of enforcement proceedmg; CLI 9117, 38 NRC 55 0993)

United States v. Italper,490 U S. 435,109 5 Ct 1892,104 L FA 2d 487 0989) analysis of double jeopardy and due process A!J-951. 38 NRC 154 0993)

United States v. Munsmgwear, Inc<. 340 0 S 36, 39-40 0950) effect of smotness of a proceceng on the deciuon below, Cll-9517, 38 NRC 49 0993) j Umtod States v. Prerrdnes located at Route ll. 946 F.2d 749,755 Olth Or 1991)

-l i

premature release of informaaon as basis for addiuonal delay of enforcenent proceeding; CLI 9117, J

38 NRC 55 0993)

United States v. Premises located at Route 13,946 E2d 749,756 & n.ll Ulth Or.1991) prejudce to clenuutts from delay of proceedmg. CLI 9L17, 38 NRC 510993) i Umted States v. Schaffner, 771 F.2d 149 (6th Cir.1985) pretrial & version agreement as jeopardy; A11951,18 WRC 153,157 (1993) 19 l

l l

l I

' J

~

- -. _ ~.

IJ. GAL CITATIONS INDl3 CASFS Unned Stars v.,h Alvarer, 958 l'.2d 473 Out Car 1942), cert demed.

U S 113 5. Ct. 221 0992) pretrial diveruon agicenent as ynpardy, A11931, 38 NRC 153 (1993)

Unned staics Departnent of Jusum v. landano, 61 U S t.W. 4485 (U.S May 24.1943) prmlency of criminal procceang as came for delay of adtrumstrauve procerdmg; Ct.t.9tl7,38 NRC 54 (1993)

Upjeta Ce v. United States. 449 U S. 383. 396 97,101 S. Ct. 677,685 66 0981) apphcation of attorney-client privilege in a corporauon; LBP-9kl8, 38 NRC 124 0993)

ValL*y forte Christian College v. Apencana United for Separauon of Church and State, Inc., 454 U.S 464. 472 0 982) standard for estabhshmg iniury in fact, CI19521, 38 NRC 92.93 (1993)

Veg-Man, loc. v. Department of Ar.riculture, 832 l'.2d 601, 607-08 (D C. Cir.1987) agency authoney to dnpense with an evidentiary heanng; CLI 9122,38 NRC 120 n 85 0993)

Virgima 1:lectric and Power Co (North Anna Power Station, Units I and 2), ALA10522,9 NRC $4. 56 0979) niamling to intervene on basis of geographic prosirruty; CL1-9516, 38 NRC 34 0993); C119121, 311 NRC 95 0u93)

Wrginia Licetrk om! lower Co. (North Anna Power Station, Units 1 and 2), A1AB 584.11 NRC 451, 455 (1980) bur &n on oppment of summary dispouoon; CLI 93-22, 38 NRC 102 (1993)

Waddngton Public Power Supply System (WPPSS Nuclear Project No 2), AIAlb721,17 NRC 546, $51 n.5 (1983) heensing board authonty to linut dacovery, LHP-9315, 38 NRC 21 n 2 (1993)

Wadungton Public h.wer Supply Sysicm (WPPSS NucIcar Pro 3cct No 2), DO A4.-7,19 NRC 899, 924 0 984) standard for iratitution of show-cause proceedmgs, DD-93-14. 3R NRC 77 0V93)

Wdderness Socacty v. Onles, 824 F.2d 4.11 G1C, Cir 1987) standard for estabhshmg injury in fact. CU9316, 38 NRC 32 (1993). ClJ 9k21, 38 NRC 92 93 0 993) 9 s

t

.emen.mme=

l

.. ~.

.e

_. =.__. _

i s

N d

i i

IEGAL CITATIONS INDEX REGUIATIO%

10 C F R. 2109c)(2) junwhctum in a heense amendnent pmcccJing a'tcr assuance of Notwc of Hearing., C1.19120, 38 NRC 84 (1993)

Notice of Ilcaring requirenents; LliP-93-16. 38 NRC 24 (190) 10 CT R 21094)

Jurmhetmn over withdrawal of operatmg hcene anrushnent npplicanonn.1.flP-93-16, 38 NRC 24 (1993) withdrawal of apphcat. ions after issuance of Nouce of licarmg ClI 91-16, 38 NRC 38 n 26 (1993),

CL1-9120. 38 NRC R4 o 1 (1993)

/

10 C f R. 2 202 standard for institutmn of show-cause procce hngs. DD C-14. 33 NRC 77 (190)

F l

10 C I-R 2 202(b) y answers to enforcenrnt orders, LilP-9114, 38 SRC 18,19 (199h

~

l nsk of moneous dernvation, nuessnrnt of. CIL9Ll7, 38 NRC 57, SR (1993). LitP 9120, 30 NRC

[

f' l

10 C F R. 2 202(cX2Xi) 7

]

137 (1993)

=

Z 10 CF R. 2 202(cX2Xii)

)

[

gm! cause frw delay of enforcement pmceedmgs; 12P 9120, 30 NRC 133 (1993)

NRC Staff request for delay of proceedmg, ClJ93-17,38 NRC 48 (199h i-

[

gmnciples for delay of gwoceedmgs; C119Ll7, 38 NRC 49. 50 n 2 (1993) 10 C1 R. 2 206 y

farum for addremng brense changes aher anendnrnt has been approwd. CLI 9 021, 38 NRC 91, 93 (1993)

[

imgability of instwn raird m pendmg a.liushcations Cl) 93-l$, 38 NRC 2 (1993) safety of dry cask storage DD-93-14, 38 NRC 7479 (1993) safety of imcrim ormte processing and storage fadhty far low-level wastes; DD 9115, 38 NRC Ifo68 9

(19H) 10 C F R 2 20b(c) review of directors' decismns, CLI 9315, 38 NRC 2 (1993) 10 CitR 2 714(a) mimiuihihty entena for amended contenuons, CLI93-19, 38 NRC 82 (1993) 10 CJ.R. 2 714(axi)

]

interest requirenrnt for standing to intervene in operating hcera amendment proceedmg, CLI 9121,38 NRC 91 (1993) 8 10 C.I R 2.714iaXI)(iHv) alnumbibty cnieria for amended contentmns; CLI 93-19, 3'I NRC 82 (1993) 10 C F R. 2 7144aX2) l content of intervenuon petitions, C1193-21, 34 NRC 92 (1993) 10 C f R 2.714(b) ainusdbihty entena for anended contentions. CLI-9119, 38 NRC 82 (1993) contention requirenrnt for miervention, C119L21, 3R NRC % (1993) 10 C F R 2 714(bX2) admisuhihty of contentmns iluit raise only issues of law, Cl 19121, 38 NRC % (1993) 4 21 a

-v-v v

w w

-r

_m.

LI: GAL CITATIONS INDIN RECl)LATIONS interpretation as a piemhng requirement and as a pritripir of interpret ition, LitP-9L21, 38 NRC 146 (IM) pleading requirenems foi cordenuonsi CLI-9316, 38 NRC 39 (1993) 10 C FA 2.714db)(2i(iii) pkatng segmrernents far contemions. CL1-9116, 38 NRC 40-41 (1993) 10 C F R 2.714(d) aaltruuihihty enteria for anended coritent'ons, C1J 9Ll9. 38 NRC B2 (1993) i 10 CER. 2.714(d)(2) pleadtag requirenu nts for contentions; CLI-9Ll6, 38 NRC 39 (1993) 10 CER 2.714te) aduunibihty of contentions that raiw only hsues of tw, C1J 9121, 38 NRC 96 (1993) 10 C.F R. 2.714a appeal of denial of stan&ng; CLI-93-21,38 NRC 92 (1993) buis for appeals of beensing board &ciuons; CL19116, 38 NRC 29 (1993) 10 C r R. 2 718(c) dimion of discovery into two phases; IEP 9115, 38 NRC 21-22 (1993) 10 C.F R 2.7180) certification of heensing teard questions in Commission; CLI-9119, 38 NRC 82 (1993) ceruhcanon of quesuons on disclosure of privileged matter, LIIP-9Ll3, 38 NRC 14 (1993) 10 CER. 2.730(f) referral of ruhngs on &nclosure of privileged matter; LEP-9113, 38 NRC 14.16 (1993) t review &clined on interlocutory discovery order; CLI-9L18, 38 NRC 63 (1993) 10 CER. 2.740

. I knuts un scope of dacavery; LEP 93 IS, 38 NRC 22 (1993) 10 C.FA 2.7#Xb)(2) -

discowry of trial preparation nunerials; LEP-9L18. 38 NRC 123 (1993) 10 CER. 274Wc) balancing test for prosecuon of privileged matter. LEP-9113, 38 NRC 16 a.5 (1993) 10 C.F R 2.749 bois for summary disposioon; CLI 4119, 38 NRC 82 (1993)

Comminion standants for ruling on sumnuiry disposmon monons; CLi-9L22,38 NRC 102 (1993) summary dispositian for failure to raise genuine iuue of material fact (BP-93-12, 38 NRC 6 (1993) 10 CJK 2.749(a) burden on oppment of summary disposioon; ClJ-9122, 38 NRC 103 (1993) 10 C FA 2.749(b) burden on opponent of summary disposition, CLI.9122,38 NP.C 102,103 (1993) i 10 CER. 2 749(c) conunuances to permit af6davita to be obtained by opponents to summary dnposmon CLIML22,38 NRC 103, l17 (1993) learing rights where kmg dclay occurs between propmal and impontion of civil penalty, CL193 22, 38 NRC 119 (1993) i 10 CF R. 2.749(d) bass for deictnunanon of a summary esponiuon motion; Cl19122, 38 NRC 115 n 65 (1993) fin &ng necessary for board to summanly dispow of all argunrnis on the taus of plealings; CLI 9L22, 38 NRC 102 (1993) 10 C1.R 2.7M) linahty of heenxing tmard deciuon; LitP-9112,38 NRC 10 (1993) 10 C F R. 2.7720)

Conmnssion referral of peritions to licenung boards; LRP-93-16, 38 NRC 24 (1993) 10 C ER. 2,786 finahty of licensing board decaion; LEP-9112, 38 NRC 10 (1993) pierequiutes for judidal tewcw; IEP 9L12, 38 NRC 10 (1993) 22

. 1 x

- - - _. -. - -.. -.. - - - ~.. -.. -. -... - - - ~ - - -

1 4-5 A

1.EGAl, CITATIONS INIEX Rf GL'LA1lONS.

l-10 C F R. 2.786(bw2) lenph of penuons for review; LHP 9312, 38 NRC 10 (1993) a l

10 C ER 2.784h)(b 4

rephes to petitions fw seview; IJtP.9312, 38 NRC 10 (1993) 10 C F R 2 71%(g) mterlocutory orders appropriate for Conwnissitm review, C119318. 38 NRC 64 (1991) 10 C F R 2 790 dmlosure of prmlered snatter,135P.9313, 38 NRC 15 (1993) l 1

noorporatum of IDIA gmiuons under, LBP-93-13,38 NRC ILl4 (1991) 10 C F R, 2.790f aX4)

IOlA evnpion for Imutute far Nuclear Power Operanons report, LBP4L13, 38 NRC 12 (1993)

-10 CIR 2.79fKb) balancing test for release of darunents sub)cci to nondisclosure; thP-9313, 33 NRC 14 (1993) 10 C F R. 2.790(b)(4)-(6.)

availatubry of oocunents covered by f 01A exeneion; LHP 93-13. 38 NRC 12-15 (1993) 10 C F.R. 2.79(xb)(6) balancing test for release of docunents subject to nondaclosure; LBP-9113. 38 NRC 15 (1993) j 10 C F R. 2.802 forum for addressing cesarrns about argulattion of diy cask neorage, DD.9tl4. 38 NRC 72 (1993) 10 Cf R. I%rt 2. Appendia C authority of Director of OIhce of Enforcenent, CU 93 22, 38 NRC 117 (1993) severity level ill violauons; Cl1 93 22, 38 NRC IfC (1991) 10 CIR. Part 20 dose hmits for independent spent fuel storage mstalianon; DD 93-14, 3R NkC 75. 76 (1093) 10 C ER. 20 lte) l intervals for ren4hng dominrters in hot cella; CU 9L22, 38 NRC 112 n 50 0993) 10 CJ R. 2010i(a) i Form 4 requirement; CU-9122, 38 NRC 106 (1993) huut for whole body dose in restncted area; CU 9122, 38 NRC llo,104 105 06 0 993) 10 CER. 20,101(b)

]

excepuon to limit for whole body donc in restricted area; CU 93-22. 38 NRC 100,10Wi 0991) 10 Cf.R. 20102(b)(1) 4 furm-4 re<purernents; CU-9122. 38 NRC 107 0993) 3 10 CJ R. 20 20 lib) g I

dncrepancy between estimated and actual exposure rates as violatmn of,. CU 9122, 38 NRC 100 n 36 0 993) bot cell surveillance rnethod; CU 9L22, 38 NRC 101,108-110993) j 10 C F R 309, 3010 masceial false atutenents as basis for NRC enforcenent actions; CLI.9317, 3R NRC 56 0993) 10 CJ R 30 34 retroactive apphcation of Conunission rules; CU 93 22, 38 NRC 118 n 77 0993) 5 3

10 C.I R. 34 3Vc). 35 51(b) margin of error in radiauon surveys; CW.93 22, 38 NRC 109 0991) e 10 C F R. 50 4

)

reporting requirenrnts for changes, tests and esperinenu at irvenm onute low-level radhmetive waste processing and smrage facihties, DD 9L15, 38 NRC 1610993) j 10 C F R. 50.34(b)(6)(i) j apphcabihty of licensee clutracter determination in tramfers of operating authonty; Ct19116, 38 NRC 30 0 993) e l

10 Cf R. 503Mb) incorporanon of technkal specihcanons in hcenses. CU 9L21, 38 NRC 91 n 6 0993) 10 C F R. 50.54(c) l deternunation nemsary for transfer of operating authonly; CU 9kle, 38 NRC 31 n 9 (1993)

).

i 23

'h t

l i

1 l

1 l-

--....-...,..--....--.-...-__.,_,.-.m_....._-...__.~.-.

-.,,m,. --~ -.. - -, _., - - - - _. - -. -. - ~ _, -

...-.-. ~.. -... - -..... ~...

. - - - -. ~. - - -. -.. -. ~.. - -. - - ~ ~ ~ - -.. -.

.... - - ~ -. - >..

1.EGAL CIDTIONS INDEX k!'GULATION%

10 C I R. 50.57taKh I

reau nable suurance hmbng nrtnsary for hauance of tperaung hveme, CtL%1r3 38 NHC 31 (1993)

IO C I R. 50 59 dn}mition of changes. tnis, and expennrnts at mierim onute low level.nhoactive waste proccuing I

and storage fe:ibues; DIK9315, 38 NRC 161 (1993) i 10 C F R 50.59(aX1)

NRC approval needed for f acihties that pnw no untrviewed safety quet,tions, l>Ik9Lis 38 NRC 162 (1993) 10 C.F R. 50 59taK2) tritena for driernurdng custence of unreviewed safety quest on; DD-9115, 38 NRC 16162 (199h safety of imerim enntte proccumg and storage facahey for low-level wies: DD 93-15, M NRC 16142 (IW3) 10 CIR. 50 65 roomtoring effectivrness of mainienance progranw. LI)P-M13, 38 NRC 15 (1993) 10 CER. 50 7tte) reportmg requirenents for changes, tents, and experinrnts at intenm omite low-lesel ra.hoactise waste procenang and sinrape facilitics, DD 9M5, 38 NRC 161 (1993) j i

10 C ER. 50 80(c) 1 deternunation necessary for transfer of operaung authority, Ct.1 OLl6, 38 NRC 31 (1993)

]

10 CER 50W I

fosum for changing trchnical specihcauonr CtJ 9171, 38 NRC 91 a 6 (1993)

]

10 CJ R Part 50, Appetahn 11. IlIt3 NRC upproval acquirements for changes to withdrawal $dedule for restor venel nmunal specinrns, i

q j

CLI 93 28. 3M NRC 89 (1993) 4 10 Cf R Part $1 enviremnental assennent of imlepernient spent fuel storage imtallation; DD-nl4. 38 NRC 71 (1993) applicabihty of etmronnental impact stmenents to intenm low-level r.nhoacuve waste pmcening and f

10 CF R 5120 dupusal faelhty; DD-9115,38 NRC 167 (1993) j 10 Cl IL Part 72, Subpa1 11 a

matrn.ds liceme to allaw spent fuel sinrage in an irklepcmicnt spent fuct storage installation. DI193-14 M NkC 71,72 (1993) i 10 C ER Part 72, Subpart K Certifwate of Cornphance reymfenrnis for dry cask shnnge; DD 9%I4. 3R NRC 72 (1993) i 10 CI'R 72lfM envininmental sk se bnuts for independent spent fuel storage installauon. DD-9114, 38 NRC 77 (1993) i 10 C l R. Pai1 100 l

accident dose hnuts for inimm low-level nuhoactive wasic pmccuing and disreal facihty; !&9115.

j 48 NRC 165 (1993) 10 C1.R. P;ut 1331 l

authonty of admmntrauve law judge to mingare pen 41ues and ancasments and obviate double punishnent, AlJ 931, M NRC 156 (1993) i i

i

]

4 i

24 a

j i

t t

h' d

I w-w.

,w a,

... - ~..

- ~._

l l

l l

l l

l l

l i

i I

LEG Al, CITATIONS INDEX ST AT UTES IM U S C 287 g

wtanom of, Al J-91-1, 3H NRC 151 (199h ift U.S C 1001 nuttenal falv statenrnis as basis for criminal acuan. C1.14117, 38 NHC So (190) nohdions of AlJ 93-1, 38 NRC 151 (1993)

Atonuc Lrrrgy Act,182a. 42 U.S C. 2232(a) alt caNiity of becmce d.aractc deterrmnannn in transfers of operaung auttumty; C1193-16, 33 NRC h

30 (1993)

Cenouinion autlionty to deterndne an appheant's chancier, C1.19316, 38 NRC 30 (1993) y reimatin apphration of Comminion rule.g. Cl!43-22, 38 NRC 118 n 77 (199) 7 Atonue Energy Act, 184, 42 U S C. 2234 7

dricinunauon uct.csury for transfer of operatmg authonty, CLI 9L 16,18 NFC 31 n 9 (1991)

Atomic F.ncrgy Act, IU9a, 42 U S C. 2239(a) y change in reacur venel withdrawn! nchedule as vmlanon of CLI 93 21, 38 NRC 40 (190) 7

/

hearmg nghis on liccnung issues; CIJ 93 24, 38 NRC 92 (1993) 2 C

I rcedom of lofwmauon Act 001A), i:xempuun 7(D). 5 U.S C 552ibX7)iD) i-i degree of specificity rnpiired for gowrnment to prevail on awrtnn of conElennah!y as an excepuon to disclosure under; CIJ9317,38 NRC 56 090)

I 7

Progtum I raud Civil Rcmeibes Act of 1986, 31 U S C. 3N013812 l

+

uolations of, Al.J 91-1. 38 NRC 152 (1991) a

/

j 1

+

I s

l U

i P

i s

P 25 i

j

....m_...

m..,-....

_.m_m..

l l

l l

l l

LI:GAI, CITATIONS INDEX OTilFHS f

I ed R Ov. P. 24bH3) dmovery of trial prepsation nuterials. L11P-93-lR. 38 NRC 121 (1993) l ed R. Ov P. 24cK7) balancing test for dnclosure of praileged maner,1.15P43-13, 38 NRC 15 (19'0) led R Ov. P. 56 j

apphcation of judicial standards to summary daposition, C1193-22. 34 NRC 102 (IVH) l'rd R. Ov. P. SNc) burden on optxment of summary dnpoution; CLI 93-22, 38 NRC 103 (1W0)

I ed R.1 vid. 501 y

Imurauons on attorney-client and work-product pnvileges, IIJP 9018. 38 NRC 125 (190) y 9 Manarenient Directives. United States Nuclear Regulatory Comnussion. "NRC Orpnmmon and Ibardons." Chapter 9 27,18 0123.031 and 0123 032 d

driegation of Commission authority to [>irector of Nucles Heattor Regulation. Cl.! 93-20, 38 NRC 85 f

n 2 (1993)

/

Model Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 17 I

hmitations on attorney-chent and workpoduct pnvileges. LIIP91-18, 38 NRC 125 (1993)

L S. Rrp No 93-1277, p.13 (1974) 9 huvuitmns on attnincy-chent nod work prodml pnvilcres, l.fsP 9318. 38 NRC 125 (lWl) 7 i

j C

2 i

k

~~

i 4

27 4

J 1

...... ~..

=.,-... ~ - - - ~..... - - -..

I l

SUlijECf INDEX t

i AGRilMENTS prrtnal diveruon. AIJ93-l. 38 NRC 151 (1993) 1 AMENDMENT environmental contendons, CL1-93-19, 38 NRC 81 (lW3)

See also Operating ljcense Attendment APP 1JCANTS disclosure of document prepturd by Insutute for Nuclear Pewer Operauons; CLI 9318, 38 NRC 62 (1993)

AlOMIC I:NERGY ACT 14censec's tharacter and compeence, CLI-9316, 38 NKC 25 (1991)

ATTORNE Y-CLILNT l'RIVIIIGE statenrnes given to apphcants' *.tternays relevant to 01 mvemganon, i 11P 93.lE. 38 NRC 121 (1993) p HOARDS See Liecasmg Doards C

DRACIlYTHERAPY

~

f

/

nrdical nusadndnistranon, LDP-93-20, 38 NRC 130 (1993) l HYPRODUCT MATERIAL N

transfer to authonmf recipient, enforccrrent trder for, I BP-93-14. 38 NRC 18 (1943)

I j

CASE MANAGEMINT 2

1 dncovery limits; LbP-93-15, 38 NRC 20 (1993) 1 CIV1L PLNAl.TY reverul and remand of proceeding, CLI 9A22, 38 NRC 98 (1993)

COHALT40 teletherapy unit, I BP-93-14. 38 NRC 18 (1993)

CONCRLTE pa%&kVely cooled Vimlts, thermal hmh Of, DD-93-14. 38 NRC 69 (1991)

CONI'lDI:N11ALTT Y degree of speci6 city required for government to pcval on awertmn of, as an excepion to disclosure under lot A. CLI93-17, 38 NRC 44 (1993)

CONTENrlONS almusiNbty in operaung beense anendment proceedmg; Cl.1-93-16, 38 NRC 25 (1993) amended, interpretauon of; I BP-93,2L 38 NRC 143 099't) i amendnrnt of; C119319,38 NRC 31 (1993) based on newly prmhled analyses, admindNbry standards. CLI-9319, 38 NRC 81 (1993) basu as scope of dncovery; LBP-93-13. 38 NRC 20 (1943n loss of offute power, C!J 93-19,38 NRC Bt (1943) references to other materials sn; LDP-93-21,38 NRC 143 (1993) speci6 city reqmted of, LUP-93-21, 38 NRC 143 (1993)

CORPORATIONS aticaney-cher,i and work-product pnvileges in. LHP 93-18, 38 NRC 121 (1993)

CRITICAllTY ANAIYSIS KLNO nrdel, thP-93-12, 38 NRC $ (1993)

Mome Carlo analyss. LDP-9312. 38 NRC 5 (1993) 29

.I 1

1 J

4 n

4 m

SUlijECI' INDEX wrtnW budling term in. LEP-93-12, 38 NkC 5 (1993)

CROS5 LX AM!N ATION Intnung hoasd deferral of acuun on dmcwry request pen &ng, LJtP-9317, 38 NRC f>5 (1993) 11:CESIONS See LJcensing Daard Decishms; Vacauon of Otusion UllAY cr.forcenris prmxe&ngs, Staff request for; Cl19L17, 38 NRC 44 (1993) hcenw sugensmn procer&ng; LitP-93-20, 38 NRC 130 (IN3)

Dl5GDSURE insurute for Nuclear Power Operations report; C.L93-18, 38 NRC 62 (1993) prmleged rnatter, referral of ruhngs on; LBP-9313, 38 NRC !! (1993)

DISCOVERY conternion baais as determmant of scope of, i DP-93-15, 38 NRC 20 (1993) falsificatum of fire legn; LBP-9Ll7,38 NRC 65 (1993) hnats impond by board on; LDP-9Ll5,38 NRC 20 (1993) privileged matter, LDP-93-13, 38 NRC 110993) review of inscrkcutory order, ClL9L18, 38 NRC 62 fl993) trial preparation materials.; 1BP.91,18, 38 NRC 121 (1993)

DISMISSAL OF PRORLDING double jeopardy gmunds, AlJ 911,38 NRC 1510993)

DOSE See Ra& anon Ibse DOSIMETLKS l

failure to read at reqmred intervals; CLI-9L22, 38 NRC 99 0993)

DOUBLL JLOPARDY pmgtam fraud procceang as: ALI 931, 33 NRC 151 (1993)

DRY CASK STORAGE l

canister radsauon linuts, inspectmn, and momumng; DD-9114. 38 NRC 69 (1993)

Certificate of Comphance reqmrenrnts for, DD-9Ll4, 38 NRC 69 (1993) safety of, DD 93-14, 38 NRC 69 0993)

IIII.CTIVf. NESS See imurdiate Effccuveren I:NTORGMLNT AC110N mattern teing considered in penang adju& canon; Cl 1-9315,38 NRC 1 (1993) ntay of procee&ngs, LBP-93 70, 38 NRC 130 0993)

LNTORCEMENT ORDLRS I

answers to; IEP-9114. 38 NRC 18 (1993)

LNIORGMI'.NT PROCIT, DINGS delay in; CLI 9117, 38 NRC 44 (1993)

LNYlRONMINfAL ASSLSSMLKI' indepen&pt spent fuel storage intallauon, DD 9Ll4, 38 NRC 69 (1993) fiNVIRONMENTAL IMPACT STATEMENTS apphenbihty to interim low level radioacove waste procesung and disposal facihty, DD-93-15, 38 NRC 159 (IN3)

EVIDE NCE hearsay, staintard of adminibihty; LBP 93-20, 38 NRC 130 099h I.X1 MI'IION from cornpliance wnh ra&auon dose standud. CL19122. 38 NRC 98 (1993) l'Al.Sil'ICATION fire logs; 1.BP-9117, 38 NRC 65 (1993) 11NAlJTY hecnung board deriuon, for purpose of review; LDP 9112,38 NRC 5 (199h

n

.. ~ ~ -.-- - - - --.- - --,

_.. ~

..~ - -

1 1

SUlijECT INilEX l

j IIRE logs, dwovery contrining allegd ancmpia to aber, IJiP 9% l7, 38 NFC M (1991)

I l'RAUD

&ferral of powntion for All9tl, 38 NRC 1510993) iRITJXEl Of INHHrMA1 ION ACT exemptions, Li1P.9113, 3R NRC 11 (IW3) degree of specihdry required for governnrnt to prval on awrtmn of confanuality an an excepuon to duelosure un&r; CLI 9L17, 38 NRC 44 0993)

IMMIDIATl I fil CTIVLNISS enforcenent order, requent to set ar,ide; l.DP9014, 38 NIA' la 0991)

INDflT.NDiffr SPl.NT l'Ull STORAGl' INSI AllAllON rashauna dose hmiis; DIF9314, 38 NFC 69 099h INJURY IN 1 ACT kna of procedural nghi an, Cl193 21,38 NRC 87 (199h loss of rights to notice, opporturuty for a hearmg, and opporturuty for juthcint renew an; ClJ-9121, 38 NRC 37 OWB)

INSPIC!lON dry cask storare canister, for enibrittlenrnt, corrosion, or leakage, DD 9114, 38 NRC 69 0993)

INSTTIVI'E LOR NUCLEAR POWIR OPERAT!ONS ducovery of report sub)cct to punecove twder, IEP-9113, 3A NRC 110993) trport, dachnure to intervenor, CLI 9A18, 38 NRC 62 0993)

IN1lRVENTION PITf1 TONS cffect of wnhdrawal of, IJiP-9L19, 3A NRC 128 OW3)

JUR]SDiCTION apphcation whhdrawals, CLi 9L20, 38 NRC 83 0993) operming license anendnwnt application; ISP 9116, 33 NRC 21 (IW3) 1.lCINSE SU$PINSION PROCI EDING delay of, ISP.9120, 38 NRC 110 0993) iJCENSILS j

character and competence; CLl 9016, 38 NRC 25 OW3) transfer of operatmg authonry; CLI-9116, 3M NRC 25 0993) truth and accinacy of inforn* tion provided to NRC by, Cl.19017, 38 NRC 4.109V1) i L.lCLNSING 110ARD DILTAIONS finably far gmrposes of review; LitP-9L12, 38 NRC 5 0991)

LICENSING IlOARDS case mannynrnt authonty; i DP.9)-f 5, 38 NRC 20 fl99D dmrethm to &dde nouun for reconudeiation on the nwnis; IllP.93 21, 3# NRC 143 (19H)

LIQUID NATURAL GAS PI ANT safrey relevant to indepetulcnt spent fuel storage mstalianon. DD 91-14,18 NRC 69 0993)

MANTENANCis PROGRAMS l

nennonng effecuveness of, l.ItP 93-13, 38 NRC 11 OVD)

MANAGIMINT CilARACTI-R AND COMPL1LNCE e

stamlad for determinatum; CLt-9bl6, 3!I NRC 25 0993)

MNilltfAl.S l.letNSE vent fuel Storage in in& pendent spent fuel storage muallanon; DD ntl4. 38 NRC 69 OW31 Mt. DICAL MISADMINISTRAllON 4-widium-192 source kidged in panent's abainwn, LitPM20, M NRC 110 099))

MONf10 RING interrud, of dry tok storage canisters; DD 9114, 38 NRC 69 (1994) maintenance prograna; ISPMI), 33 NFC 110991)

MfXTINLss of geocerdmg. ef fect on deciuon below; Cl19Ll7, 38 NRC 44 09'H) 31 r

. 5 w

r,-

8

.-n---

e e-. N,.

.a-.-,

,c a

e

---

E

... -.-..~..

- -.. -.. ~ -. - ~.

~.

l

\\

SUlijirr INDEX MOf!ONS I=OR RECONSIDERATION

')

new arguirents in; l. IIP-93 21, 311 NRC 143 (twh i

MOTIONS TO COMPEL tinrbness of, l.itP-93-18,3R NRC 121 fl993)

NOTICE OF llEARING requirenents for; (JtP-9316, 38 NRC 24 (1993)

NRC POLICY truth and accuracy of informatmn from licensees. LU 9317,38 NRC 44 (1991)

NRC PROCFLDINGS

- judicial concepts of standmg applied in; C11-93-16, 38 NRC 25 (19931 NRC STAIT request for & lay of enforcerrent proceedmg; LBP 9120, 38 NRC 130 (1993)

OITICE OF INVI3TIGATIONS delay in enfortenwta proceedmg because of mterference with. CLI93-17, 38 NRC 44 (1993)

OliSITE IT)WER kna of, CL19319,35 NRC 81 (1993)

OITRATING IJCENSE AMENDMENT transfer of reactor vessel mawrial surveillance withdrawal schedule frnrn technical specificatium to safety analysis report; Cl19121,38 NRC 87 (1993) withdrawal of apphcations; C1J-93-20, 38 NRC 83 (1993); LBP-9116, 38 NRC 24 (1993)

OITRATING LICENSE AMENDMENT PROCEEDING standing to intervene in; CLi 9316, 38 NRC 25 (1993), C1J 9k21, 38 NRC 87 (1993) terminatmn of; IJIP-93-16,38 NRC 24 (1993)

ORDERS See Enforcenent Orders; Protective Orders PENALTIES See Civil Penalty POWER See Offute Powr PRIUUDICE to party opposing deley of enforcenent proceedmg; I RP.93-20, 38 NRC 130 (1993)

PRESIDING OliICERS responsibstines regarding delay of promedings; LllP-9120, 38 NRC 130 (1993)

I'RIVi1IGED MATTER balancing test far dacovery of, LBP-9113, 38 NRC 11 (1993)

See also Attorney Clent Privilege; Work-Product Privilege PROGRAM IT(AUD motmn for shsnussal on giuunds of double jeopardy; AtJ-931, 38 NRC 151 (1993)

PROTI.ClIVE ORDIRS dnclosure of INPO report under, Cf.J-9118, 38 NRC 62 (1993) discovery of tcpons sutiect to; LDP-93-13,38 NRC 11 (1993)

RADIATION bnuts of dry cask storage canisters; DD-9114, 38 NRC 69 (1993) surveys, &wrminants of what comututes; C1193-22, 38 NRC 98 (1993)

RADIATION DOSli hnuts fu accidental retcases from intenm low level rathnactive waste promsmg and disposal facihty; DD 9L15, 38 NRC 159 (1993) hnuts for independent spent fuel storage installation. DD 93-14, 38 NRC 69 (1993) stamlards, exemption from conyhance with; CL1-9F22, 38 NRC 98 (1993)

RADIOACTIVE WASTE imerim onsite processing and stusage facary for low-level wastes; DD 9115, 38 NRC 159 (1993)

See aho Dry Cask Storage, In& pendent Spent ivel Storage Installati<m 5

N 32 r

fr' s.-

- wrw T-

%e f--

1

--~9t-t

,*TP W-P-*

.v-

.. ~..

u-~

.a.

u. - - - - -

~n..-.-.--

.-~ -

~ -

~...

SUllJECT INDEX r

RLACIOk VESSEL material surveillae withdrawal schedule tramfened from technical speciscauona to safety analysis report, ClL9k21, 38 NRC B7 099M RLM.RRAL Of KULINGS drctmure ref givileged matter, LBP 9L13, 38 NRC 110993)

RIMAND direcida dccision CU 9313, 38 NHC 10993:

RFSTflUTION for falac claims AU 93-1, 38 NRC l$10993)

REYlEW finahiy of heenung board decision for purpmes of; LDP 9112, 38 NRC 5 0993) judicial, perequiutes for; !.BP 9112, 38 NRC 5 0993) length of peutiom for; LEP-9112,38 NRC 5 OW3) 7 replies to petirams 'lur; LBP-9Ll2, 38 NRC 5 099h RLVIEW, INTERIDCUTORY decision ordering disclosure of INPO report; Cil-93-18, 38 NRC 62 0993)

RfVOCATION OF UCLNSE lak of technical Cornpetence or ctwacter qualihcations as grounds for; CLI-9116, 38 NRC 25 0993)

RULLS OF PRACI'!CT anorney-chent privilege; L11P-93-18,38 NRC 1210993) contention admisubshry; CLI-93-Ifi, 38 NkC 25 0993) discovery of privileged matter; LBP-9%l3, 38 NRC 110993) hearsay evidence; LDP.9120,38 NRC 130 0993) interlocutory review of decision cr:tenng disclosure of INPO report; CL193-18, 38 NRC 62 0993) interpretation of amended petitions; LEP-9121,38 NRC 143 0993) j nisdiction over appheation witintrawals; Cl.19L20, 38 NRC 83 0993) new argumems in motions for recomideration; ISP-9121, 38 NRC 143 (1993) references to other nuscrials in contentions; LilP-9121, 38 NRC 143 0993) section 2 20ri procedures ued to decide matters being comidered in pending ailplication, CU 93-15, 38 NRC l 0993) specificity required of consennons; LDP-9L21, 38 NRC 143 0993) standing to intervene; Cil-9kl6, 38 NRC 25 0993), CLI-91-21, 38 NRC 87 0993) summary disposition; CU-9122,38 NRC 98 0993) termination of poceedings; CLl 93 20, 38 NRC B3 (1993) work product pivilege; LDP-9bl8,38 NRC 1210993)

SAlffY dry cask storage; DD-93-14,38 NRC 69 0993) irdenm onsite processing and storage facihty for low-level wastes; DD 9315, 38 NRC 159 0993)

SATTTY ANALYSIS REPORT transfer of reactor vesel nulerial surveillance withdrawal schedule from icthnical specificatiom to.

CU-93-21, 38 NRC 87 0993)

- SilOW-CAUSE PROCLJDINGS ntandard for institution of; DD 9Ll4, 38 NRC 69 0993)

SPENT HJEL with penixde leaks, dry task storage of DD 9Ll4,38 NRC 69 0993)

SPENT I1;11. K)OL apphcation for expansion of, LDP 9Ll9,38 NRC 128 0993) cnticahty calculauons, LDP 9112, 38 NRC 5 0993) trumfer of nixicar waste from; Db.9Ll4. 33 NRC 69 0993)

}

STANDING TO INTLRVENE geor.raphic poundry as Imsis for; CLI 93-21, 38 NRC 87 0903) injury-in fact and interest reqsements for; CLL9116, 38 NRC 25 0993),. CLI-9121, 38 NRC 87

' 0 993)

• ="*""

3 3

s f

e i

~h

_.._. _ _ _ _.. _ _... _.. ~.... _.. _. _. _ _ _. _ _. _. _.. _. _ _. _ _ _ _. _ _.. - _ _ _ _. _ _ _ _ _. _ _ _. _. _ _ _ _ _

i

.i SUlijECI' INDEX 1

judnial ents.rps appled in NRC pamredmp, CII9116, 38 NRC 25 (1991), Cll 9121. 38 NRC 87

]

(1991) t' NTAY i

i inforcenent prracedings; C1.14317, 38 NRC 44 (1993) live-fa. tor test for grant r,f, LitP 95 20, 38 NHC 110 (1993) i 1

SUMMARY

DISPOSrilON haws for; C1.19tl9, 38 NRC 81 (1991) burden on opponent of, (.119t22, 38 NkC 98 (19936 Imrden on proponent of. C1j 93-22, 38 NRC 98 (lW1) 4 j

isture to raise gennene inue of ruaiersal fact as gnmnds fur; 1.11P-9312, 38 NRC 5 (190)

NRC's felure to detect a violatum as a pnuine inue of rnaterial fut, CL193 22, 38 NRC 98 (1993) e

'lII1INICAL SPICll1 CATIONS transfer t.( reator venel nmterial surveillance wnhdrawal scledule to safety atinlyds report, CLI 93 21, 38 NRC 87 (IW3) l 1LLLTHERAPY UNilS transfer to authovbed empent, enfortenrnt order for; L11P-9314, 38 NRC 18 (190) i 1TRMINATION OF PROCIIDING I

rmoness gnmnds. CLI-9L20, 38 NRC 83 (1993) withdrawal of intervention and learing nmnons as gmunds for; LBP.9119, 3N NRC 128 (lW3)

T!: STING 2

I blacknen; LBP-9312, 3M NkC S (1991) l TRAN511;R OF OPERATING AITDIORifY injury 4n-fact as basis for standing to intrrvene on, C1.I-9tl6, 3M NRC 25 (1993) i UNRE Vll.WED SAllTY OUI:5110NS critena for deternumng the esistenic of; DD-9115, 31f NRC 159 (1993)

VACATION OF DECISION director's deciuon. Cua315, 38 NKC 1 (1991)

WAIVI'.R attorney. client and work prmloci prmleges. by a corporaton, LDP.9318, 38 NRC 121 (1993)

WASTli See Radmactive Waue WORK-PROI)UCl PHIVil1GL

.j statenrnts pven to apphcants' attorneys relevant to O! investiganon, l.IlP.9118.18 NRC 121 (1993)

'f i

1 a

i i

d b

i r

R l

i 1

l 1

N

?

t i -

I l

1 a

l 1

t ll. '

i i

4 l

l 1

1' I

1 u

l 4

i i

1 ll 1

2 1

1 FACILITY INDEX E RVI RT CljilS INDI. PENDENT SPINI ITJI L STORAGE INSTALL.AllON. Ibcket Nos 72 8, M3D, 50 318 f

RI Qt'L5T 1OR AGION, August 16, 199 1 DIRICIOR'S DICl510N UNDI.R 10 C F R 62 206; DD-93-14, 38 NRC 69 (1993) j DIABl.O CANYON NUCLEAR POWE R PLANT, Unns 1 anti 2; thket Nos 50 275-OLA-2, SG 32tOLA2 OF'l RAllNG llCENSE AMENDMENT; July 19. lW3, MI MORANDUM AND ORDI.R (Granting thscowry Reyuni/Refemng Rulmg to Comnunion). IJ1P 93-1138 NRC 11 (1993)

OPI RATING 1JCENSE AMENDMENT; August 13, 1993, MEMORANDUM AND ORDI R l

(1clephone Conference Call, 8/13/931; LDP-9317, 38 NRC t>5 (1993)

OPI RAllNG IJCf.NSE AMENDMENT; Auguss 19, 1991, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER-ClJ 93-lF, 38 NRC 62 (1993)

/

!!ATCll NUCI EAR PLANT, Units 1 and 2, IMet Nas M 321. M 366 RIQUEST IOR ACTION; July 14, 1993, MLMORANDUM AND ORDLR, ClJ-9315, 38 NRC 1 7,

(1993)

Mllj510NL NUCLIAR POWER STATION, Umt 2, Doder Not M 336 OLA f

001 RATING IJCENSE AMENDMENT; July 9.1W3, DECISION AND ORDER (Terminuung Proceeding by Summary Disposioon) LDP 9.L12, 38 NRC 5 (1993)

[

PLRRY NUCILAR POWi R PLANT, Unit I; lbcket No 50-440 RIQUEST IOR ACrlON; September 21,1993, SUPPI LMENTAL DlkECTOR'S DECISION I

l UNDER 10 C F.R. 5 2 206; DI193-li 38 NRC 153 (19931 PI RRY NUCl EAR l'OWI R PLANT, Umt 1; Docket No. M440 Ol.A.3 OPERATING LICENSE AMENDMENT; September 30,199'l; MEMORANDUM AND ORDIR; 4

Clj 93-21, 38 NRC 87 (1993)

PIlORIM NUCIT.AR IOWE R STAT 10N; Docket No. %293-OIA OPI RATING IJCLNSE AMENDMENT; ScPtember 13.190, MEMURANDUM AND ORDER (Ternunauou of hocteding); LBP-93-19, 38 NRC 128 (1993)

)

RANCilO SECO NUCLLAR GENERATING STATION, [*xtet Nn M312 DCOM l

DI COMMISSIONING, Septetr,ber 10, 1993; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, CLI 9bl9, 38 NRC a

I B1 (1993)

VERMONT YANAf E NUCLEAR PORT.R STATION. IMet No 50-271-OLA-5

)

OPERATING IJCINS!! AMENDMENT; July 28. 1993 MIMORANDt!M (Ternunation of hweedmg); IJ1P-93-16, 38 NRC 23 (1993) j OPI RATING IJCENSE AMENDMENT; September 16, 1993, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER, C1J 9L20, 38 NRC H3 (1993) i VOMIL EllLTRIC GENERATING PLANT, Units I and 2. Ibckrt Nos M424,50-425 RIQUEST IOR AC110N; July 14,1993; MEMORANDUM AND ORDER; Cl3 93-15, 38 NRC 1 (1993) l Vo(rl1.E Ell:CIR!C GENERATING PLANT, Units 1 and 2 TbcLei Nos 50424-OIM, 50-425-OLA 3 j

OPi RATING 1) CENSE AMENDMENT; July 21, 1993, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER (Cam i

Managemeno LDP-9315, 38 NRC 20 (1993) l j

l OPl RATING IJCINSE AMENDMENT; Augu.<t 19, 1993, MEMORANDUM AND ORDLR; Cl19tl6, 33 NRC 25 (1993) 4 i

I 1

l l

l

.., ~,

.. ~.

j l

\\

l i

l'ACIIJlY INDEX OPER ATING (JCI.NSI AMI.NDMl(NT, Squemfer 8. IVM, MlalORANDUM AND ORDLR (Discovery Mouan); LitP,9kl5,38 NkC 1210991)

OPI RATING llCLNM AMI.NDMINT, Septemler 24,19'3, MIMORANDUM AND ORDLR (Georgia Power Motion to Heronsider Scope of 1%cedingt 1 ftP 9121, 38 hkC 141 (IW3) t a

i i

i

. j 36

- 1 i

i

.n.

<n..

- - n

-,,-. - -,