Text

Rept on Cable Installation
	ML20063L203
Person / Time
Site:	Midland
Issue date:	06/04/1982
From:	; BECHTEL GROUP, INC.
To:	;
Shared Package
ML20063L149	List: ML20063L160; ML20063L192; ML20063L203;
References
	NUDOCS 8209080670
	Download: ML20063L203 (102)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:__

O REPORT ON CABLE INSTALLATION MIDLAND PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 JUNE 4, 1982 i

i ,tO i i I i I PREPARED BY BECHTEL POWER CORPORATION I O 8209000670 820902 PDR ADOCK 05000329 Q PDR

. -.. ~ !~ /s REPORT ON CABLE INSTALLATION b MIDLAND PLANT UNITS 1 AND 2 CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION II. CASES NOT OF POTENTIAL GENERIC CONCERN - NO FURTHER ACTION NEEDED III. CASES OF POTENTIAL GENERIC CONCERN - FURTHER ACTION NEEDED IV. ACTION PLANS V. CONCLUSIONS VI. MEETING MINUTES ATTACHMENTS 1 i j ('} l Results of the Special Electrical Overinspection 2 f CPCo Nonconformance Reports M01-9-2-013, M01-9-2-016, M01-9-2-021, and Bechtel Nonconformance Report 3996 f-l 3 Potential Generic Concerns Table, Definitions and l Sketches 4 List of Attendees at the May 14, 1982, Meeting in Glen Ellyn t f I i I d F f-O

~ a: ('} I. INTRODUCTION v PURPOSE j This report describes the evaluation of the results of a major overinspection [i.e., an inspection made by Midland 1 Project Quality Assurance Department (MPQAD) of a previous inspection by Bechtel Quality Control (QC) of the instal-lation of Class 1E cable at the Midland site]. It also describes actions to date, and actions yet to be taken, to address the generic implications of any undetected misin-stallations in the remainder of the Class 1E cables not overinspected. BACKGROUND t NRC Reg on III Inspectors R. Gardner and R. Love partici-pated in a special team inspection at the Midland site May 18 through 22, 1981. One result of this inspection was an NRC question on the adequacy of the qualification of certain QC electrical inspectors and the process by which they were certified. The NRC considered the acceptability of the inspections performed by these inspectors to be indeterminate and requested that MPQAD perform an audit of QC to determine the adequacy of this training, qualifica- ,() tions, and examinations prior to their certifications. This 6 matter was left as an unresolved item (NRC Item Number 50-329/81-12-08; 50-330/81-12-09). MPQAD performed the requested audit in June 1981. The NRC +' concluded that the MPQAD audit results were partially "in-conclusive" and requested that MPQAD perform another audit. In addition, the NRC requested that MPQAD perform over-inspections of selected installations. 4 MPQAD performed the second audit in November 1981. Bechtel ll QC began to include on-the-job training as part of the personnel certification records. Subsequently, NRC Inspec-l tion Report 50-329/82-06; 50-330/82-06 closed the unresolved item by concluding that the training, qualifications, and l examinations for certification meet applicable requirements. OVERINSPECTION RESULTS j t MPQAD also performed the requested overinspections. Attach- ~ ment 1 summarizes the results of the overinspections of 1,084 cable installations. Misinsta11ations identified during that overinspection were documented on nonconformance reports (NCRs), which are given as Attachment 2. () l I-1

l NONCONFORMANCE REPORT DISPOSITIONS The NCRs identified 55 cables as misinstalled in part. The [ 55 cables were evaluated by Bechtel project engineering } based on the specifics of each case and the appropriate design criteria. Each case was determined to have no impact j on safety. Fifty-two cables were dispositioned "use as is," and the remaining three cables were dispositioned " rework." Subsequent review and verification of the disposition actions will be made by MPOAD prior to closure of the NCRs. i i I I e I i i ( i ) l E t i i 6' I i f l l 1 I-2 f

II. . CASES NOT OF GENERIC CONCERN - NO FURTHER ACTION NEEDED Section I described how the 55 specific cases of cable misinstallation were dispositioned. Each type of misinstal-lation had to be dispositioned generically, as well. In other words, not only must the 55 specific cases be dispo-sitioned, but each type of case also must be dispositioned with the assumption that the misinstallation could occur anywhere in the plant and remain undetected. This section identifies the types of cases which are generi-cally dispositioned to be of no concern, therefore warrant-ing no further action. For each case of this type, the rationale is provided as to why it is not of generic concern. includes a table, definition of terminology and a list of each of the 55 specific cases. This table also identifies each case as belonging to one of two categories - "No Further Action Needed" or "Further Action Needed." Cases described in this section of the report all fall into the "No Further Action Needed" category. The cases not of potential generic concern are as follows: \\' l. Five cables were found to enter or leave tray in loca-tions other than as specified in Drawing 7220-E-37. These cable installations did not use all designed tray vias (raceway sections) but also did not use any addi-tional trays. These were evaluated as no potential generic concern because the absence of a cable in a tray via would make the thermal analysis more conserva-l tive. These cases are identified in the table of under the subheading " Covered by Analysis." 2. Five cables were misinstalled in that installation to { turn from one raceway section into another, resulting i in a small length of the cable protruding into the adjacent raceway section. These were determined to constitute no potential generic concern because project engineering's method for determining which trays are to be wrapped will include the requirement for wrapping a (; portion of-the adjacent trays. These cables are listed in the table of Attachment 3 under the subheading " Wrapping Criteria." 3. Eight cables involved airlining (limited routing of cable without using raceway) at the motor control center (MCC). Although these cables did not conform to the detailed routing in 7220-E-37, they did conform to l () the design criteria in 7220-E-42, Sheet 5, which gives II-l i [

-, ~. ~.. ~-c

~..

~ ) notes and defines the proper use of 7220-E-37. Because 7220-E-42 takes precedence over 7220-E-37, these cases were determined to constitute no potential generic concern. These cases are listed in the table of Attach-ment 3 under the subheading "Airlining at MCCs." 4. Four cables were determined to constitute no potential generic concern because, although the cable was pulled, additional construction processes and inspections already planned at the time of the overinspection would have identified these conditions. These cases are listed in the table of Attachment 3 under the subhead-ing " Construction Incomplete." Two of these four cases were related to cables which had been neither final trained in accordance with Procedure FPE-4.000 nor inspected in accor-dance with PQs" E-3.0. Two cases involved cables that could not be termi-nated. One cable entered the wrong compartment of a control panel and the other was pulled to the incorrect penetration. In each of the four cases above, the subsequent construc- -( ) tion activities could not have been accomplished and construction would have corrected the conditions. 5. Sixteen cables had nonconformances directly related to extensive successive rework. This was determined to be a unique case and not repeatable, and thus not a poten-tial generic concern. For more details on this case, refer to Sketch 25 of Attachment 3. A second unique j case involves a cable being tied to the bottom rung of a riser. We are unaware of this situation ever occurring elsewhere in the plant. These cases are listed in the 1 I table of Attachment 3 under the subheading " Unique Case." 6. None of the misinstalled cables were evaluated to be a i source of potential generic concern relative to 10CFR, Appendix R (fire protection) because of the wrapping design of the trays. Whenever any two Class 1E trays (of different channels) are within 20 feet of each other, one tray will be wrapped. Therefore, a misin-stalled cable would be located in another lE tray of i the same channel already evaluated for fire protection and it would be wrapped, if required. A subheading is given for this condition in the table of Attachment 3, but none of the specific 55 cases exhibited this condi-tion. II-2

u. ~.

(') 7. Channel separation, in accordance with Regulatory \\' Guide 1.75, was determined not to be a potential generic concern because the design is based on cable tray spacing. When trays from different channels are deter-mined to be less than the required distance apart, one tray will be wrapped to provide an adequate barrier. Therefore, a misinstalled cable located in another tray of the same channel will be adequately separated (or protected) _from trays of other channels. A subheading is given for this condition in the table of Attach-ment 3, but none of the specific 55 cases exhibited this condition. It should be noted that,.of the 1,084 cables subject to overinspection, no cases of channel mixing due to misinstalled cables were detected. This is because lE cables are color-coded, which makes this type of error t apparent and it would thus be detected and corrected by construction or QC. The remaining 17 of the 55 cables represented a potential i generic concern for which further actions are required as described in Section III of this report. ,m i i I i n-s 1 II-3

(~) III. CASES OF POTENTIAL GENERIC L,) CONCERN - FURTHER ACTION NEEDED l Section III identifies the types of cases that are evaluated to be of potential generic concern, and therefore warranting further action. This section is written in two parts - the first part dealing with potential voltage violations and the second part dealing with potential adverse thermal ef fects. 1. Six cables were installed into incorrect trays at transition points. If repeated elsewhere, this could result in a voltage violation, mixing power and instru-ment cable. Thus, this is of potential generic concern for which further action is required to remove the concern. OC will add to the area walkdown inspection procedure (PQCI 7220-E-3.0), a requirement to inspect all cable transitions from raceways to ensure that no voltage violations occur. Therefore, this type of misinstallation will be corrected or subject to Project Engineering evaluation on a case-by-case basis. These cases are identified in the table of Attachment 3 under the subhcading "QC Area Walkdown." ( 2. The remaining 11 cables also represented a potential generic concern of derating of cables due to thermal effects for which further actions are required to remove the concern. The conditions represented by these cables might result in nonconservative thermal analysis for trays that are subject to wrapping (for j fire protection according to 10CFR, Appendix R, or channel separation according to Regulatory Guide 1.75) or have tray fill greater than 30% by volume (PSAR Table 8.3-44). Thirty percent tray fill is considered to be a conservative level for initiating analysis and is the most widely accepted value in the industry. According to FSAR Appendix 9A, a 20-foot horizontal separa-tion is required between redundant safe shutdown cables. According to Regulatory Guide 1.75, a 3-foot horizontal and a 5-foot vertical separation are also required. Raceway (cable tray) is wrapped when the configuration does not meet these separation requirements. (~m III-l

m. ...a .u. a _ _ _.; u 1_ 1 a ('<) In reviewing raceway drawings, a subject raceway is picked and reviewed in every direction to determine if another Class lE raceway of a different channel does not meet the separation requirements. The process is repeated throughout the length of the raceway. When two sections of raceway are found to be less than the required distance apart, both raceways will be analyzed for thermal ef fects, and the tray with the lower energy level (wattage per square foot) will be identified for wrapping (in Drawing Series E-2500 and E-2600). The thermal analysis is based on the cables designed to be in a given tray (in accordance with Raceway Schedule 7220-E-36). To acquire an additional level of confidence that wrapped trays or overfilled raceways will not be degraded, the number of power cables that have the potential for being misinstalled in a pull will be determined. This information will be used to identify cable tray sections which may be analyzed considering the potential for misinstallation. This added step will identify tray sections that require verification because of potential thermal derating of the cables. Therefore, when a tray is to be wrapped, it must be verified that the cables designed to be in that tray are 1 present. This verification will be accomplished by inspec-ting identified tray sections to confirm that the population 1 of cables in each specific tray section is the same quantity and size as established by Drawing 7220-E-36. i i When a raceway is determined by verification to have a population different from that specified in Drawing 7220-E-l 36, additional inspections will be performed to identify the specifics of the population variance. The specifics will be lt referred to project engineering for evaluation and disposi- { tion. j These 11 cases are listed in the table of Attachment 3 under J j the subheading " Thermal Analysis." c I t III-2

,n _ - n. () ' '-~ IV. ACTION PLANS 1 The following is a list of the specific actions which are to be taken, with the organization pri=arily responsible for the action and the j action ec=pletion date given parenthetically: 1. Revise PQCI E-3.0 t: add a QC area valkdown inspection to verify that no cable transitions result in voltage violations (QC, co=plete). 1 2. Submit the revised PQCI E-3.0 to MPQAD for review and approval and through MPQAD to NRC for review (QC, co=plete/MPQAD, June 14, 1982). 3. Establish the method of ther=al analysis by which to identify the cable trays to be inspected by QC (Project Engineering, 6/11/82). h. Perfor= the thermal analysis to identify the cable trays to be inspected by QC (Project Engineering, T/1/82 through 12/31/82). 5 Issue the drawing (or revisions) which identifies cable trays . to be inspected by QC (Project Engineering, 12/31/82). O !') 6. Prepare the PQCI for the inspections to be made per drawing 'in Ite= 5 and for trays to be wrapped per E-2500 and E-2600 (QC, 2 weeks after the co=pletion of ite: 5). 7 Submit the PQCI to MPQAD for approval and through !&QAD to IEC for review (QC,1 day later/MPQAD, 2 weeks later). 8. Issue the PQCI for i=plementation (QC, 2 days after 1&QAD approval). 9 Schedule and conduct training to the PQCI per Paragraph 8.5 of PSP G-6.1. Notify MFQAD prior to the training so they =ay attend. (QC, 2 days after MPQAD date in ite= 7). 10. After training has been docu=ented as required by Paragraph 8.5 of PSP G-8.1, notify MPQAD, who, in turn, vill notify the !EC. (QC, 2 days after the ec=pletion of training /MPQAD, I week thereafter). 11. Perfor= the inspections per the PQCI in Item 6 above (QC, per construction schedule). 12. Issue the MPQAD plan for the overinspection of the inspections being perfor=ed by QC (MPQAD, 2 weeks after MPQAD approval of the PQCI per ite= 7).

(')

N, I IV-1

O

13. - Perfor::t the overinspections (MPQAD, per construction schedule).

Ih. In accordance with the existing procedures, prepare the FSAR revision (Project Engineering, FSAR Review Schedule). 15 Begin the overinspection of the remainder of the cable installations previously inspected by QC Engineer #1 (MPQAD & QC, June T,1982). O O IV-2

_ _ _ -. _ _ _ _ _ _ m c ; I V. CONCLUSIONS Based on the foregoing, the following conclusions are drawn. 4 1. The misinsta11ations detected by the overinspection are. minor departures from design criteria, usually one incorrect via on a cable routing. None of the specific 55 misinstalled cables had any_ adverse impact on safety. 2. The generic implications of the misinstalled cables were evaluated. Either there was no generic concern 3 for the majority of cases or the generic concern is being resolved by the additional actions, and thus has no adverse impact on safety. O i i> i i d I e 4 r i \\ V-1 l

VI. MEETING MINUTES A meeting was held on May 14, 1982, in Glen Ellyn, Illinois, between Consumers Power Company, Bechtel, and the NRC, to discuss this report on cable installation. Meeting attendees are listed in Attachment 4. The results of the meeting were that the NRC, in general, favored our approach. However, certain additional conditions must be met for the approach to be officially accepted. The conditions were as follows. 1. That, in addition to the 43% of inspections made pre-viously, the remaining 57% of the cable installations originally inspected by Bechtel QC Engineer $1, be reinspected. (Subsequent to the meeting, on May 17,

1982, B.W.

Marguglio advised C. Norelius that this reinspection would be made.) 2. That the NRC review PQCI E-3.0, which will be revised to reflect the inspection of all cable transitions from raceways to ensure that no voltage violations occur ^ the NRC review the approach to be used for the 3. That ( 's thermal analysis to identify raceways, by type, that will be subject to QC inspection for cabic count 3 4. That the FSAR be revised to be consistent with other construction activities 5. That the NRC review the PQCI for inspection of the cables in selected raceways i 6. That the Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) review this j entire matter i 7. That Consumers Power Company p: ) vide the specific schedule for each action given in the action plan of Section IV 4 VI-l

j i p .e Attachstut 1 to i Rsport on Ceble Insta11c'.. t iLUu l MG 2 - CABLE *ER.*t!NACICN CFJUt2C"TRISTICS T F 1 Number of Each Type Tvoe of Characteristie of Characteristic t cablo scheme number identification 1 1 l Cablo type identification j Cablo code identification Cablo reel number 1 1-i l Cablo minimum,bwid radius l 1 Cabic permanent identification tag ( 1 tug integrity ~ 1 Termination integrity t I 1 Crisp integrity 4 oct termination per wiring diggras I." l s Shicid and drain wires 1 Insulation J TOTAL. 12. s e I ( l O e l r i j J h I 9 o.. -

Report on Cablo Insta11atica "A2LI 1 - CHARAc m :2*" C5 A55cc:A ID '4ISt CARLI 7tEL

-Her of Each ?/pe

^ of Charseterist:.e tr=e of Charseteristic j l g g Cablo jacket color band 1 Cablo jacket color stripe 1 Cablo identification tagging at each end 2 Cablo reel number 1 I"b I Minimum cable bend radius (*) Cablo vias (b) 15(b) Cablo ties (*) 1("I r Cablo tray damage 1 s Cablo damage 1 24 TOTAI. am m ) u O'There are multiple points at which the cables are bent or at which the cables are tied but, in the interest of conservation, these are cach counted as one* characteristic. (b)For each cable pull, it is estimated that there is an average cf 15 vias. This is considered to be a conservative estimacs. although it was not arrived at by an actual count of ths v:,as fer each t of the jchs overinspected. l a. O 9 JD~ 6-e g p y .--.et.----J**P*, F-*N*eq e _ _ em

Attach =ent 1 to f ! "' i t Report on Cable Installation i f Discosition A. Of the 157 individual nonconforming characteristic, 145 were dis-positioned by Bechtel Project Engineering to be "used as is." l h basis for this disposition for the cable routing nonconform-l ances is that they have no impact on separation, segregatica, physical loading and thermal loading and, therefore, no impact. 2 s whsucever, on plant safety. The disposition of these cable routing nonconformances also calls for the drawings to be changed to rafinct the "as built" conditions. 5. Twelve characteristics were dispositioned to be " reworked " N-of these were for cable pulls involving ten different cables. i N other' two were for cable terminations. In each of these cases. ~, Bechtel Projpct 7:ngineering stated that there was no public safet? impact, ie, that th'ese nonconformances could not have caused an accident or impeded the ability to analiorate the consequences of an accident. As a matter of fact, in the opinion of Bechtel Pro-1 -) f ~ ject EnginiW, it was doubtful that any of these nonconformances woulet have leneireel the functionability of the circuits involved. ( Attachment A provides the specifics of the sechtel Project Engin-l I i -. eering disposities and the jurisdiction for that disposition. VII. Conclusions On the basis of the above information, the undersigned believe that the Bechtel certification process for the nine Bechtel quality Con-trol Engineers was adequate. In the' interest of further improvement, on-the-job training is now being documented and MPQAD, on a sampling basis, is overviewing the sechtel quality Contrcl Engineer certifica-I i 1 tion prccess. E2 wever, in each case for which the ANSI N45.2.6-1973 aducation and experience criteria are not met, MPQAD is now overview-3 s ing the Bochtel certifications. ]4,. QS[ _& 3l34YhL X% M J Schaeffer, %ction Head 'Date )

j El trical/GC, l@QAD O

Sh .y- ' Date j T. U/ Jones,Q3roup Supervisor Electrical /I&C, MPQhD Y O" I + ' a -.n, ..w .~-~-e ,n,. ,.w -e..n..,..,-e..

7__.__ Attachm:nt 1 to R port on Ccble Installation r. S C., Therefore, a_ total of 26,016 cable pull characteristics were over-inspected (24 x 1 C84). D. There were 91 nonconforming via characteristics and 66 nonconform-ing recordings of cable reel numbers, for a total of 157 nonconform-ing characteristics. Therefore 0.60 percent (157 + 26,016) of the cable pull characteristics were nonconforming, .nw. word-Ercuted individual cables in 1 or more vias, result-S r. ing in 5.07 percent (55 + 1,084) of the cables being misrouted at 1 or more points. III. Cable Terminations A. For each cable termination, 12 characteristics were overinspectedT as enumerated N Table 2 (attached). B. MPQAD overinspected 282 cable terminations. C. Therefore, a total of 3,384 characteristics (12 x 282) were over- /-( T.. inspected. D. 'there were 2 nonconforming characteristics, or 0.06 percent (2 + 3,384). E. Each of the termination nonconformances was on a different cable. .Therefore, 0.71 percent (2 +-282) of the terminations was noncon-forsning with regard to 1 characteristic. IV. Cable Tray supports For each of the 2 cable tray support overinspections, there are 8 inspec-tion characteristics, resulting in the overinspection of 16 characteristics. There were no nonconformances. v. Totals ' For all jobs overinspected, there were 159 individual nonconforming char-acteristics, from a total of 29,416 individual characteristics. There- ,_.. fore, 0.54 percent (159 + 29,416) of the characteristics were noncon-forming. f .._/ v 2 '*v --a 9 N. _ umweew

. ~ l r Attcchment 1 to i Report on Cablo Installation i t REST 1TS CF THE SPECIAL ELECTRICAL CVERINSPECTION J I REQUESTED BY NRC 1 eacu f Introduction NRC requested that MPQAD perform special overinspec'tions of the inspec-A. tions made by 4 Bechtel Electrical Quality control gineers whose car-tifications were questioned by NRC because of the t of training f l whichwasdocumentedintheircertificabianfiles.) i l NRC requested also that MPQAD perf6rm special overinspections of the B. inspections made by any other Bechtel Electrical Qtdality Control Engineerswhoseoriginalinspectionswereimpactedhyanythenexist-ing Nonconformance Reports originated by MPQAD. Thf,sresultedinthe f identification of 5 additional Bechtel Electrical Qt ality Control. f Engineers whose inspections were to be subject to thh WQAD special t l overinspection. In a telephone conversation with Mr willian Little od the Nac, it was C. agreed that 250 of these overinspections could be accomplished by 3 Bechtel Electrical Quality Control Engineers, other the 9 Engin-j s ears whose work was subject to this special overinspection.. MPQAD performed overinspections of 1,118 original inspections for cable D. Each of these orig-pulls, cable terminations and cable tray supports. inal inspections was documented on a Bechtel Quality control Inspection soport (QCIR). Bechtel Quality Control overinspected 250 cable pulls which were orig-E. inally inspected by one Engineer. Each of lihese original inspections f f also was documented on a QCIn. F. Therefore, 1,368 original inspections were overinspected by either f MPQAD or Bechtel quality control. i I II. Cable Pulls A. Por each cable pull, 24 characteristics were overinspected by either { MPQAD or Bechtel Quality Control. These characteristics are enumer-ated in Table 1 (attached). i 3. MPQAD overinspected 834 cable pulls and Bechtel Quality control over- 't l inspected 250 cable pulls, for a total of 1,084. -e.

Attcch=snt 1 to Raport on Cablo Insta11ction / 1290 7: Distribution % 1. Se! .'ys rRCM: ICSchaeffer, MPQAD DATE: March 24, 1982 l UBJECT: File 10.0 Enclosed is the revised report on the results of the Special Elec-trical Overinspection requested by the NRC to support their testi-many as to the adequacy of the certification / qualification process I of Bechtel Electrical Quality Control Inspectors. j This report was revised to reflect that a total of 55 cables were j nisrouted, in lieu of 61, which was originally reported on the now superseded report dated rebruary 25, 1982. Distribution: WRBird, P14-418A I JWCook, P26-336B l RCook, NRC Inspector on Site l PCorcoran, Bechtsi-Midland '-~ l IECurland, Midland Lacurtis, Bechtel-Ann Arbor LEDavis, Bechtel-Midland d MADietrich, Bechtel-Midland RGardner, NRC Region III f BWMarguglio, Midland l DBM111er, Midland ( JARutgers Bechtel-Ann Arbor l ESaith, Bechtel-Midland i ~i l l ( l I l I I O h I l l e e -n .-er.- y

Attachr.ent 2 to l Raport on Cablo Installation m I / l, MDy3 { nnT ouALITY ASSURANCE DEPARTutMT A, JCTS. Enol 8etERING ANO Co8esTRUCTION = M M n M f* n d O parer MURL.UN r[" unit V cammy s( Uni M t (j un-e SUS: OGLH Trend: B-3 (B-5)- Priority: 5. AI: 5-12 70== _1_ y _2_ j unac aus. 7. souxeramass mar son

a. mucaramos mar anas

2. mz mazd%ft'-9-2-013 I

tidland 1 and 2 CAB 4511 H Electrical cables "'2 /3 /82 8'iYM [ m massas

u. ca. em c=m si

u. assa/ wc. e m :

3 mm e av' N/A I Bechtel Osnatruction/ T.ower Cable l g,,, N/A Bechtel Qttality Control Spreadinc Room 16.0 * ,A l As u uncaemme=== voman as meuzass -== wza aurs s sanzarzum gY l Asm us osers achtel Electrical Circuit Schedule Drawing E-37. Revision 52, lhan ds 17 gives the first five vias for routing cable scheme CAB 4511 H as: LEDavis M324. AFB 07, AFB 08, AFB 09 and AFA09. Bechtel PQCI 7220/E-4.0 gives g lentical routing requirements. uno uns )ntrary to the above requirements, actual cable routing of this WRBird AM tblo for the first seven vias is AWWO24. AFC06 AFC07, AFC08' JWCook DANott , AFA10 AFA09 MADietrich ALAB-2 BWMarguglio L'Schaeffer j REMcCue/Cilir. BHPeck 3 DBMiller RDJohnson .a --m= m nas ca. g echt01 Engineering evaluate routing of cable OAB 4511 H. Take propriate action to make E-37 and routing of cable agree. (LHQartis) DMmarnbuM i N ser memes [ sRAwells [ ---trimumer me. assoaszzne unsums a mensa. uria = a ms e unsa seewar.zune - r,m.mse..tz i

s - ca amassasse as a

a m. aran.narzrscarzas munfs sans a Arruct e.sart 2nses us l Xlsol W.

s an usammasa psa so.pste) na R so T

s se up==mm run mar sta as l lsol Xl

13. y us, um a ins or assume a met N/A l

r us, ao unas assaar a mes N/A

a. y m, aus e ac wrzczas, a em ascans' N/A

-{ ses a s are a3. mzuzz nort.T m araus are

m. sessvzam's ar==/ mms

. hh4-At 8 [.51 h 9.8[-dw zo esmar.:sa ca mm anar en c..---....L,.natzrscA53 s 03rI21:43 mSa

urtio response dated 2/23/82 at+= h=L

-e. sa GR/FBQJK T s & Alfm. azar.a M. He Sza. Alta. 8sEr.s Es. J ,.sa S E CopC. 3:sr.s

39. AE e ons. Assy. Jon G/Aa a P %.k 25 N/A y/A See Block 25

. Sza. AlfEs. 239. Szar.3

31. SE Or SST GROUr ACImpf.

3s. Pas penJaB DER = FI.r. Apr.

33. 44 ARTzE. 8% z0 zMF!Dsa! DMP.s J

- = = sza. Arm. azar.: ock 25 N/A N/A sman or mar ca suasrscazzas. .ified DCN-884 and latest Revision of Drawing E-37 reflect the as pulled vias of Cable 34511L z - -

- to Report on Cable Installation Tor

3. V. Marguglio 4

,m i Rlll"' NONCONt0RMANGE (SEf0RT '"- "' 7.O f qqagy 4-s m St:5: I b.3 R b, ': rend : 5-3, (B-5) Priority: 5 AI: 5-1270 maa 1_ w V ma smeye.'-9-2-01_3 = sa.s, 7. mucomminns mar me

a. smaaronizzo mar ms:

1. 1and 1 and 2 CAB 4511 H Electrical Cables "*2 /3 /82 w am.m. . an c:n.c=

u. Anu nac. = ses 2.

ans = svi gfg Bechtel Construction / tower cable N/A Sechtel cuality control Screadino Room 16.0 ts acacomamme -~= vunas as muu:ssr c:momos vun aurs,

s. smuzarras AcTRE CRPts col Electrical Circuit Schedule Orawing E-37, Revi*irm 57. Run given the first five vias for reuting cable scheme CAS 4511 H as:

{~~g'~,' l 24, AF307, AT508, AFB 09 and AFA09. Bechtel PQCI 7220/E-4.0 gives th tical routing requirements. una c:wss rary to the above requirements, actual cable routing of this WRB M AM o fer the first seven vias is AWWO24 AFC06, AFC07, AFCO,8, k Ntt 9, AFA10, AFA09 MADietrich ALAB-2 BWMarquglio REMcCut/CFollin DBMiller sc: u :.a cca rea p az ca. g tal Engineering evaluate routing of cable OAB 4511 H. Take g opricts action to make E-37 and routing of cable agree. (ZJfcurtis ) DA%ar t DM'nzenbull we mamum I M11s

sr actinn. nassesums sammus

,J

m. -m ases asess, tacazzam & sys e uma uns ApH.ame ul 1

- ca .s . y :... m'atruc; s.ust mani ns l Xlsol l

17. :s ac auxemata rua Jo.n(e): as O mlX i

e spermass run mar as as 1, l se l Xl

19. : Pus,umatne w arer3 me N/A za, an unas asons 3.se yfg

u. a m, aus e sc wrmas, m vim apaam N/A un ars as. vamzz aspr.: asutus are an. smuavuca azma.as/mus h

h 9..$ M j w.:.b j f.2 , __ a? I 3 assuza e nam A c _a La is Project EngineeSing's ocuplete response. The actual 'as built' routing for cable 31611X has been evalueted and is acceptable se is. 3)CN number 88h to E-37 has been issued /12/82) to reflect thd 'as built' route. ac now,,isy i dpy l ? (NFo PRINTS

3. 3orlass P. %h won nourike oenr l l

l l ~~ 6 ' ' 7 m" ' r. N pmiNrTo 7 Lg a L. Curtis ue ? URio TO FILg /(,, C '- ~ * - - - '. - sa/isonc; sm aarns. sssa.; m ao sm Aarts. aJ3F.a as. reocmo ert a m ccw. azsp.,

29. 4;a. :s,;x.. aur. rcn r,saa b

/As N/A N/A kCouBr. 333. Anf:E. 39 31sF.a

31. 3 m CF TEzz 20U7 ACIM3f.

32 FCA MnJC2 #c0. PL;. Juyt. 33 g agtng. && :g Detmer7 ccND2:" Qss S13. AIF:3. 3I27.s N/A N/A-ca or mar c4.ta:rzaz:as. j =_ .. n a.--.- a, - ., = - -

~ . _ _ _ _ Attachment 2 to Report on Cable Installation 0 <3 pao = cts, asemasesELase asas casesta c *

b. E..'_8888 M..O F.. 0 b l. O D...M...$.N..N.

f.E9. Q R.." S EoS i mr__-._ ./M PROCESS CORRECTIVE ACTION mm 2 2 e (m 13T e sept canEEtSI: i i' [ ?OR Bechtel construction did'~notl fo'116w correct routing for cable scheme CAB 4511 H.., correct routing of the cable. r -QC Engineer did sei.. 12 7 B i sat anos easaarsi, a szrrums runn assis is a asezm at ans mesosazma as means as s t t [ l 1 xmas a suszumroom a manness omsimum ,,3,, mammer mesms g,,, j i 88 t -m= ma massas ou .t M4--Determine if-there-were other cables in this pull which may.not be routed othert i %.J.__.than as specified by E-37. Inform MPQAD of results. (LEDevis) } l \\ / -(2) Daview PQCI E4.u. -Anstallation of Electrical Cables" with cable pulling l QCEs. emphasis to be placed on Activity 2.5. Inform MPQAD when action is complete. (ESaith) I i k oczas a s as mass sr ents) <m:sm a stans at a ma ar osmanmes I l -n ~. _... _.

~

{ ,e, j EM W U S,,,. e y w w - - d + .,--.-,.f,,- ,,.,-.-e e.-,. m.-- ,4._ .,mp e9,. ,,,-_,,_,,,%-e,_,,y.. -w.-aew.y=.' .ww-e-m- --.emW-wg w+v--' pew--'-

~ .. _. _ ~ - -l Attcchment 2 to Rsuort on Ccble Installat.cn,. N a me WDLAND PROJECT g 20275 ruAsc nicon u.o nevu= E g } 971298 n ), j

asmen susJacT coot AOTIO. FC". VEMDORS ACTION FOR OTHC:

C esenta o=ammes a i O vanoon onamnes V i 1.0 meeves. awe. may reecess 6 0 poe aeonovna. O m rsa a neowenen asR O srscwicanons s 2.O M eistowe.swa. mv 7.ccomersucnon C so meovast sR l O overanens Q 0.C aremovco acarf as morro. mas 8.C resunumane uns O Puecmsg oness Po E"m*** s'"7:E"a"s',"dl$v7 0 coswsmarcamoras CN l c.or.act o.os - Rs 4.0 soor aremovsa conoscr amo assusaur Q suecominacre j gg@ Gomplete response O X

s. c M'"m'?',.M".'". "

O Y NTION VENDORS: ALL RNAL DRAWINGS SUSMITTED TO SECHTE. MUST BE CDmRED TRANSPARDOCIES.

f. P. PGEFFE mm4g {

l M escura osameno een. O as-l MPOAD NCR M-01-9-2-013 OA AI S-1270 dC AI 1503 l .x' t_ \\ ........,emnosus I a.) *sy - - __ ;,, l " - r mtP51yP R1 g i. v BB =- w M ,.noo gyn A s www isin 00ALHY A55UE5NCE c ~ini.ni u..m-, ulCHIGAN m- %7,c,;; enIMt TAM WENM W-I- I 4 '*d 8?#

R_

lt h v'en e14 a yv.s noseft?!C IMd6 \\l l I p ..r ft., Mt.E w.enn ron led 2P' -m, vo ms / fo.O W l g g-- g D. M. Turnbull, MPQAD ESmith, Quality Control Consumers Power Company Bechtel Power Corp. Q O VENOORPRINT gyQg], ,v37 n e,,u ~e

q Atte.chment 2 to Rsport on Cable Innta11ctict. i l2Sd s QC AI 1803 MPQA. D N,.CR,M,,01 2- 013 A review of PQCI E-4.0 Rev. 9 "Insta11ation of Electrical Cables" with cable pulling QCE's was perfor:::cd on 3/12/82. Special. emphasis was placed on activity 2.5, verification of correct vias. W T/N 20275 1 ,s e a 1 6

a

. n mmer ---.2' L2-L L _L-_,* u .t,

L -.,..

'b 'h 7220 MIDLAND PROJECTO N 22997 N .~ rurst =Ecorr uso noe.. in' TR $$MINEL ERM i S- .0.. ACTION FOR VENDORS ACTION FOR OTHERS O esent:6 osamines S O vsmoononamines y L 0 aeonovse. mee. mae,mmesas a.c con an, nova 6 0 matematseousmen un O speancanons s 2.O,s,,e,m,,gi e one.mee. ma, 7 0constavenen a meneovest sR O overanens e s.O perum mane use 0 evacmassoness Po 3.O gg,angarry,7,.,y.g m,. ,,ocuo a .o. a <.on. mes mor= cn s.0awassac O se s== naar as c.O mer a,enovas, conneer a ensumer a sueco,ancis sc 18.ff*b & MM!156-t1 s.05,I.**m."?' elm r, y ENTIONVENDORS: AU. FINAL DRAWINGS SUSMITTED TO SECHTE. MUST BE CDmMED T;8JWtWARDCER. esoita,oemom et sea. O d I mcmen een.m .so. O a*- NC_K H-Ot-4-2-013 A.T. S-12 70 AEh l i ,e w -w ., any pgg) 7 4g 1 hu e g s = , = 3 1 E !P L ii y g, g M ll l l 3 !li 'd 1 ese i c. Wiz 5ww wu a t-

t :01 Mpg

'I l'ItLU yu6u ! rya avm-- I. MIDLAND. NiiC;ilGA i I i'l t u ! I i e i AC IILJN # nira s

mn

** ** *T8 fWm/ E'L4"/tr45 tutum c a. w ouve c er.F l'

Pat'f 7 ?Q Ptt.E j, i fL O )TmsCCPY PGR] h ' F#08 ) H*'S"

O l. E C)aeis 3c,kson - CPCo a

de. f 4Hel \\ldbSs k W Y. 0 s B e.rk D. M.Tacn bul h s O

00RPMNT d

s.

i Attadhment 2 to Rcport on Cable Inst =11ntion ~ + m O-n2" N 3 M-01-9-2-013 A.I. 5-1270 A complace review of all cables in the A-276 pull package revealed 1AA-0503N and 1AA-504L were also incorrectly routed. The actual ,routing was determined to be acceptable. FCN 6388 has been written to correct E-37 to the "as built" condition. s ~' e

O l

l e QD .V O "*~* V 'w m wv e w w e --W-m mq

( - Attachment 2 to Report on Cable Installat.ico, s . 2. v. mar.ugu.

t.,, w l 1Y" NONCONFullMANCE REPORT"'#' " "

O. ,,mm. Priority: 1 Sta-t Uts: CD-88 Trond: I-3 (I-5) AI: s-1273 meLw5 mer. 7. mumurmans mas me

s. macaram os m a anses

a. M M 2-.Ol6

, :: anssa l land.1&2 Electrica) Cables "*' 2 /11/8 2 see

low

..s wans as. ama.ca== = === sa. assuiac. e as

3. mm

ys nu Bechtel osastnaction/

heious class lE UA QC/ Project Engineerisq Incations "** "'16.0 - -= amass --- vamme m emusass m==mn= wum men.

s. saraz_ um ac m e ener:

MPQAD overinspections have determine'd thatthe actual routing cf tho listed cables does not conform to the required routing. N y s N eoran

t.ZDavia.

he *AS I5" condition of cable routing and the *AS REQUIRED" g3eigjg cablo routing, taken from Electrical C1.rcuit schedule E-37. Rev 52, are listed adjacent to the cable scheme numbers and couting 88* cows s

inconsistencies underlined. wRaird EDfnarnbull ':he *AS IS" condition of cable routing does not also conform to Jwcook. RAwells the *AS REQUIRED" routing" referenced -in Bechtel PQCI 7220/E-4.0 e MLoarland Jt. Wood which was used by *anchtel for inspection and acceptance of cables. MADietrich AI.AB-2

he cable routing given by E-37. Rev 52, is identical to that REDohnson M7Mr h==f f er -

referenced by PQCT/E-4.0 for each of the listed cables. gg, -- ~-- ran as: ca. REMacas anchtel Ihgineering is requested to evaluate the impact of the =Att,IS" cable routing to determine acceptability and advise seeh-ta;2 nsi

r. ion accordingly.(I.Hoartis)

. " *I*** ,ramene s. - nummes IX we mamme I (cantinued on page 5) DATaggart am.m.mme inaus, sanaams a nas y unas 1 pas Asusana ,t_ .g t _ga y.m. _ ._,_m s.a - e arrurr t.u st n ue us l X l se l

17. m as asycosasa na ss.75(els us f asl~~I" mroenssa na mar as ml l rz l Xl as ir us; as a zos or ureer a me N/A

. _ mas m_r a mas N/A

- - "'8"'"*""3*3'""""8"**

N/A uaumas un as, azuss mesa numus sei

m. assanana s==-/nesa IschaYe

^ . m mas c. 2, gig 2,,,, g,,my,gj __y,y,/y/f,g 2 --- aricanas. c sim. See cttached for Pro,1 eat *P=oring's response. urion mwr m4-5 meo mms m.a novrme ourI I-l mur,o ms oos. D. Earlass P. Corcoran D. Hollar C Wr p.,a c:.yy ecajt=9 '"'* * ** 4 O) g r cartis rue- _ hMA A,p a *g r. ,e _. 7- ..: _r __. ,,.. _m. _. m _ _ v erummun. 83s. AEFIE. BIEF.a N/A N/A > e mas ca venzracanum. n_

.._7 l 2.$ 0 ' to Report on Cable Installation s racascTs. tac:Naanimo Amo ce=svavi. 7 ( NONCOLdRMANCE REPORT ' f" ~^~'.'. s' hits-a 5 ' PROCI55 COR RECTIVE ACTION ,.as 2 e =5 m e acer.AuuE(3): Bechtal Construction and QC in conjunction with Project Daqineering to determine tha root cause and inform MPQAC. (I.EDavis & E3aith) =u. aort ausstsi, a aamur Fame movs tm a ases:xo ar me. samania ses sencuss =# 0 .r runs ca 6 FNei I~~ sus omemamns 3 maamser y momens,g,,, as - - -,casanans m. n raine the need for additional gProcess Qarrective Action in view of the fact that l NCR M-01-9-2-013, dated 2/3/82, addressed a similar problem. Inform MPQAD of tha decision and action takaa to jiroclude reoccurrence of the cable routing discro-pancies. (t.EDavis a tamith) s e xzza es a as ssus ar ase(s) amuza a asacz 4 a nas e osmazumi i l l l

me er necuss es vuxxncazumi

.~

_... _... _... _. _. to Report on Cable Install.-c. j j l , = *. [ ft M-01-9-2 -016 , ~ I7I2bU 2/11/82 Fage 3 of 5 12. "AS IS" NONCONFORMDG CONDITION VERSUS *AS REQUIRED" CONDITION WIM RIFS CABLE SCHEME NLHSER AS MwuEL ROOTDG:

oAa6501N ASL135 M3041, M302, M301, Ma025, AAc27, AMH006, AAc63, M1059 ASA027, ASA09, ASA08, ASA07, ASA06, ASA05 ASA04 ASAoa AsA014 and ASL964.

s As IS ROUTING: ASL135 AN41, M302, M301, MB025, AAc27, AMs006 AAc63, M1059, ASA027, ASA08,.ASA07, ASA06, ASA05, ASA04, ASA03 ASA014 and-ASL968. 2A363C2K AS Mwan.u 200TDS: AK1054 AKA04, AK103 AKA02, AKF01, MF02, MF01, AFD01, AFD02, AFD03, AFD04 AFD05, AFDOS, AFv07, AFv08, AFUS9, AFA09, AFD09 and ASL921 (Per DCS 657). I AS IS RetFFING: a ~ AKA054, AK104, AKA03, AK102, AKA01, MF01, AFD01, AFD02, AFD03 AFD04, AFDOS, AFD06, AFv07, Arvo8, AFU99, AFA09, AFD09 and ASL921. CAB 6SO2M AS REQUIRED ROUTDG: ASL921. AFD09, AFA09, AFU99, AFv08, AFV07, AFD06, AFDOS, AFD04, AFD03, AFD02 AFD01, MF01, MF02, AKF01, AKA02, AKA03, AK104 and AKA054'. l AS IS ROUTU S: ASL921 AFLOS, AFA09, AFU99, Arvo8, Arv07, AFD06, AFD05 AFD04, AFD03 AfD02, AFD01, MF01 AK101 AKA02, AKA03, AKA04 and AKA054. AS REQUIRED ROUTING: CBY36141 e BSL936, 3De01, BDA02, BDA01, N419, BAO32, N524 MA073, BJA05, NA04, BJA03 and BJA035. AS IS RotFFING BSL938 BDs0L, BDA02, BDA01, SJ419, BA032, BJ524 NA073, 5JA05, 57A04, SJA03 and BJA035. ,mw. -w. n w .- w rv

' 'to Report en Cable Installation. 3 NC* M-01-9-2-016 ll ') 2/ /;I Faqe 4 of 5 l j 3

AS IS* NONCONFORMING CONDITIONS VERSUS *AS REQUIRED
CONDITION WIIll REFS:

j ! I I ! l CEtr SOfEME NUMBER AS REQUIRL hi.,G!hu: 4 t 1A35301K ASL944, AD301, ADA02, ADA01, M424, AAQ33, AFX01, f MLol, AFE01, AFF01, AFF02. AF301, AFB 02, AF303, AF304, AF305, AF306, AF307, AF308, AF309, AFA09, AFA08, AFA07, AFA06,'AFA05, AFA04, AFA03, AFA02, AFA01, AFLol, AFLO3, AFL10. M307 ASL935. AS IS ROUTING: ASL945, AD501, ADA02, ADA01, M424, AAQ33

AFE01, l

MLol, AFID1, AFf91, AF792 AF301, AF302, AF303, AF304, AF305, AF306, AF507, AFBOS, AFB 09, AFA09, i AFA06, AFA07, AFA06, AFA05, AFA04, AFA03,-AFA02, AF201, AFE,01, AFLO3, AFL10, MS07 and ASL935. 1DQL57A AS ar.vuwEL ROUTING: { DrB005, DrB07, DrB06, DNQ15. nT475. DT3001, DTB03 DEA 07, DEA 06, DIA05, Dr204 DTA03, DrA02. DTA01, Dc003. DEA 002, DTA21, DTA22. O3 .j AS IS ROUTING: DrB005, DTB07, DrB06 DHD15. n7475, D!s001, DrB03, ' c DFA08, ETA 07, DTA07, DTA06,,DIAOS, DIA04

DIA03, j

DTA02, DTA01, ETA 01, Dc002, DTA003, DTA21, DrA22. 1DQ396D AS REQUIRED ROUTING: 1Dg396F 1DQ3965 DrB004, DTB07, DrB06 DH015, a7475. DTB001, DrB03, 1Dg396L DrA07 DTA06 DrA05, DrA04, DrA03, prA01, DC003, 1DQ396T DIA002, DYA21. DTA22. AS IS ROUFING: l DrB004,, DrB07, DrB06. Ist015, 37475. DrB001 DT303, DFA08, a7A07, DEA 07. DTA06, DTA05, Dr104

DTA03, a

- DIA02, DEA 01, DJA01, DC002, DTA003, DTA21, DTA22. 1DQL77E AS REQUIRED ROUTING: DSL907, DGA01, Dm8001, DrB07, DTB06, DH015

n7475, l

DrB001, DT303, DrA07, DrA06, prA05, DrA04, prA03, DrA02, DrA01, DC003. DrA002, DrA21. ] AS IS ROUTING: coil, prB03, DFA08, ETA 07, DrA07, DrA06, DTA05, j DTA04 DrA03, prA02, DTAdl, n7A01, Dc002. DrA003, l DEA 21. l m -.t

Attachmsnt 2 to Rsport on Ccble Inctallctien t } M-01-9-2-016 2Ml/82 Pge 5 of 5 x. 1 ILo L 1 .3. QA RECCleGDfDATION FOR PART CORRECTIVE ACTION: (Continued from page 1) B) 1. Bechtel Construction is requested to comply with the E-37 Rev 52, car directica from Project Ihgineering per (A) above. (LEDavis) ~' 2. Bechtel QC is requested to update the applica61e QCIRs to reflect the nonconforsung condition identified. (Esaith) 9 9 e O e O e e e e e e* 9 9 9* g e M 9* O O 0 8 1 e

- e*m-we

.m mam.- w -y w - e w

' to Rapert on cable In:tallction l ~ i / 2 M-01-3-2-016

l

..) AI S-1273 At+mehment (sis is Project hf==ezing's ocamplete response: => sesEMs yt: Asia Lv e xrIcy i i On6501N 'As built' zoutes as stated are l 2n6302E amoeptable. Use as ist E-37 revised, On6502N zeference DC number" 884 (2/12/82). l in5301E l r asT361hA 'As built' via 35L938 is stated incor=ectly on NCL l ' As. built' via (verified by Essident j m f==ering) is EsL937. This via is acceptable as is. b37 i = vis.d. zeference DCs numb.= sah j (2/12/s2). i 1DQ157A a) 'As built' vias...DFA08. WA07... i e 1DQ396D taze unacceptable. (Instrument 1D4396F oableinstalledinopntrolracever) s ~.) 1DQ396E Field hp==-ring has been dizeoted .1DQ396L to zowozic cables intid vias na stated ~ 1DQ396T in 3-37 1D41775 b) 'As built' vias... NA01, DC002, DTA003...aze stated incozzeotly an l NCL ' As built' vias (verified by Besident hf==ezing) are DC002, DTA003... These vias are acceptable as is. 3-37 nvis.d nr.=noe DC numb.= sah (2/12/82). e M* i m l l ? l q

. - ~. Attcchm:nt 2 to Report on Cablo Installation ..,.s ! l ) ~s J Bechtel Associates Professional Corporation 777 East Eisennower Parmway Anti Arter. Mactmean -P.o. ses soon.= amor.uenema meios 039360-ELC 12497 ipAN 18, 1982 s, ECElVE Consumers Power Company ((g1 g 1962 P. O. Box 1963 3500 E. Miller Road Midland, Michigna 44640 g quAUTY ASSURANCE Atte e1

r. s. v. Mars.gite MIDt.AND, MICHIGAN

,l Subjects Midland Plant maits 1 & 2 Consumers Power-Company Bechtel Job 7220 Additional Response to CFCe NCE M-01-9-2-016 and 3echtal NCE 3996 4.ES-G73 's Enferences: A)- CPCo BCE 3H1-9-2-016 d February 17, 1982 W 3) Bechtel NCE 3996 dated February 17, 1982 ,j ~ As requested, the following is additional information to' the response which we provided to the above-referenced NCRs. Cables 1DQ137A, IDQ396D, IDQ396F 1DQ3965,1DQ396L, IDQ396T,1DQ177E, (NCE MH)1-9-2-016) 1DQ403I,15q403D, and 2385626A (NCE 3999 have been reviewed for control / power and instrument cablee being routed together. Based on an induced voltage calculation for the power cable (2355626A), emble characteristics, and length of rua, engineering has determined that if these, cables were to have been left in the as-installed condith., -i - 1d not adversely affect the safety operation of the plant through itti design life. ~ .__..I.f 7 eel _haveTany guestions on the subject, please odvise. a L. W Curt __] Project Engineering Manager LEC/PJC/CDW/sil Written Response Required No acmm Pamt M4 y,m entNTS ect M. Schaffer ,; t - ;ourine ourl l l D. Turnbull e... ro Pii.s t W. Bird )msmy pC3 M"onioToe u 44 W D. Tassart

___m_.___ ~.. _. Attechm:nt 2 to Esport on Cable Installation s, .s i ..) .3 M-01-9-2-016 i AI S-1273 Attmeh==nt a q is is Project Engineering's complete responses ,/ l t ent2 smEME NdtHER EALUATIcy 0a6501N 'As built' zoutes as stated are 226302E acceptable. Use as ist E-37 revised, OAB6502N reference DCE zmaber 88h (2/12/82). 1AB5301E i i CET361h1 'As built' via 35L938 is stated incor=ectly on N G. i 'As built' via (verified by Besident

f"=ering) is BSL937.

[ This via is noceptable as is. B-37 t revis.4, reference DCE number 8ah (2/12/82). I 1M157A a) 'As imilt' vias...DrA08, wAo7... 1M396D

are unacceptable.

(Instrument i 1M396F cableinstalledincontrolrecover) O_l. 1M396E Field Engineering has been directed v .1M396L to rework cables in1id vias as stated 1DQ396T in 3-37. 1M1775 i b) 'As built' vias... NA01, DC002, DTA003...are stated incozzeotly on l NCE. 'As built' vias (verified by l Besident h paaeming) are DC002, I DTACO3... These vias are acceptable l as is. B-37 zovised reference DCE number 88h (2/12/82). i i l i I l s OJ V I e l . ~ _. ..-.. ~.... -. -... .. ~ -, t

(lLbD ~ ..,.. At,tachm:nt 2 to Retort,on Cable Insta11ntinn. ,j To .2. V. Marruglio Ti""' NONCONCRMANCE REPORT b l x==*i-5-3 (B-5) '*359337 1 SU: c3-88 "&end: I-3. (T-5) AI: 5-1289 inar 1 5 w ener-* Prierity: nas: mass 7. ammmmmenam as

s. maammazo snar ms.

6 na uypJ $9-2-021 l

a. assa Midland 1 & 2 See below Electrical Cables 2/16/82 h

mu. -. as. an. ~ - s. m w a s:4 s za. yjg Bechtal construction / Various class 1E t N/A Oc/Prodeet meineering toeations is 0 o a namenmass anz=ss amas as mamar amass== win asse

s. am azurn e leQED overinspections have determined that the act=al routi=g of -

th3 listed cables does not conform to the required routing. LHCartis/PC. : rcrc= LEDavis The "AU IS" condition of cable routing and the "AS REQUIRED" h cablo routing, taken from Electrical circuit Schedule E-37, Anv Dscott 52, are listed adjacent to the cable scher e numbers and routing

w e espri CATaqqart in'consistancies underlined.

g 3 Tha "AS IS" condition of cable routing does not also conform to k m ils the "AS Kr.vdinEL" routing referenced in Bechtel PQcI 7220/E-4.5, g g.g which was used by Bechtal for inspection and acceptance of cables. MADietrieh ALAB J the cable routing given by E-37, nov 52, is identical to that W ohnson referenced by Poc!/E-4.0 for each of the listed cables. (Cont'd) 6 - - inn mas a. 3WMarguglio + REMcCum Bechtel hqineering is requested to evaluate the impact of the N 11** "As IS" cable routing to dotarmine acceptability and advise Bech-N'

- - "'*W ' "qy use muump (Continued on page.*S)

]plyp{p f tal construction accordingly. (LHQartis ) ,rtavammer us. - unsmem l g ss~A i w amane sess. sasume a sus e uma ses mamme, C "E m a.. m - e s.. S l iG p m FIELD QUAUPI ASSURA I{ t a m murr +.use =me mlx aI tr. m a mammasa nu ss.m.) ss I f"Fr W' 'vuumurm .l l se spassua run mar na um l lml Xl

19. 2 m. mm a :ss or seast s men N/A f

N/A rus. a maamar3 ma N/A a ann am:m ass as. m an ns u r u a s sa m s e an. sensesma s - -ms. 7 i 2/18/82

)pe,*_6# fdl_ _ gi/2/,g M J Schaeffer N'f 3 arm a ns ca ametas=s ses

~

" = " " = " ' " = = ^ = " " * * = ' = = =

M PROJECT EDGunnw'S CCBGUZE RESPQISE IS ATZACIED. griom paint IMPo PalN,3 ourI l I ooe 'D. BoMm== P. CoroorumL . m pourine

3. Ho11ar G. Vammar-

-~~a" rCm

2. sor.oe

p. con.ca J -Dn-== du

'G, >2c

m. e = e.22,

i. ro=*

.- sm. g. 7.- a m.

m m. - m.

. m. .p.l W/7 h b l}<} [ h ,f g 5/A N/A gy 4 l < u.. -m. m. m - m. m. m.s.,. u. m r. . m. :o. m,.. 3. m...= m mm. sm..: l l, l N/A N/A I

g, cy cas. atst. pas anar c/a

16. sm. naams am c/a a esa as Jf. Jca c:assa unass l

(anar a mcssa ca m) MIrr:ss amma:2Imu ,,.., amanns/anma,, j

.g a o.e*-. s m- ..m .ao =-eem-+w 4 ...u mmo, 2 to a oort on cm. Inmunti-g f l ]I c {. L a m h memesame me conomcame- ) [ ] i:l F " NONCONFORMANCE REPORT _"'917-2":1 7 V ~ V ~M PROCI55 CCRRICTIVE ACTICN 2, 5 a aussa.am:, met cumusas l I Bechtel Construction and QC,in con %3ction with Pre!c=t Ihqine --in;, to determine the root cause and inform lePQAD. (t.rnavis & E M th) i aszw. me cumstsa. m-se rum mee (a a amasan s me. -== rom - as i I I,' .t, ,i ? \\ amamsd musum rame e E -Q J s .).](e son mamms a. s - , De me -the-need-4ee -edditional Process correctlshon Ta viow of the fact that , - ~ . MPQAD NCR N-01 + 2 ^15, dated 2/11/82, addressed a similar problem. Inform MrQAD of \\ the decision and--acties-taisen to preclude re-occurrence of the cable routing dia-lj crepancies..,(LEDavis-4-Ean6th) { met.B m 2 E SEE W EEA(2) M N EdEE E & R&B W GustBEBER I l.I l l l msgo e Funcue a e m O3 ? ? J

- - _ me ene. essesWW99 9 M Wes'.".WW fa.e9PWTTF N M

,.4 A _ O Ma nem mM =

^~i L b 'O ~ ' ~ ~ ~ui [ i 7 h, ~ NCP M-01-9-2-021 'u.' Dat 2/16/82 File: 16.0 Page 3 of' 5 12.

AS IS*NCNCONFORMING CONDI[ICN VERSUS *AS REQUIRED
CONDITION WIM REFS:

'.e CABI.E SCHENE NUMBER AS REQUIRED ROUTING: 1DQ 173 D DSL907, DGA01, DWW001, DrB07 DrB06, InI015, 1D0 173 E B7475. Drn001, Drs03 DTA07. DrA06 DTA05, DTA04, Dm03 DTA02, 'DTA01. DC003, DTA002 DrA21. 1DQ 173 F 1DQ 177 F iAs IS ROUTING: l 1DQ 181 B { 1DQ 181 D osil at 37475. Dr5001, Dr303 DTA07, prA06. DTA05, 1DQ 181 F UtAD4, DTA03, Dm02, DTA01, DCD02. DrA003, DrA21. 1DQ 181 5 ~~ As Ewud:D ROUTINS: CAS 6502 M , ASL921. AFD09', AFA09, AFV99, AFVCS, Ar707, AFD0G. , AFD05, AFD04, AFD03 AFD02, AFD01, MF01, MF02 2AB 6302 K s AIF01, AKA02, AIA03 AKA04 AKA054. As IS no0 TING: ,i ASL921. AFDOS, AFA09, AF099, AFv08, AFv07, AFD06, l jlLFD05. AFD04, AFD03, AFD02, AFD01, MF01, UCA01, AKA02, AKA03, AKA04 AR2054. .-,37 As wwuw.u acrJ rNs: 2BI 002 A BG042, 57637, BG043. BG044, BG045, M1371. BG046, 2BI 004 A BA045, NVA005, BVA01, SVA98, BVA99. AS IS ROUTING: 3G042 W637. BG043, SG044. BG045, BJ1371 BG046 BA045

EVA005,

, EVA99. AS REQUIRED ROUTING: LAG 1113 E ASL151, ADA005, ADA05 ADA04, ADA03, ADA02, ADA01, M424 AA033, AKF01, MLOO3, MLOL, AFP01, AFF02, AFP03, AFN02. AFN01, AFIAl, AFLO3, AFL10. M307,

[

M508 M309, ASL933. AS IS B00 TING: ASL151, ADA005, ADA05 ADA04, ADA03, ADA02, ADA01, M424. AA033 AKF01 ML003, MIAL, AFP01, AFP02, AFP03 AFN02, AFN01, AFIAL, AFLO3, AFL10. MS07, M308, MSO9, ASL935. ,o O' se

Denotes that via was skipped

~ .- to Report on Cable Insta11at:::n, i i r ': M-01-S-2-021 [ q% ' L hs 2/16/82-l F11e: 16.0 f T p-Fage 4 of 5 l ? 12. "AS IS" NQl0 CONFORMING CONDITION VERSUB "AS REQUIRED" CDHDITION WI*DE REFS: ) CABLE SCHEME NUMBER AS as.vutar.u EDtFrI!OS: j las 1213 E EDA 005. EDA 05, 3DA04, EDA 03, BDA02, 3DA01, N419, BA031 N524 NA073, NAOS, Ens 05, NP01, anIO1, i I EFIW2, SFH03, WH04 BF195, anIO6, EnIO7, EnWS, j BFH09. RFH10, BFM11 BFH12. EFK13. Erfl14, EFA13, j EFA14, SFA15, 5F2002, EFF09. l l AS Is notfrIns: ~~" ~~ ~ EDA 006, EDA 05. EDA 04. EDA 03, BDA02, 3DA01, N419 ~ BA031 N524 MA073,- NAOS, NN05, NF01, NP02 BMIO2, SFIIO3. EFIN4, BFH05, RFH06, RFH07, SFNOS, ErlWS, 3FIE10, anill, BFH12 EFH13, SFH14. EFA13, l - ~ " - ~~~ EFA14. EFA15. EFA002. EFF09. i As namusa notFr231st 135 5610 C ESL922 NH01, BRA 06, SKA05, BEE 01, NF03, RF301, -~' EF302, BF303, SF304, BF305i BF3015 M106. s . ); t gg gg gg7pgg,... , l ~/ l g

EsL922,

-i axacts Es301 Ny03, SF301, -'

t l '- ~ EF302, BFs03, 3F304, ootled. ' - l AS as,wutar.u notfrztes l l lan 0012 A BFF09, EFA002, RFA15 SFA14. EFII14, BFH13. BFH12, BMD, i SFIt10, BFH09, SFHOS, BFH07, BFHOS, BMW5, BFH04, EFHO3, EFH02. EFH01, NF01, NN05, NAOS, NA073, N524 BA031, N419, 3DA01, BDA02, BDA03, EDA 04, -~ 3DA05, EDA 06, EDA 07, BDA10. AS Is nOEFFIIISt-BFF09, SFA002~, EFA15. era 14. BFA13. EFH14 SFH13, l Ent12, EFIt11, SFH10 -- BFH09, EMIDS, anIO7, EFH06.. { NF01, 57N05.. 3FH05, SFIIO4. 3FH037 BFH02, 57A05, 53A073.-23524, BA031, SJ419 BDA01, 3DA02 3DA03, 3DA04, 3DA05, i /", BDA07, 3DA10. As mswusar.u ROUTI1ES: j 131 067 A BG083, 371763, EVA022. EVA16. EVA15. EVA14, EVA13, 's BVA12 BVA001, EVA06. EVA05, BYA04. EVA03, svA02, ) ava01-to 1z132. l . f AS IS RotfrINtB: i SG083, BJ1763. BVA022, EVA16, EVA15, EVA14. EVA13, BVA12, EVA001, EVA06, EVA05, BVA04, EVA03 EV202, ei. e y-W eur- ,w. ---w+,y-yw-m-ew-g evme.,w--e-e iu-w-w ww=wi.ra-og - -,-+w m, y

,w-u-Atte.ch=rnt 2 to Report en Cable Installation i b" t: M 01-9-2-021 ~ wee: 2/16/82 File: 16.O ~ Page 5 of 5 ( .i 4 12. "AS IS' NONCONFORMING CONDITION VERSUS *AS RM UIRED" CONDITION WITH REFS: CABLE SCHEME NUMBER AS REQUIRED ROUTING 25A0001F _rR _tBa 3 l 2C46 2J1145 BGrot, swo23. BGC01, BGB02, BGB01, BTG01, BTB06, BTB011, N924, BA035. BJ690', SN054 i AS IS ROUTING: N E 2C46 2C232 BN054, BJ690 BA035 W924. BT5011. BTB06, STG01, BGB01, BGB02, BGC01, BWO23, BGFOS

13. QA RECCletENDATION FCR PART C1 1

G N B) CJ 1. sechtel omstruction is requested to comply with the E-37.Be. 52, .r ere .a -,r.3e rm m, < -.m > y 2. Bechtel QC is requested to update the applicable QCIas to reflect the nonconforming condition identified. (E3mith ) 2 e JJ. e p t--

i Attachm:nt 2 to Report on Cable Installatin A, l D lqcU a c NCE M-01-9-2-02, AI: S-1289 Attachneat _....x., i This is Frofect Engineering's complete response. f Cable Scheme Number Evaluatios ] 1DQ173D "As-built" routes as stated are i 1DQ173E acceptable. Use as is; E-37 1DQ173F has been revised; Reference 1DQ177D DCN Number 885 dated February 17, 1982 i ' 2DQ177F i ~ IDQ181k'~ 2DQ181D 1DQ181F ~ 1DQ181E OA36502E i 2A36302K l 23I003& 23I004& uc113 3 .s l J IBB5610C _.y /'. ! 13A0012A i 13G12133 "As-built" vis 13JP02 is incorrectly l stated on the NCE. l The as-built route is...BJ701, 3FR02.. 3 E-37 has been revised to reflect l this route; Reference DCN Number 885 dated i February 17, 1982 { 1 13IO67A The scheme cable number is incorrectly 1 stated on the NCE. The cable number should be 2 BIO 67A. The as-built route i I for 2 BIO 67A as stated is unacceptable. ~ ~~~ ~ ~ -Field Engineering has been directed ) ~_ ~4. to rework the cable into the~ vias - - - j ~ - :n r as stated in E-37. The7e tToestion" (2C232) as acated as - i . _. - - - -23d40017:_. tisch is ' incorrect. The cable is ~~ yelled 'and terufnated per the as required rooting (2J1145). Therefore, a l noncomforming condition does not exist for this cable. O;> /

e-

.m.4.,

eis. w . ~e~,r.:, a. } _._. -_-. _... _~_ _,.. _.. _ __, -

~ _n , _. ~ - Atte. chm:nt 2 to Report on Cablo Installation or129. c A s g Y A$ "} = g s ci T-a G C f- ~ w g ~ g!s. !l i 2 b-N l i l go k i g ! ;G WE Es : 1 ] 8 E 3 e "I j i i j i i l. JE E J d Ji m l 6 y a 3 3 $$k N b $ kl$' 5 i e g i'J bi:y $ f %w t. ~ 2 n ' l o n ilm 9 t J E 6 ' Y 7 V o d. ? ( 5 c 2 ~ g 4 4, 't $ ] 4 N y l, ". h 7 x 3 Q g g g e u. 2 3 i d j 9 d N h5 hh $ 4 g l e %w M 2 x s o-w = e 0 E de p 2 d 4 'a N g ) N) g nT N c 5 9 3 a.- e ,g !$o'd I I d ) ;5 (-) h 5 ,, J 4 ' s.v 3 ,t-2,a g 9 g="8 0 s g .., <( A 1 a tv 9 q s = g h I D (Q D

E

~. o u i U 1 a (. 4 d z= g p. 5 =!! 2 e n 3 e R L' 4-

9

$ k V 5 s 4 w; a .,I I ( M k e w 9 h b h \\ dI W 3 "3 ! h d I h l f ! Od $ h l g ! j l"b.(d i e V i l B= 4 s - d db-A i s J 5 'e E- ! E 3 y 2 Ik { 4 5 Y .9 3 <4 4 R $ ,i 4

ca.

x y . = = F- -e n y e i 2 -8 is w ~ .> t g s S En e 'j s o x u =8 c 8 5-- 5 C d E

b E AIA 0 ~*

) b~ a }* $ ~ w ,W:@ Ed b.se] R S y y w V 8y i: 3 t -4 y gD !

5=-: g g

$ 2 !! ! $ = h f e n $ q y W a ege s 4 d-e: S x s kk n..... ___ _.

[Y.

NEN a

~. .3 s y, _ r_gu - n =. '.** 1-- y-* r 5qq sy-.;r::: ::pp..g ;._.~;--'-.- 7.q.. -- .. 33, _ Atthchment 2 to Rt. port on Cablo Installc, tion 1 1 l l I c o. ~ .I M C t

d i

C ," 'u ~ 4-0 h b E d( b CO. c l d h g Cg '9 - I 9 t j E oc c b e In

h E

cc 2 E-b' 3 -l-i d i h C 4<<j j 0 u.z a,' Wc u ,C < d l t c. g n. c i as J e M 2 : 3 a ,a g g-to g C ~) .3 y gh ] ~. 3 f uV '> ~g e 3 w w c t -q n [ h 4 4 yp b g y l l u g y wa ,3 M h O $o,o< 2 c} 2 cd j E 3 s k h' M h \\ N M F t). U 3 a c.c c w -; 4 v.i c< s.J s <;. g. , o i s m e et r t y c n [ D OG M Q h 'h $ j b 'e Dk )q,g g g w b % z a fs Q,j'p sd M.< d Od d 'O J $-f 4 ! F 1 'i w j ta *o l e ca n 4, q" ~4 C $$ --,r;y p,., kt -f. 7 O c +2 r z 4

d. 7 5

4 7 ) 't ) g.a 4 a 2 S $ *5 m g-cc o> fl 0a el (L.a. .e CC.s <' N u .9 y 5 1 4 0 N. 98, -+ cs l {0 .,$ f i i t o )C I3 a (3 E 't A L ia t e 2< .s e < P c 3 - J k ( b I L l < 0 A p !) ! f) Q ( _) l _3- _- i - ~..

i i 3, jQ0. g t,, 'tn.,) jn y i, lfl f i,- i !. j,y!.. .-l. ..h5: <- ). ' I f' f 3' [ l f.: . o r'. ~ gyyn DS 8 g. yyyg, a. ~ ] s t u

s. -

S, J z r oa n o a 1 o a n a n O O L A A T. s s-a z coc y 3 9 ts A .'A L t_ A, e f s o s .._ e i n s

a a

o o r A T. o c T A a s e g 8 a 5 d g0 .s 9i l

s. 7, l

v i '5 . v 9 A _n A . n 8 u .c 3 A I ~ V T g u s u 6 s A 7 M d - s n S B o_ n s i A 0 (A v a i a e s V i 1 2 V h u u p i d z i m u s ) A u' z r r a \\ e z h c s t s i i v

n i

C T u l S u 2 u A e v s 0 l o S U 'M e e U s 'a 5 m u e e A r E t E ns R t v e l ..A 1 K 'C l ly/f. a &i l t Ac o n y o o 8 t A L&ki l e_ T A c r o s c / s l ( e A A x f s e V T G f r K u A \\ [d 7 ~ 7 l_ ~ b 6 J S' A e s S ~ W-A3 c f e v A A v /~e e i 3 O o C d-E-m e / 6 e o E \\ t 2 U A L e A e o e e 'e A 2 M o e o %A P s 6 e o 5 A t-u os v 2 e g 3 P z a a e _P h O_ E l s s o A rA R n e s j:k b A M 2_ s r A s u e r o 4, o r 1r 1 r 3 o Rs e 4 / A e s b 4 n u M-aA l (e 6 h-k s r t C n~ 4, sq dy h,% 1 i i 8 sc g e 6 e b % ay MK 6ea w9, 5 nL l

0. m A e A 2_l e

ur Qr 5u t e y o 8e y I l C I._ a u ma Qa t o A a c T .a e o l a E l h a c u e n C d I k '\\ o r f M n E C u e h e E gl e g k N O R A e 6R 6, L s c A A c %.v P b m D ( 1

l'

} t

,j I\\ 14 1' i' !,h. ); io} i. f j' ilM@i}n } p ]f1 j 1 mm:'j. u 7 { [- e /t J j }FA 'i ; i: i. j ': .l k. 3 L giiE" l3 8 Q Mp3r8 f i ~ O; p ~ - 0 4 t B s 2 s o 3 a k f a o o A A l n d e 4 d k l n y { a K K l s t A, A e.w r s. c-t n A I o s. s B A Kbv e s 3 h T v, Ba o n o A o } o A 7 m K a K o. 3 m S s s r A 5 la; x i A I 9 [ t t .i 0e O ,A o o e l 0 K n A 1 t o n s n f E r 7 o s,. 5 n C A ? 2

8. a L

K 3 9 5 T l A A B a A 3 8 R I T s 9l ts L A r 3d = .e A S A Ba A q, I X s s N S n a A A B j n s 'O i i I - s s. U v V s s i A s

4 sv l u
o n

i h v a u n i i l i t i4 U s h G 1 / d S

d r

u t o A t R l d 2 e n c e pl Ae n i l. v 5 S ll e t. i n a e a 2l n Ta l

s. S'

,u s f M l . ) C n l. l u u n a

v. a

( v A0. i A s. l n r v es l 8 fe l 2-u A e DRu s K F 9i s 5 e-4 e A o R % B i 1 L 9 e C } 9 l t ) B b 8 h L u Aa e M k A ?e N~ &l 4 d. 3 b /, / A ~ 3l b I .a _ c. R-a s a Eb e. E A_ c / a 'l C E A 1 K E r e s c f c_ L Net c, A }lS e_,. c a h o u e e A p e-v. .u ._ f s a . o a b E e En u e d A 9 2. b e v e o A a a Pb e o h l a o 2 2.gu A 9 o A s b h e

3ht, O

8e n a: a_ 4 N kh (C_ 6 0 A o . h G k_ k 4 4 6 t 9 n. r> D uL e c$ Ru W s 'o o F r nb 6 ui

e. 4 R nb 8e b s-r 1

A n y_ 8 e k_ l 1 h _v 8B A ey R m F e e b t m A Lo n e 1 v l e a ey A a s n e s n I I 1 i a s h a, EeA m ue $n - ~ r t e o e'aa a a e e n d b Q% d b eU I s oe e um d ,b L \\ l b u b 4 ) B % hd i % F A oa % LS s n n. n a 0-A. A C P C vc t / V / a ,'t nQ - 3 D i 6 C ( j j j )

_,...; v p..u-9,-3.c...m-:x:m--.g... .y.;; -- 3-., -

. v.v e ;.<.-.: ., _

.y. Attcchment 2 to Rsport on Cable Installation 7y7pp L 9 .I d x e t c g a a! E E k k ! O h x e c w c e X 4 [x*l s e-g g CC J g k Q Xh X 3.. e u. 05 e y to .. e o ${ a K E e gj yy* c 2 4 n< e u m

q m

x c h a u = e $. c C 6 C o-e = es s e n e n .n M I 00 rs j { ,h j f . 7,J e a ae ' e g y ? $ S t do-7s ? d d' s 4 4 x n m g h( h k,k Y.h I e t.5 .S 3 m 5 ga $2 e a ; e .a 2, 9-g q w a - 4 q .s 5

7 4

g,u a r q, g m

! c Y4 h =8 9n 3 3:

dh O e 3 <J g3 S $ Q i-3<}. n d5yd3 !@c a$ *!,4 b 2 s .; m g ,3 s q. g g w w i %u og g d CC W s s C N a ..- a J .S C o 'a h h k. D E q, e m4 E [ *f i k W J x a m 2 O J cl$ m') $y _<f .sj .i ya ,s E 't ad ,7..*d cdj o g 9 4 4"a 3 *8 d l 't sa g e a u, $ h 4 (4 Y !D !d M w u@ .g W -f s 8 4 a i g L,e w w e3 6 s, ~1: s E = -* ca ; s f,.1, % h 7 4 I I ~ t l ~ -y .s u 2 c 1.s t .s = s e-8] 5 .o e- -o e .c %yed gC o t f 9 = e g e 9 d(< e ) @) h) b .,0 -- a.-- - v

i l yhl5]hdl.k&dj]h(,,j-b f1)i\\ Ni{}a, !t,N ji j E:i i 'h I gy[n yO,g3 g gw c ^ g = = n a l a o. S g E n t 3 L-0 A a n 3 0 m e 8 k w-s 1 r o A t A, A ]= c o c a S s s A A a cr t o. Q A a. t ~ I TA A a A ,A A 2 A Y sS T h A o A, t s go l 6 s A A 3 o c a 1-om C S,. s s a 2 se c A g e. Ar TD A r A ra J A. no A,T a A K i A. A

s.

ea l A,9. S T oA l A aS n

s. o "s

1 A n o n o 9 o D A n-s o K 2 m h S - O A'd t A A a T H T s V r A A A T A A e-s i s A Aa u 9L a A n a 9n ivh a l s i u 7 u 3, i 9 n l u u R ;n s i L u. n S \\ L t aA %A , A.S ie s A u s i ^ O } V_ d_ h s u %_ A a S ll _ l_ F s ]i A cd: l ii \\ a _} L c s l r . l. l, .l u C-d n l .i A e & 2s a,sina A as L. a, e i sl A s& 6 ,l 65i Ns 6 a }s &Ml n l l a s n t, c A si l 1 a 1 s t sin ei 2

u. s i. S o.Ra l n

as / v n o A v e s / I 1 s un a Re Re A 'e A h e i ee R nh

^

n l l b k ? e. e b mc 2 l l a n 3 b A b ) p ,. n, 7 a a a e e A E. b d Aa c, a 3o s A v e 8 #' e. e E e a u t, E s,. A.s_e % e. u i u a a v 0 e A_ L n. a

6. ilk a

o u u u l t a o 9 P. e. s s0 b 6 a 1E b D. d. S D. h lP n J a H 4 I* s_ A. 6.~.h A i 1 S +s %.a s. L. u 5 d* e 3I 65 h h. e t ak 4 h 5 Ah L R. b 4 u o Qu d _ 6 0 e.u ( 6k 4 B A o6 B aL S"L b y e4 n e k. A h

I a

my m _ n e I l a ee y. een o n mu "s an 'w e y e ee a '* a eaa l n \\ en n l a l a a l l. t p h o s kl e h I" 4 h as l \\ a t e ) A A su eh d b {% h a e A a fL 0 R( 6 A eh g C k A ed 0ea3 a g R e O kv t RA R d C t f 't E(Q" ) 1 M D _5~ D. 2 ( ,. [? (2 G~ (2^ 2 ( i, lt

... :., -,. 3 ;..:::~.% : '.h.~.T.' z - . _~ '; ' "'~ " ~ T ?- W m*=t*'~':.W *

v ' m ~ ' ' ~. * - - " - : A -" ---

^ Attach::u:;nt 2 to Raport on Cable Installation I . i, [ l 1... I h h D l j t -[f I { y-y p l e c e t 7 H 'C 7 h & Q %..h ,/, aoi .* T '. k N ~ q f ^s dI h *d N. c C 94 Gm p n 3 @k 6C 7 h 7* 2 h 6 m Kh G a $ p s: .w K E A fN O b N$ k 2 pf f 4: 3 3

c E'

,f .a. c o a ,5 E.3 4 .5 6 T -A k. q kf2 ts .63 \\ } .S a h h ' '2 ' $n %.s 5 s n T.~j $ N "i m 5 0 O M a s > -r 2 g. t a h f,.3 % Q!C c 5 f()]. s a 3 s e N +$h ( s _M % b 3 h ma s-m c' %y i t e c *O Q g o< 9 I B 3 fr: e C a: .G a q f. M a m =. a g x. 6 3 s9d C Z d.1 8 9 T "i o e 7 -j 7 =# I 9 w 2 CJ J N S 4 E 4 6 a M*:'! gj 4 s .p 1 g-j.,4 s 3 ( =a y a r 9 o a O 9 L -f- < g3 a g t y %o a g 9 %( J NR Q 'A 1f en E g,$ g y Q ti 2 c n ], y m t a t

J

~ I ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ -

~ ~ ~ " ' - -'

_ __...-._._ m f._.

~ Attachmant 3 l NO PCTENTIAL POTENTIAL t;ENERIC CONCERNS GEhTRIC CDNCERNS 7* ? E 3 at s I ~ C i i 2 -L t 3 $_ t 3 4 t 8 e e t 7 8. 8. 3 1 2 3 u i i 3 2 : I I 3 m 2 L L t 8 t t 8 k 2 5 G 8 6 8 u Reme"'t 8 Cable SK W i V x 1AB55148 1 GA CAB 6909A 2 SH T T CAB 69098 2 SH I y 1BB2441B 3 GA x x 2sB4401E 4 SG x x 6 x seth =ca e* rahe th) 2AB5531A 5 SG x x i x t 1AB5301K 6 DG x i CBY3614A 7 DG x ! x 1AG1113E 8 SE x i ? x Bee fortre-te ! c ) 1BA0012A 9 SR x 6 i x 8 1BB5605A 10 SG x 6 i x 1885605B 10 SG x i 6 x i ISB5626A 10 SG x i t x 1B856268 10 SG x l x 1BB5636A 10 SG x ? x i i 1AB2327A 11 SG v i i xix i

x Catie van rew rked a

xe 2BB5626A 12 SG f x i i 1BB5610C 13 SG xe t i i y i 1AB17048 14 SG a x 1BB2444Q 15 SG i x6 i x twinue fat eg i [ j 1ArWC21B 16 GA t x 6 i x \\.. / 1ArWO82E 16 GA 1 x i ? ! X i i x cahim was reverk=4 231067A 17 R i ! x + *

i x i 2B1004A 18 R 2B1003A 18 R e

t l x ? i t x i 4 0AB6501N 19 SH x+ 1AB5526A 20 SG i i xtx 1AB55128 20 SG e i i x!x 2BB4401B 21 SG 6 t ( x!x 2BB4402B 21 SG rix i 1 6 xtx 2584406B 21 SG i i xix 2BB4405B 21 SG r x!x 2BB4409B 21 SG i i OAB6502M 22 SG i i i xix x!x 2AB6302K 22 SG 1 OAB4511H 23 SR 6 e >ix 1BQ403D 24 SG t j xa ?y cable wan r erkaa 1BQ403E 24 SG ! l x! !x *able was roerkad IDQ157A 25 SR x x i

1DQ396D 25 SR x

x 1DQ396r 25 SR x x i 1DQ396H 25 SR x x 1DQ396L 25 SR x x 1DQ396T 25 SR x x 25 SR r r 1DQ177E IDQ177D 25 SR r v 1DQ177F 25 SR x v i 1DQ173D 25 SR r r 1DQ173E 25 SR r r 1DQ173r 25 SR r v IDQ181B 25 SR r r 1DQ181D 25 SR r r 1DQ181r 25 SR r v 1DQ181H 25 SR v v !Y 1 AB23411 26 SG x TOTAL s s e h

ni b5 - A tt t?

LEGEND GA General Auxiliary DG Diesel Generator R Reactor SH Service Water SE Safety Eq1upment /3 SR Spreading Ih3cm SG 1E Ssitchgear Room kw NCftES (a) Tied to last rung of riser 38,* the total of the bottom (b) Although the total of the 'No Concerns

column is row is 39 because Sketch 5 has a dual condition.

(c) 7he cable routing as designed was to the wrong control panel compartment. Construction discovered and corrected the err >r during termination. i

i Attar hmant 3 % Report on Cablo Inctallation s f t w r. uni,CNS g e { 1. Co. d by Analysis J' }l.' e i The actual cable installatiov'did not #14 = a. the dee4 W racewa@ { f vias. Sarefore, ths. =h of a cable would only make the thermal / analysis. W far tray w 4-* and overfilled. af more con-cervative. ,s I ) ~ 2. W i== criteria l Se tray M "' critaria requires wrapping of the affected tray y. 4 1 ancL at least 12 inches in adjacent. trays. l i i.

a. arm a

= I I cables may be6 rina. = +, = M ar 'airiined. fee a== distance. af three fest upon leavizar the physical confines of' **1ed raceway Geferance: I E-42Q, Sheet 5). 4. c h _on wr==1ata cable Pulling - 14en a cable is completely pulled tight into au raceways a the problemt with cables 1WM out from ana tray to another will be cor-rected. cable-Mrminatione - 1een construction attempts to terminate a cable and 8 du-eat es cab 1. a -e a e. correct -t of ee gene 1, i or the cable is not at the equipment to which the cable is to be

==4 n=ted, Field Engineering is notified and the condition is corrected.

-,y- -w-ww-wy--w-w- - - - - = - e ,w,-+y- .-,e,,,,-g,,,.-wwww--Nwwwe<*-*--*'=r-'erwwwwwwweh w N-m vr'N-wv7-"Wvvm M*'w rw e p vevw-==ty y tw-w-t9'W-W9 &-**e--***-P"*=*-

-~_.u-... 1 l 5. Separatiori, Appendix R [ l ~ h design criteria is based on FSAR, ?pdix 9A.1.8.3 for achieving and main *=4=47 safe shutdown after a fire (Raference: General Design criteria 10CFR, 1 W 4x R). f f I I t 6. Seperation, nequlatory maide 1.75 The Design criteria is based on FSAR, W4 x 3A for achieving physical f f ind W of electrical systems.. f 1 i i 1 1 7. QC Area Wm11rdawn f During final area turnover, QC shall verify, in accordance with PQCI 7220/E-. 3.0, that cables maintain the separation distances as shown in Drawing 7220-E-47, Paragraphs. 5.1.3 and 5.1.4r and that all cable installations maintain the proper voltage separation. 8. Thermal Analysis When a tray is wrapped or overfilled, heat generated from cables in that tray must be taken into consideration. If.a cable is pulled into a tray without j l I Project =-$ _IM's knowledge, the thermal analysis will not include that f cable, bat conservative analytical " ' -4, and.1;-mh dmocribed in Sections III and.17 resolve ths. annaarn. I e 9 0 3-11 9 p -w-'..% /,..-._...., - -, _,,,,,_,,,,, _ _ _,,.., _,,.

j 3 i _a j Midland Plant Units'l and 2 to j Report on Cable Installation 4 S i s i l b8u'#485Sif 8 SA'.i (;,.._. y. y7 4_ _.__ [.. .. 7_... _,_.2 l %>. .6 i Av f- +:aw.. s-. i ..hsw = a . 6g ,E w ma d % m.ar. s. I ygy y.y g,y =4 l AN., g m$M ge M M MM 1 ~.. x x

s..

x - t a a .. ~ Nelm Tr*h, k E 31 C a h. w. % p. I s. ) ppany n t b o r A 1.:o Tr Anot.. r i t 4 As%\\ rew%p. t s '. l Sec., A. A* bas.

to n Arboy t

"u'* Arou== ===r aussy' ' w wy .g 4 i s l .i t 1 I '. [ -w- ,(-- ,au A-,' 4. D%

n.,h. p.

g. ., e

Midland Plant Unita 1 and 2 to Report on Cable Installation 5, SK-1 y,' Description of Basic Concern This cable was passed through the wrong Nelson transit (cable seal) window. Both the right and wrong window were for power cables. However, because of the closeness of power and instrument penetrations in the plant, our basic concern was a possible voltage violation if this problem were repeated with a Power cable being passed through an instrument cable window. Reason for No Concern j Quality control will inspect all cable transitions from one raceway to another; this inspection will eliminate this concern. } I E 0 f I l t I r h P r O 3-1 t . --.-.:.w..... i

.y- __ a (.$fe, G 4 R~L TCsf $ & G8kkWN (,p g M 8==d Midland Plant Units 1 and 2

to SE*.[T Report on Cable Installation s

O i t ggg ~ nse.o t 1hy A$ Rot e e. rat $$R o.1 s .%a---- >.ml 1 g .g .. I... a

't gay..gfyygsg.r '.__ :

'.o6 i o d =.-C.abis.pf resded-by Field . ek.k shmk, 6 s -Tux E 17 . m... .....W ..._._..] e e ___a_ m.: .~~>- ~. n---" ' -r *~ %* * '-~;

A.

Midicnd Plent Unito 1 cnd 2 to j Report on Cable Installation c; SK-2 Description of Basic Concern i Accountability; i.e., not knowing where a cable is pulled. Reason for No Concern The actual cable installation did not use all the designed raceway vias. Therefore, the absence of a cable would only make thermal analysis more conservative. i Q3 9% e 4 3-2

C ....yy. .sg.. " '.** "" Attachment-Milll~anI P1I't'6n'its 1 and' 2 ~"~~~~~ Ce@ Me. ad O=*.b. to -~ - . Id.stf M. Rep, ort,op C4S e Installation._ T ( y; _. .-).. .s..-......_..1 .I t g t s l ..1 .( I L t t I I I s. - g ...l 4 g ) i .i i*4 s s s i i i .a .. r. i O ._. n. z . J. l v.1... ' i '_.'..L.1.... _... t . r.. a. + +...; 3 _ ...J.__: ., _..e 1 t I t t i t. 4 s-r. m i i + 3. : i i.i.. 1 4 o i.. a . v. c am.i.. . y;. m a_. _ _i i ~ J _, I 6 _.... =.._.... _ _ _ _.. _.. _.. _.....____.y__. l w .= _.. _%..is.'ae.Mns+=Hed.. e.><aL N6..L.L 4.y 4wt..Jwjr..:. a._ a _ _. _._. _ cy_ . Mfs.,.,pg5 n, f 6.d...'By.fts//... ' _.. _. .m care.cktd.._...__L s, - %. e. n..... = i .i. ii s s g... ..w _.m ....u. g g.. l \\ I g I w^ g s* 1 o.. a.s* .__gi.QL.'. i ^*L

i I I Midland Plant Units 1 and 2 ! to l Report on Cable Installation j \\ \\ \\_).- SK-3 I t I Description of Basic Concern i s The subject cable enters the confines of an additional raceway. If the trays containing subject cable were required to be [ wrapped, how do we make sure that the cable portion in the unlisted via is protected. f ( i Reason for No Concern f 1 When a cable enters the confines of additional vias, the tray j wrapping criteria would require wrapping approximately 12 more inches at each end for safety. I ) i I .5 1 t P I ?-! t f i i i t 1 t J 3-3 1 l

~ ~~ ~ ^ ^' m-m_. _ ..e w-p==... ny = -f .C G

Midland Plant Unito 1 and 2

' M ') ph. to i Report on Cable Installatiers "w x:..:_ ___...,._j _ .. _ _... _ _......m. 4 s 2 ~. 4 i i. ,.. v .- -.g - . - t. j i ,e .,.F. l. 1 g g ! t i e i l j-a 1 o .. _, _ __ _ m. _. -... 5 1 g 1 i, s._;.. _; _ ..._ _a .,_.s.... t __i... . Y. . gfg g.. ) B _.i 1 ._ r. . r : , _ i _... ~ I .t f_.. - 1 t i, g t g i 1 I i i { t i m. 1 L i. I ,e i 1. i 1 (E, : i..:_.._;_ '..... 1._ l L. -i .;.?' i p., a si;1 PS. f.. f ; i . v. 1 i I J. :. ._.i_. ..t._ ..Tr 1.t.!au.i.nd llc 2 ye't.'536:2 L.hy;wh d.upy > i. i

i..

i, i

1.....

Chh : ts...& tel. by f.=M !.. 2 ~., i

-..=

)c hk.. iA.ta 4. :..ha. K-? E.

+ r _.._.. _ __.__._ 1 9 - - e. g g c. \\ l l m l

7 r

-m uw:-a...,w- -u ,q,,c, .,g, ,,y ,,y y ..=e- "7

i I MidlEnd Pltnt Unita 1 and 2 to l Report on Cable Installation l SK-4 l }; i Description of Basic Concern p The subject cable enters the confines of an additional raceway. If the trays containing subject cable were required to be l wrapped, how do we make sure that the cable is protected. ? t Reason for No Concern When a cable enters the confines of additional vias, the tray wrapping criteria would require wrapping to the edge of the violation and approximately 12 more inches at each end for safety. OD f ( ) \\. / ' 3-4 c..+..-.

{

v. ~

__ 7,- gg,p- - _ i bk%L E i \\. CM g, M g.[ Midland Plant Units 1 and 2 s to - l 5LSl*hi y.--*~'- Report on Cable Installation j i

c. 2

R# ar nem j

s ... )J i r_ i h I. ._.s. a j i i i t i C.,_ '., I l _TY.Risst._ :.: L... ) .a s p_.._. . g.g n...._._. - _.._ _.._. 1 g I, i i 1 e. .] 1 1 Mcc,. i 2355 (._ _ ___.. /..r. j _., p,.. 4 1 i 70." Ex) a c Lle .... ___SX-S*E' t., e. (9s a3, _ n... ~ i Do to S:je of c.,L.iu. G-/h.,C.4/e.'is #, N I ... _.in fht. Cn%es of r seh Tley ittset. 8 ASSOl.. R:r.hore. Roenf. Lie 'Pa.e E-M3. IasL % $.', 3RSL913 '.. { MR r i

t%3 s

w ~ .,b ) M . c.a%. ts.ros kel-Ly htJ Ca . V s m u ta h e. r o s + s & q a.n. F,.t 7 w ,_,,,,--.mnw*d***"'+ s j, ook b- ' * ' ' '~ d d6 es.'a & e--- - - -~

w

Mid1cnd Plcnt Units 1 cnd 2 to Report on Cable Installation OQ SK-5A and SB ~ Description of Basic Concern - SK-5A The subject cable enters the confines of additional raceway. Also, if the subject cable was required to be wrapped, how do.we i make sure that the cable is protected. Reason for No Concern When a cable enters the confines of additional vias, the tray wrapping criteria would require wrapping to the edge of the violation and approximately 12 more inches at each end for l safety. Description of Basic Concern - SK-5B cable is airlined, and is not in the riser. It also enters the wrong slot number of the motor control center (Mcc). The same slot has two numbers for ease of computer installation. Inspector might read the wrong number. p 3, Reason for No Concern f 3 A cable can be airlined 3 feet without engineering approval. The cable enters the correct stack (the subject stack of this MCC has t two slot numbers; i.e., one opening, two numbers). i 3 i i i l k i dU b J 3-5 1 I I -. l

.._._u. Cdr . M B s 3 c t k '. =l.. Mi41n.n. d.. P l..a. n.t. U. nit.s 1 a.n. d. 2. Xttachment to DM[ Report on Cable.Installatic.n.... _s .....t s, s .s. __y _ 5. ... ~. -- .ay.. _ y. q-., f3 1 :i !

- I 11 i

<- i i ( =f ; - . _ __ i. __i...: i 4 I e 3 .. ASUIf/.... i. __;. b. ? '_. ASLT_Af.f" A,...".. _. t. i r .t., t ,is 1 y a.__._._... .i t. o

i 4

g, - M...._.!... r. . - - a...:_.:. .n.. _-t t it i ..i ,F i. i, i i i

1. :

1 1_. 8 i l ^ i. ,1 i i '1 1 1 c Mer i

.i

_ _. I _..t._. I l .. _. ~.. _ _. 1 b i .s-5....,. .r..;..... ___. 1._j l ... - t ~ C4..Me.. Le redsd-6.@ ell. ' ' ' ..,[ f =- S. S L J. b e... r o. e

9.,7,

.,,.i _a_ i.: i,i .-..._.-_w_-.... t. _,... I.

... u....;

y _. = e y, i ., _, _ _.. ~,.

_2_.._ .-_-.._ -.._._...I_ ..[~~' ( i Midlend Plcnt Unita 1 cnd 2 to l Report on Cable Installation l SK-6 -a Description of Basic Concern Cable enters the wrong stack of the motor control center. Reason for No Concern A cable can enter any stack of a motor control center and be j terminated because motor control canters are separated by channel. i l i s i i f I s f I 3-6 i I

l -~ g_,

hQg, C @ M / % *

Midland Plant Units 1 and 2 O S. g Report on cable Insta11at to dssyn

s. ~

. ~........__. t y.o.L./a.../:...?/.:./....:/

. /

/ : /. /- _ / / wi]_/-+-/-- _/--/ - / /. / / / / / ~~ n ._ ESL U b. 'E s'L n.. E 5'l.*r3 B * . ? n t

,i r

i ,I. u._ _.. _ -.. .t s.._.. i WC. g t. ,L I r i f I 3 i am.am. m., i l c y t i / 5 i 1, .~ -} L &g .e i u.t. ' CJe. Is roe ~te.d4 Re.td . C M e 5A,e.JJ bs. ro -3.7 i e 6 1 n.~ W --n .:,-..a..L.*d m

~- Midit.nd Plcnt Units 1 and 2 to Report on Cable Installation ') SK-7 v Description of Basic Concern Cable enters the wrong stack of the motor control center. Reason for No Concern A cable can enter any stack of a motor control center and be terminated because motor control centers are separated by channel. O__,; ~ ~ U e / o e 3-7 "27"J7:2~ ~ ~

~~~ - - - - - - - ' ' ~ ~. ' ~ b ~ * ' kbN[..... T Midland Plant Units 1 and 2 C,..,. d '"*..., to Report on Cable Installat s......_.. T .D.e.si W 8 t 8 s *.

l. 8 n

~ i 6 s l. s e s =' { t t e I .g I ( L l l i e e e f i -l

e

.II j.i:: e i i r i t...- e -s { l _ s. g..-- j i I,. i.*. ; ,i..._... .en g._ - . ~. _ s. .,a e.a. m q,R of _I g g *. g e e . =. _.. _ _ _C a.. _..._._ y__. _. + ___ few g e

L

. 4 ,I g g g t t t I .I g l g I s8 e g g _..y...-- 5 =. I i } .f-t. 3 e 1 = y, t.. m- .t f.' .y. ... r I_. 1.. I y p. i .yg h, 7 r, a 8 e l i ..m ..m ., S. M g e 1 \\ g -.g.. ,..w ..4 8 g .--.L.....- 8 e c, l g e g..... e e n. l .*e l..: g... ...g = g. \\..-

3==.

2.. ...J. l.* _s. 1 1 ~ . 3.. $4 Asu.u_ ~. n sLT34 ; n rL1.5s_** ~ 8_ g (. a. 7 3 3._ g. tINM "T" WW

h. M TN

.T*l.s 5 T r' y p u ur.87 75ppuu rrsug'.T n.u vruna su.yTg ps WTTW & NW u uswPT-E'44 NTI 53.'F 8 FF'I T

'-T V '

m. s

',-e-.-- 6 .u.- ^ ^

~ I i Midicnd Plcnt Units 1 cnd 2 ! to Report on Cable Installation i t SK-8 i Description of Basic Concern Cable was routed to the wrong compartment of the control panel. Field discovered E37 error then pulled and terminated cable at the correct compartment. E37 did not reflect as-built condition. { t I Reason for No Concern When construction attempts to terminate a cable and discovers l that the cable is in the wrong compartment, field engineering is L notified of the problem. [ i i I t i i i I - t f I i l l r I l t 3-8 i: b t -,_.n-ie e a = - - * - - * = ~ * - - - ~"

M_.. (.-. : -. y __..gpa.. g CCGte ..N s. 'f.O ' to ~ Report on Cable Installation .T. r ; 3 s .h. 7. f g t 1 ,v .l ( .. 4 1 t .g s g.g g i j g a 4 g g 3 g . ~.* ~ l. .'~; [ 1 1 . s e = e f m. l l*- t . 64 3

.I I

i. i b 3 Y I _t s a, I 3 s .i : e. g s.a 4 ._._,i ._L.. =... ,g.. 1 B M.;.. 4. _ F. 913.'... B I...

i...

i 1 ,i c. ...... c.... - - N. v . w, uni. _: r m 4

- 5 i-

_..L._,r g~._ i. 1. '_ _:- i, o i. i .:.I i.. r. i _i I.: I-i i i i l.! i lI } I t_ t I !. i i . _ i.._., t. t. U E..'tu..'_ E h.1-S... l i .s..w.. g t r !k. x.rC.',-~~~.T.~.2Clo....:. _.... - u---- ut.e. 5LM & e... ita.f /_fi.d_L_'_ :) !1 1-i ..pe= y rN 1 t ._._. ___..._T i . '._.. t i .i: .. n ,.1.... _... I ...__L.. ___ u. .i.: i. 1 t-s, .t I j a i 4 l 8

t.... l 4

t E 1 1 e 4 L.. 1 i e a. .I -...m 1 a 4 I 4 g .._.,l. <.. l s

3..

I a. .g { s g j l t..._. t. t_

i...t.

l 5 I e i f...:. - _.-_3 s -..s. s e-1 e

]._._..,-...,..._q.....

,.p: ... e g . 6. t. .l _t i -.i.~ ~ N e v.g , ' * * * * - - ~ = ? 4. \\- .F h ape.

- -b\\

aM*gqg + +

Midland Plcnt Unita 1 cnd 2 to Report on Cable Installation SK-9 .a Description of Basic Concern Accountability; i.e., not knowing where a cable is pulled. jteason for No Concern Engineering designed the cable to be airlined between E37 designated vias. The criteria, when in a case like this a Class IE cable leaves the confines of a raceway, the subject cable will be visually inspected for possible separation violation. This inspection will discover this problem. O% 9 C 3-9 r~ - __L_____- ~~

Cable?"~ IBasnitte YE. ' Pwe't-??B' /Jea".tsssM 4,E /0~ - - - ~ - gggM y, Midland Plant. Units 1 and 2 , to' D48. M. / Report on Cable Installation "fF

E.If 4 R..
Y D IC E. I A y Is'g s. -

^- Wet

1xoM pHoc.~,

j l. s w. __.i _ i i ;. i i t c._ )==" -= =r M _l t

(-

} S l e l' l l .3... t g , i 1 ssis_.21 s st ra.t

sszm, nu.m

.xtL n 1 esi vs.s-t s L s 1 to m t.r . =. g t. ..l. _. g. ___ t e

8 d

I m. m,gsc,ogg. ___..... ....._... anspst__..wisa.tgx.r, " 188560$'B. , ra c!.c.. -_.. Ixt.ms..h5 - _) i r: _ _ i. i_. 1_.... _._.. _..._,'3 g (p _ .... _. ~.. 8 ...._.._....v,. ._.i.._. t _.+ u C. bis as peu.ted. 'ay' Deld. caste..suaJ.3 - n,z.,........... '~ '37. .)3 s (a w

.a==

I - - =. .o,, a.g, .mx ,e' O. L _____i_________.________.--------_. ~h.W~*W ~

- a. Midlcnd Plcnt Unita 1 cnd 2 to Report on Cable Installation SK-10 s. Description of Basic Concern Cables are airlined, and are not in the riser. Reason for No Concern A cable can be airlined 3 feet without engineering approval. ) 03 3-10

M e.* '/432327 * ..Q~ jj 6# Midland Plant Units 3 and 2 - to %g,, # .j hport on Cable Insta11at s 1 I .......-.-..............a. -1 \\ . ;. pay'ttset. afuer , fray tesst ns'Mos *.. ~ ~~~

* - - " ~

As or q g l J 1 - e 4 r 6 . e, c _.. -.. ~.. t .....g._. . f 1 g g t a L~ ~ ~ ~ s i nr L 2 T V ec, 3 p,. c.bts 1.s %Asd-L F.*std M

h. amma.m.

.........' ~ _

e. eden.

t t,. C k t be.-- r E- ?- . a. g (_ e e n ~ n.. w - u:n %

* ~ ~ " ' ~ ~ ' * ' *-
!'~~

~

Midland Plant Unito 1 and 2 - to Report on Cable Installation ) SK-li s Description of Basic Concern i Cable was pulled into tray AJM03 without engineering's knowledge. Reason for Concern Accountability; i.e., not knowing where a cable is pulled. This l problem may have an adverse affect on thermal analysis. When a tray is wrapped, heat generated from cables in the tray must be taken into consideration. If a cable were pulled into that tray and engineering was not aware of it, the thermal analysis would not include that cable. i 4 0 .i f t I < r l lCT l 3-11 ) l

~ h kIc* 2PSJ5SEM Jt. /2 bd I D-l Midland Plant Units 1 and 2 C g h g h g,f.* g to Report on Cable Installation i ./ t* .Tr* s11R k'M03 'reaY % X M e 4 f r a y B k n o t " f u '5 k M. o t /_. Yt**41tfkOY tfA'0 A BfkOf ,, n frey gyggy = s%- , -- y ur y a n,<. .r t fx' .I gfA,st4 ggA i V 4., It26 937 939 92 7 #fl920 1 i c k te is Rewtscl - ky O f4 c a. L le. S l,e n i d L e. ~. % n. 5 3 7 i .) &); i e t I [ .7 a s.4

Midicnd Plcnt Unito 1 and 2 to Report on Cable Installation e, SK-12 y Description of Basic Concern Cable was not installed as routed in E37 and a voltage violation was created when a power cable was run in an instrumentation tray. Reason for No Concern Quality control will inspect all cable transitions from one raceway to another; this inspection will eliminate this concern. [r l (~D o 3-12

* * * *~
90J Ur IO C,,

"f jf Midland Plant Units 1 and 2 Df,,$.)A

to Report on Cable Installati 8

.e 1 '-4 %y 3XMofe y j L YAYNYAO$ i X.,.i.s I g% I s g N s e a ~ a _I t ) I h ala-/,ne is

cerp f 4/e.....

t pe.it. K-42., :... .g l r, [ nnua TCL921 t ,l i, 22 Fs.N. . IB.Tto .... _... ~.. y cd f.e..;s re-ted - by fhtJ.._. c ble sAmtJ be - T+a E.?> ~

.9 h

. e., y. e : W. _' ---~ - ~ ' ' j,[.; ,;;,~ ~ ~ ~ v __s + e5 e.e A - -_:___=------_---

~. -. ..:-~-- - ~ - - - - - Midland Plant Unito 1 and 2 to Report on Cable Installation SK-13 kJ Description of Basic Concern Accountability; i.e., not knowing where a cable is pulled. Reason for No Concern The actual cable installation did not use all the designed raceway vias. Therefore, the absence of a cable would only make thermal analysis more conservative. O

ee J

C i \\ l 3-13 t - -- 4 =

va.w "~] Ass 76[B-EX'/4 Agf g 88 3-l S. Midland Pla t Units 1 and 2 4ongWg## . to s neport on cable Insta11at s t v e T*AY# Ake og a u le t.ondutWn ke.cM f h. -~. _.. ~s t \\ I 1 .L v.- - -. m t ') ~ ~ - - ~I L my m_ n o. s 4 W., t s..t w.+ ~ ~ ca.Ve, skodt &. e.A-b4'hu -- ~ bs~ - k..K 27 . e t e. = 8 __ .~;=.-... ~ .J.. = e l t.- M =-7 e

+**+-6.e w

. e.E em,. aw y w.-r w-- ,r m'..*een.- , N, ns ,.ar-e W . S.6 g q -p 0 w w V s-v'

- -- - ~- -- -- - - ?- i Midlcnd Plcnt Unita 1 cnd 2 > to l Report on Cable Installation ( ,O i Q SK-14 i s.s 1 Description of Basic Concern i i The subject cable enters the confines of additional raceway. If the trays containing the subject cable were required to be wrapped, how do we make sure that the cable portion in the unlisted via is protected. ? I Reason for No Concern i i l When a cable enters the confines of additional vias, the tray wrapping criteria would require wrapping approximately 12 more { inches at each end for safety. l t t t t i a es I \\m I ) t I ' i I I h -t 6 i l i i l i 1 I i [ 3-14 i l i .p 9 w.. yy j e r.- 9 D' e P

.m. m ~ ~ - ~ -~~~ ~ '~~~ cab \\e # 18824D Q d Cod e

d-l nialana vignt units r ana 2 Attachment to..

MS R U C. 1 O M 1 Report on cable Installati, j T. .s t .g dau 4 tea b last Roug es el.see _....

Tk A1, g;,,

ISTH it h,-,f my 18 KAo6 / l. l... l l. t MC c. rnc c w. IBa4 18.s 5 t 1 .i ( 1 1 ..~ Adual cAWe goute W O... elcl.. i Cable. Rou+e. pe.e. E.3'.7__ ,. - ) t _.. v = w y r

i i Midland Plant Units 1 and 2 to i Report on Cable Installation SK-15 l l Description of Basic Concern l l } Cable is pulled into BJH11 which was not one of its assigned i vias. ) Reason for No Concern l i The cable is only tied to the last rung of the riser, and will not contribute to thermal loading of the riser. ( i I I i { t i s O' [ l f i [ l OJ 6 3-15 l i ? o - L..L. lL, _ - - - *.. L " ~ e +- - -

L~ i --- L - \\ 'cL%\\< /8FWO;t1B and IMftJc83E M -/& M Q g-(**l Midland Plant Units 1 and 2 C,C n8/f*4 M to Report on Cable Installat -g i ..) od l i ~., ~

* =
I Confutt? M.YB0/8

~ 1 i e i ) .q .s n ..I .f Qj lL 1 u...-._... ... ' ' ~rr#fGTrM J. i u .i s.. t

- C4/c. i.s es*fst-67 h*//.

' 5.' --.- ~ - -- cats.hoat) b e. 'Psn A' 37. i "i. C.akls5 t.vc,1t.e. /daped aa.+ o f' M t.. lasfhm. d. ft y.. A5tM uA is+0 conhti, Af8016 ro +Asf Atin. ke.n d it.adt;.was a noi. bs wol +ca.an&+'on e-ra etcsUs p ll,ny. ...O j n.. C ' Codiffaw a.+ ktsaw fr tntny. Q c to Jnr>ec.f 'R4=l -IAinty ' o,nl %4fing c/w+ atm watkdows. i i ~ ~-

.--.--.-r A. 2'-

, an.

Midland Plcnt Units 1 and 2 to Report on Cable Installation SK-16 i Description of Basic Concern cables looped out the bottom of tray AJB14 into tray AJT14. Reason for No Concern f As a normal procedure, construction eliminates all slack from cables before tying them down. With this procedure accomplished, this concern will not be a problem. 1 O_ 3-16 z m.1 - 2 . r s.

Midland Plant Unito 1 cnd 2 to Cable * & BI 067 A Report on Cable Installation Ced e

D -l

~ $ n k.l. bAJSkR.OCki O M ..) (, / Y tc y=/ . kff f~gf N &f. 2Z l3a i 3 o l g =.. . __r.RpN 2 SVA o c [ 2 2.1 3. 3 - D. 7.28V_A0 .m - TR AY 2 BVA 9 8 --.-

e o

c A\\e. noub:. pes. E-a?..__ =- j ~"& Yh ' DU

N

=. _. 'e s. 1 g _m '[ _8

--. - ~. - - - - - - - -. - - - Midland Plcnt Unito 1 and 2 to Report on Cable Installation C SK-17 Description of Basic Concern Cable is pulled to the wrong penetration. Reason for No Concern When construction attempts to terminate a cable at a penetration and discovers that the cable is not at the proper penetration, field engineering is notified of the problem. O/

ee e

e 3-17 u_

7 \\ C.a.Ve., 3BIco4R and.kBI003 9 .S% ty. C, og[s. "3 * / Midland Plant Units 1 and 2 gggggg e$ to Report on Cable Installation ,u ,y

c<aur i n

i[ rr.ay amoi Ja_FMd'*f __._._._.g--.---. n ir=#y. c _. }da.k.. l 1svens s azas <i i i A k t Eud s i.eaa n rsat maon L..~a _.[. e g ~ .. J _.. C bdm;t.* 3nvnoer y Cosidwit 2BvAccr Instaltsd sf te e.emmest. Ew). lee.i; s_. Skowld run to 3.BVAct t 19" Info eJjetn:y funt $< s.% C*klas ut s pet K 37 Am** tvSooJ. Bushi tvnt8. BVA9f.. bus te IasetAsd.Ndl le**h'.3vd**f Rvd47 C. W. Is rew+s/ "By 9:stJ y ..__ g g - --.- c u, s k.,.t 4 L. - ha c-2 7 --__----.-.-----A-- --=.m-

war

...,--,,i,,m,-

Midlcnd Plant Unita 1 and 2 l to Report on Cable Installation I i SK-18 i u.- I Description of Basic Concern Because of incorrect conduit installation, the cable was pulled i incorrectly. ' Reason for No Concern j The subject conduit installation had not been inspected by i quality control. On discovering the incorrect conduit installation, cable misinstallation would have been corrected. t h-2 i i i 9 I ( i I .t I 3-18 t i I f ..,s

C,a.V.e *- -.. OAB6,50/N M /f ggg $ g.l s Midland Plant

Units 1 and 2 hdMW&kd4 to Report on Cable Installation

( )3 k, v. 4 (1 f,; W'., i ~ t $yAsfoe bydsdas tl [ y 4s = I q .._......_...._..._.t u . s 4 a 3,. Covdw t

ntn o31 %et Ilsd at feconnu.+ :G/./esakon.

i Skew \\d ras +o AsRo9 216" Info adjo:st 3 faay ses \\ s .C o. V t. w s 'p s u. K.31 ame.; MRon $TRo9 . ASRCS i i. khe. to tsunnss+ Ewa tes-Hen'. Mnon ~ MR 0 6... l _ 3l I i l (+ r I.s t' ) L I I ~r X A l --E---

Midland Plant Unita 1 and 2 to Report on Cable Installation SK-19 g Description of Basic Concern Accountability; i.e., not knowing where a cable is pulled. Reason for No Concern The actual cable installation did not use all the designed raceway vias. Therefore, the absence of a cable would only make thermal analysis more conservative. li CO 3-19 m .~ ~

~.' cable." IREffab M_. -and. Iggys4'ty... SK 26 CAle. "" b-l Midland Plant

Units 1 and 2

' to bO "8

M Report on Cable Installation O

i I r-t LyTJsn RTMD6 Treytust nTAA*4 h \\ \\ m m r l l . ' A_kAoS ? Mknob I ~ i- -.s / we# x l N w q ~. % nn o.I. c o '3 'y' A90s - -"/ n.Thob ' 1 ~ nov i r--- 4 l t I I a f s l,3 A5LTp1 g g A$L*10's ( IRas.rakR.. .IA a.r.s 4 3. ..... '. - 1 ~.. r + .N _ _s \\ C aLle. Is ros +ed - by %sta \\ 1 I c.&tesA4&a h M7 i g { ~. ?,.n. g.-- SL.-+ '? ~., a

Midltnd Plcnt Unito 1 and 2 to Report on Cable Installation ] SK-20 Description of Basic Concern Cables were pulled into trays AKA06 and AJA06, which were listed as vias in E37, without engineering's knowledge. Reason for Concern + Accountability; i.e., not knowing where a cable is pulled. This problem may have an adverse affect on thermal analysis. When a tray is wrapped, heat generated from cables in the tray must be taken into consideration. If a cable were pulled into that tray and engineering was not aware of it, the thermal analysis would not include that cable. 4 6 1%

ee i

I P t h 3-20 l . [ J-

r ~- ^ ~ ' ' ~ ' ' ' ^ ^ .. ~ -. --- _C,ainte. ** 3BBPip)B. 033 .053 otoB c4 B ' "~ ~ Sr.y M 8-Midland Plant Units 1 and 2 $dyg,ffFt.4.C,h* ppt i.# to Report on Cable Installation T t ./ l t ( l mi stu*a t 'W' g n[ c 'T f,.g o '116$1356N: 0 I V t.r l 0 I~ L- _. ' - - 't t D .yAnY kknot... i ruy weet yinkt m ov m.. _. e u ., Q~ m -. -- ~ q f l g I m z.- ggtygy. . [... .4~ L ....~... l ,1 .. l g gg y.r g 6 225MelB. 288@s'B - gok . on5 ~. C. alls ts. touisd. b hst). v oft. f ..._ T- :--- _ ~- c< st< sbutJ 1>s-k. &27 - L .es s.) e - ^ .m. e W _

---7------------- l I Midicnd Plcnt Unita 1 and 2 ! to Report on Cable Installation ( L' l i SK-21 ( Description of Basic Concern i Cables were pulled into tray BJM02, not in E37 vias, without l engineering's knowledge. t Reason for Concern Accountability; i.e., not knowing where a cable is pulled. This I problem may have an adverse affect on thermal analysis. l When a tray is wrapped, heat generated from cables in the tray l must be taken into consideration. If a cable were pulled into j that tray and engineering was not aware of it, the thermal analysis would not include that cable. f i i I I f i t o;.. u i i r i i i l t I l c 3-21 } i L I i .h.'. ~ ~. _ .,j,

,.a 4 a. gg # pg - w.* wem L cant 2RDb303M SO$ ve Midland Plant bnits 1 and 2 6@Mg[X.&4CrYiOM ~ to Report on Cable Installation 3AkMoM Mkne2 nknen 11kaet f' (-_ a T s i o ' fray'5Liten Akf i Atti.tne. e

a f

' Ace,9tek ~ P4.a E C i o. -fea4 I A;tl04. M.'ffe.1 v M5MA e 2, MTfel '.^. I.... ,.a - - J) e.. -m )* ~ ~ s t.ab!<. ts % 4 s d - h,t -'.~ ~ w - ~.--- uble. 5%stJ L e ~ Pen 531... ee e .e .m. e ee o e .e...e O e ee. e. e. i e ~ l e e e e e se e e e e e o.e e e oe e e o ..O e . = e

9 em o e....

==. *. * - e e. O e .Oe m.e." e .s m .e. o ..{' e v W m. e ,,7 ,,,,'[ ^ 4. w _________.A~_S*Y s

^ ^ ~

j l e Midicnd Plant Unita 1 and 2 l to Report on Cable Installation \\ SK-22 I Description of Basic Concern t Cables were pulled into tray AKA01, not in E37 vias, without f engineering's knowledge. t I Reason for Concern i i Accountability; i.e., not knowing where a cable is pulled. This problem may have an adverse affect on thermal analysis. When a tray is wrapped, heat generated from cables in-that tray must be taken into consideration. If a cable were pulled into l that tray and engineering was not aware of it, the thermal analysis would not include that cable. i ? r t

== L ) 1 i r i i h i h I i i f l i [ 6 1 3-22 I l e -h ...-[ m v s -

i - '~-- - 1 C abla ~~ cMB %f//.N ~ y CFd S.. D*I Midland Plant Units 1 and 2 I C,pq ffmada.Ye*Ps

e. to Report on Cable Installa

) . _J.. l l l l [ i I t I "frev #FFef. i f Affo4, AFB 08 AF807 ' T gwy q r,- / ~~ ,J. nfcon 970 8 .. Arco 1. /. f f ,w nset, - ~. (f ,, / = n fh.T ~' $f809 4FRIO C.aLfs Is en+sd ~. by CstJ cells. AJJ 1. - M E-37 O gr" ' ( i 1 i "'W NN W Nr 45 vg.p ,w W M.M D .T " M 8 h-L .. -n. e,p e p.H nm',g.gf ..... -.. ^ ...m', _j

~ __.__.-__._.__._.i l Midicnd Plant Units 1 and 2 . to l Report on Cable Installation f i I SK-23 Description of Basic Concern Cable was pulled into tray AFC07-09, not listed in E37 vias, ( without engineering's knowledge. T t Reason for Concern f f Accountability; i.e., not knowing where a cable is pulled. This problem may have an adverse affect on thermal analysis. t When a tray is wrapped, heat generated from cables in the tray must be taken into consideration. If a cable were pulled into that tray and engineering was not aware of it, the thermal l analysis would not include that cable. l I i ~ I t i i i i [ l t 3-23 t .~

__.s j, I.;'* s' f4 ,It' 4 F. ,J k F P + 3 5 .$$-Z $ Midland Plant Units 1 and 2 Me 13Me a 1 E l attaonment 3 to i d Qg, W y Report on Cable Ins tallatior}, c,,ns+swwwaw. [...f ixa

u. s.' 4. -

h .j ~

1.. pL, y a

6 ._t: - i- .A. f.. f .-y-;s. t r f 4 -.= _ _: = _.. r.1 ,e 3 u i i,. _a'ig -. 1 l l t I i 2 fu'/ 5yfgf._.* i : ". 3 y / 3,p r .1.........-..- gp V. r ._._._..__.__....sa _ . w .I s, o i . c i (y > m. -: q 'i;I, q ,_s ___. m j 4(. i t i i .. 2. gw..- s l r, i r i 5 n 37.A48 4 i t L _.il. . p :.. u; 5 [ ED96.f" t g _s

p

.__.. g g,:.w g s ..,,, l.,J _.. BSL 11e ... _g .i..._ I a. ... r.. c. .... s. _.s m _..__i _. 2 i i._< _.:........... .= . a, + g, .r. w.: a s.,... _. w :...,;. .s = e s

._.._.. u._

C M e se e v4 6.J.. _. % y_ S.t.J J.. -q r.n...... ........n.'.._._.. .e. ~"""'.,"-~: 3 :"""#" . L': ~~h&b.&hhh..%W.. N,1J. &e, 'Am. E-37 fhs [ .l. 3. 1.* -d-

. - -- --.-..--.---~ - ~~ Midland Plcnt Units 1 and 2 ' to Report on Cable Installation SK-24 Description of Basic Concern Voltage' violation - Control cables used instrumentation raceway. Reason for No Concern Quality control will inspect all cable transitions from one raceway to another; this inspection will eliminate this concern. l 1 i t l l l l l f l 1 =s I e. l t ~ l i b - i f l t i l i l I f l l I Q i i 3-24 l t b m-- e =e ^'#e-Y=*' w ,.-g4w.- =, w +4b

.[ Z. - _ _- :~ - -

~ ~;

^ ~ ,,:.r.s w un.: a vie er.Ksg) ~ ""~ w,g ~ agf d M/ Midland Plant Units 1 and lll '

to 04MI,b68

' d h" Report on Cable Installation o x r ._.._,.3..... _. w s _. _ _. -l-]3g.794 7). F:N.d.d. 7:~. *.,. b. :.. ' ... f*

s j

.,,p a s.*** I'~. %..

3..

.y.+f__. :.,.. ~ /2) /_%f. f +- N %. s.". '.gY G ~ = (.. Cont +h s4.%. Con.0$$ G Wsk e T fe.prki k k t. ^ .._. b M o t. - b.'T 4 0 7 67Mc) -F r w a 3. 4b e a a 1

c.... -

i g a u.. ;.. i r. V,. s 1 -fi a i.: _.. p_ o rn er l d*T/ ' A'7"# Oa3 -b c oc 3 3 i 8-7. 7...._. 1 - a s e, p .~ yyy6 g..p . p p 4 _ o 7 L ',.. j w{ g. g_.. bss:p...,.v : = ..._......C*. Ll<. caJ sA.~ L ht.! Y _~ ~ _.. _ .caLie..LLeaQ.Le.,~ 'p&. &37. ~~ i us 3 3 J ow we < M.M gmme g D

___ M Ls L.i.m Midicnd Plcnt Units 1 and 2 ' to Report on Cable Installation O ,SK-25 Unique Case -.s Description of Basic Concern , Sixteen small instrument cables were pulled into the wrong conduit". = Rep:;.on for No Concern There is ample room in conduit DTA002/DC003 for the additional cable., The:re are no thermal concerns. This was a unique case because'the subject conduits and cables had undergone successive renumbering and relocation after initial installation 1) to accommodate neutron detector cables and 2) because a steel beam biccked access to some of the conduit sleeves. The many changes ~may have caused confusion which led to the misinstallation of the

ables.

It is not credible that this situation would be repeated elsewhere; therefore, it constitutes a unique case. T 4. ou ~ 9% 6 4A g 3-25 ___m_.m__.__ --A^- t---

.m, SX-26 Midland Plant Units 1 and 2 to Report on Cable Installat V' t N, ) i .- e.:_: t {- 9 .1 I. ;.. t..*.~..i}_.s t i -- -..... i ? i i a #... a .I _ ;.. . _._I _ i

i. _..,.

j7,

i wir

.t . e., j i i i r' t ....!__l e_ __ ___i _.I ett n.... 4. I _. ._.......f.... _i I. .r.. I i t. i i l U I.:.. +1 _i_.. i... i .._..._.I_....._,: _. l 1 I i t i i i ..3.- i !.._i 1._ i t... Iq, i i..- m l l i W i I l 1 v i@.\\ -l. i l I l e.e .g l t._ 4 j I i, 3 \\ '._j 1 7. _ t.._. 1 l. 7kAy.11!:se2'M, Msti;_ I,- l j !. 4 I I 8 8 .i !t-i : I i. t...!. .'. _._, _. _ ___. _._i _ ! i v' i / i ..'. i i .i 1 ~ N i i._.,.g... j....._;._ y,._ i 1 ..i.._ _. r ..g. i i .j. L. ;>._t yn o..

4..

t ._.i...., 1 i i i ....,l_; l t t. __d .{. t l l !. t. ..i -i-t 1 i . C_. i .. 4 J

-i r

.... n i 1!< 1 . r.g. pop. j. .i I l li l 11i' 1.I i i i I i 11 i 7 .1. I 6.I a, _' l l i r 1 ...i... 4 l : _2.__. .n __ .. _. q.. t I r ..l.._'.. l l l ...!_..j' _ __ _ g

r... _ p...

!y -j g 8 l l g l ._^(~q._ 4 . _.4 3 .t _. t. L . MC.C. IB A3. _.. NLC.lBf.T .e = l ] o i _ t L 1 1 1 _n 't \\ h e. ..-~ .i i 6 y i --.m t 1 . p.:;t. ; t ...a _ _2-'i. t s

4.. u..,

~ '..I i _..; a_ .,!.. 1 _ I. _' _,. gs_.. ~ we..._..... ~. ~c L e... >s. s ~3 ~_l. y. c .7.. :......:., _,l.. j 1 e._ _... I __i 9 - - _.. 3 i s. m I t

~,,g;
e.

.3 _l._.,l _ [_ _ L i i x __..p.! r ; i

t. _

i i e i

~.. -... - ~. - - r Midland Plant Units 1 and 2 ! to Report on Cable Installation i l SK-26 i Description of Basic Concern I, i Accountability; i.e., not knowing where a cable is, pulled, f i i Raason for No Concern e f The actual cable installation did not use all the designed j raceway vias. Therefore, the absence of a cable would only make thermal analysis more conservative. i k t k t ,s '1 e. f -I i f f h s I I l l t I 3-26 t i e. T . f. ..v.,,,.

Attachmtnt 4 to Rsport on Cable Installation Name Position - Oreanization l J.". Anderson Electrica]/CS Encineerine Cr--'d--*'e* - Rech*c1 Power Corp. 1 K.D. Bailey Division Engineering Manager - Bechtel Power Corp. 1 R. Cook Resident Inspector - NRC R.N. Gardner Reactor Inspector - NRC D.B. Kelly Circuitry and Raceway Group Leader - Bechtel Power Corp. R.B. Landsman Reactor Inspector - NRC B.W. Marguglio Director of MPQAD - Consumers Power Co. C.E. Norelius Director of Division of Engineering and Technical Programs - NRC J.A. Pastor ! Design Production Electrical Section Head - Consumers Power Co. G.W. Rows MPQAD SMO Lead Electrical Engineer - Consumers Power Co. MPQAD Electrical /I&C Section Head - Conspaers Power Co. M.J. Schaeffer ' ~ ~ A. West Attorney - Isham, Lincoln & Beale C.C. Williams Section Chief - NRC e k CD o}}

ML20063L203

Text

Navigation menu

Search