ML20063H638
| ML20063H638 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Waterford  |
| Issue date: | 05/25/1982 |
| From: | ASSOCIATED PIPING & ENGINEERING CORP. |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20063H637 | List: |
| References | |
| SWP-836, NUDOCS 8207300357 | |
| Download: ML20063H638 (7) | |
Text
{{#Wiki_filter:= NUMBER:
.NSCN SWP-e36 v , TYPE:
P0wer & Prccess Picing '4ELDIE Divisicn cATE ISSUEO: ASSOCIATED PIPING & ENGINEERING CORP. 5/25/82
....u.....~...e.~,,.......,...,~o=......
ja^oE oa 1707 WEST CO'4PTCN SLVO., COMPTCN. CA 90220 (213) 537 7200 i
^ 1 WELDING PROCEDURE ATTACHMENT APPLICABILITY: Temp Flex Divisien Jcb R-9347 (Ref: T-3765)
Ebasco NCR W3-3647 Waterford SES Unit No. 3 1.0 The attached
+ Sod: documentation supports post-weld heat treatment at
~
1000 F - Ocr for 6 to 7.5 hours of welds made to this precedure. Attachments:
- 1. PQR 8-157
- 2. Durkee Testing Lab Report Q-9869
- 3. Base material CMTR's :
EM-671: 2" SA240 T304 Plate EM-680: 2" SA516 Gr. 70 Plate
- 4. Filler material CMTR's:
GTAW: BK-729 SMAW: CM-598 - SAW: CB-476/EJ-648 Y 0.C. ENGIN EER 9207300357 820723 PDR ADOCK 05000382 S PDR vo. .se s y . _ .
.a -- - '
~
Procedure Qualification Rtcord (POR) No: 8-137
# HNSON weS No:
eve a u CONTR$LS Power & Process Piping Complies with Division. National Codes: ASME Section IX ASSOCIATED PIPING
& ENGINEERING CORP. Weld test per WPS No: SWP-836 Rev. 6 dated 8/9/76 Conducted By: Associated Piping & Engr. Corp. Date 5/14/82 WELDING GTAW. sMAN MODES OF Manual PROCESSES OPERATION w., Autcmatic JOINT AND WELD SKETCH: GMW BASE METALS:
SMW SAW Material Spec.: SA240 to SA516 SMAW7 SAW [ l .k @ do ["O p [*U p Type or Grade: 304 to 70 K'a'.M
'I , ,,. Efe fr fr P-No. 6 Gr. No. 1
'1 16 120 1. 23 125 Ald 29l 300
%* \~t +
3/l g 2 16 120 2 23 125 l to P.No. 1 Gr. No. -2 2 t 23 125 3 l16 ' 120 3 ur3uic / ._ by,..+ye Thickness: 2" GTAW g ~ Diameter: Thickness POSITION: GTAW: 3/16" gggy, Joint Position: 1G 174.. SAW: Balance Weld Progression: NA FILLER METALS: PREHEAT: Consumable insert: None P-No. 1: 2000 F min.
, Preheat Temp: P-No. 8: 500 F min.
PROCESS: GTAW SMAW SAW Interpass Temp: 350oF max. Analys.is A No: . ........ 8 8 8 Filler F.No: . . . . . . ..... 6 5 6 GAS:
- S FA Spec
- . . . . . . . . . . .. g,9 g,a c; _ o
{ PROCESS: GTAW l AWS Class: ............ ER309 E309 E0309 Type of Gas: ............. Argon Filler Size: ............ 3/32" 5/32" 3/32" I ' % Mixture Comp: . . . . . . . . . 99*9 ELEC. CH AR ACTERISTICS: TECHNIQUE: PROCESS: GTAW SME SAW PROCESS: c;Aw snAw 3Aw Current Type: Type of Beads: . . . . . . . . . . . . DC DC cc _ stringer Stringer Stringer Amps Range: . . . . . . . . . . . 120 23 300 Oscillation: .... ........ None None None Vcits Range: ........... 16 125 29 Passes: ................. 3 3 37 Polarity: . . . . . . ....... Str. Rev. Rev. Number of Arcs: Single Single Single POST WELD HEAT TREATMENT: 0 Travel Speed (IPM): 2.2 5.2 17.5 Temperature o ,30F 1000 F -0 F
*I.incoln ST-100 Flux Tima 6 heurs Othir Page No. 1 of 2 Fmn (Go IM - 6/79
- t. - - - - . .7 -
; y n r ., , . . , . _ . . . ,_
8-157 Procedure Qualification Recorci(Cont *c) PCR No: TENSILE TEST (QW-150) in in-dia. in' ULTIMATE ULTIMATE CHARACTER OF SPECIMEN TOTAL LOAD UNIT STRESS FAILURE & N O. WIDTH THICKNESS AREA L B. PSI LOCATION i -
.496 .1932 16,000 82,800 PM 2 -
.492 .1901 15,600 82,050 PM 3 -
.493 .1909 15,750 82,500 PM 4 -
.496 .1932 15,500 50,250 PM GUIDED BEND TESTS (CW-160)
TYPE AND FIGURE NUMBER RESULT Side Bends (4) - QW 462.2 (a) Satisfactory TOUGHNESS TESTS (QW 170) SPECIMEN NOTCH NOTCH TESTo IMPACT LATERAL EXP. DROP WE!GHT NO. LOCATION TYPE TEMP.F FT LBS % SHEAR MILS BREAK NO BREAK 1 HAZ Vee +20 37 40 40 2 HAZ Vee +20 37 40 37 3 HAZ Vee +20 56 60 47 l l l l BK-729, CM-598 , A. P. & E. Code Nos: Base Material: EM-671, EM-680
. Filler Material: C3-476/EJ-648 Other: Two intergranular corresien tests per ASTM A262 Practice A.
Cross section examination of the weld deposit, stainless steel heat-affected sene and base material: Acceetable l l Welder's Name: Brooks Lena Stamp No: 3 A.P. & E. Test No. 1805 Tests conducted by: Curkee Testinc Lab Laboratory Test No: 0-99 e: g We certify that the statements in this record are correct and that the test welds were prepared, welded and tested in accor-dance with the requirements of Section IX of the ASME Code. 1971 Ed. W/73 Add. Signed: Assoc. Piping & Engr. Corp. (uanufacturer! Date: _ 5/24/82 By: / ## l ? Q.C. Engineer Page No. 2 of 2
g Durkco Testing 1.aboratories 1520 WEST 178 TM STREET . CARDENA, C ALIFo ANI A 90248
# ~
PwoNE (213) 321 9800 Asso lated riping & Engineering Corp. 1707 W. Compton Blvd. Page 1 of 2 Compton, California 90220 (1) Weld Specimen, identified as for Weld Procedure Qualification Test No. 1805 Base Metal: 2" SA240 T304 to SA516 Gr. 70 Code Nos. EM-680 to EM-671 Filler Metal: GTAW: ER 309 - BK-729 SMAW: E309 - CM-598 PQR No.: 8 - 15 7 sM.yor No. Aegi SAW: ER309/ST-1CO Flux - C3-576 /EJ-643 Rec. No. 75170 oa rt - No . co . , o No .. r t . . . . s, Ec. . .ca r.c N 5/24/82 Q-9869 59019 See above identification ASME Section IX, QW-462.2(a) QW-462.1(d), QW-153.3, ASME CERTIFIED REPORT OF PHYSICAL TEST Section II Part C SFA-5.9 HARCENED IN FURNACE TEMPERED IN FURNACE Physical Procerties SA-516 and P.0. TIELO POINT TENSILE STRENGTH ACTUAL ACTUAL ACTUAL PouNOS ACTU AL PouNOS ELoNG EsoNG REDvCto o 4. . Si2 E A R EA LCaosN Les Pts So IN Loao iN Les Pts So IN IN 2 iN *i (Jew t N sec N g, Heat T reated at 10C# F. f ct: 6 hour FemWah Heating & Cooling rate did not exceeds,200 fugnace cooledF.p.erhouralbove800 F. 1 .496 .1932 9,850 51,000 16,000 82,800 .41 20.5 Out of Weld 2 .492 .1901 9,400 49,450 15,600 82,050 .35 17.5 Out of Weld 3 .493 .1909 9,950 52,100 15,750 82,500 .42 21.0 Out cif Weld l 4 .496 .1932 9,450 48,900 15,500 80,250 .36 18.0 Out of Weld Charav "V" Notch 1moact Test at +20 F. Impact Values Lateral E::cansien % Shear Fracture Hea t Affected - Zona -1 37.0 Ft. Lbs. .040" 40.0
-2 37.0 Ft. Lbs. .037" 40.0
-3 56.0 Ft. Lbs. .047" 60.0 Four (4) Side Bend Tests: Satisfactory.
uAA.u. arou..E ENes l l u,~, w. arouinto v.rs ; j 70,000 l ! OUR REC. LOG NO.: Z-9668 METAuURGICAL TE57 DM/qh' oNE SawrLE Test Satc.utN *as ExawsNto M'Caosco*'CaLLv som tNE FoLLo*'*sG Corburination Decarbvrinosion I wattaat Conforms To Satcar ti a. ,
"'a<'<*6-APPR0VE AP&E h By% E. Pdram, General Manager 0.A. DEPT.
'DATE M / I ".2. DURKEE TESTING LABORATORIES SIGNED ddus
__ m _
-c-
~
Date May 24, 1982 Lab.No. Q-9009 Durkee Testing, Laboratories 15 20 W EST 1787H STR EET
- G A RD E N A. C A LIFO RNI A 902 47 R eport To: PHO N E: 323-9800 Your P.O. No.:
59019 Associated Piping & Engineering Corp. Shipper No.: 1707 W. Compton Blvd. Our Rec. Log No.:Z-9668 Compton, California 90220 Req. No. 75170 CHEMICAL ANALYSIS REPORT Page 2 of 2 Identification: Test No. 1805 PQR No. 3-157 Base Metal: SA240 T304 to SA516 CR 70 SAW Weld Deposit: ER309/ST-100 Flux de Nos. 6 680 to a-671 CB-576/EJ-648 Specification: ASME Section IX, QW-462.2(a) . QW-462.1(d), QW-153.3, ASME Section II Part C SFA-5.9 (ER-309) Results
*Intergranular Corrosion Test (2) Samples per ASTM-A-262 Practice A Satisfactory - Sheving no evidence of intergranular attach.
Carbon l Manganese l Phrssphorus l Sulfur i Silicon
.06 % 1.90 % l .030 % I
.020 % .95 %
I l Chromium l Molybdenum i Nickel l Aluminum l Selen~um ! 23.40 % .15 % 13.65: % Copper Columbium + Vanadium T,.nwi l Iron Titanium Tantalum
.05 % .09 % Remainder . 01 % .02 % -
Copper Magnesium l Manganese Iron l Silicon Chromium Zine i Titanium Lead l 'ra n U CL 19 I\ v i J , aP&E Li J l Q.A. DEPT. Nickel l Aluminum , DATE t SIGNED , Material, as tested, meets specification requirements. M /#/ C- , DM/ Respectfully Sut:mitted l
- Test taken in weld deposit, heat affected zone .
and base material. DURKEE TESTI G L BORATORIES By -
/
Chsmist Roy E. Ppram, Generu itanager r ._ __
LABERATORY REPORT Ob . June 14, 1982 Q-9869 m 3,, DURKEE TESTING 1ABORATORIES our Re. tog no.z-9668 1520 West 17Brh St. e Gardeno, California 90247
. Report To : 59019 Phone (213) 3219800 Your P.O. No.:
Associated Piping & Engineering Corp. Shipper No. 6981 1707 W. Compton Blvd. Req. No. 75170 Compton, California 90220 Cover to Lab Q-9869
< ADDITION TO WELD PROCEDURE OUALIFICATION
- 1) The fracture locations of the welded tensile specimens had occurred in the SA-516 GR 70 base material.
- 2) Only one of the four (4) bend specimens had exhibited any cracking. This cracking hcd occurred in the weld metal and was found to be less than the limits (1/8" maximum) of the applicable ASME Specifications.
- 3) The sample of the weld, heat affected zone, and stainless base metal, when tested in accordance with the procedure outlined in ASTM-A-262 Practice A, revealed a metallurgical structure acceptable per the referenced specifi-cation. This structure consisted of primarily a step type microstructure containing a small amount of non-interconnected grain boundary ditching.
Additionally, the weld was found to be free of ' any interdendritic ditching. i p Respectfully Subrr' N DURKEE i ST .G ABOR ATORIES METALLURGIST /
/
By ' rye Pegram, eneral Manager DM/5 a
/ - J/ b3
' t,2 7 5 EBr%CO SE AVICES INCO APCR ATED [, 0;,,,;9;13
* * ' ' '1 * ## I'> A I'*P*Nilea OUAt.!TY ASSU R AN CE hE CRT P,0 iii NONCONFORMANCE REPORT Y'"* " - dispo ""',". "*""c adias C'c'"'s itio<
Pin t, . Initiator of NCR SSTRUCTioN5: tsee boet, of forent
<r. ILMC'lY CLIENT CR PR OJE C T '2s
- OR AWelNG NO./ sPE C P. O . 136 LMISM PMC.It. i Licwr- Co I.,j,n e s.pe;,_o g u n / /
SOP PLIE R C ON sT a'J C T'O N CC C CONTRACTOR 84) P.O. NO. 38 TGM[> E=L. bs DNsSteH L.D U - $ p#'> lC-{ . O Sb' &&* k l\'5 5 0C t 'r't-@ ? tP! o E s c nip Ti:N O r Cov ONE N T. PA=T Om sysTEu.e.
\ @ ctu Q1b%%L .
yO M S3 M M 6 t# T fPIhlG- h6J.CQ h M J$fM CI-LSS __
- l. D ESC RIP TION O F NOH cot 4 FO RM AN C E Urem s I.,voi<ci. Spe c u 'o ca ion, Code or Star ~dard r > Which trems Do Not Cer- ply, Submit Sketch if Applicable)
S oP N Ell (3J l LL bJ 07- P!terom Po.cr wecn Mcwr Trzcs:rucur-
' OE: G_U %) P rPG-- UcU-W. 'To G_Lu c o M4D s f-ort Pe/JETc/gn mS bJu M R c (Leo T,. (, , 3 (3 , 3 7, ' , gj 3g4 O 4-(. S 4 5 c ,X 7 j 5 K ,, 6 9 c d r~1 c .
Sfcc wtacrua w m4 , P.neA_% .aug 's?6cumes kwovrezy Pos r w c:-tD Mtwr res5weer co7' Ou e-o arowrs u- caasM Gr7x_c:A. P(Pe.C&A,TtJtTia. 34. o rt. CR2 G-9 Tert. Oc m ud m D kY' b ($5 N & V E A N O 5 t G '4 A T U M C O F PERsONR"P u N G N O N f *. s' f e *.' A '. C E fi T I T t. C 3 ATE i91 N$ d l N y L-t'-J@. D
'fd/ M k _ NhIr-h6AG8/JMWE 6 -C9 ~1 7
- 11. RECOMMENDED DISPO5k!CT r5e if Aphcabre REQUEST ACCEPTANCE OF " DESCRIPTION OF NONCONFORML.UCE" FOR THE FOLLOUING REASONS:
- 1) CARBON CONTE';T OF ALL PIPES INVOLVED IS EELO',T .30%. POSTWELD HEAT TREAT G T.
NOT A CODE REQUIFT SNT.
- 2) POSI~.TELD HEAT TREATENT WOULD DIST02T SCG OF THE CRITICAL DI'ENSIONS OF THE FLUED READ. -
CMIR FCR PARTS INVOLT.TD PAILED WITH OUn LETTER DATED MAY 17, 1977
~
" ^ " "
~ A,. c .~ o s. c N A T u 7 y a so.. n E c o uu E N 2 iN c ois Pc s. T io,. TET FLEX COMPANY '
k4f4M/ M #4- Zoltan Eovaes Senior Project _ Engineer 5/19/77 t'./ EVALU ATION O F DISPOSITION BY ESASCO RE ASON FOR DISPOSITION '22 l'.ti , .m _ al~f sbl. ..b
- e .l.*n ' Cou 'K. A J . , > .? M .k .
.c . ,
+i . M 0 2 -uh L - e w u h ! l .. J s ,..u ~B' , /- ,d r'M
'6 . k (* !_ % .
* / sJ__
- _/ .y 92 _
t, { < $ ,' ?/ J 00 . b f** 1 **.r 's " 6*/
'll lJh.. c y c - a g 3 y 3 -! j 45k M '
Net.ba. ,' 'J?L ~.YI'. !!{ Ali n n .;l -.a21Q L , ./A .L ' ENGIN E E RIN G ! _j CU ALITY ASSU R ANCE ', ] CONSTRUCTICri OTHER AUTHORILEO PERSONNEL NAMC Ic.47uP . NAME isIG N A T U R E e N,L M E IS I G N A T V F4 E I '.A M E 431 G N A T U R E I
/ -
9 ' _7l, , !.' Q ;. ' 7 / % I..iL.*.",'?'/'A,O'-
- QATE 6/nf~' DATE
.' ~f, o,s y /7 3 ATE DATE
@ ACCEPTED REJECTED 'sACCEPTED [ REJECTED ] ACCEPTED ] REJECTED ] ACCEPTED 0 REJECTED ACCEPTED wlTH COMMENTS O ACCEPTED wlTH COvuENTS CCEPTED WITH COMMENTS ] ACCEPTED WITH COMMENTS IV. VERIFIC ATION OF DISPOSITION C REQUIRED -
NOT REQUIRED ti4l
#" a . a . , v i n . <. . o. a .
sicN ATURE TITLC DAF a =se uens}}